Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-10 Thread ropers
On 07/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 FYI, masquerading is a LINUX shit but openbsd rules with its PF power.

FYI, masquerading is a generic term and a synonym for NATing, and
not an invitation to diss Linux.



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-08 Thread L. V. Lammert

At 09:33 AM 2/8/2008 -0500, Jim Razmus wrote:

* L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080207 13:30]:
 At 04:43 PM 2/7/2008 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 You can absolutely run a mail server at home. This is not rocket science
 and in fact, it is dumb easy to do. Try to follow these steps:

 1. Get a domain name and look for registrars that can host it for you. 
For

 example, check this kind of services at www.no-ip.com.

 2. Configure your ADSL router to re-direct SMTP and POP3 traffic to that
 server of yours
 running sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd, spam-assassin, etc. You can
 even incorporate
 services like IMAP3 for you to  be able to log-in into your mail server
 anywhere.

 Please stop spreading misinformation. Unless you have reverse DNS setup,
 ANY email server that adhering to standards should (and probably will)
 block your incoming email.

 If you want to run your own, that's great, but don't expect to use it
 reliably without either setting up the reverse DNS or forwarding through
 your ISPs email server(s). If you don't do that, you won't know be able to
 have any assurance that your email will be received properly.

 Lee


I don't get your point Lee.  I agreed with you that reverse DNS is
necessary.  I then stated it is possible to get ISP's to support you
with this task.  Where's the misinformation?


Didn't mean to jump on you specifically, .. however your statement above 
(to which I was replying) *does* neglect to mention reverse DNS. In fact, 
it is dumb easy to do seems to give the impression that it's a trivial 
task, when it is not.


I'm just trying to make sure that anyone considering setting up their own 
email server realizes that without the proper [willing] ISP and DNS 
configuration an email server is just not ready for prime time (i.e. the 
probability that your email will get through vs. the work to configure the 
server). I can't count the number of times someone we deal with has tried 
to send email, gets it rejected, and we find out in the logs that they are 
using a mis-configured server. With the 'hazardous' environment right now 
regarding SPAM/UCE, it is just not a simple task to set up a mail server 
properly. To give the impression otherwise is slightly irresponsible, 
*especially* if someone gets the impression that the mail server itself is 
the most important part (a cooperating ISP is far more important than the 
box itself).


Lee



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-08 Thread Jim Razmus
* Lori Barfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080207 12:41]:
 consumer IP space is really a problem for outgoing mail.
 at the very least, all the majors will add spam points to
 your messages and so your mail is a lot more likely to
 be bulked.  even resold IP space at large colos is treated
 that way by default, and it causes heartburn for businesses.
 just having reverse DNS isn't good enough, either, because
 if it has a name that looks like dynamic IP space, that
 can also get your mail treated with prejudice.  it's best to
 own your own reverse DNS so you can give it a realistic
 look.
 
 you can try to work with the major ISPs to get your IP(s)
 whitelisted, and try to convince folks to take them off their
 no-no lists as well, but that can be very time consuming
 and you'll have mixed results.
 
 bottom line is, check out the reputation of your IP space
 before buying it.  you don't want the problem to start with.
 
 ...lori
 

I second this!  Ending up blacklisted by association was exactly the
reason I dumped ATT.  Huge swathes of their address space went into the
blacklists from which there was no escape.  And ATT did little to
resolve it.  Consequently, I voted with my dollar.  I dropped their
Internet service and phone service too.

Now ATT gets not even a penny from me.

Jim



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-08 Thread Jim Razmus
* L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080207 13:30]:
 At 04:43 PM 2/7/2008 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 You can absolutely run a mail server at home. This is not rocket science 
 and in fact, it
 is dumb easy to do. Try to follow these steps:

 1. Get a domain name and look for registrars that can host it for you. For 
 example,
 check this kind of services at www.no-ip.com.

 2. Configure your ADSL router to re-direct SMTP and POP3 traffic to that 
 server of yours
 running sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd, spam-assassin, etc. You can 
 even incorporate
 services like IMAP3 for you to  be able to log-in into your mail server 
 anywhere.

 Please stop spreading misinformation. Unless you have reverse DNS setup, 
 ANY email server that adhering to standards should (and probably will) 
 block your incoming email.

 If you want to run your own, that's great, but don't expect to use it 
 reliably without either setting up the reverse DNS or forwarding through 
 your ISPs email server(s). If you don't do that, you won't know be able to 
 have any assurance that your email will be received properly.

 Lee


I don't get your point Lee.  I agreed with you that reverse DNS is
necessary.  I then stated it is possible to get ISP's to support you
with this task.  Where's the misinformation?

I've been running this way for years.  And I can speak from experience
that without getting reverse DNS setup correctly, many email servers
will reject your mail.  They did reject mine until it was setup...

???

Jim



running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Chris
I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the moment. I
am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
on this box along with web, ssh and samba.

I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail server at home.
I want to know if I should use only one box or buy another box? Also,
what sort of electricity bills
will I run into? And also if is there anything else I would need to know.

Thanks for any help.



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Michael
Hi,

Chris schrieb:
 And also if is there anything else I would need to know.

For it to work properly at home you would, first, need a fixed IP
address. Second, you can get problems because a lot of spam filters are
blocking dynamic IP ranges or even IP ranges that look dynamic because
of its PTR, so you would need to be able to change the PTR of your fixed
IP to something like mail.yourdomain.tld instead of
dsl-4433433.cust.provider.tld.

Just rent a virtual system somewhere and put everything on it. That is
a) cheaper than the electricity bill at home and b) more reliable.


Michael



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail server at 
 home.

It is doable with OpenBSD on the sort of box you describe.  For small
scale operations, it is possible to fit all those things on a single
machine, if you like.  

For any useful mail handling you *will* need one or more fixed IP
addresses, and you need to make very sure you have any and all forward
and reverse DNS zones involving your kit set up correctly.  Even then
you may be bit by somebody else's goofs if your address range
allocation is anything less than a /24[1].

Then you may or may not want to run all that many services on a single
box (thing single point of failure), but once again it's doable for
small-scale operations.  You could probably improve reliability by
going for a colocation somewhere or even a virtual machine in a
controlled environment, as has already been suggested.

So yes, a definite maybe ;)

[1] http://bsdly.blogspot.com/2007/08/on-business-end-of-blacklist-oh.html
-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Jim Razmus
Lee's point about getting reverse DNS is not to be missed.  It's
important and possible.  You'll just have to fight your way past first
level tech support.  It took me some work to get it myself, but in the
end I got it.

I ended up telling the first level guy that I _was_ running Windows,
OpenBSD was a mis-statement, and yes I did reboot, yes that quickly, and
finally got to second level who then gave me another number to call,
etc, etc...

Jim

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080207 11:45]:
 You can absolutely run a mail server at home. This is not rocket science and 
 in fact, it
 is dumb easy to do. Try to follow these steps:
 
 1. Get a domain name and look for registrars that can host it for you. For 
 example,
 check this kind of services at www.no-ip.com.
 
 2. Configure your ADSL router to re-direct SMTP and POP3 traffic to that 
 server of yours
 running sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd, spam-assassin, etc. You can even 
 incorporate
 services like IMAP3 for you to  be able to log-in into your mail server 
 anywhere.
 
 
  On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
 
  On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
   I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the 
   moment. I
   am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
   on this box along with web, ssh and samba.
  
   I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail
   server at home.
  
  In reality, you cannot run your own mail server at home. This would
  require:
 
  1) DNS resolution for your domain name
  2) Appropriate MX records
  3) Valid REVERSE DNS for your IP
 
  #3 is usually the big factor for most ISPS, without it, you will not be
  able to send email to any 'sane' mail server.
 
  Lee
 
  
Leland V. Lammert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Chief Scientist Omnitec Corporation
   Network/Internet Consultants   www.omnitec.net
  



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread demuel
Absolutely, there is nothing hard about it and in fact it is very stupidly 
simple.
Preaching about reverse lookups for these purposes is a sort of masochistic 
ignorance.

 I don't do reverse dns and most people get my email just fine.  If you
 don't I probably don't care enough to hear about it.

 I have 5 static IPs at home that resolve.  Nothing hard about it; I just
 refuse to pay $5/month for reverse lookups.

 On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:38:30AM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
 On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:

  On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
   I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the 
   moment. I
   am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
   on this box along with web, ssh and samba.
  
   I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail
   server at home.
  
 In reality, you cannot run your own mail server at home. This would
 require:

 1) DNS resolution for your domain name
 2) Appropriate MX records
 3) Valid REVERSE DNS for your IP

 #3 is usually the big factor for most ISPS, without it, you will not be
 able to send email to any 'sane' mail server.

  Lee

 
   Leland V. Lammert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Chief Scientist Omnitec Corporation
  Network/Internet Consultants   www.omnitec.net
 



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Robert C Wittig

Shane Harbour wrote:

I beg to differ.  It really depends on your ISP and how far you really
want to go.  I've run everything (DNS, mail, etc) out of my basement for
3 years now. 


Ditto.

I've been running my own OBSD web/mail server in an old 1U SuperMicro 
server up my attic for about two years now without incident. It's just 
for my personal domains, so there is not a lot of traffic.


I have an ATT-DSL account with 5 static IP's.

Because it is not co-located, when the DSL line acts up (couple times 
a year, when it's hot, usually), my mail and websites go off-line, but 
when I was paying for hosting, sometimes the same thing would happen 
occasionally, anyhow.


I have two SuperMicro servers, so if one has a mechanical failure, I 
have a back-up in place, but in the two years I have been running it, 
I have racked up more down-time playing with it myself, doing things 
like messing with my PF rules and other learning-related things, than 
all the downtime due to DSL and mechanical problems combined.



--
-wittig http://www.robertwittig.com/
http://robertwittig.net/
http://robertwittig.org/
.



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread L. V. Lammert

At 04:43 PM 2/7/2008 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can absolutely run a mail server at home. This is not rocket science 
and in fact, it

is dumb easy to do. Try to follow these steps:

1. Get a domain name and look for registrars that can host it for you. For 
example,

check this kind of services at www.no-ip.com.

2. Configure your ADSL router to re-direct SMTP and POP3 traffic to that 
server of yours
running sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd, spam-assassin, etc. You can 
even incorporate
services like IMAP3 for you to  be able to log-in into your mail server 
anywhere.


Please stop spreading misinformation. Unless you have reverse DNS setup, 
ANY email server that adhering to standards should (and probably will) 
block your incoming email.


If you want to run your own, that's great, but don't expect to use it 
reliably without either setting up the reverse DNS or forwarding through 
your ISPs email server(s). If you don't do that, you won't know be able to 
have any assurance that your email will be received properly.


Lee



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Steven Surdock
L. V. Lammert wrote:
 On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:

 In reality, you cannot run your own mail server at home. This would
 require:

 1) DNS resolution for your domain name
 2) Appropriate MX records
 3) Valid REVERSE DNS for your IP

 #3 is usually the big factor for most ISPS, without it, you
 will not be
 able to send email to any 'sane' mail server.

Dynamic DNS (e.g. dyndns.org) resolves 1  2.
Your ISP's mail server, that likely allows (authenticated) relaying, can
resolve #3.

-Steve S.



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread demuel
Reliably? I been running it for 3 years already without single incident that 
those damn
e-mails I'd sent reached their destinations at all.

 At 04:43 PM 2/7/2008 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can absolutely run a mail server at home. This is not rocket science
and in fact, it
is dumb easy to do. Try to follow these steps:

1. Get a domain name and look for registrars that can host it for you. For
example,
check this kind of services at www.no-ip.com.

2. Configure your ADSL router to re-direct SMTP and POP3 traffic to that
server of yours
running sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd, spam-assassin, etc. You can
even incorporate
services like IMAP3 for you to  be able to log-in into your mail server
anywhere.

 Please stop spreading misinformation. Unless you have reverse DNS setup,
 ANY email server that adhering to standards should (and probably will)
 block your incoming email.

 If you want to run your own, that's great, but don't expect to use it
 reliably without either setting up the reverse DNS or forwarding through
 your ISPs email server(s). If you don't do that, you won't know be able to
 have any assurance that your email will be received properly.

  Lee



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread scott
1. You must have DNS services somewhere. I am similarly setup abd I use
www.zoneedit.com.  Free and competent.  

2. Most cable-based broadbands and DSL do have a fixed dns string.  Mine
is in the form of cable-modem-mac-cpe-mac.a.b.ips.com.
Reverse look-up your own dynamic ip and see what it resolves to.  Use
this as input to your dns entries (zoneedit.com).

3. Strongly recommend also configuring spf and domain-key signing via
your dns entries.  This helps sane sites to not flag you as a spammer.


-Original Message-
From: L. V. Lammert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: OpenBSD Misc misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: running mail server at home
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:38:30 -0600 (CST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:

 On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
  I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the 
  moment. I
  am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
  on this box along with web, ssh and samba.
 
  I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail
  server at home.
 
In reality, you cannot run your own mail server at home. This would
require:

1) DNS resolution for your domain name
2) Appropriate MX records
3) Valid REVERSE DNS for your IP

#3 is usually the big factor for most ISPS, without it, you will not be
able to send email to any 'sane' mail server.

Lee


  Leland V. Lammert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief Scientist Omnitec Corporation
 Network/Internet Consultants   www.omnitec.net




Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Mark Rolen

L. V. Lammert wrote:


Please stop spreading misinformation. Unless you have reverse DNS 
setup, ANY email server that adhering to standards should (and 
probably will) block your incoming email.





It's also rather incorrect to simply state, You _must_ have reverse DNS 
to run a mail server at home.  Do you know of many ISPs that don't have 
a smarthost for users to relay through?  I haven't run into one yet, 
granted I've only had 4 different ISPs in the past 7 years...


More accurate would be saying, You will _either_ need reverse DNS, or 
to relay through your ISP's smarthost.  There is no absolute 
requirement for reverse DNS, it's simply one possible route to achieve 
what you desire (that your outgoing mails are accepted on a sanely 
configured remote mail server).


Regards,
Mark



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Jussi Peltola
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:45:44PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 If your ISP is blocking port 25, port 110, and port 143 both ways maybe it is 
 high-time
 you consider changing internet service provider. There is no point paying 
 them good
 money when what they are doing is basically blocking ports here and there.
Mine blocks nothing. Many people are stuck with monopolistic evil ISPs
without a choice, and those are the ones most likely to sell such crap
as internet service... 

-- 
Jussi Peltola



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Chris Smith
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
 What you forget here is that most don't adhere to standards.

I'm not sure it's a standard, but for many it (matching the servers helo 
name with the PTR record) is standard practice. Some then continue with 
a forward lookup and expect the A record to match the connecting IP. 
Last I looked the University of Michigan was one of several sites that 
used this level of email server identification before accepting email.

In the past, before the days of major spam, one could always adjust to 
such paranoid security measures as messages were either received or 
bounced. But due to the increase in forged from addresses many servers 
no longer bounce such posts and just silently drop them. unfortunately 
your users, in many cases, will simply not know that mail was not 
delivered.

-- 
Chris



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Brian

Lori Barfield wrote:

consumer IP space is really a problem for outgoing mail.
at the very least, all the majors will add spam points to
your messages and so your mail is a lot more likely to
be bulked.  even resold IP space at large colos is treated
that way by default, and it causes heartburn for businesses.
just having reverse DNS isn't good enough, either, because
if it has a name that looks like dynamic IP space, that
can also get your mail treated with prejudice.  it's best to
own your own reverse DNS so you can give it a realistic
look.

you can try to work with the major ISPs to get your IP(s)
whitelisted, and try to convince folks to take them off their
no-no lists as well, but that can be very time consuming
and you'll have mixed results.

bottom line is, check out the reputation of your IP space
before buying it.  you don't want the problem to start with.

...lori
  
Gewt an ISP that doesnt block it and youre fine, Ive been using 
speakeasy for years, theyre pricey but they stay out of the way.


Brian



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Chris Smith
On Thursday 07 February 2008, Lori Barfield wrote:
 just having reverse DNS isn't good enough, either, because
 if it has a name that looks like dynamic IP space, that
 can also get your mail treated with prejudice.

Yes, I've seen that in practice as well.

-- 
Chris



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Brian

Douglas A. Tutty wrote:



Well, as always, it depends.  What do _you_ mean by a mail server?  Do
you mean that you want people to mail you directly and your mail to go
out to the internet directly and bypass your ISP?  If so, you'll need a
fixed IP and help from you ISP since they normall block this for home
users.  Hey, my ISP says that their connection is only for one computer
that I can't run a network on their hookup.  I guess they've never heard
of UNIX and masquerading.

I run a mailserver in that I can mail internally and externally.
However, the mail all goes out to my ISP's smart host and comes in with
fetchmail.

Doug.
  
A p3 is plenty unless youre doing a VERY large quantity of mail.. Re the 
IP thing, a static IP and an ISP that doesn't block and is willing to 
change a reverse dns entry to match the forward are what I have done, 
seems to have worked ok for me.  Smarthosting is not for me, I'll 
deliver direct..


Brian



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Marco Peereboom
Works for me and has for years.  You would not see these emails if it
didn't.

What you forget here is that most don't adhere to standards.

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 11:26:17AM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
 At 04:43 PM 2/7/2008 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 You can absolutely run a mail server at home. This is not rocket science 
 and in fact, it
 is dumb easy to do. Try to follow these steps:

 1. Get a domain name and look for registrars that can host it for you. For 
 example,
 check this kind of services at www.no-ip.com.

 2. Configure your ADSL router to re-direct SMTP and POP3 traffic to that 
 server of yours
 running sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd, spam-assassin, etc. You can 
 even incorporate
 services like IMAP3 for you to  be able to log-in into your mail server 
 anywhere.

 Please stop spreading misinformation. Unless you have reverse DNS setup, 
 ANY email server that adhering to standards should (and probably will) 
 block your incoming email.

 If you want to run your own, that's great, but don't expect to use it 
 reliably without either setting up the reverse DNS or forwarding through 
 your ISPs email server(s). If you don't do that, you won't know be able to 
 have any assurance that your email will be received properly.

 Lee



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Predrag Punosevac

Lori Barfield wrote:

consumer IP space is really a problem for outgoing mail.
at the very least, all the majors will add spam points to
your messages and so your mail is a lot more likely to
be bulked.  even resold IP space at large colos is treated
that way by default, and it causes heartburn for businesses.
just having reverse DNS isn't good enough, either, because
if it has a name that looks like dynamic IP space, that
can also get your mail treated with prejudice.  it's best to
own your own reverse DNS so you can give it a realistic
look.

you can try to work with the major ISPs to get your IP(s)
whitelisted, and try to convince folks to take them off their
no-no lists as well, but that can be very time consuming
and you'll have mixed results.

bottom line is, check out the reputation of your IP space
before buying it.  you don't want the problem to start with.

...lori

  
My DSL provider in Arizona is Qwest. The basic service is $26 and for 
another $5 they will toss you a fixed IP address. As pointed out earlier 
you must have fixed IP address for all practical purposes. You may 
however set
MTA even with dynamic IP but the chances are that most other MTA will 
bounce your mail. However some will not. Even with dynamic IP, I was 
able to send emails to my friends working for Apple. Apparently, Apple 
is not very afraid of the spam or they have crystal ball to see which 
dynamic IP addresses are legit.


The Qwest internet speed in Arizona vary from 1.5-7 Mps pending how far 
is one's house is from their switch.
I know that those speeds look funny to people from Europe and Japan but 
ISP providers in U. S. are monopolies thanks to the president Bush. A 
decent speed of 10-100Mps on T1 will cost you about $1400 a month.


Qwest's modem blocks by default www hosting, MTA, and most other 
services. However it is trivial to log into the modem and unblock the 
ports. Qwest actually actively encourage customers to have fixed IP 
addresses for purpose of online gaming and conference hosting.


I did run my own MTA with the proper domain name that can be purchased 
for about $10 a year. I had no problems receiving incoming mail and 
mixed success with sending mail. I did that because I wanted to learn a 
few things.
My real MTA is at the University I work for and I fetch my mail via IMAP 
server to my local mail client as probably most people do.


I would suggest that before you make definitive decision to run your own 
MTA you try to do dynamic mail hosting. I used free DynDNS services 
provided by DynDNS.com. The way that it works is that they run a honest 
MTA which does virtual hosting for many servers which do have only 
dynamic IP address.
This is usually extra service you get from them as their main thing is 
virtual web hosting. Basic web and mail
virtual hosting is free but their real objective is to get you sign for 
their paid services.


Their MTA is completely legit and on the white list so your outgoing 
mail will never bounce. The big draw back in my eyes is that you must 
run something like opendd which is DynDNS client in order to update 
their server about your current IP address.


The positive thing is that they will run spamassassin and clamav for you.

Kind Regards,
Predrag



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Bryan Irvine
On Feb 7, 2008 2:51 AM, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the moment. 
 I
 am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
 on this box along with web, ssh and samba.

 I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail server at 
 home.
 I want to know if I should use only one box or buy another box? Also,
 what sort of electricity bills
 will I run into? And also if is there anything else I would need to know.

I've done that with limited success.  Works OK emailing servers that
don't check much of anything.
What I eventually did was set up TLS and relay through google.
This worked for me because I was the only user of the system (gmail
re-maps your email address) so YMMV.

-B



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Mark Rolen

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Reliably? I been running it for 3 years already without single incident that 
those damn
e-mails I'd sent reached their destinations at all.

  
Indeed it comes down to this for the OP...  do you want to listen to one 
person telling you (very incorrectly) that it can't be done without 
reverse DNS, or listen to the dozens of replies that have made it 
abundantly clear that it's entirely possible, with years of real 
experience actually doing it to back it up?




Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread demuel
Either you want to send or receive mail from anyone and from anywhere in 
cyberspace,
that is irrefutably possible. Like I said, consider this site:

www.no-ip.com

I am not working for them but I had used their affordable services and it works 
well.
One thing, if your ADSL router at home has either a dynamic or a public static 
IPv4
address your purpose is very doable. The keyword here is redirection.

FYI, masquerading is a LINUX shit but openbsd rules with its PF power.


 On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
 I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the 
 moment. I
 am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
 on this box along with web, ssh and samba.

 I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail server at 
 home.
 I want to know if I should use only one box or buy another box? Also,
 what sort of electricity bills
 will I run into? And also if is there anything else I would need to know.

 Thanks for any help.

 Well, as always, it depends.  What do _you_ mean by a mail server?  Do
 you mean that you want people to mail you directly and your mail to go
 out to the internet directly and bypass your ISP?  If so, you'll need a
 fixed IP and help from you ISP since they normall block this for home
 users.  Hey, my ISP says that their connection is only for one computer
 that I can't run a network on their hookup.  I guess they've never heard
 of UNIX and masquerading.

 I run a mailserver in that I can mail internally and externally.
 However, the mail all goes out to my ISP's smart host and comes in with
 fetchmail.

 Doug.



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread demuel
If your ISP is blocking port 25, port 110, and port 143 both ways maybe it is 
high-time
you consider changing internet service provider. There is no point paying them 
good
money when what they are doing is basically blocking ports here and there.

 On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:38:30AM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
 In reality, you cannot run your own mail server at home. This would
 require:

 1) DNS resolution for your domain name
 2) Appropriate MX records
 3) Valid REVERSE DNS for your IP

 #3 is usually the big factor for most ISPS, without it, you will not be
 able to send email to any 'sane' mail server.

 I have all of those on a home ADSL connection, although I doubt you can
 get that from many ISPs, mine is about 20% more expensive than the cheap
 ones and didn't even offer non-static IPs until about a year ago. If you
 use your ISP's smarthost you can probably get away without reverse DNS,
 I doubt mail servers are going to leave their mail undelivered because
 the receiving MX is in a dialup range.

 BTW, you forgot 4), the biggest obstacle with residential ISPs: blocking
 of port 25 both ways, which is luckily becoming more and more common,
 even to the point were the telecommunications regulation authority here
 officially recommends it to ISPs. Love the spammers and stupid users...

 --
 Jussi Peltola



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread demuel
You can absolutely run a mail server at home. This is not rocket science and in 
fact, it
is dumb easy to do. Try to follow these steps:

1. Get a domain name and look for registrars that can host it for you. For 
example,
check this kind of services at www.no-ip.com.

2. Configure your ADSL router to re-direct SMTP and POP3 traffic to that server 
of yours
running sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd, spam-assassin, etc. You can even 
incorporate
services like IMAP3 for you to  be able to log-in into your mail server 
anywhere.


 On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:

 On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
  I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the 
  moment. I
  am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
  on this box along with web, ssh and samba.
 
  I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail
  server at home.
 
 In reality, you cannot run your own mail server at home. This would
 require:

 1) DNS resolution for your domain name
 2) Appropriate MX records
 3) Valid REVERSE DNS for your IP

 #3 is usually the big factor for most ISPS, without it, you will not be
 able to send email to any 'sane' mail server.

   Lee

 
   Leland V. Lammert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Chief Scientist Omnitec Corporation
  Network/Internet Consultants   www.omnitec.net
 



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Jussi Peltola
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:38:30AM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
 In reality, you cannot run your own mail server at home. This would
 require:
 
 1) DNS resolution for your domain name
 2) Appropriate MX records
 3) Valid REVERSE DNS for your IP
 
 #3 is usually the big factor for most ISPS, without it, you will not be
 able to send email to any 'sane' mail server.

I have all of those on a home ADSL connection, although I doubt you can
get that from many ISPs, mine is about 20% more expensive than the cheap
ones and didn't even offer non-static IPs until about a year ago. If you
use your ISP's smarthost you can probably get away without reverse DNS,
I doubt mail servers are going to leave their mail undelivered because
the receiving MX is in a dialup range.

BTW, you forgot 4), the biggest obstacle with residential ISPs: blocking
of port 25 both ways, which is luckily becoming more and more common,
even to the point were the telecommunications regulation authority here
officially recommends it to ISPs. Love the spammers and stupid users...

-- 
Jussi Peltola



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread L. V. Lammert
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:

 On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
  I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the 
  moment. I
  am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
  on this box along with web, ssh and samba.
 
  I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail
  server at home.
 
In reality, you cannot run your own mail server at home. This would
require:

1) DNS resolution for your domain name
2) Appropriate MX records
3) Valid REVERSE DNS for your IP

#3 is usually the big factor for most ISPS, without it, you will not be
able to send email to any 'sane' mail server.

Lee


  Leland V. Lammert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief Scientist Omnitec Corporation
 Network/Internet Consultants   www.omnitec.net




Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Shane Harbour
I run all my stuff at home and even do virtual hosting for web and mail
for one of my wife's websites.  I have a separate box for mail running
postfix, dovecot, postgresql, clamd, and spamd.  It's not a beefy box
but still works  well.  Haven't really seen my electrical bill go up.  I
did have to get a server class DSL line so I could have static IPs. 
It was slightly higher but not by much.  I also pay a small fee for my
IP addresses.

Regards,
Shane

Chris wrote:
 I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the moment. 
 I
 am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
 on this box along with web, ssh and samba.

 I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail server at 
 home.
 I want to know if I should use only one box or buy another box? Also,
 what sort of electricity bills
 will I run into? And also if is there anything else I would need to know.

 Thanks for any help.



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Douglas A. Tutty
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
 I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the moment. 
 I
 am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
 on this box along with web, ssh and samba.
 
 I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail server at 
 home.
 I want to know if I should use only one box or buy another box? Also,
 what sort of electricity bills
 will I run into? And also if is there anything else I would need to know.
 
 Thanks for any help.

Well, as always, it depends.  What do _you_ mean by a mail server?  Do
you mean that you want people to mail you directly and your mail to go
out to the internet directly and bypass your ISP?  If so, you'll need a
fixed IP and help from you ISP since they normall block this for home
users.  Hey, my ISP says that their connection is only for one computer
that I can't run a network on their hookup.  I guess they've never heard
of UNIX and masquerading.

I run a mailserver in that I can mail internally and externally.
However, the mail all goes out to my ISP's smart host and comes in with
fetchmail.

Doug.



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Marco Peereboom
I run all my stuff at home.  My old firewall (just replace it) was a
pentium pro 200 with 128MB; my mailserver is a PIII 800 and runs www,
postfix, dovecot, mysql and some other junk.  Works just fine.

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
 I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the moment. 
 I
 am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
 on this box along with web, ssh and samba.
 
 I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail server at 
 home.
 I want to know if I should use only one box or buy another box? Also,
 what sort of electricity bills
 will I run into? And also if is there anything else I would need to know.
 
 Thanks for any help.



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread demuel
Spreading misinformation? Look, I subscribe to an ISP with ADSL that provided 
me with
public dynamic IP address. I register it to a registrar that offers dynamic 
hosting
courtesy of www.no-ip.com and I am sending this email to you because of it. And 
you tell
me that I am preaching something not doable? Oh common

 At 04:43 PM 2/7/2008 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can absolutely run a mail server at home. This is not rocket science
and in fact, it
is dumb easy to do. Try to follow these steps:

1. Get a domain name and look for registrars that can host it for you. For
example,
check this kind of services at www.no-ip.com.

2. Configure your ADSL router to re-direct SMTP and POP3 traffic to that
server of yours
running sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd, spam-assassin, etc. You can
even incorporate
services like IMAP3 for you to  be able to log-in into your mail server
anywhere.

 Please stop spreading misinformation. Unless you have reverse DNS setup,
 ANY email server that adhering to standards should (and probably will)
 block your incoming email.

 If you want to run your own, that's great, but don't expect to use it
 reliably without either setting up the reverse DNS or forwarding through
 your ISPs email server(s). If you don't do that, you won't know be able to
 have any assurance that your email will be received properly.

  Lee



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Lori Barfield
consumer IP space is really a problem for outgoing mail.
at the very least, all the majors will add spam points to
your messages and so your mail is a lot more likely to
be bulked.  even resold IP space at large colos is treated
that way by default, and it causes heartburn for businesses.
just having reverse DNS isn't good enough, either, because
if it has a name that looks like dynamic IP space, that
can also get your mail treated with prejudice.  it's best to
own your own reverse DNS so you can give it a realistic
look.

you can try to work with the major ISPs to get your IP(s)
whitelisted, and try to convince folks to take them off their
no-no lists as well, but that can be very time consuming
and you'll have mixed results.

bottom line is, check out the reputation of your IP space
before buying it.  you don't want the problem to start with.

...lori



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008/02/07 16:06, L. V. Lammert wrote:
  If you want to hack a setup together [lacking one
 of the DNS requirements like reverse lookup], it's important to know that
 your email *MIGHT* not get through, and there's nothing you can do about
 it.

Same applies *with* all the requirements met these days. Loads of
people drop mail on the floor without so much as a 550.



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread L. V. Lammert
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:

 Works for me and has for years.  You would not see these emails if it
 didn't.

 What you forget here is that most don't adhere to standards.

Didn't say it wouldn't work, .. but I, for one, don't want to have to call
someone to make sure they get my email.

Bottom line - there are many more issues to an setting up an email server
than the machine itself. If you want to hack a setup together [lacking one
of the DNS requirements like reverse lookup], it's important to know that
your email *MIGHT* not get through, and there's nothing you can do about
it.

Lee



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Jussi Peltola
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:49:58PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Spreading misinformation? Look, I subscribe to an ISP with ADSL that provided 
 me with
 public dynamic IP address. I register it to a registrar that offers dynamic 
 hosting
 courtesy of www.no-ip.com and I am sending this email to you because of it. 
 And you tell
 me that I am preaching something not doable? Oh common
 
No, you are relaying it through a mailing list that happens to accept
it. Getting mail through to the large webmail services, for example, is
quite difficult from residential ranges.

Claiming it is a good idea to run an outgoing MTA on a dynamic
residential address is silly. It may work for you, but it does have its
problems. People wishing to correspond with many companies whose IT
people you don't control probably don't want to do it.

-- 
Jussi Peltola



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Andrei GUDIU
I stumbled today upon this while following a different article, maybe it is
helpful to you

http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/mail/



 I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the moment. 
 I
 am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
 on this box along with web, ssh and samba.

 I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail server at 
 home.
 I want to know if I should use only one box or buy another box? Also,
 what sort of electricity bills
 will I run into? And also if is there anything else I would need to know.

 Thanks for any help.



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Daniel Ouellet

L. V. Lammert wrote:

On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:


Works for me and has for years.  You would not see these emails if it
didn't.

What you forget here is that most don't adhere to standards.


Didn't say it wouldn't work, .. but I, for one, don't want to have to call
someone to make sure they get my email.

Bottom line - there are many more issues to an setting up an email server
than the machine itself. If you want to hack a setup together [lacking one
of the DNS requirements like reverse lookup], it's important to know that
your email *MIGHT* not get through, and there's nothing you can do about
it.


Yes there is, but lots of good point have been raise here, including ISP 
that block ports that frankly they really should on connection for cable 
model for example, or home connection. Every ISP should just do it, and 
spam and virus propagation via emails would see a huge decline.


I run an ISP and the point is that all that say, you should change ISP 
because of that, always forget the fact that 99% of the home users have 
no clue what they do and even less protect their computers.


In most case, I even provide firewall free, not because I wouldn't love 
to get the income, I sure would love and need it, but the bottom line is 
that users need to be protected against their own stupidity really.


Any why do I do that, because it does protect all the other users on my 
network as well as on the Internet, that's why.


But also, anytime a user wants to run a mail server, or what ever at 
home, I have no problem with that and will always do rDNS for them as 
well as forward DNS too. And, I will sure hell not bill you for it. I 
was surprise to see Marco would be charge $5/month for that!


The only requirements I have are pretty simple and that's in the 
contract as well. If you SPAM, I cut you off. No question asked and I 
will notify you to clean it up. If you are not responsible and I had 
rare case, but I did in the pass, I will simply terminate your contract 
and you go else where.


You want to setup servers, no problem and in some cases, I will even 
help you or suggest things. As long as it is safe, properly configure 
and you act responsibly, then never will you ear from me.


Sadly, almost every single ISP do not act responsibly and sadly as well, 
with how things are at times, they can't or do not have the resources to 
do so.


And in the end, very sadly Marco is right and it will work in most 
cases, why. Because most ISP just do not do it right, or care anymore 
and in some cases, believe it or not, they don't even know!


And, don't forget something as well. Part of the problem is also some 
users will beat everyone to death for saving one buck here and there and 
as such, many ISP just can't care anymore as much as they used to, if 
they did in the first place.


How many users will complain and report SPAM to their ISP or others and 
these same one are also complaining if they are asked to clean their 
setup by their ISP, or block because their server got hacked and their 
ISP cut them off until the clean it up.


In the end, it's a joint responsibility if you want and you need to find 
the right ISP that will work with you and help you as well, but these 
are not the cheapest one either and you need to asked yourself the 
question, what are you really looking for.


You want cheap, then you get cheap, you want good, then don't expect to 
pay the lowest price.


Anyway, I have been doing it for 15 years and I always get the same 
thing. Users what cheap and it takes time to built trust and confidence, 
but when it's there, they go no where and all my clients I get them by 
word of mouth only and they stay for years. Make that  10 years.


You get what you pay for in the end, but also if you do your job right 
and you have the right ISP, they will work with you and if they don't 
then change.


Best,

Daniel



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Marco Peereboom
I don't do reverse dns and most people get my email just fine.  If you
don't I probably don't care enough to hear about it.

I have 5 static IPs at home that resolve.  Nothing hard about it; I just
refuse to pay $5/month for reverse lookups.

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:38:30AM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
 On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
 
  On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
   I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the 
   moment. I
   am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
   on this box along with web, ssh and samba.
  
   I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail
   server at home.
  
 In reality, you cannot run your own mail server at home. This would
 require:
 
 1) DNS resolution for your domain name
 2) Appropriate MX records
 3) Valid REVERSE DNS for your IP
 
 #3 is usually the big factor for most ISPS, without it, you will not be
 able to send email to any 'sane' mail server.
 
   Lee
 
 
   Leland V. Lammert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Chief Scientist Omnitec Corporation
  Network/Internet Consultants   www.omnitec.net
 



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Shane Harbour
I beg to differ.  It really depends on your ISP and how far you really
want to go.  I've run everything (DNS, mail, etc) out of my basement for
3 years now.  Granted I had to switch ISPs in order to do so and upgrade
to a server class DSL line.  They even delegated control of my reverse
DNS to me.  It's all part of a standard package they provide.

Again, it just comes down to your ISP and how far you really want to go.
 I'm sure there are quite a few on the list that do this.

Regards,
Shane


L. V. Lammert wrote:
 On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
 
 On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
 I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at the 
 moment. I
 am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam-assassin
 on this box along with web, ssh and samba.

 I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail
 server at home.

 In reality, you cannot run your own mail server at home. This would
 require:
 
 1) DNS resolution for your domain name
 2) Appropriate MX records
 3) Valid REVERSE DNS for your IP
 
 #3 is usually the big factor for most ISPS, without it, you will not be
 able to send email to any 'sane' mail server.
 
   Lee
 
 
   Leland V. Lammert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Chief Scientist Omnitec Corporation
  Network/Internet Consultants   www.omnitec.net
 



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Marco Peereboom
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:06:08PM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
 On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
 
  Works for me and has for years.  You would not see these emails if it
  didn't.
 
  What you forget here is that most don't adhere to standards.
 
 Didn't say it wouldn't work, .. but I, for one, don't want to have to call
 someone to make sure they get my email.

I don't care that much.

 
 Bottom line - there are many more issues to an setting up an email server
 than the machine itself. If you want to hack a setup together [lacking one
 of the DNS requirements like reverse lookup], it's important to know that
 your email *MIGHT* not get through, and there's nothing you can do about
 it.

Right, the questions is do you or do you not care.

 
   Lee



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread L. V. Lammert

At 04:54 PM 2/7/2008 -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:06:08PM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
 On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:

  Works for me and has for years.  You would not see these emails if it
  didn't.
 
  What you forget here is that most don't adhere to standards.
 
 Didn't say it wouldn't work, .. but I, for one, don't want to have to call
 someone to make sure they get my email.

I don't care that much.


Well, I'm certainly everyone knows that by now, and they also know what the 
issues are.


I am, however, very surprised at the hacker mentality from someone on this 
project. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't. Does that should like a good 
motto for this project? Sheesh.


Lee



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Marco Peereboom
It's email.  I am not sending a rocket to the moon.  Like I said you
either care or you don't.  For me it is perfectly acceptable that
someone won't get my email.  This has nothing to do with the quality of
my code.  This also has no bearing whatsoever on the project.  I fail to
see why that needs to be mentioned.

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:39:18PM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
 At 04:54 PM 2/7/2008 -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
 On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:06:08PM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
  On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
 
   Works for me and has for years.  You would not see these emails if it
   didn't.
  
   What you forget here is that most don't adhere to standards.
  
  Didn't say it wouldn't work, .. but I, for one, don't want to have to call
  someone to make sure they get my email.

 I don't care that much.

 Well, I'm certainly everyone knows that by now, and they also know what the 
 issues are.

 I am, however, very surprised at the hacker mentality from someone on this 
 project. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't. Does that should like a good 
 motto for this project? Sheesh.

 Lee



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread STeve Andre'
On Thursday 07 February 2008 18:39:18 L. V. Lammert wrote:
 At 04:54 PM 2/7/2008 -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
 On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 04:06:08PM -0600, L. V. Lammert wrote:
   On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
Works for me and has for years.  You would not see these emails if it
didn't.
   
What you forget here is that most don't adhere to standards.
  
   Didn't say it wouldn't work, .. but I, for one, don't want to have to
   call someone to make sure they get my email.
 
 I don't care that much.

 Well, I'm certainly everyone knows that by now, and they also know what the
 issues are.

 I am, however, very surprised at the hacker mentality from someone on this
 project. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn't. Does that should like a good
 motto for this project? Sheesh.

  Lee

But thats the state of email today -- maybe it works, and maybe not.  You can
control your own email system but can't do anything about the hundreds of
thousands of weirdly configed systems that are more-or-less broken.

That isn't a motto.  It's a realization that mail is  hard to do, and making 
sure that you can talk with the folks you want is the most thing for a lot
of people.

--STeve Andre'



Re: running mail server at home

2008-02-07 Thread Ben Calvert

On Feb 7, 2008, at 7:38 AM, L. V. Lammert wrote:


On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:


On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:51:31AM -0800, Chris wrote:
I have a P3 box with 120GB HDD that's doing web, ssh and samba at  
the moment. I
am planning setup sendmail, spamd, mimedefang, clamd and spam- 
assassin

on this box along with web, ssh and samba.

I was wondering if anyone has any experience with running a mail
server at home.


In reality, you cannot run your own mail server at home. This would
require:

1) DNS resolution for your domain name


check - mine runs dns too



2) Appropriate MX records


check



3) Valid REVERSE DNS for your IP


and check - piece of cake with a business class dsl package.




#3 is usually the big factor for most ISPS, without it, you will not  
be

able to send email to any 'sane' mail server.

Lee


 Leland V. Lammert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Chief Scientist Omnitec Corporation
Network/Internet Consultants   www.omnitec.net




Ben Calvert
Chief walrus
Flying Walrus Communications, inc