Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site

2014-08-18 Thread Fmiser via Mercedes
 Dan wrote:
 
 Take a look at my work in progress web site at www.meuxette.com

 Constructive comments and criticism are welcome.

Okay...  Fair warning - I'm opinionated and blunt. Please don't
take it personal.  *smiles*

The image is a png.  I like png files - but for photos they are
large files.  516K for a 700x400 px image.  Saved as a very high
quality jpeg, it is less than 90K.  And it still looks okay for
this application compressed to 30K.  It even appears to have been a
jpeg, as I can see jpeg compression artifacts.

Smaller size with no perceivable quality loss is always good - even
if you don't notice or care about the smaller size.

But that's about all I can comment on as the link to apple is the
only link on the page.

Oh.  I see.  Looking at the source, I see the navigation is
javascript only.  *grumble*

{waits for page to reload after allowing javascript)

Seems you are using javascript for plain HTML-type links.  More
data to download = slower = more data used.  But no functional
benefit that I can see.  Is there a reason you are doing simple
page linking with javascript?  

Although the menu is text, the text doesn't change color to
indicate which links I have already visited nor is the text
underlined and colored blue like a link should be.

The Welcome menu item is a link to the home page - where I
already am.  I would find it would be helpful if it were dead
text.  

The contrast between the dark gray you are here and the light gray
you could go here isn't enough.  I have to look closely to see
which is which.

You are using pixel, not em, or percent for size - which is far
less adaptable for different browsers, screens, and font sizes.  

  Cars section

I like the photo for the car ID.  The chassis code could be handy
(S123, W124, etc)

Is there an order to the cars?  Manufactured year?  Ownership order?

I found two pages that the page title is Text.
http://www.meuxette.com/meuxette.com/1979_300TD.html
http://www.meuxette.com/meuxette.com/1991_300E.html

 Photos section

Basic navigation is broken, replaced by a javascript kludge.  I
really, really, really, dislike any website that forces me to
navigate _only_ the one way the developer decided to use.  If I
were just a visitor to your site, I would give up and leave (at
least the photos section) because of how the navigation _STINKS_.
The javascript prevents me browsing my way. Examples: Can't opening
a photo in a new tab.  The back button doesn't work. copy image
location doesn't.  And after all that, the big picture that
(sometimes) eventually shows isn't very big.

So - in summary.  
 + The layout is clean and uncluttered.  
 - Contrast between the text and the white background is a bit low.  
 + The pages are pleasantly free of junk, blinking text, wild
   colors, excessive links.
 - The front page photos could easily be a jpeg and be smaller.
 - Javascript required for simple navigation
 - The big photos are so small I have no incentive to put up with
   the dreadful photo album javascript nav.

If I were a visitor (and not reviewing at your request), I would
not have ever gotten past the first page (since it required
javascript) unless I had some insider scoop that there was
something worth digging for.  Once in, the cars section is okay.
But the only reason I would endure the photos page is if I were
_really_ desperately - say, looking for a (rare) photo.

And that is _my_ opinion. :)

--   Philip

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT button cell batteries

2014-08-18 Thread Fmiser via Mercedes
 Allan wrote:
 
 Are the button type batteries of a size all the same? I have an
 old stopwatch which doesn't have a battery installed. Will any
 battery that fits work?

Probably.

There are a few odd ones that are 3V, or such.  But for the most
part, the physical size is all that really matters.  There may be a
capacity difference, but that isn't usually a big deal.   Oh - be
sure to check the height, as there are a number of the most commons
sizes that differ only in height.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


[MBZ] Dan Penoff

2014-08-18 Thread LarryT via Mercedes
Dan - your email seems not to work.  Is d...@penoff.com still active?   
Everytime I try to send to this address I get an error.


Thx
Larry

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Dan Penoff

2014-08-18 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
It's not. 11 killed my domain when I transferred it so my email isn't 
redirecting right now.

Use dpen...@mac.com

Dan

Sent from my iPad

 On Aug 18, 2014, at 6:36 AM, LarryT via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com 
 wrote:
 
 Dan - your email seems not to work.  Is d...@penoff.com still active?   
 Everytime I try to send to this address I get an error.
 
 Thx
 Larry
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site

2014-08-18 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
Thanks, Philip!

All good points and well taken.

While iWeb is far front FrontPage, it still does a lot of kludgy stuff, I'll 
admit.

I am looking at a couple of current HTML editors that do a much better job, 
with which I will redraft the web site, keeping a lot of the points you made in 
mind.

Dan

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 18, 2014, at 2:42 AM, Fmiser via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 Dan wrote:
 
 Take a look at my work in progress web site at www.meuxette.com
 
 Constructive comments and criticism are welcome.
 
 Okay...  Fair warning - I'm opinionated and blunt. Please don't
 take it personal.  *smiles*
 
 The image is a png.  I like png files - but for photos they are
 large files.  516K for a 700x400 px image.  Saved as a very high
 quality jpeg, it is less than 90K.  And it still looks okay for
 this application compressed to 30K.  It even appears to have been a
 jpeg, as I can see jpeg compression artifacts.
 
 Smaller size with no perceivable quality loss is always good - even
 if you don't notice or care about the smaller size.
 
 But that's about all I can comment on as the link to apple is the
 only link on the page.
 
 Oh.  I see.  Looking at the source, I see the navigation is
 javascript only.  *grumble*
 
 {waits for page to reload after allowing javascript)
 
 Seems you are using javascript for plain HTML-type links.  More
 data to download = slower = more data used.  But no functional
 benefit that I can see.  Is there a reason you are doing simple
 page linking with javascript?  
 
 Although the menu is text, the text doesn't change color to
 indicate which links I have already visited nor is the text
 underlined and colored blue like a link should be.
 
 The Welcome menu item is a link to the home page - where I
 already am.  I would find it would be helpful if it were dead
 text.  
 
 The contrast between the dark gray you are here and the light gray
 you could go here isn't enough.  I have to look closely to see
 which is which.
 
 You are using pixel, not em, or percent for size - which is far
 less adaptable for different browsers, screens, and font sizes.  
 
  Cars section
 
 I like the photo for the car ID.  The chassis code could be handy
 (S123, W124, etc)
 
 Is there an order to the cars?  Manufactured year?  Ownership order?
 
 I found two pages that the page title is Text.
 http://www.meuxette.com/meuxette.com/1979_300TD.html
 http://www.meuxette.com/meuxette.com/1991_300E.html
 
 Photos section
 
 Basic navigation is broken, replaced by a javascript kludge.  I
 really, really, really, dislike any website that forces me to
 navigate _only_ the one way the developer decided to use.  If I
 were just a visitor to your site, I would give up and leave (at
 least the photos section) because of how the navigation _STINKS_.
 The javascript prevents me browsing my way. Examples: Can't opening
 a photo in a new tab.  The back button doesn't work. copy image
 location doesn't.  And after all that, the big picture that
 (sometimes) eventually shows isn't very big.
 
 So - in summary.  
 + The layout is clean and uncluttered.  
 - Contrast between the text and the white background is a bit low.  
 + The pages are pleasantly free of junk, blinking text, wild
   colors, excessive links.
 - The front page photos could easily be a jpeg and be smaller.
 - Javascript required for simple navigation
 - The big photos are so small I have no incentive to put up with
   the dreadful photo album javascript nav.
 
 If I were a visitor (and not reviewing at your request), I would
 not have ever gotten past the first page (since it required
 javascript) unless I had some insider scoop that there was
 something worth digging for.  Once in, the cars section is okay.
 But the only reason I would endure the photos page is if I were
 _really_ desperately - say, looking for a (rare) photo.
 
 And that is _my_ opinion. :)
 
 --   Philip
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Dan Penoff

2014-08-18 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes

Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote:

It's not. 11 killed my domain when I transferred it so my email isn't 
redirecting right now.


Ouch.
Craig didn't have any problems when he moved his domain, did he?

When I set up a new domain last month, I looked through my old saved messages on 
the subject and took Curt and Craig's advice in going with 11. Now I'm 
wondering if I should have asked the question again instead of using old answers.


Mitch
(who so far hasn't had any problems with 11 that he knows about)

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site

2014-08-18 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes

Fmiser via Mercedes wrote:


If I were a visitor (and not reviewing at your request), I would
not have ever gotten past the first page (since it required
javascript) unless I had some insider scoop that there was
something worth digging for.  Once in, the cars section is okay.
But the only reason I would endure the photos page is if I were
_really_ desperately - say, looking for a (rare) photo.



What really frosts me is when a home page has nothing on it but a flash object.
I might assume there was navigation to the rest of the site embedded in the 
flash, but since I don't open the flash I'll never know for sure. That's a 
guaranteed ctrl-w for me.


Mitch.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Dan Penoff

2014-08-18 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
It was partially my fault, as I tried to cancel my hosting BEFORE transferring 
the domains.  Duh!

They were able to back the cancellation out, but it killed DNS for the site 
which is why you don't see it any more.  I already transferred the new 
nameserver DNS but that won't kick in for a while.  The domain transfer will 
take place later this week, so I'm not going to try and kludge something.  I'll 
just use an alternate address for now.  If I miss something important, so be 
it.  I'm on the lists and my bills are being paid, so anything else is gravy.

The issue I had with 11, and I believe the same that Craig experienced as 
well, was their inability to control spam coming out of their MX (mail) 
servers.  In the last week it was so bad that I was averaging about 100 bounces 
a day from my ISPs due to 11's  mail servers being blacklisted for spam.

Efforts to resolve it were fruitless.  I spoke to support on several occasions 
without results.  All they ever said was that they knew about the problem, were 
working to fix it, and after they did their MX servers would be whitelisted and 
all would be well again.

After two weeks of this I finally gave up and bailed.  I would add that this is 
not the first time this has happened, either.  I simply had enough.

Dan




On Aug 18, 2014, at 8:21 AM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com 
wrote:

 Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote:
 It's not. 11 killed my domain when I transferred it so my email isn't 
 redirecting right now.
 
 Ouch.
 Craig didn't have any problems when he moved his domain, did he?
 
 When I set up a new domain last month, I looked through my old saved messages 
 on the subject and took Curt and Craig's advice in going with 11. Now I'm 
 wondering if I should have asked the question again instead of using old 
 answers.
 
 Mitch
 (who so far hasn't had any problems with 11 that he knows about)
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Dan Penoff

2014-08-18 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
I haven't had any troubles but I don't use their email...

Curt

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Dan Penoff

2014-08-18 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
For hosting they were fine.

Dan

On Aug 18, 2014, at 8:46 AM, Curt Raymond via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com 
wrote:

 I haven't had any troubles but I don't use their email...
 
 Curt
 
 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site

2014-08-18 Thread Tim Crone via Mercedes
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes 
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 I am looking at a couple of current HTML editors that do a much better
 job, with which I will redraft the web site, keeping a lot of the points
 you made in mind.


To echo Philip, I can't view the site at work on Chrome/FF because our
(admittedly aggressive) firewall is blocking the external JS downloads.  If
the JS was inlined it would work, though of course that costs caching for
everyone else.  The best way would be to use a static image as a link, IMO.

Oddly, IE at work doesn't even take the initial forward.  Not sure if
that's unique to the firewall or IE, as I don't use IE anywhere else.

Overall, what is the goal of the site?  To serve as a picture sharing
repository for friends and family?  As a work log on the cars, like Jim
does?  A placeholder so the e-mail server isn't so lonely?  Or...?

If you are taking requests, I would love to see a graphical Mercedes Martha
tutorial, with pictures of the steps and setup in between.  It is so hard
to get my forced labor - I mean, children - to read how to do a job
properly. :)

Best,
Tim
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site

2014-08-18 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
Detailing DIYs are in the works.

I gotta get my hosting sorted out first.  And find a decent web editor.

Thanks!

Dan



On Aug 18, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Tim Crone bb...@crone.us wrote:

 On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes 
 mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:
 I am looking at a couple of current HTML editors that do a much better job, 
 with which I will redraft the web site, keeping a lot of the points you made 
 in mind.
 
 To echo Philip, I can't view the site at work on Chrome/FF because our 
 (admittedly aggressive) firewall is blocking the external JS downloads.  If 
 the JS was inlined it would work, though of course that costs caching for 
 everyone else.  The best way would be to use a static image as a link, IMO.
 
 Oddly, IE at work doesn't even take the initial forward.  Not sure if that's 
 unique to the firewall or IE, as I don't use IE anywhere else.
 
 Overall, what is the goal of the site?  To serve as a picture sharing 
 repository for friends and family?  As a work log on the cars, like Jim does? 
  A placeholder so the e-mail server isn't so lonely?  Or...?
 
 If you are taking requests, I would love to see a graphical Mercedes Martha 
 tutorial, with pictures of the steps and setup in between.  It is so hard to 
 get my forced labor - I mean, children - to read how to do a job properly. :)
 
 Best,
 Tim
  

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT: Win7 SP1

2014-08-18 Thread Tim Crone via Mercedes
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Mitch Haley mi...@mitchellhaley.com
wrote:

 Tim Crone wrote:

  On Aug 17, 2014 9:50 AM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes 
 mercedes@okiebenz.com mailto:mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:
  
   My laptop has been sluggish lately, and somehow it lost bluetooth
 capability, so  I did a 'minimal factory restore' (I forgot how much stuff
 came with that, maybe I should have dug up my Windows disk and done a true
 clean install). Everything works now.

 I think it resets the registry.  Is Loren still around?



 It formats the hard drive and reinstalls the OS, so yes, the registry gets
 reset.


Youch!  I didn't think the restores did a format, that's rather painful.


IIRC, I want service pack 1 installed on a Windows 7 computer?

 Yes.



 What surprised me was there were about twenty more 'critical updates
 needed' in Windows Updates after the SP1 install than before. I installed a
 cumulative security update but left the other 108 updates uninstalled.


I don't think MS has fixed their incremental problem - you have to run
update multiple times to actually get everything installed - so you might
check WU again.  Also the criticals tend to be things that aren't
security-specific, but could maybe be exploited, and of course QA will be
testing all the other fixes with the latest of everything.  You can block
Bing and so forth from installing (ignore, I believe) and then bulk
install the rest, unless there is a particular objection.  On a new install
I usually start the updates before I leave for the night, restart in the
morning, monitor occasionally, and then I might be done at lunchtime.

With a few notable exceptions*, I have been satisfied with the MS update
quality control, enough that I let the lab computers update automatically
now.  That said our machines are mostly running Server OSs, so I'm not sure
that completely translates to the desktop offerings.

* Yes I am aware that they just released an update that causes a blue
screen...

Best,
Tim
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site

2014-08-18 Thread Jim Cathey via Mercedes

...And find a decent web editor.


There's a lot to be said for NON-wysiwyg, aka wisiwiw,
using something like emacs.  The learning curve is a
bit steeper, but there are no surprises and you're
in complete control of everything.  A browser refresh
is fast, and that's all you need to see if a change
came out right or not.  (I do it locally, before
publishing the page(s) to the server.  My publication
step is a script that ftp's all changed files to
the server, automatically.)

You can lay out a few dummy pages using a tool whose
output you like, then view the source to see what is
going on and model your edits after that.

It's surprising how messy the output of such tools
can be.

-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site

2014-08-18 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
I agree. In the past I've used a tool for things that are a little complicated 
like tables but then clean up the code by hand. Especially lately they all want 
to insert style sheets and other schmegma...

-Curt



 From: Jim Cathey via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com
To: Dan Penoff dpen...@mac.com; Mercedes Discussion List 
mercedes@okiebenz.com 
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site
 

 ...And find a decent web editor.

There's a lot to be said for NON-wysiwyg, aka wisiwiw,
using something like emacs.  The learning curve is a
bit steeper, but there are no surprises and you're
in complete control of everything.  A browser refresh
is fast, and that's all you need to see if a change
came out right or not.  (I do it locally, before
publishing the page(s) to the server.  My publication
step is a script that ftp's all changed files to
the server, automatically.)

You can lay out a few dummy pages using a tool whose
output you like, then view the source to see what is
going on and model your edits after that.

It's surprising how messy the output of such tools
can be.




-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site

2014-08-18 Thread Jim Cathey via Mercedes
I agree. In the past I've used a tool for things that are a little 
complicated like tables but then clean up the code by hand. Especially 
lately they all want to insert style sheets and other schmegma...


I learned the editor in the early 80's, and HTML 1.0 in the 90's,
and I haven't had any obsolescence problems since.  Sure, my pages
aren't fancy, but I don't _need_ fancy.  I need what I have, which
is fifteen years (now) of date-indexed searchable logs (I use
grep and/or emacs for searches) and no tool obsolescence.  I
could have used plain text, but the HTML formatting is a lot
nicer, and links are just plain nice to have.

I've added tables from later HTML, but I don't think I'm using
much else from newer specs.  Maybe a few character encodings.

-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site

2014-08-18 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
I was looking at your site today, read through some of the early history of the 
Chicken Wagon, hard to believe that was all the way back in 2007...

-Curt



 From: Jim Cathey via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com
To: Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com 
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site
 

 I agree. In the past I've used a tool for things that are a little 
 complicated like tables but then clean up the code by hand. Especially 
 lately they all want to insert style sheets and other schmegma...

I learned the editor in the early 80's, and HTML 1.0 in the 90's,
and I haven't had any obsolescence problems since.  Sure, my pages
aren't fancy, but I don't _need_ fancy.  I need what I have, which
is fifteen years (now) of date-indexed searchable logs (I use
grep and/or emacs for searches) and no tool obsolescence.  I
could have used plain text, but the HTML formatting is a lot
nicer, and links are just plain nice to have.

I've added tables from later HTML, but I don't think I'm using
much else from newer specs.  Maybe a few character encodings.




-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


[MBZ] Fridge update

2014-08-18 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
You might remember a couple weeks ago when I was working on my fridge that 
wouldn't defrost. Well I'm sitting in the living room and I just heard the 
gentle rain of water into the drain pan. The dammed thing just defrosted!

So theory: The timer was stuck. In my troubleshooting I cranked it around a 
couple cycles. At first it didn't want to come back on after I'd cranked it 
around but eventually it played right. I didn't think much of it at the time 
but I'll keep in watch mode now, if it plays up again I'll crank the timer a 
couple more times. If that works I'll replace it.

-Curt
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] headlight brightness, 123 126

2014-08-18 Thread ernest breakfield via Mercedes

toss the stock lamps, not just the bulbs.

get a set of H4 Cibié lamps and some decent bulbs like the 
Sylvania/Osrams, or high-efficacy Narvas; they'll mount in the same 
place as the stuff that came stock.
having the right light in front of a car isn't just about wattage; 
it's about having a lens and reflector in the lamp that put the light in 
the right place (and don't interfere with oncoming traffic). lamps in 
most other parts of the world did a much better job of this than what 
the US DOT stuck us with.



cheers!
e

On 17/Aug/14 11:35, Ralph Robertson via Mercedes wrote:

I have a '84 300CD and a '87 300SDL and both vehicles' lights are not
bright enough for night driving especially on back roads.  I have tried
upgrading the bulbs for brighter ones, but nothing yet is satisfactory.
Any suggestions for making these safer?  Thanks.
Ralph
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.




___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT button cell batteries

2014-08-18 Thread Allan Streib via Mercedes
As I said, but maybe not clearly, I don't have the old battery.

Kaleb C. Striplin via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com writes:

 They are a bunch of different ones. Just take the old one to Walmart and 
 match it up. 

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Aug 17, 2014, at 5:34 PM, Allan Streib via Mercedes 
 mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:
 
 Are the button type batteries of a size all the same? I have an old 
 stopwatch which doesn't have a battery installed. Will any battery that fits 
 work?
 
 
 
 Allan
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com

 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] OT button cell batteries

2014-08-18 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
I missed that part entirely. Do you know the voltage required? Can you look i 
tup online maybe?

Curt



 From: Allan Streib via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com
To: Kaleb C. Striplin ka...@striplin.net; Mercedes Discussion List 
mercedes@okiebenz.com; Mercedes Discussion List mercedes@okiebenz.com 
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT button cell batteries
 

As I said, but maybe not clearly, I don't have the old battery.

Kaleb C. Striplin via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com writes:

 They are a bunch of different ones. Just take the old one to Walmart and 
 match it up. 

 Sent from my iPhone

 On Aug 17, 2014, at 5:34 PM, Allan Streib via Mercedes 
 mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:
 
 Are the button type batteries of a size all the same? I have an old 
 stopwatch which doesn't have a battery installed. Will any battery that fits 
 work?
 
 
 
 Allan
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com

 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Surrender

2014-08-18 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
Just heard back from the seller.  He said he was going to relist the car for 
$700.

I suspect he'll get a buyer at that price.  Then again, maybe not, as he lives 
in Brooksville, which is over an hour's drive form Tampa.  I'll watch for the 
listing and see what happens


On Aug 17, 2014, at 4:47 PM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com 
wrote:

 Yes, I felt somewhat Okiefied when this first came up  I'm not sure what I'm 
 going to do at this point.  I need to give it some thought.
 
 Dan
 
 On Aug 17, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin via Mercedes 
 mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:
 
 You are out of control buying all these Junkers. Next thing you know your 
 back yard will look like mine. What kind of shape is it in otherwise? I 
 would tell him the offer is now $500, 6 tops. 
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


[MBZ] MX Record Help

2014-08-18 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
While I think I have a good understanding of DNS, the MX thing has me puzzled, 
so I'll toss it out here with the hope that someone out there knows how I can 
sort this out:

I had a domain (penoff.com) hosted on 1and1.  My email address was 
d...@penoff.com and was forwarded from the domain to Verizon, my ISP.  I also 
forwarded the address to Gmail as well for redundancy.

When I went to transfer my domains to GoDaddy on Sunday, they suggested that I 
configure off-site DNS so that when the domains transferred in they would be 
able to configure DNS on the spot.

As one might expect, when the DNS changes propagated, it broke my mail, as the 
MX records didn't match in DNS.

I can configure the MX servers in my DNS control panel at GoDaddy, however, I'm 
a little confused as to how my mail will get to Verizon.  I say that since the 
former incoming mail from my web host was forwarded to Verizon 
(dpen...@verizon.net) in this form, not as d...@penoff.com.

How will Verizon's servers know what to do with mail coming in from penoff.com 
since it won't be pointed at a Verizon account?  The only thing I can set up in 
the MX records are my domain name and the smtp server I want the mail pointed 
to?

Help?

Dan
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


[MBZ] 300SDL in Bawstun

2014-08-18 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w126-s-se-sec-sel-sd/1463904-w126-related-items-sale-wanted-buy-352.html#post9847945

Dan
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] headlight brightness, 123 126

2014-08-18 Thread WILTON via Mercedes
I put 7 in. Hellas on my 81 300D 'bout 12 years ago.  The first time I 
turned

them on at night, I threw so much light out front that I thought I felt some
thrust (deceleration) to the rear.

Wilton

- Original Message - 
From: ernest breakfield via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com

To: mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] headlight brightness, 123  126


toss the stock lamps, not just the bulbs.

get a set of H4 Cibié lamps and some decent bulbs like the
Sylvania/Osrams, or high-efficacy Narvas; they'll mount in the same
place as the stuff that came stock.
having the right light in front of a car isn't just about wattage;
it's about having a lens and reflector in the lamp that put the light in
the right place (and don't interfere with oncoming traffic). lamps in
most other parts of the world did a much better job of this than what
the US DOT stuck us with.


cheers!
e

On 17/Aug/14 11:35, Ralph Robertson via Mercedes wrote:

I have a '84 300CD and a '87 300SDL and both vehicles' lights are not
bright enough for night driving especially on back roads.  I have tried
upgrading the bulbs for brighter ones, but nothing yet is satisfactory.
Any suggestions for making these safer?  Thanks.
Ralph
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner 
has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.





___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.



___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Fridge update

2014-08-18 Thread Randy Bennell via Mercedes

On 18/08/2014 12:55 PM, Curt Raymond via Mercedes wrote:

You might remember a couple weeks ago when I was working on my fridge that 
wouldn't defrost. Well I'm sitting in the living room and I just heard the 
gentle rain of water into the drain pan. The dammed thing just defrosted!

So theory: The timer was stuck. In my troubleshooting I cranked it around a 
couple cycles. At first it didn't want to come back on after I'd cranked it 
around but eventually it played right. I didn't think much of it at the time 
but I'll keep in watch mode now, if it plays up again I'll crank the timer a 
couple more times. If that works I'll replace it.

-Curt
___



Enjoy your relative youth and your good hearing.
I would never hear the refrigerator defrosting.

Randy

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Fridge update

2014-08-18 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
Blame it on the number of videos I've made in the house...

I'd noticed that the fridge wasn't running all the time which is a pretty good 
sign. When its freezing up it runs constantly as the coils freeze up since its 
not putting as much cold into the fridge compartment as it should be, 
especially once it ices over the hole from the freezer into the fridge.

The noise in question was a rather loud drip, the water drops a good 3 from 
the end of the tube to the drip tray. Our house is pretty quiet.

-Curt



 From: Randy Bennell rbenn...@bennell.ca
To: Curt Raymond curtlud...@yahoo.com; Mercedes Discussion List 
mercedes@okiebenz.com 
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Fridge update
 

On 18/08/2014 12:55 PM, Curt Raymond via Mercedes wrote:



 You might remember a couple weeks ago when I was working on my fridge that 
 wouldn't defrost. Well I'm sitting in the living room and I just heard the 
 gentle rain of water into the drain pan. The dammed thing just defrosted!

 So theory: The timer was stuck. In my troubleshooting I cranked it around a 
 couple cycles. At first it didn't want to come back on after I'd cranked it 
 around but eventually it played right. I didn't think much of it at the time 
 but I'll keep in watch mode now, if it plays up again I'll crank the timer a 
 couple more times. If that works I'll replace it.

 -Curt
 ___


Enjoy your relative youth and your good hearing.
I would never hear the refrigerator defrosting.

Randy
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


[MBZ] Republic Wireless followup

2014-08-18 Thread Curt Raymond via Mercedes
Another followup, I finally got around to signing up with Republic Wireless and 
my MotoX arrived today. Its pretty terrific, I've got the functionality almost 
up to my iPhone, just need to install the travel App that lets me build my 
expense report on the road and it'll be ready to go.

I LOVE OK Google. You say Ok Google Now plus whatever you want it to do, I've 
been playing with send text mostly. The phone wakes up (notice I never said 
to press anything), parses what you want to do, then does it Who do you want 
to text?
While Siri and I don't get along (she can't understand a word I say) Google 
gets it just about every time, surprisingly it even does well with music 
playing.

-Curt
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] MX Record Help

2014-08-18 Thread Rich Thomas via Mercedes
Doesn't it take some time for the domain info to propagate throughout 
the webertubez?  It might be that all the various mail routers and such 
don't know yet what the new target is?


--R


On 8/18/14 3:01 PM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote:

While I think I have a good understanding of DNS, the MX thing has me puzzled, 
so I'll toss it out here with the hope that someone out there knows how I can 
sort this out:

I had a domain (penoff.com) hosted on 1and1.  My email address was 
d...@penoff.com and was forwarded from the domain to Verizon, my ISP.  I also 
forwarded the address to Gmail as well for redundancy.

When I went to transfer my domains to GoDaddy on Sunday, they suggested that I 
configure off-site DNS so that when the domains transferred in they would be 
able to configure DNS on the spot.

As one might expect, when the DNS changes propagated, it broke my mail, as the 
MX records didn't match in DNS.

I can configure the MX servers in my DNS control panel at GoDaddy, however, I'm a little 
confused as to how my mail will get to Verizon.  I say that since the former incoming 
mail from my web host was forwarded to Verizon (dpen...@verizon.net) in this form, not as 
d...@penoff.com.

How will Verizon's servers know what to do with mail coming in from penoff.com 
since it won't be pointed at a Verizon account?  The only thing I can set up in 
the MX records are my domain name and the smtp server I want the mail pointed 
to?

Help?

Dan
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.




___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] MX Record Help

2014-08-18 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
It depends on the ISP, but I have run the MX Lookup tool on the domain name and 
it's already showing that it's pointed at Verizon.  This confirms that the MX 
server records have propagated through DNS.

I may have been a bit obtuse.  Here's the rub:

If I send an email to d...@penoff.com, it goes to my domain and gets resolved 
by the MX settings, which send the mail to smtp.verizon,net.  Since the 
incoming mail has my domain rather than a *@verizon.net domain address, how 
would the Verizon mailservers know it's mail for me? (dpen...@verizon.net.)

In other words, how would they resolve my domain name to my personal account?

Does this make sense?

I have Googled this every possible way I can think of and I'm not finding 
anything.  I'm either not asking the right question or I misunderstand 
something.

Thanks,

Dan


On Aug 18, 2014, at 4:20 PM, Rich Thomas richthomas79td...@constructivity.net 
wrote:

 Doesn't it take some time for the domain info to propagate throughout the 
 webertubez?  It might be that all the various mail routers and such don't 
 know yet what the new target is?
 
 --R
 
 
 On 8/18/14 3:01 PM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote:
 While I think I have a good understanding of DNS, the MX thing has me 
 puzzled, so I'll toss it out here with the hope that someone out there knows 
 how I can sort this out:
 
 I had a domain (penoff.com) hosted on 1and1.  My email address was 
 d...@penoff.com and was forwarded from the domain to Verizon, my ISP.  I 
 also forwarded the address to Gmail as well for redundancy.
 
 When I went to transfer my domains to GoDaddy on Sunday, they suggested that 
 I configure off-site DNS so that when the domains transferred in they would 
 be able to configure DNS on the spot.
 
 As one might expect, when the DNS changes propagated, it broke my mail, as 
 the MX records didn't match in DNS.
 
 I can configure the MX servers in my DNS control panel at GoDaddy, however, 
 I'm a little confused as to how my mail will get to Verizon.  I say that 
 since the former incoming mail from my web host was forwarded to Verizon 
 (dpen...@verizon.net) in this form, not as d...@penoff.com.
 
 How will Verizon's servers know what to do with mail coming in from 
 penoff.com since it won't be pointed at a Verizon account?  The only thing I 
 can set up in the MX records are my domain name and the smtp server I want 
 the mail pointed to?
 
 Help?
 
 Dan
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has 
 no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
 
 

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Dan Penoff

2014-08-18 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:21:02 -0400 Mitch Haley via Mercedes
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote:
  It's not. 11 killed my domain when I transferred it so my email
  isn't redirecting right now.
 
 Ouch.
 Craig didn't have any problems when he moved his domain, did he?

No, he didn't have any problems.

The folks at SWCP were very concerned about 11 locking my domains so I
couldn't transfer them, so they had me click on the correct box on 11's
page to allow changes to be made and then did their business with the
registrar (Internic?). 11 had no idea what was going on until the final
step of transferring my domains out of their control.


 When I set up a new domain last month, I looked through my old saved
 messages on the subject and took Curt and Craig's advice in going with
 11. Now I'm wondering if I should have asked the question again
 instead of using old answers.

Things do change ... Hopefully, you will get good service from them,
Mitch.


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] headlight brightness, 123 126

2014-08-18 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:20:17 -0400 WILTON via Mercedes
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 I put 7 in. Hellas on my 81 300D 'bout 12 years ago.  The first time I 
 turned them on at night, I threw so much light out front that I thought
 I felt some thrust (deceleration) to the rear.

!   :-)


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] headlight brightness, 123 126

2014-08-18 Thread ernest breakfield via Mercedes

yep; the difference between DOT and real headlamps is like that.

as popular as Hellas are, i specifically didn't mention Hellas 
because in the cars where my family of lighting geeks has compared 
Hellas side-by-side with Cibiés, we've found that when they're aimed 
properly (so that the high beam points out to the horizon), the low beam 
pattern for the Hellas was shorter than the Cibiés.
considering that most of us do 90% of our driving on the low beams, 
that's pretty significant.



cheers!
e


On 18/Aug/14 12:20, WILTON wrote:
I put 7 in. Hellas on my 81 300D 'bout 12 years ago. The first time I 
turned
them on at night, I threw so much light out front that I thought I 
felt some

thrust (deceleration) to the rear.

Wilton

- Original Message - From: ernest breakfield via Mercedes 
mercedes@okiebenz.com

To: mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] headlight brightness, 123  126


toss the stock lamps, not just the bulbs.

get a set of H4 Cibié lamps and some decent bulbs like the
Sylvania/Osrams, or high-efficacy Narvas; they'll mount in the same
place as the stuff that came stock.
having the right light in front of a car isn't just about wattage;
it's about having a lens and reflector in the lamp that put the light in
the right place (and don't interfere with oncoming traffic). lamps in
most other parts of the world did a much better job of this than what
the US DOT stuck us with.


cheers!
e

On 17/Aug/14 11:35, Ralph Robertson via Mercedes wrote:

I have a '84 300CD and a '87 300SDL and both vehicles' lights are not
bright enough for night driving especially on back roads.  I have tried
upgrading the bulbs for brighter ones, but nothing yet is satisfactory.
Any suggestions for making these safer?  Thanks.
Ralph
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, 
those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The 
list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each 
contributor.





___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list 
owner has no control over the content of the messages of each 
contributor.






___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] headlight brightness, 123 126

2014-08-18 Thread Randy Bennell via Mercedes

And that is really the problem isn't it?
There is so much traffic anymore that I am stuck on low beam most of the 
time and most low beam lamps don't light enough ground for me at highway 
speeds - especially as I get older and my vision deteriorates.


Randy


On 18/08/2014 3:52 PM, ernest breakfield via Mercedes wrote:

yep; the difference between DOT and real headlamps is like that.

as popular as Hellas are, i specifically didn't mention Hellas 
because in the cars where my family of lighting geeks has compared 
Hellas side-by-side with Cibiés, we've found that when they're aimed 
properly (so that the high beam points out to the horizon), the low 
beam pattern for the Hellas was shorter than the Cibiés.
considering that most of us do 90% of our driving on the low 
beams, that's pretty significant.



cheers!
e


On 18/Aug/14 12:20, WILTON wrote:
I put 7 in. Hellas on my 81 300D 'bout 12 years ago. The first time I 
turned
them on at night, I threw so much light out front that I thought I 
felt some

thrust (deceleration) to the rear.

Wilton

- Original Message - From: ernest breakfield via Mercedes 
mercedes@okiebenz.com

To: mercedes@okiebenz.com
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] headlight brightness, 123  126


toss the stock lamps, not just the bulbs.

get a set of H4 Cibié lamps and some decent bulbs like the
Sylvania/Osrams, or high-efficacy Narvas; they'll mount in the same
place as the stuff that came stock.
having the right light in front of a car isn't just about wattage;
it's about having a lens and reflector in the lamp that put the light in
the right place (and don't interfere with oncoming traffic). lamps in
most other parts of the world did a much better job of this than what
the US DOT stuck us with.


cheers!
e

On 17/Aug/14 11:35, Ralph Robertson via Mercedes wrote:

I have a '84 300CD and a '87 300SDL and both vehicles' lights are not
bright enough for night driving especially on back roads.  I have tried
upgrading the bulbs for brighter ones, but nothing yet is satisfactory.
Any suggestions for making these safer?  Thanks.
Ralph
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, 
those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The 
list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each 
contributor.





___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, 
those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The 
list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each 
contributor.






___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list 
owner has no control over the content of the messages of each 
contributor.



___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] MX Record Help

2014-08-18 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 15:01:22 -0400 Dan Penoff via Mercedes
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 While I think I have a good understanding of DNS, the MX thing has me
 puzzled, so I'll toss it out here with the hope that someone out there
 knows how I can sort this out:

Yes, MX is a little confusing; I'm not sure I completely understand it
myself.



 I had a domain (penoff.com) hosted on 1and1.  My email address was
 d...@penoff.com and was forwarded from the domain to Verizon, my ISP.
 I also forwarded the address to Gmail as well for redundancy.

So in that case, Verizon did take incoming mail from your domain. You
just need to repeat what was set up then. (The only problem, I'm sure is
finding out what you had then.)



 When I went to transfer my domains to GoDaddy on Sunday, they suggested
 that I configure off-site DNS so that when the domains transferred in
 they would be able to configure DNS on the spot.

That was the first step in my switchover from 11 to SWCP. They changed
11's DNS record from 11's DNS server to theirs. Then, when the domains
were transferred, they changed the DNS registration to point to their
servers instead of 11's. It caused a few hours of downtime, but worked
just fine.



 As one might expect, when the DNS changes propagated, it broke my mail,
 as the MX records didn't match in DNS.

I just ran this:

[craig@mccluskey ~]$ nslookup penoff.com
Server: 198.59.115.2
Address:198.59.115.2#53

Non-authoritative answer:
*** Can't find penoff.com: No answer

[craig@mccluskey ~]$ host penoff.com
penoff.com mail is handled by 10 smtp.verizon.net.
[craig@mccluskey ~]$ 


That tells me you have no web server but have mail configured, as I do
here:

[craig@mccluskey ~]$ nslookup pisquared.net
Server: 198.59.115.2
Address:198.59.115.2#53

*** Can't find pisquared.net: No answer

[craig@mccluskey ~]$ host pisquared.net
pisquared.net mail is handled by 10 mx1.swcp.com.
[craig@mccluskey ~]$ 



 I can configure the MX servers in my DNS control panel at GoDaddy,
 however, I'm a little confused as to how my mail will get to Verizon.
 I say that since the former incoming mail from my web host was
 forwarded to Verizon (dpen...@verizon.net) in this form, not as
 d...@penoff.com.

With your information at GoDaddy, I presume you have some sort of mail
handling service so mail coming to your domain is not rejected. If you
do (and I don't see how you would not), all you need to do is set it up
to forward from d...@penoff.com to dpen...@verison.net.



 If I send an email to d...@penoff.com, it goes to my domain and gets
 resolved by the MX settings, which send the mail to smtp.verizon,net.
 Since the incoming mail has my domain rather than a *@verizon.net
 domain address, how would the Verizon mailservers know it's mail for
 me? (dpen...@verizon.net.)
 
 In other words, how would they resolve my domain name to my personal
 account?

My situation is slightly different because my domain hosting and email
serving are by the same company. I do, however, have a forward from, for
example, diese...@pisquared.net to the account at which I really pick up
my email. That forward is a part of my domain hosting.



 Help?

How about calling tech support at Verizon and GoDaddy?


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


[MBZ] W124 headlights [was Re: headlight brightness, 123 126]

2014-08-18 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:03:51 -0400 Dan Penoff via Mercedes
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 The headlights on these cars are woefully inadequate even for their
 time, and border on being dangerous when driving the car at highway
 speeds, in my opinion.  My R129 (SL500) has the same lights as the
 W124, and I might as well be holding a candle in front of a reflector.
 It's about as efficient as these headlights...

How does one tell if the headlights in one's W124 are the ones to which
you here refer, Dan, or a better version?

I think the lighting of our W124s has been quite adequate, even with
standard wiring and standard bulbs.


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site

2014-08-18 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:09:40 -0700 Jim Cathey via Mercedes
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

  ...And find a decent web editor.
 
 There's a lot to be said for NON-wysiwyg, aka wisiwiw,
 using something like emacs.  The learning curve is a
 bit steeper, but there are no surprises and you're
 in complete control of everything.  A browser refresh
 is fast, and that's all you need to see if a change
 came out right or not.

All my web pages have been created with vi.


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


[MBZ] Stupid people

2014-08-18 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin via Mercedes
Had my office ship me a spare hard drive for a lap top. It arrived in about a 
4x6 box, just in the box, just the jar drive, no packing material, just in the 
empty box. Fixing to install it, wonder what the chances are it's still good.

Sent from my iPhone
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Stupid people

2014-08-18 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 16:49:09 -0500 Kaleb C. Striplin via Mercedes
mercedes@okiebenz.com wrote:

 Had my office ship me a spare hard drive for a lap top. It arrived in
 about a 4x6 box, just in the box, just the jar drive, no packing
 material, just in the empty box. Fixing to install it, wonder what the
 chances are it's still good.

I once bought a hard drive from someone on eBay. It arrived wrapped in
a layer of cardboard. It worked.


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Insurance Comparison

2014-08-18 Thread Randy Bennell via Mercedes

On 16/08/2014 9:28 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote:

Randy,

I was chatting with a Canadian guy on one of the other forums I frequent about 
(aboot?) car insurance.

Is it significantly different in Canada compared to the States, or are you 
familiar with our car insurance system here?

Just curious

Dan
___



In Manitoba, we have Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation - MPIC or 
Autopac. A government run monopoly on car insurance.
It is no fault so you cannot sue for injuries. They have a chart of some 
sort so if you lose your hand in an accident, they pay you the same 
whether you were a car sales man or a surgeon.
It started out cheaper than private insurance companies. No idea if it 
still is.
In Winnipeg we pay from about $1200 to $1400 each for my truck, my 
wife's 07 Accord and the old 300D. It gets switched to storage insurance 
between Nov 1 and whenever the roads get cleaned up in the spring so I 
don't pay the full bore on it.
That is with a pretty good driving record. They are all registered to my 
wife. She wrecked the Toyota Avalon a few years back but apart from 
that, no driving issues so she has a full load of merit points.


My elder son moved to Ottawa, Ontario and pays about the same there as 
he did here for a Mazda 3. Cannot recall what year - must be a 2011 or 2012.
That is Ottawa however and I am told if he were in Toronto, he would 
likely pay about 3 times as much.


Here in Manitoba, the rates are lower if you don't live in Winnipeg but 
only if you don't commute into Winnipeg daily.


Ontario has private insurance and a modified no fault system. You can 
sue for big injuries but not for the small stuff.


Saskatchewan has SGI so very similar to our MPIC and BC has BCIC again 
like MPIC.

Alberta remains private insurance.

Not sure about Quebec. I think they were first in Canada to have no 
fault but I don't know as though they have state run monopoly insurance.


No real idea what goes on in the Maritimes.

Back when we used to sue for damages on auto accident claims, we had to 
include a claim for medical costs. The state run insurance company would 
reimburse the state run hospital for costs of treatment in auto 
accidents so I don't know as though our tax funded medical system made 
our car insurance any cheaper.
Our medical costs were no so high as you generally hear about medical 
costs in the USA so it may have helped in that regard.


How is that for a general answer to your question?

Randy


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] headlight brightness, 123 126

2014-08-18 Thread Ned Kleinhenz via Mercedes
I think Ernest probably has it right.
But do the '94-95 124 headlights fit the earlier 124's?  Those lights on my '95 
were the brightest I ever had on any car
Ned 

Sent from my iPhone
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] 300SDL in Bawstun

2014-08-18 Thread Dwight Giles via Mercedes
Hmm. Thanks Dan. I have had a long- time lusting in my heart for an SDL.
But we are going on vacation in the AMmy driveway privileges are close
to max.
On Aug 18, 2014 3:05 PM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes mercedes@okiebenz.com
wrote:


 http://www.benzworld.org/forums/w126-s-se-sec-sel-sd/1463904-w126-related-items-sale-wanted-buy-352.html#post9847945

 Dan
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com

 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those
 individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner
 has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site

2014-08-18 Thread Jim Cathey via Mercedes
I was looking at your site today, read through some of the early 
history of the Chicken Wagon, hard to believe that was all the way 
back in 2007...


The log may have started in 2007, but the CW itself is maybe
2002.  That one picture of my son, born in 2001, in back in
the baby bucket tells that story.  The logs themselves didn't
really get going until 2004.

-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] W124 headlights [was Re: headlight brightness, 123 126]

2014-08-18 Thread Jim Cathey via Mercedes

How does one tell if the headlights in one's W124 are the ones to which
you here refer, Dan, or a better version?


Pretty sure if it uses a 9004 bulb, they are NOT a better version!
A tripod of three glass bumps on the front is also a pretty good
indication of USDOT lamps.  This is/was for an automatic aiming
device.

-- Jim


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] headlight brightness, 123 126

2014-08-18 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes

WILTON via Mercedes wrote:
I put 7 in. Hellas on my 81 300D 'bout 12 years ago.  The first time I 
turned
them on at night, I threw so much light out front that I thought I felt 
some

thrust (deceleration) to the rear.


I only bought one set of E-code lamps new, Hella 6x8.
The aiming instructions called for setting the low beam cutoff level to slightly 
down, with the point at which the low beam started rising to illuminate road 
signs aimed straight ahead. I followed those instructions to the best of my 
ability, and loved those lights. I never felt the high beams were aimed too high 
either. I put a set of Candlepower 55/100w bulbs in them. Woe be onto any fool 
in a pickup truck who failed to dim his lights to me. Even a quick beam flash 
probably left them seeing spots for the next half hour.


Mitch.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site

2014-08-18 Thread Fmiser via Mercedes
 Jim wrote:

 There's a lot to be said for NON-wysiwyg, aka wisiwiw,
 using something like emacs.  The learning curve is a
 bit steeper, but there are no surprises and you're
 in complete control of everything.  A browser refresh
 is fast, and that's all you need to see if a change
 came out right or not.

 You can lay out a few dummy pages using a tool whose
 output you like, then view the source to see what is
 going on and model your edits after that.
 
 It's surprising how messy the output of such tools
 can be.

I use emacs.  But I have found bluefish and html-kit to be helpful
because the tag names are all listed conveniently.  You still write
markup - but with a crutch. *smiles*

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] W124 headlights [was Re: headlight brightness, 123 126]

2014-08-18 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:05:09 -0700 Jim Cathey jim.cathey...@gmail.com
wrote:

  How does one tell if the headlights in one's W124 are the ones to
  which you here refer, Dan, or a better version?
 
 Pretty sure if it uses a 9004 bulb, they are NOT a better version!
 A tripod of three glass bumps on the front is also a pretty good
 indication of USDOT lamps.  This is/was for an automatic aiming
 device.

Ours use H4 bulbs and have a flat front.

This is on a '95 W124, if that makes any difference.


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.


Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site

2014-08-18 Thread Scott Ritchey via Mercedes
I've been using a free downloadable HTML editor called KompoZer.  For a
johnny-come-lately like me it works pretty well.

Scott

 -Original Message-
 From: Mercedes [mailto:mercedes-boun...@okiebenz.com] On Behalf Of
 Fmiser via Mercedes
 Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 9:24 PM
 To: mercedes@okiebenz.com
 Subject: Re: [MBZ] Reworked Web Site
 
  Jim wrote:
 
  There's a lot to be said for NON-wysiwyg, aka wisiwiw, using something
  like emacs.  The learning curve is a bit steeper, but there are no
  surprises and you're in complete control of everything.  A browser
  refresh is fast, and that's all you need to see if a change came out
  right or not.
 
  You can lay out a few dummy pages using a tool whose output you like,
  then view the source to see what is going on and model your edits
  after that.
 
  It's surprising how messy the output of such tools can be.
 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those 
individuals are responsible for the content of the post.  The list owner has no 
control over the content of the messages of each contributor.