Re: Re: lyx 1.4.1 and branches
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: 2006-04-25 14:52:28 GMT Don't you have InsertBranch?? JMarc I also don't have it. my configuration: LyX 1.6.4 (2009-08-22) Built on Sep 23 2009, 00:00:08 Configuration Host type:x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Special build flags: aiksaurus warnings use-aspell use-ispell C Compiler: gcc C Compiler LyX flags: C Compiler flags:-g -O2 C++ Compiler: g++ (4.4.1) C++ Compiler LyX flags: C++ Compiler flags:-g -O2 Linker flags: Linker user flags:-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed Qt 4 Frontend: Qt 4 version: 4.5.2 Packaging:posix LyX binary dir: /usr/bin LyX files dir:/usr/share/lyx Peter -- skype:cendp1am +49-176-63326870 +421-907-431671 http://cendo.skialpfest.sk http://www.ifw-dresden.de/institutes/iin/
Re: lyx 1.4.1 and branches
Le 22/06/2011 10:40, Peter Čendula a écrit : From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: 2006-04-25 14:52:28 GMT Don't you have InsertBranch?? JMarc I also don't have it. my configuration: [...] I do not remember much about the 2006 discussion, but if you do not have an InsertBranch, I suspect that you are using the so-called classic menus, which have not been updated a lot these days, and have been removed in 2.0. I advise to go to the preference dialog and change user interface from classic to default. JMarc
Re: lyx 1.4.1 and branches
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote: Le 22/06/2011 10:40, Peter Čendula a écrit : From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: 2006-04-25 14:52:28 GMT Don't you have InsertBranch?? JMarc I also don't have it. my configuration: [...] I do not remember much about the 2006 discussion, but if you do not have an InsertBranch, I suspect that you are using the so-called classic menus, which have not been updated a lot these days, and have been removed in 2.0. I advise to go to the preference dialog and change user interface from classic to default. JMarc Bingo! Since I've only upgraded my ubuntu 8.10 to 9.10 (current), I didn't knew there was change in the user interface setup. Thanks Peter
Re: Re: lyx 1.4.1 and branches
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: 2006-04-25 14:52:28 GMT Don't you have InsertBranch?? JMarc I also don't have it. my configuration: LyX 1.6.4 (2009-08-22) Built on Sep 23 2009, 00:00:08 Configuration Host type:x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Special build flags: aiksaurus warnings use-aspell use-ispell C Compiler: gcc C Compiler LyX flags: C Compiler flags:-g -O2 C++ Compiler: g++ (4.4.1) C++ Compiler LyX flags: C++ Compiler flags:-g -O2 Linker flags: Linker user flags:-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed Qt 4 Frontend: Qt 4 version: 4.5.2 Packaging:posix LyX binary dir: /usr/bin LyX files dir:/usr/share/lyx Peter -- skype:cendp1am +49-176-63326870 +421-907-431671 http://cendo.skialpfest.sk http://www.ifw-dresden.de/institutes/iin/
Re: lyx 1.4.1 and branches
Le 22/06/2011 10:40, Peter Čendula a écrit : From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: 2006-04-25 14:52:28 GMT Don't you have InsertBranch?? JMarc I also don't have it. my configuration: [...] I do not remember much about the 2006 discussion, but if you do not have an InsertBranch, I suspect that you are using the so-called classic menus, which have not been updated a lot these days, and have been removed in 2.0. I advise to go to the preference dialog and change user interface from classic to default. JMarc
Re: lyx 1.4.1 and branches
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote: Le 22/06/2011 10:40, Peter Čendula a écrit : From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: 2006-04-25 14:52:28 GMT Don't you have InsertBranch?? JMarc I also don't have it. my configuration: [...] I do not remember much about the 2006 discussion, but if you do not have an InsertBranch, I suspect that you are using the so-called classic menus, which have not been updated a lot these days, and have been removed in 2.0. I advise to go to the preference dialog and change user interface from classic to default. JMarc Bingo! Since I've only upgraded my ubuntu 8.10 to 9.10 (current), I didn't knew there was change in the user interface setup. Thanks Peter
Re: Re: lyx 1.4.1 and branches
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: 2006-04-25 14:52:28 GMT >Don't you have Insert>Branch?? >JMarc I also don't have it. my configuration: LyX 1.6.4 (2009-08-22) Built on Sep 23 2009, 00:00:08 Configuration Host type:x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Special build flags: aiksaurus warnings use-aspell use-ispell C Compiler: gcc C Compiler LyX flags: C Compiler flags:-g -O2 C++ Compiler: g++ (4.4.1) C++ Compiler LyX flags: C++ Compiler flags:-g -O2 Linker flags: Linker user flags:-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,--as-needed Qt 4 Frontend: Qt 4 version: 4.5.2 Packaging:posix LyX binary dir: /usr/bin LyX files dir:/usr/share/lyx Peter -- skype:cendp1am +49-176-63326870 +421-907-431671 http://cendo.skialpfest.sk http://www.ifw-dresden.de/institutes/iin/
Re: lyx 1.4.1 and branches
Le 22/06/2011 10:40, Peter Čendula a écrit : From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: 2006-04-25 14:52:28 GMT Don't you have Insert>Branch?? JMarc I also don't have it. my configuration: [...] I do not remember much about the 2006 discussion, but if you do not have an Insert>Branch, I suspect that you are using the so-called "classic" menus, which have not been updated a lot these days, and have been removed in 2.0. I advise to go to the preference dialog and change "user interface" from classic to default. JMarc
Re: lyx 1.4.1 and branches
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgoutteswrote: > Le 22/06/2011 10:40, Peter Čendula a écrit : > > From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Date: 2006-04-25 14:52:28 GMT >> >> Don't you have Insert>Branch?? >>> JMarc >>> >> >> I also don't have it. >> >> my configuration: >> > [...] > > I do not remember much about the 2006 discussion, but if you > do not have an Insert>Branch, I suspect that you are using the so-called > "classic" menus, which have not been updated a lot these days, and have been > removed in 2.0. > > I advise to go to the preference dialog and change "user interface" from > classic to default. > > JMarc > Bingo! Since I've only upgraded my ubuntu 8.10 to 9.10 (current), I didn't knew there was change in the user interface setup. Thanks Peter
Installation of Lyx 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP: missing windefault
Hi, I just tried to install both 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP and have the problem that it then refuses to start because windefault is missing. I assume this refers to windefault.ui. What has gone wrong here? Or more to the point, how do I replace this file. I have tried several different installation methods, and they all produce the same error. I have had Lyx installed before without problems, but this time the configuration doesn't seem to have worked properly. Thanks for any help, Graeme
Re: Installation of Lyx 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP: missing windefault
Graeme Handisides wrote: Hi, I just tried to install both 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP and have the problem that it then refuses to start because windefault is missing. I assume this refers to windefault.ui. What has gone wrong here? Or more to the point, how do I replace this file. I have tried several different installation methods, and they all produce the same error. I have had Lyx installed before without problems, but this time the configuration doesn't seem to have worked properly. Ok, I'll bite: what's windefault.ui? I have LyX 1.3.7, 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 installed on WinXP, and none of them have that file. I think the following fix should work. Navigate to C:\Documents and Settings\your id here\Application Data\LyX1.4.x\, open the preferences file in a text editor (e.g., notepad), and insert the line \ui_file default at the end. If you don't have a preferences file, copy lyxrc.defaults to lyxrc and stick it in there. (Or stick it in lyxrc.defaults, even though editing that file is apparently equivalent to tearing the tag off a mattress.) HTH, /Paul
Re: Installation of Lyx 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP: missing windefault
Graeme Handisides wrote: I just tried to install both 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP and have the problem that it then refuses to start because windefault is missing. I assume this refers to windefault.ui. What has gone wrong here? This is bug 720: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2720 windefault.ui-file was used by the old LyX Windows installer and should be removed when you uninstall LyX. It seems that soething has gone wrong on your system. To fix it, either uninstall LyX 1.4.1 that might be on your system or delete the folder C:\documents and settings\username\Application Data\LyX1.4.x manually, or reinstall LyX 1.4.2 using this installer: http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller that still supports windefault.ui. regards Uwe
Installation of Lyx 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP: missing windefault
Hi, I just tried to install both 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP and have the problem that it then refuses to start because windefault is missing. I assume this refers to windefault.ui. What has gone wrong here? Or more to the point, how do I replace this file. I have tried several different installation methods, and they all produce the same error. I have had Lyx installed before without problems, but this time the configuration doesn't seem to have worked properly. Thanks for any help, Graeme
Re: Installation of Lyx 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP: missing windefault
Graeme Handisides wrote: Hi, I just tried to install both 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP and have the problem that it then refuses to start because windefault is missing. I assume this refers to windefault.ui. What has gone wrong here? Or more to the point, how do I replace this file. I have tried several different installation methods, and they all produce the same error. I have had Lyx installed before without problems, but this time the configuration doesn't seem to have worked properly. Ok, I'll bite: what's windefault.ui? I have LyX 1.3.7, 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 installed on WinXP, and none of them have that file. I think the following fix should work. Navigate to C:\Documents and Settings\your id here\Application Data\LyX1.4.x\, open the preferences file in a text editor (e.g., notepad), and insert the line \ui_file default at the end. If you don't have a preferences file, copy lyxrc.defaults to lyxrc and stick it in there. (Or stick it in lyxrc.defaults, even though editing that file is apparently equivalent to tearing the tag off a mattress.) HTH, /Paul
Re: Installation of Lyx 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP: missing windefault
Graeme Handisides wrote: I just tried to install both 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP and have the problem that it then refuses to start because windefault is missing. I assume this refers to windefault.ui. What has gone wrong here? This is bug 720: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2720 windefault.ui-file was used by the old LyX Windows installer and should be removed when you uninstall LyX. It seems that soething has gone wrong on your system. To fix it, either uninstall LyX 1.4.1 that might be on your system or delete the folder C:\documents and settings\username\Application Data\LyX1.4.x manually, or reinstall LyX 1.4.2 using this installer: http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller that still supports windefault.ui. regards Uwe
Installation of Lyx 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP: missing windefault
Hi, I just tried to install both 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP and have the problem that it then refuses to start because windefault is missing. I assume this refers to windefault.ui. What has gone wrong here? Or more to the point, how do I replace this file. I have tried several different installation methods, and they all produce the same error. I have had Lyx installed before without problems, but this time the configuration doesn't seem to have worked properly. Thanks for any help, Graeme
Re: Installation of Lyx 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP: missing windefault
Graeme Handisides wrote: Hi, I just tried to install both 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP and have the problem that it then refuses to start because windefault is missing. I assume this refers to windefault.ui. What has gone wrong here? Or more to the point, how do I replace this file. I have tried several different installation methods, and they all produce the same error. I have had Lyx installed before without problems, but this time the configuration doesn't seem to have worked properly. Ok, I'll bite: what's windefault.ui? I have LyX 1.3.7, 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 installed on WinXP, and none of them have that file. I think the following fix should work. Navigate to C:\Documents and Settings\\Application Data\LyX1.4.x\, open the preferences file in a text editor (e.g., notepad), and insert the line \ui_file "default" at the end. If you don't have a preferences file, copy lyxrc.defaults to lyxrc and stick it in there. (Or stick it in lyxrc.defaults, even though editing that file is apparently equivalent to tearing the tag off a mattress.) HTH, /Paul
Re: Installation of Lyx 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP: missing windefault
Graeme Handisides wrote: I just tried to install both 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 on WinXP and have the problem that it then refuses to start because windefault is missing. I assume this refers to windefault.ui. What has gone wrong here? This is bug 720: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2720 windefault.ui-file was used by the old LyX Windows installer and should be removed when you uninstall LyX. It seems that soething has gone wrong on your system. To fix it, either uninstall LyX 1.4.1 that might be on your system or delete the folder C:\documents and settings\username\Application Data\LyX1.4.x manually, or reinstall LyX 1.4.2 using this installer: http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller that still supports windefault.ui. regards Uwe
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
Steve == Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve Hi Miguel, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ locate libaudio | grep libaudio\\. Steve /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2 /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2.3 Steve /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ Steve I don't know exactly what the significance is, but see if U Steve have those files. Steve, if you do rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2.3 you will even be able to tell from which package they come. JMarc
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
Steve == Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve Hi Miguel, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ locate libaudio | grep libaudio\\. Steve /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2 /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2.3 Steve /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ Steve I don't know exactly what the significance is, but see if U Steve have those files. Steve, if you do rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2.3 you will even be able to tell from which package they come. JMarc
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
> "Steve" == Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> Hi Miguel, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ locate libaudio | grep libaudio\\. Steve> /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2 /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2.3 Steve> /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ Steve> I don't know exactly what the significance is, but see if U Steve> have those files. Steve, if you do rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2.3 you will even be able to tell from which package they come. JMarc
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
Paul == Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul On 6/29/06, icebna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Paul Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. Paul You will always have available the recentest version of LyX and Paul of very many others programs. Or Mandrake 2006 community, maybe... JMarc
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
Hi all : In the compilation of the tarball lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz in a machine with Mandriva 2006 give the next errors, then make. The configuration ./configuration was succesfully : I have compiled the tarball, and give me the next error /usr/bin/ld cannot find -laudio collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 Leaving /home/. make[2]: ***[all recursive] Error 1 Leaving /home . make[1]: ***[all] Error 2 Leaving /home . I have installed libaudiofile0-devel Someone idea Thanks Miguel Steve Litt escribió: On Friday 30 June 2006 06:21 am, you wrote: Hello Steve : I have compiled the tarball, and give me the next error /usr/bin/ld cannot find -laudio collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 Leaving /home/. make[2]: ***[all recursive] Error 1 Leaving /home . make[1]: ***[all] Error 2 Leaving /home . Can you help me ? Miguel Hi Miguel, You're probably better off asking this on the list, as a lot of people there are much more conversant with compilation than I. Probably you're missing something on your system, and given that the compile worked on my system, it's probably something that I've installed and you haven't, which means you can use Mandriva's package manager to install it, if only you knew what it was. A man ld command showed that the -l flag of ld includes an archive file whose name is lib+the archive name, or in this case libaudio. In fact, I've installed a libaudiofile0-devel-0.2.6-3mdk. Maybe you haven't, and maybe that's the problem. Anyway, I'd suggest asking on the list, where you'll have lots of eyes looking at your question. Thanks Steve Steve Litt escribió: On Thursday 29 June 2006 04:49 pm, Paul Smith wrote: On 6/29/06, icebna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. You will always have available the recentest version of LyX and of very many others programs. Paul I just installed on Mandriva 2006 with ./configure;make;make install. The process was very easy, and I didn't get any dependency problems. If you like Mandriva 2006 (I've been a Mandrake Man since 2000), this might be an excellent way to do it, especially because you can retain your old LyX 1.3.5 that came with Mandriva 2006. Let me tell you how I did it... tar xzvf lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz cd lyx-1.4.1 ./configure --with-version-suffix=-1.4.1qt --with-frontend=qt make su make install exit cp ~/.lyx/layouts/* ~/.lyx-1.4.1qt/layouts/ lyx-1.4.1qt #tools-reconfigure cp mybook.lyx test.lyx lyx-1.4.1qt test.lyx If you have the performance problems reported by some people, you can compile it with xforms. Do the same thing as above, except everywhere change qt to xforms. This will create a lyx-1.4.1xforms to coexist with your lyx-1.4.1qt and lyx. If you have performance problems, please report it to the list. Then you and I can compare everything and find out why you have performance problems and I don't, and in doing so, perhaps you and I could help the developers nail this elusive bug. HTH SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
Hi Miguel, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ locate libaudio | grep libaudio\\. /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2 /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2.3 /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ I don't know exactly what the significance is, but see if U have those files. SteveT On Friday 30 June 2006 09:59 am, icebna wrote: Hi all : In the compilation of the tarball lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz in a machine with Mandriva 2006 give the next errors, then make. The configuration ./configuration was succesfully : I have compiled the tarball, and give me the next error /usr/bin/ld cannot find -laudio collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 Leaving /home/. make[2]: ***[all recursive] Error 1 Leaving /home . make[1]: ***[all] Error 2 Leaving /home . I have installed libaudiofile0-devel Someone idea Thanks Miguel Steve Litt escribió: On Friday 30 June 2006 06:21 am, you wrote: Hello Steve : I have compiled the tarball, and give me the next error /usr/bin/ld cannot find -laudio collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 Leaving /home/. make[2]: ***[all recursive] Error 1 Leaving /home . make[1]: ***[all] Error 2 Leaving /home . Can you help me ? Miguel Hi Miguel, You're probably better off asking this on the list, as a lot of people there are much more conversant with compilation than I. Probably you're missing something on your system, and given that the compile worked on my system, it's probably something that I've installed and you haven't, which means you can use Mandriva's package manager to install it, if only you knew what it was. A man ld command showed that the -l flag of ld includes an archive file whose name is lib+the archive name, or in this case libaudio. In fact, I've installed a libaudiofile0-devel-0.2.6-3mdk. Maybe you haven't, and maybe that's the problem. Anyway, I'd suggest asking on the list, where you'll have lots of eyes looking at your question. Thanks Steve Steve Litt escribió: On Thursday 29 June 2006 04:49 pm, Paul Smith wrote: On 6/29/06, icebna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. You will always have available the recentest version of LyX and of very many others programs. Paul I just installed on Mandriva 2006 with ./configure;make;make install. The process was very easy, and I didn't get any dependency problems. If you like Mandriva 2006 (I've been a Mandrake Man since 2000), this might be an excellent way to do it, especially because you can retain your old LyX 1.3.5 that came with Mandriva 2006. Let me tell you how I did it... tar xzvf lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz cd lyx-1.4.1 ./configure --with-version-suffix=-1.4.1qt --with-frontend=qt make su make install exit cp ~/.lyx/layouts/* ~/.lyx-1.4.1qt/layouts/ lyx-1.4.1qt #tools-reconfigure cp mybook.lyx test.lyx lyx-1.4.1qt test.lyx If you have the performance problems reported by some people, you can compile it with xforms. Do the same thing as above, except everywhere change qt to xforms. This will create a lyx-1.4.1xforms to coexist with your lyx-1.4.1qt and lyx. If you have performance problems, please report it to the list. Then you and I can compare everything and find out why you have performance problems and I don't, and in doing so, perhaps you and I could help the developers nail this elusive bug. HTH SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
Paul == Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Paul On 6/29/06, icebna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Paul Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. Paul You will always have available the recentest version of LyX and Paul of very many others programs. Or Mandrake 2006 community, maybe... JMarc
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
Hi all : In the compilation of the tarball lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz in a machine with Mandriva 2006 give the next errors, then make. The configuration ./configuration was succesfully : I have compiled the tarball, and give me the next error /usr/bin/ld cannot find -laudio collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 Leaving /home/. make[2]: ***[all recursive] Error 1 Leaving /home . make[1]: ***[all] Error 2 Leaving /home . I have installed libaudiofile0-devel Someone idea Thanks Miguel Steve Litt escribió: On Friday 30 June 2006 06:21 am, you wrote: Hello Steve : I have compiled the tarball, and give me the next error /usr/bin/ld cannot find -laudio collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 Leaving /home/. make[2]: ***[all recursive] Error 1 Leaving /home . make[1]: ***[all] Error 2 Leaving /home . Can you help me ? Miguel Hi Miguel, You're probably better off asking this on the list, as a lot of people there are much more conversant with compilation than I. Probably you're missing something on your system, and given that the compile worked on my system, it's probably something that I've installed and you haven't, which means you can use Mandriva's package manager to install it, if only you knew what it was. A man ld command showed that the -l flag of ld includes an archive file whose name is lib+the archive name, or in this case libaudio. In fact, I've installed a libaudiofile0-devel-0.2.6-3mdk. Maybe you haven't, and maybe that's the problem. Anyway, I'd suggest asking on the list, where you'll have lots of eyes looking at your question. Thanks Steve Steve Litt escribió: On Thursday 29 June 2006 04:49 pm, Paul Smith wrote: On 6/29/06, icebna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. You will always have available the recentest version of LyX and of very many others programs. Paul I just installed on Mandriva 2006 with ./configure;make;make install. The process was very easy, and I didn't get any dependency problems. If you like Mandriva 2006 (I've been a Mandrake Man since 2000), this might be an excellent way to do it, especially because you can retain your old LyX 1.3.5 that came with Mandriva 2006. Let me tell you how I did it... tar xzvf lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz cd lyx-1.4.1 ./configure --with-version-suffix=-1.4.1qt --with-frontend=qt make su make install exit cp ~/.lyx/layouts/* ~/.lyx-1.4.1qt/layouts/ lyx-1.4.1qt #tools-reconfigure cp mybook.lyx test.lyx lyx-1.4.1qt test.lyx If you have the performance problems reported by some people, you can compile it with xforms. Do the same thing as above, except everywhere change qt to xforms. This will create a lyx-1.4.1xforms to coexist with your lyx-1.4.1qt and lyx. If you have performance problems, please report it to the list. Then you and I can compare everything and find out why you have performance problems and I don't, and in doing so, perhaps you and I could help the developers nail this elusive bug. HTH SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
Hi Miguel, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ locate libaudio | grep libaudio\\. /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2 /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2.3 /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ I don't know exactly what the significance is, but see if U have those files. SteveT On Friday 30 June 2006 09:59 am, icebna wrote: Hi all : In the compilation of the tarball lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz in a machine with Mandriva 2006 give the next errors, then make. The configuration ./configuration was succesfully : I have compiled the tarball, and give me the next error /usr/bin/ld cannot find -laudio collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 Leaving /home/. make[2]: ***[all recursive] Error 1 Leaving /home . make[1]: ***[all] Error 2 Leaving /home . I have installed libaudiofile0-devel Someone idea Thanks Miguel Steve Litt escribió: On Friday 30 June 2006 06:21 am, you wrote: Hello Steve : I have compiled the tarball, and give me the next error /usr/bin/ld cannot find -laudio collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 Leaving /home/. make[2]: ***[all recursive] Error 1 Leaving /home . make[1]: ***[all] Error 2 Leaving /home . Can you help me ? Miguel Hi Miguel, You're probably better off asking this on the list, as a lot of people there are much more conversant with compilation than I. Probably you're missing something on your system, and given that the compile worked on my system, it's probably something that I've installed and you haven't, which means you can use Mandriva's package manager to install it, if only you knew what it was. A man ld command showed that the -l flag of ld includes an archive file whose name is lib+the archive name, or in this case libaudio. In fact, I've installed a libaudiofile0-devel-0.2.6-3mdk. Maybe you haven't, and maybe that's the problem. Anyway, I'd suggest asking on the list, where you'll have lots of eyes looking at your question. Thanks Steve Steve Litt escribió: On Thursday 29 June 2006 04:49 pm, Paul Smith wrote: On 6/29/06, icebna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. You will always have available the recentest version of LyX and of very many others programs. Paul I just installed on Mandriva 2006 with ./configure;make;make install. The process was very easy, and I didn't get any dependency problems. If you like Mandriva 2006 (I've been a Mandrake Man since 2000), this might be an excellent way to do it, especially because you can retain your old LyX 1.3.5 that came with Mandriva 2006. Let me tell you how I did it... tar xzvf lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz cd lyx-1.4.1 ./configure --with-version-suffix=-1.4.1qt --with-frontend=qt make su make install exit cp ~/.lyx/layouts/* ~/.lyx-1.4.1qt/layouts/ lyx-1.4.1qt #tools-reconfigure cp mybook.lyx test.lyx lyx-1.4.1qt test.lyx If you have the performance problems reported by some people, you can compile it with xforms. Do the same thing as above, except everywhere change qt to xforms. This will create a lyx-1.4.1xforms to coexist with your lyx-1.4.1qt and lyx. If you have performance problems, please report it to the list. Then you and I can compare everything and find out why you have performance problems and I don't, and in doing so, perhaps you and I could help the developers nail this elusive bug. HTH SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
> "Paul" == Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> On 6/29/06, icebna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva >> 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing >> error, but don't start. Paul> Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. Paul> You will always have available the recentest version of LyX and Paul> of very many others programs. Or Mandrake 2006 community, maybe... JMarc
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
Hi all : In the compilation of the tarball lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz in a machine with Mandriva 2006 give the next errors, then make. The configuration ./configuration was succesfully : I have compiled the tarball, and give me the next error /usr/bin/ld cannot find -laudio collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 Leaving /home/. make[2]: ***[all recursive] Error 1 Leaving /home . make[1]: ***[all] Error 2 Leaving /home . I have installed libaudiofile0-devel Someone idea Thanks Miguel Steve Litt escribió: On Friday 30 June 2006 06:21 am, you wrote: Hello Steve : I have compiled the tarball, and give me the next error /usr/bin/ld cannot find -laudio collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 Leaving /home/. make[2]: ***[all recursive] Error 1 Leaving /home . make[1]: ***[all] Error 2 Leaving /home . Can you help me ? Miguel Hi Miguel, You're probably better off asking this on the list, as a lot of people there are much more conversant with compilation than I. Probably you're missing something on your system, and given that the compile worked on my system, it's probably something that I've installed and you haven't, which means you can use Mandriva's package manager to install it, if only you knew what it was. A man ld command showed that the -l flag of ld includes an archive file whose name is lib+the archive name, or in this case libaudio. In fact, I've installed a libaudiofile0-devel-0.2.6-3mdk. Maybe you haven't, and maybe that's the problem. Anyway, I'd suggest asking on the list, where you'll have lots of eyes looking at your question. Thanks Steve Steve Litt escribió: On Thursday 29 June 2006 04:49 pm, Paul Smith wrote: On 6/29/06, icebna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. You will always have available the recentest version of LyX and of very many others programs. Paul I just installed on Mandriva 2006 with ./configure;make;make install. The process was very easy, and I didn't get any dependency problems. If you like Mandriva 2006 (I've been a Mandrake Man since 2000), this might be an excellent way to do it, especially because you can retain your old LyX 1.3.5 that came with Mandriva 2006. Let me tell you how I did it... tar xzvf lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz cd lyx-1.4.1 ./configure --with-version-suffix=-1.4.1qt --with-frontend=qt make su make install exit cp ~/.lyx/layouts/* ~/.lyx-1.4.1qt/layouts/ lyx-1.4.1qt #tools->reconfigure cp mybook.lyx test.lyx lyx-1.4.1qt test.lyx If you have the performance problems reported by some people, you can compile it with xforms. Do the same thing as above, except everywhere change qt to xforms. This will create a lyx-1.4.1xforms to coexist with your lyx-1.4.1qt and lyx. If you have performance problems, please report it to the list. Then you and I can compare everything and find out why you have performance problems and I don't, and in doing so, perhaps you and I could help the developers nail this elusive bug. HTH SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
Hi Miguel, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ locate libaudio | grep libaudio\\. /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2 /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so.2.3 /usr/X11R6/lib/libaudio.so [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ I don't know exactly what the significance is, but see if U have those files. SteveT On Friday 30 June 2006 09:59 am, icebna wrote: > Hi all : > In the compilation of the tarball lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz in a machine with > Mandriva 2006 > give the next errors, then make. The configuration ./configuration was > succesfully : > > I have compiled the tarball, and give me the next error > /usr/bin/ld cannot find -laudio > collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status > make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 > Leaving /home/. > make[2]: ***[all recursive] Error 1 > Leaving /home . > make[1]: ***[all] Error 2 > Leaving /home . > > I have installed libaudiofile0-devel > > Someone idea > Thanks > Miguel > > Steve Litt escribió: > > On Friday 30 June 2006 06:21 am, you wrote: > >> Hello Steve : > >> I have compiled the tarball, and give me the next error > >> /usr/bin/ld cannot find -laudio > >> collect2 : ld returned 1 exit status > >> make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 > >> Leaving /home/. > >> make[2]: ***[all recursive] Error 1 > >> Leaving /home . > >> make[1]: ***[all] Error 2 > >> Leaving /home . > >> > >> Can you help me ? > >> Miguel > > > > Hi Miguel, > > > > You're probably better off asking this on the list, as a lot of people > > there are much more conversant with compilation than I. > > > > Probably you're missing something on your system, and given that the > > compile worked on my system, it's probably something that I've installed > > and you haven't, which means you can use Mandriva's package manager to > > install it, if only you knew what it was. > > > > A man ld command showed that the -l flag of ld includes an archive file > > whose name is lib+the archive name, or in this case libaudio. In fact, > > I've installed a libaudiofile0-devel-0.2.6-3mdk. Maybe you haven't, and > > maybe that's the problem. > > > > Anyway, I'd suggest asking on the list, where you'll have lots of eyes > > looking at your question. > > > > Thanks > > > > Steve > > > >> Steve Litt escribió: > >>> On Thursday 29 June 2006 04:49 pm, Paul Smith wrote: > >>>> On 6/29/06, icebna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva > >>>>> 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing > >>>>> error, but don't start. > >>>> > >>>> Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. You > >>>> will always have available the recentest version of LyX and of very > >>>> many others programs. > >>>> > >>>> Paul > >>> > >>> I just installed on Mandriva 2006 with ./configure;make;make install. > >>> The process was very easy, and I didn't get any dependency problems. If > >>> you like Mandriva 2006 (I've been a Mandrake Man since 2000), this > >>> might be an excellent way to do it, especially because you can retain > >>> your old LyX 1.3.5 that came with Mandriva 2006. > >>> > >>> Let me tell you how I did it... > >>> > >>> tar xzvf lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz > >>> cd lyx-1.4.1 > >>> ./configure --with-version-suffix=-1.4.1qt --with-frontend=qt > >>> make > >>> su > >>> make install > >>> exit > >>> cp ~/.lyx/layouts/* ~/.lyx-1.4.1qt/layouts/ > >>> lyx-1.4.1qt > >>> #tools->reconfigure > >>> cp mybook.lyx test.lyx > >>> lyx-1.4.1qt test.lyx > >>> > >>> If you have the performance problems reported by some people, you can > >>> compile it with xforms. Do the same thing as above, except everywhere > >>> change qt to xforms. This will create a lyx-1.4.1xforms to coexist with > >>> your lyx-1.4.1qt and lyx. > >>> > >>> If you have performance problems, please report it to the list. Then > >>> you and I can compare everything and find out why you have performance > >>> problems and I don't, and in doing so, perhaps you and I could help the > >>> developers nail this elusive bug. > >>> > >>> HTH > >>> > >>> SteveT > >>> > >>> Steve Litt > >>> Author: > >>>* Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware > >>>* Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist > >>>* Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting > >>>* Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting > >>>* Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist > >>> > >>> http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore > >>> http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
Hi all : Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Miguel
Re: Centering image on Lyx 1.4.1
Isaac Pante wrote: Hello everybody! I know you have already answered at this question, but all the answers didn't worked for me. I'm trying to center a PDF image in my document. I made a floatting box, and tried to change the paragraph alignement setting to center. But Lyx won't do it. Lyx can center images within the margins, assuming you set up the centering _inside_ that floating box. (Don't turn on centering before making the float. Instead, put the cursor next to the image inside the float and apply centering.) What is very strange is the fact that the legend is perfectly centered, but not the image. I also tried with a BMP image, but with the same result. Here is what I get: http://isaacpante.net/problem.png As others have pointed out already, the image is too large. Therefore it doesn't get centered. There is no space left, so it is aligned with the left margin and breaks through the right one. (Centering is done by distributing leftover space on both sides of the image, in this case there were no leftover space.) It is possible to use latex commands to achieve centering in such a way that the image breaks equally much through the left and the right margin. But do you really want that? It tends to be ugly. What I do, is to resize such big images so they fit perfectly between the margins. This is easy in lyx, click on the image to get the graphichs dialog, and change the output width to 100 line%. That way, the width of the image will be exactly the width of the line, and it will be beautifully flush with both margins. No ugly breaking through either margin, and perfectly centered too of course. Helge Hafting
LyX 1.4.1: crash while opening certain file
I have attached a minimal file example that crashes lyx 1.4.1 when opened. I hope you can fix it soon. Bye and many thanks for your software! -- Lorenzo `paulatz' Paulatto Trieste ``Grandissima mi par l'inezia di coloro che vorrebbero che Iddio avesse fatto l'universo più proporzionato alla piccola capacità del lor discorso.'' --Galileo Galilei (Opere VII) -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: TLC Ricerca Consulenti. Settore Telefonia Fissa. Provvigioni a vita sulla propria clientela. Entra in www.tlctel.com Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=5385d=29-6 newfile1.lyx Description: application/lyx
Re: LyX 1.4.1: crash while opening certain file
Lorenzo == Lorenzo Paulatto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lorenzo I have attached a minimal file example that crashes lyx 1.4.1 Lorenzo when opened. I hope you can fix it soon. This is a bug related with italian documents. It will be fixed in 1.4.2. JMarc
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
On 6/29/06, icebna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. You will always have available the recentest version of LyX and of very many others programs. Paul
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
On Thursday 29 June 2006 04:49 pm, Paul Smith wrote: On 6/29/06, icebna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. You will always have available the recentest version of LyX and of very many others programs. Paul I just installed on Mandriva 2006 with ./configure;make;make install. The process was very easy, and I didn't get any dependency problems. If you like Mandriva 2006 (I've been a Mandrake Man since 2000), this might be an excellent way to do it, especially because you can retain your old LyX 1.3.5 that came with Mandriva 2006. Let me tell you how I did it... tar xzvf lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz cd lyx-1.4.1 ./configure --with-version-suffix=-1.4.1qt --with-frontend=qt make su make install exit cp ~/.lyx/layouts/* ~/.lyx-1.4.1qt/layouts/ lyx-1.4.1qt #tools-reconfigure cp mybook.lyx test.lyx lyx-1.4.1qt test.lyx If you have the performance problems reported by some people, you can compile it with xforms. Do the same thing as above, except everywhere change qt to xforms. This will create a lyx-1.4.1xforms to coexist with your lyx-1.4.1qt and lyx. If you have performance problems, please report it to the list. Then you and I can compare everything and find out why you have performance problems and I don't, and in doing so, perhaps you and I could help the developers nail this elusive bug. HTH SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
Hi all : Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Miguel
Re: Centering image on Lyx 1.4.1
Isaac Pante wrote: Hello everybody! I know you have already answered at this question, but all the answers didn't worked for me. I'm trying to center a PDF image in my document. I made a floatting box, and tried to change the paragraph alignement setting to center. But Lyx won't do it. Lyx can center images within the margins, assuming you set up the centering _inside_ that floating box. (Don't turn on centering before making the float. Instead, put the cursor next to the image inside the float and apply centering.) What is very strange is the fact that the legend is perfectly centered, but not the image. I also tried with a BMP image, but with the same result. Here is what I get: http://isaacpante.net/problem.png As others have pointed out already, the image is too large. Therefore it doesn't get centered. There is no space left, so it is aligned with the left margin and breaks through the right one. (Centering is done by distributing leftover space on both sides of the image, in this case there were no leftover space.) It is possible to use latex commands to achieve centering in such a way that the image breaks equally much through the left and the right margin. But do you really want that? It tends to be ugly. What I do, is to resize such big images so they fit perfectly between the margins. This is easy in lyx, click on the image to get the graphichs dialog, and change the output width to 100 line%. That way, the width of the image will be exactly the width of the line, and it will be beautifully flush with both margins. No ugly breaking through either margin, and perfectly centered too of course. Helge Hafting
LyX 1.4.1: crash while opening certain file
I have attached a minimal file example that crashes lyx 1.4.1 when opened. I hope you can fix it soon. Bye and many thanks for your software! -- Lorenzo `paulatz' Paulatto Trieste ``Grandissima mi par l'inezia di coloro che vorrebbero che Iddio avesse fatto l'universo più proporzionato alla piccola capacità del lor discorso.'' --Galileo Galilei (Opere VII) -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: TLC Ricerca Consulenti. Settore Telefonia Fissa. Provvigioni a vita sulla propria clientela. Entra in www.tlctel.com Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=5385d=29-6 newfile1.lyx Description: application/lyx
Re: LyX 1.4.1: crash while opening certain file
Lorenzo == Lorenzo Paulatto [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lorenzo I have attached a minimal file example that crashes lyx 1.4.1 Lorenzo when opened. I hope you can fix it soon. This is a bug related with italian documents. It will be fixed in 1.4.2. JMarc
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
On 6/29/06, icebna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. You will always have available the recentest version of LyX and of very many others programs. Paul
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
On Thursday 29 June 2006 04:49 pm, Paul Smith wrote: On 6/29/06, icebna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. You will always have available the recentest version of LyX and of very many others programs. Paul I just installed on Mandriva 2006 with ./configure;make;make install. The process was very easy, and I didn't get any dependency problems. If you like Mandriva 2006 (I've been a Mandrake Man since 2000), this might be an excellent way to do it, especially because you can retain your old LyX 1.3.5 that came with Mandriva 2006. Let me tell you how I did it... tar xzvf lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz cd lyx-1.4.1 ./configure --with-version-suffix=-1.4.1qt --with-frontend=qt make su make install exit cp ~/.lyx/layouts/* ~/.lyx-1.4.1qt/layouts/ lyx-1.4.1qt #tools-reconfigure cp mybook.lyx test.lyx lyx-1.4.1qt test.lyx If you have the performance problems reported by some people, you can compile it with xforms. Do the same thing as above, except everywhere change qt to xforms. This will create a lyx-1.4.1xforms to coexist with your lyx-1.4.1qt and lyx. If you have performance problems, please report it to the list. Then you and I can compare everything and find out why you have performance problems and I don't, and in doing so, perhaps you and I could help the developers nail this elusive bug. HTH SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
Hi all : Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Miguel
Re: Centering image on Lyx 1.4.1
Isaac Pante wrote: Hello everybody! I know you have already answered at this question, but all the answers didn't worked for me. I'm trying to center a PDF image in my document. I made a floatting box, and tried to change the "paragraph" alignement setting to "center". But Lyx won't do it. Lyx can center images within the margins, assuming you set up the centering _inside_ that floating box. (Don't turn on centering before making the float. Instead, put the cursor next to the image inside the float and apply centering.) What is very strange is the fact that the legend is perfectly centered, but not the image. I also tried with a BMP image, but with the same result. Here is what I get: http://isaacpante.net/problem.png As others have pointed out already, the image is too large. Therefore it doesn't get centered. There is no space left, so it is aligned with the left margin and breaks through the right one. (Centering is done by distributing leftover space on both sides of the image, in this case there were no leftover space.) It is possible to use latex commands to achieve "centering" in such a way that the image breaks equally much through the left and the right margin. But do you really want that? It tends to be ugly. What I do, is to resize such big images so they fit perfectly between the margins. This is easy in lyx, click on the image to get the graphichs dialog, and change the output width to 100 line%. That way, the width of the image will be exactly the width of the line, and it will be beautifully flush with both margins. No ugly breaking through either margin, and perfectly centered too of course. Helge Hafting
LyX 1.4.1: crash while opening certain file
I have attached a minimal file example that crashes lyx 1.4.1 when opened. I hope you can fix it soon. Bye and many thanks for your software! -- Lorenzo `paulatz' Paulatto Trieste ``Grandissima mi par l'inezia di coloro che vorrebbero che Iddio avesse fatto l'universo più proporzionato alla piccola capacità del lor discorso.'' --Galileo Galilei (Opere VII) -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: TLC Ricerca Consulenti. Settore Telefonia Fissa. Provvigioni "a vita" sulla propria clientela. Entra in www.tlctel.com Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=5385=29-6 newfile1.lyx Description: application/lyx
Re: LyX 1.4.1: crash while opening certain file
>>>>> "Lorenzo" == Lorenzo Paulatto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lorenzo> I have attached a minimal file example that crashes lyx 1.4.1 Lorenzo> when opened. I hope you can fix it soon. This is a bug related with italian documents. It will be fixed in 1.4.2. JMarc
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
On 6/29/06, icebna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, but don't start. Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. You will always have available the recentest version of LyX and of very many others programs. Paul
Re: lyx-1.4.1 to Mandriva 2006
On Thursday 29 June 2006 04:49 pm, Paul Smith wrote: > On 6/29/06, icebna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Someone can say me, where can find the rpm lyx-1.4.1_qt to Mandriva 2006 > > ? I have attempt compiled, but don't start. Don't give nothing error, > > but don't start. > > Maybe, this is the appropriate time to migrate to Fedora Core. You > will always have available the recentest version of LyX and of very > many others programs. > > Paul I just installed on Mandriva 2006 with ./configure;make;make install. The process was very easy, and I didn't get any dependency problems. If you like Mandriva 2006 (I've been a Mandrake Man since 2000), this might be an excellent way to do it, especially because you can retain your old LyX 1.3.5 that came with Mandriva 2006. Let me tell you how I did it... tar xzvf lyx-1.4.1.tar.gz cd lyx-1.4.1 ./configure --with-version-suffix=-1.4.1qt --with-frontend=qt make su make install exit cp ~/.lyx/layouts/* ~/.lyx-1.4.1qt/layouts/ lyx-1.4.1qt #tools->reconfigure cp mybook.lyx test.lyx lyx-1.4.1qt test.lyx If you have the performance problems reported by some people, you can compile it with xforms. Do the same thing as above, except everywhere change qt to xforms. This will create a lyx-1.4.1xforms to coexist with your lyx-1.4.1qt and lyx. If you have performance problems, please report it to the list. Then you and I can compare everything and find out why you have performance problems and I don't, and in doing so, perhaps you and I could help the developers nail this elusive bug. HTH SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Yaron == Yaron Y Goland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yaron First, THANK YOU! I love LyX! And the integration that 1.4.x Yaron provided into OS X is great. It is still too slow for me to use Yaron but the direction is great and in the meantime I can use 1.3.7 Yaron which performs just fine on my mac. Yaron Second, any idea when 1.4.2 might be released? I would be very glad to be able to do it this week or next week. Time will tell. JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Sorry for what? That your life interfered with providing a free service to the community? Gosh... shame on you! :) Yaron On Jun 28, 2006, at 7:06 AM, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jun 28, 2006, at 4:45 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Yaron == Yaron Y Goland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yaron First, THANK YOU! I love LyX! And the integration that 1.4.x Yaron provided into OS X is great. It is still too slow for me to use Yaron but the direction is great and in the meantime I can use 1.3.7 Yaron which performs just fine on my mac. Yaron Second, any idea when 1.4.2 might be released? I would be very glad to be able to do it this week or next week. Time will tell. Even if LyX-1.4.2 is released earlier, my packaging of LyX/ Mac-1.4.2 will have to wait until after July 11, however: I'll be pretty much offline from now until then. Sorry. Bennett
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Yaron == Yaron Y Goland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yaron First, THANK YOU! I love LyX! And the integration that 1.4.x Yaron provided into OS X is great. It is still too slow for me to use Yaron but the direction is great and in the meantime I can use 1.3.7 Yaron which performs just fine on my mac. Yaron Second, any idea when 1.4.2 might be released? I would be very glad to be able to do it this week or next week. Time will tell. JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Sorry for what? That your life interfered with providing a free service to the community? Gosh... shame on you! :) Yaron On Jun 28, 2006, at 7:06 AM, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jun 28, 2006, at 4:45 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Yaron == Yaron Y Goland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yaron First, THANK YOU! I love LyX! And the integration that 1.4.x Yaron provided into OS X is great. It is still too slow for me to use Yaron but the direction is great and in the meantime I can use 1.3.7 Yaron which performs just fine on my mac. Yaron Second, any idea when 1.4.2 might be released? I would be very glad to be able to do it this week or next week. Time will tell. Even if LyX-1.4.2 is released earlier, my packaging of LyX/ Mac-1.4.2 will have to wait until after July 11, however: I'll be pretty much offline from now until then. Sorry. Bennett
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
> "Yaron" == Yaron Y Goland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Yaron> First, THANK YOU! I love LyX! And the integration that 1.4.x Yaron> provided into OS X is great. It is still too slow for me to use Yaron> but the direction is great and in the meantime I can use 1.3.7 Yaron> which performs just fine on my mac. Yaron> Second, any idea when 1.4.2 might be released? I would be very glad to be able to do it this week or next week. Time will tell. JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Sorry for what? That your life interfered with providing a free service to the community? Gosh... shame on you! :) Yaron On Jun 28, 2006, at 7:06 AM, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jun 28, 2006, at 4:45 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Yaron" == Yaron Y Goland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Yaron> First, THANK YOU! I love LyX! And the integration that 1.4.x Yaron> provided into OS X is great. It is still too slow for me to use Yaron> but the direction is great and in the meantime I can use 1.3.7 Yaron> which performs just fine on my mac. Yaron> Second, any idea when 1.4.2 might be released? I would be very glad to be able to do it this week or next week. Time will tell. Even if LyX-1.4.2 is released earlier, my packaging of LyX/ Mac-1.4.2 will have to wait until after July 11, however: I'll be pretty much offline from now until then. Sorry. Bennett
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Steve == Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you ever upgrade to 1.4, you will find that the display is significantly slower with qt (for a reason we do not really understand). The old xforms version is still ugly, but snappy. Steve Do I need to recompile to switch to Xforms? Yes, unless you can find it precompiled for your platform. In 1.3, when you configure without any special option, you do get the xforms version. To get the qt version, you need to use the switch --with-frontend=qt. I do not think you will find that the xforms frontend is better in 1.3. In 1.4, it is required to specify which frontend you want (xforms, qt, or the unofficial gtk). You can even specify several frontends, like --with-frontend='qt xforms'. Xforms will feel snappier, in particular when scrolling or selecting text. But of course it is ugly (in particular the fonts are not antialiased on screen). JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
First, THANK YOU! I love LyX! And the integration that 1.4.x provided into OS X is great. It is still too slow for me to use but the direction is great and in the meantime I can use 1.3.7 which performs just fine on my mac. Second, any idea when 1.4.2 might be released? Thanks, Yaron P.S. If I can make a feature request for 1.4.2 what about native support for hypertarget and hyperlink? Having to enter and manage these manually as ERT is a nightmare! On Jun 26, 2006, at 8:42 AM, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. This is not possible on Mac (natively). 1.4.2 -- currently still undergoing testing -- will be much better for speed on Mac. (It's acceptable for me on a 466 MHz iBook, which was impossible to use with 1.4.1.) Bennett
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Steve == Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you ever upgrade to 1.4, you will find that the display is significantly slower with qt (for a reason we do not really understand). The old xforms version is still ugly, but snappy. Steve Do I need to recompile to switch to Xforms? Yes, unless you can find it precompiled for your platform. In 1.3, when you configure without any special option, you do get the xforms version. To get the qt version, you need to use the switch --with-frontend=qt. I do not think you will find that the xforms frontend is better in 1.3. In 1.4, it is required to specify which frontend you want (xforms, qt, or the unofficial gtk). You can even specify several frontends, like --with-frontend='qt xforms'. Xforms will feel snappier, in particular when scrolling or selecting text. But of course it is ugly (in particular the fonts are not antialiased on screen). JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
First, THANK YOU! I love LyX! And the integration that 1.4.x provided into OS X is great. It is still too slow for me to use but the direction is great and in the meantime I can use 1.3.7 which performs just fine on my mac. Second, any idea when 1.4.2 might be released? Thanks, Yaron P.S. If I can make a feature request for 1.4.2 what about native support for hypertarget and hyperlink? Having to enter and manage these manually as ERT is a nightmare! On Jun 26, 2006, at 8:42 AM, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. This is not possible on Mac (natively). 1.4.2 -- currently still undergoing testing -- will be much better for speed on Mac. (It's acceptable for me on a 466 MHz iBook, which was impossible to use with 1.4.1.) Bennett
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
> "Steve" == Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If you ever upgrade to 1.4, you will find that the display is >> significantly slower with qt (for a reason we do not really >> understand). The old xforms version is still ugly, but snappy. Steve> Do I need to recompile to switch to Xforms? Yes, unless you can find it precompiled for your platform. In 1.3, when you configure without any special option, you do get the xforms version. To get the qt version, you need to use the switch --with-frontend=qt. I do not think you will find that the xforms frontend is better in 1.3. In 1.4, it is required to specify which frontend you want (xforms, qt, or the unofficial gtk). You can even specify several frontends, like --with-frontend='qt xforms'. Xforms will feel snappier, in particular when scrolling or selecting text. But of course it is ugly (in particular the fonts are not antialiased on screen). JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
First, THANK YOU! I love LyX! And the integration that 1.4.x provided into OS X is great. It is still too slow for me to use but the direction is great and in the meantime I can use 1.3.7 which performs just fine on my mac. Second, any idea when 1.4.2 might be released? Thanks, Yaron P.S. If I can make a feature request for 1.4.2 what about native support for hypertarget and hyperlink? Having to enter and manage these manually as ERT is a nightmare! On Jun 26, 2006, at 8:42 AM, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. This is not possible on Mac (natively). 1.4.2 -- currently still undergoing testing -- will be much better for speed on Mac. (It's acceptable for me on a 466 MHz iBook, which was impossible to use with 1.4.1.) Bennett
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Yaron == Yaron Y Goland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yaron When I first installed LyX 1.4.0 on OS X I had such serious Yaron performance problems that even on my dual proc G5 with 1 gig of Yaron Ram I could trivially type faster than LyX could print out my Yaron characters. So when LyX 1.4.1 was released with a focus on Yaron performance I was very excited. Unfortunately LyX 1.4.1 is as Yaron slow for me as LyX 1.4.0 is. In fact even on simple documents Yaron containing little more than text (e.g. Yaron http://www.goland.org/webtemplate.lyx) just typing simple text Yaron is so slow that I can easily out type LyX. The performance improvements in 1.4.1 were mostly for when typing inside insets. LyX 1.4.2 will have some speedup for LyX/Mac, but there is still some inherent drawing performance problem we are not able to pinpoint. JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 01:54 am, Yaron Y. Goland wrote: When I first installed LyX 1.4.0 on OS X I had such serious performance problems that even on my dual proc G5 with 1 gig of Ram I could trivially type faster than LyX could print out my characters. So when LyX 1.4.1 was released with a focus on performance I was very excited. Unfortunately LyX 1.4.1 is as slow for me as LyX 1.4.0 is. In fact even on simple documents containing little more than text (e.g. http://www.goland.org/webtemplate.lyx) just typing simple text is so slow that I can easily out type LyX. Please note that I made sure to delete LyX 1.4.0 and do a new install of LyX 1.4.1 and then confirm that my newly installed program is indeed LyX 1.4.1 If anyone has any suggestions or ideas I would love to hear them because I depend on LyX for a book I'm writing and as things now stand I'm in trouble. Thanks, Yaron Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. I use the Xforms interface in 1.3.6 (and have for many older versions), and personally I never did see the need to have it support anything else -- after all, LyX is just a simple front end to LaTeX. SteveT -- Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm (Legal Disclaimer) Follow these suggestions at your own risk.
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. This is not possible on Mac (natively). 1.4.2 -- currently still undergoing testing -- will be much better for speed on Mac. (It's acceptable for me on a 466 MHz iBook, which was impossible to use with 1.4.1.) Bennett
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42 am, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. This is not possible on Mac (natively). Curious -- is it possible on Linux? I'd really hate to have a great product slide backwards just to make a prettier screen and more KDE interoperability or Gnome interoperability, whatever those are. Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Ughh. Is Xforms still available? I like it -- it's worked every time for me since 2000. SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Jun 26, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Steve Litt wrote: On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42 am, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. This is not possible on Mac (natively). Curious -- is it possible on Linux? I'd really hate to have a great product slide backwards just to make a prettier screen and more KDE interoperability or Gnome interoperability, whatever those are. Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Ughh. Is Xforms still available? I like it -- it's worked every time for me since 2000. All I meant is that the native Mac port of LyX depends on Qt. LyX-1.4 should work with Xforms on Linux, but on Mac doing so would require an X11 environment that is not nicely integrated with the rest of Mac OS X. (I don't know about Windows.) Bennett
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Steve Litt wrote: On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42 am, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. This is not possible on Mac (natively). Curious -- is it possible on Linux? Of course - at compile time. What Bennet probably meant was that if you want a native Mac LyX with Aqua GUI you have only one choice: qt. You can of course use LyX xforms via the X server if you want to. I don't know if anybody did it, but assume that xforms is available via fink. I'd really hate to have a great product slide backwards just to make a prettier screen and more KDE interoperability or Gnome interoperability, whatever those are. Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Yes. Ughh. Is Xforms still available? Yes, but probably not in 1.5 when it comes out. Georg
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Steve Litt wrote: Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC. Ughh. Is Xforms still available? Yes. Still. Jürgen
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 02:14 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Steve Litt wrote: Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC. That's interesting. I use 1.3.5 currently. How can I tell whether I'm using Xforms or Qt? I assumed Xforms because it looks the same as it always looked. Thanks SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Georg Yes. Well, not really. Now there is no default :) JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Steve == Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve On Monday 26 June 2006 02:14 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Steve Litt wrote: Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC. Steve That's interesting. I use 1.3.5 currently. How can I tell Steve whether I'm using Xforms or Qt? I assumed Xforms because it Steve looks the same as it always looked. The it is xforms. You can run 'lyx --version' to know for sure. JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 04:32 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Steve == Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve On Monday 26 June 2006 02:14 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Steve Litt wrote: Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC. Steve That's interesting. I use 1.3.5 currently. How can I tell Steve whether I'm using Xforms or Qt? I assumed Xforms because it Steve looks the same as it always looked. The it is xforms. You can run 'lyx --version' to know for sure. JMarc Well looky looky... === [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ lyx --version LyX 1.3.5 of Wed, Oct 6, 2004 Built on Sep 9 2005, 18:48:14 Configuration Host type: i586-mandriva-linux-gnu Special build flags: C Compiler: gcc C Compiler flags: -O2 -pipe -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i586 -mtune=pentiumpro C++ Compiler: g++ (4.0.1) C++ Compiler flags: -O2 -Wall -W Linker flags: Frontend: qt Qt version: 3.3.4 LyX binary dir: /usr/bin LyX files dir: /usr/share/lyx [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ === I've been using qt all along, and have observed absolutely no problems. Here's what my machine looks like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]$ cat meminfo | head -n2 MemTotal: 1555824 kB MemFree:718944 kB [EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]$ cat cpuinfo | head -n8 processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 10 model name : AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2600+ stepping: 0 cpu MHz : 1916.547 cache size : 512 KB [EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]$ uname -a Linux mydesk.domain.cxm 2.6.12-12mdk #1 Fri Sep 9 18:15:22 CEST 2005 i686 AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2600+ unknown GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]$ So I officially withdraw my objections to qt. I've been using it the past several months, thinking it was Xforms, and liking it just fine. Thanks for the tip! SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Steve == Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve So I officially withdraw my objections to qt. I've been using Steve it the past several months, thinking it was Xforms, and liking Steve it just fine. :) If you ever upgrade to 1.4, you will find that the display is significantly slower with qt (for a reason we do not really understand). The old xforms version is still ugly, but snappy. JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 05:52 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Steve == Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve So I officially withdraw my objections to qt. I've been using Steve it the past several months, thinking it was Xforms, and liking Steve it just fine. :) If you ever upgrade to 1.4, you will find that the display is significantly slower with qt (for a reason we do not really understand). The old xforms version is still ugly, but snappy. Do I need to recompile to switch to Xforms? SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Yaron == Yaron Y Goland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yaron When I first installed LyX 1.4.0 on OS X I had such serious Yaron performance problems that even on my dual proc G5 with 1 gig of Yaron Ram I could trivially type faster than LyX could print out my Yaron characters. So when LyX 1.4.1 was released with a focus on Yaron performance I was very excited. Unfortunately LyX 1.4.1 is as Yaron slow for me as LyX 1.4.0 is. In fact even on simple documents Yaron containing little more than text (e.g. Yaron http://www.goland.org/webtemplate.lyx) just typing simple text Yaron is so slow that I can easily out type LyX. The performance improvements in 1.4.1 were mostly for when typing inside insets. LyX 1.4.2 will have some speedup for LyX/Mac, but there is still some inherent drawing performance problem we are not able to pinpoint. JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 01:54 am, Yaron Y. Goland wrote: When I first installed LyX 1.4.0 on OS X I had such serious performance problems that even on my dual proc G5 with 1 gig of Ram I could trivially type faster than LyX could print out my characters. So when LyX 1.4.1 was released with a focus on performance I was very excited. Unfortunately LyX 1.4.1 is as slow for me as LyX 1.4.0 is. In fact even on simple documents containing little more than text (e.g. http://www.goland.org/webtemplate.lyx) just typing simple text is so slow that I can easily out type LyX. Please note that I made sure to delete LyX 1.4.0 and do a new install of LyX 1.4.1 and then confirm that my newly installed program is indeed LyX 1.4.1 If anyone has any suggestions or ideas I would love to hear them because I depend on LyX for a book I'm writing and as things now stand I'm in trouble. Thanks, Yaron Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. I use the Xforms interface in 1.3.6 (and have for many older versions), and personally I never did see the need to have it support anything else -- after all, LyX is just a simple front end to LaTeX. SteveT -- Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm (Legal Disclaimer) Follow these suggestions at your own risk.
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. This is not possible on Mac (natively). 1.4.2 -- currently still undergoing testing -- will be much better for speed on Mac. (It's acceptable for me on a 466 MHz iBook, which was impossible to use with 1.4.1.) Bennett
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42 am, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. This is not possible on Mac (natively). Curious -- is it possible on Linux? I'd really hate to have a great product slide backwards just to make a prettier screen and more KDE interoperability or Gnome interoperability, whatever those are. Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Ughh. Is Xforms still available? I like it -- it's worked every time for me since 2000. SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Jun 26, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Steve Litt wrote: On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42 am, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. This is not possible on Mac (natively). Curious -- is it possible on Linux? I'd really hate to have a great product slide backwards just to make a prettier screen and more KDE interoperability or Gnome interoperability, whatever those are. Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Ughh. Is Xforms still available? I like it -- it's worked every time for me since 2000. All I meant is that the native Mac port of LyX depends on Qt. LyX-1.4 should work with Xforms on Linux, but on Mac doing so would require an X11 environment that is not nicely integrated with the rest of Mac OS X. (I don't know about Windows.) Bennett
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Steve Litt wrote: On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42 am, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. This is not possible on Mac (natively). Curious -- is it possible on Linux? Of course - at compile time. What Bennet probably meant was that if you want a native Mac LyX with Aqua GUI you have only one choice: qt. You can of course use LyX xforms via the X server if you want to. I don't know if anybody did it, but assume that xforms is available via fink. I'd really hate to have a great product slide backwards just to make a prettier screen and more KDE interoperability or Gnome interoperability, whatever those are. Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Yes. Ughh. Is Xforms still available? Yes, but probably not in 1.5 when it comes out. Georg
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Steve Litt wrote: Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC. Ughh. Is Xforms still available? Yes. Still. Jürgen
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 02:14 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Steve Litt wrote: Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC. That's interesting. I use 1.3.5 currently. How can I tell whether I'm using Xforms or Qt? I assumed Xforms because it looks the same as it always looked. Thanks SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Georg Yes. Well, not really. Now there is no default :) JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Steve == Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve On Monday 26 June 2006 02:14 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Steve Litt wrote: Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC. Steve That's interesting. I use 1.3.5 currently. How can I tell Steve whether I'm using Xforms or Qt? I assumed Xforms because it Steve looks the same as it always looked. The it is xforms. You can run 'lyx --version' to know for sure. JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 04:32 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Steve == Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve On Monday 26 June 2006 02:14 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Steve Litt wrote: Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC. Steve That's interesting. I use 1.3.5 currently. How can I tell Steve whether I'm using Xforms or Qt? I assumed Xforms because it Steve looks the same as it always looked. The it is xforms. You can run 'lyx --version' to know for sure. JMarc Well looky looky... === [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ lyx --version LyX 1.3.5 of Wed, Oct 6, 2004 Built on Sep 9 2005, 18:48:14 Configuration Host type: i586-mandriva-linux-gnu Special build flags: C Compiler: gcc C Compiler flags: -O2 -pipe -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i586 -mtune=pentiumpro C++ Compiler: g++ (4.0.1) C++ Compiler flags: -O2 -Wall -W Linker flags: Frontend: qt Qt version: 3.3.4 LyX binary dir: /usr/bin LyX files dir: /usr/share/lyx [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ === I've been using qt all along, and have observed absolutely no problems. Here's what my machine looks like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]$ cat meminfo | head -n2 MemTotal: 1555824 kB MemFree:718944 kB [EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]$ cat cpuinfo | head -n8 processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 10 model name : AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2600+ stepping: 0 cpu MHz : 1916.547 cache size : 512 KB [EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]$ uname -a Linux mydesk.domain.cxm 2.6.12-12mdk #1 Fri Sep 9 18:15:22 CEST 2005 i686 AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2600+ unknown GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]$ So I officially withdraw my objections to qt. I've been using it the past several months, thinking it was Xforms, and liking it just fine. Thanks for the tip! SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Steve == Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve So I officially withdraw my objections to qt. I've been using Steve it the past several months, thinking it was Xforms, and liking Steve it just fine. :) If you ever upgrade to 1.4, you will find that the display is significantly slower with qt (for a reason we do not really understand). The old xforms version is still ugly, but snappy. JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 05:52 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Steve == Steve Litt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Steve So I officially withdraw my objections to qt. I've been using Steve it the past several months, thinking it was Xforms, and liking Steve it just fine. :) If you ever upgrade to 1.4, you will find that the display is significantly slower with qt (for a reason we do not really understand). The old xforms version is still ugly, but snappy. Do I need to recompile to switch to Xforms? SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
>>>>> "Yaron" == Yaron Y Goland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Yaron> When I first installed LyX 1.4.0 on OS X I had such serious Yaron> performance problems that even on my dual proc G5 with 1 gig of Yaron> Ram I could trivially type faster than LyX could print out my Yaron> characters. So when LyX 1.4.1 was released with a focus on Yaron> performance I was very excited. Unfortunately LyX 1.4.1 is as Yaron> slow for me as LyX 1.4.0 is. In fact even on simple documents Yaron> containing little more than text (e.g. Yaron> http://www.goland.org/webtemplate.lyx) just typing simple text Yaron> is so slow that I can easily out type LyX. The performance improvements in 1.4.1 were mostly for when typing inside insets. LyX 1.4.2 will have some speedup for LyX/Mac, but there is still some inherent drawing performance problem we are not able to pinpoint. JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 01:54 am, Yaron Y. Goland wrote: > When I first installed LyX 1.4.0 on OS X I had such serious > performance problems that even on my dual proc G5 with 1 gig of Ram I > could trivially type faster than LyX could print out my characters. > So when LyX 1.4.1 was released with a focus on performance I was very > excited. Unfortunately LyX 1.4.1 is as slow for me as LyX 1.4.0 is. > In fact even on simple documents containing little more than text > (e.g. http://www.goland.org/webtemplate.lyx) just typing simple text > is so slow that I can easily out type LyX. > > Please note that I made sure to delete LyX 1.4.0 and do a new install > of LyX 1.4.1 and then confirm that my newly installed program is > indeed LyX 1.4.1 > > If anyone has any suggestions or ideas I would love to hear them > because I depend on LyX for a book I'm writing and as things now > stand I'm in trouble. > > Thanks, > > Yaron Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. I use the Xforms interface in 1.3.6 (and have for many older versions), and personally I never did see the need to have it support anything else -- after all, LyX is just a simple front end to LaTeX. SteveT -- Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm (Legal Disclaimer) Follow these suggestions at your own risk.
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. This is not possible on Mac (natively). 1.4.2 -- currently still undergoing testing -- will be much better for speed on Mac. (It's acceptable for me on a 466 MHz iBook, which was impossible to use with 1.4.1.) Bennett
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42 am, Bennett Helm wrote: > On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: > > Hi Yaron, > > > > I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made > > LyX support > > multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just > > Xforms. See > > if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather > > than KDE > > bloated stuff like that. > > This is not possible on Mac (natively). Curious -- is it possible on Linux? I'd really hate to have a great product slide backwards just to make a prettier screen and more "KDE interoperability" or "Gnome interoperability", whatever those are. Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Ughh. Is Xforms still available? I like it -- it's worked every time for me since 2000. SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Jun 26, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Steve Litt wrote: On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42 am, Bennett Helm wrote: On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Yaron, I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made LyX support multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just Xforms. See if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather than KDE bloated stuff like that. This is not possible on Mac (natively). Curious -- is it possible on Linux? I'd really hate to have a great product slide backwards just to make a prettier screen and more "KDE interoperability" or "Gnome interoperability", whatever those are. Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Ughh. Is Xforms still available? I like it -- it's worked every time for me since 2000. All I meant is that the native Mac port of LyX depends on Qt. LyX-1.4 should work with Xforms on Linux, but on Mac doing so would require an X11 environment that is not nicely integrated with the rest of Mac OS X. (I don't know about Windows.) Bennett
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Steve Litt wrote: > On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42 am, Bennett Helm wrote: >> On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Steve Litt wrote: >> > Hi Yaron, >> > >> > I've never used LyX 1.4.x, but from what I understand they've made >> > LyX support >> > multiple graphics libraries, whereas in the old days it was just >> > Xforms. See >> > if there's any way to configure your LyX so it uses Xforms rather >> > than KDE >> > bloated stuff like that. >> >> This is not possible on Mac (natively). > > Curious -- is it possible on Linux? Of course - at compile time. What Bennet probably meant was that if you want a native Mac LyX with Aqua GUI you have only one choice: qt. You can of course use LyX xforms via the X server if you want to. I don't know if anybody did it, but assume that xforms is available via fink. > I'd really hate to have a great > product slide backwards just to make a prettier screen and more "KDE > interoperability" or "Gnome interoperability", whatever those are. > > Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Yes. > Ughh. Is Xforms still > available? Yes, but probably not in 1.5 when it comes out. Georg
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
Steve Litt wrote: > Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC. > Ughh. Is Xforms still > available? Yes. Still. Jürgen
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 02:14 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Steve Litt wrote: > > Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? > > Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC. That's interesting. I use 1.3.5 currently. How can I tell whether I'm using Xforms or Qt? I assumed Xforms because it looks the same as it always looked. Thanks SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? Georg> Yes. Well, not really. Now there is no default :) JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
> "Steve" == Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> On Monday 26 June 2006 02:14 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: >> Steve Litt wrote: > Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? >> >> Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC. Steve> That's interesting. I use 1.3.5 currently. How can I tell Steve> whether I'm using Xforms or Qt? I assumed Xforms because it Steve> looks the same as it always looked. The it is xforms. You can run 'lyx --version' to know for sure. JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 04:32 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Steve" == Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Steve> On Monday 26 June 2006 02:14 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > >> Steve Litt wrote: > Is the default graphics library on LyX 1.4 Qt? > >> > >> Yes. It already was in LyX 1.3 IIRC. > > Steve> That's interesting. I use 1.3.5 currently. How can I tell > Steve> whether I'm using Xforms or Qt? I assumed Xforms because it > Steve> looks the same as it always looked. > > The it is xforms. You can run 'lyx --version' to know for sure. > > JMarc Well looky looky... === [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ lyx --version LyX 1.3.5 of Wed, Oct 6, 2004 Built on Sep 9 2005, 18:48:14 Configuration Host type: i586-mandriva-linux-gnu Special build flags: C Compiler: gcc C Compiler flags: -O2 -pipe -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fomit-frame-pointer -march=i586 -mtune=pentiumpro C++ Compiler: g++ (4.0.1) C++ Compiler flags: -O2 -Wall -W Linker flags: Frontend: qt Qt version: 3.3.4 LyX binary dir: /usr/bin LyX files dir: /usr/share/lyx [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ === I've been using qt all along, and have observed absolutely no problems. Here's what my machine looks like: [EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]$ cat meminfo | head -n2 MemTotal: 1555824 kB MemFree:718944 kB [EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]$ cat cpuinfo | head -n8 processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 10 model name : AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2600+ stepping: 0 cpu MHz : 1916.547 cache size : 512 KB [EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]$ uname -a Linux mydesk.domain.cxm 2.6.12-12mdk #1 Fri Sep 9 18:15:22 CEST 2005 i686 AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2600+ unknown GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] proc]$ So I officially withdraw my objections to qt. I've been using it the past several months, thinking it was Xforms, and liking it just fine. Thanks for the tip! SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
> "Steve" == Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> So I officially withdraw my objections to qt. I've been using Steve> it the past several months, thinking it was Xforms, and liking Steve> it just fine. :) If you ever upgrade to 1.4, you will find that the display is significantly slower with qt (for a reason we do not really understand). The old xforms version is still ugly, but snappy. JMarc
Re: Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
On Monday 26 June 2006 05:52 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Steve" == Steve Litt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Steve> So I officially withdraw my objections to qt. I've been using > Steve> it the past several months, thinking it was Xforms, and liking > Steve> it just fine. > > :) > > If you ever upgrade to 1.4, you will find that the display is > significantly slower with qt (for a reason we do not really > understand). The old xforms version is still ugly, but snappy. Do I need to recompile to switch to Xforms? SteveT Steve Litt Author: * Universal Troubleshooting Process courseware * Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist * Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting * Twenty Eight Tales of Troubleshooting * Rapid Learning: Secret Weapon of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/bookstore http://www.troubleshooters.com/utp/tcourses.htm
Serious performance problem with LyX 1.4.1 on OS X
When I first installed LyX 1.4.0 on OS X I had such serious performance problems that even on my dual proc G5 with 1 gig of Ram I could trivially type faster than LyX could print out my characters. So when LyX 1.4.1 was released with a focus on performance I was very excited. Unfortunately LyX 1.4.1 is as slow for me as LyX 1.4.0 is. In fact even on simple documents containing little more than text (e.g. http://www.goland.org/webtemplate.lyx) just typing simple text is so slow that I can easily out type LyX. Please note that I made sure to delete LyX 1.4.0 and do a new install of LyX 1.4.1 and then confirm that my newly installed program is indeed LyX 1.4.1 If anyone has any suggestions or ideas I would love to hear them because I depend on LyX for a book I'm writing and as things now stand I'm in trouble. Thanks, Yaron