RE: [ozmidwifery] Strep B

2007-01-08 Thread Roberta Quinn
Hi Jassy,
 
I don't know from a midwive's point-of-view but I'm 32 weeks pregnant and
have decided against the test. Like you, I first made the decision against
antibiotics and then made the decision not to have the test. My decision was
also swayed by a friend living in the UK who tells me it's not a routine
test there like it is here, which I find so interesting. My midwife and I
will simply monitor my baby closely for any signs of ill-health, which some
have argued to me is what we should do anyway and not rely on antibiotics as
a cure-all.
 
Good luck with your decision.
 
From Roberta.

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of nunyara
Sent: Tuesday, 9 January 2007 10:49 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Strep B



Hi all,

 

I know info on this topic has been posted before but I deleted it all -
silly me as I now wish to ask some questions which have probably already
been covered.

 

I am 34 weeks pregnant and was not going to have the STREP B test but I have
done some further research and it suggests that all women SHOULD be tested
but antibiotics used during labour for a positive result may not be the way
to go. 

 

To all the midwife's on this forum: is it necessary for me to have this
test? Is it in my and my babies best interest to do this?

 

If I tested positive (which I didn't with my first child, in fact I don't
even remember having the test) is the intravenous antibiotic really
necessary? I do not want this as I plan to have a water birth and I am also
highly allergic to penicillan and other forms of backup antibiotics. 

 

I will raise this at my midwife appointment I am due for this week I would
just like some opinions.

 

Kind Regards

Jassy



[ozmidwifery] An Epidemic of Diagnoses

2007-01-04 Thread Roberta Quinn
This article doesn't specifically mention pregnancy and birth, but the
concepts could be easily applied. I thought you might be interested esp.
this line: You can't be a victim of medical error if you are not in the
system!

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/02/health/02essa.html?ex=1168578000en=7c2783
399f526e72ei=5070emc=eta1
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] 13 pound baby born in Tasmania.

2006-12-01 Thread Roberta Quinn
Wow! What a story for them to tell for years to come :)

But: I did have an epidural but apart from that it was naturally... Does
that sentence/logic even make sense?!

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lara
Sent: Friday, 1 December 2006 6:29 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] 13 pound baby born in Tasmania.

Just wondering if you've seen this? A 13 pound baby was born in Tasmania
today.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200612/s1802380.htm
Vaginal delivery, with epidural.

Maybe this should be printed out and sent to all the HCPs who recommend C
section for presumed macrosomia ...

Lara
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs

2006-11-18 Thread Roberta Quinn
I don't think anyone really understands what the baby bonus is for! Not even
the government... as is proven by the latest change in policy.

  _  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifairy
Sent: Saturday, 18 November 2006 8:42 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] homebirth costs


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 

Hi Barb,



I think it's wonderful that you had such an amazing birth and wish for all
women to have such an experience. From my understanding, many Sydney
midwives ask their clients to come to them not vice versa. So a lot of their
care is not midwifery care at home, rather it is out of their home until the
final weeks. I'm not sure about all midwives, but this seems more common
place now in Sydney.



  

And, you get paid $4000 to have a child these days.  Midwifery care at 

home?  It's a bargain.





I find it very interesting that people see you get paid to have a baby. I
was under the impression that the baby bonus was given to help mums to be
able to afford to stay home longer from work, or upgrade their car if they
need more space, or buy car seats, slings, good food for nourishment while
breastfeeding etc. The only women I know that can afford to spend that whole
$4000 on midwifery care are the women that didn't need that money in the
first place. The women that choose to spend the whole amount even though
they can't afford it, because they have no other choice in Sydney, have no
benefits from the baby bonus for living expenses with a newborn. There is no
bargain if you can't afford it.



I understand the value of midwives and continuity of care and midwifery care
at home, but why should women in Sydney and NSW be paying that much more??
Nobody has answered that question. I'm not questioning the value of
midwifery care, more why Sydney midwifery care is so much more 'valuable' in
the dollars and sense kind of way?



Love Abby xo

--

This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.

Visit  http://www.acegraphics.com.au http://www.acegraphics.com.au to
subscribe or unsubscribe.





  

The real question as far as Im concerned ( yes I have a 'vested interest'
as a midwife, which I guess is slightly different to the vested interest I
had when I was a consumer of homebirth midwifery services) is why are women
being made to pay out of their own pockets at all just because they choose
to birth at home? If women had to pay up-front for obstetric services, ie
they were not provided 'free' by the public health system nor were rebatable
by the majority of private health insurance companies, then this
conversation might have some balance to it. 
I think some of the answers to the question of differences in charges of
homebirth midwifery services is more about supply and demand, cost of living
in different geographical areas, the fact as Mary has stated that midwifery
service is traditionally undervalued not just within the profession but by
other health professionals and consumers alike.and we are meant to be
seen as 'caring' and how caring can you be when you actually charge what
your service is worth, when you want to provide care to women whether they
can afford it or not, regardless of their financial situation, when the
midwife in the next suburb or state charges significantly differently
because she has different financial needs or different ways of practice or
. 
Please just take into account that every single independently practising
midwife I know has worked for no or very little pay, sometimes by choice
because we dont want to turn away a woman desperate for a homebirth, or
because we've had a client who either didnt pay or didnt pay the agreed
amount. Please also take into account that every single homebirth a midwife
attends is a major financial risk in terms of the lack of PI insurance - we
can be sued by anyone at any time with no recourse to any sort of support,
and yes we all want to believe this doesnt happen but it does actually,
enough that a significant number of midwives stopped practicing
independantly after the PII was no longer available. 
Rather than asking why are women in NSW paying more, the question should be
why are women in other states paying less? And why are they being made to
pay at all, when homebirth is provided free in some very specific areas and
obstetric care is 'free' everywhere?


-- 


Jennifairy Gillett RM 

Midwife in Private Practice 

Women's Health Teaching Associate 

ITShare volunteer - Santos Project Co-ordinator 
ITShare SA Inc - http://itshare.org.au/ 
ITShare SA provides computer systems to individuals  groups, created from
donated hardware and opensource software 



RE: [ozmidwifery] my letter to 60 minutes

2006-10-22 Thread Roberta Quinn



Well done Pinky. I hope it gets read out next week! Surely 
people with half a brain can see that AP is not "socially negligent", 
"obsessive" and "lacks common sense". In fact, those words better 
describesuch asilly segment!


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pinky 
McKaySent: Monday, 23 October 2006 7:12 AMTo: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: [ozmidwifery] my letter to 60 
minutes


My letter to sixty minutes

I could have written an encyclopedia on that 
segment but figure they will only read short ones - well done 
Janet.

Pinky
www.pinky-mychild.com


Why do we need to label parenting styles? Or to 
offer such exteme definitions? 

This is about as much attachment parenting as 
saying that people who are environmentally conscious must grow all their own 
food, make all their own clothes, build their own homes, and live in 
isolation.

Attachmentisn't 
about what kind of nappies parents use (or dont!), and it doesnt require both 
parents to give up their day jobs, nor does it require adults to 'earn' 
children's respect or never say 'no'. 

Surely all people deserve to be treated with 
respect -including children. We CAN have happy, creative children AND 
encourage mutual respect however long we choose to breastfeedor share 
sleep witb our children or whether we send them to school or not.




RE: [ozmidwifery] I need to vent!!!

2006-10-19 Thread Roberta Quinn



What was said on "Life at 1"?


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barbara Glare 
 Chris BrightSent: Friday, 20 October 2006 5:07 AMTo: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery] I need to 
vent!!!

HI,

They won't have free rein if we all (mothers and 
health professionals COMPLAIN) It amazes me that amidst the ocean of media 
report about healthy eating and obesity, the importance of breastfeeding is 
ignored, or ridiculed on television as it was on "Sunrise" yesterday morning 
(and probably will be on 60 minutes on the weekend) or crucified like it was on 
"Life at One" last week. 

The media needs to lift it's act, and they will 
only do so when they get the message from US. 
Yesterday morning "Sunrise" did an article on David 
Suzuki, talking about in 1992 more than 1/2 of the world's scientific Nobel 
Laureats wrote an open letter warning of the damage to the enviromnment. 
No media outlet in the world ran the story.
Then Sunrise spoke about a poll they were 
running. Breast v. bottle, and the announcer tut-tutting about how 
breastfeeding was a personal choice and women shouldn't be judgemental of each 
other. Excuse me! they had just set it up!

Breastfeeding is not a choice like wearing your 
blue top or your red top tonight. And getting information to women and 
health professionals has nothing at all to do with guilt - the usual excuse used 
by the media to ( and promoted by the formula companies to ultimately promote 
their wares) Anyway, as to complaining

Write to your member of Parliament asking him to 
write to/forward on the material you send to Tony Abbott, Minister for 
Health. This way you kill 2 birds with the one stone. You educate 
your local MP and Let Tony Abbott know that health professionals and mothers of 
Australia are NOT HAPPY

Also, write to the APMAIF panel, enclosing any 
brochures etc that you have. Don't worry about whether it is technically a 
breech of the agreement. If it is enough to offend you as a mother or a 
health professional, send it in - let them know how you feel!

APMAIF SecretariatDepartment of Health and AgeingMail Drop Point 
15GPO Box 9848ACT 2601
While you are at it, you could complain to the 
Victorian Office of Children about their decision to keep having their Maternal 
and child health nurses educated by Wyeth. You could write to the CEO Gill 
Callister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And send a copy to Minister Sheryl Garbutt at the 
same time.

Warm Regards,
Barb

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  jesse/jayne 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 10:35 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] I need to 
  vent!!!
  
  Arethe formula companies really giving 
  infant FORUMULA samples to pregnant women here? Are they breeching the 
  WHO Code so blatantly here? I thought it was fairly well regulated - 
  unlike many other countries. If it does happen at the Expo, you should 
  report them to the ABA for further action.
  
  Unfortunately they have free reign with that 
  toddler milk crap in a can/drink dispensing machine whatever.
  
  Jayne
  
  
  
  - Original Message - 
  
From: 
Janet 
Fraser 
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 10:06 
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] I need to 
vent!!!

Writing a complaint letter about 
inappropriate advertising of artificial baby "milk" might help you channel 
this rage. I HATE those stalls with a passion. You know that expo is really 
the Prams'n'Formula Expo, don't you? You'll also see lots of drug companies 
giving unbiassed (snort) show bags to pregnant women and even better, 
FORMULA companies giving SAMPLES and show bags to PREGNANT WOMEN. How's that 
for totally unethical, hey?!
J

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kelly 
  @ BellyBelly 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:51 
  PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] I need to 
  vent!!!
  
  
  Im going to be at the 
  Melbourne Pregnancy, Babies and Childrens Expo in Melbourne starting 
  tomorrow, and who else is my stand next to but. Karicare! I felt so angry 
  the whole time setting up today - I have a really bad feeling they are 
  going to be giving out toddler milk samples, ready to drink  on the stand 
  they have one of those drink dispensing machines with the clear plastic 
  tops with a mixer inside it, you know like when you go to those ice-cream 
  shops and they have slushies or juice in them swishing around? GrRRrrRrr! 
  I hope I am wrong but they always hand out samples anyway. The marketing 
  plastered all over the massive stand just infuriates me... for mums who 
  nutrition is important to them! Its firing me up and I am not even there 
  yet!!! I dont want to even look at them 
  tomorrow
  
  

RE: [ozmidwifery] Karicare formula Ad

2006-10-03 Thread Roberta Quinn



A 
good verdict, but I find it interesting that the summary notes: 
It should be noted that the complainant is the Womens Health Action 
Trust breastfeeding advocate... Two other 
almost identical complaints from breastfeeding advocators opposed to the use of 
infant formulas were subsequently received.
Why 
should that be noted?!!! Silly.





From: 
owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
[mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of Barbara Glare  
Chris BrightSent: Tuesday, 3 October 2006 8:25 
AMTo: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au; 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ozmidwifery] Karicare formula 
Ad


Hi,



The offensive Karicare Formula ad 
(mother bear - I don't want to give my baby the milk of another species so I 
gave him Karicare Toddler formula) has been banned in New Zealand. See 
the ruling at http://203.152.114.11/decisions/06/06290.rtf



Currently the "Parents Jury" is 
running a poll on it. You can vote at http://www.parentsjury.org.au/

You need to register first, (I think 
it's the top right hand corner) 



It's worth letting it be know that 
neither parents nor health professionals apreciate this sort of misleading 
advertising.



Barb GlareMum of Zac, 12, Daniel, 10, Cassie 7  Guan 
3Counsellor, Warrnambool Vic[EMAIL PROTECTED]



**



Ph (03) 5565 8602Director, 
Australian Breastfeeding AssociationMothers Directwww.mothersdirect.com.au


RE: [ozmidwifery] agonising pain described by Vic govt

2006-09-22 Thread Roberta Quinn



My GP told mea similar thing when I said I was 
planning a homebirth. First, he wrote in my notes that I wanted to try 
for a homebirth. Then he told me that while homebirth has become very trendy 
these days and lots of women would like to think they can have a homebirth, that 
I should realise that 10% of women who give birth in the wild die! Luckily he 
retired the following week before any more women had to hear his ignorant 
dribble.

As for the original paragraph... oh my, it is so 
wrong on so many levels!!


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Janet 
FraserSent: Friday, 22 September 2006 6:27 PMTo: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery] agonising 
pain described by Vic govt

I wonder what idiot wrote that? I'm 
still stuck on the idea that NCB is "popular" these days. Where is that? Let me 
go there immediately!
*shaking head*
J

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  diane 
  
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 7:09 
  PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] agonising pain 
  described by Vic govt 
  
  OMG, check this out 
  


  
Childbirth - pain relief options
  

   
The current popularity of natural childbirth can make some pregnant 
women believe that using pain-relieving drugs during labour is weak or 
a sign of failure. However, childbirth is one of the most painful 
experiences the human body can ever have. Some women are lucky and have 
relatively short, easy labours, while others experience long, agonising 
ordeals. If you planned for a natural birth but find the labour pains 
overwhelming, dont be reluctant to ask for pain relief. Childbirth 
isnt a moral or political judgement of your performance - the aim is 
simply to bring your baby into the world. 
  

  
  
  
  http://www.disability.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Childbirth_pain_relief_options?OpenDocument


[ozmidwifery] Doppler u/s

2006-09-22 Thread Roberta Quinn



Can 
anyone tell me the difference between a hand-held doppler and a visual 
ultrasound macine? Is a hand-held doppler a lesser 
evil?


RE: [ozmidwifery] Use of ultrasound routinely to check for breech position!!!!!

2006-08-09 Thread Roberta Quinn



Most (all?) OBs like to deliver breech births via 
c-section.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sazz 
EatonSent: Wednesday, 9 August 2006 3:51 PMTo: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Use of 
ultrasound routinely to check for breech position!
I'm curious, what are the supposed reasons it is 
necessary to know whether or not the baby is going to be breech? I thought 
breech was just another position, but still birth like the rest of it?(Part 
of me suspects the desire to find out whether a baby is breech is because the 
medical profession is keen to pathologise yet another element of wimmin's 
reproductive experiences as "abnormal" and in need of medical 
attention).My only knowledge about breech does come from Sarah Buckley's 
book, so I have been coloured by her experience and I don't think she knew her 
fourth was breech, or that it was seen as a problem?Can OzMid. wimmin 
enlighten me?Cheers,Sazz


RE: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread Roberta Quinn
Title: Re: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff



From: Susan 
Cudlipp
"The reply was 'I DONT CARE- I WANT TO BE INDUCED' How can the 
ob refuse in this instance?"

In my experience, many women don't understand 
that being induced can result in a very different birthing experience for 
themselves and their babies. Perhaps rather than simply being told yes or no, a 
woman would change her mind about wanting to be induced (or the way she is 
induced)if she hadall the facts.

I also think "due 
dates" (particularly the dates calculated at early ultrasounds) can have a 
hugely negative psychological effect on a woman's willingness to wait for labour 
to start spontaneously.

From: Justine 
Canes
"It is not until we have a full complement of 
choice from homebirth to elec c/s can we say that women are really making a 
choice."

And that women are fully informedwhen 
making those choices.


RE: [ozmidwifery] ctg stuff

2006-06-17 Thread Roberta Quinn
On the contrary, very well said.

-Original Message-
From: Andrea Robertson

This is a tricky area - informed choice is really a myth, as so many
vested interests come into play, but we must support women once they have
made a considered decision. To do less would be to undermine her further and
to miss the opportunity for learning, even of some of those lessons are
unpalatable at the time.

Not really expressing this well this morning.

Regards

Andrea
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] How long before synto is used?

2006-06-16 Thread Roberta Quinn
That birthing experiences vary so drastically as a result of individual
staff is reason to advocate for returning the power and control of birth to
birthing women. This, not policy, will help ensure that all women and babies
have the best chance for a truly great birth.

But it's institutions as well as individual staff that influence women's
birthing experiences since each hospital has its own culture that filters
through to the individuals working within it.


At 12:19 PM +1000 17/6/06, Janet Fraser wrote:
So there are hospitals around where it is possible.

I think in most cases it's that there are individual staff, nothing to 
do with the institutions. Some women have great births in some 
hospitals and for others the same place is a bloodbath. It's the staff 
you fluke on the day that have the biggest impact on your experience.
J
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.