Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-28 Thread Vaj


On Feb 27, 2006, at 12:50 PM, authfriend wrote:I was actually serious. I often thought of you as similar to  Camille   (in a positive sense), therefore it was surprising to hear you  find   her offensive in some way and therefore the post seemed unlike   you...however...  people often project dislike towards those who mirror certain   aspects of themselves, no? Can you see Camille as a certain aspect of yourself?  Other than that we can both be abrasive and both loathe what seems to us to be hypocrisy, no.  But her abrasiveness and hatred of hypocrisy aren't why I think she's full of it. In many ways Camille Paglia exemplies a woman who manifests her enlightment energy as a vajra-class Dakini. The enlightenment aspect of the vajra class is someone who can find the relevant point amongst a list of intellectual arguments (and where the holes are) and breathtakingly share the core insight as to why or how: highlights of how things really are. Since the same answer already is in all the listeners, this can invoke the same surprise and eureka in others, also causing their enlightenment energy to sparkle through as they briefly glimpse their real nature. However, if a person is not fully enlightened and there is some egoic involvement due to obscurations, they can manifest this propensity also in a distorted way with endless argument, positioning, many points which miss the point, analytical coldness, ready to pursue and criticize, etc.The fun thing of course, if we recognize the enlightenment energy of such people, we share in that. In some people, the energy is simply irresistible--and that fuels their popularity. It's totally natural to want to know your real nature.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/26/06 6:17:40 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
According to the Bible, they didn't want to have toshare their 
  prosperity with every stranger who camealong.I suspect they could 
  have found other means, but rapewas a pretty effective threat, and, as I 
  said, a commonmeans of doing so at that time.Plus which, they 
  probably would have enjoyed the actualintimidation and humiliation of the 
  strangers.Rape generally--including heterosexual rape--is notabout 
  sex but about power.

I re read the story ofLot and found nothing about the 
people of Sodom not wanting to share their prosperity with anybody. Perhaps just 
the opposite. The crowd expected they Angels share themselves with the men and 
boys of Sodom while staying in their city.In fact the two angels that came 
were traveling and only intended to spend the night in the town square and Lot 
insisted they come to his home where he prepared a feast for them and they would 
be able to leave in the morningand be on their way as earlyas they 
wanted. In fact when the crowd demanded to "know" or have sex with the two 
angels andLot refused and offered his virgin daughters instead, the 
crowd became furious andtold Lot he was an outsider living among 
them and had no right totell them what they could have or not have. The 
point of the story was God had been told the people of Sodom and Gomorra were 
wicked in every way and He wanted to see for himself. Now I'll 
agree,thatdepriving hospitality to traveling strangerscould have 
been looked upon as wicked or unkind but remember, they were wicked in every 
way. And Laviticus 18:22 describes homosexuality as an abomination in the 
eyes of God. Also it says else where in the Bible that God took the land that he 
gave to the Jews away from other people that had defiled themselves 
through such behaviors. And God commanded that Jews not do the same things or he 
would take the land from them.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/26/06 6:48:11 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christ. 
  What Christ is saying is that the people of a town that refuses his 
  message  are in far worse condition because the message was 
  offered and rejected  where as it was never offered to the 
  Sodomites who never rejected it.Of course, but why did Jesus 
  choose Sodom for thecomparison? He didn't just pick it out of a 
  hat;

Exactly! Are there any other towns other than Sodom and 
Gomorra that were totally destroyed by God with fire and brimstone mentioned in 
the Bible? It was the ideal example that Jesus was trying to impress on his 
disciples. God's judgemnet.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/27/06 9:29:23 A.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But the 
  Hebrew Scriptures are full of tales of suchpunishments of one unpleasant, 
  violent sort or another.Jesus chose the destruction of Sodom because 
  it workedin three respects: a punishment meted out to a *town*,the 
  comparative severity of the punishment, *and* thespecific sin for which it 
  was punished.If you want to insist that Sodom was punished for 
  thethe sin of homosexuality, the force of the analogy isgreatly 
  weakened because the sins wouldn't be similar.Jesus was nothing if not 
  precise in his analogies andmetaphors. That's why they're so 
  powerful.

Judy can youfind something specific that I said 
regarding this whole thread that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed *only* 
for homosexuality. The Story of Lot specifically says the Lord told 
Abraham, "I have heard that the people of Sodom and Gomorrah are extremely evil 
and everything they do is wicked. I am going down to see whether or not these 
reports are true then will know." Now couple this with Leviticus 18:22 "Do 
not practice homosexuality; it is a detestable sin". Surely the act of raping or 
wanting to molest the strangers is an act of homosexuality whether it is for 
pleasure or exhorting power. Either way, it is an abominable act and considered 
sinful. The actions of homosexuality are forbidden by God. And I believe 
the whole purpose of this thread was somebody had asked if there was anything in 
scripture that forbid homosexuality and if so what and where. I have mentioned 
several places in the Bible where homosexuality is considered a sin and should 
not be practiced.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/27/06 1:56:44 A.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What's 
  the punishment for this "abomination?" Failing to observe the Sabbath 
  (always Saturday, sorry non-7th-dayers) is punishable by being stoned or 
  banished. What's the set punishment for homosexuality in the 
  bible?

Do your own rersearch





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...





on 2/27/06 10:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In a message dated 2/27/06 9:29:23 A.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But the Hebrew Scriptures are full of tales of 
such punishments of one unpleasant, violent sort or another.

Jesus chose the destruction of Sodom because it worked in three respects: a 
punishment meted out to a *town*, the comparative severity of the 
punishment, *and* the specific sin for which it was punished.

If you want to insist that Sodom was punished for the the sin of 
homosexuality, the force of the analogy is greatly weakened because the 
sins wouldn't be similar.

Jesus was nothing if not precise in his analogies and metaphors. That's 
why they're so powerful. Judy can you find something specific that I said 
regarding this whole thread that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed *only* 
for homosexuality. The Story of Lot specifically says the Lord told Abraham, 
I have heard that the people of Sodom and Gomorrah are extremely evil and 
everything they do is wicked. I am going down to see whether or not these 
reports are true then will know. Now couple this with Leviticus 18:22 Do 
not practice homosexuality; it is a detestable sin. Surely the act of 
raping or wanting to molest the strangers is an act of homosexuality whether 
it is for pleasure or exhorting power. Either way, it is an abominable act 
and considered sinful.

According to the Bible:

Laura Schlessinger is a US radio personality who dispenses advice to people 
who call in to her radio show. Recently, she said that homosexuality is an 
abominaton according to Leviticus 18:22 and cannot be condoned in any 
circumstance. The following is an open letter to Dr.Laura penned by a US 
resident and also posted on the Internet:-


Dear Dr. Laura, Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding 
God's Law.

I have learned a great deal from your show, and I try to share that 
knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the 
homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 
clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice 
from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to follow 
them-

a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a 
pleasing odour for the Lord (Lev. 1:9). The problem is my neighbours. They 
claim the odour is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

b ) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 
21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her 
period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev. 15:19-24). The problem is,how do I 
tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offence.

d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, 
provided they are purchased from neighbouring nations. A friend of mine 
claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? 
Why can't I own Canadians?

e) I have a neighbour who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 
clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him 
myself?

f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an 
abomination (Lev. 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I 
don't agree. Can you settle this?

g) Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a 
defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my 
vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around 
their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev.19:27. How 
should they die?

i) I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me 
unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different 
crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two 
different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse 
and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of 
getting the whole town together to stone them?(Lev.24:10-16) Couldn't we 
just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people 
who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can 
help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and 
unchanging. Your devoted disciple and adoring fan.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread Vaj


On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:44 AM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" jstein@ wrote:   Camille Paglia is bullshit.  Judy, this post seems very unlike you, why do you say this?  Uh, because I think she's bullshit?  (Not sure why it seems unlike me.) Maybe because you seem similar is some way?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread Vaj


On Feb 27, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Rick Archer wrote:on 2/27/06 10:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:In a message dated 2/27/06 9:29:23 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But the  Hebrew Scriptures are full of tales of such punishments of one unpleasant,  violent sort or another.Jesus chose the destruction of Sodom because  it worked in three respects: a punishment meted out to a *town*, the  comparative severity of the punishment, *and* the specific sin for which it  was punished.If you want to insist that Sodom was punished for  the the sin of homosexuality, the force of the analogy is greatly  weakened because the sins wouldn't be similar.Jesus was nothing if not  precise in his analogies and metaphors.  That's why they're so  powerful. Judy  can you find something specific that I said regarding this whole thread that  Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed *only*  for homosexuality. The Story of Lot specifically says the Lord told Abraham, "I have heard that the people of Sodom and Gomorrah are extremely evil and everything they do is wicked. I am going down to see whether or not these reports are true then will know."  Now couple this with Leviticus 18:22 "Do not practice homosexuality; it is a detestable sin". Surely the act of raping or wanting to molest the strangers is an act of homosexuality whether it is for pleasure or exhorting power. Either way, it is an abominable act and considered sinful.According to the Bible:Laura Schlessinger is a US radio personality who dispenses advice to people who call in to her radio show. Recently, she said that homosexuality is an abominaton according to Leviticus 18:22 and cannot be condoned in any circumstance. The following is an open letter to Dr.Laura penned by a US resident and also posted on the Internet:-Dear Dr. Laura, Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law.I have learned a great deal from your show, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to follow them-a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odour for the Lord (Lev. 1:9). The problem is my neighbours. They claim the odour is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?b ) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev. 15:19-24). The problem is,how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offence.d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighbouring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?e) I have a neighbour who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination (Lev. 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?g) Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev.19:27. How should they die?i) I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them?(Lev.24:10-16) Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging. Your devoted disciple and adoring fan. Jesus f*cking Christ are you going to be smote for posting that!





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...





on 2/27/06 10:38 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Jesus f*cking Christ are you going to be smote for posting that!

We must inquire, who is the smiter, and who the smitee? Isnt there really only one of us? And is there really a process of smiting, or is that not also part of Brahman?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  











Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread Vaj


On Feb 27, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Rick Archer wrote:on 2/27/06 10:38 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Jesus f*cking Christ are you going to be smote for posting that!We must inquire, who is the smiter, and who the smitee? Isn’t there really only one of us? And is there really a process of smiting, or is that not also part of Brahman?"I" can't decide!





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread Vaj


On Feb 27, 2006, at 12:17 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:44 AM, authfriend wrote:  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "anonyff" anonyff@ wrote:   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" jstein@  wrote:Camille Paglia is bullshit.   Judy, this post seems very unlike you, why do you say this?   Uh, because I think she's bullshit?  (Not sure why it seems unlike me.)  Maybe because you seem similar is some way?  It seems unlike me because I seem similar.  Very good, Vaj. I was actually serious. I often thought of you as similar to Camille (in a positive sense), therefore it was surprising to hear you find her offensive in some way and therefore the post seemed unlike you...however...people often project dislike towards those who mirror certain aspects of themselves, no? Can you see Camille as a certain aspect of yourself?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread Sal Sunshine
Maybe this is the abridged version. :)

Sal

On Feb 27, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:

 I haven't analyzed your posts, Judy, but I would venture 
 that if I did, I'd find most have a beginning, a middle 
 and an end: Camille Paglia is bullshit because she's 
 wrong. Every study of rape finds it's an act of violent 
 control. For Paglia to say rape is an act of sex is like 
 saying head-on collisions are an alternative way to 
 park one's car. 

 To simply say she's bullshit and walk away is kind of 
 pugilis interruptus, you know what I mean?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread Vaj


On Feb 27, 2006, at 12:41 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:I know that might sound harsh, so I'll explain. In my opinion, EVERY SINGLE "HOLY" BOOK IN THE HISTORY OF THIS PLANET WAS WRITTEN BY MEN, FOR MEN. A few of them IMO may have been "inspired," in the sense that they were written by or dictated by human beings in higher states of consciousness, but to be honest not very many of them even achieved that. The norm in the realm of "holy books" is that most of the books that  humans consider "holy" were written by NON-enlightened  humans describing the actions of enlightened (or at  least more enlightened) fellow humans as best they  could (such as the Gospels). What about yellow scrolls written in microscopic Dakini script :-)?...not all works are "by purusha", by men. Of course, this is one thing Mahesh Yogi has claimed to have: the "apurusheya bhasya" (not purusha created commentary), of Rig Veda, which is also "not by man". So "men" can use the fact that books 'not by men' have some alleged clout...What about texts that require a certain level or state of consciousness to even grok?Sometimes there's more to the text than meets the eye. :-)





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread Vaj


On Feb 27, 2006, at 1:10 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  What about texts that require a certain level or state of   consciousness to even grok?  Sometimes there's more to the text than meets the eye. :-)  Indeed. The claim that a book can only be "understood" by a few might, in fact, mask an attempt by those "few" to manipulate others.  :-) And indeed it does. That's why some texts are sealed by the beings who communicate them.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread Vaj


On Feb 27, 2006, at 1:33 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 27, 2006, at 1:10 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:  What about texts that require a certain level or state of consciousness to even grok?  Sometimes there's more to the text than meets the eye. :-)  Indeed. The claim that a book can only be "understood" by a few might, in fact, mask an attempt by those "few" to manipulate others.  :-)  And indeed it does. That's why some texts are sealed by  the beings who communicate them.  Whatever floats your boat.  I'm not saying that such a thing isn't possible. All I'm suggesting is that, given the long,  sordid history of spirituality on this rock, it's just as possible that claims of a book's specialness are a way of attracting followers whose greatest desire is to feel "special" to those who claim to have "special" knowledge of "special" books. Yeah, that's a given because it clearly has. One only has to remember the Christian liturgy and bible which was encoded in Latin and dispensed to the unknowing masses. Destroy the Gnosis and we, the priest, will mediate for you. Just keep sending money.It's interesting in Sanskrit literature it is said that it is only in the Kali Yuga, 'when the minds of men began to wane' that writing appeared. Writing is therefore an artifact of the age of darkness. Some traditions do not even consider written texts to be worthy of repetition. Having met a number of yogis who had photographic memory I can understand how this is possible even though epic poets and bards are hard to find these days. Also NOT having photographic memory myself, I can see why writing is important. But while either the oral or written can create exclusive priesthoods, in history it was the written word which allowed for codification, dogma and control--the Aryans "capture" of Dravidian texts in the artificial language of Sanskrit is but one example. The question seems to me is 'which is more capable of producing Gnosis for a given person?' The importance of "ear-whispered tradition" thus remains important--the morphogenetic field of living tradition: only "alive" when it is alive in us.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  








Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/27/06 10:32:48 A.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Homosexual acts between two people of homosexualpreference are 
  engaged in for "pleasure" and, often,out of deep emotional feelings of 
  love, just as withheterosexuals.Homosexual acts between two people 
  of *heterosexual*preference are engaged in for many different 
  reasons,including ritualistic performance, stimulating ajaded sexual 
  appetite, and for purposes ofintimidation and humiliation, among 
  others.Now, given a loving, beneficent God, which type 
  of"homosexuality" do you think He would be mostopposed to? Or do 
  you think He would condemn allof them as equally detestable in His 
  sight?

Perhaps you should ask Him. Either way, it's still sin and 
disobedience and either way that sin and disobedience can be forgiven if 
repented of. Basically you're asking me to judge for God or speak for him. I 
can't do that. You still haven't shown me any evidence that the men and boys in 
Sodom tried to have sex with the angels in order to intimidate them into 
leaving. Yet it is said in the Bible that they wanted to "know" them, a term 
which is repeatedly used to show intimacy between men and women in the Bible. 
Somebody wanting to exhibit dominance and control by rape are not 
concernedwith intimacy.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-27 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/27/06 3:25:09 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, it 
  would be rather difficult to provide youwith hard evidence at this 
  juncture. However, asI've noted, there's excellent 
  historical/culturalevidence that anal rape was a means of 
  intimidatingand humiliating people; and there's also 
  Ezekiel'scomplaint about Sodom, which emphasizes its refusalto share 
  its wealth with the poor and needy (inthis case, Lot's 
  visitors).There's also the unlikelihood that all the males inthe 
  town--including the young ones--suddenly gothorny all at once on that 
  particular evening, andinstead of satisfying their desires with each 
  other,decided to go after Lot's visitors.In other words, the story 
  doesn't make much sense inyour interpretation, whereas it makes perfect 
  sensein mine.

Actually I think my interpretation makes much more since. 
Lot's guests made no demand for charity from anybody in the city. As a matter of 
fact Lot met them at the gate to the city and invited them to stay in his house 
for the evening. Why would anybody object to that? On the other hand, can you 
imagine if two gorgeous angels walked into the Castro district of San Francisco 
and a bunch of gay biker types saw them and followed them to the house they went 
in. Do you think they would hang aroundto run them out of town or be 
inhopes of getting a *date*?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-26 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/25/06 8:12:07 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Let 
  me ask it this way: Do you think they wanted to rape Lot's 
  visitors because they were horny? In other words, was the 
  point sexual gratification?  Would it matter? Would the 
  act be justified if it were just a power  trip? Or justified if 
  it were for shear pleasure?Was anybody trying to *justify* 
  it?? Certainly not I.Can you answer the question, 
  please?

The men and boys of Sodomwanted Lot to bring out his 
guests so they could "know" them. Sounds like horniness to me. But that would be 
a guess on my part.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-26 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/25/06 8:49:40 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What a 
  family. And what a great book from which to take instruction about family 
  values and sexual mores!

And what does that say about homosexuality in the eyes of God? 
At least Leviticus deals with the rest at a later place in the Bible as society 
evolves.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-26 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/26/06 12:13:43 A.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you 
  know, if this stuff were in the Koran, the fundies would be using it as 
  evidence of how bad Islam is...

It probably is in the Koran. Much of the Bible is found in the 
Koran with a few variations and twists. 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-26 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/26/06 12:29:53 A.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Better 
  yet: Billy Crystal's impersonation of Edward J. Robinson's biblical 
  character from "The Ten Commandments": "Where's your Moses now? 
  Where's your King of the Jews now?", done in classical 
  Brooklynese...

Billy Crystal is one of my favorites! I Liked his Yule Brenner 
impersonation going back and forth between the King of Siam and Ramases," So it 
shall be written, so it shall be, done etc etc 
etc





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-26 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/26/06 12:19:32 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
suggests 
  otherwise--i.e., that the men of Sodom weren'thomosexual or even bisexual, 
  and that the threatened rapewas not a function of sexual desire on their 
  part, butrather an attempt to intimidate Lot's visitors intoleaving 
  forthwith.

And Why did they want them to leave so quickly? Was rape the 
only means of intimidating them?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-26 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/26/06 12:21:12 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cite 
  some passages and I'll look them up. Thanks.

Try Leviticus 18 Forbidden Sexual 
practices.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-26 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/26/06 12:31:30 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But 
  remember that the kingdom of God is coming soon.' I tell you, on the 
  judgment day it will be worse for the people of that town than for the 
  people of Sodom."It appears that as far as Jesus was concerned, the 
  sinof refusing hospitality was far worse than that 
  ofhomosexuality.

The comparison of homosexuality and hospitality are not 
made here by Christ. What Christ is saying is that the people of a town that 
refuses his message are in far worse condition because the message was offered 
and rejected where as it was never offered to the Sodomites who never rejected 
it. Try reading Leviticus 18:22,Romans 1:18-32, 1 Corinthians 
6:9-10.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-25 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/25/06 12:35:05 A.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 The 
  Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with anotherman 
  they  way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think that gets the 
  point across  without being too graphic.I am not a 
  biblical scholar, but apparently, the bible adds that it iswithin gods 
  grace for a man to *lay* with a woman in the ways a man lays 
  with another man. 

There is no sin that can not be 
forgiven.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-25 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:44 A.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 The 
  Bible says it is an abomination for a man to *lay* with another man 
  they  way he would with a woman. (paraphrased). I think that gets 
  the point across  without being too 
  graphic.That's IT?Sounds pretty vague to 
  me.

Shemp That's the only verse, from Leviticus, that I remember 
off hand. I pretty sure there is more. The Bible wasn't written in legalese as a 
contractbetween man and God. Could you imagine if priests and rabbi had to 
be attorneys as well?ROFLMAO!





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-25 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/25/06 1:10:06 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, 
  actually the Hebrew Scriptures are exactly,precisely that, as far as 
  Judaism is concerned.Have you really never heard of the Covenant 
  betweenGod and His Chosen People?And as to rabbis being lawyers, 
  have you neverheard the provisions of the Covenant, especiallyin 
  Leviticus, being referred to as the Law?

Yes Judy, a covenant , however I'm referring to the legalese 
one would hear in today's laws... the party of the first part shall be referred 
to as... As for the men of Sodom being homosexual?Read it for 
yourself Genesis 19:3 thru 9and Judges 19:22. Yes they were at least 
bi-sexual because they demanded to have sex with the "strangers" that Lot had 
brought to his home for safe keeping that evening. The men of Sodom tried to 
break into Lot's home to rape the guests and Angels blinded the men of Sodom to 
make their escape along with Lot's family.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-25 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/25/06 1:56:16 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Shemp That's the only verse, from Leviticus, that I remember off 
  hand. I  pretty sure there is more. The Bible wasn't written in 
  legalese as a contract  between man and God. Could you 
  imagine if priests and rabbi had to be attorneys  as well? 
  ROFLMAO!Well, actually, isn't that precisely what the 
  Talmud is...basically, volume after volume after volume of "legalese" of 
  the contract between man and God?

Shemp just as I explained to Judy, yes that's is exactly what 
the Talmud is, a promise from God, however my definition of legalese is probably 
far different than what yours may be. I'm referring to legalese as the technical 
terms used today in the practice of modern civil law. Open a contract for a new 
house today and compare it to the contract between Abraham and God 
linguistically. 





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-25 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/25/06 2:00:21 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, 
  actually, isn't that precisely what the Talmud is...  basically, 
  volume after volume after volume of "legalese" of the  contract 
  between man and God?Between Jews and God, yes, indeed, that is 
  exactlywhat it is (the contract itself is what Leviticusis, the book 
  where we find the passage MDixon cites).He needs to brush up on his 
  religious history justa bit, I think.

"Legalese" according to the Merriam Webster Dictionary is "the 
specialized language of the legal profession" as opposed to plain talk or in the 
case of Leviticus "scriptural reference". My religious history is fine it's your 
understanding of the word "legalese" that is the problem, I 
think.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-25 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/25/06 5:22:13 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Let me 
  ask it this way: Do you think they wanted torape Lot's visitors because 
  they were horny? Inother words, was the point sexual 
  gratification?

Would it matter? Would the act be justified if it were just a 
power trip? Or justified if it were for shear 
pleasure?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-25 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 2/25/06 5:28:43 P.M. Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Law 
  as laid down in the Torah was in what amountedto legalese of the 
  time.

I wouldn't presume to know that. However it might be funny to 
hear Leviticus redone in modern day legalese.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of homosexuality...

2006-02-25 Thread Sal Sunshine
What I have always understood about the Talmud was that it was a commentary on every aspect of the Torah that the rabbis writing it could come up with, the Torah being the basis of Jewish law.  

x-tad-biggerTraditional Judaism has always held that the books of the /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerTanakh/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger were transmitted in parallel with a living, /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggeroral tradition/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger. Thus, the /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerTorah/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger - the Law or Instruction - is the /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerwritten law/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger, while the /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggeroral law/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger deals with its application and elaborates on its meaning. The Talmud, ultimately, constitutes the authoritative /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerredaction/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger of this tradition. It is thus the major influence on /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerJewish belief and thought/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger. Furthermore, although not a formal legal code, it is the basis for all later /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggercodes of Jewish law/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger, and thus continues to exert a major influence on /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerHalakha/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger and Jewish religious practice. (See /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerMaimonides/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger introduction to the /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerMishneh Torah/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger /x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger[1]/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger.) The Talmud is arranged content-wise by Order and by Tractate; while conceptually, it is divided into two parts: /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerMishna/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger and /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerGemara/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger. There is also a distinction between /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerHalakha/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger (/x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggernormative/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger, legal focused material) and /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerAggadah/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger (non-normative material).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talmud
/x-tad-bigger

On Feb 25, 2006, at 1:55 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:

 Well, actually, isn't that precisely what the Talmud is...basically, 
 volume after volume after volume of legalese of the contract 
 between man and God?