[Flightgear-devel] MSVC error - glut32.lib

2005-07-02 Thread DesmoSS
I am trying to compile FG on  MSVC.net (7.0) on a Windows platform.  I have 
been sucessful through plib, simgear and now FG is providing me with  a "fatal 
LNK error 1104: cannot open file 'glut32.lib' ".  The  'glut32.lib'  file 
exists in the C:\windows\system32 folder...
 
Can anyone suggest a solution or path to examine.
 
Mike 




___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Native_FDM suggestion

2005-06-22 Thread DesmoSS
In a message dated 6/22/2005 3:53:23 AM Eastern  Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What do you guys think?  

I think you should share the specifics of the UDP and Matlab version  with 
those of us that have been toying with this unsucessfully for months...  ;^)
 
Mike  

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] SP_FMDS

2005-06-16 Thread DesmoSS
In a message dated 6/16/2005 3:56:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's nothing fancy, currently it covers an FDM from  a research group...
 
E-
 
A quick review of the FlightGear/src/FDM/SP file indicates the  ADA program 
calls numerous aux functions into the HUD...some of which  I am interested in 
nurturing.  Is this an on-going project? Is there a  discription of the 
external models flown...or help incorporating this into  another external 
model?  The 
SAS website listed in the readme file is  no longer accessible...
Thanks,
 
MK  
 

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


[Flightgear-devel] SP_FMDS

2005-06-15 Thread DesmoSS
I've noticed in the cockpit.cxx file the instance of "ENABLE_SP_FMDS" and a  
search uncovers a trail into the fg_init, config.h, as well as into the 
HUD.cxx  files.  There seems to infer the existance of special FDM's,  although 
they 
seem to be disabled or hidden.  Can anyone offer any  information surrounding 
these Special FDM's ?  Do they relate to particular  aircraft?  
 
Mike 

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Modifying nav.dat file and waypoints

2005-05-28 Thread DesmoSS
In a message dated 5/28/2005 8:59:19 AM Eastern  Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have unpacked all of these,  removed most of the data, and then repacked 
them 
in gzip.  They work  fine.  What are you using to gzip them?  Make sure they 
are ".gz"  and not ".tgz".  

Dave, 
 
Good call, seems my WinZip has no .gz capability so I've moved over to  
win-gz and some experimenting provided good results...
 
Thanks much,
Mike

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] Modifying nav.dat file and waypoints

2005-05-28 Thread DesmoSS
In a message dated 5/28/2005 7:24:32 AM Eastern  Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How does it not work? Do you get  an error? Are you not getting what you 
expect 
when you tune the navradio to  your frequency?  

I'm actually working thru the same type of problem... my nav.dat files are  
within the Navaid folder as a Zip file.  I can open the file and make my  
alterations, but returning the file to a zipped.dat file is escaping me. This  
seems to be the case for apt.dat, awy.dat, and nav.dat.  Has anyone  
sucessfully 
returned altered data to the folder? 
 
Mike  

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] c172r-yasim solution error

2005-05-21 Thread DesmoSS
In a message dated 5/20/2005 8:36:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

I didn't test this, but it should work for a quick hack.  The  result
will be an aircraft that looks like a Skyhawk but flies like  a
Warrior.
 
A,
 
Sweet...!!!   Although the aircraft seems to act like a  mix-breed, this will 
certainly serve my purposes in the short term.  If you  get the chance, try 
the "hack" on your machine and let me know if you experience  some performance 
degradation in both a/c and FG.  I had to copy the  pa28-161.xml file into my 
...data/Aircraft/c172p folder for a successful  launch.
 
Mike

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] c172r-yasim solution error

2005-05-20 Thread DesmoSS
In a message dated 5/20/2005 3:02:33 PM Eastern  Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can
use the 172 panel and  graphics with another airplane's FDM
configuration.

A,

Could  you send me some specifics on the above procedure?  I'm playing around 
 within the pa28-set.xml without much success.

Mike  


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] c172r-yasim solution error

2005-05-20 Thread DesmoSS
In a message dated 5/20/2005 12:49:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Or if you really want to cheat: use the Cessna 3D model with the  Piper
FDM configuration. :)
 
I think that's how this whole thing started... YASim FDM with c172 model  
results in a YASim solution error -  insufficient elevator trim.  I  could 
start 
altering the geometry or moving the CG, but I was hoping NOT  to upset all the 
previous efforts put into the model.
 
Mike  

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] c172r-yasim solution error

2005-05-20 Thread DesmoSS
In a message dated 5/20/2005 2:09:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

But is is meant to be fixed at the aircraft and thus rotates due to the  
aircrafts velocity or is it fixed at the earth and relocated for every frame  
to display?

Or the other question is: what is that hud element meant  to display?
I cannot yet make sense of that.
 
 
Hi M,
 
The HUD element provides a visual indicator of energy within a  constant 
speed climb or descent thru the use of hud_ladr.cxx: 
 
 if(energy_marker) {
if (total_vel < 5.0)  {
t1 = 0;
t2 =  0;
} else {
t1 =  up_vel/total_vel;
t2 = asin((Vxx*Axx + Vyy*Ayy +  Vzz*Azz)/(9.81*total_vel));
}
pot_slope =  ((t2/3)*SGD_RADIANS_TO_DEGREES)*factor + vel_y;
 
The values of Vxx, Vyy, ... are called in for the JSBSim and YASim both,  but 
Axx, Ayy, ... are called for YAsim only, rendering the HUD element to  
indicate velocity only.
 
As for reference plane, I'm hazy as to the effect of the frame on the  
reference but would lean towards the geodedic or earth-referenced  
acceleration.  I 
have been through the flight.cxx and .hxx files along with  the 
src/FDM/JSBSim.cxx and YASim.cxx and have come away with the  "v_dot_local",  
"Get_" and 
"Set_Accels_Local" as the given  terminology in the NED sections, although 
these 
may be in name only and not  function.
 
To refresh the initial query;  I would like to use the energy marker  within 
a training tool using a simple single trainer but I need 2 VOR's for  
intersection identification.  The PA-28 -YASim provides the energy  marker and 
the 
c172 - JSBSim provides the avionics... hmmm...
 
Thanks,
Mike   





___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] c172r-yasim solution error

2005-05-19 Thread DesmoSS
We can do this, it will just take some thinking.
And, yes, Mathias is  the expert, here.


Thanks for your input, here... I'll sit tight and see if Mathias can  respond.
 
Mike

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] c172r-yasim solution error

2005-05-18 Thread DesmoSS
The JSBSim interface, /src/FDM/JSBSim/JSBSim.cxx  never calls  
_set_Accels_local() in 
the function copy_from_JSBSim().
 
 
Is it ( the call) easily added to the JSBSim.cxx code as a local fix  ?  I've 
looked at both the JSBSim.cxx and Yasim.cxx files, and although I  think I 
see the call in yasim, the similarities are beyond me... 
 
Mike

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] c172r-yasim solution error

2005-05-18 Thread DesmoSS
Can you be specific? Which accelerations are zero. This may be a bug.
 
hud_ladr.cxx defines:
 
 // OBJECT MOVING RETICLE
// TYPE  ENERGY_MARKERS
// ATTRIB - ALWAYS
//energy markers - compute potential slope
if(energy_marker) {
if (total_vel < 5.0)  {
t1 = 0;
t2 =  0;
} else {
t1 =  up_vel/total_vel;
t2 = asin((Vxx*Axx + Vyy*Ayy +  Vzz*Azz)/(9.81*total_vel));
 
c172 JBS Axx, Ayy, Azz seem always zero where PA-28 and A-10 YASim  have 
values.  This effectively makes t2 = 0 and defeats the pot_slope from  any 
value 
other than Vx, Vy, Vz.
 
Mike 




___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] c172r-yasim solution error

2005-05-18 Thread DesmoSS
??  I would have figured the HUD symbology is FDM-independent.
 
That would be ideal, however there seems to be a dis-connection between the  
EOM in the JSB models that's present in the YASim model. Of course, I'm  
comparing the PA-28 to the c172 models, but the PA-128 will drive the energy  
markers within the HUD according to model velocities and accelerations  while 
the 
c172 seems to pass a zero value for the accelerations and the energy  markers 
just hang onto the velocity vector values.
 
Mike  
 

___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] c172r-yasim solution error

2005-05-17 Thread DesmoSS

But again: it is unlikely that this  model will be maintained in the
future.  The standard FlightGear 172 is  a JSBSim model, and it works
quite well.  If there is something specific  you need from the Skyhawk
model, you might best be served by modifying the  JSBSim one.  And if
you want a YASim lightplane, definitely check out  the pa28-161.  This
is very well tuned (by David Megginson, who actually  owns such a
Cherokee) and works great.

Andy

A,

At your  suggestion, I spent this AM looking at the Cherokee / Warrior and 
agree it's as  realistic as needed.  My problem arises in the radio/nav stack 
where the  individual VOR's cannot be set independently like in the c172, ie: 
the headings  on each OBS are always the same.   I'm looking into an 
instructor's  aide for IFR approaches and would like to define an approach path 
intersection  with the second vor-radial, easy to do with the c-172.  To add to 
the  
confusion, I'm using the energy markers in the HUD to define inputs to the  
student and the Yasim FDM seems to support more HUD components than the JBS  
FDM... although I haven't spent too much time in the hud_ladr.cxx to find the  
links...

Mike   


___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d


Re: [Flightgear-devel] PC7-maintainer

2005-01-14 Thread DesmoSS



I believe that carrot is the elevator trim indicator. It should never be 
centered, but it should be near the neutral point for S & L flight.
 
Mike
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Re: [Flightgear-devel] May I help with scenery?

2005-01-11 Thread DesmoSS



Each of the new portables has an option to average the position for up to 
an hour, making return to the point accurate to within 3-meters. I have found 
that with 3-birds recognized, the position is usually accurate within 
15-minutes. 
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

[Flightgear-devel] Re:Development Platform Help Needed

2005-01-06 Thread DesmoSS



In a message dated 1/6/2005 9:16:31 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I 
  unfortunately do not have an FTP server or the like to make my version 
  ofthe source code available to you.  But since you have some time, I 
  couldsimply e-mail you the source code that I have built along with some 
  simplesetup instructions.  Collectively, the source code for all of 
  the projectsis rather large; however, I believe that they could be split 
  up sufficientlyenough to be e-mailed.  We can take the details of 
  setting up anyarrangement off-list.
 
Chuck
 
If your source code will work along with MSVC v.6 or .NET, I'll find 
the best deal ($$) and upgrade.  As far as the code is concerned, is 
copying to CD an option? 
 
Mike
 
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

[Flightgear-devel] Re: Development Platform Help Needed

2005-01-05 Thread DesmoSS



Thanks Christian and Chuck,
 
I think Linux would be the most direct but my comfort level 
diminishes rapidly.  I would appreciate an opportunity to review 
the MSVC++ path if I can get together with Chuck.
 
Most of this development will take place in Suffolk, 
and I'm devoting the entire semester to the project... so I'm flexible to 
travel if you can afford some time to help me get this started.
 
Thanks,
 
Mike 
Krizansky   
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

[Flightgear-devel] Development Platform Help Needed

2005-01-05 Thread DesmoSS



Greetings, 
 
I am a graduate student in Virginia working with FlightGear towards a MS 
in aerospace engineering and human factors.  I am trying to 
alter the existing HUD within FG to reflect a newly developed energy 
management algorithm.  Ultimately, the pilot could match icons 
for bank, pitch, and throttle and fly an optimal path to a waypoint or 
runway threshold. 
 
My strengths lie outside the C, C+, and C++ environment and while I find 
the capability fascinating, time prevents me from pursuing this from 
the basic level.  I am looking for help in assembling a development 
platform that will allow me to alter the program and review the changes.  
In addition, I need to trace the path from the HUD display to their origins, ie: 
velocity vector is driven by Vxx, Vyy, and Vzz... I need to access these 
origins.  I realize this is a tall order, especially at a distance, but I 
have failed miserably with local talent.  
 
My exposure to development has been a review of the 
source code and toying with OpenGL in Visual C++, v 4.0, although I am open to 
suggestions for an alternate program.  I feel confident that with an 
operating platform and a few gentle nudges, my ignorance would only surface 
occasionally.
 
I would appreciate your thoughts, both on my path and on any guidance 
you might be able to offer. 
 
Thanks,
 
Mike Krizansky  (MS-AE/HF != CS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 
 
 
 
 
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d