Any PCI Draft-N wireless cards supported?
Can anybody tell me if there are any 802.11n (draft) wireless PCI cards supported by FreeBSD? Thanks! Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Memory >3.5GB not used?
Jonathan Horne wrote: i have a system with 4GB memory, doing the same similar behavior. but, on top of not using the last few hundred megs of ram, even the POST shows like 3.6 or 3.7GB of ram. is PAE still a solution for my case? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dmesg | grep memory real memory = 3958833152 (3775 MB) avail memory = 3875762176 (3696 MB) My motherboard has a BIOS option as to how the memory is to be used. If it is remapped, then you can see 3.2GB from a 32-bit OS (like Windows XP or Vista x86). If I turn remapping off, then only 3.0GB will show in such a 32-bit OS. However, a 64-bit OS can see all the memory and use it accordingly. Check your BIOS. Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: GMail [and other free email] and these lists?
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: Does this list automatically reject subscribers "free" email addresses? I would like to move over to Gmail to avoid all the spam coming in from the years of using this address, but I am not getting any response from the subscription request. Nevermind ... I am way to impatient. The confirmation eventually came through. Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
GMail [and other free email] and these lists?
Does this list automatically reject subscribers "free" email addresses? I would like to move over to Gmail to avoid all the spam coming in from the years of using this address, but I am not getting any response from the subscription request. Thanks, Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Which build to use for Intel Core 2 Duo 64-bit?
Which build should I use to build a native 64-bit installation on an Intel Core 2 Duo (E6600)? Can I use the AMD64 build? Is there anything I should be careful when rebuilding from source after a cvsup? Can I just use the AMD64 build and CPUTYPE=nocona in /etc/make.conf ? Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Periodic Emails are not coming
Abid Saigol wrote: Hello, Recently, the daily/weekly/monthly periodic emails have stopped coming from one of my servers. There were no changes made of the system, except that part of the filesystem was exported as an NFS share. These shares are setup on another FreeBSD machine for automount. I have checked my /etc and /var/logs and cannot find any reason for the mails to have stopped. Any help and guidance will be greatly appreciated. Here are some of the relevant files: Have you inadvertently aliased the root user to another user? Or perhaps you deleted an alias and should be looking in the "root" mailbox? I have virtual mail setup on my systems and I lost periodic emails as well until I configured postfix correctly to consider my local machine's hostname as an acceptable recipient. I now alias root to the virtual user I want to receive these emails. Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Samba and FAM
I have been using Samba 3.x for my Windows file share and printing. I chose not to use FAM as the implementation on FreeBSD seems non-existant (where is the daemon?). So, when I configured Samba, I unchecked the option for FAM. Yet, when it runs, I still see that it is required. Sep 13 03:12:30 fuggle smbd[2898]: FAM file change notifications not available Sep 13 03:12:30 fuggle smbd[2897]: FAM file change notifications not available Sep 13 03:12:30 fuggle smbd[2897]: [2006/09/13 03:12:30, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(534) I considered uninstalling FAM and rebuilding Samba, but, as it turns out, Courier-IMAP requires FAM as a dependency even though it is not a declared dependency in the Makefile. Even though FAM was not selected when building Samba, I am getting the above errors. Is there a way to avoid these filling my log files? Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: cups 1.2.2 and parallel port printers
Robert Huff wrote: # make lpt0 available to CUPS perm/dev/lpt00666 Doesn't seem to work. :-( You need devfs_system_ruleset="system" in /etc/rc.conf Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sshd login stalling
Noah wrote: Okay I cant seem to figure out why sshd logins are stalling. I see that I am coming from an IP address that does not have Reverse mapping. So I added the lines below to /usr/local/etc/ssh/sshd_config and /etc/ssh is sym linked to /usr/local/etc/ssh What are the contents of your /etc/hosts file? Is there a setting there for your local IP other than localhost 127.0.0.1? Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
AMD64 Stability with 6.1+?
Can anybody on this list indicate what kind of stability they have seen with AMD64 systems using FreeBSD (the 64-bit binaries)? How about the majority of PORTS in the tree? I realize this question will solicit relatively subjective responses, but I am interested in them all. Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: NIC ON FREEBSD 6.0
Alex Zbyslaw wrote: michael paquette wrote: HOW DO i GET MY NIC CARD TO WORK ON MY LAPTOP USING FREEBSD ? Why don't you tell us what the NIC actually is? And please STOP SHOUTING. And consider http://www.freebsd.org and the documentation listed there. Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: What does this message mean (watchdog timeout DC0)?
Corey Brune wrote: It may be hardware related. Have you made any system changes lately? How often does this occur? No changes since about last April. I did move from FBSD 5.x to FBSD 6.x (RELENG_6_0) at the time that 6.0 was released. Nothing since. I have seen the issue a couple of times this week, but I have not had any network problems that I have noticed. I have noticed this problem for years on and off (so to speak) with DC cards. But lately, I seem to be seeing it more. Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
What does this message mean (watchdog timeout DC0)?
I am seeing the following in my security logs. Can anybody tell me what this means? Perhaps I should consider a new NIC? +dc0: watchdog timeout +dc0: link state changed to DOWN +dc0: link state changed to UP Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Problems with phpMyAdmin ...
Recently, I pulled down the current ports on my 6.0-RELEASE system and ran portupgrade (-Ra). Everything works fabulously except for phpMyAdmin. Other PHP (5.1.1) applications work just fine, including postfixadmin and others. With phpMyAdmin (2.7.0p2 and all previous versions that I have attempted manually) I simply get a empty page. If I run it through Squid, I get the following. "The following error was encountered: * * Zero Sized Reply * Squid did not receive any data for this request." I have checked my Apache (2.0) error logs and find no errors at all. This problem is unique to phpMyAdmin and I am truly stumped. I have been through all of the documentation and I have searched Google for hours. I have found MANY reports of this same issue, but none have found the cause (some wiped everything and reinstalled with success, but that is not an option). So, does anybody here with experience with this piece of software have a suggestion as to its cause? Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: simple (very) Bash problem
tg webb wrote: In SuSe 9.1 and in the shell, Bash works fine until I attempt "make". It responds with unknown command. I know I'm missing something obvious but what? Any help gratefully received Well ... this is freebsd list, so I don't suppose you should be asking that question here. Short answer is that you do not have make installed or it is not in your path (probably the former). Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Squid ,ipfw and pop3
Carstea Catalin wrote: Please help me to solve one problem: to run squid and to permit only pop3 for clients. How to configure this with ipfw ( natd) and squid? Give me the script (if possible). . tks Do you want to do transparent proxy with Squid? If so, it is not really possible with ipfw, but it is possible [in the real sense] with IPFilter and PF. Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Freebsd 4.11 - Hypterthreading
eric wyzerski wrote: Hi, on freebsd 4.11 how I enable hyperthreading? sysctl -a | grep machdep.hlt_logical_cpus returns nothing. Someone have an idea? I have the options SMP in the kernel Thank you (Please CC me if you reply im not in the list) Do you have it enabled in your BIOS as well. That is also required. Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Maildrop filtering for virtual users (postfix)?
FreeBSD Questions - Has anybody implemented filtering for virtual users via Maildrop? I have a postfix installation with a mysql backend running virtual users for several virtual domains. I would like to implement filtering (manual configuration of files is fine). Does anybody have any experience getting this to work well? FWIW, I am using postfixadmin to manage everything. Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ca.freebsd.org
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: >>Lucas wrote: >> >> >>I just clicked the www.ca.freebsd.org link directly from your email and >>it worked fine; it took me to the FreeBSD Canada site. I did NOT click >>the doctordomain link [why bother]. >> >>Tom Veldhouse >> >> > > Nevermind, I misread your email. Sounds like ca.freebsd.org is only used for web services. Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ca.freebsd.org
Lucas wrote: >Hi all, > >I thought I would go to a local mirror and see what's new with the >logo contest, so I punched in 'ca.freebsd.org' and I got a real ugly >website. (As a note I should have punched in www.ca.freebsd.org) I >suggest you try it as well. It ended up pointing me to >'http://www.doctordomain.net/unconfigured.html?' > > I just clicked the www.ca.freebsd.org link directly from your email and it worked fine; it took me to the FreeBSD Canada site. I did NOT click the doctordomain link [why bother]. Tom Veldhouse signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
LDAP/SASL/POSTFIX setup?
Has anybody attempted to create Postfix installation with SASL authenticated via LDAP? Is it possible to do via the ports collection? Or do I need a patch? Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Courier IMAP, MySQL, Postfix and Maildrop
Has anybody setup the combination of Courier IMAP, MySQL, Postfix and Courier Maildrop and managed to get it to work? I am so close I could just scream, but I can not get any of the Courier components to work! I get postfix to query my MySQL database just fine so it will accept recipient mail. However, when I try to get courier maildrop to deliver the mail I get: fuggle# maildrop -d [EMAIL PROTECTED] Invalid user specified. There is no record of it querying the database even though I know I have the maildropmysql.config setup correctly (tabs, no spaces etc). As a matter of fact, it doesn't seem to matter what is in the file and just touching it results in the same thing! I am having the same problem with Courier IMAP, it doesn't seem to read the database either and I have setup authmysqlrc appropriately as well and placed authmysql at the front of the authmodulelist. Does anybody have any ideas what I should look for to solve this problem? It is truly maddening. Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Repeated connections to port 25 with firewall
From: "Jonathon McKitrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This is probably a simple question with a simple answer, but I wasn't sure > where to look. > > I recently installed a deny-all firewall and everything is working fine. > However, I keep getting /kernel log messages about attempts to connect to > port 25. Are these just various processes trying to mail their results to > root, but can't because of the firewall? Or maybe cron doing the same thing? > > May 24 08:00:00 neptune /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:25 from > 127.0.0.1:1101 flags:0x02 > May 24 08:00:00 neptune /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:25 from > 127.0.0.1:2270 flags:0x02 > May 24 08:05:00 neptune /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:25 from > 127.0.0.1:4230 flags:0x02 > May 24 08:10:00 neptune /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:25 from > 127.0.0.1:2687 flags:0x02 > May 24 08:15:00 neptune /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:25 from > 127.0.0.1:3274 flags:0x02 > May 24 08:20:00 neptune /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:25 from > 127.0.0.1:1542 flags:0x02 > May 24 08:25:00 neptune /kernel: Connection attempt to TCP 127.0.0.1:25 from > 127.0.0.1:3652 flags:0x02 > > You should allow all traffic on your loopback device by default. Much like this (for IPFILTER) pass in quick on lo0 all pass out quick on lo0 all It would also be good to block spoofed traffic if you allowing connectivity to the internet or other unprotected networks. # # Deny reserved addresses. # block in log quick from 10.0.0.0/8 to any group 100 block in log quick from 192.168.0.0/16 to any group 100 block in log quick from 172.16.0.0/12 to any group 100 # # prevent IP spoofing. # block in log quick from me to any group 100 BTW ... group 100 is "inbound packets on the public interface". Tom Veldhouse ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Way to get ALL options for a meta-port?
Is there a way to get ALL of the options available for a meta-port like KDE? Many of the ports it is dependent upon have options to use GIF or UNGIF and other things like that. It would be nice if I could: # cd /usr/ports/x11/kde3 # make show-options and see ALL of the options that all of the dependent ports allow? Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 5.2.1-RC1 and RC2
Chris wrote: Is is me? Or has something changed in 5.2 that tends to make systems freeze up during portupgrade? Mainly - KDE-3.2.0 That being said, I seem to be seeing this more often on other upgrades. Strange thing is, I considered it to be my PC however, I never seem to run into the total freeze when doing a buildworld. No trouble here upgrading 5.2 to current on my desktop and no trouble upgrading my 5.2p1 to 5.2RC2 on my server. I suspect your problem is hardware or driver related. Tom Veldhouse signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: OpenLDAP and Mozilla Messenger
Loren M. Lang wrote: On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 06:06:32PM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: Does anybody know of a "GOOD" HOWTO to get Mozilla Messenger and OpenLDAP (2.2) to work well together [for addressbooks]? I have been searching for doco all day and I have downloaded schema and entered configurations to no avail. I don't know about any howtos off-hand, but the #ldap channel on irc.freenode.net was a good help to me. I used the inetOrgPerson schema which is the same schema for M$ Outlook, Pine, and several other mail clients. Also, for Mozilla to work, I needed to add the following line: allow bind_v2 AHA! That worked. I had Outlook reading just fine, but Netscape wouldn't do it. This has moved a long way in the right directly. Now the only trouble I am having is with some invalid Mozilla atributes in my ldif file, most second emails and the like. Here is an example: ldap_add: Object class violation (65) additional info: attribute 'mozillaSecondemail' not allowed This is defined in the schema, so I am not sure why it is failing ... is there a better schema to use somewhere? Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
OpenLDAP and Mozilla Messenger
Does anybody know of a "GOOD" HOWTO to get Mozilla Messenger and OpenLDAP (2.2) to work well together [for addressbooks]? I have been searching for doco all day and I have downloaded schema and entered configurations to no avail. Thanks in advance for any help, Tom Veldhouse pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Mutt, GPG and Maildir HOWTO
Can anybody lead me to a HOWTO or simple configuration for using Mutt with GPG and a Maildir setup (via courier-imap)? Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: freebsd 4.8 and the spamassassin 2.6x port
Charles Swiger wrote: > FreeBSD 4.8 should be recent enough that you can use a modern ports > tree without the CONFLICTS feature causing problems, so use CVSUP to > update your ports tree to the current version. From there, install > /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8, and then run "use.perl port". > > That should give you the latest version of Perl, from which you can > then install the p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port (or spamass-milter, or > amavisd, or whatever). You can also try installing the software via > "perl -MCPAN -e shell \;", and do an "install Mail::SpamAssassin", but > the ports mechanism is better tested. Why perl 5.8? My 5.2 machine is running postfix, perl 5.6.1 and amavisd-new without any trouble at all. Tom Veldhouse ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: IPFW and Dynamic Rules
Dinesh Nair wrote: > seems like you're hitting this limit with too many keep-state rules in > your ipfw ruleset. try trimming them down a little, by adding in > specific reverse packet flow rules. > It does not take many at all to hit the limit. This is what I used to use [in /etc/sysctl.conf] on a webserver with great success: # increase the number of dynamic firewall rules allowed net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max=3000 Tom Veldhouse ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ALSA drivers
Stas wrote: > Hello, > > Does FreeBSD supports ALSA drivers? > > Thanks The L in ALSA stands for Linux ... so I highly doubt it. It might be possible to code such a thing for the Linux ABI emulation, but I don't believe it has been done. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [5.2] Startup script won't install
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > > Still no luck, it only confirms the placement of the slapd daemon at > the end of the install. Everything goes well, but no slapd.sh in > rc.d. Any ideas? It installed the startup scripts as /etc/rc.d/slapd /etc/rc.d/slurpd You will need to add these to your /etc/rc.conf file: slapd_enable="YES" slapd_flags='-h "ldapi://%2fvar%2frun%2fopenldap%2fldapi/ ldap://0.0.0.0/";' slapd_sockets="/var/run/openldap/ldapi" slurpd_enable="NO" Tom Veldhouse ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ipfw/nated stateful rules example
fbsd_user wrote:
> I disagree with you that the /etc/rc.firewall is the best example.
> It's really a good example of stateless rules, & how to use
> scripting Symbolic substitution.
>
> I have working keep-state rule set using user-ppp -nat, but as soon
> as I add that darn legacy divert rule and drop user-ppp -nat it will
> not work. Dynamic stateful rules table always ends up with an
> mis-match between public and private ip address. Moving the divert
> rule around only changes which ip address gets posted to the
> stateful table(ie: the private or public one).
>
> Test results look like that legacy divert subroutine call to NATD is
> the problem. See same mis-match ip address problem when stateless
> rules are used, but since there is no stateful table involved it
> just slips by un-noticed.
>
> Was hoping that the ipfw2 rewrite would have fixed this problem.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thomas T.
> Veldhouse
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 1:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
> Subject: Re: ipfw/nated stateful rules example
>
> fbsd_user wrote:
>> Friends
>> In both 4.9 and 5.2 I can not get an rules set to function that only
>> uses keep-state' rules for outbound and inbound selection control
>> and the divert rule.
>>
>> Does anybody have an rules set they can share with me as an sample
>> for me to see.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
> The best sample is /etc/rc.firewall [and look in
> /usr/share/examples/ipfw
> for a potentially useful script to use while testing]. I have moved
> over to
> IPFILTER due to the fact that natd is userland based and is more
> problematic
> [than ipnat] because of it.
>
> Tom Veldhouse
Here are the contents of one that I used to use when I used IPFW ... it was
originally and loosely based off of /etc/rc.firewall.
#
# Setup system for firewall service.
#
# Suck in the configuration variables.
if [ -z "${source_rc_confs_defined}" ]; then
if [ -r /etc/defaults/rc.conf ]; then
. /etc/defaults/rc.conf
source_rc_confs
elif [ -r /etc/rc.conf ]; then
. /etc/rc.conf
fi
fi
# Set quiet mode if requested
#
case ${firewall_quiet} in
[Yy][Ee][Ss])
fwcmd="/sbin/ipfw -q"
;;
*)
fwcmd="/sbin/ipfw"
;;
esac
# Flush out the list before we begin.
#
${fwcmd} -f flush
# set these to your outside interface network and netmask and ip
oif="dc0"
onet="x.y.z.32"
omask="255.255.255.240"
oip="x.y.z.33"
# set these to your inside interface network and netmask and ip
iif="fxp0"
inet="192.168.1.0"
imask="255.255.255.0"
iip="192.168.1.3"
# outlaw addresses, never allow traffic from these
outlaws="24.93.67.0/24"
# Only in rare cases do you want to change these rules
#
${fwcmd} add 100 pass all from any to any via lo0
${fwcmd} add 105 deny all from any to 127.0.0.0/8
${fwcmd} add 110 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any
# ip-options (per FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-00:23.ip-options)
${fwcmd} add deny log ip from any to any ipoptions ssrr,lsrr,ts,rr via
${oif}
# allow certain ICMP through (allows ping, traceroute, plus
# the required source quence and similar)
${fwcmd} add pass icmp and to any icmptypes 0,3,4,8,11,12 via ${oif}
${fwcmd} add deny icmp from any to any icmptypes 9 via ${oif} # silent block
on router advertisements
${fwcmd} add pass icmp from any to any via ${iif} # allow all internally
${fwcmd} add deny icmp from any to any
# Stop spoofing
${fwcmd} add deny all from ${inet}:${imask} to any in via ${oif}
${fwcmd} add deny all from ${onet}:${omask} to any in via ${iif}
# Stop RFC1918 nets on the outside interface
${fwcmd} add deny all from any to 10.0.0.0/8 via ${oif}
${fwcmd} add deny all from any to 172.16.0.0/12 via ${oif}
${fwcmd} add deny all from any to 192.168.0.0/16 via ${oif}
# Stop draft-manning-dsua-03.txt (1 May 2000) nets (includes RESERVED-1,
# DHCP auto-configuration, NET-TEST, MULTICAST (class D), and class E)
# on the outside interface
${fwcmd} add deny all from any to 0.0.0.0/8 via ${oif}
${fwcmd} add deny all from any to 169.254.0.0/16 via ${oif}
${fwcmd} add deny all from any to 192.0.2.0/24 via ${oif}
${fwcmd} add deny all from any to 224.0.0.0/4 via ${oif}
${fwcmd} add deny all from any to 240.0.0.0/4 via ${oif}
# Network Address Translation. This rule is placed here deliberately
# so that it does not interfere with the surrounding address-checking
# rules.
case ${natd_enable} in
[Yy][Ee][Ss])
if [ -n "${natd_interface}" ]; then
${fwcmd} add divert natd all from any to any via ${natd_interface}
fi
;;
esac
# Stop RFC1918 nets on the outside interface
${fwcmd} add deny all from 10.0.0.0/8 to any via ${oif}
${fwcmd} add
Re: ipfw/nated stateful rules example
fbsd_user wrote: > Friends > In both 4.9 and 5.2 I can not get an rules set to function that only > uses keep-state' rules for outbound and inbound selection control > and the divert rule. > > Does anybody have an rules set they can share with me as an sample > for me to see. > > Thanks > The best sample is /etc/rc.firewall [and look in /usr/share/examples/ipfw for a potentially useful script to use while testing]. I have moved over to IPFILTER due to the fact that natd is userland based and is more problematic [than ipnat] because of it. Tom Veldhouse ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [5.2] Startup script won't install
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 13:08, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: >> Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: >>> I have installed the openldap-2.1.23 package through the ports >>> system, but it will not install the slapd.sh file into the rc.d >>> directory. Am I missing something to get it to do this? I see the >>> file in the files directory below the ports for openldap. Other >>> packages installed their scripts fine, such as Apache2, pgsql, etc. >> >> # (cd /usr/ports/net/openldap21-server && make all install clean) >> > > Thanks. How do I know when this is needed for everything? Or should I > always use the 'all' argument? I have not been able to figure out > where to look for instructions under each port. 'all' is the default make target in just about all ports, so it is actually redundant. Tom Veldhouse ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: [5.2] Startup script won't install
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > I have installed the openldap-2.1.23 package through the ports system, > but it will not install the slapd.sh file into the rc.d directory. Am > I missing something to get it to do this? I see the file in the files > directory below the ports for openldap. Other packages installed their > scripts fine, such as Apache2, pgsql, etc. # (cd /usr/ports/net/openldap21-server && make all install clean) Tom Veldhouse ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Web Editing?
I just use Dreamweaver (or whatever software is available) on Windows and post the files to my FreeBSD servers. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Eric F Crist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 8:25 AM Subject: Web Editing? What do people here use to edit HTML documents? I usually use Dreamweaver, but I haven't gotten the time to try to get wine working so I can run Dreamweaver on FreeBSD. TIA -- Eric F Crist AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ACPI S3 compatible video card?
Andrew Gallatin wrote: > Does anybody have suggestions as to a cheap, AGP based video card > which is known to suspend/resume correctly and has DVI output? > > I'm currently using an "ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 Pro Ultra TF rev > 0", and the screen fails to come back when I resume the machine (an > Intel D845EBG2 based desktop). > > Since I need to get a new card, I want to ensure I get one which is > known to work with ACPI. > > Thanks, > > Drew I think the ATI Radeon DDR (7500) will do this, and they are quite cheap now ... if you can find them. BTW ... this is a candidate for freebsd-questions rather than freebsd-current. Tom Veldhouse ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: /usr/ports/www/graphics/png install error
Take a look at the text ... it should tell you how to forcibly install over the top. Or, it might be better to use another port to help you out: portupgrade (/usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade). I often upgrade all of my ports to the latest revision with just portupgrade -ra Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Kris Yates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:32 PM Subject: /usr/ports/www/graphics/png install error > I am upgrading from png port: > png-1.2.5 < needs updating (port has 1.2.5_2) > > to png port 1.2.5_2. > > "make" seems fine, the following error occurs on the port "make install": > > cc -fpic -DPIC -O -pipe -I. -DPNG_USE_PNGGCCRD -c pnggccrd.c -o > pnggccrd.So > building shared library libpng.so.5 > gzip -cn libpng.3 > libpng.3.gz > gzip -cn libpngpf.3 > libpngpf.3.gz > gzip -cn png.5 > png.5.gz > ===> Installing for png-1.2.5_2 > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ===> Checking if graphics/png already installed > *** Error code 1 > > This also happens when I try to upgrade the port for Webalizer, which is > my ultimate goal here. Webalizer says libpng is not installed but I see > that is, however, it seems to be a problem with something in > ports/graphics/png. I am running FBSD 4.6.2p13. > > Any ideas? Will upgrading to 4.7 stable fix this? > > Please send reply to me, as I do not have time to check the list > archives often. > > Thank you, > > Kris > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: *BSD is dying
The fact that it is a moderated forum leads me to believe that the slashdot operators are themselves FreeBSD bigots. I for one have much less respect for Slashdot for allowing that drivel through. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Andrew Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 9:08 PM Subject: *BSD is dying > I can assure you that this clown posts exactly this post to /. on a regular > basis ... except that half the time, it's BSD that's dying, and the other > half it's Windows Server, and the other half (ahem) it's Linux ... > > Andrew > > > > > > >http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=70502&cid=6404771 > > > > > > > >It is now official - Netcraft has confirmed: *BSD is dying > > > > > > > >Yet another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered *BSD community when > > > >recently IDC confirmed that *BSD accounts for less than a fraction of 1 > > > >percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of the latest Netcraft > > > >survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this > > > >news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing > > > >in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last > > > >[samag.com] in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test. > > > > > > > >You don't need to be a Kreskin [amazingkreskin.com] to predict *BSD's > > > >future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In > > > >fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. > > > >Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, > > > >*BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of > > > >blood. FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of > > > >its core developers. > > > > > > > >Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers. > > > > > > > >OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How > > > >many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus > > > >NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there > > > >are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about > > > >half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users > > > >of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD > > > >market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. > > > >This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts. > > > > > > > >Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD > > > >went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another > > > >troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet > > > >another charnel house. > > > > > > > >All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. > > > >*BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If > > > >*BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS hobbyist dabblers. *BSD > > > >continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this > > > >point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead. > > > > > > > >Fact: *BSD is dead > > > > > > > > > > > >___ > > -- > Andrew Robinson Ph: 208 885 7115 > Department of Forest Resources Fa: 208 885 6226 > University of Idaho E : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PO Box 441133W : http://www.uidaho.edu/~andrewr > Moscow ID 83843 Or: http://www.biometrics.uidaho.edu > No statement above necessarily represents my employer's opinion. > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How do I max a 6Mbps link
The problem is probably file I/O. I use samba for use with Windows. I can transfer a large file from my FreeBSD server and get almost 10MB/s (using an Intel 10/100 card). However, when I transfer files to FreeBSD, I only get about 6MB/s. I seem to get this same ratio when using FTP transfers as well. This leads me to believe it is I/O bound (my FreeBSD machine has a UDMA66, mainboard limitted to UDMA33, 7200RPM drive in it running softupdates). BTW -- this is one area where Linux (w / reiserfs) kicks the FreeBSD daemon all over town. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Max Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:19 PM Subject: Re: How do I max a 6Mbps link > > Sounds like you have a problem with your server/network hardware or > firewall/proftpd settings. FreeBSD out of the box on low-end Intel hardware > can easily sustain 6mbps link, which is roughly 3megs/sec. Make sure > your harddrive on receiving end can write at least this fast and your network > is capable of such transfers. Sometimes faulty switches/cable wires can > cause packet loss/delays, causing a bottleneck. It could be a number of > things, but I would start with testing your network. > > -Simon > > On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:12:03 -0700, Max Clark wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >What configuration changes do I need to make to two freebsd-stable boxes to > >fully max out a 6Mbps/220ms network link? This is for bulk 500+MB file > >transfers. > > > >The target application is proftpd with ncftpd as the client. > > > >Thanks in advance, > >Max > > > >___ > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: answer me plz
Java will work better on 5.x then it will on 4.x. If it is just a home server, I wouldn't hesistate to give 5.1 a try first. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:48 PM Subject: RE: answer me plz > Version 4.8 is the one for you. 5.0 & 5.1 are development versions > and are for people who can debug the operating system. 4.8 is the > stable production version. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of dark matrix > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: answer me plz > > I want to build my own server on a p1 233 mhz 64M ram and 4gb hd > Wich FreeBSD version 4.8 - 5.0 - 5.1 do you recommend me? > thank for your answer > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: a little question
- Original Message - From: "dark matrix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:57 PM Subject: a little question > I know it is not directly related to FreeBSD but can you explain me the > difference between SQL and PHP? > That is a question that is like asking the difference between a dog and a bird. Both are animals, but that is all they have in common. In the case of your question, they are both languages (or scripts). SQL is a query language for databases and PHP is a scripting language that is primarily used for web pages. Any more details beyond that are way out of context for this forum. Tom Veldhouse ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How to get FreeBSD-3.0-RELEASE?
Why not simply use the compat3x libraries on 4.8-RELEASE? Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Chris Shenton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:12 PM Subject: How to get FreeBSD-3.0-RELEASE? > I've been asked to install a specific version of RealServer on > FreeBSD, and this version requires FreeBSD-3.0. I usually pull down > the floppies and then install from the net. > > I can't find floppies for anything older then 4.7. I expect I can use > modern install floppies and use the "options" to specify 3.0-RELEASE > instead of what's default on the floppy, but then it undoubtedly be > unable to find the actual distribution to download and install. > > If I could find an ISO, I probably can borrow a friend's CD burner but > I can't find an ISO for 3.0-RELEASE either. > > It would seem stupid to install 4.7 on the box, then use cvsup to pull > down the source for 3.0, then compile that and install it on top of > 4.7. Ick. > > I'll have a FreeBSD-4.8-STABLE box nearby, and I guess it might be > possible to cvsup 3.0-R and build there, but not how I'd go about > net-installing onto the target, without NFS. > > Any suggestions? Thanks. > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Problem with USB ulpt0 and CUPS
I posted this in April and received no response. However, this has been an ongoing issue since at least 2001 (where I found the first reference to this trouble via Google). The problem seems to be that the FreeBSD USB LPT driver (even with no-reset) is somehow dropping the first bits of the data stream, causing a page full of trash to be printed prior to the actual print job. I have no verified this problem with 5.1-RELEASE as well. I have a machine that has been serving as a print server. That machine was running CUPS and SAMBA over Linux. Now, it is running FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE-p7 with CUPS and SAMBA. I have a Lexmark Optra 312 laser printer hooked up to the usb port, ulpt0 (no reset). When it was running linux, everything ran perfectly. I allow the Windows client machines to use their print drivers and send a raw stream through samba to cups for printing. This configuration has worked fine. However, for reasons of my own, I have put FreeBSD 5.0 on this machine. The same software configuration exists for printing. Now, when I print most pages, I get an extra page prefixing the job with two or three lines of printer commands (i.e. resolution = 600, @PCL, etc). This seems to be caused by the FreeBSD usb printer driver dropping a couple of characters at the beginning of the command stream. This used to happen to me with FreeBSD 4.6 as well, which is why that machine was running Linux in the first place. Has anybody seen this strange behavior and is there a known fix for it? Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: devfs problem (was: Re: 5.x & usb & gphoto
It should have read something nicer in the comment though: # Allow members of group operator to write to ugen0 perm ugen0 0664 Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "FreeBSD-Questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 11:20 AM Subject: Re: devfs problem (was: Re: 5.x & usb & gphoto > I just looked in /etc/devfs.conf ... so here is a guess ;) > > # Allow members of group operator to cat things to the speaker > perm ugen0 0664 > > Tom Veldhouse > > - Original Message - > From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:56 AM > Subject: devfs problem (was: Re: 5.x & usb & gphoto > > > > Jesse Guardiani wrote: > > > > > Howdy list, > > > > > > I'm trying to get gphoto2 to connect to my digital > > > camera as a NON root user. (it works fine when root, > > > but that's a security risk) > > > > > > Under 4.x, all I had to do was make the appropriate > > > USB devices group readable and writeable, then add > > > users to the appropriate group (operator, usually). > > > > > > Under 5.x, I'm having more trouble. The /dev/usb* > > > devices have the appropriate group permissions out > > > of the box, but I apparently also need group write > > > permission to the /dev/ugen* devices. > > > > > > Here are the ugen permissions when my camera is attached > > > to the usb port: > > > > > > [11:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[/etc]# ls -al /dev/ugen* > > > crw-r--r-- 1 root operator 114, 0 Jun 13 09:07 /dev/ugen0 > > > crw-r--r-- 1 root operator 114, 1 Jun 13 09:07 /dev/ugen0.1 > > > crw-r--r-- 1 root operator 114, 2 Jun 13 09:07 /dev/ugen0.2 > > > > > > > > > The problem is that I'm unfamiliar with devfs, and > > > I can't figure out how to get the ugen devices to > > > appear with group writable permissions. > > > > > > > > > Any help appreciated! Thanks. > > > > > > > Anyone? Anyone at all? Surely someone here has a wee bit of > > experience with devfs... > > > > > > > > -- > > Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator > > WingNET Internet Services, > > P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 > > 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) > > http://www.wingnet.net > > > > > > ___ > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: devfs problem (was: Re: 5.x & usb & gphoto
I just looked in /etc/devfs.conf ... so here is a guess ;) # Allow members of group operator to cat things to the speaker perm ugen0 0664 Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Jesse Guardiani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 10:56 AM Subject: devfs problem (was: Re: 5.x & usb & gphoto > Jesse Guardiani wrote: > > > Howdy list, > > > > I'm trying to get gphoto2 to connect to my digital > > camera as a NON root user. (it works fine when root, > > but that's a security risk) > > > > Under 4.x, all I had to do was make the appropriate > > USB devices group readable and writeable, then add > > users to the appropriate group (operator, usually). > > > > Under 5.x, I'm having more trouble. The /dev/usb* > > devices have the appropriate group permissions out > > of the box, but I apparently also need group write > > permission to the /dev/ugen* devices. > > > > Here are the ugen permissions when my camera is attached > > to the usb port: > > > > [11:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[/etc]# ls -al /dev/ugen* > > crw-r--r-- 1 root operator 114, 0 Jun 13 09:07 /dev/ugen0 > > crw-r--r-- 1 root operator 114, 1 Jun 13 09:07 /dev/ugen0.1 > > crw-r--r-- 1 root operator 114, 2 Jun 13 09:07 /dev/ugen0.2 > > > > > > The problem is that I'm unfamiliar with devfs, and > > I can't figure out how to get the ugen devices to > > appear with group writable permissions. > > > > > > Any help appreciated! Thanks. > > > > Anyone? Anyone at all? Surely someone here has a wee bit of > experience with devfs... > > > > -- > Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator > WingNET Internet Services, > P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 > 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) > http://www.wingnet.net > > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: OpenGL and ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
Yes they are. They are DRM drivers exactly for this purpose.There is a section further down the page that references this: "Getting 3d acceleration to work" Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Kenneth Wayne Culver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "FreeBSD-Questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:24 AM Subject: Re: OpenGL and ATI Radeon 9700 Pro > Those drivers are not for 3D support. Those are for getting things like TV > out on laptops and cards that have it to work. > > Ken > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > > > http://gatos.sourceforge.net/ati.2.php > > > > The binary drivers do not work, presumably because they were compiled with > > gcc-2.95.2? I think the modules for X (not the kernel modules) are supposed > > to be portable between platforms (i.e. Linux and FreeBSD). However, you can > > CVS source and try to build from there, but I have had no luck as I have not > > been able to login: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ati]$ > > cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/gatos login > > Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/cvsroot/gatos > > CVS password: > > cvs [login aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) > > > > I have the drivers working great under Linux using Gentoo ... but I would > > like my workstation to be FreeBSD for the obvious reason ... but I need > > accellerated OpenGL support. > > > > Tom Veldhouse > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Kenneth Wayne Culver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: "FreeBSD-Questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:00 AM > > Subject: Re: OpenGL and ATI Radeon 9700 Pro > > > > > > > You actually found a site that had drivers for FreeBSD? I was under the > > > impression that such a thing didn't exist. Basically this card has no 3d > > > acceleration support in FreeBSD. > > > > > > Ken > > > > > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > > > > > > > This weekend I installed KDE and noticed that the OpenGL screen savers > > were > > > > incredibly slow. It is clear that the graphic accelleration provided by > > my > > > > ATI Radeon 9700 Pro video card is not being used. I found a site that > > had > > > > drivers apparently for FreeBSD, but it didn't seem to work. I am > > running > > > > FreeBSD 5.1. Are there adequate drivers out there to support this? > > > > > > > > Tom Veldhouse > > > > > > > > ___ > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: got load > 1 but no CPU state is showing?
Any chance you are running an SMP system? You might be seeing the usage of only one CPU? Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Stijn Hoop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "FreeBSD-Questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:19 AM Subject: Re: got load > 1 but no CPU state is showing? On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 09:14:39AM -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > Load averages and current load are two different things. I suspect you > didn't catch it when it was busy. I know, but I've been running top for about 15 minutes now, and it consistently shows 0.0%. I can also assume that top has gotten in sync with somehow, but then again I have more than 1 runnable process on average over the last 15 minutes, so I would suspect that some other process should also get some CPU. And of course I also ran top on other terminals -- could they all be in sync at the same time or something? --Stijn -- "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc., 1989 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: got load > 1 but no CPU state is showing?
Load averages and current load are two different things. I suspect you didn't catch it when it was busy. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Stijn Hoop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:11 AM Subject: got load > 1 but no CPU state is showing? Hi, On a lightly loaded server top is misbehaving: it continuously shows all CPU states at 0.0% yet my load varies from 0.50 to about 3. Is there any explanation for this? Obviously, my kernel + world are in sync, running 4.8-RELEASE. Rebuilding top did no good. --Stijn ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: OpenGL and ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
http://gatos.sourceforge.net/ati.2.php The binary drivers do not work, presumably because they were compiled with gcc-2.95.2? I think the modules for X (not the kernel modules) are supposed to be portable between platforms (i.e. Linux and FreeBSD). However, you can CVS source and try to build from there, but I have had no luck as I have not been able to login: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ati]$ cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/gatos login Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401/cvsroot/gatos CVS password: cvs [login aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) I have the drivers working great under Linux using Gentoo ... but I would like my workstation to be FreeBSD for the obvious reason ... but I need accellerated OpenGL support. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Kenneth Wayne Culver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "FreeBSD-Questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:00 AM Subject: Re: OpenGL and ATI Radeon 9700 Pro > You actually found a site that had drivers for FreeBSD? I was under the > impression that such a thing didn't exist. Basically this card has no 3d > acceleration support in FreeBSD. > > Ken > > On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > > > This weekend I installed KDE and noticed that the OpenGL screen savers were > > incredibly slow. It is clear that the graphic accelleration provided by my > > ATI Radeon 9700 Pro video card is not being used. I found a site that had > > drivers apparently for FreeBSD, but it didn't seem to work. I am running > > FreeBSD 5.1. Are there adequate drivers out there to support this? > > > > Tom Veldhouse > > > > ___ > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
OpenGL and ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
This weekend I installed KDE and noticed that the OpenGL screen savers were incredibly slow. It is clear that the graphic accelleration provided by my ATI Radeon 9700 Pro video card is not being used. I found a site that had drivers apparently for FreeBSD, but it didn't seem to work. I am running FreeBSD 5.1. Are there adequate drivers out there to support this? Tom Veldhouse ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 5.1 on a 386
I recall conversation in current about dropping i386 support. Still, the kernel config files back me up. In GENERIC of the 4.x series machine i386 cpu I386_CPU cpu I486_CPU cpu I586_CPU cpu I686_CPU ident GENERIC In GENERIC of the 5.x series machine i386 cpu I486_CPU cpu I586_CPU cpu I686_CPU ident GENERIC And I find this in NOTES # # You must specify at least one CPU (the one you intend to run on); # deleting the specification for CPUs you don't need to use may make # parts of the system run faster. # I386_CPU is mutually exclusive with the other CPU types. # #cpuI386_CPU cpu I486_CPU cpu I586_CPU# aka Pentium(tm) cpu I686_CPU# aka Pentium Pro(tm) So, support is there, but I wonder how much. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Bill Moran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "John Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:42 PM Subject: Re: 5.1 on a 386 > Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > > I could be wrong, but I thought that they finally gave up on 386 support and > > now the base minimum is 486. It could very well be that you can't compile > > the system for a 386 without significant modification. > > If this is the case, then the hardware notes need updated, I quote: > "All Intel processors beginning with the 80386 are supported, including the > 80386, ..." > ... and ... > "While technically supported, the use of the 80386SX is specifically not > recommended." > That last sentence is slightly vague. I assume that they recommend against > the 386 simply because it's not powerful enough to be worthwhile, but it > doesn't say specifically why. > > > > > Tom Veldhouse > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "John Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:25 PM > > Subject: 5.1 on a 386 > > > > > > > >>Hi folks- > >> > >>I am setting up FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE on a 386DX. I'm mostly doing it as a > >>learning exercise (or perhaps because I'm a masochist), but the machine > > > > may > > > >>be used as a firewall at some point. I have the OS installed with a > > > > custom > > > >>kernel, and things are actually going quite well. > >> > >>There are (of course) some problems though. Most of the userland > > > > utilities > > > >>work great, but some just dump core. The one I miss in particular is > > > > groff > > > >>(for manpages, etc). I suspect that the problems are a result of CPU > >>instructions that the poor 386 doesn't understand. > >> > >>I do have a separate build machine (soon to be running 5.1 as well), so > > > > I'd > > > >>like to recompile everything (kernel, userland, and > >>ports-to-be-made-into-packages) for the 386 with the appropriate flags to > >>gcc and friends. Hopefully that will take care of the issues I'm seeing. > >> > >>So my question is, what flags should I use and where should I put them? > > > > I'd > > > >>like to be able to switch easily between builds for the 386 and "normal" > >>builds (for everything else). Can I just put an override in > > > > /etc/make.conf > > > >>or do I have to futz with /usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk? (In the case of the > >>latter, detailed hints would be appreciated.. I don't grok Make all that > >>well yet.) > >> > >>Thanks, > >> > >>JN > > -- > Bill Moran > Potential Technologies > http://www.potentialtech.com > > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 5.1 on a 386
I could be wrong, but I thought that they finally gave up on 386 support and now the base minimum is 486. It could very well be that you can't compile the system for a 386 without significant modification. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "John Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:25 PM Subject: 5.1 on a 386 > Hi folks- > > I am setting up FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE on a 386DX. I'm mostly doing it as a > learning exercise (or perhaps because I'm a masochist), but the machine may > be used as a firewall at some point. I have the OS installed with a custom > kernel, and things are actually going quite well. > > There are (of course) some problems though. Most of the userland utilities > work great, but some just dump core. The one I miss in particular is groff > (for manpages, etc). I suspect that the problems are a result of CPU > instructions that the poor 386 doesn't understand. > > I do have a separate build machine (soon to be running 5.1 as well), so I'd > like to recompile everything (kernel, userland, and > ports-to-be-made-into-packages) for the 386 with the appropriate flags to > gcc and friends. Hopefully that will take care of the issues I'm seeing. > > So my question is, what flags should I use and where should I put them? I'd > like to be able to switch easily between builds for the 386 and "normal" > builds (for everything else). Can I just put an override in /etc/make.conf > or do I have to futz with /usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk? (In the case of the > latter, detailed hints would be appreciated.. I don't grok Make all that > well yet.) > > Thanks, > > JN > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Upgrading 5.0 -> 5.1
You will need a whole new world as well. cvsup (cd /usr/src && make world) (cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf && config GENERIC && cd ../compile/GENERIC && make all install) reboot Approximately. I guess there is a way to make the kernel from the top level tree, but I have always done it that above way and don't plan to change unless I must. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Andrew Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:05 AM Subject: Upgrading 5.0 -> 5.1 > Hi all, > > I'm trying to figure out what options I have for upgrading from 5.0 to 5.1. > Can I just use csvup to change my local copy of the source code, and > recompile? Ie do the same steps that I've done to upgrade after security > announcements? Would that just entail editing my standard-supfile to replace > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_0 > > with > > *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_1 > > and running csvsup, then compiling a new kernel? > > I'd appreciate confirmation, cautions, or tips. > > Thanks! > > Andrew > -- > Andrew Robinson Ph: 208 885 7115 > Department of Forest Resources Fa: 208 885 6226 > University of Idaho E : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > PO Box 441133W : http://www.uidaho.edu/~andrewr > Moscow ID 83843 Or: http://www.biometrics.uidaho.edu > No statement above necessarily represents my employer's opinion. > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Sound Blaster Live DD5.1
I have recently purchased a Dell Dimension 8250 which contains a Creative Labs SoundBlaster Live! DD 5.1 card. My previous SoundBlaster Live! card was detected in FreeBSD 4.7, but this one is not detected in this machine using FreeBSD 5.1 RELEASE (cvsup to it). No pcm devices show during boot. Is there a way to give the kernel a hint? There is no way to shut of PNP in the BIOS, as Dell as not added this option. Windows XP is showing: I/O Range: DC40-DC5F IRQ: 18 Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Problems Installing on a Presario 2200
I think you could try turning APCI off in your BIOS and trying again. That has never worked all that well (it doesn't work all that well in Linux either). Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Gerald Coco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 2:31 PM Subject: Problems Installing on a Presario 2200 > Hello, > > Im not sure if this is the e-mail where you guys answer questions pertaining > to FreeBSD installation problems, if not please direct me to the place where > I can find answers. Ok anyways, here are my problems and questions... > > Im trying to install FreeBSD 5.0, but I cant seem to get passed the boot > process where everything is being loaded and printed to the screen (dmesg). > It gets to a certain point and it stops booting (this is the installer from > the freebsd cdrom by the way). Here is where it starts going wrong: > > Sc0:VGA <16 Virtual Consoles flags=0300> > Sio0: at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 > Sio0: type 16550A > Sio0: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > Sio0: port may not be enabled. > vga0:at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem oxa-oxb on > isa 0 > unknown: can't assign resources > unknown: can't assign resources > unknown: can't assign resources > unknown: can't assign resources > unknown: can't assign resources > unknown: can't assign resources > unknown: can't assign resources > unknown: can't assign resources > unknown: can't assign resources > > After this msg it just stops loading and sits there... What can I do to get > rid of this? Is some of my hardware not supported? Do I have to reset my > BIOS or even upgrade them? Please let me know what you think I'm stumped! > > Thanks! > Gerald Coco > > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: How do i install the Kdevelop?
Uhm -- the ports tree. # (cd /usr/ports/devel/kdevelop && make all install clean) Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "alireza mahini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 2:07 PM Subject: How do i install the Kdevelop? > I am downloading Kdevelop pakage from it's website > as a GZ file and I am extract it into my root > directory > but i don't know how to install and run it; > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > http://faith.yahoo.com > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: What is the best IDE for C++programming in FreeBSD4.4?
Oh yes -- we can not forget Emacs. Not my preference, but some have devoted their lives to it. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Adam Weinberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "alireza mahini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 2:03 PM Subject: Re: What is the best IDE for C++programming in FreeBSD4.4? > there are a number of neat IDE packages for FreeBSD in the ports tree. > kdevelop is certainly one of them. there are a couple strong ones for > the gnome environment, too. > > browse http://www.freebsd.org/ports/devel.html and search around for > 'IDE'. > > -Adam > > > >> (10.08.2002 @ 1149 PST): alireza mahini said, in 0.5K: << > > I am Alireza and i am a young c++ developer in > > freebsd. > > I am working with freebsd4.4 and i need an IDE for > > programming in C or C++ languages such as KDvelop. > > Please guide me about this . > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > __ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > > http://faith.yahoo.com > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > >> end of "What is the best IDE for C++programming in FreeBSD4.4?" from alireza mahini << > > > -- > "Oh good, my dog found the chainsaw." > -Lilo, "Lilo & Stitch" > Adam Weinberger > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: What is the best IDE for C++programming in FreeBSD4.4?
KDevelop is the one I tend to use. You could try Eclipse as well. I believe there is a C++ plugin for it. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "alireza mahini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:49 PM Subject: What is the best IDE for C++programming in FreeBSD4.4? > I am Alireza and i am a young c++ developer in > freebsd. > I am working with freebsd4.4 and i need an IDE for > programming in C or C++ languages such as KDvelop. > Please guide me about this . > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > http://faith.yahoo.com > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: ncsd
It is for name caching. It is supplied as part of the GNU C library. isc-bind fills the role nicely. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Steven Garrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:40 PM Subject: Re: ncsd To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: php4 apache 2
If you build mod_php4 and choose imap-ssl and you have not yet built the imap client library (cclient), it will build it as a dependency, but it will not build it with ssl support and thus it will fail. Solution is to build cclient with SSL support first. # (cd /usr/ports/mail/cclient && make -DWITH_SSL all install clean) # (cd /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 && make all install clean) Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Wesley Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Jeff MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:14 PM Subject: Re: php4 apache 2 > On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > > > Actually, the problem occurs when you build in IMAP-SSL. It has not worked > > for a very long time. I am not entirely sure why, as I have not had a large > > enough need to look into it. > > > > Yeah I just realized that when Jeff said it didnt work :>... But if you > build your IMAP library with SSL support everything works fine. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: php4 apache 2
Actually, the problem occurs when you build in IMAP-SSL. It has not worked for a very long time. I am not entirely sure why, as I have not had a large enough need to look into it. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Wesley Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jeff MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:45 AM Subject: Re: php4 apache 2 > Make sure you include SSL support in php. I believe this is your problem. > > On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Jeff MacDonald wrote: > > > I installed apache2 and php4 from ports, when i try to start apache iget > > this > > > > Syntax error on line 193 of /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf: > > Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache2/libphp4.so into server: > > /usr/local/libexec/apache2/libphp4.so: Undefined symbol "ssl_onceonlyinit" > > bash-2.05a# vi /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf > > > > Line 193 is this > > > > LoadModule php4_module libexec/apache2/libphp4.so > > > > php4 compiled without errors. > > > > --- > > Jeff MacDonald > > Interchange Technologies > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > -- >_ __ ___ ___ ___ ___ > Wesley N Morgan _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ | _ \._ \ |) | > FreeBSD: The Power To Serve _ |___/___/___/ > Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread! > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: php4 apache 2
Don't chose the IMAP-SSL option. It has been broken for years and years Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Jeff MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:22 AM Subject: php4 apache 2 > I installed apache2 and php4 from ports, when i try to start apache iget > this > > Syntax error on line 193 of /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf: > Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache2/libphp4.so into server: > /usr/local/libexec/apache2/libphp4.so: Undefined symbol "ssl_onceonlyinit" > bash-2.05a# vi /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf > > Line 193 is this > > LoadModule php4_module libexec/apache2/libphp4.so > > php4 compiled without errors. > > --- > Jeff MacDonald > Interchange Technologies > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: IPFW and IpFilter
Why would you want to do that? I can think of no reason to use both other than some of the supplemental features of ipfw like bandwidth shaping. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "ksrgyn -" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 3:58 PM Subject: IPFW and IpFilter > > Hi, > > I have a problem where the ipfw and ipfilter can not work together. > I need the packages matching first in the rules of ipfw and after in the > rules of ipfiter. > I configure my kernel with ipfw options before ipfilter options and i > compile but don't work, then i try to compile my kernel with the ipfw > options and without ipfilter options that was loaded as a module, and don't > work too. > The packages must be checked first in IPFW and then they need to be > checked in ipfilter. They are not being checked in IPFW, what's the problem > ? > > This is what i find in IPFILTER FAQ: > > IPF and IPFW both have features I want to use, must I choose between them? > No. You can run them both on a single machine. However, you must take care > to ensure that one package's rules do not interfere with the other's. Note > that the packages get access to rules in the order in which they were > loaded, e.g. if IPFW is compiled in the kernel and IPF is loaded as a > module, IPFW "sees" packets before IPF. > > > _ > Tenha você também um MSN Hotmail, o maior webmail do mundo: > http://www.hotmail.com/br > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: SSH asks strange questions...
You an also change your default protocol to ssh 2 rather than ssh 1 (so that it tries using ssh 2 first). For freebsd-security: Why is the default still ssh 1? Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Roman Neuhauser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Martin Moeller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "FreeBSD Questions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 8:50 AM Subject: Re: SSH asks strange questions... > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-10-07 17:24:25 +0200: > > > > Hi all, > > after switching to 4.7-RC something strange happens, > > whenever I try to connect to another host via ssh. > > Before I can enter my password, I get the following > > output: > > > > # ssh -l someone some.sshhost.foo > > Password: > > Response: > > > > The cursor remains behind the "Response:". > > If I press RETURN, I get the normal: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: > > > > What's that about? Am I dreaming or have I really > > overlooked it for years??? > > ChallengeResponseAuthentication, archives, /etc/sshsshd_config > > -- > smime.p7s Description: application/pkcs7-signature
Re: apache13-modssl + mod_php4, php not interpreted
First, did you start your server with SSL? Second, unless you want php to run ONLY with SSL, I would move it out of that block so that it will start anytime. Lastly, make sure you have the following in your config. [...] DirectoryIndex index.php index.html [...] AddType application/x-httpd-php .php AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps [...] Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Nigel Soon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 1:15 PM Subject: apache13-modssl + mod_php4, php not interpreted > Hello, > > I have a problem with php not being interpreted now that I have > started using apache13-modssl instead of apache13. > > I am running freebsd 4.6-RELEASE. The procedure I went through > was removing mod_php4 then removing apache. I then changed the > dependency of mod_php4 to use apache13-modssl and recompiled. > > The web server starts fine using ssl but the php web pages are > not interpreted. I have the following lines in my http.conf > file which leads me to believe the php modules are being loaded > > --- > > LoadModule ssl_module libexec/apache/libssl.so > LoadModule php4_modulelibexec/apache/libphp4.so > > . > . > . > . > > AddModule mod_ssl.c > AddModule mod_php4.c > > --- > > > Does anybody have any ideas? > > Thanks, > > Nigel > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: motherboard for freebsd 5.0 server
Depending on the use perhaps (I am not sure there is a working hot swapable IDE raid solution for FreeBSD), but most can probably get by with it. Of more concern is that FreeBSD 5.0 is going to be used. Don't use that! It is not stable yet. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "Stephen Hovey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "gsfgs sgsgsg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:15 AM Subject: Re: motherboard for freebsd 5.0 server > > IDE is not a good choice for a server. Should choose scsi > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, gsfgs sgsgsg wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I need an answer on this. > > http://tw.giga-byte.com/products/8iexp.htm > > I intend to use IDE RAID 0 or 1 with a SCSI sony DAT 12/24gb. > > Thise services will run on:(DSL)router,NAT, firewall, proxy, mail, ftp, > > web,apache,SSL, PHP, amavis, antivirus. > > 120gb disks, 1gb ram, amd or intel > > > > We are a small company in Slovenia > > > > Please am desperate nobody work in Slovenia with BSD. > > > > BYE > > > > VLado > > > > > > _ > > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: MySQL or Postgresql on FreeBSD, have I just started a holy war?
I am a Postgresql person myself. I can say there is one bad thing about Postgres that might be annoying to some. When data is deleted, the disk space is not recovered until a manual "vacuum" takes place. On a high load system with many updates or deletes, this could be a real headache. A cron job would probably fill role nicely. Tom Veldhouse - Original Message - From: "GB Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mailing Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 7:05 AM Subject: Re: MySQL or Postgresql on FreeBSD, have I just started a holy war? > Hello, > > I'm a PostgreSQL person so take all my comments with that in mind. > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002 03:06:37 -0700 > Mailing Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
