Re: z/OS's basis for TCP/IP
Lindy ... they took long time to implement a resolver. There has always been a resolver function in TCP/IP for VM, TCP/IP for MVS and the IP component of z/OS Communications Server (CS) (CS IP). What you may have in mind is the introduction of the resolver *address space* in z/OS V1R2 CS IP. Since it is the responsibility of the manuals to explain such developments - maybe also the responsibility of folk playing the role of system programmers to discover such explanations! - here is what the z/OS V1R2 Communications Server IP Migration manual says about the introduction of the resolver *address space*: quote 4.2 Resolver Enhancements ... Prior to z/OS V1R2, the resolver function was implemented as part of the various socket APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) available on the z/OS platform. As a result, multiple versions of the resolver function were available, one for each type of socket API supporting resolver calls. All of these resolver libraries were quite similar in their support of resolver functions but had slight differences from an administrative and configuration perspective. For example, the resolver search logic to locate its configuration file (TCPIP.DATA file) varied depending on whether the application was using the TCP/IP provided Socket APIs or the C/C++ Socket API provided by the LE (Language Environment) component of z/OS. In z/OS V1R2, the various resolver libraries supported by the TCP/IP and LE APIs are now consolidated into a single resolver component. This allows consistent name resolution processing across all applications using the TCP/IP and LE socket APIs. The new consolidated resolver is automatically enabled on z/OS V1R2 and requires a new system address space that is automatically started during UNIX System Services initialization. The consolidated resolver offers several enhancements over previous releases: ... /quote http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/f1a1b110/4.2 If so, how were hostnames resolved? Well, it's not so and so the question becomes immaterial! Chris Mason On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 06:30:12 +, Lindy Mayfield lindy.mayfi...@sas.com wrote: Interesting, if I am correct, they took long time to implement a resolver. If so, how were hostnames resolved? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Help Programming for ISPF Jump
How about not using == ? On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:28:20 -0600 Chuck Arney ch...@arneycomputer.com wrote: :I need some pointers on programming with the ISPF Jump command. : :I'll provide some background details first to hopefully prevent suggestions :for things I have already tried. I am working on an assembler ISPF :application that does not use the ISPF Select service nor ZSEL in panel :definitions. It is a single load module that uses the ISPF Display service :to display menus and data panels. It performs all its own processing of :menus. : :I am in the process of adding support for fast path commands. Without using :the Select service, the Dialog Manager does not seem to handle multi-level :menu selections (eg. 8.3) at all, so I have implemented code to support :that. : :The problem I have is with the ISPF Jump (=) command. I would like for the :application to operate as any standard ISPF application using the normal :Jump command which users will expect. I would like to either find a way for :the Dialog Manager to handle the multi-level menu commands or to completely :disable it. So far I have not found a way to prevent ISPF from handling the := command. Whenever an =x.x style command is entered, ISPF processes the :Jump command (generating return code 8 and ZVERB RETURN for each panel :display back to the Primary Menu) but I don't get the remainder of the :command (the x.x part). ZCMD is blanks and ZVERB is RETURN. I attempted to :use the .trail function to get the remaining command into a variable, with :no success. Either that is handled by Select, which I don't issue, or I :have not found the right combination to get it set. : :At this point I would like to stop ISPF from handling the = command at all, :so that I receive it along with the rest of the command string but I have :not found a way to do that. Using the nojump(on) parameter on the field :attribute panel definition does not help because that simply creates an ISPF :error message if the = command is used and the command input is not provided :to the program. : :Is there a way to stop, via a program call or panel definition, ISPF from :processing the = command? Or a way to change Jump to another character so I :could use =? Or, am I missing something obvious and going about this in the :wrong way? : :I currently have the needed support implemented by using a different :character as my Jump command, but that's not intuitive to a typical ISPF :user. Surly there is something I have not been able to find in the :documentation, to do this. : :Thanks for any suggestions. : :Chuck Arney :Arney Computer Systems : : : :-- :For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, :send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO :Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Help Programming for ISPF Jump
What about perhaps preceding the = with another character, perhaps a slash == /=abc Lindy -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chuck Arney Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:28 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Help Programming for ISPF Jump I need some pointers on programming with the ISPF Jump command. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Help Programming for ISPF Jump
Chuck Arney wrote: I need some pointers on programming with the ISPF Jump command. Jump command is so an ingrained part of ISPF... (Perhaps disabling RACF is easier... :-D ) ... So far I have not found a way to prevent ISPF from handling the = command. Look at these extracts from 'ISPF User's Guide Volume I' to see if it can help you: The command field is the only field that can be initialized to =n by the dialog and have the jump function recognize it. Modifying the ZCMD field in the )PROC or )INIT section can affect jump function operation. Otherwise, the dialog developer can cancel the jump request/return mode by providing two consecutive displays with the same panel name. Is there a way to stop, via a program call or panel definition, ISPF from processing the = command? Or a way to change Jump to another character so I could use =? Or, am I missing something obvious and going about this in the wrong way? Can you grab any command (inside your program or via emulator keystroke scanner) before ISPF grabs it and just simple drop/ignore any command containing '=' and simply passing a blank and ENTER? I'm sure there is an exit available for pre-processing commands, but I can't find it. Perhaps ISPF-L members can help you out there? Binyamin Dissen's suggestion is a very interesting one. I'm sure he got on something useful... Just my two worthless cents before tax... Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
ISPF scrollable areas
A query. I have a panel with two scrollable areas (defined within )AREA sections) If I issue UP or DOWN with my cursor outside these areas, I get the message ISPP651 The cursor must be within a scrollable area to perform the requested scroll. All working correctly, but not wot I want What I want to do is to trap this message, reposition the cursor within one of the areas, and reissue the scroll Does anyone have any ideas as how to do this??? The message does not show up in ZERRSM/ZERRLM or ZMSGID. The )REINIT section does not appear to be being redriven. Any ideas? Andy Robertson telephone mobile 0777 214 9545 home 01308 420797 ** This email is confidential and may contain copyright material of the John Lewis Partnership. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete all copies of this message. (Please note that it is your responsibility to scan this message for viruses). Email to and from the John Lewis Partnership is automatically monitored for operational and lawful business reasons. ** John Lewis plc Registered in England 233462 Registered office 171 Victoria Street London SW1E 5NN Websites: http://www.johnlewis.com http://www.waitrose.com http://www.johnlewis.com/insurance http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: ISPF scrollable areas
Andy, I can't answer your question but wonder if what you're trying to do violates the principle of least astonishment in UI design. Cheers, Martin Martin Packer, Mainframe Performance Consultant, zChampion Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM +44-7802-245-584 email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker Blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker From: Andy Robertson andy_robert...@johnlewis.co.uk To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu, Date: 07/12/2011 11:17 Subject: ISPF scrollable areas Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu A query. I have a panel with two scrollable areas (defined within )AREA sections) If I issue UP or DOWN with my cursor outside these areas, I get the message ISPP651 The cursor must be within a scrollable area to perform the requested scroll. All working correctly, but not wot I want What I want to do is to trap this message, reposition the cursor within one of the areas, and reissue the scroll Does anyone have any ideas as how to do this??? The message does not show up in ZERRSM/ZERRLM or ZMSGID. The )REINIT section does not appear to be being redriven. Any ideas? Andy Robertson telephone mobile 0777 214 9545 home 01308 420797 ** This email is confidential and may contain copyright material of the John Lewis Partnership. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete all copies of this message. (Please note that it is your responsibility to scan this message for viruses). Email to and from the John Lewis Partnership is automatically monitored for operational and lawful business reasons. ** John Lewis plc Registered in England 233462 Registered office 171 Victoria Street London SW1E 5NN Websites: http://www.johnlewis.com http://www.waitrose.com http://www.johnlewis.com/insurance http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: z/OS's basis for TCP/IP
Yes, playing and I get things wrong. Sorry. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Mason Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 10:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: z/OS's basis for TCP/IP Since it is the responsibility of the manuals to explain such developments - maybe also the responsibility of folk playing the role of system programmers to discover such explanations! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: z/OS's basis for TCP/IP
lindy.mayfi...@sas.com (Lindy Mayfield) writes: Interesting, if I am correct, they took long time to implement a resolver. If so, how were hostnames resolved? re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011p.html#42 z/OS's basis for TCP/IP http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011p.html#43 z/OS's basis for TCP/IP http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011p.html#45 z/OS's basis for TCP/IP http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011p.html#46 z/OS's basis for TCP/IP http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011p.html#47 z/OS's basis for TCP/IP trivia ... person that invented DNS had a decade prior did stint working at the cambridge science center (while at MIT) ... related to cms multi-level source update process (this was after gml had been invented at science center and before cp67 morphed into vm370). old posts with reference to somebody being semi-facetious http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aepay11.htm#43 Mockapetris agrees w/Lynn on DNS security - (April Fool's day??) http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aepay11.htm#45 Mockapetris agrees w/Lynn on DNS security - (April Fool's day??) wiki reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Mockapetris another trivia from above wiki entry, jon postel used to let me do part of std1 ... referenced in this recent linkedin post http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2011o.html#17 Ancient Internet History -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
CSFEUTIL RC
Trying to run one of the jobs in the Install Dialog for z/OS 1.13. DOC: This job uses a pass phrase value to load DES and PKA master keys. //SETMKEXEC PGM=CSFEUTIL, // PARM='CSF.CSFCKDS,My New Passphrase,PPINIT' //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //* running the job I get CSFU002I CSFEUTIL COMPLETED, RETURN CODE = 12, REASON CODE = 0. IEF142I CSFSETMK SETMK - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE 0012 Return and reason codes for the CSFEUTIL program 12 Process unsuccessful. That's it. Process unsuccessful. Nothing else in the log or console to indicate what the problem may be. I've checked the RACF definitions for this file and I have Alter access. Anyone have any ideas on what may be wrong? -- The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent Mainline’s positions or opinions Mark D Pace Senior Systems Engineer Mainline Information Systems -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: CSFEUTIL RC
What type of processor are you trying to run this on? Found this restriction is the Crypto Services Admin Guide: Restriction: You cannot use this utility to initialize a CKDS (and load DES and PKA master keys using a pass phrase) on the z990, z890, z9 EC, z9 BC, z10 EC, z10 BC, and z196. On the supported hardware, the utility only loads DES and PKA master keys on the CCF. If you have a PCICC as part of the configuration, the SYM-MK is not loaded. Tom Chicklon --- Trying to run one of the jobs in the Install Dialog for z/OS 1.13. DOC: This job uses a pass phrase value to load DES and PKA master keys. //SETMKEXEC PGM=CSFEUTIL, // PARM='CSF.CSFCKDS,My New Passphrase,PPINIT' //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //* running the job I get CSFU002I CSFEUTIL COMPLETED, RETURN CODE = 12, REASON CODE = 0. IEF142I CSFSETMK SETMK - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE 0012 Return and reason codes for the CSFEUTIL program 12 Process unsuccessful. That's it. Process unsuccessful. Nothing else in the log or console to indicate what the problem may be. I've checked the RACF definitions for this file and I have Alter access. Anyone have any ideas on what may be wrong? -- This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: CSFEUTIL RC
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.r12.csfb300%2Futrcrs.htm 8 is a RACF error. 12 has a long list of reason code, 0 is not among them. http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/PRS757 When run from batch, the reason code is not displayed, This web page has a sample program to call the program and display the return and reason codes. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Mark Pace pacemainl...@gmail.com wrote: Trying to run one of the jobs in the Install Dialog for z/OS 1.13. DOC: This job uses a pass phrase value to load DES and PKA master keys. //SETMK EXEC PGM=CSFEUTIL, // PARM='CSF.CSFCKDS,My New Passphrase,PPINIT' //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //* running the job I get CSFU002I CSFEUTIL COMPLETED, RETURN CODE = 12, REASON CODE = 0. IEF142I CSFSETMK SETMK - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE 0012 Return and reason codes for the CSFEUTIL program 12 Process unsuccessful. That's it. Process unsuccessful. Nothing else in the log or console to indicate what the problem may be. I've checked the RACF definitions for this file and I have Alter access. Anyone have any ideas on what may be wrong? -- The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent Mainline’s positions or opinions Mark D Pace Senior Systems Engineer Mainline Information Systems -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: CSFEUTIL RC
Wondering why you are doing this? Is this a new, empty dataset? You shouldn't be setting new masterkeys just for a z/OS upgrade. Did you select new install or upgrade path in your Serverpack dialogs? _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.2717 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Pace Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 8:42 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: CSFEUTIL RC Trying to run one of the jobs in the Install Dialog for z/OS 1.13. DOC: This job uses a pass phrase value to load DES and PKA master keys. //SETMKEXEC PGM=CSFEUTIL, // PARM='CSF.CSFCKDS,My New Passphrase,PPINIT' //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //* running the job I get CSFU002I CSFEUTIL COMPLETED, RETURN CODE = 12, REASON CODE = 0. IEF142I CSFSETMK SETMK - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE 0012 Return and reason codes for the CSFEUTIL program 12 Process unsuccessful. That's it. Process unsuccessful. Nothing else in the log or console to indicate what the problem may be. I've checked the RACF definitions for this file and I have Alter access. Anyone have any ideas on what may be wrong? This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: CSFEUTIL RC
Oh. This is on a z10. By looking at that list the only supported processor must be the z114. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Chicklon, Thomas thomas.chick...@53.comwrote: What type of processor are you trying to run this on? Found this restriction is the Crypto Services Admin Guide: Restriction: You cannot use this utility to initialize a CKDS (and load DES and PKA master keys using a pass phrase) on the z990, z890, z9 EC, z9 BC, z10 EC, z10 BC, and z196. On the supported hardware, the utility only loads DES and PKA master keys on the CCF. If you have a PCICC as part of the configuration, the SYM-MK is not loaded. Tom Chicklon --- Trying to run one of the jobs in the Install Dialog for z/OS 1.13. DOC: This job uses a pass phrase value to load DES and PKA master keys. //SETMKEXEC PGM=CSFEUTIL, // PARM='CSF.CSFCKDS,My New Passphrase,PPINIT' //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //* running the job I get CSFU002I CSFEUTIL COMPLETED, RETURN CODE = 12, REASON CODE = 0. IEF142I CSFSETMK SETMK - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE 0012 Return and reason codes for the CSFEUTIL program 12 Process unsuccessful. That's it. Process unsuccessful. Nothing else in the log or console to indicate what the problem may be. I've checked the RACF definitions for this file and I have Alter access. Anyone have any ideas on what may be wrong? -- This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- The postings on this site are my own and don’t necessarily represent Mainline’s positions or opinions Mark D Pace Senior Systems Engineer Mainline Information Systems -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: CSFEUTIL RC
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Pace Trying to run one of the jobs in the Install Dialog for z/OS 1.13. DOC: This job uses a pass phrase value to load DES and PKA master keys. //SETMKEXEC PGM=CSFEUTIL, // PARM='CSF.CSFCKDS,My New Passphrase,PPINIT' //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //* running the job I get CSFU002I CSFEUTIL COMPLETED, RETURN CODE = 12, REASON CODE = 0. IEF142I CSFSETMK SETMK - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE 0012 Return and reason codes for the CSFEUTIL program 12 Process unsuccessful. That's it. Process unsuccessful. Nothing else in the log or console to indicate what the problem may be. I've checked the RACF definitions for this file and I have Alter access. Anyone have any ideas on what may be wrong? Well, the ICSF Administrator's Guide is real helpful: It doesn't document a reason code of 0. Here's as close as it gets: http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/CSFB3ZA1/16.4 Return code 12 has these reason codes: Reason Code Meaning 36000 Unable to change master key. Check hardware status. -jc- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: CSFEUTIL RC
No, z114 is not supported as well. This is dead utility, because it worked on CCF* machines. CCF means pre-z/990, means following models: z/900 z/800 9672 (G6, G5, G4...) * I don't talk about pre-CCF machines, because that means Middle Ages of IT. ;-) -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland W dniu 2011-12-07 15:22, Mark Pace pisze: Oh. This is on a z10. By looking at that list the only supported processor must be the z114. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Chicklon, Thomasthomas.chick...@53.comwrote: What type of processor are you trying to run this on? Found this restriction is the Crypto Services Admin Guide: Restriction: You cannot use this utility to initialize a CKDS (and load DES and PKA master keys using a pass phrase) on the z990, z890, z9 EC, z9 BC, z10 EC, z10 BC, and z196. On the supported hardware, the utility only loads DES and PKA master keys on the CCF. If you have a PCICC as part of the configuration, the SYM-MK is not loaded. Tom Chicklon --- Trying to run one of the jobs in the Install Dialog for z/OS 1.13. DOC: This job uses a pass phrase value to load DES and PKA master keys. //SETMKEXEC PGM=CSFEUTIL, // PARM='CSF.CSFCKDS,My New Passphrase,PPINIT' //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //* running the job I get CSFU002I CSFEUTIL COMPLETED, RETURN CODE = 12, REASON CODE = 0. IEF142I CSFSETMK SETMK - STEP WAS EXECUTED - COND CODE 0012 Return and reason codes for the CSFEUTIL program 12 Process unsuccessful. That's it. Process unsuccessful. Nothing else in the log or console to indicate what the problem may be. I've checked the RACF definitions for this file and I have Alter access. Anyone have any ideas on what may be wrong? -- This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- Tre tej wiadomoci moe zawiera informacje prawnie chronione Banku przeznaczone wycznie do uytku subowego adresata. Odbiorc moe by jedynie jej adresat z wyczeniem dostpu osób trzecich. Jeeli nie jeste adresatem niniejszej wiadomoci lub pracownikiem upowanionym do jej przekazania adresatowi, informujemy, e jej rozpowszechnianie, kopiowanie, rozprowadzanie lub inne dziaanie o podobnym charakterze jest prawnie zabronione i moe by karalne. Jeeli otrzymae t wiadomo omykowo, prosimy niezwocznie zawiadomi nadawc wysyajc odpowied oraz trwale usun t wiadomo wczajc w to wszelkie jej kopie wydrukowane lub zapisane na dysku. This e-mail may contain legally privileged information of the Bank and is intended solely for business use of the addressee. This e-mail may only be received by the addressee and may not be disclosed to any third parties. If you are not the intended addressee of this e-mail or the employee authorised to forward it to the addressee, be advised that any dissemination, copying, distribution or any other similar activity is legally prohibited and may be punishable. If you received this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software and delete permanently this e-mail including any copies of it either printed or saved to hard drive. BRE Bank SA, 00-950 Warszawa, ul. Senatorska 18, tel. +48 (22) 829 00 00, fax +48 (22) 829 00 33, e-mail: i...@brebank.pl Sd Rejonowy dla m. st. Warszawy XII Wydzia Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sdowego, nr rejestru przedsibiorców KRS 025237, NIP: 526-021-50-88. Wedug stanu na dzie 01.01.2011 r. kapita zakadowy BRE Banku SA (w caoci wpacony) wynosi 168.346.696 zotych. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: ISPF scrollable areas
I think you'd need to create your own command table and define the UP and DOWN commands as PASSTHRU. That way, the commands would be passed through to your dialog and you could process them however you want. For example, you could manually position the cursor to a certain area and manually simulate a scroll having taken place. However, if your dialog displays other screens in which scrolling is also allowed (where you do NOT want scroll commands being passed through to your dialog), then your dialog would need to use a variable in place of PASSTHRU so that it could turn PASSTHRU on and off. Basically, it might be a lot more trouble than it's worth. Hope that helps, Dave Salt SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it! http://www.mackinney.com/products/program-development/simplist.html Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 11:12:16 + From: andy_robert...@johnlewis.co.uk Subject: ISPF scrollable areas To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu A query. I have a panel with two scrollable areas (defined within )AREA sections) If I issue UP or DOWN with my cursor outside these areas, I get the message ISPP651 The cursor must be within a scrollable area to perform the requested scroll. All working correctly, but not wot I want What I want to do is to trap this message, reposition the cursor within one of the areas, and reissue the scroll Does anyone have any ideas as how to do this??? The message does not show up in ZERRSM/ZERRLM or ZMSGID. The )REINIT section does not appear to be being redriven. Any ideas? Andy Robertson telephone mobile 0777 214 9545 home 01308 420797 ** This email is confidential and may contain copyright material of the John Lewis Partnership. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete all copies of this message. (Please note that it is your responsibility to scan this message for viruses). Email to and from the John Lewis Partnership is automatically monitored for operational and lawful business reasons. ** John Lewis plc Registered in England 233462 Registered office 171 Victoria Street London SW1E 5NN Websites: http://www.johnlewis.com http://www.waitrose.com http://www.johnlewis.com/insurance http://www.johnlewispartnership.co.uk ** -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
QUEUED() not working with ISPF (CROSS POSTED to ISPF-L)
ISPF Masters; I have been struggling with IBM since July on this one. IBM says they can NOT duplicate this. I am not using PCOMM and this borders on an application issue. We are running z/OS V1R12. QUEUED() is not showing anything, but the pull on line 14 is being satistifed by something. This PMR is sev 2 and opened up because QUEUED() is not showing anything. If you have PCOMM and can reproduce this I would be interested in hearing from you. This EXEC fails reliably across a few different 3270 emulators. I don't understand what PCOMM would be doing so differently. WARNING: This does a slow big loop (with user intervention input required) because you can't enter QUIT to end the EXEC. My scenario: After putting the exec and panel in place enter SSBDLHW. It will QUEUE SSBDLHW to run again and again. 1). QUEUED() = 0 is shown pull PRTRID waits for your input. (Press ENTER) '***' displayed. (Press ENTER) 2). Panel is displayed. Type an A and press ENTER. 3). QUEUED() = 0 is shown pull RESP waits for your input. (Press ENTER) '***' displayed. (Press ENTER) 4). QUEUED() = 0 is shown pull PRTRID=== DOES NOT WAIT FOR YOU INPUT === '***' displayed. 5). Kill the EXEC anyway you can. Can anyone help me with why (as shown in the trace below) I am not given the opportunity to enter something for the pull on line 14? Problem: 12 *-* Say 'Queued =' QUEUED() L Queued = F 0 O Queued = 0 Queued = 0 13 *-* /**/ 14 *-* parse upper pull PRTRID 15 *-* trace n EXEC: /*** REXX ***/ ADDRESS TSO /* trace i */ ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) parse upper arg PRTRID If length(PRTRID) = 0 Then Do Say '=== When the panel displays: ===' Say '===Enter an A and then press ENTER.===' Say '=== Press ENTER to continue or ===' Say '===Enter QUIT to exit the program. ===' trace i Say 'Queued =' QUEUED() /* parse upper external PRTRID */ parse upper pull PRTRID trace n End If PRTRID = QUIT Then Exit Else Say PRTRID = PRTRID ADDRESS 'ISPEXEC' 'DISPLAY PANEL(SSBDLHP)' 'VGET (MYCMD)' ADDRESS TSO IF MYCMD = 'A' Then Do ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) Say Record Add Successful Say Press ENTER to Continue trace i Say 'Queued =' QUEUED() /* parse upper external RESP */ parse upper pull RESP ADDRESS 'ISPEXEC' MYCMD = ' ' 'VPUT (MYCMD)' ADDRESS TSO trace n Queue SSBDLHW Exit End Else Do Say Hint: Enter 'A' next time Say Press Enter to continue /* parse upper external RESP */ parse upper pull RESP Queue SSBDLHW Exit End Panel: )ATTR DEFAULT(%+_) % TYPE(TEXT) INTENS(HIGH) COLOR(TURQ) + TYPE(TEXT) INTENS(LOW) COLOR(GREEN) )BODY %---ADD PRINTER-- + %SELECTION =_MYCMD+ %A+- ADD PRINTER )INIT .CURSOR = MYCMD )PROC VPUT (MYCMD) )END Dave Hansen Eagan Software Systems Branch 651-406-1208 dave.l.han...@usps.gov -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: What SMF record types and formats does ACF2 write?
Charles, I believe, a long time ago mind you, that there was a conversation at GUIDE about where the proper place was for the layouts. The agreement was in the SMF manual. It seemed to work as lot of products records showed up there. Then they started to leave, slowly mind you. The question is of course why. I don#39;t think it#39;s any great crime, just curious as to why the reversal on the part of IBM. Ed -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: QUEUED() not working with ISPF (CROSS POSTED to ISPF-L)
I don't use PCOMM, and don't have CLRSCRN, but I made a few small changes and get no errors. Here's my ISPF compare results: I - /* ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) */ D - ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) I -Else Say PRTRID = PRTRID D -Else Say PRTRID = PRTRID ADDRESS 'ISPEXEC' I - ADDRESS ISPEXEC DISPLAY PANEL(SSBDLHP) D - 'DISPLAY PANEL(SSBDLHP)' I - ADDRESS ISPEXEC VGET (MYCMD) D - 'VGET (MYCMD)' I - /* ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) */ D -ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) -Original Message- From: Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN [mailto:dave.l.han...@usps.gov] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 11:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: QUEUED() not working with ISPF (CROSS POSTED to ISPF-L) ISPF Masters; I have been struggling with IBM since July on this one. IBM says they can NOT duplicate this. I am not using PCOMM and this borders on an application issue. We are running z/OS V1R12. QUEUED() is not showing anything, but the pull on line 14 is being satistifed by something. This PMR is sev 2 and opened up because QUEUED() is not showing anything. If you have PCOMM and can reproduce this I would be interested in hearing from you. This EXEC fails reliably across a few different 3270 emulators. I don't understand what PCOMM would be doing so differently. WARNING: This does a slow big loop (with user intervention input required) because you can't enter QUIT to end the EXEC. My scenario: After putting the exec and panel in place enter SSBDLHW. It will QUEUE SSBDLHW to run again and again. 1). QUEUED() = 0 is shown pull PRTRID waits for your input. (Press ENTER) '***' displayed. (Press ENTER) 2). Panel is displayed. Type an A and press ENTER. 3). QUEUED() = 0 is shown pull RESP waits for your input. (Press ENTER) '***' displayed. (Press ENTER) 4). QUEUED() = 0 is shown pull PRTRID=== DOES NOT WAIT FOR YOU INPUT === '***' displayed. 5). Kill the EXEC anyway you can. Can anyone help me with why (as shown in the trace below) I am not given the opportunity to enter something for the pull on line 14? Problem: 12 *-* Say 'Queued =' QUEUED() L Queued = F 0 O Queued = 0 Queued = 0 13 *-* /**/ 14 *-* parse upper pull PRTRID 15 *-* trace n EXEC: /*** REXX ***/ ADDRESS TSO /* trace i */ ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) parse upper arg PRTRID If length(PRTRID) = 0 Then Do Say '=== When the panel displays: ===' Say '===Enter an A and then press ENTER.===' Say '=== Press ENTER to continue or ===' Say '===Enter QUIT to exit the program. ===' trace i Say 'Queued =' QUEUED() /* parse upper external PRTRID */ parse upper pull PRTRID trace n End If PRTRID = QUIT Then Exit Else Say PRTRID = PRTRID ADDRESS 'ISPEXEC' 'DISPLAY PANEL(SSBDLHP)' 'VGET (MYCMD)' ADDRESS TSO IF MYCMD = 'A' Then Do ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) Say Record Add Successful Say Press ENTER to Continue trace i Say 'Queued =' QUEUED() /* parse upper external RESP */ parse upper pull RESP ADDRESS 'ISPEXEC' MYCMD = ' ' 'VPUT (MYCMD)' ADDRESS TSO trace n Queue SSBDLHW Exit End Else Do Say Hint: Enter 'A' next time Say Press Enter to continue /* parse upper external RESP */ parse upper pull RESP Queue SSBDLHW Exit End Panel: )ATTR DEFAULT(%+_) % TYPE(TEXT) INTENS(HIGH) COLOR(TURQ) + TYPE(TEXT) INTENS(LOW) COLOR(GREEN) )BODY %---ADD PRINTER-- + %SELECTION =_MYCMD+ %A+- ADD PRINTER )INIT .CURSOR = MYCMD )PROC VPUT (MYCMD) )END Dave Hansen Eagan Software Systems Branch 651-406-1208 dave.l.han...@usps.gov -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: ROOT file system is out space
I have successfully expanded the Service Root but it has reached 4 GB limit and unable to expand it further. Is there any way to expand beyond 4 GB limit and the file system is on non sms volume. Regards, Chokalingam From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Lizette Koehler Sent: Tue 06/12/2011 03:53 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: ROOT file system is out space Subject: Re: ROOT file system is out space This is live ROOT. Regards, Chokalingam Thangavelu Is the root a zFS or HFS file? I do not think the zfsadm will work for HFS files. Lizette -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: ROOT file system is out space
We define all of our ZFS datasets in extended format which allows them to grow beyond the 4GB limit. Mark Jacobs On 12/07/11 13:11, Chokalingam Thangavelu wrote: I have successfully expanded the Service Root but it has reached 4 GB limit and unable to expand it further. Is there any way to expand beyond 4 GB limit and the file system is on non sms volume. Regards, Chokalingam From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Lizette Koehler Sent: Tue 06/12/2011 03:53 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: ROOT file system is out space Subject: Re: ROOT file system is out space This is live ROOT. Regards, Chokalingam Thangavelu Is the root a zFS or HFS file? I do not think the zfsadm will work for HFS files. Lizette -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service Tampa, FL One of life's greatest mysteries is how the boy who wasn't good enough to marry your daughter can be the father of the smartest grandchild in the world. Yiddish Proverb -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: ROOT file system is out space
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 23:41:17 +0530, Chokalingam Thangavelu thangavelu.chokalin...@wipro.com wrote: I have successfully expanded the Service Root but it has reached 4 GB limit and unable to expand it further. Is there any way to expand beyond 4 GB limit and the file system is on non sms volume. Regards, No, it must be SMS managed as extended format to be larger than 4 GB. But why is it so big? Do you have something in there besides what Serverpac delivers? Did you combine some other separate HFS / zFS roots into your z/OS root?Even at z/OS 1.13 the root fits on a 3390-3 still (barely). Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:m...@mzelden.com Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: QUEUED() not working with ISPF (CROSS POSTED to ISPF-L)
Anthony, I made the changes you did and still have the same problem. It appears not to be a problem with CLRSCRN. I did notice a problem with my cut and paste. This: If PRTRID = QUIT Then Exit Else Say PRTRID = PRTRID ADDRESS 'ISPEXEC' Should have been: If PRTRID = QUIT Then Exit Else Say PRTRID = PRTRID ADDRESS 'ISPEXEC' Dave Hansen Eagan Software Systems Branch 651-406-1208 dave.l.han...@usps.gov -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Sambataro, Anthony (NIH/NBS) [E] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 12:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: QUEUED() not working with ISPF (CROSS POSTED to ISPF-L) I don't use PCOMM, and don't have CLRSCRN, but I made a few small changes and get no errors. Here's my ISPF compare results: I - /* ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) */ D - ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) I -Else Say PRTRID = PRTRID D -Else Say PRTRID = PRTRID ADDRESS 'ISPEXEC' I - ADDRESS ISPEXEC DISPLAY PANEL(SSBDLHP) D - 'DISPLAY PANEL(SSBDLHP)' I - ADDRESS ISPEXEC VGET (MYCMD) D - 'VGET (MYCMD)' I - /* ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) */ D -ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) -Original Message- From: Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN [mailto:dave.l.han...@usps.gov] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 11:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: QUEUED() not working with ISPF (CROSS POSTED to ISPF-L) ISPF Masters; I have been struggling with IBM since July on this one. IBM says they can NOT duplicate this. I am not using PCOMM and this borders on an application issue. We are running z/OS V1R12. QUEUED() is not showing anything, but the pull on line 14 is being satistifed by something. This PMR is sev 2 and opened up because QUEUED() is not showing anything. If you have PCOMM and can reproduce this I would be interested in hearing from you. This EXEC fails reliably across a few different 3270 emulators. I don't understand what PCOMM would be doing so differently. WARNING: This does a slow big loop (with user intervention input required) because you can't enter QUIT to end the EXEC. My scenario: After putting the exec and panel in place enter SSBDLHW. It will QUEUE SSBDLHW to run again and again. 1). QUEUED() = 0 is shown pull PRTRID waits for your input. (Press ENTER) '***' displayed. (Press ENTER) 2). Panel is displayed. Type an A and press ENTER. 3). QUEUED() = 0 is shown pull RESP waits for your input. (Press ENTER) '***' displayed. (Press ENTER) 4). QUEUED() = 0 is shown pull PRTRID=== DOES NOT WAIT FOR YOU INPUT === '***' displayed. 5). Kill the EXEC anyway you can. Can anyone help me with why (as shown in the trace below) I am not given the opportunity to enter something for the pull on line 14? Problem: 12 *-* Say 'Queued =' QUEUED() L Queued = F 0 O Queued = 0 Queued = 0 13 *-* /**/ 14 *-* parse upper pull PRTRID 15 *-* trace n EXEC: /*** REXX ***/ ADDRESS TSO /* trace i */ ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) parse upper arg PRTRID If length(PRTRID) = 0 Then Do Say '=== When the panel displays: ===' Say '===Enter an A and then press ENTER.===' Say '=== Press ENTER to continue or ===' Say '===Enter QUIT to exit the program. ===' trace i Say 'Queued =' QUEUED() /* parse upper external PRTRID */ parse upper pull PRTRID trace n End If PRTRID = QUIT Then Exit Else Say PRTRID = PRTRID ADDRESS 'ISPEXEC' 'DISPLAY PANEL(SSBDLHP)' 'VGET (MYCMD)' ADDRESS TSO IF MYCMD = 'A' Then Do ISPEXEC SELECT PGM(CLRSCRN) Say Record Add Successful Say Press ENTER to Continue trace i Say 'Queued =' QUEUED() /* parse upper external RESP */ parse upper pull RESP ADDRESS 'ISPEXEC' MYCMD = ' ' 'VPUT (MYCMD)' ADDRESS TSO trace n Queue SSBDLHW Exit End Else Do Say Hint: Enter 'A' next time Say Press Enter to continue /* parse upper external RESP */ parse upper pull RESP Queue SSBDLHW Exit End Panel: )ATTR DEFAULT(%+_) % TYPE(TEXT) INTENS(HIGH) COLOR(TURQ) + TYPE(TEXT) INTENS(LOW) COLOR(GREEN) )BODY %---ADD PRINTER
Re: QUEUED() not working with ISPF (CROSS POSTED to ISPF-L)
In 84ea18831601b6429e578236ae239b01a41d467...@eagnmnsxmb07.usa.dce.usps.gov, on 12/07/2011 at 10:50 AM, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN dave.l.han...@usps.gov said: 4). QUEUED() = 0 is shown pull PRTRID=== DOES NOT WAIT FOR YOU INPUT === '***' displayed. Did you run a buffer trace? What were the inbound and outbound data streams? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: ROOT file system is out space
it's got to be sms managed if you want it larger than 4 GB, but I'm curious why you have a 4 GB root, my 1.12 root still fits within a mod 3 size. (although just barely). Perhaps you might want to look at sms management for this, or splitting some directories into their own separate files. Bobbie Jo Justice I have successfully expanded the Service Root but it has reached 4 GB limit and unable to expand it further. Is there any way to expand beyond 4 GB limit and the file system is on non sms volume. Regards, Chokalingam -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: z/OS's basis for TCP/IP
Point it to a DNS that worked. We ran ours on an RS/6000 for many moons. In a message dated 12/7/2011 12:34:12 A.M. Central Standard Time, lindy.mayfi...@sas.com writes: If so, how were hostnames resolved? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: QUEUED() not working with ISPF (CROSS POSTED to ISPF-L)
Seymour, I asked IBM if a tn3270 trace would help. I felt this would show the 3270 stream to see if anything came back from the terminal. In TSO/E if the data stack is empty, PULL reads from either: Terminal (TSO/E foreground) Input stream, which is SYSTSIN (TSO/E background) I asked if IBM could put REXX in a single step execution. I have done this before with intertest and COBOL programs under CICS. It sounds like IBM has nothing beyond REXX TRACE. No further documentation has been requested from IBM. I will look at running a buffer trace. Thank you, Dave Dave Hansen Eagan Software Systems Branch 651-406-1208 dave.l.han...@usps.gov -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 1:22 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: QUEUED() not working with ISPF (CROSS POSTED to ISPF-L) In 84ea18831601b6429e578236ae239b01a41d467...@eagnmnsxmb07.usa.dce.usps.gov, on 12/07/2011 at 10:50 AM, Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN dave.l.han...@usps.gov said: 4). QUEUED() = 0 is shown pull PRTRID=== DOES NOT WAIT FOR YOU INPUT === '***' displayed. Did you run a buffer trace? What were the inbound and outbound data streams? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Last use date of a PDS member
I didn't go through all the replies so forgive me if I am repeating was someone said... There a CA product (use to be called PDSMAN) that records the last referenced date in the directory. With that said, I am not sure if that means JCL procedure execution. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: ROOT file system is out space
I'd be willing to bet there is a whole lot more being stored in the root filesystem that just root. Another good reason to force read-only root regimentation. /u - users information and storage should get it's own filesytem / - dumps? /usr/lpp - various licensed program products can use separate file-systems Rob Schramm Senior Systems Consultant Imperium Group On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Bobbie Justice golds...@yahoo.com wrote: it's got to be sms managed if you want it larger than 4 GB, but I'm curious why you have a 4 GB root, my 1.12 root still fits within a mod 3 size. (although just barely). Perhaps you might want to look at sms management for this, or splitting some directories into their own separate files. Bobbie Jo Justice I have successfully expanded the Service Root but it has reached 4 GB limit and unable to expand it further. Is there any way to expand beyond 4 GB limit and the file system is on non sms volume. Regards, Chokalingam -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Possible impact of VTS on batch I/O times (also posted to IMS-L)
Listers, We’re trying to understand the elapsed times of a couple of batch IMS jobs that ran this past weekend. Both jobs used virtual tape (IBM 3494 B20) for log file processing and our Mainview for z/OS monitor attributed most of the elapsed time of each job to log file processing. One job was an IMS batch backout job (IMS utility DFSBBO00) and the other was an IMS Cobol database update job (DLI). Surprisingly (to us) it’s the output log file processing of each job that exhibited very long I/O response times in the monitor output. Blocking and buffering may not be as generous as they could be, but should be adequate. We want to understand what’s going on and see if we can improve processing performance or provide an alternative approach that will reduce job elapsed time. We've had the VTS system for some time but to my knowledge no one here has noticed or been made aware of this sort of behavior previously (which doesn't mean it hasn't happened before). Below is some monitor output showing virtual tape device behavior for both input and output log file processing in the batch backout job mentioned earlier. The job read the log file from a preceding update job on device 1057 and wrote its new log file on device 1064. We understand that backout processing using a real tape device might run very slowly due to processing the incoming log file data in reverse sequence. But we’re using virtual tape and the elapsed time appears to be attributed to the NEW (output) log file rather than the incoming (input) log file. Below is data from a couple of displays from our Mainview for z/OS monitor showing input and output virtual tape device device behavior during the time the backout job executed. We've been speculating that what we're seeing is somehow due to VTS configuration or the manner in which real tape is simulated or something of that sort. Any insights or suggestions concerning the high I/O response times we see would be greatly appreciated. This is data for the input log file for the 5-hour period from 06:30-11:30 on 04 Dec. I/O response time looks good. 07DEC2011 09:29:23 -- MAINVI CURR WIN === 1ALT WIN === H1 =DEVINFO===ASYS=*04DEC2011==11:30=300M==MVMVS Volser. E06934 % Allocated 100.00 Avg Serv Time.. 4.80 Device Number.. 1057 % Utilized. 9.09 Avg IOSQ Time.. Type... 3490 % Active... 10.52 Avg Act Time... 4.80 LCU Number.01C % Connected 8.96 Avg Conn Time.. 4.09 Status.RSV % Disconn.. 0.12 Avg Dsc Time... 0.05 Mount Status...PRV % Pending.. 1.44 Avg Pnd Time... 0.66 % Mount Pend...% Req Queued...Avg Con+Dis Tm. 4.14 SSCH/Sec... 21.92 % Dev Queued...Avg DPB Delay.. N/A Total SSCH. 19729 % Q+CPU Wait...Avg CUB Delay.. N/A % In Use... 9.25 % Efficiency... 100.00 Avg DvB Delay.. % Delaying.I/O Concurrency 0.09 % Reserved. Curr DS open...Init Cmd Res Tm% Resv Shr. Avg DS openAvg Q Depth% Error Rec Max Q Depth This is data for the output log file for the 5-hour period from 06:30-11:30 on 04 Dec. I/O response time is very high and nearly all of it is disconnect time. 07DEC2011 08:29:20 -- MAINV: CURR WIN === 1ALT WIN === H1 =DEVINFO===ASYS=*04DEC2011==11:30=300M==MVMVS===: Volser. E55687 % Allocated 100.00 Avg Serv Time.. 844.27: Device Number.. 1064 % Utilized. 90.08 Avg IOSQ Time.. Type... 3490 % Active... 90.10 Avg Act Time... 844: LCU Number.01D % Connected 1.30 Avg Conn Time.. 12.16: Status.RSV % Disconn.. 88.73 Avg Dsc Time... 831: Mount Status...PRV % Pending.. 0.07 Avg Pnd Time... 0.67: % Mount Pend...% Req Queued...Avg Con+Dis Tm. 843.59: SSCH/Sec... 1.07 % Dev Queued...Avg DPB Delay.. N/A: Total SSCH.961 % Q+CPU Wait...Avg CUB Delay.. N/A: % In Use... 90.75 % Efficiency... 100.00 Avg DvB Delay.. % Delaying.I/O Concurrency 0.90 % Reserved. Curr DS open...Init Cmd Res Tm% Resv Shr. Avg DS openAvg Q Depth% Error Rec Max Q Depth Doug Johnson Software Systems Internal Consultant Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Voice: 785-291-7192 Fax: 785-291-8548 Cell:
Re: Possible impact of VTS on batch I/O times (also posted to IMS-L)
Hi Doug, We used to have a 3494 B20 VTS. You might want to see if the VTS was running reclamation during the time your job was running. HTH, Linda - Original Message - From: Doug Johnson doug.john...@bcbsks.com To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 11:44:50 AM Subject: Possible impact of VTS on batch I/O times (also posted to IMS-L) Listers, We’re trying to understand the elapsed times of a couple of batch IMS jobs that ran this past weekend. Both jobs used virtual tape (IBM 3494 B20) for log file processing and our Mainview for z/OS monitor attributed most of the elapsed time of each job to log file processing. One job was an IMS batch backout job (IMS utility DFSBBO00) and the other was an IMS Cobol database update job (DLI). Surprisingly (to us) it’s the output log file processing of each job that exhibited very long I/O response times in the monitor output. Blocking and buffering may not be as generous as they could be, but should be adequate. We want to understand what’s going on and see if we can improve processing performance or provide an alternative approach that will reduce job elapsed time. We've had the VTS system for some time but to my knowledge no one here has noticed or been made aware of this sort of behavior previously (which doesn't mean it hasn't happened before). Below is some monitor output showing virtual tape device behavior for both input and output log file processing in the batch backout job mentioned earlier. The job read the log file from a preceding update job on device 1057 and wrote its new log file on device 1064. We understand that backout processing using a real tape device might run very slowly due to processing the incoming log file data in reverse sequence. But we’re using virtual tape and the elapsed time appears to be attributed to the NEW (output) log file rather than the incoming (input) log file. Below is data from a couple of displays from our Mainview for z/OS monitor showing input and output virtual tape device device behavior during the time the backout job executed. We've been speculating that what we're seeing is somehow due to VTS configuration or the manner in which real tape is simulated or something of that sort. Any insights or suggestions concerning the high I/O response times we see would be greatly appreciated. This is data for the input log file for the 5-hour period from 06:30-11:30 on 04 Dec. I/O response time looks good. 07DEC2011 09:29:23 -- MAINVI CURR WIN === 1 ALT WIN === H1 =DEVINFO===ASYS=*04DEC2011==11:30=300M==MVMVS Volser. E06934 % Allocated 100.00 Avg Serv Time.. 4.80 Device Number.. 1057 % Utilized. 9.09 Avg IOSQ Time.. Type... 3490 % Active... 10.52 Avg Act Time... 4.80 LCU Number. 01C % Connected 8.96 Avg Conn Time.. 4.09 Status. RSV % Disconn.. 0.12 Avg Dsc Time... 0.05 Mount Status... PRV % Pending.. 1.44 Avg Pnd Time... 0.66 % Mount Pend... % Req Queued... Avg Con+Dis Tm. 4.14 SSCH/Sec... 21.92 % Dev Queued... Avg DPB Delay.. N/A Total SSCH. 19729 % Q+CPU Wait... Avg CUB Delay.. N/A % In Use... 9.25 % Efficiency... 100.00 Avg DvB Delay.. % Delaying. I/O Concurrency 0.09 % Reserved. Curr DS open... Init Cmd Res Tm % Resv Shr. Avg DS open Avg Q Depth % Error Rec Max Q Depth This is data for the output log file for the 5-hour period from 06:30-11:30 on 04 Dec. I/O response time is very high and nearly all of it is disconnect time. 07DEC2011 08:29:20 -- MAINV: CURR WIN === 1 ALT WIN === H1 =DEVINFO===ASYS=*04DEC2011==11:30=300M==MVMVS===: Volser. E55687 % Allocated 100.00 Avg Serv Time.. 844.27: Device Number.. 1064 % Utilized. 90.08 Avg IOSQ Time.. Type... 3490 % Active... 90.10 Avg Act Time... 844: LCU Number. 01D % Connected 1.30 Avg Conn Time.. 12.16: Status. RSV % Disconn.. 88.73 Avg Dsc Time... 831: Mount Status... PRV % Pending.. 0.07 Avg Pnd Time... 0.67: % Mount Pend... % Req Queued... Avg Con+Dis Tm. 843.59: SSCH/Sec... 1.07 % Dev Queued... Avg DPB Delay.. N/A: Total SSCH. 961 % Q+CPU Wait... Avg CUB Delay.. N/A: %
Re: Help Programming for ISPF Jump
Thanks for the suggestions guys. So far nothing has worked out. I'll check over on ISPF-L. Chuck Arney Arney Computer Systems -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 6:24 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Help Programming for ISPF Jump On 12/6/2011 3:28 PM, Chuck Arney wrote: Thanks for any suggestions. isp...@listserv.nd.edu -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Help Programming for ISPF Jump
Sir, Would ISPFVAR NOJUMP or even the panel attributes section's NOJUMP help you ??. If you are building and handling your own menus you should be able to turn off 'jump'. Kind Regards Jim Thomas 617-233-4130 (mobile) 636-294-1014(res) j...@thethomasresidence.us (Email) -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chuck Arney Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 4:36 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Help Programming for ISPF Jump Thanks for the suggestions guys. So far nothing has worked out. I'll check over on ISPF-L. Chuck Arney Arney Computer Systems -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 6:24 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Help Programming for ISPF Jump On 12/6/2011 3:28 PM, Chuck Arney wrote: Thanks for any suggestions. isp...@listserv.nd.edu -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1873 / Virus Database: 2102/4665 - Release Date: 12/07/11 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Help Programming for ISPF Jump
Thanks for the suggestions Jim but they don't work for this situation. ISPFVAR JUMP OFF only controls jumping from fields with leader dots and nojump(on) in the attr does not pass thru the jump command to the application. It generates an error message when you attempt to use Jump. Chuck Arney -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 5:06 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Help Programming for ISPF Jump Sir, Would ISPFVAR NOJUMP or even the panel attributes section's NOJUMP help you ??. If you are building and handling your own menus you should be able to turn off 'jump'. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
JCL sheesh! for today
If the DDNAME parameter appears . the referenced DD statement must not contain a . PATH parameter. In other words, you can NOT do //DD1 DD DDNAME=DD2 //DD2 DD PATH='/my/hfs/path' Sheesh! Thanks for listening. Charles -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: JCL sheesh! for today
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:21:49 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: If the DDNAME parameter appears . the referenced DD statement must not contain a . PATH parameter. In other words, you can NOT do //DD1 DD DDNAME=DD2 //DD2 DD PATH='/my/hfs/path' Sheesh! Thanks for listening. All in all, it appears to me that the developers weren't sincerely motivated to make Unix System Services work as it should. It's a half-hearted (is that the right anatomical reference?) implementation. This shouldn't be something fundamentally difficult like making forked processes inherit DDNAMEs; they should just do it. I hate JCL! -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
RECFM=VBA and no JCL
All: I have the following situation: I am calling a program via Cobol and the output is RECFM=VBA,LRECL=133,BLKSIZE=1330 (only an example) The actual allocations are done dynamically via BPXWDYN and work fine no problem. I then close the file and free it and re-allocate it ( no JCL ) for this file its dynamic and of course I can read it. If I code a 'DD' with a RECFM=VB,LRECL=137 it works great with no problems. I can I do the same internally inside my Cobol code without a 'DD' stmt ? All comments and opinions are much appreciated. Regards, Scott J Ford Software Engineer http://www.identityforge.com -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: JCL sheesh! for today
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote: All in all, it appears to me that the developers weren't sincerely motivated to make Unix System Services work as it should. It's a half-hearted (is that the right anatomical reference?) implementation. This shouldn't be something fundamentally difficult like making forked processes inherit DDNAMEs; they should just do it. I hate JCL! Indeed. The tiny improvements in JCL over time make me think that POK is afraid of the code -- never a good situation. Yes, a change that broke production jobs would be Bad, but that's what testing and ESPs are for. JCL is so primitive lo these almost 50 years later: I'm always astonished (and a bit depressed). -- zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: JCL sheesh! for today
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 23:13:37 -0500, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote: All in all, it appears to me that the developers weren't sincerely motivated to make Unix System Services work as it should. It's a half-hearted (is that the right anatomical reference?) implementation. This shouldn't be something fundamentally difficult like making forked processes inherit DDNAMEs; they should just do it. I hate JCL! Indeed. The tiny improvements in JCL over time make me think that POK is afraid of the code -- never a good situation. Yes, a change that broke production jobs would be Bad, but that's what testing and ESPs are for. JCL is so primitive lo these almost 50 years later: I'm always astonished (and a bit depressed). -- zMan -- I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it A wish: //ddname DD IPADDR=n.n.n.n,PATHOPTS=R Wouldn't it be nice if you could just open a pipe to (or from, or both) an IP address straight into your JCL? Different pathopts for output, input, update, etc. Does the Co:Z toolkit already do this? A quick look at http://dovetail.com/docs/coz/index.html left me still wondering. thx Peter -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
