[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-12 Thread Hudson (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16790624#comment-16790624
 ] 

Hudson commented on HDDS-1095:
--

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #16183 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/16183/])
HDDS-1095. OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in 
(msingh: rev daf4660eebfa9267e7082f7c9a14c3dd5d6d5d46)
* (edit) 
hadoop-hdds/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdds/scm/protocolPB/ScmBlockLocationProtocolClientSideTranslatorPB.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-hdds/server-scm/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdds/scm/server/SCMBlockProtocolServer.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-hdds/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdds/scm/protocol/ScmBlockLocationProtocol.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-hdds/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/OzoneConfigKeys.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/KeyManagerImpl.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/ScmBlockLocationTestIngClient.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/om/TestKeyManagerImpl.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-hdds/common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/ozone/protocolPB/ScmBlockLocationProtocolServerSideTranslatorPB.java
* (edit) hadoop-hdds/common/src/main/proto/ScmBlockLocationProtocol.proto
* (edit) hadoop-hdds/common/src/main/resources/ozone-default.xml


> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0, 0.5.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.003.patch, HDDS-1095.004.patch, HDDS-1095.005.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.006.patch, HDDS-1095.007.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-12 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16790444#comment-16790444
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDDS-1095:
-

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  8m  
1s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green}  0m  
1s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  4m  
2s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  5m 
52s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  2m 
47s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
12m 31s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source: 
hadoop-hdds hadoop-ozone {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
47s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
24s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  5m 
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  2m 
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  2m 
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
2s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
10m 46s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source: 
hadoop-hdds hadoop-ozone {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}  1m  8s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdds in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}  1m 39s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-ozone in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
24s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 62m  5s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.hdds.security.x509.certificate.client.TestDefaultCertificateClient |
|   | 

[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-12 Thread Lokesh Jain (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16790414#comment-16790414
 ] 

Lokesh Jain commented on HDDS-1095:
---

[~msingh] Thanks for updating the patch! It looks good to me. +1.

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.003.patch, HDDS-1095.004.patch, HDDS-1095.005.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.006.patch, HDDS-1095.007.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-12 Thread Mukul Kumar Singh (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16790408#comment-16790408
 ] 

Mukul Kumar Singh commented on HDDS-1095:
-

Thanks for the review [~ljain]. 

HDDS-1252 takes care of case when the number of allocated block is lesser than 
requested.
patch v7 address the rest of the comments.

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.003.patch, HDDS-1095.004.patch, HDDS-1095.005.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.006.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-12 Thread Lokesh Jain (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16790394#comment-16790394
 ] 

Lokesh Jain commented on HDDS-1095:
---

[~msingh] Thanks for updating the patch! The path looks good to me. I have a 
few minor comments.
 # In ScmBlockLocationProtocolServerSideTranslatorPB, we should return the 
blocks in the response proto even if they are less than the requested number of 
blocks. Also can we add another error code for this situation?
 # ScmBlockLocationProtocolClientSideTranslatorPB:114 - We can initialise the 
array list with the received number of blocks.
 # SCMBlockProtocolServer:167 - Same as above.

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.003.patch, HDDS-1095.004.patch, HDDS-1095.005.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.006.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-11 Thread Shashikant Banerjee (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16789793#comment-16789793
 ] 

Shashikant Banerjee commented on HDDS-1095:
---

Thanks [~msingh] for the update. Patch v6 looks good to me. +1.

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.003.patch, HDDS-1095.004.patch, HDDS-1095.005.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.006.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-11 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16789500#comment-16789500
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDDS-1095:
-

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
39s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
58s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  6m 
 4s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  2m 
55s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
49s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
14m 56s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source: 
hadoop-hdds hadoop-ozone {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m 
25s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
29s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  7m 
27s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  3m 
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  3m 
20s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
55s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
11m 30s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source: 
hadoop-hdds hadoop-ozone {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
6s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}  1m 21s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdds in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}  2m 24s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-ozone in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
35s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 59m 45s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.hdds.security.x509.certificate.client.TestDefaultCertificateClient |
|   | 

[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-08 Thread Bharat Viswanadham (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16788468#comment-16788468
 ] 

Bharat Viswanadham commented on HDDS-1095:
--

Thank You [~msingh] for the update.

+1 for patch v005.

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.003.patch, HDDS-1095.004.patch, HDDS-1095.005.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-08 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16788253#comment-16788253
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDDS-1095:
-

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
40s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
24s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  5m 
54s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  3m  
7s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
49s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
14m 25s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source: 
hadoop-hdds hadoop-ozone {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
59s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
24s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  5m 
54s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  3m  
1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  3m  
1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  3m  
1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
52s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
11m 26s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source: 
hadoop-hdds hadoop-ozone {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
51s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}  1m 12s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdds in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 20m 19s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-ozone in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
30s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 73m 27s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.hdds.security.x509.certificate.client.TestDefaultCertificateClient |
|   | 

[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-08 Thread Shashikant Banerjee (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16787774#comment-16787774
 ] 

Shashikant Banerjee commented on HDDS-1095:
---

Thanks [~msingh] for updating the patch. Patch looks good to me. +1

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.003.patch, HDDS-1095.004.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-08 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16787765#comment-16787765
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDDS-1095:
-

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  7m  
6s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  9m 
27s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  3m 
10s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  1m 
 2s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
14m 40s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source: 
hadoop-hdds hadoop-ozone {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
25s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  5m 
57s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  3m 
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  3m 
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  3m 
21s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
53s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
11m 26s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source: 
hadoop-hdds hadoop-ozone {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
53s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}  1m 14s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdds in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 16m 21s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-ozone in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
37s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 80m 48s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.hdds.security.x509.certificate.client.TestDefaultCertificateClient |
|   | 

[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-08 Thread Mukul Kumar Singh (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16787696#comment-16787696
 ] 

Mukul Kumar Singh commented on HDDS-1095:
-

Thanks for the review [~shashikant]. I have addressed the review comment in the 
v4 patch.

Also, right now, when a allocate block fails, the error code is not returned 
inside the SCM. hence making it difficult to return the error. We can do it as 
part of a followup.

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.003.patch, HDDS-1095.004.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-07 Thread Shashikant Banerjee (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16786538#comment-16786538
 ] 

Shashikant Banerjee commented on HDDS-1095:
---

Thanks [~msingh] for updating the patch. Some comments:

1) Let's have a limit on the no of blocks allocated per allocate block rpc call 
to SCM.(We can cap it to be 5GB which is our container size)

2) The error code "Unknown" does not seem to be convey any useful message here. 
Can we make it more meaningful?
{noformat}
if (allocatedBlocks.size() < request.getNumBlocks()) {
   return builder
 .setErrorCode(AllocateScmBlockResponseProto.Error.unknownFailure)
 .build();
   }{noformat}

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.003.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-06 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16785388#comment-16785388
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDDS-1095:
-

| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
35s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} dupname {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} No case conflicting files found. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  7m 
24s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  9m 
45s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  3m  
2s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  1m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
13m 38s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source: 
hadoop-hdds hadoop-ozone {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  2m  
7s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue}  0m 
25s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  6m 
11s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green}  3m  
8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} cc {color} | {color:green}  3m  
8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green}  3m  
8s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
54s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} xml {color} | {color:green}  0m  
1s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no ill-formed XML file. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green} 
10m 51s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing 
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} findbugs {color} | {color:blue}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:blue} Skipped patched modules with no Java source: 
hadoop-hdds hadoop-ozone {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  1m 
58s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red}  1m  5s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-hdds in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 11m 41s{color} 
| {color:red} hadoop-ozone in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
37s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 75m 18s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | 
hadoop.hdds.security.x509.certificate.client.TestDefaultCertificateClient |
|   | 

[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-03-05 Thread Mukul Kumar Singh (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16785276#comment-16785276
 ] 

Mukul Kumar Singh commented on HDDS-1095:
-

Thanks for the review [~bharatviswa]. I have addressed the comments in v3 patch.

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch, 
> HDDS-1095.003.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-02-28 Thread Bharat Viswanadham (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16780953#comment-16780953
 ] 

Bharat Viswanadham commented on HDDS-1095:
--

Moving this to open, till comments are addressed.

 

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-02-20 Thread Bharat Viswanadham (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16773555#comment-16773555
 ] 

Bharat Viswanadham commented on HDDS-1095:
--

Hi Mukul,

Build compilation is still failing. We need to update ScmBlockTestingClient.java

One more comment from me.
 # We cannot check below condition to return an error case, as 
BlockManagerImpl.allocateBlock can return null.
 ## if (allocatedBlocks.size() < request.getNumBlocks())

 

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-02-20 Thread Shashikant Banerjee (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16772802#comment-16772802
 ] 

Shashikant Banerjee commented on HDDS-1095:
---

[~msingh],Thanks for updating the patch. I have two minor comments. Rest all 
looks good to me.

1) ScmBlockLocationProtocolClientSideTranslatorPB.java : The javadoc needs to 
be updated here accordingly.

2) Let's have the block allocation limit (equal to a container size), so that 
we don't ever hit the hadoop rpc payload limit in case.

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-02-19 Thread Mukul Kumar Singh (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16772645#comment-16772645
 ] 

Mukul Kumar Singh commented on HDDS-1095:
-

Thanks for the review [~bharatviswa]. The comments are incorporated in v2 patch.

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch, HDDS-1095.002.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (HDDS-1095) OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc call

2019-02-19 Thread Bharat Viswanadham (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16772238#comment-16772238
 ] 

Bharat Viswanadham commented on HDDS-1095:
--

Thank You [~msingh] for this perf improvement fix.

*Few comments:*
 # 
Line 417 can we move before calling allocateBlocks, and remove the preAllocate 
and allocateSize? In this way even if the key length provided is zero, we 
allocate at least a block, as we are setting size as scmBlockSize and storing 
as keyInfo. (As even now we are doing min(Preallocate, length), so with above 
mentioned way, we can remove this logic.
 # 
And also code comments in allocate locks and in openKey Line 406 needs to be 
updated.
 # 
Can we add a javadoc for newly added method allocateBlocks
 # 
Update java doc for allocateBlock in 
ScmBlockLocationProtocolClientSideTransalatorPB.java and 
ScmBlockLocationProtocol.java
 # 
Setting numBlocks is missing when constructing request object in allocateBlock 
in ScmBlockLocationProtocolClientSideTransalatorPB.java.
 # 
And one more question, do we need to pass this block size from OM to SCM, as we 
read from config "ozone.scm.block.size” in OM.

> OzoneManager#openKey should do multiple block allocations in a single SCM rpc 
> call
> --
>
> Key: HDDS-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-1095
> Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: SCM
>Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>Reporter: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Assignee: Mukul Kumar Singh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
> Attachments: HDDS-1095.001.patch
>
>
> Currently in KeyManagerImpl#openKey, for a large key allocation, multiple 
> blocks are allocated in different rpc calls. If the key length is already 
> known, then multiple blocks can be allocated in one rpc call to SCM.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org