Re: A backwards approach to upgrading.
compared to the regular approach, this is certainly backwards. -- Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg Amsterdam
dmesg for Asus Striker Extreme Motherboard w/ unknown product
Hello misc@ here is a dmesg of my new system, This post is to let the developers know about the unknown product (not sure why it repeats so many times) I asume it is my Video Card There is a single Nvidia 8800 GTS Video Card in this system also on the Logitech G15 Keyboard keyboard the decimal key on the Number pad does not work, it just spits out escape charters instead. Thank you again Sam Fourman Jr. OpenBSD 4.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #1248: Tue Mar 27 13:48:13 MDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.14 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,xTPR real mem = 2145939456 (2095644K) avail mem = 1951256576 (1905524K) using 4278 buffers containing 107421696 bytes (104904K) of memory User Kernel Config UKC enable acpi 389 acpi0 enabled UKC quit Continuing... mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 12/20/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf1dd0, SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xf (77 entries) bios0: ASUSTeK Computer INC. StrikerExtreme apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2 apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown apm0: flags 70102 dobusy 1 doidle 1 pcibios0 at bios0: rev 3.0 @ 0xf/0xd8b4 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfd760/336 (19 entries) pcibios0: bad IRQ table checksum pcibios0: PCI BIOS has 19 Interrupt Routing table entries pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 5 7 10 11 pcibios0: no compatible PCI ICU found pcibios0: Warning, unable to fix up PCI interrupt routing pcibios0: PCI bus #8 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xc400 0xd/0x4000! acpi0 at mainbus0: rev 2 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP HPET MCFG APIC acpitimer at acpi0 not configured acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: apic clock running at 267 MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.14 GHz cpu1: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,xTPR ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 4 pa 0xfec0, version 11, 24 pins ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 4 acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 2 (HUB0) acpibtn at acpi0 not configured acpitz at acpi0 not configured pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03a1 rev 0xa2 vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ac (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 1 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03aa (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 2 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03a9 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 3 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ab (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 4 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03a8 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa2) at pci0 dev 0 function 5 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b5 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 6 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b4 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 7 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ad (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 0 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ae (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 1 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03af (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 2 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b0 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 3 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b1 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 4 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b2 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 5 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b3 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 6 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b6 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 2 function 0 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03bc (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ba (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 2 function 2 not configured ppb0 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b7 rev 0xa1 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x0193 rev 0xa2 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) NVIDIA MCP55 Memory rev 0xa1 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 not configured pcib0 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 NVIDIA MCP55 ISA rev 0xa2 nviic0
Re: Booting a Thinkpad T23
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, sweetnsourbkr wrote: John Gould wrote: Burn a single session CD-R it should just work! Why are you trying to make and boot a multi session CD? There really is no need! The packages aren't included in cd40.iso, are they? From what I understand, I must either do what I did, or burn 2 CDs, one for the boot process and the other one for packages, right? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Booting-a-Thinkpad-T23-tf3525744.html#a9841885 Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com. No there not, but if I were you I'd burn a single session CD using cd40.iso and a separate CD containing the packages. Alternatively you could just burn cd40.iso, install and then use pkg_add to grab whatever packages you want off whatever site is convenient to you. Best regards John.
anyone using smtp-vilter with attachment backend ?
*** Warning: Your file, no filename/Presentation1.ppt, was not scanned by InterScan MSS. *** Hello, I'm trying to setup smtp-vilter-1.3.6p0 with sendmail on 4.1_STABLE. smtp-vilter works with the regex and the clamd backend but _not_ with the attachment backend. (For this test I temporarily disabled the clamd backend, as it is working nicely!) I'm sending a mail with an .ppt attachment, as defined in the attachment.conf file, it should be marked as an unwanted content! Unfortunately it isn't I tried many different combinations, restarting reloading etc ... adding other unwanted file extensions but the attachments are always declared valid, whatever I try !!! Below you will find the different config files and smtp-vilter running in verbose mode while receiving an email containing unwanted content (undetected by smtp-vilter). Thank you very much for helping!!! kind regards didier Here is a sample mail, that should have been marked as containing unwanted content: --- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 5 13:04:56 2007 Content-return: prohibited Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:04:47 +0200 From: Didier Wiroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: No Subject To: Didier [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Boundary_(ID_/CT8fSiDCvtRjkDQZOdk7Q) X-SMTP-Vilter-Version: 1.3.6 X-SMTP-Vilter-Unwanted-Backend: attachment X-SMTP-Vilter-Unwanted-Backend: regex X-SMTP-Vilter-regex-Unwanted-Status: clean X-SMTP-Vilter-attachment-Unwanted-Status: clean --Boundary_(ID_/CT8fSiDCvtRjkDQZOdk7Q) Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Boundary_(ID_efxiFmA88sy9/oI8ADc4yQ) --Boundary_(ID_efxiFmA88sy9/oI8ADc4yQ) Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT --Boundary_(ID_efxiFmA88sy9/oI8ADc4yQ) Content-type: TEXT/HTML; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN HTMLHEAD META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=us-ascii META content=MSHTML 6.00.2900.3059 name=GENERATOR/HEAD BODY DIVnbsp;/DIV/BODY/HTML --Boundary_(ID_efxiFmA88sy9/oI8ADc4yQ)-- --Boundary_(ID_/CT8fSiDCvtRjkDQZOdk7Q) Content-type: APPLICATION/vnd.ms-powerpoint; NAME=Presentation1.ppt Content-transfer-encoding: BASE64 Content-disposition: attachment; filename=Presentation1.ppt Content-description: Presentation1.ppt 0M8R4KGxGuEAPgADAP7/CQAGAAAB DwAAEAAAEQEAAAD+ABD/ etc etc ... end snip-- --- smtp-vilter.conf user=_vilter group=_vilter chroot=/var/smtp-vilter tmpfiles=g+r tmpfiles=setgrp backend-path=/usr/local/lib/smtp-vilter backend=regex,attachment,clamd config-file=clamd:/etc/smtp-vilter/clamd.conf config-file=spamd:/etc/smtp-vilter/spamd.conf config-file=icap:/etc/smtp-vilter/icap.conf config-file=attachment:/etc/smtp-vilter/attachment.conf config-file=regex:/etc/smtp-vilter/regex.conf virus-strategy=notify-recipient recipient-notification=/etc/smtp-vilter/recipient-notification spam-strategy=mark spam-subject-prefix=* SPAM * spam-header=X-Its-A-Nuisance: This is spam unwanted-strategy=mark error-strategy=mark port=unix:/var/run/smtp-vilter.sock tmpdir=/tmp log-facility=mail logfile=/var/log/smtp-vilter.log statfile=/var/log/stats option=logvirus option=logspam option=logunwanted option=logall option=markall --- /etc/smtp-vilter/attachment.conf case-sensitive=false unwanted-filename=.*\.exe$ unwanted-filename=.*\.bat$ unwanted-filename=.*\.pif$ unwanted-filename=.*\.ppt$ unwanted-filename=.*\.com$ unwanted-filename=.*\.url$ unwanted-content-type=application/octet-stream unwanted-content-type=image/.* attachment-notification=/etc/smtp-vilter/attachment-notification --- smtp-vilter running verbose and receiving an email with unwanted .ppt content, but not detecting it: # /usr/local/sbin/smtp-vilter -v smtp-vilter: config-file for unused backend clamd defined smtp-vilter: config-file for unused backend spamd defined smtp-vilter: config-file for unused backend icap defined smtp-vilter: loading backend regex from file /usr/local/lib/smtp-vilter/vilter-regex.so smtp-vilter: regex: vilter_init() smtp-vilter: regex: using configuration from file /etc/smtp-vilter/regex.conf smtp-vilter: regex: adding unwanted header pattern From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp-vilter: regex: adding unwanted header pattern From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtp-vilter: regex: adding unwanted body pattern Philip Potocki smtp-vilter: regex: adding unwanted body pattern Ralph Lewin smtp-vilter: regex: vilter_init() return smtp-vilter: loading backend attachment from file /usr/local/lib/smtp-vilter/vilter-attachment.so smtp-vilter: attachment: vilter_init() smtp-vilter: attachment: using configuration from file /etc/smtp-vilter/attachment.conf smtp-vilter: attachment: adding unwanted filename pattern .*\.exe$ smtp-vilter: attachment: adding unwanted
Re: A backwards approach to upgrading.
At 02:22 PM 4/4/07, Peter Fraser wrote: I use an approach to upgrading that I have not seen written anywhere. It does need additional space in the root partition but with disks these days that is not normally a problem. First copy away the important parts of the root partition onto another partition. What is the important parts is up to you, but should include any changes that you have made to the root partition. I use the ROOTBACKUP code in /etc/daily which copies the root partition to another partition on a separate disk, so that is done automatically. If you've got the space to waste on a large root partition; wouldn't it make more sense to simply leave the original root partition as a small slice and create a partition used exclusively for installing new releases; then merge from this 'install' partition to your live partitions.
Re: dmesg for Asus Striker Extreme Motherboard w/ unknown product
I'm just curious... why would you use such an expensive video card in an OBSD system? danno -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Fourman Jr. Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 2:52 AM To: OpenBSD-Misc Subject: dmesg for Asus Striker Extreme Motherboard w/ unknown product Hello misc@ here is a dmesg of my new system, This post is to let the developers know about the unknown product (not sure why it repeats so many times) I asume it is my Video Card There is a single Nvidia 8800 GTS Video Card in this system also on the Logitech G15 Keyboard keyboard the decimal key on the Number pad does not work, it just spits out escape charters instead. Thank you again Sam Fourman Jr. OpenBSD 4.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #1248: Tue Mar 27 13:48:13 MDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.14 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36, CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST ,TM2,CX16,xTPR real mem = 2145939456 (2095644K) avail mem = 1951256576 (1905524K) using 4278 buffers containing 107421696 bytes (104904K) of memory User Kernel Config UKC enable acpi 389 acpi0 enabled UKC quit Continuing... mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 12/20/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf1dd0, SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xf (77 entries) bios0: ASUSTeK Computer INC. StrikerExtreme apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2 apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown apm0: flags 70102 dobusy 1 doidle 1 pcibios0 at bios0: rev 3.0 @ 0xf/0xd8b4 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfd760/336 (19 entries) pcibios0: bad IRQ table checksum pcibios0: PCI BIOS has 19 Interrupt Routing table entries pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 5 7 10 11 pcibios0: no compatible PCI ICU found pcibios0: Warning, unable to fix up PCI interrupt routing pcibios0: PCI bus #8 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xc400 0xd/0x4000! acpi0 at mainbus0: rev 2 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP HPET MCFG APIC acpitimer at acpi0 not configured acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: apic clock running at 267 MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.14 GHz cpu1: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36, CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST ,TM2,CX16,xTPR ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 4 pa 0xfec0, version 11, 24 pins ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 4 acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 2 (HUB0) acpibtn at acpi0 not configured acpitz at acpi0 not configured pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03a1 rev 0xa2 vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ac (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 1 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03aa (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 2 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03a9 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 3 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ab (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 4 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03a8 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa2) at pci0 dev 0 function 5 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b5 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 6 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b4 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 7 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ad (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 0 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ae (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 1 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03af (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 2 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b0 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 3 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b1 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 4 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b2 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 5 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b3 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 6 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b6 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 2 function 0 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03bc (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ba (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 2 function 2 not configured ppb0 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b7 rev 0xa1 pci1 at ppb0
Issue with rThreads and Shared Libraries
Hi Ive found a way to freeze a program when using rThreads and using a function pointer back to one of the threads from within a shared library. The higher the level of interrupts on the system, the more frequently the problem occurs. The problem can be duplicated as follows: 1. Create a child rThread 2. Pass a function pointer to a shared library 3. Get the shared library to call the function pointer The program will now lockup, and you must kill -9 it. I originally found this in pcap, inside pcap_loop when it tries to call the callback function. I have attached a very small project and shared library that will reproduce the problem. Just run ./configure ./make Then generate a lot of interrupts somehow. I do this by running iperf -us // on the test machine iperf -uc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -b 5 -t // on some other machine Then if you run ./callback 1 and try and kill it with Ctrl-C, it should freeze. It may take a few tries though. It usually happens for me within 3 or 4 tries if I run iperf really fast. If you run ./callback then it wont lockup. The only difference is that when you pass in the 1, it creates the child thread. Id like to try this on current but I cant get rThreads compiled for it. Does anybody have any insight, or could they test it out on current? Thanks in advance Jonathan Steel [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/x-gzip which had a name of amcallback-1.0.tar.gz]
running OpenBSD on switch hardware
Hello all, I've got this linksys SRW2016 managed 16 port gigabit switch at home. The only problem with it, is that the firmware well eh, sucks. The telnet interface can't configure everything (just basic setup, you can't even set up SNMP or VLANs) and the webinterface only works correctly with Internet Explorer. Now during the bootup messages I see that the processor is an ARM946E-S. Since OpenBSD should run on ARM processors (armish port?) I wonder if it would be possible to replace the current firmware with an OpenBSD install. To upgrade the firmware, you need two images, a boot image and software image. But before I get started, would this even be possible? I'm already having a hard time screwing open the device :-(. You have to keep in mind I'm no good at programming, I know very little C beyond hello world, let alone booting such a piece of hardware. Thanks, Glenn
Re: Issue with rThreads and Shared Libraries
On 4/5/07, Jon Steel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ive found a way to freeze a program when using rThreads and using a function pointer back to one of the threads from within a shared library. The higher the level of interrupts on the system, the more frequently the problem occurs. The problem can be duplicated as follows: 1. Create a child rThread 2. Pass a function pointer to a shared library 3. Get the shared library to call the function pointer ld.so isn't thread safe yet, but should be shortly.
Re: Issue with rThreads and Shared Libraries
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Jon Steel wrote: Hi Ive found a way to freeze a program when using rThreads and using a function pointer back to one of the threads from within a shared library. The higher the level of interrupts on the system, the more frequently the problem occurs. The problem can be duplicated as follows: 1. Create a child rThread 2. Pass a function pointer to a shared library 3. Get the shared library to call the function pointer The program will now lockup, and you must kill -9 it. I originally found this in pcap, inside pcap_loop when it tries to call the callback function. I have attached a very small project and shared library that will reproduce the problem. Just run ./configure ./make Then generate a lot of interrupts somehow. I do this by running iperf -us // on the test machine iperf -uc xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -b 5 -t // on some other machine Then if you run ./callback 1 and try and kill it with Ctrl-C, it should freeze. It may take a few tries though. It usually happens for me within 3 or 4 tries if I run iperf really fast. If you run ./callback then it wont lockup. The only difference is that when you pass in the 1, it creates the child thread. Id like to try this on current but I cant get rThreads compiled for it. Does anybody have any insight, or could they test it out on current? See http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=113991745810561w=2 Behind the scene some works is going on to solve this. -Otto
Re: dmesg for Asus Striker Extreme Motherboard w/ unknown product
Because I Dual Boot I use OpenBSD to hack on Wireless, and FreeBSD 6.2 as a Basic Desktop System. Sam Fourman On 4/5/07, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm just curious... why would you use such an expensive video card in an OBSD system? danno -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Fourman Jr. Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 2:52 AM To: OpenBSD-Misc Subject: dmesg for Asus Striker Extreme Motherboard w/ unknown product Hello misc@ here is a dmesg of my new system, This post is to let the developers know about the unknown product (not sure why it repeats so many times) I asume it is my Video Card There is a single Nvidia 8800 GTS Video Card in this system also on the Logitech G15 Keyboard keyboard the decimal key on the Number pad does not work, it just spits out escape charters instead. Thank you again Sam Fourman Jr. OpenBSD 4.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #1248: Tue Mar 27 13:48:13 MDT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.14 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36, CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST ,TM2,CX16,xTPR real mem = 2145939456 (2095644K) avail mem = 1951256576 (1905524K) using 4278 buffers containing 107421696 bytes (104904K) of memory User Kernel Config UKC enable acpi 389 acpi0 enabled UKC quit Continuing... mainbus0 (root) bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 12/20/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xf1dd0, SMBIOS rev. 2.4 @ 0xf (77 entries) bios0: ASUSTeK Computer INC. StrikerExtreme apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2 apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown apm0: flags 70102 dobusy 1 doidle 1 pcibios0 at bios0: rev 3.0 @ 0xf/0xd8b4 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfd760/336 (19 entries) pcibios0: bad IRQ table checksum pcibios0: PCI BIOS has 19 Interrupt Routing table entries pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 5 7 10 11 pcibios0: no compatible PCI ICU found pcibios0: Warning, unable to fix up PCI interrupt routing pcibios0: PCI bus #8 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xc400 0xd/0x4000! acpi0 at mainbus0: rev 2 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP HPET MCFG APIC acpitimer at acpi0 not configured acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: apic clock running at 267 MHz cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.14 GHz cpu1: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36, CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST ,TM2,CX16,xTPR ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 4 pa 0xfec0, version 11, 24 pins ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 4 acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 2 (HUB0) acpibtn at acpi0 not configured acpitz at acpi0 not configured pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03a1 rev 0xa2 vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ac (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 1 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03aa (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 2 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03a9 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 3 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ab (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 4 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03a8 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa2) at pci0 dev 0 function 5 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b5 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 6 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b4 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 0 function 7 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ad (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 0 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ae (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 1 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03af (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 2 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b0 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 3 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b1 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 4 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b2 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 5 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b3 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 1 function 6 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03b6 (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 2 function 0 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03bc (class memory subclass RAM, rev 0xa1) at pci0 dev 2 function 1 not configured vendor NVIDIA, unknown product 0x03ba (class
Re: running OpenBSD on switch hardware
On 4/5/07, RedShift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I've got this linksys SRW2016 managed 16 port gigabit switch at home. The only problem with it, is that the firmware well eh, sucks. The telnet interface can't configure everything (just basic setup, you can't even set up SNMP or VLANs) and the webinterface only works correctly with Internet Explorer. Now during the bootup messages I see that the processor is an ARM946E-S. Since OpenBSD should run on ARM processors (armish port?) I wonder if it would be possible to replace the current firmware with an OpenBSD install. To upgrade the firmware, you need two images, a boot image and software image. But before I get started, would this even be possible? I'm already having a hard time screwing open the device :-(. You have to keep in mind I'm no good at programming, I know very little C beyond hello world, let alone booting such a piece of hardware. Thanks, Glenn I don't think the ARM 946 has a MMU which I'm pretty it needs to run OpenBSD. So I think you are out of luck. Don't know if Linux runs on systems without MMU but it's worth a try. BR dunceor
Re: firewall stopped working unexpectedly
Are you referring to the recent IPV6 issue or another? -- John Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007/4/3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] dmesg gateway# dmesg OpenBSD 3.5 (GENERIC) #1: Sat May 1 08:18:25 PDT 2004 Sorry for not being more helpfull, but why are you running a firewall with at least one known remote root exploit? Update! Best Martin
Re: firewall stopped working unexpectedly
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:55:55AM -0500, John Brooks wrote: 2007/4/3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] dmesg gateway# dmesg OpenBSD 3.5 (GENERIC) #1: Sat May 1 08:18:25 PDT 2004 Sorry for not being more helpfull, but why are you running a firewall with at least one known remote root exploit? Update! Are you referring to the recent IPV6 issue or another? I'm pretty sure it's the IP6 issue. Joachim -- TFMotD: basename (1) - return filename portion of pathname
Redirect traffic through VPN
Hi good people ! I need to make connection from server witch is in LAN1 to server witch is in LAN3. And I need to make another connection from that same server witch is in LAN3 to that same server witch is in LAN1. There is 3 different company Ethernets, and I need to make this connection trough my company. There is no way to make direct VPN from LAN1 to LAN3 - Business etc. |---LAN1-| |OpenBSD--| |--LAN2--| |-10.210.1.0/24--|---|--Router/pf/vpn--||-192.168.0.0/24-| || |-| || | | VPN IPsec over public Internet. | |---LAN3--||---Netscreen 5xt---| |-192.168.30.0/29-|--|---Router/pf/vpn---| |-||---| This VPN is from LAN2 to LAN3 I will make nat,rdr or binat, because I can't give direct access. I need to control what, where and how can connect. I tried to make redirect like this: rdr from 10.210.1.2 to 10.210.1.1 - 192.168.30.1 But, OpenBSD box, cant see the LAN3 network, or Nestcreen box internal IP. - I tried ping, telnet, ssh etc. Of course I can see that all, if i connect from LAN2 or LAN3. How can I see this server in LAN3 from OpenBSD box ? Or maybe there is better way to do that ? In my pf.conf is no deny rulle There is my ipsec.conf: ike esp from 192.168.0.0/24 to 192.168.30.0/29 \ local x.x.x.x peer x.x.x.x \ main auth hmac-md5 enc 3des \ quick auth hmac-md5 enc 3des \ psk xxx This is OpenBSD snapshot from 2007.26. Jan. (or something that way). Best regards Matiss
Re: Redirect traffic through VPN
Matiss Miglans wrote: Hi good people ! I need to make connection from server witch is in LAN1 to server witch is in LAN3. And I need to make another connection from that same server witch is in LAN3 to that same server witch is in LAN1. There is 3 different company Ethernets, and I need to make this connection trough my company. There is no way to make direct VPN from LAN1 to LAN3 - Business etc. |---LAN1-| |OpenBSD--| |--LAN2--| |-10.210.1.0/24--|---|--Router/pf/vpn--||-192.168.0.0/24-| || |-| || | | VPN IPsec over public Internet. | |---LAN3--||---Netscreen 5xt---| |-192.168.30.0/29-|--|---Router/pf/vpn---| |-||---| This VPN is from LAN2 to LAN3 I will make nat,rdr or binat, because I can't give direct access. I need to control what, where and how can connect. I tried to make redirect like this: rdr from 10.210.1.2 to 10.210.1.1 - 192.168.30.1 But, OpenBSD box, cant see the LAN3 network, or Nestcreen box internal IP. - I tried ping, telnet, ssh etc. Of course I can see that all, if i connect from LAN2 or LAN3. How can I see this server in LAN3 from OpenBSD box ? Or maybe there is better way to do that ? In my pf.conf is no deny rulle There is my ipsec.conf: ike esp from 192.168.0.0/24 to 192.168.30.0/29 \ local x.x.x.x peer x.x.x.x \ main auth hmac-md5 enc 3des \ quick auth hmac-md5 enc 3des \ psk xxx This is OpenBSD snapshot from 2007.26. Jan. (or something that way). Best regards Matiss So you have working VPN from LAN2 to LAN# and reverse? You can not NAT on the same box you run ipsec on ... Nat is applied first, then a routing decision is made and if your ip addr are outside your encryption 'domain' your traffic will not traverse the tunnel. Are LAN1 and LAN2 really hosted off the same firewall? If so then the statement no no VPN between LAN1 and LAN3 is silly. In the layout as described you need to setup a VPN from LAN1 to LAN3. You could possibly introduce an additional firewall to do nating prior to VPN but that would be again silly.
fs ACLs and hide processes
Is someone working on filesystem ACLs and hiding processes like ACLs, kern.ps_showallprocs from freebsd? if no how can i get similar effect? thanks for answers -- ubuntu.i386.pl
bcw(4) is gone
In case you don't follow -current commits, http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=117579052530442w=2 bcw(4) is gone
Re: bcw(4) is gone
and info why here, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/1558/
Re: bcw(4) is gone
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:55:10PM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote: In case you don't follow -current commits, http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvsm=117579052530442w=2 bcw(4) is gone I don't believe Michael's initial intention was to have this happen, but the nature of his first email made it almost guaranteed. For Marcus to delete the driver is absolutely understandable, and I imagine I would have done the same. It's very sad to see people supposedly on the same side fighting instead of helping each other. It's worth remembering that initial words on a topic have a lot to do with how it turns out in the end. -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation
Re: bcw(4) is gone
Diana Eichert wrote: bcw(4) is gone Marcus Glocker, [EMAIL PROTECTED], knows a big deal about wireless LANs. He has been involved in many of our wirelesss driver, he has also written applications for wireless applications like rtunes. He wrote the nostromo webserver. He is certainly the person who knows how to write original code. When it comes to bcw, a piece of hardware for that no documentation exists, he decided to use the docs the linux folks have. He began a rewrite of a bcw driver, inspired by the work of the linux folks. His driver was not working yet, to give him a headstart, he used some code of the linux folks with the clear intent to replace it with his own. Just to make sure this shit works. To ease his work, and to let others in our group to step in in his efforts, he committet it to our work area which we call cvs. The linux folks tooks this as the grounds to ride attacks agains Marcus, claiming license violations. Marcus, devoting his spare time to OpenBSD decided that this is kindergarten and best left to the Linux amateurs and deleted his driver from the OpenBSD cvs tree. Now everyone has won, the Linux people, Broadcom and the OpenBSD users. Thank you, Linux BCW developers!
Re: bcw(4) is gone
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:16 -0600, Diana Eichert wrote: and info why here, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/1558/ With apologies to everyone for off-color language... What a bunch of douches.
Re: bcw(4) is gone
I think it is sad, and a horrible representation of GPL coders. Michael doesn't speak for all of us, and it is clear to anyone with common sense that the first thing you do is contact in private. On 4/5/07, Bret Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:16 -0600, Diana Eichert wrote: and info why here, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/1558/ With apologies to everyone for off-color language... What a bunch of douches.
Re: fs ACLs and hide processes
On 4/5/07, lukasz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is someone working on filesystem ACLs and hiding processes like ACLs, kern.ps_showallprocs from freebsd? no.
Re: bcw(4) is gone
And this make it even worst: http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38746 All good work and good faith to come with better end results is wrongfully drag into mud. I read all the thread and this makes me sick! It only makes me more sick with anything carrying GPL, Linux, and Broadcom names on it. Even the part of the discussion about relicensing code so that they can include it in their GPL because Linus refuse BSD code was a twisted angle to try to justify their actions. This makes me sick! I guess all the Microsoft of the world that can't compete on good, secure and clean code got an other win today as they can't beat the good guys at their own game, well no need let them destroy each others so we win anyway in the end. A great day for the Open Source community I tell you. This makes me so sick that I can't even come up with words to describe it properly, so I will not try! Where is the Open Community is going these days...
Re: fs ACLs and hide processes
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 08:53:36PM +0200, lukasz wrote: Is someone working on filesystem ACLs and hiding processes like ACLs, kern.ps_showallprocs from freebsd? if no how can i get similar effect? No, but there used to be a patch for 3.7 or thereabouts that 'solved' this issue in a 'proper' way. To get that effect, use another system, and/or be very clever about using systrace... Joachim -- TFMotD: netgroup (5) - defines network groups
OPENBSD_4_1 (-stable) userland build on alpha.
Interesting.
Decided to update non-production critical system and ran into the following
on the arch/alpha processor blend during the (make build) portion of the
userland builds.
arch/i386 works fine. So this could possibly be a compiler setting.,,
Although,, I am having userland compile issue on httpd on a PII system in
production I am doing a userland build on, and THAT may be because I need to
re-build the /usr/src tree from CVS.
I'm cross-referencing the problem on my test i386 unit at home.
CVS branch I'm using. Not expecting it to be rock solid, would like to try
to correct/test if possible
#cvs -d$CVSROOT up -rOPENBSD_4_1 -Pd
dmesg further below.
-snip-
*** make build ***
.
.
.
.
rm -f bfd-tmp.h
cp bfd-in3.h bfd-tmp.h
/bin/sh /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/bfd/../move-if-change bfd-tmp.h bfd.h
rm -f bfd-tmp.h
touch stmp-bfd-h
# we don't install ansidecl.h, we merge it into the file that
# needs it instead.
sed -e '/^#include
ansidecl.h/r/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/include/ansidecl.h' -e '//d'
bfd/bfd.h bfd/mybfd.h
preparing in /usr/src/include/../gnu/lib/libstdc++
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin INSTALL_PROGRAM=install -c -s
CC=cc CXX=c++ CFLAGS=-O2 -pipeCXXFLAGS=-O2 -pipe/bin/sh
/usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/libstdc++/configure --prefix=/usr --disable-nls
--enable-shared --disable-multilib --with-gnu-ld
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/g++ touch config.status
creating cache ./config.cache
checking host system type... alpha-unknown-openbsd4.1
checking target system type... alpha-unknown-openbsd4.1
checking build system type... alpha-unknown-openbsd4.1
checking for Cygwin environment... no
checking for mingw32 environment... no
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... no
checking for nawk... nawk
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for gcc... cc
checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
checking whether cc accepts -g... yes
checking for c++... c++
checking whether we are using GNU C++... yes
checking whether c++ accepts -g... yes
checking for GCC version number... 2.95.3
checking for strerror in -lcposix... no
checking for as... as
checking for ar... ar
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
CPU config directory is cpu/alpha
OS config directory is os/bsd/openbsd
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
checking for working aclocal... missing
checking for working autoconf... missing
checking for working automake... missing
checking for working autoheader... missing
checking for working makeinfo... found
checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes
checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r
checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B
checking how to recognise dependant libraries... unknown
checking for object suffix... o
checking for ranlib... (cached) ranlib
checking for strip... strip
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... c++ -E
updating cache ./config.cache
loading cache ./config.cache within ltconfig
checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... yes
checking for objdir... .libs
checking for cc option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC
checking if cc PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes
checking if cc static flag -static works... yes
finding the maximum length of command line arguments... 98305
checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking if cc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions ... yes
checking whether the linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... openbsd4.1 ld.so
checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output... ok
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... yes
checking for dlopen in -ldl... no
checking for dlopen... yes
checking for dlfcn.h... yes
checking whether a program can dlopen itself... yes
checking whether a statically linked program can dlopen itself... Wrong dl
symbols!
no
creating libtool
updating cache ./config.cache
loading cache ./config.cache
loading cache ./config.cache within ltconfig
checking host system type... alpha-unknown-openbsd4.1
checking build system type... alpha-unknown-openbsd4.1
checking for objdir... .libs
checking for c++ option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC
checking if c++ PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes
checking if c++ static flag -static works... yes
finding the maximum length of command line arguments... (cached) 98305
checking if c++ supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes
checking if c++ supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions ... yes
checking whether the linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries...
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs...
Re: bcw(4) is gone
On 4/5/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And this make it even worst: http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38746 All good work and good faith to come with better end results is wrongfully drag into mud. I read all the thread and this makes me sick! It only makes me more sick with anything carrying GPL, Linux, and Broadcom names on it. Even the part of the discussion about relicensing code so that they can include it in their GPL because Linus refuse BSD code was a twisted angle to try to justify their actions. This makes me sick! I guess all the Microsoft of the world that can't compete on good, secure and clean code got an other win today as they can't beat the good guys at their own game, well no need let them destroy each others so we win anyway in the end. A great day for the Open Source community I tell you. This makes me so sick that I can't even come up with words to describe it properly, so I will not try! Where is the Open Community is going these days... What's wrong? They protect their license. Period.
Re: bcw(4) is gone
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Daniel Ouellet wrote: And this make it even worst: http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38746 Typical of that rag. The author talks as if bcw was part of a release, not some sort of development code. Apparently GPL means Go Piss in the Lake. ... Where is the Open Community is going these days... To the lawyers *sigh*. RSM and his pet toad Egon have discovered the subtle joys, glories and honors of litigation, and this unwholesome appetite is spreading to a world starved for respect and admiration. All this once again shows that GPL is about free as in free beer, not free as in free will, and the forced acceptance of some sort of True Faith. What a waste. Barely worth talking about. Probably has negative worth to talk about it. If *BSD felt that way, we'd be auditing the Linux/GNU userland looking for Regents code falsely GPLed. But what a stupid thing to do. sarcasm Anybody willing to sign an NDA with Mr Buesch and his crew to use their spec? Are we now in the position of having to reverse engineer a reverse-engineered Linux driver? Maybe OpenBSD could put a click to consent shrink-wrap license/NDA/hold-harmless on the CVS sites (like Sun had on jde) Maybe Marcus should have released a sed script (acting on the Linux code) to grab the parts temporarily needed for debugging/regression and included them in his source? That would pass the GPL, I think -- copyright would only apply to the code output from sed and cpp, which would be transient. /sarcasm Here's a book! Don't read it! If you read it, forget it! (c) Woodchuck 2007. Some rights reserved, you guess which. Maybe the whole thing is Mr Buesch's idea of some sort of protracted April Fool's hoax. Dave I may hold the patent on the off-by-one bug. -- Resistance is futile. You've already been GPLed.
Re: bcw(4) is gone
On 4/5/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andris Delfino wrote: What's wrong? They protect their license. Period. Did you read the full tread first before you wrote this? Did you look at the code in CVS, did you even see Marcus reply and why? http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/1573 I don't think you did! He sure did a hell of a huge amount of work that was his, and original for your own benefit, and the only mistakes he may have done was to try to work on it faster then he may should have and wrongly include temporary files to help in the process! Should he had finish his work in a later time and not try to make this available sooner to us, then nothing would have been said on this. In any case a simple private email to him directly would have been the decent human being things to do, but I guess you don't even get that do you? Just like I said before. Where the hell is the open community is going these days, I have no clue... Look to me it sure enjoy destroy itself for sure. I am lost for words! Yes, and he was wrong. He shouldn't base his work in copylefted software (if he intend to release the result as non-copylefted). Licenses are licenses.
Re: bcw(4) is gone
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 05:25:53PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote: A great day for the Open Source community I tell you. In the public, most people talking about open source community don't really care about open source or community at all -- they just want great software for cheap, and they aren't developers and don't contribute. At least that's my impression. Maybe i'm wrong. I hope i'm wrong. Sorry for the rant. Ciao, Kili, still slacking far too much -- Das ist ein hiermeins dadeins BALKEN -- Kay Freier zur philosophischen Frage, wie denn die Dinger heissen, die man im Supermarkt hinter seinen Krempel aufs Fliessband packt.
Re: bcw(4) is gone
On 4/5/07, Andris Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/5/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andris Delfino wrote: What's wrong? They protect their license. Period. Where the hell is the open community is going these days, I have no clue... Look to me it sure enjoy destroy itself for sure. I am lost for words! Yes, and he was wrong. He shouldn't base his work in copylefted software (if he intend to release the result as non-copylefted). Licenses are licenses. Yeah. I'm going to have to agree. Sure the way they dealt with it was really poor form, but licenses are licenses. This has been blown all our of proportion, and this thread isn't even to 15 replies yet. -Nick
Re: monitoring raid with mpi
yeah, this is akward... i guess i should plug my mpi in again. On 05/04/2007, at 2:50 AM, Thierry Lacoste wrote: On Wednesday 04 April 2007 17:37, Chris Black wrote: Thierry Lacoste wrote: I installed OpenBSD on a Dell PowerEdge with a raid1 array controlled by a SAS 5iR controller thanks to the new mpi driver. mpi0 at pci2 dev 8 function 0 Symbios Logic SAS1068 rev 0x01: irq 5 scsibus0 at mpi0: 63 targets sd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: Dell, VIRTUAL DISK, 1028 SCSI3 0/ direct fixed sd0: 69618MB, 69618 cyl, 16 head, 128 sec, 512 bytes/sec, 142577664 sec total I would like to know if there is a way to monitor my array. Regards, Thierry. Have you tried bioctl? Yes. I use it with ami (4) but here it gives # bioctl mpi0 bioctl: Can't locate mpi0 device via /dev/bio The bio 4 manpage dosn't mention mpi0. Thierry.
Re: bcw(4) is gone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6-apr-2007, at 0:51, Andris Delfino wrote: Yes, and he was wrong. He shouldn't base his work in copylefted software (if he intend to release the result as non-copylefted). Licenses are licenses. Would it be wrong to develop software using existing GPL'ed code as a starting point. And bit by bit rewrite the code until you have rewritten all of it. Then releasing the final code under an BSD license? I still don't know exactly what happened, but I suspect the process went something like this. Only the code in the development phase was public too and this is what pissed of the developers of the GPL'ed version. Floor iD8DBQFGFYMsUnW3VkBpTO4RAoz0AJ9QbDrwd4JYO9mooUxx6TRhm5clDwCeNGW2 IvES2c/ESqR3o38RjW6sEyY= =c/+8 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: bcw(4) is gone
This isnt a question of him being wrong, its a question of HOW IT WAS HANDLED. Get it? The simple courtesy of privately emailing someone would have taken 30 seconds and would have saved everyone a bunch of time, energy, and embarrassment. On 4/5/07, Andris Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/5/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andris Delfino wrote: What's wrong? They protect their license. Period. Did you read the full tread first before you wrote this? Did you look at the code in CVS, did you even see Marcus reply and why? http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/1573 I don't think you did! He sure did a hell of a huge amount of work that was his, and original for your own benefit, and the only mistakes he may have done was to try to work on it faster then he may should have and wrongly include temporary files to help in the process! Should he had finish his work in a later time and not try to make this available sooner to us, then nothing would have been said on this. In any case a simple private email to him directly would have been the decent human being things to do, but I guess you don't even get that do you? Just like I said before. Where the hell is the open community is going these days, I have no clue... Look to me it sure enjoy destroy itself for sure. I am lost for words! Yes, and he was wrong. He shouldn't base his work in copylefted software (if he intend to release the result as non-copylefted). Licenses are licenses.
Re: bcw(4) is gone
On 4/5/07, Steven Harms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This isnt a question of him being wrong, its a question of HOW IT WAS HANDLED. Get it? The simple courtesy of privately emailing someone would have taken 30 seconds and would have saved everyone a bunch of time, energy, and embarrassment. On 4/5/07, Andris Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/5/07, Daniel Ouellet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andris Delfino wrote: What's wrong? They protect their license. Period. Did you read the full tread first before you wrote this? Did you look at the code in CVS, did you even see Marcus reply and why? http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/1573 I don't think you did! He sure did a hell of a huge amount of work that was his, and original for your own benefit, and the only mistakes he may have done was to try to work on it faster then he may should have and wrongly include temporary files to help in the process! Should he had finish his work in a later time and not try to make this available sooner to us, then nothing would have been said on this. In any case a simple private email to him directly would have been the decent human being things to do, but I guess you don't even get that do you? Just like I said before. Where the hell is the open community is going these days, I have no clue... Look to me it sure enjoy destroy itself for sure. I am lost for words! Yes, and he was wrong. He shouldn't base his work in copylefted software (if he intend to release the result as non-copylefted). Licenses are licenses. He should realized that he couldn't do that... get it?
Re: bcw(4) is gone
Andris Delfino wrote: Yes, and he was wrong. He shouldn't base his work in copylefted software (if he intend to release the result as non-copylefted). Licenses are licenses. Yes, Marcus made a mistake. But not the mistake this GPL zealots seem to think (not knowing that copying GPL code is not allowed). He should have waited to commit his code to the public CVS until he had properly rewriten the GPL code... Marcus admitted he made a mistake and corrected it. I don't see the Linux guy admitting he made a big mistake in dealing with this issue. Cheers, Dries
Re: bcw(4) is gone
On 4/6/07, Andris Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's wrong? They protect their license. Period. No one seems to dispute the right of copyright holders to protect their licence. That said, there are more ways than one to protect one's licence. It hardly seems unreasonable to privately contact the developer in question before going public, as seems to be the custom in many other suspected licence issues. Choosing to first send a private message would likely have remedied any issues, both quickly and with a lot less fallout. Too bad that that didn't happen. Rogier
Re: bcw(4) is gone
On 4/5/07, Rogier Krieger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/6/07, Andris Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's wrong? They protect their license. Period. No one seems to dispute the right of copyright holders to protect their licence. That said, there are more ways than one to protect one's licence. It hardly seems unreasonable to privately contact the developer in question before going public, as seems to be the custom in many other suspected licence issues. Choosing to first send a private message would likely have remedied any issues, both quickly and with a lot less fallout. Too bad that that didn't happen. Rogier First, this wouldn't happen cause I prefer the BSD license, but, if someone violates the copyright of my work, I'll take that guy down. In the most publicly and shameful way.
Re: bcw(4) is gone
* Andr?s Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-04-05 20:26:06]: First, this wouldn't happen cause I prefer the BSD license, but, if someone violates the copyright of my work, I'll take that guy down. In the most publicly and shameful way. Heh. I think the person that's feeling the biggest burn right now is Michael Buesch because he realizes the mistake HE made is bigger that what happened with the licensing. -- Travers Buda
Possible error on swat(8) man page on OpenBSD 4.0?
Hi, After install samba from ports (samba-3.0.21bp4) i can see in the swat(8) man page: In /etc/inetd.conf you should add a line like this: swat stream tcp nowait.400 root /usr/local/samba/sbin/swat swat But swat binary is, actually, on /usr/local/libexec/swat and not on /usr/local/samba/sbin/swat. Regards, Alvaro
Re: bcw(4) is gone
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 08:26:06PM -0300, Andr?s Delfino wrote: On 4/5/07, Rogier Krieger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/6/07, Andris Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's wrong? They protect their license. Period. No one seems to dispute the right of copyright holders to protect their licence. That said, there are more ways than one to protect one's licence. It hardly seems unreasonable to privately contact the developer in question before going public, as seems to be the custom in many other suspected licence issues. Choosing to first send a private message would likely have remedied any issues, both quickly and with a lot less fallout. Too bad that that didn't happen. Rogier First, this wouldn't happen cause I prefer the BSD license, but, if someone violates the copyright of my work, I'll take that guy down. In the most publicly and shameful way. Thats great! What would that accomplish? Software is developed by PEOPLE (plural), people dont work very well together when one of them is acting like a five year old. gwk
WEP key wireless cracking made easy
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/04/04/wireless_code_cracking/
Re: running OpenBSD on switch hardware
On 4/5/07, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/5/07, RedShift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think the ARM 946 has a MMU which I'm pretty it needs to run OpenBSD. So I think you are out of luck. Don't know if Linux runs on systems without MMU but it's worth a try. One of my greatest wishes were to get an openBSD port to run on hardware as small as a Linksys firewall http://www.openbsd.org/landisk.html fulfilled it. Though I am not sure how many ethernet ports it have/can have I wish somebody would design a simple hardware that has 24 or more NIC ports ( and of course WiFi ) and processor than can install OpenBSD. With PF then I could have a very inexpensive managed switch with ACLS for all hosts on the network:-) Thankyou so much Kind Regards Siju
Re: running OpenBSD on switch hardware
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 06:52:25PM +0200, Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor wrote: On 4/5/07, RedShift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got this linksys SRW2016 managed 16 port gigabit switch at home. The only problem with it, is that the firmware well eh, sucks. The telnet interface can't configure everything (just basic setup, you can't even set up SNMP or VLANs) and the webinterface only works correctly with Internet Explorer. Now during the bootup messages I see that the processor is an ARM946E-S. Since OpenBSD should run on ARM processors (armish port?) I wonder if it would be possible to replace the current firmware with an OpenBSD install. I don't think the ARM 946 has a MMU which I'm pretty it needs to run OpenBSD. So I think you are out of luck. Don't know if Linux runs on systems without MMU but it's worth a try. NetBSD says it will run anything, will it run this? Doug.
Re: bcw(4) is gone
There are two roads, the high and the low road. I am not sure why an adult (assuming) needs to be educated on this. The guy took code and relicensed it. That sucks. We know. But instead of trying to work with him, and educated him (since he does do a ton of work on free software), Michael effectively destroys him. Thats fair. Whether code is GPL or BSD, we all are in the same sea, and our boats are pretty damn close. On 4/5/07, Andris Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He should realized that he couldn't do that... get it?
Re: running OpenBSD on switch hardware
Siju George wrote: I wish somebody would design a simple hardware that has 24 or more NIC ports ( and of course WiFi ) and processor than can install OpenBSD. With PF then I could have a very inexpensive managed switch with ACLS for all hosts on the network:-) The problem isn't just getting lots of ports on a device (usb could probably do that), it's getting lots of ports on a device and getting them all to run at full bandwidth.
Re: running OpenBSD on switch hardware
On 4/5/07, Steve Shockley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Siju George wrote: I wish somebody would design a simple hardware that has 24 or more NIC ports ( and of course WiFi ) and processor than can install OpenBSD. With PF then I could have a very inexpensive managed switch with ACLS for all hosts on the network:-) The problem isn't just getting lots of ports on a device (usb could probably do that), it's getting lots of ports on a device and getting them all to run at full bandwidth. I have been interested for quite some time in making a Switch with OpenBSD See this post http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2007-03/2353.html you may find this interesting Sam Fourman Jr.
spamdb: convert greylisted addresses to whitelisted servers?
I've been looking at the source and I've read the man page but I don't see a way to convert a greylisted entry to a whitelisted entry. Is it possible or just unnecessary? # spamdb -a 12.34.56.78 # spamdb | grep 12.34.56.78 WHITE|12.34.56.78|||1175817375|1175819030|1178929430|1|2 GREY|12.34.56.78|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|1175815019|1175829419| 1175829419|4|0 #
Re: spamdb: convert greylisted addresses to whitelisted servers?
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 18:06:29 -0700, John N. Brahy wrote: I've been looking at the source and I've read the man page but I don't see a way to convert a greylisted entry to a whitelisted entry. Is it possible or just unnecessary? # spamdb -a 12.34.56.78 # spamdb | grep 12.34.56.78 WHITE|12.34.56.78|||1175817375|1175819030|1178929430|1|2 GREY|12.34.56.78|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|1175815019|1175829419| 1175829419|4|0 # Unnecessary. The WHITE entry wins when a lookup of 12.34.56.78 is done in the database. R/ A consultant is someone who's called in when someone has painted himself into a corner. He's expected to levitate his client out of that corner. -The Sayings of Chairman Morrow. 1984.
upgrade from 3.1 to 4.0
Hi, all! How can I painlessly upgrade OpenBSD 3.1 to 4.0 without reinstalling all system and soft?
Re: spamdb: convert greylisted addresses to whitelisted servers?
And since the greylisted entry doesn't see anymore activity, after the 4 hours elapse, it just quietly bows out and exits... stage-left even! /Jason On Apr 5, 2007, at 11:18 PM, RW wrote: On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 18:06:29 -0700, John N. Brahy wrote: I've been looking at the source and I've read the man page but I don't see a way to convert a greylisted entry to a whitelisted entry. Is it possible or just unnecessary? # spamdb -a 12.34.56.78 # spamdb | grep 12.34.56.78 WHITE|12.34.56.78|||1175817375|1175819030|1178929430|1|2 GREY|12.34.56.78|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|1175815019| 1175829419| 1175829419|4|0 # Unnecessary. The WHITE entry wins when a lookup of 12.34.56.78 is done in the database. R/ A consultant is someone who's called in when someone has painted himself into a corner. He's expected to levitate his client out of that corner. -The Sayings of Chairman Morrow. 1984.
Re: running OpenBSD on switch hardware
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: I have been interested for quite some time in making a Switch with OpenBSD See this post http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2007-03/2353.html you may find this interesting Sam Fourman Jr. Sam, while I'm sure that was fun to setup I have to be the jerk to respond with an old dawg on it's last legs will move packets between ports faster than this configuration. Switches transfer packets with purpose built switch engines. but it is fun to tinker with low cost embedded h/w. diana
Re: upgrade from 3.1 to 4.0
On 4/5/07, Artyom Goryainov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, all! How can I painlessly upgrade OpenBSD 3.1 to 4.0 without reinstalling all system and soft? Just bite the bullet and start fresh with 4.1. Probably faster than going 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 4.0 4.1. Greg
