[onap-discuss] [modeling] teleconf of modeling project/subcommittee this week is cancelled

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

You might know that 1 billion Chinese people are taking vocation this week all 
together, so considering the hard life in china are not easy, please allow us 
to cancel this week teleconf for modeling project.

Hi Kenny, would you mind to kindly help us to send meeting cancel to the list? 
Thanks a lot for your kind help again

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] Session this afternoon will start on time at 3pm

[denghui (L)]

Thanks everybody
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] new ZOOM id for modeling discussion.

[Amir Levy]

zoom -
https://zoom.us/j/809102388

— amir

a...@cloudify.co +1 408 916 8572 

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling]zoom number for now

[denghui (L)]

Zoom id: 809102388
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] new ZOOM id for modeling discussion.

[Amir Levy]

zoom -
https://zoom.us/j/809102388 



— amir

a...@cloudify.co +1 408 916 8572 

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling subcommittee F2F Cont. on Wednesday

[Vul, Alex]

Deng Hui,

The R2 VNF modeling work is being led by Andy as part of the VNF SDK project 
being driven by Chris. I think it would be good for the folks who doing the 
model definition to actually hear the inputs... :) Otherwise, I don't see the 
point...

Kind regards,

Alex

From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 12:50 AM
To: Vul, Alex ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 

Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling subcommittee F2F Cont. on 
Wednesday

Alex,

we have already heard yesterday feedback from Chris Donley Andy, VNFSDK & 
Architecture, ,
and now we need to move on and would expect more from the implementers side.

Thanks

DENG Hui

From: Vul, Alex [mailto:alex@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 9:45 AM
To: denghui (L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling subcommittee F2F Cont. on 
Wednesday

Hi,

I don't see how we the critical mass to do this. If you want the feedback to be 
heard, you need to include the people who are working on the VNF models, 
including those who are leading the work - Chris, Andy, others. Chris is on 
stage presenting. Andy is asleep...

My two cents,

Alex

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 12:32 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling subcommittee F2F Cont. on Wednesday

Hello all

We haven't finished yesterday session, let's continue 10:30-11:30 this morning 
in the meeting room (Algebre), 2nd floor.
Agenda would be :

1)  SDC feedback to VNF modeling

2)  VFC feedback to VNF modeling

3)  Summary of VNF Modeling

4)  OSM modeling comparison

Apologies to US remote attendees, we couldn't conflict with TSC meeting in the 
afternoon.

Thanks a lot for your attending
Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling subcommittee F2F Cont. on Wednesday

[denghui (L)]

Alex,

we have already heard yesterday feedback from Chris Donley Andy, VNFSDK & 
Architecture, ,
and now we need to move on and would expect more from the implementers side.

Thanks

DENG Hui

From: Vul, Alex [mailto:alex@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 9:45 AM
To: denghui (L) ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 

Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling subcommittee F2F Cont. on 
Wednesday

Hi,

I don't see how we the critical mass to do this. If you want the feedback to be 
heard, you need to include the people who are working on the VNF models, 
including those who are leading the work - Chris, Andy, others. Chris is on 
stage presenting. Andy is asleep...

My two cents,

Alex

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 12:32 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling subcommittee F2F Cont. on Wednesday

Hello all

We haven't finished yesterday session, let's continue 10:30-11:30 this morning 
in the meeting room (Algebre), 2nd floor.
Agenda would be :

1)  SDC feedback to VNF modeling

2)  VFC feedback to VNF modeling

3)  Summary of VNF Modeling

4)  OSM modeling comparison

Apologies to US remote attendees, we couldn't conflict with TSC meeting in the 
afternoon.

Thanks a lot for your attending
Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling subcommittee F2F Cont. on Wednesday

[Vul, Alex]

Hi,

I don't see how we the critical mass to do this. If you want the feedback to be 
heard, you need to include the people who are working on the VNF models, 
including those who are leading the work - Chris, Andy, others. Chris is on 
stage presenting. Andy is asleep...

My two cents,

Alex

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 12:32 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling subcommittee F2F Cont. on Wednesday

Hello all

We haven't finished yesterday session, let's continue 10:30-11:30 this morning 
in the meeting room (Algebre), 2nd floor.
Agenda would be :

1)  SDC feedback to VNF modeling

2)  VFC feedback to VNF modeling

3)  Summary of VNF Modeling

4)  OSM modeling comparison

Apologies to US remote attendees, we couldn't conflict with TSC meeting in the 
afternoon.

Thanks a lot for your attending
Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling subcommittee F2F Cont. on Wednesday

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

We haven't finished yesterday session, let's continue 10:30-11:30 this morning 
in the meeting room (Algebre), 2nd floor.
Agenda would be :

1)  SDC feedback to VNF modeling

2)  VFC feedback to VNF modeling

3)  Summary of VNF Modeling

4)  OSM modeling comparison

Apologies to US remote attendees, we couldn't conflict with TSC meeting in the 
afternoon.

Thanks a lot for your attending
Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling javatoscachecker] About the javatoscacheker.jar in the nexus.

[Gary Wu]

Hi Serban,

Generally when you see such a warning you should not submit; this is how you 
get into the situation where your change depends on other changes in Gerrit, 
making it un-mergeable.  It’s only ok to submit with those dependencies if you 
are sure that all those other dependencies will be submitted and merged first, 
which is typically hard to guarantee.

What you usually should do is to always make each change off of the latest 
master.  So, typically this means:

# make some changes, commit
git review  # this submits the change to gerrit
git reset --hard origin   # WARNING: this will blow away all your commits in 
the working directory!
git pull  # pull latest code

This will get your local working directory back to match the latest master 
branch.  Then you work on your next change on top of this.

Thanks,
Gary


From: JORA, SERBAN (SERBAN) [mailto:j...@research.att.com]
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 1:52 PM
To: Gary Wu 
Subject: RE: [Modeling javatoscachecker] About the javatoscacheker.jar in the 
nexus.

Thank you,
Made the update.
Trying to use ‘git review’ but I get the following


jora@vm-jora:~/src/toscaparsers/javatoscachecker$ git review
Enter passphrase for key '/home/jora/.ssh/id_rsa':
You are about to submit multiple commits. This is expected if you are
submitting a commit that is dependent on one or more in-review
commits. Otherwise you should consider squashing your changes into one
commit before submitting.

The outstanding commits are:

133c26e (HEAD -> master) Correct the group id in poms
a002ab7 Remove ecomp staging deployment plugin.
903c9b8 Reorganize poms, declare version as 1.0.0
0b72d5f Remove old test files (moving to junit)
bcfbb7a Tune the license text
163c17b Add license header to kwalify
d1c7688 Add common parent project ref to top level pom.

Do you really want to submit the above commits?

Is that normal? (only the top one is actually new but the rest have not been 
submitted through git-review) Should I proceed?

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ECOMP IM and DM uploaded

[denghui (L)]

Hello all,

Thanks Rittwik kindly help, those two Doc have been uploaded under 20170912 
Meeting Minutes
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+meetings

please help to review and be prepared for next week presentation

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling javatoscachecker] About the javatoscacheker.jar in the nexus.

[JORA, SERBAN (SERBAN)]

Hi,
Working on it. I just figured out yesterday how to push to Nexus, should have 
it done today. I will send you an update later today. Sorry for the delay.

Serban

From: Jinxin (Saw) [mailto:saw@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 1:14 AM
To: JORA, SERBAN (SERBAN) 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; denghui (L) ; Seshu m 
; Chenchuanyu 
Subject: [Modeling javatoscachecker] About the javatoscacheker.jar in the nexus.

Hi Serban:

  I add a dependence of org.onap.tosca:Checker in the so common project,but 
there are some errors in the jenkins.

The error is not find the org.onap.tosca:Checker:jar:0.0.1-SNAPSHOT in 
snapshots.

I check with the neuxs site. I can’t find the snapshot of Checker in the 
following folder.

Could you please help me with this issue.

Thank you.

[cid:image001.png@01D32BB0.2739BC50]




[cid:image002.png@01D32BB0.2739BC50]





Best wishes
Jinxin

***
本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！**

***
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, 
which is intended only for the person  or entity whose address is listed above. 
Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not   
limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by 
persons other than the intended recipient(s) is  prohibited. If you receive 
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately 
and delete it!
***


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling javatoscachecker] About the javatoscacheker.jar in the nexus.

[Jinxin (Saw)]

Hi

Thanks Serban



Best wishes
Jinxin

***
本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！**

***
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, 
which is intended only for the person  or entity whose address is listed above. 
Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not   
limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by 
persons other than the intended recipient(s) is  prohibited. If you receive 
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately 
and delete it!
***


From: JORA, SERBAN (SERBAN) [mailto:j...@research.att.com]
Sent: 2017年9月12日 22:16
To: Jinxin (Saw) 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; denghui (L) ; Seshu m 
; Chenchuanyu 
Subject: RE: [Modeling javatoscachecker] About the javatoscacheker.jar in the 
nexus.

Hi,
Working on it. I just figured out yesterday how to push to Nexus, should have 
it done today. I will send you an update later today. Sorry for the delay.

Serban

From: Jinxin (Saw) [mailto:saw@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 1:14 AM
To: JORA, SERBAN (SERBAN) mailto:j...@research.att.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; denghui 
(L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; Seshu m 
mailto:seshu.kuma...@huawei.com>>; Chenchuanyu 
mailto:chenchua...@huawei.com>>
Subject: [Modeling javatoscachecker] About the javatoscacheker.jar in the nexus.

Hi Serban:

  I add a dependence of org.onap.tosca:Checker in the so common project,but 
there are some errors in the jenkins.

The error is not find the org.onap.tosca:Checker:jar:0.0.1-SNAPSHOT in 
snapshots.

I check with the neuxs site. I can’t find the snapshot of Checker in the 
following folder.

Could you please help me with this issue.

Thank you.

[cid:image001.png@01D32C79.4E918160]




[cid:image002.png@01D32C79.4E918160]





Best wishes
Jinxin

***
本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！**

***
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, 
which is intended only for the person  or entity whose address is listed above. 
Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not   
limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by 
persons other than the intended recipient(s) is  prohibited. If you receive 
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately 
and delete it!
***


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling javatoscachecker] About the javatoscacheker.jar in the nexus.

[Jinxin (Saw)]

Hi Serban:

  I add a dependence of org.onap.tosca:Checker in the so common project,but 
there are some errors in the jenkins.

The error is not find the org.onap.tosca:Checker:jar:0.0.1-SNAPSHOT in 
snapshots.

I check with the neuxs site. I can’t find the snapshot of Checker in the 
following folder.

Could you please help me with this issue.

Thank you.

[cid:image003.png@01D32BC1.05C0F2D0]




[cid:image002.png@01D32BC1.05C0F2D0]





Best wishes
Jinxin

***
本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！**

***
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, 
which is intended only for the person  or entity whose address is listed above. 
Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not   
limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by 
persons other than the intended recipient(s) is  prohibited. If you receive 
this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately 
and delete it!
***


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling][sdc][so][vfc][vnfsdk]ONAP naming convention options

[Lingli Deng]

I suggest we consider either option 2 or option 3.

 

Thanks,

Lingli

  _  

Hello all
 
We hadn’t have the time to discuss this yesterday teleconf based on the
request from SDC,
so I posted here to get more comments in the list regarding to ONAP Naming
convention.
OPENECOMP historically follow 1st option, and OPENO follow 2nd option.
●   1st: Openecomp: org.openecomp.*
●   2nd: OPEN-O: tosca.nodes.nfv.*
●   3rd :  tosca.nodes.onap.
●   4th:
●   standard part is based on TOSCA simple/TOSCA NFV
●   Extension could be onap
 
Thank you all for your comments.
 
Best regards,
 
DENG Hui

 

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling][sdc][so][vfc][vnfsdk]ONAP naming convention options

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

We hadn’t have the time to discuss this yesterday teleconf based on the request 
from SDC,
so I posted here to get more comments in the list regarding to ONAP Naming 
convention.
OPENECOMP historically follow 1st option, and OPENO follow 2nd option.
●   1st: Openecomp: org.openecomp.*
●   2nd: OPEN-O: tosca.nodes.nfv.*
●   3rd :  tosca.nodes.onap.
●   4th:
●   standard part is based on TOSCA simple/TOSCA NFV
●   Extension could be onap

Thank you all for your comments.

Best regards,

DENG Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling][sdc][vfc][so][vnfsdk][sdnc][uui] Agenda of modeling project/subcommittee for tomorrow teleconf

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

This Thursday is the deadline for freezing of API, normally it means freezing 
of modeling spec for R1. We can't always delay until the deadline for code 
freezing :)
even tomorrow was planned for modeling project, we will borrow most time from 
modeling project to discuss the status of interface and modeling spec, to check 
whether we need additional call in this week.


1)  Modeling project, (only 1 tosca parser is on the repo for VFC, UUI 
hasn't confirmed yet)



2)  Check the status of interface and modeling spec

Interfaces

a)   VNFSDK-SDC

b)   SDC-SO

c)SDC-VFC

d)   SO-VFC

e)   SO-SDNC
Modeling specs
1.a) VNFD (skip for R1?)
1.b) SD
1.c) NSD
1.d) WAN spec
1.e) vnf package (skip for R1)



3)  ONAP modeling namespace

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

[SHADMI, DAVID]

Hi Maopeng,

Your suggestion include a new artifact, swImageDesc.json. The information in 
this artifact is the same as in tosca.artifacts.nfv.SwImage.
Two questions:

  1.  What ONAP components use this json artifact?
  2.  Would it be possible to use the information which is part of the VNF 
descriptor (tosca.artifacts.nfv.SwImage)?
Thanks,
David

From: zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn [mailto:zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 6:53 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: denghu...@huawei.com; rittwik.j...@gmail.com; yangya...@chinamobile.com; 
denglin...@chinamobile.com; feng.yuanx...@zte.com.cn; SHADMI, DAVID 
; LANDO, MICHAEL 
Subject: 答复: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly


hi,



  In R1, the VNF package is imported from VNF vendors and dealed with its SVNFM.

  We need to define interfaces that the VNF package should be exposed for the 
SDC design and the VFC orchestration.

  The attachment is my suggestions for R1.



Thanks

Maopeng
原始邮件
发件人：张茂鹏10030173
收件人： mailto:ds2...@att.com>>;
抄送人： mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; 
mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; 
mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>; 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; 
mailto:yangya...@chinamobile.com>>;
日 期 ：2017年08月15日 23:30
主 题 ：答复: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly



Hi David



 Please review the ppt from VFC side, thanks. If possible, please give some 
answers before the meeting.





Best Regards

Maopeng




发件人： mailto:ds2...@att.com>>;
收件人： mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; 
mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; 
mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>;
抄送人： mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>;
日 期 ：2017年08月15日 00:07
主 题 ：Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly


Good idea!

Let’s change item #4 to VNF CSAR format and add an item about onboarding Open-O 
types.

Thanks,
David


From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:03 AM
To: LANDO, MICHAEL mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; Rittwik 
Jana mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>; SHADMI, DAVID 
mailto:ds2...@att.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

Hi Michael and David,

Because there are so many overlapped modeling topic for release 1, please allow 
me to  recommend that we use both tomorrow 6-7PDT(modeling subcommittee) and 
7-8 PDT(SDC)  to discuss those issues together.

  1.  SDC vs VFC interfaces
  2.  WAN discussion (SDC-SO, SO-SDNC)
  3.  Workflow design
  4.  VNFSDK-SDC API (resolved?)
  5.  Service template design (resolved?)


If you prefer to discuss any topic SDC would like to focus on, please feel free 
to let us know it.
Modeling subcommittee is open to pick other topics you left.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui


From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Lando,Michael
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:35 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-discuss] SDC weekly

Hi,
Today’s SDC weekly call today and tomorrow morning are canceled.
The meeting will be haled on Tuesday at 7-8 PDT.



BR,

Michael Lando
Opensource & Frontend Team Lead, SDC
AT&T Network Application Development · NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
···
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: ml6...@intl.att.com<mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>






___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] Modeling subcommittee minutes and slide

[denghui (L)]

Hello Halfon, zhuoyao, chuanyu

Could you kindly help to upload your slide yesterday to the meeting minutes 
wiki page for modeling committee?
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+meetings

Thanks a lot for your help

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

[denghui (L)]

1)   Modeling subcommittee:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee+meetings
* Meeting every Tuesday 9:00/10:00 EDT, 6:00/7:00 PDT, 15:00/16:00 CET, 
9:00/10:00PM Beijing -

* Meeting bridge?https://zoom.us/j/137904496



2)   SDC seems no website, copy here:
When

   Tue Aug 15, 2017 7am - 8am Pacific Time

Where

   https://zoom.us/j/913154106 
(map)



From: Halfon Tal [mailto:halfon@amdocs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 3:31 PM
To: denghui (L); Lando,Michael; SHADMI, DAVID; Rittwik Jana
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Zohar Sacks
Subject: RE: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

HI

When is the meeting?


Best regards
Tal Halfon

Development Manager @ Amdocs

P. +972 54 2213763

[cid:image001.png@01D2DC45.AD6F91B0]   [ONAP_logo_Sig]

From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 10:25 AM
To: Lando,Michael mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; SHADMI, 
DAVID mailto:ds2...@att.com>>; Rittwik Jana 
mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Halfon Tal 
mailto:halfon@amdocs.com>>; Zohar Sacks 
mailto:zohar.sa...@amdocs.com>>
Subject: RE: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

Hi David and Michael,

Thanks for kind your suggestion, updated agenda for "Modeling Subcommittee" and 
"SDC" below:

1)   Service template design (resolved?)

2)   WAN discussion (SDC-SO, SO-SDNC)

3)   Workflow design

4)  VNF CSAR format

5)   SDC vs VFC interfaces
6)Onboarding Open-O types

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: Lando,Michael [mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 12:48 AM
To: SHADMI, DAVID; denghui (L); Rittwik Jana
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; HALFON, 
TAL; SACKS, ZOHAR
Subject: RE: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

I prefer to have David on the call to assist with the modeling issue's.
We can add another call on Wednesday to progress our items.


BR,

Michael Lando
Opensource & Frontend Team Lead, SDC
AT&T Network Application Development * NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
***
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: ml6...@intl.att.com


From: SHADMI, DAVID
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 7:07 PM
To: denghui (L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; 
Lando,Michael mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; Rittwik Jana 
mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; HALFON, 
TAL mailto:half...@amdocs.com>>; SACKS, ZOHAR 
mailto:zohar.sa...@amdocs.com>>
Subject: RE: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

Good idea!

Let's change item #4 to VNF CSAR format and add an item about onboarding Open-O 
types.

Thanks,
David


From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:03 AM
To: LANDO, MICHAEL mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; Rittwik 
Jana mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>; SHADMI, DAVID 
mailto:ds2...@att.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

Hi Michael and David,

Because there are so many overlapped modeling topic for release 1, please allow 
me to  recommend that we use both tomorrow 6-7PDT(modeling subcommittee) and 
7-8 PDT(SDC) to discuss those issues together.

1)   SDC vs VFC interfaces

2)   WAN discussion (SDC-SO, SO-SDNC)

3)   Workflow design

4)   VNFSDK-SDC API (resolved?)

5)   Service template design (resolved?)


If you prefer to discuss any topic SDC would like to focus on, please feel free 
to let us know it.
Modeling subcommittee is open to pick other topics you left.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui


From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Lando,Michael
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:35 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] SDC weekly

Hi,
Today's SDC weekly call today and tomorrow morning are canceled.
The meeting will be haled on Tuesday at 7-8 PDT.



BR,

Michael Lando
Opensource & Frontend Team Lead, SDC
AT&T Network Application Development * NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
***
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: ml6...@intl.att.com


This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.o

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

[Halfon Tal]

HI

When is the meeting?


Best regards
Tal Halfon

Development Manager @ Amdocs

P. +972 54 2213763

[cid:image001.png@01D2DC45.AD6F91B0]   [ONAP_logo_Sig]

From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 10:25 AM
To: Lando,Michael ; SHADMI, DAVID ; 
Rittwik Jana 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Halfon Tal ; Zohar 
Sacks 
Subject: RE: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

Hi David and Michael,

Thanks for kind your suggestion, updated agenda for "Modeling Subcommittee" and 
"SDC" below:

1)   Service template design (resolved?)

2)   WAN discussion (SDC-SO, SO-SDNC)

3)   Workflow design

4)  VNF CSAR format

5)   SDC vs VFC interfaces
6)Onboarding Open-O types

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: Lando,Michael [mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 12:48 AM
To: SHADMI, DAVID; denghui (L); Rittwik Jana
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; HALFON, 
TAL; SACKS, ZOHAR
Subject: RE: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

I prefer to have David on the call to assist with the modeling issue's.
We can add another call on Wednesday to progress our items.


BR,

Michael Lando
Opensource & Frontend Team Lead, SDC
AT&T Network Application Development * NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
***
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: ml6...@intl.att.com


From: SHADMI, DAVID
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 7:07 PM
To: denghui (L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; 
Lando,Michael mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; Rittwik Jana 
mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; HALFON, 
TAL mailto:half...@amdocs.com>>; SACKS, ZOHAR 
mailto:zohar.sa...@amdocs.com>>
Subject: RE: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

Good idea!

Let's change item #4 to VNF CSAR format and add an item about onboarding Open-O 
types.

Thanks,
David


From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:03 AM
To: LANDO, MICHAEL mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; Rittwik 
Jana mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>; SHADMI, DAVID 
mailto:ds2...@att.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

Hi Michael and David,

Because there are so many overlapped modeling topic for release 1, please allow 
me to  recommend that we use both tomorrow 6-7PDT(modeling subcommittee) and 
7-8 PDT(SDC) to discuss those issues together.

1)   SDC vs VFC interfaces

2)   WAN discussion (SDC-SO, SO-SDNC)

3)   Workflow design

4)   VNFSDK-SDC API (resolved?)

5)   Service template design (resolved?)


If you prefer to discuss any topic SDC would like to focus on, please feel free 
to let us know it.
Modeling subcommittee is open to pick other topics you left.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui


From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Lando,Michael
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:35 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] SDC weekly

Hi,
Today's SDC weekly call today and tomorrow morning are canceled.
The meeting will be haled on Tuesday at 7-8 PDT.



BR,

Michael Lando
Opensource & Frontend Team Lead, SDC
AT&T Network Application Development * NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
***
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: ml6...@intl.att.com


This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

[denghui (L)]

Hi David and Michael,

Thanks for kind your suggestion, updated agenda for "Modeling Subcommittee" and 
"SDC" below:

1)   Service template design (resolved?)

2)   WAN discussion (SDC-SO, SO-SDNC)

3)   Workflow design

4)  VNF CSAR format

5)   SDC vs VFC interfaces
6)Onboarding Open-O types

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: Lando,Michael [mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 12:48 AM
To: SHADMI, DAVID; denghui (L); Rittwik Jana
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; HALFON, TAL; SACKS, ZOHAR
Subject: RE: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

I prefer to have David on the call to assist with the modeling issue's.
We can add another call on Wednesday to progress our items.


BR,

Michael Lando
Opensource & Frontend Team Lead, SDC
AT&T Network Application Development * NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
***
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: ml6...@intl.att.com


From: SHADMI, DAVID
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 7:07 PM
To: denghui (L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; 
Lando,Michael mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; Rittwik Jana 
mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; HALFON, 
TAL mailto:half...@amdocs.com>>; SACKS, ZOHAR 
mailto:zohar.sa...@amdocs.com>>
Subject: RE: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

Good idea!

Let's change item #4 to VNF CSAR format and add an item about onboarding Open-O 
types.

Thanks,
David


From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:03 AM
To: LANDO, MICHAEL mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; Rittwik 
Jana mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>; SHADMI, DAVID 
mailto:ds2...@att.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

Hi Michael and David,

Because there are so many overlapped modeling topic for release 1, please allow 
me to  recommend that we use both tomorrow 6-7PDT(modeling subcommittee) and 
7-8 PDT(SDC) to discuss those issues together.

1)   SDC vs VFC interfaces

2)   WAN discussion (SDC-SO, SO-SDNC)

3)   Workflow design

4)   VNFSDK-SDC API (resolved?)

5)   Service template design (resolved?)


If you prefer to discuss any topic SDC would like to focus on, please feel free 
to let us know it.
Modeling subcommittee is open to pick other topics you left.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui


From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Lando,Michael
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:35 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] SDC weekly

Hi,
Today's SDC weekly call today and tomorrow morning are canceled.
The meeting will be haled on Tuesday at 7-8 PDT.



BR,

Michael Lando
Opensource & Frontend Team Lead, SDC
AT&T Network Application Development * NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
***
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: ml6...@intl.att.com


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

[Lando,Michael]

I prefer to have David on the call to assist with the modeling issue's.
We can add another call on Wednesday to progress our items.


BR,

Michael Lando
Opensource & Frontend Team Lead, SDC
AT&T Network Application Development * NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
***
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: ml6...@intl.att.com


From: SHADMI, DAVID
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 7:07 PM
To: denghui (L) ; Lando,Michael ; 
Rittwik Jana 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; HALFON, TAL ; SACKS, ZOHAR 

Subject: RE: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

Good idea!

Let's change item #4 to VNF CSAR format and add an item about onboarding Open-O 
types.

Thanks,
David


From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:03 AM
To: LANDO, MICHAEL mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; Rittwik 
Jana mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>; SHADMI, DAVID 
mailto:ds2...@att.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

Hi Michael and David,

Because there are so many overlapped modeling topic for release 1, please allow 
me to  recommend that we use both tomorrow 6-7PDT(modeling subcommittee) and 
7-8 PDT(SDC) to discuss those issues together.

1)   SDC vs VFC interfaces

2)   WAN discussion (SDC-SO, SO-SDNC)

3)   Workflow design

4)   VNFSDK-SDC API (resolved?)

5)   Service template design (resolved?)


If you prefer to discuss any topic SDC would like to focus on, please feel free 
to let us know it.
Modeling subcommittee is open to pick other topics you left.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui


From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Lando,Michael
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:35 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] SDC weekly

Hi,
Today's SDC weekly call today and tomorrow morning are canceled.
The meeting will be haled on Tuesday at 7-8 PDT.



BR,

Michael Lando
Opensource & Frontend Team Lead, SDC
AT&T Network Application Development * NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
***
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: ml6...@intl.att.com


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

[SHADMI, DAVID]

Good idea!

Let's change item #4 to VNF CSAR format and add an item about onboarding Open-O 
types.

Thanks,
David


From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:03 AM
To: LANDO, MICHAEL ; Rittwik Jana 
; SHADMI, DAVID 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

Hi Michael and David,

Because there are so many overlapped modeling topic for release 1, please allow 
me to  recommend that we use both tomorrow 6-7PDT(modeling subcommittee) and 
7-8 PDT(SDC) to discuss those issues together.

1)   SDC vs VFC interfaces

2)   WAN discussion (SDC-SO, SO-SDNC)

3)   Workflow design

4)   VNFSDK-SDC API (resolved?)

5)   Service template design (resolved?)


If you prefer to discuss any topic SDC would like to focus on, please feel free 
to let us know it.
Modeling subcommittee is open to pick other topics you left.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui


From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Lando,Michael
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:35 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] SDC weekly

Hi,
Today's SDC weekly call today and tomorrow morning are canceled.
The meeting will be haled on Tuesday at 7-8 PDT.



BR,

Michael Lando
Opensource & Frontend Team Lead, SDC
AT&T Network Application Development * NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
***
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: ml6...@intl.att.com


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling][SDC][SO][VFC][SDNC]RE: SDC weekly

[denghui (L)]

Hi Michael and David,

Because there are so many overlapped modeling topic for release 1, please allow 
me to  recommend that we use both tomorrow 6-7PDT(modeling subcommittee) and 
7-8 PDT(SDC) to discuss those issues together.

1)  SDC vs VFC interfaces

2)  WAN discussion (SDC-SO, SO-SDNC)

3)  Workflow design

4)  VNFSDK-SDC API (resolved?)

5)  Service template design (resolved?)


If you prefer to discuss any topic SDC would like to focus on, please feel free 
to let us know it.
Modeling subcommittee is open to pick other topics you left.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui


From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Lando,Michael
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 9:35 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] SDC weekly

Hi,
Today's SDC weekly call today and tomorrow morning are canceled.
The meeting will be haled on Tuesday at 7-8 PDT.



BR,

Michael Lando
Opensource & Frontend Team Lead, SDC
AT&T Network Application Development * NetCom
Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago
***
Office: +972 (3) 5451487
Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603
e-mail: ml6...@intl.att.com


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] tomorrow call agenda

[denghui (L)]

1st part is modeling project,
And because modeling committee has too many things to handle, we have to add 
more meeting time to discuss key R1 issue.

From: Vul, Alex [mailto:alex@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 12:24 AM
To: denghui (L); onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc
Cc: Rittwik Jana
Subject: RE: [modeling] tomorrow call agenda

Is this going to be a modeling subcommittee or a project meeting?

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 9:00 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc 
mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: Rittwik Jana mailto:rittwik.j...@gmail.com>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] tomorrow call agenda

Hello all

Agenda will be

1)  Repo of TOSCA PARSERs and FOSS progress

2)  SD Template proposals discussion from SO/VFC and SDC.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] tomorrow call agenda

[Vul, Alex]

Is this going to be a modeling subcommittee or a project meeting?

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 9:00 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
Cc: Rittwik Jana 
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] tomorrow call agenda

Hello all

Agenda will be

1)  Repo of TOSCA PARSERs and FOSS progress

2)  SD Template proposals discussion from SO/VFC and SDC.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] tomorrow call agenda

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Agenda will be

1)  Repo of TOSCA PARSERs and FOSS progress

2)  SD Template proposals discussion from SO/VFC and SDC.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] Modeling subcommittee chart

[Michael Brenner]

Hi Denghui,

In reviewing the Modeling sub-committee coordination chart - it seems that
the Modeling project itself is not listed under the projects. I may have
missed the discussion - is this intentional, or an omission? I was
expecting to see the project that owns tools (parsers/processors) to be
impacting the modeling coordination chart.
Attached link to the diagram I refer to:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+specification

Regards,
Michael
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

[Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network)]

DENG Hui,

I’m a little confused. I have not seen any VoLTE e2e modeling work, I thought 
you are working on it.

Thanks,
-Yang

From: denghui (L)
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 12:12 AM
To: Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network); ml6...@att.com; Rittwik Jana; Seshu m; 
yangya...@chinamobile.com; Kang Xi; am8...@att.com; jf2...@att.com
Subject: RE: [modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

If that is possible, please help to present VoLTE e2e modeling?

Thanks

DENG Hui

From: Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network)
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:49 AM
To: denghui (L) ; ml6...@att.com; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Rittwik Jana ; Seshu m 
; yangya...@chinamobile.com; Kang Xi 
; am8...@att.com; jf2...@att.com
Subject: RE: [modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

Deng Hui,

I can join for the first hour.

Thanks,
-Yang

From: denghui (L)
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 11:22 AM
To: ml6...@att.com; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Rittwik Jana; 
Seshu m; yangya...@chinamobile.com; Kang Xi; 
Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network); am8...@att.com; 
jf2...@att.com
Subject: [modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

Hi Michael, Seshu, Yangyan, Andy, Jimmy, Kang Xi, Yang Xu,

Modeling subcommittee is planning to meet together with projects like 
(SDC/SO/VFC/VNFSDK) and Use cases, so wondering whether you could kindly help 
to drop by our conference
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/July+24-26+Virtual+Developers+Event

Modeling meeting will be in Monday 2pm, Alt 2 conference Bridge #2

Thanks

DENG HUI
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

[denghui (L)]

If that is possible, please help to present VoLTE e2e modeling?

Thanks

DENG Hui

From: Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network)
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 11:49 AM
To: denghui (L) ; ml6...@att.com; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Rittwik Jana ; Seshu m 
; yangya...@chinamobile.com; Kang Xi 
; am8...@att.com; jf2...@att.com
Subject: RE: [modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

Deng Hui,

I can join for the first hour.

Thanks,
-Yang

From: denghui (L)
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 11:22 AM
To: ml6...@att.com; 
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Rittwik Jana; 
Seshu m; yangya...@chinamobile.com; Kang Xi; 
Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network); am8...@att.com; 
jf2...@att.com
Subject: [modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

Hi Michael, Seshu, Yangyan, Andy, Jimmy, Kang Xi, Yang Xu,

Modeling subcommittee is planning to meet together with projects like 
(SDC/SO/VFC/VNFSDK) and Use cases, so wondering whether you could kindly help 
to drop by our conference
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/July+24-26+Virtual+Developers+Event

Modeling meeting will be in Monday 2pm, Alt 2 conference Bridge #2

Thanks

DENG HUI
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

[Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network)]

Deng Hui,

I can join for the first hour.

Thanks,
-Yang

From: denghui (L)
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 11:22 AM
To: ml6...@att.com; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Rittwik Jana; Seshu m; 
yangya...@chinamobile.com; Kang Xi; Yang Xu (Yang, Fixed Network); 
am8...@att.com; jf2...@att.com
Subject: [modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

Hi Michael, Seshu, Yangyan, Andy, Jimmy, Kang Xi, Yang Xu,

Modeling subcommittee is planning to meet together with projects like 
(SDC/SO/VFC/VNFSDK) and Use cases, so wondering whether you could kindly help 
to drop by our conference
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/July+24-26+Virtual+Developers+Event

Modeling meeting will be in Monday 2pm, Alt 2 conference Bridge #2

Thanks

DENG HUI
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

[denghui (L)]

Hi Kang,

Do you have E2E modeling for both use cases?
Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

From: Kang Xi
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 10:21 AM
To: denghui (L) ; ml636r ; onap-discuss 
; Rittwik Jana ; Seshu m 
; yangyanyj ; Yang Xu 
(Yang, Fixed Network) ; am803u ; jf2512 

Subject: Re: [modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

Hi Hui,

I'll be pleased to join but have to leave at 3pm for the integration session.
Regards,
Kang
发件人：denghui (L)
收件人：ml636r,onap-discuss,Rittwik Jana,Seshu m,yangyanyj,Kang Xi,Yang Xu (Yang, 
Fixed Network),am803u,jf2512,
时间：2017-07-23 11:21:48
主题:[modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

Hi Michael, Seshu, Yangyan, Andy, Jimmy, Kang Xi, Yang Xu,

Modeling subcommittee is planning to meet together with projects like 
(SDC/SO/VFC/VNFSDK) and Use cases, so wondering whether you could kindly help 
to drop by our conference
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/July+24-26+Virtual+Developers+Event

Modeling meeting will be in Monday 2pm, Alt 2 conference Bridge #2

Thanks

DENG HUI
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

[Kang Xi]

Hi Hui,

I'll be pleased to join but have to leave at 3pm for the integration session.
Regards,
Kang
发件人：denghui (L)
收件人：ml636r,onap-discuss,Rittwik Jana,Seshu m,yangyanyj,Kang Xi,Yang Xu (Yang, 
Fixed Network),am803u,jf2512,
时间：2017-07-23 11:21:48
主题:[modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

Hi Michael, Seshu, Yangyan, Andy, Jimmy, Kang Xi, Yang Xu,

Modeling subcommittee is planning to meet together with projects like 
(SDC/SO/VFC/VNFSDK) and Use cases, so wondering whether you could kindly help 
to drop by our conference
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/July+24-26+Virtual+Developers+Event

Modeling meeting will be in Monday 2pm, Alt 2 conference Bridge #2

Thanks

DENG HUI
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] modeling meeting invite in Developers event on Monday

[denghui (L)]

Hi Michael, Seshu, Yangyan, Andy, Jimmy, Kang Xi, Yang Xu,

Modeling subcommittee is planning to meet together with projects like 
(SDC/SO/VFC/VNFSDK) and Use cases, so wondering whether you could kindly help 
to drop by our conference
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/July+24-26+Virtual+Developers+Event

Modeling meeting will be in Monday 2pm, Alt 2 conference Bridge #2

Thanks

DENG HUI
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Use of Papyrus for UML modeling tools...

[denghui (L)]

Hi Alex

Papyrus is an UML graphics tool, we use this to describe our information model, 
but won't include it in our final release, it is backward compatible and should 
be ok if each project pick different version.

Thanks,

DENG Hui

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Vul, Alex
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 11:50 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Use of Papyrus for UML modeling tools...

Dear all,

We are looking to use Papyrus as part of our modeling work in VNF SDK and 
External API projects. Does the Modeling Project need to do anything with 
respect to ownership and endorsement of this tool? If not, how do we go about 
getting an "official" version of Papyrus deployed for use across ONAP projects?

Thanks in advance,

Alex Vul
Intel Corporation


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Specification sub page and Developers Event

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

I have created an sub page for modeling specification:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+specification

and also added modeling subcommittee meeting request to below link,
https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=8232264

please add your name there for the participants list:

Best regards,

DENG Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Use of Papyrus for UML modeling tools...

[Vul, Alex]

Dear all,

We are looking to use Papyrus as part of our modeling work in VNF SDK and 
External API projects. Does the Modeling Project need to do anything with 
respect to ownership and endorsement of this tool? If not, how do we go about 
getting an "official" version of Papyrus deployed for use across ONAP projects?

Thanks in advance,

Alex Vul
Intel Corporation


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] remove some committers and add some contributors

[denghui (L)]

Hello all,

After one to one engagement, some of people have decided to move from the 
committers to contributors, some of them would like to join the contributors.
Please kindly help to check the latest version.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Resources+and+Repositories

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling][vfc] TOSCA Parser API Requirements

[Thomas Nadeau]

Cool.  Thx.

From: 杨艳 [mailto:yangya...@chinamobile.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 8:16 PM
To: Thomas Nadeau ; 'denghui \\(L\\)' 
; 'onap-discuss' 
Subject: 答复: [onap-discuss] [Modeling][vfc] TOSCA Parser API Requirements

Hi Tom,

Thanks for your suggestion, I have uploaded the document to the wiki 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VF-C+R1+Deliverables, If there is any feedback 
that need to update the document, I will update to the wiki page.

TOM: Or others can to speed things up if needed and now we don’t have email 
around multiple versions of the same file. 8)

--Tom


Best Regards,
Yan
发件人: Thomas Nadeau [mailto:thomas.nad...@amdocs.com]
发送时间: 2017年7月13日 19:14
收件人: 杨艳; 'denghui \\(L\\)'; onap-discuss
主题: RE: [onap-discuss] [Modeling][vfc] TOSCA Parser API Requirements

Can you please post the document onto Jira somewhere rather than mailing it 
around?  That will allow everyone to look at the same version until its changed.

--Tom


From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of ??
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 6:53 AM
To: 'denghui \\(L\\)' 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; onap-discuss 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling][vfc] TOSCA Parser API Requirements




Very sorry,I forgot to add the attachment in last email.



Best Regards,

Yan

邮件原文
发件人："杨艳" mailto:yangya...@chinamobile.com>>
收件人："'denghui \\(L\\)'" 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>,onap-discuss 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
抄　送: (无)
发送时间：2017-07-13 17:53:28
主题：[onap-discuss] [Modeling][vfc] TOSCA Parser API Requirements
Dear Modeling Project PTL,

Please check the attachment about the API requirements of TOSCA Parser in VF-C 
for R1, which has been discussed within the VF-C project team. And now we want 
to submit it to the modeling project for evaluation and hope the modeling 
project recommends appropriate Parser that can meet these requirements.

Best Regards,
Yan
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 
<https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling][vfc] TOSCA Parser API Requirements

[rene.robert]

Hi all,

I suggest NFV node types to be aligned, when possible, with TOSCA Simple 
Profile for Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) Version 1.0

More details here : 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/tosca-nfv/v1.0/tosca-nfv-v1.0.html

Best regards,


[Logo Orange]<http://www.orange.com/>

René Robert
Fixe : +33 2 96 07 39 29 
<https://monsi.sso.francetelecom.fr/index.asp?target=http%3A%2F%2Fclicvoice.sso.francetelecom.fr%2FClicvoiceV2%2FToolBar.do%3Faction%3Ddefault%26rootservice%3DSIGNATURE%26to%3D+33%202%2096%2007%2039%2029>
Mobile : +33 6 74 78 68 43 
<https://monsi.sso.francetelecom.fr/index.asp?target=http%3A%2F%2Fclicvoice.sso.francetelecom.fr%2FClicvoiceV2%2FToolBar.do%3Faction%3Ddefault%26rootservice%3DSIGNATURE%26to%3D+33%206%2074%2078%2068%2043>
rene.rob...@orange.com<mailto:rene.rob...@orange.com>





De : onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] De la part de ??
Envoyé : jeudi 13 juillet 2017 12:53
À : 'denghui \\(L\\)'; onap-discuss
Objet : Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling][vfc] TOSCA Parser API Requirements




Very sorry,I forgot to add the attachment in last email.



Best Regards,

Yan

邮件原文
发件人："杨艳" mailto:yangya...@chinamobile.com>>
收件人："'denghui \\(L\\)'" 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>,onap-discuss 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
抄　送: (无)
发送时间：2017-07-13 17:53:28
主题：[onap-discuss] [Modeling][vfc] TOSCA Parser API Requirements
Dear Modeling Project PTL,

Please check the attachment about the API requirements of TOSCA Parser in VF-C 
for R1, which has been discussed within the VF-C project team. And now we want 
to submit it to the modeling project for evaluation and hope the modeling 
project recommends appropriate Parser that can meet these requirements.

Best Regards,
Yan

_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling][vfc] TOSCA Parser API Requirements

[Thomas Nadeau]

Can you please post the document onto Jira somewhere rather than mailing it 
around?  That will allow everyone to look at the same version until its changed.

--Tom


From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of ??
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 6:53 AM
To: 'denghui \\(L\\)' ; onap-discuss 

Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling][vfc] TOSCA Parser API Requirements




Very sorry,I forgot to add the attachment in last email.



Best Regards,

Yan

邮件原文
发件人："杨艳" mailto:yangya...@chinamobile.com>>
收件人："'denghui \\(L\\)'" 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>,onap-discuss 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
抄　送: (无)
发送时间：2017-07-13 17:53:28
主题：[onap-discuss] [Modeling][vfc] TOSCA Parser API Requirements
Dear Modeling Project PTL,

Please check the attachment about the API requirements of TOSCA Parser in VF-C 
for R1, which has been discussed within the VF-C project team. And now we want 
to submit it to the modeling project for evaluation and hope the modeling 
project recommends appropriate Parser that can meet these requirements.

Best Regards,
Yan
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 
<https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling][vfc] TOSCA Parser API Requirements

[杨艳]

Dear Modeling Project PTL, 

 

Please check the attachment about the API requirements of TOSCA Parser in
VF-C for R1, which has been discussed within the VF-C project team. And now
we want to submit it to the modeling project for evaluation and hope the
modeling project recommends appropriate Parser that can meet these
requirements.

 

Best Regards,

Yan

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling]VNFD and NSD information model recommendations for review

[Vul, Alex]

Hi Yan,

How is related to the modeling work being done as part of the VNF SDK project? 
Part of the VNF SDK project’s work streams is to define a VNF model (i.e. 
descriptor).  Thoughts?

Best regards,

Alex Vul
Intel Corporation

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of ??
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 3:31 AM
To: 'denghui (L)' ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Modeling]VNFD and NSD information model 
recommendations for review

Dear Modeling Subcommittee,

VF-C team has provided the VNFD and NSD information model recommendations in 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VF-C+R1+Deliverables.
These information models have been discussed within the VF-C project team and 
now submitted to the Modeling Subcommittee for review.

Best Regards,
Yan
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling]VNFD and NSD information model recommendations for review

[杨艳]

Dear Modeling Subcommittee,

 

VF-C team has provided the VNFD and NSD information model recommendations in
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/VF-C+R1+Deliverables.

These information models have been discussed within the VF-C project team
and now submitted to the Modeling Subcommittee for review.

 

Best Regards,

Yan

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Please vote for chairperson of Modeling Subcommittee

[Lingli Deng]

+1

 

Lingli

 

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: 2017年7月7日 11:57
To: onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Please vote for chairperson of Modeling
Subcommittee

 

Hello, Modelling members,

 

There is only one candidate for modeling subcommittee: Hui Deng

 

If you support Please help to vote “+1”, 

If you are neutral, please vote “0”,

If you don’t please respond  “-1” 

 

Members are listed here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Members

 

Thanks a lot

 

DENG Hui

 

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Please vote for chairperson of Modeling Subcommittee

[Ethan Lynn]

+1

Best Regards,
Ethan Lynn
ethanly...@vmware.com
+86 010-59934270



On Jul 7, 2017, at 11:56, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:

Hello, Modelling members,

There is only one candidate for modeling subcommittee: Hui Deng

If you support Please help to vote “+1”,
If you are neutral, please vote “0”,
If you don’t please respond  “-1”

Members are listed here: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Members

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=up9Omq7NCNKkP4VoMfzsYPYkeRuQmKh7eeF2fTMIAm4&m=W3-sWUY7kJ-ayTlh2tTSLdzTlDKZsmyeqNNLFVfUiV4&s=VVETBygpg4g-fpXAWCxmMl8eHedy2J9F-hRsO-fcAHQ&e=

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Please vote for chairperson of Modeling Subcommittee

[Xinhui Li]

+1

From:  on behalf of "denghui (L)" 

Date: Friday, 7 July 2017 at 11:56 AM
To: "onap-...@lists.onap.org" , 
"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Please vote for chairperson of Modeling 
Subcommittee

Hello, Modelling members,

There is only one candidate for modeling subcommittee: Hui Deng

If you support Please help to vote “+1”,
If you are neutral, please vote “0”,
If you don’t please respond  “-1”

Members are listed here: 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Members<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Members&d=DwMFAg&c=uilaK90D4TOVoH58JNXRgQ&r=14DWHoQdlEcTDc7RcGLzzkS0IMYLAIocLc5dNQRKqgk&m=Yp4vR8ohgOfFHhXAU2oIbzgPiTEJJfAC6U1PXxtDjYY&s=XLuF63CeWjfHS0KeI1yZeYviOLafQ3Tww2j9DTxxNOk&e=>

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Please vote for chairperson of Modeling Subcommittee

[Seshu m]

+1



Best Regards,
Seshu
**
 This email and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, 
which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. 
Any use of the information contained here in any way (including, but not 
limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by 
persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this 
email in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and 
delete it!
 
*

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
on behalf of denghui (L) [denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 11:56 AM
To: onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Please vote for chairperson of Modeling 
Subcommittee

Hello, Modelling members,

There is only one candidate for modeling subcommittee: Hui Deng

If you support Please help to vote “+1”,
If you are neutral, please vote “0”,
If you don’t please respond  “-1”

Members are listed here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Members

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Please vote for chairperson of ModelingSubcommittee

[meng.zhaoxing1]

+1
















原始邮件



发件人： 
收件人：  
日 期 ：2017年07月07日 11:57
主 题 ：[onap-discuss] [modeling] Please vote for chairperson of 
ModelingSubcommittee







Hello, Modelling members,


 


There is only one candidate for modeling subcommittee: Hui Deng


 


If you support Please help to vote “+1”,


If you are neutral, please vote “0”,


If you don’t please respond  “-1”


 


Members are listed here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Members


 


Thanks a lot


 


DENG Hui___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Please vote for chairperson of Modeling Subcommittee

[ll...@chinatelecom.cn]

+1  modeling subcommittee



ll...@chinatelecom.cn
 
From: denghui (L)
Date: 2017-07-07 11:56
To: onap-...@lists.onap.org; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Please vote for chairperson of Modeling 
Subcommittee
Hello, Modelling members,
 
There is only one candidate for modeling subcommittee: Hui Deng
 
If you support Please help to vote “+1”, 
If you are neutral, please vote “0”,
If you don’t please respond  “-1” 
 
Members are listed here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Members
 
Thanks a lot
 
DENG Hui
 
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] Please vote for chairperson of Modeling Subcommittee

[denghui (L)]

Hello, Modelling members,

There is only one candidate for modeling subcommittee: Hui Deng

If you support Please help to vote "+1",
If you are neutral, please vote "0",
If you don't please respond  "-1"

Members are listed here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Members

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling Subcommittee self-nomination

[denghui (L)]

Dear Modeling subcommittee members,

I'd like to nominate myself as the chairperson for the Modeling Subcommittee.

Deng HuiI has been heavily involved in ONAP/OPENO process and projects 
creation, especially in the topic of modeling., and he worked as Principal 
staff between 2007 and 2016 in China Mobile, joined Huawei and working on NFV 
related topic quite recently. He acted as the co-chair of IETF MIF working 
group. And he was the board of director of WBA(Wireless Broadband Alliance) 
between 2012-2014, acted as the board of director of OPNFV between 2014-2016 
and 1st board of chairman of OPEN-O project in Linux Foundation.

In order to better align modeling project and modeling subcommittee, and based 
on past experience of standard about modeling specification
I look forward to working with everyone in the ONAP community.  Many thanks for 
your consideration.

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] today's teleconf is cancelled

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Since we have less than 20 people for today teleconf, and we were planning to 
present about modeling spec but there were no SDC people here today.

So we have to cancel today's teleconf, let's do it next Tuesday. Apologize for 
not familiar with US national holiday.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP Mode Subcommittee Chairperson election

[Kenny Paul]

Hello ONAP Modeling Committee members:

This email is to kickoff the ONAP Modeling Subcommittee Chairperson election.  
Any member of the Modeling Subcommittee may run for this position.  

You *MUST* ensure your name and email address are both on the Modeling 
Subcommittee Membership Wiki page  https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Members 
 within the deadlines listed below to 
be eligible for Nomination and/or Voting in this election.

The election process will be held in two phases:

1) Self Nomination Period
Individuals interested in running for the Chairperson position should please 
respond-all to this email with your intention to run.  Please also feel free to 
include a biography and statement of intent on why you would be a good person 
to hold this position.

The nomination phase begins with the reciept of this email on June 29th/30th 
depending on your timezone.
The nomination phase ends Wednesday, July 5th, at 03:00 PM UTC / 8:00 AM PDT / 
11:00 AM EDT / 11:00 PM China

2) Election Phase
A Condorcet election will be held using the CIVS voting system as we have done 
in the past.  All Modeling Subcommittee members of record 
 as identified on the above mentioned 
membership wiki page at the time the vote is initiated will be invited to vote. 
Members added to the page after the vote is initiated will be ineligible to 
cast a ballot.

The election phase will begin on July 6th/7th depending on your timezone 
The election phase will end Midnight UTC Wednesday July 12, 8:00am China / 
Tuesday, July 11, 5:00pm PDT, 8:00pm EDT 

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best Regards, 
-kenny

Kenny Paul,  Technical Program Manager
kp...@linuxfoundation.org
510.766.5945

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling]The result of PTL election of modeling project

[Parviz Yegani]

Congrats Deng Hui!

Parviz

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 5:11 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Modeling]The result of PTL election of modeling project

Hello all

I would like to share the result of PTL election of modeling project, Deng Hui 
is only one candidate and got 17 “+1”
So Deng Hui win this election, thanks a lot for your support

Best regards,

DENG Hui


From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: 2017年6月25日 22:42
To: JANA, RITTWIK (RITTWIK) 
mailto:rj...@research.att.com>>; 
alex@intel.com<mailto:alex@intel.com>; 
a...@gigaspaces.com<mailto:a...@gigaspaces.com>; 
andr...@amdocs.com<mailto:andr...@amdocs.com>; 
art...@gigaspaces.com<mailto:art...@gigaspaces.com>; 
bru...@cisco.com<mailto:bru...@cisco.com>; 
wangchen...@chinamobile.com<mailto:wangchen...@chinamobile.com>; 
ethanly...@vmware.com<mailto:ethanly...@vmware.com>; 
don...@raisecom.com<mailto:don...@raisecom.com>; 
ll...@chinatelecom.cn<mailto:ll...@chinatelecom.cn>; 
denglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>; 
zhonghe...@boco.com.cn<mailto:zhonghe...@boco.com.cn>; 
zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn<mailto:zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn>; 
ss00473...@techmahindra.com<mailto:ss00473...@techmahindra.com>; Lishitao 
mailto:lishi...@huawei.com>>; 
thinh.nguyen...@nokia.com<mailto:thinh.nguyen...@nokia.com>; 
lxin...@vmware.com<mailto:lxin...@vmware.com>; 
shiyb...@chinatelecom.cn<mailto:shiyb...@chinatelecom.cn>; 
hanya...@raisecom.com<mailto:hanya...@raisecom.com>; 
yangyuan...@boco.com.cn<mailto:yangyuan...@boco.com.cn>; 
meng.zhaoxi...@zte.com.cn<mailto:meng.zhaoxi...@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Kenny Paul mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
Casey Cain mailto:cc...@linuxfoundation.org>>; Phil 
Robb mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Subject: ONAP Modeling project PTL election

Hello all

In order to NOT generating so much traffic in TSC list, I am sending this email 
to committers and LF only, will close the vote at 8am EDT, June 27th, Tuesday,
will disclose the election result to the TSC list once we finished.

Upon closing our self-nomination period, we have only one candidate: Hui Deng
Committers, if you support Hui Deng for PTL, please send “+1”, if you don’t, 
please send “-1”, if you are neutral, please send “0”

Thanks a lot for your kind help
Best regards,

DENG Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling]The result of PTL election of modeling project

[denghui (L)]

Thank you, Michael,

DENG Hui

From: Michael Brenner [mailto:mich...@gigaspaces.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 8:52 PM
To: denghui (L) 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling]The result of PTL election of modeling 
project

Congratulations!
Michael

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:10 AM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hello all

I would like to share the result of PTL election of modeling project, Deng Hui 
is only one candidate and got 17 “+1”
So Deng Hui win this election, thanks a lot for your support

Best regards,

DENG Hui


From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: 2017年6月25日 22:42
To: JANA, RITTWIK (RITTWIK) 
mailto:rj...@research.att.com>>; 
alex@intel.com<mailto:alex@intel.com>; 
a...@gigaspaces.com<mailto:a...@gigaspaces.com>; 
andr...@amdocs.com<mailto:andr...@amdocs.com>; 
art...@gigaspaces.com<mailto:art...@gigaspaces.com>; 
bru...@cisco.com<mailto:bru...@cisco.com>; 
wangchen...@chinamobile.com<mailto:wangchen...@chinamobile.com>; 
ethanly...@vmware.com<mailto:ethanly...@vmware.com>; 
don...@raisecom.com<mailto:don...@raisecom.com>; 
ll...@chinatelecom.cn<mailto:ll...@chinatelecom.cn>; 
denglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>; 
zhonghe...@boco.com.cn<mailto:zhonghe...@boco.com.cn>; 
zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn<mailto:zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn>; 
ss00473...@techmahindra.com<mailto:ss00473...@techmahindra.com>; Lishitao 
mailto:lishi...@huawei.com>>; 
thinh.nguyen...@nokia.com<mailto:thinh.nguyen...@nokia.com>; 
lxin...@vmware.com<mailto:lxin...@vmware.com>; 
shiyb...@chinatelecom.cn<mailto:shiyb...@chinatelecom.cn>; 
hanya...@raisecom.com<mailto:hanya...@raisecom.com>; 
yangyuan...@boco.com.cn<mailto:yangyuan...@boco.com.cn>; 
meng.zhaoxi...@zte.com.cn<mailto:meng.zhaoxi...@zte.com.cn>
Cc: Kenny Paul mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
Casey Cain mailto:cc...@linuxfoundation.org>>; Phil 
Robb mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Subject: ONAP Modeling project PTL election

Hello all

In order to NOT generating so much traffic in TSC list, I am sending this email 
to committers and LF only, will close the vote at 8am EDT, June 27th, Tuesday,
will disclose the election result to the TSC list once we finished.

Upon closing our self-nomination period, we have only one candidate: Hui Deng
Committers, if you support Hui Deng for PTL, please send “+1”, if you don’t, 
please send “-1”, if you are neutral, please send “0”

Thanks a lot for your kind help
Best regards,

DENG Hui


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss



--
Michael Brenner, Chief Architect NFV

[图像已被发件人删除。]



M: +1-732-895-5772

http://getcloudify.org<http://getcloudify.org?utm_source=signaturesatori&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Cloudify%204.0%20Webinar>

@cloudifysource

[图像已被发件人删除。]<https://twitter.com/CloudifySource>  [图像已被发件人删除。] 
<https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/17918192/>   [图像已被发件人删除。] 
<https://github.com/cloudify-cosmo>   [图像已被发件人删除。] 
<https://www.youtube.com/cloudifysource>



[图像已被发件人删除。]<http://getcloudify.org/webinars/the-new-cloudify-4.html?utm_source=signaturesatori&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Cloudify%204.0%20Webinar>

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling]The result of PTL election of modeling project

[Michael Brenner]

Congratulations!
Michael

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 8:10 AM, denghui (L)  wrote:

> Hello all
>
>
>
> I would like to share the result of PTL election of modeling project, Deng
> Hui is only one candidate and got 17 “+1”
>
> So Deng Hui win this election, thanks a lot for your support
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> DENG Hui
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com ]
> *Sent:* 2017年6月25日 22:42
> *To:* JANA, RITTWIK (RITTWIK) ; alex@intel.com;
> a...@gigaspaces.com; andr...@amdocs.com; art...@gigaspaces.com;
> bru...@cisco.com; wangchen...@chinamobile.com; ethanly...@vmware.com;
> don...@raisecom.com; ll...@chinatelecom.cn; denglin...@chinamobile.com;
> zhonghe...@boco.com.cn; zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn;
> ss00473...@techmahindra.com; Lishitao ;
> thinh.nguyen...@nokia.com; lxin...@vmware.com; shiyb...@chinatelecom.cn;
> hanya...@raisecom.com; yangyuan...@boco.com.cn; meng.zhaoxi...@zte.com.cn
> *Cc:* Kenny Paul ; Casey Cain <
> cc...@linuxfoundation.org>; Phil Robb 
> *Subject:* ONAP Modeling project PTL election
>
>
>
> Hello all
>
>
>
> In order to NOT generating so much traffic in TSC list, I am sending this
> email to committers and LF only, will close the vote at 8am EDT, June 27th,
> Tuesday,
>
> will disclose the election result to the TSC list once we finished.
>
>
>
> Upon closing our self-nomination period, we have only one candidate: Hui
> Deng
>
> Committers, if you support Hui Deng for PTL, please send “+1”, if you
> don’t, please send “-1”, if you are neutral, please send “0”
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot for your kind help
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> DENG Hui
>
>
>
> ___
> onap-discuss mailing list
> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
>
>


-- 
Michael Brenner, Chief Architect NFV
--
M: +1-732-895-5772 http://getcloudify.org

@cloudifysource





___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling]The result of PTL election of modeling project

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

I would like to share the result of PTL election of modeling project, Deng Hui 
is only one candidate and got 17 “+1”
So Deng Hui win this election, thanks a lot for your support

Best regards,

DENG Hui


From: denghui (L) [mailto:denghu...@huawei.com]
Sent: 2017年6月25日 22:42
To: JANA, RITTWIK (RITTWIK) 
mailto:rj...@research.att.com>>; 
alex@intel.com; 
a...@gigaspaces.com; 
andr...@amdocs.com; 
art...@gigaspaces.com; 
bru...@cisco.com; 
wangchen...@chinamobile.com; 
ethanly...@vmware.com; 
don...@raisecom.com; 
ll...@chinatelecom.cn; 
denglin...@chinamobile.com; 
zhonghe...@boco.com.cn; 
zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn; 
ss00473...@techmahindra.com; Lishitao 
mailto:lishi...@huawei.com>>; 
thinh.nguyen...@nokia.com; 
lxin...@vmware.com; 
shiyb...@chinatelecom.cn; 
hanya...@raisecom.com; 
yangyuan...@boco.com.cn; 
meng.zhaoxi...@zte.com.cn
Cc: Kenny Paul mailto:kp...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
Casey Cain mailto:cc...@linuxfoundation.org>>; Phil 
Robb mailto:pr...@linuxfoundation.org>>
Subject: ONAP Modeling project PTL election

Hello all

In order to NOT generating so much traffic in TSC list, I am sending this email 
to committers and LF only, will close the vote at 8am EDT, June 27th, Tuesday,
will disclose the election result to the TSC list once we finished.

Upon closing our self-nomination period, we have only one candidate: Hui Deng
Committers, if you support Hui Deng for PTL, please send “+1”, if you don’t, 
please send “-1”, if you are neutral, please send “0”

Thanks a lot for your kind help
Best regards,

DENG Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] PTL self-nomination

[denghui (L)]

Dear Modeling committers,

I'd like to nominate myself as Project Technical Lead (PTL) for the Modeling 
project.

Deng HuiI has been heavily involved in ONAP/OPENO process and projects 
creation, especially in the topic of modeling., and he worked as Principal 
staff between 2007 and 2016 in China Mobile, joined Huawei and working on NFV 
related topic quite recently. He acted as the co-chair of IETF MIF working 
group. And he was the board of director of WBA(Wireless Broadband Alliance) 
between 2012-2014, acted as the board of director of OPNFV between 2014-2016 
and 1st board of chairman of OPEN-O project in Linux Foundation.

I look forward to working with everyone in the ONAP community.  Thanks for your 
consideration.

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] Modeling subcommittee is calling for contributors

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Last week TSC teleconf, Modeling subcommittee was just approved by TSC.
We just created a membership page for Modeling Subcommittee, this is open to 
everybody,
please kindly help to volunteer and put your name under the page
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Members

thanks a lot for your kind help
Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling teleconf this week is cancelled

[Vitaliy Emporopulo]

Hello DENG Hui,

Would it be possible next time to cancel the calendar appointment in addition 
to sending a cancellation email?

Thanks in advance,
Vitaliy

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 19:26
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc 
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling teleconf this week is cancelled

Hello all

Due to Linux Conference in China this week, there are many people who needs to 
attend and present, so we have to cancel it again this week.

Best regards,

DENG Hui
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 
<https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] Modeling teleconf this week is cancelled

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Due to Linux Conference in China this week, there are many people who needs to 
attend and present, so we have to cancel it again this week.

Best regards,

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling subcommittee proposal

[denghui (L)]

Hi Stephen,

As discussed in last time breakout session, the intention is both, for open 
source project, we don't have guideline, it is more standard's way like 3GPP or 
ETSI, it will delay at least our release for 3 or 6 months without modeling 
spec.
I will update other 2 revisions tomorrow, thanks a lot for your comments

DENG Hui

From: Stephen Terrill [mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 7:13 PM
To: denghui (L) ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-tsc 
Subject: RE: Modeling subcommittee proposal

Hi Deng hui,

Regarding the modelling delivery, is this expectation in line with the 
expectation from the projects about who publishes what, and how do you see that 
working?  In the expected deliverables, is it the information models or data 
models or both?

Could I suggest a few wording changes in the scope.  I understand the 
intention, but they could be interpreated more broadly.
*Purpose:
*Publish Guidelines 
  -> publish modelling guidelines
*Facilitate model reviews
*Publish models
*Curate approved models (model lifecycle management, e.g., versioning)
*Coordinate adoption/use across projects -> 
coordinate model adoption/use across projects
*Alignment with industry standards-> 
Alignment with industry standards for modelling.
Scope:
-I thought that parsers were the responsibility of the ONAP modelling 
project, not the sub-committee?
BR,

Steve


From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: 14 June 2017 12:06
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-tsc mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Modeling subcommittee proposal

Hello all.

Thanks Chris Donley for kindly help to simplified the wording on the wiki page,
If that is possible, we would like to request an approval in tomorrow during 
TSC meeting
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: denghui (L)
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 4:13 PM
To: 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-tsc mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Modeling subcommittee proposal

Hello all

Based on the modeling project subgroup discussion, we propose Modeling 
subcommittee for TSC review,
we separate the scope of modeling project for tools, modeling subcommittee for 
modeling specifications across the projects.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+sub-committee

Thanks a lot for review

Best regards,

DENG Hui


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling subcommittee proposal

[Stephen Terrill]

Hi Deng hui,

Regarding the modelling delivery, is this expectation in line with the 
expectation from the projects about who publishes what, and how do you see that 
working?  In the expected deliverables, is it the information models or data 
models or both?

Could I suggest a few wording changes in the scope.  I understand the 
intention, but they could be interpreated more broadly.
* Purpose:
* Publish Guidelines
   -> publish modelling guidelines
* Facilitate model reviews
* Publish models
* Curate approved models (model lifecycle management, e.g., versioning)
* Coordinate adoption/use across projects -> 
coordinate model adoption/use across projects
* Alignment with industry standards-> 
Alignment with industry standards for modelling.
Scope:

 *   I thought that parsers were the responsibility of the ONAP modelling 
project, not the sub-committee?
BR,

Steve


From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] 
On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: 14 June 2017 12:06
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: onap-tsc 
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Modeling subcommittee proposal

Hello all.

Thanks Chris Donley for kindly help to simplified the wording on the wiki page,
If that is possible, we would like to request an approval in tomorrow during 
TSC meeting
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: denghui (L)
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 4:13 PM
To: 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' 
mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>
Cc: onap-tsc mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: Modeling subcommittee proposal

Hello all

Based on the modeling project subgroup discussion, we propose Modeling 
subcommittee for TSC review,
we separate the scope of modeling project for tools, modeling subcommittee for 
modeling specifications across the projects.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+sub-committee

Thanks a lot for review

Best regards,

DENG Hui


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] Modeling subcommittee proposal

[denghui (L)]

Hello all.

Thanks Chris Donley for kindly help to simplified the wording on the wiki page,
If that is possible, we would like to request an approval in tomorrow during 
TSC meeting
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Modeling+sub-committee

Best regards,

DENG Hui

From: denghui (L)
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 4:13 PM
To: 'onap-discuss@lists.onap.org' 
Cc: onap-tsc 
Subject: Modeling subcommittee proposal

Hello all

Based on the modeling project subgroup discussion, we propose Modeling 
subcommittee for TSC review,
we separate the scope of modeling project for tools, modeling subcommittee for 
modeling specifications across the projects.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+sub-committee

Thanks a lot for review

Best regards,

DENG Hui


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] The regular modeling teleconf of this week is cancelled

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Due to OPNFV summit in Beijing, we would like to cancel this week teleconf.
Have a good free Tuesday morning or evening :)

Thanks,

Rittwiki & DENG Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] Modeling subcommittee proposal

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Based on the modeling project subgroup discussion, we propose Modeling 
subcommittee for TSC review,
we separate the scope of modeling project for tools, modeling subcommittee for 
modeling specifications across the projects.
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Modeling+sub-committee

Thanks a lot for review

Best regards,

DENG Hui


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] Project webpage updated

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

We have more than 40 contributors on the wiki page, based on the breakout 
session this afternoon, we have only around 10 contributors.
Based on the discussion, we updated the Project webpage accordingly to handover 
the modeling specification from modeling project to modeling subcommittee.

https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3247202&src=contextnavpagetreemode

thanks for your review
Best regards,

DENG Hui


From: denghui (L)
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 12:24 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [Modeling]breakout room 1614 for modeling discussion

Apologize for mistake,  1614

From: 
onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 12:18 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Modeling]breakout room 1612 for modeling discussion

Hello all

The breakout room will be 1612, please come to level 16, we are going to have a 
discussion on it
Time: 2:30-3:30pm, Beijing time

Thanks

Deng Hui


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling]breakout room 1614 for modeling discussion

[denghui (L)]

Apologize for mistake,  1614

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of denghui (L)
Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 12:18 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [Modeling]breakout room 1612 for modeling discussion

Hello all

The breakout room will be 1612, please come to level 16, we are going to have a 
discussion on it
Time: 2:30-3:30pm, Beijing time

Thanks

Deng Hui


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling]breakout room 1612 for modeling discussion

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

The breakout room will be 1612, please come to level 16, we are going to have a 
discussion on it
Time: 2:30-3:30pm, Beijing time

Thanks

Deng Hui


___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf

[Michael Brenner]

+1!

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:30 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L  wrote:

> A good practice that I developed from my years of leading groups in
> standards, is to have the next week’s draft agenda as a section in the
> current week’s agenda. That way you get a chance in the meeting to say –
> here’s what’s upcoming, and take input on it a week in advance.
>
>
>
> Maybe establishing such a practice here can help?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bryan Sullivan | AT&T
>
>
>
> *From:* onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-bounces@
> lists.onap.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Brenner
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 16, 2017 8:28 AM
> *To:* denghui (L) 
> *Cc:* JANA, RITTWIK ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf
>
>
>
> Deng,
>
>
>
> I understand - but we all do 1000 different things/commitments. Without
> knowing the agenda in time, it is hard to make choices when conflicts
> arise. This is one of those weeks where there are conflicts for multiple
> folks. I think if we miss some people, in some cases the agenda may have to
> change or be postponed - otherwise the conclusion of the meetings may be
> different.
>
> Things happen, and I am not complaining. I am just suggesting that if we
> want to make an effort to have interested people at the appropriate
> meeting, we need to make the extra effort in future to announce the agenda
> in a timely manner.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:12 AM, denghui (L) 
> wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
>
>
> After doodle until last weekend. I sent telecof bridge invite yesterday
> other than 1 hour ago. Hope you could see that
>
>
>
> Last 3 times Teleconf/f2f, we even don’t have agenda posted before the
> meeting.
>
> We are still in the startup stage, can’t have a good program manager at
> this moment.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> DENG Hui
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Brenner [mailto:mich...@gigaspaces.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 16, 2017 4:25 PM
> *To:* denghui (L) 
> *Cc:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; JANA, RITTWIK (RITTWIK) : <
> rj...@research.att.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf
>
>
>
> Deng,
>
>
>
> Please communicate the agenda earlier in future. As you know, I am in ETSI
> NFV meetings this week, and getting a 1 hour notice with an agenda item
> forced me to make a last minute decision. At the time of the discussion on
> workflow I was presenting at SOL WG on the topic of Deployment Flavor for
> VNF model - and could not attend the ONP discussion.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:00 AM, denghui (L)  wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
>
>
> We are going to have teleconf in an hour, agenda would be:
>
> 1)  Working through other Modeling related projects, suggested
> influence. (All)
>
> 2)  Combination of declarative and imperative workflow with BPMN
> (Huabin Zhao)
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Rittwik and Deng Hui
>
>
> ___
> onap-discuss mailing list
> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2-FskNSRL5sc9nQutgafCDIk3JbYrtcUwMwT5Zs1Tnk&m=MDiqwCtc6zZzFN_nPL7xa4uz5T7xlDA_yjx_2RNsEnQ&s=PcmDG-cR1EjxfcLK3Yly478f_ffbOtaTd4-oX4E4TLU&e=>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Michael Brenner, **Chief Architect NFV*
>
> *[image: 图像已被发件人删除。]*
> --
>
> M: +1-732-895-5772 <(732)%20895-5772>
>
> http://getcloudify.org
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__getcloudify.org-3Futm-5Fsource-3Dsignaturesatori-26utm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fcampaign-3DCloudify-25204.0-2520Webinar&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2-FskNSRL5sc9nQutgafCDIk3JbYrtcUwMwT5Zs1Tnk&m=MDiqwCtc6zZzFN_nPL7xa4uz5T7xlDA_yjx_2RNsEnQ&s=nd-jmbHAmVezywLvwlGo5zmZ17lkvdVO2Uy29NmqYl8&e=>
>
> @cloudifysource
>
> [image: 图像已被发件人删除。]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_CloudifySource&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2-FskNSRL5sc9nQutgafCDIk3JbYrtcUwMwT5Zs1Tnk&m=MDiqwCtc6zZzFN_nPL7xa4uz5T7xlDA_yjx_2RNsEnQ&s=pchlVHvFUTRHNPw6KDRkYwME_DlNOwo5CuwH-5k4Sag&e=>
>   [image: 图像已被发件人删除。]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_company-2Dbeta_17918192_&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2-FskNSRL5sc9nQutgafCDIk

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf

[SULLIVAN, BRYAN L]

A good practice that I developed from my years of leading groups in standards, 
is to have the next week’s draft agenda as a section in the current week’s 
agenda. That way you get a chance in the meeting to say – here’s what’s 
upcoming, and take input on it a week in advance.

Maybe establishing such a practice here can help?

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Michael Brenner
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 8:28 AM
To: denghui (L) 
Cc: JANA, RITTWIK ; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf

Deng,

I understand - but we all do 1000 different things/commitments. Without knowing 
the agenda in time, it is hard to make choices when conflicts arise. This is 
one of those weeks where there are conflicts for multiple folks. I think if we 
miss some people, in some cases the agenda may have to change or be postponed - 
otherwise the conclusion of the meetings may be different.
Things happen, and I am not complaining. I am just suggesting that if we want 
to make an effort to have interested people at the appropriate meeting, we need 
to make the extra effort in future to announce the agenda in a timely manner.

Best regards,
Michael

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:12 AM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Michael,

After doodle until last weekend. I sent telecof bridge invite yesterday other 
than 1 hour ago. Hope you could see that

Last 3 times Teleconf/f2f, we even don’t have agenda posted before the meeting.
We are still in the startup stage, can’t have a good program manager at this 
moment.

Thanks

DENG Hui

From: Michael Brenner 
[mailto:mich...@gigaspaces.com<mailto:mich...@gigaspaces.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 4:25 PM
To: denghui (L) mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; JANA, 
RITTWIK (RITTWIK) : mailto:rj...@research.att.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf

Deng,

Please communicate the agenda earlier in future. As you know, I am in ETSI NFV 
meetings this week, and getting a 1 hour notice with an agenda item forced me 
to make a last minute decision. At the time of the discussion on workflow I was 
presenting at SOL WG on the topic of Deployment Flavor for VNF model - and 
could not attend the ONP discussion.

Regards,
Michael

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:00 AM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hello all

We are going to have teleconf in an hour, agenda would be:

1)  Working through other Modeling related projects, suggested influence. 
(All)

2)  Combination of declarative and imperative workflow with BPMN (Huabin 
Zhao)

Thanks

Rittwik and Deng Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2-FskNSRL5sc9nQutgafCDIk3JbYrtcUwMwT5Zs1Tnk&m=MDiqwCtc6zZzFN_nPL7xa4uz5T7xlDA_yjx_2RNsEnQ&s=PcmDG-cR1EjxfcLK3Yly478f_ffbOtaTd4-oX4E4TLU&e=>



--
Michael Brenner, Chief Architect NFV

[图像已被发件人删除。]



M: +1-732-895-5772

http://getcloudify.org<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__getcloudify.org-3Futm-5Fsource-3Dsignaturesatori-26utm-5Fmedium-3Demail-26utm-5Fcampaign-3DCloudify-25204.0-2520Webinar&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2-FskNSRL5sc9nQutgafCDIk3JbYrtcUwMwT5Zs1Tnk&m=MDiqwCtc6zZzFN_nPL7xa4uz5T7xlDA_yjx_2RNsEnQ&s=nd-jmbHAmVezywLvwlGo5zmZ17lkvdVO2Uy29NmqYl8&e=>

@cloudifysource

[图像已被发件人删除。]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_CloudifySource&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2-FskNSRL5sc9nQutgafCDIk3JbYrtcUwMwT5Zs1Tnk&m=MDiqwCtc6zZzFN_nPL7xa4uz5T7xlDA_yjx_2RNsEnQ&s=pchlVHvFUTRHNPw6KDRkYwME_DlNOwo5CuwH-5k4Sag&e=>
  [图像已被发件人删除。] 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_company-2Dbeta_17918192_&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2-FskNSRL5sc9nQutgafCDIk3JbYrtcUwMwT5Zs1Tnk&m=MDiqwCtc6zZzFN_nPL7xa4uz5T7xlDA_yjx_2RNsEnQ&s=aal9lkDBUMs7CH_PHgQCQxKDNDlkxH4b1qjQ0wZXAJ8&e=>
   [图像已被发件人删除。] 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_cloudify-2Dcosmo&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2-FskNSRL5sc9nQutgafCDIk3JbYrtcUwMwT5Zs1Tnk&m=MDiqwCtc6zZzFN_nPL7xa4uz5T7xlDA_yjx_2RNsEnQ&s=xpOFdDR7XsX5Oc0LuMfpP4Z_BomStOM4aiO2QVsG3xI&e=>
   [图像已被发件人删除。] 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.youtube.com_cloudifysource&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2-FskNSRL5sc9nQutgafCDIk3JbYrtcUwMwT5Zs1Tnk&m=MDiqwCt

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf

[Michael Brenner]

Deng,

I understand - but we all do 1000 different things/commitments. Without
knowing the agenda in time, it is hard to make choices when conflicts
arise. This is one of those weeks where there are conflicts for multiple
folks. I think if we miss some people, in some cases the agenda may have to
change or be postponed - otherwise the conclusion of the meetings may be
different.
Things happen, and I am not complaining. I am just suggesting that if we
want to make an effort to have interested people at the appropriate
meeting, we need to make the extra effort in future to announce the agenda
in a timely manner.

Best regards,
Michael

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:12 AM, denghui (L)  wrote:

> Michael,
>
>
>
> After doodle until last weekend. I sent telecof bridge invite yesterday
> other than 1 hour ago. Hope you could see that
>
>
>
> Last 3 times Teleconf/f2f, we even don’t have agenda posted before the
> meeting.
>
> We are still in the startup stage, can’t have a good program manager at
> this moment.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> DENG Hui
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Brenner [mailto:mich...@gigaspaces.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 16, 2017 4:25 PM
> *To:* denghui (L) 
> *Cc:* onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; JANA, RITTWIK (RITTWIK) : <
> rj...@research.att.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf
>
>
>
> Deng,
>
>
>
> Please communicate the agenda earlier in future. As you know, I am in ETSI
> NFV meetings this week, and getting a 1 hour notice with an agenda item
> forced me to make a last minute decision. At the time of the discussion on
> workflow I was presenting at SOL WG on the topic of Deployment Flavor for
> VNF model - and could not attend the ONP discussion.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:00 AM, denghui (L)  wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
>
>
> We are going to have teleconf in an hour, agenda would be:
>
> 1)  Working through other Modeling related projects, suggested
> influence. (All)
>
> 2)  Combination of declarative and imperative workflow with BPMN
> (Huabin Zhao)
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Rittwik and Deng Hui
>
>
> ___
> onap-discuss mailing list
> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Michael Brenner, **Chief Architect NFV*
>
> *[image: 图像已被发件人删除。]*
> --
>
> M: +1-732-895-5772 <(732)%20895-5772>
>
> http://getcloudify.org
> <http://getcloudify.org?utm_source=signaturesatori&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Cloudify%204.0%20Webinar>
>
> @cloudifysource
>
> [image: 图像已被发件人删除。] <https://twitter.com/CloudifySource>  [image:
> 图像已被发件人删除。] <https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/17918192/>  [image:
> 图像已被发件人删除。] <https://github.com/cloudify-cosmo>  [image: 图像已被发件人删除。]
> <https://www.youtube.com/cloudifysource>
>
>
> [image: 图像已被发件人删除。]
> <http://getcloudify.org/webinars/the-new-cloudify-4.html?utm_source=signaturesatori&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Cloudify%204.0%20Webinar>
>
>
>



-- 
Michael Brenner, Chief Architect NFV
--
M: +1-732-895-5772 http://getcloudify.org
<http://getcloudify.org?utm_source=signaturesatori&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Cloudify%204.0%20Webinar>
@cloudifysource
<https://twitter.com/CloudifySource>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/17918192/>
<https://github.com/cloudify-cosmo>
<https://www.youtube.com/cloudifysource>
<http://getcloudify.org/webinars/the-new-cloudify-4.html?utm_source=signaturesatori&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Cloudify%204.0%20Webinar>
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf

[denghui (L)]

Michael,

After doodle until last weekend. I sent telecof bridge invite yesterday other 
than 1 hour ago. Hope you could see that

Last 3 times Teleconf/f2f, we even don’t have agenda posted before the meeting.
We are still in the startup stage, can’t have a good program manager at this 
moment.

Thanks

DENG Hui

From: Michael Brenner [mailto:mich...@gigaspaces.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 4:25 PM
To: denghui (L) 
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; JANA, RITTWIK (RITTWIK) : 

Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf

Deng,

Please communicate the agenda earlier in future. As you know, I am in ETSI NFV 
meetings this week, and getting a 1 hour notice with an agenda item forced me 
to make a last minute decision. At the time of the discussion on workflow I was 
presenting at SOL WG on the topic of Deployment Flavor for VNF model - and 
could not attend the ONP discussion.

Regards,
Michael

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:00 AM, denghui (L) 
mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hello all

We are going to have teleconf in an hour, agenda would be:

1)  Working through other Modeling related projects, suggested influence. 
(All)

2)  Combination of declarative and imperative workflow with BPMN (Huabin 
Zhao)

Thanks

Rittwik and Deng Hui

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss



--
Michael Brenner, Chief Architect NFV

[图像已被发件人删除。]



M: +1-732-895-5772

http://getcloudify.org<http://getcloudify.org?utm_source=signaturesatori&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Cloudify%204.0%20Webinar>

@cloudifysource

[图像已被发件人删除。]<https://twitter.com/CloudifySource>  [图像已被发件人删除。] 
<https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/17918192/>   [图像已被发件人删除。] 
<https://github.com/cloudify-cosmo>   [图像已被发件人删除。] 
<https://www.youtube.com/cloudifysource>



[图像已被发件人删除。]<http://getcloudify.org/webinars/the-new-cloudify-4.html?utm_source=signaturesatori&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Cloudify%204.0%20Webinar>

___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf

[SULLIVAN, BRYAN L]

Thanks Brian. I see also from the wiki that there is an IRC channel as 
requested: 
https://www.irccloud.com/#!/ircs://irc.freenode.net:6697/%23onap-modeling

I recommend we get the LF infra team to setup a bot there to log the channel 
for the minutes. We can also let people use the zoom chat and paste that into 
the IRC channel at the end of the meeting, so it’s part of the minutes.

Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Brian Hedstrom
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 7:01 AM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf

Here are the ZOOM chat notes from the Modeling meeting today.
07:38:25  From Bryan Sullivan : I disagree in principle that 
declarative methods can'rt handle complex use cases.
07:39:33  From DENG Hui : Bryan, do you have example, how vendor's 
volte could be deployed based on declarative methods?
07:39:37  From Bryan Sullivan : Dependencies as an example is clearly 
supported by a declarative model, and can be used to derive VNFC sequencing.
07:40:09  From Alex Vul : I agree with Bryan...
07:40:24  From Bryan Sullivan : You need to list the particular aspects 
of the model (actions in a deployment process for example) that need to be 
assessed per support in declarative means.
07:40:51  From Bryan Sullivan : Do we have an IRC channel for the 
meeting? Will be more effective than this chat tool.
07:41:35  From Alex Vul : just look at the VMware proprietary 
implementaton or the BMC one, or examples of complex SAP landscapes that have 
been modelled in TOSCA
07:42:08  From Alex Vul : the complexity of SAP landscapes rivals what 
we need to do in terms of network services, VNFs and SFCs
07:42:20  From Bryan Sullivan : Also, the Cloudify DSL has a lot of 
complex features that they have extended TOSCA with. These have not worked into 
the standard but are a clear example of how to declaratively model complex 
features.
07:43:34  From Alex Vul : I have been working with declarative 
orchestrators for more than 10 years - they can do the job...
07:44:15  From maopeng : could the Tosca deal with both deploy and 
upgrade？
07:44:16  From Bryan Sullivan : Same for JuJu, which uses a largely 
declarative approach, supplemented by scripts where needed for any detailed 
actions not yet supported by the model DSL. This is a common technique, and is 
a design decision in the end (how much to script based upon lifecycle hook 
calls).
07:45:14  From DENG Hui : one more clarification again: is there any 
vendor's VOLTE could be deployed based on declarative model? please show the 
example,
07:45:20  From Bryan Sullivan : I see no reason that upgrade cannot be 
represented by a reference to a dependent artifact that has changed version 
(upgrade or downgrade), based upon the current running state of a VNF.
07:45:38  From DENG Hui : today's svnfm is under JUJU,
07:45:44  From Alex Vul : TOSCA *is* for deployment
07:46:22  From maopeng : @Alex，just for deployment？
07:46:30  From Bryan Sullivan : Deng, the "vendor's VOLTE" example 
needs to be defined re requirements by the vendor. We can't in a generic sense 
respond to a particular example withouth understanding the 
assumptions/requirements of that example.
07:46:38  From Alex Vul : you can also orchestrate upgrades/updates
07:47:07  From Amir Levy : @DENG - we have ran VoLTE over declarative 
model using Cloudify
07:47:10  From Alex Vul : the containment graph is helpful for 
in-service upgrades
07:47:34  From Amir Levy : 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfkCkj3Hd8U<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.youtube.com_watch-3Fv-3DNfkCkj3Hd8U&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2-FskNSRL5sc9nQutgafCDIk3JbYrtcUwMwT5Zs1Tnk&m=Rgmc1JpyXlbitlUTK3B3w4xSmioN1q33FRvR_XPR19g&s=TiAnBbUpznRZzfkKGWvkJYgLF000tVKT17T0zpOcKMk&e=>
07:47:48  From DENG Hui : @amir, which operator , and which telecom 
vendor, don't tell me that is open source
07:48:25  From maopeng : one Tosca file or two files do deploy and 
update?
07:48:26  From Amir Levy : @DENG check out - OPNFV / ClearWater
07:48:35  From Bryan Sullivan : Deng, where possible we should always 
use open source examples to develop ONAP functionality.
07:48:55  From Bryan Sullivan : (if I understood your point/question)
07:49:05  From DENG Hui : Bryan, we are talking about commerical value 
and commerical deployment, not just for academy based on open source vnf
07:51:18  From Bryan Sullivan : If we can't derive clear deployable 
platform value from developing a platform using open source reference VNFs, 
then we might as well go home now. That does n

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf

[Michael Brenner]

Deng,

Please communicate the agenda earlier in future. As you know, I am in ETSI
NFV meetings this week, and getting a 1 hour notice with an agenda item
forced me to make a last minute decision. At the time of the discussion on
workflow I was presenting at SOL WG on the topic of Deployment Flavor for
VNF model - and could not attend the ONP discussion.

Regards,
Michael

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:00 AM, denghui (L)  wrote:

> Hello all
>
>
>
> We are going to have teleconf in an hour, agenda would be:
>
> 1)  Working through other Modeling related projects, suggested
> influence. (All)
>
> 2)  Combination of declarative and imperative workflow with BPMN
> (Huabin Zhao)
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Rittwik and Deng Hui
>
> ___
> onap-discuss mailing list
> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
>
>


-- 
Michael Brenner, Chief Architect NFV
--
M: +1-732-895-5772 http://getcloudify.org

@cloudifysource





___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf

[Brian Hedstrom]

Here are the ZOOM chat notes from the Modeling meeting today.
07:38:25 From Bryan Sullivan : I disagree in principle that declarative
methods can'rt handle complex use cases.
07:39:33 From DENG Hui : Bryan, do you have example, how vendor's volte
could be deployed based on declarative methods?
07:39:37 From Bryan Sullivan : Dependencies as an example is clearly
supported by a declarative model, and can be used to derive VNFC sequencing.
07:40:09 From Alex Vul : I agree with Bryan...
07:40:24 From Bryan Sullivan : You need to list the particular aspects of
the model (actions in a deployment process for example) that need to be
assessed per support in declarative means.
07:40:51 From Bryan Sullivan : Do we have an IRC channel for the meeting?
Will be more effective than this chat tool.
07:41:35 From Alex Vul : just look at the VMware proprietary implementaton
or the BMC one, or examples of complex SAP landscapes that have been
modelled in TOSCA
07:42:08 From Alex Vul : the complexity of SAP landscapes rivals what we
need to do in terms of network services, VNFs and SFCs
07:42:20 From Bryan Sullivan : Also, the Cloudify DSL has a lot of complex
features that they have extended TOSCA with. These have not worked into the
standard but are a clear example of how to declaratively model complex
features.
07:43:34 From Alex Vul : I have been working with declarative orchestrators
for more than 10 years - they can do the job...
07:44:15 From maopeng : could the Tosca deal with both deploy and upgrade？
07:44:16 From Bryan Sullivan : Same for JuJu, which uses a largely
declarative approach, supplemented by scripts where needed for any detailed
actions not yet supported by the model DSL. This is a common technique, and
is a design decision in the end (how much to script based upon lifecycle
hook calls).
07:45:14 From DENG Hui : one more clarification again: is there any
vendor's VOLTE could be deployed based on declarative model? please show
the example,
07:45:20 From Bryan Sullivan : I see no reason that upgrade cannot be
represented by a reference to a dependent artifact that has changed version
(upgrade or downgrade), based upon the current running state of a VNF.
07:45:38 From DENG Hui : today's svnfm is under JUJU,
07:45:44 From Alex Vul : TOSCA *is* for deployment
07:46:22 From maopeng : @Alex，just for deployment？
07:46:30 From Bryan Sullivan : Deng, the "vendor's VOLTE" example needs to
be defined re requirements by the vendor. We can't in a generic sense
respond to a particular example withouth understanding the
assumptions/requirements of that example.
07:46:38 From Alex Vul : you can also orchestrate upgrades/updates
07:47:07 From Amir Levy : @DENG - we have ran VoLTE over declarative model
using Cloudify
07:47:10 From Alex Vul : the containment graph is helpful for in-service
upgrades
07:47:34 From Amir Levy : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfkCkj3Hd8U
07:47:48 From DENG Hui : @amir, which operator , and which telecom vendor,
don't tell me that is open source
07:48:25 From maopeng : one Tosca file or two files do deploy and update?
07:48:26 From Amir Levy : @DENG check out - OPNFV / ClearWater
07:48:35 From Bryan Sullivan : Deng, where possible we should always use
open source examples to develop ONAP functionality.
07:48:55 From Bryan Sullivan : (if I understood your point/question)
07:49:05 From DENG Hui : Bryan, we are talking about commerical value and
commerical deployment, not just for academy based on open source vnf
07:51:18 From Bryan Sullivan : If we can't derive clear deployable platform
value from developing a platform using open source reference VNFs, then we
might as well go home now. That does not impact your ability to deploy
proprietary "real" VNFs, or diminish the potential quality of the platform
to support them. We just have to do a thorough job using open source tools
including VNFs.
07:51:20 From maopeng : if the deploy and the update have the different
relations or other depandencies running state, how to do that?
07:52:02 From Alex Vul : can you elaborate maopeng...
07:52:19 From Bryan Sullivan : We are not in a science experiment here; we
are working in the open on a real deployable platform. We just need to keep
all the components of the project discussion open and free.
07:54:20 From maopeng : @alex, we can discuss offline
07:54:32 From Ranny Haiby (Nokia) : Nokia successfully deployed a
commercial IMS using a TOSCA driven templates decribed here:
https://tools.ext.nokia.com/asset/200827
07:54:36 From Alex Vul : sure... i spent 15 years working on app modeling...
07:54:59 From Alex Vul : what Huabing is proposing is actually one
implementation that I have done...
07:55:21 From Bryan Sullivan : Do these chat notes get published in the
minutes? If not we need to start using IRC so the notes are minuted.


On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 6:00 AM, denghui (L)  wrote:

> Hello all
>
>
>
> We are going to have teleconf in an hour, agenda would be:
>
> 1)  Working through other Modeling relat

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] agenda for today teleconf

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

We are going to have teleconf in an hour, agenda would be:

1)  Working through other Modeling related projects, suggested influence. 
(All)

2)  Combination of declarative and imperative workflow with BPMN (Huabin 
Zhao)

Thanks

Rittwik and Deng Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] ONAP Modeling weekly teleconf bridge

[denghui (L)]

BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:China Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ORGANIZER;CN=denghui (L):MAILTO:denghu...@huawei.com
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=onap-discu
 s...@lists.onap.org:MAILTO:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN="JANA, RITT
 WIK (RITTWIK) :":MAILTO:rj...@research.att.com
DESCRIPTION;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:Join from PC\, Mac\, Linux\, iOS or Android: htt
 ps://zoom.us/j/9117271979\n\nOr iPhone one-tap (US Toll):  +16465588656\,9
 117271979# or +14086380968\,9117271979#\n\nOr Telephone:\nDial: +1 646
  558 8656 (US Toll) or +1 408 638 0968 (US Toll)\nMeeting ID: 911 727 
 1979\nInternational numbers available: https://zoom.us/zoomconference?
 m=gOYfuD6bgjKCKALU45taWVbpR4FYRl5S\n\n
RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;UNTIL=20170606T13Z;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=TU;WKST=MO
SUMMARY;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:[Modeling] ONAP Modeling weekly teleconf bridge
DTSTART;TZID=China Standard Time:20170516T21
DTEND;TZID=China Standard Time:20170516T22
UID:04008200E00074C5B7101A82E008E02F67C101CED201000
 010003F38F016EC601541A50124015F5F5C2D
CLASS:PUBLIC
PRIORITY:5
DTSTAMP:20170515T210328Z
TRANSP:OPAQUE
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SEQUENCE:0
LOCATION;LANGUAGE=zh-CN:Telconf
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-APPT-SEQUENCE:0
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-OWNERAPPTID:-1779410975
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:TENTATIVE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INTENDEDSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-INSTTYPE:1
X-MICROSOFT-DISALLOW-COUNTER:FALSE
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:REMINDER
TRIGGER;RELATED=START:-PT4H
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling]Doodle result of Modeling weekly teleconf

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

According to Doodle result, we have quite a lot of contributors prefer PDT 
6-7AM,
let's go forward with this time, since we haven't had our project approved yet, 
let's continue use this teleconf bridge before Beijing F2F meeting.
Will send a separate calendar invite to the list.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling]Start Poll Modeling weekly teleconf time

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

Please help to do doodle for our regular weekly teleconf time, we are going to 
close the doodle until this Sunday, EDT 10AM
http://doodle.com/poll/itpu466itrriqerc

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] TOSCA BPMN support proposal at OASISTOSCA WG

[zhao.huabing]

Hi Michael,




I brought this issue here only because the proposal has a strong relationship 
to the ONAP community.




In the OASIS TOSCA meeting and maillist, I have repeatedly clarified that our 
proposal only adds an option for the backward-compatible with TOSCA 1.0 to 
allow reusing the tremendous existing codes of OpenECOMP and OPEN-O, it doesn't 
intend to replace the new workflow DSL defined in TOSCA v1.1, and we also 
acknowledge the vision of TOSCA declarative workflow. 




TOSCA TSC Chair Matt also agree on this approach, here is what he said: “I 
thought we had resolved going forward to acknowledge BPMN and BPEL (by name) as 
popular examples of opaque ("Black box" artifact) work flow languages and list 
all the issues/problems/caveats around using them in conjunction within a 
declarative topology (for the Orchestrator and portability).  To be clear, we 
would not endorse them as normative, but neither would we reject them and 
follow our philosophy of "meeting customer where they are at in their 
(declarative) journey that is, not leave them behind, ignore them or force them 
to choose to rewrite to TOSCA or leave.”




If BPMN/BPEL is not included in the TOSCA, we must either abandon the existing 
codes, or extend the TOSCA spec in a non-standard way to support this.  We hope 
that the opensource and standard can cooperate and codevelop in a harmonized 
way in the journey to it's ideally destination, that's why we submit this 
proposal to OASIS TOSCA. 




Here is the main idea of the proposal: it suggests an inclusive approach for 
workflow definition: While the user can define each step of the imperative 
workflow, the workflow can also be delegated to an arbitrary artifact, which 
could be BPMN, BPEL or any other implementations which make sense.




To achieve that, the proposal suggest adding a “delegate” keyname at the 
workflow level to signal that the workflow is delegated to an artifact 
implementation. The value of “delegate” keyname is the relative path of the 
artifact file in the CSAR package which the tosca template is in. During the 
runtime, the orchestrator is responsible for instantiating the corresponding 
artifact processor and hand over the workflow to it.




artifact_types: 

  tosca.artifacts.Implementation.BPMN:

derived_from: tosca.artifacts.Implementation

description: Script artifact for the BPMN workflow

mime_type: application/bpmn+xml

file_ext: [ bpmn ]  



topology_template:

  workflows:

update:

  description: A BPMN workflow to update the network service

  delegate: plan/update.bpmn




This approach is similar to the plan defined in TOSCA V1.0




＜Plans＞ 

＜Plan id="UpdateApplication" 

planType="http://www.example.com/UpdatePlan"; 

planLanguage="http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/20100524/MODEL"＞ 

  ＜PlanModelReference reference="plans:UpdateApp"/＞ 

   ＜/Plan＞ 

＜/Plans＞ 




Given the intention of this proposal which is detailed described above, I don't 
understand why you keep pushing it back .





Thanks,

Huabing



Original Mail



Sender:  ＜mich...@gigaspaces.com＞
To: zhaohuabing10201488
CC:  ＜a...@gigaspaces.com＞ ＜onap-discuss@lists.onap.org＞ 
＜onap-...@lists.onap.org＞
Date: 2017/05/10 21:03
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] TOSCA BPMN support proposal at 
OASISTOSCA WG






Huabing,
I recognize the need in ONAP to support delegation in TOSCA to external 
workflow engines. I have said this repeatedly, and still am miss-interpreted.
This has nothing to do with backward compatibility to TOSCA 1.0, it only has to 
do with supporting "facts on the ground/existing implementations". We should 
get this agreed once for all, and it became obvious in ONAP's Friday modeling 
discussion.

It also became clear that some of these "facts-on-the-ground" use TOSCA in a 
limited way. This is OK, and I have no issue with that. I can support in TOSCA 
TC to find the right mechanism to delegate externally, but only if we do it in 
a way that is complete: that means we need to not only specify how to "get out 
of TOSCA" but also has to include how to "get back to TOSCA", and "what is the 
TOSCA orchestrator supposed to do after it delegates externally". I suggest we 
work jointly to resolve these issues.

Further, your claim that I am the only one opposing the half-way solution on 
the table is incorrect, and you know it. Luc Boutier in the TOSCA TC is also 
vehemently opposed, and partly at least for the same reasons as those quoted by 
me.

It would be great if we stop making unfounded claims in one community, by 
quoting only partially what happens in another community, and it would be 
better to focus joint energy to resolve the issue in a consistent and complete 
technical manner in the TOSCA TC. Please realize that you absolutely CANNOT 
resolve TOSCA TC dis

[onap-discuss] Modeling teleconf

[denghui (L)]

Hello all,

Some people told me that they have received invite, so forward to here , we are 
going to start in 1 minute

Sorry for private email group, will forward to public next time.

Thanks

DENG Hui

详情 
>

ONAP Models Zoom Meeting
Hi there,
ONAP MODEL is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.
Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: 
https://zoom.us/j/9117271979
Or iPhone one-tap (US Toll): +16465588656,9117271979# or 
+14086380968,9117271979#
Or Telephone:
Dial: +1 646 558 8656 (US Toll) or +1 408 638 0968 (US Toll)
Meeting ID: 911 727 1979
International numbers available: 
https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=gOYfuD6bgjKCKALU45taWVbpR4FYRl5S







参加？   
是
 - 
不确定
 - 
否
更多选项 
>
来自 Google 日历的邀请
由于您是该活动的参加者，所以您会通过 denghu...@huawei.com 帐号收到此邮件。
要停止接收有关此活动的后续更新，请拒绝此活动。另外，您可以在https://www.google.com/calendar/注册一个Google帐号并控制所有针对日历的通知设置。
转发此邀请后，任何收件人都可以修改您的回复。了解详情。






BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20170510T133000Z
DTEND:20170510T143000Z
DTSTAMP:20170510T020148Z
ORGANIZER;CN=chl.wan...@gmail.com:mailto:chl.wan...@gmail.com
UID:ih9s9pdloulbisefdlf8ugt...@google.com
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=ACCEPTED;RSVP=TRUE
 ;CN=chl.wan...@gmail.com;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:chl.wan...@gmail.com
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=
 TRUE;CN=wangchen...@chinamobile.com;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:wangchengli@china
 mobile.com
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=
 TRUE;CN=denghu...@huawei.com;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:denghu...@huawei.com
CLASS:PUBLIC
CREATED:20170510T020148Z
DESCRIPTION:Hi there\, \n\nONAP MODEL is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom m
 eeting. \n\nJoin from PC\, Mac\, Linux\, iOS or Android: https://zoom.us/j/
 9117271979\n\nOr iPhone one-tap (US Toll):  +16465588656\,9117271979# or +1
 4086380968\,9117271979#\n\nOr Telephone:\nDial: +1 646 558 8656 (US Tol
 l) or +1 408 638 0968 (US Toll)\nMeeting ID: 911 727 1979\nInternat
 ional numbers available: https://zoom.us/zoomconference?m=gOYfuD6bgjKCKALU4
 5taWVbpR4FYRl5S\n\n\n在 https://www.google.com/calendar/event?action=VIEW&ei
 d=aWg5czlwZGxvdWxiaXNlZmRsZjh1Z3RyYmsgZGVuZ2h1aTEyQGh1YXdlaS5jb20&tok=MjAjY
 2hsLndhbmcwOEBnbWFpbC5jb200YjIxMTEwMDQzMWViZjUzOGExOWVlZTk4ZjliNDgyNmRkMDc0
 YTVh&ctz=America/Los_Angeles&hl=zh_CN 查看您的活动。
LAST-MODIFIED:20170510T020148Z
LOCATION:https://zoom.us/j/9117271979
SEQUENCE:0
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SUMMARY:ONAP Models Zoom Meeting
TRANSP:OPAQUE
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] TOSCA BPMN support proposal at OASIS TOSCA WG

[Michael Brenner]

Huabing,

I recognize the need in ONAP to support delegation in TOSCA to external
workflow engines. I have said this repeatedly, and still am
miss-interpreted.
This has nothing to do with backward compatibility to TOSCA 1.0, it only
has to do with supporting "facts on the ground/existing implementations".
We should get this agreed once for all, and it became obvious in ONAP's
Friday modeling discussion.

It also became clear that some of these "facts-on-the-ground" use TOSCA in
a limited way. This is OK, and I have no issue with that. I can support in
TOSCA TC to find the right mechanism to delegate externally, but only if we
do it in a way that is complete: that means we need to not only specify how
to "get out of TOSCA" but also has to include how to "get back to TOSCA",
and "what is the TOSCA orchestrator supposed to do after it delegates
externally". I suggest we work jointly to resolve these issues.

Further, your claim that I am the only one opposing the half-way solution
on the table is incorrect, and you know it. Luc Boutier in the TOSCA TC is
also vehemently opposed, and partly at least for the same reasons as those
quoted by me.

It would be great if we stop making unfounded claims in one community, by
quoting only partially what happens in another community, and it would be
better to focus joint energy to resolve the issue in a consistent and
complete technical manner in the TOSCA TC. Please realize that you
absolutely CANNOT resolve TOSCA TC discussions/debates in the ONAP
community alone, and this is not the appropriate way for you to convince me
to drop my opposition in TOSCA TC.
The right way to have me support this is by resolving the technical issues
that I raised.

Best regards,
Michael

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 3:16 AM,  wrote:

> Hi Amir and all,
>
> Both OPEN-O and OpenECOMP have used TOSCA for service topology modelling
> and BPMN/BPEL for lifecycle management process modelling. After the merger,
> ONAP will inherit the existing codes from OPEN-O and OpenECOMP and continue
> to use BPMN/BPEL in SO/VF-C.
>
> However, I noticed that TOSCA has removed the support for BPMN/BPEL in
> v1.1[1] which is recommended in the Topology and Orchestration
> Specification for Cloud Applications Version 1.0[2].
>
> This incompatible change of TOSCA specification may cause unpredictable
> effects to existing opensource projects, in particular, the ONAP, which
> have already adopted BPMN as its lifecycle management process modelling.
>
> To harmonize the opensource and standards, I am co-proposing a proposal[3]
> with Lingli(CMCC), Claude(AT&T) and Shitaoto(Huawei) to suggest OASIS TOSCA
> revert standard workflow DSLs support such as BPMN/BPEL in the next version
> of simple YAML specification.
>
> The proposal has been discussed in the OASIS TOSCA for a couple of weeks
> and most of the members agreed on it except the strong pushback from
> Michael of Gigaspaces.
>
> I think this proposal is for the best interest of ONAP community, so I'm
> writing this mail to solicit supports from Gigaspaces and all the other
> community members who are both in ONAP and OASIS TOSCA WG.
>
>
> [1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-
> YAML/v1.1/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.1.html
>
> [2] http://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/TOSCA/v1.0/TOSCA-v1.0.html
>
> [3] https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tosca/
> download.php/60604/Issue_TOSCA318_Lack%20of%20BPMN%
> 20BPEL%20support-v-2017-04-25.pptx
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Huabing
>
>
>
> ___
> onap-discuss mailing list
> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
>
>


-- 
Michael Brenner, Chief Architect NFV
--
M: +1-732-895-5772 http://getcloudify.org

@cloudifysource





___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [modeling] TOSCA BPMN support proposal at OASIS TOSCA WG

[zhao.huabing]

Hi Amir and all,


Both OPEN-O and OpenECOMP have used TOSCA for service topology modelling and 
BPMN/BPEL for lifecycle management process modelling. After the merger, ONAP 
will inherit the existing codes from OPEN-O and OpenECOMP and continue to use 
BPMN/BPEL in SO/VF-C.


However, I noticed that TOSCA has removed the support for BPMN/BPEL in v1.1[1] 
which is recommended in the Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud 
Applications Version 1.0[2].   


This incompatible change of TOSCA specification may cause unpredictable effects 
to existing opensource projects, in particular, the ONAP, which have already 
adopted BPMN as its lifecycle management process modelling.


To harmonize the opensource and standards, I am co-proposing a proposal[3] with 
Lingli(CMCC), Claude(AT&T) and Shitaoto(Huawei) to suggest OASIS TOSCA revert 
standard workflow DSLs support such as BPMN/BPEL in the next version of simple 
YAML specification. 


The proposal has been discussed in the OASIS TOSCA for a couple of weeks and 
most of the members agreed on it except the strong pushback from Michael of 
Gigaspaces.


I think this proposal is for the best interest of ONAP community, so I'm 
writing this mail to solicit supports from Gigaspaces and all the other 
community members who are both in ONAP and OASIS TOSCA WG.






[1] 
http://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML/v1.1/TOSCA-Simple-Profile-YAML-v1.1.html


[2] http://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/TOSCA/v1.0/TOSCA-v1.0.html


[3] 
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/tosca/download.php/60604/Issue_TOSCA318_Lack%20of%20BPMN%20BPEL%20support-v-2017-04-25.pptx






Thanks,


Huabing___
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

[onap-discuss] [Modeling] May 5th agenda for Modelling

[denghui (L)]

Hello all

We have updated our program for next week Friday, since only have half day 
session in the morning before noon, we probably will start early.
Meeting room (TBD)

1)  Tosca (Shitao)

1.1   Tosca and Tosca NFV introduction (Shitao)

1.2   ECOMP workflow

1.3   OPENO workflow (ZTE)

2)  Parser (Rittwik)

2.1 Tosca Parser (Rittwik)

2.2 YANG Parser (Cisco)

2.3 Heat-Tosca translator (ZTE)
3)  Modeling (Deng Hui)
  3.1 Modeling project discussion
  3.2 Opendpeloyment

Thanks for your checking

DENG Hui
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: