Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
He's making stuff up. I never said Bhairitu thought Moore was supporting Trump. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 LOL!  You seem to be making the same mistake that Barry did on The Corner. 
 

 What's this with the bawee thing? First you compare me to bawee and now 
authfriend. Get a grip and give yourself some distance from whatever is 
happening over there at the Water Closet. It seems to be some sort of infection 
and you're possibly contagious.
 

  I already knew Moore was supporting Clinton.  And a lot of the Trump 
supporters knew that too.  Moore is not going to bite the Hollywood Hillary 
supporting hands that feed him.  But what he pointed out was nothing more than 
many political analysts have been pointing out for months about the Trump 
supporters.  They're against the establishment that has royally screwed them 
over.
 
 The Moore video was just a piece of cheese dropped in to the maze to see the 
reaction. :-D
  
 On 10/27/2016 06:50 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   Bhairitu is all overstimulated because Michael Moore has been babbling about 
how Hillary's going to lose.
 
 
 Trump is thrilled too; so's his son. 
 
 Moore tweeted:
 

 Hey everyone - Trump, Jr. & right wing thinks my movie called "TrumpLand" is 
pro-Trump! Haha. Pls don't tell them otherwise! 

 

 Speaking of TweedleDumber...
 
 
 It's hard to imagine the mindset of folks so consumed by hatred of Hillary 
that they're actually hoping Trump wins.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :

 
 On 10/27/2016 03:17 PM, Sal Sunshine salsunshineiniowa@... 
mailto:salsunshineiniowa@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:

   Nate Silver has Hillary at 54%, Trump at 45%, in Iowa.
 

 And in the battle ground state of Ohio, Hillary edges out Trump at 51% vs 48.
 

 Pennsylvania isn’t even close anymore, at 86 to 13, same with Michigan.
 

 Woo hoo.  
 

 Still, no complacency and everybody has to go and vote, who knows what kinds 
of tricks Trump’s people are planning.  But things are definitely looking good.
 

 Bet Bhairitu is making his travel plans as we speak.  He and Barry can cry 
together over their beers.


 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 LOL!  You seem to be making the same mistake that Barry did on The Corner. 
 

 What's this with the bawee thing? First you compare me to bawee and now 
authfriend. Get a grip and give yourself some distance from whatever is 
happening over there at the Water Closet. It seems to be some sort of infection 
and you're possibly contagious.
 

  I already knew Moore was supporting Clinton.  And a lot of the Trump 
supporters knew that too.  Moore is not going to bite the Hollywood Hillary 
supporting hands that feed him.  But what he pointed out was nothing more than 
many political analysts have been pointing out for months about the Trump 
supporters.  They're against the establishment that has royally screwed them 
over.
 
 The Moore video was just a piece of cheese dropped in to the maze to see the 
reaction. :-D
  
 On 10/27/2016 06:50 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   Bhairitu is all overstimulated because Michael Moore has been babbling about 
how Hillary's going to lose.
 
 
 Trump is thrilled too; so's his son. 
 
 Moore tweeted:
 

 Hey everyone - Trump, Jr. & right wing thinks my movie called "TrumpLand" is 
pro-Trump! Haha. Pls don't tell them otherwise! 

 

 Speaking of TweedleDumber...
 
 
 It's hard to imagine the mindset of folks so consumed by hatred of Hillary 
that they're actually hoping Trump wins.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :

 
 On 10/27/2016 03:17 PM, Sal Sunshine salsunshineiniowa@... 
mailto:salsunshineiniowa@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:

   Nate Silver has Hillary at 54%, Trump at 45%, in Iowa.
 

 And in the battle ground state of Ohio, Hillary edges out Trump at 51% vs 48.
 

 Pennsylvania isn’t even close anymore, at 86 to 13, same with Michigan.
 

 Woo hoo.  
 

 Still, no complacency and everybody has to go and vote, who knows what kinds 
of tricks Trump’s people are planning.  But things are definitely looking good.
 

 Bet Bhairitu is making his travel plans as we speak.  He and Barry can cry 
together over their beers.


 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa [1 Attachment] I feel the same as our esteemed moderator

2016-10-28 Thread William Leed wle...@aol.com [FairfieldLife] 
Col Ret. U.S. Army Wm . D. Leed IV I meditate now & more often  & this weekend 
am sponsoring 4 18-20 yr old's ( in Body only) GREAT Atman's all! to learn TM 
Sat - Tuesday checking & will then have 7 or 8 to regularly meditate with same 
at my small condo home in  Amherst NY & in joys to hte Universe as well



-Original Message-
From: Sal Sunshine salsunshineini...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
To: FairfieldLife <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Fri, Oct 28, 2016 1:42 pm
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa [1 Attachment]



Doug just FEELS these things so  deeply...







Sal 






On Oct 28, 2016, at 11:19 AM, feste37 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:




Actually, the only person who has this "feeling" appears to be the moderator 
himself.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote :



For those who may be new to lurking FairfieldLife, a spiritual Yahoo-group, I 
want to be clear that as a spiritual Yahoo-group we do not support any one 
mundane political candidate over any other candidate. However there seems a 
communal feeling by some here that is both spiritual and postmodern scientific 
that Natural Law, quite evidently when enlivened by the individual and group 
practice of effective transcendent meditation, will support a best outcome for 
the nation and world.




P.P.S., This does not mean that we, as individuals, do not support specific 
candidates. We may do so, offline. And we could be sure to exercise a civic 
duty and vote for the candidates we believe will serve a nation in the most 
evolutionary way.



Welcome to FairfieldLife,
-Jai Guru You







FairfieldLife, a (spiritual) Yahoo-group:
Not the customary analysis of politics and economics but  a conversation about 
spiritual questions.   What did it mean for our spiritual lives?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote :





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :


We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess.  Conservative 
Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal.


Uh, no.


In fact he may be to the left of Clinton.


Uh, no.


They're buddies too


Uh, no.


 so sometimes I think they're playing a massive charade on the American people.

I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It Can't 
Happen Here") when he started running. So did others.  I thought the Sanders 
was a long shot


("the Sanders"??)


but he did well in his campaign.  I think he should still be the Democratic 
Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did everything they could to 
get him out of the race.


Actually, he lost (by almost 4 million votes).


Remember both Trump and Sanders are on the same page regarding trade 
agreements, job loss and wars of empire.  Clinton just tries to snow her 
followers.


Trump is an ignoramus; Sanders is an unrealistic dreamer. Clinton is a wonk who 
has oogobs of experience and a big set of well-thought-out policies. She snows 
people because she's so obviously qualified to be president.









On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote:


 
I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do not 
know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely that 
Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the election 
arrives. 

I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major 
differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced 
the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened 
had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number 
of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have.  



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :


LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?

The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.







Sal 











On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:





According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 LOL!  You seem to be making the same mistake that Barry did on The Corner.  I 
already knew Moore was supporting Clinton.
 

 Get a grip, Bhairitu. I never said you didn't know that.
  
 And a lot of the Trump supporters knew that too.
 
 Most of the YouTube commenters didn't. And the Trumps don't.
 

 Moore is not going to bite the Hollywood Hillary supporting hands that feed 
him.
 

 Oh, right, I forgot, nobody supports Hillary unless they're being paid to do 
so. Good lord, talk about delusional.
 

 But what he pointed out was nothing more than many political analysts have 
been pointing out for months about the Trump supporters.  They're against the 
establishment that has royally screwed them over.

 

 Duh. Stop the presses! Whatever would we do without Mooresplanations?
 

 

 

 The Moore video was just a piece of cheese dropped in to the maze to see the 
reaction. :-D

  
 On 10/27/2016 06:50 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

   Bhairitu is all overstimulated because Michael Moore has been babbling about 
how Hillary's going to lose.
 
 
 Trump is thrilled too; so's his son. 
 
 Moore tweeted:
 

 Hey everyone - Trump, Jr. & right wing thinks my movie called "TrumpLand" is 
pro-Trump! Haha. Pls don't tell them otherwise! 

 

 Speaking of TweedleDumber...
 
 
 It's hard to imagine the mindset of folks so consumed by hatred of Hillary 
that they're actually hoping Trump wins.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :

 
 On 10/27/2016 03:17 PM, Sal Sunshine salsunshineiniowa@... 
mailto:salsunshineiniowa@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:

   Nate Silver has Hillary at 54%, Trump at 45%, in Iowa.
 

 And in the battle ground state of Ohio, Hillary edges out Trump at 51% vs 48.
 

 Pennsylvania isn’t even close anymore, at 86 to 13, same with Michigan.
 

 Woo hoo.  
 

 Still, no complacency and everybody has to go and vote, who knows what kinds 
of tricks Trump’s people are planning.  But things are definitely looking good.
 

 Bet Bhairitu is making his travel plans as we speak.  He and Barry can cry 
together over their beers.


 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread feste37 
Actually, the only person who has this "feeling" appears to be the moderator 
himself.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 For those who may be new to lurking FairfieldLife, a spiritual Yahoo-group, I 
want to be clear that as a spiritual Yahoo-group we do not support any one 
mundane political candidate over any other candidate. However there seems a 
communal feeling by some here that is both spiritual and postmodern scientific 
that Natural Law, quite evidently when enlivened by the individual and group 
practice of effective transcendent meditation, will support a best outcome for 
the nation and world.


 

 P.P.S., This does not mean that we, as individuals, do not support specific 
candidates. We may do so, offline. And we could be sure to exercise a civic 
duty and vote for the candidates we believe will serve a nation in the most 
evolutionary way.

 

 Welcome to FairfieldLife,
 -Jai Guru You
 

 

 

 FairfieldLife, a (spiritual) Yahoo-group:
Not the customary analysis of politics and economics but  a conversation about 
spiritual questions.   What did it mean for our spiritual lives?
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess.  Conservative 
Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 In fact he may be to the left of Clinton.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 They're buddies too
 

 Uh, no.
 

  so sometimes I think they're playing a massive charade on the American people.
 
 I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It 
Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others.  I thought the 
Sanders was a long shot
 

 ("the Sanders"??)
 

 but he did well in his campaign.  I think he should still be the Democratic 
Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did everything they could to 
get him out of the race.
 

 Actually, he lost (by almost 4 million votes).
 

 Remember both Trump and Sanders are on the same page regarding trade 
agreements, job loss and wars of empire.  Clinton just tries to snow her 
followers.
 

 Trump is an ignoramus; Sanders is an unrealistic dreamer. Clinton is a wonk 
who has oogobs of experience and a big set of well-thought-out policies. She 
snows people because she's so obviously qualified to be president.
 

 

 
 
 On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote:
 
   I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do 
not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely 
that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the 
election arrives. 
 
 I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major 
differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced 
the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened 
had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number 
of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have.  

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] 
LOL!  You seem to be making the same mistake that Barry did on The 
Corner.  I already knew Moore was supporting Clinton.  And a lot of the 
Trump supporters knew that too.  Moore is not going to bite the 
Hollywood Hillary supporting hands that feed him.  But what he pointed 
out was nothing more than many political analysts have been pointing out 
for months about the Trump supporters.  They're against the 
establishment that has royally screwed them over.


The Moore video was just a piece of cheese dropped in to the maze to see 
the reaction. :-D


On 10/27/2016 06:50 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:


Bhairitu is all overstimulated because Michael Moore has been babbling 
about how Hillary's going to lose.



Trump is thrilled too; so's his son.

Moore tweeted:

Hey everyone - Trump, Jr. & right wing thinks my movie called 
"TrumpLand" is pro-Trump! Haha. Pls don't tell them otherwise!


Speaking of TweedleDumber...

It's hard to imagine the mindset of folks so consumed by hatred of 
Hillary that they're actually hoping Trump wins.




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

On 10/27/2016 03:17 PM, Sal Sunshine salsunshineiniowa@... 
 [FairfieldLife] wrote:


Nate Silver has Hillary at 54%, Trump at 45%, in Iowa.


And in the battle ground state of Ohio, Hillary edges out Trump at
51% vs 48.

Pennsylvania isn’t even close anymore, at 86 to 13, same with
Michigan.

Woo hoo.

Still, no complacency and everybody has to go and vote, who knows
what kinds of tricks Trump’s people are planning.  But things are
definitely looking good.

Bet Bhairitu is making his travel plans as we speak.  He and Barry
can cry together over their beers.


LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that 
this election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) 
millennials don't have landlines which are called for polling and 2) 
older folks like me who get those surveys have robocall blockers so we 
never pick up?


The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber. Ho-hum.  Welcome to 
politics South American style.



Sal






On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@...  
[FairfieldLife] > wrote:




According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with 
Trump in Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
Trump is basically a dim, spoiled moron. To assume that he knows what he is 
talking about, or has coherent political ideas or strategy, is an overthought 
fantasy. Imagine taking a poorly raised third grader and making them the  
candidate of a major political party. There you have it. Anyone claiming 
otherwise is wistfully adding brain cells to Donnie's very empty head, and 
trying to imagine feelings he is incapable of.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote :

 noozguru, yep, I've begun to wonder if there's some very bizarre deal bt 
Clinton and Trump.  This morning it's reported that he's advocating not having 
an election, just give the win to him! It's almost insane to think that he's 
not throwing the election her way by his extreme behavior. Oh, what a movie it 
would make. (-: 
 
 


 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 8:27 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa
 
 
   
 We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess.  Conservative 
Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal.  In fact he may be to 
the left of Clinton.  They're buddies too so sometimes I think they're playing 
a massive charade on the American people.
 
 I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It 
Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others.  I thought the 
Sanders was a long shot but he did well in his campaign.  I think he should 
still be the Democratic Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did 
everything they could to get him out of the race.  Remember both Trump and 
Sanders are on the same page regarding trade agreements, job loss and wars of 
empire.  Clinton just tries to snow her followers.
 
 On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote:
 
   I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do 
not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely 
that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the 
election arrives. 
 
 I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major 
differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced 
the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened 
had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number 
of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have.  

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<noozguru@...> mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 For those who may be new to lurking FairfieldLife, a spiritual Yahoo-group, I 
want to be clear that as a spiritual Yahoo-group we do not support any one 
mundane political candidate over any other candidate. However there seems a 
communal feeling by some here that is both spiritual and postmodern scientific 
that Natural Law, quite evidently when enlivened by the individual and group 
practice of effective transcendent meditation, will support a best outcome for 
the nation and world.


 

 P.P.S., This does not mean that we, as individuals, do not support specific 
candidates. We may do so, offline. And we could be sure to exercise a civic 
duty and vote for the candidates we believe will serve a nation in the most 
evolutionary way.

 

 I do not endorse this message. I support and voted for Hillary and every 
democrat on the Illinois down ballot. Never D.rump - can't stand the guy.
 

 Welcome to FairfieldLife,
 -Jai Guru You
 

 

 

 FairfieldLife, a (spiritual) Yahoo-group:
Not the customary analysis of politics and economics but  a conversation about 
spiritual questions.   What did it mean for our spiritual lives?
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess.  Conservative 
Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 In fact he may be to the left of Clinton.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 They're buddies too
 

 Uh, no.
 

  so sometimes I think they're playing a massive charade on the American people.
 
 I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It 
Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others.  I thought the 
Sanders was a long shot
 

 ("the Sanders"??)
 

 but he did well in his campaign.  I think he should still be the Democratic 
Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did everything they could to 
get him out of the race.
 

 Actually, he lost (by almost 4 million votes).
 

 Remember both Trump and Sanders are on the same page regarding trade 
agreements, job loss and wars of empire.  Clinton just tries to snow her 
followers.
 

 Trump is an ignoramus; Sanders is an unrealistic dreamer. Clinton is a wonk 
who has oogobs of experience and a big set of well-thought-out policies. She 
snows people because she's so obviously qualified to be president.
 

 

 
 
 On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote:
 
   I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do 
not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely 
that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the 
election arrives. 
 
 I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major 
differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced 
the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened 
had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number 
of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have.  

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
I hope you're just joking. This is an utterly ridiculous idea. The very last 
thing Trump would want, or consent to, is to be publicly declared a "loser." 

 For those interested, two "enlightening" articles that appeared today about 
the Trump campaign's plans for after the election (win or lose):
 

 

 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-27/inside-the-trump-bunker-with-12-days-to-go
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-10-27/inside-the-trump-bunker-with-12-days-to-go

 

 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/28/will-donald-trumps-uprising-go-global-even-if-he-loses/
 
http://www.salon.com/2016/10/28/will-donald-trumps-uprising-go-global-even-if-he-loses/

 

 

 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote :

 
 noozguru, yep, I've begun to wonder if there's some very bizarre deal bt 
Clinton and Trump.  This morning it's reported that he's advocating not having 
an election, just give the win to him! It's almost insane to think that he's 
not throwing the election her way by his extreme behavior. Oh, what a movie it 
would make. (-: 
 
 


 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 8:27 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa
 
 
   
 We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess.  Conservative 
Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal.  In fact he may be to 
the left of Clinton.  They're buddies too so sometimes I think they're playing 
a massive charade on the American people.
 
 I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It 
Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others.  I thought the 
Sanders was a long shot but he did well in his campaign.  I think he should 
still be the Democratic Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did 
everything they could to get him out of the race.  Remember both Trump and 
Sanders are on the same page regarding trade agreements, job loss and wars of 
empire.  Clinton just tries to snow her followers.
 
 On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote:
 
   I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do 
not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely 
that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the 
election arrives. 
 
 I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major 
differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced 
the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened 
had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number 
of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have.  

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<noozguru@...> mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife] <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 For those who may be new to lurking FairfieldLife, a spiritual Yahoo-group, I 
want to be clear that as a spiritual Yahoo-group we do not support any one 
mundane political candidate over any other candidate.
 Of course "we" don't. FFL is not a corporate entity and isn't set up to take 
any positions on anything as a group, including:

 However there seems a communal feeling by some here that is both spiritual and 
postmodern scientific that Natural Law, quite evidently when enlivened by the 
individual and group practice of effective transcendent meditation, will 
support a best outcome for the nation and world.


 And as to the P.P.S. below: Nobody agreed to refrain from posting about their 
support for specific political candidates when they joined FFL, nor has that 
ever been a requirement for membership.

 

 P.P.S., This does not mean that we, as individuals, do not support specific 
candidates. We may do so, offline.
 

 If you want to make this a rule, you need to put it in the About section, and 
you need to make sure anybody who joins the group understands that they're 
giving up the right to publicly support specific candidates in their postings 
here.
 

 Moreover, imposing new rules on people who have been FFL members for many 
years and who never agreed to those rules when they joined is devious, to say 
the least, and reflects very poorly on the claimed status of this group as a 
"spiritual" one, IMHO.
 

 

 

 And we could be sure to exercise a civic duty and vote for the candidates we 
believe will serve a nation in the most evolutionary way.

 

 Welcome to FairfieldLife,
 -Jai Guru You
 

 

 

 FairfieldLife, a (spiritual) Yahoo-group:
Not the customary analysis of politics and economics but  a conversation about 
spiritual questions.   What did it mean for our spiritual lives?
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess.  Conservative 
Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 In fact he may be to the left of Clinton.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 They're buddies too
 

 Uh, no.
 

  so sometimes I think they're playing a massive charade on the American people.
 
 I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It 
Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others.  I thought the 
Sanders was a long shot
 

 ("the Sanders"??)
 

 but he did well in his campaign.  I think he should still be the Democratic 
Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did everything they could to 
get him out of the race.
 

 Actually, he lost (by almost 4 million votes).
 

 Remember both Trump and Sanders are on the same page regarding trade 
agreements, job loss and wars of empire.  Clinton just tries to snow her 
followers.
 

 Trump is an ignoramus; Sanders is an unrealistic dreamer. Clinton is a wonk 
who has oogobs of experience and a big set of well-thought-out policies. She 
snows people because she's so obviously qualified to be president.
 

 

 
 
 On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote:
 
   I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do 
not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely 
that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the 
election arrives. 
 
 I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major 
differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced 
the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened 
had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number 
of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have.  

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
noozguru, yep, I've begun to wonder if there's some very bizarre deal bt 
Clinton and Trump.  This morning it's reported that he's advocating not having 
an election, just give the win to him! It's almost insane to think that he's 
not throwing the election her way by his extreme behavior. Oh, what a movie it 
would make. (-: 


  From: "Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 8:27 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa
   
 We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess.  
Conservative Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal.  In fact he 
may be to the left of Clinton.  They're buddies too so sometimes I think 
they're playing a massive charade on the American people.
 
 I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It 
Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others.  I thought the 
Sanders was a long shot but he did well in his campaign.  I think he should 
still be the Democratic Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did 
everything they could to get him out of the race.  Remember both Trump and 
Sanders are on the same page regarding trade agreements, job loss and wars of 
empire.  Clinton just tries to snow her followers.
 
 On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote:
  
    I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do 
not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely 
that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the 
election arrives. 
 
 I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major 
differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced 
the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened 
had Obama not been in the White House. The  Republicans also have a large 
number of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have.  
  
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :
 
  LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
Sal  
  
   
  
 
  
  On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa. 
 
   
  

 
  #yiv4879776711 #yiv4879776711 -- #yiv4879776711ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4879776711 
#yiv4879776711ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4879776711 
#yiv4879776711ygrp-mkp #yiv4879776711hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv4879776711 #yiv4879776711ygrp-mkp #yiv4879776711ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4879776711 #yiv4879776711ygrp-mkp .yiv4879776711ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv4879776711 #yiv4879776711ygrp-mkp .yiv4879776711ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv4879776711 #yiv4879776711ygrp-mkp .yiv4879776711ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4879776711 #yiv4879776711ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv4879776711ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4879776711 
#yiv4879776711ygrp-sponsor #yiv4879776711ygrp-lc #yiv4879776711hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4879776711 
#yiv4879776711ygrp-sponsor #yiv4879776711ygrp-lc .yiv4879776711ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4879776711 #yiv4879776711actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4879776711 
#yiv4879776711activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4879776711
 #yiv4879776711activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4879776711 
#yiv4879776711activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4879776711 #yiv4879776711activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4879776711 #yiv4879776711activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4879776711 #yiv4879776711activity span 
.yiv4879776711underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4879776711 
.yiv4879776711attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv4879776711 .yiv4879776711attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4879776711 .yiv4879776711attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4879776711 .yiv4879776711attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv4879776711 .yiv4879776711attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4879776711 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv4879776711 .yiv4879776711bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv4879776711 
.yiv4879776711bold a

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-28 Thread dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
For those who may be new to lurking FairfieldLife, a spiritual Yahoo-group, I 
want to be clear that as a spiritual Yahoo-group we do not support any one 
mundane political candidate over any other candidate. However there seems a 
communal feeling by some here that is both spiritual and postmodern scientific 
that Natural Law, quite evidently when enlivened by the individual and group 
practice of effective transcendent meditation, will support a best outcome for 
the nation and world.


 

 P.P.S., This does not mean that we, as individuals, do not support specific 
candidates. We may do so, offline. And we could be sure to exercise a civic 
duty and vote for the candidates we believe will serve a nation in the most 
evolutionary way.

 

 Welcome to FairfieldLife,
 -Jai Guru You
 

 

 

 FairfieldLife, a (spiritual) Yahoo-group:
Not the customary analysis of politics and economics but  a conversation about 
spiritual questions.   What did it mean for our spiritual lives?
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess.  Conservative 
Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 In fact he may be to the left of Clinton.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 They're buddies too
 

 Uh, no.
 

  so sometimes I think they're playing a massive charade on the American people.
 
 I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It 
Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others.  I thought the 
Sanders was a long shot
 

 ("the Sanders"??)
 

 but he did well in his campaign.  I think he should still be the Democratic 
Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did everything they could to 
get him out of the race.
 

 Actually, he lost (by almost 4 million votes).
 

 Remember both Trump and Sanders are on the same page regarding trade 
agreements, job loss and wars of empire.  Clinton just tries to snow her 
followers.
 

 Trump is an ignoramus; Sanders is an unrealistic dreamer. Clinton is a wonk 
who has oogobs of experience and a big set of well-thought-out policies. She 
snows people because she's so obviously qualified to be president.
 

 

 
 
 On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote:
 
   I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do 
not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely 
that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the 
election arrives. 
 
 I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major 
differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced 
the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened 
had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number 
of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have.  

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-27 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess.  Conservative 
Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 In fact he may be to the left of Clinton.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 They're buddies too
 

 Uh, no.
 

  so sometimes I think they're playing a massive charade on the American people.
 
 I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's "It 
Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others.  I thought the 
Sanders was a long shot
 

 ("the Sanders"??)
 

 but he did well in his campaign.  I think he should still be the Democratic 
Party Candidate and we know to Clinton campaign did everything they could to 
get him out of the race.
 

 Actually, he lost (by almost 4 million votes).
 

 Remember both Trump and Sanders are on the same page regarding trade 
agreements, job loss and wars of empire.  Clinton just tries to snow her 
followers.
 

 Trump is an ignoramus; Sanders is an unrealistic dreamer. Clinton is a wonk 
who has oogobs of experience and a big set of well-thought-out policies. She 
snows people because she's so obviously qualified to be president.
 

 

 

 On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote:
 
   I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do 
not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely 
that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the 
election arrives. 
 
 I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major 
differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced 
the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened 
had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number 
of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have.  

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-27 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
Bhairitu is all overstimulated because Michael Moore has been babbling about 
how Hillary's going to lose. 

 Trump is thrilled too; so's his son. 

 Moore tweeted:
 

 Hey everyone - Trump, Jr. & right wing thinks my movie called "TrumpLand" is 
pro-Trump! Haha. Pls don't tell them otherwise! 

 

 Speaking of TweedleDumber...
 

 It's hard to imagine the mindset of folks so consumed by hatred of Hillary 
that they're actually hoping Trump wins.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 On 10/27/2016 03:17 PM, Sal Sunshine salsunshineiniowa@... 
mailto:salsunshineiniowa@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:

   Nate Silver has Hillary at 54%, Trump at 45%, in Iowa.
 

 And in the battle ground state of Ohio, Hillary edges out Trump at 51% vs 48.
 

 Pennsylvania isn’t even close anymore, at 86 to 13, same with Michigan.
 

 Woo hoo.  
 

 Still, no complacency and everybody has to go and vote, who knows what kinds 
of tricks Trump’s people are planning.  But things are definitely looking good.
 

 Bet Bhairitu is making his travel plans as we speak.  He and Barry can cry 
together over their beers.


 
 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-27 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] 
We'll know November 9th but until then it seems anybodies guess.  
Conservative Republicans don't like Trump because he's too liberal.  In 
fact he may be to the left of Clinton.  They're buddies too so sometimes 
I think they're playing a massive charade on the American people.


I saw the possibility of Trump being a Buzz Windrip (Slnclair Lewis's 
"It Can't Happen Here") when he started running. So did others.  I 
thought the Sanders was a long shot but he did well in his campaign.  I 
think he should still be the Democratic Party Candidate and we know to 
Clinton campaign did everything they could to get him out of the race.  
Remember both Trump and Sanders are on the same page regarding trade 
agreements, job loss and wars of empire.  Clinton just tries to snow her 
followers.


On 10/27/2016 04:47 PM, feste37 wrote:


I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I 
do not know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems 
highly unlikely that Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when 
the day after the election arrives.


I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are 
also major differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, 
has markedly reduced the number of uninsured people in this country, 
which would never have happened had Obama not been in the White House. 
The Republicans also have a large number of climate change deniers, 
which the Democrats do not have.




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that 
this election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) 
millennials don't have landlines which are called for polling and 2) 
older folks like me who get those surveys have robocall blockers so we 
never pick up?


The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber. Ho-hum.  Welcome to 
politics South American style.



Sal






On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@...  
[FairfieldLife] > wrote:




According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with 
Trump in Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-27 Thread feste37 
I'm worried about these polls for some of the reasons you state, but I do not 
know which candidate the inaccuracies will favor. It seems highly unlikely that 
Trump can win, but I will still be relieved when the day after the election 
arrives. 

I understand the Tweedledee-Tweedledum thing, but I think there are also major 
differences between the parties. Obamacare, for example, has markedly reduced 
the number of uninsured people in this country, which would never have happened 
had Obama not been in the White House. The Republicans also have a large number 
of climate change deniers, which the Democrats do not have.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that this 
election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) millennials don't 
have landlines which are called for polling and 2) older folks like me who get 
those surveys have robocall blockers so we never pick up?
 
 The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to politics 
South American style.
 
 
 Sal 
 

 


 

 
 

 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:
 
 
 
 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-27 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] 
On 10/27/2016 03:17 PM, Sal Sunshine salsunshineini...@gmail.com 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:


Nate Silver has Hillary at 54%, Trump at 45%, in Iowa.


And in the battle ground state of Ohio, Hillary edges out Trump at 51% 
vs 48.


Pennsylvania isn’t even close anymore, at 86 to 13, same with Michigan.

Woo hoo.

Still, no complacency and everybody has to go and vote, who knows what 
kinds of tricks Trump’s people are planning.  But things are 
definitely looking good.


Bet Bhairitu is making his travel plans as we speak.  He and Barry can 
cry together over their beers.


LOL!  And just how are these polls conducted?  Have you not read that 
this election year polls have been difficult to conduct because 1) 
millennials don't have landlines which are called for polling and 2) 
older folks like me who get those surveys have robocall blockers so we 
never pick up?


The election is tweedle-dee and tweedle dumber.  Ho-hum.  Welcome to 
politics South American style.




Sal






On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
 [FairfieldLife] 
> 
wrote:




According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with 
Trump in Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-27 Thread feste37 
Nate Silver's statistic for Iowa refers to percentage chance of winning, not 
percentage of the vote. Unfortunately, HIllary only has a slight lead in the 
latter. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Nate Silver has Hillary at 54%, Trump at 45%, in Iowa. 

 And in the battle ground state of Ohio, Hillary edges out Trump at 51% vs 48.
 

 Pennsylvania isn’t even close anymore, at 86 to 13, same with Michigan.
 

 Woo hoo.  
 

 Still, no complacency and everybody has to go and vote, who knows what kinds 
of tricks Trump’s people are planning.  But things are definitely looking good.
 

 Bet Bhairitu is making his travel plans as we speak.  He and Barry can cry 
together over their beers.
 
 Sal 
 

 







 
 On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]  wrote:

 

 According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Clinton-Trump 44-44 in Iowa

2016-10-27 Thread Sal Sunshine salsunshineini...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] 
Nate Silver has Hillary at 54%, Trump at 45%, in Iowa.

And in the battle ground state of Ohio, Hillary edges out Trump at 51% vs 48.

Pennsylvania isn’t even close anymore, at 86 to 13, same with Michigan.

Woo hoo.  

Still, no complacency and everybody has to go and vote, who knows what kinds of 
tricks Trump’s people are planning.  But things are definitely looking good.

Bet Bhairitu is making his travel plans as we speak.  He and Barry can cry 
together over their beers.

Sal 






On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:49 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
 wrote:



According to the latest Quinnipiac poll, Hillary has pulled even with Trump in 
Iowa.