[Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

2007-01-17 Thread Walt
Rich,

This concern may have been best addressed by Michael (Funk) last evening. He
wrote in part: check out some of the ebay discussions boards on this
subject.

Those boards, despite some of the irrational and subjective peanut-gallery
noisemakers you will see, are the best place to find others who, probably
like me, you, and so many other genuinely responsible and decent folks in
Phono-L, really do have a focused and genuine concern for how these changes
affect eBay users in general.

Now...If eBay were to implement a truly democratic process rather than a
dictatorship, I would vote for Loran Hughes to be president. Hey...Maybe
that would be a good fundraiser for the coming years: A bumper sticker that
reads, Loran Hughes is MY President. But in the meantime, don't forget
what Inspector Harry Callahan (a.k.a Clint Eastwood - one of the guys who
used to be on the bumper sticker that we are going to put Loran on) said in
the 1973 movie, Magnum Force:

A man's got to know his limitations.

Walt



-Original Message-
From: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org] On
Behalf Of Rich
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:04 AM
To: Antique Phonograph List
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

As eBay only provides a 30 day look back and there is no way to find the IP
address of the seller and 
bidders from the information provided by eBay, how does this recent change -
... makes it harder to 
detect fraudulent bidding too,  The only thing that I have seen is
multiple bids from the same 
individual.  That just looks dumb to me.  To make shill bidding work there
needs to be a minimum of 2 
bidders, at least one of which is the shill.  How are you going to RELIABLY
detect this?  If is is poorly 
done it is obvious but if it is done right you will never know.  The only
way to tell is to have the IP of 
the seller and all bidders then if the bids from two bidders or the seller
and one bidder originate from 
the same IP you would be correct in suspecting something.

In my opinion this is a tempest in a very small tea pot.  I find the highly
inflated shipping and 
handling charges much more egregious and revealing as to the ethics of the
seller.

Rich



On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:48:30 -0800 (PST), Donald Dellmann wrote:

Generally in the past, a private auction was used for items where it was
likely that people wouldn't 
want their friends to know what they were buying.  Prime examples would be
items of a sexual or 
fetishistic nature, or unusual items out of the mainstream of society.
Applying it to auctions in 
general does protect bidders, I can see eBay's point, but it also makes it
harder to detect fraudulent 
bidding too, so I have to lean towards the side of opposition to the new
policy.
   
  Don

Daniel Melvin d...@old-phonographs.com wrote:
  I have always avoided auctions that hide bidders. I agree with Jeff's 
suspicions. I just don't trust sellers that hide things. It just feels 
wrong. I suppose many people have had OK transactions this way. It's not
for 
me though.

Dan

- Original Message - 
From: 
To: 

Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!



 In a message dated 1/16/2007 4:13:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
 jeff...@prevea.com writes:

 Has anyone bid, or won anything with these bidder identification 
 protected
 auctions? The seller of the Zonophone-A is doing that with that
particular
 auction.



 
 eBay has always had an option for keeping bidders private, but this is
not
 the case here. Recently eBay instituted a new policy whereby anything
that 
 tops
 $200 becomes protected. It's not the seller's choice. Instead of
showing
 bidder IDs it shows Bidder 1,  Bidder 2 etc. This is an attempt to 
 combat
 rampant fraud since so many scammers are sending fake second chance 
 notices
 to underbidders. By hiding bidders on higher-priced items they hope to 
 cut
 down on these scams. It will also prevent people from offering similar 
 items
 to underbidders by private message.

 On the bid history page you can view some statistics on the bidders. 
 Perhaps
 the most telling is the one that shows what percent of the bidder's total
 bid activity is with the particular seller. In the Zonophone auction, for
 example, the current high bidder has 42% of activity with the seller. 
 That's
 certainly very high. It also shows the categories the bidder has been 
 active in,
 so it's very easy to see if a person who spends most of his time buying
 Christmas ornaments is suddenly a player on high-end collector 
 phonographs.

 The new system is far from ideal, and I confess I liked to see what other
 people were bidding on. But by the same token, I never liked airing my 
 own bid
 history publicly so I guess I'm a hypocrite at heart! Overall I think 
 this
 new system will have more pros than cons. (And it will hopefully stifle 
 some of
 the con artists, pun intended)

 Best regards,

[Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

2007-01-17 Thread Rich
My point is that just looking at the bidder's bidding history and the sellers' 
selling history does not 
provide much meaningful information.  The exceptions are the stolen IDs, no 
feedback high buck item, 
and several others.  All of these are easy to spot and check out.  My point is 
that if a seller uses shill 
bidding to run up the final price and is reasonably creative you will never 
know it.  This is just exactly 
how it happens at the live in person auctions.

Harry Callahan (a.k.a Clint Eastwood was right though, A man's got to know his 
limitations.  If you 
lack the ability to spot a bad deal (auction) then you are going to get taken 
to the cleaners.  Same for 
poker games...

I realize also that there is massive resistance to any change, good or bad.  
Something about a golden 
vice comes immediately to mind.

I do not see any real problem with the eBay change as regards $200.00 value 
auctions.  And I do ever 
so often look in on the eBay community forums.  I guess my thought is this, why 
do I need to know 
who Bidder 1 is?  What information will this provide that will possibly protect 
me from being taken?

One thing you can be quite sure of is that if an item hits eBay and it is 
fairly and correctly described 
and is also a desirable collectable the final price will be right up there.  
There will be no bargain deal.

Rich




On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 12:06:42 -0500, Walt wrote:

Rich,

This concern may have been best addressed by Michael (Funk) last evening. He
wrote in part: check out some of the ebay discussions boards on this
subject.

Those boards, despite some of the irrational and subjective peanut-gallery
noisemakers you will see, are the best place to find others who, probably
like me, you, and so many other genuinely responsible and decent folks in
Phono-L, really do have a focused and genuine concern for how these changes
affect eBay users in general.

Now...If eBay were to implement a truly democratic process rather than a
dictatorship, I would vote for Loran Hughes to be president. Hey...Maybe
that would be a good fundraiser for the coming years: A bumper sticker that
reads, Loran Hughes is MY President. But in the meantime, don't forget
what Inspector Harry Callahan (a.k.a Clint Eastwood - one of the guys who
used to be on the bumper sticker that we are going to put Loran on) said in
the 1973 movie, Magnum Force:

A man's got to know his limitations.

Walt



-Original Message-
From: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org] On
Behalf Of Rich
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:04 AM
To: Antique Phonograph List
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

As eBay only provides a 30 day look back and there is no way to find the IP
address of the seller and 
bidders from the information provided by eBay, how does this recent change -
... makes it harder to 
detect fraudulent bidding too,  The only thing that I have seen is
multiple bids from the same 
individual.  That just looks dumb to me.  To make shill bidding work there
needs to be a minimum of 2 
bidders, at least one of which is the shill.  How are you going to RELIABLY
detect this?  If is is poorly 
done it is obvious but if it is done right you will never know.  The only
way to tell is to have the IP of 
the seller and all bidders then if the bids from two bidders or the seller
and one bidder originate from 
the same IP you would be correct in suspecting something.

In my opinion this is a tempest in a very small tea pot.  I find the highly
inflated shipping and 
handling charges much more egregious and revealing as to the ethics of the
seller.

Rich



On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:48:30 -0800 (PST), Donald Dellmann wrote:

Generally in the past, a private auction was used for items where it was
likely that people wouldn't 
want their friends to know what they were buying.  Prime examples would be
items of a sexual or 
fetishistic nature, or unusual items out of the mainstream of society.
Applying it to auctions in 
general does protect bidders, I can see eBay's point, but it also makes it
harder to detect fraudulent 
bidding too, so I have to lean towards the side of opposition to the new
policy.
   
  Don

Daniel Melvin d...@old-phonographs.com wrote:
  I have always avoided auctions that hide bidders. I agree with Jeff's 
suspicions. I just don't trust sellers that hide things. It just feels 
wrong. I suppose many people have had OK transactions this way. It's not
for 
me though.

Dan

- Original Message - 
From: 
To: 

Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!



 In a message dated 1/16/2007 4:13:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
 jeff...@prevea.com writes:

 Has anyone bid, or won anything with these bidder identification 
 protected
 auctions? The seller of the Zonophone-A is doing that with that
particular
 auction.



 
 eBay has always had an option for keeping bidders private, but this is
not
 the 

[Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

2007-01-17 Thread Ken Danckaert
It seems to me that it will not do much good to discuss this only on 
Phono-L.  You all need to state your displeasure to Ebay itself.  That 
is not an easy task since Ebay makes it very difficult to send something 
directly to them.  If anyone knows a good way to send them your comments 
please share it with the rest of us.  I have commented on the new policy 
on one of the chat boards but there is no way to know if Ebay pays much 
attention to that.   I make heavy use of the bidder info to protect 
myself as both a buyer and seller.  Ebay has shown themselves to be 
incapable of  protecting the buyers and sellers from the abuses that 
have been discussed here.  I believe the policy is purely profit based 
and they could care less about the rest of us.  Unless they can 
guarantee protection to buyers and sellers from the abuses that are 
rampent on Ebay, then they should not remove about the only way we have 
to protect ourselves.

Ken


 Walt wrote:

Rich,

This concern may have been best addressed by Michael (Funk) last evening. He
wrote in part: check out some of the ebay discussions boards on this
subject.

Those boards, despite some of the irrational and subjective peanut-gallery
noisemakers you will see, are the best place to find others who, probably
like me, you, and so many other genuinely responsible and decent folks in
Phono-L, really do have a focused and genuine concern for how these changes
affect eBay users in general.

Now...If eBay were to implement a truly democratic process rather than a
dictatorship, I would vote for Loran Hughes to be president. Hey...Maybe
that would be a good fundraiser for the coming years: A bumper sticker that
reads, Loran Hughes is MY President. But in the meantime, don't forget
what Inspector Harry Callahan (a.k.a Clint Eastwood - one of the guys who
used to be on the bumper sticker that we are going to put Loran on) said in
the 1973 movie, Magnum Force:

A man's got to know his limitations.

Walt

  

 
From rich-m...@octoxol.com  Wed Jan 17 10:48:58 2007
From: rich-m...@octoxol.com (Rich)
Date: Wed Jan 17 10:49:09 2007
Subject: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!
In-Reply-To: 45ae6a03.5010...@lemur.org
Message-ID: 20070117184900.c61c2292...@mail.intellitechcomputing.com

The bidder information is available to the seller.  It is ONLY converted to 
Bidder 1 etc.  for the other 
bidders.

I might be missing something here, so please clarify, if you would.  What 
exactly does knowing the 
bidders actual eBay user IDs provide to you as regards protection that Bidder 
1 etc. does not?

Rich



On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:25:07 -0500, Ken Danckaert wrote:

It seems to me that it will not do much good to discuss this only on 
Phono-L.  You all need to state your displeasure to Ebay itself.  That 
is not an easy task since Ebay makes it very difficult to send something 
directly to them.  If anyone knows a good way to send them your comments 
please share it with the rest of us.  I have commented on the new policy 
on one of the chat boards but there is no way to know if Ebay pays much 
attention to that.   I make heavy use of the bidder info to protect 
myself as both a buyer and seller.  Ebay has shown themselves to be 
incapable of  protecting the buyers and sellers from the abuses that 
have been discussed here.  I believe the policy is purely profit based 
and they could care less about the rest of us.  Unless they can 
guarantee protection to buyers and sellers from the abuses that are 
rampent on Ebay, then they should not remove about the only way we have 
to protect ourselves.

Ken




[Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

2007-01-17 Thread Daniel Melvin
Well, for one; I try not to purposely bid against some of my other phono 
friends that live in my same town. It isn't that there is a problem bidding 
against someone you know, I just choose to not do it as a courtesy to my 
friends. This change eliminates that possibility. I also know who many of 
the real phono ebay users are. It makes me feel better when legit folks are 
bidding. And, I see no value to anyone in this change. It's stupid.

Dan

- Original Message - 
From: Rich rich-m...@octoxol.com
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!


 The bidder information is available to the seller.  It is ONLY converted 
 to Bidder 1 etc.  for the other
 bidders.

 I might be missing something here, so please clarify, if you would.  What 
 exactly does knowing the
 bidders actual eBay user IDs provide to you as regards protection that 
 Bidder 1 etc. does not?

 Rich



 On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:25:07 -0500, Ken Danckaert wrote:

It seems to me that it will not do much good to discuss this only on
Phono-L.  You all need to state your displeasure to Ebay itself.  That
is not an easy task since Ebay makes it very difficult to send something
directly to them.  If anyone knows a good way to send them your comments
please share it with the rest of us.  I have commented on the new policy
on one of the chat boards but there is no way to know if Ebay pays much
attention to that.   I make heavy use of the bidder info to protect
myself as both a buyer and seller.  Ebay has shown themselves to be
incapable of  protecting the buyers and sellers from the abuses that
have been discussed here.  I believe the policy is purely profit based
and they could care less about the rest of us.  Unless they can
guarantee protection to buyers and sellers from the abuses that are
rampent on Ebay, then they should not remove about the only way we have
to protect ourselves.

Ken



 ___
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.oldcrank.org 


[Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

2007-01-17 Thread wilenz...@bellsouth.net
I agree completely.  It's very stupid and useless.  I find it helpful to see 
exactly who is bidding, and this adds a certain amount of enjoyment to the 
eBay game.   If eBay wanted to eliminate a lot of problems, they could 
simply do away with the 2nd chance offer.  Hiding the names of the bidders 
will certainly increase the number of shill bidders.  The change is very ill 
advised and one that eBay will certainly regret.  I have heard that Google 
is considering getting into the auction business, and if they do then eBay 
will be in real trouble.

Ray

- Original Message - 
From: Daniel Melvin d...@old-phonographs.com
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!


 Well, for one; I try not to purposely bid against some of my other phono 
 friends that live in my same town. It isn't that there is a problem 
 bidding against someone you know, I just choose to not do it as a courtesy 
 to my friends. This change eliminates that possibility. I also know who 
 many of the real phono ebay users are. It makes me feel better when legit 
 folks are bidding. And, I see no value to anyone in this change. It's 
 stupid.

 Dan

 - Original Message - 
 From: Rich rich-m...@octoxol.com
 To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:48 AM
 Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!


 The bidder information is available to the seller.  It is ONLY converted 
 to Bidder 1 etc.  for the other
 bidders.

 I might be missing something here, so please clarify, if you would.  What 
 exactly does knowing the
 bidders actual eBay user IDs provide to you as regards protection that 
 Bidder 1 etc. does not?

 Rich



 On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:25:07 -0500, Ken Danckaert wrote:

It seems to me that it will not do much good to discuss this only on
Phono-L.  You all need to state your displeasure to Ebay itself.  That
is not an easy task since Ebay makes it very difficult to send something
directly to them.  If anyone knows a good way to send them your comments
please share it with the rest of us.  I have commented on the new policy
on one of the chat boards but there is no way to know if Ebay pays much
attention to that.   I make heavy use of the bidder info to protect
myself as both a buyer and seller.  Ebay has shown themselves to be
incapable of  protecting the buyers and sellers from the abuses that
have been discussed here.  I believe the policy is purely profit based
and they could care less about the rest of us.  Unless they can
guarantee protection to buyers and sellers from the abuses that are
rampent on Ebay, then they should not remove about the only way we have
to protect ourselves.

Ken



 ___
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

 ___
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
 



[Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

2007-01-17 Thread michael funk
Part of this new hidden bidder ID policy is revealed when a bidder search is
done.  Formerly, one could obtain a history of recent bidding activity of
any particular bidder for both completed and in-process auctions.  This
search enabled one to see the specific bidding activities for both items won
and not won.  The new policy enables a searcher to see only the finFINAL
PRICE of auctions WON by that particular bidder - and no other bidding
activities, whatsoever.  From the point of view of the ebay community
at-large, bidding histories have, essentially, evaporated for items over $
200. I believe one of the key points that concerned ebay members are trying
to make is this:  I DON'T CARE WHO THE BIDDER IS OR WHAT HIS IP ADDRESS IS,
BUT I DO CARE TO KNOW WHAT HE DOES. He may shill or he may not shill, but
don't take away some of the information that, quite possibly, might help me
make my own decision in the auction process.  If it is good information for
auctions less than $ 200, is it not be even better information for auctions
more than $ 200?

-Original Message-
From: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org] On
Behalf Of wilenz...@bellsouth.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 2:47 PM
To: Antique Phonograph List
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

I agree completely.  It's very stupid and useless.  I find it helpful to see

exactly who is bidding, and this adds a certain amount of enjoyment to the 
eBay game.   If eBay wanted to eliminate a lot of problems, they could 
simply do away with the 2nd chance offer.  Hiding the names of the bidders

will certainly increase the number of shill bidders.  The change is very ill

advised and one that eBay will certainly regret.  I have heard that Google 
is considering getting into the auction business, and if they do then eBay 
will be in real trouble.

Ray

- Original Message - 
From: Daniel Melvin d...@old-phonographs.com
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!


 Well, for one; I try not to purposely bid against some of my other phono 
 friends that live in my same town. It isn't that there is a problem 
 bidding against someone you know, I just choose to not do it as a courtesy

 to my friends. This change eliminates that possibility. I also know who 
 many of the real phono ebay users are. It makes me feel better when legit 
 folks are bidding. And, I see no value to anyone in this change. It's 
 stupid.

 Dan

 - Original Message - 
 From: Rich rich-m...@octoxol.com
 To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:48 AM
 Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!


 The bidder information is available to the seller.  It is ONLY converted 
 to Bidder 1 etc.  for the other
 bidders.

 I might be missing something here, so please clarify, if you would.  What

 exactly does knowing the
 bidders actual eBay user IDs provide to you as regards protection that 
 Bidder 1 etc. does not?

 Rich



 On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:25:07 -0500, Ken Danckaert wrote:

It seems to me that it will not do much good to discuss this only on
Phono-L.  You all need to state your displeasure to Ebay itself.  That
is not an easy task since Ebay makes it very difficult to send something
directly to them.  If anyone knows a good way to send them your comments
please share it with the rest of us.  I have commented on the new policy
on one of the chat boards but there is no way to know if Ebay pays much
attention to that.   I make heavy use of the bidder info to protect
myself as both a buyer and seller.  Ebay has shown themselves to be
incapable of  protecting the buyers and sellers from the abuses that
have been discussed here.  I believe the policy is purely profit based
and they could care less about the rest of us.  Unless they can
guarantee protection to buyers and sellers from the abuses that are
rampent on Ebay, then they should not remove about the only way we have
to protect ourselves.

Ken



 ___
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

 ___
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
 


___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
From steve_nor...@msn.com  Wed Jan 17 15:23:12 2007
From: steve_nor...@msn.com (Steven Medved)
Date: Wed Jan 17 17:25:28 2007
Subject: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!
Message-ID: bay124-w50bfc12d54a99b09e969eaf6...@phx.gbl

When certain experts bid you know an item is genuine.  There were several items 
I was leery about until I saw one of the experts making a bid.
 
Steve


 I might be missing something here, so please clarify, if you would. What 
 exactly does knowing the  bidders actual eBay user IDs provide to you as 
 regards protection that Bidder 1 etc. does not?  Rich
From 

[Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

2007-01-17 Thread Rich
Several previous attempts have been made to horn in on the eBay business and 
they have all failed.  I 
do not think Google will fair any better than the last guy who tried.

I do not see how identifying a bidder as Bidder 1, Bidder 2 etc. will have any 
impact on the amount of 
shill bidding.  Only a complete idiot would assume that their actions were now 
hidden by the Bidder 
X label.

Rich


On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:47:13 -0500, wilenz...@bellsouth.net wrote:

I agree completely.  It's very stupid and useless.  I find it helpful to see 
exactly who is bidding, and this adds a certain amount of enjoyment to the 
eBay game.   If eBay wanted to eliminate a lot of problems, they could 
simply do away with the 2nd chance offer.  Hiding the names of the bidders 
will certainly increase the number of shill bidders.  The change is very ill 
advised and one that eBay will certainly regret.  I have heard that Google 
is considering getting into the auction business, and if they do then eBay 
will be in real trouble.

Ray

- Original Message - 
From: Daniel Melvin d...@old-phonographs.com
To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!


 Well, for one; I try not to purposely bid against some of my other phono 
 friends that live in my same town. It isn't that there is a problem 
 bidding against someone you know, I just choose to not do it as a courtesy 
 to my friends. This change eliminates that possibility. I also know who 
 many of the real phono ebay users are. It makes me feel better when legit 
 folks are bidding. And, I see no value to anyone in this change. It's 
 stupid.

 Dan

 - Original Message - 
 From: Rich rich-m...@octoxol.com
 To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:48 AM
 Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!


 The bidder information is available to the seller.  It is ONLY converted 
 to Bidder 1 etc.  for the other
 bidders.

 I might be missing something here, so please clarify, if you would.  What 
 exactly does knowing the
 bidders actual eBay user IDs provide to you as regards protection that 
 Bidder 1 etc. does not?

 Rich



 On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:25:07 -0500, Ken Danckaert wrote:

It seems to me that it will not do much good to discuss this only on
Phono-L.  You all need to state your displeasure to Ebay itself.  That
is not an easy task since Ebay makes it very difficult to send something
directly to them.  If anyone knows a good way to send them your comments
please share it with the rest of us.  I have commented on the new policy
on one of the chat boards but there is no way to know if Ebay pays much
attention to that.   I make heavy use of the bidder info to protect
myself as both a buyer and seller.  Ebay has shown themselves to be
incapable of  protecting the buyers and sellers from the abuses that
have been discussed here.  I believe the policy is purely profit based
and they could care less about the rest of us.  Unless they can
guarantee protection to buyers and sellers from the abuses that are
rampent on Ebay, then they should not remove about the only way we have
to protect ourselves.

Ken



 ___
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

 ___
 Phono-L mailing list
 http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
 


___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org




[Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

2007-01-17 Thread Ken Danckaert
I have seen a number of instances where I was able to determine a shill 
bidder (in this case I'll call them a ftiend of the seller) where they 
are bidding on items fron a particular seller.  It usually has nothing 
to do with the category of the item.  In won auction they are bidding on 
a phonograph item, in another they are bidding onb an expensive doll, in 
another they are bidding on a gernerator -- all from the same seller.  
The odds of this kind of interaction is extremely high.  I do this by 
researching the high several bidders in an auction that I'm interested 
in.  This is valuable to me indetermining whether to bid on a particular 
auction or on auctions from a particular seller.

If someone is using a friend to up the bids on there items, chances are 
they will not be on the same server and will not have the same IP.  
Seeing these relationships lets me sort these people out.

Another use that I use that information for is to track bidders that 
have similar interests to me.  I can track items they are bidding on.   
If they have found something that I also want, I'll bid on it.  Some may 
not like this , but it is an auction and everything is open to everyone 
equally.  In other cases seeing shat other bidders are bidding on  might 
lead me to a seller that lists items in a manner that I would not have 
found it. 

Ken


Rich wrote:

The bidder information is available to the seller.  It is ONLY converted to 
Bidder 1 etc.  for the other 
bidders.

I might be missing something here, so please clarify, if you would.  What 
exactly does knowing the 
bidders actual eBay user IDs provide to you as regards protection that 
Bidder 1 etc. does not?

Rich



On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:25:07 -0500, Ken Danckaert wrote:

  

It seems to me that it will not do much good to discuss this only on 
Phono-L.  You all need to state your displeasure to Ebay itself.  That 
is not an easy task since Ebay makes it very difficult to send something 
directly to them.  If anyone knows a good way to send them your comments 
please share it with the rest of us.  I have commented on the new policy 
on one of the chat boards but there is no way to know if Ebay pays much 
attention to that.   I make heavy use of the bidder info to protect 
myself as both a buyer and seller.  Ebay has shown themselves to be 
incapable of  protecting the buyers and sellers from the abuses that 
have been discussed here.  I believe the policy is purely profit based 
and they could care less about the rest of us.  Unless they can 
guarantee protection to buyers and sellers from the abuses that are 
rampent on Ebay, then they should not remove about the only way we have 
to protect ourselves.



  

Ken





___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
  



[Phono-L] Standard A - Thread Mount Horn Information

2007-01-17 Thread Walt
I am trying to locate a decent Standard A (thread mounted) horn for a
machine I have. Many, perhaps most, were iridescent red, but I would be
happy with the non iridescent red also.

If someone has a decent original for sale, please contact me. It is for a
machine that I personally own (and will be keeping).

Walt


[Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

2007-01-17 Thread Dan K
The same has been used against me, in revenge for outbidding someone!  
Followed me around, upping 
the bid on everything I bid on, just for spite.
Some countries' privacy laws, such as Germany's, do not allow Ebat to show such 
information;  that's 
what I would like to see them adopt for all.


- Original Message - 
Another use that I use that information for is to track bidders that
have similar interests to me.  I can track items they are bidding on.
If they have found something that I also want, I'll bid on it.  Some may
not like this , but it is an auction and everything is open to everyone
equally. 


[Phono-L] Orthophonic Reproducer Bearings

2007-01-17 Thread Mark Lynch
Hey Walt,

Not only did five out of four students at my High School have trouble with
fractions but the other half couldn't even count!

Here is the link to the Victor electrodeposited Orthophonic diaphragm we
were talking about. I doubt it was ever put into production as the
Orthophonic era was so brief and likely it was faster to form a diaphragm
between dies. A fascinating idea none the less. 

http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT1793483id=a2lFEBAJpg=PP1dq=vic
tor+talking+machine+1931#PPP1,M1

Wanted: I am in search or a Victor Orthophonic/Electrola horn driver for a
10-51 or later 8-60/9-40. This is the large version with the
electromagnetic field coil not the more common permanent magnet horseshoe
type. Victor refered to it as an intermediate speaker and it contains a
large electrically driven orthophonic diaphragm. I can send pictures of the
insides for anyone interested.

I would be most pleased if everyone would keep me in mind. 

Best Wishes,
Mark


 [Original Message]
 From: Walt waltsomm...@comcast.net
 To: Antique Phonograph List phono-l@oldcrank.org
 Date: 1/11/2007 10:03:32 PM
 Subject: RE: [Phono-L] Orthophonic Reproducer Bearings

 Mark,

 Five out of four students is the same as saying 125% of the
 students...lol...

 I was reading another Victor patent that had to do with the last
 [production] version of the No.2 reproducer. If I look it up again I will
 get the number for everyone to take a look. In that particular patent,
 Eldridge Johnson set forth several concepts, not all of which were ever
 implemented in production. One of the ideas featured a needle bar balance
 system that used both a spring to establish neutral balance of the needle
 bar as well as bearings to keep the bar in parallel [with the record
plane].
 But it is obvious why Victor never implemented the system - there is no
 doubt that the springs could not be so precisely made or installed or
 bearings so accurately set as to not conflict (in some degree) with the
 forces that the bearings would otherwise try to uniformly establish about
 the circumference of the bar ends. The bottom line is that the springs
would
 always have a tendency to move the bar away from center (probably along
both
 axes) and work against what the bearings were trying to do. It's just a
bad
 idea...

 So what was Eldridge Johnson's motive for such a bizarre design? I think
the
 man's engineering skills were such that he certainly knew that the idea,
 although patented and easy enough to build, could not work as well as
those
 already in use. I often wonder that Victor patented so many ideas just to
be
 able to elbow-out the competition, whether it was a bad design, or a good
 one... Interestingly, I have never seen a balance spring used by any
company
 that looked like Eldridge's last No.2 design. On the other hand, the
bearing
 setup he proposed is remarkably similar to the later 6-bearing per side
 Columbia designs like you see in the No.9 and other later parts. But then,
 Columbia was one of those companies that not only had enough money to go
to
 court against Victor, but could pay a lawyer to live in the courtroom if
 necessary...hmmm

 It's not difficult to improve on Victor's old designs, especially
 considering the immense progress in materials engineering, but I, for one,
 would rather strive for originality if only to be original. About a year
 ago, I developed small inserts for the Orthophonic that are made of a
 composite that can be installed in place of the bearings. They work better
 than the bearings, can't rust, and probably have a friction coefficient
that
 is 100 times less than the steel bearings...but after I proved I could do
 it, I threw them all away...cuz that just ain't no fun Just a glance
at
 modern loudspeaker engineering hints at all sorts of Mylar and titanium
 films that would probably be superior diaphragms for most all reproducers,
 but that ain't no fun either...

 BTW, When you were here xmas eve with Doug you mentioned a Victor patent
 that had to do with an electroplating or electroforming process which was
 ultimately to be used for the production (I think) of diaphragms. Do you
by
 chance have the reference to that, or remember any keywords for it?

 Walt



 --Original Message-
 From: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org]
On
 Behalf Of mark lynch
 Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 11:24 AM
 To: Antique Phonograph List
 Subject: RE: [Phono-L] Orthophonic Reproducer Bearings

 Thanks Walt, it is amazing how those fractions work...did you know that
five
 out of four student at my High School had trouble with them?

 For all of us who have dealt with rebuilding Orthophonic soundboxes it
looks
 like Victor had another idea rather than the 1/16 balls to support the
 stylus bar. 


http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT1796149id=XldNEBAJpg=PP1dq=vic
 tor+talking+machine+1931#PPP1,M1

 Like many patented ideas it looks like this one was never put into
 

[Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

2007-01-17 Thread Rich
Having read through the previous posts as to the usefulness of the actual 
bidder IDs.  The one item 
that jumps out is the total lack of feedback information.  The value of that 
seems minimal to me but it 
does have value.  why do I care if another bidder is less than desirable as a 
friend.  The lack of the 
identification of the bidders will prevent the harassment of the winners 
though, as mentioned below.  
All of the rest of the comments are also true for the live auction setting.  
This is especially true when 
the live auction also accepts phone in bids and prior bids to be placed by the 
clerk.  seems to me that 
the majority of this bidder research is directed at determining the bidding 
habits of the competition 
so as to make the purchase at the absolute lowest price.  I have no problem 
with that, by the way.  But 
I have yet to see an argument for why the stated purpose of the new ebay policy 
will increase the risk 
to any other bidder.

As to the comment that by checking the bidder history one sees that a bidder 
bids on items from a 
specific seller and those items are not related to each other.  It is entirely 
possible that the bidder 
has located a seller who he considers a cut or two above the normal eBay seller 
and also has wide 
and various interests.  I have a list of my prefered sellers and I periodically 
check their listings to see 
if they have something that I can use, if so I bid on it.


Rich


On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:32:51 -0500, Dan K wrote:

The same has been used against me, in revenge for outbidding someone!  
Followed me around, 
upping 
the bid on everything I bid on, just for spite.
Some countries' privacy laws, such as Germany's, do not allow Ebat to show 
such information;  that's 
what I would like to see them adopt for all.


- Original Message - 
Another use that I use that information for is to track bidders that
have similar interests to me.  I can track items they are bidding on.
If they have found something that I also want, I'll bid on it.  Some may
not like this , but it is an auction and everything is open to everyone
equally. 

___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org




[Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

2007-01-17 Thread Rich
Or, there is also the remote possibility that they also have been fooled.

Rich

On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:23:12 -0500, Steven Medved wrote:

When certain experts bid you know an item is genuine.  There were several 
items I was leery about 
until I saw one of the experts making a bid.
 
Steve


 I might be missing something here, so please clarify, if you would. What 
 exactly does knowing the  
bidders actual eBay user IDs provide to you as regards protection that Bidder 
1 etc. does not?  
Rich___
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org




[Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!

2007-01-17 Thread aph4...@aol.com
 
In a message dated 1/17/2007 6:37:58 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,  
trainman...@prodigy.net writes:

I might  be missing something here, so please clarify, if you would. What 
exactly does  knowing the 
bidders actual eBay user IDs provide to you as regards  protection that 
Bidder 1 etc. does not?

Rich


The phonograph community is really very small.  When you've been in  this 
game for a while, you get to know who the knowledgeable bidders are.   When I 
see 
a potentially rare item attracting bids from knowledgeable  collectors, I am 
much more likely to bid myself.  This affords a certain  degree of protection 
from buying mistakes.  I'm sure everyone has his or  her own system for 
providing security in bidding, but I think it is unfortunate  that eBay has 
chosen 
to remove some of my security.
---Art Heller
From aph4...@aol.com  Thu Jan 18 08:18:09 2007
From: aph4...@aol.com (aph4...@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jan 18 08:18:24 2007
Subject: Fwd: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!
Message-ID: cd1.778940c.32e0f...@aol.com

 
In a message dated 1/17/2007 9:50:58 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,  
aph4...@aol.com writes:

I  might  be missing something here, so please clarify, if you would. What  
exactly does  knowing the 
bidders actual eBay user IDs provide to  you as regards  protection that 
Bidder 1 etc. does  not?

Rich


The phonograph community is really very  small.  When you've been in  this 
game for a while, you get to  know who the knowledgeable bidders are.   When 
I see 
a  potentially rare item attracting bids from knowledgeable  collectors, I  
am 
much more likely to bid myself.  This affords a certain   degree of 
protection 
from buying mistakes.  I'm sure everyone has his  or  her own system for 
providing security in bidding, but I think it  is unfortunate  that eBay has 
chosen 
to remove some of my  security.
---Art Heller


 
-- next part --
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: aph4...@aol.com
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 23:44:12 EST
Size: 4082
Url: 
http://www.oldcrank.org/pipermail/phono-l/attachments/20070118/0dd12e11/attachment.mht
From lo...@oldcrank.com  Thu Jan 18 11:33:27 2007
From: lo...@oldcrank.com (Loran Hughes)
Date: Thu Jan 18 11:33:47 2007
Subject: [Phono-L] Protected Bidding on ebay!
In-Reply-To: 01cf01c73a59$de510320$0200a...@daddell
References: 01cf01c73a59$de510320$0200a...@daddell
Message-ID: de07fd7b-6caf-47bd-997b-e4f074da7...@oldcrank.com

On Jan 17, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Walt wrote:

 ... I would vote for Loran Hughes to be president. Hey...Maybe
 that would be a good fundraiser for the coming years: A bumper  
 sticker that
 reads, Loran Hughes is MY President. But in the meantime, don't  
 forget
 what Inspector Harry Callahan (a.k.a Clint Eastwood - one of the  
 guys who
 used to be on the bumper sticker that we are going to put Loran on)  
 said in
 the 1973 movie, Magnum Force:

 A man's got to know his limitations.

Go ahead, make my day.

Now you're just scaring me, Walt!

LOL,
Loran
From aph4...@aol.com  Thu Jan 18 13:20:13 2007
From: aph4...@aol.com (aph4...@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jan 18 13:20:41 2007
Subject: [Phono-L] Re: Loran for President
Message-ID: cec.774f9f1.32e13...@aol.com

 
In a message dated 1/18/2007 12:35:50 P.M. Mountain Standard Time,  
lo...@oldcrank.com writes:

 ...  I would vote for Loran Hughes to be president. Hey...Maybe
 that would  be a good fundraiser for the coming years: A bumper  
 sticker  that
 reads, Loran Hughes is MY President. But in the meantime,  don't  
 forget
 what Inspector Harry Callahan (a.k.a Clint  Eastwood - one of the  
 guys who
 used to be on the bumper  sticker that we are going to put Loran on)  
 said in
 the  1973 movie, Magnum Force:

 A man's got to know his  limitations.

Go ahead, make my day.

Now you're just scaring  me, Walt!

LOL,
Loran


Hey. If Tom Tancredo can run for president (shudder!) certainly Loran  Hughes 
can too!
--Art Heller
From klin...@modex.com  Thu Jan 18 16:52:23 2007
From: klin...@modex.com (Bill Klinger)
Date: Thu Jan 18 16:52:42 2007
Subject: [Phono-L] Reminder: ARSC Conference Travel Grants
Message-ID: 01d001c73b64$152149e0$0201a...@billqbszr49l7m

The following message has been posted by the Outreach Committee of the
Association for Recorded Sound Collections (ARSC). If you need further
information, please click on the link or e-mail address below. Please DO NOT
simply hit REPLY or post further messages to this list.

-- ARSC CONFERENCE TRAVEL GRANTS --

Application Deadline: January 30, 2007

The Association for Recorded Sound Collections is now accepting applications
for ARSC Conference Travel Grants to be awarded in 2007.

Grant recipients are awarded:
-- complimentary registration for the entire ARSC Annual Conference
-- gratis registration for the Pre-Conference Workshop, and
-- reimbursement up to US$750 to defray the expenses of transportation and
lodging.

The grant requirements are detailed