[mssms] RE: Hardware Asset Inventory management with SCCM

[Michael Mott]

Lard has a place in this world!

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 4:10 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Hardware Asset Inventory management with SCCM

I always wanted to build an asset mgmgt solution on top of ConfigMgr's HW 
extensions!

What kind of info are you looking to put into CM? And maybe the MVP mob/MS 
would know if it's a good thing to fill up the CM DB with loads of lard.

//A

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jim Walker
Sent: den 15 juni 2016 00:56
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Hardware Asset Inventory management with SCCM

Hey folks,
I know this is probably a rehashed topic, but what are some of the good 
products out there you guys are using to compliment SCCM with Hardware 
Inventory? (not software inventory/normalization, but could do both?)
We're happy with what SCCM tells us, but it can't be our definitive source of 
information about hardware assets...

_Jim







Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

[mssms] RE: SCCM 2007 Migrate to new Hardware -

[Michael Mott]

Unless your limited by politics, I would go to a parallel scenario with one 
beef virtual server and get to CM12 ASAP.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Enley, Carl
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 11:43 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] SCCM 2007 Migrate to new Hardware -

I have been approached with a project to migrate our existing SCCM 2007 R2 
environment to new Server hardware. We are currently running on Server 2003 and 
need to get to 2008R2 before EOL in June\July. I suppose a in place upgrade is 
not supported? I have suggested time and time again that we should put our 
efforts into SCCM 2012 but Mgt has not made a decision and time is running out.

We have 2 primary sites with about 5000 clients and I am looking for a brief 
outline of the steps required to perform this upgrade with no loss of data \ 
production services - patching, software distribution, reporting etc...

Some of my questions surround the following:

* In what order should the upgrade take place ? Primary Parent site 
first?

* Can I go from X86 server OS to X64 server OS.

* Physical to Virtual supported

* Sql Server versions, do they need to be the same (2005)

* Drive configuration (Raid levels etc..)

* Are there any gotchas that I should be looking at?

If anyone has performed this task before and you are willing to share some tips 
or outline the steps that you have taken I would greatly appreciate it.

Thanks





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] RE: Microsoft Intune Survival Guide now live!

[Michael Mott]

Good thing the award came in prior!

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Ed Aldrich
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 3:20 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Microsoft Intune Survival Guide now live!

DOHT!!!


Ed Aldrich
Mobile: (401) 924-2293
ed.aldr...@1e.commailto:ed.aldr...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/
[Description: Description: cid:image011.png@01CAD56A.EFDE3F90] Ent Cli Mgmt 
(2003-2015)


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Niall Brady
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 3:01 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Microsoft Intune Survival Guide now live!

here's the Intune one ;-)

http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/23431.microsoft-intune-survival-guide.aspx

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Ed Aldrich 
ed.aldr...@1e.commailto:ed.aldr...@1e.com wrote:
With a proper link:

http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/7075.system-center-2012-configuration-manager-survival-guide.aspx


Ed Aldrich | Channel Solutions Engineer | 1E
+1 (401) 924-2293
[Description: Description: cid:image011.png@01CAD56A.EFDE3F90] Ent Cli Mgmt 
(2003-2015)
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Ed Aldrich
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 2:45 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Microsoft Intune Survival Guide now live!

From the Product Group earlier today:

The community-based Microsoft Intune Survival 
Guidehttp://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/23431.microsoft-intune-survival-guide.aspx
 has been launched on the TechNet Wiki. This parallels the Configuration 
Manager Survival 
Guidehttp://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/7075.system-center-2012-configuration-manager-survival-guide.aspx#Blogs,
 and is meant to be a list of links to helpful resources. You’re encouraged to 
edit the guide, and especially, to add to it as you discover or create new 
resources. I remind everyone not to reveal anything proprietary.

If you’re unfamiliar with the TechNet Wiki and how to contribute to it, go to 
the home pagehttp://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/, and on the right, 
explore the topics under Help  Feedback.

Ed Aldrich
Mobile: (401) 924-2293
ed.aldr...@1e.commailto:ed.aldr...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/
[Description: Description: cid:image011.png@01CAD56A.EFDE3F90] Ent Cli Mgmt 
(2003-2015)






Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015tel:%2B44%280%29%202083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 
4214tel:%2B1%20866%20592%204214 (USA). This email and any attachments may be 
privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or 
printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions 
expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to 
any order or other contract.





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015tel:%2B44%280%29%202083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 
4214tel:%2B1%20866%20592%204214 (USA). This email and any attachments may be 
privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or 
printing of any information it contains is strictly prohibited. The opinions 
expressed in this email are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will operate to bind 1E to 
any order or other contract.







Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] Deploy Trend

[Michael Mott]

You asked a question with a question, titch titch

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 3:17 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [mssms] Deploy Trend

Why would it work when ran as a real user but not when run as local system??

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 1:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Deploy Trend

looks like it cannto install isscript.dll or something
yup that is what it is. a custom action inside of a dll. either cannot do the 
function or cannot install the dll.

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Marcum, John 
jmar...@babc.commailto:jmar...@babc.com wrote:
Anyone deploying Trend OfficeScan from ConfigMgr using the msi generated using 
the client deployment tool? This is being deployed to Windows 7 x64.  My msi 
installs fine when installing as myself but when installing as local system it 
fails with this helpful error message below. At the point of the failure 
there's nothing helpful in the msi log but I do notice just before it dies the 
log starts mentioning InstallShield. Once I click ok on the error message I 
see in my msi log  NOTE: custom action tmRestorePreviousClientSettings 
unexpectedly closed the hInstall handle (type MSIHANDLE) provided to it. The 
custom action should be fixed to not close that handle. followed by 
CustomAction tmStartClientService returned actual error code 1603 (note this 
may not be 100% accurate if translation happened inside sandbox)


[cid:image001.png@01D0670F.380ED190]



[cid:image002.png@01D0670F.380ED190]

John Marcum
MCITP, MCTS, MCSA
  Desktop Architect
   Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP


  [H_Logo]




Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.








Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

[mssms] RE: Deploy Trend

[Michael Mott]

That free scep is looking good again

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 1:56 PM
To: SMS List (mssms@lists.myITforum.com)
Subject: [mssms] Deploy Trend

Anyone deploying Trend OfficeScan from ConfigMgr using the msi generated using 
the client deployment tool? This is being deployed to Windows 7 x64.  My msi 
installs fine when installing as myself but when installing as local system it 
fails with this helpful error message below. At the point of the failure 
there's nothing helpful in the msi log but I do notice just before it dies the 
log starts mentioning InstallShield. Once I click ok on the error message I 
see in my msi log  NOTE: custom action tmRestorePreviousClientSettings 
unexpectedly closed the hInstall handle (type MSIHANDLE) provided to it. The 
custom action should be fixed to not close that handle. followed by 
CustomAction tmStartClientService returned actual error code 1603 (note this 
may not be 100% accurate if translation happened inside sandbox)


[cid:image001.png@01D0670A.167EB180]



[cid:image003.png@01D0670A.167EB180]

John Marcum
MCITP, MCTS, MCSA
  Desktop Architect
   Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP


  [H_Logo]




Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] Using SCCM 2012 for Third Party Licensing

[Michael Mott]

It can, open API for steps 1 and 4 to accomplish that.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 1:21 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [mssms] Using SCCM 2012 for Third Party Licensing

Does it

1. Open a ticket in SCSM prior to do so?
2. Allow the user to opt out of the reclamation?
3. If the user opts out allow an override by a manager?
4. Close the SCSM ticket upon completion of the removal?

I need that in order to stay in compliance with change management. SCORCH Rocks!







From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 12:13 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Using SCCM 2012 for Third Party Licensing

AppClarity reclaims license with its own Reclaimer

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:12 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Using SCCM 2012 for Third Party Licensing

I use BDNA Normalize for this. It works well. You can even reclaim licenses 
automatically etc if you have SCROCH.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Nick sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:56 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Using SCCM 2012 for Third Party Licensing

We are currently looking for the best third party licensing tool to integrate 
with SCCM.  Anyone ever used 1E to accomplish this? Or do you have any 
suggestions to accomplish this goal?

http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2012/12/19/sccm-integrated-sam-tools-appclarity-and-shopping-by-1e/

Thanks,

Systems Architect



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.






Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] Using SCCM 2012 for Third Party Licensing

[Michael Mott]

AppClarity reclaims license with its own Reclaimer

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:12 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Using SCCM 2012 for Third Party Licensing

I use BDNA Normalize for this. It works well. You can even reclaim licenses 
automatically etc if you have SCROCH.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Nick sullivan
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:56 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Using SCCM 2012 for Third Party Licensing

We are currently looking for the best third party licensing tool to integrate 
with SCCM.  Anyone ever used 1E to accomplish this? Or do you have any 
suggestions to accomplish this goal?

http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/2012/12/19/sccm-integrated-sam-tools-appclarity-and-shopping-by-1e/

Thanks,

Systems Architect



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] RE: (OT) Vendor list for Ignite?

[Michael Mott]

+1 there Mike, it seems to cost to play and learn now.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marable, Mike
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2015 9:09 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: (OT) Vendor list for Ignite?

For me the biggest fear is access to the technology.  Right now I have free and 
unlimited access to Configuration Manager.  I can download the evaluation 
software and build as many labs as I need.

Once I burn an Intune evaluation (and I haven't tried yet so fear of the 
unknown...) can I sign up for another eval using my same email of do will I 
need to set up throw away email accounts to sign up using? If in the future 
having access to Azure and Intune subscriptions is a requirement that will 
become a barrier to those of us who do not have access to it.

It could become a world of the haves and the have nots.  If you're a have 
not then you're unable to learn the technologies and quickly become obsolete.

That is what worries me.

Mike


From: David O'Brien obrien.da...@outlook.commailto:obrien.da...@outlook.com
Reply-To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com 
mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Date: Friday, February 27, 2015 at 8:28 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com 
mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: (OT) Vendor list for Ignite?

What exactly is the scary bit here? (since I'm being quoted...)

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: Daniel Ratliffmailto:dratl...@humana.com
Sent: 28/02/2015 6:53 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: (OT) Vendor list for Ignite?

A scary thought on Twitter this morning from Peter Egerton.



https://twitter.com/david_obrien/status/571068420298420225



Host the #configmgrhttps://twitter.com/hashtag/configmgr?src=hash site on 
Azure / Cloud and just have a DP on site. Would that be a bad thing?



Daniel Ratliff



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Bill Bernat
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 2:09 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: (OT) Vendor list for Ignite?



It's a fascinating topic. Here's a recent take from Brad Anderson: 
http://redmondmag.com/articles/2015/02/23/system-center-configuration-manager-future.aspx.



-billb



From: Andreas Hammarskjöld 
jun...@2pintsoftware.commailto:jun...@2pintsoftware.com
Reply-To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com 
mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Date: Friday, February 27, 2015 at 10:58 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com 
mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: (OT) Vendor list for Ignite?



But also remember what wise men say: One does not just migrate 20 years of 
code in to Mordor... sorry the Cloud



MS focuses primarily on the Cloud right now, but we all know were few people 
actually use it. Does Intune even cover 1% of the ConfigMgr install base? And I 
am not talking purchased or licensed, I am talking about deployed.



So MS faces the options to put in a few years to make Intune better with zero 
new stuff in ConfigMgr, which will make existing customer base angry, making 
future sells harder. Alternative is to do a split where some like 70% goes 
towards the Cloud and 30% to keep customer happy enough. But that won't make 
the market people as they want a good story and strong figures on cloud and 
market share in that. The lack of ConfigMgr sessions at these events since 
there are very few new features, i.e. not so much dev time for our friend 
ConfigMgr.



In my previous role at my old company I was in exactly the same spot as MS. I 
had to develop new things for the cloud, and still maintain good ol' slow 
moving software. It's not an easy game. MS will make most mistake's again with 
Intune as they did with ConfigMgr, because people are like that. Writing new 
code generates bugs, period, since developers are human. So it will be slower 
than they think, and when no new stuff comes to existing platform owners they 
will start not to renew Enterprise deals since there is a lack of roadmap, 
people will raise hell internally. And then God knows what will happen.



So basically, Microsoft has to develop a kick-ass Intune with the same feature 
set that it took them 20 years to put into ConfigMgr + more. And this they have 
to do in a very short timeframe before losing new or existing customers. I 
think I recall that ConfigMgr 2012 was 9 million lines of code and the test 
tools had 4.5 million, so to finish in 5 years time they have to check in more 
than 12000 perfect lines of code each day. You do the math! :)



Anyhow, my 2 cents after having 2Pints! So 

RE: [mssms] Application Model / Targeting

[Michael Mott]

Check the 1E Enforcement tool, located here

http://www.1e.com/free-tools/



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Sean Pomeroy
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 7:37 PM
To: mssms@lists.myITforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Application Model / Targeting


For licensed applications we use AD groups tied to collections for the users 
and UDA to only deploy to the users primary machine.

For license free applications we just deploy as available to the all users 
collection and they use the application catalog.

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, 7:30 PM Robert Spinelli 
rspinell...@outlook.commailto:rspinell...@outlook.com wrote:
Just trying to figure out how others target using the application model?  I was 
looking to create a minimal amount of collections and use AD group membership 
of the machine as an application requirement but after doing some research, 
seems like people are saying that application requirements shouldn't be used as 
a targeting method.  It can cause performance issue as all clients would have 
policies for all applications (ex: 2000 apps) even if they only need 5 apps.

Nice long thread/post here:

https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/3a737afa-26e8-4881-9105-a9c42055ca67/how-to-create-a-global-condition-based-on-computersusers-active-directory-group

If you have 2000 apps for example and have an AD group per app, are you 
creating 2000 collections?  This is what I used to do for 2007 and 2012 package 
model, but thought the benefit of 2012 was less collections.

Would like to hear what others are doing.

Rob






Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

[mssms] RE: anyone know anything about SNOW software? for software license optimization?

[Michael Mott]

Depends on what business initiative is and or what they are trying to 
accomplish.  If an audits looming, then there are other products that do the 
job quicker.  Looking for software waste, there is another product that does 
that.  Gather more detail from her and come back to the group or shoot me an 
email offline

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Jimmy Martin
Sent: Tuesday, February 3, 2015 2:40 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: anyone know anything about SNOW software? for software 
license optimization?

I'm the cm guy here, my AD came to me and said he was investigating the vendor 
(for a software asset containment solution) and I thought I would start 
investigating a bit to know more about the company and how it rates with it's 
competitors.  Thought I would ping the group


Jimmy Martin
(901) 227-8209

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 1:36 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: anyone know anything about SNOW software? for software 
license optimization?

Yeah, quite a lot, Lost one of my good employees to them at my last job, and we 
were in direct competition with another product.

What do you want to know?

//A

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Martin
Sent: den 3 februari 2015 18:10
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] anyone know anything about SNOW software? for software license 
optimization?

TIA...



Jimmy Martin | Engineer | Information Technology | BMHCC - CORPORATE
Phone: (901) 227-8209 | jimmy.mar...@bmhcc.orgmailto:jimmy.mar...@bmhcc.org
Opinions expressed above are not necessarily those of Baptist.


This message and any files transmitted with it may contain legally privileged, 
confidential, or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message, you are not permitted to use, copy, or forward it, in whole or 
in part without the express consent of the sender. Please notify the sender of 
the error by reply email, disregard the foregoing messages, and delete it 
immediately.


P Please consider the environment before printing this email...




This message and any files transmitted with it may contain legally privileged, 
confidential, or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message, you are not permitted to use, copy, or forward it, in whole or 
in part without the express consent of the sender. Please notify the sender of 
the error by reply email, disregard the foregoing messages, and delete it 
immediately.


P Please consider the environment before printing this email...






Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] Re: Rebuilding SCCM 2012R2 Environment in Parallel

[Michael Mott]

So why did you put a CAS in?  Just curious.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of David Jones
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 1:47 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Re: Rebuilding SCCM 2012R2 Environment in Parallel

I forgot to add, there are about 32,000 managed clients in one forest.

Dave

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:44 PM, David Jones 
dkjones9...@gmail.commailto:dkjones9...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to rebuild an existing SCCM environment to be simpler and more up 
to date in SW.

Currently the environment is:
OS/SQL for the 5 servers in question is Server 2008 R2, SQL 2008 in VMware.
Clients are XP / Vista / and Windows 7 Pro (NOT Enterprise) with some Win 
8.1 sprinkled in.
1 CAS
2 Primaries with MP-DP-Catalog
2 Internet based MP-DP-Catalog (one for each primary)
 about 100 just DP's ( OS Win7 Pro thru Server 2003/8). There used to be 
about 400.
 SCCM 2012R2 CU 2 (to CU latest):  We only use Asset Intelligence, package 
deployment and Reporting. We do not image or do SUP (another team using what 
they use), or anything else.

My focus is on going to 1 Primary, 1 Internet based MP/DP/Catalog in VMware 
using Server 2012R2 and SQL 2012R2 (unlikely but maybe SQL 2014) as well as the 
necessary number of just DP's ( we piggy back on existing servers/workstations 
so they are what they are, and with no PXE ).

It would have to be done in parallel, exporting/importing what I can, 
recreating what I need to, then migrating by boundary I suppose.

What advice to you have, links you know of, things you've been burned by, etc. 
I am burning my way thru TechNet now.

Thanks for any and all help,

Dave






Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up

[Michael Mott]

Are you not cleaning old systems out?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of sccmfun
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:40 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up

It the machine has been re-imaged, and was created a month ago it wouldn't show 
up in the collection since it's a re-image.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 1:46 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up

Also set a high coll refresh on this, maybe 30 minutes.  It's not a big hit 
either and it works quite well.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:25 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up

select 
SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client
 from SMS_R_System where   datediff(day,CreationDate,getdate())  1

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:37 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up

Follow-up on this.

What if you are re-imaging a machine?  If the machine was discovered when it 
was created a month ago by System Discovery, it won't show-up in the collection 
of new machines.

How do you get around something like this?

From: sccmfun [mailto:sccm...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:58 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection

Cool, both good suggestions.

Thanks

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gilmanov, Nile
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:10 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection

Or do a query on what's NOT in a patch collection and then run stuff against 
that data.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 11:53 AM
To: mssms@lists.myITforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myITforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection

You could do a query for creation date

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:52 AM
To: mssms@lists.myITforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myITforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection

Just wondering what have others done to get newly built machines into patching 
collections.

We're using MDT (not integrated yet) and have the SCCM client get installed 
during the MDT build.

How do you ensure that the newly built machines get into the patching 
collections quickly so they are patched during build time?



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.







Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed

RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up

[Michael Mott]

select 
SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client
 from SMS_R_System where   datediff(day,CreationDate,getdate())  1

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of sccmfun
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:37 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up

Follow-up on this.

What if you are re-imaging a machine?  If the machine was discovered when it 
was created a month ago by System Discovery, it won't show-up in the collection 
of new machines.

How do you get around something like this?

From: sccmfun [mailto:sccm...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:58 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection

Cool, both good suggestions.

Thanks

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gilmanov, Nile
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:10 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection

Or do a query on what's NOT in a patch collection and then run stuff against 
that data.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 11:53 AM
To: mssms@lists.myITforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myITforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection

You could do a query for creation date

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:52 AM
To: mssms@lists.myITforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myITforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection

Just wondering what have others done to get newly built machines into patching 
collections.

We're using MDT (not integrated yet) and have the SCCM client get installed 
during the MDT build.

How do you ensure that the newly built machines get into the patching 
collections quickly so they are patched during build time?



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.







Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up

[Michael Mott]

Also set a high coll refresh on this, maybe 30 minutes.  It's not a big hit 
either and it works quite well.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 12:25 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up

select 
SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client
 from SMS_R_System where   datediff(day,CreationDate,getdate())  1

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:37 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection - Follow-up

Follow-up on this.

What if you are re-imaging a machine?  If the machine was discovered when it 
was created a month ago by System Discovery, it won't show-up in the collection 
of new machines.

How do you get around something like this?

From: sccmfun [mailto:sccm...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:58 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection

Cool, both good suggestions.

Thanks

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gilmanov, Nile
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 1:10 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection

Or do a query on what's NOT in a patch collection and then run stuff against 
that data.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 11:53 AM
To: mssms@lists.myITforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myITforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection

You could do a query for creation date

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of sccmfun
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 10:52 AM
To: mssms@lists.myITforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myITforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Newly built machines into patching collection

Just wondering what have others done to get newly built machines into patching 
collections.

We're using MDT (not integrated yet) and have the SCCM client get installed 
during the MDT build.

How do you ensure that the newly built machines get into the patching 
collections quickly so they are patched during build time?



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.







Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

[mssms] RE: unscheduled SCEP scans

[Michael Mott]

Marcum rant forthcoming

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Timothy Ransom
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 3:12 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: unscheduled SCEP scans

Scheduled scan completed last Friday at 9pm but another scan started this 
afternoon.

[cid:image001.jpg@01D029C5.44CB1380]

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Krueger, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 2:58 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: unscheduled SCEP scans

What are you settings for scheduled scans in you Default Client Antimalware 
Policy?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Timothy Ransom
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 2:53 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: unscheduled SCEP scans

I am experiencing both.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jimmy Martin
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 2:51 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: unscheduled SCEP scans

Are they unscheduled or are they just running REAL long :)  Ive seen other 
threads discussing the EXTRA long scan times.  Has anyone seen a fix for that?


Jimmy Martin
(901) 227-8209

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Timothy Ransom
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 1:44 PM
To: mssms
Subject: [mssms] unscheduled SCEP scans

Hi,

I have several servers that perform unscheduled SCEP scans that degrade 
performance during business hours.

Has anyone else experienced this?
What can cause unscheduled SCEP scans?

Thanks,
Tim

**
GDOL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This transmission may contain confidential 
information protected by state or federal law. The information is intended only 
for use consistent with the state business discussed in this transmission. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action based on the 
contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately. Your 
cooperation is appreciated.
**



This message and any files transmitted with it may contain legally privileged, 
confidential, or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this message, you are not permitted to use, copy, or forward it, in whole or 
in part without the express consent of the sender. Please notify the sender of 
the error by reply email, disregard the foregoing messages, and delete it 
immediately.


P Please consider the environment before printing this email...



**
GDOL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This transmission may contain confidential 
information protected by state or federal law. The information is intended only 
for use consistent with the state business discussed in this transmission. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action based on the 
contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please delete this email and notify the sender immediately. Your 
cooperation is appreciated.
**





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email contains information from the sender that 
may be CONFIDENTIAL, LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY or otherwise protected 
from disclosure. This email is intended for use only by the person or entity to 
whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, 
disclosure, copying, distribution, printing, or any action taken in reliance on 
the contents of this email, is strictly prohibited. If you received this email 
in error, please contact the sending party by reply email, delete the email 
from your computer system and shred any paper copies.

Note to Patients: There are a number of risks you should consider before using 
e-mail to communicate with us. See our Privacy  Security page on 
www.henryford.comhttp://www.henryford.com for more detailed information as 
well as information concerning MyChart, our new patient portal. If you do not 
believe that our policy gives you the privacy and security protection you need, 
do not send e-mail or Internet 

RE: [mssms] HELP!

[Michael Mott]

I had this working back in the day on SCCM 07, let me see if I have a OneNote 
for it.  Jeff is right, psexec it with a –s me thinks…

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Jeff Poling
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 5:05 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] HELP!

Psexec needs to be run from an elevated command prompt.  Is that how you are 
doing it?

Jeff

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: Aday, Karalene B   (RCIS)mailto:karalene.a...@rcis.com
Sent: ‎12/‎18/‎2014 3:55 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] HELP!

So is that telling me it won’t run under the system account?  Then how do I 
make it run?  Yikes this should be a simple thing and it is not.  Do I dare so 
I really dislike Microsoft right now?  :P



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Aday, Karalene B (RCIS)
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 3:42 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] HELP!



I have ran it with c:\windows\system32\cleanmgr.exe sagerun:3501 and it doesn’t 
work.



I have tried psexec and can’t get it to work.  I’m not sure I am doing it 
correctly.  I run the command psexec -s -i cmd.exe and a windows flashes and 
that’s it?



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Poling
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 3:24 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] HELP!



try removing the cmd.exe and giving the full path to cleanmgr.exe. . . i.e, 
c:\windows\system32\cleanmgr.exe

Also, you can use psexec from Sysinternals to test.

psexec -s -i cmd.exe
Then run your script or command line in the resulting command window




From: karalene.a...@rcis.commailto:karalene.a...@rcis.com
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] HELP!
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 21:10:46 +

This is what I have in the bat file:



cmd.exe /c cleanmgr.exe /sagerun:3501



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Poling
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 2:43 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] HELP!



The error code is rather cryptic - 255.  Can you send me your batch script in 
text file format? or a screenshot of the batch script logic would work as well.

Jeff




From: karalene.a...@rcis.commailto:karalene.a...@rcis.com
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] HELP!
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:54:24 +

I have tried so many things, sorry.  I currently have a bat file that I am 
running that has the command cmd.exe /c cleanmgr.exe /sagerun:3501.



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Poling
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 1:38 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] HELP!



Looking at the log, it shows that the program executes a VBscript:

Executing program cscript.exe clean.vbs in User context

Is the VBscript executing cleanmgr.exe?

Have you tried just a batch script to run cleanmgr.exe with the desired 
parameters?  Simplicity is better - eliminate as many variables as possible to 
troubleshoot it.

Jeff




From: karalene.a...@rcis.commailto:karalene.a...@rcis.com
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] HELP!
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 19:21:44 +

It’s attached, and thank you!



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Poling
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 12:46 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] HELP!



Can you send a copy of the execmgr.log showing the program execution and 
potential error(s)?

Thanks,

Jeff




From: karalene.a...@rcis.commailto:karalene.a...@rcis.com
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] HELP!
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:39:47 +

No that didn’t work either.



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Poling
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 12:17 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] HELP!



Try prefacing your command line with cmd.exe /c

So: cmd.exe /c cleanmgr.exe /sagerun:xx

Jeff




From: 

RE: [mssms] OT: Using 1E Nomad during OSD Task Sequences

[Michael Mott]

Careful what you wish for

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Giroux, Eric J
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 2:37 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Using 1E Nomad during OSD Task Sequences

I think we should have a 1E/SCCM specific list.  I’d subscribe to that.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Mike Dougherty
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 12:09 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] OT: Using 1E Nomad during OSD Task Sequences

Can someone from 1E ping me offline about some general (and hopefully brief) 
questions I have about using Nomad in conjunction OSD task sequences in CM2012?

I don't want to a create a very vendor-specific thread on the main list.

Thanks.

email is mikedou (at) gmail (dot) com.








Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] pls vote it up - Console should show newer version available and allow upgrade

[Michael Mott]

I know of some folks have wmi issues on the central\primary where TS’s are 
edited.  Would this actually help alleviate this issue if all consoles are 
equal perhaps?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 2:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] pls vote it up - Console should show newer version 
available and allow upgrade

Done, great idea.  :)

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Niall Brady
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 5:53 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] pls vote it up - Console should show newer version available 
and allow upgrade

please vote it up ! (see the title bar in the attached screenshot for the 
concept)

Today, you can be running a console with one version, that is not in sync with 
what is running on the primary. The only way you'll know is if you are missing 
features added to a newer release or if troubleshooting leads you down that 
route. You have to check the about page in the console to verify version number 
and compare that against what is installed on the Primary site server to see if 
they match, what I'm proposing is an easy visual way in the console to inform 
you when your versions don't match, and to offer the ability to upgrade via a 
simple click,.


public link

https://connect.microsoft.com/ConfigurationManagervnext/feedback/details/1049659/dcr-show-version-incompatability-and-allow-ability-to-upgrade-console-to-match-the-primary-site-version-of-configuration-manager
mvp link

https://connect.microsoft.com/ConfigurationManagervnext/feedback/details/1049655/mvp-dcr-configuration-manager-console-should-alert-you-to-newer-version-availability
cheers
niall.






Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 Dashboards in SCOM 2012

[Michael Mott]

I remember when people used Myitforum to show this stuff….

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 8:11 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 Dashboards in SCOM 2012

Thanks Paul, was restraining myself from the self-promotion.

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Paul Winstanley
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 8:00 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 Dashboards in SCOM 2012

and it's a great blog too. http://www.potentengineer.com/ for anyone who 
doesn't know.

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Ratliff 
dratl...@humana.commailto:dratl...@humana.com wrote:
I couldn’t have said it better myself Paul, almost the exact same reasons for 
me.

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Paul Winstanley
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 7:43 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 Dashboards in SCOM 2012

Great stuff John.

I started my blog http://sccmentor.wordpress.com/ just over a year ago for 
similar reasons. My own knowledge base that I could refer back to months down 
the line without jumping straight into a Google search, Sometimes you retain 
things better when you write them down.

I was surprised to see hits going up and up a I added content. Now I use it as 
a tool to promote myself in the contracting world and was glad to hear it was a 
major factor in securing my current project.

But mainly when I hear that someone has benefited from a solution or guide that 
I have posted then that makes it all worthwhile.


On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:33 AM, John Aubrey 
jaub...@norwoodmedical.commailto:jaub...@norwoodmedical.com wrote:
I thought this would be the best time to start a blog since the idea of a 
knowledgebase keeps getting shot down at work.  Below is a link to the queries 
I used in the report.  You will need some collection ID’s and the site code in 
a couple places.

http://thatsystemcenterguy.wordpress.com/


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Boseman, Marcia H - Raleigh, NC
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:59 PM

To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 Dashboards in SCOM 2012

Thank you very much

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of John Aubrey
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:56 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 Dashboards in SCOM 2012

I’ll put something together tonight.  I have a few other reports that are 
pretty cool dashboard type I’ll add too.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of LEROY Mathieu
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:40 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 Dashboards in SCOM 2012

Me too ☺

Cordialement,

Mathieu Leroy

De : listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] De la part de Jason Lang
Envoyé : mardi 28 octobre 2014 18:24
À : mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Objet : [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 Dashboards in SCOM 2012

I like this as well. Looking it over, I (probably) could whip it up myself when 
I found time, but generally I despise reinventing the wheel. If you’re able and 
willing to share, I’d like to mooch ☺


Jason Lang

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Boseman, Marcia H - 
Raleigh, NC
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:12 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 Dashboards in SCOM 2012

Yes please send the queries to me.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of John Aubrey
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 9:31 AM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 Dashboards in SCOM 2012

I do have this.  This is actually pulled from SCCM server DB.  I have it on our 
dashboard home page of the IT intranet.  I can share the queries if wanted. I 
ripped most from the IT @ Microsoft blog a while ago.  Please don’t judge the 
Update Compliance, it’s broken.  I think this would 

[mssms] RE: KB2984972 and App-V

[Michael Mott]

So basically you don't listen.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Stephen Murley
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 9:29 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] KB2984972 and App-V

Well, I'd read the media article but still didn't believe it as it went on and 
on about AutoCAD in App-V. Anyhow, yes, this update does botch App-V apps. I 
estimate 60% of our App-V apps stop working with this update installed.


[Image removed by sender.]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass

This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended 
recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained 
is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this 
email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your 
system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every 
care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your 
responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does 
not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in 
this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless 
accompanied by an official order form.





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

[mssms] Somewhat OT: OneDrive Business and sharing files

[Michael Mott]

Is OneDrive for business flakey in sharing files, have you guys seen this?  
Sometimes my clients get asked to create an account or login, and other times 
not, and or the download link is missing.  This seems to defeat the purpose of 
sharing doesn't it?  If you don't have a business OneDrive account, you should 
be able to share regardless, not forcing an MS log in, correct?

Michael Mott | Solutions Engineer - MI and OH
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: 734-790-6643
INTL : +44 208 326 9128
Google Voice : 734-265-0488
michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/1eglobal | 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/1e_global/ | 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/1enews | Blogshttp://blogs.1e.com/ | 
RSShttp://blogs.1e.com/index.php/feed/
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] Somewhat OT: OneDrive Business and sharing files

[Michael Mott]

Hmmm, so it doesn't dump it out to a more friendly structure?  Sad.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:14 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Somewhat OT: OneDrive Business and sharing files

OneDrive for Business runs on SharePoint and depending on the company's 
management configuration, can allow or disallow sharing outside the company.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:03 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Somewhat OT: OneDrive Business and sharing files
Importance: Low

Is OneDrive for business flakey in sharing files, have you guys seen this?  
Sometimes my clients get asked to create an account or login, and other times 
not, and or the download link is missing.  This seems to defeat the purpose of 
sharing doesn't it?  If you don't have a business OneDrive account, you should 
be able to share regardless, not forcing an MS log in, correct?

Michael Mott | Solutions Engineer - MI and OH
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: 734-790-6643
INTL : +44 208 326 9128
Google Voice : 734-265-0488
michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/1eglobal | 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/1e_global/ | 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/1enews | Blogshttp://blogs.1e.com/ | 
RSShttp://blogs.1e.com/index.php/feed/
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.






Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] Michigan System Center User Group - October 9th meeting!

[Michael Mott]

Stay out of my credit Mr.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Ed Aldrich
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 5:04 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Michigan System Center User Group - October 9th meeting!

NICE!

Make sure Mike Mott brings his 1E corporate credit card to pay for the 
beer/pizza!!


Ed Aldrich
Mobile: (401) 924-2293
ed.aldr...@1e.commailto:ed.aldr...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/
[Description: Description: cid:image011.png@01CAD56A.EFDE3F90] Ent Cli Mgmt 
(2003-2014)


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Mike Dzikowski
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 4:45 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Michigan System Center User Group - October 9th meeting!

Just a quick update for the upcoming October MISCUG meeting. Looks like we got 
some awesome news and Nash Pherson, Microsoft MVP from NowMicro will be joining 
us!  I don't know about you all, but I'm super stoked!

Mike D-


From: 
sccmlist-mikedzikow...@outlook.commailto:sccmlist-mikedzikow...@outlook.com
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Michigan System Center User Group - October 9th meeting!
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:56:08 +
We're proud to let you know that MISCUG http://www.miscug.org/ is hosting our 
next meeting on October 9th! We have some great names presenting!  We are 
bringing in Trevor Sullivan (Powershell MVP), http://trevorsullivan.net/  Ken 
Smith (PFE), 
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/profile/ken%20smith%20%28pfe%29/ and our 
Sponsor Secuniahttps://app.eventday.com/secunia.com. If you're just learning 
ConfigMgr or already have had success, this will be a great event to join!

MISCUG will be hosting the event, at the Microsoft Southfield Office, starting 
at 5:30PM

1000 Town Center - 19th Floor
Suite 1930
Southfield Michigan 48075

Sessions will cover:

  *   Managing Third Party Updates with Microsoft's System Center Configuration 
Manager - Meaghan McKeown, Director Business Development, Secunia
  *   Configuring and Utilizing PowerShell with ConfigMgr Compliance Setting - 
Trevor Sullivan, Microsoft Powershell MVP
  *   Configuration Manager 2012 R2 - Performance Measuring with status 
messages - Ken Smith, Microsoft PFE
  *   Catering will be provided.

Come on out!

Mike D-








Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] Intune and CM

[Michael Mott]

Hmm deliberate error, I like that term!

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Gerry Hampson
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 3:19 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Intune and CM

You get a deliberate error when you try to install both.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: 15 September 2014 23:59
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Intune and CM

No, they are mutually exclusive. Why would you want to?

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Pedro Henrique
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 5:28 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Intune and CM

Folks,

Is there a way to have Windows Intune Client and SCCM Client installed om same 
desktop? Tnx







Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

[mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection

[Michael Mott]

Works great on the intended targets, workstations.  For servers use a diff 
solution

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of SCOTT Nick D
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:24 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] System Center Endpoint Protection

I'm curious what everyone's thoughts are on SCEP. How does it compare with 
other anti-virus products? I'm curious to see if it's worth implementing and 
moving away from other anti-virus products.

Nick Scott





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection

[Michael Mott]

I came up with a way to recover files, remotely using psexec.  It was pretty 
easy.

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:19 PM
To: Nash Pherson; mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection


Add me to thay list and you now know an uphappy customer. The support is 
horrible. There's no central recovery point. Out of the box SCEP doesn't even 
tell thou what files it quarantined. CSS actually told me I'd have to go to 
each and every machine to clean and recover files.

So, yes it's super easy to implement because it doesn't really have any 
features. It's a great product until you need it then you are screwed. Well, at 
least if something gets past it you are.

And. ...
If you have any virtual machines protect it doesn't integrate at the hyper 
visor level.


-
On Sep 10, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Nash Pherson na...@nowmicro.com wrote:


SCEP is the easiest product to successfully manage, and of course you have 
already paid for it (not cheap... its actually horribly expensive... but you've 
already paid for it).

While Kaspersky may have incrementally higher detection rates, the conversation 
really needs to be centered around whether or not Kaspersky is so much better 
that it warrants paying for two antivirus products.  With almost every customer 
I've worked with, the business decision has been to go with SCEP and I have yet 
to see an unhappy customer.




From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of SCOTT Nick D
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 15:42 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection

Thanks, I'm debating whether to rollout the new Kaspersky client or this once 
we go to ConfigMgr 2012. Kaspersky has had great detection rates for us and I'd 
hate to go with something that's just okay.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gerlak, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 1:37 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection

Same here it's a lot cheaper and the guys that do our pen test say it's better 
than the McAfee product we had.
One thing I don't like is no way to see active file scans like you can in 
McAfee but no complaints at all.
Love the product and easy of management and rollout.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of John Aubrey
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:26 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection

We moved 4 years ago and haven't looked back.  Works as well if not better than 
the Symantec.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of SCOTT Nick D
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:24 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] System Center Endpoint Protection

I'm curious what everyone's thoughts are on SCEP. How does it compare with 
other anti-virus products? I'm curious to see if it's worth implementing and 
moving away from other anti-virus products.

Nick Scott















Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection

[Michael Mott]

Granted this was from FEP but it still applies.  Quarantine, never delete so 
you can go back if need be

C:\Program Files\Microsoft Security Client\Antimalware\mpcmdrun.exe -restore 
-name Program:Win32/PowerRegScheduler



-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 9:48 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com; Nash Pherson
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection

I came up with a way to recover files, remotely using psexec.  It was pretty 
easy.

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:19 PM
To: Nash Pherson; mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection


Add me to thay list and you now know an uphappy customer. The support is 
horrible. There's no central recovery point. Out of the box SCEP doesn't even 
tell thou what files it quarantined. CSS actually told me I'd have to go to 
each and every machine to clean and recover files.

So, yes it's super easy to implement because it doesn't really have any 
features. It's a great product until you need it then you are screwed. Well, at 
least if something gets past it you are.

And. ...
If you have any virtual machines protect it doesn't integrate at the hyper 
visor level.


-
On Sep 10, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Nash Pherson na...@nowmicro.com wrote:


SCEP is the easiest product to successfully manage, and of course you have 
already paid for it (not cheap... its actually horribly expensive... but you've 
already paid for it).

While Kaspersky may have incrementally higher detection rates, the conversation 
really needs to be centered around whether or not Kaspersky is so much better 
that it warrants paying for two antivirus products.  With almost every customer 
I've worked with, the business decision has been to go with SCEP and I have yet 
to see an unhappy customer.




From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of SCOTT Nick D
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 15:42 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection

Thanks, I'm debating whether to rollout the new Kaspersky client or this once 
we go to ConfigMgr 2012. Kaspersky has had great detection rates for us and I'd 
hate to go with something that's just okay.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gerlak, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 1:37 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection

Same here it's a lot cheaper and the guys that do our pen test say it's better 
than the McAfee product we had.
One thing I don't like is no way to see active file scans like you can in 
McAfee but no complaints at all.
Love the product and easy of management and rollout.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of John Aubrey
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:26 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] RE: System Center Endpoint Protection

We moved 4 years ago and haven't looked back.  Works as well if not better than 
the Symantec.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of SCOTT Nick D
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:24 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] System Center Endpoint Protection

I'm curious what everyone's thoughts are on SCEP. How does it compare with 
other anti-virus products? I'm curious to see if it's worth implementing and 
moving away from other anti-virus products.

Nick Scott















Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may

RE: [mssms] MOF import fails

[Michael Mott]

Grabbing some popcorn now

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 12:17 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] MOF import fails

My primary goal (among many) is to prevent the existing site from installing 
clients on the new Primary and vice versa.  We have a big problem preventing 
our site from assimilating clients in the same domain that are not managed by 
us.

If administration has to happen on the CAS and not on the Primary then I have 
to do very specific things with role based admin at the CAS.

One note: Since this new to us group of computers will live in the same domain 
and forest as our current primary I thought that two separate Primaries with no 
CAS COULD NOT work.  What would the System Management container look like?

I have a lot of thinking and learning to do, admittedly.

Ivan

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 11:55 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] MOF import fails


Primaries don't provide any separation though in administration/management or 
even data since everything flows up to the CAS.



J


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com on 
behalf of Lindenfeld, Ivan 
ivan.lindenf...@fnf.commailto:ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 10:36 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] MOF import fails

I was actually baiting you, Jason.  :)

New Primary on different continent than the existing one.  Different team 
managing that Primary and separation required for compliance reasons.  The 
computers there will reside in the same domain as the computers in my existing, 
mature primary so to achieve the separation I want a separate primary.

I know I haven't satisfied all parameters for this implementation but so far 
this is it and it sets up a model for future integrations (MA).

Ivan

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 11:14 AM
To: Sherry Kissinger; 
mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] MOF import fails


OK, so most people know my disdain of CASes -- not so much that they don't 
work, but like so many things, folks simple don't know when they should and 
shouldn't be used. So I have to ask, why are you planning a CAS?



J


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com on 
behalf of Lindenfeld, Ivan 
ivan.lindenf...@fnf.commailto:ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 9:43 AM
To: Sherry Kissinger; 
mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] MOF import fails

The thing is, I am doing it at the Primary.  We have no CAS.  We're planning 
one, but have done nothing but talk. ;)

Not at a console away from the Primary, but AT THE PRIMARY.

Aha, I am not doing it at the default client settings, I am doing it at the 
custom client settings for our workstations.  You probably just nailed my 
mistake.

...verified.

Thank you Sherry.

Ivan


From: Sherry Kissinger [mailto:slkissin...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 9:57 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com; Lindenfeld, 
Ivan
Subject: Re: [mssms] MOF import fails

You are doing that import by...
1. You are at the cas, not a primary (if you have a cas)
2. You are importing by going to default client settings, properties Not 
trying to import into a custom client setting?

I ask because in 1 of your pictures selections of what to import is greyed 
out... And that usually means your console isn't at the cas
On September 2, 2014 3:51:55 PM CDT, Lindenfeld, Ivan 
ivan.lindenf...@fnf.commailto:ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com wrote:
Hi folks.  I throw myself humbly at your feets.  I am trying to grab some 
registry data, the ZTITatoo from the MDT deployments.


The error from the HINV import in the console client settings is The following 
classes for which you are trying to import settings do not exist.  Import the 
required class definitions and then try to import the settings again.  
Screenshot attached as well.


I also attached my RegKey2mof screenshot.


I am using REgkey2MOF 3.1 with SCCM 2012 SP1.  I generate the data in 
Regkey2MOF and copy the left tab to the Configuration.mof in the area between 
the
//
// Added extensions start
//
And
//
// Added extensions 

[mssms] RE: WMI out of disk space? (0x8004103b)

[Michael Mott]

What OS?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] WMI out of disk space? (0x8004103b)

Here's one I haven't run into before. WMI is saying it is out of space. I first 
noticed it on a users machine when I was looking at their CTM log and it stated 
the following:

CTM encountered error processing reply from DTS. Code 0x8004103b

I thought it might've been disk space but they have 52GB free on their C: drive 
so I tried to blow away WMI and repair the CM client and below is what I found 
in the ccmrepair.log. Any ideas?

[cid:image001.png@01CFC795.7793C060]

Here is what I did to rebuild WMI in case you're wondering. Usually works...

net stop winmgmt /y
if exist %windir%\system32\wbem\repository.001 rmdir /s /q 
%windir%\system32\wbem\repository.001
rename %windir%\system32\wbem\repository repository.001
regsvr32 /s %systemroot%\system32\scecli.dll
regsvr32 /s %systemroot%\system32\userenv.dll
mofcomp %windir%\system32\wbem\cimwin32.mof
mofcomp %windir%\system32\wbem\cimwin32.mfl
mofcomp %windir%\system32\wbem\rsop.mof
mofcomp %windir%\system32\wbem\rsop.mfl
cd \windows\system32\wbem
for /f %%s in ('dir /b /s %windir%\system32\wbem\*.dll') do regsvr32 /s %%s
for /f %%s in ('dir /b %windir%\system32\wbem\*.mof') do mofcomp %%s
for /f %%s in ('dir /b %windir%\system32\wbem\*.mfl') do mofcomp %%s
net start winmgmt
net start ccmexec
net start ccmsetup
%windir%\system32\wbem\wmiprvse /regserver

Thanks,
James


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named 
above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise 
protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of 
this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or 
other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please reply to the sender listed above immediately and permanently 
delete this message from your inbox. Thank you for your cooperation.





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] RE: WMI out of disk space? (0x8004103b)

[Michael Mott]

Agree mine was specific, and the salvage command can be substituted

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Saraceno, Rob
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 5:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: WMI out of disk space? (0x8004103b)

May I highly suggest this blog series…
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2014/08/07/troubleshooting-wmi-series-coming.aspx

“WMI: Repository Corruption, or Not?” has some good advice about using 
/salvagerepository instead of /resetrepository



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 5:00 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'; 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: WMI out of disk space? (0x8004103b)

Keep in mind this blows away all WMI repositories. For us we have to repair 
App-v after a reset.

-Original Message-
From: Michael Mott [michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 04:57 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: WMI out of disk space? (0x8004103b)

Use this for win 7 the stuff you list is XP centric

rem stop SCCM exec service
echo Stopping SCCM...

:NOTSTOPPED
REM SLEEP.EXE 10
timeout /t 10 /nobreak
sc stop ccmexec | find /I The service has not been started
if ERRORLEVEL 1 goto NOTSTOPPED
if ERRORLEVEL 0 goto ITSSTOPPED
:ITSSTOPPED
echo done.
echo.

rem stop IP Helperservice
echo Stopping IP Helper...
Net stop IP Helper

Taskkill /F /IM tsmanager.exe

Winmgmt /resetrepository

rem Start IP Helperservice
echo Starting IP Helper...
Net start ip helper

rem Start SCCM exec service
echo Starting SCCM...
Net start SMS AGENT HOST

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:42 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: WMI out of disk space? (0x8004103b)

Windows 7 x64

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:38 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: WMI out of disk space? (0x8004103b)

What OS?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Beardsley, James
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 4:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] WMI out of disk space? (0x8004103b)

Here’s one I haven’t run into before. WMI is saying it is out of space. I first 
noticed it on a users machine when I was looking at their CTM log and it stated 
the following:

CTM encountered error processing reply from DTS. Code 0x8004103b

I thought it might’ve been disk space but they have 52GB free on their C: drive 
so I tried to blow away WMI and repair the CM client and below is what I found 
in the ccmrepair.log. Any ideas?

[cid:image001.png@01CFC7A0.ED2EDD40]

Here is what I did to rebuild WMI in case you’re wondering. Usually works…

net stop winmgmt /y
if exist %windir%\system32\wbem\repository.001 rmdir /s /q 
%windir%\system32\wbem\repository.001
rename %windir%\system32\wbem\repository repository.001
regsvr32 /s %systemroot%\system32\scecli.dll
regsvr32 /s %systemroot%\system32\userenv.dll
mofcomp %windir%\system32\wbem\cimwin32.mof
mofcomp %windir%\system32\wbem\cimwin32.mfl
mofcomp %windir%\system32\wbem\rsop.mof
mofcomp %windir%\system32\wbem\rsop.mfl
cd \windows\system32\wbem
for /f %%s in ('dir /b /s %windir%\system32\wbem\*.dll') do regsvr32 /s %%s
for /f %%s in ('dir /b %windir%\system32\wbem\*.mof') do mofcomp %%s
for /f %%s in ('dir /b %windir%\system32\wbem\*.mfl') do mofcomp %%s
net start winmgmt
net start ccmexec
net start ccmsetup
%windir%\system32\wbem\wmiprvse /regserver

Thanks,
James


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named 
above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise 
protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, or dissemination of 
this transmission, or taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or 
other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in 
error, please reply to the sender listed above immediately and permanently 
delete this message from your inbox. Thank you for your cooperation.





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender

RE: [mssms] what's the deal with the configuration manager client package?

[Michael Mott]

Make a new Client package and point it to the same source location, problem 
solved.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Russ Rimmerman
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 1:41 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] what's the deal with the configuration manager client 
package?

I wouldn’t remind hacking the db, but you can use powershell to refresh it.

$SiteCode = Site code
$PackageID = ConfigMgr Client Package ID
 $distpoints = Get-WmiObject -Namespace root\SMS\Site_$($SiteCode) -Query 
Select * From SMS_DistributionPoint WHERE PackageID='$PackageID'
foreach ($dp in $distpoints)
{
$dp.RefreshNow = $true
$dp.Put()
}

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2014 11:59 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] what's the deal with the configuration manager client 
package?

It is a built in package,
SCCM controls it. Have to hack the DB to refresh it

On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Ryan Shugart 
rshug...@mii.commailto:rshug...@mii.com wrote:
So really odd, I can validate the package on that DP and it validates 
successfully but I can’t remove it, the remove button is greyed out for some 
reason.  I actually can’t edit the package at all and I’m not sure why, I have 
rights to it in security.
Ryan

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of Niall Brady
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 12:11 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] what's the deal with the configuration manager client 
package?

failed to resolve PackageID=䊘Ȏ
that's a package problem (in wmi) on whatever dp it's referring to, i would 
revalidate the package on that dp or use smsdpmon to validate it, if that 
doesn't help, remove the package from the dp, and then re-add it

On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Todd Hemsell 
hems...@gmail.commailto:hems...@gmail.com wrote:
I made an additional one. I did not like it when the built in one auto 
incremented when I installed hotfixes etc.
With an additional one I can control when os deployment goes down

On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 12:18 PM, s kissel 
sakis...@outlook.commailto:sakis...@outlook.com wrote:
Hi - I don't think it's necessary to create another client package from 
definition - That might have been a 2007 thing.

The Configuration Manager Client Upgrade package is also pre-defined, and can 
be deployed to systems to upgrade them from say SP1 to R2, for example, and 
where applicable.

As for the OSD task sequence indicating that it can't find the client package, 
have you tried to update the content on the distribution points? This might 
also be helpful, if you run into not being able to distribute the client 
package:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/11df0f63-d146-434d-91f3-c4e826fee92c/redistribute-configuration-manager-client-upgrade-package-xxx3?forum=configmanagermigration

-S

From: rshug...@mii.commailto:rshug...@mii.com

To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] what's the deal with the configuration manager client package?
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:47:44 +
Hi:
So we’re getting errors in our OSD task sequences saying the task 
sequence can’t find the files needed for the Configuration Manager Client 
Package.  We do have such a package available, it appears to have been created 
when SCCM was set up but I really can’t change any of the options for this 
package.  In doing some web research I’m finding this is by design for some 
reason, and you’re supposed to create a new Configuration Manager client 
package from definition.  So I guess two questions.  First, what’s the point of 
the Configuration Manager Client Package in the first place if you can’t do 
anything with it, and if you’re supposed to create a new Configuration Manager 
Client Package from definition how is that done?  I have definitions for Device 
Management Client Transfer and Configuration Manager Client Upgrade.  Should I 
use the Configuration Manager Client Upgrade definition?
Thanks a lot for any help, finding this very confusing.
Ryan

Ryan Shugart
LAN Administrator
MiTek USA, MiTek Denver
314-851-7414


MiTek Holdings, Inc., 2011-2014, All Rights Reserved
  
This communication (including any attachments) contains information which is 
confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note 
that any distribution, copying, or use of this communication or the information 
in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 

RE: [mssms] Deployment warning system?

[Michael Mott]

Hasn’t the Shy WMI guy already have these triggers in place or blogged out?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 11:58 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Deployment warning system?

If you think of something, let me know.

Otherwise, I've been thinking of writing something to notify you if you add too 
many devices to a collection or if you make a new deployment and deploy it to 
more than x devices. I was also thinking of making it auto-delay (change start 
date) a required task sequence until you tell it to allow the task sequence.

I just need to find the most elegant way of checking every minute if 
deployments fit that criteria.



On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Atkinson, Matt 
matt.atkin...@providence.orgmailto:matt.atkin...@providence.org wrote:
Hi All,

We’ve been kicking around the idea of some kind of warning system to notify our 
SCCM team via email when someone creates a deployment targeting more than $x 
number of computers. Has anyone out there seen or built something like that? I 
think I can put something together using WMI events and Powershell, but want to 
make sure it doesn’t already exist before heading down that path.

Thanks!
-Matt




This message is intended for the sole use of the addressee, and may contain 
information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under 
applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you 
may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any 
information contained in the message. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this 
message.







Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

[mssms] RE: ccmexec at login

[Michael Mott]

More than likely soft inv too, as even rebooting it picks up where it left off 
if it didn't finish.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 9:40 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: ccmexec at login

Ccmexec could be doing a lot of different things, will need to dig into the 
logs to confirm.

If you suspect inventory, check out InventoryAgent.log.

Daniel Ratliff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Gary Ossewaarde
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 9:28 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] ccmexec at login

Does anyone know what ccmexec is doing at (first) login? I'm working with a 
deep-frozen lab, so each login is a first login. We don't use roaming 
profiles/profile redirection at all, either.

I ran a boot trace with the Windows Performance Toolkit and noticed ccmexec 
doing a decent amount of disk IO.

Is this software inventory? That doesn't seem to make sense to run that at 
login. Any ideas?


The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information 
in error,
please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

FW: [mssms] SCCM Distribution Point migration issue

[Michael Mott]

Guys, one of our clients had the same issue, I pinged him, hope this gets thru

From: Mitchell, Steven R [mailto:steven.r.mitch...@ehi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 11:56 AM
To: Michael Mott
Subject: FW: [mssms] SCCM Distribution Point migration issue

Sometimes my emails don’t go through to the list.  If you don’t see it then 
forward this answer to them.

From: Mitchell, Steven R
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 10:51 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM Distribution Point migration issue
Jeff,

I ran into this with my migration.  After weeks of this process going on and on 
with MS Premiere we found a setting in WMI that resolved this issue.  The way 
we saw this was through DPU files continuing to show up meaning that the 
migration had kicked off again.  This is what is re-evaluating all the software 
on the migrated DP.

Here are the steps MS sent us.

How to set DPFlags:
1. Open up an administrative command prompt on ConfigMgr 2012 Primary Site 
Server
2. Type wbemtest and hit enter to open up the tool.
3. Click Connect and in the box type root\sms\site_[SITECODE] and click on 
Connect again.
4. Click the query button and Enter the following query: select * from 
SMS_SCI_SysResUse
5. In the list that populates, you’ll see entries that begin with 
SMS_SCI_SysResUse.FileType=2,ItemName= [\Display=servername\\\]...
The servername highlighted above should match the DP server for which we want 
to make that change. Additionally, if you scroll further towards the right, 
you’ll find the various roles that are installed on that server listed (each 
will be a different line item in the list). You need to choose the one that 
says SMS Distribution Point.
6. Now, double click on the selected item to open up its properties.
7. In the window that comes up, you’ll have three boxes with the middle one 
having the properties. Put a check in Hide System Properties.
8. Scroll down in the list in the middle box and double click on the Property 
Props.
9. In the Property editor window, click on the button that says View Embedded.
10. Now, there will be a complete list of all the properties of the 
Distribution Point, each looking like SMS_EmbeddedProperty=no key.
11. You will need to find the entry with the PropertyName showing DPFlags by 
double clicking each entry. (Don’t save any changes yet)
12. Once you have this entry pulled up, double click on the property called 
Value and set it to “0” in the window that comes up.
13. Once the above is done, click the Save Property button and then Save Object 
in the rest of the dialogs to ensure that the change that was made takes effect.
14. Wait for at least 5 minutes
15. Delete .DPU file for specific DP if exist
16. To take effect you have to restart the “SMSExec” service on the ConfigMgr 
2012 Primary Site Server

I also modified this vbscript to evaluate which dps have the incorrect setting. 
 WE had hundreds of DP’s so this was helpful as this is a very manual process.  
I have attached this script and renamed it to .txt.

Hope this helps you.

STeven



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Poling
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 10:13 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM Distribution Point migration issue

I can't provide any help other than the fact that I see this in an environment 
I migrated as well.  If anyone has insight or suggestions, I would also be 
grateful!

Thanks,

Jeff

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Rick 
rickhambri...@hotmail.commailto:rickhambri...@hotmail.com wrote:
We are in the process of moving from SCCM 2007 to SCCM 2012 and have started 
Distribution Point migrations. SCCM 2012 reported completed reassign 
distribution point and there were entries in the smsdpprov.log showing that 
the packages were migrated. We thought the process had completed successfully, 
but soon after, the following entries was written in the smsdpprov.log for 
every package:

Importing package XX as content XX.1 into SIS from source 
\\DPserver\SMSPKGE$\XXfile:///\\%3cDPserver%3e\SMSPKGE$\XX
Failed to access source

The failed to access source makes sense, since the 2007 package folder no 
longer exists because it was migrated and then deleted by the migration job. 
This has repeated over and over again (from every few minutes to 30-60 minute 
intervals) since the migration job was first run. The server has been restarted 
since the migration. It's like the migration job is running over and over again.

We are running SCCM 2012 R2 CU1 on Server 2008 R2.

Any ideas on how to clean this up? Thanks in advance for your assistance.








CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed and may contain confidential

RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

[Michael Mott]

With a propeller!

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of steven hosking
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 5:27 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises

Can I get a beanie? :D

From: Marable, Mikemailto:mmara...@med.umich.edu
Sent: ‎22/‎07/‎2014 7:20 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Cc: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Microsoft's unified technology event for enterprises
Know much about quilting? LOLLL

And what is wrong with quilting?  After 50-60 hours a week in the office 
spending some time doing some English Paper Piecing goes a long way to help 
with the sanity.

What?

:)

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jul 21, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Marcum, John 
 jmar...@babc.commailto:jmar...@babc.com wrote:

 Know much about quilting? LOLLL
**
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues









Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 07/21/2014)

[Michael Mott]

Never, even after 12 years

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Johns, Damon (DoJ)
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 7:09 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 
07/21/2014)


Has he ever posted to this forum? Can't remember a time since I've been a 
subscriber. Probably 3+ years!
On 17/07/2014 8:15 pm, Stephen Murley stephen.mur...@plymouth.ac.uk wrote:
Chuck doesn’t talk to us mere mortals. We’re beneath him :)

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of steven hosking
Sent: 17 July 2014 10:27
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 
07/21/2014)

Hi Chuck hope you have a good time off work :D

From: chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.commailto:chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com
Sent: ‎17/‎07/‎2014 7:02 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 
07/21/2014)

I am out of the office until 07/21/2014.

I will be out of the office from 7/17 thru 7/18.  If you need assistance
please email or call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380.  If you cannot
reach Will then please email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK
Secaucus PC Support, 201-553-3920.


Note: This is an automated response to your message  [mssms] RE: Software
updates not installing during build  capture sent on 7/17/2014 3:16:25 AM
.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.

The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared 
solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make 
any warranties in relation to the use of them. The information contained in 
this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or 
otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please 
notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession.




[Image removed by sender.]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass

This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended 
recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained 
is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this 
email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your 
system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every 
care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your 
responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does 
not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in 
this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless 
accompanied by an official order form.



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by 
legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to 
whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any 
disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you 
have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office 
by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable 
arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return 
at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the 
information contained in this transmission.





Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] WMI + Hardware Inventory

[Michael Mott]

Yeah and on a server to boot.

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Stephen Murley
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 2:06 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] WMI + Hardware Inventory

Isn't that a bit severe for one incorrect value?


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on behalf 
of Trevor Sullivan [tsul...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 July 2014 18:45
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] WMI + Hardware Inventory

Try winmgmt.exe /resetrepository.

Cheers,
Trevor Sullivan
Microsoft PowerShell MVP

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of HELMS, DAVID C
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 12:32 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] WMI + Hardware Inventory

I've got several servers that is reporting in incorrect data for Last Boot up 
time.  When I check WMI on the local servers I notice the LastBootUpTime is 
incorrect.These servers were built in April 2014 and Win32_OperatingSystem 
-  LastBootUpTime is showing Feb 2014.   How would I go about correcting this?  
Do I need to reset WMI?

[cid:image001.png@01CFA02A.B1286980]




[http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/worldclass

This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended 
recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained 
is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this 
email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your 
system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every 
care, Plymouth University accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is your 
responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. Plymouth University does 
not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. Nothing in 
this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or services unless 
accompanied by an official order form.







Legal Notice: This email is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is 
addressed. If you are not an intended recipient and have received this message 
in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this email or 
calling +44(0) 2083269015 (UK) or +1 866 592 4214 (USA). This email and any 
attachments may be privileged and/or confidential. The unauthorized use, 
disclosure, copying or printing of any information it contains is strictly 
prohibited. The opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent the views of 1E Ltd. Nothing in this email will 
operate to bind 1E to any order or other contract.

RE: [mssms] RE: CM12 R2 Upgrade question

[Michael Mott]

I'll look at my deployment share and compare versions again to be sure, but 
more than likely that's it

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 9:12 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: CM12 R2 Upgrade question

If you uninstall a newer version of the ADK, and then install an older version 
of the ADK, then you have installed an older version of WinPE (as part of the 
ADK). This doesn't directly affect your ConfigMgr boot images, which it seems 
you're talking about. Boot images and WinPE images are two distinct concepts. A 
boot image is simply an object that points to a WinPE image on the filesystem, 
and contains some configuration data.

I'm a little confused why you had to downgrade the ADK in the first place ... 
did the hydration process install the Windows 8.1 Update 1 ADK? Sorry, I 
don't readily recognize version numbers of the ADK, but rather the operating 
system that they map to.

Cheers,
Trevor Sullivan
Microsoft PowerShell MVP

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 2:04 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: CM12 R2 Upgrade question

I can't be the only one who has done this then...gone from CM12 SP1 to R2.  
Anybody else have to downgrade?

So if I

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 3:01 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: CM12 R2 Upgrade question

Yes, WinPE is revisioned with the ADK.

Cheers,
Trevor Sullivan
Microsoft PowerShell MVP

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 1:53 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: CM12 R2 Upgrade question

I'm thinking I degraded my PE now too then!?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marable, Mike
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 2:16 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] RE: CM12 R2 Upgrade question

It was probably because the R2 installer only knows to expect and look for the 
older version of the ADK.  You had the newer ADK for Update 1, so the R2 
installer didn't find what it was expecting.

That's my guess.  I don't have an SP1 setup to try it against.

Mike



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 2:05 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] CM12 R2 Upgrade question

I have a nice hydration kit I use to build a fully functional lab with CM12 
SP1.  I went to mess with R2 and the upgrade process, and was forced to 
downgrade the ADK from ver 8.5 to 8.1.

Did I miss the boat somewhere on something?!

Michael Mott | Solutions Engineer - MI and OH
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: 734-790-6643
INTL : +44 208 326 9128
Google Voice : 734-265-0488
michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/1eglobal | 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/1e_global/ | 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/1enews | Blogshttp://blogs.1e.com/ | 
RSShttp://blogs.1e.com/index.php/feed/
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.


**
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues

[mssms] CM12 R2 Upgrade question

[Michael Mott]

I have a nice hydration kit I use to build a fully functional lab with CM12 
SP1.  I went to mess with R2 and the upgrade process, and was forced to 
downgrade the ADK from ver 8.5 to 8.1.

Did I miss the boat somewhere on something?!

Michael Mott | Solutions Engineer - MI and OH
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: 734-790-6643
INTL : +44 208 326 9128
Google Voice : 734-265-0488
michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/1eglobal | 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/1e_global/ | 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/1enews | Blogshttp://blogs.1e.com/ | 
RSShttp://blogs.1e.com/index.php/feed/
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: CM12 R2 Upgrade question

[Michael Mott]

I'm thinking I degraded my PE now too then!?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marable, Mike
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 2:16 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] RE: CM12 R2 Upgrade question

It was probably because the R2 installer only knows to expect and look for the 
older version of the ADK.  You had the newer ADK for Update 1, so the R2 
installer didn't find what it was expecting.

That's my guess.  I don't have an SP1 setup to try it against.

Mike



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 2:05 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] CM12 R2 Upgrade question

I have a nice hydration kit I use to build a fully functional lab with CM12 
SP1.  I went to mess with R2 and the upgrade process, and was forced to 
downgrade the ADK from ver 8.5 to 8.1.

Did I miss the boat somewhere on something?!

Michael Mott | Solutions Engineer - MI and OH
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: 734-790-6643
INTL : +44 208 326 9128
Google Voice : 734-265-0488
michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/1eglobal | 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/1e_global/ | 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/1enews | Blogshttp://blogs.1e.com/ | 
RSShttp://blogs.1e.com/index.php/feed/
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.


**
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues

RE: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 R2 book

[Michael Mott]

Perfect on the iPad kindle app

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kevin Johnston
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 6:15 AM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 R2 book

I think the digital version usually shows up a few weeks later (Revision 2 was 
like that). Still haven’t figured out why as I am sure the book was not written 
in paper translated to digital…

Kevin


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Paul Winstanley
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2014 3:55 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: ConfigMgr 2012 R2 book

Haven't looked yet but is this in electronic format as well?

On 27 Jun 2014, at 08:00, LEROY Mathieu 
mathieu.le...@econocom-osiatis.commailto:mathieu.le...@econocom-osiatis.com 
wrote:
One-Click instant buy ;)

De : listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] De la part de Johan Arwidmark
Envoyé : vendredi 27 juin 2014 04:55
À : mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Objet : [mssms] ConfigMgr 2012 R2 book

Truly awesomeness! The ConfigMgr 2012 R2 book by Kent Agerlund is out: 
http://amzn.com/9187445085

/ Johan









DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 cbt

[Michael Mott]

Computer Based Training

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 6:58 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 cbt

I have never heard the term CBT and a google search led to some adult content.

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Trevor Sullivan tsul...@gmail.com wrote:
 Computer-based training. Upgrade your sarcasm detector. :)

 Cheers,
 Trevor Sullivan
 Microsoft PowerShell MVP

 -Original Message-
 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
 [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
 Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 4:15 PM
 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
 Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 cbt

 CBT?

 On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Trevor Sullivan tsul...@gmail.com wrote:
 Here’s another couple of CBT courses for ConfigMgr:



 http://it.slashdot.org/story/14/05/17/051214/emory-university-sccm-se
 r ver-accidentally-reformats-all-computers-campus-wide



 http://delimiter.com.au/2012/07/30/disastrous-patch-cripples-commbank
 /



 Cheers,

 Trevor Sullivan

 Microsoft PowerShell MVP



 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
 [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
 On Behalf Of Hun boy
 Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 8:48 AM
 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
 Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 cbt



 I have the channel 9

 Just looking for my team to buy one cbt with r2

 Sent from iPhonesorry for typos


 On 03-Jun-2014, at 7:15 pm, Jeff Poling
 jeffrey.d.pol...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 CBTNuggets is a really good option.  I used the referenced Nugget and
 learned a lot.  If you are looking for information specific to R2,
 check out Channel 9:



 http://channel9.msdn.com/events/TechEd/NorthAmerica/2014/PCIT-B215#fb
 i
 d=



 There may be other options on Channel 9 as well.



 Jeff



 On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Hun boy hun@outlook.com wrote:

 Yeah I checked that but it is not covering R2.

 Sent from iPhonesorry for typos


 On 03-Jun-2014, at 6:47 pm, Nash Pherson na...@nowmicro.com wrote:

 CBT Nuggets has a pretty good intro course:

 http://www.cbtnuggets.com/it-training-videos/course/microsoft-system-
 c
 enter-config-sccm-70-243





 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com
 [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com]
 On Behalf Of Hun boy
 Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 11:58 PM
 To: mssms lists.myitforum.com
 Subject: [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 cbt



 Is there any CBT for ConfigMgr 2012 R2































DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: New Installation Question

[Michael Mott]

Back in the old days you may have had to add that account to the domain admins 
group.  It’s better now, and you’re learning too.  Don’t feel bad!  That’s why 
this group is best, no question is dumb enough.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Orlebeck, Geoffrey
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 3:46 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: New Installation Question

*Facepalm*. Well there you have it. I’ll go ahead and add the AD account I 
created in there now…don’t mind me over here…

Thanks,
Geoff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Barnes,Chris
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 12:28 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: New Installation Question

Is the account that you configured for client push in the local administrator 
group on the clients you are trying to install the SCCM client on?


Chris Barnes

Senior Technical Specialist
Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
Desk:  (248) 648-2528
Cell: (248) 767-4415

[Penske75new]
PENSKECARS.COMhttp://penskecars.com/

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Orlebeck, Geoffrey
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 3:24 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] New Installation Question

I posted a couple weeks ago that I was just getting my feet wet with SCCM 2012. 
I have gone through several test installations in a lab environment now, 
including the AD prep and SQL installation parts. I’ve been using several 
references, including the windows-noob.com recommendation given here.

Each install was done as a single primary site server, with the “use defaults” 
selected during SCCM 2012 installation. In each instance I’ve installed, the 
first time I push a client to a test device, the install fails with error code 
5. Once I add the SCCM host to the local admin group on the target device, the 
install goes fine. I can’t find anywhere that states the SCCM host server has 
to be a member of local admins on all target devices. So I’m wondering if I’m 
missing/misconfiguring something during install. I know I can create a GPO to 
drop the SCCM host in the local admin group across the board, but should I need 
to? Basically hoping for a sanity check to know if this is the default 
behavior, or something I’m doing wrong and am too inexperienced to see it yet. 
Thank you.

-Geoff
Confidentiality Notice: This is a transmission from Community Hospital of the 
Monterey Peninsula. This message and any attached documents may be confidential 
and contain information protected by state and federal medical privacy 
statutes. They are intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not 
the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this 
information is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, 
please accept our apologies and notify the sender. Thank you.



Penske Automotive Group and its affiliates will never sell or rent your email 
address in violation of applicable law. This email and any files transmitted 
with it are confidential and intended solely for use of the individual or 
entity to whom they are addressed. Please delete all copies if you are not the 
intended recipient.

Confidentiality Notice: This is a transmission from Community Hospital of the 
Monterey Peninsula. This message and any attached documents may be confidential 
and contain information protected by state and federal medical privacy 
statutes. They are intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not 
the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this 
information is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, 
please accept our apologies and notify the sender. Thank you.





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: New Installation Question

[Michael Mott]

I always added the sms admin account (SMS 1.X 2.X 2003) to ensure the client 
installed no issue.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 4:56 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: New Installation Question

Never use a client push account. It's just one more account that needs to be 
kept up with. Use the CM server machine account.

And if there was ever a time domain admin was required, that was before my 
time. Well, except for installing on domain controller which I prefer to do by 
hand.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 3:46 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: New Installation Question

Back in the old days you may have had to add that account to the domain admins 
group.  It’s better now, and you’re learning too.  Don’t feel bad!  That’s why 
this group is best, no question is dumb enough.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Orlebeck, Geoffrey
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 3:46 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: New Installation Question

*Facepalm*. Well there you have it. I’ll go ahead and add the AD account I 
created in there now…don’t mind me over here…

Thanks,
Geoff

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Barnes,Chris
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 12:28 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: New Installation Question

Is the account that you configured for client push in the local administrator 
group on the clients you are trying to install the SCCM client on?


Chris Barnes

Senior Technical Specialist
Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
Desk:  (248) 648-2528
Cell: (248) 767-4415

[Penske75new]
PENSKECARS.COMhttp://penskecars.com/

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Orlebeck, Geoffrey
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 3:24 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] New Installation Question

I posted a couple weeks ago that I was just getting my feet wet with SCCM 2012. 
I have gone through several test installations in a lab environment now, 
including the AD prep and SQL installation parts. I’ve been using several 
references, including the windows-noob.com recommendation given here.

Each install was done as a single primary site server, with the “use defaults” 
selected during SCCM 2012 installation. In each instance I’ve installed, the 
first time I push a client to a test device, the install fails with error code 
5. Once I add the SCCM host to the local admin group on the target device, the 
install goes fine. I can’t find anywhere that states the SCCM host server has 
to be a member of local admins on all target devices. So I’m wondering if I’m 
missing/misconfiguring something during install. I know I can create a GPO to 
drop the SCCM host in the local admin group across the board, but should I need 
to? Basically hoping for a sanity check to know if this is the default 
behavior, or something I’m doing wrong and am too inexperienced to see it yet. 
Thank you.

-Geoff
Confidentiality Notice: This is a transmission from Community Hospital of the 
Monterey Peninsula. This message and any attached documents may be confidential 
and contain information protected by state and federal medical privacy 
statutes. They are intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not 
the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this 
information is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, 
please accept our apologies and notify the sender. Thank you.



Penske Automotive Group and its affiliates will never sell or rent your email 
address in violation of applicable law. This email and any files transmitted 
with it are confidential and intended solely for use of the individual or 
entity to whom they are addressed. Please delete all copies if you are not the 
intended recipient.

Confidentiality Notice: This is a transmission from Community Hospital of the 
Monterey Peninsula. This message and any attached documents may be confidential 
and contain information protected by state and federal medical privacy 
statutes. They are intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not 
the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this 
information is strictly prohibited. If you received this transmission in error, 
please accept our apologies and notify the sender. Thank you

RE: [mssms] SCEP

[Michael Mott]

I'm not sure that that makes FEP\SCEP a bad product and the Red Headed step 
child does it?  I remember meeting the product guys at MMS (imagine that) and 
spent about 30 minutes talking to them.  Very receptive, and very helpful 
people, which may be different than PSS folks on the phone.

Seems like scanning a 10TB SAN might be difficult for any product actually.

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 3:06 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCEP

Oh I forgot something else Try doing a full scan again a 10 TB SAN using 
SCEP. After scanning for 2 weeks and it not being complete I gave up.

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Robert Marshall
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 2:03 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCEP

EP has detected worms and such like when switched on for the first time at 
various customers I visit. I visited one that was totally infested (XP, Mcafee, 
DATS maintained) with an atypical worm, customer was impressed with how it was 
removed from the network entirely as we rolled EP out.

Robert

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: 16 April 2014 18:27
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCEP

Todd, seems like many have, and without issue.

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Johan van Dijk
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 12:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCEP

Using it for 2+ years now and we had some outbreaks but were caught properly by 
FEP/SCEP..

Oh...and the Google (false positive) block thingy we had as well... :) Which 
was at least harmless compared to the Office apps booboo which we experienced 
with McAfee several years ago...(excel.exe removedthank god for MSI repairs 
back then)

Overall we're happy with it.


-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 6:06 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCEP

Have you had a virus outbreak and had to recover from it?

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Johan van Dijk
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 10:51 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCEP

Running without issues here on 2000 Servers...regardless Exchange/DC's/SQL...

It has been a relieve for us coming from Symantec...

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Todd Hemsell
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 3:30 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] SCEP

Somehow my server admins are under the impression that SCEP is never used in an 
enterprise and especially not on servers.

Anyone here with a large (1,000 plus servers) willing to speak to them?

email me at todd.hems...@exterran.com if so. Thanks!!!











Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.









DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.










Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

[mssms] RE: MAC Clients in CM2012

[Michael Mott]

Has anyone got a foolproof way to get macs into a virtual lab env?  Hyper V or 
VMware?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of henry.wil...@sanofi.com
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 9:32 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] MAC Clients in CM2012

Hello
I'm currently working on getting MAC Clients in our CM2012 Lab.  I'm following 
this 
bloghttp://www.jamesbannanit.com/2012/10/enrol-mac-os-x-clients-in-configuration-manager-2012-sp1/
 post that links to this MS 
bloghttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj591553.aspx post but I'm 
looking for something like a Superflow or a Visio diagram - Does anyone have 
something like that?

Thanks





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] RE: MAC Clients in CM2012

[Michael Mott]

You cant go into an apple store and buy the OS anymore.  I think you have to 
order it online now.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Eric Morrison
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 11:49 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: MAC Clients in CM2012

http://www.chrisnackers.com/2013/06/07/running-mac-os-x-on-windows-vmware-workstation/

This should help you… Chris Nackers did a great job at this to test for a 
client.


Sent from Windows Mail

From: Michael Mottmailto:michael.m...@1e.com
Sent: ‎Monday‎, ‎April‎ ‎7‎, ‎2014 ‎10‎:‎41‎ ‎AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com

Has anyone got a foolproof way to get macs into a virtual lab env?  Hyper V or 
VMware?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of 
henry.wil...@sanofi.commailto:henry.wil...@sanofi.com
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 9:32 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] MAC Clients in CM2012

Hello
I’m currently working on getting MAC Clients in our CM2012 Lab.  I’m following 
this 
bloghttp://www.jamesbannanit.com/2012/10/enrol-mac-os-x-clients-in-configuration-manager-2012-sp1/
 post that links to this MS 
bloghttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj591553.aspx post but I’m 
looking for something like a “Superflow” or a Visio diagram – Does anyone have 
something like that?

Thanks





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: CM2007 - low disk space for content

[Michael Mott]

Yup, done the same

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 4:16 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] RE: CM2007 - low disk space for content

On the record or off the record??

You should not delete pck files. Have I ever done it? Yes many times. :-)
Is it a real solution? No, it's a band-aid to get you by until you can get more 
disk space.



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 2:53 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: CM2007 - low disk space for content

Bump. This is the drive that serves as the package source and the DP.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 1:48 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] CM2007 - low disk space for content

The drive that contains our patches is getting low on space. Is this the way to 
go to clear up space?

http://eskonr.com/2013/09/sccm-2007-script-to-delete-old-pck-files-from-smspkg-folder-avoid-disk-space-issues/


Best Regards,

Mike Murray
Desktop Management Coordinator - IT Support Services
California State University, Chico
530.898.4357
mmur...@csuchico.edumailto:mmur...@csuchico.edu





Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: CM2007 - low disk space for content

[Michael Mott]

I could yes, but then.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 4:43 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] RE: CM2007 - low disk space for content

Mott, Aren't you supposed to say, With the 1e Nomad product pck files are of 
no concern.?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 3:35 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: CM2007 - low disk space for content

Yup, done the same

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 4:16 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] RE: CM2007 - low disk space for content

On the record or off the record??

You should not delete pck files. Have I ever done it? Yes many times. :-)
Is it a real solution? No, it's a band-aid to get you by until you can get more 
disk space.



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 2:53 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: CM2007 - low disk space for content

Bump. This is the drive that serves as the package source and the DP.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 1:48 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] CM2007 - low disk space for content

The drive that contains our patches is getting low on space. Is this the way to 
go to clear up space?

http://eskonr.com/2013/09/sccm-2007-script-to-delete-old-pck-files-from-smspkg-folder-avoid-disk-space-issues/


Best Regards,

Mike Murray
Desktop Management Coordinator - IT Support Services
California State University, Chico
530.898.4357
mmur...@csuchico.edumailto:mmur...@csuchico.edu





Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

RE: [mssms] Teched, Hotel/Apartment advice

[Michael Mott]

Makes Vegas look that much better doesn’t it?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 11:06 AM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [mssms] Teched, Hotel/Apartment advice

Agreed, this will be me only TechEd trip unless it moves. I'd have picked Dev 
Connections had I known more about the two conferences.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Leuthold
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 9:29 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Teched, Hotel/Apartment advice

Honestly, if TechEd was in another place that's not logistically retarded for 
these type of events I might of gone. My team and I are going to give IT/Dev 
connections a shot this year. Hopefully we get similar value to MMS. I know 
this isn't helpful to this thread. Just venting, again. :)

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: Roland Janusmailto:roland.ja...@hispeed.ch
Sent: ‎4/‎2/‎2014 8:57 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Teched, Hotel/Apartment advice

ARGH!







From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Nash Pherson
Sent: Mittwoch, 2. April 2014 15:48
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Teched, Hotel/Apartment advice



Yeah, all the airbnb stuff close to the hotel listed by “Kozi Corporate 
Housing” is only for month long stays.  They advertise 5 day minimums, but if 
you aren’t booking a month they will only let you book at the last second.







From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Wallace
Sent: Wednesday, April 2, 2014 8:39 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Teched, Hotel/Apartment advice



May I just highlight www.airbnb.comhttp://www.airbnb.com again?




From: jmar...@babc.commailto:jmar...@babc.com
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Teched, Hotel/Apartment advice
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:33:27 +

I think that area is fine. I was looking an apt there and a co-worker did end 
up getting one there. There's a free bus that runs in the area.



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Roland Janus
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2014 8:05 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Teched, Hotel/Apartment advice



Still not sure if I want to go, but if I do, I figured that the hotels listed 
with the convention are already booked or too expensive or both…



But an apartment within the yellow line here should be ok right?

The distance is rather close, around 1 mile, so walking could be ok to, right?

If people walk in Houston ☺

Otherwise it’s a really short cab drive or maybe bus ride?





[cid:image001.png@01CF4E8B.B8333CA0]



Roland











Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.





Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.








Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: FEP Updates without WSUS

[Michael Mott]

Yup sure can, did it at my last job.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Joshua Searles
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 4:32 PM
To: MSSMS (mssms@lists.myitforum.com)
Subject: [mssms] FEP Updates without WSUS

It appears according to policy configurations that I can setup FEP clients to 
get their updates from a UNC share, and take WSUS completely out of the 
equation(It's complicated, please don't ask.)  Has anyone on the list here 
successfully configured FEP policy for their clients to get their definition 
updates from a UNC path? I've configured the default policy to get updates from 
a UNC Path.  I've configured the UNC path share for read only (both users and 
computer accounts). The x86, and x64 architecture folders are in place.  The 
updates are in the folders, yet clients will not install the updates from the 
UNC path.  What am I missing?


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] XP EOL Notification

[Michael Mott]

I hope they DON'T allow it to be blocked.  Half the world will soon become the 
largest honey pot ever if people don't get with it.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:11 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] XP EOL Notification

It will affect all Windows XP installation connected to either WSUS or Windows 
Update this month.  I'm sure Microsoft will allow for blocking it for companies 
because it's primarily aimed at consumers who still have no clue that the OS 
support is ending. But, that's not been clarified. Personally, I think they 
should have started doing this about a year ago and I think it's a good idea.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Tuomo Leppänen
Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2014 11:48 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] XP EOL Notification

Switch to Windows 7 / 8.1 ?

-T
On 4.3.2014 18:14, Barnes,Chris wrote:
Anyone see this yet? The blog post says that it affects Professional versions 
as well. Anyone know if this will impact VL copies of XP? If so, any ideas on 
how to suppress it?

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/03/04/windows_xp_end_of_life_warning/


Chris Barnes

Senior Technical Specialist
Penske Automotive Group, Inc.
Desk:  (248) 648-2528
Cell: (248) 767-4415

[Penske75new]
PENSKECARS.COMhttp://penskecars.com/




Penske Automotive Group and its affiliates will never sell or rent your email 
address in violation of applicable law. This email and any files transmitted 
with it are confidential and intended solely for use of the individual or 
entity to whom they are addressed. Please delete all copies if you are not the 
intended recipient.







DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.



inline: image001.jpg

[mssms] RE: User logs out during package based install

[Michael Mott]

There is a third party vendor product's which can watch these process's and act 
accordingly.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Miller, Todd
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 10:41 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: User logs out during package based install

It turns out that any process running with desktop interaction will terminate 
upon user logout/shutdown.  Even though a process is running as SYSTEM, if you 
have it set to interact with the user desktop, the process will terminate 
immediately upon user logout.  This is not specific to SCCM.  You can check 
this out by launching notepad.exe as SYSTEM using psexec with system  
interactive flags.  Once the process is running, you can see in TaskMgr that it 
is running as SYSTEM.  If the logged in user logs out, all process running in 
the userland desktop are terminated even though the process is not running as 
that user.  If on the other hand, you launch Notepad.exe as system without 
setting the interactive flag, the Notepad window will not be visible to the 
logged in user and the process will survive a logout (but not a shutdown 
obviously.)

This affects any SCCM deployment that is set to run interactively.  If the user 
logs out during dialogs or the installation process, the installation process 
will terminate.  It is possible to write Autoit or other scripting wrappers 
which subscribe to and block shutdown/logout events.  I am looking into this 
option to make my installers more robust.

The other option, I think, might be to rely on SCCM notification processes and 
reboot notifications and mark package installations as non-interactive.  It is 
not flexible enough for our environment, but it probably works great in some 
scenarios.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Miller, Todd
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 3:36 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] User logs out during package based install

I have a package (old style) that I am using SCCM to deploy.  The advertisement 
is set to run whether or not a user is logged in, is set to run with admin 
rights and is set to allow interaction with the user.

The advertisement runs a program called Installer.exe which is a custom Autoit 
script.

When installer.exe kicks off according to the advertisement, Installer.exe can 
be seen running as SYSTEM, as expected.  This is verified by Taskmgr and PSList.
If the user logs out while Installer.exe is running, then the process exits.  
This is unexpected.  Do you happen to know, if a user logs out while an 
advertisement is running, should I expect SCCM to kill the process?   What do 
you think might be killing the EXE?  The user doesn't have rights to the 
process, so I don't think their logout should be effecting the process, but it 
seems like it does.




Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.




Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.






DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have IBCM and Windows Azure Cloud?

[Michael Mott]

Kent Augerlunds book has a section about setting this up, but I haven't gotten 
around to it.  For 9.99 you can get a Kindle version of it, well worth the 
price with the Kindle app on IPad or Win 8

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:38 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have IBCM and Windows Azure Cloud?

I haven't researched it, but what about having the DMZ on premise Distribution 
Point and your Azure Cloud Distribution Point both be part of the same Boundary 
Group?

Michael Dzikowski
Senior Systems Engineer |  Ally Technical Infrastructure - Windows Hosting
[cid:image002.gif@01CDF887.776259A0]

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brian McDonald
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:28 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Is it possible to have IBCM and Windows Azure Cloud?

Here's a valid question. Can you use a DMZ/IBCM server and Windows Azure Cloud 
DP?

To me, this isn't making any sense. How could you possibly use both? How would 
an internet client know where to go from one in the DMZ to the one in the Cloud?

Thanks,
Brian






DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.



inline: image001.png

RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have IBCM and Windows Azure Cloud?

[Michael Mott]

Nope, just as a DP.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Brian McDonald
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:49 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have IBCM and Windows Azure Cloud?

On setting up IBCM site system in the DMZ and Windows Azure Cloud? I want to be 
clear here are the specifics.

In other words, is it possible to have a SUP/DP/MP in the DMZ for HTTPS 
communications AND a Cloud Based Distribution Point?

How would the client know where to go? Seems like you would only need one or 
the other.

From: michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have IBCM and Windows Azure Cloud?
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 15:42:59 +
Kent Augerlunds book has a section about setting this up, but I haven't gotten 
around to it.  For 9.99 you can get a Kindle version of it, well worth the 
price with the Kindle app on IPad or Win 8

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:38 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Is it possible to have IBCM and Windows Azure Cloud?

I haven't researched it, but what about having the DMZ on premise Distribution 
Point and your Azure Cloud Distribution Point both be part of the same Boundary 
Group?

Michael Dzikowski
Senior Systems Engineer |  Ally Technical Infrastructure - Windows Hosting
[cid:image002.gif@01CDF887.776259A0]

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brian McDonald
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:28 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Is it possible to have IBCM and Windows Azure Cloud?

Here's a valid question. Can you use a DMZ/IBCM server and Windows Azure Cloud 
DP?

To me, this isn't making any sense. How could you possibly use both? How would 
an internet client know where to go from one in the DMZ to the one in the Cloud?

Thanks,
Brian






DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.




inline: image001.png

[mssms] RE: deploying Internet Explorer 9 through SCCM

[Michael Mott]

+10, this thing killed me when I did it.  The uninstalling it to get back to 
what worked for some hospital apps was a nightmare….

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 12:08 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: deploying Internet Explorer 9 through SCCM

I always use software updates. I've gotten burned using software dist for this. 
MAKE SURE TO REBOOT after or you will be sorry.


John Marcum
Lead Desktop Engineer
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Shugart
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:03 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] deploying Internet Explorer 9 through SCCM

Hello all:
I’ve been asked to push Internet Explorer 9 out to one of our offices 
using SCCM.  I haven’t pushed an IE upgrade out through SCCM before, normally 
if the user needs IE upgraded they install the update on their own.  I figured 
the best way to do this was to use software updates and just send the various 
versions of IE out to a collection of the appropriate computers as an update.  
Unfortunately, while it installed fine on a test machine I set up, its not 
installing on the users machines, and I can’t tell why.  The update is on the 
DP, but I don’t think the computers think they need the update.  So I’m 
thinking that’s not the right approach and am looking into just sending it out 
using software distribution.  I looked on Microsoft’s site and found 
instructions for doing this, I need to download the various IE components and 
distribute them out and run
ie9_package.exe /quiet /norestart /update-no
I assume if I take off the /update-no it will go ahead and just install any 
updates it needs.  Question, am I on the right track for the best way to do 
this?  Is there a better way to handle this I’m not thinking of?
Thanks.
Ryan

Ryan Shugart
LAN Administrator
MiTek USA, MiTek Denver
314-851-7414


© COPYRIGHT, MITEK HOLDINGS, INC., 2011-2013, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
  
This communication (including any attachments) contains information which is 
confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note 
that any distribution, copying, or use of this communication or the information 
in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, 
please notify the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] TechNet End

[Michael Mott]

So I'm trying to assess how I will handle the end of my Subscription and what 
will happen to all the installs I have and use for my Lab.  Should I download 
all my keys, should I download all possible OS and server installs?  And when I 
install them after this ends, will they all just die?

What are the rest of you guys going to do?

Michael Mott | Solutions Engineer - MI and OH
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: 734-790-6643
INTL : +44 208 326 9128
Google Voice : 734-265-0488
michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/1eglobal | 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/1e_global/ | 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/1enews | Blogshttp://blogs.1e.com/ | 
RSShttp://blogs.1e.com/index.php/feed/
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: TechNet End

[Michael Mott]

That's already there, but I like me own stuff!

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:53 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: TechNet End

I think it would be wise to back your license keys up. :-)

Then get your employer to get you an MSDN account.






John Marcum
Lead Desktop Engineer
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 1:15 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] TechNet End

So I'm trying to assess how I will handle the end of my Subscription and what 
will happen to all the installs I have and use for my Lab.  Should I download 
all my keys, should I download all possible OS and server installs?  And when I 
install them after this ends, will they all just die?

What are the rest of you guys going to do?

Michael Mott | Solutions Engineer - MI and OH
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: 734-790-6643
INTL : +44 208 326 9128
Google Voice : 734-265-0488
michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/1eglobal | 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/1e_global/ | 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/1enews | Blogshttp://blogs.1e.com/ | 
RSShttp://blogs.1e.com/index.php/feed/
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

RE: [mssms] CMApplicationCatalog and Win8.1 clients

[Michael Mott]

Whatever was found out here?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Brian McDonald
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 3:02 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] CMApplicationCatalog and Win8.1 clients

This here describes my symptoms:

http://blogs.technet.com/b/michaelgriswold/archive/2012/06/08/application-catalog-not-working-for-everyone.aspx

I'm gonna give this a shot.

From: mcdonald...@hotmail.commailto:mcdonald...@hotmail.com
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] CMApplicationCatalog and Win8.1 clients
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:35:27 -0600
Trevor - no GPOs were put in place recently that would have caused this 
particular issue.

I did follow this blog and made the changes outlined so user's could access the 
CMapplicationCatalog easier: 
http://blog.coretech.dk/rja/sccm-2012-software-catalog-easy-access-using-dns/

Clients were working just fine after I made the above changes in DNS and IIS. 
Seems to be a problem since adding a second App Catalog...

We added a remote DP and created a second Application Catalog. But, that has 
since been removed.

Thanks,
Brian

From: tsul...@gmail.commailto:tsul...@gmail.com
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] CMApplicationCatalog and Win8.1 clients
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:22:54 -0600
Brian,

I have not run into any issues with Windows 8.1 clients and the Web Application 
Catalog in Configuration Manager 2012.

Have you examined your IIS settings and permissions, to see if they have 
deviated from the default? Have any Group Policy settings changed lately, that 
could impact the ability for clients to access the Web Application Catalog?

Cheers,
Trevor Sullivan

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Brian McDonald
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2014 1:10 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] CMApplicationCatalog and Win8.1 clients

I have a few interesting things going on when I attempt to access the 
CMApplicationCatalog from a Win8.1 client. First of all I am prompted for 
credentials. What the...!?  Secondly, it doesn't except my Administrator 
permissions for the account that is a Full Infrastructure Admin in the CM12 
environment.

Strangely, this works fine without these issues on Win7 clients. :)

Has anyone ran into this problem with Win8.1 clients?

Thank you,

Brian








DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: Rolling with SCCM 2012 SP1 tonight

[Michael Mott]

Nice work Russ.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Russ Rimmerman
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 8:57 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Rolling with SCCM 2012 SP1 tonight

Here's a doc I created awhile back which lists all the fixes  KBs included in 
CU1 through CU3.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Monday, January 6, 2014 1:39 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Rolling with SCCM 2012 SP1 tonight

We are rolling SP1 no CU tonight to workstations, same to servers Sunday then 
upgrading to CU3 and enabling Automatic Client Upgrade that day as well.

We told our users not to expect stability until CU 3 is deployed.

Is it that bad without it?  We don't use OSD.

Ivan Lindenfeld
Sr. Systems Engineer
Enterprise Deployment / SCCM

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 2:10 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Rolling with SCCM 2012 SP1 tonight

Are you going to CU3 at least?

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2882125


Michael Dzikowski
Senior Systems Engineer |  Ally Technical Infrastructure - Windows Hosting
[cid:image002.gif@01CDF887.776259A0]

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 12:31 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Rolling with SCCM 2012 SP1 tonight

Many thanks.

Ivan Lindenfeld
Sr. Systems Engineer
Enterprise Deployment / SCCM
Fidelity National Financial | Jacksonville, Florida
ivan.lindenf...@fnf.commailto:ivan.lindenf...@fnf.com | 904 854 8178

Team email: enterprisedeploym...@fnf.commailto:enterprisedeploym...@fnf.com
Teamsite: Enterprise Deployment / 
SCCMhttps://teamsites.fnf.com/sites/technology/apps/sccm/Pages/default.aspx

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 12:15 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Rolling with SCCM 2012 SP1 tonight

You'll want this handy:
http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/docs/configuration-manager-2012-sp1-issues-and-resolutions/

http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/docs/system-center-2012-sp1-woes-gotchas-and-workarounds/


Michael Dzikowski
Senior Systems Engineer |  Ally Technical Infrastructure - Windows Hosting
[cid:image002.gif@01CDF887.776259A0]

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 12:12 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Rolling with SCCM 2012 SP1 tonight

We have a big complex environment.  I think we're prepared.  But we sure could 
use some well wishes!

We already pre-staged the client to 18,000 PCs.  That went well.

Is a troll for luck on topic?

Thanks in advance!

Ivan Lindenfeld
Sr. Systems Engineer
Enterprise Deployment / SCCM












DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.



inline: image001.png

[mssms] RE: Software True-up reporting questions

[Michael Mott]

Ironic!

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Ed Aldrich
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 11:45 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Software True-up reporting questions

...and I typically use AppClarity.

Ed Aldrich | Solutions Engineer
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: (401) 924-2293
ed.aldr...@1e.commailto:ed.aldr...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/
[Description: Description: cid:image011.png@01CAD56A.EFDE3F90] Ent Cli Mgmt 
(2003-2013))
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 11:32 AM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] RE: Software True-up reporting questions

Some type of normalization software. Personally I use BDNA.


John Marcum
Sr. Desktop Architect
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Johnston
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 10:29 AM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] Software True-up reporting questions

I have been asked to provide a list of software for Microsoft True-up. I don't 
have any custom reports, I am just running the basic report on all software 
then finding the typical (Visio and Project).

I have 2 issues that I am wondering how most admins deal with this.


1.   Old data - if the software was installed on a machine and has been 
repurposed or decommissioned the data is still In the data base, so how to you 
filter out what is really accurate and what is old data?

2.   Microsoft feels the need to name the same product a few different ways 
(Microsoft Office Visio 2010, Microsoft Visio 2010) but it seems the machines 
are the same in both reports, which tells me it's just a naming thing.

I think my best interest is maybe finding a custom report that will give me 
this info.

So I ask, how do you deal with software true-up reports?

Thanks,

Kevin Johnston




Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.



Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.




inline: image001.png

RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 01/06/2014)

[Michael Mott]

COME ON MAN

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 5:01 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 
01/06/2014)


I am out of the office until 01/06/2014.

I will be out of the office 12/23-1/3.  If you need assistance please email or 
call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380.  If you cannot reach Will then please 
email or call the Secaucus PC Support desk, NAU_NYK Secaucus PC Support or 
201-553-3920.  If an emergency situation and you cannot reach anyone please 
have a manager or supervisor call me on my cell phone.


Note: This is an automated response to your message  [mssms] SCCM 2012 R2 
HealthCheck toolkit – Pre-beta version sent on 12/23/2013 3:24:39 AM.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.

The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared 
solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make 
any warranties in relation to the use of them.  The information contained in 
this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or 
otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please 
notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession.





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] SCCM 2007 - Control versioning

[Michael Mott]

+1

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Schwan, Phil
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 10:51 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2007 - Control versioning

Correct. I usually create a custom directory under C:\Windows in which I store 
a build marker as well as a subdirectory for any install logs (msiexec verbose 
logs, etc.).  For the build marker, I just use something like 
Win7x64-1.2.3.4.20130724.exe with the numeric portion being a tracked version 
number and the last number in the series being the image creation date/patch 
level.  I do it as an EXE because it’s automatically inventoried by ConfigMgr 
without any additional configuration.

Lots of ways to do it, this is just my personal preference.

-Phil
_
Phil Schwan | Technical Specialist, Enterprise Windows Services
Project Leadership Associates | 2000 Town Center, Suite 1900, Southfield, MI 
48075
Lync: 312.756.1626  Mobile: 419.262.5133
www.projectleadership.nethttp://www.projectleadership.net/
[Description: Description: Description: Arrow email]Lead with Strategy. 
Leverage Technology. Deliver Results.
[linkedin_logo-19x20]http://www.linkedin.com/in/philschwan[Twitter-Logo1-20x20]https://twitter.com/philschwan
 [wordpress-logo3] http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/author/philschwan





From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:57 AM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'; 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2007 - Control versioning

There was a chain on this a few months back. I'll see if I can find it when I 
get in. I know Phil Schwan was doing an .exe method I think, dropping files in 
c:\Windows or something like that.

-Daniel Ratliff

-Original Message-
From: Craig Andrew (OIZ) 
[andrew.cr...@zuerich.chmailto:andrew.cr...@zuerich.ch]
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 05:20 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: AW: [mssms] SCCM 2007 - Control versioning
This at end of TS:
REG ADD HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\OEMInformation /v Model 
/t REG_SZ /d %_SMSTSPackageName% /f
REG ADD HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\OEMInformation /v 
LastStagingEndTime /t REG_SZ /d %date% %time% /f
REG ADD HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\OEMInformation /v 
LastStagingMethod /t REG_SZ /d %_SMSTSLaunchMode% /f


Add to Configuration.MOF, edit Client Settings and inventory with HINV to 
obtain the results for reporting.
Please do not simply add this to the MOF. Create the registry keys on a 
test machine, use RegKeyToMOF, compile the MOF on test machine, test before 
activating. If at all unsure how to do this, read here
http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/skissinger/archive/2009/04/13/mark-cochrane-s-regkeytomof.aspx
http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/skissinger/archive/2010/12/01/march-cochrane-s-regkeytomof-v2-5.aspx
Think this is the latest version:
http://myitforum.com/cs2/files/folders/proddocs/entry152945.aspx


#pragma namespace (.\\root\\cimv2file:///\\root\cimv2)
#pragma deleteclass(Maintenance_OEM_Information_64, NOFAIL)
[DYNPROPS]
Class Maintenance_OEM_Information_64
{
[key] string KeyName;
String Manufacturer;
String Model;
String SupportHours;
String SupportPhone;
String SupportURL;
String LastStagingEndTime;
String LastStagingMethod;
};

[DYNPROPS]
Instance of Maintenance_OEM_Information_64
{
KeyName=OEM_Information_64;
[PropertyContext(Local|HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\OEMInformation|Manufacturer),Dynamic,Provider(RegPropProv)]
 Manufacturer;
[PropertyContext(Local|HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\OEMInformation|Model),Dynamic,Provider(RegPropProv)]
 Model;
[PropertyContext(Local|HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\OEMInformation|SupportHours),Dynamic,Provider(RegPropProv)]
 SupportHours;
[PropertyContext(Local|HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\OEMInformation|SupportPhone),Dynamic,Provider(RegPropProv)]
 SupportPhone;
[PropertyContext(Local|HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\OEMInformation|SupportURL),Dynamic,Provider(RegPropProv)]
 SupportURL;
[PropertyContext(Local|HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\OEMInformation|LastStagingEndTime),Dynamic,Provider(RegPropProv)]
 LastStagingEndTime;
[PropertyContext(Local|HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Microsoft\\Windows\\CurrentVersion\\OEMInformation|LastStagingMethod),Dynamic,Provider(RegPropProv)]
 LastStagingMethod;
};

Von: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] Im Auftrag von Dean Cunningham
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. November 2013 09:54
An: 

RE: RE: [mssms] Deploy RDP Shortcut using SCCM 2012

[Michael Mott]

FOC

Friend of Chuck

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of ga...@enhansoft.com
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 4:22 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: OOO: RE: [mssms] Deploy RDP Shortcut using SCCM 2012

Please note that I’m out of the office with no access to emails. I will be 
replying to emails on Nov 27th. During this time please contact 
sa...@enhansoft.com or supp...@enhansoft.com for your urgent questions.








DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] Scup issue

[Michael Mott]

That’s is s stupid.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Schwan, Phil
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 1:41 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Scup issue

You’ll love this…

According to the WSUS Product Team, WSUS no longer issues self-signed 
certificateshttp://blogs.technet.com/b/wsus/archive/2013/08/15/wsus-no-longer-issues-self-signed-certificates.aspx
 as of R2.

The link does include a reg hack to re-enable, but the API is deprecated and 
will likely disappear in the future.

The supported solution is to install Windows Server Certificate Services and 
issue the cert that way.

-Phil

_
Phil Schwan | Technical Specialist, Enterprise Windows Services
Project Leadership Associates | 2000 Town Center, Suite 1900, Southfield, MI 
48075
Lync: 312.756.1626  Mobile: 419.262.5133
www.projectleadership.nethttp://www.projectleadership.net/
[Description: Description: Description: Arrow email]Lead with Strategy. 
Leverage Technology. Deliver Results.
[linkedin_logo-19x20]http://www.linkedin.com/in/philschwan[Twitter-Logo1-20x20]https://twitter.com/philschwan
 [wordpress-logo3] http://myitforum.com/myitforumwp/author/philschwan




From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 8:06 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Scup issue

Other thought... your config file.

http://myitforum.com/cs2/blogs/rzander/archive/2011/05/30/scup-2011-with-shared-database.aspx

The db maybe was pointing somewhere else the first times you ran it, or your 
profile was wiped? So the db was lost too?
Roland Janus roland.ja...@hispeed.chmailto:roland.ja...@hispeed.ch wrote:
Tried that already.




From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Sherry Kissinger
Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Oktober 2013 23:55
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Scup issue


UAC

Right-click Run as administrator

I've just made a shortcut on my desktop with the run-as-admin set up on the 
shortcut.  I've been burned too many times by the SCUP console when I forget to 
run as admin.



Sherry Kissinger
Microsoft MVP - ConfigMgr
mofmas...@myitforum.commailto:mofmas...@myitforum.com




From: Roland Janus roland.ja...@hispeed.chmailto:roland.ja...@hispeed.ch
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:17 PM
Subject: [mssms] Scup issue


New install of CM12SP1R2 and SCUP on Server 2012R2.

I never had this combination, but somehow I doubt that is the reason for this:

The screen looks like that, always,

[cid:image001.jpg@01CED057.1D411620]

This is the message I get when clicking either Test or Create, any combination 
on how to connect the WSUS makes no difference and it never changes or even 
creates a cert.

[cid:image002.png@01CED057.1D411620]

The SCUP log in %temp% says:

The system cannot find the file specified

That’s all, no other error us other indication.

Any ideas?



The system cannot find the file specified

[cid:image003.png@01CED057.1D411620]

[cid:image002.png@01CED057.1D411620]

Roland Janus
IMS Informatics AG
Providing Services to Novartis Pharma AG
Lead Architect SCCM 2012 Project
Phone number : + 41 61 32 43902
e-mail: roland.ja...@novartis.netmailto:roland.ja...@novartis.net









PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. This email and any files transmitted with it are 
privileged and confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual 
or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error 
please notify the sender. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail or any of its attachments.






DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

inline: image001.jpginline: image002.jpginline: image003.jpginline: image004.jpg

RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 TS export and import help

[Michael Mott]

Did you ever get this resolved?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Hun boy
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 10:16 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] SCCM 2012 TS export and import help

My SCCM 2012 server integrated with 3rd party extension (Nomad) I have SCCM 
2012 task sequence with 3rd party party extensions added in the TS. We are able 
exported without any issues. We wanted to import on Plain SCCM 2012 server 
(where we don't have 3rd party extensions). We are fine that the 3rd party 
steps can be disabled or not required on the plain SCCM 2012when imported.

When I try to import it says the 3rd party party extensions are not found.

When I tried to modify any files inside the exported TS file.zip by unzipping 
it and zipping after modifications it says the zip
file is unrecognized format.

What would be the easy way of coming out of this situation? Creating the 
manually all the task sequence steps would take a 20 days' time for me as lot 
of tasks inside with lot of criteria's for this specific TS.

Any ideas or help would be appreciated in this.

or can we make system to fool that Nomad is available ? ( may be intresting 
question)





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] RE: Updating BIOS

[Michael Mott]

We used to bring them into SCUP, and found a way to detect a warm reboot was 
needed.  Our shutdown process at night saw the warm reboot, and did the BIOS 
upgrade.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Niall Brady
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 9:16 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Updating BIOS

we never change the bios version that is shipped unless there's a very good 
reason for doing so (like adding features we need or fixing an issue that can 
only be fixed via bios upgrade)
we do however make changes in the bios (dell/lenovo) using their bios tools 
(cctk/smbios/smbus) but it would be nice if these tools from lenovo were 
supported better...

On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Kim Oppalfens 
kim.oppalf...@oscc.bemailto:kim.oppalf...@oscc.be wrote:
Bios to me is like drivers, done during staging.
Outside staging I'd only do if there is a real need or tangible benefit.

Bios and drivers are the main influencers of blue screens, I need a very good 
reason to run that risk.

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: Brandon Lintonmailto:balin...@inkbal.com
Sent: 4/10/2013 19:50

To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Updating BIOS
That depends on the customer.  A lot of customers prefer to only do it during 
the imaging process.  I am fine with that but if you can be thorough enough to 
test and are capable of supporting your users I would pro-actively keep the 
bios up to date on all systems.

Thanks,
Brandon

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of SCOTT Nick D
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 1:41 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] RE: Updating BIOS

Do you only update them when they're reimaged?

Nick

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Arif Usman
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 9:04 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Updating BIOS

agree with Brandon

Arif Usman

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Brandon Linton 
balin...@inkbal.commailto:balin...@inkbal.com wrote:
I always update them as part of the task sequence.

Thanks,
Brandon A. Linton | blin...@outlook.commailto:blin...@outlook.com | Work 
484.323.7205tel:484.323.7205 | Mobile 610.883.2453tel:610.883.2453



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] 
On Behalf Of SCOTT Nick D
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2013 11:29 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Updating BIOS

What's everyone's opinion on updating the BIOS on your agencies computers? Is 
it something you actively do or do you just leave them alone once they go out 
the door?

Nick Scott
City of Eugene
ISD Desktop Team
(541) 682-8171tel:%28541%29%20682-8171














DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 10/07/2013)

[Michael Mott]

h

-Original Message-
From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of chuck.spalli...@na.nykline.com
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 1:05 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] AUTO: Chuck Spalliero is out of the office (returning 
10/07/2013)


I am out of the office until 10/07/2013.

I will be out of the office the afternoon of 10/4.  If you need assistance 
please call Will Scott in Atlanta, 770-818-1380.


Note: This is an automated response to your message  [mssms] WinPE with lid 
down sent on 10/4/2013 9:44:47 AM.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.



The materials contained in and accompanying this e-mail have been prepared 
solely for informational purposes. Neither NYK nor any of its affiliates make 
any warranties in relation to the use of them.  The information contained in 
this e-mail message may be confidential, subject to legal privilege, or 
otherwise protected from disclosure, and is intended solely for the use of the 
intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please 
notify the sender immediately and delete all copies in your possession.









DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] Great Midwest System Center Rally 2013

[Michael Mott]

Use Shaun's

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Reed Porter
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 10:17 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Great Midwest System Center Rally 2013


No open WiFi and I left three mifi at the house :(
On Sep 26, 2013 6:31 AM, Reed Porter 
reedra...@gmail.commailto:reedra...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll try




Reed Porter
(816) 739-2491tel:%28816%29%20739-2491
reedra...@gmail.commailto:reedra...@hotmail.com

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:14 PM, 
rodtr...@myitforum.commailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com wrote:
Fire up Skype tomorrow.

Sent from Lenovo Tablet 2

From: Reed Porter
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 9:57 PM
To: MyOT; mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com

Anyone going? I'm going to see if I see my shadow and pop over. Hit me if you 
are there


http://www.systemcenterrally.com/

Reed Porter
(816) 739-2491tel:%28816%29%20739-2491
reedra...@gmail.commailto:reedra...@hotmail.com









DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 SUP/WSUS and GPO... grr!

[Michael Mott]

Jason I didn't need my glasses to read that page, thanks!

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 4:28 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 SUP/WSUS and GPO... grr!

Set your WUA to Disabled.
(Not Configured = Enabled)

Problem solved.

http://blog.configmgrftw.com/?p=88
http://blog.configmgrftw.com/?p=89

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 3:08 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2012 SUP/WSUS and GPO... grr!

Kevin,

You shouldn't be using any GPOs if you're using ConfigMgr to deploy software 
updates. There's a good chance that you have a GPO settings that's overriding 
the ConfigMgr behavior of suppressing reboots. That could be why you're seeing 
what you're seeing.

Cheers,
Trevor Sullivan

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Johnston
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 2:40 PM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: [mssms] SCCM 2012 SUP/WSUS and GPO... grr!

I have read many blog posts about this configuration, and during our last patch 
cycle servers had rebooted themselves just after 3AM, which leads me to believe 
that something is not right. We just changed to having SCCM take care of it.

Even though we suppress the reboots, I want to think that the WUAgent is the 
one actually rebooting, so we need the settings to hopefully stop this from 
happening.

Ideally we are trying to accomplish the following:

1) user cannot modify settings;
2) updates download and install, absolutely no forced reboot, regardless if 
user is/isnt logged on;
3)NO REBOOT

We have created an ADR for patch Tuesday which deploys the patches to test 
servers. We then take the previous months ADR and manually deploy it to our 
Production servers collection, this allows us to have a month of testing the 
patches.
We noticed that servers were rebooting, which lead us to our GPO's and 
rethinking this process.

Currently all our GPO settings that involve WSUS are set to Not Configured

We don't have any maintenance windows configured either, although I read that 
some people put them far into the future...


Thanks,

Kevin Johnston








DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] Image for windows 8

[Michael Mott]

I see what you did there

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Niall Brady
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 9:15 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Image for windows 8

I'm can i able to do  on SCCM 2012 SP1?
nope, you need to wait for R2 to get support for deploying Windows 8.1
cheers
niall

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Syed Lateef 
syed.lat...@endp.aemailto:syed.lat...@endp.ae wrote:
Hi,

I'm can i able to do  on SCCM 2012 SP1?


Regards,
Syed Lateef
IT Support Administrator, ENDP
KHDA


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] on 
behalf of Johns, Damon (DoJ) 
[damon.jo...@justice.tas.gov.aumailto:damon.jo...@justice.tas.gov.au]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 12:42 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Image for windows 8

And dont forget to use all the new deployment tools to configure your win 8.1 
environment like the new group policy items and the new tool that lets you 
capture and deploy a default live tile layout for all users.



 Original message 
From: Niall Brady any...@gmail.commailto:any...@gmail.com
Date:
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Image for windows 8


Step 1. wait for System Center 2012 Configuration Manager R2 to release (GA is 
approximately October 18th).
Step 2. Install R2 and any prerequisites as described below:-

  *   CM12 in a Lab - How can I deploy Windows 8.1 using System Center 2012 R2 
Configuration Manager 
?http://www.windows-noob.com/forums/index.php?/topic/8473-how-can-i-deploy-windows-81-using-system-center-2012-r2-configuration-manager/
  *   CM12 in a Lab - How can I install System Center 2012 R2 Configuration 
Managerhttp://www.windows-noob.com/forums/index.php?/topic/8451-how-can-i-install-system-center-2012-r2-configuration-manager/
 ?

cheers

niall




On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Syed Lateef 
syed.lat...@endp.aemailto:syed.lat...@endp.aemailto:syed.lat...@endp.aemailto:syed.lat...@endp.ae
 wrote:
Dear All,

I want to create an image on SCCM 2012 for Windows 8.1 . Kindly send  me the 
steps with images that I can follow to create image in SCCM 2012 with task 
sequence

Your inputs are highly appreciated.

Regards,
Syed Lateef



سيد لطيف

Senior IT Support Administrator



إداري أول دعم تقينة المعلومات

Emirates Nationals Development Programme



 برنامج الإمارات لتطوير الكوادر الوطنية







CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by 
legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to 
whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any 
disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you 
have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office 
by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable 
arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return 
at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the 
information contained in this transmission.










DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: Windows 8.1 RTM and Windows Server 2012 R2 RTM available...

[Michael Mott]

I read online it worked well, took about 17mins


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Lindenfeld, Ivan
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 10:09 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Windows 8.1 RTM and Windows Server 2012 R2 RTM available...

I've got an HP ElitePad 900 to test with.  I'm going to try to upgrade over 
Windows 8 Pro on it.  I'll post my results.

I do not do OSD, this will be manual.

Ivan Lindenfeld

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ed Aldrich
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 5:43 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Windows 8.1 RTM and Windows Server 2012 R2 RTM available...

...but nothing TIME BOMBED here, right?

Ed Aldrich | Solutions Engineer
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: (401) 924-2293
ed.aldr...@1e.commailto:ed.aldr...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/
[Description: Description: cid:image011.png@01CAD56A.EFDE3F90] SMS/CfgMgr 
(2003-2013)
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Niehaus
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 5:33 PM
To: mdt...@lists.myitforum.commailto:mdt...@lists.myitforum.com; 
mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Windows 8.1 RTM and Windows Server 2012 R2 RTM available...

Just note that it's Windows 8.1 Pro at this point.  Windows 8.1 Enterprise 
isn't available yet.

And it's for evaluation, not production deployment - you have to wait until 
October 18th for that :)

Thanks,
-Michael

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marable, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 6:30 AM
To: mdt...@lists.myitforum.commailto:mdt...@lists.myitforum.com; 
mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Windows 8.1 RTM and Windows Server 2012 R2 RTM 
available...

Well that figures.  I just rebuilt my lab servers with Preview over the weekend.

Oh well, I suppose I can start over again.  :)

Mike



From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Johan Arwidmark
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 1:56 PM
To: mdt...@lists.myitforum.commailto:mdt...@lists.myitforum.com; 
mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [MDT-OSD] Windows 8.1 RTM and Windows Server 2012 R2 RTM available...

My first cross-post, worth it...:)

Windows 8.1 RTM and Windows Server 2012 R2 RTM available...
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/stevengu/archive/2013/09/09/download-windows-8-1-rtm-visual-studio-2013-rc-and-windows-server-2012-r2-rtm-today.aspx

/ Johan


Johan Arwidmark | Chief Technical Architect | Knowledge Factory
Torsgatan 8 | SE 111 23 Stockholm
Mobile: +46-70-454 30 07 | Switchboard: +46 8 465 012 70
www.knowledgefactory.sehttp://www.knowledgefactory.se/

[Description: 
C:\Users\johan.arwidmark\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet 
Files\Content.Outlook\ULRY6HCP\kf_signoff_eng (3).png]

[cid:image003.jpg@01CEAE10.0B506150]


**
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.





inline: image001.pnginline: image002.pnginline: image003.jpg

[mssms] RE: Branch Cache - 50 limit.

[Michael Mott]

It's a state limitation.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Spinelli, Robert J
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 1:49 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Branch Cache - 50 limit.

Branch cache supports hosted or distributed branch cache, but SCCM 2012 only 
supports distributed branch cache.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/video/windows-7-branchcache-explained.aspx

When you look at the difference between distributed and hosted branch cache it 
always says it's for subnets with less than 50 clients.  It never says why that 
is? Does anyone know technically why this limit is?  Is there something to do 
that once the 51st client tries to connect to that Win7 box to get the content 
the host explodes?  I can't find anything that says why they say 50 is the 
limit.  Does that mean if you have 2 clients on the subnet that has the full 
package you can have 50 clients hit the 1st host and 50 hit the 2nd?  So 100 
clients on the subnet get the package without going across the WAN?

This isn't about buying a 3rd party (ex: 1E, Adaptiva) we're just trying to 
figure out where this 50 limit comes from.

Thank you.

Robert Spinelli | CTS | GTI | 575 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ, 07310, 
United States| T: +1.201.595.6820 | C: +1.917.538.6192 | 
robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.commailto:robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.com


This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an 
offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or 
as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and 
other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are 
subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not 
necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase  Co., its subsidiaries and 
affiliates. This transmission may contain information that is proprietary, 
privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein 
(including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this 
transmission and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other 
defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and 
opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus 
free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase  Co., its 
subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in 
any way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please 
immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, 
whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. Please refer to 
http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for disclosures relating to European 
legal entities.





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: Branch Cache - 50 limit.

[Michael Mott]

There are only 50 states.  Wish I had a better answer.

More than likely need an MS person to tackle that one, as I am sure 50 isn't 
exact.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Spinelli, Robert J
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 2:38 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Branch Cache - 50 limit.

Hmm, yeah I have looked at that sentence like 10 times, its Monday so I'm slow. 
 Could you be more specific?

Thank you.

Robert Spinelli | CTS | GTI | 575 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ, 07310, 
United States| T: +1.201.595.6820 | C: +1.917.538.6192 | 
robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.commailto:robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.com

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 2:34 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Branch Cache - 50 limit.

It's a state limitation.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Spinelli, Robert J
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 1:49 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Branch Cache - 50 limit.

Branch cache supports hosted or distributed branch cache, but SCCM 2012 only 
supports distributed branch cache.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/video/windows-7-branchcache-explained.aspx

When you look at the difference between distributed and hosted branch cache it 
always says it's for subnets with less than 50 clients.  It never says why that 
is? Does anyone know technically why this limit is?  Is there something to do 
that once the 51st client tries to connect to that Win7 box to get the content 
the host explodes?  I can't find anything that says why they say 50 is the 
limit.  Does that mean if you have 2 clients on the subnet that has the full 
package you can have 50 clients hit the 1st host and 50 hit the 2nd?  So 100 
clients on the subnet get the package without going across the WAN?

This isn't about buying a 3rd party (ex: 1E, Adaptiva) we're just trying to 
figure out where this 50 limit comes from.

Thank you.

Robert Spinelli | CTS | GTI | 575 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ, 07310, 
United States| T: +1.201.595.6820 | C: +1.917.538.6192 | 
robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.commailto:robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.com


This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an 
offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or 
as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and 
other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are 
subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not 
necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase  Co., its subsidiaries and 
affiliates. This transmission may contain information that is proprietary, 
privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein 
(including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this 
transmission and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other 
defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and 
opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus 
free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase  Co., its 
subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss or damage arising in 
any way from its use. If you received this transmission in error, please 
immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, 
whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. Please refer to 
http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for disclosures relating to European 
legal entities.





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.


This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an 
offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or 
as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and 
other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are 
subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not 
necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase  Co., its subsidiaries and 
affiliates. This transmission may

[mssms] RE: SCCM 2012 - could use some help configuring Mac clients

[Michael Mott]

Need a way to VM a Mac.  Is it even possible just to test stuff?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 10:37 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: SCCM 2012 - could use some help configuring Mac clients

Stumbled across this post, let me try these steps first!

http://www.jamesbannanit.com/2012/10/enrol-mac-os-x-clients-in-configuration-manager-2012-sp1/

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Murray, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 7:31 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] SCCM 2012 - could use some help configuring Mac clients

Hey folks,

I've had a lot of difficulty getting Macs set up in SCCM. Could someone be so 
kind as to offer any expertise, preferably some good step by step instructions? 
I'm having no luck!


Best Regards,

Mike Murray
Desktop Management Coordinator - IT Support Services
California State University, Chico
530.898.4357
mmur...@csuchico.edumailto:mmur...@csuchico.edu







DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

[Michael Mott]

If we can get MMS back, why cant we swell up TechNet?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:38 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

No one does.  But, what alternative do you have right now?


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:10 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

Not really, I don't want to rebuild labs every 6 months

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:04 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

6 months is a pretty long time.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 4:08 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

I think the intent is for ITPros to use the 180 day evals for their own labs.

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 3:02 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

There's also the virtual labs.  You no longer have to maintain special hardware.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 3:22 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

Spinning up an Azure VM does not meet the requirement of MSDN software. I can't 
test on my hardware, in my data center,  in my environment without MSDN or 
paying for software. Microsoft is going to push this Azure crap too hard and 
people are simply going to stop using MS software. People are heavily invested 
in the Microsoft skillset but other than the bodies running the systems there's 
no other real dependency upon Microsoft. We could just as easily run on open 
source.




From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 2:12 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

Not really, when you think about it.  TechNet was used more for downloading 
software than any of the other benefits.  You can spin-up a Windows Azure VM 
and test the same software now.  No reason to have it on-premise for testing.  
Plus, the other options they are offering as replacements are all free.

They are keeping MSDN, though (for a while), so you can subscribe to that if 
you want to download bits.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Spinelli, Robert J
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 2:37 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

This is pretty terrible, TechNet yearly subscription was great.

http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-to-shut-down-technet-subscription-service-717541/

Thank you.

Robert Spinelli | CTS | GTI | 575 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ, 07310, 
United States| T: +1.201.595.6820 | C: +1.917.538.6192 | 
robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.commailto:robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.com


This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an 
offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or 
as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and 
other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are 
subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not 
necessarily reflect those of JPMorgan Chase  Co., its subsidiaries and 
affiliates. This transmission may contain information that is privileged, 
confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure under 
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained 
herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this 
transmission and any attachments

RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription ser vice

[Michael Mott]

You’re doing it wrong

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of rodtr...@myitforum.com
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 8:52 PM
To: SMS
Subject: Re: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription ser vice

Two completely different areas, for one reason. Microsoft will drag us kicking 
and screaming into the future - count on it.

Sent from Microsoft Surface Pro

From: Michael Mott
Sent: ‎Monday‎, ‎July‎ ‎1‎, ‎2013 ‎8‎:‎27‎ ‎PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com

If we can get MMS back, why cant we swell up TechNet?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:38 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

No one does.  But, what alternative do you have right now?


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:10 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

Not really, I don’t want to rebuild labs every 6 months….

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 5:04 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

6 months is a pretty long time.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 4:08 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

I think the intent is for ITPros to use the 180 day evals for their own labs.

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 3:02 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

There’s also the virtual labs.  You no longer have to maintain special hardware.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 3:22 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

Spinning up an Azure VM does not meet the requirement of MSDN software. I can’t 
test on my hardware, in my data center,  in my environment without MSDN or 
paying for software. Microsoft is going to push this Azure crap too hard and 
people are simply going to stop using MS software. People are heavily invested 
in the Microsoft skillset but other than the bodies running the systems there’s 
no other real dependency upon Microsoft. We could just as easily run on open 
source.




From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 2:12 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

Not really, when you think about it.  TechNet was used more for downloading 
software than any of the other benefits.  You can spin-up a Windows Azure VM 
and test the same software now.  No reason to have it on-premise for testing.  
Plus, the other options they are offering as replacements are all free.

They are keeping MSDN, though (for a while), so you can subscribe to that if 
you want to download bits.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Spinelli, Robert J
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 2:37 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

This is pretty terrible, TechNet yearly subscription was great.

http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-to-shut-down-technet-subscription-service-717541/

Thank you.

Robert Spinelli | CTS | GTI | 575 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ, 07310, 
United States| T: +1.201.595.6820 | C: +1.917.538.6192 | 
robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.commailto:robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.com


This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an 
offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or 
as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and 
other information are not warranted

RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

[Michael Mott]

+1

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 10:20 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

180 days is ridiculous, and it requires me to constantly be connected to even 
access the systems! It just so happens that some of my customers have either: 
1) terrible guest wireless connectivity, or 2) no guest wireless connectivity. 
I'm guessing most other people can relate to that. So now what? Are you going 
to tell me to use my mobile phone to tether? That would be: 1) ridiculously 
slow,  and 2) my coverage isn't good enough to guarantee that I can always use 
this, and 3) this doesn't work on a plane. So right, I'm supposed to pay for, 
and use, the airline's in-flight wifi? Laughable. It costs a hell of a lot, 
it's ridiculously slow, and it's not available on a huge percentage of flights!

On top of all that, the virtual labs don't give me enough flexibility to test 
out all of the scenarios that I need to! Let's say that I'm having a problem 
with a customer's deployment package, and I need to test out that deployment 
package through my local ConfigMgr 2012 lab (after taking a snapshot, of 
course, so I can roll it all back)? How am I supposed to do that with a 
virtual lab? How do I test out PXE booting in a virtual lab? How do I test 
out pre-staged media in a virtual lab? How do I test out device driver 
packages in a virtual lab? How do I test out booting from a USB flash drive 
in a virtual lab? Will they give me enough VMs, and access to all the 
installation media necessary so that I can install a SQL Server / ConfigMgr 
2012 database replica, and five Management Points for load balancing? Will they 
give me access to Windows 8 retail media so that I can develop task sequences? 
Do I get a choice of which operating system I have my virtual lab running on, 
or am I always stuck with the latest operating system (not necessarily a bad 
thing, but it's also not practical / real-world).
Bottom line: Retirement of TechNet subscriptions right now is way too premature.

Ridiculous. Insane.

Cheers,
Trevor Sullivan
[WordPress Logo 32px]http://trevorsullivan.net/   [Twitter Logo 32px] 
http://twitter.com/pcgeek86[Facebook Logo 32px] 
http://facebook.com/trevor.sullivan [Google+ Icon 32px] 
https://plus.google.com/106658223083457664096

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Jason Sandys
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 3:08 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

I think the intent is for ITPros to use the 180 day evals for their own labs.

J

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 3:02 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

There's also the virtual labs.  You no longer have to maintain special hardware.


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 3:22 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

Spinning up an Azure VM does not meet the requirement of MSDN software. I can't 
test on my hardware, in my data center,  in my environment without MSDN or 
paying for software. Microsoft is going to push this Azure crap too hard and 
people are simply going to stop using MS software. People are heavily invested 
in the Microsoft skillset but other than the bodies running the systems there's 
no other real dependency upon Microsoft. We could just as easily run on open 
source.




From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Rod Trent
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 2:12 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] OT: Microsoft to shut down TechNet subscription service

Not really, when you think about it.  TechNet was used more for downloading 
software than any of the other benefits.  You can spin-up a Windows Azure VM 
and test the same software now.  No reason to have it on-premise for testing.  
Plus, the other options they are offering as replacements are all free.

They are keeping MSDN, though (for a while), so you can subscribe to that if 
you want to download bits.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Spinelli, Robert J
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2013 2:37 PM
To: 

[mssms] Win Magic and OSD

[Michael Mott]

Any OSD\MDT people using winmagic in their processes?  Seeing any issue or 
gotchas or high fail rates on rebuilds using it?

Michael Mott | Solutions Engineer - MI and OH
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: 734-790-6643
michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/1eglobal | 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/1e_global/ | 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/1enews | Blogshttp://blogs.1e.com/ | 
RSShttp://blogs.1e.com/index.php/feed/
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: SCEP Email

[Michael Mott]

Available for?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 2:35 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: SCEP Email

FYI - Gerry, I'm available at my contractor rate


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 3:02 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: SCEP Email



WELCOME TO THE LIST

EAT


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Vann, Gerry
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 2:53 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: SCEP Email

Yea, it took me longer because I had to fix all his crap first.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 2:48 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: SCEP Email

The dude who set that up, must have left.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Vann, Gerry
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 2:32 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] SCEP Email

Anyone know how to change or configure the email alerts that get sent out for 
Malware Detection?  The current configuration sends all open malware alerts in 
each email.  I have these alerts going to our helpdesk system, but when the 
tickets are generated there are several computers in there in which some have 
already been taken care of.  I'm looking for a way to send 1 email per malware 
infection or 1 email per computer.

Thanks,
Gerry









DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] Disable SkyDrive in Office 2013 deployment

[Michael Mott]

Old news?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 7:57 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Disable SkyDrive in Office 2013 deployment

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/sep/29/cloud.computing.richard.stallman


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of 
rodtr...@myitforum.commailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2013 8:27 AM
To: SMS
Subject: Re: [mssms] Disable SkyDrive in Office 2013 deployment

Well, we've hit a speed bump. Microsoft is worried that the recent PRISM 
reports will slow adoption due to trust issues. BYOD, Big Data, and Cloud are 
all suspect. It'll be interesting to see how this pans out.

Sent from Microsoft Surface Pro

From: Ryan Finnesey
Sent: ‎Saturday‎, ‎June‎ ‎8‎, ‎2013 ‎11‎:‎40‎ ‎PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com

There is going to be lots of changes coming.  Microsoft no longer wants to be a 
software company.  It is all about devices and services.   Can they be both a 
devices and service company for consumers and the enterprise?  Time will tell.

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Spinelli, Robert J 
robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.commailto:robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.com wrote:
It is Microsoft’s fault for not listening to what corporations need / want.  
The problem is that MS wants their customers to adapt to them, and the way 
business works is you need to adapt to your customers.  I’m pretty sure the 
fact they need to bring back the Start Menu / boot to desktop sort of proves 
that.

John Marcum is right, the amount of regulations that we need to adhere to at 
the firm would make your head spin.

Just my 2 cents.

Thank you.

Robert Spinelli | CTS | GTI | 575 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ, 07310, 
United States| T: +1.201.595.6820 | C: +1.917.538.6192 | 
robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.commailto:robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.com

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 11:23 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Disable SkyDrive in Office 2013 deployment

It’s not Microsoft’s fault for innovating. Information Security teams are 
generally not flexible with end users, and don’t understand that different 
users work differently.

Cheers,
Trevor Sullivan
image001.gifhttp://trevorsullivan.net/   
image002.gifhttp://twitter.com/pcgeek86   
image003.gifhttp://facebook.com/trevor.sullivan
image004.gifhttps://plus.google.com/106658223083457664096

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Mote, Todd
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 9:14 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Disable SkyDrive in Office 2013 deployment

You can also do this in RTM, it’s just harder.

http://www.windows-noob.com/forums/index.php?/topic/8101-using-system-center-2012-configuration-manager-part-13-deploying-windows-8-x64-with-custom-start-screen/

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Ratliff
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 9:12 AM
To: 'mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com'; 
'mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com'
Subject: RE: [mssms] Disable SkyDrive in Office 2013 deployment

It's confirmed that is fixed in 8.1.

-Original Message-
From: Spinelli, Robert J 
[robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.commailto:robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.com]
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 10:09 AM Eastern Standard Time
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Disable SkyDrive in Office 2013 deployment
The internet might as well not exist here since everything is blocked.  We also 
block all USB ports, so nothing can be copied off.

Skydrive at JPMC would never be allowed, and of course it’s blocked.

It’s an ongoing issue with MS, they like to consumerize all their products 
which makes life more difficult for corporations.  The worst example is Win8, 
where there was no way to customize the tiles in Metro or whatever they renamed 
it to.  You couldn’t say I want this icon to go in this specific spot so my 
users always click here to do XYZ.  You couldn’t have a “standard” interface.  
I’m sure / hoping they fixed that in Win8.1.

Thank you.

Robert Spinelli | CTS | GTI | 575 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ, 07310, 
United States| T: +1.201.595.6820 | C: +1.917.538.6192 | 
robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.commailto:robert.j.spine...@jpmchase.com

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Trevor Sullivan

RE: [mssms] SCCM 2007 FEP definitions advertisement

[Michael Mott]

CM07 or CM12

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Timothy Ransom
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 4:47 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2007 FEP definitions advertisement

Sorry for not being clear.

FEP definitions are being downloaded thru software updates and are current - 
downloaded two today.
But the package on DPs has not updated and source version hasn't changed since 
5/6/13.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 3:53 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2007 FEP definitions advertisement

There are a few ways of doing this, you could do it thru software updates but 
that's a lot of refreshing 3 times a day.  How about pulling them to a network 
share and having the policy pull from there?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Timothy Ransom
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 2:59 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] SCCM 2007 FEP definitions advertisement

Thanks, I saw that under policies but isn't there also an advertisement for FEP 
definitions?
Under FEP- Operations package, there is a program called definition updates -so 
I thought it would have a corresponding advertisement.
Currently all FEP clients are downloading from internet and network team is 
complaining.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Niall Brady
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 2:38 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] SCCM 2007 FEP definitions advertisement

is this what you were looking for ?

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Timothy Ransom 
timothy.ran...@gdol.ga.govmailto:timothy.ran...@gdol.ga.gov wrote:
Hi,

A junior admin has accidently deleted the SCCM 2007 FEP definitions 
advertisement.
Can someone tell me the default recurrence schedule for this advertisement?

Thanks,
Tim


**
GDOL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This transmission may contain confidential 
information protected by state
or federal law.  The information is intended only for use consistent with the 
state business discussed in this
transmission.If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or the taking of any action based on the contents is strictly 
prohibited.  If you have received this
transmission in error, please delete this email and notify the sender 
immediately.Your cooperation is
appreciated.
**






**
GDOL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This transmission may contain confidential 
information protected by state
or federal law.  The information is intended only for use consistent with the 
state business discussed in this
transmission.If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or the taking of any action based on the contents is strictly 
prohibited.  If you have received this
transmission in error, please delete this email and notify the sender 
immediately.Your cooperation is
appreciated.
**






DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.



**
GDOL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This transmission may contain confidential 
information protected by state
or federal law.  The information is intended only for use consistent with the 
state business discussed in this
transmission.If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or the taking of any action based on the contents is strictly 
prohibited.  If you have received this
transmission in error, please delete this email and notify the sender 
immediately.Your cooperation is
appreciated.
**

[mssms] Detecting SQL in CM

[Michael Mott]

Guys, any good blog posts on sql installation detections thru SCCM\CM, even if 
it's just SQL queries themselves?

Michael Mott | Solutions Engineer - MI and OH
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: 734-790-6643
michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/1eglobal | 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/1e_global/ | 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/1enews | Blogshttp://blogs.1e.com/ | 
RSShttp://blogs.1e.com/index.php/feed/
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: Detecting SQL in CM

[Michael Mott]

Looking for a more accurate, as that may show just the tools installed but no 
sql actually installed.  Does that make sense?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of steve_r_thomp...@dell.com
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 9:58 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Detecting SQL in CM

What are you looking for here? You could find SQL Server instances by searching 
on the service name LIKE MSSQL%.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 6:23 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Detecting SQL in CM

Guys, any good blog posts on sql installation detections thru SCCM\CM, even if 
it's just SQL queries themselves?

Michael Mott | Solutions Engineer - MI and OH
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: 734-790-6643
michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/1eglobal | 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/1e_global/ | 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/1enews | Blogshttp://blogs.1e.com/ | 
RSShttp://blogs.1e.com/index.php/feed/
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: Detecting SQL in CM

[Michael Mott]

I'm looking for a pretty comprehensive sql ties to arp proper detection and 
such.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 10:19 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Detecting SQL in CM

Looking for a more accurate, as that may show just the tools installed but no 
sql actually installed.  Does that make sense?

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of 
steve_r_thomp...@dell.commailto:steve_r_thomp...@dell.com
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 9:58 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Detecting SQL in CM

What are you looking for here? You could find SQL Server instances by searching 
on the service name LIKE MSSQL%.

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 6:23 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Detecting SQL in CM

Guys, any good blog posts on sql installation detections thru SCCM\CM, even if 
it's just SQL queries themselves?

Michael Mott | Solutions Engineer - MI and OH
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: 734-790-6643
michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/1eglobal | 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/1e_global/ | 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/1enews | Blogshttp://blogs.1e.com/ | 
RSShttp://blogs.1e.com/index.php/feed/
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: Detecting SQL in CM

[Michael Mott]

Good link mike, let me dig there

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Dzikowski, Michael
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 9:59 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] RE: Detecting SQL in CM

I bet someone on the list will suggest BDNA

What about Asset Intelligence?

http://blog.danovich.com.au/2011/08/15/sccm-report-for-sql-server-developer-enterprise-and-standard-version-installations/

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Michael Mott
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 8:23 AM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: [mssms] Detecting SQL in CM

Guys, any good blog posts on sql installation detections thru SCCM\CM, even if 
it's just SQL queries themselves?

Michael Mott | Solutions Engineer - MI and OH
1E | Empowering Efficient IT
Mobile: 734-790-6643
michael.m...@1e.commailto:michael.m...@1e.com | www.1e.comhttp://www.1e.com/

Facebookhttp://www.facebook.com/1eglobal | 
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/1e_global/ | 
YouTubehttp://www.youtube.com/1enews | Blogshttp://blogs.1e.com/ | 
RSShttp://blogs.1e.com/index.php/feed/
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

[mssms] RE: Tivoli Endpoint Management

[Michael Mott]

SCCM SCEP free

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Joshua Searles
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:02 PM
To: MSSMS (mssms@lists.myitforum.com)
Subject: [mssms] Tivoli Endpoint Management

So, our IBM rep. is wanting to demo Tivoli Endpoint Management.  Has anyone 
seen the product?  How does it compare to SCCM?

Thanks,

Joshua


Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message.





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.

RE: [mssms] Powershell update refreshschedule on a collection

[Michael Mott]

I know that guy

From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On 
Behalf Of Kelley, Matthew
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 2:07 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: RE: [mssms] Powershell update refreshschedule on a collection

Try this:

http://kelleymd.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/sccm-2007-update-collection-refresh-schedule-token/


From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.commailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com 
[mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Ryan
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 4:16 PM
To: mssms@lists.myitforum.commailto:mssms@lists.myitforum.com
Subject: Re: [mssms] Powershell update refreshschedule on a collection

I haven't been able to find one... If you create the collection with the 
powershell cmdlet, you can use a combination of New-CMSchedule and 
NewCMUserCollection or New-CMDeviceCollection and -RefreshType -RefreshSchedule.

Here was something I wrote to randomize the refresh times when I created a 
large number of collections:

$AddDays = Get-Random -Maximum 7
$AddHours = Get-Random -Maximum 24
$DateTime = (Get-Date).AddDays($AddDays).AddHours($AddHours)
$NewColRefreshSch = New-CMSchedule -RecurInterval Days -RecurCount 7 -Start 
$DateTime
New-CMUserCollection -Name $ColName -LimitingCollectionName All User Groups 
-RefreshType Periodic -RefreshSchedule $NewColRefreshSch

Not sure if that will help or not. There isn't a -RefreshType or 
-RefreshSchedule switch on Set-CMUserCollection


On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Todd Hemsell 
hems...@gmail.commailto:hems...@gmail.com wrote:
What powershell command updates the refresh schedule on a collection?




**
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues





DISCLAIMER: This is a PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL message for the ordinary user of 
this email address. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete 
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind 1E to any 
order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or 
government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose.