fetchmail question
Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header in every messages that it retrives from the pop server. Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr030563 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 I am running fetchmail as root user so it has modified the recepient to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isn't there any way so that fetchmail retains the original recepient ? I tried -n and --invisible options but they didn't help. Thanks, Bikrant ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: setting a disk read only
On Saturday 26 June 2004 22:06, JJB wrote: Security Paranoia It's very important that you completely understand the impact of using the following command will have on your ability to make changes to your system. The simplest thing you can do is set the immutable flag on all system binaries and /etc config files with: chflags schg /bin/*(*) /sbin/*(*) /usr/bin/*(*) /usr/sbin/*(*) /etc/*(*) It seems to me that mounting all partitions from the disk as read only would achieve rather more; and more simply. But neither protects against direct writes to the raw device. And if you are really paranoid about this I think the only solution is a hardware switch. I suspect the linux 'hdparm' also has its limitations; only a hardware switch can protect against software bugs or a successful invasion. Setting the immutable flag on, means the files are marked as being protected from being written over. Once you execute the above command, no process can over write those files thus increasing the level of difficulty for the attacker and increasing the odds in your favor of the attacker leaving error messages in the system log. On the other hand you as root user can not make any changes to those file so marked either. Ever time you want to make changes you have to issue the command to turn off the immutable flag on all the same files. Use this command to do that: chflags noschg /bin/*(*) /sbin/*(*) /usr/bin/*(*) /usr/sbin/*(*) /etc/*(*) You can use ls -lo command to see the immutable flags of existing You could do this to any slice with chflags noschg /*(*) /usr/*(*) what ever Malcolm ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Updating source code manually
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:26:20AM -0500, Jay Moore probably wrote: stupid newbie question: How do I view the source file with the patches merged? By running `make extract patch' in the port's directory, I presume. -- DoubleF We are on the verge: Today our program proved Fermat's next-to-last theorem. -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982 pgpBEMW7FlI1t.pgp Description: PGP signature
/boot/loader freezing up?
I just installed FreeBSD 5.2.1 (from the ISO, not the latest patch level in CVS) and quickly ran into a problem related to the serial console. I dropped -h (sans-quotes, of course) into /boot.config so that it would boot with output going to the serial console, as I've done many times with older versions of FreeBSD on other systems. However, all startups after doing this freeze. I get the F1 FreeBSD, F5 Drive 1, Default F1 prompt as usual, then get: /boot.config: -h BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 .. and nothing more. Nothing ever comes out the serial port and the system never finishes booting. This install was working fine until I tried getting it to boot through the serial console. Furthermore, because I never get to the point of the prompt to boot into single user mode, I can't figure out how to get in and remove /boot.config so that I can at least start up properly, if not with serial console support. Any clues as to how to hose that file, or better yet, how to get it to stop seizing up during bootup? Thanks for your time! W ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The FreeBSD Diary: 2004-06-06 - 2004-06-26
The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives http://www.freebsd.org/search/search.html#mailinglists and/or The FreeBSD Diary http://www.freebsddiary.org/. These are the articles posted during this period: 23-Jun : USENIX'04 ATC I'll be there! http://freebsddiary.org/usenix-atc-2004.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
zorp and freebsd
Hi, is there any way to do transparent proxying in FreeBSD? I'd be happy to have a fully functional Zorp server based on FreeBSD. Transparent proxying is working on Linux via the TPROXY patch, but ipf rdr methods are not really the same. Is there any way to implement that transparent stuff in FreeBSD? Are there any unofficial modifications (don't slap me please ;)? Thanks, Tamas ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: next question re the Thinkpad.
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:47 -0700 Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] granted us these pearls of wisdom: Is anybody using a Thinkpad among the list? I have found one with the ``SMC 2206 compact USB-Ethernet adapter for connecting to ethernet networks.'' In LINT (4.10) I see SMC 2202USB listed. Can anybody help me? gary I have Thinkpad X30 which runs 4.9-p10 currently and I have had no real issues in setting it up. Mine has inbuilt NIC's though and there were no issues at all in recognising the ethernet or wireless NIC. X was really easy to setup and it's been really reliable since day1. HTH LukeK -- Luke Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tripwire on 5.2.1
Hi Dave, dave wrote: Hello, A while back i tried installing the tripwire port, but it reported as broken. I was wondering is anyone using this on 5.2.1? Thanks. Dave. Well, i am not going to answer your question since i dont run tripwire... What i do run is AIDE, which does the same (keeps checksums of files in a db and checks them).. I don't know if you want to run it, but here it is /usr/ports/security/aide Cheers -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporter DSINet|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
See that's I'm thinking, the raw performance is very attractive to me!! So what's this about a p4 1.7 outperforming a 2.8? You got link to benchmarks? -Original Message- From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 8:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Remi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote: I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one would you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be easier to run, so I guess my question is what is the state of the AMD64 FreeBSD version? You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop, right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4 2.8GHz running the same OS. A Pentium-M 1.7Ghz will outperform a 2.8Ghz P4 too ;) If battery life is important to you I'd suggest not getting an AMD64. For raw performance it's pretty nice though :) - -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA3j2V5ZPcIHs/zowRAoZpAKCnZMb/Kxk9wElcBhktj9NPDPsPggCgh6b2 iasKpu5F998wHLaC5flWA+E= =QBEE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fetchmail question
Bikrant wrote: Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header in every messages that it retrives from the pop server. Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr030563 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 I'm not sure about this. But to me it doesn't look like this is added by fetchmail but rather by sendmail. Below you find the header which was added to your original email by fetchmail on my box. Note the difference in the 'from' part. Also I don't think that fetchmail 'speaks' (E)SMTP. Phil. Received: from pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.0) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:25:38 +0200 (CEST) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fetchmail question
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Bikrant wrote: Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header in every messages that it retrives from the pop server. Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr030563 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 I am running fetchmail as root user so it has modified the recepient to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isn't there any way so that fetchmail retains the original recepient ? I tried -n and --invisible options but they didn't help. Hi, if you count all the RECEIVED: headers you will find that using the --invisible option fetchmail suppresses the fetchmail added RECEIVED: header ... all the others are added by sendmail Oliver -- ... don't touch the bang bang fruit ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
terabyte limit problem with vinum
Shawn, Did you ever find a solution to the terabyte limit problem you reported last year on FreeBSD.Questions (09/06/2003 and 01/12/2004). I'm having exactly the same problem. I've got eight Maxtor 250GB SATA drives ganged together into one big RAID5 volume with a net size of 1636GB. Everything is fine until newfs -U -O2 /dev/vinum/... gives the can't read old UFS1 superblock error. I'm using FreeBSD 5.2.1 csvup'd to REL_ENG_5_2 in mid June 2004. Thanks, Richard Holmes Lambda Software Development Rocklin, CA (916) 390-2057 (cell) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (soon to be discontinued) P.S. I've also been having some other problems with vinum. vinum resetconfig doesn't always wipe out all of the vinum drives and seems to not reliably erase the vinum database from all of the drives. After resetconfig, vinum list may show one or two drives remaining. To get rid of them all, I need to do multiple cycles of vinum rm -f -r, vinum stop and vinum start. Have also had problems with empty vinum volumes being corrupted after reboot (remember newfs failed, so nothing was ever written to the volume). After successfully creating and initializing the vinum RAID5 volume, I stop it, then reboot. After reboot, vinum insists on reinitializing the entire volume (an 8 hour process). ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Sendmail permission problems
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Jamie LaPointe wrote: I am having problems with a Perl based application (Bugzilla 2.16.5) that uses Sendmail. I recently upgraded from Sendmail version 8.9.3 to 8.12.10 and am using FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release. I installed this version of Sendmail from the Ports collection from the FreeBSD FTP site. Ever since I upgraded to this new version I have been having the following problem when attempting to send an email via Bugzilla (the following error is from the mailog): Jun 25 17:11:42 srv-linbsd01 sm-mta[539]: starting daemon (8.12.10): SMTP+queuei [EMAIL PROTECTED]:30:00 Jun 25 17:11:42 srv-linbsd01 sm-msp-queue[542]: starting daemon (8.12.10): queue [EMAIL PROTECTED]:30:00 Jun 25 17:11:42 srv-linbsd01 sm-msp-queue[547]: starting daemon (8.12.10): queue [EMAIL PROTECTED]:30:00 Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[630]: i5Q0C4fA000630: SYSERR(apache): coll ect: Cannot write ./dfi5Q0C4fA000630 (bfcommit, uid=1003, gid=25): Permission de nied Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[630]: i5Q0C4fA000630: from=apache, size=46 8, class=0, nrcpts=0, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[630]: i5Q0C4fA000630: i5Q0C4fB000630: DSN: collect: Cannot write ./dfi5Q0C4fA000630 (bfcommit, uid=1003, gid=25): Permissi on denied Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[630]: i5Q0C4fB000630: SYSERR(apache): queu eup: cannot create queue file ./qfi5Q0C4fB000630, euid=1003: Permission denied Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[631]: i5Q0C4K8000631: SYSERR(apache): coll ect: Cannot write ./dfi5Q0C4K8000631 (bfcommit, uid=1003, gid=25): Permission de nied Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[631]: i5Q0C4K8000631: from=apache, size=45 9, class=0, nrcpts=0, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[631]: i5Q0C4K8000631: i5Q0C4K9000631: DSN: collect: Cannot write ./dfi5Q0C4K8000631 (bfcommit, uid=1003, gid=25): Permissi on denied Jun 25 17:12:04 srv-linbsd01 sendmail[631]: i5Q0C4K9000631: SYSERR(apache): queu eup: cannot create queue file ./qfi5Q0C4K9000631, euid=1003: Permission denied It sure appears that something is screwed up with Permissions, yet /var/spool/clientmqueue has the following permission: -bash-2.05b# ls -l total 32 drwxrwx--- 2 smmsp smmsp 512 Jun 25 12:09 clientmqueue drwxr-xr-x 3 root daemon512 Apr 6 08:53 cups drwxrwxr-x 2 uucp dialer512 Jun 25 17:11 lock drwxr-xr-x 2 root daemon512 Feb 23 12:41 lpd drwxr-xr-x 3 root daemon 16384 Jun 25 15:17 mqueue drwx-- 2 root daemon512 Feb 23 12:41 opielocks drwxr-xr-x 3 root daemon512 Feb 23 12:41 output drwxr-xr-x 15 root wheel 512 Jun 25 11:48 postfix drwxrwxrwt 2 root wheel 512 Apr 6 08:53 samba From everything that I have read this is correct. I also checked the permission for the sendmail binary and it has the following permission: -bash-2.05b# ls -l /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail -r-xr-sr-x 1 root smmsp 635864 Feb 23 12:42 sendmail A look at SECURITY doc in /usr/local/share/doc/sendmail gives me: -r-xr-sr-x root smmsp... /PATH/TO/sendmail drwxrwx--- smmsp smmsp... /var/spool/clientmqueue drwx-- root wheel... /var/spool/mqueue -r--r--r-- root wheel... /etc/mail/sendmail.cf -r--r--r-- root wheel... /etc/mail/submit.cf Oliver -- ... don't touch the bang bang fruit ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: next question re the Thinkpad.
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 05:19:09PM +0900, Luke Kearney wrote: On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 22:24:47 -0700 Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] granted us these pearls of wisdom: Is anybody using a Thinkpad among the list? I have found one with the ``SMC 2206 compact USB-Ethernet adapter for connecting to ethernet networks.'' In LINT (4.10) I see SMC 2202USB listed. Can anybody help me? gary I have Thinkpad X30 which runs 4.9-p10 currently and I have had no real issues in setting it up. Mine has inbuilt NIC's though and there were no issues at all in recognising the ethernet or wireless NIC. X was really easy to setup and it's been really reliable since day1. HTH It helps to a point. The thing is that my budget is limited to th $200-$300 range. I'm not looking for anything fast ... just smething solid with a good drive and CDROM. And a NC that just-works. I've been checking the freebsd laptop list and working from these, but still flying blind pretty much. Anybody else have laptop success stories to share in the 266-400MHz range?? thanks to all, gary -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fetchmail question
Sorry.. I mentioned the wrong header :( Indeed the hearder was added by sendmail. This is the one added by fetchmail Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 (NPT) and this one is the full header From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 27 00:32:39 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr030563 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 (NPT) Received: (qmail 31304 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 - Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 - Received: (qmail 86161 invoked by uid 1008); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 - Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 1002 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.76):. Processed in 0.607579 secs); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 - Received: from smtp1.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.76) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:02 - Received: (qmail 8704 invoked by uid 508); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:01 - Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.org.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:01 - (Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:50:01 +0545) You can see that mail is to be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when it is fetched by fetchmail it is changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] regards, Bikrant On Sunday 27 June 2004 12:22, Bikrant wrote: Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header in every messages that it retrives from the pop server. Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr030563 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 I am running fetchmail as root user so it has modified the recepient to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isn't there any way so that fetchmail retains the original recepient ? I tried -n and --invisible options but they didn't help. Thanks, Bikrant ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fetchmail question
Sorry.. I mentioned the wrong header :( Indeed the hearder was added by sendmail. This is the one added by fetchmail Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 (NPT) and this one is the full header From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 27 00:32:39 2004 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr030563 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 (NPT) Received: (qmail 31304 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 - Received: from unknown (HELO qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.74) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 - Received: (qmail 86161 invoked by uid 1008); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 - Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np by uid 1002 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamscan: 0.60. Clear:RC:1(202.79.32.76):. Processed in 0.607579 secs); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:03 - Received: from smtp1.wlink.com.np (202.79.32.76) by qmail-scanner.wlink.com.np with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:02 - Received: (qmail 8704 invoked by uid 508); 27 Jun 2004 06:05:01 - Received: from [202.79.36.168] (HELO bikrant.org.np) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 27 Jun 2004 06:05:01 - (Sun, 27 Jun 2004 11:50:01 +0545) You can see that mail is to be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but when it is fetched by fetchmail it is changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] regards, Bikrant On Sunday 27 June 2004 12:22, Bikrant wrote: Hi... I am trying to retrive mails using fetchmail and then deleiver it locally using sendmail. I found that fetchmail adds the following header in every messages that it retrives from the pop server. Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i5QIldIr030563 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 I am running fetchmail as root user so it has modified the recepient to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isn't there any way so that fetchmail retains the original recepient ? I tried -n and --invisible options but they didn't help. Thanks, Bikrant ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Updating source code manually
On 2004-06-27 11:18, Sergey Zaharchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:26:20AM -0500, Jay Moore probably wrote: stupid newbie question: How do I view the source file with the patches merged? By running `make extract patch' in the port's directory, I presume. Just running `make patch' should be enough. The dependencies will take care of running `make fetch', `make checksum', `make extract' and *then* `make patch'. - Giorgos ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Updating source code manually
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:18:33PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas probably wrote: On 2004-06-27 11:18, Sergey Zaharchenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:26:20AM -0500, Jay Moore probably wrote: stupid newbie question: How do I view the source file with the patches merged? By running `make extract patch' in the port's directory, I presume. Just running `make patch' should be enough. The dependencies will take care of running `make fetch', `make checksum', `make extract' and *then* `make patch'. - Giorgos True, but being more `verbose' and giving a more self-explanatory command sometimes helps to understand what it actually is going to do. BTW I still forgot to mention what seemed obvious --- the patched source will be in the working directory (/usr/ports/.../.../work if you didn't change anything in make.conf). -- DoubleF Aquadextrous, adj.: Possessing the ability to turn the bathtub faucet on and off with your toes. -- Rich Hall, Sniglets pgpcd6PKcs8WL.pgp Description: PGP signature
make index error
Running 4.10. I ran a 'make index' in /usr/ports just now and i get the following error Generating INDEX - please wait..tkscanfax-1.02: /usr/ports/japanese/tk80 non-existent -- dependency list incomplete === comms/tkscanfax failed *** Error code 1 1 error Thanks __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: changing cards in a reader
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 07:27:40PM -1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aloha Scott and thanks for staying awake and responding. I thought I had tried all of that camcontrol stuff before I posted but I am getting old so I tried what you suggested. Alas, it did not seem to help. Here is the output of the attempt: Hi Robert, Weird - that's what works for me, so I don't know how much more help I can offer, but here are a few suggestions that might help us figure out what's going on... Boot with 128MB card installed. hp# ls -l /dev/da* crw-r- 1 root operator4, 20 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da0 crw-r- 1 root operator4, 21 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da1 crw-r- 1 root operator4, 22 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da2 crw-r- 1 root operator4, 24 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da2s1 crw-r- 1 root operator4, 23 Jun 26 18:50 /dev/da3 Ah... you're running FreeBSD 5 - it was pretty late when I wrote that first reply, so I didn't notice that immediately. Unlike FreeBSD 4, where stuff in /dev/ had to be created manually, FreeBSD 5 uses devfs to create the device nodes as needed, when devices come and go. I haven't actually used my card reader on 5 yet, so I could be missing something obvious here... Remove 128MB card and insert 8MB card hp# camcontrol rescan 0:0:2 Re-scan of 0:0:2 was successful What does 'fdisk da2' give you at this point? Do you get anything in /var/log/messages when you insert the new card? It might be worth doing a 'camcontrol start' after the rescan, just in case, but I don't really think that will make any difference. Since you're running FreeBSD 5, it might be worth re-porting your question to the freebsd-current mailing list, to see if anyone there can shed some light on this. Sorry I can't be more help, Scott -- === Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | Eagles may soar, but weasels Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet engines scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
File tree replication in FreeBSD
I'm looking for file replication solution for FreeBSD. I have a task to replicate about 11G of files with 500k total files count. I say replication not mirroring i.e. I need to copy modified files to slaves almost imidiately after the change. Tried to find some ready solution but fails. There is FAM from SGI but it fails to work properly on FreeBSD (it makes silly stat(2) calls). kevent(2) also don't have anough API to watch = 500k files. So I see the only way is to have kernel module that watch kernel calls for file operations. So is there some other points to build a file replication? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: File tree replication in FreeBSD
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:48:07 +0400 Kentucky Mandeloid Mo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus: I'm looking for file replication solution for FreeBSD. I have a task to replicate about 11G of files with 500k total files count. I say replication not mirroring i.e. I need to copy modified files to slaves almost imidiately after the change. Tried to find some ready solution but fails. There is FAM from SGI but it fails to work properly on FreeBSD (it makes silly stat(2) calls). kevent(2) also don't have anough API to watch = 500k files. So I see the only way is to have kernel module that watch kernel calls for file operations. So is there some other points to build a file replication? Can I suggest you investigate rsync ? It will allow you to replicate file trees pretty much on demand across a LAN or indeed the internet should you choose to. Works over SSH so it's nice and secure and if you need virtually instant replication you could conceivably run this from a cron job every N minutes. /usr/ports/net/rsync HTH LukeK -- Luke Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gigafast usb wireless network card
Is it possible to configure Gigafast wireless network card WF741-UIC on x86 machine? Thanks Ganesh ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux emulator core dumps at install
I tried to install the Linux emulator from the ports on FreeBSD 4.10-stable (i386) but it crashes when it installs: ... === Installing for linux_base-7.1_7 === Generating temporary packing list kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 - 3 glibc-common-2.2.4-33.i386.rpm package glibc not listed in conflict index glibc-2.2.4-33.i386.rpm execution of glibc-2.2.4-33 script failed, exit status 0 *** Error code 1 ... Is there a solution for this? Thanks, Marco -- Blore's Razor: Given a choice between two theories, take the one which is funnier. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Gigafast usb wireless network card
Hi, On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:53:53 -0400, Ganesh Kini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to configure Gigafast wireless network card WF741-UIC on x86 machine? Check the atuwi project (http://vitsch.net/bsd/atuwi/), it might work with this card. Arjan Thanks Ganesh ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using sendmail
On 2004-06-25 10:12, antenneX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giorgos: Thanks for your review of my setup I did change the IP for server2 back to 200.200.200.102 -- however, now the emails go straight though the firewall port on server1 to sendmail on server2 and apparently bypasses sendmail on server1. If it bypasses sendmail on server1, I cannot use greylisting to filter the emails before being sent over to server2. I'm still missing something here. I'm afraid I haven't kept notes about your network setup, the name and IP address of each server involved, and their Sendmail options. Can you, please, show me what these commands print? server1# ifconfig -a server1# host server1.example.net server1# host server2.example.net server1# host -t mx example.net server2# ifconfig -a server2# host server1.example.net server2# host server2.example.net server2# host -t mx example.net A detailed description (including verbatim copies of the relevant files) of the Sendmail setup on each host would be very nice too. - Giorgos ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared Partitions?
Thomas Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a Fat32 partition that I use to share files between Windows and FreeBSD. I have it mounted on /home and when it mounts the owner of all the files is root and the group is wheel. Is there a way to change that so it acts like a normal home partition? In other words the individual directories and files are owned by the user etc. Unfortunately, no. This is because FAT doesn't support users and groups (or permissions for that matter) so the mount has to have everything owned by one user/group. Thus it won't work as a /home partition because each /home/user directory should be owned by the user. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Asus P4S800D-E Deluxe
I've noticed that many newer Asus boards have ACPI problems with FreeBSD. Its a shame because i have always bought asus boards since I learned of them. On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Doug Poland wrote: On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:15:18AM +0100, Shaun Friedle wrote: On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 18:42, Doug Poland wrote: I currently have an Asus P4C800 Deluxe which is okay - until I turn off ACPI and then I get a Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while is kernel mode while booting. I need to be able to turn off ACPI as the nvidia driver doesn't work with it on. The P4S800D-E Deluxe is very similar is features to the P4C800 Deluxe and I want to make sure that it doesn't suffer from the same problem before I buy it. Sorry, it does suffer the same problem. I've got an nVidia 5700 that's running the XFree86 nv driver because of this issue. Hi, It's a good job I checked first then. Do you know of any boards that offer similar features, but don't have this problem? No, I don't. Someone created a webapp that attempted to rate the performance of mobos for FBSD. The URL is: http://www.eilio.com/freebsd-motherboards/ I just checked it out and it seems to be stale now. There's a MySQL connect error visible on the page. Also, it didn't rate ACPI compatibility/performance which is something you really want to know. -- Regards, Doug ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: tripwire on 5.2.1
I was able to get a really old version in ports to work, but not the most recent build. The old version occasionally crashed on me when running a check on the filesystem. I would look at some of the alternatives to tripwire in ports for a 5.x system. On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, dave wrote: Hello, A while back i tried installing the tripwire port, but it reported as broken. I was wondering is anyone using this on 5.2.1? Thanks. Dave. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: File tree replication in FreeBSD
On Sunday 27 June 2004 15:20, Luke Kearney wrote: On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:48:07 +0400 Kentucky Mandeloid Mo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus: I'm looking for file replication solution for FreeBSD. I have a task to replicate about 11G of files with 500k total files count. I say replication not mirroring i.e. I need to copy modified files to slaves almost imidiately after the change. Tried to find some ready solution but fails. There is FAM from SGI but it fails to work properly on FreeBSD (it makes silly stat(2) calls). kevent(2) also don't have anough API to watch = 500k files. So I see the only way is to have kernel module that watch kernel calls for file operations. So is there some other points to build a file replication? Can I suggest you investigate rsync ? It will allow you to replicate file trees pretty much on demand across a LAN or indeed the internet should you choose to. Works over SSH so it's nice and secure and if you need virtually instant replication you could conceivably run this from a cron job every N minutes. /usr/ports/net/rsync Yes. I use rsync already and its a great tool. But actually its too slow with numbers of fles 100k. Its takes more then 5mins to found just few files to update in list of 500k files. So I decide rsync to be a transport manager for my own replication tool. Right now I'm writing a kernel module that catches all file syscalls that can modify a file. Its almost done exept rmdir unlink calls - I don't know how to get a cwd from a thread. Function kern___getcwd sometimes fails with not a directory error. BTW, whats a good place where can I ask about kernel programming? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: zorp and freebsd
MEZEI Tamas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, is there any way to do transparent proxying in FreeBSD? I'd be happy to have a fully functional Zorp server based on FreeBSD. Transparent proxying is working on Linux via the TPROXY patch, but ipf rdr methods are not really the same. Is there any way to implement that transparent stuff in FreeBSD? Are there any unofficial modifications (don't slap me please ;)? Never heard of Zorp, but I've used Squid for transparent HTTP proxying, worked fine. If you're looking for an overall proxy, I don't know. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cue images
Hello, Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. thanks, Paulo __ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fetchmail question
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 15:02:57 +0545, Bikrant Neupane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry.. I mentioned the wrong header :( Indeed the hearder was added by sendmail. This is the one added by fetchmail Received: from pop2.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.43] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Sun, 27 Jun 2004 00:32:39 +0545 (NPT) Hello! Would you mind posting your .fetchmailrc here? I think it should have a user1 there is user2 here clause. poll server.host with proto POP3 user 'remoteuser' there is 'localuser' here options flush fetchall ssl So mail for remoteuser gets delivered to localuser. Gautam ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fbdev
Hi, Second question in a row... I am trying to configure X to use the linux frame buffer, but when I try to run X, it complains about no fbdev module. It seems X does not come with it installed. Any procedure on getting fbdev working on 4.10? thanks again, Paulo __ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: A SED script
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Kay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: antenneX [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Giorgos Keramidas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: A SED script
On Sunday 27 June 2004 07:49, antenneX wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: antenneX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: A SED script
On 2004-06-26 12:08, antenneX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot get it to work on another file (perl.pl file) to change
the
line:
$OrderNumPrefix = ATX060; to $OrderNumPrefix = ATX070;
I suspect I'm not handling the quotes or other operators
correctly
and it
just ignores the change.
Here's the snippet of the script I'm trying to use:
#!/bin/sh
new=`grep -i new /path/to/newfile`
old=`grep -i new /path/to/oldfile`
It would seem that the variables new and old will both be set to
something
containing 'new' (perhaps not in lower case).
How does this relate to ATX060 and ATX070?
sed -i.bak -e s/$old/$new/ /path/to/myfile
The results depend heavily on the existence and contents of the
two
files
named /path/to/{old,new}file. I'm sure if you change the sed line
to:
sed -i.bak -e 's/ATX060/ATX070/' /path/to/myfile
it will all work fine.
Indeed, this works fine. The old/new files are needed to set the
varibles to hold the new number for the next time as this is run via
cron.
You've still not shown us the relevant lines of /path/to/newfile or
/path/to/oldfile
old = ATX060
new = ATX070
What are these? The contents of /path/to/{new,old}file?
If so sed will be looking to change the string old = ATX060 to
new = ATX070.
Or do the files simply consist of
ATX060
and
ATX070
?
If so then grep is not the right command to load the variables old and
new.
Try:
new=`cat /path/to/newfile`
old=`cat /path/to/oldfile`
Malcolm
I've solved the script ptoblem with a verbose run of the script it
told me exactly what was wrong -- the two varibles newfile oldfile
were not defined properly.
Running this showed the error:
/bin/sh -xv ./myscript
Sorry I didn't think to do this in the first place.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cue images
Paulo Roberto wrote: Hello, Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. thanks, Paulo .bin/.cue files are not standard. Use ports/sysutils/bchunk to convert them to a standard ISO image. -- Jeremy Faulkner http://www.gldis.ca ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: File tree replication in FreeBSD
Kentucky Mandeloid Mo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 27 June 2004 15:20, Luke Kearney wrote: On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:48:07 +0400 Kentucky Mandeloid Mo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake thus: I'm looking for file replication solution for FreeBSD. I have a task to replicate about 11G of files with 500k total files count. I say replication not mirroring i.e. I need to copy modified files to slaves almost imidiately after the change. Tried to find some ready solution but fails. There is FAM from SGI but it fails to work properly on FreeBSD (it makes silly stat(2) calls). kevent(2) also don't have anough API to watch = 500k files. So I see the only way is to have kernel module that watch kernel calls for file operations. So is there some other points to build a file replication? Can I suggest you investigate rsync ? It will allow you to replicate file trees pretty much on demand across a LAN or indeed the internet should you choose to. Works over SSH so it's nice and secure and if you need virtually instant replication you could conceivably run this from a cron job every N minutes. /usr/ports/net/rsync Yes. I use rsync already and its a great tool. But actually its too slow with numbers of fles 100k. Its takes more then 5mins to found just few files to update in list of 500k files. So I decide rsync to be a transport manager for my own replication tool. Right now I'm writing a kernel module that catches all file syscalls that can modify a file. Its almost done exept rmdir unlink calls - I don't know how to get a cwd from a thread. Function kern___getcwd sometimes fails with not a directory error. BTW, whats a good place where can I ask about kernel programming? [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the best place I know of. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using sendmail
- Original Message - From: Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: antenneX [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 7:50 AM Subject: Re: Using sendmail On 2004-06-25 10:12, antenneX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giorgos: Thanks for your review of my setup I did change the IP for server2 back to 200.200.200.102 -- however, now the emails go straight though the firewall port on server1 to sendmail on server2 and apparently bypasses sendmail on server1. If it bypasses sendmail on server1, I cannot use greylisting to filter the emails before being sent over to server2. I'm still missing something here. I'm afraid I haven't kept notes about your network setup, the name and IP address of each server involved, and their Sendmail options. Can you, please, show me what these commands print? Giorgos: Thanks for your patience and willingness to help. As far as sendmail (8.12.11) options, my configs are pretty much out of the box except for the spamassassin majordomo addins. I believe below is all the pertinent info, but if I've missed anything needed, just let me know: server1 = franklin-belle.com (gateway/firewall/nat/router) server2 = antentop.com (server is on same LAN with NAT route from server1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:-) host franklin-belle.com franklin-belle.com has address 65.68.247.73 franklin-belle.com mail is handled (pri=0) by mail.franklin-belle.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]:-) host antentop.com antentop.com has address 65.68.247.75 antentop.com mail is handled (pri=0) by mail.antentop.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]:-) host -t mx franklin-belle.com franklin-belle.com mail is handled (pri=0) by mail.franklin-belle.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]:-) host -t mx antentop.com antentop.com mail is handled (pri=0) by mail.antentop.com local-host-names (franklin-belle.com) franklin-belle.com mail.franklin-belle.com local-host-names (antentop.com) antentop.com mail.antentop.com ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using sendmail - One more file
- Original Message - From: Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: antenneX [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 7:50 AM Subject: Re: Using sendmail On 2004-06-25 10:12, antenneX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giorgos: Thanks for your review of my setup I did change the IP for server2 back to 200.200.200.102 -- however, now the emails go straight though the firewall port on server1 to sendmail on server2 and apparently bypasses sendmail on server1. If it bypasses sendmail on server1, I cannot use greylisting to filter the emails before being sent over to server2. I'm still missing something here. I'm afraid I haven't kept notes about your network setup, the name and IP address of each server involved, and their Sendmail options. I forgot to include the mailertable from server1: mail.antentop.comesmtp.mail.antentop.com No mailertable on server2 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why link broken?!
Hello, freebsd-questions. i downloading a file http://ftp9.us.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/5.2.1/5.2.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso and 200 Mb is now to me, but don't download :( why?! Eugene. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cue images
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:58 -0400 Jeremy Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. .bin/.cue files are not standard. Use ports/sysutils/bchunk to convert them to a standard ISO image. Actually, bin/cue is pretty much standard (at least in the win32 world), and sysutils/cdrdao can burn those without any problem. Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 pgpolPsKkoLAa.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: why link broken?!
Eugene Ivanov wrote: Hello, freebsd-questions. i downloading a file http://ftp9.us.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/5.2.1/5.2.1-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso and 200 Mb is now to me, but don't download :( why?! Eugene. Network problems might be the reason, did you try another host ? If not, please try another one, perhaps that does work. Cheers -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reporter DSINet|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cue images
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 06:55:32AM -0700, Paulo Roberto wrote: Hello, Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. cdrdao does it. Marc ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: any use to build from source?
Kai Grossjohann wrote: Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oh, yes. The first time you run into a problem and fix it yourself, or make a change to the programs to add some feature that you want, you will discover the serious advantages. However, if you never try to fix bugs or write code for yourself, then you aren't going to gain nearly as much from using source compared with using precompiled binaries. How does one deal with local changes in the software when installing as a port? One way is to put your local changes into files/patch-aa [1] using diff format. Other times it's as simple as defining some environment variables by passing them into make, via /etc/make.conf, etc. -- -Chuck [1]: Choose whatever name seems appropriate, perhaps files/patch-src-file.c; the patch-aa naming convention works fine but is depricated. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: next question re the Thinkpad.
Hi Gary: You can look here and see if your Thinkpad runs FreeBSD: The FreeBSD Laptop Compatibility List http://gerda.univie.ac.at/freebsd-laptops/ This list is up to date. I had a 600E Thinkpad running 4.9. The USB printer, scanner and Lexar flash ram storage worked well on it. Kind regards, Jonathan Is anybody using a Thinkpad among the list? I have found one with the ``SMC 2206 compact USB-Ethernet adapter for connecting to ethernet networks.'' In LINT (4.10) I see SMC 2202USB listed. Can anybody help me? gary -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cue images
Miguel Mendez wrote: On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 10:30:58 -0400 Jeremy Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is there any program that runs on fbsd that allows burning cue files? I did not find anything about it on the burncd man page. .bin/.cue files are not standard. Use ports/sysutils/bchunk to convert them to a standard ISO image. Actually, bin/cue is pretty much standard (at least in the win32 world), and sysutils/cdrdao can burn those without any problem. Cheers, What international standard describes their format? Windows is not a standard. -- Jeremy Faulkner http://www.gldis.ca ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OT: Cable management
Bill Sawyer wrote: Jorn Argelo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/26 3:25 PM Main point is, I want to get rid of VGA cables, power cables, PS2 cables, USB cables etcetera. So I have more use of a big cable gutter then a patch panel. Jorn, Sounds like you're a good candidate for a KVM switch, if you have more than one computer in the same workspace. I'd recommend looking on eBay for Cybex KVM switches. Bill Sawyer Information Systems Six Flags St. Louis (636) 938-5300 x. 231 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I already have a KVM switch :-) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: cue images
Jeremy Faulkner wrote: What international standard describes their format? Windows is not a standard. Many times a de-facto standard is just as important/valid as a real standard. /Daniel Eriksson ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Forgot to add...
3BSD wrote: One thing I forgot to add to be previous e-mail about hardware compatibility was that I'm using the DVI port of my graphics card, connected to an LCD display, will that pose any problems? Generally not. To the extent that your configuration of video card and monitor can be treated as a generic (s)VGA display, FreeBSD will be plug-and-play for text mode (booting, console), and will also work genericly under X11. Getting 3D hardware support going for fast OpenGL stuff, and/or doing a multimonitor display mode are more complicated questions, but generally one can get such things working after more tweaking and time spent on your part. -- -Chuck ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[from newbies] RE: IPFW2 + 4.10
On June 28, 2004, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello freebsd-newbies, I am still fairly new at the BSD level, migrated from linux. The question that I have is, is Version 4.10 kernel compiled with IPFW2, I know the doc's say that CURRENT version has and that it was implemented in 2002, yet the doc's say that STABLE does not have it compiled into the kernel. Can some one please clarify -- Best regards, Matt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Matt, (Can't reply on -newbies, it's a list charter thing :).) 4.x versions come from the STABLE branch and, so, do not have ipfw2 compiled in the kernel by default. (Instead, they use the older, and more tested, ipfw.) If you want ipfw2, refer to 'man 8 ipfw', the section using ipfw2 on freebsd-stable, for very good instructions. Regards, Clayton _ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
