[LegacyUG] Re: MHT file

2009-10-07 Thread Margaret Bauer

Hi Listers

Just want to thank everyone that have had some ideas about the file I had 
received with the MHT extension.
My son has come and explained things too about what the file is etc., so 
have now been intouch with the person who sent it and they had sent me the 
wrong file as this was one she worked on and she has now send the Gedcom and 
it has slipped into Legacy with no further dramas.


Thanks everyone for your imput.
Margaret 





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Census information

2009-10-07 Thread Ron Ferguson
I had not considered that as a possible reason as to why I am a lumper, Jim, 
but you may well be right. It certainly is natural way of working for me 
rather than something which I actually gave consideration to when I first 
started out.


Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/


- Original Message - 
From: Jim Walton

To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: 07 October 2009 00:50
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Census information


I guess my problem stems from my history with computers. I grew up in the 
days that if you did something on a computer more than twice, you write a 
program to automate the task. (This was back in the 70s when most people 
still didn't believe such a thing as a personal computer was very useful.)


When I look at a list of sources, I would much rather see three or four 
sources that are easy to locate and then add the state, county, and city 
information in the detail record. I see the census as a single source with a 
series of volumes, one for each state. Each volume would have a number of 
chapters, one for each county.


Guess I'm a lumper, but that seems much more practical to me. Just one 
man's opinion...


Jim



On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Janis L Gilmore rajan...@earthlink.net 
wrote:


In theory, it seems as if that would be true. But I haven't done much
combining of sources, so I can't speak with any authority. g

Janis



On 10/5/09 4:21 PM, Bruce Jones juicebo...@gmail.com wrote:


It seems to me that it is easier for a Splitter to move toward being a
Lumper (by combining Master Sources)  than it is for a Lumper to move
towards being a Splitter.  Do you agree?

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Janis L Gilmore rajan...@earthlink.net
wrote:






Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Census information

2009-10-07 Thread Jenny M Benson

Ron Ferguson wrote
I had not considered that as a possible reason as to why I am a lumper, 
Jim, but you may well be right. It certainly is natural way of working 
for me rather than something which I actually gave consideration to 
when I first started out.


And in my case it was having had Nomalisation drummed into me when I 
first trained on PCs!

--
Jenny M Benson



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Census information

2009-10-07 Thread Mike Fry

Jim Walton wrote:

When I look at a list of sources, I would much rather see three or four 
sources that are easy to locate and then add the state, county, and city 
information in the detail record. I see the census as a single source 
with a series of volumes, one for each state. Each volume would have a 
number of chapters, one for each county.


Guess I'm a lumper, but that seems much more practical to me. Just one 
man's opinion...


I know that I'm a lumper too! Perhaps it's less a matter of personal 
choice, than one of where one's census sources are kept. In the UK, 
there is generally a single repository - The National Archives at Kew. 
In the US, the Federal equivalent is in Washington DC, but actual source 
documents seem to be kept at a local, county level.


Perhaps this is why I see so many Americans opting to 'split' and 
Europeans opting to 'lump'! If so, then aren't the lumpers confusing 
Source and Repository?


--
Best regards,
Mike Fry
Johannesburg.



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





[LegacyUG] how to print Event Address Coordinates

2009-10-07 Thread Dede Holden
I think I know the answer to this, but I want to be sure I'm not
missing something.

Does anyone know of a way to print a report that shows Event Addresses
and their map coordinates?  I'm particularly interested in the
cemeteries listed in my database.

I'd like to know which ones I already have and which ones I need to
find and enter.

I can't find an option to print this info anywhere.

I've looked at three different places and can't find a way to do this.

1. Search - Detailed Search

2. View - Master Lists - Address Lists - Events

3. Reports - Event Reports - doesn't even include burials, since it's
not considered an Event.

I've printed my event address list as mailing labels, but the only way
I can find to get the Lat/Long info is to open each address from the
list and see if the info is there or not.

If anyone sees a way that I've missed, I'd love to hear from you.  If
you know for a fact that it can't be done, let me know that also.

I've searched the archives, and it seems that I'm going to have to
create a Cemetery event for each individual, then include the lat/long
for each location.  Seems a little redundant since that info is
already included in the Burial field, but if that's what I have to do,
I'll just dig in and get started.  I was only going to do that for the
large cemeteries where the coordinates are different for different
graves.  Most of my cemeteries are very small, rural cemeteries and
one set of coordinates works for everyone buried there.

Thanks for any help/ideas.

Dede Holden



Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Gedcom problem

2009-10-07 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:33:27 +0800, Stuart Gregory
s.w.greg...@gmail.com wrote:

Legacy does not open Gedcom files.

Actually, you can open a GEDCOM file with legacy. But Legacy will
immediately give you the import screen.
 
-- 

Dennis Kowallek (LTools)
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools



Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Census information

2009-10-07 Thread Jim Walton
Got a reply from Legacy and their response was basically like it or lump
it. Except I can't lump it so I guess it's like it or split it. Too bad
because I really think it would make a census much easier to cite.

Jin


On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Ron Ferguson rnldfe...@tiscali.co.ukwrote:

 I had not considered that as a possible reason as to why I am a lumper,
 Jim, but you may well be right. It certainly is natural way of working for
 me rather than something which I actually gave consideration to when I first
 started out.

 Ron Ferguson
 _

 New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
 http://www.fergys.co.uk
 Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
 For The Fergusons of N.W. England
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
 

 - Original Message - From: Jim Walton
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Sent: 07 October 2009 00:50
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Census information


 I guess my problem stems from my history with computers. I grew up in the
 days that if you did something on a computer more than twice, you write a
 program to automate the task. (This was back in the 70s when most people
 still didn't believe such a thing as a personal computer was very useful.)

 When I look at a list of sources, I would much rather see three or four
 sources that are easy to locate and then add the state, county, and city
 information in the detail record. I see the census as a single source with a
 series of volumes, one for each state. Each volume would have a number of
 chapters, one for each county.

 Guess I'm a lumper, but that seems much more practical to me. Just one
 man's opinion...

 Jim



 On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Janis L Gilmore rajan...@earthlink.net
 wrote:

 In theory, it seems as if that would be true. But I haven't done much
 combining of sources, so I can't speak with any authority. g

 Janis



 On 10/5/09 4:21 PM, Bruce Jones juicebo...@gmail.com wrote:

  It seems to me that it is easier for a Splitter to move toward being a
 Lumper (by combining Master Sources)  than it is for a Lumper to move
 towards being a Splitter.  Do you agree?

 On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Janis L Gilmore rajan...@earthlink.net
 wrote:






 Legacy User Group guidelines:
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp






Re: [LegacyUG] Census information

2009-10-07 Thread Jim Walton
Evidence Explained says that a web site should not be used as a
repository, so I don't. The only time I would have a repository is if it is
a brick and mortar location like a genealogical library or personally owned
copy. Web documents are digital images, and most templates have that
capability. It's hard to find on some until you realize that a book image on
the web is considered a reprint, so select book, reprint, online book, and
then all the information goes in the right place. I had asked Legacy about
it and never got a straight answer. I found it by accident while reading Ms.
Mills and she mentioned the reprint issue.

The more I use Legacy the easier it gets, but that's the normal way of
things. Sure beats the old paper and pen method I was used to.

Jim


On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.ukwrote:

 Mike Fry wrote

 Perhaps this is why I see so many Americans opting to 'split' and
 Europeans opting to 'lump'! If so, then aren't the lumpers confusing
 Source and Repository?


 I don't make a great deal of use of Repository I must admit.  An example
 of one of my Census Sources (first time citation) reads

 1851 census of England; digital images, The Generations Network, Ancestry (
 www.ancestry.co.uk); citing PRO HO107; Original data: Census Returns of
 England and Wales, 1851. Kew, Surrey, England: The National Archives of the
 UK (TNA): Public Record Office (PRO), 1851. Data imaged from the National
 Archives, London, England.

 At the moment, all my Census information has come from Ancestry. In due
 course I will be obtaining some from FindMyPast, at which time I will add
 additional Master Sources for the Censuses from FMP.

 By the same token, I have several different Birth/Marriage/Death Index
 Master Sources because I access the GRO ones from both FreeBMD and Ancestry
 and Ancestry and have made various changes to their databases over the years
 and each Master Source relates to one database.

 So perhaps I'm not as much of a lumper as some database purists would like,
 but I definitely class myself as a lumper rather than a splitter!
 --
 Jenny M Benson




 Legacy User Group guidelines:
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp






RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy unable to lock file

2009-10-07 Thread Orion
It sounds to me like you've run out of virtual memory.
 
In short, the computer has not got enough space to work with the pdf file
that is being created.  PDF files are notoriously big especially so when u
add photo's to it.  And if generating a 3500 page file...wow!  Its going to
be huge, and will take forever to open if u ever get it created.  
 
Think of your virtual memory like your desk, and your hard drive like your
book shelf.  ...when u work on a project you work on your desk and all your
supplies are stored on your book shelf.  If you don't have enough room on
the desk...it makes working on the project extremely hard, or at the very
least very time consuming moving stuff on and off the desk.  Computers are
the same way.  That's why you're encouraged to have as much memory as
possible.
 
As a rule of thumb, your virtual memory should be at least twice the size of
your RAM memory.  The computer will automatically set it but generally no
where near the proper size.  You have the ability to change it,
manually...(but you will get warning messages when you do so - don't worry
about them)
 
First, check how much space you have available.  You said you have 4 GB of
RAM.  This means your should set your virtual memory to at least 8 GB (I
would set mine to 8320 mb...which equates to 8 GB of space plus 128 kb -
just to be safe).  Make sure you have the available space on your hard drive
as this is where your desk is carved out of.  Assuming you have the space
continue as indicated.  My instructions are for XP...I don't use Vista as it
is to problematic...even Microsoft is moving away from it.  You'll have to
make the necessary adjustments in finding the exact location
 
1)  Right click on My Computer
2)  Left click on Properties
3)  Left click on the Advanced tab
4)  Find the Virtual Memory section and click on the change button.  
5)  Set the Initial Size and the Maximum size to the same number...8320 (you
set them both to the same size so the system takes all the room it will need
at one time.  Otherwise the computer will only take the bare minimum when it
starts up and continue trying to take more as needed.  It's similar to
having to work on 10 or 12 small desks vs. 1 large desk.  The large desk is
what you want)
6)  Click ok until you are backed right out.  
7)  Restart your computer
 
You will now have enough virtual memory to properly work with your computer.
Assuming your have the hard drive space available, I guarantee that ALL your
programs will run better, not just Legacy.  
 
One word of caution...make sure you have enough disk space...or else you may
lock your computer up and not get it to start
 
Best of luck.
 
Dan
 


  _  

From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Evert van Dijken
Sent: October 6, 2009 6:41 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy unable to lock file


There could also be something wrong with writing permissions to a folder or
drive (cd, dvd, usb?).
Evert


2009/10/6 Robert57P_Gmail robert...@gmail.com


Pat,
 
How's your hard drive space?  It might be  having a problem creating some
temporary work files on the drive due to lack of space.
 
I'd also look over the drive for any left-over temp files that didn't get
deleted after the crash.  No, I'm not sure where to look - don't know where
the PDF utility might put them.
 
First place I'd look would be:
  C:\WINDOWS\TEMP
  C:\Documents and Settings\\My Documents(where  is your
log-in ID)
Note that these locations might vary depending on what version of WIndows
you have.  Maybe a better method would be to use Microsoft's Disk cleanup
utility.  Under my XP, it is at:  
START, ALL PROGRAMS, ACCESSORIES, SYSTEM TOOLS, Disk Cleanup
If it isn't there, you may need to install it.  When it asks what you want
to remove, you would want to check at least:
  Temporary Internet Files
  Temporary Files  (this should catch both of the above directories)
Note that there are some 3rd party utilities available that do the same
thing - but their names escape me at the moment.
 
You also may want to run a memory test utility to see if your memory has
gone bad, but I suspect a full harddrive.
 
Good luck,
Bob

Original Message - 
From: Pat  mailto:r...@ntelos.net Hickin 
To: LEGACY mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com  
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 01:14 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy unable to lock file

I am trying to create a .pdf (descendant narrative) with LOTS of pictures.
Without the pictures I was unable to create the file easily (it was roughly
800 pages long).
With the pictures, I get a repeated error message that says:
 
Error opening temporary work file.
Error 3050.  Could not lock file. [I have no idea what is meant by locking
a file.]
Would you like to TRY IT AGAIN?
 
I get this message several times, and the number of pages being created
advances to c 3500!  I have a LOT of pictures but I don't think I have 

RE: [LegacyUG] how to print Event Address Coordinates

2009-10-07 Thread leo macdonald


Hi Dede, there may be other ways to do this but this is what I would do. 
 
I would go to search Find Detailed Search enter on the first line the 
following: Individual, Burial Place, Contains, Cemetery at the bottom of the 
screen select clear list before search Create list.
 
When the list comes up I would go to the bottom of the page and select Print 
when the List Report Options opens, under the Options Tab select : Vertical 
lines between columns, Line Numbers, Wrap long lines down columns; 
 
Go to Row 1 tab and select: Surname, Given Names; 
 
Click the Customize button, when the Customize Display screen opens go down to 
Father and click the button with the three dots  
 
The Field Name screen will open, about half way up this screen you will see 
Burial Lat/Long, click on it to highlight it and then click Select at the 
bottom. 
 
Close the Custom Display screen. 
 
You are now back to the List Report Options screen, now select Buried and 
Bur.L/L. 
 
Now select Preview to see if this is what you want. 
 
If you want more options included, remember that the report will get larger.
 
I hope this helps,
Leo
 
 
 
 Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:04:36 -0500
 Subject: [LegacyUG] how to print Event Address Coordinates
 From: deanbuc...@gmail.com
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 
 I think I know the answer to this, but I want to be sure I'm not
 missing something.
 
 Does anyone know of a way to print a report that shows Event Addresses
 and their map coordinates?  I'm particularly interested in the
 cemeteries listed in my database.
 
 I'd like to know which ones I already have and which ones I need to
 find and enter.
 
 I can't find an option to print this info anywhere.
 
 I've looked at three different places and can't find a way to do this.
 
 1. Search - Detailed Search
 
 2. View - Master Lists - Address Lists - Events
 
 3. Reports - Event Reports - doesn't even include burials, since it's
 not considered an Event.
 
 I've printed my event address list as mailing labels, but the only way
 I can find to get the Lat/Long info is to open each address from the
 list and see if the info is there or not.
 
 If anyone sees a way that I've missed, I'd love to hear from you.  If
 you know for a fact that it can't be done, let me know that also.
 
 I've searched the archives, and it seems that I'm going to have to
 create a Cemetery event for each individual, then include the lat/long
 for each location. Seems a little redundant since that info is
 already included in the Burial field, but if that's what I have to do,
 I'll just dig in and get started. I was only going to do that for the
 large cemeteries where the coordinates are different for different
 graves. Most of my cemeteries are very small, rural cemeteries and
 one set of coordinates works for everyone buried there.
 
 Thanks for any help/ideas.
 
 Dede Holden
 
 
 
 Legacy User Group guidelines: 
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages: 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
 
 
 


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread CE Wood
The problem / BUG is that when the report is Previewed or in PDF, The
Index/Indices is shown/printed.  When it is Text or RTF (if allowed) the
Index/Indices are NOT!

If a report shows something in Preview, it needs to print it in ALL
permissible formats!


CE

From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Jim Walton
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:08 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other bugs in
reports

It seems to be designed that way. If you go through each of the reports you
will see what printing options are available on the right, under the image
of the printer. Family  and descendant will do text, html, and pdf. Pedigree
will only do pdf. Not sure why they aren't available in rtf because it is
certainly capable of doing it. My plan is to do all my writing in Word, and
importing a pdf of group sheets, etc. as images into the document. I'm just
disappointed that I can't create an rtf of the source report so that I could
then create a bibliography and reference that in my text.

Jim

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:23 AM, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote:
I am trying to produce Individual, Family, Ancestor, Descendant, and Lineage
Reports.  When I choose Text file or HTML (there is no option for RTF), the
file is produced without any indices, even though both Name and Location
indices have been selected and do appear in Preview and PDF.

Also, when using Publishing Center, the HTML report includes only the first
chapter of the book even though Preview and PDF include all the chapters.

And, in the book, the Name Index for the book includes ONLY the names from
the first chapter.


CE




Legacy User Group guidelines:
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.420 / Virus Database: 270.14.3/2409 - Release Date: 10/07/09
05:18:00




Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] how to print Event Address Coordinates

2009-10-07 Thread Bruce Jones
This is what I do.
- I put the cemetery name in the Location field instead of the Event Addresses
- Since most of my ancestors are buried in one very large cemetery, I
have created multiple Locations, one for each section of the cemetery
(guess I am a location splitter)
- So my locations look like this:
- USA, Utah, Salt Lake, Salt Lake City Cemetery (E.8.1) (Sort name
Utah, SLC Cemetery (E.8.1))
- USA, Utah, Salt Lake, Salt Lake City Cemetery (Park.36.2)
To get a list of all cemeteries (and those in these cemeteries) I do
the following:
- Tag each desired cemetery location
- In the Location Report I select Only Tagged Locations under
Include and Include Latitude  Longitude under Options
For those locations without a Lat/Log (or not correct):
- In the Master Location List, I find the correct site on the map and
right click to set the Lat/Long
Then I can create a map of the cemetery and where my ancestors are
located in it.  I can also click on any (cemetery) location and the
map moves to place that location in the center of the screen.

Probably not what you are looking for, but it is another way of
approaching the issue.  This is what I do.



On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Dede Holden deanbuc...@gmail.com wrote:
 I think I know the answer to this, but I want to be sure I'm not
 missing something.

 Does anyone know of a way to print a report that shows Event Addresses
 and their map coordinates?  I'm particularly interested in the
 cemeteries listed in my database.

 I'd like to know which ones I already have and which ones I need to
 find and enter.

 I can't find an option to print this info anywhere.

 I've looked at three different places and can't find a way to do this.

 1. Search - Detailed Search

 2. View - Master Lists - Address Lists - Events

 3. Reports - Event Reports - doesn't even include burials, since it's
 not considered an Event.

 I've printed my event address list as mailing labels, but the only way
 I can find to get the Lat/Long info is to open each address from the
 list and see if the info is there or not.

 If anyone sees a way that I've missed, I'd love to hear from you.  If
 you know for a fact that it can't be done, let me know that also.

 I've searched the archives, and it seems that I'm going to have to
 create a Cemetery event for each individual, then include the lat/long
 for each location.  Seems a little redundant since that info is
 already included in the Burial field, but if that's what I have to do,
 I'll just dig in and get started.  I was only going to do that for the
 large cemeteries where the coordinates are different for different
 graves.  Most of my cemeteries are very small, rural cemeteries and
 one set of coordinates works for everyone buried there.

 Thanks for any help/ideas.

 Dede Holden



 Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread Jim Walton
A pdf file is an image, similar to a jpg file. If it is created from a text
file it has a text layer that can be indexed and modified, etc. It's quite
easy to move a text or rtf file into pdf format, but a totally different
matter to go the other way.

I think the problem is that Legacy is a genealogical tool, not a reporting
tool. The reporting section is very cumbersome and has no real formatting
capabilities beyond the bare minimum. It might be better for them to partner
with another company/program for the reporting functions. So far the main
use I've seen in the report feature is to dump reports to the printer for
proofreading and database corrections. I could never conceive of using it to
create a document for publication.

I did try to create one rtf report and got a single page that told me I
could now import into my word processor and create an index because all the
headings used heading tags. Very convenient, but the rest of the report was
blank. (grin)

Jim

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:21 AM, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote:

 The problem / BUG is that when the report is Previewed or in PDF, The
 Index/Indices is shown/printed.  When it is Text or RTF (if allowed) the
 Index/Indices are NOT!

 If a report shows something in Preview, it needs to print it in ALL
 permissible formats!


 CE

 From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
 Of Jim Walton
 Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:08 PM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other bugs in
 reports

 It seems to be designed that way. If you go through each of the reports you
 will see what printing options are available on the right, under the image
 of the printer. Family  and descendant will do text, html, and pdf.
 Pedigree
 will only do pdf. Not sure why they aren't available in rtf because it is
 certainly capable of doing it. My plan is to do all my writing in Word, and
 importing a pdf of group sheets, etc. as images into the document. I'm just
 disappointed that I can't create an rtf of the source report so that I
 could
 then create a bibliography and reference that in my text.

 Jim

 On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:23 AM, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote:
 I am trying to produce Individual, Family, Ancestor, Descendant, and
 Lineage
 Reports.  When I choose Text file or HTML (there is no option for RTF), the
 file is produced without any indices, even though both Name and Location
 indices have been selected and do appear in Preview and PDF.

 Also, when using Publishing Center, the HTML report includes only the first
 chapter of the book even though Preview and PDF include all the chapters.

 And, in the book, the Name Index for the book includes ONLY the names from
 the first chapter.


 CE




 Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.5.420 / Virus Database: 270.14.3/2409 - Release Date: 10/07/09
 05:18:00




 Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp






Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread Ron Ferguson

Jim,

Whilst I broadly agree with you comments regarding the Legacy reporting 
(except for the blank page which I have never experienced) as I have said 
before, it is my belief that those asking for what would amount to a fully 
fledged word processor as part of the program are asking for far too much. 
The total size of the package would be far too big for many, and why should 
Legacy reinvent the wheel when it is there in Word, Open Office and a number 
of other programs.


If it is ever done then let us add onto the list a fully fledged web page 
designer, after all, why should the web creation section of users be not 
have an equivalent tool for their chosen method of publication. Naturally, 
it should have the attributes of Dreamweaver or Front Page in order to meet 
all the demands which may be required. It shouldn't really be any bigger 
than a word processor and the total package should come in at not a lot more 
than 200MB.


Pity that this is too big for Africa and the rural areas of many other 
countries (including the USA) where dial up is on the only access, but those 
of us with broadband should be fine. Or maybe we should have several 
different versions with escalating prices in order to meet all the available 
customisations.


Please don't think that I am suggesting for one minute, Jim, that this is 
your view, I feel sure that it isn't. In one form or an other this argument 
has been going on for years, so please excuse the rant :-)


Ron Ferguson

_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/


- Original Message - 
From: Jim Walton

To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: 07 October 2009 20:42
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other bugs in 
reports



A pdf file is an image, similar to a jpg file. If it is created from a text 
file it has a text layer that can be indexed and modified, etc. It's quite 
easy to move a text or rtf file into pdf format, but a totally different 
matter to go the other way.


I think the problem is that Legacy is a genealogical tool, not a reporting 
tool. The reporting section is very cumbersome and has no real formatting 
capabilities beyond the bare minimum. It might be better for them to partner 
with another company/program for the reporting functions. So far the main 
use I've seen in the report feature is to dump reports to the printer for 
proofreading and database corrections. I could never conceive of using it to 
create a document for publication.


I did try to create one rtf report and got a single page that told me I 
could now import into my word processor and create an index because all the 
headings used heading tags. Very convenient, but the rest of the report was 
blank. (grin)


Jim


On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:21 AM, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote:

The problem / BUG is that when the report is Previewed or in PDF, The
Index/Indices is shown/printed.  When it is Text or RTF (if allowed) the
Index/Indices are NOT!

If a report shows something in Preview, it needs to print it in ALL
permissible formats!


CE

From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Jim Walton
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:08 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other bugs in
reports


It seems to be designed that way. If you go through each of the reports you
will see what printing options are available on the right, under the image
of the printer. Family  and descendant will do text, html, and pdf. Pedigree
will only do pdf. Not sure why they aren't available in rtf because it is
certainly capable of doing it. My plan is to do all my writing in Word, and
importing a pdf of group sheets, etc. as images into the document. I'm just
disappointed that I can't create an rtf of the source report so that I could
then create a bibliography and reference that in my text.

Jim

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:23 AM, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote:
I am trying to produce Individual, Family, Ancestor, Descendant, and Lineage
Reports.  When I choose Text file or HTML (there is no option for RTF), the
file is produced without any indices, even though both Name and Location
indices have been selected and do appear in Preview and PDF.

Also, when using Publishing Center, the HTML report includes only the first
chapter of the book even though Preview and PDF include all the chapters.

And, in the book, the Name Index for the book includes ONLY the names from
the first chapter.


CE





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical 

RE: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread CE Wood
I am not asking Legacy to be a word processor.  I am asking that, when a
report is Previewed and there are check boxes for printing various types of
files, that those options be produced in whatever format which has a
checkbox.

The simplest would be a text file because then you could format the file in
your word processor.

When the opening page allows you to choose Index Options, you assume that
the indices will be produced in whatever format is allowed, i.e.
Screen/Printer, Text file, HTML, RTF, PDF.

When the Preview shows you a report that includes indices, you assume that
when produced in one of the formats with a check box, that the indices will
be produced when you choose one of those formats.

This does not happen!  The indices are missing!!!

THAT is what the problem is.


CE

-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Ron Ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 1:19 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other bugs in
reports

Jim,

Whilst I broadly agree with you comments regarding the Legacy reporting 
(except for the blank page which I have never experienced) as I have said 
before, it is my belief that those asking for what would amount to a fully 
fledged word processor as part of the program are asking for far too much. 
The total size of the package would be far too big for many, and why should 
Legacy reinvent the wheel when it is there in Word, Open Office and a number

of other programs.

If it is ever done then let us add onto the list a fully fledged web page 
designer, after all, why should the web creation section of users be not 
have an equivalent tool for their chosen method of publication. Naturally, 
it should have the attributes of Dreamweaver or Front Page in order to meet 
all the demands which may be required. It shouldn't really be any bigger 
than a word processor and the total package should come in at not a lot more

than 200MB.

Pity that this is too big for Africa and the rural areas of many other 
countries (including the USA) where dial up is on the only access, but those

of us with broadband should be fine. Or maybe we should have several 
different versions with escalating prices in order to meet all the available

customisations.

Please don't think that I am suggesting for one minute, Jim, that this is 
your view, I feel sure that it isn't. In one form or an other this argument 
has been going on for years, so please excuse the rant :-)

Ron Ferguson

_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/


- Original Message - 
From: Jim Walton
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: 07 October 2009 20:42
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other bugs in 
reports


A pdf file is an image, similar to a jpg file. If it is created from a text 
file it has a text layer that can be indexed and modified, etc. It's quite 
easy to move a text or rtf file into pdf format, but a totally different 
matter to go the other way.

I think the problem is that Legacy is a genealogical tool, not a reporting 
tool. The reporting section is very cumbersome and has no real formatting 
capabilities beyond the bare minimum. It might be better for them to partner

with another company/program for the reporting functions. So far the main 
use I've seen in the report feature is to dump reports to the printer for 
proofreading and database corrections. I could never conceive of using it to

create a document for publication.

I did try to create one rtf report and got a single page that told me I 
could now import into my word processor and create an index because all the 
headings used heading tags. Very convenient, but the rest of the report was 
blank. (grin)

Jim


On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:21 AM, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote:

The problem / BUG is that when the report is Previewed or in PDF, The
Index/Indices is shown/printed.  When it is Text or RTF (if allowed) the
Index/Indices are NOT!

If a report shows something in Preview, it needs to print it in ALL
permissible formats!


CE

From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Jim Walton
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:08 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other bugs in
reports


It seems to be designed that way. If you go through each of the reports you
will see what printing options are available on the right, under the image
of the printer. Family  and descendant will do text, html, and pdf. Pedigree
will only do pdf. Not sure why they aren't available in rtf because it is
certainly 

Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread Jim Walton
I agree totally. I think the report tool should be used for personal reports
for either archiving or editing purposes, and a totally separate program
needs to be used for publishing. Naturally users of the program would like
an all-in-one solution, but Microsoft can't even get their suite of office
apps to play nice together. I think the Legacy programmers should stick to
what they do best, creating the best genealogy program available. That's why
I suggested a partnership with another group whose specialty is publishing.
A good team would be unbeatable. All that needs to be done is to create
hooks between the two so that there is a seamless interface between what
Legacy produces and what the document writer needs.

I think that for Millennia to get wrapped around the documentation axle
would detract from what they need to be doing, keeping the best program as
the best.

Jim


On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Ron Ferguson rnldfe...@tiscali.co.ukwrote:

 Jim,

 Whilst I broadly agree with you comments regarding the Legacy reporting
 (except for the blank page which I have never experienced) as I have said
 before, it is my belief that those asking for what would amount to a fully
 fledged word processor as part of the program are asking for far too much.
 The total size of the package would be far too big for many, and why should
 Legacy reinvent the wheel when it is there in Word, Open Office and a number
 of other programs.

 If it is ever done then let us add onto the list a fully fledged web page
 designer, after all, why should the web creation section of users be not
 have an equivalent tool for their chosen method of publication. Naturally,
 it should have the attributes of Dreamweaver or Front Page in order to meet
 all the demands which may be required. It shouldn't really be any bigger
 than a word processor and the total package should come in at not a lot more
 than 200MB.

 Pity that this is too big for Africa and the rural areas of many other
 countries (including the USA) where dial up is on the only access, but those
 of us with broadband should be fine. Or maybe we should have several
 different versions with escalating prices in order to meet all the available
 customisations.

 Please don't think that I am suggesting for one minute, Jim, that this is
 your view, I feel sure that it isn't. In one form or an other this argument
 has been going on for years, so please excuse the rant :-)

 Ron Ferguson

 _

 New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
 http://www.fergys.co.uk
 Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
 For The Fergusons of N.W. England
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
 

 - Original Message - From: Jim Walton
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Sent: 07 October 2009 20:42

 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other bugs in
 reports


 A pdf file is an image, similar to a jpg file. If it is created from a text
 file it has a text layer that can be indexed and modified, etc. It's quite
 easy to move a text or rtf file into pdf format, but a totally different
 matter to go the other way.

 I think the problem is that Legacy is a genealogical tool, not a reporting
 tool. The reporting section is very cumbersome and has no real formatting
 capabilities beyond the bare minimum. It might be better for them to partner
 with another company/program for the reporting functions. So far the main
 use I've seen in the report feature is to dump reports to the printer for
 proofreading and database corrections. I could never conceive of using it to
 create a document for publication.

 I did try to create one rtf report and got a single page that told me I
 could now import into my word processor and create an index because all the
 headings used heading tags. Very convenient, but the rest of the report was
 blank. (grin)

 Jim


 On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:21 AM, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote:

 The problem / BUG is that when the report is Previewed or in PDF, The
 Index/Indices is shown/printed.  When it is Text or RTF (if allowed) the
 Index/Indices are NOT!

 If a report shows something in Preview, it needs to print it in ALL
 permissible formats!


 CE

 From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
 Of Jim Walton
 Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 5:08 PM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other bugs in
 reports


 It seems to be designed that way. If you go through each of the reports you
 will see what printing options are available on the right, under the image
 of the printer. Family  and descendant will do text, html, and pdf.
 Pedigree
 will only do pdf. Not sure why they aren't available in rtf because it is
 certainly capable of doing it. My plan is to do all my writing in Word, and
 importing 

Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread Ron Ferguson
All programs, whether genealogy ones or otherwise, can only produce what is 
allowed by software specifications. For examaple it is not possible to have 
indices in a .txt file, the number itself will appear, but not 
superscripted. Nor will such a file allow diagrams. In general, and I am not 
saying always it is restrictions such as these which limit the form of the 
output.


I do not suggest that is the sole reason only mostly! I imagine some are not 
available because nobody thought that someone might wish to produce 
something in a format which is never used for that purpose (can't think of 
an example at present though).


RTFs are a constant problem as different programs seem to have different 
interpretations of the specification, so there is a lack of consistency 
between programs - about the only thing which is constant with RTFs :-).


As someone else observed wrt to PDFs the one in question could simply have 
been to big for the PC no matter how much  RAM was available. I've never had 
a problem with them, but I am never likely to have 400 pages either.


HTML does allow indices and have yet to find them not appearing as 
superscripts, and I produce many thousands of  Legacy generated HTML pages 
each month.


There were problems with Sources when V7 was first released but apart from 
an odd unusual one which crops up occasionally, I would say they have now 
been resolved. All software has their own idiocincracies which to someone 
used to another similar product (and that is not a comment directed at 
yourself, as I have no idea as to your experience with other software) might 
be regarded as a bug. I did not, btw, suggest that you were asking for a 
wordprocessor, simply that the discussion was yet again drifting in that 
well documented direction.


Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/



CE Wood wrote:

I am not asking Legacy to be a word processor.  I am asking that,
when a report is Previewed and there are check boxes for printing
various types of files, that those options be produced in whatever
format which has a checkbox.

The simplest would be a text file because then you could format the
file in your word processor.

When the opening page allows you to choose Index Options, you assume
that the indices will be produced in whatever format is allowed, i.e.
Screen/Printer, Text file, HTML, RTF, PDF.

When the Preview shows you a report that includes indices, you
assume that when produced in one of the formats with a check box,
that the indices will be produced when you choose one of those
formats.

This does not happen!  The indices are missing!!!

THAT is what the problem is.


CE

-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 1:19 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other
bugs in reports

Jim,

Whilst I broadly agree with you comments regarding the Legacy
reporting (except for the blank page which I have never experienced)
as I have said before, it is my belief that those asking for what
would amount to a fully fledged word processor as part of the
program are asking for far too much. The total size of the package
would be far too big for many, and why should Legacy reinvent the
wheel when it is there in Word, Open Office and a number

of other programs.

If it is ever done then let us add onto the list a fully fledged web
page designer, after all, why should the web creation section of
users be not have an equivalent tool for their chosen method of
publication. Naturally, it should have the attributes of Dreamweaver
or Front Page in order to meet all the demands which may be
required. It shouldn't really be any bigger than a word processor
and the total package should come in at not a lot more

than 200MB.

Pity that this is too big for Africa and the rural areas of many
other countries (including the USA) where dial up is on the only
access, but those

of us with broadband should be fine. Or maybe we should have several
different versions with escalating prices in order to meet all the
available

customisations.

Please don't think that I am suggesting for one minute, Jim, that
this is your view, I feel sure that it isn't. In one form or an
other this argument has been going on for years, so please excuse
the rant :-)

Ron Ferguson

_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England

RE: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread CE Wood
You said:  HTML does allow indices and have yet to find them not appearing
as superscripts, and I produce many thousands of  Legacy generated HTML
pages each month.

Individual Report, Family Group Records, Descendant Chart, Ancestor Chart,
and Lineage Chart, all of which have the check box for HTML, and which do
produce Indices in Preview and PDF, do NOT produce Indices in either text or
HTML.

Individual Report and Family Group Records, which allow sources, DO produce
Sources in both HTML and Text.


CE


-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Ron Ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 2:51 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other bugs in
reports

All programs, whether genealogy ones or otherwise, can only produce what is 
allowed by software specifications. For examaple it is not possible to have 
indices in a .txt file, the number itself will appear, but not 
superscripted. Nor will such a file allow diagrams. In general, and I am not

saying always it is restrictions such as these which limit the form of the 
output.

I do not suggest that is the sole reason only mostly! I imagine some are not

available because nobody thought that someone might wish to produce 
something in a format which is never used for that purpose (can't think of 
an example at present though).

RTFs are a constant problem as different programs seem to have different 
interpretations of the specification, so there is a lack of consistency 
between programs - about the only thing which is constant with RTFs :-).

As someone else observed wrt to PDFs the one in question could simply have 
been to big for the PC no matter how much  RAM was available. I've never had

a problem with them, but I am never likely to have 400 pages either.

HTML does allow indices and have yet to find them not appearing as 
superscripts, and I produce many thousands of  Legacy generated HTML pages 
each month.

There were problems with Sources when V7 was first released but apart from 
an odd unusual one which crops up occasionally, I would say they have now 
been resolved. All software has their own idiocincracies which to someone 
used to another similar product (and that is not a comment directed at 
yourself, as I have no idea as to your experience with other software) might

be regarded as a bug. I did not, btw, suggest that you were asking for a 
wordprocessor, simply that the discussion was yet again drifting in that 
well documented direction.

Ron Ferguson
 _

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
 http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/



CE Wood wrote:
 I am not asking Legacy to be a word processor.  I am asking that,
 when a report is Previewed and there are check boxes for printing
 various types of files, that those options be produced in whatever
 format which has a checkbox.

 The simplest would be a text file because then you could format the
 file in your word processor.

 When the opening page allows you to choose Index Options, you assume
 that the indices will be produced in whatever format is allowed, i.e.
 Screen/Printer, Text file, HTML, RTF, PDF.

 When the Preview shows you a report that includes indices, you
 assume that when produced in one of the formats with a check box,
 that the indices will be produced when you choose one of those
 formats.

 This does not happen!  The indices are missing!!!

 THAT is what the problem is.


 CE

 -Original Message-
 From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On
 Behalf Of Ron Ferguson
 Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 1:19 PM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other
 bugs in reports

 Jim,

 Whilst I broadly agree with you comments regarding the Legacy
 reporting (except for the blank page which I have never experienced)
 as I have said before, it is my belief that those asking for what
 would amount to a fully fledged word processor as part of the
 program are asking for far too much. The total size of the package
 would be far too big for many, and why should Legacy reinvent the
 wheel when it is there in Word, Open Office and a number

 of other programs.

 If it is ever done then let us add onto the list a fully fledged web
 page designer, after all, why should the web creation section of
 users be not have an equivalent tool for their chosen method of
 publication. Naturally, it should have the attributes of Dreamweaver
 or Front Page in order to meet all the demands which may be
 required. It shouldn't really be any bigger than a word processor
 and the total package should come in at not a lot 

Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread Ron Ferguson


Of course the Individual Report, Family Group Records, Descendant Chart, 
Ancestor Chart amd Lineage Chart do not have sources - why should they when 
they don't have Sources, where would they be used?


I have already said in a previous post that .txt files do *not* allow 
superscripts. That is to do with the text format itself.


Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/



CE Wood wrote:

You said:  HTML does allow indices and have yet to find them not
appearing as superscripts, and I produce many thousands of  Legacy
generated HTML pages each month.

Individual Report, Family Group Records, Descendant Chart, Ancestor
Chart, and Lineage Chart, all of which have the check box for HTML,
and which do produce Indices in Preview and PDF, do NOT produce
Indices in either text or HTML.

Individual Report and Family Group Records, which allow sources, DO
produce Sources in both HTML and Text.


CE


-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 2:51 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other
bugs in reports

All programs, whether genealogy ones or otherwise, can only produce
what is allowed by software specifications. For examaple it is not
possible to have indices in a .txt file, the number itself will
appear, but not superscripted. Nor will such a file allow diagrams.
In general, and I am not

saying always it is restrictions such as these which limit the form
of the output.

I do not suggest that is the sole reason only mostly! I imagine some
are not

available because nobody thought that someone might wish to produce
something in a format which is never used for that purpose (can't
think of an example at present though).

RTFs are a constant problem as different programs seem to have
different interpretations of the specification, so there is a lack
of consistency between programs - about the only thing which is
constant with RTFs :-).

As someone else observed wrt to PDFs the one in question could
simply have been to big for the PC no matter how much  RAM was
available. I've never had

a problem with them, but I am never likely to have 400 pages either.

HTML does allow indices and have yet to find them not appearing as
superscripts, and I produce many thousands of  Legacy generated HTML
pages each month.

There were problems with Sources when V7 was first released but
apart from an odd unusual one which crops up occasionally, I would
say they have now been resolved. All software has their own
idiocincracies which to someone used to another similar product (and
that is not a comment directed at yourself, as I have no idea as to
your experience with other software) might

be regarded as a bug. I did not, btw, suggest that you were asking
for a wordprocessor, simply that the discussion was yet again
drifting in that well documented direction.

Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/



CE Wood wrote:

I am not asking Legacy to be a word processor.  I am asking that,
when a report is Previewed and there are check boxes for printing
various types of files, that those options be produced in whatever
format which has a checkbox.

The simplest would be a text file because then you could format the
file in your word processor.

When the opening page allows you to choose Index Options, you
assume that the indices will be produced in whatever format is
allowed, i.e. Screen/Printer, Text file, HTML, RTF, PDF.

When the Preview shows you a report that includes indices, you
assume that when produced in one of the formats with a check box,
that the indices will be produced when you choose one of those
formats.

This does not happen!  The indices are missing!!!

THAT is what the problem is.


CE

-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 1:19 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other
bugs in reports

Jim,

Whilst I broadly agree with you comments regarding the Legacy
reporting (except for the blank page which I have never
experienced) as I have said before, it is my belief that those
asking for what would amount to a fully fledged word processor as
part of the program are 

Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:23:04 -0700, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote:

I am trying to produce Individual, Family, Ancestor, Descendant, and Lineage
Reports.  When I choose Text file or HTML (there is no option for RTF), the
file is produced without any indices, even though both Name and Location
indices have been selected and do appear in Preview and PDF.

Also, when using Publishing Center, the HTML report includes only the first
chapter of the book even though Preview and PDF include all the chapters.

And, in the book, the Name Index for the book includes ONLY the names from
the first chapter.

Enter a suggestion at...

http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/suggest.asp
 
-- 

Dennis Kowallek (LTools)
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools



Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread Ron Ferguson

Correction,

My last post should, of course, have said .do not have indices - why 
should they when they don't have Sources

Sorry.

Ron Ferguson


Ron Ferguson wrote:

Of course the Individual Report, Family Group Records, Descendant
Chart, Ancestor Chart amd Lineage Chart do not have sources - why
should they when they don't have Sources, where would they be used?

I have already said in a previous post that .txt files do *not* allow
superscripts. That is to do with the text format itself.

Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/



CE Wood wrote:

You said:  HTML does allow indices and have yet to find them not
appearing as superscripts, and I produce many thousands of  Legacy
generated HTML pages each month.

Individual Report, Family Group Records, Descendant Chart, Ancestor
Chart, and Lineage Chart, all of which have the check box for HTML,
and which do produce Indices in Preview and PDF, do NOT produce
Indices in either text or HTML.

Individual Report and Family Group Records, which allow sources, DO
produce Sources in both HTML and Text.


CE


-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 2:51 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other
bugs in reports

All programs, whether genealogy ones or otherwise, can only produce
what is allowed by software specifications. For examaple it is not
possible to have indices in a .txt file, the number itself will
appear, but not superscripted. Nor will such a file allow diagrams.
In general, and I am not

saying always it is restrictions such as these which limit the form
of the output.

I do not suggest that is the sole reason only mostly! I imagine
some are not

available because nobody thought that someone might wish to produce
something in a format which is never used for that purpose (can't
think of an example at present though).

RTFs are a constant problem as different programs seem to have
different interpretations of the specification, so there is a lack
of consistency between programs - about the only thing which is
constant with RTFs :-).

As someone else observed wrt to PDFs the one in question could
simply have been to big for the PC no matter how much  RAM was
available. I've never had

a problem with them, but I am never likely to have 400 pages
either.

HTML does allow indices and have yet to find them not appearing as
superscripts, and I produce many thousands of  Legacy generated
HTML pages each month.

There were problems with Sources when V7 was first released but
apart from an odd unusual one which crops up occasionally, I would
say they have now been resolved. All software has their own
idiocincracies which to someone used to another similar product
(and that is not a comment directed at yourself, as I have no idea
as to your experience with other software) might

be regarded as a bug. I did not, btw, suggest that you were asking
for a wordprocessor, simply that the discussion was yet again
drifting in that well documented direction.

Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/



CE Wood wrote:

I am not asking Legacy to be a word processor.  I am asking that,
when a report is Previewed and there are check boxes for printing
various types of files, that those options be produced in
whatever format which has a checkbox.

The simplest would be a text file because then you could format
the file in your word processor.

When the opening page allows you to choose Index Options, you
assume that the indices will be produced in whatever format is
allowed, i.e. Screen/Printer, Text file, HTML, RTF, PDF.

When the Preview shows you a report that includes indices, you
assume that when produced in one of the formats with a check box,
that the indices will be produced when you choose one of those
formats.

This does not happen!  The indices are missing!!!

THAT is what the problem is.


CE

-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com]
On Behalf Of Ron Ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 1:19 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other
bugs in reports

Jim,

Whilst I broadly agree with you comments regarding the Legacy
reporting (except for the blank page 

RE: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread CE Wood
This thread is NOT ABOUT SOURCES!!!  You mentioned that Sources WERE in your
HTML files, so I responded to that.

This thread is about INDICES - Name Index and Location Index.

Reached from the pages Individual Report, Family Group Records, etc.,
included in your report or chart by checking the box Index Options

Clicking on Index Options... takes you to the Name Index tab and the
Location Index tab where you can make choices about what each Index will
include.  Checking the box marked Index Options... means you want one or
both Indices (depending what you chose) to be included in your report or
chart.

NO Indices appear in either HTML or Text file, but DO appear in Preview and
PDF.  That is the problem


CE

-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Ron Ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 3:30 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other bugs in
reports


Of course the Individual Report, Family Group Records, Descendant Chart, 
Ancestor Chart amd Lineage Chart do not have sources - why should they when 
they don't have Sources, where would they be used?

I have already said in a previous post that .txt files do *not* allow 
superscripts. That is to do with the text format itself.

Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/



CE Wood wrote:
 You said:  HTML does allow indices and have yet to find them not
 appearing as superscripts, and I produce many thousands of  Legacy
 generated HTML pages each month.

 Individual Report, Family Group Records, Descendant Chart, Ancestor
 Chart, and Lineage Chart, all of which have the check box for HTML,
 and which do produce Indices in Preview and PDF, do NOT produce
 Indices in either text or HTML.

 Individual Report and Family Group Records, which allow sources, DO
 produce Sources in both HTML and Text.


 CE


 -Original Message-
 From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On
 Behalf Of Ron Ferguson
 Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 2:51 PM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other
 bugs in reports

 All programs, whether genealogy ones or otherwise, can only produce
 what is allowed by software specifications. For examaple it is not
 possible to have indices in a .txt file, the number itself will
 appear, but not superscripted. Nor will such a file allow diagrams.
 In general, and I am not

 saying always it is restrictions such as these which limit the form
 of the output.

 I do not suggest that is the sole reason only mostly! I imagine some
 are not

 available because nobody thought that someone might wish to produce
 something in a format which is never used for that purpose (can't
 think of an example at present though).

 RTFs are a constant problem as different programs seem to have
 different interpretations of the specification, so there is a lack
 of consistency between programs - about the only thing which is
 constant with RTFs :-).

 As someone else observed wrt to PDFs the one in question could
 simply have been to big for the PC no matter how much  RAM was
 available. I've never had

 a problem with them, but I am never likely to have 400 pages either.

 HTML does allow indices and have yet to find them not appearing as
 superscripts, and I produce many thousands of  Legacy generated HTML
 pages each month.

 There were problems with Sources when V7 was first released but
 apart from an odd unusual one which crops up occasionally, I would
 say they have now been resolved. All software has their own
 idiocincracies which to someone used to another similar product (and
 that is not a comment directed at yourself, as I have no idea as to
 your experience with other software) might

 be regarded as a bug. I did not, btw, suggest that you were asking
 for a wordprocessor, simply that the discussion was yet again
 drifting in that well documented direction.

 Ron Ferguson
 _

 New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
 http://www.fergys.co.uk
 Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
 For The Fergusons of N.W. England
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
 


 CE Wood wrote:
 I am not asking Legacy to be a word processor.  I am asking that,
 when a report is Previewed and there are check boxes for printing
 various types of files, that those options be produced in whatever
 format which has a checkbox.

 The simplest would be a text file because then you could format 

Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread Ron Ferguson

Dennis M. Kowallek wrote:

On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:23:04 -0700, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote:


I am trying to produce Individual, Family, Ancestor, Descendant, and
Lineage Reports.  When I choose Text file or HTML (there is no
option for RTF), the file is produced without any indices, even
though both Name and Location indices have been selected and do
appear in Preview and PDF.

Also, when using Publishing Center, the HTML report includes only
the first chapter of the book even though Preview and PDF include
all the chapters.

And, in the book, the Name Index for the book includes ONLY the
names from the first chapter.


Enter a suggestion at...

http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/suggest.asp


It was only when I read your post, Dennis, that I realised I had a 
translation problem, and the OP was concerned indexes! I will have to check 
whether that is true or otherwise.


Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread Ron Ferguson

Dennis M. Kowallek wrote:

On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:23:04 -0700, CE Wood wood...@msn.com wrote:


I am trying to produce Individual, Family, Ancestor, Descendant, and
Lineage Reports.  When I choose Text file or HTML (there is no
option for RTF), the file is produced without any indices, even
though both Name and Location indices have been selected and do
appear in Preview and PDF.

Also, when using Publishing Center, the HTML report includes only
the first chapter of the book even though Preview and PDF include
all the chapters.

And, in the book, the Name Index for the book includes ONLY the
names from the first chapter.


Enter a suggestion at...

http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/suggest.asp


Ok, I can now confirm the first paragraph, I have not looked at the other 
two, but since two pages of both the txt and html files will be required to 
have an index I suspect that the answer will be not to offer an index with 
these two format - I can't really see the use for one really.


Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread Ron Ferguson
Please see my comment in response to Dennis - an INDICES over here is used 
as a superscripted number referencing another place, or a power to which a 
number may be raised. x squared would have an indices of 2. The 
superscripted number referencing a source is an indices.


Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/



CE Wood wrote:

This thread is NOT ABOUT SOURCES!!!  You mentioned that Sources WERE
in your HTML files, so I responded to that.

This thread is about INDICES - Name Index and Location Index.

Reached from the pages Individual Report, Family Group Records, etc.,
included in your report or chart by checking the box Index
Options

Clicking on Index Options... takes you to the Name Index tab and the
Location Index tab where you can make choices about what each Index
will include.  Checking the box marked Index Options... means you
want one or both Indices (depending what you chose) to be included
in your report or chart.

NO Indices appear in either HTML or Text file, but DO appear in
Preview and PDF.  That is the problem


CE

-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 3:30 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other
bugs in reports


Of course the Individual Report, Family Group Records, Descendant
Chart, Ancestor Chart amd Lineage Chart do not have sources - why
should they when they don't have Sources, where would they be used?

I have already said in a previous post that .txt files do *not* allow
superscripts. That is to do with the text format itself.

Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: Embed Blogger RSS feed into your Website
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/



CE Wood wrote:

You said:  HTML does allow indices and have yet to find them not
appearing as superscripts, and I produce many thousands of  Legacy
generated HTML pages each month.

Individual Report, Family Group Records, Descendant Chart, Ancestor
Chart, and Lineage Chart, all of which have the check box for HTML,
and which do produce Indices in Preview and PDF, do NOT produce
Indices in either text or HTML.

Individual Report and Family Group Records, which allow sources, DO
produce Sources in both HTML and Text.


CE


-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On
Behalf Of Ron Ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 2:51 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other
bugs in reports

All programs, whether genealogy ones or otherwise, can only produce
what is allowed by software specifications. For examaple it is not
possible to have indices in a .txt file, the number itself will
appear, but not superscripted. Nor will such a file allow diagrams.
In general, and I am not

saying always it is restrictions such as these which limit the form
of the output.

I do not suggest that is the sole reason only mostly! I imagine
some are not

available because nobody thought that someone might wish to produce
something in a format which is never used for that purpose (can't
think of an example at present though).

RTFs are a constant problem as different programs seem to have
different interpretations of the specification, so there is a lack
of consistency between programs - about the only thing which is
constant with RTFs :-).

As someone else observed wrt to PDFs the one in question could
simply have been to big for the PC no matter how much  RAM was
available. I've never had

a problem with them, but I am never likely to have 400 pages
either.

HTML does allow indices and have yet to find them not appearing as
superscripts, and I produce many thousands of  Legacy generated
HTML pages each month.

There were problems with Sources when V7 was first released but
apart from an odd unusual one which crops up occasionally, I would
say they have now been resolved. All software has their own
idiocincracies which to someone used to another similar product
(and that is not a comment directed at yourself, as I have no idea
as to your experience with other software) might

be regarded as a bug. I did not, btw, suggest that you were asking
for a wordprocessor, simply that the discussion was yet again
drifting in that well documented direction.

Ron Ferguson
_

New Tutorial: 

Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:58:35 +0100, Ron Ferguson
rnldfe...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:

It was only when I read your post, Dennis, that I realised I had a 
translation problem, and the OP was concerned indexes!

Yeah, I thought you might have been thinking of superscripts.

If true (I have no reason to doubt the OP), the OP should make the
suggestion to the programmers and move on.
 
-- 

Dennis Kowallek (LTools)
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools



Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread Brian L. Lightfoot
You people drive on the wrong side of the street anyhow. :-)

Brian in CA


-Original Message-
From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:rnldfe...@tiscali.co.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 4:32 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other bugs in
reports

Please see my comment in response to Dennis - an INDICES over here is used 
as a superscripted number referencing another place, or a power to which a 
number may be raised. x squared would have an indices of 2. The 
superscripted number referencing a source is an indices.

Ron Ferguson





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format, other bugs in reports

2009-10-07 Thread Jan Roberts
CE,
I believe the limitations you are experiencing are part and parcel of the
type of output you are requesting, rather than a limitation of Legacy.
Asking for a text file will automatically strip / not pick up the coding
which allows for the creation of an index - just as it strips / does not
pick up any coding relating to font, bold, italics etc.  It produces a text
document only.  With the .rtf document it includes something like the
following

[ Note:  Using your word processor, generate an Index here. ]
[ All names have been marked as index entries in this document. ]
[ Erase these three lines. ]

at the end of the document so you can use your word processor to create the
index.  I find this invaluable, because I don't create the index until I
have edited the .rtf which may put people onto different pages as I move
things, change the size of photos etc.  So the .rtf version retains the
index markings, but allows you to still create an index once you have
finished editing.  The other versions you cannot edit (unless you have a
fully fledged PDF creator / editor) so there is no need to hold off creating
the index.

Cheers
Jan

-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of CE Wood
Sent: Thursday, 8 October 2009 8:07
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] No report indices in text format,  other bugs in
reports

I am not asking Legacy to be a word processor.  I am asking that, when a
report is Previewed and there are check boxes for printing various types of
files, that those options be produced in whatever format which has a
checkbox.

The simplest would be a text file because then you could format the file in
your word processor.

When the opening page allows you to choose Index Options, you assume that
the indices will be produced in whatever format is allowed, i.e.
Screen/Printer, Text file, HTML, RTF, PDF.

When the Preview shows you a report that includes indices, you assume that
when produced in one of the formats with a check box, that the indices will
be produced when you choose one of those formats.

This does not happen!  The indices are missing!!!

THAT is what the problem is.


CE





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





[LegacyUG] Some report problems

2009-10-07 Thread Jan Roberts
In trying to test some report behaviour in order to respond to the index
problems experienced by CE I discovered a couple of other problems in .rtf
reports.  After the lines giving instructions about creating your own index
I get a short second set of source citations, numbered from 1. again.  There
is plenty or room for these citations to fit on the last page of the long
list of citations.

The second problem is that if a direct descendant is married their picture
doesn't appear - only that of their spouse.  If the direct descendant is
unmarried their picture appears.  I have options set for show pictures of
husband and wife, show all preferred.  They have always shown in other
reports, specifically the Descendant Narrative.  Can anyone reproduce?

 

Cheers

Jan

 





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp