[LUTE] Robert Tailour's Sacred Hymns

2014-01-30 Thread Sam Chapman
   Dear all,
   I urgently need a modern edition of Robert Tailour's Sacred Hymns
   (1615), and I know that one has been made as part of a University of
   London dissertation:
   Christopher Martin Thomas: `Sacred Hymns' by Robert Tailour: A Critical
   Study and Transcription
   Since the University library won't send it to me, does anybody here
   have a scanned copy? Or can somebody put me in touch with Christopher
   Martin Thomas?
   Thanks for your help!
   Sam
   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Robert Tailour's Sacred Hymns

2014-01-30 Thread Sam Chapman
   Problem solved, thanks to Jean-Marie Poirier!

   On 30 January 2014 13:58, Sam Chapman [1]manchap...@gmail.com wrote:

  Dear all,
  I urgently need a modern edition of Robert Tailour's Sacred Hymns
  (1615), and I know that one has been made as part of a University of
  London dissertation:
  Christopher Martin Thomas: `Sacred Hymns' by Robert Tailour: A
   Critical
  Study and Transcription
  Since the University library won't send it to me, does anybody here
  have a scanned copy? Or can somebody put me in touch with
   Christopher
  Martin Thomas?
  Thanks for your help!
  Sam
  --
  Sam Chapman
  Oetlingerstrasse 65
  4057 Basel
  (0041) 79 530 39 91

--
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91

   --

References

   1. mailto:manchap...@gmail.com
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Fine Knacks text trouble

2013-07-29 Thread Sam Chapman
   Thanks so much to Matteo and Howard (and those who replied off list) -
   my singer is very grateful!
   Sam

   On 25 July 2013 22:32, Matteo Turri [1]matteo.o.tu...@gmail.com
   wrote:

  This is a paraphrase made by David Hill in 2009 (of all the books of

Dowland) and posted on [1][2]johndowland.co.uk, but no more
 available.

  Let me know if you want to a have a copy.
  Fine knacks for ladies, cheape choise brave and new,
  Good penniworths but mony cannot move,
  I keepe a faier but for the faier to view,
  A begger may bee liberall of loue,
  Though all my wares be trash, the hart is true.
  Great gifts are guiles and looke for gifts againe,
  My trifles come, as treasures from my minde,
  It is a precious Iewell to bee plaine,
  Sometimes in shell th' orienst36 pearles we finde,
  Of others take a sheafe, of mee a graine.
  Within this packe pinnes points laces  gloves,
  And divers toies fitting a country faier,
  But my37 hart, where duety serves and loves,
  Turtles and twins, courts brood, a heavenly paier,
  Happy the hart that thinks of no removes.
  I (a `pedlar'), have fine small goods for ladies: cheap, rare,
   exciting
  and new. They are good
  value for money, though money alone does not motivate me. I hold
   back
  my finest goods for
  only the fairest to see, for a `beggar' such as I can easily afford
   to
  be generous in dispensing
  his love. Even though all my goods-in-trade are really worthless
   trash,
  my heart is true and
  constant.
  Those great gifts (such as wealth) are deceptive, and you should
   look
  for other qualities, for,
  in my case, even my most trivial cheap `goods' are, in fact,
  `treasures' that come from my
  mind (i.e. wit). It is a rare and valuable thing to appear plain and
  simple, as I do, for
  sometimes we find the bright, shining pearl inside the coarse shell
   (of
  the oyster). My quality
  of `stock' (wit and charm) is such that, whereas you may take a
   whole
  `sheaf' of others, you38
  need only to take a `grain' in weight of me!
  Though here, in my pedlar's bundle, I carry a stock of pins,
   aiglets39,
  laces and gloves, and
  various trivial small goods suitable for a humble country fair, my
  heart (because I serve both
  40duty and love equally) carries constancy, as is embodied by the
  turtle doves and the
  famous twins41 , the offspring of Zeus (who also represent duty and
  love) - truly a heavenly
  pair. Happy is the heart that thinks of no higher state42 (than one
   who
  serves with such
  constancy).
  36
  Orient meant bright and shining in the 17th century: We have spoken
   of
  the cause of orient colours in

birds... (Bacon - Natural History 1607); ...He offers to each
 weary

  traveller/ Orient liquor in a crystal
  glass. (Milton - Paradise Lost 1667). `Orienst', as here, may
   simply
  be a misprint for `orient'. Diana
  Poulton asserted that Orienst is a good Elizabethan word, the
  superlative of orient.. (John Dowland, p.
  267, 1982), though I have not been able to confirm this.The word is
   not
  used anywhere in Shakespeare.
  37
  The original printed copies give: `But my hart...', not `in my
   hart',
  as is given in all modern printed
  editions (following E.H. Fellowes). `My' can easily be sung to the
   two
  notes as Dowland probably
  intended without inserting an extra word. The poet is saying that
   his
  heart is constant, like the turtles and
  twins, not that they are ` in his heart'.
  38
  A grain was traditionally the smallest unit of measured weight,
   based
  upon a grain of wheat.
  39
  Pointed metal end-tags for laces.
  40
  Noted for mating for life, and displaying constant affection.
  41

Castor and Pollux, the sons of Zeus and Leda (`courts brood' -
 Zeus

  seduced Leda in the form of a
  swan). The key element of the twins' myth, as far as this song is
  concerned, relates to the filial love and
  constancy demonstrated by Pollux when Castor was mortally wounded -
  Pollux was given the choice of
  elevation to Olympus, or of giving half his immortality to his twin,
  the latter of which he chose. Zeus

placed Castor and Pollux in the heavens as the constellation
 Gemini -

  `a heavenly pair'
  42
  `Removes' means an elevation of status at this date - see also no.
   15
  `White as lillies'

  On 25 July 2013 21:12, Sam Chapman [2][3]manchap...@gmail.com
   wrote:
   Hi all,
   I've been asked by a singer to explain the meaning of a couple
   of
lines
   from Fine Knacks for Ladies. Frankly I've never understood them
either

[LUTE] Fine Knacks text trouble

2013-07-25 Thread Sam Chapman
   Hi all,
   I've been asked by a singer to explain the meaning of a couple of lines
   from Fine Knacks for Ladies. Frankly I've never understood them either,
   have any of you? She writes:

   I've been struggling with a verse from Fine Knacks for Ladies, but I'm
   stuck. Maybe you could help me. It is the following:
   But my heart wherein duty serves and loves,
   Turtles and twins, court's brood, a heavenly pair.

   I understand the first row, but not the second one. The words are all
   right, but how does it fit in the poem? And what is the link to the
   previous one? Is there an allusion to something I don't (but should)
   know about?

   Can anyone help us out?
   All the best,
   Sam

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Lute for Sturt

2013-02-28 Thread Sam Chapman
   Dear Alan,

   According to Robert Spencer's article in New Grove:

   Sturt's seven extant lute solos were written for a ten-course lute in
   aEUR~old' tuning with the lowest course lowered to B a(TM) A for two of
   the pieces.
   Fret material (and strings for that matter) would have been gut. We
   can't know for sure the exact size and pitch to which Sturt's
   instrument would have been tuned - this is arguably less crucial in any
   case, since lutes in all manner of different sizes survive from the
   period, and would no doubt have been tuned accordingly. If there was
   ever such a thing as concert pitch at that time in England, Bruce
   Haynes has suggested that it might have been about a tone lower than
   modern pitch. Since Sturt was employed at court and was involved in
   masque entertainments, one might assume that he sometimes played at
   this pitch. Assuming he thought of his lute in G, this corresponds to a
   string length of about 66cm. Assuming (again) that he had 8 or possibly
   9 frets tied on the neck, one can then work out the body size
   (roughly). Or one can examine surviving instruments with this string
   length. Lot's of assumptions I'm afraid - I wouldn't get too bogged
   down in the dogma!

   Good luck!

   Sam
   On 28 February 2013 21:17, Alan Sturt [1]alanst...@gmail.com wrote:

 --f46d0408395de054f104d6ce93f3
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 A  A  A  A  I am interested to know what kind of lute would have
 been played by
 John Sturt in England (1610-1625) - see attached.
 A  A  A  A  I am a guitar player and would like to get involved with
 the lute -
 and I would like to play John Sturt's music on an instrument he
 would have
 used. I have not yet proved that he is part of my family tree but
 Sturt is
 an uncommon name - even in England.
 A  A  A  A  I would like to know string number, body size, fret
 material and
 any other details that would help define the instrument.
 A  A  A  A  A  Thanks in advance A  A  A  A  Alan Sturt
 --f46d0408395de054f104d6ce93f3
 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 A  A  A  A  I am interested to know what kind of lute would have
 been played by John Sturt in England (1610-1625) - see
 attached.divA  A  A  A  I am a guitar player and would like to get
 involved with the lute - and I would like to play John Sturt#39;s
 music on an instrument he would have used. I have not yet proved
 that he is part of my family tree but Sturt is an uncommon name -
 even in England./div
 divA  A  A  A  I would like to know string number, body size, fret
 material and any other details that would help define the
 instrument./divdivA  A  A  A  A  Thanks in advance A  A  A  A
 Alan Sturt/div
 --f46d0408395de054f104d6ce93f3--
 --
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91

   --

References

   1. mailto:alanst...@gmail.com
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Damping overspun strings.

2013-02-21 Thread Sam Chapman
 strings
   sustains too long, compared with gut strings.
   Thus it seems strange that I've never
   seen anyone damp overspun strings with
   foam rubber.
   Is is easy to control the amount
   of damping by using dampers of different sizes,
   or by sliding dampers farther or closer
   to the bridge.
   Strings damped this way don't sound like gut,
   but for some pieces I find them a significant
   improvement.
   If you're lucky enough to have yellow
   foam rubber instead of pink, the dampers
   will match the soundboard rather well.
   Alternatively, there are also opportune times,
   notably at the end of pieces, when you can damp
   a string with your thumb to good effect.
   To get on or off this list see list information at

   [1][6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   --
   References
   1. [7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91

   --

References

   1. mailto:dwinh...@lmi.net
   2. http://www.christopherwilke.com/
   3. mailto:wa...@physics.utexas.edu
   4. mailto:wa...@physics.utexas.edu
   5. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Damping overspun strings.

2013-02-21 Thread Sam Chapman
   Dear Howard et al,

   Isn't cutting a note short articulating by definition, regardless of
   what one does with all the other notes? Articulation isn't necessarily
   deliberate - it can be an involuntary consequence of what you call
   choppy playing, or it can be part of a carefully-planned performance
   (though the former is probably easier to justify historically).

   I don't think you've done justice to the first rule I mentioned in my
   post. Most authors write about holding down the fingers for as long as
   possible, that is, sustaining the notes for as long as possible. This
   is not the same as avoiding stopping notes prematurely. Whether the
   rule relates to establishing good technique or creating a certain kind
   of sound world (or both) is up for debate. If we see it as refering to
   an aesthetic preference and take it literally then yes, it is evidence
   against stopping notes for whatever purpose.

   I have great respect for Paul O'Dette's playing and I have nothing
   against articulation per se. However, much of what we take for granted
   has absolutely no historical precedent. When articulated playing is
   regarded as a period performance practice technique and historically
   informed, whereas legato is called totally modern, I take issue.

   As far as I know, Mace is the only author to describe shortening notes
   (not specifically bass notes) on the lute. He considers this effect an
   ornament (along with Piano/Forte and Pauses, among other things). He
   writes it will seem to speak the word tut - perhaps we should use
   this ornament as often as we would say the word tut in a sentence?

   On several occasions Mace refers to his dissatisfaction with the long
   bass strings on the theorbo and their snarling together. Tellingly,
   he does NOT suggest articulating the bass notes here as a solution.
   Instead he suggests playing the basses softer, though admits that this
   is not an ideal solution. He seems to regard this problem as intrinsic
   to the nature of the instrument.

   In other places, Mace praises playing which is smooth and clean. On
   several occasions he describes a kind of over-legato effect: Thus
   holding of your letters stopt, all the while, will give a very fine
   sound, or gingle beyond any other way of play. Other than the tut
   Mace never mentions anything about what we today call articulation, or
   indeed musical phrasing. Since he writes about virtually everything
   else, I think this is significant.

   Personally, I feel that many performers today overarticulate, and this
   can have the effect of introducing unpleasant accents and (moreover)
   reducing the volume/resonance of the instrument. The lute, especially
   when strung in gut, can be seen as a self-articulating instrument - why
   exaggerate this characteristic?

   I anticipate your reply!

   Sam

   On 21 February 2013 20:13, howard posner [1]howardpos...@ca.rr.com
   wrote:

   On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Sam Chapman [2]manchap...@gmail.com
   wrote:
There is far more evidence for a legato
  way of playing. One of the first rules we learn on the lute is to
   hold
  down the left hand fingers until they are needed for another note -
  doesn't this indicate a desire for sustaining the resonance of the
  instrument, rather than cutting it short (i.e. articulating).

 Cutting a note short amounts to articulating only if it's a
 contrast to other notes.  If all the notes are short, it's just
 choppy playing, and deliberately shortening a note is pointless if
 that note is surrounded by notes that are inadvertently shortened.
 So evidence of a preference for not inadvertently stopping notes
 prematurely through poor technique 1) is not evidence against
 preventing a bass note from ringing beyond its written value, and 2)
 is not evidence against stopping stopping notes for expressive
 purposes.
 This doesn't settle the question of whether Weiss (for example)
 would have been perfectly satisfied with how his basses sounded
 without damping them.
 O'Dette is a master at controlling the ends of notes, and it's the
 reason he makes contrapuntal voice-leading dizzyingly obvious:  a
 note that comes after silence is
 emphasized.
 --

   To get on or off this list see list information at

 [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91

   --

References

   1. mailto:howardpos...@ca.rr.com
   2. mailto:manchap...@gmail.com
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: lute iconography on the web

2013-02-02 Thread Sam Chapman
Very interesting picture. Yes, I think I would agree with David,
unless the painting has been poorly restored at some point. In any
case, the 6th course is certainly a unison. Clearly they had excellent
strings back then...

On 2 February 2013 15:39, Arthur Ness arthurjn...@verizon.net wrote:
 Marin has been mentioned:

 Too bad that Mary Rasmussen is gone.  She would have accomplished much, as
 one can see from her start.  (See Carlone for an extended list iof sites.)


 http://www.lutevoice.com/luteiconography/Page%201.html

 http://www.klassiskgitar.net/imagesmain.html

 http://www.musico.it/Mariagrazia_Carlone/iconografia%20musicale.htm

 Martin, were you asking about Cavalcanti or about Chilesotti?  My computer
 crashed, but I saved everything except my eMail files.
 - Original Message - From: Martin Shepherd mar...@luteshop.co.uk
 To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 11:29 AM
 Subject: [LUTE] lute iconography on the web



 Hi All,

 Can someone remind me of the best sources for lute pictures on the web? At
 the moment I'm particularly interested in stripey lutes with ribs of
 different colours - is the lighter colour nearly always the edge rib, or is
 that usually the darker colour?  And is the capping strip the same colour as
 the edge rib, or the other colour?

 Thanks in advance,

 Martin

 www.luteshop.co.uk




 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html






-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Re: Lute bass strings - was Re: Are Pistoys prone to rot according to Mace?

2012-12-01 Thread Sam Chapman
   -- Forwarded message --
   From: Sam Chapman [1]manchap...@gmail.com
   Date: 2 December 2012 00:38
   Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Lute bass strings - was Re: Are Pistoys prone
   to rot according to Mace?
   To: Markus Lutz [2]mar...@gmlutz.de
   About string holes: I generally use Stoppani plain gut basses at high
   tension (c. 3.5kg) on all my lutes - sometimes I cut the string down to
   size to get it through the hole. Even reducing the width of the string
   by half puts it in no danger of breaking when tuned up to whatever bass
   note it should be at. The cut portion of the string passes through the
   hole and in no way affects the vibrating length of the string. I'm very
   happy with the sound and don't find it any duller than that the loaded
   strings I've tried.
   All the best,
   Sam
   On 30 November 2012 12:12, Markus Lutz [3]mar...@gmlutz.de wrote:

 Am 29.11.2012 16:10, schrieb R. Mattes:

 On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:04:48 +0100, Markus Lutz wrote

 Hi Shaun, Hi Martyn,
 unfortunately I cannot say too much on this topic, at least for the
 17th century.
 [...]
 Another important source, though late, on all topics of life is
 Kruenitz, Oeconomische Encyclopaedie. Probably it also depends on
 the
 encyclopedy of Diderot and on other encyclopedys, for sure at least
 some things will have been copied.
 It has 242 volumes and describes many things very detailed.
 He has big articles on the lute and on strings
 Kruenitz,
 Artikel Laute (lute, vol. 66, p. 380ff, 1795)

 But this is rather late as a source for information on 17th century
 lute practice (or even for the first half of the 18th century).
 There have been two changes in lute building during that time:
 first, the extension of the bass range by adding a second pegbox
 (swank neck lutes) and then the change to bass rider style lutes
 during the 18th century (the later could well be a in response
 to a wider availability of overspun bass strings).

 Yes, this is pretty late - as I said, an I never claimed anything on
 the use of overspun strings in the 17th century.
 And I don't know, when they were used first, but I would guess at
 least in the end of the 17th and beginning of the 18th century.
 But anyway these encyclopedies reflect the things that had been
 there for many years.
 If you look at the article on lutes you will see that it consist of
 different sources, some still have the renaissance tuning/stringing
 in mind  and others that describe the baroque lute.
 In this article Baron is cited quite extensive, and also they used
 the articles of Luise Gottsched in Gottscheds Handlexicon oder
 Kurzgefasstes Woerterbuch der schoenen Wissenschaften und freyen
 Kuenste
 We cannot at all compare an encyclopedy of that time with our time
 (or wikipedia). Changes then had been much slower and they are more
 a summing up and mixing old and new things.
 But this article says nothing on the first use of overspun strings.
 BTW:
 The development of the extended bass range indeed is vice versa at
 least in Germany.
 First there had been lutes with bass riders (ca. 1719), afterwards
 the 13-course lutes had been theorbified (around 1730).
 Although there had been other theorbified lutes up to the late 17th
 century, the theorbifying of the baroque lute had been ascribed to
 Silvius Leopold Weiss, who probably first combined this with a
 13-course lute.
 Best regards
 Markus

   --
   R. Mattes -
   Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg
   [4]r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de

   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [5]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Markus Lutz
   Schulstrasse 11
   88422 Bad Buchau
   Tel  0 75 82 / 92 62 89
   Fax  0 75 82 / 92 62 90
   Mail [6]mar...@gmlutz.de

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. mailto:manchap...@gmail.com
   2. mailto:mar...@gmlutz.de
   3. mailto:mar...@gmlutz.de
   4. mailto:r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
   5. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   6. mailto:mar...@gmlutz.de



[LUTE] Re: Swedish lute songs?

2012-11-22 Thread Sam Chapman
   Hi Jan and all,
   Thanks for these links. The pieces from Buxtehude are extremely
   interesting - I don't think there is any other written out tablature
   part for theorbo that is so demanding and shows what a professional
   player might have played (in this style at least). The other cantata
   you mentioned Herr wenn ich nur dich habe has a basso continuo part
   in staff notation labelled theorba, as opposed to an almost identical
   one labelled organo. Both are fully figured, and I don't think there
   are significant differences in the bass lines. This is good ammunition
   to use against those who still say that the theorbo should only play
   the bass in this kind of music!
   All the best,
   Sam

   On 22 November 2012 11:05, Jan Johansson [1]j...@horseforce.se wrote:

Hi therobo b.c. fans,
Andreas Schlegel was kind enough to direct me to the correct
 Buxtehude
piece,
Fuerchtet euch nicht, where we have both the basso continuo
 parts and
a
tiorba part (labeled th) written at the end of the 17th
 century
probably by one of the
lute players of the Hofkapelle in Stockholm. It can perhaps be
interesting to compare
the figured bc with the theorbo implementation.
Here it is:

 [2]http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/presentationSource1.php?Select_Dnr)
 4
Regards
/Jan
--

   To get on or off this list see list information at

 [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. mailto:j...@horseforce.se
   2. http://www2.musik.uu.se/duben/presentationSource1.php?Select_Dnr)4
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Chitarrone

2012-10-18 Thread Sam Chapman
   Dear Lex,

   I don't think Kapsperger qualifies as an arisocratic amateur since he
   was (along with Frescobaldi) the highest paid musician at Cardinal
   Barbarini's court in Rome. Castaldi on the other hand certainly was an
   aristocratic amateur...

   While creating a full family tree of lute-type instruments might be
   unfeasible, it might be interesting to come up with a list of all the
   different instruments which were refered to as chitarrone
   historically. I think it would be quite a long list. The theorbo list
   would be even longer!

   All the best,

   Sam
   On 18 October 2012 10:13, Lex van Sante [1]lvansa...@gmail.com wrote:

 I agree and BTW Milan and Kapsberger to name but a few also could be
 categorized as aristocratic amateurs, couldn't they?
 Op 18 okt 2012, om 10:03 heeft Martyn Hodgson het volgende
 geschreven:

   
  Dear Denys,
   
  Thank you for this - I think it well reflects many peoples' views.
  Indeed, it is remarkable that, even after 36 years, much of what
   Bob
  wrote is still widely agreed upon today.
   

Martyn

  --- On Wed, 17/10/12, Denys Stephens [2]denyssteph...@sky.com
   wrote:
   
From: Denys Stephens [3]denyssteph...@sky.com

  Subject: [LUTE] Re: Chitarrone

To: 'lute net' [4]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Date: Wednesday, 17 October, 2012, 20:32
   
  Dear Roman,
  I fully respect your freedom of speech, but I find it sad to
  see Robert Spencer referred to in that way. His article was
  written 36 years ago, and represented a significant contribution
  to the subject at the time. It's hardly surprising that
  things have moved on since then, but notwithstanding that, his
  outstanding contribution to the world of lute music is
  remembered with gratitude and respect by many.
  Best wishes,
  Denys
  -Original Message-
  From: [1][5]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  [mailto:[2][6]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
  Of Roman Turovsky
  Sent: 17 October 2012 13:56
  To: R. Mattes
  Cc: Monica Hall; Lutelist
  Subject: [LUTE] Re: Chitarrone
  Thanks for this!
  The bottom line is that the Italians had lutes of less than 6
   courses
  in
  guitar tuning (with whatever names),
  the bass variety thereof eventually evolved into chitarrone, in the
  perspicacious opinion of Renato Meucci.
  I agree with Meucci, as his opinion is intelligently conceived,
  well-informed, and doesn't sound like Bob Spencer's
  aristocratic amateurism.
  RT

  To get on or off this list see list information at

[3][7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 
--
 
  References
 
1.
 [8]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=lute-arc@cs.dartmout
 h.edu
2.
 [9]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=lute-arc@cs.dartmout
 h.edu
3. [10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91

   --

References

   1. mailto:lvansa...@gmail.com
   2. mailto:denyssteph...@sky.com
   3. mailto:denyssteph...@sky.com
   4. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   5. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   6. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   8. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   9. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: the point of synthetics - Rather the movement of the whole lute

2012-10-07 Thread Sam Chapman
   About coloured/dyed strings - I spoke to a harpist yesterday who told
   me that coloured strings were sometimes used on renaissance harps to
   help with orientation (as modern players use them today). In fact, I
   was thinking about getting a few coloured basses for my theorbo...

   On 7 October 2012 18:25, howard posner [1]howardpos...@ca.rr.com
   wrote:

   On Oct 7, 2012, at 4:23 AM, JarosAA'aw Lipski [2]jaroslawlip...@wp.pl
   wrote:
There is also quite a lot of speculation in your answer,

 So I said at the beginning.

however I doubt very much if Mace could be so poetic and enigmatic in
   the book which was to simplify things. He was defending lute's position
   amongst instruments so he tried to make explanations as easy as
   possible. For us it's not easy because we didn't live at that time. IMO
   he talks about most common things (obviously except his dyphone, but in
   this case he wanted to show people his invention). I really doubt very
   much that he would be inclined to make generalization after examining
   just a one string and immediately wanting to share his discovery with
   the whole world. In this case the whole book would be of little value
   for anyone. But I don't thing this is the case. He clearly explained
   that many kinds of strings were commonly dyed. Then he proceeded to
   give his opinion on which ones were good, and which he found commonly
   faulty. This would be quite a normal thing to write in a handbook.

 Obviously, I'm less inclined to take Mace seriously than you are.
 A You're writing here about what you would mean if you wrote what
 Mace wrote. A I'm writing about what an oddball who may have been an
 inaccurate observer or someone quick to jump to odd conclusions may
 have meant. A And remember, when he wrote the book he was so deaf he
 had to put his teeth on a lute to hear any sound from it, so the
 details of strings' A actual sounds may have been a different
 memory. A If you're inclined to take everything Mace says as
 practical and workable, try building his dyphone, and then try
 playing it.

As far as your objections concerning unusual colors are concerned
   please have a look at the 12c lute's bridge detail of Bilcius painting
   (2nd half of the 17th c). It shows string colors from bright yellow,
   orange, till various shades of blue.

 Where?

   --
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. mailto:howardpos...@ca.rr.com
   2. mailto:jaroslawlip...@wp.pl
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Tuner

2012-10-05 Thread Sam Chapman
   The entire case (including battery cover) of the new version is made
   from very classy brushed aluminium. I've already dropped the tuner a
   few times and it seems to be pretty bomb proof.

   best,

   Sam
   On 5 October 2012 16:48, Anthony Hind [1]agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote:

Hello Francesco
   Yes the replacement cover is exactly the same. I think
 the
problem is both because the original cover is as you say
 inherently
weak, and EU 9V batteries are perhaps a little larger than some
 others
making it more difficult to close the cover.
I hadn't realized that the new ST-122 was made of metal, but I
 have had
three years use out of this one, and as you say, since it is
 working,
it would seem a pity to have to buy a new one just for this cover
question.
I will carry on with this one, unless there are other arguments
 for
swapping to the new one.
Regards
Anthony

 __
De : Francesco Tribioli [2]tribi...@arcetri.astro.it
A : 'Anthony Hind' [3]agno3ph...@yahoo.com
Envoye le : Vendredi 5 octobre 2012 10h52
Objet : RE: [LUTE] Re: Tuner
Hello Anthony,

  The reason I am writing today, however, is because I had a
   problem
  with
  a slightly fractured battery cover on the ST-122 (this is a
   part
  which
  does get stressed, when ever the battery is changed, and I have
  had
  mine for at least a three years). I sent a message about this
   to
  Sonic
  research, and immediately Roger sent me a new cover, which I
   have
  just
  received this morning.

I've exactly the same problem with my ST-122 and I was thinking
 to buy
the
122a, which is built in aluminum, just for this. My question: is
 the
replaced cover exactly as the older one? I ask because the
 locking
system of
that cover is inherently weak and I think that it might break in
 a
short
time too. On the other hand to spend quite a bit of money to
 replace a
perfectly working tuner just for the battery cover seems a little
 bit
silly
8^)
Thank in advance for any info you can share
Francesco
--

   To get on or off this list see list information at

 [4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91

   --

References

   1. mailto:agno3ph...@yahoo.com
   2. mailto:tribi...@arcetri.astro.it
   3. mailto:agno3ph...@yahoo.com
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Consort Suggestions Please

2012-09-09 Thread Sam Chapman
   Dear Tom,

   There's a lot of 16th-century consort music for three instruments - a
   good place to start would be to look in Brown's Instrumental Music
   Printed Before 1600. You can play along with any of that repertoire on
   the lute if you make your own intabulations. Of course, you can make
   relatively free intabulations (as in the Lachrimae), leaving out
   unplayable voices and possibly adding new things of your own.

   If you're after something more specific, have a look at Vincenzo Ruffo
   La Gamba in Basso e Soprano - I could well imagine a lute fitting
   into the consort in that piece.

   Good luck!

   Sam

   On 9 September 2012 21:34, Edward Mast [1]nedma...@aol.com wrote:

 Not an answer to your question, but perhaps relevant if playing part
 music.  When I got back to the lute a few years ago, I went to our
 local recorder society meetings to play ensemble music.  What I
 found is that recorders generally read an octave higher then
 notated, so that playing the lute on a top or middle line put me an
 octave lower than the recorders, and thus out of place harmonically.
   So, I generally ended up on the bottom, or bass line, which is not
 the most comfortable area on the lute.  Also, when playing music
 with longer not values, the lack of sustain of the lute compared to
 the recorders bothered me a bit.  My solution was to learn to play
 the recorder.  It sounds as if they could loan you an instrument or
 two to learn, and if you learn the fingering for the alto and tenor
 you can also play the bass and the soprano.  I draw the line at the
 crumhorn, however!

   On Sep 9, 2012, at 1:12 PM, [2]t...@heartistrymusic.com wrote:
 I have some friends who have had a recorder ensemble for many years.
Formerly 4 players.  They lost one of their main players some years
   ago,
and they would like to re-group as a trio with me playing Renaissance
   lute.
They inherited a fine collection of Renaissance and Baroque
   recorders,
in all sizes including Bass, crumhorns, zincs, and even a sakpipa and
   a
cornemuse from the founder of the ensemble.
 Does anybody have suggestions for composers and / or specific pieces
   that
would fit well with 3 recorders, etc. and lute?  Dowland's Lachrimae,
   perhaps?
(I know that's 5 parts - but ... leave one out maybe ... ? )
 Thanks in advance,
Tom
   
Tom Draughon
Heartistry Music
[3]http://www.heartistrymusic.com/artists/tom.html
714  9th Avenue West
Ashland, WI  54806
[4]715-682-9362
   
   
   
To get on or off this list see list information at
[5]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. mailto:nedma...@aol.com
   2. mailto:t...@heartistrymusic.com
   3. http://www.heartistrymusic.com/artists/tom.html
   4. tel:715-682-9362
   5. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: String wear/ technique

2012-09-04 Thread Sam Chapman
   Dear David and Gary,

   Thanks for the tips. I don't think it's a problem with the tension - I
   have only about 3.5kg on all my fingerboard strings at the moment!

   I'll check my frets again though - the first fret is quite thick
   (1.2mm) so that might be causing a hump as Gary points out. I use
   Kuerschner fret gut which is very tough but quite inflexible, so
   perhaps that's adding to the problem. In any case, I was planning to
   lower the action at the nut anyway, so I'll try lowering the nut and
   putting on thinner frets.

   If that doesn't work I'll check for fret-mashing. Could be that I'm
   tying the frets too tight, causing them to stretch out at the bend.
   I've tried filing down frets in the past but have never got it to work
   - usually just makes things worse in my experience!

   All the best,

   Sam
   On 1 September 2012 15:04, Gary R. Boye [1]boy...@appstate.edu wrote:

 Sam,
 This may be another shot in the dark, but when you tie frets,
 sometimes there is a small hump in the fret where the flat part
 bends around to the back of the neck, even if the frets are really
 tight. A slightly bulging fret at this bend could cause buzzing and
 it's likely to cause it on the 1st course, closest to where the fret
 bends.
 That's one of the reasons nylon frets are so difficult to work with,
 IMO, as well as the very thick gut frets. If there is a slight gap
 with the fingerboard where the fret curves around neck, you could
 have a high point. I've been able to just file it down a bit and
 make things work--it's that or lose the fret entirely (which costs
 $$).
 And sometimes the opposite occurs: the fret gets sort of mashed and
 stretched out at the bent point. Then you could have a low point and
 buzzing when fretting . . .
 Gary
 --
 Dr. Gary R. Boye
 Professor and Music Librarian
 Appalachian State University

 On 31 August 2012 23:13, Sam Chapman [2]manchap...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Interesting. I don't have an answer, but I have a problem of my
 own:
 when I string my theorbo with gut, the 1st course always becomes
 untrue
 rapidly and starts to buzz against the frets, long before I have
 such
 problems on the other strings. Even if the string is fine when I
 put it
 on, within as little as a few hours it can be more or less
 unusable
 whereas I can play the other courses for several weeks or months
 before
 such problems develop. The action is normal and though I use
 very low
 tension now, I've had the same problem with higher tension
 strings too.
 I've tried many makes of string and it's the same with all of
 them. I'm
 wondering if there's a problem with the way the neck is set up,
 or if
 it's something about the way I pluck that particular string that
 causes
 it to become untrue. Or perhaps it's the way I tie the frets
 (though
 they're tight and I don't see any obvious problems there)? It's
 a
 Jacobsen theorbo, 84cm, about 20 years old. Any ideas?
 All the best,
 Sam

   To get on or off this list see list information at

 [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91

   --

References

   1. mailto:boy...@appstate.edu
   2. mailto:manchap...@gmail.com
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Tuner

2012-09-04 Thread Sam Chapman
   Yes, I also got the ST-122a some time ago. It's an extremely
   well-designed and robust piece of kit and in terms of accuracy and
   functionality I don't think you can beat it for the price. It seems to
   be virtually the only thing Sonic Research produces, and they clearly
   pour a huge amount of effort into making it as good as it can be -
   quite a different story from the plastic Korg tuners that most people
   seem to use. By programming the tuning of my theorbo and setting the
   tuner to manual (so that Theorbo Man appears on the display!) I've
   been able to use it in orchestras even without a contact microphone.

   I used to have a TLA strobe tuner but had to sell it since, while it
   was great for keyboard instruments, it couldn't really pick up the
   sound of the lute properly. The TurboTuner is the opposite: perfect for
   lutes, but picks up the sound of harpsichords less well (no problem
   with organs though). The only other criticisms I have is that it can't
   produce sound and it can't do piano curves, though I have a cheap tuner
   that can do the former and I rarely need the latter. Also, you have to
   get used to people asking you what the flashing lights are all about...

   Buy one!

   Sam

   On 3 September 2012 22:50, Edward Mast [1]nedma...@aol.com wrote:

 When I went to order mine a few moths ago, the ST-122 was indeed out
 of stock and out of production.   But it has been replaced by the
 ST-122a, a very similar but slightly upgraded version.  I'm very
 happy with it also.

   On Sep 3, 2012, at 1:14 PM, R. Mattes wrote:
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:22:11 -0400, William Brohinsky wrote
I have one. I have had it for a few years. For piano tuning, it is
not a choice.
   
For just about everything else, it is wonderful.
   
   
Please correct me if I'm wrong - but isn't this tuner out of stock
since _years_?
   
--
R. Mattes -
Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg
[2]r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
   
   
   

To get on or off this list see list information at
[3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91

   --

References

   1. mailto:nedma...@aol.com
   2. mailto:r...@inm.mh-freiburg.de
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: fret gut

2012-08-15 Thread Sam Chapman
   Dear all,

   Some time ago I read something about fretting vihuelas, probably
   Bermudo: as I remember, the best vihuelas can be fretted with the
   same thickness of gut all the way up the neck. Can somebody quote this
   source more accurately?

   Best,

   Sam
   On 15 August 2012 11:46, Martyn Hodgson [1]hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   wrote:

Dear Stuart,
Many people nowadays use a quite large diameter first fret
(around 1.00mm or even more on a relatively small [60cm] lute)
 but, as
Martin points out, the best record of actual historic fret sizes
 is
John Dowland (in Varietie) which suggests significantly thinner
 frets -
these allow a lute to be 'set fine' ie minimum distance between
 string
and fingerboard at the higher frets, so easing higher fret
 fingering.
I try to aim for first fret at 0.90mm on this size of instrument
 but,
again as Martin points out, this depends on the set of your
 particular
instrument. So that if the neck has pulled up a bit, or even
incorrectly set from the start, you can use almost same diameter
 frets
right  up the fingerboard (around 0.70mm) - like a modern
 'classical'
guitar. But if the neck set is in the same plane as the belly (at
 the
bridge) you may well need graduated frets. As said,  I aim for a
setting on this size lute which allows from 0.90 (first) down to
 around
0.50mm (8th fret).
Thomas Mace also gives some info (again, hurrah Thos.!): 'with a
 fine
smooth File, cut the Notches to a convenient depth so that all
 your
Strings may lye at an even and equal height, from the
 Finger-Board,
which would be about the thickness of a Half-Crown, or a little
more;'.   So if you know the thickness of a halfcrown in 1676 you
 know
the distance from the underside of the strings to the fingerboard
 at
the nut he's advocating and hence you may judge the diameter of
 his
ideal first fret.
Finally, Martin raises the matter of double v single  loop frets:
 in
fact there is no early evidence for the use of single loop frets
 with
the noticeable exception, again, of the all-inclusive Thos Mace
 who, it
should be noted, when it comes down to describing how to tie a
 fret
desribes the usual double loop. You may care to see my paper on
 this
very subject in the forthcoming issue of FoMRHI Quarterly.
regards
Martyn
  From: Martin Shepherd [2]mar...@luteshop.co.uk
  Subject: [LUTE] Re: fret gut
  To: Lute List [3]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  Date: Tuesday, 14 August, 2012, 21:14

  Hi Stuart,
  It depends on the height of the nut.  The first fret has to be as
   high
  as it can be without buzzing (in normal play, and this is
   surprisingly
  high), and so on up the neck.  This may involve reducing fret sizes
   as
  one goes up the neck, it may not.
  Historically Dowland suggested using a fourth course string (about
  .75mm?) for the first fret, but he was talking about double frets.
  Best wishes,
  Martin
  14/08/2012 21:01, WALSH STUART wrote:
   Is there a set of standard gauges of fret gut for a typical G
  lute,
   60cms string length?
   And, if so, what are they?
   Stuart
   --
  
  
   To get on or off this list see list information at

 [1][4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
--
 References
1. [5]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91

   --

References

   1. mailto:hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
   2. mailto:mar...@luteshop.co.uk
   3. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   5. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Re-tuning the diapason of a 7c

2012-05-02 Thread Sam Chapman
Hi Joshua,

I have a 7-course lute and I usually tune the 7th course to D.
However, I keep an extra 7th course in the case, and if I'm playing
lots of music where I need the 7th course in F I simply change it
over. It takes about 5 minutes to change the course, and if you use
plain gut strings they tune up and keep their tuning (more or less) in
a matter of minutes. I'm fussy about string tensions, so I wouldn't
attempt to retune the same strings.

Good luck with your lute playing - I think a 7-course instrument is a
great place to start!

Sam


On 2 May 2012 17:39, Joshua Burkholder burkholder.jos...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear lute-listers,

 A question from a beginner:

 First to introduce myself, my name is Joshua and I've been playing the lute 
 for several months now; I have been on the list for a couple weeks and am 
 really enjoying following your discussions. I have a rental 7-course and I am 
 now in the process of taking the plunge and buying a lute of my own. After 
 much reading, pondering and agonizing over the best number of courses to 
 start with, I've come to the conclusion that a 7-course best suits my needs. 
 So onto to my question:

 I know that some people re-tune the 7th course from D to F as needed, but on 
 my rental lute this seems quite impossible. The diapason is stung to F and if 
 I drop it down to D it becomes far too wobbly and flabby. From this I assume 
 that if I were to restring it to D, which I'd prefer on the whole, it would 
 likewise be impossible to raise it to F. Currently the lute is strung with 
 Pyramid strings so the basses are metal wound. Is it only possible to change 
 from D to F on the same string if one uses gut strings (Poulton remarks to 
 this effect in her tutor that if it's strung to be tuned at D it will only 
 be possible to raise it to F if gut strings are used)? Otherwise I have to 
 re-string? Or does someone use some other stringing solution, besides just 
 keeping it D and fingering the third fret for F (or buying an 8-course 
 lute...)? I've read enough about stringing lutes to understand that it will 
 be a while before I understand anything about stringing lutes...

 Thank you for taking the time to help out a newcomer.

 Best wishes,

 Joshua







 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Re: Why no active historical lutes?

2012-04-22 Thread Sam Chapman
Dear Ned,

Yes, the Messiah is more or less unmodified I think, though it is
certainly not in active use - as far as I know, all instruments in
the Hill collection at the Ashmolean were donated under the strict
condition that they are never to be played! Also, it is pretty hard to
convincingly de-modify a historical bowed instrument, since most of
these instruments have had their soundboards considerably thinned out!
Any other offers for Strads in active use in original condition?

All the best,

Sam


On 21 April 2012 23:57, Edward Mast nedma...@aol.com wrote:
 I think one or two may have survived un-modified (perhaps the Messiah?).  
 Also, Yo Yo Ma 'de-modified' one of his strad cellos (I believe I've read 
 this), reconfiguring it as a Baroque instrument.  (How much of a shame the 
 modifications are depends upon who you're talking with, of course).
 -Ned
 On Apr 21, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Sam Chapman wrote:

 Just for the record, I don't think any of those Stradivarius violins
 are in anything like their original condition. Which is a real shame.

 All the best,

 Sam

 On 20 April 2012 20:23, Herbert Ward wa...@physics.utexas.edu wrote:

 According to Wikipedia, there are many Strativarius violins
 in active use today:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Stradivarius_instruments

 But I never hear of anyone playing a historical lute routinely.
 In fact, it seems rare for anyone to even handle one.

 Is this because the thin soundboard becomes fragile with age?

 --



 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



 --
 Sam Chapman
 Oetlingerstrasse 65
 4057 Basel
 (0041) 79 530 39 91






-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Re: Why no active historical lutes?

2012-04-21 Thread Sam Chapman
Just for the record, I don't think any of those Stradivarius violins
are in anything like their original condition. Which is a real shame.

All the best,

Sam

On 20 April 2012 20:23, Herbert Ward wa...@physics.utexas.edu wrote:

 According to Wikipedia, there are many Strativarius violins
 in active use today:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Stradivarius_instruments

 But I never hear of anyone playing a historical lute routinely.
 In fact, it seems rare for anyone to even handle one.

 Is this because the thin soundboard becomes fragile with age?

 --



 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Re: What makes a good lute?

2012-04-07 Thread Sam Chapman
 / construction (again we need to
     be
      very
             careful: there are TWO 6 course lutes survived which tells
     us
      not
           much
             about the variety of 6 course instruments available to XVI
      century
             players)
             5. materials (I'd dare say that if it's nicely playable and
      have a
           good
             sound and looks beautiful, well, materials must have been
      selected
           the
             right way...)
             I don't care about the maker's reputation. If it's an
      investment,
           OK.
             If it's a music instrument, then the maker is not the first
      point
           on my
             list either.
             Very exciting conversation: I look forward to read other
      opinions
           :-)
             Thanks!
             Luca
      
           William Samson on 07/04/12 15.25 wrote:
           I haven't really got much to add to the subject line.  I've
     been
           chatting with Rob about this and various points have emerged
      I'd
      be
           interested in hearing what priorities you might put on the
      various
           characteristics of a lute in deciding if it's 'good' or
      otherwise.
           The kinds of things that have come up are (in no particular
      order):
             * playability (action, string spacing etc)
             * sound (which I can't easily define)
             * authenticity of design/construction
             * materials used
             * quality of craftsmanship
             * reputation of maker
           Of course these are rather broad headings and might easily be
         refined,
           clarified or broken down.
           Thoughts, please?
           Bill
           --
         To get on or off this list see list information at
      
      
     [1][2][3][8]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
           References
             1.
     [3][4][9]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      
         --
      
      References
      
         1. mailto:[5][10]l...@manassero.net
         2.
     [6][11]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
         3.
     [7][12]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      
      
      --
     References
      1. mailto:[13]jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr
      2. mailto:[14]l...@manassero.net
      3. [15]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      4. [16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      5. mailto:[17]l...@manassero.net
      6. [18]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
      7. [19]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

 References

   1. mailto:r.turov...@verizon.net
   2. mailto:eugene.kure...@gmail.com
   3. mailto:jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr
   4. mailto:l...@manassero.net
   5. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   6. mailto:jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr
   7. mailto:l...@manassero.net
   8. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   9. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  10. mailto:l...@manassero.net
  11. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  12. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  13. mailto:jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr
  14. mailto:l...@manassero.net
  15. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  16. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  17. mailto:l...@manassero.net
  18. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  19. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Re: Tree edition Goess Manuscript CD ROM question

2012-03-11 Thread Sam Chapman
Hi John,

The CD-Rom just contains an index, not images of all the pages. I
think there are some photos of the castle too...

All the best,

Sam

On 7 March 2012 22:07, John Lenti johnle...@hotmail.com wrote:
   Dear All,
   Has anyone purchased the Tree Edition publication The Goess
   Manuscripts: Music Manuscripts in Tablature from Ebenthal Castle,
   Klangenfurth, Carinthia, Austria. Music for Baroque Lute, Baroque
   Guitar, Theorbo, Viol. Index.? It's described in the OMI catalogue as
   Index, with CD ROM of the entire contents of the Goess Manuscripts,
   compiled by Douglas Alton Smith, Tim Crawford, Francois Pierre Goy,
   Claude Chauvel, David Ledbetter  Gordon Dodd. So, it includes a CD
   ROM, but the guy at OMI wasn't sure if this meant that the CD ROM
   included the entire contents of the Goess Mss, that is to say, images
   of every page of all of the books, which would be great, or if the CD
   ROM was an index itself, which would be far less interesting to me. He
   thought the latter more likely. Maybe one of you guys has it. Maybe one
   of you guys is one of the editors. Anyone?
   Thanks,
   John

   --


 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Re: RCH cases

2012-02-20 Thread Sam Chapman
Dear Stuart,

I bought an RCH case for my baroque guitar last year and had quite a
lot of trouble with it.
Firstly they made it too short, despite getting a clear plan of the
guitar from the maker. The head of my guitar is quite square but the
case was rounded, meaning that although I could force the guitar into
the case, it was not really safe for the instrument and I wasn't happy
about using it.
Secondly, the lid of the case wouldn't stay open on its own.
Thirdly, the handle was in the wrong place, causing the case to be
very poorly balanced. Standing up holding the case, the neck end would
be sticking up into the air and the body end almost touching the
ground.
My guitar maker complained to RCH about the case and they replaced it
for free (he was in Italy and was able to pick up the new case from
them directly). Though the new case has none of the old problems, it
lacks the secure clasp that the old one had (the old case had four
normal clasps, plus a stronger one which could be closed with a
padlock), and as a result it can't be closed to tightly and I'm not
sure if it will be as waterproof.
So, all in all I have the impression that these cases are rather
carelessly made. That said, they are certainly solid, though perhaps a
little heavier than Kingham cases. And they are MUCH cheaper! So, if
you need a strong case for a student lute it might be worth taking the
risk.

All the best,

Sam

On 16 February 2012 17:42, William Samson willsam...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
   I have had an RCH case for my 7c lute for the past ten years or so.
   It's fine.  If I had a criticism it is that the handle is a bit near to
   the bottom end and the case tends to dangle head down when I'm carrying
   it.  Easily fixed, if I could be bothered.

   Bill
   From: Roland Hayes rha...@legalaidbuffalo.org
   To: mcluckie stuart stuart.mcluc...@blueyonder.co.uk; Lutelist
   lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Thursday, 16 February 2012, 16:26
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: RCH cases
   I have one for my archlute from Paolo Busato and the case is fine. r
   -Original Message-
   From: [1]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [mailto:[2]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On
   Behalf Of mcluckie stuart
   Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:58 AM
   To: Lutelist
   Subject: [LUTE] RCH cases
     Can anyone advise me on buying an RCH case? I need to get mobile with
     my student lute and am willing to accept that it won't be as good as
   a
     Kingham case.
     Please email me off-list, if you think it's more appropriate.
     Cheers - Stuart McLuckie
     --
   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

 References

   1. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   2. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Re: Music for a While

2012-02-20 Thread Sam Chapman
I just happened to have it on my computer...I've sent it to you in a
seperate mail.

Hope it goes down well with the students!

Sam



On 20 February 2012 16:59,  be...@interlog.com wrote:
 Hi, folks - would anyone have a pdf of original music for Purcell's Music
 for a While that they could kindly send me, or direct me towards? I'm doing
 a lecture for high school students - yikes - and I want to show 'em some
 original basso continuo scores. There's nothing on the 'net that I've been
 able to find except modern scores. Thanks very much - Benjamin Stein

 -
 http://benjaminstein.ca/





 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Besard's Nova Testudo

2012-02-11 Thread Sam Chapman
Dear all,

Does anybody have a reliable translation from the Latin of Besard's
text describing the Nova Testudo in his Novus Partus. This text
doesn't seem to appear in the Isagoge. Translations into any language
accepted!

All the best,

Sam

-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: tuning software?

2012-02-05 Thread Sam Chapman
   I have the same problem on vista but I'd always assumed that was just a
   problem with my computer. I tend to use it more for producing notes
   than picking up notes that I play into it.

   On 5 February 2012 19:16, Craig Robert Pierpont
   [1]crpierp...@yahoo.com wrote:

Has anybody gotten this to work on Windows 7? It seems to run
 fine
   except that I can't get it to recognize any sound input.
   Craig
   Craig R. Pierpont
   Another Era Lutherie
   [2]www.anotherera.com
   --- On Sat, 2/4/12, Sam Chapman [3]manchap...@gmail.com wrote:
 From: Sam Chapman [4]manchap...@gmail.com

   Subject: [LUTE] Re: tuning software?

   To: David van Ooijen [5]davidvanooi...@gmail.com

 Cc: lutelist Net [6]Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Date: Saturday, February 4, 2012, 4:19 PM
  WinTemper is pretty good:
  [1][1][7]http://wintemper.com/

Best,
Sam
On 29 January 2012 17:41, David van Ooijen

[2][2][8]davidvanooi...@gmail.com wrote:
  It has come up, and I even had something installed on my
   computer
  once, but I lost all. Does anybody use tuning software for
   Windows
  and/or Mac, and if so, any feedback on the software used?
  David
  --
  ***
  David van Ooijen

[3][3][9]davidvanooi...@gmail.com

  [4][10]www.davidvanooijen.nl
  ***
  To get on or off this list see list information at


 [5][4][11]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

--
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91
--
 References

  1. [5][12]http://wintemper.com/
  2. mailto:[6][13]davidvanooi...@gmail.com
  3. mailto:[7][14]davidvanooi...@gmail.com
  4. [8][15]http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
  5.
 [9][16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html

 --
   References
 1. [17]http://wintemper.com/

   2. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=[18]davidvanooi...@gmail.com
   3. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=[19]davidvanooi...@gmail.com
   4. [20]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
   5. [21]http://wintemper.com/
   6. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=[22]davidvanooi...@gmail.com
   7. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=[23]davidvanooi...@gmail.com
   8. [24]http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
   9. [25]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. mailto:crpierp...@yahoo.com
   2. http://www.anotherera.com/
   3. mailto:manchap...@gmail.com
   4. mailto:manchap...@gmail.com
   5. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
   6. mailto:Lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   7. http://wintemper.com/
   8. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
   9. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
  10. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
  11. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  12. http://wintemper.com/
  13. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
  14. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
  15. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
  16. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  17. http://wintemper.com/
  18. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
  19. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
  20. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  21. http://wintemper.com/
  22. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
  23. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
  24. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
  25. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: tuning software?

2012-02-04 Thread Sam Chapman
   WinTemper is pretty good:
   [1]http://wintemper.com/
   Best,
   Sam

   On 29 January 2012 17:41, David van Ooijen
   [2]davidvanooi...@gmail.com wrote:

 It has come up, and I even had something installed on my computer
 once, but I lost all. Does anybody use tuning software for Windows
 and/or Mac, and if so, any feedback on the software used?
 David
 --
 ***
 David van Ooijen
 [3]davidvanooi...@gmail.com
 [4]www.davidvanooijen.nl
 ***
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [5]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. http://wintemper.com/
   2. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
   3. mailto:davidvanooi...@gmail.com
   4. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
   5. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Lute humidifiers

2011-03-08 Thread Sam Chapman
   If you go for a room humidifier, make sure you get one with a hygrostat
   built in, or buy a hygrostat separately. This will allow you to keep
   the humidity at a constant level, avoiding too much moisture in the air
   which can walls go mouldy (but will please your houseplants). Most
   humidifiers, if left on all the time, produce a higher level of
   humidity in a normal-size room than is necessary. I keep mine at 50%. I
   find that the sound of my instruments deteriorates if the humidity is
   much higher than that. Also, if you use gut strings then they will stay
   in tune better and last much longer if you avoid high levels of
   humidity. Unfortunately, most modern concert halls don't take this into
   account...
   Best,
   Sam

   On 7 March 2011 23:09, [1]dem...@suffolk.lib.ny.us wrote:

   Does anyone have any recommendations for a humidifier for lute.
   Would
   appreciate any advice - thanks.

 regulating the humidity of your home might be the best option; all
 your
 instruments, your furniture, pets, people will all benefit.
 Mildew is the enemy, and the smaller the case the more likely it is
 to go
 mildew.
 Talk to music stores which deal with serious students of violin,
 cello,
 and piano, all of which have comercial solutions for humidification.
 --
 Dana Emery

   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. mailto:dem...@suffolk.lib.ny.us
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Theorbo strings

2010-12-21 Thread Sam Chapman
   Hi Caius,
   I absolutely agree with David - there is nothing better than a gut
   strung theorbo and it's much easier to keep under control than a gut
   strung lute. Also, unless you have an enormous instrument, the highest
   strings will not be as thin as they get on a lute, so there will be
   less chance of them breaking unexpectedly or wearing out during a
   concert. Are you still using wound strings for the low basses? These
   should be the first to go! I liked the old Sofracob double-twist gut
   for the basses, but since you can't get it now Gamut basses might be a
   good option. On the fingerboard I normally use Aquila half-rectified
   for strings 1-4, Aquila Venice for string 5 and Stoppani high-twist for
   string 6 (or a wound string for later repertoire). But I'm still
   experimenting with other strings, especially for the trebles.
   The problem with Nylon is that it sounds sweet but lacks the overtones
   and brightness of gut, so it doesn't project so well (as David points
   out). I don't have much experience with Carbon, but I imagine the
   thinness of the higher strings could make them unpleasant to play and
   the sound lacks depth and quality. The flexibility of Nylgut always
   gives me the impression that the tension of the string is lower than it
   actually is - after playing on real gut for a couple of years, I don't
   feel that nylgut is a very good substitute anymore. Perhaps New Nylgut
   will be more convincing?
   Looking forward to playing together in the summer...
   Sam

   On 19 December 2010 10:01, hera caius [1]caiush2...@yahoo.com wrote:

   Hello lutenists,
   As I played theorbo really a lot this months, I started to wonder
 about
   the sound of the strings. In this moment I use some Nylon and
 carbon in
   the high registers and some copper on the basses and it sounds
 really
   good but the basses sounds too long and the tension of the treble
   strings is too low.
   Can anyone give me some ideas what kind of strings I can try (with
   sound closer to gut), and where can I buy?
   Thank you.
   --
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. mailto:caiush2...@yahoo.com
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: lute strings

2010-12-18 Thread Sam Chapman
   For Aquila I use [1]stringking.net. They are reliable, don't charge a
   fortune for postage, and offer a discount for large orders...

   On 17 December 2010 19:15, nigelsolomon
   [2]nigelsolo...@btinternet.com wrote:

 Could anyone tell where the best (cheapest!) place to order lute
 strings from is in the UK? I need mainly aquila and Pyramid.
 Thanks
 Nigel
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. http://stringking.net/
   2. mailto:nigelsolo...@btinternet.com
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Galilei Fuga a l'unisono

2010-12-13 Thread Sam Chapman
   Dear Lutenists,
   Has anyone successfully performed Galilei's Fuga a l'unisono from Il
   Fronimo? The piece starts well, but if you play the canon as written
   you end up with some pretty bizarre harmonies towards the middle/end of
   the piece. If anyone has worked out where the errors are or come up
   with a version that works, please let me know!
   Thanks,
   Sam
   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: tying two strings together (in process of changing from 407Hz to 392)?

2010-11-24 Thread Sam Chapman

 __
   De : Guy Smith [2]guy_m_sm...@comcast.net
   A : Anthony Hind [3]agno3ph...@yahoo.com
   EnvoyA(c) le : Lun 22 novembre 2010, 18h 33min 07s
   Objet : RE: [LUTE] Re: tying two strings of different thickness
   together?
   I agree. The grapevine knot works best when the sizes are roughly
   equal. Fortunately, I've never had to extend a loaded string.

 
 ___
   From: Anthony Hind [mailto:[4]agno3ph...@yahoo.com]
   Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 8:58 AM
   To: Guy Smith
   Subject: Re : [LUTE] Re: tying two strings of different thickness
   together?
   Thanks Guy
  One of the two ropes could be a loaded one, and so probably
 not
   supple enough to participate in a double knot. The sheet bend knot
   might be all I can manage, but for other strings I will try your
   suggestion.
   Regards
   Anthony
   PS I see there animated knot examples, that make things fairly
   foolproof.

 
 ___
   De : Guy Smith [5]guy_m_sm...@comcast.net
   A : [6]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu; Anthony Hind
 [7]agno3ph...@yahoo.com
   EnvoyA(c) le : Lun 22 novembre 2010, 17h 18min 57s
   Objet : RE: [LUTE] Re: tying two strings of different thickness
   together?
   I use a grapevine knot. I learned that in my rock-climbing days as
 a
   bombproof way to tie into a rope. Probably overkill, but if it can
 hold
   a
   twenty foot leader fall, it should be able to handle a lute
 string:-)
   FWIW, the traditional knot for joining two lengths of fishing line
 is a
   blood knot, which would be another possibility. I tend to avoid
 square
   knots. They can easily be turned into a cats paw knot, which isn't
   secure at
   all.
   Here's a good reference for all sorts of knots:
   [1][8]http://www.layhands.com/Knots/Knots_KnotsIndex.htm
   Guy
   -Original Message-
   From: [2][9]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [mailto:[3][10]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
   Of Martyn Hodgson
   Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 8:05 AM
   To: [4][11]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu; Anthony Hind
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: tying two strings of different thickness
 together?
   I use a reef knot - but secured with a drop of super glue
 --- On Mon, 22/11/10, Anthony Hind [5][12]agno3ph...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
   From: Anthony Hind [6][13]agno3ph...@yahoo.com
   Subject: [LUTE] tying two strings of different thickness
 together?
   To: [7][14]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Date: Monday, 22 November, 2010, 15:28
 Dear All
   I may need to lengthen a string which does not quite
 reach
 the
 peg, but goes well beyond the nut. I would like to attach it
 to a
 slightly thinner short piece of gut to reach the peg in
 question.
   I
 remember that Stephen Gottlieb had done that for several
 strings
   on
 my
 lute; but I can no longer remember the type of knot he used.
 Can
 anyone
 advise me, or tell me of a page where this knot is
 described.
 Regards
 Anthony
 --
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [1][8][15]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 --
   References
 1. [9][16]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   --
 References
   1. [17]http://www.layhands.com/Knots/Knots_KnotsIndex.htm
   2. mailto:[18]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. mailto:[19]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   4. mailto:[20]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   5. mailto:[21]agno3ph...@yahoo.com
   6. mailto:[22]agno3ph...@yahoo.com
   7. mailto:[23]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   8. [24]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
   9. [25]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. mailto:agno3ph...@yahoo.com
   2. mailto:guy_m_sm...@comcast.net
   3. mailto:agno3ph...@yahoo.com
   4. mailto:agno3ph...@yahoo.com
   5. mailto:guy_m_sm...@comcast.net
   6. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   7. mailto:agno3ph...@yahoo.com
   8. http://www.layhands.com/Knots/Knots_KnotsIndex.htm
   9. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  10. mailto:lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  11. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  12. mailto:agno3ph...@yahoo.com
  13. mailto:agno3ph...@yahoo.com
  14. mailto:lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  15. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  16. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html
  17. http://www.layhands.com/Knots

[LUTE] Re: Theorbo treatises

2010-11-01 Thread Sam Chapman
   Dear Shaun,



   I was just looking for these as well. As far as I know there are no
   translations, but Bartolomi, Fleury and Grenerin are more or less
   understandable from their music examples alone (helped by a very basic
   knowledge of French).

   Are you looking for Campion's 1716 treatise (in which he talks about
   harmony and accompaniment in general) or the Addition au traite
   d'accompaniment  from 1730 (which is much larger, and contains more
   specific info about theorbo, lute and guitar)? If the latter, there is
   an article by Kevin Mason: Franc,ois Campions Secret of Accompaniment
   for the Theorbo, Guitar and Lute. This is in Journal of LSA, Vol XIV
   (1981). Mason sums up Campion's main points.

   You can find a modern edition of Grenerin here:
   [1]http://luthlibrairie.free.fr/?Baroque:Fran%26ccedil%3Baise

   I think there might be some mistakes in it, but I haven't been able to
   get hold of the facsimile to check it. In LSA Journal Vol XIX (1986)
   you can find a review of the facsimile edition, again by Kevin Mason,
   which contains some interesting information.



   Good luck, and let me know if you find anything else!



   Sam





   2010/10/30 Shaun Ng [2]shaunk...@gmail.com

   Dear All,
   Does anyone happen to know if there are English translations of
 the
   following treatises and if they are available (either original or
   translation) online?
   Angelo Michele Bartolotti: Table pour apprendre facilement `a
 toucher
   le theorbe sur la basse-continue (Paris, 1669)
   Franc,ois Campion: Traite d'accompagnement et de composition selon
 la
   regle des octaves de musique, op.2 (Paris, 1716/R)
   Henry Grenerin: Livre de theorbe contenant plusieurs pieces sur
   differents tons, avec une nouvelle methode tres facile pour
 apprendre
   `a jouer sur la partie les basses continues et toutes sortes dairs
   Thanks very much in advance.
   Shaun
   --
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. http://luthlibrairie.free.fr/?Baroque:Fran%26ccedil%3Baise
   2. mailto:shaunk...@gmail.com
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Thumb under

2010-11-01 Thread Sam Chapman
   Hi Ned,



   This is a sticky topic and players tend to deal with it in different
   ways. If the kind of music you're playing is made up almost entirely of
   runs but contains the odd 3 voice chord, it's probably best to set up
   your hand/arm/lute position to prioritise the p-i runs, i.e. keep the
   lute and right arm as horizontal as possible. With the lute and hand
   like this, your thumb will probably most naturally pass inside your
   middle finger. However, if what you're playing contains a lot of 3 or 4
   note chords, I find that a slightly less horizontal position allows me
   to get a clearer sound with all the fingers. In this case my thumb
   might pass either inside or outside my middle finger, or possibly, as
   you said, move opposite or even collide with it. I think it's generally
   better to avoid letting fingers collide with each other, but you should
   be guided by the sound and comfort of the hands, rather than a
   principle. It will also depend on the length of your fingers and
   thumb. The main thing is to find a good position for the lute, arm and
   hand, then let the fingers move naturally. There is no point trying to
   force the thumb or a finger to move in a direction it simply doesn't
   want to go in!



   I wonder if that helps at all? Good luck!



   Sam

   On 1 November 2010 15:37, Edward Mast [1]nedma...@aol.com wrote:

 When playing a single line with t-i, it is clear that the thumb
 finishes its stroke under the first finger.  But not so clear to me
 is the position of the thumb relative to the second finger when two
 note chords are interspersed with the single line.  Does the thumb
 finish its stroke under the second finger, or in line with - perhaps
 touching - the end of the first finger?
 Relevant here, I guess, is the position of the thumb and second
 finger at the start of the two note chord.  Are they in opposition,
 or is the second finger stretched out beyond the thumb, so that it
 strikes its string at a point farther from the bridge than the thumb
 strikes its string?
 (For lutenists the phrase rule of thumb takes on a new meaning!).
 Thanks,  Ned
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. mailto:nedma...@aol.com
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: beginner help required for thumb under technique

2010-10-21 Thread Sam Chapman
   Dear Morgan, Franz, and Ned,



   I'm glad I could be of some help! If you don't have a teacher it can
   sometimes take years to find solutions to relatively simple problems,
   so by passing on things that Hoppy told me I hope to be able to speed
   up the process a bit!

   The guitar videos are indeed supposed to be thumb out! As far as I
   know, baroque guitar was never played thumb-in. But it's true, my thumb
   doesn't extend as much as it probably should. I find it quite hard to
   keep my little finger on the soundboard, keep the thumb out AND make a
   nice sound. These videos were made a few years ago though, so maybe I'd
   manage it better now...In any case, when I play chords with the thumb
   and fingers, I don't think you ever see the fingers passing over the
   thumb (which for me more or less defines thumb-in technique).



   All the best,



   Sam



   On 20 October 2010 17:30, Edward Mast [1]nedma...@aol.com wrote:

   Having spent some time reading and rereading - and trying - the
   suggestions made in his response to Morgan, I want to thank Sam for
   such a clear and useful analysis of RH technique.  For over a year,
   I've been working at moving from thumb over to thumb under in the right
   hand (without a teacher's guidance) and Sam's observations will be
   helpful.  His last sentence was encouraging:  . . .even with a good
   teacher it can take years to develop healthy technical habits.  I say
   encouraging, for I was beginning to view my efforts as hopelessly
   inept.  Inept, yes, but perhaps not hopeless!
   Thanks, Sam, and your improvisations in Morley's consort lessons are a
   delight.
   Ned
   On Oct 19, 2010, at 10:52 AM, mc41mc wrote:
  Dear Sam,
   
  I didn't watch the theorbo vids, but the baroque guitar is
   thumb-in,
  isn't it?  Sure looks that way.  It also looks like your thumb and
  index occupy some of the same space on occasion, or at least they
   would
  if they were playing on the same course.  I suppose in that case
   you
  would pull your thumb back a bit, and have a bit more
   thumb-in/under
  and less thumb above (above because it's not really out/over or
  in/under, it's pretty much directly above).  For playing chords
  (without rolling) it seems to help to pull the thumb back a little
  also.  I'm still away from my lute but have been experimenting with
   a
  parlor guitar that's around here.
   
  Unnatural may be ok in this circumstance, but after decades of
   guitar
  playing and trying hard to play naturally, pulling my thumb way
   from
  my index finger and pointing it more toward the soundboard feels
   odd.
  When I watch lute players the plucking hand often looks very
  comfortable, except sometimes the thumb position looks tiring.  I'm
  just trying to get off to a reasonably good start and not develop
   any
  bad habits, and get a nice tone.  When I watch Nigel North, he
   seems to
  be under, over, and above depending on what he is playing.  But
   other
  players, not so much.
  Thanks again for the advice,
  morgan
   
   __
   
  From: Sam Chapman [2]manchap...@gmail.com
  To: mc41mc [3]mc4...@yahoo.com
  Cc: [4]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  Sent: Tue, October 19, 2010 5:43:07 AM
  Subject: Re: [LUTE] beginner help required for thumb under
   technique
  Hi Morgan,
  Glad you found it helpful! It's sometimes a good idea to kind of
  flatten the thumb, i.e. turn it downwards towards the lute.
   Classical
  guitarists tend to have a habit of sort of plucking up from the
   string,
  and this won't sound good. If what you're doing feels a bit
   unnatural
  that might be a good sign - shows that you're not just repeating
   your
  old guitar habits!
  Using the thumb/index is a bit like using a pick, but a really big
  squashy sort of pick that covers both strings of the course!
  As for the videos, I'm glad you liked them, but don't copy the
  technique I use on the baroque guitar and theorbo ones (that's
   supposed
  to be thumb-out!). If you're really stuck, you could make your own
  YouTube video, post it to the list and ask for comments!
  All the best,
  Sam
  On 19 October 2010 03:28, mc41mc [1][5]mc4...@yahoo.com wrote:
   
  Dear Sam,
   
  Thank you so much for the detailed response.  I need to re-read it
   and
  I am away from my lute, but already it is very helpful.
   
  I think I need to use more of the tip of my thumb (i.e. point it
   more
  toward the soundboard) and less of the side (pointing toward the
   head
  stock), and contact the second string of the course sooner.
   Orienting
  my thumb this way, more perpendicluar to the strings, feels a
   little
  unatural to me so I was hesitant to do it.  Also, I think I was a
  little

[LUTE] Re: beginner help required for thumb under technique

2010-10-19 Thread Sam Chapman
   Hi Morgan,
   Glad you found it helpful! It's sometimes a good idea to kind of
   flatten the thumb, i.e. turn it downwards towards the lute. Classical
   guitarists tend to have a habit of sort of plucking up from the string,
   and this won't sound good. If what you're doing feels a bit unnatural
   that might be a good sign - shows that you're not just repeating your
   old guitar habits!
   Using the thumb/index is a bit like using a pick, but a really big
   squashy sort of pick that covers both strings of the course!
   As for the videos, I'm glad you liked them, but don't copy the
   technique I use on the baroque guitar and theorbo ones (that's supposed
   to be thumb-out!). If you're really stuck, you could make your own
   YouTube video, post it to the list and ask for comments!
   All the best,
   Sam

   On 19 October 2010 03:28, mc41mc [1]mc4...@yahoo.com wrote:

   Dear Sam,

   Thank you so much for the detailed response.  I need to re-read it and
   I am away from my lute, but already it is very helpful.

   I think I need to use more of the tip of my thumb (i.e. point it more
   toward the soundboard) and less of the side (pointing toward the head
   stock), and contact the second string of the course sooner.   Orienting
   my thumb this way, more perpendicluar to the strings, feels a little
   unatural to me so I was hesitant to do it.  Also, I think I was a
   little bit mislead by how much thumb-index scale passages resemble
   using a pick, and so assumed that the thumb could plant on a single
   string and then push through to the second string, similar to a pick.

   I enjoyed the youtube clip you gave.  It was hard to see your hands in
   detail, but I could get a good sense of how you hold the lute.  I got a
   pretty good look at your hands in some of your baroque guitar clips
   which were very nice.

   Thanks again,
   morgan
 __

   From: Sam Chapman [2]manchap...@gmail.com
   To: m cornwall [3]mc4...@yahoo.com; [4]lute-cs.dartmouth.edu
   [5]l...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   Sent: Mon, October 18, 2010 12:13:18 PM
   Subject: Re: [LUTE] beginner help required for thumb under technique
   Dear Morgan,
   Here are a few tips about RH technique on the lute (most of which I
   picked up during my lessons with Hopkinson Smith...):
   Firstly, I think most players find it much harder to get a good tone
   from the thumb than from the fingers - it's something that even the
   best players have to continually work on, so don't be disheartened! If
   the sound is harsh it may simply be because the the skin on your thumb
   is rough. Just as modern guitarists are obsessive about the
   shape/smoothness of their nails, lutenists soon realise how much
   difference the state of the fingertips makes to the sound produced. You
   may consider avoiding doing lots of manual work (gardening, working
   with tools, chopping wood etc), wearing gloves in cold weather, evading
   doing the washing up, using hand creams, etc...during periods when you
   plan to play the lute a lot.
   If the strings are buzzing against each other or the frets, it might be
   worth checking that your lute is set up really well. If the string
   spacing is very narrow, or the tension is very low this might cause
   buzzing. Also, if the frets are old or not quite the right guage you
   might get similar problems. The best thing would be to get this checked
   out by an experienced player or maker, otherwise you might waste a lot
   of time!
   As for the stroke itself, you might consider the following:
   1. At the start of the stroke, try to have contact with both strings of
   the course. You can practice this by planting the thumb on the course
   and feeling both strings under your thumb, without pushing them towards
   each other.
   2. The most important thing about getting a good sound with the thumb
   is to allow the arm to move freely. At the beginning you might want to
   take your little finger off the soundboard, and make thumb strokes
   where you simply put the thumb on the course (as above) then allow the
   weight of the arm to bring the thumb through the strings from the elbow
   (keeping the wrist, hand, and thumb more or less as a unit). Do this
   with big exaggerated movements at the beginning, until the arm feels
   very free. You can also simply strum through all the courses like this.
   This can be very hard for guitarists, since the elbow is more or less
   locked in place most of the time on the classical guitar.
   3. Once the arm is free and moveable you can put your little finger
   back on the soundboard and do the same kind of thing, obviously making
   less exaggerated movements. But generous arm movements are generally
   very good (you only need to make smaller movements when you start
   playing very fast passages). Your little finger and wrist need to be
   quite flexible, otherwise the arm can't move.
   4

[LUTE] Re: beginner help required for thumb under technique

2010-10-18 Thread Sam Chapman
 position (and lute
   position!). However much you change what your fingers do, if you hold
   the lute at a similar angle to how you would hold a guitar, and your
   right hand approaches it at a similar angle, you will never develop a
   good thumb-in technique. Your right hand needs to approach the
   instrument at a much less acute angle, ideally so that the right
   arm/wrist passes more or less over the bridge. You can achieve this by
   either dropping the right shoulder as much as possible (popular, but
   not advised!) or by finding a way to raise the lute so that your arm
   aproaches it naturally at a less acute angle. Some players use a
   footstool for the right foot, others sit on a very low chair, some
   suspend the lute in mid air with a strap...I personally use a little
   cushion on my right leg to raise the lute. The smaller the instrument,
   the bigger the problem! The lute should also be held at a less steep
   angle than a modern guitar. When you get these geometrical problems
   sorted out, the chances are that your right hand will fall more or less
   naturally in the correct place and you won't have problems avoiding
   your thumb and fingers clashing. It shouldn't be an effort to avoid
   them bumping into each other - the position of the body and the
   instrument should simply make it more or less impossible (unless you
   have a very long thumb or very short fingers!).
   I hope this helps a bit. As you can see, this is a very large topic and
   even with a good teacher it can take years to develop healthy technical
   habits. Good luck!
   All the best,
   Sam
   P.S. You can judge me thumb technique for yourself here:
   [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnpaOTGrG2M

   On 11 October 2010 15:50, m cornwall [2]mc4...@yahoo.com wrote:

   Howdy,
   I am now the proud owner of a lovely Barber and Harris 7 course
 student
   lute.   I have played the guitar for years, but the lute is new to
 me.
   I have been studying lute technique as I best can from home, using
   books, the internet and some DVDs I have.  I have yet to find an
   available teacher anywhere near me.
   I have a number of things to sort out, but the most pressing at
 the
   moment is my thumb-under technique.  I can get a nice tone from my
   fingers, but the tone produced by my thumb is harsh.  I suspect
 the
   courses are either bumping into each other or the frets, but it is
 also
   just the way the thumb engages the strings.  So I am looking for
 advice
   on the proper thumb stroke.  Most of the videos I have, such Ronn
   McFarlane's Mel Bay video, show the hands from front on.  I have
 yet to
   find a video shot from above and behind the player which might be
   helpful.  (just found this ukulele thumb under video:
   [1][3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Bab_tC20K4)
   My nails are short.  I believe that my hand position is reasonably
   close to where it should be (i.e. it's not in the classical guitar
   position).
   Obviously the lute requires a much lighter thumb stroke than used
 on
   the guitar, but even when I use a light strike the sound produced
 by my
   thumb is not at all as pleasant as the sound when using my
 fingers.
   Does the thumb stroke primarily come from the main thumb joint?
 When
   playing scales the arm seems to come into use as well.  But what
 about
   the last joint on the thumb?  Players preference?
   Does the thumb begin it's stroke only touching 1 string of a
 course,
   similar to a guitar, or does it rest on both strings, more like
 the
   fingers?
   Is the general direction of the tip of the thumb down,
 perpendicular to
   the strings, or somewhat angled, down and away from the neck?
   Is the portion of the thumb that touches the strings the side,
 mainly
   the side with a bit of the curve of the tip, mostly on the curve
 of the
   tip (where the nail ends), or something else?
   When playing chords, my thumb is much happier when rolling chords.
   When striking all the courses simultaneously, my thumb is more
 likely
   to run out of space and collide with my index finger.
   Thank you in advance for any advice,
   morgan
   --
 References
   1. [4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Bab_tC20K4
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [5]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnpaOTGrG2M
   2. mailto:mc4...@yahoo.com
   3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Bab_tC20K4
   4. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Bab_tC20K4
   5. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Thomas Campion

2010-09-29 Thread Sam Chapman
   Thanks to Ron and Howard for your help.
   The question is becoming more complicated: as far as I can work out,
   Campion published a Traite d'accompagnement (1716) and an Addition
   au traite d'accompagnement (1730). I think that the detailed
   descriptions of accompanying on theorbo, lute and guitar are in the
   latter. According to Nigel North's bibliography in Continuo
   Playing the Campion in question was Francois, but in the more
   recent Fuzeau Methodes  Traites Basse Continue both works are
   attributed to Thomas (hence the whoops). So, in addition to helping me
   find a translation, can anyone tell me which Campion we're talking
   about?!
   Thanks again for your suggestions,
   Sam

   On 28 September 2010 17:24, howard posner [1]howardpos...@ca.rr.com
   wrote:

   On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:12 AM, Ron Andrico wrote:
There
  is a _Traite d'accompagnement_ by one Francois Campion (1716), and
  there is _The Art of Descant, or Composing Musick in Parts_ by
   Thomas
  Campion published by Playford (1674).  My guess is that you are
   seeking
  the former, which is (I think) available from Minkoff.

 The Minkoff is a facsimile with no English translation.  But there's
 very little text, and most of it is pretty obvious if you have any
 knowledge of continuo coming in.

   To get on or off this list see list information at
   [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. mailto:howardpos...@ca.rr.com
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Thomas Campion

2010-09-28 Thread Sam Chapman
   Hi all,



   Does anyone know where I can get an English (or at least German)
   translation of Thomas Campion's continuo treatise, preferably with his
   descriptions of chords written out in staff notation or tablature?



   Thanks!



   Sam
   -
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Translate Italiano pioverin?

2010-09-10 Thread Sam Chapman
   Garbled version of poverino (poor one)?

   On 8 September 2010 06:38, howard posner [1]howardpos...@ca.rr.com
   wrote:

 Small rain?
  Drizzle?
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. mailto:howardpos...@ca.rr.com
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] RIP Sofracob fretgut

2010-09-07 Thread Sam Chapman
   Dear lutelist,
   Sofracob used to make great fretgut: strong, consistant (I even used it
   as a string in several emergencies!), available in long lengths, and
   cheap. Now that it's no longer available, does anyone know a good
   alternative? I've tried Aquila but the gut was hopelessly soft and wore
   out or broke very quickly. Old strings can work, but sometimes they are
   worn down too much or weakened, and there are always a few guages I
   don't have...
   Any tips?
   Thanks a lot,
   Sam
   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Bermudo translation?

2010-06-22 Thread Sam Chapman
   Does anybody know if there is a translation of Bermudo's treatise into
   English or German? Or at least bits of it?



   Thanks!



   Sam

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Bermudo translation?

2010-06-22 Thread Sam Chapman

Dear Thomas,

Thanks very much! I found it in the LSA journal, 1995/6.

All the best,

Sam


- Original Message - 
From: Thomas Schall lauten...@lautenist.de

To: Sam Chapman manchap...@gmail.com
Cc: Lutelist lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Bermudo translation?



There has been one in one of the journals of the lute society.
Take a look at their website

Thomas

Sam Chapman schrieb:

   Does anybody know if there is a translation of Bermudo's treatise into
   English or German? Or at least bits of it?



   Thanks!



   Sam

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html









[LUTE] Ferrabosco Miserere

2010-06-03 Thread Sam Chapman
   Dear Lutenists,



   Has anyone ever been able to locate a Miserere plainsong (or any other
   cantus firmus for that matter) in Ferrabosco's Miserere (Dd.2.11,
   ff.22v-23)? I've looked for it for hours, but to no avail...



   Thanks for your help!



   Sam

   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Another lute Masters concert...

2010-06-03 Thread Sam Chapman
   Dear Lutenists,



   I will give my Master's concert at the Schola Cantorum Basiliensis
   (Kleiner Saal), Basel on Monday 7th June, 7.30pm. Any lutenists in the
   area are very welcome to come!

   The programme consists of a selection of solos, duets, and consort
   pieces by Ferrabosco, Collard, Danyel, Allison etc. from the Matthew
   Holmes lute manuscripts, plus one song from Danyel's printed
   book. Also performing will be my mixed consort The Queen's Revels and
   the lutenist Ryosuke Sakamoto. 7-course lutes by Thompson and Jacobsen,
   strung up in all gut!



   Send me an email directly for more details!



   All the best,



   Sam





   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: John Donne

2009-01-24 Thread Sam Chapman
   There are 2 exquisite settings of An Hymn to God the Father (Willst
   thou forgive that sin...), one by Hilton (perhaps commissioned by
   Donne himself?) and another by Pelham Humfrey. Nigel North and Paul
   Hillier have recorded the Hilton along with some other Donne settings
   on The Rags of Time.
   Sam

   2009/1/24 David Tayler [1]vidan...@sbcglobal.net

 The Expiration springs to mind, Ferrabosco.
 dt
 At 01:59 PM 6/16/2008, you wrote:
 Dear Wisdom,
 
 What lute and voice settings are there of poems by John Donne (a
 long-time
 favourite poet of mine)? I'm also interested in settings for viols
 and voice
 or voices.
 
 Rob MacKillop
 
 --
 
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [2]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. mailto:vidan...@sbcglobal.net
   2. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/%7Ewbc/lute-admin/index.html



[LUTE] Re: Morley consort lessons

2009-01-14 Thread Sam Chapman
Dear Jean-Marie,

this is fantastic, thanks!

I haven't printed yet, but I'm sure the scores will be readable...

all the best,

Sam

On 13/01/2009, Jean-Marie Poirier jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
 Sam;
 I have uploaded a zip file with photos of the complete Treble Viol Book
 (Morley, 1611) done after my photocopies. I think they are big enough to be
 used for reading or printing.
 You can get the file by clicking there : http://le.luth.free.fr/Morley.htm
 Then, just right click on the link and save as a zip file on your hard disk.

 Hope it helps !

 Best wishes,

 Jean-Marie

 === 13-01-2009 00:17:22 ===


   Does anyone have a facsimile copy of the treble viol part for the
   Morley consort lessons? It's missing from EEBO and various microfilm
   collections...any leads would be much appreciated!
   Also, Ian Harwood will be giving a lecture on the mixed consort at the
   Schola Cantorum in Basel this Thursday at 6pm. As part of the lecture,
   my group Microcosmos will be making their debut performance. On the
   following Friday and Saturday Ian will be coaching the group and
   listeners are very welcome!
   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
---
Orange vous informe que cet  e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail.
Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.



 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

 jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr
 http://poirierjm.free.fr
 13-01-2009






-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Morley consort lessons

2009-01-12 Thread Sam Chapman
   Does anyone have a facsimile copy of the treble viol part for the
   Morley consort lessons? It's missing from EEBO and various microfilm
   collections...any leads would be much appreciated!
   Also, Ian Harwood will be giving a lecture on the mixed consort at the
   Schola Cantorum in Basel this Thursday at 6pm. As part of the lecture,
   my group Microcosmos will be making their debut performance. On the
   following Friday and Saturday Ian will be coaching the group and
   listeners are very welcome!
   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Morley consort lessons

2009-01-12 Thread Sam Chapman
   Thanks Diego, this is an interesting resource. The consort pieces seem
   to be more like arrangements than exact transcriptions of the original
   versions though.
   All the best,
   Sam

   2009/1/13 Diego Cantalupi [1]cantal...@tin.it

 Hi Sam,
 perhaps you already know that here you can find a modern edition:
 [2]http://sca.uwaterloo.ca/Hendricks/
 Ciao,
 Diego

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91
   --

References

   1. mailto:cantal...@tin.it
   2. http://sca.uwaterloo.ca/Hendricks/


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Kapsberger Canarios

2008-10-28 Thread Sam Chapman
Here's a tip: Farewell to Stromness is great on theorbo!

2008/10/28 Steve Ramey [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   Dear Collected Wisdom,
   I just heard a fellow playing a baroque guitar solo on the radio.  It
   was something called Arpegiatt and Canarios, by Kapsberger.  The
   Canarios sounded rather similar to the modern piano piece, Farewell to
   Stromness, which we may know as a guitar piece.  I've thought for a
   long time it might be interesting on the lute.
   Anybody know anything about this one?
   TIA,
   Steve

   --


 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Re: Tune the tuna - Part II

2008-10-28 Thread Sam Chapman
Double sided sticky tape is also great for holding down wooden tastini
(even permanent tastini or on the body frets). I normally use little
bits of fret gut and normal sticky tape though - I've often left them
on for a month or so and never had any problems with sticky marks.
The guage of gut for the tastino should usually be the same (or
possibly .05mm larger) as used for the fret it's behind. Cutting such
small pieces of gut sometimes flattens the ends which can cause
buzzing and roughness under your fingers when playing - I use a cable
cutting tool (available in all good bike shops!). This cuts the fret
simultaneously from all sides, so it doesn't get flattened.
If your lute is permanently in meantone (or any other temperament) you
can get a lute maker to reset the body frets. This is quick and easily
done (though it may not be wise!).

Sam


2008/10/28 Omer katzir [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 So, few days ego (i think it was Sunday, not what day it is today...) I
 received the Super Duper Sonic Tuner as some of you recommended.

 A great tuner, but I really need tips to use it, I'm still used to my old
 needle tuner, I always used them and now all the flashing lights confusing
 me. I read the instruction manual, it is great becuase now I know how to
 change temperaments, cents, save, delete, backlight etc.
 But I'm not really sure how to tune, the manual fails to explain it (at
 least for me) in nice and clear way.

 For now i don't care about flats and sharps, I just want it to tune, when
 I'll get used to it, I'll think some more. But how, in the name of the great
 Henry the VIII, I know if my string is tuned? So any one with this nice
 tuner (and it really nice) please help me.

 The second part of my tuning trilogy goes to the temperament. I have decided
 1/6 Comma for my first test. according to LSA i need Tastino which i guess
 supposed to be an extra fret (had little time to read) and i don't have one
 for now, I only have the frets already on my lute, i can try other
 temperament that not requires it, like the Mersenne's Spinet #1, Kepler #2
 but from what i see, they are... different from what i want to try. so
 again, suggestions will be gladly excepted.
 Other problem i have, are the 10th-12th frets, they are on the lute body,
 how should i handle that problem?

 My lute is a 7c, 61cm and it is now tuned to Equal Temperament, I have 9
 frets on the neck and three more on the body.

 Thank you again and again

 Omer Katzir



 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-06 Thread Sam Chapman
Dear Martyn,

Thanks for the useful information and sources for cittern tunings. You
did indeed explain what kind of flute was used in your first message -
I was actually asking that question to Martin Shepherd! Your response
was nevertheless interesting!
As for the Morley pieces - the only one which seems imply a flute with
a different tessituta is Joyne Hands. This goes up to a high G (none
of the other pieces go above a D in the flute). I think the other
Morley pieces are in exactly the same range as the rest of the pieces
in the publication (Allison etc...).

Thanks to everyone else for their comments too!

Sam

2008/10/5 Martyn Hodgson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 A few sources that come to mind include:

 1. LS Booklet by Gill (1977)page 7:

 Praetorius small english cittern string stop c. 35cm tuned
 f bflat' d g or f a' d g Also same tuning for 'gittern' an octave lower 
 as below: evidence of 'gittern' in Payford's 1652 publication as suggesting 
 mid/late 17thC  citterns tuned as four course guitars and name gittern 
 applied to them

 2. NRI current historical notes on cittern strings extract In 1602 Meuler 
 was able to produce an even stronger wire, which allowed the small cittern to 
 tune up to g and some English players tuned it to gittern or ocatave- lute 
 tuning
 Segerman then goes onto to speak about Payford's later instrument using the 
 same intervals similar to outlined in 1 above.

 3. Ward 'Sprightly and Cheerful Music' 1981 tunings page 11, 12. Ward's 
 extended paper contains a number of references to cittern/gittern (eg Sir 
 Peter Leycester's remarks  we...do call a gitterne, which is only a treble 
 Psittyrne.. and similar such as Rowbotham's 1569 publication)

 I hope you didn't read to earlier email that I was advocating such an 
 instrument in this repertoire!  My own knowledge of the cittern is  limited 
 and if you've anything to add, or correct, on cittern sizes, tunings, pitches 
 etc for the 'Rroken Consort' I'd be delighted to hear it.

 MH


  --- On Sun, 5/10/08, Doc Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: Doc Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Broken consort
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Lute List lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Date: Sunday, 5 October, 2008, 10:14 AM
 On Oct 5, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Martyn Hodgson wrote:

  More recently the gittern tuning (with highest string
 on the first
  course at g') seems to have found favour

 Which tuning is this?







 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-06 Thread Sam Chapman
Thanks for all the advice on Flutes and other things. I'll definitely
look up Bob Marvin's article.
Ian also let me have a peek at a draft version of Chapter 13...I agree
with you Stuart - it's going to be a fantastic book and just the kind
of incredibly thorough study this repertoire needs.
Thanks for pointing out the inadequacy of the term Broken Consort
Ron. Confusing as it is, I decided to use the term when starting this
discussion because it's still the one most people are familiar with,
and I wanted to hear as many peoples comments about this repertoire as
possible!

All the best,

Sam


2008/10/6 Ron Andrico [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   Dear Stewart  All:

   I thought the term 'Broken Consort' had long ago been abandoned in
   favor of 'Consort of Six' or something less confusing.

   Best wishes,

   Ron Andrico

   [1]www.mignarda.com


Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 18:45:30 +0100
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LUTE] Broken consort
   
Dear Jean-Marie,
   
A couple of weeks ago, I had the pleasure of reading through Chapter
   13
on the Holmes manuscripts. It is extremely interesting, with lots of
   new
information, and mistakes by others in the past corrected. There are
still a few more chapters to go. Ian is very thorough, so progress is
slow, despite the time he devotes to the book. Yes, he had to stop
   work
for a while, because he had been working too hard, and he needed to
   take
a break. However, he is now back at his computer, working on the
   final
chapters. We shall have to wait a little longer, I'm afraid, but it
   will
be worth it. From what I have read so far, I can safely say that it
   will
be an excellent book.
   
Best wishes,
   
Stewart McCoy.
   
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Marie Poirier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 October 2008 14:41
To: lute
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Broken consort
   
Puzzling, indeed ! I really look forward to the publication of Ian
Harwood's book on the subject. Last time I went over to Norwich, in
   June
this year, David van Edwards told me the book was well under way. I
contacted Ian by email after that and he told me the same thing, but
also that he had been delayed because he had overworked himself and
   the
doctors had recommended him to sort of calm down... Alas, still no
   sign
of this strongly expected book ! Does anyone on the list have fresher
news than these about it ?
   
All the best,
   
Jean-Marie
   
   
   
   
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 __

   Get more out of the Web. Learn 10 hidden secrets of Windows Live.
   [2]Learn Now --

 References

   1. http://www.mignarda.com/
   2. 
 http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_getmore_092008





-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-04 Thread Sam Chapman
Hi Martin,

Which pieces did you play? Were they from the Morley publication, the
Holmes manuscripts, or something else? Did you use flute or recorder?
It wasn't quite clear from your Email if the flute/recorder played at
the written pitch or an octave higher (I assume it was the former if
you were demonstrating Ian's ideas). As I understood it, even with
instruments playing at high pitch, a bass flute in the low pitch is
still needed to produce all the lowest notes found in the repertoire
at their written pitch. So do you mean that Ian has another even lower
pitched bass flute? Or did you simply avoid the few pieces which go
below low G on the flute (in which case a bass flute at the same pitch
as the other instruments is sufficient). I'm slightly concerned about
the flute being more or less inaudible when a bass instrument is
played at written pitch. How was the balance in your group?
Lots of complicated questions, sorry!

All the best,

Sam

2008/10/4 Martin Shepherd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Hi Sam,

 These are interesting questions.  At the recent Lute Society weekend Ian
 Harwood managed to assemble a consort at the high pitch - a minor third
 above modern pitch. I played my A lute tuned up a semitone, strung all in
 gut except for the top string which was nylgut.  For a gut string I think
 you would need a slightly shorter string length (mine is 53.5cm).  The
 treble part was played on a treble violin, the size of which made holding it
 quite tricky!  The consort sounded good and the advantage of the high pitch
 solution is that the flute/recorder parts fit in the correct place in the
 texture.  Ian does however have a bass flute which allows a low pitch
 consort to achieve the same thing.  In any case I think it depends which
 pieces we're talking about as to whether the octave displacement of the
 flute causes a problem or not.  Ian's dual-pitch hypothesis was originally
 based on the sizes of surviving viols, but he also has theories about the
 bandora which seem to make a lot of sense. I can't remember how it all
 relates to the sizes of surviving citterns but we used a small cittern for
 the high-pitch consort and it sounded fine.

 I note with interest that the designation treble lute and a high pitch of
 about a minor third above modern fits nicely with the notion that the mean
 lute was about a tone below modern pitch (a fourth lower than the high
 pitch) - arguments for which I have made elsewhere, e.g., in the brief essay
 on Dowland's lutes which can be found at www.johndowland.co.uk

 Best wishes,

 Martin

 Sam Chapman wrote:

 Dear Lute list,

 I'm in the process of organizing a consort in Basel to play, among
 other things, pieces from the Morley consort lessons. Having read
 various articles on the subject and listened to recordings of the
 music, I'm left with some difficult questions:
 What pitch should the music be played at?
 What kind of flute should be used and should the part be played as
 written or up an octave?
 Why the designation for treble lute when clearly a G instrument is
 intended?
 These questions and others have been already been tackled by Ian
 Harwood in his several articles, but I would be very interested to
 hear other people's thoughts and opinions (and justifications). If you
 have experience performing this repertoire, how did you solve these
 problems?

 Many thanks,

 Sam








-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[LUTE] Re: Broken consort

2008-10-04 Thread Sam Chapman
Dear Martyn,

Thanks for your interesting ideas. From what you wrote then, there
seems to be some justifiaction for performing the consort music at
A-440hz (treating the A lute as an instrument in G). Most of the
traverso players I know possess and play instruments only in 415hz or
440hz, so this would make life easier at least. Does anyone know what
pitch existing english flutes and recorders where normally tuned to?
Is there evidence for instruments at 392hz, and if so why are these
instruments so seldom copied?

The strange viol bowhold in Upton's famous painting can be seen in
many other pictures, so I think it can be considered as a playing
technique rather than an artist's ignorance. See the viol players here
for example: http://silviart.altervista.org/blog/?p=20
I've asked players to try it out, and the sound produced is very clear
and articulated and actually ideal for consort playing! Legend has it
that Hopkinson Smith once asked Jordi Savall to try out this technique
(but Jordi refused).

I'll have a look again at the Morley pieces compared to those by other
composers and see if I agree with your ideas...

All the best,

Sam



2008/10/4 Martyn Hodgson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Dear Martin,

 What is the early evidence from England that 'treble' lutes were generally 
 considered such very small lutes (ie c 48/50cm string stop). Are they not 
 nowadays more generally thought as being simply lutes a tone (or so) above 
 the ordinary common or 'mean' lute as, for example, often required for duets 
 a tone apart found in various sources both continental as well as English?  
 This would suggest a pitch only a tone higher than general 'lute' pitch 
 rather than a fourth higher.

 On flutes: many years ago I played these pieces with a transverse bass flute 
 (John Cousen) and recall it was pretty inaudible. It also looked considerably 
 larger than the traverso in the best historical depiction of this sort of 
 ensemble (Scenes from the life of Sir Henry Unton, Unkown artist, c. 1596). 
 In this painting the lute and cittern and violin also look to me like 
 ordinary sized instruments (lute, say, around 55 - 63cm string stop), tho' 
 the bass viol looks smaller than might be expected, but then such a quiet 
 consort would have little need of a powerful full sized consort bass. 
 Interestingly, the viol is shown being played with overhand bow with the hand 
 on the treble side of the instrument - wether this is artistic ignorance or 
 attempting to depict the overarm way of playing shown in some continental 
 paintings I cannot say. Praetorius also speaks about the ambiguity of the 
 pitch of flutes and that even he was fooled for a time (see Beck
  Editorial Note p. 40 and translation). In short, I think the weight of 
 evidence is that an ordinary sized traverso of the period was used for most 
 of these consorts. The exception is for Morley's  arrangements of his own 
 lighter pieces which seem to be notated at pitch; the other pieces are mostly 
 by other composers particularly associated with this form (eg Allison) and 
 presumably from manuscripts copied for the Morley print.

 regards

 Martyn

 --- On Sat, 4/10/08, Martin Shepherd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: Martin Shepherd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [LUTE] Re: Broken consort
 To: Sam Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Lute List lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
 Date: Saturday, 4 October, 2008, 10:54 AM
 Hi Sam,

 These are interesting questions.  At the recent Lute
 Society weekend Ian
 Harwood managed to assemble a consort at the high pitch - a
 minor third
 above modern pitch. I played my A lute tuned up
 a semitone, strung all
 in gut except for the top string which was nylgut.  For a
 gut string I
 think you would need a slightly shorter string length (mine
 is 53.5cm).
 The treble part was played on a treble violin, the size of
 which made
 holding it quite tricky!  The consort sounded good and the
 advantage of
 the high pitch solution is that the flute/recorder parts
 fit in the
 correct place in the texture.  Ian does however
 have a bass flute
 which allows a low pitch consort to achieve the same thing.
  In any case
 I think it depends which pieces we're talking about as
 to whether the
 octave displacement of the flute causes a problem or not.
 Ian's
 dual-pitch hypothesis was originally based on
 the sizes of surviving
 viols, but he also has theories about the bandora which
 seem to make a
 lot of sense. I can't remember how it all relates to
 the sizes of
 surviving citterns but we used a small cittern for the
 high-pitch
 consort and it sounded fine.

 I note with interest that the designation treble
 lute and a high pitch
 of about a minor third above modern fits nicely with the
 notion that the
 mean lute was about a tone below modern pitch
 (a fourth lower than the
 high pitch) - arguments for which I have made elsewhere,
 e.g., in the
 brief essay on Dowland's lutes which can be found at
 www.johndowland.co.uk

 Best wishes,

 Martin

[LUTE] Re: Temperament wondering...

2008-10-04 Thread Sam Chapman
Ah...I see what you mean Andrew!

In reply to Rainer, Martin and Martyn: perhaps I'm being incredibly
naive, but I've always managed to tune octaves and unisons on my
theorbo with no beating, whether or not I set the frets equal or to
some variety of meantone. Of course I don't count, for example,
g-sharp to a-flat as an octave or unison. I simply stick on tastino if
I need a different note, or use alternate fingerings if I'm playing
continuo. Do you really suggest that one should tune, for example, the
6th course so that it beats with the 1st and 13th when using
temperaments other than equal? Perhaps we misunderstood each other?

All the best,

Sam



2008/10/4 Andrew Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 You're right - it's not a circular process if the fretting system has
 been worked out properly. As I said, I've been using David van
 Ooijen's instructions for tuning in 1/6 comma and it's a straight-
 forward process.

 But I was referring to the historical instructions found on the LSA
 Fret Placement Chart, which (no disrespect to the Ancients) haven't
 been passed down to us 100% accurately. So there's some to-ing and
 fro-ing between frets and open strings to figure out that Gerle, for
 instance, was aiming at approx. 1/6 comma. Obviously, having
 established this, I don't need to repeat the process - I can just
 tune straight to 1/6 comma...


 On 3 Oct 2008, at 23:39, Sam Chapman wrote:

 In any tempered fretting system that's been worked out properly you
 need to first set the frets, then tune the strings to each other in
 perfect octaves or unisons, since these intervals must be pure in all
 schemes. If this doesn't work and your lute sounds out of tune, then
 the fret placement has been wrongly calculated. There should be no
 need for a circular process (unless you're interested in inventing a
 new temperament by trial and error).


 --

 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Re: Temperament wondering...

2008-10-03 Thread Sam Chapman
In any tempered fretting system that's been worked out properly you
need to first set the frets, then tune the strings to each other in
perfect octaves or unisons, since these intervals must be pure in all
schemes. If this doesn't work and your lute sounds out of tune, then
the fret placement has been wrongly calculated. There should be no
need for a circular process (unless you're interested in inventing a
new temperament by trial and error).


2008/10/3 Andrew Gibbs [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 The LSA file works on my mac - but I found those historical
 instructions for placing frets weren't really that useful - I think
 some are inaccurate (Dowland's doesn't seem to make much sense). And
 there's no instructions on how to tune the open strings - so if you
 don't know what temperament you're aiming for, it makes the process a
 bit circular - tweak the frets, tweak the open strings, tweak the
 frets etc

 My basic understanding is that 16th c lute players would have used
 some kind of meantone - ranging from 1/4 to 1/8 - but of course
 wouldn't have used that terminology as the fine maths weren't worked
 out until later when meantone was on the point of becoming obsolete.
 This is my basic understanding - I'm sure someone on this list will
 know better/more...

 Andrew


 On 3 Oct 2008, at 07:22, Omer katzir wrote:

 Thanks andrew, but i have a problem with LSA file, i see every
 thing as 0, beside the english...
 i used both office 2008 and Neoofice, and it showed me the same
 thing. might be becuase I'm a mac user...


 --

 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html




-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91




[LUTE] Broken consort

2008-10-03 Thread Sam Chapman
Dear Lute list,

I'm in the process of organizing a consort in Basel to play, among
other things, pieces from the Morley consort lessons. Having read
various articles on the subject and listened to recordings of the
music, I'm left with some difficult questions:
What pitch should the music be played at?
What kind of flute should be used and should the part be played as
written or up an octave?
Why the designation for treble lute when clearly a G instrument is intended?
These questions and others have been already been tackled by Ian
Harwood in his several articles, but I would be very interested to
hear other people's thoughts and opinions (and justifications). If you
have experience performing this repertoire, how did you solve these
problems?

Many thanks,

Sam


-- 
Sam Chapman
Oetlingerstrasse 65
4057 Basel
(0041) 79 530 39 91



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html