generated pdf page is in iso-8859-1
hi, i've got a .fo file like this ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format; /fo:root I transform it in pdf with fop and myweb browser tells me the encoding is iso-8859-1 but for some url links reasons, I need the file to be in utf-8. is there something I can do ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Compiled FOP versions
Hi there. I didn't find any post in the last months concerning my point. If it was discussed earlier, I'd like to apologize. My Problem: My provider doesn't offer a Java VM on the servers. So I'm looking for another possibility to run FOP. I found out (at Wikipedia) that you can compile Java written programs to machine code (e.g., with the Gnu CJ). Well, actually I'm still using Windows and I have no clue where to compile it for Linux. I am looking for: - already compiled versions of FOP (for Linux; SuSe, I think) - any tips or hints how I could use FOP on a server without having a Java VM. Does anyone have an idea? Best Regards Manuel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: generated pdf page is in iso-8859-1
What happens when you open the PDF file with Adobe Acrobat directly, and not using the browser? Are you getting the same result opening the PDF with both IE and Firefox? Is this just an annoying message, or is a corrupted/unusable PDF returned? It very well could be, but I was unaware that the encoding in the source FO file somehow makes its way to the PDF document. If the PDF is being returned from a web app, my suspicion is that a wrong response header value is being sent to the browser. Glen Myriam Delperier wrote: hi, i've got a .fo file like this ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format; /fo:root I transform it in pdf with fop and myweb browser tells me the encoding is iso-8859-1 but for some url links reasons, I need the file to be in utf-8. is there something I can do ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compiled FOP versions
You're pretty much out of luck at the moment. It is on my list to make FOP compile with GCJ/Classpath but so far I've had no time to go after it. At the moment a JVM is simply required. What you can try, though, is install a JVM for that machine yourself. But you have to figure out yourself if you're allowed to do that. On 16.11.2005 14:29:15 Manuel Strehl wrote: Hi there. I didn't find any post in the last months concerning my point. If it was discussed earlier, I'd like to apologize. My Problem: My provider doesn't offer a Java VM on the servers. So I'm looking for another possibility to run FOP. I found out (at Wikipedia) that you can compile Java written programs to machine code (e.g., with the Gnu CJ). Well, actually I'm still using Windows and I have no clue where to compile it for Linux. I am looking for: - already compiled versions of FOP (for Linux; SuSe, I think) - any tips or hints how I could use FOP on a server without having a Java VM. Does anyone have an idea? Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Compiled FOP versions
Without servlets and JSPs, what will your provider allow you use to execute programs on the server--ASP, PHP, or cgi? A pure HTTP server will not be able to activate programs, regardless of what you can compile FOP into. Is the provider using IIS or Apache as the web server? My thinking, along with Jeremias', is that it would be probably best to somehow distribute/install the Java VM with your application. The JVM is, after all, already compiled into an executable that the server can run. I can't see the reason why you would not be allowed to run the JVM executable but you would be allowed to run another compiled executable instead (what you are trying to do to FOP)--they would both be programs running on the server. Glen Manuel Strehl wrote: Hi there. I didn't find any post in the last months concerning my point. If it was discussed earlier, I'd like to apologize. My Problem: My provider doesn't offer a Java VM on the servers. So I'm looking for another possibility to run FOP. I found out (at Wikipedia) that you can compile Java written programs to machine code (e.g., with the Gnu CJ). Well, actually I'm still using Windows and I have no clue where to compile it for Linux. I am looking for: - already compiled versions of FOP (for Linux; SuSe, I think) - any tips or hints how I could use FOP on a server without having a Java VM. Does anyone have an idea? Best Regards Manuel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: generated pdf page is in iso-8859-1
Glen Mazza wrote: | | What happens when you open the PDF file with Adobe Acrobat | | directly, and not using the browser? ||Are you getting the same | | result opening the PDF with both IE and Firefox? acrobat, ie, firefox give me the same result my problem was that i've in my fo : fo:basic-link external-destination=resultats-in.html?q=finstitutiontype:|Service général|base=institutionfrom1=rechtermsf=ftitle.../fo:basic-link and the result of the link was resultats-in.html?q=finstitutiontype:|Service%20g%e9n%e9ral| whereas I'm waiting for : resultats-in.html?q=finstitutiontype:|Service%20g%C3%A9n%C3%A9ral| I can solve my problem with this : fo:basic-link external-destination=http://tourny:8082/mpf/pub-fr/resultats-in.html?q=finstitutiontype:|Service+g%C3%A9n%C3%A9ral|base=institutionfrom1=rechtermsf=ftitleService général/fo:basic-link but I thought I woudn't have to encode this url in the .fo if the pdf file was already in utf-8 | | If the | | PDF is being returned from a web app, my suspicion is that a wrong | | response header value is being sent to the browser. mypdf is generated by a cocoon application with a fo2pdf serializer, but everything else in the appli is utf-8, that's why I thought the encoding pb could be resoved by fop - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: get value of command line arguments
Yes I know the command line is slow, this sounds like another incentive to change that. Thanks, Roland Jeremias Maerki wrote: Hi Roland No, that parameter to the XSL is not set by the FOP command line. Of course, it would be no problem to add this. In the latest code it's possible to specify XSLT parameters. But that version won't be of use to you right now, since PCL support has not been resurrected, yet. Still, you're talking about speed but yet you use the command line. That's kind of a contradiction to me. However, it should be easy for you to add that XSL parameter to the FOP command line yourself. On 16.11.2005 03:04:22 Roland Neilands wrote: Does anyone know if it's possible to check the value of FOP command line arguments within XSL, specifically the chosen output format? eg I have one stylesheet which may produce PDF and/or PCL from the same XML file depending on local setup. PCL is mainly for non-PS printers faxes, so I would like to disable colour formatting switch to bw images when producing these. I could do this with an input parameter I know, but that means producing the .fo as a separate step, slowing things down. Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
