Re: EBCDIC (was: Json table characters)
On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:14:21 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
>>>It's worth getting a copy of the SHARE ÆCS report to see what the
>>>state of character encoding and standardization was like in 1989.
>>>
>On 8 August 2018 at 13:03, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>> Is it available?
>
>I thought I had seen it on Bitsavers, but though there are references
>to it I don't see it there, or indeed anywhere else. Well I have an
>original paper copy, so time to get scanning...
>
Thanks. Will it go to Bitsavers? They do an incredible job of some sort
of 2-layer PDFs which are simultaneously images (even with fingerprints)
and searchable text. I've found:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBCDIC_037
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBCDIC_037-2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBCDIC_1047
Differences in a handful of code points; not enough to bring world
peace or solve climate change.
On Linux, the script below compares the output of "dd conv={ebcdic|ibm}"
to pages 037, 500, and 1047. The best match seems to be "conv-ibm"
to IBM-1047.
I don't believe that the "dd" utility per se motivated a serious requirement,
but does "dd conv=ibm" reflect otherwise prevalent practice?
(And we still have the LF-NL irritant.)
# #
#! /bin/sh -x
S=$( awk 'BEGIN {
for ( I=32; I<128; I++ ) printf( "%c", I ) }'; )
around() {
echo; echo; echo EBCDIC "$1"
printf %s "$S" | dd conv=ebcdic |
iconv -f "$1" -t ISO8859-1
echo; echo IBM"$1"
printf '%s\n' "$S"
printf %s "$S" | dd conv=ibm|
iconv -f "$1" -t ISO8859-1
}
around CSIBM037
around CSIBM500
around IBM-1047
echo
exit
# #
Thanks again,
gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: EBCDIC (was: Json table characters)
On 8 August 2018 at 13:03, Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 23:38:07 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: >>It's worth getting a copy of the SHARE ÆCS report to see what the >>state of character encoding and standardization was like in 1989. >> > Is it available? I thought I had seen it on Bitsavers, but though there are references to it I don't see it there, or indeed anywhere else. Well I have an original paper copy, so time to get scanning... Tony H. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: OT - BREXIT parameter in CICS
fwiw, it is Friday in Australia, China, and Japan... I have no idea what the etymology of that CICS version of BREXIT is, but it occurs to me that it could a synonym of IEFBR14 (BR EXIT), as any program* launched by the system has R14 pointing at an EXIT SVC. sas *except the exceptions, which of course there are legion. On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 10:06 AM, Peter Hunkeler wrote: > It is almost Friday. > > I'm not a CICS guy, but while looking up something I stumbled across this: > > > From the CICS TS Reference, "Transaction Resources", I just learnt that > the CICS developers at Hursley long foresaw the UK will leave the EU one > day or the other: There is a transaction definition parameter called > BREXIT, and an associated START BREXIT command. > > > LOL. Too cute not to share. > > > > -- > Peter Hunkeler > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- sas -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: [External] Re: Filemanager and security
List, Just a follow-up on this to let those involved in responding to me that I didn't forget to reply back, but I got pulled onto more critical issues and haven't been able to get back to this. Once I get it resolved I'll actually post what the resolution was - most likely self-inflicted... Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 10:01 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [External] Re: Filemanager and security Hey Russell, I think we're on a different wavelength. :-) As best I can tell, CA1 is doing exactly what it should do. My comments earlier on the 17 character limit was referring to the fact that without a TMS of some flavor, the only thing protecting a tape dataset is the DSN on the tape label which can only be 17 characters, so by necessity that's all the system can check. My test with shorter DSNs was simply taking my 35 (or so) character tape dataset, and trying to convince FileManager to let me look at the tape by removing the HLQ of the DSN within FM. CA1 did exactly what I hoped it would do, comparing the DSN the TMS said was supposed to be on that tape with what FM was telling CA1 was on the tape. CA1 rightly said the DSNs didn't match and it rejected the tape request. The DSN recorded in CA1 when the tape was created was HIGHQUAL.SECONDLQ.MORE.STUFF.G0005V00 (36 characters if I counted right), the tape label only has RE.STUFF.G0005V00 on it, so I tried to convince FM to allow me to read SECONDLQ.MORE.STUFF.G0005V00 and CA1 said "nope". My FM tests were all performed using ISPF so no batch jobs involved, but ISPF was displaying the correct DSNs. FUNC option is set to NO, but I was also telling FM to use SL tapes and not BLP. Thanks, Rex -Original Message- From: Russell Witt [mailto:res09...@verizon.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 8:45 PM To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List' Cc: Pommier, Rex Subject: RE: [External] Re: Filemanager and security Rex, If the DSN is less than 17-characters and CA 1 rejects it; I am wondering if Filemanager is dynamically adding an extra HLQ before doing the OPEN and has 98000 specified to bypass the tape management system. If you look at the job that ran successfully, what DSN was actually allocated? Was it the correct name? And when you say that CA 1 rejects the access when the DSN is less than 17-characters, what exactly is the rejection message? Lastly, is the FUNC option enabled (YES or EXT) within CA 1? This would allow you to control who can use 98000 to bypass CA 1. Russell Witt CA 1 Development -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 1:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [External] Re: Filemanager and security Hi Bob, Sorry for the delay. RACF is showing "TAPE DATA SET PROTECTION IS ACTIVE" . CA-1 won't allow me to browse the tape using FM if I shrink the DSN or change it to something other than what is recorded in TMS. ICHBLP is defined with UACC(NONE) and no users in the access list. Thanks, Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Robert S. Hansel (RSH) Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 5:30 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: Filemanager and security Hi Rex, How have you activated tape protection in your environment - SETROPTS, PARMLIB(DEVSUPxx), or a Tape Management product option? What Tape Management product do you have? Not that this may matter, but does your ID have READ access to FACILITY ICHBLP or your Tape Management product's equivalent? If it does, have you tried the function with an ID that does not have this access? Regards, Bob Robert S. Hansel Lead RACF Specialist RSH Consulting, Inc. *** Celebrating our 25th Year *** 617-969-8211 www.linkedin.com/in/roberthansel https://twitter.com/RSH_RACF www.rshconsulting.com -Original Message- Date:Thu, 12 Apr 2018 13:08:16 + From:"Pommier, Rex" Subject: Re: [External] Re: Filemanager and security Hi Kolusu, Unfortunately that doesn't do it. According to the FileManager documentation - which I verified on my system - granting any kind of access (read, update, alter, it doesn't matter) either grants you access to the function or denies it (access=none). For example, if I grant READ access to FILEM.TAPE.OUTPUT, I have access to update tapes. Likewise if I grant ALTER access to FILEM.TAPE.INPUT, all that gives me access to is tape browse type functions like tape browse and tape label display. These are just toggles to the function within FileManager. The problem that I am running into is that for example, if I have 2 production datasets on tape, one with GL information and the other with the payroll information on it, and I need
Re: [External] Re: OSA-ICC ports are disabled
Hi Thanks All POR worked plus some chpid Toggle On Thu 9 Aug, 2018, 6:14 PM Pommier, Rex, wrote: > We also just did this literally yesterday! ICC came up disabled. Went > through the same process, plugged the ICC in, loaded the configuration from > the old machine, and then had to do a POR before it would come up enabled. > > One other thing that bit us, we still couldn't get to it from the > network. We had to change the port from 3270 to something else. We chose > 1024 and then everything started working. I guess the possible restriction > is documented at the end of the exception letter but by then my eyes were > bleary and I missed that note. > > Rex > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Michael Babcock > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2018 5:37 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: [External] Re: OSA-ICC ports are disabled > > We just did this. Make sure you export your old OSA-ICC config from the > old HMC and import it to the new one. Then use Advanced OSA functions, > card specific functions, and validate and activate. > > Once we had our new cable plugged in and the ICC imported and activated, we > ended up having to do a power on reset to get the card to come active. > > One other thing, I’ve heard there was one report of a ZR1 where OSA’s > wouldn’t work until the OSA cards were reseated by the IBM SSR. > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:27 AM Jake Anderson > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Cross posted . > > > > I was able to bring up the z/OS on tht new hardware z14 successfully. > > > > The OSA base 1000t were plugged into the correct port as per the chpid > > mapping output and also the cable was plugged into the correct switch > port > > > > > > Still the status of the OSA shows as DISABLED in HMC. I tried with reset > > too but no luck. > > > > Anything that is missing to be checked ? > > > > Regards > > Jake. > > > > -- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from > disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is > not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for > delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action > omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If > you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately > by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, > whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. > > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
EBCDIC Bad History (was: Json table characters)
On 2018-08-09, at 05:18:16, David Crayford wrote: > On 9/08/2018 2:08 AM, Charles Mills wrote: >> Yes, ??= is the trigraph for #. Talk about hash! >> >> Trigraphs go away in C++17. > > Michael Wong from IBM has already stated that IBM will still support > trigraphs in C++ as an extension. C hasn't deprecated them. > But seeing as #pragma filetag() is already an extension I see no reason why > anybody would use them. I have no idea why > the health checker header files in SYS1.SIEAHDR.H(HZS*) chose to use them. > It's an act of madness! > About 40 years ago, IBM considered Pascal essential: bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/pascal/SH20-6168-1_VS_PASCAL_Dec81.pdf Pascal/VS uses square brackets, '[' and ']', in the declaration of arrays. Because these symbols are not directly available on many I/O devices, the symbols '(.' and '.)' may be used as an equivalent to square brackets. I believe the original VM TCP/IP stack (a user developed product) was written in Pascal. And IBM devised the dreadful XLATE macro: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idar100/g1059.htm IGC0010CXLATE (translate to and from ASCII (BSAM and QSAM)) I conjecture its primary objective was to map ASCII to code points supported on existing printers, keyboards, and displays, but not necessarily with a faithful visual representation. IIRC, it mapped '[' and ']' to x'4A' and X'5A'. In CP 037 and CP 1047 these are '¢' and '!'. In CP 500 they are '[' and ']'. Does anyone recall the chronology? I imagine bitter internal territorial fights over the precious code points. Trigraphs: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27601706/c1z-why-not-remove-digraphs-along-with-trigraphs "C++1z will remove trigraphs. IBM heavily opposed this (here and here) so there seem to be arguments for both sides of removal/non removal." citing: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2910.pdf http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4210.pdf The arguments they raise are: o Continued support of existing source code relying on trigraphs. o Support of antique peripheral devices with limited vocabulary. C/C++ do not use "??" as operators in code. However, they may occur in quoted strings and must be converted to support '??/n' and '??/"'. for examples. Supporting them there is not an extension but a true incompatibility. -- gil -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: [External] Re: OSA-ICC ports are disabled
We also just did this literally yesterday! ICC came up disabled. Went through the same process, plugged the ICC in, loaded the configuration from the old machine, and then had to do a POR before it would come up enabled. One other thing that bit us, we still couldn't get to it from the network. We had to change the port from 3270 to something else. We chose 1024 and then everything started working. I guess the possible restriction is documented at the end of the exception letter but by then my eyes were bleary and I missed that note. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Michael Babcock Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2018 5:37 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [External] Re: OSA-ICC ports are disabled We just did this. Make sure you export your old OSA-ICC config from the old HMC and import it to the new one. Then use Advanced OSA functions, card specific functions, and validate and activate. Once we had our new cable plugged in and the ICC imported and activated, we ended up having to do a power on reset to get the card to come active. One other thing, I’ve heard there was one report of a ZR1 where OSA’s wouldn’t work until the OSA cards were reseated by the IBM SSR. On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:27 AM Jake Anderson wrote: > Hi > > Cross posted . > > I was able to bring up the z/OS on tht new hardware z14 successfully. > > The OSA base 1000t were plugged into the correct port as per the chpid > mapping output and also the cable was plugged into the correct switch port > > > Still the status of the OSA shows as DISABLED in HMC. I tried with reset > too but no luck. > > Anything that is missing to be checked ? > > Regards > Jake. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
OT - BREXIT parameter in CICS
It is almost Friday. I'm not a CICS guy, but while looking up something I stumbled across this: >From the CICS TS Reference, "Transaction Resources", I just learnt that the >CICS developers at Hursley long foresaw the UK will leave the EU one day or >the other: There is a transaction definition parameter called BREXIT, and an >associated START BREXIT command. LOL. Too cute not to share. -- Peter Hunkeler -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: For JES2 Experts - v.2.2 question
I would go through the Migration Manuals from V1.13 up to V2.2. As I recall, there are some interesting changes in JES2 Exits over that period of time. Also, review if the exit is still needed. JES2 and other products, have helped in reducing the number of exits needed. Lizette > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of > Don Parrott > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2018 5:17 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: For JES2 Experts - v.2.2 question > > Question: We are trying to reassemble our JES2 exits for z/OS 2.2.In > z/OS V2R2 can the JES2 JQE still have extensions similar to what is available > on z/OS 1.13, or is this now somehow prohibited? > > Thanks! > Don Parrott > Clemson University > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: Jes2 Initiator number
On 2018-08-08 5:58 AM, Cieri, Anthony wrote: The audit trail is needed to determine what job(s) instigate the S822 ABENDs. Well, maybe that audit trail will work now (and maybe it won't)- but it definitely would not have been reliable in the past. In the olden days - even before the iPhone 6 was invented - the JES2 INIT number was more of a logical concept or a virtual queue - and did not mean any particular address space. For example, suppose the "INIT 2" address space A1 was doing job termination. Then "INIT 2" would be eligible to run a new job. But suppose there were other started initiators that had no work in their assigned classes, and so address spaces A2 and A3 were idle initiators. JES2 may well start the next job under "INIT 2" in address space A2 or A3 as JES2 saw fit, perhaps before address space A1 had become truly idle. S822 abends are probably caused by LSQA fragmentation, where LSQA is sloppy terminology for "private high" virtual storage. If you want to find out who the "culprit" is, you need to track the ASID, not the INIT number, in my view. In a previous life as a sysprog, I wrote and implemented an MPF exit to append the ASID to the STARTED and ENDED messages - the ones produced by the MONITOR or MN command IIRC, but it might also work for the JES2 messages. It reported the ASID for started tasks and TSO users as well, without actually increasing the number of messages. You may not be interested in messages as such, but the most convenient window into the past I had at the time was the SYSLOG. If you want to look at SMF, then you probably do not need to change much because the ASID is in the type 30 (SMF30ASI). Even if my observations about JES2 INIT numbers are out of date or even totally incorrect, ASID is still a valid thing to track when trying to track storage fragmentation within the private area of an individual address space, so you still don't need to audit JES2 INIT numbers. And don't forget there is always the el cheapo version of the therapeutic IPL - just drain and restart all the initiators every so often when convenient for pristine unfragmented private storage for your batch jobs. Cheers, Greg -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: For JES2 Experts - v.2.2 question
I recall having to write some SAPI code for exit 6 circa 2.1 or 2.2 . Found the info below in the zOS V2.2 Migration Guide. GA32-0889-08 Review changes applicable to JES2 exits Description: In z/OS V2.1, there may be exit changes necessary, depending on which exits you are using and which JES2 data areas those exits are referencing. Element or feature: z/OS JES2. When change was introduced: z/OS V2R1. Applies to migration from: z/OS V1R13 and z/OS V1R12. Timing: Before the first IPL of z/OS V2R1. Is the migration action required? Yes, if you have any affected JES2 exits. Target system hardware requirements: None. Target system software requirements: None. Other system (coexistence or fallback) requirements: None. Restrictions: None. System impacts: None. Related IBM Health Checker for z/OS check: None. Steps to take: Refer to the "JES2 z/OS V2R1 migration details" section of z/OS JES2 Installation Exits. This section details the changed information which you may need to accommodate. The changes include (but are not limited to) Exit 6 considerations, with the DTE (macro $DTECNV) containing fields which have changed. Generally, assembly errors in JES2 exits indicate that you were affected by a JES2 data area change. Reference information: z/OS JES2 Installation Exits JES2 actions to perform after the first IPL of z/OS V2R1 This topic describes JES2 migration actions that you can perform only after you have IPLed z/OS V2R1. You need a running z/OS V2R1 system to perform these actions. None. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Don Parrott Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2018 7:17 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: For JES2 Experts - v.2.2 question Question: We are trying to reassemble our JES2 exits for z/OS 2.2.In z/OS V2R2 can the JES2 JQE still have extensions similar to what is available on z/OS 1.13, or is this now somehow prohibited? Thanks! Don Parrott Clemson University -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ::DISCLAIMER:: -- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and other defects. -- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
For JES2 Experts - v.2.2 question
Question: We are trying to reassemble our JES2 exits for z/OS 2.2.In z/OS V2R2 can the JES2 JQE still have extensions similar to what is available on z/OS 1.13, or is this now somehow prohibited? Thanks! Don Parrott Clemson University -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: EBCDIC (was: Json table characters)
On 9/08/2018 2:08 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
Yes, ??= is the trigraph for #. Talk about hash!
Trigraphs go away in C++17.
Michael Wong from IBM has already stated that IBM will still support
trigraphs in C++ as an extension. C hasn't deprecated them.
But seeing as #pragma filetag() is already an extension I see no reason
why anybody would use them. I have no idea why
the health checker header files in SYS1.SIEAHDR.H(HZS*) chose to use
them. It's an act of madness!
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 10:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: EBCDIC (was: Json table characters)
On Wed, 8 Aug 2018 09:55:08 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
Thank you -- I did not know about not. I see here
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_alternative that there is a
whole family of these including not_eq.
I have encountered IBM files that used the C++ trigraphs: ??< for { and so
forth. What an unreadable mess! (IMHO, obviously)
I understand that some compilers have a #pragma that disables trigraphs.
Alas, "#" may not be entirely portable and may need to be coded as a
trigraph.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: OSA-ICC ports are disabled
Jeez, haven’t had my coffee yet, the subject says ICC. I’ll go back offline now! On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:38 AM Michael Babcock wrote: > I just re-read your post. No mention of ICC so ignore me! > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:36 AM Michael Babcock > wrote: > >> We just did this. Make sure you export your old OSA-ICC config from the >> old HMC and import it to the new one. Then use Advanced OSA functions, >> card specific functions, and validate and activate. >> >> Once we had our new cable plugged in and the ICC imported and activated, >> we ended up having to do a power on reset to get the card to come active. >> >> >> One other thing, I’ve heard there was one report of a ZR1 where OSA’s >> wouldn’t work until the OSA cards were reseated by the IBM SSR. >> >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:27 AM Jake Anderson >> wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> Cross posted . >>> >>> I was able to bring up the z/OS on tht new hardware z14 successfully. >>> >>> The OSA base 1000t were plugged into the correct port as per the chpid >>> mapping output and also the cable was plugged into the correct switch >>> port >>> >>> >>> Still the status of the OSA shows as DISABLED in HMC. I tried with reset >>> too but no luck. >>> >>> Anything that is missing to be checked ? >>> >>> Regards >>> Jake. >>> >>> -- >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >>> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >>> >> -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: OSA-ICC ports are disabled
I just re-read your post. No mention of ICC so ignore me! On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 5:36 AM Michael Babcock wrote: > We just did this. Make sure you export your old OSA-ICC config from the > old HMC and import it to the new one. Then use Advanced OSA functions, > card specific functions, and validate and activate. > > Once we had our new cable plugged in and the ICC imported and activated, > we ended up having to do a power on reset to get the card to come active. > > > One other thing, I’ve heard there was one report of a ZR1 where OSA’s > wouldn’t work until the OSA cards were reseated by the IBM SSR. > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:27 AM Jake Anderson > wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Cross posted . >> >> I was able to bring up the z/OS on tht new hardware z14 successfully. >> >> The OSA base 1000t were plugged into the correct port as per the chpid >> mapping output and also the cable was plugged into the correct switch port >> >> >> Still the status of the OSA shows as DISABLED in HMC. I tried with reset >> too but no luck. >> >> Anything that is missing to be checked ? >> >> Regards >> Jake. >> >> -- >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN >> > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Re: OSA-ICC ports are disabled
We just did this. Make sure you export your old OSA-ICC config from the old HMC and import it to the new one. Then use Advanced OSA functions, card specific functions, and validate and activate. Once we had our new cable plugged in and the ICC imported and activated, we ended up having to do a power on reset to get the card to come active. One other thing, I’ve heard there was one report of a ZR1 where OSA’s wouldn’t work until the OSA cards were reseated by the IBM SSR. On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:27 AM Jake Anderson wrote: > Hi > > Cross posted . > > I was able to bring up the z/OS on tht new hardware z14 successfully. > > The OSA base 1000t were plugged into the correct port as per the chpid > mapping output and also the cable was plugged into the correct switch port > > > Still the status of the OSA shows as DISABLED in HMC. I tried with reset > too but no luck. > > Anything that is missing to be checked ? > > Regards > Jake. > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
OSA-ICC ports are disabled
Hi Cross posted . I was able to bring up the z/OS on tht new hardware z14 successfully. The OSA base 1000t were plugged into the correct port as per the chpid mapping output and also the cable was plugged into the correct switch port Still the status of the OSA shows as DISABLED in HMC. I tried with reset too but no luck. Anything that is missing to be checked ? Regards Jake. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
