Re: [Gimp-user] gimp 2.2 -> 2.4, python-fu: what's the difference?
Hi Joao; and first off, thanks a bunch for your pointer. :) Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: [..] > You might just try to load your script with straight with python, to > check for syntax errors, since if there is a python syntax error, > gimp will just spill out an obscure uninformative error message > instead of the traceback of the script. Actually yes, that did resolve my problems. Seems copying the script across the machines somehow messed my charset up so python complained about illegal characters while starting up. Thanks loads for your help on that. :) Cheers, Kristian -- Kristian Rink * http://zimmer428.net * http://flickr.com/photos/z428/ jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * icq: 48874445 * fon: ++49 176 2447 2771 "One dreaming alone, it will be only a dream; many dreaming together is the beginning of a new reality." (Hundertwasser) ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] gimp 2.2 -> 2.4, python-fu: what's the difference?
Hi there; Sven Neumann schrieb: >> ... which obviously doesn't work again as the /Python-Fu menu is gone >> and I fail to relocate the menu entry elsewhere, no matter what I enter as >> menu path (/Filters/Python/... failed...). What to do here? Is there >> some pointer outlining how to deal with python scripts in Gimp 2.4? > > Are you sure that you have the GIMP Python extension installed at all? Well... to put it this way: As sure as can be: - The package seems to be installed in the appropriate version matching my Gimp: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ > dpkg -l|grep gimp-python ii gimp-python2.4.6-1ubuntu1~hardy1 Python support and plugins for GIMP - In Gimp, there is an "Extras" -> "Python-Fu" menu which, so far, just contains a "console". - Using the "Procedure browser" querying for python-fu leaves me finding a few entries, yet none of these provided by my own scripts... I actually would question my installation if it wasn't for these things... Could anything still be wrong here? Invoking the python console from within Gimp also works well, same as does "import gimpfu" in the python console. Anything else I could be overlooking so far? Platform is Ubuntu 8.04 by the way... Thanks in advance and best regards, Kristian ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
[Gimp-user] gimp 2.2 -> 2.4, python-fu: what's the difference?
Folks; dealing with python-fu quite a while ago (early gimp 2.2, I guess), I haven't dealt with this for quite a while, just to stumble across it once again by now, figuring out a few things obviously changed: - Initially, I used to write up a script, dump it to .gimp/plug-ins, start the Gimp and find its procedures using the gimp Procedure Browser searching for "python-fu". It's not the case anymore now, despite the file being still in .gimp-2.4/plug-ins/ and being marked executable and the code structure not having changed. - Likewise, I used something like this to register the script with The Gimp: register( ”python_fu_mergesofned”, ”merge picture with a blurred version of itself”, ”merge picture with a blurred version of itself”, ”Kristian Rink”, ”Kristian Rink”, ”2005″, ”/Python-Fu/z428/LayeredSoftness”, ”RGB*,GRAY*”, [], [], mergesofned) ... which obviously doesn't work again as the /Python-Fu menu is gone and I fail to relocate the menu entry elsewhere, no matter what I enter as menu path (/Filters/Python/... failed...). What to do here? Is there some pointer outlining how to deal with python scripts in Gimp 2.4? Any help / hints greatly appreciated. :) Cheers & best regards, Kristian ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] going digital
Andrew; [Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> @ Thu, 03 May 2007 15:54:17 +0200] > I'm thinking of moving into the 21st century and getting a bottom-end > digital reflex, preferably Pentax for the sake of nostalgia. Can > anyone advise me from a technical point of view as to what I need in > order to be able to get pictures into GIMP for editing? In my opinion, the only thing _really_ worth paying attention to in relation to "the computer" / Gimp is making sure your camera is supported by dcraw [1], thus enabling you to read full-sized RAW pictures right off the device and do something useful to them without having to use the proprietary tool that usually comes with the camera. Everything else should be quite easy: * About storage, most of the DSLRs I know about run on CF cards, and you can get a decent USB card reader supporting CF and a bunch of other cards rather cheap nowadays. * Connecting directly to your machine (USB link between computer and camera), most cameras by now fortunately seem to be capable of being usb-storage, thus being handled more or less like an ordinary SCSI drive. There you go. ;) About Slackware, your mileage might vary as I don't know what drivers and/or features come packed with the distribution - running Ubuntu on various machines, and even my girlfriend (who does not really like computers that much, altogether) by now manages to easily transfer their digi-cam pictures to $HOME. Overally, however, choosing a DSLR you probably should focus on other technical aspects of the camera itself, but probably that's another story... ;) Cheers, Kristian [1] http://cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/ -- Kristian Rink * http://zimmer428.net * http://flickr.com/photos/z428/ jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * icq: 48874445 * fon: ++49 176 2447 2771 "One dreaming alone, it will be only a dream; many dreaming together is the beginning of a new reality." (Hundertwasser) ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] X11
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [Orlando Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> @ Wed, 21 Feb 2007 09:51:06 +] > No doubt that X11 is better then nothing. But GIMP deserves better > then X11. Don't you think so? > Thanks for helping me. Well... Not meant to be offending, but what on earth are you talking about? :) Cheers, Kris - -- Kristian Rink * http://zimmer428.net * http://flickr.com/photos/z428/ jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * icq: 48874445 * fon: ++49 176 2447 2771 "One dreaming alone, it will be only a dream; many dreaming together is the beginning of a new reality." (Hundertwasser) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF3BdGcxBAPOA1m6wRApP7AKCfT0e5Pjjw6NRANkacmtdsp0KS4QCfafnR +U+seYG2NhxxP80h9QTPmQo= =E/Om -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
Re: [Gimp-user] How damaged photos my camera takes?
Juhana; Juhana Sadeharju schrieb: > Why Canon thinks it is ok to damage the photos in automatic mode? > Very sad, I have taken hundreds of photos for my freephotos project > and mostly they look as bad as 3893 and 3922. More mild automatic > settings would have allowed me to fix the photos later. Not now. The pictures aren't really damaged - actually, that's what the "automatic mode" is all about: The camera itself tries to figure out what settings fit best to take an "optimum" shot, optimum in terms of values measurable by a machine. To a machine, determining how the pictures finally will "look like" is a rather tough (not to say impossible) job. If you want to have pictures which look according to your demands or needs, probably you will have to switch off automatic mode and do the job yourself. ;) Cheers, Kristian -- Kristian Rink * http://zimmer428.net * jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 48874445 * fon: ++49 176 2447 2771 "Wenn einer allein träumt, ist es nur ein Traum. Wenn viele gemeinsam träumen, ist das der Anfang einer neuen Wirklichkeit." (Hundertwasser) ___ Gimp-user mailing list Gimp-user@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
