Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
I knew once you rode one, you would be sold. The same thing happened to me when I rode a Betty Foy for the first time. There was no way I could stay satisfied with my 2006 2200 Aluminum/carbon Trek. I wanted 40's on my bike, so I went with a custom mixte. I've had it for a year now and I've ridden the Trek one time. It's now for sell. I also have a 85 Bridgestone which I've been using like a cargo bike and as a bike I'll lock up in downtown LA. I put a porteur rack on it and have transported everything for Xmas trees to DVR's on it. Maybe you can use the Schwinn as a cargo or grocery getter. On Sunday, September 28, 2014 6:12:28 PM UTC-7, Ty Jeske wrote: Thanks again for posting the Ebay Sam frame offer and for everyone's thoughtful help. Yesterday afternoon I went to the seller's house. He showed me his stable, complete with the frame for sale and his three built up Sams. They were all 56cm double TT versions and a little tall for me, so I think the 55cm will be perfect. They rode like a dream, and the quality and craftsmanship were outstanding. I was surprised by how thin and light the frame was. I never would have guessed from the ride - the bike feels sturdy but yielding. You guys know that already though. The point is, I'm convinced this is the bike for me. I will call them this week to discuss sizing and dimensions. Any final words of advice? On Thursday, September 25, 2014 11:30:48 AM UTC-4, Conway Bennett wrote: You can always buy it, and if you like it, but absolutely want it new or the 55 cm 1TT just resell it. You should be able to move it quick and get your money back. But for the price of a repaint, which isn't necessary but'll essentially make it new, you'll come out of this for less than a new Sam+shipping with little liability. I'd buy it and leave it alone though. Then you won't agonize over that first scratch. I really like the green and the non creamed headtube. I find it understated and the lugwork speaks for itself. You won't regret the auxiliary TT either. Fair winds, Captain Conway Bennett On Sep 25, 2014, at 9:04 AM, Ty Jeske tyj...@gmail.com wrote: @conway, Thanks! The Sam you saw on EBay is actually right here in Tampa. I sent him a message to see if I can see it first. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rbw-owners-bunch/cPNXPpW-E-s/unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
Thanks again for posting the Ebay Sam frame offer and for everyone's thoughtful help. Yesterday afternoon I went to the seller's house. He showed me his stable, complete with the frame for sale and his three built up Sams. They were all 56cm double TT versions and a little tall for me, so I think the 55cm will be perfect. They rode like a dream, and the quality and craftsmanship were outstanding. I was surprised by how thin and light the frame was. I never would have guessed from the ride - the bike feels sturdy but yielding. You guys know that already though. The point is, I'm convinced this is the bike for me. I will call them this week to discuss sizing and dimensions. Any final words of advice? On Thursday, September 25, 2014 11:30:48 AM UTC-4, Conway Bennett wrote: You can always buy it, and if you like it, but absolutely want it new or the 55 cm 1TT just resell it. You should be able to move it quick and get your money back. But for the price of a repaint, which isn't necessary but'll essentially make it new, you'll come out of this for less than a new Sam+shipping with little liability. I'd buy it and leave it alone though. Then you won't agonize over that first scratch. I really like the green and the non creamed headtube. I find it understated and the lugwork speaks for itself. You won't regret the auxiliary TT either. Fair winds, Captain Conway Bennett On Sep 25, 2014, at 9:04 AM, Ty Jeske tyj...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: @conway, Thanks! The Sam you saw on EBay is actually right here in Tampa. I sent him a message to see if I can see it first. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rbw-owners-bunch/cPNXPpW-E-s/unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com javascript:. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com javascript:. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
This thread was interesting at first but got way off topic BUT there is a green 56 cm Sam on Ebay and it's in FL. One thing to glean from this thread is that there is not one bike to rule them all. Buy ittry itsell it. FW, CBB Sam rider who just bought a Quickbeam that will replace his Cross Check that was supposed to be the last bike he'd ever buy FIVE bikes ago. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
Conway has a point. I know a guy who bought a Raleigh International new in 1972 and -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
If you like quill stems, then by all means -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
I think a person who's relatively new to bikes should understand that -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
@conway, Thanks! The Sam you saw on EBay is actually right here in Tampa. I sent him a message to see if I can see it first. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
You can always buy it, and if you like it, but absolutely want it new or the 55 cm 1TT just resell it. You should be able to move it quick and get your money back. But for the price of a repaint, which isn't necessary but'll essentially make it new, you'll come out of this for less than a new Sam+shipping with little liability. I'd buy it and leave it alone though. Then you won't agonize over that first scratch. I really like the green and the non creamed headtube. I find it understated and the lugwork speaks for itself. You won't regret the auxiliary TT either. Fair winds, Captain Conway Bennett On Sep 25, 2014, at 9:04 AM, Ty Jeske tyje...@gmail.com wrote: @conway, Thanks! The Sam you saw on EBay is actually right here in Tampa. I sent him a message to see if I can see it first. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rbw-owners-bunch/cPNXPpW-E-s/unsubscribe. To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
+1. To which I add: Riding seasons vary. In WI, for example, unless you wish to install studded tires, the season ends in early December, returns late March. Your body looses elasticity during the off-season. So the first 2-3 weeks in March you need to raise the bars and lower the seat. Not much, but a little. Then as your riding fitness returns, the seat returns to last year's level, and the bars drop, just a bit. This fine tuning matches your body's increasing limberness. I also notice that I change my cockpit slightly depending on the temperature. In summer, shorts and sandals (and lots of mileage) make it easy and desireable to stretch out. In late fall when it's cold, wearing bulky clothes and winter shoes, reduce mobility, and a somewhat shorter, more upright, cockpit is fits better. For me, these are always modest adjustments: ~1 cm here or there. But feeling dialed in is nice, particularly when you can do it in less than a minute. Quills make this possible. On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 1:22:03 PM UTC-5, Steve Palincsar wrote: On 09/24/2014 01:10 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: I always thought the Cross-check was probably more comparable to the Sam, but the LHT isn't far off. All three are smartly designed and versatile. All three can be lifetime bikes, if you want them to be. I've extensively ridden a Disc Trucker, Cross-check, Atlantis, Romulus, and a few test miles on a Sam. There isn't anything magical about the intrinsic ride quality of the Sam compared to the two Surly models I mentioned, but it does have an extra measure of cosmetic flair, which may or may not be worth the extra cost and wait, depending on your point of view. Despite the lower price of the Surly, I don't believe there's any sacrifice of quality, which is sometimes implied in any Surly vs Riv discussion. Surly's quality control is the best of any company I've dealt with - they almost never make mistakes. Here are a few technical details to consider. The Riv uses a 1 quill stem, which has some advantage for quickly raising and lowering the bar, but the quill stems currently available don't have a 31.8 clamp option. Since 25.4/26.0 handlebars are getting fewer everyday, and 31.8 is effectively standard now, you'll be opting out of some great handlebar options with a standard quill stem (there are workarounds to solve this problem, but it's better to not have the problem in the first place, IMO). The Surly frames come with a threadless steerer, which makes switching to different bars much easier/cheaper. In general, threaded steerers and quill stems are regarded as outdated in the bicycle industry, and few manufacturers are supporting that design anymore. That makes the Surly somewhat more future-proof in regard to headsets, stems, and handlebars. I see the quill stems as a fairly major inconvenience, but, of course, the quill stems have an aesthetic effect that some people prefer, and I can't argue that. A second consideration is how you plan to accessorize the bike. Rivs tend to have rack braze-ons designed around the Nitto racks that they sell, while Surly frames have braze-ons designed around more universal rack designs. The rack thing shouldn't be a deal-breaker, because many racks will fit on the back of a Riv, but it does get difficult if you want, say, a Tubus low-rider rack on the fork of a Riv. In my personal experience, the biggest issue regarding a lifetime bicycle is the ability to adjust your position to physiological changes that occur with time. Most significant of these, certainly for me and probably for most, has been the need to raise the handlebar position. In my 30s, I had a 5 drop. In my 50s, 5cm below the saddle was fine. By the time I turned 60, as mile 80 rolled around I'd feel as though a railroad spike had been hammered down into the back of my neck, a problem that was solved by raising the bars to seat height. Step 1 with threadless is to cut the steerer. And once you have done that, there is no way to make it longer again. Yes, you could go for more of an up-angle, but unless you started out with a -17 (and odds are you actually started out with an up-angled stem already) you're very limited in how much higher you can go. With a quill stem you can not only raise the bars, if necessary you can substitute a stem with a longer quill. Let's take this bike as a case in point. It was originally built for a well known New England randonneur in 1991, for the 100th anniversary PBP. Here's how he had it set up when I bought it in 2002: Not quite slammed, but the stem is easily several inches lower than I could use. Switching from a standard quill length to a Technomic made this frame usable for me. If it had been threadless, there would have been no way on earth I could have ridden this bike. Which would have been a terrible shame,
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
What you need to worry about is future-proofing your ability to fit on the bike long term. And there, threadless falls on its face. I disagree. In the special case of 1 threadless with a steel steerer, no matter how short you happened to cut the steerer, you can always get equivalent adjustability to a quill stem..by having the steerer threaded and converting to a quill stem. ;-) Bill watching-the-bars-rise-as-the-years-roll-by Lindsay El Cerrito, CA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
For a lot of us, the ideal of a lifetime bike isn't realistic. Tastes often change faster than our bodies do. Anyway, I would point out that a new Surly fork with uncut steerer isn't much more costly than a Nitto quill stem. If you don't cut it too short at the beginning, which a lot of people do (and regret), then there shouldn't be an issue for many years. I would strongly suggest NOT threading a threadless fork. It seems very unsafe to me On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 1:22:03 PM UTC-5, Steve Palincsar wrote: On 09/24/2014 01:10 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: I always thought the Cross-check was probably more comparable to the Sam, but the LHT isn't far off. All three are smartly designed and versatile. All three can be lifetime bikes, if you want them to be. I've extensively ridden a Disc Trucker, Cross-check, Atlantis, Romulus, and a few test miles on a Sam. There isn't anything magical about the intrinsic ride quality of the Sam compared to the two Surly models I mentioned, but it does have an extra measure of cosmetic flair, which may or may not be worth the extra cost and wait, depending on your point of view. Despite the lower price of the Surly, I don't believe there's any sacrifice of quality, which is sometimes implied in any Surly vs Riv discussion. Surly's quality control is the best of any company I've dealt with - they almost never make mistakes. Here are a few technical details to consider. The Riv uses a 1 quill stem, which has some advantage for quickly raising and lowering the bar, but the quill stems currently available don't have a 31.8 clamp option. Since 25.4/26.0 handlebars are getting fewer everyday, and 31.8 is effectively standard now, you'll be opting out of some great handlebar options with a standard quill stem (there are workarounds to solve this problem, but it's better to not have the problem in the first place, IMO). The Surly frames come with a threadless steerer, which makes switching to different bars much easier/cheaper. In general, threaded steerers and quill stems are regarded as outdated in the bicycle industry, and few manufacturers are supporting that design anymore. That makes the Surly somewhat more future-proof in regard to headsets, stems, and handlebars. I see the quill stems as a fairly major inconvenience, but, of course, the quill stems have an aesthetic effect that some people prefer, and I can't argue that. A second consideration is how you plan to accessorize the bike. Rivs tend to have rack braze-ons designed around the Nitto racks that they sell, while Surly frames have braze-ons designed around more universal rack designs. The rack thing shouldn't be a deal-breaker, because many racks will fit on the back of a Riv, but it does get difficult if you want, say, a Tubus low-rider rack on the fork of a Riv. In my personal experience, the biggest issue regarding a lifetime bicycle is the ability to adjust your position to physiological changes that occur with time. Most significant of these, certainly for me and probably for most, has been the need to raise the handlebar position. In my 30s, I had a 5 drop. In my 50s, 5cm below the saddle was fine. By the time I turned 60, as mile 80 rolled around I'd feel as though a railroad spike had been hammered down into the back of my neck, a problem that was solved by raising the bars to seat height. Step 1 with threadless is to cut the steerer. And once you have done that, there is no way to make it longer again. Yes, you could go for more of an up-angle, but unless you started out with a -17 (and odds are you actually started out with an up-angled stem already) you're very limited in how much higher you can go. With a quill stem you can not only raise the bars, if necessary you can substitute a stem with a longer quill. Let's take this bike as a case in point. It was originally built for a well known New England randonneur in 1991, for the 100th anniversary PBP. Here's how he had it set up when I bought it in 2002: Not quite slammed, but the stem is easily several inches lower than I could use. Switching from a standard quill length to a Technomic made this frame usable for me. If it had been threadless, there would have been no way on earth I could have ridden this bike. Which would have been a terrible shame, because I love this bike. I think worrying about the future availability of 25.4 or 26.0 handlebars, quill stems and threaded headsets is worrying about the wrong thing. There are plenty of bars, stems and headsets and I'm confident there will continue to be. What you need to worry about is future-proofing your ability to fit on the bike long term. And there, threadless falls on its face. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
On 09/24/2014 04:23 PM, Joe Broach wrote: It's worth noting that you can quick adjust the newfangled stems' height, too, if you use Sheldon's method and clamp a cable hanger or seatpost collar around the steerer below the stem. That holds the headset adjustment when you remove the stem and shuffle spacers around. I go even further afield when I'm monkeying with fit and remove the spacers entirely, then it's truly as simple as a quill stem, if not as tidy looking. Yes, but those are tiny adjustments. They address Will's seasonal tweaks, yes, but don't address the long-term changes I was alluding to. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
On 09/24/2014 04:19 PM, Bill Lindsay wrote: I disagree. In the special case of 1 threadless with a steel steerer, no matter how short you happened to cut the steerer, you can always get equivalent adjustability to a quill stem..by having the steerer threaded and converting to a quill stem. ;-) A very special case indeed... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
Of course, if someone is devoted to quill stems, then I would expect that person to be devoted to traditional handlebar designs, to the exclusion of newer designs. I personally think the Jones Loop bar is the best all-around bar for my riding. I can't do that with a quill stem. There are a lot more 31.8 bars than there are 26.0 bars nowadays. I prefer to have the option rather than be locked in to a standard that appears to be dying, or at least dwindling. On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:36:36 PM UTC-5, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: For a lot of us, the ideal of a lifetime bike isn't realistic. Tastes often change faster than our bodies do. Anyway, I would point out that a new Surly fork with uncut steerer isn't much more costly than a Nitto quill stem. If you don't cut it too short at the beginning, which a lot of people do (and regret), then there shouldn't be an issue for many years. I would strongly suggest NOT threading a threadless fork. It seems very unsafe to me On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 1:22:03 PM UTC-5, Steve Palincsar wrote: On 09/24/2014 01:10 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: I always thought the Cross-check was probably more comparable to the Sam, but the LHT isn't far off. All three are smartly designed and versatile. All three can be lifetime bikes, if you want them to be. I've extensively ridden a Disc Trucker, Cross-check, Atlantis, Romulus, and a few test miles on a Sam. There isn't anything magical about the intrinsic ride quality of the Sam compared to the two Surly models I mentioned, but it does have an extra measure of cosmetic flair, which may or may not be worth the extra cost and wait, depending on your point of view. Despite the lower price of the Surly, I don't believe there's any sacrifice of quality, which is sometimes implied in any Surly vs Riv discussion. Surly's quality control is the best of any company I've dealt with - they almost never make mistakes. Here are a few technical details to consider. The Riv uses a 1 quill stem, which has some advantage for quickly raising and lowering the bar, but the quill stems currently available don't have a 31.8 clamp option. Since 25.4/26.0 handlebars are getting fewer everyday, and 31.8 is effectively standard now, you'll be opting out of some great handlebar options with a standard quill stem (there are workarounds to solve this problem, but it's better to not have the problem in the first place, IMO). The Surly frames come with a threadless steerer, which makes switching to different bars much easier/cheaper. In general, threaded steerers and quill stems are regarded as outdated in the bicycle industry, and few manufacturers are supporting that design anymore. That makes the Surly somewhat more future-proof in regard to headsets, stems, and handlebars. I see the quill stems as a fairly major inconvenience, but, of course, the quill stems have an aesthetic effect that some people prefer, and I can't argue that. A second consideration is how you plan to accessorize the bike. Rivs tend to have rack braze-ons designed around the Nitto racks that they sell, while Surly frames have braze-ons designed around more universal rack designs. The rack thing shouldn't be a deal-breaker, because many racks will fit on the back of a Riv, but it does get difficult if you want, say, a Tubus low-rider rack on the fork of a Riv. In my personal experience, the biggest issue regarding a lifetime bicycle is the ability to adjust your position to physiological changes that occur with time. Most significant of these, certainly for me and probably for most, has been the need to raise the handlebar position. In my 30s, I had a 5 drop. In my 50s, 5cm below the saddle was fine. By the time I turned 60, as mile 80 rolled around I'd feel as though a railroad spike had been hammered down into the back of my neck, a problem that was solved by raising the bars to seat height. Step 1 with threadless is to cut the steerer. And once you have done that, there is no way to make it longer again. Yes, you could go for more of an up-angle, but unless you started out with a -17 (and odds are you actually started out with an up-angled stem already) you're very limited in how much higher you can go. With a quill stem you can not only raise the bars, if necessary you can substitute a stem with a longer quill. Let's take this bike as a case in point. It was originally built for a well known New England randonneur in 1991, for the 100th anniversary PBP. Here's how he had it set up when I bought it in 2002: Not quite slammed, but the stem is easily several inches lower than I could use. Switching from a standard quill length to a Technomic made this frame usable for me. If it had been threadless, there would have been no way on earth I could have ridden this bike. Which would have been a
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
On 09/24/2014 04:36 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: For a lot of us, the ideal of a lifetime bike isn't realistic. Tastes often change faster than our bodies do. Anyway, I would point out that a new Surly fork with uncut steerer isn't much more costly than a Nitto quill stem. If you don't cut it too short at the beginning, which a lot of people do (and regret), then there shouldn't be an issue for many years. And a new fork of comparable quality to a Nitto stem will cost over six times as much, about as much as a new frame of comparable (or even superior) quality to the Surly frame, based on what we learned in the discussion of the Lyon forks. Basically, I interpret all this as saying frames made for threadless forks should be considered disposable. And I'm sure there are plenty of production frames out there that legitimately could be considered disposable tools. Certainly the LHT qualifies. But I don't consider a frame like my Longstaff a disposable tool. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
I'm talking about replacing the stock for on a LHT with the same exact fork with a longer steerer, if aging or injury (or whatever) makes it desirable to have higher bars. Upgrading to a more magical fork is another matter. Robert Pirsig had a famous book about a guy who drove himself insane trying to define quality, so I won't try to argue whether or not a Surly fork is of the same quality as a Nitto stem. Interesting point about disposability. To an extent, you are right. This doesn't mean you're likely to wear out your LHT anytime soon, but let's say you wreck it somehow. No problem, for $400ish, you can get another one just like it tomorrow. For more precious frames, like your Longstaff or most Rivs, replacement will be more costly in terms of time and money. On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:51:33 PM UTC-5, Steve Palincsar wrote: On 09/24/2014 04:36 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: For a lot of us, the ideal of a lifetime bike isn't realistic. Tastes often change faster than our bodies do. Anyway, I would point out that a new Surly fork with uncut steerer isn't much more costly than a Nitto quill stem. If you don't cut it too short at the beginning, which a lot of people do (and regret), then there shouldn't be an issue for many years. And a new fork of comparable quality to a Nitto stem will cost over six times as much, about as much as a new frame of comparable (or even superior) quality to the Surly frame, based on what we learned in the discussion of the Lyon forks. Basically, I interpret all this as saying frames made for threadless forks should be considered disposable. And I'm sure there are plenty of production frames out there that legitimately could be considered disposable tools. Certainly the LHT qualifies. But I don't consider a frame like my Longstaff a disposable tool. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
One of the things I LOVE about threadless forks/headsets is their adjustability. Swapping stems and adding spacers is a quick job, and so much more pleasant than unwrapping bars (and inevitably scratching them up pulling them through a quill stem). Threadless stems come in a plethora of sizes and are easy and cheap to swap out when I need one. Much more so than Nitto quill stems. The trick is leaving the stem long enough to have the option of putting on spacers and moving the stem up. My $.02 On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 2:01:44 PM UTC-7, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: I'm talking about replacing the stock for on a LHT with the same exact fork with a longer steerer, if aging or injury (or whatever) makes it desirable to have higher bars. Upgrading to a more magical fork is another matter. Robert Pirsig had a famous book about a guy who drove himself insane trying to define quality, so I won't try to argue whether or not a Surly fork is of the same quality as a Nitto stem. Interesting point about disposability. To an extent, you are right. This doesn't mean you're likely to wear out your LHT anytime soon, but let's say you wreck it somehow. No problem, for $400ish, you can get another one just like it tomorrow. For more precious frames, like your Longstaff or most Rivs, replacement will be more costly in terms of time and money. On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:51:33 PM UTC-5, Steve Palincsar wrote: On 09/24/2014 04:36 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: For a lot of us, the ideal of a lifetime bike isn't realistic. Tastes often change faster than our bodies do. Anyway, I would point out that a new Surly fork with uncut steerer isn't much more costly than a Nitto quill stem. If you don't cut it too short at the beginning, which a lot of people do (and regret), then there shouldn't be an issue for many years. And a new fork of comparable quality to a Nitto stem will cost over six times as much, about as much as a new frame of comparable (or even superior) quality to the Surly frame, based on what we learned in the discussion of the Lyon forks. Basically, I interpret all this as saying frames made for threadless forks should be considered disposable. And I'm sure there are plenty of production frames out there that legitimately could be considered disposable tools. Certainly the LHT qualifies. But I don't consider a frame like my Longstaff a disposable tool. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
On 09/24/2014 05:01 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: I'm talking about replacing the stock for on a LHT with the same exact fork with a longer steerer, if aging or injury (or whatever) makes it desirable to have higher bars. Upgrading to a more magical fork is another matter. Robert Pirsig had a famous book about a guy who drove himself insane trying to define quality, so I won't try to argue whether or not a Surly fork is of the same quality as a Nitto stem. But you certainly wouldn't argue that a Surly fork is the same quality as a Jeff Lyon fork, would you? Interesting point about disposability. To an extent, you are right. This doesn't mean you're likely to wear out your LHT anytime soon, but let's say you wreck it somehow. No problem, for $400ish, you can get another one just like it tomorrow. For more precious frames, like your Longstaff or most Rivs, replacement will be more costly in terms of time and money. If even possible. In the case of the Longstaff, impossible, since he passed away in 2003. On the other hand, there's a lot to be said for using a disposable tool on a mission that is apt to be potentially hazardous or at a minimum is likely to lead to rough handling, and touring can certainly be that. I'd rather use my Kogswell P/R for touring than my MAP Randonneur, even though Mitch Pryor does make a lovely add-on low-rider rack that mounts to the front bag support for the current generation of Randonneur Project bikes. On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:51:33 PM UTC-5, Steve Palincsar wrote: On 09/24/2014 04:36 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: For a lot of us, the ideal of a lifetime bike isn't realistic. Tastes often change faster than our bodies do. Anyway, I would point out that a new Surly fork with uncut steerer isn't much more costly than a Nitto quill stem. If you don't cut it too short at the beginning, which a lot of people do (and regret), then there shouldn't be an issue for many years. And a new fork of comparable quality to a Nitto stem will cost over six times as much, about as much as a new frame of comparable (or even superior) quality to the Surly frame, based on what we learned in the discussion of the Lyon forks. Basically, I interpret all this as saying frames made for threadless forks should be considered disposable. And I'm sure there are plenty of production frames out there that legitimately could be considered disposable tools. Certainly the LHT qualifies. But I don't consider a frame like my Longstaff a disposable tool. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com mailto:rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com mailto:rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
I always purchase lifetime bikes. Problem is, I always sell them for different lifetime bikes ;) On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:53:04 PM UTC-7, Philip Williamson wrote: Leaving the steerer long isn't even a trick... Simply do nothing, and it magically stays long! I have and love bikes with quill stems and with threadless stems. I've had my Bontrager (threadless) for almost 14 years, so it's looking like a Buy It For Life bike. And the fork may well be almost as irreplaceable as Steve's Longstaff fork. Stem adjustment is something I almost never do on most of my bikes. My quill bikes, never, my newer threadless bike every few months as I dial different elements. Bearing preload seems easy, once you learn to use your body weight, and which thing (stem or star nut) to tighten first. Maybe I'm missing some secret difficulty? Philip www.biketinker.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
'til death do us partor some other bike catches my eye On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 4:49:33 PM UTC-7, Joe Bernard wrote: I always purchase lifetime bikes. Problem is, I always sell them for different lifetime bikes ;) On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:53:04 PM UTC-7, Philip Williamson wrote: Leaving the steerer long isn't even a trick... Simply do nothing, and it magically stays long! I have and love bikes with quill stems and with threadless stems. I've had my Bontrager (threadless) for almost 14 years, so it's looking like a Buy It For Life bike. And the fork may well be almost as irreplaceable as Steve's Longstaff fork. Stem adjustment is something I almost never do on most of my bikes. My quill bikes, never, my newer threadless bike every few months as I dial different elements. Bearing preload seems easy, once you learn to use your body weight, and which thing (stem or star nut) to tighten first. Maybe I'm missing some secret difficulty? Philip www.biketinker.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
I used to buy bikes for my lifetime, until I realized that each and every bike I've had has ridden differently, and I've *liked* the difference. Two years ago I lost a Trek 560 that I absolutely *loved. *I was going to get a custom-built replacement, but that ultimately proved unworkable. Consequently, I bought a Velo Orange Randonneur. I like it a lot. I also liked my Kogswell D58--threadless stem and all. I just didn't need it anymore. This is all by way of saying that variety is a spice of life. When my next bike gets shot out from under me--if--I will not worry about a perfect replacement. Because whatever I find will be as good as, if not better, than the old bike. Lifetime, schmifetime. They're all tools, they're all bikes, and they're all meant to be ridden into the ground. If you want one with fancy paint, that's your deal, and I can completely understand. On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:54:32 PM UTC-4, Bill Lindsay wrote: 'til death do us partor some other bike catches my eye On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 4:49:33 PM UTC-7, Joe Bernard wrote: I always purchase lifetime bikes. Problem is, I always sell them for different lifetime bikes ;) On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:53:04 PM UTC-7, Philip Williamson wrote: Leaving the steerer long isn't even a trick... Simply do nothing, and it magically stays long! I have and love bikes with quill stems and with threadless stems. I've had my Bontrager (threadless) for almost 14 years, so it's looking like a Buy It For Life bike. And the fork may well be almost as irreplaceable as Steve's Longstaff fork. Stem adjustment is something I almost never do on most of my bikes. My quill bikes, never, my newer threadless bike every few months as I dial different elements. Bearing preload seems easy, once you learn to use your body weight, and which thing (stem or star nut) to tighten first. Maybe I'm missing some secret difficulty? Philip www.biketinker.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
Much like guitars, never found anything close to a lifetime bike. In a related matter, a friend of mine has been through more custom guitars and custom bikes than I can count. At least 4 custom bikes I know of. His present passion? Long Haul Trucker with 26 wheels. I have no problem getting the bars high enough on my bikes with threadless stems. Now, the 6 or so above the saddle I occasionally put the bars on my Hillborne? Nope. But two or three inches above, not a problem. Eric Platt St. Paul, MN On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Bill Lindsay tapebu...@gmail.com wrote: 'til death do us partor some other bike catches my eye On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 4:49:33 PM UTC-7, Joe Bernard wrote: I always purchase lifetime bikes. Problem is, I always sell them for different lifetime bikes ;) On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:53:04 PM UTC-7, Philip Williamson wrote: Leaving the steerer long isn't even a trick... Simply do nothing, and it magically stays long! I have and love bikes with quill stems and with threadless stems. I've had my Bontrager (threadless) for almost 14 years, so it's looking like a Buy It For Life bike. And the fork may well be almost as irreplaceable as Steve's Longstaff fork. Stem adjustment is something I almost never do on most of my bikes. My quill bikes, never, my newer threadless bike every few months as I dial different elements. Bearing preload seems easy, once you learn to use your body weight, and which thing (stem or star nut) to tighten first. Maybe I'm missing some secret difficulty? Philip www.biketinker.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
On 09/24/2014 09:00 PM, Eric Platt wrote: Much like guitars, never found anything close to a lifetime bike. Lots of people figured the 54-year-old Gibson Les Paul electric guitar would fetch more than its $20,000 to $30,000 pre-auction estimate, but no one knew how much more. The answer: a lot. Two Saturdays ago, *Gil Southworth Jr.* paid $140,000 for the guitar I wrote about http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/one-careful-owner-the-story-of-a-desirable-vintage-guitar-about-to-be-auctioned/2014/09/08/7a57b312-3778-11e4-9c9f-ebb47272e40e_story.html recently. Add in the premium paid toQuinn’s Auction Galleries http://www.quinnsauction.com/in Falls Church and the price tag came to $165,200. Why, with that money, Gil could have bought 1,652 brand-new $100 ukuleles (a sobering thought) Sure as hell sounds like a lifetime guitar to me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
So of course you should do as you like and go threadless ever and always. I see absolutely no reason why you shouldn't. But some of the rest of us find that the bars we want work with quill stems, and find the range of quill stems available perfectly adequate. Though threadless has dominated the market for what 15 years I don't think the last 5 or 10 have seen dramatic reductions in the availability of quill stems etc. I believe your implied prediction of their imminent demise is premature, and see no need to shun them for fear of being locked into something unobtainable. Folks explaining how you can adjust bar height on threadless setups, and how its really easy, remind me of when I told people that gluing tubulars was simple. Easy is in the eye of the doer, and (aside from the advantages of removable face plates) I can't believe dealing with threadless is as easy as the quill system is. I think spacers above the stem on a threadless setup looks bad. You say I can buy a new fork if I want to raise my bars an inch? Yea, well you go ahead with that plan but I don't think I will. On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 1:40:43 PM UTC-7, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: Of course, if someone is devoted to quill stems, then I would expect that person to be devoted to traditional handlebar designs, to the exclusion of newer designs. I personally think the Jones Loop bar is the best all-around bar for my riding. I can't do that with a quill stem. There are a lot more 31.8 bars than there are 26.0 bars nowadays. I prefer to have the option rather than be locked in to a standard that appears to be dying, or at least dwindling. On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:36:36 PM UTC-5, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: For a lot of us, the ideal of a lifetime bike isn't realistic. Tastes often change faster than our bodies do. Anyway, I would point out that a new Surly fork with uncut steerer isn't much more costly than a Nitto quill stem. If you don't cut it too short at the beginning, which a lot of people do (and regret), then there shouldn't be an issue for many years. I would strongly suggest NOT threading a threadless fork. It seems very unsafe to me On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 1:22:03 PM UTC-5, Steve Palincsar wrote: On 09/24/2014 01:10 PM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery wrote: I always thought the Cross-check was probably more comparable to the Sam, but the LHT isn't far off. All three are smartly designed and versatile. All three can be lifetime bikes, if you want them to be. I've extensively ridden a Disc Trucker, Cross-check, Atlantis, Romulus, and a few test miles on a Sam. There isn't anything magical about the intrinsic ride quality of the Sam compared to the two Surly models I mentioned, but it does have an extra measure of cosmetic flair, which may or may not be worth the extra cost and wait, depending on your point of view. Despite the lower price of the Surly, I don't believe there's any sacrifice of quality, which is sometimes implied in any Surly vs Riv discussion. Surly's quality control is the best of any company I've dealt with - they almost never make mistakes. Here are a few technical details to consider. The Riv uses a 1 quill stem, which has some advantage for quickly raising and lowering the bar, but the quill stems currently available don't have a 31.8 clamp option. Since 25.4/26.0 handlebars are getting fewer everyday, and 31.8 is effectively standard now, you'll be opting out of some great handlebar options with a standard quill stem (there are workarounds to solve this problem, but it's better to not have the problem in the first place, IMO). The Surly frames come with a threadless steerer, which makes switching to different bars much easier/cheaper. In general, threaded steerers and quill stems are regarded as outdated in the bicycle industry, and few manufacturers are supporting that design anymore. That makes the Surly somewhat more future-proof in regard to headsets, stems, and handlebars. I see the quill stems as a fairly major inconvenience, but, of course, the quill stems have an aesthetic effect that some people prefer, and I can't argue that. A second consideration is how you plan to accessorize the bike. Rivs tend to have rack braze-ons designed around the Nitto racks that they sell, while Surly frames have braze-ons designed around more universal rack designs. The rack thing shouldn't be a deal-breaker, because many racks will fit on the back of a Riv, but it does get difficult if you want, say, a Tubus low-rider rack on the fork of a Riv. In my personal experience, the biggest issue regarding a lifetime bicycle is the ability to adjust your position to physiological changes that occur with time. Most significant of these, certainly for me and probably for most, has been the need to raise the handlebar position. In my 30s, I had a 5 drop. In my
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
Sounds more like an investment to me. Philip www.biketinker.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
haha Andrew great comments I thought my Paul Taylor custom was going to be a lifetime bike, it's very fast but it's punishing and you can not get anyting over 23mm under the front fork. The other problem is that it TT is 66mm C-C and it's threadless so even with the itty bittiest stem is more than I want. And it's hard to get any up angle when you're using a tiny threadless stem. A quill with 50mm extension would have been so much better. So I got the thing repainted, err powdercoated, and now I'm selling it. Then there's the Eisentraut, I thought it would be a piece of history that I would keep for a lifetime. Now, I'm kind of wondering why I have it, ifn I'm not going to build it up and ride it. The problem is that it's a touring frame, with none of the modern accoutrements for touring like eyelets for racks and so forth. But anyway :) On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Andrew Marchant-Shapiro marchantshap...@gmail.com wrote: I used to buy bikes for my lifetime, until I realized that each and every bike I've had has ridden differently, and I've liked the difference. Two years ago I lost a Trek 560 that I absolutely loved. I was going to get a custom-built replacement, but that ultimately proved unworkable. Consequently, I bought a Velo Orange Randonneur. I like it a lot. I also liked my Kogswell D58--threadless stem and all. I just didn't need it anymore. This is all by way of saying that variety is a spice of life. When my next bike gets shot out from under me--if--I will not worry about a perfect replacement. Because whatever I find will be as good as, if not better, than the old bike. Lifetime, schmifetime. They're all tools, they're all bikes, and they're all meant to be ridden into the ground. If you want one with fancy paint, that's your deal, and I can completely understand. On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:54:32 PM UTC-4, Bill Lindsay wrote: 'til death do us partor some other bike catches my eye On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 4:49:33 PM UTC-7, Joe Bernard wrote: I always purchase lifetime bikes. Problem is, I always sell them for different lifetime bikes ;) On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:53:04 PM UTC-7, Philip Williamson wrote: Leaving the steerer long isn't even a trick... Simply do nothing, and it magically stays long! I have and love bikes with quill stems and with threadless stems. I've had my Bontrager (threadless) for almost 14 years, so it's looking like a Buy It For Life bike. And the fork may well be almost as irreplaceable as Steve's Longstaff fork. Stem adjustment is something I almost never do on most of my bikes. My quill bikes, never, my newer threadless bike every few months as I dial different elements. Bearing preload seems easy, once you learn to use your body weight, and which thing (stem or star nut) to tighten first. Maybe I'm missing some secret difficulty? Philip www.biketinker.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Keep the metal side up and the rubber side down! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
On 09/23/2014 05:39 AM, Ty Jeske wrote: Thanks for all the great advice and thoughtful responses everyone. The LHT I'm riding is my friend's spare, so I think I could get a good deal on it should I decide to go that direction. I am wary of buying what I intend to be a lifetime bicycle just because it's convenient or a bargain though, so I would love to see and ride a Sam first hand. If you know anyone who has a Sam in my area (i could meet anywhere in Florida), or in Atlanta where I visit frequently, please see if they're willing to allow a test-ride. I think I would fit a 55cm best. I think most would agree that a LHT is a useful tool, but as a lifetime bicycle, not so much. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
I own and ride both a Surly LHT and an Atlantis. If I could keep only one, it would be the Atlantis. To quote Steve: I think most would agree that a LHT is a useful tool, but as a lifetime bicycle, not so much. On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:52:44 PM UTC-4, Steve Palincsar wrote: On 09/23/2014 05:39 AM, Ty Jeske wrote: Thanks for all the great advice and thoughtful responses everyone. The LHT I'm riding is my friend's spare, so I think I could get a good deal on it should I decide to go that direction. I am wary of buying what I intend to be a lifetime bicycle just because it's convenient or a bargain though, so I would love to see and ride a Sam first hand. If you know anyone who has a Sam in my area (i could meet anywhere in Florida), or in Atlanta where I visit frequently, please see if they're willing to allow a test-ride. I think I would fit a 55cm best. I think most would agree that a LHT is a useful tool, but as a lifetime bicycle, not so much. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: Considering my first Riv purchase and looking for helpful advice
Buy my Bombadil! On Sep 22, 2014 1:57 PM, Daniel M dpmay...@hotmail.com wrote: I will submit my opinion to add to the variety. I owned a Sam Hillborne for two years. I bought it brand new, rode it in a double-century, later added front and rear racks and rode it from Berkeley to the Oregon-Washington border and back. It was/is a near-perfect all rounder. So why did I sell it? I wanted something with smaller wheels and bigger tires. The Hillborne in my size (no longer made 56cm, single top tube, cantilever brakes) happened to come with 700c wheels and I was running the biggest tires that I could fit with fenders: Schwalbe Marathon Supreme 700x40. What happened is that I finally built the touring bike of my dreams with a Rohloff hub and 26 wheels (and currently running 60mm tires with fenders) and I was kind of blown away by the stability of the touring geometry coupled with the agility of the smaller wheels. The Hillborne was incredibly stable on descents but REALLY reluctant to change direction quickly around town - kind of the complaint about 29ers (AKA 700c) that has sent people to 27.5 (AKA 650b) in the mountain bike world. If I hadn't built up the touring bike, I would probably still own the Hillborne, but I didn't need two touring bikes, so when I stumbled across a reasonably-priced used 650b randonneuring bike I bought it and sold the Hillborne for the same amount of money. When it came time to choose an all-around bike for my wife, who is 5'10, we chose a Long Haul Trucker in the 58cm frame size with 26 wheels. We also swapped out the drop handlebars for upright, swept bars, and replaced the canti brakes with V-brakes. I really think it is the ideal all-round bike. So comfortable, capable of hauling whatever you can put on it, and 2.0 (50mm) Big Apples are wonderfully smooth on pavement and stable and capable off of it. If my main uses were as you describe, rides under 40 miles, getting groceries, and occasional touring, I would get it over the Hillborne in a heartbeat. If I intended to ride mostly lightly loaded and for longer distances (60+ miles), then I would seriously consider the Hillborne, which is less of a tank and more of a road bike, although the lack of canti posts on the current offerings I find really disappointing. My two cents in a nutshell. Daniel M Berkeley, CA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
