[Pkg-kde-extras] Accepted qconf 2.4-3 (source) into unstable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 01:37:16 +0300 Source: qconf Binary: qconf Architecture: source Version: 2.4-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Qt extras Maintainers <debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org> Changed-By: Boris Pek <tehn...@debian.org> Description: qconf - nice configure script for qmake-based projects Changes: qconf (2.4-3) unstable; urgency=medium . * Change Maintainer name to "Debian Qt extras Maintainers". Checksums-Sha1: 02f65708cfb2b86b7067bddbd0b1f3bab210d0fa 1908 qconf_2.4-3.dsc 7ae5daade2ad5ef0951f0f70c7a9404c9ca1e110 97556 qconf_2.4.orig.tar.gz f44b26832273910063dadf2fcc3e56c1fee9e690 3684 qconf_2.4-3.debian.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 575e12e33fdc30c150074b4e9b478a4328810da6d5285648ee31cc1a2ed977de 1908 qconf_2.4-3.dsc 8a486060d5481f5b62171b8ffe343d9a9dd49e3b3170a1f79314ee34ea9e8819 97556 qconf_2.4.orig.tar.gz 6f8f59df16ede385230047d13f975863bb1c077dffcc85dab336fc8154e11df5 3684 qconf_2.4-3.debian.tar.xz Files: 975fbddf59a723c7c8a1491b8edd16e6 1908 devel optional qconf_2.4-3.dsc b94644b73f3151db6def9e36b3207cbc 97556 devel optional qconf_2.4.orig.tar.gz a608f7e83335aa40dfc75ce6fa921307 3684 devel optional qconf_2.4-3.debian.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJHBAEBCgAxFiEE74NZeBI5qRlNLX9Z0AFb0SjzkngFAlqXu+8THHRlaG5pY2tA ZGViaWFuLm9yZwAKCRDQAVvRKPOSeA6tD/9HuEh+JcXTfOmnr8ASE1qopnoICp6Q FxmVOxRO7g4bUoQGVa4AAgAk8cWYjoHUVgEM2nVuu7cyQ8dmIOcOoLUpODP4ILQ5 HvY5g1KthA0VolPPB4XwvKY1TWalsvCYQTx8jUHau5fSqrhlQNTJaASfYAB1z6TB t/qF/Kv9mUvaZMZXKGKhtVeRxWud2jDu0b7A5A8EAxholMAkFCrE+7Qu9n9vT39P YMgMIREi9mso8TIfz0sjXZicWpnUVH1on9O7EWkT8QIV0W3k6j2Yoh1y+vkoqanw +Ke8YvgC7Oeui326Cc4qflHTN1kCMpO7ky06XCMtWLnKW2IlIBKahF3UTTdVIl3x LtVeUHgtV8q7nVT3YwworYVek68NznsEORwyc6DqUhcy8D76XzQj/MVAshRbT3Kw IlLFvykHa97eH3yIFA+vx6Lgig8MfGBv6dPOo5PQZEIvnqry6Wn/iGAYa45ZMlTE F1DEJ/FjIVtdBP+XnKnBWhh5Bo/4N6GhvJtXd/w83SEILJB9lpya1EMyTosJXoye T4t38zKJkLOhLL6Ve+hskSxVee2BFanIXfhq1LFACPh7T+cD+cYGcN61hTeGYDHi BW2MWgANWgP4jpwP3fCy3sZGmOz7D0TKkL+zsvzvZFQoksLw/oEzFRYQwUONoVtn LzF1942T2GH0BQ== =etAf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Accepted qconf 2.4-1~bpo9+1 (source amd64) into stretch-backports, stretch-backports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:53:35 +0300 Source: qconf Binary: qconf Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.4-1~bpo9+1 Distribution: stretch-backports Urgency: medium Maintainer: Boris Pek <tehn...@debian.org> Changed-By: Boris Pek <tehn...@debian.org> Description: qconf - nice configure script for qmake-based projects Changes: qconf (2.4-1~bpo9+1) stretch-backports; urgency=medium . * Rebuild for stretch-backports. . qconf (2.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. * Bump Standards-Version to 4.1.2 (was 4.0.0): no changes required. . qconf (2.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium . * New upstream release. * Bump Standards-Version to 4.0.0 (was 3.9.8): no changes required. * Update years in debian/copyright. Checksums-Sha1: 7662a4a21bda52104367db6f8170460847abb436 1835 qconf_2.4-1~bpo9+1.dsc 287ffe75d6513d910059942f9ca5526e42e2cac5 3552 qconf_2.4-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz 2e65c7f7925ce14160fe68329f0d6766bbd88ae6 9966 qconf_2.4-1~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo 68d13cce5c5261ba4d8137c7d93d8450f733029b 65038 qconf_2.4-1~bpo9+1_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: ff9ec9d4f66025f8f823f5fddbcacc8e40471f9bec1a5c6450a429e3a78271ac 1835 qconf_2.4-1~bpo9+1.dsc d16857d2a496409afe69415aff2323d25428a1259458db1ec5153c463927c4ae 3552 qconf_2.4-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz 4c49edb3b551a8a3653aa36f57e6787c8fe346f3583b08a7c101c00f62fe88a4 9966 qconf_2.4-1~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo 4d9c6c715c138ccd558b05045a5d7617ae34dc68f2716757addc2acc61f2a972 65038 qconf_2.4-1~bpo9+1_amd64.deb Files: 307afd6713ff294b6c7adf129c637b7c 1835 devel optional qconf_2.4-1~bpo9+1.dsc 552fd8e4ada934743c06dea823b72530 3552 devel optional qconf_2.4-1~bpo9+1.debian.tar.xz 7d84326a999e02f2d622b25cee17eb0d 9966 devel optional qconf_2.4-1~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo 7f5a62df55783afd990b35e6db304bd1 65038 devel optional qconf_2.4-1~bpo9+1_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJHBAEBCgAxFiEE74NZeBI5qRlNLX9Z0AFb0SjzkngFAlqUgh8THHRlaG5pY2tA ZGViaWFuLm9yZwAKCRDQAVvRKPOSeC++EAChiauVswNO2Xb2RP9cnxSNUUVK7Vd8 FZRRSymgzWPHncieJDFgpabw2V3QFEEUOdq9QYPa1xRlDPHEZAYtQTFaX0g4FJCX J9MGPr+Z81Qew6jrDE3sfUonUa8VGU5UQbU4fGekwbJWK4dDF79Q/j9cOOweZoc3 pfOIvy42ILbpLQmughWmphsPOZHBlHAp6eIaDLHDTB/FD3J14kC35AlGl4pv7Nu7 QDOrNG8xvGLqlZrOkzgqion8z8W/5WeohWGBTfQ/IXIqI8JMqS2AfIWnku78K0Wu RcFqXSSKHsa8Wn+rlfEQl2qwzRIpTBxfJLM5wGQ28UvSqONzKiQVVAJzDsJmiBqQ Aw3qdN6fU8TtAW/+UwUCLor8l4hJlh3MspIklLMRajX+XOtFEgfTnq+j7CVuwK2W pggjS6NJThTrLuk/Kgvu4toAxtNfI6KjveM4MIb/2gWLRLsU4TlxVkLlDr/IAqPT 95qWsRg+j2+eZuTvTEkq4FBErYc8PLeNdlwRw/NmafR1GB0nLIbqsfnpSVUZDicx vx43cxg+tJNY6uWozl+rRGeDeJx4BnI8LVHuFuqHzNm80kIYs6mQdB2VM37VI4Ad YjemJdIAMMSkqAhusXBG+qq3o4QwfS+KKAlk9LzVLrBS18EzxD42SZRDXSkeVglR zqnCwW81z2NzXQ== =5mEM -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#865765: [qtcurve] Crash when using QtCurve widget style and Breeze preset
control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374046 > I don't think there is anything to be discussed actually. > > After closer studying of the latest upstream sources of QtCurve it > appears same exact bug was submitted a while back to them. Same exact > patch was committed to the upstream, see [1]. And here is an original > bug report [2]. > > So guess it's either matter downstreaming the fix or waiting for 1.9.0 > to be out (it is at RC1 state atm). > > [1] https://cgit.kde.org/qtcurve.git/commit/?id=f164a4b69 > [2] https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374046 I had not time to check last commits in upstream VCS, so I was not aware of this. Thanks for the links, I'll update the package soon. Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#865765: [qtcurve] Crash when using QtCurve widget style and Breeze preset
Hi Sergey, > Patch had some malformed header (was mixing information from previous > maintainer patch and residue of some older description). Here is an > updated patch with hopefully all headers filled correct. > > Hopefully this one will work fine :) Please discuss this patch with QtCurve developers in upstream BTS. Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#867576: Bug#867576: qtcurve: FTBFS with Qt 5.9: static assertion failed: QFlags is only usable on enumeration types.
Hi Dmitry, > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 05:18:41PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >> qtcurve fails to build with Qt 5.9 (available in experimental): >> >> [...] >> >> This upstream commit fixes this failure: >> https://cgit.kde.org/qtcurve.git/commit/?id=7ddd3782ea5635cc > > I have now committed this fix to the packaging Git [1], and I am going > to do a team upload. Do you have any objections against that? > > [1]: > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-kde/kde-extras/qtcurve.git/commit/?id=784e65e9dc406d7c Thank you for the patch! I'll look on this package today and will upload it. Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#827615: RM: xembed-sni-proxy -- ROM; Moved into plasma-workspace
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: tehn...@debian.org, pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi FTP masters, xembedsniproxy module was included into plasma-workspace since 5.5.0 release and plasma-workspace/4:5.6.4-2 is already in testing, so a separate package is not required anymore. Please remove xembed-sni-proxy package from unstable. Thanks ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#806500: quassel-client: Client configuration is world readable and contains password in plain text
Hi, > As I was trying to setup CertFP I had a look at > ~/.config/quassel-irc.org and noticed the following: > -rw-r--r-- 1 diederik diederik 8101 nov 28 03:01 quasselclient.conf > > Looking into that file I could easily see my password and that combined > with the security settings of that file did not make me happy. This is a wrong assumption, just look at directory access permissions: $ LC_ALL=C ls -alp ~/.config/ | grep '\./' drwx-- 96 user user 4096 Nov 28 23:44 ./ drwx-- 192 user user 12288 Nov 28 22:39 ../ Best wishes, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#806500: quassel-client: Client configuration is world readable and contains password in plain text
>> This is a wrong assumption, just look at directory access permissions: >> >> $ LC_ALL=C ls -alp ~/.config/ | grep '\./' >> drwx-- 96 user user 4096 Nov 28 23:44 ./ >> drwx-- 192 user user 12288 Nov 28 22:39 ../ > > Mine are not the same: > > diederik@bagend:~$ LC_ALL=C ls -alp ~/.config/ | grep '\./' > drwxr-xr-x 45 diederik diederik 4096 Nov 28 19:29 ./ > drwxr-x--- 68 diederik diederik 12288 Nov 28 17:59 ../ > diederik@bagend:~$ ls -ld ~/.config/ > drwxr-xr-x 45 diederik diederik 4096 nov 28 19:29 /home/diederik/.config/ > diederik@bagend:~$ ls -ld ~/.config/quassel-irc.org/ > drwxr-xr-x 2 diederik diederik 4096 nov 28 11:10 > /home/diederik/.config/quassel-irc.org/ This should be enough I think: > drwxr-x--- 68 diederik diederik 12288 Nov 28 17:59 ../ Try something like this: $ LC_ALL=C su another-user -c 'ls -alp /home/diederik/.config' Password: ls: cannot access /home/diederik/.config: Permission denied Best wishes, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#802200: [plasma-systray-legacy] Minor Icon Problems
Hi, Could you check if your bugs are still present in plasma-systray-legacy/0~git20151104-ded1538-1 ? Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#793869: Solvable by removing kde-style-qtcurve
Hi, This is solvable by removing kde-style-qtcurve. Then libqtcurve-utils1 is not required as kde-style-qtcurve-qt5 requires libqtcurve-utils2. Maybe kde-style-qtcurve needs to be recompiled with libqtcurve-utils2 as well, or is it obsoleted by kde-style-qtcurve-qt5? Please read changelog [1]. I believe you will find the answer in it. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-kde/kde-extras/qtcurve.git/tree/debian/changelog Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#708169: kde-config-gtk-style: Show Icons in GTK menus is read incorrectly from current configuration - fixed upstream
Hi, this bug actually had already been fixed upstream when I reported it, it just hasn't been merged to master: https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/base/kde-gtk-config/repository/revisions/8f23071c6e7719970be9383246df8f321131048b Another bug concerning mis-matched boolean configurations was also fixed: https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/base/kde-gtk-config/repository/revisions/f47a8380c76f42d7807fcd1e5bf82a540faa8d84 Thanks for links. It is a pity that too late: I prepared similar changes by myself [1]. Eh, next time I will look into other git branches. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-kde/kde-extras/kde-gtk-config.git I am going to fix desktop file and updated package will be uploaded soon. Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#708169: Bug#708169: kde-config-gtk-style: Show Icons in GTK menus is read incorrectly from current configuration - fixed upstream
Hi, However, doesn't your patch now skip the first line of the file? Now fixed. Thanks. Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#687901: unable to use gtk2-engines
Hi, There is no such package in repository (kde-config-gtk-style), at least at testing branch. You could help Release Team to make decision about including it into Wheezy: http://bugs.debian.org/685456 Even if we will have such package, we should to put it to gtk2-engines-* dependencies list. This is bad idea. But gtk2-engines-oxygen may recommend kde-config-gtk-style I think. Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#678714: Bug#678714: [kde-gtk-config] src: Fix freezing problem on load
Hi, the [1] patch is not really useful. It's removing symlinks but it's not harmful to follow them in this case. It's not a recursive/iterative function so it's harmless. It shouldn't be applied. Yes, you are right. I made test sample and checked it. So the first point in this bug report is false. Useless patch was removed. the [2] patch, on one part is fixing the bug like i did, I updated this patch to decrease the difference. on the other it's setting the first entry in the combo box for no apparent reason... When KDE is installed at least one icon theme is present in system. But without this change [1] user will see empty icons and empty combobox item at first run or if theme from his settings is not exist. I believe this should be fixed. Just remove your settings file and test the application. Best regards, Boris [1] https://github.com/tehnick/kde-gtk-config-debian/blob/master/debian/patches/fix-loading-icons#L33 ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#678714: [kde-gtk-config] src: Fix freezing problem on load
Git commit 81b7e1e43e5fce39ace676ef40637059b9bb9317 by Aleix Pol. Committed on 11/07/2012 at 13:29. Pushed by apol into branch 'master'. Fix freezing problem on load Don't iterate over the home directory, this happened in cases where the fallback icon theme was set to and Qt translated it to QDir() which was CWD. CCMAIL: 678...@bugs.debian.org M +6 -2 src/gtkconfigkcmodule.cpp M +1 -0 src/iconthemesmodel.cpp http://commits.kde.org/kde-gtk-config/81b7e1e43e5fce39ace676ef40637059b9bb9317 Hi, Sorry for delay, I am on vacation now. I prepared own patches some time ago [1][2]. And updated package [3] is currently waiting [4] for a freeze exception [5]. If freeze exception is granted package will be uploaded. Regards, Boris [1] https://github.com/tehnick/kde-gtk-config-debian/blob/master/debian/patches/ignore-symlinks [2] https://github.com/tehnick/kde-gtk-config-debian/blob/master/debian/patches/fix-loading-icons [3] http://mentors.debian.net/package/kde-gtk-config [4] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00262.html [5] http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] RFS: kde-gtk-config/3:2.1-1 [RC] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
Hi, It looks like Wheeze will be without this package. Not necessarily. As far as I can read the release.debian.org hints, 2.0-3 has been hinted to migrate despite the freeze. So I think we can safely assume that a fixed 2.0-3 could pass the freeze. I have asked release team about this package. But there is no reply yet. Now for the content of your proposed upload: * Update to stable release 2.1. * Deleted file debian/patches/fix-build-on-kfreebsd-and-hurd-i386: accepted in upstream. The two above are too much for a freeze exception. They would be suitable for experimental. There are only two changes in upstream between versions 2.0 and 2.1: * Accepted my patch fix-build-on-kfreebsd-and-hurd-i386. * Updated translations. * Added file debian/patches/ignore-symlinks: prevents of possible infinite loop because of circular symlinks. (Closes: #678714) I'm far from convinced that your proposed patch properly addresses #678714: you address point 1 by avoiding symlinks (this means that a Gtk3 theme put under /usr/share/themes/* with a symlink would not be detected e.g.) Hmm, I don't see symlinks in /usr/share/themes/ in my systems. Is it really possible situation? and you haven't addressed the point 2; you should answer to the bugreport by explaining how you plan to address (or not) it. Program don't scan user's home directory, but only ~/.themes/ subdirectory. So I think the problem is related with symlinks. I'll ask him to check it. So if we want this to go to Wheezy, we need a proposed source package as minimal as possible from 2.0-3 which was hinted for Wheezy. New translations might be put in though. Current package already has minimal possible changes in sources and updated translations. Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#678714: kde-config-gtk-style: Applet tries to scan user home directory, endlessly following symlinks
Hi, I have prepared a patch for ignoring symlinks. But I need more info about your second point. Program don't scan user's home directory, but only ~/.themes/ subdirectory. So I think the problem is related with symlinks. Could you check it please? Also strace log can be helpful. Because I have no such problem. Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] RFS: kde-gtk-config/3:2.1-1 [RC] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
Hi, I have updated the package: kde-gtk-config (3:2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * Update to stable release 2.1. * Deleted file debian/patches/fix-build-on-kfreebsd-and-hurd-i386: accepted in upstream. * Added file debian/patches/ignore-symlinks: prevents of possible infinite loop because of circular symlinks. (Closes: #678714) Could you upload it? Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.1-1.dsc Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] kde-gtk-config/2.0-3 [updated] -- updated package and few questions
Hi, Yes. Uploaded now; thanks for your work. Thanks a lot! That said, I take as granted that you'll followup bugreports and eventual issues that might arise with kde-gtk-config now in unstable or later in testing and then as stable. Yes, of course, this is my package and I will maintain it as other my packages. And I hope that you will sponsor future versions of this package while DMUA is not enabled. Could you suggest me anything about translations? Question was in pre-previous message. Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] kde-gtk-config/2.0-3 [updated] -- updated package and few questions
Hi, Week passed since your upload into experimental. Is it good time to go forward and upload into unstable? Binary packages were built successfully on all supported architectures except mips and sparc. They are still waiting for build. But as I observed packages in experimental have the lowest priority and they can wait very long time. As I see in [2][3] queues are quite big. But I am not sure that these timestamps mean. This is not the time since upload. But also this is not the estimate time before build, because I can compare timestamps for my packages uploaded in different days. In any case I see no reason to wait build on these two architectures. Program does not have architecture-specific code and was build successfully on all other architectures. As for the tests I use this module on few machines since February without any problems. Migration of config was implemented recently. Is any other stopper now? Best regards, Boris [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=kde-gtk-configsuite=experimental [2] https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=mipssuite=experimental [3] https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=sparcsuite=experimental 2012-06-08 11:29, Boris Pek wrote: Hi, Now package builds fine on kfreebsd-* and hurd-i386: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=kde-gtk-configsuite=experimental And it should be no problems with linux-based environments on other supported architectures. So I have updated the package: kde-gtk-config (3:2.0-3) unstable; urgency=low * Package moved to unstable after tests: no changes required. * This package replaces src:kcm-gtk and closes its bugs: - fixed working on clean install (Closes: #631591) - added support of Gtk+ 3.x (LP: #734979) You could upload it when you decide it is ready. Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-3.dsc And now I have questions about translations. Conditions: 1) There are no translation files in the source tree. 2) Translations are available only in common svn repository of KDE project [1]. Questions: 1) Should I package them manually into separate package or they will be updated automatically in common package (like src:kde-l10n)? 2) If I should package them manually how to do this in comfortable way? I mean: select and copy them one by one from svn repository doesn't look good. It should be more common way. 3) If I should package them manually should I make the separate package kde-config-gtk-style-i18n or just add them into the same binary package? (Note: they will no weigh much) First part of message is only for sponsor of this package. But any suggestions and explanations for the second part of message are welcome. Best regards, Boris [1] For example: http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/ru/messages/playground-base/kde-gtk-config.po?view=markup http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/uk/messages/playground-base/kde-gtk-config.po?view=markup ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] kde-gtk-config/2.0-3 [updated] -- updated package and few questions
Hi, Now package builds fine on kfreebsd-* and hurd-i386: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=kde-gtk-configsuite=experimental And it should be no problems with linux-based environments on other supported architectures. So I have updated the package: kde-gtk-config (3:2.0-3) unstable; urgency=low * Package moved to unstable after tests: no changes required. * This package replaces src:kcm-gtk and closes its bugs: - fixed working on clean install (Closes: #631591) - added support of Gtk+ 3.x (LP: #734979) You could upload it when you decide it is ready. Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-3.dsc And now I have questions about translations. Conditions: 1) There are no translation files in the source tree. 2) Translations are available only in common svn repository of KDE project [1]. Questions: 1) Should I package them manually into separate package or they will be updated automatically in common package (like src:kde-l10n)? 2) If I should package them manually how to do this in comfortable way? I mean: select and copy them one by one from svn repository doesn't look good. It should be more common way. 3) If I should package them manually should I make the separate package kde-config-gtk-style-i18n or just add them into the same binary package? (Note: they will no weigh much) First part of message is only for sponsor of this package. But any suggestions and explanations for the second part of message are welcome. Best regards, Boris [1] For example: http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/ru/messages/playground-base/kde-gtk-config.po?view=markup http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/uk/messages/playground-base/kde-gtk-config.po?view=markup ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
Hi, src:kcm-gtk is available on all Debian architectures where src:kde- gtk-config at least failed on hurd and kfreebsd with the following error: …/kde-gtk-config-2.0/gtk3proxies/preview3.c:28:25: fatal error: sys/inotify.h: No such file or directory See https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=kde-gtk- configsuite=experimental This has to be fixed before any upload to unstable. Ok, I'll fix it ASAP. Any other issues? Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-2 (updated) -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
Hi, I have updated the package: kde-gtk-config (3:2.0-2) experimental; urgency=low * Added file debian/patches/fix-build-on-kfreebsd-and-hurd-i386: fixes FTBFS in Debian GNU/kFreeBSD and in Debian GNU/Hurd. Could you upload it? Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-2.dsc Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
Hi, Uploaded; thanks for your work. It will land in NEW for experimental later tonight. ftpmaster: for your information, src:kde-gtk-config takes over the kde-config- gtk-style binary package from src:kcm-gtk on purpose. This has been discussed in the #672268 ITP bugreport and on the debian-mentors mailing list in this thread: https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/threads.html#00115 Great! Thank you. I have updated the package: kde-gtk-config (3:2.0-2) unstable; urgency=low * Package moved to unstable after tests: no changes required. * This package replaces src:kcm-gtk and closes its bugs: - fixed working on clean install (Closes: #631591) - added support of Gtk+ 3.x (LP: #734979) So you could upload it when you decide it is ready. Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-2.dsc How long the package will in experimental of approximately? Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
Hi, Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work. With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show Raleigh nor DejaVu Sans 9, but oxygen-gtk and Bitstream Charter 12 (and Emacs for the GTK3 theme). That's not what I'd call any changes there are kept gracefully. I'll upload this package [0] when user changes setup by kde-config-gtk-style 2:0.5.3-1 are kept and converted (if needed) by kde-config-gtk-style 3:2.0-1. That's rather easy to test… I thought we were talking about clean install. But not about total changing of configuration file and its parser. Ok, I'll use your file for tests. Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
Hi, Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work. With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show Raleigh nor DejaVu Sans 9, but oxygen-gtk and Bitstream Charter 12 (and Emacs for the GTK3 theme). That's not what I'd call any changes there are kept gracefully. I'll upload this package [0] when user changes setup by kde-config-gtk-style 2:0.5.3-1 are kept and converted (if needed) by kde-config-gtk-style 3:2.0-1. That's rather easy to test… Done. Patch is tiny [1], but it works well. Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-1.dsc Best regards, Boris [1] https://github.com/tehnick/kde-gtk-config-debian/blob/master/debian/patches/mirgation-from-package-src:kcm-gtk ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
Hi, Thank you for a reply. 2) Handling of the transition I just tested with a clean user: the current kde-config-gtk-style creates one .gtkrc-2.0-kde while your new kde-config-gtk-style creates one .gtkrc-2.0-kde4 that is a symlink to .gtkrc-2.0 . You should probably cope with 04_no_kde4_in_configfile.diff in src:kcm-gtk and make sure any changes put there by kcm-gtk is kept gracefully. Done. As a general rule, make sure that any bug fixed in kcm-gtk (by its patches or by its code) is not re-introduced by src:kde-gtk-config. Ok. I have read all bug reports in Debian BTS [1] and in Launchpad [2]. There is only one bug report [3] in Debian BTS (which is still opened). And this bug is exactly about .gtkrc-2.0-kde symlink. So it will be fixed by my package when it is uploaded to unstable. There is the same bug report in Launchpad [4]. All other bugs from Ubuntu are not related with my new package. Other than that, it looks fine but at least 2) ought to be fixed. Great! So I think the package is ready for upload now. Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-1.dsc Best regards, Boris [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=both;src=kcm-gtk [2] http://tinyurl.com/cg8lbwa [3] http://bugs.debian.org/631591 [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kcm-gtk/+bug/473197 ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
Hi, Thank you for a reply. We are talking about replacing the package kcm-gtk by package kde-gtk-config which has wider functionality. That's debatable. I can't agree with you: kde-gtk-config has wider functionality objectively. As I wrote earlier, kcm-gtk does not allow to: * select themes for Gtk 3.x applications * preview available themes for Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x applications * custmize toolbars and menus for Gtk applications * select icon themes for Gtk applications * download and apply Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x themes from http://opendesktop.org/ in few mouse clicks All these things can be done in kde-gtk-config. Wheezy freeze will be soon. And I really believe that this configuration module should be in it. That's subjective. There are Gtk 3.x applications in Wheezy. And their look and fill can't be configured in KDE using current configurations module. Is it subjective? Anyway; I would strongly oppose a duplication of packages with similar functionality: either the existing src:kcm-gtk is enhanced to support the new features or it should be deprecated in favour of a new source package producing a binary package named identically. Agreed. But kde-gtk-config already exists and in good shape. Upstream is very friendly. He accepted my patches and fixed my issues. It was about 40 e-mails between us during preparing the package. And I don't want to drop this work into trash. And if you want similar features in kcm-gtk, someone should write them from scratch. Does it make sense? (A third solution, technically ugly but doable would be to keep the src:kcm-gtk source name but have it's content be the new source's.) Yep, this is not a variant. What is the procedure for replacing the binary package by one from another source package? The only existing procedure is consensus, reached through discussion. Ok. Could I maintain my package outside kde-extras team in this case? This wouldn't make sense. Ok. Now Debian KDE Extras Team is a maintainer and I am an uploader. So; such a package would make sense if it provides a set of functionalities including _everything_ currently provided by src:kcm-gtk. kcm-gtk has only 4 functions: 1) Selecting available Gtk 2.x theme. 2) Selecting few paths for searching Gtk 2.x themes in the system. 3) Setting up the same font as in KDE applications. 4) Setting up font manually. Functions 2) and 3) are not available in kde-gtk-config now. But... Function 2) has no sense. Because kde-gtk-config allow to install themes from any local location and from special web site (http://opendesktop.org/). Function 3) can be added very quickly. But even now it is not very important because fonts could be set manually. In that case, it shall be named kde-config-gtk-style and get a version bigger than the current 2:0.5.3-1 (such as it's 2.0-1 version plus a bigger epoch such as 3:2.0-1). Done. Then, after some testing, I would be OK to deprecate kcm-gtk (removing the source from unstable). And what about testing branch of Debian? Will be the package processed automatically? In order to allow such testing before the Wheezy's release, I think this new kde-gtk-config should be targeted at experimental, to ease upgrading and functionality testing without breaking Wheezy Done. If such changes are donc, I might consider sponsoring. Great! Could you look on the package now? Links: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-1.dsc http://mentors.debian.net/package/kde-gtk-config https://github.com/tehnick/kde-gtk-config-debian/tree/master/debian/ Best regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] Didier Raboud o...@debian.org
Hi, You could read the beginning of this thread: https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/threads.html#00115 (Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to pkg-kde-extras mailing list) kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to: * select themes for Gtk 3.x applications * preview available themes for Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x applications * custmize toolbars and menus for Gtk applications * select icon themes for Gtk applications * download and apply Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x themes from http://opendesktop.org/ in few mouse clicks All these things can be done in kde-gtk-config. what about the following plan then: talk with the kde-config-gtk-style maintainers (kde-extras team and didier raboud) wether it makes sense to just let your package take over the kde-config-gtk-style name. What is the procedure for replacing the binary package by one from another source package? Could I maintain my package outside kde-extras team in this case? Also I have offtopic question: How can translations for kde-gtk-config get into kde-l10n-* packages? It doesn't look like the current utility does something your utility doesn't, am I right? kde-config-gtk-style has only 4 functions: 1) Selecting available Gtk 2 theme. 2) Selecting few paths for searching Gtk 2 themes in the system. 3) Setting up the same font as in KDE applications. 4) Setting up font manually. Features 2) and 3) are not available in kde-gtk-config. No need to have two tools with the same dependencies, same audience and one tool just does a subset of the other. Agreed. Regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
Re: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
Sorry for a broken message. Here is the correct one: Hi, You could read the beginning of this thread: https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/threads.html#00115 (Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to pkg-kde-extras mailing list) kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to: * select themes for Gtk 3.x applications * preview available themes for Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x applications * custmize toolbars and menus for Gtk applications * select icon themes for Gtk applications * download and apply Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x themes from http://opendesktop.org/ in few mouse clicks All these things can be done in kde-gtk-config. what about the following plan then: talk with the kde-config-gtk-style maintainers (kde-extras team and didier raboud) wether it makes sense to just let your package take over the kde-config-gtk-style name. What is the procedure for replacing the binary package by one from another source package? Could I maintain my package outside kde-extras team in this case? Also I have offtopic question: How can translations for kde-gtk-config get into kde-l10n-* packages? It doesn't look like the current utility does something your utility doesn't, am I right? kde-config-gtk-style has only 4 functions: 1) Selecting available Gtk 2 theme. 2) Selecting few paths for searching Gtk 2 themes in the system. 3) Setting up the same font as in KDE applications. 4) Setting up font manually. Features 2) and 3) are not available in kde-gtk-config. No need to have two tools with the same dependencies, same audience and one tool just does a subset of the other. Agreed. Regards, Boris ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
[Pkg-kde-extras] RFS: gtk2-engines-qtcurve/1.8.12-1 [ITA], kde-style-qtcurve/1.8.9-1 [ITA]
Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for updated packages gtk2-engines-qtcurve and kde-style-qtcurve. Packages were orphaned and I intend to maintain them. Packages in m.d.n: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gtk2-engines-qtcurve http://mentors.debian.net/package/kde-style-qtcurve Direct links: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtk2-engines-qtcurve/gtk2-engines-qtcurve_1.8.12-1.dsc http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-style-qtcurve/kde-style-qtcurve_1.8.9-1.dsc Changes in gtk2-engines-qtcurve: * New upstream release. * New maintainer of the package. (Closes: #641952) * Vcs-* fields in debian/control were updated. * File debian/copyright was rewritten in according to DEP-5. All files were rechecked, copyright information was updated. * kde-style-qtcurve was moved from Suggests to Recommends. Changes in kde-style-qtcurve: * New upstream release. * New maintainer of the package. (Closes: #641953) * Vcs-* fields in debian/control were updated. * File debian/copyright was rewritten in according to DEP-5. All files were rechecked, copyright information was updated. * Short and long descriptions of packages were updated. * Added new package qtcurve-i18n with translation files. * Added file debian/patches/03_fix_spelling_errors.diff (Closes: #648108) (LP: #852957) I would be glad if someone uploaded these packages for me. Best regards, Boris PS: Please CC me, I'm not subscribed. ___ pkg-kde-extras mailing list pkg-kde-extras@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-extras
