Re: [Gimp-user] gimp 2.4.0-rc3
Hi, it sounds as if you managed to screw things up quite badly. You can't have several versions of GIMP installed unless you put them into separate prefixes outside the system search paths. Using '/usr/local' doesn't count as a separate prefix. Please see the release notes for the development releases: http://gimp.org/release-notes/gimp-2.3.html If you followed those instructions, and there are still problems, then it would be nice to get a bug report with a stack trace from the crash. What you included in your mail was the output from strace. That's not very useful to debug a crash. What we need is a back-trace generated from gdb. But for most problems it should be sufficient to have a detailed description that allows us to reproduce the problem. Sven ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] some quary
Hi, I am Migrating From Photoshop to Gimp, In Photoshop there is move tool move any part of image so what is option in gimp ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] some quary
- Original Message - From: jayesh thorve [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am Migrating From Photoshop to Gimp, In Photoshop there is move tool move any part of image so what is option in gimp The Move tool! It's the four headed arrow. Select part of the image; click the tool; select the option in the lower area to move the layer, or selection, etc. -- Bob long ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp-user Digest, Vol 61, Issue 21
) = 1 (in [9])
read(9, , 4) = 0
open(/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No
such file or directory)
open(/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules, O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=54635, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
0) = 0xb7416000
read(3, # GNU libc iconv configuration.\n..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, as\tJS//\t\t\tJUS_I.B1.002//\nalias\tY..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, e\tINTERNAL\t\tISO-8859-3//\t\tISO885..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, as\tISO-IR-199//\t\tISO-8859-14//\na..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, to\t\t\tmodule\t\tcost\nalias\tCSEBCDIC..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, e\t\tcost\nalias\tCP284//\t\t\tIBM284//..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, as\tCP864//\t\t\tIBM864//\nalias\t864/..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, dule\tIBM937//\t\tINTERNAL\t\tIBM937\t..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, UC-JP//\nalias\tUJIS//\t\t\tEUC-JP//\n..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, dule\t\tcost\nalias\tISO-IR-143//\t\tI..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, OX//\nmodule\tISO_10367-BOX//\t\tINT..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, dule\tINTERNAL\t\tEUC-JISX0213//\t\tE..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, odule\tIBM1130//\t\tINTERNAL\t\tIBM11..., 4096) = 4096
read(3, 804//\t\tIBM16804//\nalias\tCP16804/..., 4096) = 1387
read(3, , 4096) = 0
close(3)= 0
munmap(0xb7416000, 4096)= 0
futex(0xb76e0a4c, FUTEX_WAKE, 2147483647) = 0
open(/usr/lib/gconv/ISO8859-1.so, O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, \177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\3\0\1\0\0\0P\3\0\000...,
512) = 512
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=6950, ...}) = 0
mmap2(NULL, 8220, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0)
= 0xb7414000
mmap2(0xb7415000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) = 0xb7415000
close(3)= 0
write(2, \n(script-fu:19752): LibGimpBase-..., 79) = 79
shmdt(0xb7f0f000) = 0
exit_group(0) = ?
Should I submit a bug report?
Thanks
Rich
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /lists/gimp-user/attachments/20071009/86916de3/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 02:33:54 -0300
From: Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] gimp 2.4.0-rc3
To: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Rich wrote:
Rich wrote:
After installing 2.4.0-rc3, I was configuring the preferences, as I
was
trying out the settings,
when I double clicked the 'Main Mouse Wheel' device under
File/Preferences/Input Devices/Input Controllers, Gimp disappears
and dies.
One more item - I thought about comparing the controllers in the
controllerrc file.
There were two lines missing from the Main Mouse Wheel and Main Keyboard.
I added the stock-id and controller items and removed the other two
controllers that were added.
I started gimp, I can now select and edit them fine - the dialog works
and no more crashing.
(GimpControllerInfo Main Mouse Wheel
(stock-id gimp-controller-wheel)
(enabled yes)
(debug-events no)
(controller GimpControllerWheel)
(mapping
(GimpControllerInfo Main Keyboard
(stock-id gimp-controller-keyboard)
(enabled yes)
(debug-events no)
(controller GimpControllerKeyboard)
(mapping
:::
Thanks
Rich
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /lists/gimp-user/attachments/20071009/5cf0057c/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 02:51:42 -0300
From: Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] gimp 2.4.0-rc3
To: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Rich wrote:
Rich wrote:
Rich wrote:
After installing 2.4.0-rc3, I was configuring the preferences, as I
was
trying out the settings,
when I double clicked the 'Main Mouse Wheel' device under
File/Preferences/Input Devices/Input Controllers, Gimp disappears
and dies.
One more item - I thought about comparing the controllers in the
controllerrc file.
One last note, :)
I was testing the mappings, and it seems the context mappings for the
mouse wheel do not work.
I updated them to match the new mappings - now everything works fine.
(thanks for the debug events).
Maybe there is a default that needs to be updated.
(GimpControllerInfo Main Mouse Wheel
(stock-id gimp-controller-wheel)
(enabled yes)
(debug-events no)
(controller GimpControllerWheel)
(mapping
(map scroll-up-control-alt context-gradient-select-next)
(map scroll-up-shift-control-alt context-font-select-next)
(map scroll
Re: [Gimp-user] What's the opinion here of Beginning GIMP: From Novice to Professional?
--- Carsten Agger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I recently bought the book (it was recommended in a video podcast at www.meetthegimp.org) and did the first four chapters ... and think it looks good; i already learned a lot, and it only seems to be getting better. It looks good for not-so-advanced users, IMHO. I have that book as well and also find it very useful and easy to read. Another two GIMP books I like is, The Artist's Guide to GIMP Effects and GIMP 2 for Photographers These are good follow-up books as they concentrate on practical applications of GIMP. Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp 2.4.0-rc3
Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, it sounds as if you managed to screw things up quite badly. You can't have several versions of GIMP installed unless you put them into separate prefixes outside the system search paths. Using '/usr/local' doesn't count as a separate prefix. Please see the release notes for the development releases: http://gimp.org/release-notes/gimp-2.3.html If you followed those instructions, and there are still problems, then it would be nice to get a bug report with a stack trace from the crash. What you included in your mail was the output from strace. That's not very useful to debug a crash. What we need is a back-trace generated from gdb. But for most problems it should be sufficient to have a detailed description that allows us to reproduce the problem. Thanks. I'll check out the site. Cleaning up the so's from 2.3 worked. Updating the context actions restored the mouse wheel options. Regards Rich ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] sharpen vs. levels, curves, saturation
rather than relying on sharpen to sharpen an image, i have much better luck using levels or curves. i also typically increase saturation some on images after i have done a layers or curves adjustment. i thus almost never need to use sharpen, which is good, because sharpen usually doesn't make my image better. the above is true for both GIMP and Photoshop. carol On 10/9/07, Pere Pujal i Carabantes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all! to (gimp-selection-sharpen img) does not meet the SHARPEN or SHARPEN MORE from photoshop, so what are the gimp equivalents for SHARPEN or SHARPEN MORE? ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] sharpen vs. levels, curves, saturation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * carol irvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-07 23:14]: rather than relying on sharpen to sharpen an image, i have much better luck using levels or curves. i also typically increase saturation some on images after i have done a layers or curves adjustment. i thus almost never need to use sharpen, which is good, because sharpen usually doesn't make my image better. the above is true for both GIMP and Photoshop. Please provide a little more detail about this operation, ie: explain layers adjustment and which curves. interesting idea, tks, - -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn4472 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHDES1ClSjbQz1U5oRAk+vAJ9Mc7faAFMks3lcjM7xAvAUrbqdIwCgmxw5 PU8np2PUrv/6CJkw/sZavZw= =z3XG -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] sharpen vs. levels, curves, saturation
in both photoshop and GIMP you do not need to do these functions as a layer adjustment (i.e. work on layers). You can use the Image menu in photoshop and make these adjustments without layers or in Gimp you can go to the Tools menu and do an adjustment under colors. as long as you are saving your various versions, there is no danger of being stuck with a change you don't like. You CAN do these as a layers adjustment but that presupposes that the user is already good at using layers and also wants to take the extra time to flatten and such. As for the actual use of the tools, each has its own dialog box with sliders and you manually slide the controls till you have something which pleases you. I am NOT a purist where I insist on doing everything in layers. I usually go to layers when I am blending various versions of images. There are some who would regard me as a heretic for saying this though as they don't believe you should do anything without using layers. I think any of these manuals we have been discussing show illustrations of all of the above. Grooking the GIMP, as previously given as a link to the group, for sure shows all of the above and that manual is entirely online and free. carol On 10/9/07, Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * carol irvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-07 23:14]: rather than relying on sharpen to sharpen an image, i have much better luck using levels or curves. i also typically increase saturation some on images after i have done a layers or curves adjustment. i thus almost never need to use sharpen, which is good, because sharpen usually doesn't make my image better. the above is true for both GIMP and Photoshop. Please provide a little more detail about this operation, ie: explain layers adjustment and which curves. interesting idea, tks, - -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn4472 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHDES1ClSjbQz1U5oRAk+vAJ9Mc7faAFMks3lcjM7xAvAUrbqdIwCgmxw5 PU8np2PUrv/6CJkw/sZavZw= =z3XG -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user -- carol ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] Fwd: sharpen vs. levels, curves, saturation
-- Forwarded message -- From: carol irvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Oct 9, 2007 11:49 PM Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] sharpen vs. levels, curves, saturation To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu in both photoshop and GIMP you do not need to do these functions as a layer adjustment (i.e. work on layers). You can use the Image menu in photoshop and make these adjustments without layers or in Gimp you can go to the Tools menu and do an adjustment under colors. as long as you are saving your various versions, there is no danger of being stuck with a change you don't like. You CAN do these as a layers adjustment but that presupposes that the user is already good at using layers and also wants to take the extra time to flatten and such. As for the actual use of the tools, each has its own dialog box with sliders and you manually slide the controls till you have something which pleases you. I am NOT a purist where I insist on doing everything in layers. I usually go to layers when I am blending various versions of images. There are some who would regard me as a heretic for saying this though as they don't believe you should do anything without using layers. I think any of these manuals we have been discussing show illustrations of all of the above. Grooking the GIMP, as previously given as a link to the group, for sure shows all of the above and that manual is entirely online and free. carol On 10/9/07, Patrick Shanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * carol irvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [10-09-07 23:14]: rather than relying on sharpen to sharpen an image, i have much better luck using levels or curves. i also typically increase saturation some on images after i have done a layers or curves adjustment. i thus almost never need to use sharpen, which is good, because sharpen usually doesn't make my image better. the above is true for both GIMP and Photoshop. Please provide a little more detail about this operation, ie: explain layers adjustment and which curves. interesting idea, tks, - -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USAHOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535@ http://counter.li.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn4472 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHDES1ClSjbQz1U5oRAk+vAJ9Mc7faAFMks3lcjM7xAvAUrbqdIwCgmxw5 PU8np2PUrv/6CJkw/sZavZw= =z3XG -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user -- carol -- carol ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
