Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Dan Sugalski
I'm about done setting up the TPF Win32 tinderbox machine. It's a WinXP 
Pro gadget with Visual Studio .NET. I'm going to install cygwin as well.

I'll be setting up tinderboxes for it but, honestly, I don't do windows 
programming, so I'm not particularly sure what'd be useful. I'm going to 
try and get JIT and non-JIT tinders for both vanilla VS and cygwin builds, 
but I'd be more than happy if someone with some actual windows experience 
would throw in some suggestions on what and how to set things up for the 
maximum utility.

Dan



Re: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Melvin Smith
Based on current customers I would guess the following in priority:

VC/C++ (latest non-.NET version, most people I know are still building 
their stuff with Pre-.NET versions)
Visual Studio .NET
Cygwin
Borland C++ Builder


I love Borland but I have to put it last because I think the 1st 3 covers 
more installed base.

Just my opinions.

Hey where is my free P6E copy? :P

I'm plugging the book here at IBM, although I never saw my name mentioned, 
particularly in the IMCC chapter. :)
I'm doing a Lunch-N-Learn soon and will use the book.

Later,

-Melvin






Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/11/2003 02:54 PM

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Need Win32 Tinder suggestions



I'm about done setting up the TPF Win32 tinderbox machine. It's a WinXP 
Pro gadget with Visual Studio .NET. I'm going to install cygwin as well.

I'll be setting up tinderboxes for it but, honestly, I don't do windows 
programming, so I'm not particularly sure what'd be useful. I'm going to 
try and get JIT and non-JIT tinders for both vanilla VS and cygwin builds, 

but I'd be more than happy if someone with some actual windows experience 
would throw in some suggestions on what and how to set things up for the 
maximum utility.

 Dan





Re: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:

 Based on current customers I would guess the following in priority:
 
 VC/C++ (latest non-.NET version, most people I know are still building 
 their stuff with Pre-.NET versions)
 Visual Studio .NET
 Cygwin
 Borland C++ Builder

I don't have VC/C++ or Borland -- if someone gets me copies I'll install 
them and make 'em build as well.

 Hey where is my free P6E copy? :P

D'oh! Sitting on my bureau waiting to get packaged up and mailed. You sent 
me your address, right?

Dan



Re: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Melvin Smith
Eep, I was too busy poking fun at Dan about the book I forgot to say:

1) I do not represent IBM nor IBM's preferences for development 
environment, I was just guessing.
You are welcome to add IBM  Visual Age stuff in there, let me know if 
you need a license. :)

2) The P6E book was well done, I did finally get a look at it at Barnes 
and Noble. Good job Dan/Leo.

Cheers,

-Melvin






Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/11/2003 02:54 PM

 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: 
Subject:Need Win32 Tinder suggestions



I'm about done setting up the TPF Win32 tinderbox machine. It's a WinXP 
Pro gadget with Visual Studio .NET. I'm going to install cygwin as well.

I'll be setting up tinderboxes for it but, honestly, I don't do windows 
programming, so I'm not particularly sure what'd be useful. I'm going to 
try and get JIT and non-JIT tinders for both vanilla VS and cygwin builds, 

but I'd be more than happy if someone with some actual windows experience 
would throw in some suggestions on what and how to set things up for the 
maximum utility.

 Dan





Re: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Melvin Smith
I do have an older version of Borland that I can mail you, but I think it 
is at least 2 releases old 
 As for Microsoft I can't help with a license, but I can probably get us 
one for IBM Visual Age.
I assume you have a lot of disk space?

Doesn't Borland have some sort of free download version that is 
non-commercial usable? I'll check.

-Melvin





Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/11/2003 03:08 PM

 
To: Melvin Smith/ATLANTA/Contr/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions



On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:

 Based on current customers I would guess the following in priority:
 
 VC/C++ (latest non-.NET version, most people I know are still building 
 their stuff with Pre-.NET versions)
 Visual Studio .NET
 Cygwin
 Borland C++ Builder

I don't have VC/C++ or Borland -- if someone gets me copies I'll install 
them and make 'em build as well.

 Hey where is my free P6E copy? :P

D'oh! Sitting on my bureau waiting to get packaged up and mailed. You sent 

me your address, right?

  Dan





Re: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:

 Eep, I was too busy poking fun at Dan about the book I forgot to say:
 
 1) I do not represent IBM nor IBM's preferences for development 
 environment, I was just guessing.
 You are welcome to add IBM  Visual Age stuff in there, let me know if 
 you need a license. :)

And media! (Or a download location) I'd be thrilled to have it up and 
running. I should probably try and find a license for Intel's compiler 
too. (I think the 80G drive on this thing may end up being too small...)
 
 2) The P6E book was well done, I did finally get a look at it at Barnes 
 and Noble. Good job Dan/Leo.

And it's your job, if you choose to accept it, to help make it horribly 
out-of-date. :)

Dan



Re: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 03:16:15PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
 And it's your job, if you choose to accept it, to help make it horribly 
 out-of-date. :)

Are there going to be (booby) prizes for the people who make the most
paragraphs obsolete? Is anyone counting?
(Who do I score the U-turn on page 93 to?)

Nicholas Clark


Re: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:

 I do have an older version of Borland that I can mail you, but I think it 
 is at least 2 releases old 
  As for Microsoft I can't help with a license, but I can probably get us 
 one for IBM Visual Age.

I may be able to scare up media and license from MS for VS/C++. They're 
the folks that got us the VS/.NET kit.

 I assume you have a lot of disk space?

With 80 gig I thought I did, but I'm not so sure at this point... :)
 
 Doesn't Borland have some sort of free download version that is 
 non-commercial usable? I'll check.

I honestly don't know. It's been a few years since I used Windows, and at 
that point it was mostly as an X client, Eudora host, DVD player, and 
cygwin setup. I don't know about all these fancy gooey tools everyone's 
using... :-P

Dan



Re: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Nicholas Clark wrote:

 On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 03:16:15PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
  And it's your job, if you choose to accept it, to help make it horribly 
  out-of-date. :)
 
 Are there going to be (booby) prizes for the people who make the most
 paragraphs obsolete? Is anyone counting?

Heh. We ought to do that. Winner gets a mention in the forward of the next
version. Dunno if we should send on a signed copy, or a hand corrected
version of the old copy.

 (Who do I score the U-turn on page 93 to?)

Don't have it handy. Which U-turn is that?

Dan



RE: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Brent Dax
Dan Sugalski:
#  (Who do I score the U-turn on page 93 to?)
# 
# Don't have it handy. Which U-turn is that?

Presumably, Coroutines can be implemented in terms of continuations if
need be, but that requires using a full continuation-passing function
call system, something we chose not to do.

--Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perl and Parrot hacker
 
Yeah, and my underwear is flame-retardant--that doesn't mean I'm gonna
set myself on fire to prove it.



RE: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Brent Dax wrote:

 Dan Sugalski:
 #  (Who do I score the U-turn on page 93 to?)
 # 
 # Don't have it handy. Which U-turn is that?
 
 Presumably, Coroutines can be implemented in terms of continuations if
 need be, but that requires using a full continuation-passing function
 call system, something we chose not to do.

Ah. That one's the collective fault of the denizens of the Little 
Languages mailing list and the MIT Lisp and/or Scheme folks.

Dan



RE: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Brent Dax
Dan Sugalski:
# Ah. That one's the collective fault of the denizens of the Little
# Languages mailing list and the MIT Lisp and/or Scheme folks.

Oh, and in case it wasn't abundantly clear before, I already picked up a
copy--a month or so ago, while I was on vacation and needed something to
read during long drives.  It was good, but not long enough to last from
Virginia to Philadelphia.  ;^)

--Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perl and Parrot hacker
 
Yeah, and my underwear is flame-retardant--that doesn't mean I'm gonna
set myself on fire to prove it.





RE: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Dan Sugalski
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Brent Dax wrote:

 Dan Sugalski:
 # Ah. That one's the collective fault of the denizens of the Little
 # Languages mailing list and the MIT Lisp and/or Scheme folks.
 
 Oh, and in case it wasn't abundantly clear before, I already picked up a
 copy--a month or so ago, while I was on vacation and needed something to
 read during long drives.  It was good, but not long enough to last from
 Virginia to Philadelphia.  ;^)

You were supposed to take the rest of the time and sketch out a grammar 
for perl 6 regular expressions. Did we leave that bit out of the end of 
the book? (Damn, one more erratta to add! :)

Dan



Re: Need Win32 Tinder suggestions

2003-09-11 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 12:44:05PM -0700, Brent Dax wrote:
 Dan Sugalski:
 #  (Who do I score the U-turn on page 93 to?)
 # 
 # Don't have it handy. Which U-turn is that?
 
 Presumably, Coroutines can be implemented in terms of continuations if
 need be, but that requires using a full continuation-passing function
 call system, something we chose not to do.

That would be the one:

  http://www.ccl4.org/~nick/P/p6ee++.jpeg

(thanks to my housemate hoggy for taking the picture)

I think that a fully hand corrected first edition would make quite an
interesting prize.

Nicholas Clark