[Ql-Users] hardware
Hallo again from Richard Gwilt - George’s son. Thank you very much for your kind words over the last week or so. Sorry to bother you all AGAIN - but we are in the process of tidying up - and are faced with a room FULL of QL stuff!! 6 old black QL computers (1 with Trump card) 1 Q60 1 QL21 assorted CRT monitors, MILLIONS of micro tapes, floppies etc. ENORMOUS number of manuals etc etc We are about to take it all to the dump - if anyone would like any, it’ll be here in Edinburgh in Dad’s computer room available for pick up for the next couple of days. I know, no time to think — but perhaps there photos give you an idea of the scale of the problem … All the best, Richard ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ/E 3.39
Hello everyone at the QL-Users group. I guess most of you knew of mu father, George Gwilt - this is just to let you know that he passed away this past Saturday. All the best, Richard Gwilt > On 25 Feb 2024, at 20:54, qlus...@sinclairql.net via Ql-Users > wrote: > > > This is great news! > > It took me some time to do a first test run with QPC2 and QL/E v3.23 this > evening. So far all is well. > > QL forever! > Urs > > ___ > QL-Users Mailing List ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] QPC2 4.04 BUG (RWAP Software)
> On 23 Apr 2018, at 15:40, Michael Bulford via Ql-Users >wrote: > >> Does anyone know why the following in QPC2 reports "Invalid Channel ID" >> >> WINDOW 448,200,32,16 >> PAPER #1,3 > I get no error message. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] QPC2 for Mac update
> On 8 Oct 2017, at 16:48, Gerhard Plavec via Ql-Users >wrote: > > Tatsächlich... irgendwie gibt es da nichts zu laden !?? Events 1. I Click on the Downloads address given by Marcel. 2. Up comes a page called Downloads. 3. I then click on QPC2 v4.05 for MacOS X. 4. I now get a page called Nothing Here! with a notice Error 404 at the top. There is a list of Recent Posts. By clicking on “Updated QPC2 for Mac OS X” I now get a nice picture under the heading “Updated QPC2 for Mac OS X”. The note above the picture says “Get it from the QPC downloads page." Clicking on this produces Event 2. I can go on forever doing this - but it becomes less interesting each time. (Also - of course - there is the disadvantage of having no actual download.) George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] QMenu v8
> On 21 Sep 2017, at 09:48, Thierry Godefroy via Ql-Users >wrote: > >> >> QMenu 7.66 has a lot of problem, ink color in view_file remains always >> black, extension filter don't work and some other problems... Qmenu 8, >> works well.. > > Yes, v7.66 is buggy, but v8 is not much better... As I remember v8 worked OK - the machine code interface at any rate. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] TURBO and testing it exists
> On 18 Aug 2017, at 17:38, Per Witte via Ql-Users> wrote: > > George, the question is relevant if you write programs intended for other > people: You cant be sure THEY will load Turbo. However, IMHO, any serious > Tinkerer should load Turbo as a matter of course. I would usually expect to compile any programs before releasing them to the general public. In that case TURBO_TK_REM would have been added. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] German Minerva ROM
> On 8 Mar 2017, at 12:00, pg...@q40.de wrote: > > > By now, SMSQ/E is also free software, Minerva offers no advantages > regarding licensing anymore. Native hardware interest moved from > targeting highspeed Motorola CPU to retrocomputing with FPGA. Which > is using plain 68000 at the moment, taking away most interest in > 68020+. Although I might change to 68020 later. And most developers > are gone, more work for less people, less playground for several > operating systems on one machine. Any assembler program I write for my own use on QPC2 will certainly use the extremely useful 68020+ instructions. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] German Minerva ROM
> On 7 Mar 2017, at 15:53, pg...@q40.de wrote: > > > GWASS did not produce the same code as QMAC from Minerva source, and > required various sourcecode changes, which now no longer allow to > use QMAC. We did not hunt down all the subtle differences yet. I'm > sure this could all be solved by more debugging and discussing the > issues with you, and you would be more than willing to help. But > this process would require a continuos period of time to concentrate > on the topic, which neither Richard nor me found. I remember spending much time altering the source code of SMSQ/E so that it could be assembled by GWASS. I think the reason for doing this this was that GWASS allows the 68020+ instructions to be used, which QPC2 allows, but QMAC doesn't. Otherwise, I agree that it is silly to go to the trouble of altering the Minerva code just so that you could use GWASS. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] Behaviour of DIV with negative numbers in SBASIC (QPC2)
> On 9 Jan 2017, at 09:29, Jan Bredenbeekwrote: > > A word of warning! >> >> It may be true that SMSQ/E supports Long INTs for DIV/MOD but I do >> remember that QLIB does not. >> I tried this in SQRview and it worked fine in SBasic but needed a >> workaround for QLIB to avoid an "overflow" error. >> It's possible that QLIB uses its own DIV/MOD routines. > > > This is also true for plain interpreted SuperBASIC. Only SBASIC supports > DIV/MOD with long INTs. TURBO doesn’t. For example 325 MOD 7 gives 5 in S*BASIC with QPC2, but overflow is reported by TURBO. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] Bevaiour of DIV with negative numbers in SBASIC (QPC2)
> On 5 Jan 2017, at 15:27, Martyn Hillwrote: > > Hi everyone > > Can anyone tell me the expected behaviour for the integer-divide operator > 'DIV' in SBASIC, when provided with a negative dividend/numerator? > > My number-theory is a bit rusty, but I would have thought that, say, -1 DIV > 10 should result in 0 (with remainder/MOD of -1). > > Instead, on QPC2/SBASIC, I get the result -1 for that example - and (almost) > always 1 less than expected for negative dividends, thus: > > 12 DIV 10 = 1 > 11 DIV 10 = 1 > 10 DIV 10 = 1 > 9 DIV 10 = 0 > ... > 2 DIV 10 = 0 > 1 DIV 10 = 0 > 0 DIV 10 = 0 > * -1 DIV 10 = -1 - expected '0'** > ** -2 DIV 10 = -1** > **...** > ** -9 DIV 10 = -1* > *-10 DIV 10 = -1 - as expected* > *-11 DIV 10 = -2 - expected '-1' > -12 DIV 10 = -2 > > *etc... > > Thanks in advance! > > Martyn. n DIV m = INT(n/m) INT(a) gives the “integer part” of a. There are three possibilities. 1. a is rounded up 2. a is rounded down 3. a is rounded to nearest In S*BASIC a is rounded down. Thus -11 DIV 10 = INT(-11/10) = -2 George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] Qliberator External on Turbo??
> On 8 Dec 2016, at 15:02, Derek Stewartwrote: > > > But what I mean is, if a SBASIC procedure is written, it can be compiled with > Qliberator and LRESPRed into the Interpreter list. > > E.g. from Qliberator Manual > > 10 $$external > 20 Def Proc Square(x) > 30 print x*x > 40 End Def Square > > When this is compiled and the resulting OBJ file is LRESPRed, this adds the > command Square to the Interpreter. TURBO allows this by use of TASCOM. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] Qliberator External on Turbo??
> On 8 Dec 2016, at 15:02, Derek Stewartwrote: > > But what I mean is, if a SBASIC procedure is written, it can be compiled with > Qliberator and LRESPRed into the Interpreter list. > > E.g. from Qliberator Manual > > 10 $$external > 20 Def Proc Square(x) > 30 print x*x > 40 End Def Square > > When this is compiled and the resulting OBJ file is LRESPRed, this adds the > command Square to the Interpreter. That is certainly something TURBO does not do - - at the moment. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] Qliberator External on Turbo??
> On 8 Dec 2016, at 14:09, Derek Stewartwrote: > > I was reading my old Qliberator manual which I had forgotten about the > $$external function to allow S*Basic procedures and Functions to be compiled > to that added to the S*BASIC to extend the commands. > > Can this be done in Turbo, or can Turbo be altered to do this. You can add REM %%[ name of extension file ] to a program to be compiled by TURBO so that the extensions to S*BASIC therein are loaded. This mirrors the similar procedure in QLIB. The details are in the TURBO Manual. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] Software Preservation Project - Tasks
> On 10 Jul 2016, at 14:14, Wolfwrote: > > isn't Turbo maintained by Grorge Gwilt? Yes - ever since I read in a magazine that I was to maintain it! But I have no idea whether this affects copyright or not. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] A feature or a bug?
> On 14 Jun 2016, at 16:45, François Van Emelen <francois.vaneme...@telenet.be> > wrote: > > Op 14/06/2016 om 16:18 schreef George Gwilt: >>> On 14 Jun 2016, at 14:56, Bob Spelten <b...@upcmail.nl> wrote: >>> >>> Op Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:43:00 +0200 schreef Marcel Kilgus >>> <ql-us...@mail.kilgus.net>: >>> >>>> Marcel Kilgus wrote: >>>>> François Van Emelen wrote: >>>>>> 10 f$="":REMark empty string >>>>>> 20 if FTEST(f$)=0 >>>>>> 30 DIR f$ >>>>>> 40 ELSE >>>>>> 50 PRINT f$," can't be a file name" >>>>>> 60 ENDIF >>>>>> >>>>>> Why is line 30 executed (displaying the directory of datad$) instead of >>>>>> line 50? >>>>> Because SMSQ/E defaults to dev1_ if you don't give a filename, I >>>>> presume. >>>> Strike that, it defaults to datad$ of course, which is set to "dev1_" >>>> in my case. I mean, that's what DATA_USE is for, providing a default >>>> directory for file operations. >>>> >>>> Marcel >>>> >>> I understand the datad$ but the problem is why FTEST returns a zero? >>> FTEST should return a -7, so DIR is should not be done. >>> >>> >> The manual says that FTEST tests "a file or device”. Thus FTESTing win4_, >> say, returns “0” even if win4_ contains no files. >> >> George >> >> ___ >> QL-Users Mailing List > > So, this seems to be a feature... a very dangerous one : replacing DIR f$ in > line 30 with DELETE f$ would wipe all directories and files on that device. > > And there is no Undo available . > > François Van Emelen > > > > ___ > QL-Users Mailing List Using Turbo Toolkit’s DEVICE_STATUS might be safer. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] A feature or a bug?
> On 14 Jun 2016, at 14:56, Bob Speltenwrote: > > Op Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:43:00 +0200 schreef Marcel Kilgus > : > >> Marcel Kilgus wrote: >>> François Van Emelen wrote: 10 f$="":REMark empty string 20 if FTEST(f$)=0 30 DIR f$ 40 ELSE 50 PRINT f$," can't be a file name" 60 ENDIF Why is line 30 executed (displaying the directory of datad$) instead of line 50? >>> Because SMSQ/E defaults to dev1_ if you don't give a filename, I >>> presume. >> >> Strike that, it defaults to datad$ of course, which is set to "dev1_" >> in my case. I mean, that's what DATA_USE is for, providing a default >> directory for file operations. >> >> Marcel >> > I understand the datad$ but the problem is why FTEST returns a zero? > FTEST should return a -7, so DIR is should not be done. > > The manual says that FTEST tests "a file or device”. Thus FTESTing win4_, say, returns “0” even if win4_ contains no files. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] EasyPtr and me
> On 7 Apr 2016, at 12:19, Norman Dunbarwrote: > > A most enjoyable read, thanks Marcel. I might even take you up on the offer > of EasyMenu 4 sometime, but these days I'm using George's not-quite-WYSIWYG > assembly utilities. (Due to old age - 56 today - I'm afraid I can't remember > the damned name of the utility I use! Aargh! Better book my etirement home > soon I think. :-( I certainly find it very hard to remember things. I do remember that my assembler routines are referred to as EasyPEasy and they are on my website. From that I can find the names of any specific program. I see also that my website contains something called TurboPTR which enables you to write PE programs in S*BASIC and then compile them with TURBO. This must be similar to EasyPtr. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] Emulators and 68020 instructions
> On 29 Jan 2016, at 12:37, Norman Dunbarwrote: > > I know QPC can do these instructions but are the other emulators able to? > > Any advice gratefully received. Thanks as ever. I think not. The only other machines are Q4, Q60 and some QXLs (if that is what they are called!). But no emulators. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] screen info in assembler
> On 14 Jan 2016, at 15:32, Marcos Cruzwrote: > > Is there a key for that $C4 offset? The only $C4 I've found in all keys > files I have are ut_windw and pt_ptrok, which have nothing to do with > this. SYS_CLNK George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] screen info in assembler
> On 14 Jan 2016, at 11:11, Wolfgang Lenerzwrote: > > but probably not on systems without smsq/e. The original question assumed SMSQ/E present. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] screen info in assembler
> On 13 Jan 2016, at 20:26, Marcos Cruzwrote: > > Which is the easiest way to get the screen info from assembly is SMSQ/E? > I mean, what `scr_base`, `scr_xlim`, `scr_ylim` and `scr_llen` do in > SBASIC. The information is in the CON linkage block. The address of this block is at $C4 of the system variables (usually $28000). The keys for the contents of the block are held in “keys_con” a copy of which is in EasyPeasy. For example, the screen limits, SCR_XLIM and SCR_YLIM are at $F2 and $F4 of the linkage block. The codes for these are pt_xscrs and pt_yscrs. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] screen info in assembler
> On 14 Jan 2016, at 14:56, Marcos Cruzwrote: > > That file is not in peasp02.zip (I downloaded it also from your site, > just in case). Anyway, the keys you mention are in the file > of the SMSQ/E sources. You are right! the file KEYS_CON is in my own PE directory and was not transferred to peasp02.zip. I’m sorry. The file is indeed in the SMSQ/E sources - if you know where to look. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] Floating Point Questions
On 14 Aug 2015, at 17:56, Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk mailto:nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk wrote: Second question, is there a simple way to look at the internal representation of a float and determine whether it is an INT or not? Yes. (An amended version) Put the fp number onto the arithmetic stack and use RI.EXECB to do the following: qa.dup.qa.nlint,qa.float,qa_sub,0 This duplicates the number, finds the nearest long integer to the first copy and then converts that long integer to floating point whereupon it finds the difference between the converted number and the original. This assumes that the internal from of the fp number is normalised. That is that bit 30 of the mantissa is 1 or that the number is very small indeed. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Floating Point Questions
On 14 Aug 2015, at 17:56, Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk wrote: Second question, is there a simple way to look at the internal representation of a float and determine whether it is an INT or not? Yes. Put the fp number onto the arithmetic stack and use RI.EXECB to do the following: qa.dup.qa.nlint,qa.float,0 This duplicates the number, finds the nearest long integer to the first copy and then converts that long integer to floating point whereupon it finds the difference between the converted number and the original. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] New QL Assembly Language Book.
On 17 Jul 2015, at 20:27, Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk wrote: After much work, some wailing, some gnashing of teeth and a good few hours typing on my phone while on holiday recently, I have finished updating the file Wow! Every serious QLer should have a copy. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Decompiler
On 28 Jun 2015, at 14:22, Derek Stewart de...@q40.de mailto:de...@q40.de wrote: One question with regards to the temporary file that is created by the Parser_task: a) Is this the input file to the Codegen_task Yes b) Do we know the format of the file It is known. In fact there is a program which decodes it in a readable form. When I alter TURBO I use it to check that the output is what I expect. However, this program is not generally available. I am not sure whether the format of the intermediate code is available either. Also, I think that the location of the intermediate file can vary. It is obviously available to CODEGEN_TASK but not otherwise easily accessible by the general public! George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Paruse Partyp
On 29 Nov 2014, at 14:04, François Van Emelen francois.vaneme...@telenet.be wrote: Hi all, (Is there still someone listening here?) Three questions 1. Can someone tell me why the values printed for PARTYP and PARUSE in lines 240 to 350 are always 2? Is there something wrong with these functions or am I missing something? 100 :REMark test return values of par_use,par_typ,parnam$ 110 REMark string 120 pay$=Belgium 130 REMark array 140 DIM langue$(2,10):langue$(0)=Dutch:langue$(1)=French:langue$(2)=German: 150 REMark float 160 keyboardcode=32 170 REMark integer 180 a%=1 190 PRINT TEST_PARAM(pay$,langue$,keyboardcode,a%):PAUSE 200 : 210 DEFine FuNction TEST_PARAM (p$,l$,k,i%) 220 : 230 : 240 PRINT PARNAM$(1) :REMark prints 'pay$' as expected 250 PRINT PARTYP(1) :REMark prints 2 :shouldn't that be 1 -string PRINT PARTYP(pay$) will give the answer 1 260 PRINT PARUSE(1) :REMark prints 2 :shouldn't that be 1 -variable PARUSE like PARTYP is a function taking the name of the parameter of the procedure or function as its own parameter. I have not been able so far in testing this to find a value other than 2. How odd (or even rather). 270 PRINT PARNAM$(2) :REMark prints 'langue$' as expected 280 PRINT PARTYP(2) :REMark prints 2 :shouldn't that be 1 -string 290 PRINT PARUSE(2) :REMark prints 2 :shouldn't that be 2 -langue$ is an array 300 PRINT PARNAM$(3) :REMark prints 'keyboardcode' as lexpected 310 PRINT PARTYP(3) :REMark prints 2: correct - keyboardcode is a float 320 PRINT PARUSE(3) :REMark prints 2::shouldn'tthat be be 1 -string 330 PRINT PARNAM$(4) :REMark prints 'a%' as expected 340 PRINT PARTYP(4) : REMark prints 2 :shouldn't that be be 3 - a% is an integer 350 PRINT PARUSE(4) : REMark prints 2 :shouldn't be be 1 -variable 360 REMark the values for partyp and paruse are always 2:why? 370 RETurn What's wrong?: 380 REMark the returned value is not important here 390 : 400 END DEFine TEST_PARAM 2. Is there a way to find out how many languages are supported (English,French,..)? 3. Once we know which language is active (with language($), can we access the strings containing the days of the week and the string with the names of the months? Some help would be appreciated. François Van Emelen George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] OUT NOW!
On 4 Nov 2014, at 19:10, Ralf Reköndt ralf.rekoe...@t-online.de wrote: I have read the few demo pages at Amazon and find it a bit circumstancially to use this version as a serious book. I have the native one, and this is a lot better to flip from page to page and to search for special things. My printed book has the numbers of the pages I want to look at written in pencil inside the cover. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
[Ql-Users] Program Updates
There is an update on my website http://gwiltprogs.info TURBO v 5.09 now correctly compiles COMMAND_LINE when this procedure has a parameter, which it does when a daughter basic is to be selected. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Assembly Language Issue 1 now available.
On 5 Mar 2014, at 21:08, Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk wrote: Issue 1 of the QL Today Memorial Assembly Language Mailing List irregular eMagazine is now available in three separate flavours: Well done! George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] A quick plug: New blog post on 30 years of the QL and the Mac.
On 25 Jan 2014, at 14:35, Stephen Usher st...@lingula.org.uk wrote: Just a shameless plug for a blog post I've just written... ;-) Very interesting. And here am I trying to update NET_PEEK using QPC2 on an apple MAC. The QL just keeps on going! George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Developer assistance request.
On 21 Jan 2014, at 15:41, Petri Pellinen p...@iki.fi wrote: Richard Zidlicky's document QDOS TCP/IP and socket functionality at http://www.dilwyn.me.uk/docs/manuals/socket.html seems to propose that most of the POSIX-type functionality be implemented as an extension to standard Trap #3 calls with D0 values $50-$7B inclusive mapped to socket API calls. Does anyone here on the mailing list know of possible conflicts with other drivers if this proposed scheme was used? Trap#3 $50 to $5E, $60, $61 and $68 are used for GD2 colours. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Re: Final call for QL Today V17 + DVD orders
On 28 Nov 2013, at 00:10, Michael Bulford wrote: QPC version 4.00 just simply has to be the very best version of the QL S*Basic language there ever is! I totally agree. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] How to query current Paper/Strip/Ink in HiColour/QPC2 windows?
On 4 Nov 2013, at 22:49, Martyn Hill wrote: On an entirely different topic, and perhaps naively, can I ask how to query a window in SBASIC to discover the current Paper/Strip and Ink settings - specifically after using the COLOUR_PAL command in QPC2? My aim is to (arbitrarily) manipulate the colours on a window that's passed to my SBASIC routine and to then reset the colours back to what they were on entry, before returning. When using the default QL (8 colour) palette, the current Paper etc, could be found in the window's channel definition block at offsets 68 - 70 (decimal). Old-school, but effective, seeing as there doesn't appear to be a trap or vectored routine to officially query such properties of a window. Once the 256 colour palette is selected, the values at these offsets appear to get hammered (or at least reset to zero, regardless of what is set through the PAPER/STRIP and INK commands.) Am I missing something really obvious? The colour words for paper and strip are at positions $66 and $68 in the channel block for a particular CON/SCR. The address of the channel block for channel number n (system channel number NOT BASIC channel number) is in the nth long word from the start of the channel base ($2BC60). If you are using QPC2 and GD2 colours and the default palette, the colour word for mustard, number 16 is $9480. Suppose you set COLOUR_PAL and then PAPER 16 then when you look at the positions $66 and $68 of the channel block you will see $8094 because of the byte reversal. If you now set STRIP 2, you will see $00F8 in position $68, since $F800 is the word for red and palette number 2 is, normally, red. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Job data space - foibles?
On 10 Oct 2013, at 07:08, Tobias Fröschle wrote: Am 10.10.2013 um 00:37 schrieb Marcel Kilgus: Norman Dunbar wrote: The TK2 manual says If the parameters of EX start with '#channel TO', then the corresponding SuperBASIC channel will be closed (if it was already open) and a new channel opened as a pipe to the first program. Morale of the story: I should have looked at the documentation first ;-) Well, at least I had! ;-) Not this time ;) Marcel, Norman, I looked at both (the manual and the code), could see the mention of 'close' in the manual, but not in the code. The original channel is not really closed - It's channel ID in the SuperBASIC channel table is simply overwritten. The TK2 Manual makes also interesting reading regarding the Special Jobs paragraph that have a second $4afb in their header that is actually used to flag to the OS that this job got its own command line parsing routine that will be called within a SuperBASIC context - That is, you can apparently use Basic variables in command lines. Tobias The assembler routine, ending with RTS, following the second $4AFB is obeyed before the program is started. An example of that is in the source code for SMSQ/E in the file extras_exe_source_cct_asm. If you start such a program with ET instead of EX, the special routine will be obeyed straight away. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Job data space - foibles?
On 7 Oct 2013, at 20:36, Norman Dunbar wrote: Evening all, I'm experimenting for the first exciting episode of the new assembly language mailing list. It's the first time I've sat down with QPC since I started my new job! I have noticed something a little odd, well, even to be honest. Strangely enough, the answer is 42 - what is the question? ;-) Seriously, when I create a job with any given dataspace, when the job is activated, A5.L is always set to that data space value plus 42 extra bytes. There's nothing in the QDOS docs (from Jochen) nor in Dickens or Pennell. The closest I have found is in Pennell on page 20 where he says that ... TRNSP is expanded by D2+D3+$68, memory permitting when a job is created. D2 is the code size, D3 is the requested dataspace size and the extra $68 is for the standard job header area. I'm wondering if the mysterious 42 extra bytes is also accumulated in the space desired in TRNSP (it has to be D2+D3+$68+42 or stuff would crash!) but where does it come from? I cannot see it as being a rounding to the nearest 16 or 8 or whatever, because it's always 42. When I say always, I have tried the same job with the following dataspace sizes, and every one set A5 to be 42 extra: 126, 256, 500, 512, 1000, 1024, 2000, 2048, 3000, 3172, 4000, 4096. I could, I suppose, look up the source for SMSQ but I don;t, sadly, have the time at the moment. Not after doing all the above testing! I'm afraid I shall be lazy and rely on the good will and knowledge of the list for answers. Thanks in advance. Cheers, Norm. Pennel says that (A6,A4) points to the start of data and (A6,A5) points to immediately past the data area end. This implies that the size of the data space is A5 - A4. Having experimented with a program having no parameter list and no channels on being executed, I found that there always was an excess of A5 - A4 over the data space requested in the program. In my case the excess was always positive, always even and never 42. The excess ranged from 12 to 34. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QPC2 v3.40 Beta 2
On 10 Jul 2013, at 14:18, Marcel Kilgus wrote: While I'm at it, does anybody still use the fullscreen mode? All the time. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QPC2 v3.40 Beta 2
On 10 Jul 2013, at 14:18, Marcel Kilgus wrote: While I'm at it, does anybody still use the fullscreen mode? I'm considering moving away from DirectX completely, which would also get rid of native full screen mode. But in times of LCDs it's probably not that important anymore anyway. Although SHFT/CTRL/F12 (plus the fn key on my Apple Mac) sets full screen for v3.34 beta it has no effect on 3.40 beta 2. Has full screen already been disallowed? George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Flightdeck
On 15 May 2013, at 21:02, Jiri Dolezal wrote: Runs well on Super Gold Card with no other extensions or expansions. Stops on Sandy Q Board non-mouse version (640 K total RAM) with simillar error messages (FOP - not found, Channel not open, ...). ... because it requires Toolkit II. With Toolkit, it draws flight instruments and freezes, as described by RWAP. With TK2 this is what happens with JM rom plus Trump Card. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Flightdeck
On 15 May 2013, at 09:23, Rich Mellor wrote: The demo version also has the same problem - I wonder if I never tested it on anything less than a Gold Card ?? Can others please give this a go on QL hardware Before trying out Flightdeck on a JM rom I tried it on QPC2 with this result: The unzipped files on ram2_ were 1 Boot 2 Config (MenuConfig works) 3 FLIGHT_obj 4 MANUAL_doc PRICES_doc start_data uk_navaids_cde uk_world_cde The result on running the BOOT with a configured FLIGHT_obj was the remark on a red strip: Job 26 Flightdeck(Demo-1.05) LBYTES not found Retry Continue Abort R/C/A Pressing A caused the message to change to: not found Retry Continue Abort R/C/A Data : 512 2304 3 Stack : 800 144 Does this help? George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Test email
On 14 May 2013, at 15:01, Dilwyn Jones wrote: Please ignore this email (unless you have just read it in which case you can’t, so recursively re-enter the Ignore procedure ...) Duly ignored . . George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Test email
On 14 May 2013, at 15:25, Norman Dunbar wrote: Duly ignored . . U! You sure? ;-) More or less. I was really wondering why QDOS doesn't have a vector setting long words to ASCII when suddenly - ping! - there was this ignorable email which I inadvertently sensed out of my eye's corner. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Test email
On 14 May 2013, at 16:06, Norman Dunbar wrote: More or less. I was really wondering why QDOS doesn't have a vector setting long words to ASCII when suddenly - ping! - there was this ignorable email which I inadvertently sensed out of my eye's corner. Aha, I see. You inadvertently sensed it, and accidentally replied! :-) I think the problem is because the instruction to ignore it is at the bottom. However, it matters not. If you obey the instruction to ignore it, then obviously, you didn't ignore it. Thus, we enter Dilwyn's recursive ignoring it scenario! I'm having a bad day! Ah! I now see the problem. I must have ignored the instruction to ignore the email - or part thereof. Does that count as recursion? George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Test email
On 14 May 2013, at 16:24, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: Hi, More or less. I was really wondering why QDOS doesn't have a vector setting long words to ASCII Perhaps this will help. ; on entry, D0 = long int to convert to ascii ; A0 = space for ascii chars ; D1-D3,D7 : smashed cvtlong CMP.L #$8000,D0 BEQ.S oor; don't convert this LEA table,A2 MOVEQ #11,D1 MOVEQ #0,D7 BTST #31,D0 ; is it minus? BEQ.S binlop1 NEG.L D0 BSET #0,D7 binlop1 SUBQ.W#1,D1 ; get rid of excess 0s CMP.L (A2)+,D0 BLT.S binlop1 SUBQ.L#4,A2 MOVE.WD1,(A0)+; this will be length of final figure TST.W D7 ; was it minus? BEQ.S binlop2 ADDQ.W#1,-2(A0) MOVE.B#'-',(A0)+ binlop2 MOVE.L(A2)+,D3; merci Thierry! MOVEQ #-$30,D2 binlop3 SUB.L D3,D0 DBMI D2,binlop3 ; sub this until neg (i.e. subbed too much) NEG.B D2 MOVE.BD2,(A0)+; figure now ADD.L D3,D0 ; overshot one DBRA D1,binlop2 ; do it until no more... cvtoutMOVEQ #0,D0 RTS oor MOVEQ #-4,D0 RTS table dc.l 10 dc.l 1 dc.l 1000 dc.l 100 dc.l 10 table2dc.l 1 dc.l 1000 dc.l 100 ; 64 dc.l 10 dc.l 1 Wolfgang Interesting. I used: George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Test email
On 14 May 2013, at 16:54, George Gwilt wrote: Interesting. I used: This is what should have appeared earlier!! At entry: D0.L contains the (positive) number A0 points to the end of the area to contain the ASCII result At exit D0 = 0 A0 points to the start of the number LTODSWAPD0 BEQ.S LTODW2 MOVE.W D0,D1 BEQ.S LTODW EXT.L D1 DIVU#10,D1 SWAPD1 MOVE.W D1,D0 SWAPD0 DIVU#10,D0 SWAPD0 ADDI.W #48,D0 MOVE.B D0,-(A0) SWAPD0 MOVE.W D0,D1 MOVE.L D1,D0 BRA.S LTOD LTODW1 DIVU#10,D1 SWAPD0 LTODW2 ADDI.W #48,D0 MOVE.B D0,-(A0) CLR.W D0 LTODW SWAPD0 BNE.S LTODW1 RTS This, and a further routine to deal with negatives, is in the Library files on my website. George George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Test email
On 14 May 2013, at 16:57, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: And that works? A treat. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Auto-hide
On 16 Apr 2013, at 14:03, Dilwyn Jones wrote: This is a little programming challenge I left with George Gwilt at the Quanta workshop this weekend. I’d like to create something which can behave a bit like an “auto-hide” Windows taskbar, using the pointer environment. If the pointer rests at the bottom of the screen (or any edge for that matter) for a couple of seconds, the program or taskbar (or whatever you use it for) pops up, even if it was buried under other windows. Sounds simple: might be simple, I don’t yet know! Let's see how many different solutions we come up with. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Auto-hide
On 16 Apr 2013, at 14:03, Dilwyn Jones wrote: If the pointer rests at the bottom of the screen (or any edge for that matter) for a couple of seconds, the program or taskbar (or whatever you use it for) pops up, even if it was buried under other windows. Sounds simple: might be simple, I don’t yet know! I've just written a small program which has no window that you can see, has no loose items, or indeed anything at all, except that it picks master basic (ID = 0) when the pointer is moved to the top band of the screen. So yes it seems simple. Of course you would have to supply to this program the ID of the program you want picked. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Auto-hide
On 16 Apr 2013, at 16:42, tobias.froesc...@t-online.de wrote: how did you manage to detect where the pointer is without a window? By having an invisible window by setting the MSbit of its attributes in the window definition. This stops the window being cleared so that you see what's beneath it. Ie it's invisible. The detection is, of course, by setting D2 to 48 for IOP.RPTR George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Auto-hide
On 16 Apr 2013, at 17:10, Norman Dunbar wrote: Does the invisible window cover the whole screen by any chance? If so, what happens to any other program running beneath the invisible window when you attempt to click on it with the mouse to pick it to the top of the pile? The window does, I think, cover the whole screen. I have just tried picking the program (called 'pic') without any effect. Mind you its pointer is invisible as well as the window. I remember a program I wrote for Dilwyn some years ago (I can't remember the name of it though!) which opened a full-screen window for some reason, which effectively disabled using the pointer to pick the other running programs. Other programs remain pickable. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Qliberator problems
On 2 Apr 2013, at 18:32, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: All, Turbo does the very same thing, in my understanding - just with two different executables - parser_task and codegen_task, and the intermediate file format is not QSAVE, but something different - which is not officially documented. If you use such a file as input for codegen_task, Turbo can very well compile from a file. Interesting - does parser_task actually generate a file? Yes One difference is, of course, that you can qsave a file from any s*basic job, whereas is seems that parser_task seems to need the program to be loaded into job 0. Yes George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Qliberator problems
On 1 Apr 2013, at 16:38, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: Turbo cannot choose the dataspace which might be needed in a program it is compiling. You can either choose a specific dataspace on compilation or increase it after compilation. From within my (basic or compiled) program? If not, Turbo would be unsuitable for what I'd want to achieve. The TURBO_TK command DATA_AREA can be used in a basic program to set the dataspace. The number following DATA_SPACE is the required amount in kilobytes. Yes. Turbo won't compile a program unless the program resides, tokenised, in the master basic area. Ah OK. Can't it handle Qsaved progs? The program to be compiled must be loaded into ram under Job 0. A Qsaved program would first have to be loaded there before Turbo will compile it. Does QLIB compile directly from a file? George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] qdosmsq.dunbar-it.co.uk back online
On 2 Apr 2013, at 16:07, Norman Dunbar wrote: my website is once more online Looks good. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Qliberator problems
On 2 Apr 2013, at 16:18, Norman Dunbar wrote: I'd love to see Turbo being able to compile a QSAVE'd file, I'm not aware of the internals of Turbo, yet, but I can't see too many problems with it? Unless there's much to-ing and fro-ing in the SuperBasic area while compiling? Turbo uses the BASIC name table to find the type of a variable. It therefore needs a name table. This will be set up when the BASIC program is loaded, whether from a SAV or a BAS file. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Qliberator problems
On 1 Apr 2013, at 09:34, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: I have a problem with Qliberator. Consider the following program : 100 DEFine PROCedure increase_result_array 110 LOCal dim1,dim2,temparray$(0,0) 120 dim1=DIMN(result$,1) 130 dim2=DIMN(result$,2) 140 DIM temparray$(dim1,dim2) 150 REMark arrcopy result$,temparray$ 160 DIM result$(dim1+100,dim2) 170 REMark arrcopy temparray$,result$ 180 DIM temparray$(0) 190 END DEFine increase_result_array 200 : 210 DEFine PROCedure p 220 LOCal lp% 230 DIM result$(1,40) 240 FOR lp%=1 TO 90 250 increase_result_array 260 END FOR lp% 270 END DEFine p 280 : 290 p 295 CLS 300 PRINT DIMN(result$,1) 310 kk$=INKEY$(-1) What is does is call the increase_result_array times, each time the result$ array is increased by 100 elements (I've r'mmed out the parts where the old array is copied to tthe new one and back).. The resulting array will have 9001 elements, 40 chars long each. When I run this in S, this Sbasic job occupies about 640 K (240 were already occupied before running the prog, e.g. for the screen etc). OK, seems normal. If I compile execute this, the resulting Qliberated job takes a whopping 32 MB! It seems to me that there is a bug in the variable allocation/deallocation routines. Can anybody confirm this? More importantly, does anybody know a way around this? 1. Alter the dimensioning of temparray$ from 0,0 (and later 0!!) to 1,1 2. Use TURBO (with a large enough dataspace) George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Qliberator problems
On 1 Apr 2013, at 14:05, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: 1. Alter the dimensioning of temparray$ from 0,0 (and later 0!!) to 1,1 Interesting - why would this work? temparray is a local var and should not have any existence once the procedure is exited. Turbo seems not to like zero dimensioning and does not allow a redimensioning of a variable with a number of dimensions differing from that when it was first defined. 2. Use TURBO (with a large enough dataspace) I looked at Turbo some years ago, but AFAICR, it doesn't fit with my workflow : is it possible, from another prog, to call Turbo and have it compile a program that lies, say, on ram1_ (and recover any errors in an error file?) You have to call TURBO from master basic. but you can do this from another program by using COMMAND_LINE to select the master basic and then TYPE_IN to set the command CHARGE which causes the compilation with a report sent to ram1. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Qliberator problems
On 1 Apr 2013, at 15:36, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: 2. Use TURBO (with a large enough dataspace) Doesn't turbo automatially cliam more heap space when it needs it? The whole purpose of this prog is that when the program starts. I don't know the dimension the array will ultimately need, Turbo cannot choose the dataspace which might be needed in a program it is compiling. You can either choose a specific dataspace on compilation or increase it after compilation. My program adj_ds allows the increase of a program's dataspace and, if has been compiled by Turbo, the stack space too (which sometimes has to be increased). You have to call TURBO from master basic. but you can do this from another program by using COMMAND_LINE to select the master basic and then TYPE_IN to set the command CHARGE which causes the compilation with a report sent to ram1. Doesn't this mean that the program to be charged will need to be loaded into Job 0, too? Yes. Turbo won't compile a program unless the program resides, tokenised, in the master basic area. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today
On 22 Mar 2013, at 23:46, Billy wrote: poorer and fewer perhaps he he all the best Bill Sent from my ASUS Pad and lesser? A lesser mortal (George) ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Punk chew asian.
On 23 Mar 2013, at 16:33, Geoff Wicks wrote: This thread is reminiscent of Private Eye. They used to have a section on their letters pages Pendants Corner. Then a pedant complained that it should be Pedant's Corner. Then another pedant corrected the previous pedant saying it should be Pedants' Corner. The correspondence went on for some weeks before being solved by Private Eye, who now call it Pedantry Corner. Are you a pedant scorner? George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today
On 21 Mar 2013, at 23:51, Tony Firshman wrote: George Gwilt wrote, on 21/Mar/13 11:05 | Mar21: On 20 Mar 2013, at 21:06, Tony Firshman wrote: Thankyou to everybody for correcting my grammer, I am now considered told off. so I had better not tell you of for your spelling of 'grammar' then (8-)# A long time ago I used to pause while reading articles when I found faulty grammar. But I eventually came to the conclusion that it was more rewarding to take in what was written rather than how it was written. Even later I realised that the grammar we were taught at school is not a set of rules to be obeyed but a set of discoveries about how real people speak and write. Okay, back to the Cue Ell. ... but grammar is the foundation of language *and* understanding. Let grammar slip and meaning becomes less clear, or even entirely different! Which came first, language or grammar? George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today
On 22 Mar 2013, at 15:00, Dave Park wrote: I find some irony in that a thread about the demise of QL Today has degenerated into a conversation of violent agreement about grammar! It's probably better than wondering what the plural of referendum is, which is exercising many in Scotland just now. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today
On 20 Mar 2013, at 20:02, peet vanpeebles wrote: On a personal note I'm terrible at thinking of things to write about so maybe people thinking up topics would be good. The hardest bit for me is just to start typing out something. Or what would people like to see reviewed etc? We have lots of interesting characters in the QL scene with a long history so maybe regular interview columns or old tales etc? It always surprises me how many different ways people use their QLs. This shows up for example in differing BOOTs. It would certainly interest me to have QL users describe their own BOOT programs. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today
On 20 Mar 2013, at 21:06, Tony Firshman wrote: Thankyou to everybody for correcting my grammer, I am now considered told off. so I had better not tell you of for your spelling of 'grammar' then (8-)# A long time ago I used to pause while reading articles when I found faulty grammar. But I eventually came to the conclusion that it was more rewarding to take in what was written rather than how it was written. Even later I realised that the grammar we were taught at school is not a set of rules to be obeyed but a set of discoveries about how real people speak and write. Okay, back to the Cue Ell. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today
On 21 Mar 2013, at 11:48, Norman Dunbar wrote: It always surprises me how many different ways people use their QLs. This shows up for example in differing BOOTs. It would certainly interest me to have QL users describe their own BOOT programs. How interesting! I have always been of the opposite view. Boot files are about as boring as you can get - to my mind - but, with a little thought, I can see where you are coming from. The boot file is obviously set up to help (or in my case, probably hinder) efficient use of the QL. My own boot file is basically the following: Enable TK2. Prog and data_use set to win1_. Lrespr Qpac2, DJToolkit, Turbo Toolkit, QMON2, Liberator Run-times and QD. WTV 4 Hot Pick for SuperBasic on key b. Hot wake for QPAC2 utilities on assorted keys: P Pick R Rjob F Files X Exec Z Wake Q QD Runs the clock in the button frame. Move along everyone, there's nothing to see here! :-) Well well! Quite a lot for me to learn here. Would make an interesting article for me at any rate. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today
On 20 Mar 2013, at 12:26, Geoff Wicks wrote: Why do we have to think in terms of a magazine? What's wrong with a (simple) rolling website? A website would cope with odd items of news and, mainly non varying lists of office bearers etc, but is not really suitable for the set of articles which also appear in QL Today (and QUANTA). In fact I now have the QUANTA magazine sent by email and find it in many ways more convenient than by post. It arrives sooner and it has clickable links. But I rarely look at the Quanta website. I would much prefer a PDF magazine to a website. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today
On 20 Mar 2013, at 16:02, Geoff Wicks wrote: So let's move on to another problem that everyone has dodged so far. Where are the writers going to come from? One of the reasons QL Today is closing down is that we did not have sufficient writers to ensure its long term future. We were fortunately to have some very loyal writers but they were too few in number. I only had to lose one writer for me to be in serious editorial difficulties. The Quanta Magazine is in a less favourable position with only two permanent writers, the editor and the news editor. If I assassinate Dilwyn tonight who will fill the next Quanta Magazine? Until recently the date for receiving copy was consistently earlier than the date the magazine reached me so I rather gave up trying to write for QUANTA. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today
On 20 Mar 2013, at 18:00, Tony Firshman wrote: Ian Burkinshaw wrote, on 27/Mar/13 17:46 | Mar27: Sad though this is, I have to say it seems me inevitable this was going to happen sooner or later. The constant increase in postal rates is self defeating, the more they go up, the less poeple send. Really - so one leg is sending letters (8-)# You mean 'fewer' of course. the less people send means the same number of people send less in total. The other meaning would presumably be written as the smaller the number of people who send Anyway postage is rather high now and certainly to be avoided if possible. The small newsletter produced by the Scottish group SQLUG is now emailed to members. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today
On 20 Mar 2013, at 18:18, Tony Firshman wrote: George Gwilt wrote, on 20/Mar/13 18:07 | Mar20: On 20 Mar 2013, at 18:00, Tony Firshman wrote: Ian Burkinshaw wrote, on 27/Mar/13 17:46 | Mar27: Sad though this is, I have to say it seems me inevitable this was going to happen sooner or later. The constant increase in postal rates is self defeating, the more they go up, the less poeple send. Really - so one leg is sending letters (8-)# You mean 'fewer' of course. the less people send means the same number of people send less in total. Not at all, but maybe it is different in Glasgow (8-)# 'Less' and 'Fewer' are referring to 'people' not the letters. Fewer - when the noun can be counted. People, marbles Less - when it cannot. Flour, petrol. Why say there is less sand on the beach when you could, if you had time, count the grains? The other meaning would presumably be written as the smaller the number of people who send Anyway postage is rather high now and certainly to be avoided if possible. The small newsletter produced by the Scottish group SQLUG is now emailed to members. Tony -- t...@firshman.co.uk http://firshman.co.uk Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255 Skype: tonyfirshman TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Plastic Feet for Sinclair QL
On 2 Feb 2013, at 09:04, Rich Mellor wrote: Does anyone have spares of the plastic feet used to raise the back of the QL ? I have 5 George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Easy68K
On 31 Jan 2013, at 17:31, Ian Burkinshaw wrote: Hi Norman I do read them. But up until recently I have not had the time, to get down and learn it all. Some of it I do not fully understand. But if I started to learn it properly, I am sure it would make much more sense. The way Easy68K, displays things does make it more understandable, at least to me anyway. For example I have never realy understood which registers are used for what. Also managing the stack is not clear to me either. But to be fair I have not studied it that closely. I realy must go back to the start of your series in QLT, and re-read it all, and start to work though your examples. I have played with some the PRT stuff in your more recent articles, which has been of great interest to me. But have to admit I have not understood it all. That is down my lack of knowledge, not your work. Since one of my planed projects whould most likely be better done in MC. Ian - Original Message - From: Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk To: ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:54 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Easy68K On 31/01/13 16:51, Ian Burkinshaw wrote: Must admit I have always kept away from machine code. Hmmm. Do my QL Today articles on the matter, since many many years ago, not inspire you? :-( Cheers, Norm. Although I have programmed in Assembler from years back on IBM and Ferranti machines as well as the QL it is only after reading Norman's articles that I find that Assembler is actually easier than SuperBASIC and much, much easier than C. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
[Ql-Users] GWASL update
Norman Dunbar has found a fault in GWASL which affects the reporting of errors in labels. This is corrected in version 2.05 which can be downloaded from my site at http://gwiltprogs.info/ George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Is there a bug in QPC or am I bonkers (again!)
On 25 Jan 2013, at 10:47, Norman Dunbar wrote: Morning all, I'm doing a bit more work on the next exciting episode of QL Today's LibGen utility. I have spotted a huge pair of bugs in my code, viz: li_libfile equ $03 ... li_unavmove.l #$,ws_litem+li_libfile(a1) bra.s li_rdrw ... li_avail move.l #$01011101,ws_litem+li_libfile(a1) li_rdrwmoveq #-1,d3 jmp wm_ldraw(a2) The idea was to set 4 consecutive loose item status bytes to unavailable (#wsi_mkun) in the first case, and to set three of them to available (#wsi_mkav) and one to unavailable (#wsi_mkun) in the second case. The code above is a huge problem because li_libfile is odd, A1 is even as is ws_litem at $40. I would expect an address exception at the very least. Running the code under QMON2 shows that I'm attempting to store a long word at $43(a1) where a1 is $4ABBA6. That works out at $4ABBE9 which is most definitely odd. In QPC, version 3.33, the above works without any exceptions. PRINT PROCESSOR gives 20, I must assume that either a 68020 doesn't barf at a long word access to an odd address or something is not working correctly any more! I've checked and rechecked my paper and pdf copies of the Motorola processor manual, and there is no mention that you can do a long move to an odd address. I'm not running any monitor code that would intercept the address exceptions and quietly swallow it. I have stepped through the code for both, and it works, the MOVE.L is carried out, after executing the code at li_avail, I can see the following results at $43(a1) in QMON2: QMON d $43(a1) 4 4ABBE9 0101 0101 004E FF6F .NV. Is it any wonder I'm confused? What am I missing? Cheers, Norm. An address error occurs if an attempt is made to fetch an instruction from an odd address. As far as I know the 680020+ machines allow long and word fetches from odd addresses - they simply take longer than if the address is on a word boundary. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Is there a bug in QPC or am I bonkers (again!)
On 25 Jan 2013, at 12:34, Norman Dunbar wrote: None of mt assembly books bother to mention this fact either, I've spent the last hour or so looking up everything that could be possibly related. Sigh! My THOR 21 came with Motorola's manual MC68020. The information about instruction and data alignment is included in that. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator
On 23 Jan 2013, at 16:02, Ralf Reköndt wrote: Not as quick as QPC2, but very acceptable speed and (better than QPC2) it handles the keyboard without a problemmeaning I have access to # and other characters I can't easily get under QPC2! I never had (and have) problems with the keyboard with QPC2...??? I use QPC2 on Windows XP under VMware on a MAC. To get # (I just used ALT/3 here) I use the |\ key (where hash would be on a normal QL keyboard. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator
On 23 Jan 2013, at 16:39, SMSQE wrote: Yes, I tried all (I think) these combinations when I first got my PC...the |\ key gives nothing at all evebn with SHIFT, CTRL, ALT, etc. ALT/3 gives 3, etc. I can get at some characters using clavier, but I have to use parts of the keyboard that work normally under QPC for them to work with the clavier mappings. Quite a few keys just don't work properly...strange. But, as I say, they do under SMSQmulator so I can probably start SBASIC coding again! Jon -Original Message- From: ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com [mailto:ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com] On Behalf Of George Gwilt Sent: 23 January 2013 16:28 To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator On 23 Jan 2013, at 16:02, Ralf Reköndt wrote: Not as quick as QPC2, but very acceptable speed and (better than QPC2) it handles the keyboard without a problemmeaning I have access to # and other characters I can't easily get under QPC2! I never had (and have) problems with the keyboard with QPC2...??? I use QPC2 on Windows XP under VMware on a MAC. To get # (I just used ALT/3 here) I use the |\ key (where hash would be on a normal QL keyboard. George When I take QPC2 abroad (USA or Germany for example) I have found trouble with keyboards. One trouble was with the |\ symbols. What I did was to use the ?/ symbols on the foreign keyboard to produce the ones I wanted. This was done by putting in the BOOT the instructions Altkey '/',CHR$(92) to get \ and Altkey '?',CHR$(124) to get | George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Quick QL Today Survey
On 10 Jan 2013, at 12:29, Geoff Wicks wrote: It is not just on your articles I would like feedback. There has been more emphasis on hardware in the last couple of years. Is this what people want? More recently we have had more coverage on games - a largely forgotten area in the magazines. I am also concerned about the lack of SuperBasic and general articles. I find myself using Assembler rather more now than SuperBASIC mainly as a result of Norman's articles. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QDOS/SMS Questions
On 5 Nov 2012, at 12:25, Norman Dunbar wrote: There is a system variable for the current keyboard queue. I assume that as there is only one, that it refers to the currently executing job? So If SuperBasic is executing, it will refer to the QDOS channel ID for Channel #0 in SuperBasic. For QDOS CTRL/C takes you through the cursor winking list. A program without such a cursor was effectively lost. In SMSQ CTRL/C takes you through the list of jobs. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QDOS/SMS Questions
On 5 Nov 2012, at 15:13, Norman Dunbar wrote: On 05/11/12 14:59, tobias.froesc...@t-online.de wrote: I can find sd_keyq at offset $68 of the Screen Driver Channel Definition Block in the SMSQ/E sources. But nowhere in the documents. In my docs, updated recently, I see sd_end at that offset in the screen driver channel definition block. For QDOS 1.10 onwards. The keyboard queue starts at the end of the channel block. For QDOS this is @ $68 for v1.01 onward and $64 for earlier versions. For PE the value is $98 (counting from the start of the extended channel block). The Turbo TK commands COMMAND_LINE and TYPE_IN allow you to push characters into an S*BASIC keyboard queue. The source code for these should show how to put characters into any queue. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Web site down?
On 19 Oct 2012, at 12:48, Geoff Wicks wrote: The Quanta site has been down for at least 2 days. Has Quanta closed down? Regards Duncan ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm I think the website has been deliberately taken down. It was no longer available from the day of the committee meeting held to discuss it. I hope it is only temporary. There was nothing wrong with the site as such other than that it was not kept up to date. If all the committee, including the officers, pulled their weight it would not be a difficult job. To my mind there are four areas to keep up to date: 1: News. This is already happening so no problem there. 2: Shows information. When the site was taken down it was still advertising the Austrian show held 3 months previously. It should not be difficult to keep show information up to date as there are only two or three shows per year. 3: Quanta Magazine. This is the most difficult part, but would only need updating 6 times a year. 4: Quanta News. This would be a new area in which the officers should keep the members up to date on Quanta developments. Up to now Quanta has regarded the magazine as being the first source of information for the members. This should now become the web. There is also the question of the members' area. You have made constructive suggestions that Quanta should consider, Ah QUANTA is back!! Geirge ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Loose Items in Pointer Environment
On 1 Oct 2012, at 17:39, Dilwyn Jones wrote: The trouble seems to be that although the manual says that if D2 is a negative long word the paper and oink will not be set, the actual code tests D2.B and not D2.L. Brilliant typo (oink) ! Actually, I have discovered that the PE code is correct in this respect. It is the top byte of D2.L which is tested not D2.B. The real reason for the non-setting lies in the definition of the selected code. This is defined as $80 + $FF00. (Why not $FF80?) If you use either MOVEQ #WSI.SLCT,D2 or MOVE.L #WSI.SLCT,D2 The top bit of D2.L will be 1 and so paper and ink will not be set. If you don't positively arrange for D2.L to be non-negative, the result of WM.SWLIT will be undefined. Thus, you could write MOVEQ #0,D2 to clear D2.L MOVE.W #WSI.SLCT,D2 Better not to use WSI.SLCT and write MOVE.L #$80,D2 which is a pity, since who can remember what $80 means? Oink ... Oink George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] New QJewels game
On 17 Jul 2012, at 01:45, Marcel Kilgus wrote: Dilwyn Jones wrote: Download it free of charge from: http://www.dilwyn.me.uk/games/index.html#qjewels (173kilobyte download) That thing is very cool, well done Tobias (and I thought so even before I read the nice shout out ;) ). Funny thing is, I unpacked it and thought Oh god, this being QL software I'll probably have to configure it first to let it know where its sound files are etc., how annoying. This would be so much easier if people just used the Home directory extension Wolfgang and I had developed and what do you know, it did exactly just that! :) After unpacking it somewhere clicking the exe was all it needed to make it work, that was a very nice surprise indeed! Also, I like the quit dialog :) Although I put the program in an existing obscure directory (called Tobias) it ran without configuratrion. But there was no sound. Perhaps I should read the manual. Didn't score more than about 400 thus far, though. But I'll try just one more time now... It's a horribly addictive, but very good, program. I managed a score of 967 I think. What is the limit? George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] New QJewels game
On 23 Jul 2012, at 16:04, Marcel Kilgus wrote: Although I put the program in an existing obscure directory (called Tobias) it ran without configuratrion. But there was no sound. Perhaps I should read the manual. You need to load Simon's sound_cde extension, which was already in my boot, so it did work from the get-go. Good information. My boots are obviously holey. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] The *ins...
On 25 Jun 2012, at 14:54, Tony Firshman wrote: The moral here is secure passwords, and change regularly. Secure ones are like Ge4?pP9a . Hmm! Looks a bit like my grandfather's name. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QLToday arrived
On 21 Jun 2012, at 20:07, Ralf Reköndt wrote: Not here in Germany...8-(. - Original Message - From: peet vanpeebles Mine arrived today, I liked the little joke on the front cover! :) Not in Scotland either. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QLToday arrived
On 22 Jun 2012, at 10:14, George Gwilt wrote: On 21 Jun 2012, at 20:07, Ralf Reköndt wrote: Not here in Germany...8-(. - Original Message - From: peet vanpeebles Mine arrived today, I liked the little joke on the front cover! :) Not in Scotland either. George It's just arrived. This afternoon. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] QL Forum
On 8 Jun 2012, at 11:54, Dave Park wrote: If I create a REPeat loop thus: 100 Frame=0 : Keypress=0 110 REPEAT loop 120 a$=INKEY$ 130 Frame=Frame+1 140 IF a$ THEN Keypress=Keypress+1 150 AT 0,0 : PRINT Frame, Keypress 160 END REPeat loop INKEY$(-1) will wait until you press a key. INKEY$(3) will wait for 3 ticks for your keypress. INKEY$ will return (nearly) immediately. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Debugging nightmare
On 23 May 2012, at 13:24, Norman Dunbar wrote: On 23/05/12 12:52, Ian Pine wrote: Damn damn damn ... ... because I forgot that on m68k CPUs the MOVE instructions alter the flags ... Well, it does alter the flags, unless: * You specifically use the MOVEA instruction; or * You specify MOVE with an address register as the destination AND your assembler quietly converts the MOVE to MOVEA. Just to make things interesting. Just for fun. MOVE USP,An, MOVE An.USP MOVE SR,ea and MOVEC Rc,Rn also leave the condition codes alone. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] UPUT Qubide
On 30 Apr 2012, at 14:05, Marcel Kilgus wrote: Bob Spelten wrote: Nothing to do with BPUT here. The problem is that you're using an array expression x(0,1) with more than one dimension in the FOR loop. SBASIC got a bug there. Thanks for the insight. I was puzzled because it had worked before. But I did at one point replace the single var for the array var. This line may have been untested since. I'll check all my FOR loops and add this to my database of potential errors. Mind you, it only seems to be a problem for single line loops. The fix is fairly trivial (it's just one thrashed register), when we can get another SMSQ/E release together it will go in. Apart from that it's easy enough to avoid and at least results in a clean error and not in a crash or anything. A new version of SMSQ/E should also have a corrected version of smsq_init_exv_asm. The code dealing with address errors for machines other than 68000/8 contains the following three instructions intended to compress the stack. MOVE.L (A7),(A7,D0.W) MOVE.W 4(A7),4(A7,D0.W) MOVE.L 6(A7),6(A7,D0.W) If D0 is greater than 0 and less than 6 this will fail. One of the possible values of D0 is indeed 4. The correction is to swap the first and last instructions to prevent the premature overwriting. I commented on this peculiarity some years ago but nobody noticed. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Bug in WM_ENAME
On 2 May 2012, at 16:00, Norman Dunbar wrote: When I edit a string using this vector, and press ESC to terminate the edit, I'm seeing zero in D0 instead of a positive number. D1.W is correctly set to 27 for the ESC key. The docs state that: D0 negative is an error. D0 zero means ENTER pressed to end the edit. D0 positive means another key ended the edit. What I'm finding in tracing the code is the following: D0=0, D1=27, ESC pressed. D0=0, D1=$0a, ENTER pressed. D0=0, D1=$d0, UP pressed. D0=0, D1=$d8, DOWN pressed. It appears that D0 is always zero on return. The code in ee_wman_rname_asm (which contains the code for WM.ENAME) sets D0 to 0 when a character is correctly read. If it is one of the terminators then D0 remains zero. this means that the code distinguishing between ENTER and the rest is just not there! George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Raspberry Pi - starts
On 20 Apr 2012, at 21:40, Dilwyn Jones wrote: I always thought it was a pity superBasic demanded line numbers. They were not actually necessary, and if GOTO did not exist, not even used. I think QLiberator at least can compile without line numbers (never actually tried that). Perhaps George could tell us if Turbo can too. Turbo gives three options: omitting line numbers in the compiled program, including them without displaying them during compilation and including them as well as displaying them. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Raspberry Pi - starts
On 21 Apr 2012, at 11:42, Ralf Reköndt wrote: I think, that wasn't the question. Don't confuse this with QLiberator's option Line Numbers. As far as I know, QLiberator does not need line numbers, but this is not possible via the interpreter. It is in fact possible with the QD5 Thing to compile source code without line numbers. I think, Turbo is just able to compile a loaded SuperBASIC program, so no way to compile without line numbers. QLiberator always compile from a QSAVEd file (or QD5 Thing). Turbo compiles from the tokenised SuperBASIC program. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Fw: query
On 14 Apr 2012, at 07:26, Jochen Merz wrote: Marcel Kilgus schrieb: Norman Dunbar wrote: Mind you, it shows how well Marcel has done with QPC when it just works and just works in a manner that makes me think it's still QDOS. Ditto for SMSQ/e of course! Actually I hope it works much better than QDOS ;) The SBASIC command line history in SMSQ/E is something I'm particularly proud of and wouldn't want to live without anymore (yes, I know about the HISTORY extension for QDOS). Indeed, a great feature! - I use it every time I change something in my programs or run some tests to adjust printouts etc. Wouldn't want to miss it, especially for testing in the command line. A great feature indeed! I use it all the time and would hate to be without it. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Background colours`
On 5 Mar 2012, at 18:07, Dilwyn Jones wrote: Does anyone know if it is possible to have a transparent menu background with a pointer environment menu? Do you mean by menu, items in an application sub window? George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
[Ql-Users] TURBO version 5.07
Two faults in TURBO found by Michael Bulford (thanks) have been corrected in v5.07 which is available from my site http://gwiltprogs.info/ George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] Infinite loop in Turbo Parser
On 27 Feb 2012, at 16:17, Michael Bulford wrote: I have been having a look at the Turbo Parser, and have noticed an error in the first few lines of the code. In the call to Init_Names if there are too many structs then Complain is called. Complain will RETRY, however at this stage no RETRY_HERE has been encountered, and so the only place where it can retry is at the start. And so an infinite loop is created. Each time around this loop COMPILATION ABORTED will be written to the log file. I hope you don't mind me bringing this to your attention, this is only a very minor bug – it would not happen very often. There is a RETRY_HERE when Init_Names is called. It is at the start of every program compiled by Turbo v4.11 and after. However, this would indeed lead to an infinite loop. My suggested correction is: 10250 IF NOT _quit: Set_Links : Dialogue 10254 erased (In Init_Names) 11508 RETRY_HERE 11509 IF _quit : RETurn George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] DEBUG
Hi Michael On 22 Feb 2012, at 13:31, Michael Bulford wrote: There is an error in the Turbo parser at line 14490. Here is this line: 14490 IF var%0 AND (struct%(var%)directive_mask%)=directive_mask% Both sides of the AND get to be evaluated. Although var% is tested for being non negative on the left hand side, the right hand side will be evaluated in any event. Should var% happen to be negative, then struct%(var%) would be outside of the array bounds and will crash SuperBASIC. You are quite right. But how did you get var%=-3? Does this imply another mistake in Parser? The above line needs to be re written so that the right hand side will only be evaluated if the left hand side evaluates to true. Here is my suggested work-around: 1 LOCal both : REMark (if needed) 14488 both = 0 14489 IF var%0:IF (struct%(var%)directive_mask%)=directive_mask% : both = 1 14490 IF both My solution is: 14490 IF var%0 14494 IF (struct%(var%)directive_mask%)=directive_mask%:Parse_Directive:ELSE Skip_Stmt Cheers George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] DEBUG
Hi Michael On 21 Feb 2012, at 11:16, Michael Bulford wrote: I have a copy of parser506_bas and have managed to compile this with line numbers included. Trying this on my program the parser stops at line 14490, which is in the middle of ignoring code. I then inserted the following line Yes. At this stage if the DEBUG level is high enough code is not compiled. 14488 PRINT #log%, BASIC_NAME$(value%) ! var% After recompiling and running, this produced the following output CLS 216 PRINT 144 p -3 At line 14490, where the parser stops, struct% is an array and so the -3 has caused this to go out of range. Although I have tried compiling large programs with DEBUG 1/DEBUG 0 insertions all over the place, no errors occur. The error you find is presumably, therefore, due to something in the code being compiled, though whether Parser_task is at fault or not I couldn't say unless I have the actual code producing the errore. I could then try to track down the reason for the fault. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] DEBUG
On 18 Feb 2012, at 13:38, Michael Bulford wrote: I use DEBUG 0 and 1 for the same reasons as you and have never had the fault you mention. If you could send me, privately, a copy of your program I'll try to locate the problem. Thanks for your offer of help, this is really appreciated. However, I believe I have solved the problem. I tried moving the piece of code to near the beginning of the program, and this solved the puzzle. My guess is that because my program is over 64k, the DEBUG mechanism could not cope, so that the fault is actually with Turbo. DEBUG must be using unsigned integers, when it should be using floating point variables. That is my guess. The piece of code under question is: DEBUG is trapped by PARSER_TASK to see whether code is to be ignored or compiled. If fact in PARSER_TASK the values 0 to 9 (which is the allowed range of DEBUG) are held in an fp variable. 22268 REMark DEBUG 1 22276 DEFine PROCedure how 22284 LOCal p, scan_rt 22292 CLS 2 : PRINT 22300 p = BASIC_L(56) 22308 REPeat scan_rt 22316 p = p + 24 22324 IF p BASIC_L(60)-24 : EXIT scan_rt 22332 IF BASIC_W%(p+18)0 22340 PRINT Call at ;BASIC_W%(p+18); in ; 22348 ELSE 22356 PRINT Stop at ;BASIC_W%(146); in ; 22364 END IF 22372 IF BASIC_W%(p-12) 0 : IF NOT COMPILED : LIST #1; BASIC_W%(p-12) 22380 END REPeat scan_rt 22388 END DEFine how 22396 REMark DEBUG 0 With the DEBUG commands REMarked out TURBO will ignore them. With the DEBUG commands not REMarked out the IF NOT COMPILED is, of course, not needed. This piece was copied from the Turbo Toolkit Demos file, the original procedure name being How_COME. My idea of using DEBUG was to try and save a little bit of code, because my program is so large. ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] DEBUG
Hi Michael On 17 Feb 2012, at 19:25, Michael Bulford wrote: There is some code in my program that I do not want compiled: this is only used when the SuperBASIC version is running. So, I use DEBUG 1 before the code and DEBUG 0 afterwards. When compiling the parser stops with the report of Task Turbo 5.06 halted, after line 0. Reason: out of range The display panel reads: Pass: 1Line 22300, which is a few lines after the DEBUG 1 statement. Can anyone please tell me what I am doing wrong? The program will compile successfully if the DEBUG command is not used. I have tried using DEBUG_LEVEL but this makes no difference. I use DEBUG 0 and 1 for the same reasons as you and have never had the fault you mention. If you could send me, privately, a copy of your program I'll try to locate the problem. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [Ql-Users] PC 5.25 Disk
On 18 Feb 2012, at 08:17, Rich Mellor wrote: Can anyone still read PC formatted 5.25 disks and convert it onto a 3.5 disk? I have a 5 1/4 disk drive. Also PC Conqueror is able to read these disks in PC format. Xover should then be able to produce QL 3 1/4 disks. George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm