RE: PESO - The Protestor
I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because I'm curious to see where it's going. Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally closely related to both. Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an excellent read. The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest paper someone announces another candidate. I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it was. The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. Can I have my surprise now? B > -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C > Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > > Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what > you find. > > Alan C > > -Original Message- > From: knarf > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > > I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I suppose it > would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific feeling. > My opinion really doesn't mean much. > > Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of > opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is not an > area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. > > Cheers, > > frank > > On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C wrote: > >You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. > >"Genetically > >we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans" - which, in > >your opinion is closest to humans? Do you have an opinion as to who the > >common ancestor may have been. "I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm > >being cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a conclusion, or > >tying to trap me in some way" - not really, I'm trying to establish a > >common base so we can further our discourse. > > > >Alan C > > > >-Original Message- > >From: knarf > >Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:10 PM > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > > > >I don't understand your question. We don't have any "living ancestors" > >in > >evolutionary terms. > > > >As I said earlier, we're great apes, so genetically we're close to > >chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. But they aren't ancestors or > >somehow "below" us. We share a common ancestor and each species has > >evolved differently to where we are today. > > > >I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being cross-examined here, as if > > > >you're moving toward a conclusion, or tying to trap me in some way. > > > >Could we get to the point please? > > > >Thanks, > > > >frank > > > >On November 25, 2015 11:08:57 AM EST, Alan C wrote: > >>Which are our closest living ancestors or perhaps those most like us? > >> > >>Alan C > >> > >>-Original Message- > >>From: knarf > >>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 4:57 PM > >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > >> > >>I'm not sure exactly what you mean, however humans are animals, great > >>apes to be exact, and like every other animal on the face of the > >>earth, we have evolved from ancestors to our current form. > >> > >>Cheers, > >> > >>frank > >> > >> > >> > >>On November 25, 2015 9:41:37 AM EST, Alan C wrote: > >>>Do you consider humans to be part of the evolutionary scale? > >>> > >>>Alan C -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
You wouldn't by chance be trying to lead me to the following site: http://www.evolutionnews.org/2011/06/following_the_evidence_where_i047161.html Would you? Or possibly one like it? Just curious. Cheers, frank On November 26, 2015 12:05:55 AM EST, Alan Cwrote: >Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised >what >you find. > >Alan C > >-Original Message- >From: knarf >Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > >I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I suppose >it >would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific >feeling. >My opinion really doesn't mean much. > >Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of >opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is not >an >area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. > >Cheers, > >frank > >On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C wrote: >>You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. >>"Genetically >>we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans" - which, in >>your >>opinion is closest to humans? Do you have an opinion as to who the >>common >>ancestor may have been. "I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being >>cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a conclusion, or tying >>to >>trap me in some way" - not really, I'm trying to establish a common >>base so >>we can further our discourse. >> >>Alan C >> >>-Original Message- >>From: knarf >>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:10 PM >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >>I don't understand your question. We don't have any "living ancestors" >>in >>evolutionary terms. >> >>As I said earlier, we're great apes, so genetically we're close to >>chimps, >>bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. But they aren't ancestors or somehow >>"below" us. We share a common ancestor and each species has evolved >>differently to where we are today. >> >>I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being cross-examined here, as >if >> >>you're moving toward a conclusion, or tying to trap me in some way. >> >>Could we get to the point please? >> >>Thanks, >> >>frank >> >>On November 25, 2015 11:08:57 AM EST, Alan C wrote: >>>Which are our closest living ancestors or perhaps those most like us? >>> >>>Alan C >>> >>>-Original Message- >>>From: knarf >>>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 4:57 PM >>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >>> >>>I'm not sure exactly what you mean, however humans are animals, great >>>apes >>>to be exact, and like every other animal on the face of the earth, we >>>have >>>evolved from ancestors to our current form. >>> >>>Cheers, >>> >>>frank >>> >>> >>> >>>On November 25, 2015 9:41:37 AM EST, Alan C wrote: Do you consider humans to be part of the evolutionary scale? Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 2:28 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor We were talking about protesters and anti-fur, but you correctly surmise that I am sympathetic to their cause. And yes, many of the >protesters we met on Sunday are vegans, some of whom we've met at vegan events. We've discussed my dietary veganism before, and while there are no "rules", ethical vegans normally take the position that it is wrong to >exploit animals. For that reason we do not knowingly consume animal >products, and that extends beyond diet. I do not want to use any product that came from an animal: that includes leather, wool, silk, etc. It gets tricky >>because some glues have animal products. Some beer has fish - derived isinglas >(a foaming agent). Sometimes one really has to research to make sure >>they are not unwittingly exploiting animals. As for my shoes, I mostly wear canvas running shoes (Converse Chuck Taylor's to be exact) and my dress shoes are synthetic that have the look >(but not cruelty) of leather. Thanks for asking. And by "native" we were referring to North America's First Nations people , the descendants of those who greeted the first Europeans when they arrived here. We used to call them "Indians" because many early explorers >>were geographically challenged. That term is no longer used as we now reserve it for those who are actually from the country India. Cheers, frank On November 25, 2015 2:36:11 AM EST, Alan C wrote: >What about your leather shoes? And what is a native? > >Alan C > >-Original Message- >From: knarf >Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 7:49 AM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Re: PESO - The Protestor
Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because I'm curious to see where it's going. Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally closely related to both. Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an excellent read. The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest paper someone announces another candidate. I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it was. The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. Can I have my surprise now? B -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail ListSubject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what you find. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I suppose it would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific feeling. My opinion really doesn't mean much. Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is not an area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. Cheers, frank On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C wrote: >You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. >"Genetically >we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans" - which, in >your opinion is closest to humans? Do you have an opinion as to who the >common ancestor may have been. "I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm >being cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a conclusion, or >tying to trap me in some way" - not really, I'm trying to establish a >common base so we can further our discourse. > >Alan C > >-Original Message- >From: knarf >Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:10 PM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > >I don't understand your question. We don't have any "living ancestors" >in >evolutionary terms. > >As I said earlier, we're great apes, so genetically we're close to >chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. But they aren't ancestors or >somehow "below" us. We share a common ancestor and each species has >evolved differently to where we are today. > >I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being cross-examined here, as if > >you're moving toward a conclusion, or tying to trap me in some way. > >Could we get to the point please? > >Thanks, > >frank > >On November 25, 2015 11:08:57 AM EST, Alan C wrote: >>Which are our closest living ancestors or perhaps those most like us? >> >>Alan C >> >>-Original Message- >>From: knarf >>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 4:57 PM >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >>I'm not sure exactly what you mean, however humans are animals, great >>apes to be exact, and like every other animal on the face of the >>earth, we have evolved from ancestors to our current form. >> >>Cheers, >> >>frank >> >> >> >>On November 25, 2015 9:41:37 AM EST, Alan C wrote: >>>Do you consider humans to be part of the evolutionary scale? >>> >>>Alan C -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
Re: dos Pesos - one for Frank one for Paul Sorenson
Coyote? J Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 25, 2015, at 10:39 PM, ann sanfedelewrote: > > Two from1992 LX & Kodachrome > > Frank - > here is a friend I made along the Haines Highway in the Yukon > https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-GcTkPBJ/A > > Paul - > The Robert Service cabin in Dawson.. > https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-f6MxHC5/A > > Now I'm sorry I didn't work it more ... > > ann > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
That won't do my gout any good. B > On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan Cwrote: > > Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. > > Alan C > > > -Original Message- From: Bob W > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' > Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor > > I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because > I'm curious to see where it's going. > > Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since > common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally > closely related to both. > > Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third > Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and > talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now > so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an > excellent read. > > The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does > not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but > discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest > paper someone announces another candidate. > > I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. > There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations > happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found > of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but > we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it > was. > > The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and > Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that > somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be > unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about > 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't > even hazard a guess. > > Can I have my surprise now? > > B > > >> -Original Message- >> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C >> Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >> Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what >> you find. >> >> Alan C >> >> -Original Message- >> From: knarf >> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >> I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I suppose it >> would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific > feeling. >> My opinion really doesn't mean much. >> >> Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of >> opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is not an >> area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. >> >> Cheers, >> >> frank >> >> On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C wrote: >> >You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. >> >"Genetically >> >we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans" - which, in >> >your opinion is closest to humans? Do you have an opinion as to who the >> >common ancestor may have been. "I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm >> >being cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a conclusion, or >> >tying to trap me in some way" - not really, I'm trying to establish a >> >common base so we can further our discourse. >> > >> >Alan C >> > >> >-Original Message- >> >From: knarf >> >Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:10 PM >> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> > >> >I don't understand your question. We don't have any "living ancestors" >> >in >> >evolutionary terms. >> > >> >As I said earlier, we're great apes, so genetically we're close to >> >chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. But they aren't ancestors or >> >somehow "below" us. We share a common ancestor and each species has >> >evolved differently to where we are today. >> > >> >I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being cross-examined here, as if >> > >> >you're moving toward a conclusion, or tying to trap me in some way. >> > >> >Could we get to the point please? >> > >> >Thanks, >> > >> >frank >> > >> >On November 25, 2015 11:08:57 AM EST, Alan C wrote: >> >>Which are our closest living ancestors or perhaps those most like us? >> >> >> >>Alan C >> >> >> >>-Original Message- >> >>From: knarf >> >>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 4:57 PM >> >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >>Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >> >> >>I'm not sure exactly what you mean, however humans are animals, great >> >>apes to be exact, and like every other animal on the face of the >> >>earth, we have evolved from ancestors to our current form. >> >> >> >>Cheers, >> >> >>
Re: dos Pesos - one for Frank one for Paul Sorenson
There may be more there, but I love this cabin shot! J Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 25, 2015, at 10:39 PM, ann sanfedelewrote: > > Two from1992 LX & Kodachrome > > Frank - > here is a friend I made along the Haines Highway in the Yukon > https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-GcTkPBJ/A > > Paul - > The Robert Service cabin in Dawson.. > https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-f6MxHC5/A > > Now I'm sorry I didn't work it more ... > > ann > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea instead. It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans share about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population groups too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still to be unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it all wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor That won't do my gout any good. B On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan Cwrote: Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because I'm curious to see where it's going. Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally closely related to both. Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an excellent read. The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest paper someone announces another candidate. I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it was. The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. Can I have my surprise now? B -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what you find. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I suppose it would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific feeling. My opinion really doesn't mean much. Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is not an area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. Cheers, frank On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C wrote: >You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. >"Genetically >we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans" - which, in >your opinion is closest to humans? Do you have an opinion as to who the >common ancestor may have been. "I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm >being cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a conclusion, or >tying to trap me in some way" - not really, I'm trying to establish a >common base so we can further our discourse. > >Alan C > >-Original Message- >From: knarf >Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:10 PM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > >I don't understand your question. We don't have any "living ancestors" >in >evolutionary terms. > >As I said earlier, we're great apes, so genetically we're close to >chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. But they aren't ancestors or >somehow "below" us. We share a common ancestor and each species has >evolved differently to where we are today. > >I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being cross-examined here, as if > >you're moving toward a conclusion, or tying to trap me in some way. > >Could we get to the point please? > >Thanks, > >frank > >On November 25, 2015 11:08:57 AM EST, Alan C wrote: >>Which are our closest living ancestors or perhaps those most like us? >> >>Alan C >> >>-Original Message- >>From: knarf >>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 4:57 PM >>To:
Re: PESO - The Protestor
The key to what? Cheers, frank On November 26, 2015 7:58:51 AM EST, Alan Cwrote: >Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea >instead. > >It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans >share >about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population >groups >too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still >to be >unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it all > >wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! > >Alan C > >-Original Message- >From: Bob W-PDML >Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > >That won't do my gout any good. > >B > >> On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: >> >> Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. >> >> Alan C >> >> >> -Original Message- From: Bob W >> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM >> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' >> Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor >> >> I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this >because >> I'm curious to see where it's going. >> >> Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. >Since >> common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are >equally >> closely related to both. >> >> Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the > >> Third >> Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great >apes, >> and >> talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old >book now >> so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is >still >> an >> excellent read. >> >> The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps >does >> not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but >> discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the > >> latest >> paper someone announces another candidate. >> >> I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The >One. >> There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations >> happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are > >> found >> of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other >candidates, >> but >> we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of >creature it >> was. >> >> The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and >> Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories >that >> somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would >be >> unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines >for >> about >> 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I >> wouldn't >> even hazard a guess. >> >> Can I have my surprise now? >> >> B >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C >>> Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >>> >>> Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be >surprised >>> what >>> you find. >>> >>> Alan C >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: knarf >>> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >>> >>> I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I >suppose it >>> would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific >> feeling. >>> My opinion really doesn't mean much. >>> >>> Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter >of >>> opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is >not an >>> area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> frank >>> >>> On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C >wrote: >>> >You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. >>> >"Genetically >>> >we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans" - which, >in >>> >your opinion is closest to humans? Do you have an opinion as to who >the >>> >common ancestor may have been. "I have to say, I rather feel as if >I'm >>> >being cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a conclusion, >or >>> >tying to trap me in some way" - not really, I'm trying to establish >a >>> >common base so we can further our discourse. >>> > >>> >Alan C >>> > >>> >-Original Message- >>> >From: knarf >>> >Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:10 PM >>> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> >Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >>> > >>> >I don't understand your question. We don't have any "living >ancestors" >>> >in >>> >evolutionary terms. >>> > >>> >As I said earlier, we're great apes, so genetically we're close to >>> >chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. But they aren't ancestors >or >>> >somehow "below" us. We share a common ancestor and each species
OT: another "lost" photographer on exhibit...
Actually, this is a bit more ON topic than some of the recent exchanges! (-; So anyway, the NY Times today has an interesting article on Lee Miller, a woman who started as a fashion model in the 1920-30s, then became a photographer. Wartime photographer from London. Documented D-Day, the concentration camps, and much in between. The article has a reference to an on-going exhibit of her work at the Imperial War Museum/London. http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=InCMR7g4BCKC2wiZPkcVUsCgjL/OB2Oq_id=58905b9799479c6b6bf7ec697774f125_type=eta_id=1448547689474409_id=0 Happy Thanksgiving all! stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: dos Pesos - one for Frank one for Paul Sorenson
Looks like a lovely area to spend some time with a little food, a good book, and a nice camera kit. :) On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Jack Daviswrote: > There may be more there, but I love > this cabin shot! > > J > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Nov 25, 2015, at 10:39 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: >> >> Two from1992 LX & Kodachrome >> >> Frank - >> here is a friend I made along the Haines Highway in the Yukon >> https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-GcTkPBJ/A >> >> Paul - >> The Robert Service cabin in Dawson.. >> https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-f6MxHC5/A >> >> Now I'm sorry I didn't work it more ... >> >> ann >> >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: another "lost" photographer on exhibit...
Thank you, Stan. A welcome gift. On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Stanley Halpinwrote: > Actually, this is a bit more ON topic than some of the recent exchanges! (-; > > So anyway, the NY Times today has an interesting article on Lee Miller, a > woman who started as a fashion model in the 1920-30s, then became a > photographer. Wartime photographer from London. Documented D-Day, the > concentration camps, and much in between. The article has a reference to an > on-going exhibit of her work at the Imperial War Museum/London. > > http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=InCMR7g4BCKC2wiZPkcVUsCgjL/OB2Oq_id=58905b9799479c6b6bf7ec697774f125_type=eta_id=1448547689474409_id=0 > > Happy Thanksgiving all! > > stan > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: another "lost" photographer on exhibit...
I wouldn't describe her as 'lost'. She's been very well known since the 20s/30s and an associate, often lover, of some of the greatest artists of the 20th century. She was traumatized by her experiences during the war and her son didn't find out about her life as a photographer until after her death when he was sorting out her stuff, but that was at the end of the 1970s. He published a book about her in the 1980s, which is when I first became aware of her and she has certainly been well-known since over here. I went to the exhibition earlier this month with some friends, some of whom indeed had not heard of her before, but most of whom had. It's a superb exhibition, well worth the £10- entry fee. B > -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Stanley Halpin > Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 2:42 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List> Subject: OT: another "lost" photographer on exhibit... > > Actually, this is a bit more ON topic than some of the recent exchanges! (-; > > So anyway, the NY Times today has an interesting article on Lee Miller, a > woman who started as a fashion model in the 1920-30s, then became a > photographer. Wartime photographer from London. Documented D-Day, the > concentration camps, and much in between. The article has a reference to an > on-going exhibit of her work at the Imperial War Museum/London. > > http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=InCMR7g4BCKC2wiZPkcVUsCgjL/O > B2Oq_id=58905b9799479c6b6bf7ec697774f125_type=eta_ > id=1448547689474409_id=0 > > Happy Thanksgiving all! > > stan > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
Identifying a common ancestor. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 3:15 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor The key to what? Cheers, frank On November 26, 2015 7:58:51 AM EST, Alan Cwrote: Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea instead. It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans share about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population groups too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still to be unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it all wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor That won't do my gout any good. B On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because I'm curious to see where it's going. Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally closely related to both. Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an excellent read. The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest paper someone announces another candidate. I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it was. The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. Can I have my surprise now? B -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what you find. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I suppose it would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific feeling. My opinion really doesn't mean much. Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is not an area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. Cheers, frank On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C wrote: >You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. >"Genetically >we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans" - which, in >your opinion is closest to humans? Do you have an opinion as to who the >common ancestor may have been. "I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm >being cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a conclusion, or >tying to trap me in some way" - not really, I'm trying to establish a >common base so we can further our discourse. > >Alan C > >-Original Message- >From: knarf >Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:10 PM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > >I don't understand your question. We don't have any "living ancestors" >in >evolutionary terms. > >As I said earlier, we're great apes, so genetically we're close to >chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. But they aren't ancestors or >somehow "below" us. We share a common ancestor and each species has >evolved differently to where we are today. > >I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being cross-examined here, as if > >you're moving toward a conclusion, or tying to trap me in
Re: dos Pesos - one for Frank one for Paul Sorenson
Frank showed us his Coyote friend a while back .. in the snow.. I mentioned mine to him He'll get it.. (for a minute I thought I sent the wrong link ) ann On 11/26/2015 7:16 AM, Jack Davis wrote: Coyote? J Sent from my iPhone On Nov 25, 2015, at 10:39 PM, ann sanfedelewrote: Two from1992 LX & Kodachrome Frank - here is a friend I made along the Haines Highway in the Yukon https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-GcTkPBJ/A Paul - The Robert Service cabin in Dawson.. https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-f6MxHC5/A Now I'm sorry I didn't work it more ... ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
While I find that subject to be mildly interesting, it's really of no consequence to me who our common ancestor is. It seems very important to you. Would you mind telling us why? Thanks, frank On November 26, 2015 10:28:06 AM EST, Alan Cwrote: >Identifying a common ancestor. > >Alan C > >-Original Message- >From: knarf >Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 3:15 PM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > >The key to what? > >Cheers, > >frank > >On November 26, 2015 7:58:51 AM EST, Alan C wrote: >>Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea >>instead. >> >>It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans >>share >>about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population >>groups >>too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still >>to be >>unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it >all >> >>wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! >> >>Alan C >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Bob W-PDML >>Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >>That won't do my gout any good. >> >>B >> >>> On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: >>> >>> Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. >>> >>> Alan C >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- From: Bob W >>> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM >>> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' >>> Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor >>> >>> I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this >>because >>> I'm curious to see where it's going. >>> >>> Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. >>Since >>> common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are >>equally >>> closely related to both. >>> >>> Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of >the >> >>> Third >>> Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great >>apes, >>> and >>> talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old >>book now >>> so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is >>still >>> an >>> excellent read. >>> >>> The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps >>does >>> not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but >>> discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on >the >> >>> latest >>> paper someone announces another candidate. >>> >>> I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The >>One. >>> There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations >>> happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils >are >> >>> found >>> of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other >>candidates, >>> but >>> we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of >>creature it >>> was. >>> >>> The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and >>> Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories >>that >>> somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would >>be >>> unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines >>for >>> about >>> 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I >>> wouldn't >>> even hazard a guess. >>> >>> Can I have my surprise now? >>> >>> B >>> >>> -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be >>surprised what you find. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I >>suppose it would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific >>> feeling. My opinion really doesn't mean much. Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter >>of opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is >>not an area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. Cheers, frank On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C >>wrote: >You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. >"Genetically >we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans" - which, >>in >your opinion is closest to humans? Do you have an opinion as to >who >>the >common ancestor may have been. "I have to say, I rather feel as if >>I'm >being cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a >conclusion, >>or >tying to trap me in some way" - not really,
PESO 2015 - 175 - GDG
From recently processed film … on a neighborhood walk: https://flic.kr/p/B62hrA enjoy, G --- "The fact that nobody understands you doesn't make you an artist." -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
A Thanksgiving Message
Happy Thanksgiving to the U.S. contingent and happy Thursday to the rest of us. Perhaps It’s due to my heightened emotional state, but I found this column in today’s Times deeply moving. It’s a great bit of writing as well: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/26/opinion/freeing-thanksgiving-from-my-family.html?action=click=Homepage=story-heading=opinion-c-col-right-region=opinion-c-col-right-region=opinion-c-col-right-region&_r=1 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Thanksgiving
I wish you all a happy Thanksgiving whether you celebrate the American holiday or not. I hope you will all have a good day with someone you love and with someone who loves you. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: New iMac 5K: M380 vs. M390 graphics
Get the one that's going to be easier to expand & upgrade as it gets older. On 11/25/2015 1:38 PM, Bryan Jacoby wrote: I am thinking of buying a new 27" iMac, one of the standard configurations (so I can get a discount this weekend). I'm looking at the base and middle option. The differences are: AMD M380 vs. M390 graphics 1 TB 7200 RPM HD vs. 1 TB fusion drive $200 Photo editing (lightroom) is probably the heaviest lifting the machine will do. I know that Lr can use the GPU but I haven't been able to find much information about the difference between the M380 and M390. Now that the SSD component of the fusion drive is only 24 GB I'm not sure how much of an advantage that is over the straight HD. If I get the straight HD I will almost certainly use an external Thunderbolt SSD for most things, and use the internal drive for photo + music libraries. If I get the fusion drive, maybe that will be fast enough on its own, I'm not sure. If it's not and I still end up with the external SSD boot drive, I'm wondering if the fusion drive will actually be worse for photo and music libraries since it is presumably a 5400 RPM drive. (I guess, for the price of the middle M390 + 1 TB fusion drive model + external Thunderbolt SSD, I could get the top standard configuration with M395 + 2 TB fusion drive + slightly faster processor. The 2 TB fusion drive has 128 GB of flash. I'm just not sure how that would perform compared to an SSD boot drive). Thanks for any advice. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: PESO - The Protestor
Not too keen on rooibos tea, but in the interests of cultural harmony I'll take a sip. That 70% figure is not the figure that orthodox science quotes: < http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/permanent-exhibitions/human-origins-and-cult ural-halls/Anne-and-Bernard-Spitzer-Hall-of-Human-Origins/understanding-our- past/dna-comparing-humans-and-chimps> 70% seems to be a number that some people have latched onto to try and show that there hasn't been enough time for evolution to do its dirty work. It's rather a bizarre thing to do because they seem to be trying to have their cake and eat it. In order to make the argument they have to accept that evolution works in a certain way and then show that some relatively unimportant facts (70% versus 98.whatever %) mean the whole theory is wrong. B > -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C > Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 12:59 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > > Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea instead. > > It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans share > about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population > groups too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still to > be unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it all > wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! > > Alan C > > -Original Message- > From: Bob W-PDML > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > > That won't do my gout any good. > > B > > > On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: > > > > Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. > > > > Alan C > > > > > > -Original Message- From: Bob W > > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM > > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' > > Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor > > > > I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this > > because I'm curious to see where it's going. > > > > Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since > > common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are > > equally closely related to both. > > > > Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the > > Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) > > great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's > > quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably > > outdated, but it is still an excellent read. > > > > The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps > > does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, > > but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on > > the latest paper someone announces another candidate. > > > > I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. > > There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations > > happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are > > found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other > > candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the > > type of creature it was. > > > > The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and > > Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories > > that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance > > would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the > > sidelines for about > > 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I > > wouldn't even hazard a guess. > > > > Can I have my surprise now? > > > > B > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C > >> Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > >> > >> Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised > >> what you find. > >> > >> Alan C > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: knarf > >> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > >> > >> I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I > >> suppose it would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a > >> non-scientific > > feeling. > >> My opinion really doesn't mean much. > >> > >> Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of > >> opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is > >> not an area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> frank > >> > >> On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C wrote: > >> >You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. > >> >"Genetically > >> >we're
Re: Have we slipped into an alternative universe?
Just try to find any kind of shoe, running or otherwise, in a 9-1/2 extra wide. On 11/25/2015 10:27 PM, Alan C wrote: Too true. Try to find one who is expert on running shoes. Alan C -Original Message- From: John Francis Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:43 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Have we slipped into an alternative universe? On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 01:49:17PM -0600, Darren Addy wrote: > Just think how many Pentax would sell if they were available in stores! Sadly, that would not be enough. The salespeople would still need to show them (and know them) or else they are going to steer customers to brands that they know something about. s/they know something about/pay them an incentive to promote that brand/ Noways it's practically impossible to find a salesperson who actually knows anything about the product they are selling, let alone one who will use that knowledge to make a decision that is best for the customer. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
I wouldn't say it is particularly important to me but I have taken an interest in human evolution since my schooldays. I suppose that living in this part of the world where Sterkfontein is considered the most likely origin of hominids and also the fact that the San are an ancient family of man still living in an iron age time warp in parts of Namibia & Botswana are major factors. Sadly, the San have all been "contaminated" to some degree by contact with "civilisation". Most San were killed off by the advancing Nguni tribes in the middle ages. Their rock art is their legacy & shows how they lived in harmony with nature. The San (like the natives of North America) are the rightful owners of the land but get scant recognition nor does their language which has all but died out. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 5:39 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor While I find that subject to be mildly interesting, it's really of no consequence to me who our common ancestor is. It seems very important to you. Would you mind telling us why? Thanks, frank On November 26, 2015 10:28:06 AM EST, Alan Cwrote: Identifying a common ancestor. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 3:15 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor The key to what? Cheers, frank On November 26, 2015 7:58:51 AM EST, Alan C wrote: Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea instead. It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans share about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population groups too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still to be unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it all wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor That won't do my gout any good. B On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because I'm curious to see where it's going. Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally closely related to both. Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an excellent read. The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest paper someone announces another candidate. I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it was. The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. Can I have my surprise now? B -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what you find. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I suppose it would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific feeling. My opinion really doesn't mean much. Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is not an area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. Cheers,
Re: PESO - The Protestor
You didn't miss anything other than a lot of shouting, confused running back & forth and standing around for hours at a time waiting for someone to get an idea. On 11/25/2015 11:43 PM, knarf wrote: No, I've never been in the military. Cheers, frank On November 25, 2015 10:30:36 PM EST, Alan Cwrote: You were in the army? Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:02 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I have an army parka made with no animal products that somehow manages to not frost up. It has a "tunnel", too. Cheers, frank On November 25, 2015 2:31:45 PM EST, Paul wrote: I have one of those parkas. When the hood is fully zipped there's actually a short "tunnel" of more moderate temperature air between your face and the outside. Supposedly wolf fur was the only trim that wouldn't frost up in those cold temperatures. -p On 11/25/2015 12:45 PM, John wrote: Wolf fur used to be the preferred trim for the hoods on heavy parkas, particularly the ones the Army & Air Force issued to personnel stationed near the arctic circle. Frank mentioned that fur trim on parkas and coats was making a resurgence. I don't know if the stores are selling wolf fur or not, but that's what the image called to my mind. For all I know it may be an image of coyotes. Whether it's Wolves or Coyotes doesn't make much difference to me, but that particular image was NOT rodents. Whichever way the political winds are blowing, I know a hawk from a handsaw. On 11/24/2015 11:39 PM, Ken Waller wrote: It is available from several Alaskan sources. I've considered buying a wolf pelt. -Original Message- From: "Daniel J. Matyola" Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor No store sells wolf fur. Pure propaganda. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:36 PM, John wrote: I think that's wolf fur. On 11/23/2015 11:47 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: Children are dying of malnutrition; they protest about rodents. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:43 PM, frank theriault wrote: As we walked downtown yesterday we saw a bunch of police cars in front of Holt's, a very upscale department store. An animal rights group was protesting fur in general, but also the fact that Holt's sells it: I'll likely have a gallery later in the week, but until then, this kind of sums it up: http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2015/11/the-protestor.html Fur trim on parkas and coats is unfortunately seeing a resurgence around these parts. I'll keep political thoughts to myself. Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome. cheers, frank -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
It's very refreshing, caffeine free & full of antioxidants. I must say it is an acquired taste, especially if you're accustomed to Ceylon. Blends with other herbs are available too. I drink a Rooibos/Buchu blend. Some people like it iced. Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:31 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor Not too keen on rooibos tea, but in the interests of cultural harmony I'll take a sip. That 70% figure is not the figure that orthodox science quotes: < http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/permanent-exhibitions/human-origins-and-cult ural-halls/Anne-and-Bernard-Spitzer-Hall-of-Human-Origins/understanding-our- past/dna-comparing-humans-and-chimps> 70% seems to be a number that some people have latched onto to try and show that there hasn't been enough time for evolution to do its dirty work. It's rather a bizarre thing to do because they seem to be trying to have their cake and eat it. In order to make the argument they have to accept that evolution works in a certain way and then show that some relatively unimportant facts (70% versus 98.whatever %) mean the whole theory is wrong. B -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 12:59 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail ListSubject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea instead. It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans share about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population groups too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still to be unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it all wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor That won't do my gout any good. B > On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: > > Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. > > Alan C > > > -Original Message- From: Bob W > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' > Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor > > I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this > because I'm curious to see where it's going. > > Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since > common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are > equally closely related to both. > > Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the > Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) > great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's > quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably > outdated, but it is still an excellent read. > > The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps > does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, > but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on > the latest paper someone announces another candidate. > > I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. > There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations > happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are > found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other > candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the > type of creature it was. > > The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and > Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories > that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance > would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the > sidelines for about > 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I > wouldn't even hazard a guess. > > Can I have my surprise now? > > B > > >> -Original Message- >> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C >> Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >> Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised >> what you find. >> >> Alan C >> >> -Original Message- >> From: knarf >> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >> I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I >> suppose it would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a >> non-scientific > feeling. >> My opinion really doesn't mean much. >> >> Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of >> opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is >> not an area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. >> >>
Re: OT: another "lost" photographer on exhibit...
I wish they'd been able to show a little more of her work with the article. It's unlikely I'll get to see the exhibit, and unfortunately it's now the season when I won't be buying gifts for myself, so I won't have a chance to get the book. Maybe later if I don't forget it, but most likely I will. On 11/26/2015 9:41 AM, Stanley Halpin wrote: Actually, this is a bit more ON topic than some of the recent exchanges! (-; So anyway, the NY Times today has an interesting article on Lee Miller, a woman who started as a fashion model in the 1920-30s, then became a photographer. Wartime photographer from London. Documented D-Day, the concentration camps, and much in between. The article has a reference to an on-going exhibit of her work at the Imperial War Museum/London. http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=InCMR7g4BCKC2wiZPkcVUsCgjL/OB2Oq_id=58905b9799479c6b6bf7ec697774f125_type=eta_id=1448547689474409_id=0 Happy Thanksgiving all! stan -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
Off to a friend's for thanksgiving dinner... but Have to bop in for a moment as I love, love , love Rooibos tea... especially witha bit of cinnamon in it... and for those of you in NOrth American,whole foods, normaill whole Paycheck, has 40 Tea bags for $4.00 US of a rooibos with vanilla that has become my evening drink - 4 or 5 cups a day. YUm! Happy turkey day everyone ann On 11/26/2015 11:48 AM, Alan C wrote: It's very refreshing, caffeine free & full of antioxidants. I must say it is an acquired taste, especially if you're accustomed to Ceylon. Blends with other herbs are available too. I drink a Rooibos/Buchu blend. Some people like it iced. Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:31 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor Not too keen on rooibos tea, but in the interests of cultural harmony I'll take a sip. That 70% figure is not the figure that orthodox science quotes: < http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/permanent-exhibitions/human-origins-and-cult ural-halls/Anne-and-Bernard-Spitzer-Hall-of-Human-Origins/understanding-our- past/dna-comparing-humans-and-chimps> 70% seems to be a number that some people have latched onto to try and show that there hasn't been enough time for evolution to do its dirty work. It's rather a bizarre thing to do because they seem to be trying to have their cake and eat it. In order to make the argument they have to accept that evolution works in a certain way and then show that some relatively unimportant facts (70% versus 98.whatever %) mean the whole theory is wrong. B -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 12:59 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail ListSubject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea instead. It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans share about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population groups too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still to be unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it all wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor That won't do my gout any good. B > On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: > > Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. > > Alan C > > > -Original Message- From: Bob W > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' > Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor > > I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this > because I'm curious to see where it's going. > > Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since > common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are > equally closely related to both. > > Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the > Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) > great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's > quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably > outdated, but it is still an excellent read. > > The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps > does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, > but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on > the latest paper someone announces another candidate. > > I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. > There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations > happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are > found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other > candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the > type of creature it was. > > The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and > Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories > that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance > would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the > sidelines for about > 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I > wouldn't even hazard a guess. > > Can I have my surprise now? > > B > > >> -Original Message- >> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C >> Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >> Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised >> what you find. >> >> Alan C >> >> -Original Message- >> From: knarf >> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: PESO - The
RE: OT: another "lost" photographer on exhibit...
http://www.leemiller.co.uk/ > -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John > Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 4:56 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List> Subject: Re: OT: another "lost" photographer on exhibit... > > I wish they'd been able to show a little more of her work with the article. It's > unlikely I'll get to see the exhibit, and unfortunately it's now the season > when I won't be buying gifts for myself, so I won't have a chance to get the > book. > > Maybe later if I don't forget it, but most likely I will. > > On 11/26/2015 9:41 AM, Stanley Halpin wrote: > > Actually, this is a bit more ON topic than some of the recent > > exchanges! (-; > > > > So anyway, the NY Times today has an interesting article on Lee > > Miller, a woman who started as a fashion model in the 1920-30s, then > > became a photographer. Wartime photographer from London. > Documented > > D-Day, the concentration camps, and much in between. The article has a > > reference to an on-going exhibit of her work at the Imperial War > > Museum/London. > > > http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=InCMR7g4BCKC2wiZPkcVUsCgjL/O > B2O > > > q_id=58905b9799479c6b6bf7ec697774f125_type=eta_id=1 > 448 > > 547689474409_id=0 > > > > Happy Thanksgiving all! > > > > stan > > > > > > -- > Science - Questions we may never find answers for. > Religion - Answers we must never question. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
RE: PESO - The Protestor
So just like normal work then? > -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John > > You didn't miss anything other than a lot of shouting, confused running back > & forth and standing around for hours at a time waiting for someone to get > an idea. > > On 11/25/2015 11:43 PM, knarf wrote: > > No, I've never been in the military. > > > > Cheers, > > > > frank -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
Don't you want to know if he left us anything in his will? On 11/26/2015 10:39 AM, knarf wrote: While I find that subject to be mildly interesting, it's really of no consequence to me who our common ancestor is. It seems very important to you. Would you mind telling us why? Thanks, frank On November 26, 2015 10:28:06 AM EST, Alan Cwrote: Identifying a common ancestor. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 3:15 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor The key to what? Cheers, frank On November 26, 2015 7:58:51 AM EST, Alan C wrote: Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea instead. It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans share about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population groups too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still to be unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it all wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor That won't do my gout any good. B On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because I'm curious to see where it's going. Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally closely related to both. Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an excellent read. The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest paper someone announces another candidate. I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it was. The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. Can I have my surprise now? B -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what you find. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I suppose it would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific feeling. My opinion really doesn't mean much. Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is not an area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. Cheers, frank On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C wrote: You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. "Genetically we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans" - which, in your opinion is closest to humans? Do you have an opinion as to who the common ancestor may have been. "I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a conclusion, or tying to trap me in some way" - not really, I'm trying to establish a common base so we can further our discourse. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:10 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I don't understand your question. We don't have any "living ancestors" in evolutionary terms. As I said earlier, we're great apes, so
Re: PESO - The Protestor
My arteries are starting to harden just from reading that. On 11/26/2015 7:00 AM, Alan C wrote: Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because I'm curious to see where it's going. Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally closely related to both. Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an excellent read. The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest paper someone announces another candidate. I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it was. The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. Can I have my surprise now? B -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail ListSubject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what you find. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I suppose it would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific feeling. My opinion really doesn't mean much. Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is not an area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. Cheers, frank On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C wrote: >You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. >"Genetically >we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans" - which, in >your opinion is closest to humans? Do you have an opinion as to who the >common ancestor may have been. "I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm >being cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a conclusion, or >tying to trap me in some way" - not really, I'm trying to establish a >common base so we can further our discourse. > >Alan C > >-Original Message- >From: knarf >Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:10 PM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > >I don't understand your question. We don't have any "living ancestors" >in >evolutionary terms. > >As I said earlier, we're great apes, so genetically we're close to >chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. But they aren't ancestors or >somehow "below" us. We share a common ancestor and each species has >evolved differently to where we are today. > >I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being cross-examined here, as if > >you're moving toward a conclusion, or tying to trap me in some way. > >Could we get to the point please? > >Thanks, > >frank > >On November 25, 2015 11:08:57 AM EST, Alan C wrote: >>Which are our closest living ancestors or perhaps those most like us? >> >>Alan C >> >>-Original Message- >>From: knarf >>Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 4:57 PM >>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >>I'm not sure exactly what you mean, however humans are animals, great >>apes to be exact, and like every other animal on the face of the >>earth, we have evolved from ancestors to our current form. >> >>Cheers, >> >>frank >> >> >> >>On November 25, 2015 9:41:37 AM EST, Alan C wrote: >>>Do you consider humans to be part of the evolutionary scale? >>> >>>Alan C -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Re: PESO - The Protestor
A large stone and a termite stick, and even that caused a family feud B > On 26 Nov 2015, at 17:11, Johnwrote: > > Don't you want to know if he left us anything in his will? > >> On 11/26/2015 10:39 AM, knarf wrote: >> While I find that subject to be mildly interesting, it's really of no >> consequence to me who our common ancestor is. It seems very important >> to you. Would you mind telling us why? >> >> Thanks, >> >> frank >> >> On November 26, 2015 10:28:06 AM EST, Alan C >> wrote: >>> Identifying a common ancestor. >>> >>> Alan C >>> >>> -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, >>> 2015 3:15 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The >>> Protestor >>> >>> The key to what? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> frank >>> >>> On November 26, 2015 7:58:51 AM EST, Alan C >>> wrote: Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea instead. It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans share about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population groups too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still to be unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it >>> all wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor That won't do my gout any good. B > On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: > > Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in > lard. > > Alan C > > > -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November > 26, 2015 12:43 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: > PESO - The Protestor > > I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering > this because > I'm curious to see where it's going. > > Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to > bonobos. Since > common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we > are equally > closely related to both. > > Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall > of >>> the > Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the > (other) great apes, > and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite > an old book now > so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but > it is still > an excellent read. > > The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and > chimps does > not seem to have been settled yet. There are several > candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before > the ink is dry on >>> the > latest paper someone announces another candidate. > > I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify > The One. > There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of > speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. > Even if fossils >>> are > found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the > other candidates, > but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type > of creature it > was. > > The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, > and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different > theories that > somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance > would be > unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the > sidelines for > about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates > sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. > > Can I have my surprise now? > > B > > >> -Original Message- From: PDML >> [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: >> Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail >> List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >> Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised >> what you find. >> >> Alan C >> >> -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, >> November 26, 2015 6:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >> I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. >> I suppose it >> would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a >> non-scientific > feeling. >> My opinion really doesn't mean much. >> >> Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a >> matter of >> opinion. However I have no idea who that might be.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
Here's the most (or one of the most) recent discoveries of another branch or our human family tree. Named homo naledi, the fossils were discovered in 2013 some 100 feet underground in a chamber with very difficult access. Among the interesting elements, besides the location, are the existence of complete skeletons and that they appear to have been placed there as part of a death ritual, suggesting the development of a culture. http://onwisconsin.uwalumni.com/features/chamberof-discovery/ Nova, broadcast on PBS here in the US, has a documentary on the discovery and retrieving a small portion of the thousands of bones. It's a couple hours long, but an interesting watch... http://video.pbs.org/video/2365559270/ -p On 11/26/2015 4:43 AM, Bob W wrote: I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because I'm curious to see where it's going. Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally closely related to both. Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an excellent read. The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest paper someone announces another candidate. I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it was. The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. Can I have my surprise now? B -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail ListSubject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what you find. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I suppose it would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific feeling. My opinion really doesn't mean much. Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is not an area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. Cheers, frank On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C wrote: You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. "Genetically we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans" - which, in your opinion is closest to humans? Do you have an opinion as to who the common ancestor may have been. "I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a conclusion, or tying to trap me in some way" - not really, I'm trying to establish a common base so we can further our discourse. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:10 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I don't understand your question. We don't have any "living ancestors" in evolutionary terms. As I said earlier, we're great apes, so genetically we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. But they aren't ancestors or somehow "below" us. We share a common ancestor and each species has evolved differently to where we are today. I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a conclusion, or tying to trap me in some way. Could we get to the point please? Thanks, frank On November 25, 2015 11:08:57 AM EST, Alan C wrote: Which are our closest living ancestors or perhaps those most like us? Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 4:57 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I'm not sure exactly what you mean, however humans are animals, great apes to be exact, and like every other animal on the face of the earth, we have evolved from
Re: PESO - The Protestor
If you ever get a chance to watch the movie "The God's must be Crazy" you will see that it was actually a Coke bottle which caused a San family feud. From Wikipedia: "Xi and his San tribe are "living well off the land" in the Kalahari Desert. They are happy because of their belief that the gods have provided plenty of everything, and no one among them has any wants. One day, a Coca-Cola bottle is thrown out of an aeroplane and falls to Earth unbroken. Initially, Xi's people suppose this strange artefact is a present from the gods and find many uses for it. They employ it as a craft tool, rolling pin, pestle, blow the top to make music, etc. But unlike anything that they have had before, there is only one glass bottle to go around. With everyone wanting it at once, they soon find themselves experiencing envy, anger, and even violence." Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 7:34 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor A large stone and a termite stick, and even that caused a family feud B On 26 Nov 2015, at 17:11, Johnwrote: Don't you want to know if he left us anything in his will? On 11/26/2015 10:39 AM, knarf wrote: While I find that subject to be mildly interesting, it's really of no consequence to me who our common ancestor is. It seems very important to you. Would you mind telling us why? Thanks, frank On November 26, 2015 10:28:06 AM EST, Alan C wrote: Identifying a common ancestor. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 3:15 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor The key to what? Cheers, frank On November 26, 2015 7:58:51 AM EST, Alan C wrote: Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea instead. It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans share about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population groups too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still to be unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it all wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor That won't do my gout any good. B On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because I'm curious to see where it's going. Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally closely related to both. Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an excellent read. The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest paper someone announces another candidate. I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it was. The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. Can I have my surprise now? B -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what you find. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I suppose it would be either chimps or bonobos but that's
Re: A Thanksgiving Message
If your parents are alive, tell them you love them face to face. If that is impossible, call. If you children are alive, tell them you love them face to face. If that is impossible, call. Never let the importance of your family escape from being right in front of your Important Things list. If you are an American, Happy Thanksgiving! Re-lurking. G. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: dos Pesos - one for Frank one for Paul Sorenson
I could happily spend time just relaxing on that front porch...thanks for posting it. -p On 11/26/2015 12:39 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: Two from1992 LX & Kodachrome Frank - here is a friend I made along the Haines Highway in the Yukon https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-GcTkPBJ/A Paul - The Robert Service cabin in Dawson.. https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-f6MxHC5/A Now I'm sorry I didn't work it more ... ann -- Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: A Thanksgiving Message
Thanks Morris. Good to hear from you. As always. Paul via phone > On Nov 26, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Morris Galloway> wrote: > > If your parents are alive, tell them you love them face to face. If that is > impossible, call. > If you children are alive, tell them you love them face to face. If that is > impossible, call. > Never let the importance of your family escape from being right in front of > your Important Things list. > If you are an American, Happy Thanksgiving! > > Re-lurking. > G. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...
Well I have assumed my RAW files were OK, but I haven't checked yet. Now I'm wondering. Will have to check when I get home later this weekend. I have no explanation for how a RAW file would show processing like that. I thought a RAW file was a RAW file. On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Steve Sharpewrote: > The same thing happened to me this past summer with my K-3, and I shoot > exclusively RAW, no JPEGs. But every image was coming out in all these > otherworldly colours...which Aperture automatically fixed so I didn't > pay much attention. Then I made some astrophotos and noticed that the > sky was pink in one exposure, magenta in the next...etc. etc. To get it > back to reality and I had to reset the camera to the factory defaults > and then reprogramme it to my preferences. > > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:49:53 +1100, Rob Studdert wrote: >> I got caught mid event by the "Cross-Processing" demon too using my >> K3, had me baffled, must have bumped the buttons. I didn't have time >> to screw about so I reverted to single body shooting and it was a long >> event, I must have changed lenses 100 times :( >> >> On 25 November 2015 at 06:03, John wrote: >>> Ok, so SWAG - it's bracketing white balance. >>> >>> On 11/23/2015 2:26 PM, Darren Addy wrote: Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you an idea: http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John wrote: > > On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote: >> >> >> Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a >> group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I >> raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown. >> >> Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not >> through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked >> different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme >> in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all >> ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each >> different. >> >> I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE >> anything because of the error, but still annoying). >> >> What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas? >> > > Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG. > > --- > > Steven Sharpe - The Office Gallery > > d...@eastlink.ca > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
I've never even been mildly interested in my family tree. "Yawn" J Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 26, 2015, at 7:39 AM, knarfwrote: > > While I find that subject to be mildly interesting, it's really of no > consequence to me who our common ancestor is. It seems very important to you. > Would you mind telling us why? > > Thanks, > > frank > >> On November 26, 2015 10:28:06 AM EST, Alan C wrote: >> Identifying a common ancestor. >> >> Alan C >> >> -Original Message- >> From: knarf >> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 3:15 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >> The key to what? >> >> Cheers, >> >> frank >> >>> On November 26, 2015 7:58:51 AM EST, Alan C wrote: >>> Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea >>> instead. >>> >>> It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans >>> share >>> about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population >>> groups >>> too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still >>> to be >>> unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it >> all >>> >>> wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! >>> >>> Alan C >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Bob W-PDML >>> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >>> >>> That won't do my gout any good. >>> >>> B >>> On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this >>> because I'm curious to see where it's going. Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. >>> Since common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are >>> equally closely related to both. Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of >> the >>> Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great >>> apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old >>> book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is >>> still an excellent read. The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps >>> does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on >> the >>> latest paper someone announces another candidate. I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The >>> One. There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils >> are >>> found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other >>> candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of >>> creature it was. The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories >>> that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would >>> be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines >>> for about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. Can I have my surprise now? B > -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C > Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > > Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be >>> surprised > what > you find. > > Alan C > > -Original Message- > From: knarf > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > > I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I >>> suppose it > would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific feeling. > My opinion really doesn't mean much. > > Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter >>> of > opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is >>> not an > area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. > > Cheers, > > frank > > On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C >>> wrote: >> You're right.
Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:39:49 -0600, Darren Addy wrote: > Well I have assumed my RAW files were OK, but I haven't checked yet. > Now I'm wondering. Will have to check when I get home later this > weekend. I have no explanation for how a RAW file would show > processing like that. I thought a RAW file was a RAW file. Same here. I hope my camera isn't buggered up. --- Steven Sharpe - The Office Gallery d...@eastlink.ca -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: dos Pesos - one for Frank one for Paul Sorenson
We were there off season... both times so the cabin wasn't open - but at least in 1992 you could go in and view the interior which has been restored . This is, though, the actual cabin and location where he wrote about Sam McGee and dangerous Dan. Glad you enjoy the view ann On 11/26/2015 12:56 PM, Paul wrote: I could happily spend time just relaxing on that front porch...thanks for posting it. -p On 11/26/2015 12:39 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: Two from1992 LX & Kodachrome Frank - here is a friend I made along the Haines Highway in the Yukon https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-GcTkPBJ/A Paul - The Robert Service cabin in Dawson.. https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-f6MxHC5/A Now I'm sorry I didn't work it more ... ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: So how did I do THIS? Every JPEG looks like different processing...
The same thing happened to me this past summer with my K-3, and I shoot exclusively RAW, no JPEGs. But every image was coming out in all these otherworldly colours...which Aperture automatically fixed so I didn't pay much attention. Then I made some astrophotos and noticed that the sky was pink in one exposure, magenta in the next...etc. etc. To get it back to reality and I had to reset the camera to the factory defaults and then reprogramme it to my preferences. On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:49:53 +1100, Rob Studdert wrote: > I got caught mid event by the "Cross-Processing" demon too using my > K3, had me baffled, must have bumped the buttons. I didn't have time > to screw about so I reverted to single body shooting and it was a long > event, I must have changed lenses 100 times :( > > On 25 November 2015 at 06:03, Johnwrote: >> Ok, so SWAG - it's bracketing white balance. >> >> On 11/23/2015 2:26 PM, Darren Addy wrote: >>> >>> Well, here is a screenshot of a section of the JPEGs that will give you an >>> idea: >>> >>> http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/randomPost.png >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 PM, John wrote: On 11/22/2015 1:13 PM, Darren Addy wrote: > > > Yesterday I enjoyed a little photo safari and then, hearing that a > group of Whooping Cranes did not take off as expected on Saturday I > raced down to Thayer County to try to get to see them before sundown. > > Somewhere along the line I accidentally changed some setting (not > through the menus) and after that point each JPEG produced looked > different than the one before, but each was some sort of extreme > in-camera post-processing. I could almost understand it they were all > ONE sort of post-processing (like cross-processing) but they were each > different. > > I was shooting in RAW+ so the JPEGs are pretty irrelevant (didn't LOSE > anything because of the error, but still annoying). > > What in the heck did I do so I can avoid doing it again? Any ideas? > Without seeing examples I'd be at a loss to even take a SWAG. --- Steven Sharpe - The Office Gallery d...@eastlink.ca -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
There was recently a local documentary on the subject. The similarities to & differences from chimpanzees was mentioned. Some locals then took the viewpoint that it was racist, implying that they were descended from monkeys. Talk about a persecution complex. The way the world is going, perhaps we're all monkeys. Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 1:29 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I've seen a number of articles and possibly a documentary about the cave, but I'll have a look at that one. B On 26 Nov 2015, at 17:50, Paulwrote: Here's the most (or one of the most) recent discoveries of another branch or our human family tree. Named homo naledi, the fossils were discovered in 2013 some 100 feet underground in a chamber with very difficult access. Among the interesting elements, besides the location, are the existence of complete skeletons and that they appear to have been placed there as part of a death ritual, suggesting the development of a culture. http://onwisconsin.uwalumni.com/features/chamberof-discovery/ Nova, broadcast on PBS here in the US, has a documentary on the discovery and retrieving a small portion of the thousands of bones. It's a couple hours long, but an interesting watch... http://video.pbs.org/video/2365559270/ -p On 11/26/2015 4:43 AM, Bob W wrote: I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because I'm curious to see where it's going. Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally closely related to both. Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an excellent read. The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest paper someone announces another candidate. I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it was. The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. Can I have my surprise now? B -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what you find. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I suppose it would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific feeling. My opinion really doesn't mean much. Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is not an area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. Cheers, frank On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C wrote: You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. "Genetically we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans" - which, in your opinion is closest to humans? Do you have an opinion as to who the common ancestor may have been. "I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a conclusion, or tying to trap me in some way" - not really, I'm trying to establish a common base so we can further our discourse. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:10 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I don't understand your question. We don't have any "living ancestors" in evolutionary terms. As I said earlier, we're great apes, so genetically we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. But they aren't ancestors or somehow "below" us. We share a common ancestor and each species has evolved differently to
PESO - Still Legal
Third in this very popular series: http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2015/11/still-legal.html ;-) Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
Caffeine free? What's the point then? It's like alcohol free beer... LOL cheers, frank On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Alan Cwrote: > It's very refreshing, caffeine free & full of antioxidants. I must say it is > an acquired taste, especially if you're accustomed to Ceylon. Blends with > other herbs are available too. I drink a Rooibos/Buchu blend. Some people > like it iced. > > Alan C > > -Original Message- From: Bob W > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:31 PM > > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' > Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor > > Not too keen on rooibos tea, but in the interests of cultural harmony I'll > take a sip. > > That 70% figure is not the figure that orthodox science quotes: > < > http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/permanent-exhibitions/human-origins-and-cult > ural-halls/Anne-and-Bernard-Spitzer-Hall-of-Human-Origins/understanding-our- > past/dna-comparing-humans-and-chimps> > > 70% seems to be a number that some people have latched onto to try and show > that there hasn't been enough time for evolution to do its dirty work. It's > rather a bizarre thing to do because they seem to be trying to have their > cake and eat it. In order to make the argument they have to accept that > evolution works in a certain way and then show that some relatively > unimportant facts (70% versus 98.whatever %) mean the whole theory is wrong. > > B > >> -Original Message- >> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C >> Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 12:59 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >> Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea > > instead. >> >> >> It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans share >> about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population >> groups too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration > > still to >> >> be unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it all >> wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! >> >> Alan C >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Bob W-PDML >> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >> That won't do my gout any good. >> >> B >> >> > On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: >> > >> > Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. >> > >> > Alan C >> > >> > >> > -Original Message- From: Bob W >> > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM >> > To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' >> > Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor >> > >> > I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this >> > because I'm curious to see where it's going. >> > >> > Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since >> > common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are >> > equally closely related to both. >> > >> > Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the >> > Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) >> > great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's >> > quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably >> > outdated, but it is still an excellent read. >> > >> > The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps >> > does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, >> > but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on >> > the latest paper someone announces another candidate. >> > >> > I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. >> > There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations >> > happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are >> > found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other >> > candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the >> > type of creature it was. >> > >> > The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and >> > Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories >> > that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance >> > would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the >> > sidelines for about >> > 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I >> > wouldn't even hazard a guess. >> > >> > Can I have my surprise now? >> > >> > B >> > >> > >> >> -Original Message- >> >> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C >> >> Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM >> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> >> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >> >> >> >> Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised >> >> what you find. >> >> >> >> Alan C >> >> >> >> -Original Message- >> >> From: knarf >> >> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM >> >> To: Pentax-Discuss
Re: PESO - The Protestor
I've seen a number of articles and possibly a documentary about the cave, but I'll have a look at that one. B > On 26 Nov 2015, at 17:50, Paulwrote: > > Here's the most (or one of the most) recent discoveries of another branch or > our human family tree. Named homo naledi, the fossils were discovered in > 2013 some 100 feet underground in a chamber with very difficult access. > Among the interesting elements, besides the location, are the existence of > complete skeletons and that they appear to have been placed there as part of > a death ritual, suggesting the development of a culture. > > http://onwisconsin.uwalumni.com/features/chamberof-discovery/ > > Nova, broadcast on PBS here in the US, has a documentary on the discovery and > retrieving a small portion of the thousands of bones. It's a couple hours > long, but an interesting watch... > > http://video.pbs.org/video/2365559270/ > > -p > >> On 11/26/2015 4:43 AM, Bob W wrote: >> I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because >> I'm curious to see where it's going. >> >> Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since >> common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally >> closely related to both. >> >> Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third >> Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and >> talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now >> so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an >> excellent read. >> >> The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does >> not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but >> discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest >> paper someone announces another candidate. >> >> I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. >> There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations >> happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found >> of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but >> we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it >> was. >> >> The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and >> Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that >> somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be >> unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about >> 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't >> even hazard a guess. >> >> Can I have my surprise now? >> >> B >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C >>> Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >>> >>> Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what >>> you find. >>> >>> Alan C >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: knarf >>> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM >>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor >>> >>> I have no idea which other great ape is "closest" to humans. I suppose it >>> would be either chimps or bonobos but that's just a non-scientific >> feeling. >>> My opinion really doesn't mean much. >>> >>> Whoever the common ancestor of the great apes was, is not a matter of >>> opinion. However I have no idea who that might be. Paleontology is not an >>> area that I have much expertise, or for that matter, interest in. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> frank >>> On November 25, 2015 10:40:52 PM EST, Alan C wrote: You're right. Perhaps "living cousins" would have been better. "Genetically we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans" - which, in your opinion is closest to humans? Do you have an opinion as to who the common ancestor may have been. "I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being cross-examined here, as if you're moving toward a conclusion, or tying to trap me in some way" - not really, I'm trying to establish a common base so we can further our discourse. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 10:10 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I don't understand your question. We don't have any "living ancestors" in evolutionary terms. As I said earlier, we're great apes, so genetically we're close to chimps, bonobos, gorillas and orangutans. But they aren't ancestors or somehow "below" us. We share a common ancestor and each species has evolved differently to where we are today. I have to say, I rather feel as if I'm being cross-examined here, as if
Re: PESO - The Protestor
I will. > On 26 Nov 2015, at 17:53, Alan Cwrote: > > If you ever get a chance to watch the movie "The God's must be Crazy" you > will see that it was actually a Coke bottle which caused a San family feud. > > From Wikipedia: "Xi and his San tribe are "living well off the land" in the > Kalahari Desert. They are happy because of their belief that the gods have > provided plenty of everything, and no one among them has any wants. One day, > a Coca-Cola bottle is thrown out of an aeroplane and falls to Earth unbroken. > Initially, Xi's people suppose this strange artefact is a present from the > gods and find many uses for it. They employ it as a craft tool, rolling pin, > pestle, blow the top to make music, etc. But unlike anything that they have > had before, there is only one glass bottle to go around. With everyone > wanting it at once, they soon find themselves experiencing envy, anger, and > even violence." > > Alan C > > -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 7:34 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > > A large stone and a termite stick, and even that caused a family feud > > B > >> On 26 Nov 2015, at 17:11, John wrote: >> >> Don't you want to know if he left us anything in his will? >> >>> On 11/26/2015 10:39 AM, knarf wrote: >>> While I find that subject to be mildly interesting, it's really of no >>> consequence to me who our common ancestor is. It seems very important >>> to you. Would you mind telling us why? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> frank >>> >>> On November 26, 2015 10:28:06 AM EST, Alan C >>> wrote: Identifying a common ancestor. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 3:15 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor The key to what? Cheers, frank On November 26, 2015 7:58:51 AM EST, Alan C wrote: > Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of > Rooibos tea instead. > > It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & > Humans share about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between > human population groups too but there is an incredible web of > interbreeding & migration still to be unravelled. Those who think > the Neanderthals became extinct have it all > > wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! > > Alan C > > -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, > November 26, 2015 2:19 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: > Re: PESO - The Protestor > > That won't do my gout any good. > > B > >> On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: >> >> Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in >> lard. >> >> Alan C >> >> >> -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November >> 26, 2015 12:43 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: >> PESO - The Protestor >> >> I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering >> this > because >> I'm curious to see where it's going. >> >> Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to >> bonobos. > Since >> common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we >> are > equally >> closely related to both. >> >> Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall >> of the > >> Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the >> (other) great > apes, >> and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite >> an old > book now >> so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but >> it is > still >> an excellent read. >> >> The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and >> chimps > does >> not seem to have been settled yet. There are several >> candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before >> the ink is dry on the > >> latest paper someone announces another candidate. >> >> I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify >> The > One. >> There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of >> speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. >> Even if fossils are > >> found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the >> other > candidates, >> but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type >> of > creature it >> was. >> >> The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, >> and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different >> theories > that >> somebody like me who just follows
Re: PESO - The Protestor
Terrifc film .. and I"d say so even if I wasn't ann -san- :-) a On 11/26/2015 6:27 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote: I will. On 26 Nov 2015, at 17:53, Alan Cwrote: If you ever get a chance to watch the movie "The God's must be Crazy" you will see that it was actually a Coke bottle which caused a San family feud. From Wikipedia: "Xi and his San tribe are "living well off the land" in the Kalahari Desert. They are happy because of their belief that the gods have provided plenty of everything, and no one among them has any wants. One day, a Coca-Cola bottle is thrown out of an aeroplane and falls to Earth unbroken. Initially, Xi's people suppose this strange artefact is a present from the gods and find many uses for it. They employ it as a craft tool, rolling pin, pestle, blow the top to make music, etc. But unlike anything that they have had before, there is only one glass bottle to go around. With everyone wanting it at once, they soon find themselves experiencing envy, anger, and even violence." Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 7:34 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor A large stone and a termite stick, and even that caused a family feud B On 26 Nov 2015, at 17:11, John wrote: Don't you want to know if he left us anything in his will? On 11/26/2015 10:39 AM, knarf wrote: While I find that subject to be mildly interesting, it's really of no consequence to me who our common ancestor is. It seems very important to you. Would you mind telling us why? Thanks, frank On November 26, 2015 10:28:06 AM EST, Alan C wrote: Identifying a common ancestor. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 3:15 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor The key to what? Cheers, frank On November 26, 2015 7:58:51 AM EST, Alan C wrote: Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea instead. It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans share about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population groups too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still to be unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it all wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor That won't do my gout any good. B On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because I'm curious to see where it's going. Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally closely related to both. Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an excellent read. The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest paper someone announces another candidate. I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it was. The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. Can I have my surprise now? B -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what you find. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss
Re: Thanksgiving
We did and we'll sleep well tonight! J Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 26, 2015, at 8:27 AM, Johnwrote: > > I wish you all a happy Thanksgiving whether you celebrate the American > holiday or not. I hope you will all have a good day with someone you love > and with someone who loves you. > > -- > Science - Questions we may never find answers for. > Religion - Answers we must never question. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
On 11/26/2015 10:48 AM, Alan C wrote: It's very refreshing, caffeine free & full of antioxidants. I must say it is an acquired taste, especially if you're accustomed to Ceylon. Blends with other herbs are available too. I drink a Rooibos/Buchu blend. Some people like it iced. It has the advantage of not being made from worms. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: dos Pesos - one for Frank one for Paul Sorenson
Lovely canine! Love the cabin, too. Bet that's draughty in a -50C blizzard! cheers, frank On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 1:39 AM, ann sanfedelewrote: > Two from1992 LX & Kodachrome > > Frank - > here is a friend I made along the Haines Highway in the Yukon > https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-GcTkPBJ/A > > Paul - > The Robert Service cabin in Dawson.. > https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-f6MxHC5/A > > Now I'm sorry I didn't work it more ... > > ann > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
PESO - The Protestor
https://www.organicfacts.net/health-benefits/beverage/health-benefits-of-red-rooibos-tea.html BTW, beer is very nutitional, even the alcohol free offerings. Presumably you prefer the real thing? Alan C -Original Message- From: frank theriault Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 5:42 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Caffeine free? What's the point then? It's like alcohol free beer... LOL cheers, frank --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
Hopefully Frank will answer that. Alan C -Original Message- From: Paul Stenquist Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 6:17 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go Bears! Uh, sorry is that off topic? Paul via phone On Nov 26, 2015, at 11:04 PM, Alan Cwrote: https://www.organicfacts.net/health-benefits/beverage/health-benefits-of-red-rooibos-tea.html BTW, beer is very nutitional, even the alcohol free offerings. Presumably you prefer the real thing? Alan C -Original Message- From: frank theriault Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 5:42 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Caffeine free? What's the point then? It's like alcohol free beer... LOL cheers, frank --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso - more from Alaska and the Yukon ok 3 Pesos :-)
Beautiful photos of what looks like very challenging country. The red truck and gas pump stands out. Great stuff! Cheers, frank On November 26, 2015 11:29:04 PM EST, ann sanfedelewrote: >All from Spring, 1992 Pentax LX, Kodachrome >On the Klondike loop road >https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-5dpjbnH/A > >Both in Boundary Alaska - just west of the border with Canada... > >https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-fWVHFJf/A > >https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-4bNNBXs/A > >ann -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Peso - more from Alaska and the Yukon ok 3 Pesos :-)
Thanks, Frank Glad you like! btw - Rooibos tea is delicious - and some of us can't have caffeine past a certain hour :-) ann On 11/26/2015 11:57 PM, knarf wrote: Beautiful photos of what looks like very challenging country. The red truck and gas pump stands out. Great stuff! Cheers, frank On November 26, 2015 11:29:04 PM EST, ann sanfedelewrote: All from Spring, 1992 Pentax LX, Kodachrome On the Klondike loop road https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-5dpjbnH/A Both in Boundary Alaska - just west of the border with Canada... https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-fWVHFJf/A https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-4bNNBXs/A ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
Go Bears! Uh, sorry is that off topic? Paul via phone > On Nov 26, 2015, at 11:04 PM, Alan Cwrote: > > https://www.organicfacts.net/health-benefits/beverage/health-benefits-of-red-rooibos-tea.html > > BTW, beer is very nutitional, even the alcohol free offerings. Presumably > you prefer the real thing? > > Alan C > > -Original Message- From: frank theriault > Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 5:42 AM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor > > Caffeine free? > > What's the point then? It's like alcohol free beer... > > LOL > > cheers, > > frank > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
I guess. On 11/26/2015 12:02 PM, Bob W wrote: So just like normal work then? -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John You didn't miss anything other than a lot of shouting, confused running back & forth and standing around for hours at a time waiting for someone to get an idea. On 11/25/2015 11:43 PM, knarf wrote: No, I've never been in the military. Cheers, frank -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: OT: another "lost" photographer on exhibit...
Thanks. On 11/26/2015 12:01 PM, Bob W wrote: http://www.leemiller.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 4:56 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail ListSubject: Re: OT: another "lost" photographer on exhibit... I wish they'd been able to show a little more of her work with the article. It's unlikely I'll get to see the exhibit, and unfortunately it's now the season when I won't be buying gifts for myself, so I won't have a chance to get the book. Maybe later if I don't forget it, but most likely I will. On 11/26/2015 9:41 AM, Stanley Halpin wrote: Actually, this is a bit more ON topic than some of the recent exchanges! (-; So anyway, the NY Times today has an interesting article on Lee Miller, a woman who started as a fashion model in the 1920-30s, then became a photographer. Wartime photographer from London. Documented D-Day, the concentration camps, and much in between. The article has a reference to an on-going exhibit of her work at the Imperial War Museum/London. http://p.nytimes.com/email/re?location=InCMR7g4BCKC2wiZPkcVUsCgjL/O B2O q_id=58905b9799479c6b6bf7ec697774f125_type=eta_id=1 448 547689474409_id=0 Happy Thanksgiving all! stan -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Peso - more from Alaska and the Yukon ok 3 Pesos :-)
All from Spring, 1992 Pentax LX, Kodachrome On the Klondike loop road https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-5dpjbnH/A Both in Boundary Alaska - just west of the border with Canada... https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-fWVHFJf/A https://annsan.smugmug.com/WorksinProg/Unfinishedalcan/n-2bspQh/i-4bNNBXs/A ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO - The Protestor
Not only have I seen it, I've seen the sequel. On 11/26/2015 12:52 PM, Alan C wrote: If you ever get a chance to watch the movie "The God's must be Crazy" you will see that it was actually a Coke bottle which caused a San family feud. From Wikipedia: "Xi and his San tribe are "living well off the land" in the Kalahari Desert. They are happy because of their belief that the gods have provided plenty of everything, and no one among them has any wants. One day, a Coca-Cola bottle is thrown out of an aeroplane and falls to Earth unbroken. Initially, Xi's people suppose this strange artefact is a present from the gods and find many uses for it. They employ it as a craft tool, rolling pin, pestle, blow the top to make music, etc. But unlike anything that they have had before, there is only one glass bottle to go around. With everyone wanting it at once, they soon find themselves experiencing envy, anger, and even violence." Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 7:34 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor A large stone and a termite stick, and even that caused a family feud B On 26 Nov 2015, at 17:11, Johnwrote: Don't you want to know if he left us anything in his will? On 11/26/2015 10:39 AM, knarf wrote: While I find that subject to be mildly interesting, it's really of no consequence to me who our common ancestor is. It seems very important to you. Would you mind telling us why? Thanks, frank On November 26, 2015 10:28:06 AM EST, Alan C wrote: Identifying a common ancestor. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 3:15 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor The key to what? Cheers, frank On November 26, 2015 7:58:51 AM EST, Alan C wrote: Sorry, I didn't realize. O.K. - you can have a nice cup of Rooibos tea instead. It look as if DNA studies will be the key. Chimps, Bonobos & Humans share about 70% of their DNA. There are variations between human population groups too but there is an incredible web of interbreeding & migration still to be unravelled. Those who think the Neanderthals became extinct have it all wrong - just look at the front rows of rugby scrums! Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W-PDML Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:19 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor That won't do my gout any good. B On 26 Nov 2015, at 12:02, Alan C wrote: Cheddarmelt steak, two eggs, mopane worms & chips fried in lard. Alan C -Original Message- From: Bob W Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:43 PM To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' Subject: RE: PESO - The Protestor I'm not as strong-willed as Frank, so I don't mind answering this because I'm curious to see where it's going. Humans are most closely related to common chimps and to bonobos. Since common chimps and bonobos diverged after humans diverged we are equally closely related to both. Jared Diamond wrote an excellent book called The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee in which he argues for the rights of the (other) great apes, and talks about the closeness of humans and chimps. It's quite an old book now so some of the human ancestry stuff is probably outdated, but it is still an excellent read. The question of the most recent common ancestor of humans and chimps does not seem to have been settled yet. There are several candidates, but discoveries seem to happen so often that before the ink is dry on the latest paper someone announces another candidate. I don't think there's any reason to suppose we'll ever identify The One. There seems to have been a very complex and rapid set of speciations happening around the estimated time of the split. Even if fossils are found of The One it may be difficult to prove among all the other candidates, but we'll probably have a reasonably accurate idea of the type of creature it was. The current candidates include Orrorin tugenensis from Kenya, and Sahelanthropus tchadensis, but there are so many different theories that somebody like me who just follows the subject from a distance would be unwise to say 'this is the one'. Having watched from the sidelines for about 40 years and seen so many apparently strong candidates sidelined I wouldn't even hazard a guess. Can I have my surprise now? B -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Alan C Sent: Thursday, 26 November, 2015 5:06 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go on, I dare you, be a devil. Do some research. You may be surprised what you find. Alan C -Original Message- From: knarf Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 6:52 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor I have no idea which other great ape is
Re: PESO - The Protestor
How about them Lions? And thank you Bears for knocking off the Packers. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist"Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Go Bears! Uh, sorry is that off topic? Paul via phone On Nov 26, 2015, at 11:04 PM, Alan C wrote: https://www.organicfacts.net/health-benefits/beverage/health-benefits-of-red-rooibos-tea.html BTW, beer is very nutitional, even the alcohol free offerings. Presumably you prefer the real thing? Alan C -Original Message- From: frank theriault Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 5:42 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO - The Protestor Caffeine free? What's the point then? It's like alcohol free beer... LOL cheers, frank -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.