[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
We are trying exactly this and it seems to be working fine. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/spiUlrZ1QvcJ. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
It's easy enough for the jQuery shop guys to use this pattern:
(function($) {
// jQuery stuff here
})(jQuery);
-- Marc
On Sep 20, 8:14 pm, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote:
I've read through the post, but need clarification on the no-conflict steps.
I have written an API using prototype. I am now handing the code over to a
jquery shop. They do not want to change their use of $ symbol for jquery.
How can this be accomplished?
Thanks,
Karl..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
Clarifying Marc's post, after doing jQuery.noConflict(), the jQuery
shop folks can continue to use $ for jQuery stuff if they shadow the
global symbol with a local one. The most common way to do that is to
use a function argument:
jQuery.noConflict();
(function($) {
// Here, $ = jQuery because $ resolves to the argument, so
$(div).css(color, blue); // Turns text in all divs blue
})(jQuery);
// Here, $ = Prototype because noConflict() was called, so
$$(div).invoke('setStyle', {color: green}); // Turns text in all
divs green
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Engineer
tj / crowder software / com
www / crowder software / com
On Sep 21, 9:05 am, Marc marc.heilig...@gmail.com wrote:
It's easy enough for the jQuery shop guys to use this pattern:
(function($) {
// jQuery stuff here
})(jQuery);
-- Marc
On Sep 20, 8:14 pm, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote:
I've read through the post, but need clarification on the no-conflict steps.
I have written an API using prototype. I am now handing the code over to a
jquery shop. They do not want to change their use of $ symbol for jquery.
How can this be accomplished?
Thanks,
Karl..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
Specifically: How difficult would it be to remove $ from Prototype? I like what you are suggesting T.J. but would like another option for the JQuery shop. Karl.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/tGuKA2dgnA0J. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
Wouldn't that be as easy as a search and replace of $( in Prototype.js? You could always trying changing $( to Proto( and give it a whirl. But, any 3rd party stuff you have would need the same change. On Sep 21, 11:38 am, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote: Specifically: How difficult would it be to remove $ from Prototype? I like what you are suggesting T.J. but would like another option for the JQuery shop. Karl.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
You are mixing HTML (the script tag) and javascript (the rest)
however using a dynamic scripting language like PHP this would be
doable
ie
jQuery.noConflict();
(function($) {
?php
include 'include_my_jquery_code';
?
})(jQuery);
this is messy and I never like putting php tags in the middle of
javascript if I can help it
On Sep 21, 5:28 am, greg i...@wildanimaltracks.com wrote:
Would the following work?
jQuery.noConflict();
(function($) {
script type=text/javascript src=jQuerystuff.js/script
})(jQuery);
On Sep 21, 5:53 am, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Clarifying Marc's post, after doing jQuery.noConflict(), the jQuery
shop folks can continue to use $ for jQuery stuff if they shadow the
global symbol with a local one. The most common way to do that is to
use a function argument:
jQuery.noConflict();
(function($) {
// Here, $ = jQuery because $ resolves to the argument, so
$(div).css(color, blue); // Turns text in all divs blue
})(jQuery);
// Here, $ = Prototype because noConflict() was called, so
$$(div).invoke('setStyle', {color: green}); // Turns text in all
divs green
FWIW,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Engineer
tj / crowder software / com
www / crowder software / com
On Sep 21, 9:05 am, Marc marc.heilig...@gmail.com wrote:
It's easy enough for the jQuery shop guys to use this pattern:
(function($) {
// jQuery stuff here
})(jQuery);
-- Marc
On Sep 20, 8:14 pm, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote:
I've read through the post, but need clarification on the no-conflict
steps.
I have written an API using prototype. I am now handing the code over
to a
jquery shop. They do not want to change their use of $ symbol for
jquery.
How can this be accomplished?
Thanks,
Karl..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
I've also written an API in Prototype, and I know it will be used in jQuery shops. I hope to not run into people not willing to make a few easy search/replace changes. It would be nice if there was a way for Prototype to not conflict. On Sep 20, 3:14 pm, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote: I've read through the post, but need clarification on the no-conflict steps. I have written an API using prototype. I am now handing the code over to a jquery shop. They do not want to change their use of $ symbol for jquery. How can this be accomplished? Thanks, Karl.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
I don't think it is a matter of Prototype not conflicting with JQuery. My understanding is they conflict with each other, all over the use of $ shortcut. What I'm wondering is, how easy would it be in Prototype to compile a version which does not use the $ shortcut, so the fall back is the Element object. Is the easy or hard, or not possible? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/prototype-scriptaculous/-/-Lh3so9-4o8J. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype Vs. JQuery
Well, great feedback so far. As stated, I'm a fan of Proto, and will stay committed. I think mostly because I am just now getting to a level of proficiency that allows me to actually develop, rather than struggle with concepts, how-to's, and basic syntax. I'm not a huge plugin fan, so have been pleased with core Proto library + Scripty and writing my own, but perhaps an argument for JQuery is their wealth of plugins. I state that more as a question since I really do not know how the libraries/plugins/extensions compare in size and usefulness. Anyhow, keep up the great work Proto, and I should also mention that the support that T.J. offers on this group is amazing and well beyond expected. Karl.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype Vs. JQuery
jQuery is DOM-only, and Prototype is general Javascript with classes etc. If you program in Javascript (versus just setting colors positions css etc.), then Prototype is much better choice. For DOM-oriented tasks, both are good. For me as a programmer, Prototype is better, since I can express my intentions more clearly with Object-Oriented approach. For a non-programmer and/or beginner (e.g. web designer) jQuery is easier to use and learn because it is simpler (procedural) and limited to DOM-oriented tasks. izidor On 2.5.2011, at 9:04, kstubs wrote: Well, great feedback so far. As stated, I'm a fan of Proto, and will stay committed. I think mostly because I am just now getting to a level of proficiency that allows me to actually develop, rather than struggle with concepts, how-to's, and basic syntax. I'm not a huge plugin fan, so have been pleased with core Proto library + Scripty and writing my own, but perhaps an argument for JQuery is their wealth of plugins. I state that more as a question since I really do not know how the libraries/plugins/extensions compare in size and usefulness. Anyhow, keep up the great work Proto, and I should also mention that the support that T.J. offers on this group is amazing and well beyond expected. Karl.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype Vs. JQuery
Hello, For me the problem is actualy Why are you using Prototype when jQuery is more efficient, intuitive et en plus more developed? And remember you, jQuery accept other library with .noConflict() And you can manage RoR with jQuery http://jimneath.org/2008/06/18/using-jquery-with-ruby-on-rails.html So for me try to do something with Proto is a challenge because jQuery is so smart. cordialy LV On 1 mai, 02:45, joe t. thooke...@gmail.com wrote: The short answer is that there's no short answer. There's not really anything that either library can do that the other can't. It's mostly a question of the requirements of the project, or familiarity with either library's approach, etc. There's no conclusive answer any answer you do get will be loaded with facts about each, but no single knockout argument to use one or the other. -joe t. On Apr 29, 2:22 pm, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote: Why Prototype over JQuery? I am an avid fan of Prototype and have never used JQuery, but JQuery seems to be so popular. Is it just that, popular? I love prototype, and learning something new and magical every day it seems, but is there something *better* that Prototype does that JQuery doesn't, or vice-a-versa? Karl.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype Vs. JQuery
@lvdesign you comment sound more that an advertising than an real prove for why to move to jquery, I mean seriously I don't know anything that you CAN'T do with prototype and do with jquery cause at finally both are javascript, so the question is more about what is the real future of prototype, why stay keep in touch with this library or try to move in a new one. I mean if you have to talk about libraries you have to realize that YUI is really better option than jquery in several terms and is running in an architectural made by the famous Douglas Crockford father of JSON. But here the question is what's happend with prototype??? does anyone can help us??? On May 1, 4:33 am, lvdesign mail...@lvdesign.com.fr wrote: Hello, For me the problem is actualy Why are you using Prototype when jQuery is more efficient, intuitive et en plus more developed? And remember you, jQuery accept other library with .noConflict() And you can manage RoR with jQueryhttp://jimneath.org/2008/06/18/using-jquery-with-ruby-on-rails.html So for me try to do something with Proto is a challenge because jQuery is so smart. cordialy LV On 1 mai, 02:45, joe t. thooke...@gmail.com wrote: The short answer is that there's no short answer. There's not really anything that either library can do that the other can't. It's mostly a question of the requirements of the project, or familiarity with either library's approach, etc. There's no conclusive answer any answer you do get will be loaded with facts about each, but no single knockout argument to use one or the other. -joe t. On Apr 29, 2:22 pm, kstubs kst...@gmail.com wrote: Why Prototype over JQuery? I am an avid fan of Prototype and have never used JQuery, but JQuery seems to be so popular. Is it just that, popular? I love prototype, and learning something new and magical every day it seems, but is there something *better* that Prototype does that JQuery doesn't, or vice-a-versa? Karl.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
When using $.noConflict(); you need to load Prototype before loading jQuery. The script tag for Prototype literally needs to be above the script tag for jQuery. When using noConflict I find the most useful way of separating the two libraries logically is to assign jQuery a new name. For instance: var $j = jQuery.noConflict(); // Do something with jQuery $j(div p).hide(); // Do something with Prototype $(content).hide(); I have a project called Modevious that specifically uses Prototype and jQuery together (along with other plugins and components) and it separates the two like so ($ for Prototype and $j for jQuery, and $c for my own library). When using Prototype $ works just as expected, but when using jQuery you must use $j. jQuery plugin authors are usually good about encapsulating their plugin so that even though their code may specify $ jQuery does a good job working with that and they are accessible via $j. For instance Pines Notify is by default $.pnotify(Message). But when using Modevious or simply noConflict like above it is called by using $j.pnotify(Message). Hope that helps you use two wonderful libraries together. On Mar 16, 1:36 pm, Joseph O joeordo...@gmail.com wrote: This has been tossed around the net in many variations yet none have worked for me. I have done about ever work around for these two so they will like each other and have reached a dead end. I need my image fade menu to function with my flash driven lightbox. Please let me know if this is something anyone can help with. Here are a few links to reference. This shows the menu working.http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee.html This shows the Lightbox Working.http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee_test.html This shows the jQuery / Prototype noConflict script in action. (Prototype is disabled)http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee_test_conflict.html While the script allows jQuery to operate without Prototype loading, it still does not function with both. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
On Mar 19, 8:17 pm, P.J. pjfontil...@gmail.com wrote: When using $.noConflict(); you need to load Prototype before loading jQuery. The script tag for Prototype literally needs to be above the script tag for jQuery. No, you don't. The order doesn't matter, as long as if you load jQuery first, you make the `noConflict` before you load Prototype, e.g.: script src='jquery.js'/script scriptjQuery.noConflict();/script script src='prototype.js'/script Examples: jQuery first: http://jsbin.com/acehi5 Prototype first: http://jsbin.com/acehi5/2 Those also demonstrate how you can keep using `$` within jQuery- specific code without running into trouble using `$` elsewhere with Prototype code. But you only want to do that with they won't be intermixed; otherwise, best to stick to using the `jQuery` symbol or (as you said) one you assign yourself by grabbing the return value of `noConflict`. Best, -- T.J. Crowder Independent Software Engineer tj / crowder software / com www / crowder software / com On Mar 19, 8:17 pm, P.J. pjfontil...@gmail.com wrote: When using $.noConflict(); you need to load Prototype before loading jQuery. The script tag for Prototype literally needs to be above the script tag for jQuery. When using noConflict I find the most useful way of separating the two libraries logically is to assign jQuery a new name. For instance: var $j = jQuery.noConflict(); // Do something with jQuery $j(div p).hide(); // Do something with Prototype $(content).hide(); I have a project called Modevious that specifically uses Prototype and jQuery together (along with other plugins and components) and it separates the two like so ($ for Prototype and $j for jQuery, and $c for my own library). When using Prototype $ works just as expected, but when using jQuery you must use $j. jQuery plugin authors are usually good about encapsulating their plugin so that even though their code may specify $ jQuery does a good job working with that and they are accessible via $j. For instance Pines Notify is by default $.pnotify(Message). But when using Modevious or simply noConflict like above it is called by using $j.pnotify(Message). Hope that helps you use two wonderful libraries together. On Mar 16, 1:36 pm, Joseph O joeordo...@gmail.com wrote: This has been tossed around the net in many variations yet none have worked for me. I have done about ever work around for these two so they will like each other and have reached a dead end. I need my image fade menu to function with my flash driven lightbox. Please let me know if this is something anyone can help with. Here are a few links to reference. This shows the menu working.http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee.html This shows the Lightbox Working.http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee_test.html This shows the jQuery / Prototype noConflict script in action. (Prototype is disabled)http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee_test_conflict.html While the script allows jQuery to operate without Prototype loading, it still does not function with both. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
On Mar 19, 3:53 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote: No, you don't. The order doesn't matter, as long as if you load jQuery first, you make the `noConflict` before you load Prototype, e.g.: script src='jquery.js'/script scriptjQuery.noConflict();/script script src='prototype.js'/script Examples: jQuery first:http://jsbin.com/acehi5 Prototype first:http://jsbin.com/acehi5/2 Quite right. I retract my earlier statement. Joseph, I'm getting similar results as T.J. did when tracking down the anchors. Try to update to the latest jQuery stable release and simplify your logic wherever you can. Good luck! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype script.aculo.us group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
Re: [Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
Thank you for the reply. I worked on the repairing the code like you
have shown and it does still allows prototype to take control when loaded.
Could I still be missing something simple?
The three link examples I have shown are to see (1) jQuery happy and
working, (2) prototype doing it's thing, and (3) to show that the
no.conflict script was still allowing jQuery to work but If pototype loaded
at any point jQuery would stop.
I reposted the last link to reflect the suggested changes you made.
jQuery still works until prototype is turned back on.
I have put a lot of work into both functions separately not knowing the
conflict would exist. I have come to far to give up and truly could use
further assistant.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:44 AM, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.comwrote:
Hi,
It's not clear what's wrong from your message or examples.
Fundamentally, if you want your first link to work when you add
Prototype to the page, just add the `noConflict` call *immediately*
after loading the jquery.js file and include the Prototype file, like
so:
script src=../Scripts/jquery-1.2.6.js type=text/javascript
charset=utf-8/script
scriptjQuery.noConflict();/script
script src=../lightbox/js/prototype.js type=text/javascript/
script
..and then change your two functions that look like this:
$(function () {
if ($.browser.msie $.browser.version 7) return;
// ...
});
...to look like this:
jQuery(function($) {
if ($.browser.msie $.browser.version 7) return;
// ...
});
Note that I've added `$` as an argument. jQuery passes a reference to
itself into `ready` handlers, and so you can use a local alias for it
and not have to change all your code. *Outside* of that `ready`
handler, `$` will refer to Prototype. (Or just use `jQuery` for jQuery
throughout the page, but for large scripts it can be convenient to use
the local alias.)
Example: http://jsbin.com/uqugo3
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Engineer
tj / crowder software / com
www / crowder software / com
On Mar 16, 6:36 pm, Joseph O joeordo...@gmail.com wrote:
This has been tossed around the net in many variations yet none have
worked for me. I have done about ever work around for these two so
they will like each other and have reached a dead end. I need my image
fade menu to function with my flash driven lightbox. Please let me
know if this is something anyone can help with. Here are a few links
to reference.
This shows the menu working.
http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee.html
This shows the Lightbox Working.
http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee_test.html
This shows the jQuery / Prototype noConflict script in action.
(Prototype is disabled)
http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee_test_conflict.html
While the script allows jQuery to operate without Prototype loading,
it still does not function with both.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
Hi,
That's very strange. I'm afraid the only real thing to do is to walk
through with a debugger. I got far enough to see that for whatever
reason, the jQuery code isn't finding the anchors to add the hover
spans to them, which is why they don't work, but I don't know why not.
It looks like you're using jQuery 1.2.6, which is very, very out of
date. The first thing I'd do is migrate to the latest. Then if the
problem persists, I'd walk through with a debugger.
If you like, you can hire me for a couple of hours to work it out for
you (my rates aren't completely unreasonable). Drop me a note
privately if you want to do that.
Good luck,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Engineer
tj / crowder software / com
www / crowder software / com
On Mar 18, 6:18 pm, Joseph O joeordo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for the reply. I worked on the repairing the code like you
have shown and it does still allows prototype to take control when loaded.
Could I still be missing something simple?
The three link examples I have shown are to see (1) jQuery happy and
working, (2) prototype doing it's thing, and (3) to show that the
no.conflict script was still allowing jQuery to work but If pototype loaded
at any point jQuery would stop.
I reposted the last link to reflect the suggested changes you made.
jQuery still works until prototype is turned back on.
I have put a lot of work into both functions separately not knowing the
conflict would exist. I have come to far to give up and truly could use
further assistant.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:44 AM, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.comwrote:
Hi,
It's not clear what's wrong from your message or examples.
Fundamentally, if you want your first link to work when you add
Prototype to the page, just add the `noConflict` call *immediately*
after loading the jquery.js file and include the Prototype file, like
so:
script src=../Scripts/jquery-1.2.6.js type=text/javascript
charset=utf-8/script
scriptjQuery.noConflict();/script
script src=../lightbox/js/prototype.js type=text/javascript/
script
..and then change your two functions that look like this:
$(function () {
if ($.browser.msie $.browser.version 7) return;
// ...
});
...to look like this:
jQuery(function($) {
if ($.browser.msie $.browser.version 7) return;
// ...
});
Note that I've added `$` as an argument. jQuery passes a reference to
itself into `ready` handlers, and so you can use a local alias for it
and not have to change all your code. *Outside* of that `ready`
handler, `$` will refer to Prototype. (Or just use `jQuery` for jQuery
throughout the page, but for large scripts it can be convenient to use
the local alias.)
Example:http://jsbin.com/uqugo3
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Engineer
tj / crowder software / com
www / crowder software / com
On Mar 16, 6:36 pm, Joseph O joeordo...@gmail.com wrote:
This has been tossed around the net in many variations yet none have
worked for me. I have done about ever work around for these two so
they will like each other and have reached a dead end. I need my image
fade menu to function with my flash driven lightbox. Please let me
know if this is something anyone can help with. Here are a few links
to reference.
This shows the menu working.
http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee.html
This shows the Lightbox Working.
http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee_test.html
This shows the jQuery / Prototype noConflict script in action.
(Prototype is disabled)
http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee_test_conflict.html
While the script allows jQuery to operate without Prototype loading,
it still does not function with both.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
[Proto-Scripty] Re: Prototype and jQuery
Hi,
It's not clear what's wrong from your message or examples.
Fundamentally, if you want your first link to work when you add
Prototype to the page, just add the `noConflict` call *immediately*
after loading the jquery.js file and include the Prototype file, like
so:
script src=../Scripts/jquery-1.2.6.js type=text/javascript
charset=utf-8/script
scriptjQuery.noConflict();/script
script src=../lightbox/js/prototype.js type=text/javascript/
script
..and then change your two functions that look like this:
$(function () {
if ($.browser.msie $.browser.version 7) return;
// ...
});
...to look like this:
jQuery(function($) {
if ($.browser.msie $.browser.version 7) return;
// ...
});
Note that I've added `$` as an argument. jQuery passes a reference to
itself into `ready` handlers, and so you can use a local alias for it
and not have to change all your code. *Outside* of that `ready`
handler, `$` will refer to Prototype. (Or just use `jQuery` for jQuery
throughout the page, but for large scripts it can be convenient to use
the local alias.)
Example: http://jsbin.com/uqugo3
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Engineer
tj / crowder software / com
www / crowder software / com
On Mar 16, 6:36 pm, Joseph O joeordo...@gmail.com wrote:
This has been tossed around the net in many variations yet none have
worked for me. I have done about ever work around for these two so
they will like each other and have reached a dead end. I need my image
fade menu to function with my flash driven lightbox. Please let me
know if this is something anyone can help with. Here are a few links
to reference.
This shows the menu
working.http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee.html
This shows the Lightbox
Working.http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee_test.html
This shows the jQuery / Prototype noConflict script in action.
(Prototype is
disabled)http://fabritechonline.com/content/awning_marquee_test_conflict.html
While the script allows jQuery to operate without Prototype loading,
it still does not function with both.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.
