Re: linux_base-c6 && Skype 4.2
On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:09:35 +0200 Matthias Apitz articulated: > M$ has Linux Skype 4.2 for some Linux distributions, for example for > F16; would it be possible to run one of these distributions on top of > linux_base-c6? Is there any work in progress I could support? > I have enough systems at home running some 10-CURRENT and could use > one of them for additional tests/work According to the web site, these are the minimum requirements for a Linux version of Skype 4.2.0.11 Skype for Linux 1 GHz processor or faster. 256 MB RAM. 100 MB free disk space on your hard drive. Video card driver with Xv support. Either a built-in or external microphone is required for voice calls. An internet connection – broadband is best (GPRS is not supported for voice calls). Qt 4.7 • D-Bus 1.0.0 libasound2 1.0.18 PulseAudio 1.0 (optional) BlueZ 4.0.0 (optional) I saw a post, I think it was SlashDot, that the FreeBSD kernel was not robust enough to handle Skype. You might want to talk to the developers. You can always download a clean distribution of Skype from the web site and experiment with it. <http://www.skype.com/en/download-skype/skype-for-computer/> -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FB 9.1 - emulators/linux_base-f10 build error
David Demelier gmail.com> writes: > ... > Do you have linux emulation enabled? Such as linux_enable="YES" in your > /etc/rc.conf > > Cheers, > David Yes, indeed, that was the cause. Thanks. jb ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FB 9.1 - emulators/linux_base-f10 build error
On 01/01/2013 13:52, jb wrote: ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE ===>>> linuxulator is not (kld)loaded It is said there : ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE ===>>> linuxulator is not (kld)loaded Do you have linux emulation enabled? Such as linux_enable="YES" in your /etc/rc.conf Cheers, David ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FB 9.1 - emulators/linux_base-f10 build error
Hi, # portmaster /usr/ports/www/nspluginwrapper ... ===>>> www/nspluginwrapper >> accessibility/linux-f10-atk >> emulators/linux_base-f10 (2/2) ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10 ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE ===>>> linuxulator is not (kld)loaded ===>>> If you are sure you can build it, remove the IGNORE line in the Makefile and try again. ===>>> Update for emulators/linux_base-f10 failed ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> Update for accessibility/linux-f10-atk failed ===>>> Aborting update # Why marked IGNORE ? jb ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Replacing linux_base-fc-4_14 with linux_base-f10-10_1
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 07:29:32 -0400 Jerry wrote: > I presently have linux_base-fc-4_14 installed on a FreeBSD-7.2 machine. > Would there be any benefit installing linux_base-f10-10_1 instead? I If it works for you, don't touch it. ;-) As for benefits: . use supported linux distributions (with security updates, etc.); . hardware acceleration _may_ work (strange but at some cases it works but not at others: googleearth works for me but has been reported by someone not to work). > believe I have to remove the linux_base-fc-4_14 installation first. Are > there any pitfalls, etc? I assume I would have to rebuild any ports > that depended on the older version after installing the newer one. There is some info at /usr/ports/UPDATING. > What version is the default for FreeBSD-8.0 that will soon be released? FreeBSD-8 uses linux -f10- infrastructure ports. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Replacing linux_base-fc-4_14 with linux_base-f10-10_1
I presently have linux_base-fc-4_14 installed on a FreeBSD-7.2 machine. Would there be any benefit installing linux_base-f10-10_1 instead? I believe I have to remove the linux_base-fc-4_14 installation first. Are there any pitfalls, etc? I assume I would have to rebuild any ports that depended on the older version after installing the newer one. What version is the default for FreeBSD-8.0 that will soon be released? -- Jerry ges...@yahoo.com In time, every post tends to be occupied by an employee who is incompetent to carry out its duties. Dr. L. J. Peter ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: linux_base installation - missing rpm binary
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:54:05 +0400 Jeff Laine wrote: > I've unpacked my apps under /compat/linux tree but my binary requires > shared X libraries: > >nsdexec: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot > > open shared object file: No such file or directory This library is a part of x11-toolkits/linux-gtk2 port. > >error while loading shared libraries: libXt.so.6: cannot open shared > > object file: No such file or directory > I've tried to install x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs port Good. > but brandelf tells me As I've wrote at my previuos email, brandelf should be used only with binary executives. Don't use it for libraries. You have been warned! ;-) > they are BSD-binaries incompatible with my linux stuff. And thus my app > can't start complaining on incompatibilities if I tune lib paths. You should not tweak paths untill absolutely needed (and if you really understand what you do). Lunuxulator should DRT if a needed library is present. In case of errors submit them here (or better even to freebsd-emulation@ ML, since more people may help there). -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: linux_base installation - missing rpm binary
On Fri,28-08-2009 [14:57:04], Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:06:28 +0400 Jeff Laine wrote: > > > I've just installed the emulators/linux_base-f10 port in order to run some > > rpm-based applications. > > Various online manuals told me that one should not use the native freebsd > > rpm > > binary (archivers/rpm), but instead use the /compat/linux/bin/rpm. But > > there's > > no such rpm binary under /compat/linux tree. What am I doing wrong? XD > > FreeBSD has it's own package manager and it is used to track > all ports (linux ports as well). So we don't use linux rpm > database (it is not supported). Said that I might add that it > doesn't mean that this won't work if you try. But you'll be at > your own here. > > If you need to install a linux rpm archieve you should do > as root: > # cd /compat/linux > # rpm2cpio -q < linux.rpm.archieve | cpio -id > Then brandelf any binary executable (not libraries!). > > Sure you won't be able to do a clean uninstall. But that > may help you to do your tests. > > The best way is to create an apropriate port and use it. > Creating a linux port is not hard task. Please take a look > at the ports tree (audio ports may be a good starting points > as examples). > > HTH > > > I'm running vanilla FreeBSD-7.2-RELEASE, fresh ports tree. > > BTW, I'm sure you have read /usr/ports/UPDATING and do have an > apropriate variables at /etc/make.conf. ;-) > Sure, I did. ;) Thanks for the answer, I've used cpio to unpack my rpms. And another related question if you don't mind. I've unpacked my apps under /compat/linux tree but my binary requires shared X libraries: >nsdexec: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot > open shared object file: No such file or directory >error while loading shared libraries: libXt.so.6: cannot open shared > object file: No such file or directory I've tried to install x11/linux-f10-xorg-libs port but brandelf tells me they are BSD-binaries incompatible with my linux stuff. And thus my app can't start complaining on incompatibilities if I tune lib paths. Any hints? TIA. -- Best regards, Jeff | "Nobody wants to say how this works. | | Maybe nobody knows ..." | | Xorg.conf(5)| ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: linux_base installation - missing rpm binary
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:06:28 +0400 Jeff Laine wrote: > I've just installed the emulators/linux_base-f10 port in order to run some > rpm-based applications. > Various online manuals told me that one should not use the native freebsd rpm > binary (archivers/rpm), but instead use the /compat/linux/bin/rpm. But > there's > no such rpm binary under /compat/linux tree. What am I doing wrong? XD FreeBSD has it's own package manager and it is used to track all ports (linux ports as well). So we don't use linux rpm database (it is not supported). Said that I might add that it doesn't mean that this won't work if you try. But you'll be at your own here. If you need to install a linux rpm archieve you should do as root: # cd /compat/linux # rpm2cpio -q < linux.rpm.archieve | cpio -id Then brandelf any binary executable (not libraries!). Sure you won't be able to do a clean uninstall. But that may help you to do your tests. The best way is to create an apropriate port and use it. Creating a linux port is not hard task. Please take a look at the ports tree (audio ports may be a good starting points as examples). HTH > I'm running vanilla FreeBSD-7.2-RELEASE, fresh ports tree. BTW, I'm sure you have read /usr/ports/UPDATING and do have an apropriate variables at /etc/make.conf. ;-) -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
linux_base installation - missing rpm binary
Hello, I've just installed the emulators/linux_base-f10 port in order to run some rpm-based applications. Various online manuals told me that one should not use the native freebsd rpm binary (archivers/rpm), but instead use the /compat/linux/bin/rpm. But there's no such rpm binary under /compat/linux tree. What am I doing wrong? XD I'm running vanilla FreeBSD-7.2-RELEASE, fresh ports tree. TIA. -- Best regards, Jeff | "Nobody wants to say how this works. | | Maybe nobody knows ..." | | Xorg.conf(5)| ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: >1 linux_base port (Re: 7.2 amd64 Flash)
On Saturday 25 July 2009 23:25:41 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > PJ writes: > > > I already had f8 installed as well as fc-4 > > > > That's wrong. Two linux_base ports should not be installed > > at a system ... > > Might it be advisable for each new linux_base port to declare > itself incompatible with all earlier ones, to prevent this > kind of error? (Cc: ports@) They are, -f8/Makefile: CONFLICTS= linux_base-gentoo* linux_base-fc4 linux_base-fc6 \ linux_base-f7 linux-glib2 Someone installed with DISABLE_CONFLICTS and has a bleeding foot. -- Mel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>1 linux_base port (Re: 7.2 amd64 Flash)
Boris Samorodov wrote: > PJ writes: > > I already had f8 installed as well as fc-4 > That's wrong. Two linux_base ports should not be installed > at a system ... Might it be advisable for each new linux_base port to declare itself incompatible with all earlier ones, to prevent this kind of error? (Cc: ports@) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
sound disappeared when transition from linux_base-fc4 to linux_base-fc6
Hello,all!
The problem is as follows.
A couple of days ago I did transition from linux_base-fc4 (default
linux support module) to linux_base-fc6. The purpose was to install
skype, which rquires at least linux_base-fc6 support. Along with this
I completely reinstalled ("pkg_delete" then
"make install clean" from week-ago portsnapped ports tree) all the
dependent ports, including
linux-flashplugin-9.0r159 and nspluginwrapper.
The rusult is: skype works OK,
but sound completely disappeared when when watchin videos from, say, youtube.
Sound system itself works OK, as well as skype, too :-))
Could anyone give me a hint or readdress me to the right mailing list?
Regards,
P.S.OS FreeBSD 7.1
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: carefull confirm on using linux_base-fc8
On Tue, 05 May 2009 22:07:48 -0500 Adam Vande More wrote: > If you intend on using f8, you'll want entries like this in /etc/make.conf > USE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8 > USE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f8 > OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8 > OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f8 Actually, only the last two hav to be defined. FYI: the first two variables were written at /usr/ports/UPDATING by an accident and fixed in a day. > That and other useful information can always be found in /usr/ports/UPDATING Yep. ;-) And reading emulation@ mail list about introduction of f8 ports is also recommended. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: carefull confirm on using linux_base-fc8
vuthecuong wrote: If you intend on using f8, you'll want entries like this in /etc/make.conf USE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8 USE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f8 OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f8 That and other useful information can always be found in /usr/ports/UPDATING /quote> Wow, thanks for very fast reply. I understood that I was still missing some variables in my make.conf as you stated above. Btw I just reconfirmed for sure only: This means, if I installed linux_base-fc8 correctly, when I install net/skype, this port 'must' retrieve rpm files etc from fc8 directory over the net, right? cool thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/carefull-confirm-on-using-linux_base-fc8-tp23399213p23399321.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: carefull confirm on using linux_base-fc8
vuthecuong wrote: Hi all I just did a clean install of freebsd 7.2 final release (I not enable linux compatibility during install). In first boot, I enabled linux compatibilitty with linux_base-fc8 as below: Add linux_enable=”YES” to /etc/rc.conf. Add compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16 to /etc/sysctl.conf. Add OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8 to /etc/make.conf. Add this line to /etc/fstab: linproc /usr/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 mkdir -p /usr/compat/linux/proc mount /usr/compat/linux/proc /etc/rc.d/abi start /etc/rc.d/sysctl start cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8 && make install clean When 'make install clean' in port 'linux_base-f8', I saw that it retrieved files (rpm etc) from fc8 directory on the net. However, when I install net/skype, I saw that it retrieved files (rpm etc) from fc4 on the net (sorry for my bad English). (I still not installed X yet so I cannot very fied my skype will run fine or not). So my question is: is it normal or abnormal when 'make install ' retrieved files (rpm etc) from fc4, not from fc8 althought I already enabled linux_base-f8? If it is abnormal, how can I solve it? Thanks and regards If you intend on using f8, you'll want entries like this in /etc/make.conf USE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8 USE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f8 OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f8 That and other useful information can always be found in /usr/ports/UPDATING ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
carefull confirm on using linux_base-fc8
Hi all I just did a clean install of freebsd 7.2 final release (I not enable linux compatibility during install). In first boot, I enabled linux compatibilitty with linux_base-fc8 as below: Add linux_enable=”YES” to /etc/rc.conf. Add compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16 to /etc/sysctl.conf. Add OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8 to /etc/make.conf. Add this line to /etc/fstab: linproc /usr/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 mkdir -p /usr/compat/linux/proc mount /usr/compat/linux/proc /etc/rc.d/abi start /etc/rc.d/sysctl start cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8 && make install clean When 'make install clean' in port 'linux_base-f8', I saw that it retrieved files (rpm etc) from fc8 directory on the net. However, when I install net/skype, I saw that it retrieved files (rpm etc) from fc4 on the net (sorry for my bad English). (I still not installed X yet so I cannot very fied my skype will run fine or not). So my question is: is it normal or abnormal when 'make install ' retrieved files (rpm etc) from fc4, not from fc8 althought I already enabled linux_base-f8? If it is abnormal, how can I solve it? Thanks and regards -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/carefull-confirm-on-using-linux_base-fc8-tp23399213p23399213.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD 8.0-CUR: /usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs won't install although emulators/linux_base-f8 is already installed
Boris Samorodov wrote: On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:28:20 + O. Hartmann wrote: Before filing a PR I will ask for hints for a problem I revealed when I wanted installing usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs on a FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT/amd64 box (most recent build_world, ports tree up to date). I receive this error: ===> linux-f8-xorg-libs-7.3 the port should be used with linux_base-f8, please read /usr/ports/UPDATING. There was an error at /usr/ports/UPDATING, I committed a fix two hours ago. You should define at /etc/make.conf variables: OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f8 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs. Package /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8 is already installed, up to date and Linux kernel module is also running and showing up when doing kldstat adjacent with linprocfs and linsysfs. What's wrong? HTH & WBR After adding both lines as recommended everything worked well! Thanks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD 8.0-CUR: /usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs won't install although emulators/linux_base-f8 is already installed
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:28:20PM +, O. Hartmann wrote: > Before filing a PR I will ask for hints for a problem I revealed when I > wanted installing usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs on a FreeBSD > 8.0-CURRENT/amd64 box (most recent build_world, ports tree up to date). > I receive this error: > > ===> linux-f8-xorg-libs-7.3 the port should be used with linux_base-f8, > please read /usr/ports/UPDATING. ^^^ > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs. > > > Package /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8 is already installed, up to > date and Linux kernel module is also running and showing up when doing > kldstat adjacent with linprocfs and linsysfs. > > What's wrong? > See above? -- Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD 8.0-CUR: /usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs won't install although emulators/linux_base-f8 is already installed
On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:28:20 + O. Hartmann wrote: > Before filing a PR I will ask for hints for a problem I revealed when > I wanted installing usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs on a FreeBSD > 8.0-CURRENT/amd64 box (most recent build_world, ports tree up to > date). > I receive this error: > ===> linux-f8-xorg-libs-7.3 the port should be used with > linux_base-f8, please read /usr/ports/UPDATING. There was an error at /usr/ports/UPDATING, I committed a fix two hours ago. You should define at /etc/make.conf variables: OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f8 > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs. > Package /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8 is already installed, up to > date and Linux kernel module is also running and showing up when doing > kldstat adjacent with linprocfs and linsysfs. > What's wrong? HTH & WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD 8.0-CUR: /usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs won't install although emulators/linux_base-f8 is already installed
Before filing a PR I will ask for hints for a problem I revealed when I wanted installing usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs on a FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT/amd64 box (most recent build_world, ports tree up to date). I receive this error: ===> linux-f8-xorg-libs-7.3 the port should be used with linux_base-f8, please read /usr/ports/UPDATING. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/linux-f8-xorg-libs. Package /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f8 is already installed, up to date and Linux kernel module is also running and showing up when doing kldstat adjacent with linprocfs and linsysfs. What's wrong? Oliver ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: linux_base question
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:43:22 +1000 Da Rock wrote: > If this is the case, what is the difference between the ports? Well, just what they are: ports for Fedora Core 6, Fedora 7 and Fedora 8. > Do the libraries change? Sure, some libraries changes did occure. At least minor versions were. A more detailed information you may discover the differencies looking at makefiles and pkg-plist files. > Supporting software? Hw, compat.linux.osrelease should be set to 2.6.16. > Can freebsd effectively emulate any kernel version? No, the default is 2.4.2 and a planned one (not default and not fully supported, but in a good shape so far) is 2.6.16. WBR -- bsam ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: linux_base question
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:03:45 -0800 Chris wrote: > I just updated ports and have the following shown > linux_base-f7 > linux_base-f8 I'd use this one if you cat't use linux_base-fc4. AFAIC this port has a fixed libc which works better with linuxulator. Please read /usr/ports/UPDATING for more information about non-default linux base ports (linux_base-6,7,8). You can't use FreeBSD-6.x though. > linux_base-fc4 > linux_base-fc6 > (and several Gentoo) WBR -- bsam ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: linux_base question
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 09:07 +0100, Mel wrote: > On Thursday 18 December 2008 04:03:45 Chris wrote: > > I'm trying to keep all FreeBSD servers in my net as I have since the > > late 90s. I have a requirement to get a quickbooks enterprise server > > running so I was going to attempt to use compat_linux. > > > > It struck me that if I knew the following list of supported linux > > implementations, I should be able to figure out the best port > > to use. So far, it doesn't seem too clear to me. Here are the > > linux versions supported by the 2 daemons Intuit puts out: > > > > CentOS 5 > > Debian (Lenny) > > Fedora 6 / 7 / 8 > > Mandriva > > OpenSuSE 10.2 / 10.3 > > Ubuntu 6.06 / 7.04 / 7.10 / 8.0 > > > > Here are the components needed. > > > > Gamin - 0.1.7.7 or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer > > Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer > > Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer > > Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newer > > > > Which of the linux_base* ports would be best to > > attempt to run these two daemons. > > > > I just updated ports and have the following shown > > linux_base-f7 > > linux_base-f8 > > linux_base-fc4 > > linux_base-fc6 > > (and several Gentoo) > > On 6.x, use fc4. > On 7.x use fc6 and set compat.linux.os_release to 2.6.16 (which will be the > default for 7.x branch starting 7.1 as far as I know). > > You can use others, but these have the widest coverage in production systems > and testing by the emulation team. Sorry to butt in here, but I've suffered similar confusion. In some blogs or wikis it mentions setting the sysctl compat.linux.osrelease to either 2.4.2 or 2.6.16, and (in some of my fiddling during tests) I've found I can actually set the kernel settings to suit pretty much any software that needs to run. If this is the case, what is the difference between the ports? Do the libraries change? Supporting software? Can freebsd effectively emulate any kernel version? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: linux_base question
On Dec 18, 2008, at 12:07 AM, Mel wrote: On Thursday 18 December 2008 04:03:45 Chris wrote: I'm trying to keep all FreeBSD servers in my net as I have since the late 90s. I have a requirement to get a quickbooks enterprise server running so I was going to attempt to use compat_linux. It struck me that if I knew the following list of supported linux implementations, I should be able to figure out the best port to use. So far, it doesn't seem too clear to me. Here are the linux versions supported by the 2 daemons Intuit puts out: CentOS 5 Debian (Lenny) Fedora 6 / 7 / 8 Mandriva OpenSuSE 10.2 / 10.3 Ubuntu 6.06 / 7.04 / 7.10 / 8.0 Here are the components needed. Gamin - 0.1.7.7 or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newer Which of the linux_base* ports would be best to attempt to run these two daemons. I just updated ports and have the following shown linux_base-f7 linux_base-f8 linux_base-fc4 linux_base-fc6 (and several Gentoo) On 6.x, use fc4. On 7.x use fc6 and set compat.linux.os_release to 2.6.16 (which will be the default for 7.x branch starting 7.1 as far as I know). You can use others, but these have the widest coverage in production systems and testing by the emulation team. Great, thanks! Just to make sure, did you mean compat.linux.osrelease without the underscore. Didn't find the other sysctl. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: linux_base question
On Thursday 18 December 2008 04:03:45 Chris wrote: > I'm trying to keep all FreeBSD servers in my net as I have since the > late 90s. I have a requirement to get a quickbooks enterprise server > running so I was going to attempt to use compat_linux. > > It struck me that if I knew the following list of supported linux > implementations, I should be able to figure out the best port > to use. So far, it doesn't seem too clear to me. Here are the > linux versions supported by the 2 daemons Intuit puts out: > > CentOS 5 > Debian (Lenny) > Fedora 6 / 7 / 8 > Mandriva > OpenSuSE 10.2 / 10.3 > Ubuntu 6.06 / 7.04 / 7.10 / 8.0 > > Here are the components needed. > > Gamin - 0.1.7.7 or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer > Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer > Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer > Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newer > > Which of the linux_base* ports would be best to > attempt to run these two daemons. > > I just updated ports and have the following shown > linux_base-f7 > linux_base-f8 > linux_base-fc4 > linux_base-fc6 > (and several Gentoo) On 6.x, use fc4. On 7.x use fc6 and set compat.linux.os_release to 2.6.16 (which will be the default for 7.x branch starting 7.1 as far as I know). You can use others, but these have the widest coverage in production systems and testing by the emulation team. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
linux_base question
I'm trying to keep all FreeBSD servers in my net as I have since the late 90s. I have a requirement to get a quickbooks enterprise server running so I was going to attempt to use compat_linux. It struck me that if I knew the following list of supported linux implementations, I should be able to figure out the best port to use. So far, it doesn't seem too clear to me. Here are the linux versions supported by the 2 daemons Intuit puts out: CentOS 5 Debian (Lenny) Fedora 6 / 7 / 8 Mandriva OpenSuSE 10.2 / 10.3 Ubuntu 6.06 / 7.04 / 7.10 / 8.0 Here are the components needed. Gamin - 0.1.7.7 or newer or Fam – 2.7.0 or newer Glibc – 2.5-3 or newer, or Libc6 – 2.5-3 or newer Libgcc – 4.2.1 or newer Libstdc++ - 4.2.1 or newer Which of the linux_base* ports would be best to attempt to run these two daemons. I just updated ports and have the following shown linux_base-f7 linux_base-f8 linux_base-fc4 linux_base-fc6 (and several Gentoo) Freshports shows fc4 as what you need to support a 2.4 kernel and the others as "Ignore"? What little I could figure out suggests at least some of those linux versions above are 2.6 something kernels. I guessed f8 but then found threads saying it was experimental. I'm just not getting it. Is there an easy answer or will this be a trial and error? I don't know a thing about Linux and never thought I'd have to.___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: downloading linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:19:31 -0400 matt donovan wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:49:01 -0200 luizbcampos wrote: > > > > > After I had tried to download linux_base-fc4 I got file > > > unavailable not found no access...I need to put my printer to work! > > > > You may try to use packages: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/packages-using.html > > > > > What`s the matter? > > > > You didn't show any diagnostics (exact commands, exact output, etc.) > > so it's hard to say anything. > > > the problem with the port your installing is that it takes 5 mirrors or so > to even find .rpms that even work A patch for ports/Mk/bsd.sites.mk has just been committed. The problem should go away. Thanks for pointing this out. WBR -- bsam ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: downloading linux_base-fc4
On Tuesday 21 October 2008, luizbcampos wrote: > After I had tried to download linux_base-fc4 I got file > unavailable not found no access...I need to put my printer to work! > What`s the matter? Please read http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/128160 You can set MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX to the URL of the archive-site: # make install \ MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX="http://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/%SUBDIR%/"; Cheers, ch > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Christian Hiris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | OpenPGP KeyID 0x1A9BE943 OpenPGP-Key at hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net and http://pgp.mit.edu ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: downloading linux_base-fc4
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:49:01 -0200 luizbcampos wrote: > > > After I had tried to download linux_base-fc4 I got file > > unavailable not found no access...I need to put my printer to work! > > You may try to use packages: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/packages-using.html > > > What`s the matter? > > You didn't show any diagnostics (exact commands, exact output, etc.) > so it's hard to say anything. > > > WBR > -- > bsam > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > [EMAIL PROTECTED]" > the problem with the port your installing is that it takes 5 mirrors or so to even find .rpms that even work ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: downloading linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:49:01 -0200 luizbcampos wrote: > After I had tried to download linux_base-fc4 I got file > unavailable not found no access...I need to put my printer to work! You may try to use packages: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/packages-using.html > What`s the matter? You didn't show any diagnostics (exact commands, exact output, etc.) so it's hard to say anything. WBR -- bsam ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
downloading linux_base-fc4
After I had tried to download linux_base-fc4 I got file unavailable not found no access...I need to put my printer to work! What`s the matter? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Recommended linux_base for 8.0?
Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:33:39AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Which linux base port is recommended for FreeBSD-current on amd64? >> >> Well, the answer is "just install any linux application you need from >> ports/packages and the ports infrastructure will DTRT". ;-) > > matlab isn't in the ports collection. Yes. There is a PR about new port Matlab7 though. >> > linux_base-f7/ >> > linux_base-f8/ >> > linux_base-fc4/ >> > linux_base-fc6/ >> > linux_base-gentoo-stage1/ >> > linux_base-gentoo-stage2/ >> > linux_base-gentoo-stage3/ >> > >> > I currently have fc4 installed, but have run into some pthread >> > problems. >> >> This one is the default for now. > > % matlab >>> plotTAIHR_bin_30D > system error(34): __kmp_set_stack_info: pthread_getattr_np: Numerical result > out of range > OMP abort: fatal system error detected. > > hpc:kargl[206] pkg_info | grep linux_base > linux_base-fc-4_10 Base set of packages needed in Linux mode (for i386/amd64) > hpc:kargl[208] portversion -vl '<' | grep linux_base > linux_base-fc-4_10 < needs updating (port has 4_13) Since you don't have other linux ports at this system it will be not hard to test linux_base-f8 which is intended to become a new linux base default in the future. > Guess which port is broken? I'm not sure whether it's a port or a system blame. CCing to emulation@ since there are more sharp linuxulator eyes there. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Recommended linux_base for 8.0?
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:33:39AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Which linux base port is recommended for FreeBSD-current on amd64? > > Well, the answer is "just install any linux application you need from > ports/packages and the ports infrastructure will DTRT". ;-) matlab isn't in the ports collection. > > linux_base-f7/ > > linux_base-f8/ > > linux_base-fc4/ > > linux_base-fc6/ > > linux_base-gentoo-stage1/ > > linux_base-gentoo-stage2/ > > linux_base-gentoo-stage3/ > > > > I currently have fc4 installed, but have run into some pthread > > problems. > > This one is the default for now. % matlab >> plotTAIHR_bin_30D system error(34): __kmp_set_stack_info: pthread_getattr_np: Numerical result out of range OMP abort: fatal system error detected. hpc:kargl[206] pkg_info | grep linux_base linux_base-fc-4_10 Base set of packages needed in Linux mode (for i386/amd64) hpc:kargl[208] portversion -vl '<' | grep linux_base linux_base-fc-4_10 < needs updating (port has 4_13) Guess which port is broken? -- Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Recommended linux_base for 8.0?
Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Which linux base port is recommended for FreeBSD-current on amd64? Well, the answer is "just install any linux application you need from ports/packages and the ports infrastructure will DTRT". ;-) > linux_base-f7/ > linux_base-f8/ > linux_base-fc4/ > linux_base-fc6/ > linux_base-gentoo-stage1/ > linux_base-gentoo-stage2/ > linux_base-gentoo-stage3/ > > I currently have fc4 installed, but have run into some pthread > problems. This one is the default for now. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Recommended linux_base for 8.0?
Which linux base port is recommended for FreeBSD-current on amd64? linux_base-f7/ linux_base-f8/ linux_base-fc4/ linux_base-fc6/ linux_base-gentoo-stage1/ linux_base-gentoo-stage2/ linux_base-gentoo-stage3/ I currently have fc4 installed, but have run into some pthread problems. -- Steve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base and SMP support ?
P.Moulin wrote: Hi there. I recently added linux_base-fc4 on a host, to run linux setiathome enhanced versions (aka crunchers). The problem is that on multicore engines (core 2 duo, pentium D, etc...) where before there was 2 freebsd-crunchers on 2 differents core, now, with linux-crunchers, the 2 crunchers are sharing only 1 core. Can someone tell me what's wrong with this ? Have I missed something ? Is it an incompatibility from linux_base with smp hardware ? This problem seems to affects only freebsd 6.x, not the 7 branch. My kernels are all compiled with SMP support. I'm working for years with freebsd, but consider I'm really a newbee with linux. How do you know they are sharing one core, and what do you mean by "2 crunchers"? Are they separate processes, or a single threaded process? Kris ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
linux_base and SMP support ?
Hi there. I recently added linux_base-fc4 on a host, to run linux setiathome enhanced versions (aka crunchers). The problem is that on multicore engines (core 2 duo, pentium D, etc...) where before there was 2 freebsd-crunchers on 2 differents core, now, with linux-crunchers, the 2 crunchers are sharing only 1 core. Can someone tell me what's wrong with this ? Have I missed something ? Is it an incompatibility from linux_base with smp hardware ? This problem seems to affects only freebsd 6.x, not the 7 branch. My kernels are all compiled with SMP support. I'm working for years with freebsd, but consider I'm really a newbee with linux. T.I.A. PM. PS: if you want to join us: http://boincstats.com/stats/team_graph.php?pr=sah&id=2119 (we have the 5th position in our country statistics; we are one of the oldiest team in our country; we tend to use mostly freebsd powered engines (56% freebsd today, 73% if you consider "Darwin" being a "freebsd"). (thanks to read this, not so long, email till this line ;-) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: SOS linux_base-fc4
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:33:44 -0300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, everybody! My box runs FreeBSD-6.1-R amd64 and I need to print an > important doc; its driver when uncompressed features i386.rpm files and Did you mean a printer's driver? > linux_base-fc4 is not at /usr/ports/emulators.. > What should I do? Shall I have to update all the OS in order to setup > "linux_base-fc4 or shall I have to upgrade by using another command? A good start to understand FreeBSD is to read it's oficial Handbook. Your question has nothing to do with linux_base. And questions like "What is the ports system? How to get a FreeBSD ports tree? How to install an application from ports or via packages?" are described at "The Handbook". Ex.: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html > Yesterday, I run CVSUP and I followed all the steps to upgrade FreeBSD > but...linux_base-fc4 was not at /usr/ports/emulators! Which supfile did you use? If you used the one for ports (not for the system files) you should get /usr/ports tree. Please read the above mentioned document. After reading you will understand that there are options (i.e. installing via port or packages) and how to do them. If you have a more concrete question (with logs, error messages etc.) you are welcome back and we'll be glad to help you. BTW good docs have been always an advantage of *BSD... WBR -- bsam ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
SOS linux_base-fc4
Hi, everybody! My box runs FreeBSD-6.1-R amd64 and I need to print an important doc; its driver when uncompressed features i386.rpm files and linux_base-fc4 is not at /usr/ports/emulators.. What should I do? Shall I have to update all the OS in order to setup "linux_base-fc4 or shall I have to upgrade by using another command? Yesterday, I run CVSUP and I followed all the steps to upgrade FreeBSD but...linux_base-fc4 was not at /usr/ports/emulators! Regards Luiz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Matlab 6.5 under linux_base-fc-4_9
Hi, since updating linux_base from RH to linux_base-fc-4_9, I'm getting the following error when I run matlab: Warning: Unable to load Java Runtime Environment: /usr/local/matlab/sys/java/jre/glnx86/jre/lib/i386/native_threads/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference. Warning: Disabling Java support. Has anyone seen this before? Any ideas? Thanks!!! Rich ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Weird perms with linux_base-gentoo-stage3
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 15:58:39 +0100, Divacky Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just out of curiousity - what do you mean by "better then the recommended > fc4" ? what problems disappear with you switch to gentoo base? Well, the short answer is that with the Gentoo base, some of the proprietary applications we use will run, while under FC4, they'd either fail to load or have horrible OpenGL problems (like poor performance or bad displays). I installed the Gentoo base as a test and the programs instantly started working again. It may not be recommended for various reasons that I haven't really researched, but it does what we need. -- Kirk Strauser ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Weird perms with linux_base-gentoo-stage3
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 05:22:31PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > I'm using linux_base-gentoo-stage3-2006.0_2 for my 6.2-RELEASE system's Linux > emulation. It works perfectly for my Linux apps - better than the recommend > linux_base-fc4 port, in fact - but has a strange problem. Whenever I install just out of curiousity - what do you mean by "better then the recommended fc4" ? what problems disappear with you switch to gentoo base? thnx ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Weird perms with linux_base-gentoo-stage3
I'm using linux_base-gentoo-stage3-2006.0_2 for my 6.2-RELEASE system's Linux emulation. It works perfectly for my Linux apps - better than the recommend linux_base-fc4 port, in fact - but has a strange problem. Whenever I install new software using Gentoo's "emerge" tool, the resulting binaries have weird permissions. For example: $ ls -la /compat/linux/usr/bin/pcretest rwS--T 1 root wheel 33828 Feb 8 17:13 /compat/linux/usr/bin/pcretest I found a similar question in the freebsd-emulation list (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2006-December/002937.html>), and it seems that the problem is trigged by the utimes() syscall. Has anyone found a workaround to this problem? It doesn't look like it's been patched in FreeBSD itself yet, and I haven't gotten a reply from the author of the above post when I asked him if he'd solved the problem. Neither was I able to find the patch he mention. Any pointers would be most appreciated! I'm getting tired of manually fixing the permissions on every file I install (and hoping that 755 for exes is correct). -- Kirk Strauser pgpUTzlDPmnNl.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: What linux_base for Oracle on AMD64?
Moving the thread to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:43:59 -0400 stan wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:51:38PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:53 -0400 stan wrote: > > > The handbook says that I need to install the emulators/linux_base port in > > > order to install > > > Oracle. But when I try to install this port, it says that it is > > > depricated. > > > > > What ports do I need to install in order to install Oracle on FreeBSD 6.x > > > on an AMD64 architecture machine? > > > > Current default (maintained) linux base port is linux_base-fc4. > > > Thanks, I got that installed. > Now what about the linux_devtools port the Handbook referes to? > I can't find such a port. Oops, The handbook seems to be staled at that point. Linux_devtools was removed. It was used with unsupported linux_base port (which may be removed any time now). It is recommended to use linux_dist ports for development. You may consider searching mail archieves on Oracle installing. There were some threads about it recently (though I don't recall exact mailing list, but it may be emulation@, current@, stable@). May be somebody at freebsd-emulation@ list may help you. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: What linux_base for Oracle on AMD64?
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:51:38PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:53 -0400 stan wrote: > > The handbook says that I need to install the emulators/linux_base port in > > order to install > > Oracle. But when I try to install this port, it says that it is depricated. > > > What ports do I need to install in order to install Oracle on FreeBSD 6.x > > on an AMD64 architecture machine? > > Current default (maintained) linux base port is linux_base-fc4. > Thanks, I got that installed. Now what about the linux_devtools port the Handbook referes to? I can't find such a port. -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: What linux_base for Oracle on AMD64?
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 08:56:53 -0400 stan wrote: > The handbook says that I need to install the emulators/linux_base port in > order to install > Oracle. But when I try to install this port, it says that it is depricated. > What ports do I need to install in order to install Oracle on FreeBSD 6.x > on an AMD64 architecture machine? Current default (maintained) linux base port is linux_base-fc4. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
What linux_base for Oracle on AMD64?
The handbook says that I need to install the emulators/linux_base port in order to install Oracle. But when I try to install this port, it says that it is depricated. What ports do I need to install in order to install Oracle on FreeBSD 6.x on an AMD64 architecture machine? -- Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4_9 install problem
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:24:46 +0300 Adrian Vraciu wrote: > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> Extracting for linux_base-fc-4_9 > ===> linux_base-fc-4_9 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/rpm2cpio - found > error reading header from package > /usr/bin/cpio: premature end of archive > *** Error code 1 > how can i fix that? How did you install the port? What if you do a make checksum at the port (you didn't show that output): - # cd /usr/ports/emulation/linux_base-fc4 # make checksum - WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
linux_base-fc4_9 install problem
===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Extracting for linux_base-fc-4_9 ===> linux_base-fc-4_9 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/rpm2cpio - found error reading header from package /usr/bin/cpio: premature end of archive *** Error code 1 how can i fix that? -- Best regards. Adrian Vraciu ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Cannot install linux_base-fc4 fetch fails ...
Hi there. I recently upgraded my server to FreeBSD 6.1 but cannot for the life of me get the linux_base emulator installed. All attempts to fetch the required files fail for some reason. -START- # cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4 # make install clean ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found => compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/rpm/i386/fedora/4. => Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/4/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/. fetch: http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/4/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/updates/4/i386/. fetch: http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/updates/4/i386/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/4/SRPMS/. fetch: http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/4/SRPMS/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/updates/4/SRPMS/. fetch: http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/updates/4/SRPMS/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/4/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/. fetch: ftp://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/core/4/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) ... (many many similar lines follow) => Attempting to fetch from http://fedora.server4you.net/fedora/core/updates/4/SRPMS/. fetch: http://fedora.server4you.net/fedora/core/updates/4/SRPMS/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from ftp://fedora.server4you.net/fedora/core/4/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/. fetch: ftp://fedora.server4you.net/fedora/core/4/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://fedora.server4you.net/fedora/core/updates/4/i386/. fetch: ftp://fedora.server4you.net/fedora/core/updates/4/i386/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://fedora.server4you.net/fedora/core/4/SRPMS/. fetch: ftp://fedora.server4you.net/fedora/core/4/SRPMS/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://fedora.server4you.net/fedora/core/updates/4/SRPMS/. fetch: ftp://fedora.server4you.net/fedora/core/updates/4/SRPMS/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from http://fedora.mirrored.ca/fedora/4/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/. ^Cfetch: transfer interrupted -END- Can anyone out there please help me?cd Thanks alot in advance. -- Kiffin Gish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: emulators ports: linux_base-8 vs linux_base-fc4
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 21:18:57 +0300 Petre Bandac wrote: > after a cvsup, portupgrading acroread gives me the following: > ###### > linux_base-fc-4_6 conflicts with installed package(s): > linux_base-8-8.0_15 > They install files into the same place. > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > ## > and > kgb# pkg_info linux_base-8-8.0_15 > Information for linux_base-8-8.0_15: > Comment: > Base set of packages needed in Linux mode (for i386/amd64) > Required by: > acroread7-7.0.1,1 > linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_7 > linux-atk-1.8.0_2 > linux-expat-1.95.7_1 > linux-firefox-1.5.0.4 > linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 > linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_4 > linux-glib2-2.4.8_2 > linux-gtk2-2.4.14_4 > linux-hicolor-icon-theme-0.5 > linux-jpeg-6b.33_1 > linux-pango-1.6.0_2 > linux-png-1.2.8_1 > linux-tiff-3.6.1_6 > linux_dri-4.4.0 > skype-1.2.0.18 > is it ok deleting linux_base-8 and installing linux-base-fc4 ? will the > dependencies be satisfied ? According to /usr/ports/UPDATING (please read it for detailed information) you should replace linux base and linux X libraries. All the dependencies should be satisfied. BTW there were many changes to linux infrostructure ports since your installation. You may consider portupgrading them all. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: emulators ports: linux_base-8 vs linux_base-fc4
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 09:18:57PM +0300, Petre Bandac wrote: > hallo > > after a cvsup, portupgrading acroread gives me the following: > > ## > linux_base-fc-4_6 conflicts with installed package(s): > linux_base-8-8.0_15 > > They install files into the same place. > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). > ## [...] > > is it ok deleting linux_base-8 and installing linux-base-fc4 ? will the > dependencies be satisfied ? Read the 20060616 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING for information on how to update the linux emulation stuff. -- Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
emulators ports: linux_base-8 vs linux_base-fc4
hallo after a cvsup, portupgrading acroread gives me the following: ## linux_base-fc-4_6 conflicts with installed package(s): linux_base-8-8.0_15 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). ## and kgb# pkg_info linux_base-8-8.0_15 Information for linux_base-8-8.0_15: Comment: Base set of packages needed in Linux mode (for i386/amd64) Required by: acroread7-7.0.1,1 linux-XFree86-libs-4.3.99.902_7 linux-atk-1.8.0_2 linux-expat-1.95.7_1 linux-firefox-1.5.0.4 linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 linux-fontconfig-2.2.3_4 linux-glib2-2.4.8_2 linux-gtk2-2.4.14_4 linux-hicolor-icon-theme-0.5 linux-jpeg-6b.33_1 linux-pango-1.6.0_2 linux-png-1.2.8_1 linux-tiff-3.6.1_6 linux_dri-4.4.0 skype-1.2.0.18 is it ok deleting linux_base-8 and installing linux-base-fc4 ? will the dependencies be satisfied ? thanks, petre -- Petre Bandac Network Scientist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-fc4
On 6/21/06, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:32:04 +0200 Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:47:59 +0400 > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr > > before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so? > > > > And, please, show your: > > $ ldd `which skype_bin` > > > hi Boris, > > thx you solved :) So can I consider that it works OK and skip tonight's testing session ? No please: ldd `which skype_bin` /usr/X11R6/bin/skype_bin: /usr/X11R6/bin/skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid /usr/X11R6/bin/skype_bin: exit status 127 Exit 1 -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #177: -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:32:04 +0200 Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:47:59 +0400 > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr > > before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so? > > > > And, please, show your: > > $ ldd `which skype_bin` > > > hi Boris, > > thx you solved :) So can I consider that it works OK and skip tonight's testing session ? -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #177: signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:47:59 +0400 Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr > before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so? > > And, please, show your: > $ ldd `which skype_bin` hi Boris, thx you solved :) Martin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:13:50 +0200 Martin Wilke wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:53:56 +0300 > Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200 > > Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype > > > skype_bin: error while loading shared > > > libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% > > > > On a quick try, no. > > > > I'll look into it thing night. > it does not work correctly under current. Just tested on amd64-current (aprox. 10 days ago), works fine. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200 Martin Wilke wrote: > someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype > skype_bin: error while loading shared > libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% Do you have some non-default settings that results in seaching /usr before /compat/linux (ex. LD_LIBRARY_PATH) or so? And, please, show your: $ ldd `which skype_bin` WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:13:50 +0200 Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:53:56 +0300 > Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200 > > Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi forks, > > > > > > > > > someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype > > > skype_bin: error while loading shared > > > libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% > > > > On a quick try, no. > > > > I'll look into it thing night. > > Ok thx, > > it does not work correctly under current. Hmm, I have no current to test on. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" You are an excellent tactician, Captain. You let your second in command attack while you sit and watch for weakness. -- Khan Noonian Singh, "Space Seed", stardate 3141.9 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:53:56 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200 > Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi forks, > > > > > > someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype > > skype_bin: error while loading shared > > libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% > > On a quick try, no. > > I'll look into it thing night. > > Ok thx, it does not work correctly under current. Martin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
Hi forks, someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:51:27 +0200 Martin Wilke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi forks, > > > someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype > skype_bin: error while loading shared > libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% On a quick try, no. I'll look into it thing night. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" Ferengi Rule of Acquisition #85: Never let the competition know what you're thinking. -- ST: Legends of the Ferengi signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-fc4
Hi forks, someone has the same problems with skype after the update ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% skype skype_bin: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:11:33 +0400 Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:54:09 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:07:48 > > +0400): > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > > > >> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 > > >> Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 > > >> > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) > > >> > > > > >> > > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. > > >> > > > > >> > > Here it is. > > >> > > > >> > Looks OK: > > >> > http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781 > > > > > >> Should I commit ? > > > > > > Alexander, would you mind? > > > No, feel free to give approval to itetcu to commit it. ;-) > > OK. Ion-Mihai, will you please be so kind to commit the patch? > Thanks. Commited. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #60: system has been recalled ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:54:09 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:07:48 > +0400): > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 > >> Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 > >> > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) > >> > > > >> > > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. > >> > > > >> > > Here it is. > >> > > >> > Looks OK: > >> > http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781 > > > >> Should I commit ? > > > > Alexander, would you mind? > No, feel free to give approval to itetcu to commit it. ;-) OK. Ion-Mihai, will you please be so kind to commit the patch? Thanks. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
Quoting Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Tue, 20 Jun 2006 15:07:48 +0400): On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote: > > > > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) > > > > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. > > > > Here it is. > > Looks OK: > http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781 Should I commit ? Alexander, would you mind? No, feel free to give approval to itetcu to commit it. ;-) Bye, Alexander. P.S.: I see Boris as one of currently two people which can be described as maintainers of the emulation@ owned ports. And I'm nagging portmgr to get a commit bit for him. Additionally there's no lock on emulation@ owned ports (except the usual "hands of if you do not really know what you are doing", and the linux infrastructure has a lot of pitfalls...). -- Selling GoodYear Eagle F1 235/40ZR18, 2x 4mm + 2x 5mm, ~130 EUR you have to pick it up between Germany/Saarland and Luxembourg/Capellen http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
Hi Guys, sorry for top-posting, but I don't really know where to add this: I still have problems with acroread7, even after the update to linux_base-fc-4_2 and linux-xorg-libs-6.8.2_4: /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libm.so.6: ELF file OS ABI invalid Any ideas? Thank you! On 6/20/06, Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 > Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 > > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote: > > > > > > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) > > > > > > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. > > > > > > Here it is. > > > > Looks OK: > > http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781 > Should I commit ? Alexander, would you mind? WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:48 +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 > Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 > > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote: > > > > > > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) > > > > > > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. > > > > > > Here it is. > > > > Looks OK: > > http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781 > Should I commit ? Alexander, would you mind? WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote: > > > > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) > > > > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. > > > > Here it is. > > Looks OK: > http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781 Should I commit ? -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #253: We've run out of licenses ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:33:06 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 > Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote: > > > > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) > > > > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. > > > > Here it is. > Looks OK: > http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781 Great, thanks! WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote: > > > /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) > > > Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. > > Here it is. Looks OK: http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/tb-exp/index.php?action=describe_port&id=781 -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #28: CPU radiator broken signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 13:14:43 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > > diff -u -r1.4 pkg-plist > > --- pkg-plist 2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 - 1.4 > > +++ pkg-plist 19 Jun 2006 10:39:14 - > > @@ -598,6 +598,10 @@ > > usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7 > > usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > > usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.7 > > +usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so > > +usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so > > +usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 > Ah, this was missing from my pkg-plist. I did not test the port's > uninstall. Yep, this file is not located at rpm-file. Maybe it is created as a link, say, when running linux ldconfig. > > +usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 > > usr/lib/libttf.so.2 > > usr/lib/libttf.so.2.3.0 > > usr/lib/libz.so.1 WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:09:31 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > diff -u -r1.4 pkg-plist > --- pkg-plist 2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 - 1.4 > +++ pkg-plist 19 Jun 2006 10:39:14 - > @@ -598,6 +598,10 @@ > usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7 > usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 > usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.7 > +usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so > +usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so > +usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 Ah, this was missing from my pkg-plist. I did not test the port's uninstall. Thanks Boris! > +usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 > usr/lib/libttf.so.2 > usr/lib/libttf.so.2.3.0 > usr/lib/libz.so.1 -- Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E) -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 12:23:19 +0300 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu wrote:
> /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :)
> Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes.
Here it is.
WBR
--
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 Makefile
--- Makefile 10 Jun 2006 13:35:52 - 1.7
+++ Makefile 19 Jun 2006 10:39:12 -
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
PORTNAME= fc
PORTVERSION= 4
-PORTREVISION= 1
+PORTREVISION= 2
CATEGORIES= emulators linux
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX}
MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= ${PORTVERSION}/${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}/os/Fedora/RPMS \
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
bzip2-1.0.2-16.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
bzip2-libs-1.0.2-16.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
+ compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
Index: distinfo.i386
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -r1.6 distinfo.i386
--- distinfo.i386 2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 - 1.6
+++ distinfo.i386 19 Jun 2006 10:39:12 -
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = 4351cbd58365904bc2a21c946b624837
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = c1ec3e21db3d4ef616ce78dcf2913508fdea6b70b674267af0f0d180428fda8b
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = 859566
+MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 3f002b614c92079a32a30eaa721aba58
+SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 0f4d0394c4f746bfc6418e8fd6b46a496f742a16d4bb96589cbe56b4975f94fd
+SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 178657
MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = dab411528a710a5f61e1981f173beddc
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = 1b07f3d0c61b5a4737ac7d007485d04b7d51a00476924d5dc399a1fa347376ac
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = 233643
Index: pkg-plist
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/pkg-plist,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 pkg-plist
--- pkg-plist 2 Jun 2006 20:50:32 - 1.4
+++ pkg-plist 19 Jun 2006 10:39:14 -
@@ -598,6 +598,10 @@
usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5.0.7
usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.7
+usr/lib/libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so
+usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so
+usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2
+usr/lib/libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
usr/lib/libttf.so.2
usr/lib/libttf.so.2.3.0
usr/lib/libz.so.1
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:42:54 +0400 Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:15:42 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote: > > (Really cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Boris Samodorov a.k.a > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:41:10 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote: > > > On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote: > > > > > > > After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of > > > > applications and games that will no longer run. One of the games is > > > > HoH. I receive the following error when trying to run it... does > > > > anyone know how to fix this? > > > > > > > > ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries: > > > > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such > > > > file or directory > > > > > > Apparently that application needs (yet another?) compatibility Linux > > > libraries, because it was built with g++-2.96 and linked against > > > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3. > > > Feel free to send a problem report for this so it won't get lost, > > > linux_base-fc4 maintainers should take a look at it and update the > > > port. > > > Jeff, I've attached a patch for linux_base-fc4, can you please test it > > and see if it fixes the dependency problem? > > Adi, you did the right thing -- that library is missing at the port. > There are two hints. > > 1. The plist file is not full (one llibrary missing). I'd recommend >you to test the patches (on probably fresh machine). Then on >deinstalling you'll notice those files that remain undeletted. >You may consider reading >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ >and > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-testing.html >to create a good (i.e. ready-to-commit) patches. /me whispers 'cvs diff -uN' and misc/tinderbox :) Or send it over andI'll run a test on one of my tindyes. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #141: disks spinning backwards - toggle the hemisphere jumper signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: linux_base-fc4
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:15:42 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote: > (Really cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Boris Samodorov a.k.a > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:41:10 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote: > > > > > After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of > > > applications and games that will no longer run. One of the games is > > > HoH. I receive the following error when trying to run it... does > > > anyone know how to fix this? > > > > > > ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries: > > > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such > > > file or directory > > > > Apparently that application needs (yet another?) compatibility Linux > > libraries, because it was built with g++-2.96 and linked against > > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3. > > Feel free to send a problem report for this so it won't get lost, > > linux_base-fc4 maintainers should take a look at it and update the > > port. > Jeff, I've attached a patch for linux_base-fc4, can you please test it > and see if it fixes the dependency problem? Adi, you did the right thing -- that library is missing at the port. There are two hints. 1. The plist file is not full (one llibrary missing). I'd recommend you to test the patches (on probably fresh machine). Then on deinstalling you'll notice those files that remain undeletted. You may consider reading http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ and http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-testing.html to create a good (i.e. ready-to-commit) patches. 2. To create a good distinfo file for a linux port try to use "make PACKAGE_BUILDING=YES makesum". There are may source files (under GPL) which we must (at least) have while building linux (GPL) ports. PS. I've already sent Jeff a patch and he gave me a successful feedback. I hope this patch will be committed soon. WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
(Really cc-ed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Boris Samodorov a.k.a
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 18:41:10 +0300 Adi Pircalabu wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote:
>
> > After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of
> > applications and games that will no longer run. One of the games is
> > HoH. I receive the following error when trying to run it... does
> > anyone know how to fix this?
> >
> > ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries:
> > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such
> > file or directory
>
> Apparently that application needs (yet another?) compatibility Linux
> libraries, because it was built with g++-2.96 and linked against
> libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3.
> Feel free to send a problem report for this so it won't get lost,
> linux_base-fc4 maintainers should take a look at it and update the
> port.
Jeff, I've attached a patch for linux_base-fc4, can you please test it
and see if it fixes the dependency problem?
Cheers
--
Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E)
diff -urN /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/Makefile /data/adi/work/ports/linux_base-fc4/Makefile
--- /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/Makefile Sat Jun 10 16:35:52 2006
+++ /data/adi/work/ports/linux_base-fc4/Makefile Mon Jun 19 19:04:57 2006
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
PORTNAME= fc
PORTVERSION= 4
-PORTREVISION= 1
+PORTREVISION= 2
CATEGORIES= emulators linux
MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_FEDORA_LINUX}
MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= ${PORTVERSION}/${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}/os/Fedora/RPMS \
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
bzip2-1.0.2-16.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
bzip2-libs-1.0.2-16.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
+ compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.${LINUX_RPM_ARCH}.rpm \
diff -urN /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386 /data/adi/work/ports/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386
--- /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386 Fri Jun 2 23:50:32 2006
+++ /data/adi/work/ports/linux_base-fc4/distinfo.i386 Mon Jun 19 19:04:57 2006
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = 4351cbd58365904bc2a21c946b624837
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = c1ec3e21db3d4ef616ce78dcf2913508fdea6b70b674267af0f0d180428fda8b
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.i386.rpm) = 859566
+MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 3f002b614c92079a32a30eaa721aba58
+SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 0f4d0394c4f746bfc6418e8fd6b46a496f742a16d4bb96589cbe56b4975f94fd
+SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-296-2.96-132.fc4.i386.rpm) = 178657
MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = dab411528a710a5f61e1981f173beddc
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = 1b07f3d0c61b5a4737ac7d007485d04b7d51a00476924d5dc399a1fa347376ac
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm) = 233643
@@ -100,87 +103,3 @@
MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/zlib-1.2.2.2-5.fc4.i386.rpm) = 7222e84cfa404931ff11e5e4b3edad5e
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/zlib-1.2.2.2-5.fc4.i386.rpm) = 904382b92317044565f8951f67700db60c86bacad659f3e0050c1dffa401fe70
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/zlib-1.2.2.2-5.fc4.i386.rpm) = 49500
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/basesystem-8.0-5.src.rpm) = d928e0cc1c629716aefc843ff150eec6
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/basesystem-8.0-5.src.rpm) = 9c809619bf56d59d6cad2620d40b0b5356e77aa0045b928ad2a6e977150a3b3b
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/basesystem-8.0-5.src.rpm) = 3638
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bash-3.0-31.src.rpm) = 691751a30e991d536b262a27784de212
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bash-3.0-31.src.rpm) = 996dd5ea6ddc997b2ff700b6f854a62355295f7ca9506e1cdc0c8004ecf12372
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bash-3.0-31.src.rpm) = 4479090
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bzip2-1.0.2-16.src.rpm) = 4f35fd36a4977bea9985015bf0f1515e
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bzip2-1.0.2-16.src.rpm) = cd5b82e1331bf7be636ce8ee3720de4261983ddd00bf51f9eb3048161169bcc4
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/bzip2-1.0.2-16.src.rpm) = 677935
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.src.rpm) = 6072a40a834c5d29f4d88454a234d52a
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.src.rpm) = 7c92a659930984682a6704ce40bff3919d1e87a5be3e9d534a42148761c1cb76
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/compat-db-4.2.52-2.FC4.src.rpm) = 7176462
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.src.rpm) = 42624b59a9843f09184d017a2ce4f397
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.src.rpm) = 8aa024c536905da47fd580b99df4c80bd85107f151178665a18995cfcf0db277
-SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/4/coreutils-5.2.1-48.1.src.rpm) = 4379037
-MD5 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.src.rpm) = 989c2696624adf5c06d794947c079589
-SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/4/db4-4.3.27-5.fc4.src.rpm) = ffc33b4429734eb9
Re: linux_base-fc4
(Cc-ed to freebsd-ports@, sorry if anyone's affected by cross-posting) On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 19:43:16 -0600 Jeff Molofee wrote: > After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of applications > and games that will no longer run. One of the games is HoH. I receive > the following error when trying to run it... does anyone know how to > fix this? > > ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries: > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such > file or directory Apparently that application needs (yet another?) compatibility Linux libraries, because it was built with g++-2.96 and linked against libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3. Feel free to send a problem report for this so it won't get lost, linux_base-fc4 maintainers should take a look at it and update the port. -- Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E) -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-fc4
Jeff Molofee wrote: > After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of applications and > games that will no longer run. One of the games is HoH. I receive the > following error when trying to run it... does anyone know how to fix this? > > ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: > cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Try to recompile the programs that aren't running anymore. HTH; Frank ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
linux_base-fc4
After upgrading to linux_base-fc4, I've noticed a lot of applications and games that will no longer run. One of the games is HoH. I receive the following error when trying to run it... does anyone know how to fix this? ./HoH: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Which linux_base port to use?
On 1/30/06, Joel Hatton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to try a linux binary application (Arkeia backup server) under > FreeBSD R6, so naturally this means linux compatibility, but I'm a little > confused - until today I presumed that only one 'linux_base' port existed. > A brief inspection of the Makefile for linux_base shows it to be Redhat > 7.3 level, but as 8 and 9 are available I don't know if I should choose > one of these later releases or another flavor entirely. I'm able to obtain > the software package for quite a few different linux distributions and > releases, and I don't need X11, so I guess I can narrow it down a little > that way as some linux_base* are more minimal than others, but I'd like > to pick the one that is most regularly maintained and least likely to cause > me issues down the track. > > Any suggestions? > > thanks, > -- Joel Hatton -- > Security Analyst| Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 > AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 > The University of Queensland| WWW: www.auscert.org.au > Qld 4072 Australia | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > There's a good article on linux compatibility: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2006/01/12/Big_Scary_Daemons.html Try to stick with the default (linux_base-8), then try rh-9. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Which linux_base port to use?
Hi, I'd like to try a linux binary application (Arkeia backup server) under FreeBSD R6, so naturally this means linux compatibility, but I'm a little confused - until today I presumed that only one 'linux_base' port existed. A brief inspection of the Makefile for linux_base shows it to be Redhat 7.3 level, but as 8 and 9 are available I don't know if I should choose one of these later releases or another flavor entirely. I'm able to obtain the software package for quite a few different linux distributions and releases, and I don't need X11, so I guess I can narrow it down a little that way as some linux_base* are more minimal than others, but I'd like to pick the one that is most regularly maintained and least likely to cause me issues down the track. Any suggestions? thanks, -- Joel Hatton -- Security Analyst| Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national CERT | Fax: +61 7 3365 7031 The University of Queensland| WWW: www.auscert.org.au Qld 4072 Australia | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base-8 fetch & # of ports errors
"Anthony M. Agelastos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello everyone, > > Several hours ago, I tried to upgrade linux_base-8 on my 6.0-STABLE > box and it ran into many fetch problems, which can be seen below. > Prior to this upgrading, I upgraded xorg without problems and after > the failed troubleshooting, I had the machine install Firefox and it > fetched it and built it without problems. Does anyone have any > suggestions? I checked the archives and did not find anything. I The servers don't seem to have that RPM, and the ones I checked (from my copy of the port, which doesn't seem to match yours) had, if anything, an older version. I don't know the right place or version; I'm having a little trouble wandering around the various FTP servers... > CVSup'd from cvsup13.us if that has anything to do with it. While on > the topic, I noticed earlier today that when I first issued the > portupgrade command, it rebuilt the package database and it mentioned > that there were 13,3xx packages... last time I checked the website it > listed over 14,000 and I have my cvsup file set to d/l all groups. > Any ideas? Thank you all for your continued assistance. I've got a hair over 14000 entries in the ports db this morning. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
linux_base-8 fetch & # of ports errors
Hello everyone, Several hours ago, I tried to upgrade linux_base-8 on my 6.0-STABLE box and it ran into many fetch problems, which can be seen below. Prior to this upgrading, I upgraded xorg without problems and after the failed troubleshooting, I had the machine install Firefox and it fetched it and built it without problems. Does anyone have any suggestions? I checked the archives and did not find anything. I CVSup'd from cvsup13.us if that has anything to do with it. While on the topic, I noticed earlier today that when I first issued the portupgrade command, it rebuilt the package database and it mentioned that there were 13,3xx packages... last time I checked the website it listed over 14,000 and I have my cvsup file set to d/l all groups. Any ideas? Thank you all for your continued assistance. Script started on Sun Jan 22 23:06:36 2006 dell# portupgrade -arR ---> Upgrading 'linux_base-8-8.0_6' to 'linux_base-8-8.0_11' (emulators/linux_base-8) ---> Building '/usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8' ===> Cleaning for rpm-3.0.6_10 ===> Cleaning for gmake-3.80_2 ===> Cleaning for automake-1.4.6_2 ===> Cleaning for autoconf-2.13.000227_5 ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.3.5_2 ===> Cleaning for popt-1.7 ===> Cleaning for gettext-0.14.5 ===> Cleaning for perl-5.8.7_2 ===> Cleaning for m4-1.4.4 ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.5.22_1 ===> Cleaning for libiconv-1.9.2_1 ===> Cleaning for linux_base-8-8.0_11 => bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/ distfiles/rpm/i386/8.0. => Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/ distributions/redhat/redhat/linux/8.0/os/i386/. fetch: http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/redhat/redhat/ linux/8.0/os/i386/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/ distributions/redhat/redhat/linux/8.0/updates/i386/. fetch: http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/redhat/redhat/ linux/8.0/updates/i386/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/ distributions/redhat/redhat/linux/8.0/os/SRPMS/. fetch: http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/redhat/redhat/ linux/8.0/os/SRPMS/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/ distributions/redhat/redhat/linux/8.0/updates/SRPMS/. fetch: http://mirrors.usc.edu/pub/linux/distributions/redhat/redhat/ linux/8.0/updates/SRPMS/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/ linux/8.0/os/i386/. fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/linux/8.0/os/i386/ bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/ linux/8.0/updates/i386/. fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/linux/8.0/updates/ i386/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/ linux/8.0/os/SRPMS/. fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/linux/8.0/os/SRPMS/ bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/ linux/8.0/updates/SRPMS/. fetch: http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/redhat/linux/8.0/updates/ SRPMS/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: Not Found => Attempting to fetch from ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/ linux/redhat/8.0/os/i386/. fetch: ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/linux/redhat/8.0/os/i386/ bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/ linux/redhat/8.0/updates/i386/. fetch: ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/linux/redhat/8.0/updates/ i386/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/ linux/redhat/8.0/os/SRPMS/. fetch: ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/linux/redhat/8.0/os/SRPMS/ bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/ linux/redhat/8.0/updates/SRPMS/. fetch: ftp://mirror.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/linux/redhat/8.0/updates/ SRPMS/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/ redhat/linux/8.0/os/i386/. fetch: ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/8.0/os/ i386/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/ redhat/linux/8.0/updates/i386/. fetch: ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/8.0/ updates/i386/bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) => Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/site/ftp
Re: Installation of linux_base on 6.0-RELEASE-p1
Leslie Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've installed the linux_base but later found out that I needed the > linux_base-8. I did a make deinstall for the linux_base and then I > tried to install the linux_base-8. > > cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8 > > make install clean > > ===> Installing for linux_base-8-8.0_10 > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ===> Checking if emulators/linux_base-8 already installed > kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 -> 3 > redhat-release-8.0-8.noarch.rpm > glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8.i386.rpm > glibc-2.3.2-4.80.8.i386.rpm > setup-2.5.20-1.noarch.rpm > filesystem-2.1.6-5.noarch.rpm > basesystem-8.0-1.noarch.rpm > libattr-2.0.8-3.i386.rpm > libacl-2.0.11-2.i386.rpm > libelf-0.8.2-2.i386.rpm > bzip2-libs-1.0.2-5.i386.rpm > termcap-11.0.1-13.noarch.rpm > compat-db-3.3.11-2.i386.rpm > db4-4.0.14-14.i386.rpm > gdbm-1.8.0-18.i386.rpm > glib-1.2.10-8.i386.rpm > libtermcap-2.0.8-31.i386.rpm > bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm > bzip2-1.0.2-5.i386.rpm > compat-libstdc++-7.3-2.96.110.i386.rpm > > file /usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so from install of > compat-libstdc++-7.3-2.96.110 conflicts with file from package > libstdc++-2.96-110 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8. > > > I need to solve the conflict with libstdc but I can't find information > on how. > > I would appreciate if someone could point me in the right direction. That's a confusing error message, all right. Or maybe I just need more coffee... Okay, it looks like RPMs for compat-libstdc++-7.3-2.96.110 and libstdc++-2.96-110 are banging into each other. The latter is probably from linux_base and the former from linux_base-8. At a guess, removing the linux_base port didn't go well. Maybe removing the linux packages (use pkg_delete(1) rather than "make deinstall", as it will not be confused if you update your ports skeletons) and cleaning /usr/compat out thoroughly is the way to go. That would take a lot of time, though; first try figuring out whether any port actually owns the conflicting file, and if not, remove that by hand. Good luck. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Installation of linux_base on 6.0-RELEASE-p1
Hi I've installed the linux_base but later found out that I needed the linux_base-8. I did a make deinstall for the linux_base and then I tried to install the linux_base-8. cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8 make install clean ===> Installing for linux_base-8-8.0_10 ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if emulators/linux_base-8 already installed kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 -> 3 redhat-release-8.0-8.noarch.rpm glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8.i386.rpm glibc-2.3.2-4.80.8.i386.rpm setup-2.5.20-1.noarch.rpm filesystem-2.1.6-5.noarch.rpm basesystem-8.0-1.noarch.rpm libattr-2.0.8-3.i386.rpm libacl-2.0.11-2.i386.rpm libelf-0.8.2-2.i386.rpm bzip2-libs-1.0.2-5.i386.rpm termcap-11.0.1-13.noarch.rpm compat-db-3.3.11-2.i386.rpm db4-4.0.14-14.i386.rpm gdbm-1.8.0-18.i386.rpm glib-1.2.10-8.i386.rpm libtermcap-2.0.8-31.i386.rpm bash-2.05b-5.1.i386.rpm bzip2-1.0.2-5.i386.rpm compat-libstdc++-7.3-2.96.110.i386.rpm file /usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so from install of compat-libstdc++-7.3-2.96.110 conflicts with file from package libstdc++-2.96-110 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8. I need to solve the conflict with libstdc but I can't find information on how. I would appreciate if someone could point me in the right direction. Thank you Leslie Jensen ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base install error
On Sunday 31 July 2005 17:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > installing linux_base and get error: > /===> linux_base-rh-7.3 depends on executable: rpm - found > Linux mode is not enabled. > Loading linux kernel module now... > kldload: can't load linux: Exec format error > The linux kernel module could not be loaded. > Please enable linux mode manually and retry. > / > I have already added an entry in rc.conf and am running generic kernel > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Maybe your linux.ko module isn't matched with your kernel, do you always rebuild the modules when you rebuild the kernel? -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
linux_base install error
installing linux_base and get error: /===> linux_base-rh-7.3 depends on executable: rpm - found Linux mode is not enabled. Loading linux kernel module now... kldload: can't load linux: Exec format error The linux kernel module could not be loaded. Please enable linux mode manually and retry. / I have already added an entry in rc.conf and am running generic kernel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base compatibility issue? Counter-Strike
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:27:14 +0300, roma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > At me the same problem as at you, whether was possible to you to solve it? > [Paste from other thread] > > I came across a post you made regarding the following erros on the CS source > with freebsd 4.9 > > Illegal instruction (core dumped) > > cat: hlds.12893.pid: No such file or directory > > Deprecated bfd_read called at > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dwarf2read.c > line 3049 in dwarf2_read_section > > Dwarf Error: Cannot handle DW_FORM_strp in DWARF reader. > > /lib/libm.so.6: No such file or directory. > > debug.cmds:1: Error in sourced command file: > > email debug.log to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Did you ever figure out a resolu8tion to the problem or is the only fix to > upgrade to 5.3 ? > > Any help would be appreciated! > First, make sure you are using linux_compat8 not 7. If that alone works, then wonderful. If not, then the next part depends on what processor you have. If you can support MMX/SSE, the enable SSE in your kernel (off by default in 4.x I believe) and try again. When CS:S first came out, I had to do the SSE/compat8 thing to get it working on an Athlon XP box under 4.x, my Athlon XP box that was running 5.x had no problem once I install compat. For a long time, I couldn't run it on my test server (K6-2 350, no SSE possible), but sometime recently Valve must have fixed it to use old CPUs as well as it did work the last time I tried. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
linux_base compatibility issue? Counter-Strike
Hi, At me the same problem as at you, whether was possible to you to solve it? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: linux_base compatibility issue? Counter-Strike
> > I came across a post you made regarding the following erros on the CS source > with freebsd 4.9 > > Illegal instruction (core dumped) > > cat: hlds.12893.pid: No such file or directory > > Deprecated bfd_read called at > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dwarf2read.c > line 3049 in dwarf2_read_section > > Dwarf Error: Cannot handle DW_FORM_strp in DWARF reader. > > /lib/libm.so.6: No such file or directory. > > debug.cmds:1: Error in sourced command file: > > email debug.log to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Did you ever figure out a resolu8tion to the problem or is the only fix to > upgrade to 5.3 ? > > Any help would be appreciated! > First, make sure you are using linux_compat8 not 7. If that alone works, then wonderful. If not, then the next part depends on what processor you have. If you can support MMX/SSE, the enable SSE in your kernel (off by default in 4.x I believe) and try again. When CS:S first came out, I had to do the SSE/compat8 thing to get it working on an Athlon XP box under 4.x, my Athlon XP box that was running 5.x had no problem once I install compat. For a long time, I couldn't run it on my test server (K6-2 350, no SSE possible), but sometime recently Valve must have fixed it to use old CPUs as well as it did work the last time I tried. Hope this helps, let me know if it doesn't. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Compiling linux_base in jail fails
On 02/25/05 10:53:03, Viren Patel wrote: ===> linux_base-rh-7.3 depends on executable: rpm - found LC_ALL=C rpm --initdb --root /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base/work/linux_base-rh-7.3 --dbpath /var/lib/rpm kern.fallback_elf_brand: -1 sysctl: kern.fallback_elf_brand: Operation not permitted ELF binary type "0" not known. execution of glibc-2.2.5-44.legacy.3 script failed, exit status 255 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base. Any ideas on how to get linux emulator running inside a jail? Thanks. Use base-8, 7 is old and has security issues I hear. Check /usr/ports/UPDATING. It seems to me the sysctl kern.fallback_elf_brand is being changed, but you can't do that in a jail. Just do it as root. Then it would be avaliable to all programs, even those you might be running in a jail. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Compiling linux_base in jail fails
Hello. I am trying to install linux_base inside a jail and it fails with the following: #make ===> Extracting for linux_base-rh-7.3 => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/glibc-common-2.2.5-44.legacy.3.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/glibc-2.2.5-44.legacy.3.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/redhat-release-7.3-1.noarch.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/setup-2.5.12-1.noarch.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/filesystem-2.1.6-2.noarch.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/basesystem-7.0-2.noarch.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/termcap-11.0.1-10.noarch.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/db1-1.85-8.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/db3-3.3.11-6.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/gdbm-1.8.0-14.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/glib-1.2.10-5.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/glib2-2.0.1-2.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/libtermcap-2.0.8-28.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/bash-2.05a-13.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/bzip2-libs-1.0.2-2.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/bzip2-1.0.2-2.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/libstdc++-2.96-110.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/compat-libstdc++-6.2-2.9.0.16.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/ncurses-5.2-26.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/info-4.1-1.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/fileutils-4.1-10.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/grep-2.5.1-1.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/popt-1.6.4-7x.18.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/readline-4.2a-4.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/setserial-2.17-5.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/slang-1.4.5-2.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/sh-utils-2.0.11-14.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/rpm-4.0.4-7x.18.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/zlib-1.1.3-25.7.i386.rpm. => Checksum OK for rpm/rh-7.3/XFree86-libs-4.3.0-78.EL.tj.i386.rpm. ===> linux_base-rh-7.3 depends on executable: rpm - found LC_ALL=C rpm --initdb --root /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base/work/linux_base-rh-7.3 --dbpath /var/lib/rpm kern.fallback_elf_brand: -1 sysctl: kern.fallback_elf_brand: Operation not permitted ELF binary type "0" not known. execution of glibc-2.2.5-44.legacy.3 script failed, exit status 255 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base. Any ideas on how to get linux emulator running inside a jail? Thanks. -- Viren Patel Chemistry & Biochemistry University of Texas at Austin ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
linux_base compatibility issue? Counter-Strike
Derrick Ryalls, I came across a post you made regarding the following erros on the CS source with freebsd 4.9 Illegal instruction (core dumped) cat: hlds.12893.pid: No such file or directory Deprecated bfd_read called at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dwarf2read.c line 3049 in dwarf2_read_section Dwarf Error: Cannot handle DW_FORM_strp in DWARF reader. /lib/libm.so.6: No such file or directory. debug.cmds:1: Error in sourced command file: email debug.log to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Did you ever figure out a resolu8tion to the problem or is the only fix to upgrade to 5.3 ? Any help would be appreciated! Thanks Jaron Parsons ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
anyone get the linux_base-gentoo port to work?
I keep running into problems of the sort host# /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.2 /compat/linux/lib/ld-2.3.4.so: Exec format error. Binary file not executable. host# Apparently under linux that will work (here is from a gentoo box I have access to) bash-2.05b# /lib/ld-linux.so.2 Usage: ld.so [OPTION]... EXECUTABLE-FILE [ARGS-FOR-PROGRAM...] You have invoked `ld.so', the helper program for shared library executables. This program usually lives in the file `/lib/ld.so', and special directives in executable files using ELF shared libraries tell the system's program loader to load the helper program from this file. This helper program loads the shared libraries needed by the program executable, prepares the program to run, and runs it. You may invoke this helper program directly from the command line to load and run an ELF executable file; this is like executing that file itself, but always uses this helper program from the file you specified, instead of the helper program file specified in the executable file you run. This is mostly of use for maintainers to test new versions of this helper program; chances are you did not intend to run this program. --listlist all dependencies and how they are resolved --verify verify that given object really is a dynamically linked object we can handle --library-path PATH use given PATH instead of content of the environment variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH --inhibit-rpath LIST ignore RUNPATH and RPATH information in object names in LIST bash-2.05b# trying to update portage or to rebuild gcc (as is recommended in the port) evetually fail with the above error... (The example I have above was to retry the command at the command line) Any ideas on how to make this work? Thanks Chad ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Fixing linux_base dependencies
Not to long ago I upgraded to linux_base-rh-9 so I'd have the latest libraries. Not any time a package that depends on linux_base is upgraded or installed, all my dependecies are pointed to linux_base-8-* and I have to run pkgdb -F to fix them. Is there some variable I can set to avoid this. It's not a huge problem, but is just a big annoyance. -- I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Compiling/installing ports via NFS - any gotcha's? (while building linux_base-8-8.0_6, "/usr/bin/build-locale-archive: cannot lock new archive: Operation not supported")
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:19:18PM +0100, Ruben de Groot wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:15:19PM -0600, John typed: > > I don't have enough storage on my laptop for the entire ports tree > > (surprise, surprise), so I'm trying to "make install" acroread > > and jdk14 via NFS mounts from a bigger server. > > > > I'm down to trying to get the specific version of linux_base that > > it wants(and I already have the linux kld loaded and linprocfs > > mounted). I have rpc.statd and rpc.lockd running on both systems. > > What version of FreeBSD are you running? AFAIK, rpc.lockd in 4.x > only handles serverside locking, not from the client. Thanks, Ruben. I should have said. It's 5.3-STABLE on both sides. I now believe the problem was that I installed some parts before the cvsup, and some parts after, and missed the messages about it needing newer versions of some of the parts. I ripped out all the dependent packages and reinstalled the latest versions, and a lot of the weirdness went away. I also gave up trying to do the "make" over NFS, which I now regret, because my NFS server is the least powerful machine I have in terms of CPU power, and it's been compilig for about 16 hours now... -- John Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Compiling/installing ports via NFS - any gotcha's? (while building linux_base-8-8.0_6, "/usr/bin/build-locale-archive: cannot lock new archive: Operation not supported")
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:15:19PM -0600, John typed: > I don't have enough storage on my laptop for the entire ports tree > (surprise, surprise), so I'm trying to "make install" acroread > and jdk14 via NFS mounts from a bigger server. > > I'm down to trying to get the specific version of linux_base that > it wants(and I already have the linux kld loaded and linprocfs > mounted). I have rpc.statd and rpc.lockd running on both systems. What version of FreeBSD are you running? AFAIK, rpc.lockd in 4.x only handles serverside locking, not from the client. Ruben ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Compiling/installing ports via NFS - any gotcha's? (while building linux_base-8-8.0_6, "/usr/bin/build-locale-archive: cannot lock new archive: Operation not supported")
I don't have enough storage on my laptop for the entire ports tree (surprise, surprise), so I'm trying to "make install" acroread and jdk14 via NFS mounts from a bigger server. I'm down to trying to get the specific version of linux_base that it wants(and I already have the linux kld loaded and linprocfs mounted). I have rpc.statd and rpc.lockd running on both systems. It keeps erroring out with the message in my Subject line: ===> Patching for linux_base-8-8.0_6 ===> linux_base-8-8.0_6 depends on executable: rpm - found ===> Configuring for linux_base-8-8.0_6 ===> Installing for linux_base-8-8.0_6 kern.fallback_elf_brand: 3 -> 3 redhat-release-8.0-8.noarch.rpm glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8.i386.rpm /usr/sbin/build-locale-archive: cannot lock new archive: Operation not supported execution of glibc-common-2.3.2-4.80.8 script failed, exit status 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8. Any clues for me? -- John Lind [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
