Re: Temporarily deactivate auto_view
Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: You don't _have_ to split up your .muttrc. It's just a feature, and it has it's uses. Well, really? This would be great for me. But I don't know how to write only one muttrc when switching my digfferent identity settings on pres- sing a key (F11/F12). Is there really a mechanism to do this *without* sourcing separate files? I suppose so. You say potato, I say potahto :) And you like tomato, and I like tomahto. ;-) Mutt is perfect the way it is, IMNSHO :) I don't think it's perfect. It's just good. :-) Well, it's supposed to suck less than the other mail clients, right? :) Way, indeed! This is the reason for switching to mutt a few months ago. -volker -- http://die-Moells.de/ * http://Stama90.de/ * http://ScriptDale.de/ Diese Signatur wurde per Zufall ausgewählt, ist aber nicht repräsentativ PGP signature
Re: Temporarily deactivate auto_view
Am Fre, 19 Okt 2001, schrieb Volker Moell: Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote: You don't _have_ to split up your .muttrc. It's just a feature, and it has it's uses. Well, really? This would be great for me. But I don't know how to write only one muttrc when switching my digfferent identity settings on pres- sing a key (F11/F12). Is there really a mechanism to do this *without* sourcing separate files? I don't know, what settings you change, I presume, From: and signature. You could do this with a macro. macro index F11 :my_hdr From:...\n:set signature=\n Christoph -- Christoph Maurer - Paul-Röntgen-Straße 7 - D - 52072 Aachen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.christophmaurer.de On my Homepage: SuSE 7.0 on an Acer Travelmate 508 T Notebook PGP signature
Re: Temporarily deactivate auto_view
* Volker Moell [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19-10-2001 08:56]: | You don't _have_ to split up your .muttrc. It's just a feature, and it | has it's uses. | | Well, really? This would be great for me. But I don't know how to write | only one muttrc when switching my digfferent identity settings on pres- | sing a key (F11/F12). Is there really a mechanism to do this *without* | sourcing separate files? You know there is ;) macro index F11 :set foo=blaenter\ :set bar=blaenter\ :set ... ... :set bart_simpson=crazyenter\ And then, of course: ... macro index F12 :set... ... everything ... back to what it was... But, when you want to set the same options in different situations, you end up with a whole lot of redundant code in your .muttrc So you'd be better of sourcing some files ;) -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The chat program is in public domain. This is not the GNU public license. If it breaks then you get to keep both pieces. -Copyright notice for the chat program PGP signature
Re: Temporarily deactivate auto_view
* René Clerc [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19-10-2001 09:41]: | macro index F11 :set foo=blaenter\ |:set bar=blaenter\ |:set ... | |... | |:set bart_simpson=crazyenter\ | | And then, of course: | |... Of course, the two lines above should be switched ;) | macro index F12 :set... | ... everything | ... back to what it was... -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) I either want less corruption, or more chance to participate in it. -Ashleigh Brilliant PGP signature
Re: Temporarily deactivate auto_view
René Clerc wrote: macro index F11 :set foo=blaenter\ :set bar=blaenter\ :set ... ... :set bart_simpson=crazyenter\ [...] So you'd be better of sourcing some files ;) Indeed. And luckily! :-) In the meantime I arrived at the decision that my problem isn't the source mechanism, but the workarounds for other mutt-specifics (i.g. to change a single one default send-hook I have to unset every of the other ones and define the rest [IMHO unnecessarily] again). But meanwhile that's ok so. In small steps I begin to think better in mutt. Thanks to all for giving me the clue, :-) -volker -- http://die-Moells.de/ * http://Stama90.de/ * http://ScriptDale.de/ Multiple exclamationmarks he said, shaking his head, A sure sign for a deseased mind. -- Terry Pratchett in Eric PGP signature
S/MIME patches?
Hi, does anybody have experience with %subj%? Do you know, whether the project is dead, or there will be some support for the thing even for versions higher then 1.3.17? Thanks for any reply Matej -- Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759. smime.p7s
neato PGP/push thing... almost
I was thinking that instead of rewriting messages with procmail to change them from clearsigned to PGP/MIME, I'd set up a message-hook to hit Esc-P for me automatically. I tried this: message-hook ~h text/plain ~b -BEGIN push '\eP' I figured that the above would catch the right messages (which it does) and do the job. However, it appears that Mutt goes into an infinite loop, continuing to spawn gpg processes as it keeps performing the push over and over again -- after all, it's not a one-time command like 'set' or 'subscribe'. Any ideas how I could make it work? -- Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG Key ID 0xC9C40C31 (preferred) PGP signature
all dates are wrong, every mail got the same date and time
Hello, yesterday I switched my mailboxes from mbox format to maildir. Today I switched back because I didn't like the maildir does it. Yesterday, I converted my mboxes, doing the followning: cat mbox| formail -s procmail That worked fine. Today I did it the other way round, I converted my maildirs, doing the following: for i in `ls maildir/new`; do cat /maildir/new/$i | formail -s procmail; done Everything worked fine, except that all my mails have the same date and time. The date and time when I did the converting. Is there any way to fix this. Where does mutt gets the time and date for the mails from? Thanks for any help, Manuel
Re: conditional options in .muttrc
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 12:37:44AM -0400, David T-G wrote: Not really -- a mutt scripting language has been discussed many times before, and may actually come to fruition one day -- but you can reference shell environment variables in your muttrc file. At the very least you could have your main muttrc include a source $HOME/.mutt/muttrc-$MACHNAME where you set MACHNAME in your .profile or .login; you might even be able to directly use source $HOME/.mutt/muttrc-`uname -n` and skip the env var (but then run the uname command every time you read your muttrc; you may be obsessive enough, as am I, to want to avoid that extra few microseconds ;-) :) Ok, thanks. That should work. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED], GnuPG pub key: 5BC8BE08 Pretty soon, massive bloat is the industry standard and everyone is using huge, buggy programs not even their developers can love. -Eric S. Raymond, The Art of Unix Programming PGP signature
turn off auto-pgp-sign for an email?
i have set up auto-signature in my mutt, is it possible to switch that off on a per-message basis... i.e. before i hit y to send? tia and aloha, dave PGP signature
Re: turn off auto-pgp-sign for an email?
* Dave Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19-10-2001 14:15]: | i have set up auto-signature in my mutt, is it possible to switch | that off on a per-message basis... i.e. before i hit y to send? Before you hit y, press p (bring up pgp menu), and then press f (forget it). -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Photography can never grow up if it imitates some other medium. It has to walk alone; it has to be itself. -Berenice Abbott PGP signature
Thread sorting question
Hello, I use threads I would like the messages within the threads sorted by received date, the newest coming first. I would also like you to give me all your money, but if that is not possible a hint to the above probhlem would be nice. Thanks. -- Regards Cliff
Re: saving to several mailboxes
Hello On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:01:53AM -0400, David T-G wrote: % I want to save to more than one mailbox e.g. one month.2001-10 and one % customer.xy mailbox to archive my mail and find it quickly. How can I % do this, saving with FCC is according to manual limited to one mailbox. Just for your interest, here is how I did it. Works fine. bye, -christian- ~/.procmailrc ... :0 c: OLD/today - rotatet every day to yesterday and then removed :0 c: OLD/ch - rotatet every month to ch.2001-10 etc ... ~/.muttrc ... set sendmail=/usr/local/bin/procmail /export/home/usr/ch/.procmailrc-out ... ~/.procmailrc-out PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/export/home/usr/ch/bin LOGFILE=/export/home/usr/ch/Mail/.procmail-out.log MAILDIR=/export/home/usr/ch/Mail# You'd better make sure it exists # mein monatlich rotiertes Gesamtarchiv :0 c |formail $MAILDIR/OLD/ch # alle Mails von diesem Tag werden hier gespeichert :0 c |formail $MAILDIR/OLD/today # $DEFAULT :0 |/usr/lib/sendmail -t -- Christian HammersWESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren Tel 0241/701333-0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet Security for ProfessionalsFax 0241/911879 WESTEND ist CISCO Systems Partner - Premium Certified
Re: Thread sorting question
* Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19-10-2001 14:48]: | Hello, | I use threads | I would like the messages within the threads sorted | by received date, the newest coming first. set sort=reverse-threads sort_aux=last-date-received Trees grow from the root upwards ;) | I would also like you to give me all your money, but | if that is not possible a hint to the above probhlem | would be nice. ;) -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) PGP signature
[notify@networksolutions.com: [NIC-011017.2f17] NOTIFY CC554-ORG]
Is anyone using mutt/gpg to change records at Network Solutions using pgp? I seem unable to send a change to them which their software will accept. Their error message is less than lucid. - Forwarded message from Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 23:13:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [NIC-011017.2f17] NOTIFY CC554-ORG X-Mailer: fastmail [version 2.4 PL24] We have received your Notify Template, but are unable to process it at this time. The most likely reasons why this may have happened are listed below. Please review this list and compare the possible errors with your message. If possible, correct the error and re-send your Notify Template to VeriSign at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. Your PGP signed message was MIME-encapsulated. Most Windows based e-mail applications will perform this conversion. Currently, we cannot support PGP signed messages that have been MIME-encapsulated. 2. There are extra characters in your message, which distort your PGP signature and make it impossible for us to confirm that your signature is correct. These extra characters are inserted when a PGP plugin for Outlook or Eudora are used to sign a message, and the message is then sent to a system using a UNIX platform, which we use. Currently, we cannot support PGP signed messages sent from a computer using any platform other than UNIX. 3. Although PGP is your Guardian method, you did not sign your message with your PGP private key. Please sign your message with your PGP private key and return it by e-mail to VeriSign at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4. It appears that you have more than one PGP private key. Although you signed this message with a PGP key, you didn't use the PGP private key that is associated with the contact handle on this record. Please make sure that you are using the right PGP private key to sign your message and return the message by e-mail to VeriSign at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best regards, VeriSign, Inc. http://www.netsol.com = ntfy08 = - End forwarded message - -- -- C^2 The world's most effective anti-virus software: Linux. Looking for fine software and/or web pages? http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley PGP signature
Re: mbox problem
Manuel -- ...and then Manuel Hendel said... % On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:07:42PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote: % * Manuel Hendel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011018 12:52]: % I got the following mailboxes: ... % ~/Mail/archiv/ # a folder to archive mails ... % % I tried it this way, but mutt said ~/Mail/archiv/mutt is not a % mailbox. Where's the problem. I can't get it. It may seem silly, but I have to ask if ~/Mail/archiv already exists... Does it? :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! PGP signature
Re: [notify@networksolutions.com: [NIC-011017.2f17] NOTIFY CC554-ORG]
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 07:58:24AM -0600, Charles Curley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: Is anyone using mutt/gpg to change records at Network Solutions using pgp? I seem unable to send a change to them which their software will accept. Their error message is less than lucid. Really? Seemed pretty clear... [snip] 1. Your PGP signed message was MIME-encapsulated. Most Windows based e-mail applications will perform this conversion. Currently, we cannot support PGP signed messages that have been MIME-encapsulated. Do a colonset pgp_traditional=yes before sending to them and a colonset pgp_traditional=no (setting it to how it should be) afterwards. And mock them for not implementing the standard. :-) -- Jim Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] I brake for hallucinations
gpg/mutt and network solutions
On Fri 19-Oct-2001 at 07:58:24AM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: Is anyone using mutt/gpg to change records at Network Solutions using pgp? I seem unable to send a change to them which their software will accept. Their error message is less than lucid. If it's anything like the nic.uk robot, then you'll have a lot of messing around. The uk robot insists on: - messages are old-style (non-mime) pgp signed, ':set pgp_create_traditional' doesn't work either. - Your public key can't be self-signed. - You must use an RSA key. Try any of the above.. -- Bruno
Re: mbox problem
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 10:07:16AM -0400, David T-G wrote: Manuel -- ...and then Manuel Hendel said... % On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 03:07:42PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote: % * Manuel Hendel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011018 12:52]: % I got the following mailboxes: ... % ~/Mail/archiv/ # a folder to archive mails ... % % I tried it this way, but mutt said ~/Mail/archiv/mutt is not a % mailbox. Where's the problem. I can't get it. It may seem silly, but I have to ask if ~/Mail/archiv already exists... Does it? Yes it does.
Re: [notify@networksolutions.com: [NIC-011017.2f17] NOTIFY CC554-ORG]
Charles, et al -- ...and then Charles Curley said... % % Is anyone using mutt/gpg to change records at Network Solutions using % pgp? I seem unable to send a change to them which their software will % accept. Their error message is less than lucid. It seemed to work for me, but I didn't initiate the change. I was a contact on a domain and someone else initiated the change. I, of course, got a message. I 'r'eplied, left in all text including the we got the message and here's what you do stuff at the top, put in PGP on line 0a for my Auth scheme (note that I didn't even strip out my %_ along the way) and Y on line 1a to agree, and shipped the whole mess right off. Less than half an hour later I got a message saying that the modifications were complete. % % - Forwarded message from Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] - % ... % e-mail applications will perform this conversion. Currently, we cannot % support PGP signed messages that have been MIME-encapsulated. *snort* % ... % sent to a system using a UNIX platform, which we use. Currently, we % cannot support PGP signed messages sent from a computer using any % platform other than UNIX. *SNORT* HTH HAND :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! PGP signature
Re: [notify@networksolutions.com: [NIC-011017.2f17] NOTIFY CC554-ORG]
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 10:14:28AM -0400, Jim Toth muttered: On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 07:58:24AM -0600, Charles Curley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: Is anyone using mutt/gpg to change records at Network Solutions using pgp? I seem unable to send a change to them which their software will accept. Their error message is less than lucid. Really? Seemed pretty clear... [snip] 1. Your PGP signed message was MIME-encapsulated. Most Windows based e-mail applications will perform this conversion. Currently, we cannot support PGP signed messages that have been MIME-encapsulated. Do a colonset pgp_traditional=yes before sending to them and a colonset pgp_traditional=no (setting it to how it should be) afterwards. I did the equivalent: I saved to a file, edited, signed the file, and sent that in the body of a message. It still didn't work. For future use, I will keep this in mind. I just got off the phone with one of their support people. It appears that the change from mail-from authorization to PGP authorization had gotten lost or something, so they had me still as mail-from. So no amount of finagling would have helped. And of course, their brain-dead software that ships a generic error message on any error sent incorrect diagnostics. And mock them for not implementing the standard. :-) Indeed. -- -- C^2 The world's most effective anti-virus software: Linux. Looking for fine software and/or web pages? http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley PGP signature
How does mutt know when there's new mail in an mbox?
Greetings, I'm the author of getmail, a POP3 retriever/fetchmail replacement. One of my users reports that when getmail delivers messages to an mbox file while mutt is running, mutt doesn't realize there's new mail in that mbox file (I don't run into this, as I use Maildirs, and mutt has no problems with them and new mail). How does mutt check to see if there's new mail in an mbox file? When getmail delivers messages to it, the mtime and size of the mbox would change. Is this not enough? What else should getmail do to be mutt-friendly? cc's not necessary; I read the list. Thanks, Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ ---
Does $record expand?
Hi, I would love to define following in my .muttrc (for obvious reasons): macro index \ee "resend-messagef$recordenter" \ "resend message with fcc set to sent_mail" but unfortunately it doesn't work. I have defined previously in my .muttrc set record=+sent-`date +%Y-%m` so I would really like to use this rather complicated construct in representation. For this time, I use macro index \ee "resend-messagef+sent-`date +%Y-%m`enter" \ "resend message with fcc set to sent_mail" but it is getting really hairy (and not good for maintenance of .muttrc). Have anybody an idea, how could I use predefined variable in .muttrc? Thanks Matj -- Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488 Everything you know is wrong. But some of it is a useful first approximation.
Re: Does $record expand?
* Matej Cepl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19-10-2001 19:07]: | set record=+sent-`date +%Y-%m` | | so I would really like to use this rather complicated construct in | representation. For this time, I use | | macro index \ee resend-messagef+sent-`date +%Y-%m`enter \ | resend message with fcc set to sent_mail | | but it is getting really hairy (and not good for maintenance of | .muttrc). Have anybody an idea, how could I use predefined variable in | .muttrc? *grin* You want scripting too, don't you? ;) -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) True power is when we have every justification to kill, and don't. -Oscar Schindler PGP signature
Re: How does mutt know when there's new mail in an mbox?
Charles -- ...and then Charles Cazabon said... % Greetings, Hello! % % I'm the author of getmail, a POP3 retriever/fetchmail replacement. One % of my users reports that when getmail delivers messages to an mbox file % while mutt is running, mutt doesn't realize there's new mail in that % mbox file (I don't run into this, as I use Maildirs, and mutt has no % problems with them and new mail). In fact, mutt has no known problems other than PEBKAC with new mail in any mailbox format. % % How does mutt check to see if there's new mail in an mbox file? When % getmail delivers messages to it, the mtime and size of the mbox would % change. Is this not enough? What else should getmail do to be % mutt-friendly? That is exactly what needs to be done, and no more. % % cc's not necessary; I read the list. This has come up a couple of times in the past couple of months. If you don't still have the messages around, you might enjoy a trip through the archives. % % Thanks, HTH HAND % % Charles % -- % --- % Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] % GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ % --- :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! PGP signature
Re: Does $record expand?
Matej -- ...and then Matej Cepl said... % Hi, Hello! % % I would love to define following in my .muttrc (for obvious reasons): % % macro index \ee resend-messagef$recordenter \ % resend message with fcc set to sent_mail % % but unfortunately it doesn't work. % % I have defined previously in my .muttrc % % set record=+sent-`date +%Y-%m` Hokay. I note here that $record does not change until your muttrc is re-read. I assume that you do not leave mutt running over month boundaries :-) but the importance of this will be made evident below. % % so I would really like to use this rather complicated construct in % representation. For this time, I use % % macro index \ee resend-messagef+sent-`date +%Y-%m`enter \ % resend message with fcc set to sent_mail % % but it is getting really hairy (and not good for maintenance of % .muttrc). Have anybody an idea, how could I use predefined variable in % .muttrc? Since, as has come up again, mutt does not have its own scripting language, all I can suggest is setting $MUTTDATE in your .profile or .login file and using that for your $record and \ee macro. % % Thanks HTH HAND % % Mat?j % % -- % Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED] % 138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488 % % Everything you know is wrong. But some of it is a useful first % approximation. :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg! PGP signature
Global Operation on Tagged Messages
Hello All: I would like to tag a number of messages, and then perform the same operation on all of them. Example 1: Tag some messages, then delete them all at once. Example 2: Tag some messages, then save them all to a particular archive. 1)How may I do this? 2)Where is documentation on this? TIA Regards -- Tim Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.johnsons-web.com
Mailcap headaches
Hi I am having serious problems with mailcap! In my home directory resides a perfectly formed if small .mailcap file, however Mutt refuses to recognise it. I keep getting the message :- mailcap entry for type text/html not found Here are the relevant headers :- Content-Return: allowed Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 31956 and here is the ~/.mailcap file incase I'm being a numptie. image/*; kview %s;copiousoutput;needsterminal text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html TIA Norm.
Re: Global Operation on Tagged Messages
Thus spake Tim Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): 1)How may I do this? Tag with 't', or tag a pattern with 'Cntl-T', etc. Hit ';' and 'd' to delete, or ';' and 's' to save, etc. 2)Where is documentation on this? http://mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.3 -- Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG Key ID 0xC9C40C31 (preferred) PGP signature
Re: Global Operation on Tagged Messages
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 11:31:46AM -0800, Tim Johnson wrote: : : I would like to tag a number of messages, and then : perform the same operation on all of them. : : Example 1: Tag some messages, then delete them all at once. : : Example 2: Tag some messages, then save them all to a particular :archive. : : 1)How may I do this? solution 1) ;d solution 2) ;s : 2)Where is documentation on this? http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-4.html#ss4.3 -- Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailcap headaches
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 07:32:11PM +0100, Norm muttered: Hi I am having serious problems with mailcap! In my home directory resides a perfectly formed if small .mailcap file, however Mutt refuses to recognise it. I keep getting the message :- mailcap entry for type text/html not found Here are the relevant headers :- Content-Return: allowed Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 31956 and here is the ~/.mailcap file incase I'm being a numptie. image/*; kview %s;copiousoutput;needsterminal text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput; nametemplate=%s.html Try instead: text/html; lynx -force_html -dump %s; copiousoutput That works for me. TIA Norm. -- -- C^2 The world's most effective anti-virus software: Linux. Looking for fine software and/or web pages? http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley PGP signature
Re: Does $record expand?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 12:50:27 -0400, Matej Cepl wrote:
Hi,
I would love to define following in my .muttrc (for obvious reasons):
macro index \ee resend-messagef$recordenter \
resend message with fcc set to sent_mail
but unfortunately it doesn't work.
No, it doesn't.
.muttrc). Have anybody an idea, how could I use predefined variable in
.muttrc?
I wrote a patch to Mutt 1.3.2 last year which could expand
$$variable or $${variable} in Mutt commands. It was two $
characters to avoid conflicts with environment variables.
It was posted to the mutt-dev list, but I have never got
any feed back or requests to update to newer versions, so
I almost forgot about it.
Re: Global Operation on Tagged Messages
* Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19-10-2001 20:41]: | : Example 1: Tag some messages, then delete them all at once. | : | : Example 2: Tag some messages, then save them all to a particular | :archive. | : | : 1)How may I do this? | | solution 1) ;d | solution 2) ;s You might want to check out auto_tag: # set auto_tag=no # # Name: auto_tag # Type: boolean # Default: no # # # When set, functions in the index menu which affect a message # will be applied to all tagged messages (if there are any). When # unset, you must first use the tag-prefix function (default: ;) to # make the next function apply to all tagged messages. HTH, -- René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Happiness can exist only in acceptance. -Denis De Rougamont PGP signature
Re: Does $record expand?
* Byrial Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [19-10-2001 21:13]:
| I wrote a patch to Mutt 1.3.2 last year which could expand
| $$variable or $${variable} in Mutt commands. It was two $
| characters to avoid conflicts with environment variables.
| It was posted to the mutt-dev list, but I have never got
| any feed back or requests to update to newer versions, so
| I almost forgot about it.
Praise Byrial Jensen,
the man who will be remembered forever, for introducing scripting
capabilities for the muttrc
;)
--
René Clerc - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Religion is the opium of the masses.
-Karl Marx
PGP signature
Re: Does $record expand?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 02:15:43PM -0400, David T-G wrote: Since, as has come up again, mutt does not have its own scripting language, all I can suggest is setting $MUTTDATE in your .profile or .login file and using that for your $record and \ee macro. That's great! Thanks, I shall try it. Matej -- Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488 As with the Christian religion, the worst advertisement for Socialism is its adherents. -- George Orwell
Re: Does $record expand?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 07:38:48PM +0200, Ren Clerc wrote: *grin* You want scripting too, don't you? ;) Well, I did not expect to participate in this holy war of yours, but I suppose I am already in! Strange :-) Matej -- Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 138 Highland Ave. #10, Somerville, Ma 02143, (617) 623-1488 Don't ever think you know what's right for the other person. He might start thinking he knows what's right for you. -- Paul Williams, `Das Energi'
set return for multiple users
I want to set return for multiple users in my globle Muttrc file.
I tried
set return = {imap server name}user.imap_user.sent
but imap_user was not recognized as a variable.
what is the correct variable for current user?
Lance
Re: Tag Multiple Attachments?
Sigh. Well, here's the answer, sports fans. Upon close inspection of my .muttrc, I noted that I'd changed my folder_format (manual reference 6.3.43) from the default setting to %N %8s %d %f: i.e, I'd eliminated the display of the tag flag, the *. So, tagging was working, but the * to show it was not. In my effort to streamline the file folder display, I outdid myself. Moral here? RTF.muttrc, John ;( Cheers John On 10/19/01, 12:10:13AM -0400, John P. Verel wrote: Well, I just tried something, with interesting result. I went to the attach menu and pressed t twice. No * showed up next to the files when I typed t. BUTwhen I went back to the compose menu, the tagged files showed up in the attachments section. So... the problem is that the * is not showing up in the attachment menu. I'll have a look at the menu in the morning to see about this. But if anyone has a suggestion on changing the way the attachment screen is laid out, I'd love to hear it! Thanks. John On 10/18/01, 08:31:43PM -0700, Shawn D. McPeek wrote: Perhaps your t is bound to something other than tag-entry. Perhaps you're hitting q instead of Enter after tagging. When you tag files, it should place a * next to the listed permissions. Does it at least do that? If not, your t is probably wrong. If so, then just hit enter after tagging everything and you should be good to go. Shawn Previously, John P. Verel wrote: % That's what I do. All that happens is the cursor moves to the next file % name. % % The manual notes that typing upper case A allows for tagging and % attaching multiple messages (not files) and that works for me. The % manual makes no mention of tagging files...only messages. % % So, no luck here so far. % On 10/17/01, 05:43:40PM -0700, Igor Pruchanskiy wrote: % On Wed 17 Oct 2001, John P. Verel wrote: % Hi. I sometimes want to attach multiple files from the same directory. % I've tried to tag while in the attachment menu, but no luck. Couldn't % find anything in the on-line help. The ? indicated t for tag in the % attachment menu. What am I missing. % % just hit t to tag an attachment, just like you tag messages -- John P. Verel Norwalk, Connecticut -- John P. Verel Norwalk, Connecticut
