Re: HP1320 PCL6
O/H Alexander K. Beros wrote [...] I tried a few of the HP drivers, but the one that finally worked was the deskjet driver (#160 in section 3) -- just for the record, my precise printer model is: hp LaserJet 1320 PCL 6 (60.41.41.0) When in doubt of what driver to use, you can almost always select HP Laserjet III for generic 300dpi printout. This driver has worked perfectly in countless occasions in a wide range of laser printer products, not necessarily of HP. -- RTFM and STFW before anything bad happens _ Thanos Rizoulis Electronic Computing Systems Engineer Larissa, Greece FreeBSD/PCBSD user ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with packages on 6.2
On Friday 08 June 2007 22:37:01 Steve Lake wrote: Ok, I don't know if this is a problem with the ports setup I have on my Freebsd box or something else, but I thought I'd ask anyways. I've got a machine with a fresh copy of 6.2 release on it. Thought I'd be cute and install all the ports first and then go from there. pkg_add -r xorg came up with an error that said the package couldn't be found in the Latest directory. Ok, so I got the direct link to the package it referenced. Can't be found by pkg_add, yet I can download it via a browser just fine. So I dug around in the ALL directory instead and found the latest Xorg package. Gave that to pkg_add and it found it, but then said it couldn't find any of the dependent packages. It's the same story with every single package I try to add with pkg_add that's referenced from the packages directory for 6.2. The error I keep getting is like this: Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/xmms. tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/xmms .tbz' by URL I've even grabbed my ports tree twice and rebuilt my kernel to 6.2 stable and still no change. Anyone have any idea why this isn't working? And how do I, if possible, change the ftp location and path that pkg_add looks at so that it's using something other than the root ftp.freebsd.org server. Maybe something like ftp3.freebsd.org or one of the lesser used ftp servers? Thanks in advance for any answers you can give. :) Please reply directly to me as I'm not on this list right now. (too much mail to sort through) I may be off beam here but are you behind a firewall? Do you need to use passive mode ftp. A look at man pkg_add might help. david ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Xorg problem 6.9 7.2
On Friday 08 June 2007 07:07:03 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Bernt Hansson wrote: [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello I've upgraded Xorg to 7.2 on a 6.2-stable machine according to UPDATING. If I'am trying startx as a normal user I get this error AUDIT: date ¥ time : pid X: client 1 rejected from local host (uid 1001) Xlib: Connection to 0:0 refused by server Xlib: No protocol specified Starting from root no problem. As a normal user /usr/local/bin/startxfce4 starts fine. I'm guessing it's a permissions problem, is it? I suggest you check all the pathnames in your xorg.conf, I had a similar problem and adjusting paths solved them. What paths did you have in mind? I regenerated the xorg.conf file after upgrading. Setting ModulePath /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules is the most important one. I have just completed a portupgrade to 7.2 but have not yet restarted the server. How do I regenerate xorg.conf? Thanks in advance david ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Xorg problem 6.9 7.2
David Southwell wrote: On Friday 08 June 2007 07:07:03 [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Bernt Hansson wrote: [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Bernt Hansson wrote: Hello I've upgraded Xorg to 7.2 on a 6.2-stable machine according to UPDATING. If I'am trying startx as a normal user I get this error AUDIT: date ¥ time : pid X: client 1 rejected from local host (uid 1001) Xlib: Connection to 0:0 refused by server Xlib: No protocol specified Starting from root no problem. As a normal user /usr/local/bin/startxfce4 starts fine. I'm guessing it's a permissions problem, is it? I suggest you check all the pathnames in your xorg.conf, I had a similar problem and adjusting paths solved them. What paths did you have in mind? I regenerated the xorg.conf file after upgrading. Setting ModulePath /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules is the most important one. I have just completed a portupgrade to 7.2 but have not yet restarted the server. How do I regenerate xorg.conf? Thanks in advance david Try running X -configure as root. This will generate an xorg.conf.new file in /root and you can test it by running X -config /root/xorg.conf.new If it works you can then copy it to /etc/X11 and make any other necessary changes. Having upgraded myself, I found I did not need to regenerate the conf, just make the changes suggested in UPDATING like the ModulePath stated above. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Spamassassin Bayes/mySQL + Amavisd-new
I've been getting some nasty spam and need to setup bayes. I'm running amavisd-new with spamassassin. I haven't been able to find any guides... so it's kind of hard. The only one I have been able to find is this one. http://www.maiamailguard.com/maia/wiki/SpamAssassin3SQLBayes but it pertains to maia-mailguard more then amavisd-new. This is my local.cf config: # Enable the Bayes system use_bayes 1 bayes_store_moduleMail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL bayes_sql_dsnDBI:mysql:bayes:localhost bayes_sql_usernamebayes bayes_sql_passwordbayes and I added the SQL that I found on that link; however, it doesn't seem to be connecting. It tried to connect as root, not sure why. Also, is bayasian per user or sitewide? I'm kind of confused as to where I should even start with this because of the lack of guides. I found this: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation/SqlReadmeBayes but it's pretty broad too so i'm not sure. Has anyone done it with amavisd-new? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Spamassassin-Bayes-mySQL-%2B-Amavisd-new-tf3893449.html#a11037822 Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrading from XFree86 to Xorg
Up untill now i have been using XFree86 and being as it is basically no longer updated or maintained, so im wishing to know the basic most easiest way to change over from XFree to Xorg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Woes of xorg 7.2 upgrade ...
I've been struggling now for 2 weeks trying to do the xorg upgrade, following the upgrading instructions to a tee, but it has turned into a complete mess. If worse comes to worse, what it the best way to proceed? Is there an easy way just to reinstall xorg from scratch? Thanks a lot in advance. -- Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem with pw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Eric Dedrick wrote: I'm having a nuisance problem, especially when I try to update my ports. I'm using cups as an example, but other ports show the problem: root# pw usershow cups pw: no such user `cups' root# pw useradd cups -g cups -u 193 pw: user 'cups' already exists Any idea what the problem is and how to fix it? pwd_mkdb(8) perhaps. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGallT8Mjk52CukIwRCBEcAJ0RtLd9ajpxif2Kn+fPAIew5EZ+RQCfSRws JldcvoXVHpIRqxKgJ6+BBf4= =Zdt7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Woes of xorg 7.2 upgrade ...
* Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-09 09:45]: I've been struggling now for 2 weeks trying to do the xorg upgrade, following the upgrading instructions to a tee, but it has turned into a complete mess. If worse comes to worse, what it the best way to proceed? Is there an easy way just to reinstall xorg from scratch? Thanks a lot in advance. -- Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands In such cases the best would be to deinstall xorg with all dependencies and install xorg from scratch. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unable to mount DVD-R Media
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 18:34:33 +1000
Ivan Carey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It happens with all blank dvd -r
It also happened when writing to cd-r in k3b . The disk was written to
but when the verification ot the files written th error occured. The
files were written ok.
a dvd and cd that has been burnt mounts ok
Do you think the problem could be with k3b?
i dont know, i dont use kde.
what happens if you use the OS provided tools:
# from an ISO
growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/cd0=BURN.iso
# From FS
growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/cd0 -R -J -V VolID ./BURN/
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
So limp of brain that for them to conceive an idea is to risk a haemorrhage. So
limp of body that their purple dresses appear no more a dixative of housing nerves and
sinews than when they hang suspended from their hooks
Mervin Peake, Gormenghast, chap. 2, on the Earl's twin sisters
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
.
I am starting to understand things better now thanks
The write problem for the DVD in k3b was the write speed. The disk was
written to ok, I turned off the verify as the error comes up when k3b
reinserts the disk to verify the write.
Thanks,
Ivan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Woes of xorg 7.2 upgrade ...
On Saturday 09 June 2007, Jens B wrote: * Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-06-09 09:45]: I've been struggling now for 2 weeks trying to do the xorg upgrade, following the upgrading instructions to a tee, but it has turned into a complete mess. If worse comes to worse, what it the best way to proceed? Is there an easy way just to reinstall xorg from scratch? Thanks a lot in advance. -- Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands In such cases the best would be to deinstall xorg with all dependencies and install xorg from scratch. hi, Depending on your setup it might be a good idea to remove All the ports installed and check /usr/local ( i guess /usr/X11R6 is already a symlink ) for orphaned files that might get in the way of a new install. To speed up the initial install of xorg you could use binary packages and if you feel like it recompile after from ports... at least you will have X working in the meantime. -- Best Regards, Iulian Margarintescu http://www.erata.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] (spamassassin pf spamd all said it's OK to make it public ;-) ) Key ID: 0x03176E5CEDEFF7AB I prefer plain text email pgpldVinlLuWw.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Upgrading from XFree86 to Xorg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Warren Liddell wrote: Up untill now i have been using XFree86 and being as it is basically no longer updated or maintained, so im wishing to know the basic most easiest way to change over from XFree to Xorg If you're still running XFree86 because you're on a FreeBSD 4.x system where that is the default, then do not even think about trying this as you will completely banjax your system. Upgrade to 6.2 first. 0) Back up your system. You're going to be deleting large swathes of it, and restoring from backup is your only recourse if you need to back out these changes. Also, make a note of all of the ports you have installed for later reference: ls -1 /var/db/pkg | lpr i) Log into the console as root. Stop any X stuff running on other vtys. Delete all X related ports. Something like the following should do the trick: pkg_deinstall -rR XFree86\* Yes, this will delete the majority of the ports you have installed on your machine. ii) Make sure you have your ports tree updated to the latest available. iii) You will probably have some remnants of a /usr/X11R6 filesystem left after deleting XFree86. If not, then create a stub directory temporarily by 'mkdir /usr/X11R6' iv) Merge anything left under /usr/X11R6 into /usr/local and do various other configuration tweaks: sh /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/mergebase.sh Follow the instructions this script prints out. If it finds files etc. left laying about under the /usr/X11R6 tree it will ask you to clear them up and then try again. eg. /usr/X11R6/man/whatis, which can just be deleted as it is automatically generated from the installed man pages. Other files you'll have to decide on a case by case basis. Anyhow, keep trying that script and moving away stuff it can't cope with until the script reports success. After this procedure /usr/X11R6 should be a sym-link pointing at /usr/local v) Install the new Xorg: portinstall x11/xorg If you're using the x11/nvidia driver, then reinstall that at this point. vi) Generate a new /etc/X11/xorg.conf file and customise it according to your preferences: X -configure [...etc...] At this point 'startx' should bring up X successfully and get you into a screen configured with the correct resolution and colour depth etc. vii) Reinstall any X client software you still require. This is where the list created in (0) comes in handy. This is where you'ld reinstall Gnome or KDE, plus any applications like Firefox or Gimp. Note: beware of using pkg_add to install pre-compiled ports. pkg_add by default will attempt to install packages from the set compiled at the time the OS was released, and those (of course) pre-date Xorg 7.2 going into the ports tree. If you want to use precompiled packages make sure you download them from the 'Latest' directory. Compiling your own via the ports is recommended[*] -- it takes longer, but the results are more certain. [*] With certain exceptions, like OpenOffice viii) Enjoy. I wouldn't characterise this procedure as either 'basic' or 'easy' -- it's certainly going to take a great deal of compiling stuff and you shouldn't attempt it unless you can afford several days without a working X environment. However, if you're careful and don't try any short cuts it should work well and be completely effective. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGamXP8Mjk52CukIwRCFcOAJ46/OmPLoHZYlv9W23aNCRu5yxOJwCfTKHk zSIjPENSsCDBI46SITxBiwE= =MGkT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Woes of xorg 7.2 upgrade ...
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 08:54:43 +0200 Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been struggling now for 2 weeks trying to do the xorg upgrade, following the upgrading instructions to a tee, but it has turned into a complete mess. If worse comes to worse, what it the best way to proceed? Is there an easy way just to reinstall xorg from scratch? Thanks a lot in advance. -- Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands Hi Kiffin. You don't tell us the output of your complete mess. The best way to proceed is follow step by step what say the file /usr/ports/UPDATING, chunk 20070519. It's the more simple and easy way for get Xorg 7.2 running on your FreeBSD 6.2 machine. Before do just this portupgrade -a i was triying with portmanager -u -l and others stuffs on my way, but it can't got it. Keep trying. It isn't very dificult. Regards. Jose. -- http://www.lordofunix.org/ Not Registered GNU/Hurd User. Registered BSD User 51101. Registered Linux User #213309. Memories. You are talking about memories. Rick Deckard. Blade Runner. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: USB optical mouse issue in x
Hi, Here is my configuration. The first two lines are dmesg output on my mouse, the rest is from my xorg.conf file: ums0: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/11.10, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. Section InputDevice Identifier Mouse0 Driver mouse Option CorePointer Option Protocol Auto Option Device /dev/sysmouse Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 Option Emulate3Buttons true EndSection Thanks. Dave. - Original Message - From: Nikola Lecic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 9:44 PM Subject: Re: USB optical mouse issue in x On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 11:44:34 -0400 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Thanks for your reply. No, no buttons work at all, as i said the mouse cursor moves, but can't click, and yes it does work on the console under moused. Do i need moused running for x? Are you sure you have something like Section InputDevice [...] Option ButtonNumber 5 Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 in your /etc/X11/xorg.conf? Nikola Lečić ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problem attaching ELI encrypted disk device
Hi: I have an encrypted /home partition using ELI. Recently I changed password for the encrypted partition and now the following problem consistently occurs: At boot I am queried for a password for the ELI partition, I enter et correctly - six times - but it fails every time. After the sixth failure the rc script aborts, I am queried for the root password and enter. I am then able to run # geli attach /dev/ad0s2d manually and attach the encrypted device. Then I can run rc manually and the machine completes the startup without further problems. What has happened? How do I solve this? Thanks, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: 6to4 IPv6 problems FreeBSD 6.2 p4
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 01:01:49PM -0700, Ofloo wrote: Ofloo wrote: I use 6to4 IPv6 tunnels, when using applications which use a lot of bandwidth (400kb/s), it is not that much but still, the server gets in trouble. May 28 19:51:21 narf kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate route for 192.88.99.1 May 28 19:51:22 narf kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate route for 192.88.99.1 May 28 20:06:15 narf kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate route for 192.88.99.1 May 28 20:09:02 narf kernel: arpresolve: can't allocate route for 192.88.99.1 The default route does exist though: narf# netstat -rn -f inet6 | grep default default 2002:c058:6301:: UGS stf0 narf# when this happens it takes about 10 mins and my ssh IPv6 ssh session is closed, after keeping this up for longer the server crashes, .. any suggestions ? Using a different default gateway solved this for now, though I don't think a server should crash if its gateway is in trouble, .. Submit a bug report with the panic backtrace, etc. Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where am I supposed to get those, I'm sure it's causing it, I'm running 6to4 on a machine which has never crashed on me, I did a ping while the 6to4 relay was down and it crashed. Suggestions where I can find this panic report, .. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/6to4-IPv6-problems-FreeBSD-6.2-p4-tf3829352.html#a11038960 Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mfi RAID monitoring
Hello, the mfi(4) manpage briefly mentions the /dev/mfi? device, and that it provides a simple management interface. Is there any way to monitor the health of an array (the only thing of interest in this case) using this interface, other than getting the proprietary Linux blob to work? (I could not get the latter to work.) -- / Peter Schuller PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller [EMAIL PROTECTED]' Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.scode.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Solved: Problem attaching ELI encrypted disk device
Erik Norgaard wrote: I have an encrypted /home partition using ELI. Recently I changed password for the encrypted partition The previous config used a key, changing the password I did not specify the key so it is no longer in use - duh! Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Increase in the number of ports: upgrade xorg to 7.2...
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:07:25PM -0400, Gerard wrote: On June 08, 2007 at 03:48PM Bill Moran wrote: [snip] It's not an assumption, its OPTIMISM! That reminds me of an optimist who fell off of a fifty story building. As he passed each floor on the way down, he yelled, So, so far! Seriously, I hope you are right. I believe it was 'gettext' that was updated a short time age. That update caused me all sorts of dependency problems. My shell, bash, would no longer work, etc. Over a hundred ports had to be updated to get everything back on an even keel. That is the sort of problem I am worried about. Hopefully, it won't happen. FYI, if you'd used an upgrade tool like portupgrade it would have been seamless because portupgrade keeps the old library version around for precisely this reason. Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD arp proxy
Dear All,
I have a problem configuring routing. Here is how my setup looks:
Internet - - - ADSL modem (bridge mode) - - - FreeBSD BOX - - - - - - - Switch
- - - - - - - Server 1
IPOA: 196.218.x.97 vr1: 196.218.x.98
|bge0: 196.218.x.100
|
|
|
Server 2
eth0: 196.218.x.101
The idea is to give public IPs to servers behind FreeBSD firewall. I don't want
to assagin IP addresses to FreeBSD BOX and use binat. I want to servers have IP
assigned to their interfaces so I can
reach them directly from internet.
Someone told me that I have to use arp proxy. As I know FreeBSD has builtin arp
proxy using userland arp utillity.
When I added arp -s 196.218.x.100 mac_address_of_server1 perm pub . I still
couldn't reach 196.218.x.100 .
Ofcoure I will have to add: no nat on $ext_if from { 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.7 } to
any .
Thank you in advance,
Dominik
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: failure in xorg 7.2 compile of vblank.c
On 09/06/07, Robin Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am trying the build from scratch route of xorg 7.2. cc -c -I. -I../../../../../src/mesa/drivers/dri/common -Iserver -I../../../../../include -I../../../../../include/GL/internal -I../../../../../src/mesa -I../../../../../src/mesa/main -I../../../../../src/mesa/glapi -I../../../../../src/mesa/math -I../../../../../src/mesa/transform -I../../../../../src/mesa/shader -I../../../../../src/mesa/swrast -I../../../../../src/mesa/swrast_setup -I../../../../../src/egl/main -I../../../../../src/egl/drivers/dri `pkg-config --cflags libdrm` -I/usr/local/include -Wall -O -Wmissing-prototypes -std=c99 -Wundef -ffast-math -DUSE_X86_ASM -DUSE_MMX_ASM -DUSE_3DNOW_ASM -DUSE_SSE_ASM -I/usr/local/include -DPTHREADS -DUSE_EXTERNAL_DXTN_LIB=1 -DIN_DRI_DRIVER -DGLX_DIRECT_RENDERING -DGLX_INDIRECT_RENDERING -DHAVE_ALIAS ../common/vblank.c -o ../common/vblank.o ../common/vblank.c: In function `driGetCurrentVBlank': ../common/vblank.c:306: error: `DRM_VBLANK_SECONDARY' undeclared (first use in this function) ../common/vblank.c:306: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ../common/vblank.c:306: error: for each function it appears in.) ../common/vblank.c: In function `driWaitForVBlank': ../common/vblank.c:363: error: `DRM_VBLANK_SECONDARY' undeclared (first use in this function) ignore this I figured out it was caused by an unistalled libdrm package. -- Robin Becker ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
failure in xorg 7.2 compile of vblank.c
Robin Becker writes: ../common/vblank.c:306: error: for each function it appears in.) ../common/vblank.c: In function `driWaitForVBlank': ../common/vblank.c:363: error: `DRM_VBLANK_SECONDARY' undeclared (first use in this function) I got bit by this: you need to reinstall - by hand if necessary graphics/dri, and possible graphics/libdrm. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: rsync install md5 error
Great...thanks a lot.. Greetz 2007/6/8, Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2007/6/8, Beech Rintoul [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Friday 08 June 2007, Agus said: Hi all, I am trying to install /usr/ports/net/rsync and i am getting MD5 checksum mismatch for rsync-2.6.6.tar.gz then it says if u are sure u want to override this check, type make NO_CHECKSUM=yes What does it mean that the MD5 and sha256 checksums are wrong? How can i solve it?? Try make distclean then make install clean. Cheers, Beech On Friday 08 June 2007, Agus said: I see that in samba.org the version is 2.6.9...so my bsd tries to download it from another place is there a way to make install version 2.6.9 instead of the default that is trying?? 2.6.9 is the current version. You need to update your ports tree. See the handbook for details. Beech -- --- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R/announce.html --- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD arp proxy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dominik Zalewski wrote:
Dear All,
I have a problem configuring routing. Here is how my setup looks:
Internet - - - ADSL modem (bridge mode) - - - FreeBSD BOX - - - - - - -
Switch - - - - - - - Server 1
IPOA: 196.218.x.97vr1: 196.218.x.98|
bge0: 196.218.x.100
|
|
|
Server 2
eth0:
196.218.x.101
The idea is to give public IPs to servers behind FreeBSD firewall. I
don't want to assagin IP addresses to FreeBSD BOX and use binat. I
want to servers have IP assigned to their interfaces so I can reach
them directly from internet.
Someone told me that I have to use arp proxy. As I know FreeBSD has
builtin arp proxy using userland arp utillity.
When I added arp -s 196.218.x.100 mac_address_of_server1 perm pub . I
still couldn't reach 196.218.x.100 .
Ofcoure I will have to add: no nat on $ext_if from { 10.0.0.3,
10.0.0.7 } to any .
The usual solution to this sort of problem is to divide up your
allocated range of IP numbers into subnets and set up your firewall
to route one or more of those subnets to the machines behind it.
However, given the numbers you quote I suspect that your network
allocation is 196.218.x.96/29 -- which gives you a network address
(.96), 6 host addresses (.97 -- .102) and a broadcast address (.103)
As you'ld need to sacrifice two more of those addresses to divide the
range into two /30 blocks, and you need three host IPs for your back end
network, so that isn't going to be feasible.
It might be possible to reduce this idea to its ultimate level and
set up individual host routes to each of the back-end servers on the
FreeBSD firewall:
route add -host 196.218.x.101 -interface 12.34.56.78
where 12.34.56.78 should be replaced by the IP of the interface
plugged into your back-end switch. '12.34.56.78' should be on a
different network than 192.218.x.96/29 -- so just grab something out
of the RFC1918 address space. While you're about it, you will
probably find it helps to give your back-end servers all RFC1918
addresses with the routable 192.218.x.96/29 addresses as aliases on
the interfaces.
You'ld need to generate equivalent host routes for each of your back
end hosts, and you'ld need an equivalent host route on the back-end
machines to reach the firewall:
route add -host 192.168.x.97 12.34.56.78
as well as setting 12.34.56.78 as the 'defaultrouter' in /etc/rc.conf.
Warning: completely untested. Should work in theory, but...
Cheers,
Matthew
- --
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
Kent, CT11 9PW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGaqyd8Mjk52CukIwRCEpeAJ47a6oAGRcm49i05/MBVM73vSrVgACfXB+1
C0HnSuhr5lVG4eb7AmaT6/g=
=3LJ0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD arp proxy
On Saturday 09 June 2007 04:35:25 pm Matthew Seaman wrote:
Dominik Zalewski wrote:
Dear All,
I have a problem configuring routing. Here is how my setup looks:
Internet - - - ADSL modem (bridge mode) - - - FreeBSD BOX - - - - - - -
Switch - - - - - - - Server 1 IPOA: 196.218.x.97vr1: 196.218.x.98
| bge0: 196.218.x.100
Server 2 eth0: 196.218.x.101
The idea is to give public IPs to servers behind FreeBSD firewall. I
don't want to assagin IP addresses to FreeBSD BOX and use binat. I
want to servers have IP assigned to their interfaces so I can reach
them directly from internet.
Someone told me that I have to use arp proxy. As I know FreeBSD has
builtin arp proxy using userland arp utillity.
When I added arp -s 196.218.x.100 mac_address_of_server1 perm pub . I
still couldn't reach 196.218.x.100 .
Ofcoure I will have to add: no nat on $ext_if from { 10.0.0.3,
10.0.0.7 } to any .
The usual solution to this sort of problem is to divide up your
allocated range of IP numbers into subnets and set up your firewall
to route one or more of those subnets to the machines behind it.
However, given the numbers you quote I suspect that your network
allocation is 196.218.x.96/29 -- which gives you a network address
(.96), 6 host addresses (.97 -- .102) and a broadcast address (.103)
As you'ld need to sacrifice two more of those addresses to divide the
range into two /30 blocks, and you need three host IPs for your back end
network, so that isn't going to be feasible.
It might be possible to reduce this idea to its ultimate level and
set up individual host routes to each of the back-end servers on the
FreeBSD firewall:
route add -host 196.218.x.101 -interface 12.34.56.78
where 12.34.56.78 should be replaced by the IP of the interface
plugged into your back-end switch. '12.34.56.78' should be on a
different network than 192.218.x.96/29 -- so just grab something out
of the RFC1918 address space. While you're about it, you will
probably find it helps to give your back-end servers all RFC1918
addresses with the routable 192.218.x.96/29 addresses as aliases on
the interfaces.
You'ld need to generate equivalent host routes for each of your back
end hosts, and you'ld need an equivalent host route on the back-end
machines to reach the firewall:
route add -host 192.168.x.97 12.34.56.78
as well as setting 12.34.56.78 as the 'defaultrouter' in /etc/rc.conf.
Warning: completely untested. Should work in theory, but...
Cheers,
Matthew
I bridged vr1 and rl1. Everything seems to work fine:)
Thanks anyway,
Dominik
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: amvisd-new set up difficulty
hey wassup dhaneshki must tell you, after i set up postgrey for postfix, i only
got like 1 spam a week, as opposed to 1000 a day. after i removed amavisd-new,
spamassassin and all that overly complex bullshit... it made no differencetry
it out, keep the system clean, good luckkyrre- Original Message -From:
dhaneshk k [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: Monday, May 28, 2007 10:38 amSubject:
amvisd-new set up difficultyTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi , this is Dhanesh , by the way of finding
a solution for spam controll I come across one tutorial Postfix and
SpamAssassin By Grzegorz , So I followed the foresaid tutorial .. URL
:http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200309/postfix-spamassassin.html. Hope some of
you may be the right one to help me to controll spams in my mail system.If
not please introduce me to some experts who knows this configuration so I
can touch with them. { These all are I configured in a test machine
(FreeBSD 6.0, POSTFIX running fine in this test machine ..I can send test
mails between local users in this test machine So if this setup is good
then I can install amavis-new in my server and can controll spams
effectively) So I want to check whether this configuration is correct ya
not , for that please give some inputs( imean spam i/ps and how I know
this is blocking spams .. and I want to ask you what I have to add more for
the three line in amavisd.conf HERE I AM ATTCHING THE amvisd.conf file
read_hash(\%whitelist_sender, '/var/amavis/whitelist');
read_hash(\%blacklist_sender, '/var/amavis/blacklist');
read_hash(\%spam_lovers, '/var/amavis/spam_lovers'); }I had a
FreeBSD-6.0 box with postfix and mailman working fine .The problem is that
my mailing list members including me getting lots of spams daily ..so I
really got in trouble . From the tutorial I uderstood that by
installing amavisd-new will solve the problem so I went ahead with this
.. SpamAssain razor also coming with this amavisd-new (they are integrated
with is package ). So a box with freeebsd6.0 ,with postfix clamav etc
installed in it .. (I have installed clamav before following the tutorial
through usr/ports in FreeBSD box) SO I thought this AntiVirus clamav may
be sufficent for using with amavisd-new and after this I followed the
turorial for postfix and spamassassin step by step upto section IV
Section IV - Notifications/DSN, BOUNCE/REJECT/DROP/PASS destiny,
quarantine. You may want to set these variables: $notify_sender_templ
$notify_virus_sender_templ $notify_virus_admin_templ
$notify_virus_recips_templ $notify_spam_sender_templ
$notify_spam_admin_templ What valuses to set for this variables ,there is
no such variables in the amavisd.conf file so I added this in the file and
confused of giving what values to this variables ? so I commented these 6
variables and follwed the tutorial upto section V
read_hash(\%whitelist_sender, '/var/amavis/whitelist');
read_hash(\%blacklist_sender, '/var/amavis/blacklist');
read_hash(\%spam_lovers, '/var/amavis/spam_lovers'); these three lines I
just added in amavisd.conf ( I dont know whether to add any thing else so
I added the following lines from the tutorial to the amvisd.conf file map
{ $whitelist_sender{lc($_)}=1 } (qw( freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [EMAIL
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] )); and I went to
section vii added these 2 line $sa_local_tests_only = 0;
$sa_auto_whitelist = 1; and clamav I installed through ports so I commented
all the lines except the ones related to clamav section. then have
done # su - vscan $ touch blacklist whitelist spam_lovers $ mkdir tmp
but tmp dir is already here so its not needed to create it explicitly..
then followd spamassassin local.cf configuration as in the tutorial exactly
.. But ther is no .spamassassin dir in /var/amavis so i created
this .spamassassin dir here and then given the command below . $ touch
/var/amavis/.spamassassin/user_prefs Then razor and Bayesian learning
configured as in the tutorial then executed the command
/usr/local/sbin/amavisd debug But the debug output I dont know if it
correct ya not so I am adding the debug output here Please let me know all
my configurations correct ya not ? and in
/usr/ports/security/amavisd-new/work ther is no work directory and sample spam
files , so let me give some sample spam code so I ca test it .. NB: can
you send a sample copy of amavisd.conf , spamassassin local.cf , If my
configuration is not looking proper one in your view .
/usr/local/sbin/amavisd debug o/p don# /usr/local/sbin/amavisd debug May 25
10:29:53 don.localdomain /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[1599]: starting.
/usr/local/sbin/amavisd at don.localdomain amavisd-new-2.5.0 (20070423),
Unicode aware May 25 10:29:53 don.localdomain /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[1599]:
user=, EUID: 0
Re: USB optical mouse issue in x
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 04:56:15 -0400 Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Here is my configuration. The first two lines are dmesg output on my mouse, the rest is from my xorg.conf file: ums0: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/11.10, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. Section InputDevice Identifier Mouse0 Driver mouse Option CorePointer Option Protocol Auto Option Device /dev/sysmouse Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 Option Emulate3Buttons true EndSection Well, try simply this: Section InputDevice Identifier Mouse0 Driver mouse Option Protocol auto Option Device/dev/sysmouse Option ButtonNumber 5 Option ZAxisMapping 4 5 # or just Option ButtonNumber 3, without ZAxiaMapping EndSection and check if InputDevice Mouse0CorePointer is present in Section ServerLayout. Also, have you tried to switch the mouse from ps/2 - usb and vice versa? Nikola Lečić ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X.org 7.2 keyboard layout switching does not work
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:38:53AM +0300, Vlad GURDIGA wrote: Hello! After upgrading to Xorg 7.2 by the book (/usr/ports/UPDATING), I could not switch my keyboard layouts as I did with the previous version. Even more, I could not switch to text-mode console using Ctrl-Alt-F1. After I've regenerated a new xorg.conf using Xorg -configure, I was able to switch to text-mode console, but after adding the two lines for keyboard layout switch (from my old xorg.conf): Option XkbLayout us,ro Option XKbOptions grp:alt_shift_toggle Ctrl-Alt-F1 stopped working and the keyboard layout switching did not work. Google gave me some hints from the Gentoo documentation site regarding the imposibility to switch to text-mode console, but the solutions provided there did not work for me. Are there any substantial changes in the way that keyboard layout switching works in X.org 7.2 vs. 6.9? # uname -a FreeBSD kpax 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #2: Sat Jun 2 20:00:40 EEST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Try to install xkeyboard-config-0.8 instead of 0.9 that is currently available in ports tree. http://exitcode.org/freebsd/xkeyboard-config-0.8.tar.gz Works for me as long as the problem with newest version will be resolved. -- Marek Holly [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using courier with dspam
HI all I'm having some difficulty with getting courier to work with dspam. I have the courier local delivery agent configured to be: DEFAULTDELIVERY=| /usr/local/bin/dspam --deliver=innocent --user \$USER And I have dspam configured to use courier's maildrop: TrustedDeliveryAgent /usr/local/bin/maildrop -d %u UntrustedDeliveryAgent /usr/local/bin/maildrop -d %u Now, mail fails to be delivered with: Jun 9 12:26:08 server courierlocal: id=02D2B4BC.466AFC77.2769,from=[EMAIL PROTECTED],addr=[EMAIL PROTECTED] .com: /usr/local/bin/dspam: Permission denied Dspam is suid root, with group courier, and owner/group execute permissions. I believe courierlocal runs as courier:courier; in addition I tried making it suid courier to be sure. The various Maildir's in user accounts have group courier, with group rwx permissions, and all the files within them have group courier with group rw permissions. So I don't understand why I get this error. Any suggestions would be welcome, thanks! -g ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Php5 port and Apache Module
I can see that if I build the php5 port it defaults to CLI and CGI mode but the Apache module is not built. Am I wrong when I assume that the Apache Module will have the best performance? I guess that I'd just like to understand the engineering decisions behind the default in the port's configuration. -- Chris -- __o All I was doing was trying to get home from work. _`\,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___ Christopher Sean Hiltonchris | at | vindaloo.com pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
USB disk and write cache
How do you set a USB disk's write cache to write-through mode? As far as I can tell, putting hw.ata.wc=0 in loader.conf only affects directly connected PATA/SATA disks, not disks connected via a USB-to-*ATA bridge. Perhaps via camcontrol? But camcontrol modepage da0 -l -v returns nothing. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bery does not work on FreeBSD 7-CURRENT
Hello, I've installed beryl today (tried both: from packages and compiled from updated ports) on a FreeBSD 7-CURRENT. When I run beryl from console I get this: # beryl Something went wrong with Xgl detection. Something went wrong with Nvidia detection.Something went wrong with system check. When I run beryl-manager I get this: # beryl-manager # glxinfo: not found ** (beryl-manager:95111): WARNING **: No pidof, this may not work right. ** (beryl-manager:95111): WARNING **: No pidof, this may not work right. ** (beryl-manager:95111): WARNING **: No pidof, this may not work right. ** (beryl-manager:95111): WARNING **: No pidof, this may not work right. The red diamond on beryl manager apears in the upper notification area of GNOME desktop, but when I try to select the beryl window manager from it's contextual menu, there is a flicker and in less than a second everything is beck to normal look. When I run beryl-settings I get this: # beryl-settings Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/bin/beryl-settings, line 22, in ? --- endless pause -- ^CFatal error 'Thread is not system scope. ' at line 316 in file /usr/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_sig.c (errno = 2) Abort Do I miss a package or something? Or it is just because of the development version on FreeBSD? Or maybe it is because of my ATI Radeon videocard? The Xorg 7.2 and xf86-video-ati-6.6.3_2 were installed by the book (/usr/port/UPDATING) and work fine. Here is my uname -a: # uname -a FreeBSD kpax 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #3: Mon Jun 4 00:03:11 EEST 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Php5 port and Apache Module
The php4 php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0. Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done anything in any way of justifying removing the apache module from the default setting or re-enable it as the default. This has forced all php4/5 users who want to use php in apache to compile it manually with the apache module option selected during the make install of the port. When it was part of the default the php4/5 package was so quick to install and ready to work with apache without any special handling. Hope you have better luck finding the justification for it being removed from the default. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher Hilton Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 3:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; User Questions Subject: Php5 port and Apache Module I can see that if I build the php5 port it defaults to CLI and CGI mode but the Apache module is not built. Am I wrong when I assume that the Apache Module will have the best performance? I guess that I'd just like to understand the engineering decisions behind the default in the port's configuration. -- Chris -- __o All I was doing was trying to get home from work. _`\,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___ Christopher Sean Hiltonchris | at | vindaloo.com pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xorg failed to start after upgrading to 7.2
After upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error when I start X. (EE) Failed to load module xtt (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module module (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module kbd (module does not exist, 0 ) Before upgrading Xorg, I just upgraded FreeBSD from 6.0 to 6.2. Please help me! Xihong -- Get a free email account with anti spam protection. http://www.bluebottle.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Xorg failed to start after upgrading to 7.2
Xihong Yin wrote: After upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error when I start X. (EE) Failed to load module xtt (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module module (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module kbd (module does not exist, 0 ) Before upgrading Xorg, I just upgraded FreeBSD from 6.0 to 6.2. Please help me! Xihong -- Get a free email account with anti spam protection. http://www.bluebottle.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quick guess: you are still using the same xorg.conf from your 6.8 install. You need to change the ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Php5 port and Apache Module
Bob wrote: The php4 php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0. Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done anything in any way of justifying removing the apache module from the default setting or re-enable it as the default. This has forced all php4/5 users who want to use php in apache to compile it manually with the apache module option selected during the make install of the port. When it was part of the default the php4/5 package was so quick to install and ready to work with apache without any special handling. Hope you have better luck finding the justification for it being removed from the default. I've been operating under the assumption that: There is some configuration you can do in /usr/local/etc/apache*/httpd.conf to get apache to use the CGI version of php; That this can be done without requiring a shebang (#! ...) line at the beginning of every php script; And that using php as a CGI script offers better performance than running it as an apache module. Looking on the internet though I cannot seem to find a set of instructions for configuring php-cgi in apache2. And once I do find the configuration I'll have to have a shebang at the start of every php module. Further all the performance comparisons that I've seen seem show that the performance of php as a FastCGI script and as an Apache Module are about equal. I don't want to get into a war. I'm still assuming that the port maintainer knows something that I don't. If I cannot get this running soon I guess that I will go back to mod_php5 and revisit this later. -- Chris -- __o All I was doing was trying to get home from work. _`\,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___ Christopher Sean Hiltonchris | at | vindaloo.com pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Php5 port and Apache Module
Bob wrote: The php4 php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0. Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done anything in any way of justifying removing the apache module from the default setting or re-enable it as the default. This has forced all php4/5 users who want to use php in apache to compile it manually with the apache module option selected during the make install of the port. When it was part of the default the php4/5 package was so quick to install and ready to work with apache without any special handling. Hope you have better luck finding the justification for it being removed from the default. I've been operating under the assumption that: There is some configuration you can do in /usr/local/etc/apache*/httpd.conf to get apache to use the CGI version of php; That this can be done without requiring a shebang (#! ...) line at the beginning of every php script; And that using php as a CGI script offers better performance than running it as an apache module. Looking on the internet though I cannot seem to find a set of instructions for configuring php-cgi in apache2. And once I do find the configuration I'll have to have a shebang at the start of every php module. Further all the performance comparisons that I've seen seem show that the performance of php as a FastCGI script and as an Apache Module are about equal. I don't want to get into a war. I'm still assuming that the port maintainer knows something that I don't. If I cannot get this running soon I guess that I will go back to mod_php5 and revisit this later. -- Chris -- __o All I was doing was trying to get home from work. _`\,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___ Christopher Sean Hiltonchris | at | vindaloo.com pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 ___ seems like it was removed from the default config of lang/php5 for security reasons. many people who do build php5 do not need the apache module, so no sense building it if its not needed. cd /usr/ports/lang/php5 make config (edit your choices) make deinstall make reinstall its just one of those things that you learn to live with after a while. cheers, -- Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
problems building ftgl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Whenever I try to build blender, it stops at ftgl, and I get: checking GL/gl.h usability... no checking GL/gl.h presence... no checking for GL/gl.h... no configure: error: GL/gl.h is needed exit: Illegal number: please exit: Illegal number: please *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/ftgl. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/blender-devel This is a headless system, so I don't have any GUIs installed. I'm just trying to install the minimum X needed for blender - so I may be missing something. The whole xorg 7.2 build process was clear as mud for me. Thanks for any help you can provide. - -- Eric Mesa [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ericsbinaryworld.com Note: All emails from this address should have a GPG signature. If you have the proper setup you can use this to confirm my identity and that the email was not changed in transit. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGayUBPvU+8ApmWXIRAjBkAKCE5Xm03IMGZxGPpzlItW4ZFpe3gACgkigA KLeEA5GY/N1+LksA7Vippow= =sTn0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what causes error -- ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found
I have multiple FreeBSD 6.2 machines with different hardware, but one of them encountered this strange error when running program wine. I could not figure out what causes such error since /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 absolutely exists, otherwise no program will run. It does not matter if the wine is pre-compiled in packages or I built it from ports. All other machine do NOT have such problem. I reinstalled this machine a few times, and it always does the same thing. However other programs run well. Would this is related to some particular hardware issue? This one is ECS 848P-A7 motherboard with Intel P4 506+ CPU, plus 2 GB memory. Other machines are HP AMD64 laptop, DELL Dual XEON, DELL Intel Laptop, and AMD XP 2100+, and none of them ever had such problem. 129 /data: ldd `which wine` /usr/local/bin/wine: ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found /usr/local/bin/wine: signal 6 130 /data: ll /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 158712 Jan 11 23:39 /libexec/ld-elf.so.1* 131 /data: wine ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found Abort 132 /data: which wine /usr/local/bin/wine Does someone have an idea what is happening here? -Jin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrading from XFree86 to Xorg
At 06:33 PM 9/06/2007, Matthew Seaman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Warren Liddell wrote: Up untill now i have been using XFree86 and being as it is basically no longer updated or maintained, so im wishing to know the basic most easiest way to change over from XFree to Xorg If you're still running XFree86 because you're on a FreeBSD 4.x system where that is the default, then do not even think about trying this as you will completely banjax your system. Upgrade to 6.2 first. All ready running 6.2-STABLE .. so will give your steps a try and see how things go from there. Thanks for the info. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what causes error -- ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found
Finally find cause but no idea why -- in kernel configuration, following line causes the problem: options MAXDSIZ=(2097152U*1024) Can anyone explain why this can cause /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not seen for some program? Jin Guojun [VFFS] wrote: I have multiple FreeBSD 6.2 machines with different hardware, but one of them encountered this strange error when running program wine. I could not figure out what causes such error since /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 absolutely exists, otherwise no program will run. It does not matter if the wine is pre-compiled in packages or I built it from ports. All other machine do NOT have such problem. I reinstalled this machine a few times, and it always does the same thing. However other programs run well. Would this is related to some particular hardware issue? This one is ECS 848P-A7 motherboard with Intel P4 506+ CPU, plus 2 GB memory. Other machines are HP AMD64 laptop, DELL Dual XEON, DELL Intel Laptop, and AMD XP 2100+, and none of them ever had such problem. 129 /data: ldd `which wine` /usr/local/bin/wine: ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found /usr/local/bin/wine: signal 6 130 /data: ll /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 158712 Jan 11 23:39 /libexec/ld-elf.so.1* 131 /data: wine ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found Abort 132 /data: which wine /usr/local/bin/wine Does someone have an idea what is happening here? -Jin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what causes error -- ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found
I believe that this is a memory sub-system bug somewhere because anything equal to or below 1G options MAXDSIZ=(1024*1024*1024) will work regardless how many memory is installed in the system. I doubt this could be a hardware related issue although is memory size related. Finally find cause but no idea why -- in kernel configuration, following line causes the problem: options MAXDSIZ=(2097152U*1024) Can anyone explain why this can cause /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not seen for some program? Jin Guojun [VFFS] wrote: I have multiple FreeBSD 6.2 machines with different hardware, but one of them encountered this strange error when running program wine. I could not figure out what causes such error since /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 absolutely exists, otherwise no program will run. It does not matter if the wine is pre-compiled in packages or I built it from ports. All other machine do NOT have such problem. I reinstalled this machine a few times, and it always does the same thing. However other programs run well. Would this is related to some particular hardware issue? This one is ECS 848P-A7 motherboard with Intel P4 506+ CPU, plus 2 GB memory. Other machines are HP AMD64 laptop, DELL Dual XEON, DELL Intel Laptop, and AMD XP 2100+, and none of them ever had such problem. 129 /data: ldd `which wine` /usr/local/bin/wine: ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found /usr/local/bin/wine: signal 6 130 /data: ll /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 158712 Jan 11 23:39 /libexec/ld-elf.so.1* 131 /data: wine ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found Abort 132 /data: which wine /usr/local/bin/wine Does someone have an idea what is happening here? -Jin -- Jin Guojun --- v --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Distributed Systems Department http://www.dsd.lbl.gov/~jin Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Xorg failed to start after upgrading to 7.2
Thank you for answering my question. I did change my ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules in my xorg.conf file. Under my /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules, there are no such libs as xtt, vesa, mouse, and kbd. Xihong On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Manolis Kiagias wrote: Xihong Yin wrote: After upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error when I start X. (EE) Failed to load module xtt (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module module (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module kbd (module does not exist, 0 ) Before upgrading Xorg, I just upgraded FreeBSD from 6.0 to 6.2. Please help me! Xihong -- Get a free email account with anti spam protection. http://www.bluebottle.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quick guess: you are still using the same xorg.conf from your 6.8 install. You need to change the ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules -- Get a free email address with REAL anti-spam protection. http://www.bluebottle.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Php5 port and Apache Module
Jonathan Horne wrote: Bob wrote: The php4 php5 port apache module used to be default before FBSD 6.0. Many people before you on this list have wanted the php4/5 apache module turned back on as default but so far the port maintainer has not done anything in any way of justifying removing the apache module from the default setting or re-enable it as the default. [snip] seems like it was removed from the default config of lang/php5 for security reasons. many people who do build php5 do not need the apache module, so no sense building it if its not needed. cd /usr/ports/lang/php5 make config (edit your choices) make deinstall make reinstall its just one of those things that you learn to live with after a while. Everyone seems to be misunderstanding my question. I'm aware of how to build mod_php5. I'm curious about why the default configuration builds php5 as a standalone CLI and CGI rather than as an apache module. I'm assuming that there is some good engineering behind this decision but I'd like to know a little more about that engineering. Is there some advantage to running php as a Fast CGI process? -- Chris P.S. Sorry Bob, I've scanned the commit logs for the port and there is no mention of security problems with mod_php5.so. To tell the truth I cannot imagine that there would be any security issues in mod_php5.so that didn't also exist in /usr/local/bin/php-cgi. I could be wrong here though and then I would have the answer to my question. -- __o All I was doing was trying to get home from work. _`\,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___ Christopher Sean Hiltonchris | at | vindaloo.com pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Xorg failed to start after upgrading to 7.2
On 09/06/07, Xihong Yin [EMAIL PROTECTED] top-posted: Thank you for answering my question. On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Manolis Kiagias wrote: Xihong Yin wrote: After upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error when I start X. (EE) Failed to load module xtt (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module module (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module kbd (module does not exist, 0 ) Before upgrading Xorg, I just upgraded FreeBSD from 6.0 to 6.2. Quick guess: you are still using the same xorg.conf from your 6.8 install. You need to change the ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules I did change my ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules in my xorg.conf file. Under my /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules, there are no such libs as xtt, vesa, mouse, and kbd. There should be an entry xorg-7.2 in /var/db/pkg (I am going on a hunch here), if not you need to install ports/x11/xorg It would probably not be a bad idea to rerun X -configure and ten-finger-merge the results with your old config file. -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE
On 09/06/07, Mark Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:30 PM To: Mark Stout Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE On 08/06/07, Mark Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd prefer to remain at 6.2-STABLE but I can't find where the problem is with these IP errors. I'm figuring I've got a mixed code and that's the root cause but I'm not sure. Did you remove your object directories before starting the build? Did you build without an /etc/make.conf? I did not remove the obj directories and everything in my /etc/make.conf file is commented out except for USA_RESIDENT and PERL_VER=5.8.8 and PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 On a mad hunch I would suspect stale files in /usr/obj/ If they are still there (and the cause of your problems) they will muss up your build on RELENG_6_2 as well. -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The FreeBSD Diary: 2007-05-20 - 2007-06-09
The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives http://www.freebsd.org/search/search.html#mailinglists and/or The FreeBSD Diary http://www.freebsddiary.org/. -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 7:32 PM To: Mark Stout Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE On 09/06/07, Mark Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:30 PM To: Mark Stout Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 6.2-RELEASE from 6.2-STABLE On 08/06/07, Mark Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd prefer to remain at 6.2-STABLE but I can't find where the problem is with these IP errors. I'm figuring I've got a mixed code and that's the root cause but I'm not sure. Did you remove your object directories before starting the build? Did you build without an /etc/make.conf? I did not remove the obj directories and everything in my /etc/make.conf file is commented out except for USA_RESIDENT and PERL_VER=5.8.8 and PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 On a mad hunch I would suspect stale files in /usr/obj/ If they are still there (and the cause of your problems) they will muss up your build on RELENG_6_2 as well. -- -- So how should I fix this? Thank you, Mark Stout VPM Global Internet Services, Inc. 530-626-4218 x205 Office 530-626-7182 Fax 530-554-9295 VoIP 916-240-2850 Cell www.vpm.com http://www.vpm.com This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited, and asked to notify us immediately, then delete this email. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free and VPM Global Internet Services, Inc. does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of VPM Global Internet Services, Inc. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Xorg failed to start after upgrading to 7.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/06/07, Xihong Yin [EMAIL PROTECTED] top-posted: Thank you for answering my question. On Sat, 9 Jun 2007, Manolis Kiagias wrote: Xihong Yin wrote: After upgrading Xorg from 6.8 to 7.2, I got the following error when I start X. (EE) Failed to load module xtt (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module module (module does not exist, 0 ) (EE) Failed to load module kbd (module does not exist, 0 ) Before upgrading Xorg, I just upgraded FreeBSD from 6.0 to 6.2. Quick guess: you are still using the same xorg.conf from your 6.8 install. You need to change the ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules I did change my ModulePath to /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules in my xorg.conf file. Under my /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules, there are no such libs as xtt, vesa, mouse, and kbd. There should be an entry xorg-7.2 in /var/db/pkg (I am going on a hunch here), if not you need to install ports/x11/xorg It would probably not be a bad idea to rerun X -configure and ten-finger-merge the results with your old config file. You may also do a pkg_info | grep xorg and see what xorg packages where actually installed. My guess is you are missing the xorg-drivers metaport for some reason (since you are missing such basic things as kbd and vesa) but doing a complete install of ports/x11/xorg as suggested wouldn't harm. If you want to go with the drivers only thing, the metaport would be ports/x11-drivers/xorg-drivers ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
