Re: CVSup question

2007-12-11 Thread Aryeh M. Friedman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Simon Gao wrote:
 Hi,

 I wonder if just having port-all is enough in cvsupfile as follow.
 If I just want to keep ports tree up to date, do I really need to
 have 'src-all?


 *default host=cvsup9.freebsd.org *default base=/usr *default
 prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4_11 *default delete
 use-rel-suffix compress # src-all ports-all tag=.


Yes and oyu don't need tag=. also since that is the default value
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHXxBrzIOMjAek4JIRAhLPAJ4wmwl7Vzqv7F29Q9QOY+F3+wPiPACfbyDf
fJ7e1hG8+cHRNpdy8Esg5Wc=
=D014
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup question

2007-12-11 Thread RW
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:34:19 -0500
Aryeh M. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Simon Gao wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I wonder if just having port-all is enough in cvsupfile as follow.
  If I just want to keep ports tree up to date, do I really need to
  have 'src-all?
  ...

 Yes and oyu don't need tag=. also since that is the default value


And that's yes to: port-all is enough, not yes to do I really need
to have src-all?


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup question

2007-06-24 Thread Jonathan Horne
On Sunday 24 June 2007 12:56:31 Jim Stapleton wrote:
 I've had this answered before, but for some reason, I can't seem to
 get it working.

 I am having problems with something in WINE and I want to see if it's
 the version of WINE, thus I'd *like* to reinstall WINE 0.9.39 and put
 0.9.36 back. I have my supfile set to 2007.06.15... and use these
 commands:

 sudo csup -i 'emulators/wine' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports
 sudo csup -i '*ulators/win*' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports
 sudo csup -i 'emulators/wine' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports


 But I don't see the standard patch applications I would see when
 something is updating with any of them.

 What am I doing wrong?

 -Jim
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

i did -i ports/emulators/wine and it worked for me.

hth,
-- 
Jonathan Horne
http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup question

2007-06-24 Thread RW
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:56:31 -0400
Jim Stapleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've had this answered before, but for some reason, I can't seem to
 get it working.
 
 I am having problems with something in WINE and I want to see if it's
 the version of WINE, thus I'd *like* to reinstall WINE 0.9.39 and put
 0.9.36 back. I have my supfile set to 2007.06.15... and use these
 commands:
 
 sudo csup -i 'emulators/wine' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports
 sudo csup -i '*ulators/win*' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports
 sudo csup -i 'emulators/wine' -L 2 /etc/supfile-ports
 
 
 But I don't see the standard patch applications I would see when
 something is updating with any of them.
 
 What am I doing wrong?

I don't know, but I use ports-mgmt/portdowngrade when I want to do this
kind of thing.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup question

2007-02-21 Thread Joe Holden

Simon Gao wrote:

Hi,

I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update ports 
to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable?




Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD 
(tag=.).


HTH,
Joe

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup question

2007-02-21 Thread Simon Gao
What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD, 
then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is 
no such things as stable or current ports? 


Simon


Joe Holden wrote:

Simon Gao wrote:

Hi,

I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update 
ports to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable?




Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD 
(tag=.).


HTH,
Joe

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup question

2007-02-21 Thread Joe Holden

Simon Gao wrote:
What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD, 
then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is 
no such things as stable or current ports?

Simon


Joe Holden wrote:

Simon Gao wrote:

Hi,

I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update 
ports to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable?




Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD 
(tag=.).


HTH,
Joe

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



You can update ports to a release date, or infact an actual date.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup question

2007-02-21 Thread Patrick Bowen

Simon Gao wrote:
What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD, 
then may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there 
is no such things as stable or current ports?

Simon


Joe Holden wrote:

Simon Gao wrote:

Hi,

I have some machines running FreeBSD 5.2.1. Is it safe to update 
ports to 5.4_stable via CVSup? Or should I use 5_stable?




Ports are independant of base branch, ports should generally be HEAD 
(tag=.).


HTH,
Joe

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




No such thing as -stable or -current ports.

Patrick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup question

2007-02-21 Thread Lars Eighner

On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Simon Gao wrote:

What if I just want to update ports for 5 stable tree? If using HEAD, then 
may some ports being updated be current but not stable? Or there is no such 
things as stable or current ports?


You got the right answer the first time.  You will get the appropriate
ports tree (updated) with the . tag.  If you use any other tag, you will
destroy your ports tree.

--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup question

2007-01-30 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Charlie McElfresh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi,

 I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE

 In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line

 ports-all

 in my cvs_supfile

 After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there
 before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there.

 I'd appreciate being pointed in the right direction for the solution to my
 problem.  Thanks.

$ grep php5-cgi /usr/ports/*
/usr/ports/MOVED:www/php5-cgi|lang/php5|2006-05-06|Unification of php slave 
ports
$
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup question

2007-01-30 Thread Jonathan Horne
 Hi,

 I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE

 In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line

 ports-all

 in my cvs_supfile

 After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there
 before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there.

 I'd appreciate being pointed in the right direction for the solution to my
 problem.  Thanks.

 Charlie
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


what you are probably looking for is now found in lang/php5-extensions.

hth,
jonathan


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup question

2007-01-30 Thread Roland Smith
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:20:03AM -0800, Charlie McElfresh wrote:
 After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there
 before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there.

Check out Freshports: http://www.freshports.org/commits.php

This gives you an overview of recently changed ports.

Roland
-- 
R.F.Smith   http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914  B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725)


pgpkrsiGoO8SE.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: CVSup question

2007-01-30 Thread Brian A. Seklecki


php5-cgi hasn't been a separate port for some time.  Try make config in 
lang/php5.


~BAS

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Charlie McElfresh wrote:


Hi,

I am running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE

In an effort to update my ports collection, I ran CVSup, with the line

ports-all

in my cvs_supfile

After the update finished, I noticed that some of my ports that were there
before, notably php5-cgi, were no longer there.

I'd appreciate being pointed in the right direction for the solution to my
problem.  Thanks.

Charlie
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



l8*
-lava (Brian A. Seklecki - Pittsburgh, PA, USA)
   http://www.spiritual-machines.org/

...from back in the heady days when helpdesk meant nothing, diskquota
meant everything, and lives could be bought and sold for a couple of pages
of laser printout - and frequently were.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup question - use just one supfile?

2006-02-12 Thread Glenn Dawson

At 04:25 AM 2/12/2006, Joel Hatton wrote:

Hi,

I've been sup'ing a few different trees for a little while now, and I'm
wondering: is it possible to do all at once with the same supfile?
Something like:

*default host=CHANGE_THIS.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/var/db
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_3
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_4
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6
*default delete use-rel-suffix

this can't be the correct syntax, but is this practicable?


You need a different prefix for each tag.  You'll still want to set 
your defaults, then override them as necessary, like this:


src-all prefix=/foo tag=RELENG_5
src-all prefix=/bar tag=RELENG_6


-Glenn



thanks,
-- Joel Hatton --
Security Analyst| Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417
AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031
The University of Queensland| WWW: www.auscert.org.au
Qld 4072 Australia  | Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup question

2005-12-11 Thread Chuck Swiger
Vasile C wrote:
  How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ?

A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup
server...

-- 
-Chuck

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup question

2005-12-11 Thread Vasile C
I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I want 
to change the reconnect time ..


On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:21, Chuck Swiger wrote:
 Vasile C wrote:
   How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ?

 A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup
 server...

-- 

Regards , Vasile C

If UNIX doesn't have the solution you have the wrong problem.
UNIX is simple, but it takes a genius to understand it's simplicity.


pgpTR7G0U0h9u.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: cvsup question

2005-12-11 Thread Chuck Swiger
Vasile C wrote:
 A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup
 server...
 I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I 
 want 
 to change the reconnect time ..

I hope this is a testbed and is not a production system.
Automaticly running portupgrade on a production system is a mistake...

-- 
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup question

2005-12-11 Thread Gerard Seibert
On Sunday, December 11, 2005 11:26:24 AM
Vasile C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvsup question
Wrote these words of wisdom:

 I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I 
 want 
 to change the reconnect time ..
 
 
 On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:21, Chuck Swiger wrote:
  Vasile C wrote:
How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ?
 
  A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup
  server...
 
 -- 
 
 Regards , Vasile C
 
 If UNIX doesn't have the solution you have the wrong problem.
 UNIX is simple, but it takes a genius to understand it's simplicity.


* REPLY SEPARATOR *
On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied:

I have a script, run from CRON also, that runs cvsup, portsdb -Uu and
then portupgrade. Since each succeeding program will not run until the
preceding one has finished, I have no need to change the timing on
cvsup. Are you perhaps trying to run each program individually from CRON,
rather than through a script?

-- 
Gerard Seibert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


A Smith  Wesson beats four aces.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup question

2005-12-11 Thread Vasile C
Can someone PLEASE answer my question without asking me more questions ?
Is there a way to change the reconnect time or not ?

On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:54, Gerard Seibert wrote:
 On Sunday, December 11, 2005 11:26:24 AM
 Vasile C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: cvsup question

 Wrote these words of wisdom:
  I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I
  want to change the reconnect time ..
 
  On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:21, Chuck Swiger wrote:
   Vasile C wrote:
 How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ?
  
   A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another
   cvsup server...
 
  --
 
  Regards , Vasile C
 
  If UNIX doesn't have the solution you have the wrong problem.
  UNIX is simple, but it takes a genius to understand it's simplicity.

 * REPLY SEPARATOR *
 On 10/11/2005 5:29:42 PM, Gerard Replied:

 I have a script, run from CRON also, that runs cvsup, portsdb -Uu and
 then portupgrade. Since each succeeding program will not run until the
 preceding one has finished, I have no need to change the timing on
 cvsup. Are you perhaps trying to run each program individually from CRON,
 rather than through a script?

-- 

Regards , Vasile C

If UNIX doesn't have the solution you have the wrong problem.
UNIX is simple, but it takes a genius to understand it's simplicity.


pgpB6LDoaFm2M.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: cvsup question

2005-12-11 Thread Matthew Seaman

Vasile C wrote:

Can someone PLEASE answer my question without asking me more questions ?
Is there a way to change the reconnect time or not ?


Not without modifying the source code to cvsup.

What I recommend you do is add the '-1' flag to your cvsup command line
-- so cvsup will try once to pull down the updates and then exit.  Then
you can use a trivial bit of shell scripting to try again if the first
attempt failed, although you should try to cvsup from a different server
if you need to retry.

eg.

   #!/bin/sh

   CVSUP=/usr/local/bin/cvsup
   CVSUPFLAGS=-1 -g -L2 /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile
   CVSUPSERVERS='
   cvsup.xx.freebsd.org
   cvsup.yy.freebsd.org
   cvsup.zz.freebsd.org
   '
   OTHERCMDS=portsdb -Uu  portupgrade

   for $h in $CVSUPSERVERS ; do
$CVSUP -h $h $CVSUPFLAGS  \
   $OTHERCMDS\
   break
   done

Note: untested code intended only as an outline of what you might do --
will need some work before suitable for serious use.

Cheers,

Matthew

--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
 Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
 Kent, CT11 9PW
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup question

2004-07-23 Thread uidzero
Steve wrote:
am doing cvsup for the first time, and got the hang of it, but have one
questions for those who used it.
is it advisable to do src-all, or should i only do ports-all
also is this configuration decent, in your opinion
*default host=cvsup5.FreeBSD.org
*default tag=.
*default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress
ports-all tag=.
#src-all (pending feedback)
--
Steve Rieger
ICQ # 5956607
yahoo IM riegersteve
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

That's what I use. src-all.
Michael
--
Michael D. Whities
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.one-arm.com
--
There are four colors of hats to watch for: 
Black, White, Grey, and Red.

The meanings are: 
Cracker, Hacker, Guru, and Victim.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup question

2004-07-23 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Steve wrote:
am doing cvsup for the first time, and got the hang of it, but have one
questions for those who used it.
is it advisable to do src-all, or should i only do ports-all
 

Depends on whether you want to update the OS as
well as the 3rd party software (ports).
also is this configuration decent, in your opinion
*default host=cvsup5.FreeBSD.org
*default tag=.
*default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress
ports-all tag=.
#src-all (pending feedback)
 

Hmm, never used seperate tags in the same
SUPfile, but I guess that cvsup is smart enough
to do that, considering what it does do.
For a discussion of the release tags, see the Cutting
Edge chapter in the FreeBSD handbook[1].
Please do note that you most likely *want* to
use tag=. for ports, but *not for source*.  You
probably want the latest releases of ports, but
it's not nearly so likely you want to be running
HEAD/CURRENT on your system
Kevin Kinsey
DaleCo, S.P.
[1]For 4-STABLE, for example, your cvsup app should
be looking for src files tagged RELENG_4.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup question

2004-07-23 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Friday 23 July 2004 08:54 am, Steve wrote:
 am doing cvsup for the first time, and got the hang of it, but have one
 questions for those who used it.

 is it advisable to do src-all, or should i only do ports-all
 also is this configuration decent, in your opinion

 *default host=cvsup5.FreeBSD.org
 *default tag=.
 *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup
 *default prefix=/usr
 *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress
 ports-all tag=.
 #src-all (pending feedback)
 --
 Steve Rieger
==
Hi Steve,

Your supfile line that has  *default tag=.  is going to download source code 
for current when you uncomment the  #src-all  line. If you're intending to 
follow current, that's fine. But, if you're going for 4.10 or 5.2.1, then you 
need a different default tag line. Until you go through the makeworld 
sequence, it won't bite you, on second thought, it probably will. Below is 
the supfile that I use:
*default tag=RELENG_5_2
*default host=cvsup15.FreeBSD.org
*default prefix=/usr
*default base=/usr
*default release=cvs
*default delete use-rel-suffix
#src-all
ports-all tag=.
#doc-all

I would suggest using sysutils/fastest_cvsup. You can either do a pkg_add -r, 
or build it from the ports.

If you just installed FreeBSD, I would do a src-all to get all the latest 
patches, and after that to get new patches  Other than that, you're just 
using bandwidth. There are more changes going on in the ports, so you would 
be upgrading there the most. Be sure to read usr/src/UPGRADING and 
usr/ports/UPGRADING.

Don

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup question, which tag for 4.9-RELEASE?

2004-02-12 Thread Jez Hancock
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 11:57:59AM -0500, Bob Collins wrote:
 I am running a few boxes(n) on 4.9-RELEASE and am wondering about
 updating the ports and source. Using CVSup, should I tag src with
 RELENG_4, or RELENG_4_9? And what if any are the differences, that
 are not already noted in the handbook? Up to this point, I have not
 updated the system since install

See:

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html

to quote:

RELENG_4
The line of development for FreeBSD-4.X, also known as FreeBSD-STABLE.

RELENG_4_9
The release branch for FreeBSD-4.9, used only for security advisories and
other critical fixes.

 I think I have a rather good grasp of the topic, but there is a little
 confusion on my part. I am thinking if I read correctly, using RELENG_4
 will update to the latest in the 4.x branch and I'll be at 4.9-Current,
 no? And RELENG_4_9 will be only updates to the 4.9 branch?
No to the first question, yes to the second :P

HTH

-- 
Jez Hancock
 - System Administrator / PHP Developer

http://munk.nu/
http://jez.hancock-family.com/  - Another FreeBSD Diary
http://ipfwstats.sf.net/- ipfw peruser traffic logging
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup question, which tag for 4.9-RELEASE?

2004-02-12 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
Selon Bob Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 I am running a few boxes(n) on 4.9-RELEASE and am wondering about
 updating the ports and source. Using CVSup, should I tag src with
 RELENG_4, or RELENG_4_9? And what if any are the differences, that
 are not already noted in the handbook? Up to this point, I have not
 updated the system since install

For your system, use RELENG_4_9; tag=RELENG_4_9; this will keep you up to date
with the security fixes.
For the ports, always use CURRENT; tag=.

 I think I have a rather good grasp of the topic, but there is a little
 confusion on my part. I am thinking if I read correctly, using RELENG_4
 will update to the latest in the 4.x branch and I'll be at 4.9-Current,
 no? And RELENG_4_9 will be only updates to the 4.9 branch?

RELENG_4 will update you to 4-STABLE (the future 4.10 if there's one).

Antoine
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup question, which tag for 4.9-RELEASE?

2004-02-12 Thread Jud

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:57:59 -0500, Bob Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
 I am running a few boxes(n) on 4.9-RELEASE and am wondering about
 updating the ports and source. Using CVSup, should I tag src with
 RELENG_4, or RELENG_4_9? And what if any are the differences, that
 are not already noted in the handbook? Up to this point, I have not
 updated the system since install
 
 I think I have a rather good grasp of the topic, but there is a little
 confusion on my part. I am thinking if I read correctly, using RELENG_4
 will update to the latest in the 4.x branch and I'll be at 4.9-Current,
 no? 

No.  No such thing as 4.9-CURRENT.  RELENG_4 will update to 4-STABLE,
which means it includes whatever updates have been made to -STABLE since
the 4.9-RELEASE snapshot (4.x-RELEASE being a snapshot of 4-STABLE).

 And RELENG_4_9 will be only updates to the 4.9 branch?

4.9 isn't a branch itself, it's a snapshot of the -STABLE branch. 
RELENG_4_9 contains only critical updates from the 4.9-RELEASE snapshot,
primarily if not exclusively security updates.

Jud
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: cvsup question

2003-08-11 Thread Clement Laforet
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 01:01:15 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Hi all,
 
 I'm running Freebsd 5.1 and I noticed in the Freebsd ftp website, current has
 some new port versions. I modified my cvs-supfile based on what I read in the
 handbook:
 
 src-all
 ports-all
 cvs-root all
 
 *default tag=.
 *default host=cvsup16.FreeBSD.org
 *default base=/usr
 *default prefix=/home/ncvs
 *default release=cvs delete compress
 *default delete use-rel-suffix
 
 When I checked /usr/ports, nothing has changed, what am I missing???

Wisdom would say you to have only one cvsup file for ports like this :

*default host=cvsup16.FreeBSD.org
*default base=/usr
*default prefix=/usr
*default release=cvs tag=.
*default delete use-rel-suffix
*default compress 

ports-all


please use *default compress unless you have a goo connection.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: CVSup question

2003-02-07 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Steve Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I am trying to upgrade a 4.5 box to RELENG_4, but it doesn't appear
 that I am getting all of the required info. Here's my command, and
 supfile:
 
 # cvsup -L 2 -g /etc/supfile
 
 *default tag=RELENG_4
 *default host=cvsup2.freebsd.org
 *default release=cvs
 *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup

I think you mean base=/usr

 *default prefix=/usr/src

I think you mean prefix=/usr
(it could be almost anywhere, but putting it in /usr/src is almost
asking to shoot yourself in the foot later)

 *default delete use-rel-suffix
 src-all
 ports-all
 
 When it says it is complete, this is the list of my /usr/src/directory:
 
 drwxr-xr-x   7 root  wheel   512 Nov 14 16:46 crypto
 drwxr-xr-x   7 root  wheel   512 Nov 14 16:46 kerberos5
 drwxr-xr-x   8 root  wheel   512 Nov 14 16:46 kerberosIV
 drwxr-xr-x   6 root  wheel   512 Nov 14 16:46 secure
 drwxr-xr-x  47 root  wheel  1024 Nov 14 21:51 sys
 
 Do I have to install all the sources off of the CD at install time to
 be able to update the source in order to buildworld?

Absolutely not.

 BTW, the error is don't know how to make buildworld which is
 understood, as there is no Makefile being cvsup'd.

That makefile is /usr/local/etc/cvsup/src/Makefile, I suspect.
At least, that's where you asked cvsup to put it.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: cvsup question

2002-12-18 Thread Kent Stewart
On Wednesday 18 December 2002 10:34 am, Daniel Schrock wrote:
 This is more of a minor annoyance, but I can't seem to fix it.
 I'm tired of portsdb -Uu spitting out errors regarding not finding
 japanese ports.


Try 

cd /usr/ports
make index
portsdb -u 

I have incorporated this sequence in my uports script because of the 
many error message. You also get the full list when you use make 
index. Make will die at the first port that is missing and so you 
can't have ports in your refuse file. BTW, if you do this everytime, 
you might as well add ports/INDEX to your ports-all refuse file. 
There isn't any reason to re-transfer a 3.05 MB file when you are going 
to create it as soon as you finish cvsuping.

Kent

 I initially had all of the non-english ports in my refuse file, since
 i have zero use for them, but i've removed these entries with the
 thinking that 'I have ample space and it doesn't hurt for them to be
 there if i can quiet the output of portsdb -Uu'

 but using 'ports-all' in my ports-supfile isn't grabbing the
 japanese, or any other language  for that matter (except portuguese
 and hungarian).

 Like I said, this is more of a minor annoyance, but if anyone knows a
 fix, that would be great.

 thanks.

 .daniel.schrock


 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message