Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
So anyone Ok with this import? Thanks On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:43:16AM -0300, Gonzalo L. R. wrote: ; No one interested? :) ; ; --- x --- ; ; From: Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar ; To: ports@openbsd.org ; Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 13:12:30 -0300 ; Subject: NEW: SMTube-1.5 ; ; Hi, ; ; SMTube is a browser to search Youtube videos but it's also ; capable of downloading them. ; ; Comments? Ok? ; ; Cheers. ; ; -- ; Sending from my VCR... ; -- Sending from my VCR...
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
smplayer is just a gui for mplayer, smtube just looking for mplayer, vlc or smplayer, I think with mplayer as dep is just fine. Thanks for the test On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:48:44AM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote: ; 14.01.2013 19:06 пользователь Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com написал: ; ; 2013/1/14 David Coppa dco...@gmail.com: ; On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com ; wrote: ; 14.01.2013 18:43 пользователь Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar ; написал: ; ; No one interested? :) ; ; Just out of curiosity: what's the point to use it when we already have ; others like www/minitube, not mentioning tools like net/yt? ; ; Well, minitube is broken (performance-wise speaking) since the switch ; to rthreads... ; ; Ah, OK. I'll look into the OP port a few hours later to be able to ; test on the speedy inet connection. ; ; It took a bit more time, sorry. :( Reads fine for me (you definitely need ; another okay, though), works on i386 with SandyBridge. Two nits, though: ; ; 1) The port, probably, deserves www category, too. ; ; 2) SMPlayer streaming did not work for me, but both MPlayer and VLC did. ; Probably an SMPlayer, but if it is a common problem and could not get ; fixed, maybe use MPlayer as default in SMtube? -- Sending from my VCR...
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
On 2013/01/09 13:12, Gonzalo L. R. wrote: Hi, SMTube is a browser to search Youtube videos but it's also capable of downloading them. Comments? Ok? Cheers. -- Sending from my VCR... By default SMTube uses smplayer if you double-click on a video but the RUN_DEPENDS is on mplayer, and it doesn't fallback to a working player, can you change it one way or the other so it works out of the box please? (either change RUN_DEPENDS, change the default in the code, or patch to make it fallback; they already have code to find a working player as they use it in the settings window). Also s/[Yy]outube/YouTube/ in COMMENT and DESCR
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
I think pretty good/fast is the same people who develop smplayer and upstream response really fast any feedback. On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:13:18PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: ; On 2013/01/14 11:43, Gonzalo L. R. wrote: ; No one interested? :) ; ; How good are they at updating when youtube make changes? Does it ; take them a long time to fix things or are they quite quick? We ; currently have 6 ports that we need to patch when youtube make minor ; changes to their web pages, and several of them need work beyond ; look at upstream git and pick up a patch so I would be keen to ; only add youtube players if they are well-maintained upstream. ; -- Sending from my VCR...
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
If it is really able to play and search youtube videos in an easy way, I would be happy to see it included. Minitube was my favorite tool for youtube, but now, even with dual-core it is unusable. It feels ridiculous when people with worse computers are able to watch movies, but not me with OpenBSD. Minitube had good performance earlier, I could watch youtube videos even on a Pentium4. On 01/15/13 14:58, Gonzalo L. R. wrote: I think pretty good/fast is the same people who develop smplayer and upstream response really fast any feedback. On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:13:18PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: ; On 2013/01/14 11:43, Gonzalo L. R. wrote: ; No one interested? :) ; ; How good are they at updating when youtube make changes? Does it ; take them a long time to fix things or are they quite quick? We ; currently have 6 ports that we need to patch when youtube make minor ; changes to their web pages, and several of them need work beyond ; look at upstream git and pick up a patch so I would be keen to ; only add youtube players if they are well-maintained upstream. ;
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
Yes you can, and used mplayer to play videos. On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:19:08PM +0200, Lars Engblom wrote: ; If it is really able to play and search youtube videos in an easy ; way, I would be happy to see it included. Minitube was my favorite ; tool for youtube, but now, even with dual-core it is unusable. ; ; It feels ridiculous when people with worse computers are able to ; watch movies, but not me with OpenBSD. Minitube had good performance ; earlier, I could watch youtube videos even on a Pentium4. ; ; On 01/15/13 14:58, Gonzalo L. R. wrote: ; I think pretty good/fast is the same people who develop smplayer and ; upstream response really fast any feedback. ; ; On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:13:18PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: ; ; On 2013/01/14 11:43, Gonzalo L. R. wrote: ; ; No one interested? :) ; ; ; ; How good are they at updating when youtube make changes? Does it ; ; take them a long time to fix things or are they quite quick? We ; ; currently have 6 ports that we need to patch when youtube make minor ; ; changes to their web pages, and several of them need work beyond ; ; look at upstream git and pick up a patch so I would be keen to ; ; only add youtube players if they are well-maintained upstream. ; ; ; ; ; -- Sending from my VCR...
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:31:57PM +0100, David Coppa wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, David Coppa wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote: 14.01.2013 18:43 Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar ???: No one interested? :) Just out of curiosity: what's the point to use it when we already have others like www/minitube, not mentioning tools like net/yt? Well, minitube is broken (performance-wise speaking) since the switch to rthreads... Lots of things are. I know. For example, HTML5 videos with firefox is another one. I can see HTML5 videos with Firefox but I'm using Gregor Best's patches for the scheduler. I guess when my ATI is 100% supported by xenocara the video will be more fluid, now top shows a high use of the CPU by xorg. I mean rthreads isn't the only culprit. -- Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado http://juanfra.info
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:26:51PM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:31:57PM +0100, David Coppa wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, David Coppa wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote: 14.01.2013 18:43 Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar ???: No one interested? :) Just out of curiosity: what's the point to use it when we already have others like www/minitube, not mentioning tools like net/yt? Well, minitube is broken (performance-wise speaking) since the switch to rthreads... Lots of things are. I know. For example, HTML5 videos with firefox is another one. I can see HTML5 videos with Firefox but I'm using Gregor Best's patches for the scheduler. I guess when my ATI is 100% supported by xenocara the video will be more fluid, now top shows a high use of the CPU by xorg. I mean rthreads isn't the only culprit. It's not the only curprit but it is the biggest part of the problem. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
14.01.2013 19:06 пользователь Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com написал: 2013/1/14 David Coppa dco...@gmail.com: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote: 14.01.2013 18:43 пользователь Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar написал: No one interested? :) Just out of curiosity: what's the point to use it when we already have others like www/minitube, not mentioning tools like net/yt? Well, minitube is broken (performance-wise speaking) since the switch to rthreads... Ah, OK. I'll look into the OP port a few hours later to be able to test on the speedy inet connection. It took a bit more time, sorry. :( Reads fine for me (you definitely need another okay, though), works on i386 with SandyBridge. Two nits, though: 1) The port, probably, deserves www category, too. 2) SMPlayer streaming did not work for me, but both MPlayer and VLC did. Probably an SMPlayer, but if it is a common problem and could not get fixed, maybe use MPlayer as default in SMtube?
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
No one interested? :) --- x --- From: Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar To: ports@openbsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 13:12:30 -0300 Subject: NEW: SMTube-1.5 Hi, SMTube is a browser to search Youtube videos but it's also capable of downloading them. Comments? Ok? Cheers. -- Sending from my VCR...
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
14.01.2013 18:43 пользователь Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar написал: No one interested? :) Just out of curiosity: what's the point to use it when we already have others like www/minitube, not mentioning tools like net/yt? --- x --- From: Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar To: ports@openbsd.org Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 13:12:30 -0300 Subject: NEW: SMTube-1.5 Hi, SMTube is a browser to search Youtube videos but it's also capable of downloading them. Comments? Ok? Cheers. -- Sending from my VCR...
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote: 14.01.2013 18:43 пользователь Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar написал: No one interested? :) Just out of curiosity: what's the point to use it when we already have others like www/minitube, not mentioning tools like net/yt? Well, minitube is broken (performance-wise speaking) since the switch to rthreads... Ciao, David
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
just an alternative On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 05:59:56PM +0300, Vadim Zhukov wrote: ; 14.01.2013 18:43 пользователь Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar написал: ; ; No one interested? :) ; ; Just out of curiosity: what's the point to use it when we already have ; others like www/minitube, not mentioning tools like net/yt? ; ; --- x --- ; ; From: Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar ; To: ports@openbsd.org ; Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 13:12:30 -0300 ; Subject: NEW: SMTube-1.5 ; ; Hi, ; ; SMTube is a browser to search Youtube videos but it's also ; capable of downloading them. ; ; Comments? Ok? ; ; Cheers. ; ; -- ; Sending from my VCR... ; -- Sending from my VCR...
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
2013/1/14 David Coppa dco...@gmail.com: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote: 14.01.2013 18:43 пользователь Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar написал: No one interested? :) Just out of curiosity: what's the point to use it when we already have others like www/minitube, not mentioning tools like net/yt? Well, minitube is broken (performance-wise speaking) since the switch to rthreads... Ah, OK. I'll look into the OP port a few hours later to be able to test on the speedy inet connection. -- WBR, Vadim Zhukov
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
On 2013/01/14 11:43, Gonzalo L. R. wrote: No one interested? :) How good are they at updating when youtube make changes? Does it take them a long time to fix things or are they quite quick? We currently have 6 ports that we need to patch when youtube make minor changes to their web pages, and several of them need work beyond look at upstream git and pick up a patch so I would be keen to only add youtube players if they are well-maintained upstream.
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, David Coppa wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote: 14.01.2013 18:43 Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar ???: No one interested? :) Just out of curiosity: what's the point to use it when we already have others like www/minitube, not mentioning tools like net/yt? Well, minitube is broken (performance-wise speaking) since the switch to rthreads... Lots of things are. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Re: NEW: SMTube-1.5
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Brad Smith b...@comstyle.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, David Coppa wrote: On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote: 14.01.2013 18:43 Gonzalo L. R. gonz...@x61.com.ar ???: No one interested? :) Just out of curiosity: what's the point to use it when we already have others like www/minitube, not mentioning tools like net/yt? Well, minitube is broken (performance-wise speaking) since the switch to rthreads... Lots of things are. I know. For example, HTML5 videos with firefox is another one.
