Re: [Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

2016-01-04 Thread Martin Kosek
On 12/22/2015 05:37 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote:
> On 12/22/2015 05:19 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 22.12.2015 17:18, John Dennis wrote:
>>> On 12/22/2015 09:50 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
 John, the machines which used to generate the repos are basically dead now.

 Could you remove the directories and replace them with a README with 
 sentence
 that the repos were discontinued, please?
>>>
>>> I'd be happy to, but shouldn't the README contain a pointer to the preferred
>>> repo/copr whatever it is now? What is it?
>>
>> AFAIK we do not have nightly builds yet :-(
>>
>> Petr, could we have some nightly or post-commit builds in Fedora Copr?
>>
> 
> It is easy to setup a vm for nightly copr builds.
> 
> We should investigate a possibility of getting a project copr account. It is
> not good to build everything in mkosek's namespace.

Makes sense. I filed a ticket for Fedora infra:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5048

We will see what is their suggestion.

Martin

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code


Re: [Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

2015-12-22 Thread Petr Spacek
On 22.12.2015 17:18, John Dennis wrote:
> On 12/22/2015 09:50 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> John, the machines which used to generate the repos are basically dead now.
>>
>> Could you remove the directories and replace them with a README with sentence
>> that the repos were discontinued, please?
> 
> I'd be happy to, but shouldn't the README contain a pointer to the preferred
> repo/copr whatever it is now? What is it?

AFAIK we do not have nightly builds yet :-(

Petr, could we have some nightly or post-commit builds in Fedora Copr?

-- 
Petr^2 Spacek

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code


Re: [Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

2015-12-22 Thread Petr Vobornik

On 12/22/2015 05:19 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:

On 22.12.2015 17:18, John Dennis wrote:

On 12/22/2015 09:50 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:

John, the machines which used to generate the repos are basically dead now.

Could you remove the directories and replace them with a README with sentence
that the repos were discontinued, please?


I'd be happy to, but shouldn't the README contain a pointer to the preferred
repo/copr whatever it is now? What is it?


AFAIK we do not have nightly builds yet :-(

Petr, could we have some nightly or post-commit builds in Fedora Copr?



It is easy to setup a vm for nightly copr builds.

We should investigate a possibility of getting a project copr account. 
It is not good to build everything in mkosek's namespace.

--
Petr Vobornik

--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code


Re: [Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

2015-12-22 Thread John Dennis

On 12/22/2015 09:50 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:

John, the machines which used to generate the repos are basically dead now.

Could you remove the directories and replace them with a README with sentence
that the repos were discontinued, please?


I'd be happy to, but shouldn't the README contain a pointer to the 
preferred repo/copr whatever it is now? What is it?



--
John

--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code


Re: [Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

2015-12-22 Thread Petr Spacek
On 27.8.2015 10:34, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 15.7.2015 09:44, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49:23PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
 On 07/14/2015 12:03 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is anyone using repos
> https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/
> ?
>
> AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure about people
> outside the Brno.
>
> Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business? Upcoming lab
> maintenance window could be a good time to do that.

 I would love to get out of the builder business and I suspect Nalin would 
 as
 well [1]. The question came up in our Monday meeting as well. Nobody seem 
 to
 know if anyone was using these builds and why we weren't using COPR. The
>>>
>>> The Fedora infra admins should be able to provide HTTP logs for the
>>> repo, if you needs some numbers about potential usage.
>>
>> That is a good idea! I got logs from Fedora admins and as far as I can tell,
>> in the last month there were only 7 RPM downloads and nothing else.
>>
>> The 7 hits I found was for
>> /ipa-devel/rhel/6/x86_64/os/sssd-1.13.1-0.20150813T1121Zgit137d5dd.el6.i686.rpm
>> and
>> other packages from the same version.
>>
>> I did not find any hits for IPA packages at all. All the remaining traffic
>> (except the 7 RPM hits) was from repo data refreshes:
>> - 83 % is RHEL 5 repodata
>> - 13 % is RHEL 6 repodata
>> - remaining ~ 4 % of noise is Fedora repodata
>>
>> It seems to me that we can get out the builder business completely and
>> decommission ipa-devel and replace it with COPR.
>>
>> Do you agree? John? Nathaniel? Stephen? Anyone? :-)
> Yes, I think we can decommission this repository thanks to COPR
> infrastructure.

John, the machines which used to generate the repos are basically dead now.

Could you remove the directories and replace them with a README with sentence
that the repos were discontinued, please?

-- 
Petr^2 Spacek

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code


Re: [Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

2015-08-31 Thread Simo Sorce
On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 09:36 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 08:20 -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> > On 08/27/2015 04:27 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > > On 15.7.2015 09:44, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49:23PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> > > > > On 07/14/2015 12:03 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Is anyone using repos
> > > > > > https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/
> > > > > > ?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure
> > > > > > about people
> > > > > > outside the Brno.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business?
> > > > > > Upcoming lab
> > > > > > maintenance window could be a good time to do that.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I would love to get out of the builder business and I suspect
> > > > > Nalin would as
> > > > > well [1]. The question came up in our Monday meeting as well.
> > > > > Nobody seem to
> > > > > know if anyone was using these builds and why we weren't using
> > > > > COPR. The
> > > > 
> > > > The Fedora infra admins should be able to provide HTTP logs for
> > > > the
> > > > repo, if you needs some numbers about potential usage.
> > > 
> > > That is a good idea! I got logs from Fedora admins and as far as I
> > > can tell,
> > > in the last month there were only 7 RPM downloads and nothing else.
> > > 
> > > The 7 hits I found was for
> > > /ipa-devel/rhel/6/x86_64/os/sssd-1.13.1-
> > > 0.20150813T1121Zgit137d5dd.el6.i686.rpm and
> > > other packages from the same version.
> > > 
> > > I did not find any hits for IPA packages at all. All the remaining
> > > traffic
> > > (except the 7 RPM hits) was from repo data refreshes:
> > > - 83 % is RHEL 5 repodata
> > > - 13 % is RHEL 6 repodata
> > > - remaining ~ 4 % of noise is Fedora repodata
> > > 
> > > It seems to me that we can get out the builder business completely
> > > and
> > > decommission ipa-devel and replace it with COPR.
> > > 
> > > Do you agree? John? Nathaniel? Stephen? Anyone? :-)
> > 
> > Yes, I agree. Do we have a cut off date when I can stop the service?
> > 
> 
> 
> Given that the traffic was so small, it looks likely that only a
> single person is still using it. Probably safe to just kill it off and
> wait for that person to ask where to go.

It may be one of my VMs, if so I will just change stuff, ok to kill for
me.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code


Re: [Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

2015-08-31 Thread Nathaniel McCallum
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:27 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 15.7.2015 09:44, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49:23PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> > > On 07/14/2015 12:03 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > Is anyone using repos
> > > > https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/
> > > > ?
> > > > 
> > > > AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure
> > > > about people
> > > > outside the Brno.
> > > > 
> > > > Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business?
> > > > Upcoming lab
> > > > maintenance window could be a good time to do that.
> > > 
> > > I would love to get out of the builder business and I suspect
> > > Nalin would as
> > > well [1]. The question came up in our Monday meeting as well.
> > > Nobody seem to
> > > know if anyone was using these builds and why we weren't using
> > > COPR. The
> > 
> > The Fedora infra admins should be able to provide HTTP logs for the
> > repo, if you needs some numbers about potential usage.
> 
> That is a good idea! I got logs from Fedora admins and as far as I
> can tell,
> in the last month there were only 7 RPM downloads and nothing else.
> 
> The 7 hits I found was for
> /ipa-devel/rhel/6/x86_64/os/sssd-1.13.1-
> 0.20150813T1121Zgit137d5dd.el6.i686.rpm and
> other packages from the same version.
> 
> I did not find any hits for IPA packages at all. All the remaining
> traffic
> (except the 7 RPM hits) was from repo data refreshes:
> - 83 % is RHEL 5 repodata
> - 13 % is RHEL 6 repodata
> - remaining ~ 4 % of noise is Fedora repodata
> 
> It seems to me that we can get out the builder business completely
> and
> decommission ipa-devel and replace it with COPR.
> 
> Do you agree? John? Nathaniel? Stephen? Anyone? :-)

I'm not using it. Let's kill it. :)

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code


Re: [Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

2015-08-31 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 08:20 -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> On 08/27/2015 04:27 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > On 15.7.2015 09:44, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49:23PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> > > > On 07/14/2015 12:03 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is anyone using repos
> > > > > https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/
> > > > > ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure
> > > > > about people
> > > > > outside the Brno.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business?
> > > > > Upcoming lab
> > > > > maintenance window could be a good time to do that.
> > > > 
> > > > I would love to get out of the builder business and I suspect
> > > > Nalin would as
> > > > well [1]. The question came up in our Monday meeting as well.
> > > > Nobody seem to
> > > > know if anyone was using these builds and why we weren't using
> > > > COPR. The
> > > 
> > > The Fedora infra admins should be able to provide HTTP logs for
> > > the
> > > repo, if you needs some numbers about potential usage.
> > 
> > That is a good idea! I got logs from Fedora admins and as far as I
> > can tell,
> > in the last month there were only 7 RPM downloads and nothing else.
> > 
> > The 7 hits I found was for
> > /ipa-devel/rhel/6/x86_64/os/sssd-1.13.1-
> > 0.20150813T1121Zgit137d5dd.el6.i686.rpm and
> > other packages from the same version.
> > 
> > I did not find any hits for IPA packages at all. All the remaining
> > traffic
> > (except the 7 RPM hits) was from repo data refreshes:
> > - 83 % is RHEL 5 repodata
> > - 13 % is RHEL 6 repodata
> > - remaining ~ 4 % of noise is Fedora repodata
> > 
> > It seems to me that we can get out the builder business completely
> > and
> > decommission ipa-devel and replace it with COPR.
> > 
> > Do you agree? John? Nathaniel? Stephen? Anyone? :-)
> 
> Yes, I agree. Do we have a cut off date when I can stop the service?
> 


Given that the traffic was so small, it looks likely that only a
single person is still using it. Probably safe to just kill it off and
wait for that person to ask where to go.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code

Re: [Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

2015-08-27 Thread Petr Spacek
On 15.7.2015 09:44, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49:23PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
 On 07/14/2015 12:03 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
 Hello,

 Is anyone using repos
 https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/
 ?

 AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure about people
 outside the Brno.

 Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business? Upcoming lab
 maintenance window could be a good time to do that.

 I would love to get out of the builder business and I suspect Nalin would as
 well [1]. The question came up in our Monday meeting as well. Nobody seem to
 know if anyone was using these builds and why we weren't using COPR. The
 
 The Fedora infra admins should be able to provide HTTP logs for the
 repo, if you needs some numbers about potential usage.

That is a good idea! I got logs from Fedora admins and as far as I can tell,
in the last month there were only 7 RPM downloads and nothing else.

The 7 hits I found was for
/ipa-devel/rhel/6/x86_64/os/sssd-1.13.1-0.20150813T1121Zgit137d5dd.el6.i686.rpm 
and
other packages from the same version.

I did not find any hits for IPA packages at all. All the remaining traffic
(except the 7 RPM hits) was from repo data refreshes:
- 83 % is RHEL 5 repodata
- 13 % is RHEL 6 repodata
- remaining ~ 4 % of noise is Fedora repodata

It seems to me that we can get out the builder business completely and
decommission ipa-devel and replace it with COPR.

Do you agree? John? Nathaniel? Stephen? Anyone? :-)

-- 
Petr^2 Spacek

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code


Re: [Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

2015-08-27 Thread Alexander Bokovoy

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Petr Spacek wrote:

On 15.7.2015 09:44, Jan Pazdziora wrote:

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49:23PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:

On 07/14/2015 12:03 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:

Hello,

Is anyone using repos
https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/
?

AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure about people
outside the Brno.

Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business? Upcoming lab
maintenance window could be a good time to do that.


I would love to get out of the builder business and I suspect Nalin would as
well [1]. The question came up in our Monday meeting as well. Nobody seem to
know if anyone was using these builds and why we weren't using COPR. The


The Fedora infra admins should be able to provide HTTP logs for the
repo, if you needs some numbers about potential usage.


That is a good idea! I got logs from Fedora admins and as far as I can tell,
in the last month there were only 7 RPM downloads and nothing else.

The 7 hits I found was for
/ipa-devel/rhel/6/x86_64/os/sssd-1.13.1-0.20150813T1121Zgit137d5dd.el6.i686.rpm 
and
other packages from the same version.

I did not find any hits for IPA packages at all. All the remaining traffic
(except the 7 RPM hits) was from repo data refreshes:
- 83 % is RHEL 5 repodata
- 13 % is RHEL 6 repodata
- remaining ~ 4 % of noise is Fedora repodata

It seems to me that we can get out the builder business completely and
decommission ipa-devel and replace it with COPR.

Do you agree? John? Nathaniel? Stephen? Anyone? :-)

Yes, I think we can decommission this repository thanks to COPR
infrastructure.
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy

--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code


Re: [Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

2015-08-27 Thread John Dennis

On 08/27/2015 04:27 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:

On 15.7.2015 09:44, Jan Pazdziora wrote:

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49:23PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:

On 07/14/2015 12:03 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:

Hello,

Is anyone using repos
https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/
?

AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure about people
outside the Brno.

Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business? Upcoming lab
maintenance window could be a good time to do that.


I would love to get out of the builder business and I suspect Nalin would as
well [1]. The question came up in our Monday meeting as well. Nobody seem to
know if anyone was using these builds and why we weren't using COPR. The


The Fedora infra admins should be able to provide HTTP logs for the
repo, if you needs some numbers about potential usage.


That is a good idea! I got logs from Fedora admins and as far as I can tell,
in the last month there were only 7 RPM downloads and nothing else.

The 7 hits I found was for
/ipa-devel/rhel/6/x86_64/os/sssd-1.13.1-0.20150813T1121Zgit137d5dd.el6.i686.rpm 
and
other packages from the same version.

I did not find any hits for IPA packages at all. All the remaining traffic
(except the 7 RPM hits) was from repo data refreshes:
- 83 % is RHEL 5 repodata
- 13 % is RHEL 6 repodata
- remaining ~ 4 % of noise is Fedora repodata

It seems to me that we can get out the builder business completely and
decommission ipa-devel and replace it with COPR.

Do you agree? John? Nathaniel? Stephen? Anyone? :-)


Yes, I agree. Do we have a cut off date when I can stop the service?



--
John

--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code


Re: [Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

2015-07-15 Thread Jan Pazdziora
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49:23PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
 On 07/14/2015 12:03 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
 Hello,
 
 Is anyone using repos
 https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/
 ?
 
 AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure about people
 outside the Brno.
 
 Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business? Upcoming lab
 maintenance window could be a good time to do that.
 
 I would love to get out of the builder business and I suspect Nalin would as
 well [1]. The question came up in our Monday meeting as well. Nobody seem to
 know if anyone was using these builds and why we weren't using COPR. The

The Fedora infra admins should be able to provide HTTP logs for the
repo, if you needs some numbers about potential usage.

-- 
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code


[Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

2015-07-14 Thread Petr Spacek
Hello,

Is anyone using repos
https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/
?

AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure about people
outside the Brno.

Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business? Upcoming lab
maintenance window could be a good time to do that.

-- 
Petr^2 Spacek

-- 
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code