Joining pkg-multimedia / mpd-sima package
Hi Multimedia Team :) I recently got my package, mpd-sima, uploaded thanks to Michael Tautschnig who sponsored it. A new upstream version has been released and triggered #628911. Following Jonas advice (cf. [0]), I'd like to join the team to maintain mpd-sima. The package for the last upstream version already received a review from debian-mentors@ and is uploaded to mentors as 0.8.0-2. I did open an account on alioth (under kaliko-guest). How should I proceed now ? About me: = I'm upstream author for MPD_sima, I've been using debian since Sarge. I've learnt debian packaging recently when I noticed MPD_sima was available in Arch/Linux and not for my distro :) My involvement in the Debian project is summarized on my wiki page at debian.org [1], I'm mainly an advanced user writing code as a hobby. About MPD_sima: === MPD_sima is an autoqueue client for MPD [2]. It is a non interactive client running as a daemon, it queues tracks following last.fm recommendations. [0] http://bugs.debian.org/628911 [1] http://wiki.debian.org/GeoffB [2] upstream forge http://codingteam.net/project/sima Kind regards Geoffroy Youri Berret ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#602050: ITP: supercollider -- A real time audio synthesis programming language
2011/6/11 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: On 11-06-11 at 03:07pm, Dan S wrote: It would be great if others can comment - anyone? I did a quick look (don't expect much involvement - am involved in too much at the moment already, and have some deadlines in RL too). Thanks very much for these comments. This looks bad: # The build system apparently can't handle this CXXFLAGS = That and the DEB_SCONS_OPTIONS above it seems to indicate that it does not follow Debian Policy §4.9.1. Only a recommendation apparently, but I am uncertain if that only is _how_ to do it (i.e. DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS hinting) while the underlying mechanisms (e.g. ability to build without optimizations or without stripping binaries) is a must. This is reasonable -- there's about to be a minor upstream release so I'll try and patch upstream (even though it's a debianny issue), to parse DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. The -doc package should probably suggest the main package. Similarly for the editor plugin packages (suggestions are too weak to cause a domino effect so are in my opinion best to declare explicitly). OK Oh, and why do editor plugins recommend -doc package? Seems they are tools to write code, not closely related to the documentation of the tool, so should perhaps be lowered to a suggestion. I see your reasoning. Well, the documentation is not completely independent - the editor-plugins include jump to the help for this command-type features, and if the -doc is missing we get confused users asking why the help-feature is broken. My inclination is for Recommends here, for that reason - sounds OK? And I guess main packages not suggest/recommend -doc package too. Sorry, what do you mean? You're saying perhaps that supercollider should Suggest supercollider-doc? That sounds sensible. What is the most proper build-dependency for jack these days? Here it is libjack-dev (= 0.100) | libjack-jackd2-dev, which as I believe is not wrong but seem to recall can be satisfied by a simpler dependency. Ah right, the version 2 package is marked as Provides: libjack-dev so we can simplify the dependency to libjack-dev (= 0.100). I remember there being a reason for keeping both - but it might have been for earlier versions, before that particular Provides was in place. The clean rule does not fully cleanup. These files was left behind: common/.sconf_temp/ common/.sconsign.dblite common/config.log I don't see this behaviour. (The clean rule contains an explicit rm -f common/.sconsign.dblite so I'm not sure how it would happen.) Could you give me the full commands to reproduce please? I will do an analysis on copyrights/licenses now - and hope not to find anything controversial there Thanks Dan Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#602050: ITP: supercollider -- A real time audio synthesis programming language
2011/6/12 Dan S danstowell+de...@gmail.com: 2011/6/11 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: On 11-06-11 at 03:07pm, Dan S wrote: It would be great if others can comment - anyone? I did a quick look (don't expect much involvement - am involved in too much at the moment already, and have some deadlines in RL too). Thanks very much for these comments. This looks bad: # The build system apparently can't handle this CXXFLAGS = That and the DEB_SCONS_OPTIONS above it seems to indicate that it does not follow Debian Policy §4.9.1. Only a recommendation apparently, but I am uncertain if that only is _how_ to do it (i.e. DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS hinting) while the underlying mechanisms (e.g. ability to build without optimizations or without stripping binaries) is a must. This is reasonable -- there's about to be a minor upstream release so I'll try and patch upstream (even though it's a debianny issue), to parse DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. My mistake, it's not upstream, it's in the rules file. The -doc package should probably suggest the main package. Similarly for the editor plugin packages (suggestions are too weak to cause a domino effect so are in my opinion best to declare explicitly). OK Oh, and why do editor plugins recommend -doc package? Seems they are tools to write code, not closely related to the documentation of the tool, so should perhaps be lowered to a suggestion. I see your reasoning. Well, the documentation is not completely independent - the editor-plugins include jump to the help for this command-type features, and if the -doc is missing we get confused users asking why the help-feature is broken. My inclination is for Recommends here, for that reason - sounds OK? And I guess main packages not suggest/recommend -doc package too. Sorry, what do you mean? You're saying perhaps that supercollider should Suggest supercollider-doc? That sounds sensible. What is the most proper build-dependency for jack these days? Here it is libjack-dev (= 0.100) | libjack-jackd2-dev, which as I believe is not wrong but seem to recall can be satisfied by a simpler dependency. Ah right, the version 2 package is marked as Provides: libjack-dev so we can simplify the dependency to libjack-dev (= 0.100). I remember there being a reason for keeping both - but it might have been for earlier versions, before that particular Provides was in place. The clean rule does not fully cleanup. These files was left behind: common/.sconf_temp/ common/.sconsign.dblite common/config.log I don't see this behaviour. (The clean rule contains an explicit rm -f common/.sconsign.dblite so I'm not sure how it would happen.) Could you give me the full commands to reproduce please? I will do an analysis on copyrights/licenses now - and hope not to find anything controversial there Thanks Dan Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [OT] Qjackctl | Lucid
On 06/12/2011 02:41 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 11-06-11 at 09:30pm, rosea grammostola wrote: Hey, This question is slightly OT... I try to backport qjackctl 0.3.7 to Ubuntu 10.04. But the Debian package depends on dos2unix, which is not in the Ubuntu Lucid build environment. Is it possible to rm the dependency on dos2unix, how? In debian/rules I find: install/qjackctl:: # Fix end-of-lines, convert CRLF to LF. dos2unix -ascii \ debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop If you want same functionality, I'd suggest try replace with this command: recode /crlf../lf \ debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop Thanks for you help. It fails with this message: recode /crlf../lf \ debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop Unrecognised surface name `lf' recode: Request `/crlf../lf' is erroneous make: *** [install/qjackctl] Error 1 Best, \r ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of lilv_0.4.4-1_i386.changes
lilv_0.4.4-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: lilv_0.4.4-1.dsc lilv_0.4.4.orig.tar.bz2 lilv_0.4.4-1.debian.tar.gz liblilv-0-0_0.4.4-1_i386.deb python-lilv_0.4.4-1_i386.deb liblilv-dev_0.4.4-1_all.deb liblilv-doc_0.4.4-1_all.deb lilv-utils_0.4.4-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#602050: ITP: supercollider -- A real time audio synthesis programming language
2011/6/11 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: On 11-06-11 at 03:07pm, Dan S wrote: It would be great if others can comment - anyone? I've updated debian/copyright. Please check the FIXMEs in that file! Thanks - a couple of questions: * The PNG images in the help system are under the same CC license as the HTML help files. (They were not externally sourced.) They're already covered by the common/build/Help/* entry. Why mark them as unknown? * Files: common/Source/plugins/FilterUGens.cpp is marked as GPL-2+ and UNKNOWN, I guess because it includes code ported from Java code by Federico Fontana. It was me that did the porting, and Federico gave me permission to include it in this GPL-2+ software. So there's no unknown licensing, but are you expecting some documentation or or something? * Also, you've allocated copyright of some associated files to Federico Fontana (MoogFF.sc, MoogFF.html) yet he has no copyright in those - I wrote them, they are not ported. So I can simply delete those fixme entries, OK? Most of the other stuff is just sloppy notices, which I'll try to get fixed upstream. Dan ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#630245: libmms: Libmms uses deprecated python function BaseException.message
Package: libmms Version: 0.6-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable mimms, when trying to access a MMS stream using libmms will abort with the following error: $ mimms mms://wm-ondemand01b.omroep.nl/public/ug-od/wm/3/media/wm3c1/vpro/44818297/windowsmedia.asf?wmt=4df4e5b3\wmhash=70edd5d5 Connecting ...libmms error:/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/libmimms/core.py:245: DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of Python 2.6 print sys.stderr, libmms error:, e.message libmms connection error It wil then immediately exit/fail. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.1 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
qmidiarp 0.4.1-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the qmidiarp source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.3.9-1 Current version: 0.4.1-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
japa 0.6.0-2 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the japa source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.6.0-1 Current version: 0.6.0-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
azr3-jack 1.2.3-1 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the azr3-jack source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 1.2.3-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Fixing FIXMEs in copyright file. Note: the fixes match up with changes I've made upstream, with the declarations clarified for minor release 3.4.4, out v soon.
On 11-06-12 at 04:09pm, danstowell-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: Files: common/Headers/plugin_interface/SC_sndfile_stub.h -Copyright: 1999-2009, Erik de Castro Lopo er...@mega-nerd.com +Copyright: 2009, Erik de Castro Lopo er...@mega-nerd.com License: LGPL-2.1+ - FIXME Corresponding License section should be added. Why is years shortened? Files: common/Packager/pkg-dmg -Copyright: 2005 +Copyright: 2005, Mark Mentovai m...@moxienet.com License: MPL-1.1 GPL - FIXME Corresponding License section should be added. Files: common/build/examples/other/keepyuppy.scd -Copyright: 2005 -License: UNKNOWN - FIXME +Copyright: 2005, Dan Stowell danstow...@users.sourceforge.net +License: GPL-2+ There is already a Files section covering (only) Dan Stowell with same licensing. Please merge wit that. -Files: common/build/sounds/SinedPink.aiff -Files: common/include/nova-simd/libsimdmath/libsimdmath.pdf -Files: common/build/sounds/a11wlk01-44_1.aiff Assuming you did double-check that all images below common/build/Help is *both* same licensing *and* copyright holders, there are still above ones which are not below that same subdir. How are they covered? Files: editors/scel/el/sclang-minor-mode.el -Copyright: 2007, Marije Baalman - nescivi +Copyright: 2007, Marije Baalman - nescivi nesc...@gmail.com License: GPL - FIXME Just GPL means GPL version 1 and is thus incompatible with e.g. GPL version 3 or newer. I suspect more proof is needed on what exact licensing terms are granted from Marije. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [OT] Qjackctl | Lucid
On 11-06-12 at 06:15pm, rosea grammostola wrote: lf is default, so try this instead: recode /crlf.. \ debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop It seems to work here locally, but not with pbuilder Lucid. Does it need a higher version of some package or some extra package maybe? It obviously needs the recode package ;-) That's why I provided the other alternatives: perl-base is essential. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [OT] Qjackctl | Lucid
On 11-06-12 at 06:29pm, rosea grammostola wrote: I think you can also do this: perl -i -pe 'chomp' \ debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop Gives me a warning: W: qjackctl: desktop-entry-file-has-crs /usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop:1 I gave you hints at ways to investigate, not proven solutions. Please try solve it yourself! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
yoshimi 0.060.10-2 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the yoshimi source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.060.10-1 Current version: 0.060.10-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Debian packaging of Picard
Hi Adam, I am quite interested in Picard, and am curious if you have perhaps lost interest in maintaining its packaging for Debian? @Sébastien: It doesn't work like that - you cannot hijack a package without the consent of its current maintainer. But if Adam either agrees, we can maintain it together in the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team as I proposed in September 2010 in this bugreport. That would IMHO help the package to have more people care for it, compared to the current situation. NB! Please respond to the bugreport rather than discretely or to the multimedia team mailinglist which I cc'ed. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Fixing FIXMEs in copyright file. Note: the fixes match up with changes I've made upstream, with the declarations clarified for minor release 3.4.4, out v soon.
2011/6/12 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: On 11-06-12 at 04:09pm, danstowell-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: Files: common/Headers/plugin_interface/SC_sndfile_stub.h -Copyright: 1999-2009, Erik de Castro Lopo er...@mega-nerd.com +Copyright: 2009, Erik de Castro Lopo er...@mega-nerd.com License: LGPL-2.1+ - FIXME Corresponding License section should be added. OK, didn't realise that was the issue Why is years shortened? I thought the years-format was the issue. My mistake. Files: common/Packager/pkg-dmg -Copyright: 2005 +Copyright: 2005, Mark Mentovai m...@moxienet.com License: MPL-1.1 GPL - FIXME Corresponding License section should be added. OK Files: common/build/examples/other/keepyuppy.scd -Copyright: 2005 -License: UNKNOWN - FIXME +Copyright: 2005, Dan Stowell danstow...@users.sourceforge.net +License: GPL-2+ There is already a Files section covering (only) Dan Stowell with same licensing. Please merge wit that. OK -Files: common/build/sounds/SinedPink.aiff -Files: common/include/nova-simd/libsimdmath/libsimdmath.pdf -Files: common/build/sounds/a11wlk01-44_1.aiff Assuming you did double-check that all images below common/build/Help is *both* same licensing *and* copyright holders Yes I did, I was around when the docs+images were made, and also oversaw the transition to CC license for them. there are still above ones which are not below that same subdir. How are they covered? The two AIFF files are under the default license (GPL-2+). libsimdmath.pdf I had not noticed (sorry). I have checked with others upstream, we think it's GPL3 but it's not needed so we're removing it in 3.4.4. Files: editors/scel/el/sclang-minor-mode.el -Copyright: 2007, Marije Baalman - nescivi +Copyright: 2007, Marije Baalman - nescivi nesc...@gmail.com License: GPL - FIXME Just GPL means GPL version 1 and is thus incompatible with e.g. GPL version 3 or newer. I suspect more proof is needed on what exact licensing terms are granted from Marije. OK. The updated file upstream actually specifies GPL-2+, I just need to fix the name here. Thanks Dan - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Further fixes to copyright file (inc added LGPL-2.1+ and MPL-1.1 notice)
On 11-06-12 at 06:05pm, danstowell-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: +License: LGPL-2.1+ +This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or +modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public +License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either +version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. +. +This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, +but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of +MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU +Lesser General Public License for more details. +. +You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public +License along with this package; if not, write to the Free Software +Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA + . + On Debian systems the full text of the GNU General Public License version 2 + can be found in the `/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1' file. Last sentence refer to wrong license. Last but one sentence is superfluous. +License: MPL-1.1 + The contents of this package are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version + 1.1 (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with + the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/ + . + Software distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS basis, + WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License + for the specific language governing rights and limitations under the + License. + . + On Debian systems,the complete text of the Mozilla + Public License Version 1.1 is part of xulrunner package and can be found in + /usr/share/doc/xulrunner/MPL.gz. Such reference is not allowed (unless depending on said other package). Full licensing needs to be included! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Fixing FIXMEs in copyright file. Note: the fixes match up with changes I've made upstream, with the declarations clarified for minor release 3.4.4, out v soon.
On 11-06-12 at 07:01pm, Dan S wrote: 2011/6/12 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: On 11-06-12 at 04:09pm, danstowell-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: Files: common/Headers/plugin_interface/SC_sndfile_stub.h -Copyright: 1999-2009, Erik de Castro Lopo er...@mega-nerd.com +Copyright: 2009, Erik de Castro Lopo er...@mega-nerd.com License: LGPL-2.1+ - FIXME Corresponding License section should be added. OK, didn't realise that was the issue It wasn't. The issue was the very existence of thes new files sections: They were added from automated harvesting of hints and needed verification. Please do verify them all in light of this new info. Sorry that I didn't explain that when passing it on. there are still above ones which are not below that same subdir. How are they covered? The two AIFF files are under the default license (GPL-2+). Who holds copyright for them? Both copyright holder and licensing is important for Debian, not only licensing!!! Similar for the images in documentation! libsimdmath.pdf I had not noticed (sorry). I have checked with others upstream, we think it's GPL3 but it's not needed so we're removing it in 3.4.4. Then please keep it (i.e. restore it) as a FIXME! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Fixing FIXMEs in copyright file. Note: the fixes match up with changes I've made upstream, with the declarations clarified for minor release 3.4.4, out v soon.
2011/6/12 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: On 11-06-12 at 07:01pm, Dan S wrote: 2011/6/12 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: On 11-06-12 at 04:09pm, danstowell-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: Files: common/Headers/plugin_interface/SC_sndfile_stub.h -Copyright: 1999-2009, Erik de Castro Lopo er...@mega-nerd.com +Copyright: 2009, Erik de Castro Lopo er...@mega-nerd.com License: LGPL-2.1+ - FIXME Corresponding License section should be added. OK, didn't realise that was the issue It wasn't. The issue was the very existence of thes new files sections: They were added from automated harvesting of hints and needed verification. Please do verify them all in light of this new info. OK, thanks. Sorry that I didn't explain that when passing it on. there are still above ones which are not below that same subdir. How are they covered? The two AIFF files are under the default license (GPL-2+). Who holds copyright for them? Both copyright holder and licensing is important for Debian, not only licensing!!! Similar for the images in documentation! Yes but the AIFFs and the PNGs have the exact same status as the other files. common/build/Help/* matches those PNGs, and correctly identifies the authors and license; * matches the two AIFF files similarly. There's no need for extra rules for these. Actually, for * the listing of Copyright: 2002-2003, James McCartney is out of date. I would change it to Copyright: 2002-2011, James McCartney and others - that OK? There are many dozens of code contributors so I hope others is not too weird. libsimdmath.pdf I had not noticed (sorry). I have checked with others upstream, we think it's GPL3 but it's not needed so we're removing it in 3.4.4. Then please keep it (i.e. restore it) as a FIXME! OK Dan ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Further fixes to copyright file (inc added LGPL-2.1+ and MPL-1.1 notice)
2011/6/12 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: On 11-06-12 at 06:05pm, danstowell-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: +License: LGPL-2.1+ + This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either + version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. +. + This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU + Lesser General Public License for more details. +. + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public + License along with this package; if not, write to the Free Software + Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA + . + On Debian systems the full text of the GNU General Public License version 2 + can be found in the `/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1' file. Last sentence refer to wrong license. Oops, thanks. Last but one sentence is superfluous. Superfluous? I don't see. +License: MPL-1.1 + The contents of this package are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version + 1.1 (the License); you may not use this file except in compliance with + the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/ + . + Software distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS basis, + WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License + for the specific language governing rights and limitations under the + License. + . + On Debian systems,the complete text of the Mozilla + Public License Version 1.1 is part of xulrunner package and can be found in + /usr/share/doc/xulrunner/MPL.gz. Such reference is not allowed (unless depending on said other package). Full licensing needs to be included! Let me check that I understand: all 567 lines of the MPL to go in the copyright file? Packages such as thunderbird and firefox put it in MPL.gz, which we could put in the debian/ dir but I don't think the policy allows it to go in a different file...? Dan - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [OT] Qjackctl | Lucid
On 06/12/2011 06:54 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: On 11-06-12 at 06:29pm, rosea grammostola wrote: I think you can also do this: perl -i -pe 'chomp' \ debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop Gives me a warning: W: qjackctl: desktop-entry-file-has-crs /usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop:1 perl -i -pe 's/\x0D\x0A$ /\n/x' \ debian/qjackctl/usr/share/applications/qjackctl.desktop This seems to work. Regards, \r ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#601008:
I am Capt James Roy. I am US Army in artillery military unit here in Iraq, we discovered some oil money in Iraq. we want you to keep it safe for us. Email us at captjamesroy2...@hotmail.commailto:captjamesroy2...@hotmail.com ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Debian packaging of Picard
Hi Jonas, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk writes: I am quite interested in Picard, and am curious if you have perhaps lost interest in maintaining its packaging for Debian? @Sébastien: It doesn't work like that - you cannot hijack a package without the consent of its current maintainer. But if Adam either agrees, we can maintain it together in the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team as I proposed in September 2010 in this bugreport. That would IMHO help the package to have more people care for it, compared to the current situation. Sure, my goal is not to hijack the package nor to minimize the work of anybody. Note that since I am not a DD nor a DM, I have not the power of doing so, even if I wanted to. Also note that I have contacted Adam and asked about his opinion. My goal was 1) to have a package working for me 2) to share this with other intersted users 3) to give my contribution to the maintenance of the package. I am willing to help in any collaborative setup, including, if Adam agrees, the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team. Cheers, -- Sébastien Villemot CEPREMAP - Paris School of Economics Homepage: http://www.dynare.org/sebastien Landline phone: +33 1 40 77 49 90 SIP phone: sebastien.ville...@ekiga.net PGP Key: 0xA6C029B9D06B2913D71C105EBE37E801FB6EFF8B (http://pgp.mit.edu/) pgpRkISvz760s.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Debian packaging of Picard
Hi Jonas, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk writes: I am quite interested in Picard, and am curious if you have perhaps lost interest in maintaining its packaging for Debian? @Sébastien: It doesn't work like that - you cannot hijack a package without the consent of its current maintainer. But if Adam either agrees, we can maintain it together in the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team as I proposed in September 2010 in this bugreport. That would IMHO help the package to have more people care for it, compared to the current situation. Sure, my goal is not to hijack the package nor to minimize the work of anybody. Note that since I am not a DD nor a DM, I have not the power of doing so, even if I wanted to. Also note that I have contacted Adam and asked about his opinion. My goal was 1) to have a package working for me 2) to share this with other intersted users 3) to give my contribution to the maintenance of the package. I am willing to help in any collaborative setup, including, if Adam agrees, the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team. Cheers, -- Sébastien Villemot CEPREMAP - Paris School of Economics Homepage: http://www.dynare.org/sebastien Landline phone: +33 1 40 77 49 90 SIP phone: sebastien.ville...@ekiga.net PGP Key: 0xA6C029B9D06B2913D71C105EBE37E801FB6EFF8B (http://pgp.mit.edu/) pgpODVNpjmHRq.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Fixing FIXMEs in copyright file. Note: the fixes match up with changes I've made upstream, with the declarations clarified for minor release 3.4.4, out v soon.
On 11-06-12 at 07:46pm, Dan S wrote: 2011/6/12 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: Who holds copyright for them? Both copyright holder and licensing is important for Debian, not only licensing!!! Similar for the images in documentation! Yes but the AIFFs and the PNGs have the exact same status as the other files. common/build/Help/* matches those PNGs, and correctly identifies the authors and license; * matches the two AIFF files similarly. There's no need for extra rules for these. Not but. We do not disagree here - I ask, and you tell me that things are fine. Reason I kept asking is that you apparently answered something else than what I ask. And reason I treat those files special is that they are binary, so often do not contain (properly maintained) copyright metadata themselves. Actually, for * the listing of Copyright: 2002-2003, James McCartney is out of date. I would change it to Copyright: 2002-2011, James McCartney and others - that OK? There are many dozens of code contributors so I hope others is not too weird. others is not a legal entity. What needs to be listed in Files sections is the actual copyright holders, not all contributors. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Invitation to join the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team
Hi, [long response time too] A couple things: 1. I should probably clarify that I certainly can *handle* bugs filed against any of my packages, in the sense that I can respond to them, fix them, and create a new package with the new version, but I basically had no experience tagging or assigning or triaging or whatever other things you can do with the metadata. 2. While I'm totally down with teamwork, I've been subscribed to the pkg-multimedia-maintainer mailing list for a while now, and I have to say that the volume is almost too much for me to handle on a daily basis, and certainly will be in a couple months when I start school again (not to mention the -commits mailing list, which seems to be even *higher* volume). So honestly, although you've convinced me that I'd be qualified to join the team, and I'll hang out with you guys and help out when I have time, I just don't think I could handle being subscribed to the mailing lists for any substantial amount of time. Jeremy On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Hi Jeremy (and fellow Multimedia Maintainers), [sorry forthe lateresponse!] On 11-06-02 at 07:50am, Jeremy Salwen wrote: I'm confused, because there seem to be two standards by which one might join the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team. The first seems to be an informal one, by which someone who has created a couple of debian packages is invited to join (Alessio extended to me a similar offer). If I thought this were the final word, I would be happy to join. However, when I go to the website to look into joining, I find a second set of standards, including the items: - are familiar with managing bugs in debian. - agree to review other's work (patches and packages). Neither of which I am okay with. I am not familiar with managing bugs in debian. I simply don't know how to do anything besides send an email to the bug report. As for the second point, I suppose I could technically review others' work, but it probably wouldn't be much of a review. Much of this stuff is over my head. If I were to look at the source of Ardour, for instance, it would probably take me a week to make heads or tails of it. The requirement about managing bugs is mostly aimed at contributors *less* involved than you - in fact I am surprised by your comment: As maintainer for a package officially part of Debian, you *must* be able to handle bugs filed against it! That other requirement about reviewing works of others really is about interest in doing teamwork. Feel free to ask questions, but don't join if you do not intend to contribute yourself. That's more fun for us all. But both those requirements are about _interest_ in such work. We are not an sxclusive club and we do not require university degrees or DD membership for you to work with us. Have a look at our mailinglist, or join our IRC channel. I am confident that you will find us to be pretty nice people to hang out with :-D Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Further fixes to copyright file (inc added LGPL-2.1+ and MPL-1.1 notice)
On 11-06-12 at 08:45pm, Dan S wrote: 2011/6/12 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk: On 11-06-12 at 06:05pm, danstowell-gu...@users.alioth.debian.org wrote: +License: LGPL-2.1+ + This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either + version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. +. + This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU + Lesser General Public License for more details. +. + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public + License along with this package; if not, write to the Free Software + Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA + . + On Debian systems the full text of the GNU General Public License version 2 + can be found in the `/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1' file. Last sentence refer to wrong license. Oops, thanks. Last but one sentence is superfluous. Superfluous? I don't see. Oh, sorry. No, you are right: As it is composed above it is not superfluous. What I do myself (and wrongly thought you'd done as well) is to _not_ treat the paragraph referring to upstream canonical license location as part of the licensing info needing verbatim copying - because of the fact that it has been common practice in Debian for some time (to the extend that it triggers a lintian warning) to actively violate the verbatim of that part regarding GPL licenses which reference an old postal address for the Free Software Foundation. What I do instead is include in a Comment: subsection a modern reference to the FSF website, disregarding how upstream project referred to it. ...and when doing that, the verbatim copy is superfluous. Let me check that I understand: all 567 lines of the MPL to go in the copyright file? Don't take my word for it: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile The central word there is verbatim. Packages such as thunderbird and firefox put it in MPL.gz, which we could put in the debian/ dir but I don't think the policy allows it to go in a different file...? If you mean that upstream projects ship their licensing that way then that is irrelevant: The issue is Debian Policy, not some universal law. If you mean Debian packages (of _renaming_ of said projects: icedove and iceweasel), and that they ship licensing text separately _instead_ of verbatim inside the debian/copyright file itself, then I agree with your suggestion that it is not allowed by DEbian Policy, and I suggest filing bugreports about that, with a high severity. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: Invitation to join the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team
On 11-06-12 at 07:38pm, Jeremy Salwen wrote: 1. I should probably clarify that I certainly can *handle* bugs filed against any of my packages, in the sense that I can respond to them, fix them, and create a new package with the new version, but I basically had no experience tagging or assigning or triaging or whatever other things you can do with the metadata. Sounds great! I feel you (and me too) should not read that too literally. Point is not that you must be super clever juggling bugreports to work in this team, but that you acknowledge that it involved juggling bugreports and you do not feel uncomfortably with that. Perhaps we should rephrase that sentence, to not scare off other potential future team members. What do others think? 2. While I'm totally down with teamwork, I've been subscribed to the pkg-multimedia-maintainer mailing list for a while now, and I have to say that the volume is almost too much for me to handle on a daily basis, and certainly will be in a couple months when I start school again (not to mention the -commits mailing list, which seems to be even *higher* volume). No need for daily basis - not at all! This is a volunteer project, and there is no requirement in this team that we commit any specific amount of time on it. Heck, if you wanna work with us once a year I would still be happy to consider you a team member! :-D So honestly, although you've convinced me that I'd be qualified to join the team, and I'll hang out with you guys and help out when I have time, I just don't think I could handle being subscribed to the mailing lists for any substantial amount of time. If mailinglist traffic level discourages your joining us, then please do consider to simply setup your mail handling to reroute list traffic to a separate folder to not get bogged down by it. Point of you joining the list is not that you are alert and always on duty, but that you acknowledge the _maintainance_ part of the task of maintaining packages. And again, the actual amount of devotion is fluid - can once a week or once a month you pop by, or even more infrequently since we are a team that can cover for each other. :-) So all in all, I still think you should consider joining our team. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: please upload: puredata-import
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:05, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:18 +, Felipe Sateler wrote: I'm confused. You make a change for puredata = 0.43. Does this break puredata 0.43? The Depends field suggests that (puredata-core is non existent until 0.43). If so, the build-depends on puredata 0.43 is wrong. puredata 0.43 provides everything, headers, app, gui, doc, etc. With 0.43, the headers are in puredata-dev and puredata is a meta package that installs everything. I wanted to avoid having the package Build-Depend on the whole suite of packages, that's why I added the 0.43. Plus in the future, puredata might no longer also install puredata-dev. Also, doesn't 0.43 bring in the required headers? I think the add_required_headers patch can be removed. Yes, the puredata-dev 0.43 package does provide those headers, but I wanted to leave in the patch for now to aid backporting and let the dust settle on the big changes that happened with the puredata package being split into puredata-gui, puredata-dev, puredata-core, etc. The package won't work unmodified anyways, since it Depends on puredata-core, which doesn't exist until 0.43. So strictly speaking the aid for backporting is incomplete (also, it installs into a different dir, so that would need to be changed too). I suggest just dropping the 0.43 option, since it misleads into thinking it could actually work unchanged with 0.42. Please update the changelog. I have reviewed this and will upload tomorrow afternoon (GMT-4, so probably past midnight in europe). -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: request for sponsorship for pd-hid
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:30 +, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:45, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:41 -0300, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 21:55, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 19:08, Felipe Sateler fsate...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:37, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:37 -0800, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: On Dec 24, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 21:13, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: Just ITPed, packaged and uploaded pd-hid to git.debian.org. It is an object for Pure Data that allows you to use USB HID devices in Pd. The build system is similar in structure to pd-plugin and pd-freeverb, plus it includes the kFreeBSD and Hurd updates, so it should build on all platforms. It depends on pd-mapping and recommends pd-pddp, which are both in NEW. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-hid.git;a=summary There is some code that is not yours, please add Jan Truetzschler Falkenstein to the debian/copyright file (ftpmaster may reject the package for this missing information). Thanks for spotting that, I pushed the fix. Ping. Anyone willing to sponsor this one? Sorry, I lost track of this. I will try to get to this (and your other packages) during the weekend. I clearly didn't do this when promised, and this week I couldn't either. I've been extremely busy. I'm sorry about that. If someone else can look into these packages, please upload them, since I'm not likely to get any debian time anytime soon. I will, if nobody else gets to these packages, still review them as time permits. It seems that this package never got uploaded. It needs its git-dch done and the changelog finalized and then uploaded. I can finalize the changelog if that makes it easier. It seems some people want to do it themselves when uploading. I believe this package needs to be fixed for puredata = 0.43 As far as I can tell it has already. For me, it builds on Debian/testing using puredata-dev and no puredata, and squeeze using puredata 0.42.6. Indeed, it seems to work. I have a licensing question though. The package is distributed as GPLv3+. However, Supercollider (where some code was borrowed) is GPLv2+. I think debian/copyright should document that fact. Code from 2004 cannot possibly be under GPLv3+ unless relicensed. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Re: [SCM] supercollider/master: Fixing FIXMEs in copyright file. Note: the fixes match up with changes I've made upstream, with the declarations clarified for minor release 3.4.4, out v soon.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 22:40, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Actually, for * the listing of Copyright: 2002-2003, James McCartney is out of date. I would change it to Copyright: 2002-2011, James McCartney and others - that OK? There are many dozens of code contributors so I hope others is not too weird. others is not a legal entity. What needs to be listed in Files sections is the actual copyright holders, not all contributors. There is not full consensus around this idea. If one can be reasonably sure that the work is under the listed license, my personal take on the subject is that one lists all the copyright holders on a best effort basis. It can perfectly be possible, especially with large and relatively old packages, that names are forgotten/lost. That doesn't mean the package is not fit for debian because the copyright file cannot list all copyright holders. In other words, I believe it is acceptable to put others in the Files sections, when filling the complete list is too hard. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.changes
pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.dsc pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.debian.tar.gz pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.debian.tar.gz to main/p/pd-cxc/pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.debian.tar.gz pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.dsc to main/p/pd-cxc/pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.dsc pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.deb to main/p/pd-cxc/pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.dsc - source sound pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 609436 629704 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of pd-ekext_0.1.1-2_amd64.changes
pd-ekext_0.1.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pd-ekext_0.1.1-2.dsc pd-ekext_0.1.1-2.debian.tar.gz pd-ekext_0.1.1-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of pd-bsaylor_0.1-2_amd64.changes
pd-bsaylor_0.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pd-bsaylor_0.1-2.dsc pd-bsaylor_0.1-2.debian.tar.gz pd-bsaylor_0.1-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#609436: marked as done (pd-cxc: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: undefined references)
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2011 04:02:09 + with message-id e1qvylp-0003io...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#609436: fixed in pd-cxc 0.5.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #609436, regarding pd-cxc: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: undefined references to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 609436: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609436 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: pd-cxc Version: 0.5.1-1 Severity: important Hi, your package FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: | make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1' | cc -DPD -I/include -Wall -W -g -DVERSION='0.5.1' -o ENV.o -c ENV.c | ENV.c: In function 'ENV_float': | ENV.c:25: warning: unused parameter 'x' | ENV.c: In function 'ENV_setenv': | ENV.c:53: warning: unused parameter 'x' | cc -o ENV. ENV.o | /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/4.4.5/../../../../lib/crt1.o: In function `_start': | (.text+0x23): undefined reference to `main' | ENV.o: In function `ENV_float': | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:27: undefined reference to `post' | ENV.o: In function `ENV_RAND_MAX': | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:36: undefined reference to `s_list' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:36: undefined reference to `outlet_list' | ENV.o: In function `ENV_getenv': | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:47: undefined reference to `gensym' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:50: undefined reference to `s_list' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:50: undefined reference to `outlet_list' | ENV.o: In function `ENV_setenv': | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:58: undefined reference to `post' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:60: undefined reference to `post' | ENV.o: In function `ENV_new': | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:65: undefined reference to `pd_new' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:68: undefined reference to `s_float' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:68: undefined reference to `outlet_new' | ENV.o: In function `ENV_help': | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:75: undefined reference to `post' | ENV.o: In function `ENV_setup': | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:81: undefined reference to `gensym' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:81: undefined reference to `class_new' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:83: undefined reference to `gensym' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:83: undefined reference to `class_addmethod' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:84: undefined reference to `gensym' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:84: undefined reference to `class_addmethod' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:85: undefined reference to `gensym' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:85: undefined reference to `class_addmethod' | /build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1/ENV.c:86: undefined reference to `class_doaddfloat' | collect2: ld returned 1 exit status | make[1]: *** [ENV.] Error 1 | make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-pd-cxc_0.5.1-1-kfreebsd-amd64-PFNBq2/pd-cxc-0.5.1' | dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2 | make: *** [build] Error 2 Full build logs: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pd-cxc KiBi. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: pd-cxc Source-Version: 0.5.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pd-cxc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.debian.tar.gz to main/p/pd-cxc/pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.debian.tar.gz pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.dsc to main/p/pd-cxc/pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.dsc pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.deb to main/p/pd-cxc/pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 609...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if
Bug#629704: marked as done (pd-cxc: FTBFS: ENV.c:5:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev))
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2011 04:02:09 + with message-id e1qvylp-0003ir...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#629704: fixed in pd-cxc 0.5.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #629704, regarding pd-cxc: FTBFS: ENV.c:5:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (lacks B-D on puredata-dev) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 629704: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629704 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: pd-cxc Version: 0.5.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: debian/rules build dh build --buildsystem=makefile dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=makefile dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=makefile dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=makefile make[1]: Entering directory `/«BUILDDIR»/pd-cxc-0.5.1' cc -DPD -I/usr/include -Wall -W -g -DVERSION='0.5.1' -fPIC -O6 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -o ENV.o -c ENV.c ENV.c:5:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[1]: *** [ENV.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/06/07/pd-cxc_0.5.1-1_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: pd-cxc Source-Version: 0.5.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pd-cxc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.debian.tar.gz to main/p/pd-cxc/pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.debian.tar.gz pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.dsc to main/p/pd-cxc/pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.dsc pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.deb to main/p/pd-cxc/pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 629...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org (supplier of updated pd-cxc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:33:41 -0400 Source: pd-cxc Binary: pd-cxc Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.5.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org Description: pd-cxc - Pd library for working with patterns and numbers Closes: 609436 629704 Changes: pd-cxc (0.5.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . [ Alessio Treglia ] * Add Vcs-* tags. . [ IOhannes m zmölnig ] * Makefile-fixes for non-linux (Closes: #609436) . [ Hans-Christoph Steiner ] * updated Build-Depends to use puredata-dev when available (Closes: #629704) * bumped standards version to 3.9.2 Checksums-Sha1: 7d13a6f42d68e39168b1ed8902256228c0d6d044 1910 pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.dsc 2b1d4bd0d7ffc56727da0330f7f62dc1408d7a9f 3256 pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.debian.tar.gz c719113ced873152e529c08ed86b997190ab8ce7 75546 pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 3c8ce6664aea1caa6073794d14c527558dfa88e9f688ea3e0842ef936aa2eecf 1910 pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.dsc 95891d29e4cdc18fd3de595eaa84b9afc41bb0d063cdd4f30333a3d3ad6a054f 3256 pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.debian.tar.gz 2ae179624912072d43b844fda6d0825ddee957683d3331238ce5489ceae64ee6 75546 pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.deb Files: dfc7f6038e155df2a34ad6a8e95a4886 1910 sound optional pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.dsc 7872fd34a89ba5bc2b95c7ad7be10b16 3256 sound optional pd-cxc_0.5.1-2.debian.tar.gz 68df2508c0c9827f74bb29e9ecb080ea 75546 sound optional pd-cxc_0.5.1-2_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJN9YoHAAoJEKO6uuJAjdbP0k8QAJPt5m/fFm4A+I1WEuWxzNrZ QQQvaRGvOETidA1lf0V2qT5DP0JLyEoma/ow+fAVm/ryAa5iqDljQJEU72h/i0cX JciC7LOyoYnFkY/uBl8g1v7m6nTRKMaI8fwWAVc42kNjh/998rvgdbhZ2S2Djoog 3ioP6mn6ITHq3pKllEGn0YKsdt1V4pkOhX5VtAONr55ufvfF+F864xcXjxl6zJr3
Processing of pd-mjlib_0.1.1-2_amd64.changes
pd-mjlib_0.1.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pd-mjlib_0.1.1-2.dsc pd-mjlib_0.1.1-2.debian.tar.gz pd-mjlib_0.1.1-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of pd-markex_0.85-2_amd64.changes
pd-markex_0.85-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pd-markex_0.85-2.dsc pd-markex_0.85-2.debian.tar.gz pd-markex_0.85-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of pd-smlib_0.12.1-2_amd64.changes
pd-smlib_0.12.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pd-smlib_0.12.1-2.dsc pd-smlib_0.12.1-2.debian.tar.gz pd-smlib_0.12.1-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Processing of pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2_amd64.changes
pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2.dsc pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2.debian.tar.gz pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
pd-bsaylor_0.1-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: pd-bsaylor_0.1-2.debian.tar.gz to main/p/pd-bsaylor/pd-bsaylor_0.1-2.debian.tar.gz pd-bsaylor_0.1-2.dsc to main/p/pd-bsaylor/pd-bsaylor_0.1-2.dsc pd-bsaylor_0.1-2_amd64.deb to main/p/pd-bsaylor/pd-bsaylor_0.1-2_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: pd-bsaylor_0.1-2.dsc - source sound pd-bsaylor_0.1-2_amd64.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 609774 629703 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
pd-ekext_0.1.1-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: pd-ekext_0.1.1-2.debian.tar.gz to main/p/pd-ekext/pd-ekext_0.1.1-2.debian.tar.gz pd-ekext_0.1.1-2.dsc to main/p/pd-ekext/pd-ekext_0.1.1-2.dsc pd-ekext_0.1.1-2_amd64.deb to main/p/pd-ekext/pd-ekext_0.1.1-2_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: pd-ekext_0.1.1-2.dsc - source sound pd-ekext_0.1.1-2_amd64.deb - optional sound Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 609773 629707 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
Bug#629800: marked as done (pd-sigpack: FTBFS: chop~.c:6:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev))
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2011 04:18:04 + with message-id e1qvybe-0004zi...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#629800: fixed in pd-sigpack 0.0.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #629800, regarding pd-sigpack: FTBFS: chop~.c:6:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 629800: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629800 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: pd-sigpack Version: 0.0.4.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: debian/rules build dh build --buildsystem=makefile dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=makefile dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=makefile dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=makefile make[1]: Entering directory `/«BUILDDIR»/pd-sigpack-0.0.4.2' cc -DPD -I/usr/include -Wall -W -g -DVERSION='0.0.4.2' -fPIC -O6 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -o chop~.o -c chop~.c chop~.c:6:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[1]: *** [chop~.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/06/07/pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-1_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: pd-sigpack Source-Version: 0.0.4.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pd-sigpack, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2.debian.tar.gz to main/p/pd-sigpack/pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2.debian.tar.gz pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2.dsc to main/p/pd-sigpack/pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2.dsc pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2_amd64.deb to main/p/pd-sigpack/pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 629...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org (supplier of updated pd-sigpack package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:45:15 -0400 Source: pd-sigpack Binary: pd-sigpack Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.0.4.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org Description: pd-sigpack - signal processing effects library for Pd Closes: 609434 629800 Changes: pd-sigpack (0.0.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=low . [ IOhannes m zmölnig ] * Makefile-fixes for non-linux (Closes: #609434) * Added Vcs stanzas . [ Hans-Christoph Steiner ] * updated Build-Depends to use puredata-dev (Closes: #629800) * bumped standard version to 3.9.2 Checksums-Sha1: 9dbd748109d0362770da12e16b252d49a5ff30f6 1984 pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2.dsc a1bd3417718e06dc839aed9f12dee9476ed99aa1 2811 pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2.debian.tar.gz 9f89cce21b92dd5e80a45740ebca0cc973f2ca54 41154 pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: e3afba88663d4feabe8b5119f7d7a388b5490ed4fd785aa4142fe609907959d5 1984 pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2.dsc 91c24bce4886979db83dab390e45adbcfc5cee01cad0c8a987f5e70a2350ef19 2811 pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2.debian.tar.gz a753023c394368f300b9b861c5fb3089620b2d507a950ebed8e43de28d9f3601 41154 pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2_amd64.deb Files: 2a01199a120784df568ff4302e97f9cb 1984 sound optional pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2.dsc 6f70e9462b93c34fc099487aa5077105 2811 sound optional pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2.debian.tar.gz 39dee0e35e9080c6e61c820e9e9800fa 41154 sound optional pd-sigpack_0.0.4.2-2_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJN9Y3dAAoJEKO6uuJAjdbP6qYP/3k95W7rIyjoNqmh5v8F+N/J PT4gPmAF5bSC+arAXtnrob5ERojv7SWy4uqlaH9rr2Q8+zxFNIYe1yWSGTOcAhhg
Bug#629803: marked as done (pd-windowing: FTBFS: bartlett~.c:22:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev))
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2011 04:32:58 + with message-id e1qvype-0005ya...@franck.debian.org and subject line Bug#629803: fixed in pd-windowing 0.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #629803, regarding pd-windowing: FTBFS: bartlett~.c:22:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory (missing B-D on puredata-dev) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 629803: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629803 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Source: pd-windowing Version: 0.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: debian/rules build dh build --buildsystem=makefile dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=makefile dh_auto_configure -O--buildsystem=makefile dh_auto_build -O--buildsystem=makefile make[1]: Entering directory `/«BUILDDIR»/pd-windowing-0.1' cc -DPD -I../../pd/src -Wall -W -g -fPIC -O6 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -o bartlett~.o -c bartlett~.c bartlett~.c:22:18: fatal error: m_pd.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[1]: *** [bartlett~.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/06/07/pd-windowing_0.1-1_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: pd-windowing Source-Version: 0.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pd-windowing, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: pd-windowing_0.1-2.debian.tar.gz to main/p/pd-windowing/pd-windowing_0.1-2.debian.tar.gz pd-windowing_0.1-2.dsc to main/p/pd-windowing/pd-windowing_0.1-2.dsc pd-windowing_0.1-2_amd64.deb to main/p/pd-windowing/pd-windowing_0.1-2_amd64.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 629...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org (supplier of updated pd-windowing package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 14:47:39 -0400 Source: pd-windowing Binary: pd-windowing Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@eds.org Description: pd-windowing - library of windowing functions in Pd Closes: 609437 629803 Changes: pd-windowing (0.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . [ Hans-Christoph Steiner ] * changed Recommends to virtual pd-import so it works with upcoming pdextended pkg * added Recommends: pd-pddp since help files use things from that lib * updated Build-Depends to use puredata-dev (Closes: #629803) * bumped standards version to 3.9.2 . [ IOhannes m zmölnig ] * Makefile-fixes for non-linux (Closes: #609437) * Added Vcs stanzas Checksums-Sha1: f3c27f72c06668e51d51c2dd951850f0e35b953a 1968 pd-windowing_0.1-2.dsc 0b6e88a109800c62804301c37cac224bcaa8ecfe 2976 pd-windowing_0.1-2.debian.tar.gz 74a306e32c97696cfff3aaedc77655a26f5f38bf 26924 pd-windowing_0.1-2_amd64.deb Checksums-Sha256: 7e1a24412d92cc3fbcc8740eb1d1790d91d94b4a0c827f95ca7cc90d7b5d5eec 1968 pd-windowing_0.1-2.dsc c51bee531bb257f19d78ad89afea3906ccb837b1aceb5d3071c9144d0e4566f5 2976 pd-windowing_0.1-2.debian.tar.gz 42239c0decbc23c0340e521ae677e3348a443ea5213441195f3e0151eba4d9cf 26924 pd-windowing_0.1-2_amd64.deb Files: 91ba42e41c8fede560da5ffdb29ac40d 1968 sound optional pd-windowing_0.1-2.dsc db8a81c2b7ef268271563eb653e7c721 2976 sound optional pd-windowing_0.1-2.debian.tar.gz 4028eeb2d1cbce0e0d4045ba8603ddc3 26924 sound optional pd-windowing_0.1-2_amd64.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
