Re: Network : Bridge over bonding
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:01:16 +0200 From: Thierry Leurent thierry.leur...@asgardian.be Reply-To: redhat-sysadmin-list@redhat.com To: redhat-sysadmin-list@redhat.com Subject: Network : Bridge over bonding Hello, I'm configuring a server to use KVM. I want to have a redundant network connection. I a first time, I have create a bonding with eth0 and eth1. It's work but now I want install a bridge to use KVM and build a guest computer with an ip address in my normal address space (not NATed). But the bonding don't work. IFConfig give me informations about brigde0 and lo. cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0 tell me that eth0 and eth1 are down. You probably want to bond eth0 and eth1 into a mode 1 bond, which is active/standby based on link status. You then want to make the bond0 interface a member of bridge0. I caution you against bonding modes other than mode 1. You could easily cause a loop in your layer2 network. I suggest consulting with your networking folks about what to do here. As a network engineer, I would highly recommend enabling spanning-tree on your bridge0 interface and a short forwarding delay in your bridge. Switch side, you probably want to have spanning-tree guard root on both ports to prevent your software bridge from accidently becoming the root of your layer2 topology. You'll also want to have bpduguard and bpdufilter both disabled. Again, I would urge you to discuss spanning-tree and forwarding delays with your network engineer as well as the implications of the proposed failover bonding. A network engineer with a looped network is not a happy network engineer. Thanks, Matt -- Matthew Galgoci Network Operations Red Hat, Inc 919.754.3700 x44155 -- It's not whether you get knocked down, it's whether you get up. - Vince Lombardi -- redhat-sysadmin-list mailing list redhat-sysadmin-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-sysadmin-list
Re: Network Troubleshooting Help
* and then Nick Wilson declared Whilst fixing my nvnet driver though, I seem to have lost the network to my wifes PC connected via an adsl hub. Earlier I could ping our ip address and send/recieve packets but no longer can... BTW, I can ping my machine from my wifes, (if that helps...) -- Nick W -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network Troubleshooting Help
So you can ping your machine from your wife's, but you cannot ping the wife's from yours. Sounds like a subnet mask issue, or ICMP filtering. Check that the subnet masks on both machines match, and try service iptables stop. HTH, - nick -Original Message- From: Nick Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:39 PM To: RedHat-List Subject: Re: Network Troubleshooting Help * and then Nick Wilson declared Whilst fixing my nvnet driver though, I seem to have lost the network to my wifes PC connected via an adsl hub. Earlier I could ping our ip address and send/recieve packets but no longer can... BTW, I can ping my machine from my wifes, (if that helps...) -- Nick W -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. My views or opinions presented are solely those of the author (Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and do not necessarily represent those of the company. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Troubleshooting Help
* and then Nick White declared So you can ping your machine from your wife's, but you cannot ping the wife's from yours. Sounds like a subnet mask issue, or ICMP filtering. Check that the subnet masks on both machines match, and try service iptables stop. Ok, where will i find the subnet mask? - And, are there any tools or command line apps to inspect the network? - I'm not even sure of the hostnames... ;-) Thanks! -- Nick W -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Troubleshooting Help
On Tuesday, Oct 7, 2003, at 18:28 US/Eastern, Nick Wilson wrote: * and then Nick White declared So you can ping your machine from your wife's, but you cannot ping the wife's from yours. Sounds like a subnet mask issue, or ICMP filtering. Check that the subnet masks on both machines match, and try service iptables stop. Ok, where will i find the subnet mask? - And, are there any tools or command line apps to inspect the network? - I'm not even sure of the hostnames... ;-) ifconfig at the command line will display the status and interesting data about active interfaces, including the subnet mask. (Also the MAC or HWaddr, IP address, broadcast address, etc. etc.) man ifconfig will give you some interesting see alsos for other commands you may find helpful, but ifconfig might be all you need for this task. pjm -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Troubleshooting Help
* and then Parker Morse declared ifconfig at the command line will display the status and interesting data about active interfaces, including the subnet mask. (Also the MAC or HWaddr, IP address, broadcast address, etc. etc.) man ifconfig will give you some interesting see alsos for other commands you may find helpful, but ifconfig might be all you need for this task. Yep, that and restarting iptables did the trick ;-) I can't seem to connect to a remote desktop though. When I try to 'browse' it says browsing the network not possible, you probably have not set up SPL support properly (or somthing like that...) ...any idea what that might mean? Thanks for the help! -- Nick W -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed- For Mr.Crucificator
I am sorry but I haven't received your mail directed to me so I'll disregard any information from the mail that I'm viewing now from mr. Paul Rushing. I do believe thatload balancingis a false problem for a network made out of 50 computers. I have seen LANs made out of 100 comps and served by just one server that didn't had any problems in passing the packets. The problems that you should have are: 1. Is my hardware strong enough to sustain the traffic? If you use Squid think at this struggle: caches vs. bad blocks :). 2. is my bandwidth enough for the applications inside my LAN? If you need responses I must ask questions: what will the traffic will come from? Net browse, gaming? You can get an accurate ideea of what will be going on by knowing the number, size and type of packets that will transit your gateway. Be extra carefull while sayng I am sure I would not want to tighten anything as all ports will have to be open and check out for what side will they be open ... Use strong firewall rules especially if it is a internet cafe. P.S. Tell me us your problems exactly.
Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed
Hi Bjorn, Thanks for ar advice,but you think that it will be able to handle all the requests from 50 odd terminals effictively? Also any suggestion on the additional Host IPs that I have been given by the ISP? Thanks Harish - Original Message - From: Otto Haliburton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:44 AM Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed Remember that Ethernet is a collision based system i.e. the more collisions the less performance. Hence large networks are typically have low performance because of the greater number of collisions. So option 2 would give you better performance because it is broken up into smaller areas hence fewer collisions, also there are fewer route table updates. So while the second is more complicated it is actually a better setup. Token ring would be better for your option 1. Thats my 0.02 cents. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Enroth BjörnSent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:47 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: SV: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi, Why complicate things when not needed? The only thing you can gain from separating the clients is less broadcast, and maybe some increased security between the groups of clients. The Linux box would also have more to do in your second option. My suggestion is that you go for option 1. Remember to NOT set any default gw at the internal interface. This could confuse the routing daemon. Regards /Bjorn -Ursprungligt meddelande-Från: Harish Sabnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Skickat: den 29 september 2003 19:45Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Kopia: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Ämne: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi Ed, Thank you for taking interest in my queries,I need a suggestion from you on the way I should set up my network,I had posted this mssg on the mailing list but had no response,hence I am mailing this to you,your suggestion will be highly appreciated. Hi All,I have set up a Linux Box with NAT/MASQ, and Squid as an Internet server for my local LAN with one system on a trial basis and I see that the performance has been great.However I am apprehensive about the way the way traffice and loadbalancing will be hadled by Linux box as there will be 50 Machines banging in with requests,hence I have thought of two ways to connect,pls have alook below and pass your valuable comments. I have a 128 Kbps leased line coming thru a router.Option150 Windows Cleints with IP Adressese 192.168.0.1-50 GW 192.168.0.100Linux Server Eth0 with Ip Adress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201Linux server Eth1 with Ip Address 192.168.0.100 GW 192.168.0.100so I will use Ip NAT/MASQ techniques where all requests on Eth1 will be forwarded to Eth0.Option 23 Sepearte Networks Network 1 Ip addresses 192.168.0.1-15Network 2 Ip addresses 192.168.1.1-15Network 3 Ipaddresses 192.168.2.1-20Linux Server Eth0 with Ipaddress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201Linux Server Eth1 with Ipaddress 192.168.0.254 GW 212.72.11.89 Eth2 with Ipaddress 192.168.1.254 GW 212.72.11.89 Eth3 with Ipaddress 192.168.2.254 GW 212.72.11.89In this case I will have to NAT all requests from Eth1,Eth2,Eth3 to Eth0. Router DetailsSerial IP 212.72.11.202 Mask 255.255.255.252Network 212.72.11.88 Mask 255.255.255.248Gatway 212.72.11.201Host Ips 212.72.11.89212.72.11.90212.72.11.91212.72.11.92212.72.11.93212.72.11.94212.72.11.95 I have abt 6 dedicated host Ips is there a better way I can utilise this,Pls suggest, I dont want to have a dedicated FTP or webserver.Thanks and regardsHarish
Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed
I have set up a Linux Box with NAT/MASQ, and Squid as an Internet server for my local LAN with one system on a trial basis and I see that the performance has been great.However I am apprehensive about the way the way traffice and loadbalancing will be hadled by Linux box as there will be 50 Machines banging in with requests,hence I have thought of two ways to connect,pls have alook below and pass your valuable comments. I have a 128 Kbps leased line coming thru a router. Option1 50 Windows Cleints with IP Adressese 192.168.0.1-50 GW 192.168.0.100 Linux Server Eth0 with Ip Adress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201 Linux server Eth1 with Ip Address 192.168.0.100 GW 192.168.0.100 so I will use Ip NAT/MASQ techniques where all requests on Eth1 will be forwarded to Eth0. You don't mention any specs on the linux box, so it's difficult to say if that machine will handle the traffic for 50 clients or not.. Linux can certainly do it, if you have a reasonable box with adequate ram this setup should not be a problem. To utilize your extra ip addresses you can assign them as aliases to eth0 and then seperate your NAT/MASQ across several outgoing ip addresses. You would probably want at least 2 ip addresses on the external eth0 interface... (depends on how much traffic you expect to have) (your gateway statement above on eth1 is not correct) -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed
Again the problem is not the 50 ip addresses, but how they are connected. If they are all in the same area you have the problem of collisions and the problem of increased traffic due to updating the routing tables for all 50 nodes. Where as if you have smaller areas, one computer will be arbitrated as the router in each area and the collisions will be less because of the smaller areas. Having many computers in the same LAN is always a problem with Ethernet. If you have many computers in the same area then token ring is better because of the reduction of the collisions, but token ring does not solve the routing table problem. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Rushing Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 8:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed I have set up a Linux Box with NAT/MASQ, and Squid as an Internet server for my local LAN with one system on a trial basis and I see that the performance has been great.However I am apprehensive about the way the way traffice and loadbalancing will be hadled by Linux box as there will be 50 Machines banging in with requests,hence I have thought of two ways to connect,pls have alook below and pass your valuable comments. I have a 128 Kbps leased line coming thru a router. Option1 50 Windows Cleints with IP Adressese 192.168.0.1-50 GW 192.168.0.100 Linux Server Eth0 with Ip Adress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201 Linux server Eth1 with Ip Address 192.168.0.100 GW 192.168.0.100 so I will use Ip NAT/MASQ techniques where all requests on Eth1 will be forwarded to Eth0. You don't mention any specs on the linux box, so it's difficult to say if that machine will handle the traffic for 50 clients or not.. Linux can certainly do it, if you have a reasonable box with adequate ram this setup should not be a problem. To utilize your extra ip addresses you can assign them as aliases to eth0 and then seperate your NAT/MASQ across several outgoing ip addresses. You would probably want at least 2 ip addresses on the external eth0 interface... (depends on how much traffic you expect to have) (your gateway statement above on eth1 is not correct) -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Otto Haliburton wrote: Again the problem is not the 50 ip addresses, but how they are connected. If they are all in the same area you have the problem of collisions and the problem of increased traffic due to updating the routing tables for all 50 nodes. Where as if you have smaller areas, one computer will be arbitrated as the router in each area and the collisions will be less because of the smaller areas. Having many computers in the same LAN is always a problem with Ethernet. If you have many computers in the same area then token ring is better because of the reduction of the collisions, but token ring does not solve the routing table problem. This is not quite always the case. Ethernet's CSMA/CD (Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection) was invented during a time when a hub or bus were the primary method of connection. Collision was indeed a problem then, and keeping the LAN small was a way to ensure network performance. However, these days, switches are much cheaper and are easily within the reach of most organizations. If your users are hooked up to a switch instead of a hub, you can ignore the collisions problem, as it no longer exists. At that point, the limiting factors are the speed/RAM of the gateway and the speed/RAM of the switch. A good, short explanation can be found at http://www.duxcw.com/faq/network/hubsw.htm Ben -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed
Harish, The Linux box is absolutely able to handle 50 clients. In fact it would have to any way with the second option. I also saw someone pointing out collisions. If a switch is used instead of a hub, there are no collisions at all. You could group your internal users and hide them behind different external addresses. But again Dont complicate things when you dont need to. The amount of simultaneous sessions is more than enough if you hide them all behind one address. Regards /Bjorn -Original Message- From: Harish Sabnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 30 september 2003 10:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi Bjorn, Thanks for ar advice,but you think that it will be able to handle all the requests from 50 odd terminals effictively? Also any suggestion on the additional Host IPs that I have been given by the ISP? Thanks Harish - Original Message - From: Otto Haliburton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:44 AM Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed Remember that Ethernet is a collision based system i.e. the more collisions the less performance. Hence large networks are typically have low performance because of the greater number of collisions. So option 2 would give you better performance because it is broken up into smaller areas hence fewer collisions, also there are fewer route table updates. So while the second is more complicated it is actually a better setup. Token ring would be better for your option 1. Thats my 0.02 cents. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Enroth Björn Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SV: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi, Why complicate things when not needed? The only thing you can gain from separating the clients is less broadcast, and maybe some increased security between the groups of clients. The Linux box would also have more to do in your second option. My suggestion is that you go for option 1. Remember to NOT set any default gw at the internal interface. This could confuse the routing daemon. Regards /Bjorn -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Harish Sabnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 29 september 2003 19:45 Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopia: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ämne: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi Ed, Thank you for taking interest in my queries,I need a suggestion from you on the way I should set up my network,I had posted this mssg on the mailing list but had no response,hence I am mailing this to you,your suggestion will be highly appreciated. Hi All, I have set up a Linux Box with NAT/MASQ, and Squid as an Internet server for my local LAN with one system on a trial basis and I see that the performance has been great.However I am apprehensive about the way the way traffice and loadbalancing will be hadled by Linux box as there will be 50 Machines banging in with requests,hence I have thought of two ways to connect,pls have alook below and pass your valuable comments. I have a 128 Kbps leased line coming thru a router. Option1 50 Windows Cleints with IP Adressese 192.168.0.1-50 GW 192.168.0.100 Linux Server Eth0 with Ip Adress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201 Linux server Eth1 with Ip Address 192.168.0.100 GW 192.168.0.100 so I will use Ip NAT/MASQ techniques where all requests on Eth1 will be forwarded to Eth0. Option 2 3 Sepearte Networks Network 1 Ip addresses 192.168.0.1-15 Network 2 Ip addresses 192.168.1.1-15 Network 3 Ipaddresses 192.168.2.1-20 Linux Server Eth0 with Ipaddress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201 Linux Server Eth1 with Ipaddress 192.168.0.254 GW 212.72.11.89 Eth2 with Ipaddress 192.168.1.254 GW 212.72.11.89 Eth3 with Ipaddress 192.168.2.254 GW 212.72.11.89 In this case I will have to NAT all requests from Eth1,Eth2,Eth3 to Eth0. Router Details Serial IP 212.72.11.202 Mask 255.255.255.252 Network 212.72.11.88 Mask 255.255.255.248 Gatway 212.72.11.201 Host Ips 212.72.11.89 212.72.11.90 212.72.11.91 212.72.11.92 212.72.11.93 212.72.11.94 212.72.11.95 I have abt 6 dedicated host Ips is there a better way I can utilise this,Pls suggest, I dont want to have a dedicated FTP or webserver. Thanks and regards Harish
RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin J. Weiss Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 9:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Otto Haliburton wrote: Again the problem is not the 50 ip addresses, but how they are connected. If they are all in the same area you have the problem of collisions and the problem of increased traffic due to updating the routing tables for all 50 nodes. Where as if you have smaller areas, one computer will be arbitrated as the router in each area and the collisions will be less because of the smaller areas. Having many computers in the same LAN is always a problem with Ethernet. If you have many computers in the same area then token ring is better because of the reduction of the collisions, but token ring does not solve the routing table problem. This is not quite always the case. Ethernet's CSMA/CD (Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection) was invented during a time when a hub or bus were the primary method of connection. Collision was indeed a problem then, and keeping the LAN small was a way to ensure network performance. However, these days, switches are much cheaper and are easily within the reach of most organizations. If your users are hooked up to a switch instead of a hub, you can ignore the collisions problem, as it no longer exists. At that point, the limiting factors are the speed/RAM of the gateway and the speed/RAM of the switch. A good, short explanation can be found at http://www.duxcw.com/faq/network/hubsw.htm Ben Actually CSMA/CD is the problem on a large single area network. I read the article and see the point. Here is the problem. When a node transmits it first listen for no traffic then it tries to transmit, if a collision occurs then it goes into an algorithm to make a attempt again after it selects it's new time slot, well the larger the number of nodes the greater the probability that they will select the same time slot and cause a collision again. Etc. etc Therefore large networks always bottle neck under Ethernet and that is why no company will place a large number of computers in the same area no matter what the transport medium is. There is always a optimum number that should be in an area before it is broken down. That's the theory. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed
Hy Harish, 1. Why NAT and Squid? You should use NAT OR Squid. If you have say a internet cafe where the users will want to use every software that needs every port you should use pure transparent NAT. On the other hand if you want things a little more tightened you should use Squid. 2. On the other hand do you have 3 separate connections to your ISP to create 3 groups? It's a false problem. Maybe you intended to say something else and I couldn't understand. Be more precise. Good luck
RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed
In all Bjorn is probably correct depending on the traffic, but I think he is describing 50 users and not 50 computers, because the problem occurs with the amount of traffic on the network, that is when the collisions will occur. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Enroth Björn Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 9:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed Harish, The Linux box is absolutely able to handle 50 clients. In fact it would have to any way with the second option. I also saw someone pointing out collisions. If a switch is used instead of a hub, there are no collisions at all. You could group your internal users and hide them behind different external addresses. But again Dont complicate things when you dont need to. The amount of simultaneous sessions is more than enough if you hide them all behind one address. Regards /Bjorn -Original Message- From: Harish Sabnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 30 september 2003 10:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi Bjorn, Thanks for ar advice,but you think that it will be able to handle all the requests from 50 odd terminals effictively? Also any suggestion on the additional Host IPs that I have been given by the ISP? Thanks Harish - Original Message - From: Otto Haliburton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:44 AM Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed Remember that Ethernet is a collision based system i.e. the more collisions the less performance. Hence large networks are typically have low performance because of the greater number of collisions. So option 2 would give you better performance because it is broken up into smaller areas hence fewer collisions, also there are fewer route table updates. So while the second is more complicated it is actually a better setup. Token ring would be better for your option 1. Thats my 0.02 cents. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Enroth Björn Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SV: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi, Why complicate things when not needed? The only thing you can gain from separating the clients is less broadcast, and maybe some increased security between the groups of clients. The Linux box would also have more to do in your second option. My suggestion is that you go for option 1. Remember to NOT set any default gw at the internal interface. This could confuse the routing daemon. Regards /Bjorn -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Harish Sabnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 29 september 2003 19:45 Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopia: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ämne: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi Ed, Thank you for taking interest in my queries,I need a suggestion from you on the way I should set up my network,I had posted this mssg on the mailing list but had no response,hence I am mailing this to you,your suggestion will be highly appreciated. Hi All, I have set up a Linux Box with NAT/MASQ, and Squid as an Internet server for my local LAN with one system on a trial basis and I see that the performance has been great.However I am apprehensive about the way the way traffice and loadbalancing will be hadled by Linux box as there will be 50 Machines banging in with requests,hence I have thought of two ways to connect,pls have alook below and pass your valuable comments. I have a 128 Kbps leased line coming thru a router. Option1 50 Windows Cleints with IP Adressese 192.168.0.1-50 GW 192.168.0.100 Linux Server Eth0 with Ip Adress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201 Linux server Eth1 with Ip Address 192.168.0.100 GW 192.168.0.100 so I will use Ip NAT/MASQ techniques where all requests on Eth1 will be forwarded to Eth0. Option 2 3 Sepearte Networks Network 1 Ip addresses 192.168.0.1-15 Network 2 Ip addresses 192.168.1.1-15 Network 3 Ipaddresses 192.168.2.1-20 Linux Server Eth0 with Ipaddress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201 Linux Server Eth1 with Ipaddress 192.168.0.254 GW 212.72.11.89 Eth2 with Ipaddress 192.168.1.254 GW 212.72.11.89 Eth3 with Ipaddress 192.168.2.254 GW 212.72.11.89 In this case I will have to NAT all requests from Eth1,Eth2,Eth3 to Eth0. Router Details Serial IP 212.72.11.202 Mask 255.255.255.252 Network 212.72.11.88 Mask 255.255.255.248 Gatway 212.72.11.201 Host Ips 212.72.11.89 212.72.11.90 212.72.11.91 212.72.11.92 212.72.11.93 212.72.11.94 212.72.11.95 I have abt 6 dedicated host Ips is there a better way I can utilise this,Pls suggest, I dont want to have a dedicated FTP or webserver. Thanks and regards Harish
Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed
Thank you Ben/Bjorn for your responses,well the truth is that I will be swtiching from a Windows Environment, to Linux,my exising server is a PIII with 1GB of RAM. All the 50 Nodes are connected thruthree Cisco 2500 Switches, so colission may as such not arise. The only dillema is that will the Linux Boxable to handle the requests efficeinetly bcos all the 50 Nodes are usually occupied durinng the peak hours.As you might want to know its a Cybercafe that I am owning and intend to do this there,so i thought load balancing will be more effective if I split the networks.Correct me if i am wrong, I dont want complications as well. Thanks Harish - Original Message - From: Enroth Björn To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 8:00 PM Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed Harish, The Linux box is absolutely able to handle 50 clients. In fact it would have to any way with the second option. I also saw someone pointing out collisions. If a switch is used instead of a hub, there are no collisions at all. You could group your internal users and hide them behind different external addresses. But again Dont complicate things when you dont need to. The amount of simultaneous sessions is more than enough if you hide them all behind one address. Regards /Bjorn -Original Message-From: Harish Sabnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 30 september 2003 10:34To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi Bjorn, Thanks for ar advice,but you think that it will be able to handle all the requests from 50 odd terminals effictively? Also any suggestion on the additional Host IPs that I have been given by the ISP? Thanks Harish - Original Message - From: Otto Haliburton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:44 AM Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed Remember that Ethernet is a collision based system i.e. the more collisions the less performance. Hence large networks are typically have low performance because of the greater number of collisions. So option 2 would give you better performance because it is broken up into smaller areas hence fewer collisions, also there are fewer route table updates. So while the second is more complicated it is actually a better setup. Token ring would be better for your option 1. Thats my 0.02 cents. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Enroth BjörnSent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:47 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: SV: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi, Why complicate things when not needed? The only thing you can gain from separating the clients is less broadcast, and maybe some increased security between the groups of clients. The Linux box would also have more to do in your second option. My suggestion is that you go for option 1. Remember to NOT set any default gw at the internal interface. This could confuse the routing daemon. Regards /Bjorn -Ursprungligt meddelande-Från: Harish Sabnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Skickat: den 29 september 2003 19:45Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Kopia: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Ämne: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi Ed, Thank you for taking interest in my queries,I need a suggestion from you on the way I should set up my network,I had posted this mssg on the mailing list but had no response,hence I am mailing this to you,your suggestion will be highly appreciated. Hi All,I have set up a Linux Box with NAT/MASQ, and Squid as an Internet server for my local LAN with one system on a trial basis and I see that the performance has been great.However I am apprehensive about the way the way traffice and loadbalancing will be hadled by Linux box as there will be 50 Machines banging in with requests,hence I have thought of two ways to connect,pls have alook below and pass your valuable comments. I have a 128 Kbps leased line coming thru a router.Option150 Windows Cleints with IP Adressese 192.168.0.1-50 GW 192.168.0.100Linux Server Eth0 with Ip Adress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201Linux server Eth1 with Ip Address 192.168.0.100 GW 192.168.0.100so I will use Ip NAT/MASQ techniques where all requests on Eth1 will be forwarded to Eth0.Option 23 Sepearte Networks Network 1 Ip addresses 192.168.0.1-15Network 2 Ip addresses 192.168.1.1-15Network 3 Ipaddresses 192.168.2.1-20Linux Server
Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed
Hi Well Bjorn is talking about 50 Computers,which is as well as 50 Users at any point of time, as this is an Internet cafe. Harish - Original Message - From: Otto Haliburton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 8:10 PM Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed In all Bjorn is probably correct depending on the traffic, but I think he is describing 50 users and not 50 computers, because the problem occurs with the amount of traffic on the network, that is when the collisions will occur. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Enroth BjörnSent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 9:30 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed Harish, The Linux box is absolutely able to handle 50 clients. In fact it would have to any way with the second option. I also saw someone pointing out collisions. If a switch is used instead of a hub, there are no collisions at all. You could group your internal users and hide them behind different external addresses. But again Dont complicate things when you dont need to. The amount of simultaneous sessions is more than enough if you hide them all behind one address. Regards /Bjorn -Original Message-From: Harish Sabnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 30 september 2003 10:34To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi Bjorn, Thanks for ar advice,but you think that it will be able to handle all the requests from 50 odd terminals effictively? Also any suggestion on the additional Host IPs that I have been given by the ISP? Thanks Harish - Original Message - From: Otto Haliburton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:44 AM Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed Remember that Ethernet is a collision based system i.e. the more collisions the less performance. Hence large networks are typically have low performance because of the greater number of collisions. So option 2 would give you better performance because it is broken up into smaller areas hence fewer collisions, also there are fewer route table updates. So while the second is more complicated it is actually a better setup. Token ring would be better for your option 1. Thats my 0.02 cents. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Enroth BjörnSent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:47 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: SV: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi, Why complicate things when not needed? The only thing you can gain from separating the clients is less broadcast, and maybe some increased security between the groups of clients. The Linux box would also have more to do in your second option. My suggestion is that you go for option 1. Remember to NOT set any default gw at the internal interface. This could confuse the routing daemon. Regards /Bjorn -Ursprungligt meddelande-Från: Harish Sabnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Skickat: den 29 september 2003 19:45Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Kopia: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Ämne: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi Ed, Thank you for taking interest in my queries,I need a suggestion from you on the way I should set up my network,I had posted this mssg on the mailing list but had no response,hence I am mailing this to you,your suggestion will be highly appreciated. Hi All,I have set up a Linux Box with NAT/MASQ, and Squid as an Internet server for my local LAN with one system on a trial basis and I see that the performance has been great.However I am apprehensive about the way the way traffice and loadbalancing will be hadled by Linux box as there will be 50 Machines banging in with requests,hence I have thought of two ways to connect,pls have alook below and pass your valuable comments. I have a 128 Kbps leased line coming thru a router.Option150 Windows Cleints with IP Adressese 192.168.0.1-50 GW 192.168.0.100Linux Server Eth0 with Ip Adress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201Linux server Eth1 with Ip Address 192.168.0.100 GW 192.168.0.100so I will use Ip NAT/MASQ techniques where all requests on Eth1 will be forwarded to Eth0.Option 23 Sepearte Networks Network 1 Ip addresses 192.168.0.1-15Network 2 Ip addresses 192.168.1.1-15Network 3 Ipaddresses 192.168.2.1-20Linux Server Eth0 with Ipaddress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201Linux Server
RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed
Let me butt out cause I was talking about the LAN and I think this discussion is to the interface to the ISP. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harish Sabnani Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 9:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed Thank you Ben/Bjorn for your responses,well the truth is that I will be swtiching from a Windows Environment, to Linux,my exising server is a PIII with 1GB of RAM. All the 50 Nodes are connected thruthree Cisco 2500 Switches, so colission may as such not arise. The only dillema is that will the Linux Boxable to handle the requests efficeinetly bcos all the 50 Nodes are usually occupied durinng the peak hours.As you might want to know its a Cybercafe that I am owning and intend to do this there,so i thought load balancing will be more effective if I split the networks.Correct me if i am wrong, I dont want complications as well. Thanks Harish - Original Message - From: Enroth Björn To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 8:00 PM Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed Harish, The Linux box is absolutely able to handle 50 clients. In fact it would have to any way with the second option. I also saw someone pointing out collisions. If a switch is used instead of a hub, there are no collisions at all. You could group your internal users and hide them behind different external addresses. But again Dont complicate things when you dont need to. The amount of simultaneous sessions is more than enough if you hide them all behind one address. Regards /Bjorn -Original Message- From: Harish Sabnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 30 september 2003 10:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi Bjorn, Thanks for ar advice,but you think that it will be able to handle all the requests from 50 odd terminals effictively? Also any suggestion on the additional Host IPs that I have been given by the ISP? Thanks Harish - Original Message - From: Otto Haliburton To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:44 AM Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed Remember that Ethernet is a collision based system i.e. the more collisions the less performance. Hence large networks are typically have low performance because of the greater number of collisions. So option 2 would give you better performance because it is broken up into smaller areas hence fewer collisions, also there are fewer route table updates. So while the second is more complicated it is actually a better setup. Token ring would be better for your option 1. Thats my 0.02 cents. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Enroth Björn Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SV: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi, Why complicate things when not needed? The only thing you can gain from separating the clients is less broadcast, and maybe some increased security between the groups of clients. The Linux box would also have more to do in your second option. My suggestion is that you go for option 1. Remember to NOT set any default gw at the internal interface. This could confuse the routing daemon. Regards /Bjorn -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Harish Sabnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 29 september 2003 19:45 Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopia: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ämne: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi Ed, Thank you for taking interest in my queries,I need a suggestion from you on the way I should set up my network,I had posted this mssg on the mailing list but had no response,hence I am mailing this to you,your suggestion will be highly appreciated. Hi All, I have set up a Linux Box with NAT/MASQ, and Squid as an Internet server for my local LAN with one system on a trial basis and I see that the performance has been great.However I am apprehensive about the way the way traffice and loadbalancing will be hadled by Linux box as there will be 50 Machines banging in with requests,hence I have thought of two ways to connect,pls have alook below and pass your valuable comments. I have a 128 Kbps leased line coming thru a router. Option1 50 Windows Cleints with IP Adressese 192.168.0.1-50 GW 192.168.0.100 Linux Server Eth0 with Ip Adress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201 Linux server Eth1 with Ip Address 192.168.0.100 GW 192.168.0.100 so I will use Ip NAT/MASQ techniques where all requests on Eth1 will be forwarded to Eth0. Option 2 3 Sepearte Networks Network 1 Ip addresses 192.168.0.1-15 Network 2 Ip addresses 192.168.1.1-15 Network 3 Ipaddresses 192.168.2.1-20 Linux Server Eth0 with Ipaddress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201 Linux Server Eth1 with Ipaddress
Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed- For Mr.Crucificator
Hi Well I thought of squid bcos of caching abilities,I am sure I would not want to tighten anything as all ports will have to be open and hence NAT is very good at that,as I have tried it on my small network (one Linux Box,with one winXP Cleint). The Idea of having three networks is to divide the load on the Network as all requests from 50 Nodes on one networkwill come at Eth1 which will get NATTed thru Eth0(the Public Interfaceor the ISP).By having three networks the load will get dividded between Eth1,Eth2 and Eth3. Is there anything else you need to know from me ?Pls let me Know, I will try to explain. Thanks Harish - Original Message - From: Crucificator To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 8:04 PM Subject: Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hy Harish, 1. Why NAT and Squid? You should use NAT OR Squid. If you have say a internet cafe where the users will want to use every software that needs every port you should use pure transparent NAT. On the other hand if you want things a little more tightened you should use Squid. 2. On the other hand do you have 3 separate connections to your ISP to create 3 groups? It's a false problem. Maybe you intended to say something else and I couldn't understand. Be more precise. Good luck
RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed
This is not quite always the case. Ethernet's CSMA/CD (Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection) was invented during a time when a hub or bus were the primary method of connection. Collision was indeed a problem then, and keeping the LAN small was a way to ensure network performance. However, these days, switches are much cheaper and are easily within the reach of most organizations. If your users are hooked up to a switch instead of a hub, you can ignore the collisions problem, as it no longer exists. At that point, the limiting factors are the speed/RAM of the gateway and the speed/RAM of the switch. A good, short explanation can be found at http://www.duxcw.com/faq/network/hubsw.htm Ben Actually CSMA/CD is the problem on a large single area network. I read the article and see the point. Here is the problem. When a node transmits it first listen for no traffic then it tries to transmit, if a collision occurs then it goes into an algorithm to make a attempt again after it selects it's new time slot, well the larger the number of nodes the greater the probability that they will select the same time slot and cause a collision again. Etc. etc Therefore large networks always bottle neck under Ethernet and that is why no company will place a large number of computers in the same area no matter what the transport medium is. There is always a optimum number that should be in an area before it is broken down. That's the theory. Otto, I'm sorry, but you have absolutely no idea as to how ethernet works in a *switched* environment. You are describing a LAN that is on a hub. In that case, you are correct with all of your above comment. On the other hand, in a situation where all of the hosts are connected to a *switch*, instead of a hub, then each segment consists of exactly two devices: the host and the switch port. In that case, the chance for collision is greatly reduced. The reason for this is simple: If host-a transmits a packet while connected to a hub, then all other hosts connected to that hub will see the packet, whether or not it is intended for them. If host-a transmits a packet while connected to a switch, then something entirely different happens. The switch looks at the packet and decides where it is to go. If it is a multicast or broadcast packet, then most or all of the other hosts on the switch will see it (I won't go into those rules, it's beyond the scope of this particular discussion.) If, on the other hand, it is a *unicast* packet, and the destination host is on the switch, then the switch will only transmit it on the port to which that destination host is connected. If the host is not connected to the switch, then it will send it on it's uplink port, depending upon configuration. Now, what this means is that any host that is connected to a switch will only see broadcast traffic, multicast traffic to which it is subscribed, or unicast traffic that is addressed to it. This sharply decreases the number of packets that the host's ethernet card will see as inbound, which will thereby reduce the number of collisions during transmission and subsequently increase the perceived bandwidth. At that point the bottleneck becomes the switch's backplane capabilities, not collisions. Switched ethernet is vastly superior to ethernet on a hub, and has become very cheap. It is now easily in reach for most organizations, including the home office. Ben -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed
Ben you didn't read my latter email, which I conceded that I was talking something different than what was being presented. You have probably gotten that far now so. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin J. Weiss Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 2:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed This is not quite always the case. Ethernet's CSMA/CD (Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection) was invented during a time when a hub or bus were the primary method of connection. Collision was indeed a problem then, and keeping the LAN small was a way to ensure network performance. However, these days, switches are much cheaper and are easily within the reach of most organizations. If your users are hooked up to a switch instead of a hub, you can ignore the collisions problem, as it no longer exists. At that point, the limiting factors are the speed/RAM of the gateway and the speed/RAM of the switch. A good, short explanation can be found at http://www.duxcw.com/faq/network/hubsw.htm Ben Actually CSMA/CD is the problem on a large single area network. I read the article and see the point. Here is the problem. When a node transmits it first listen for no traffic then it tries to transmit, if a collision occurs then it goes into an algorithm to make a attempt again after it selects it's new time slot, well the larger the number of nodes the greater the probability that they will select the same time slot and cause a collision again. Etc. etc Therefore large networks always bottle neck under Ethernet and that is why no company will place a large number of computers in the same area no matter what the transport medium is. There is always a optimum number that should be in an area before it is broken down. That's the theory. Otto, I'm sorry, but you have absolutely no idea as to how ethernet works in a *switched* environment. You are describing a LAN that is on a hub. In that case, you are correct with all of your above comment. On the other hand, in a situation where all of the hosts are connected to a *switch*, instead of a hub, then each segment consists of exactly two devices: the host and the switch port. In that case, the chance for collision is greatly reduced. The reason for this is simple: If host-a transmits a packet while connected to a hub, then all other hosts connected to that hub will see the packet, whether or not it is intended for them. If host-a transmits a packet while connected to a switch, then something entirely different happens. The switch looks at the packet and decides where it is to go. If it is a multicast or broadcast packet, then most or all of the other hosts on the switch will see it (I won't go into those rules, it's beyond the scope of this particular discussion.) If, on the other hand, it is a *unicast* packet, and the destination host is on the switch, then the switch will only transmit it on the port to which that destination host is connected. If the host is not connected to the switch, then it will send it on it's uplink port, depending upon configuration. Now, what this means is that any host that is connected to a switch will only see broadcast traffic, multicast traffic to which it is subscribed, or unicast traffic that is addressed to it. This sharply decreases the number of packets that the host's ethernet card will see as inbound, which will thereby reduce the number of collisions during transmission and subsequently increase the perceived bandwidth. At that point the bottleneck becomes the switch's backplane capabilities, not collisions. Switched ethernet is vastly superior to ethernet on a hub, and has become very cheap. It is now easily in reach for most organizations, including the home office. Ben -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Setup Opinion Needed- For Mr.Crucificator
Well I thought of squid bcos of caching abilities,I am sure I would not want to tighten anything as all ports will have to be open and hence NAT is very good at that,as I have tried it on my small network (one Linux Box,with one winXP Cleint). The Idea of having three networks is to divide the load on the Network as all requests from 50 Nodes on one network will come at Eth1 which will get NATTed thru Eth0(the Public Interface or the ISP).By having three networks the load will get dividded between Eth1,Eth2 and Eth3. Is there anything else you need to know from me ?Pls let me Know, I will try to explain. squid sounds like a good idea. I'd setup squid with transparent proxying, along with NAT for other traffic. Since your ISP link is 128K, I see no purpose in dividing your lan into multiple segments. The 128K link will be your limiting factor, the 100 mbit lan will always be waiting on that. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network Setup Opinion Needed
Remember that Ethernet is a collision based system i.e. the more collisions the less performance. Hence large networks are typically have low performance because of the greater number of collisions. So option 2 would give you better performance because it is broken up into smaller areas hence fewer collisions, also there are fewer route table updates. So while the second is more complicated it is actually a better setup. Token ring would be better for your option 1. Thats my 0.02 cents. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Enroth Björn Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SV: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi, Why complicate things when not needed? The only thing you can gain from separating the clients is less broadcast, and maybe some increased security between the groups of clients. The Linux box would also have more to do in your second option. My suggestion is that you go for option 1. Remember to NOT set any default gw at the internal interface. This could confuse the routing daemon. Regards /Bjorn -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Harish Sabnani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 29 september 2003 19:45 Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopia: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ämne: Network Setup Opinion Needed Hi Ed, Thank you for taking interest in my queries,I need a suggestion from you on the way I should set up my network,I had posted this mssg on the mailing list but had no response,hence I am mailing this to you,your suggestion will be highly appreciated. Hi All, I have set up a Linux Box with NAT/MASQ, and Squid as an Internet server for my local LAN with one system on a trial basis and I see that the performance has been great.However I am apprehensive about the way the way traffice and loadbalancing will be hadled by Linux box as there will be 50 Machines banging in with requests,hence I have thought of two ways to connect,pls have alook below and pass your valuable comments. I have a 128 Kbps leased line coming thru a router. Option1 50 Windows Cleints with IP Adressese 192.168.0.1-50 GW 192.168.0.100 Linux Server Eth0 with Ip Adress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201 Linux server Eth1 with Ip Address 192.168.0.100 GW 192.168.0.100 so I will use Ip NAT/MASQ techniques where all requests on Eth1 will be forwarded to Eth0. Option 2 3 Sepearte Networks Network 1 Ip addresses 192.168.0.1-15 Network 2 Ip addresses 192.168.1.1-15 Network 3 Ipaddresses 192.168.2.1-20 Linux Server Eth0 with Ipaddress 212.72.11.89 GW 212.72.11.201 Linux Server Eth1 with Ipaddress 192.168.0.254 GW 212.72.11.89 Eth2 with Ipaddress 192.168.1.254 GW 212.72.11.89 Eth3 with Ipaddress 192.168.2.254 GW 212.72.11.89 In this case I will have to NAT all requests from Eth1,Eth2,Eth3 to Eth0. Router Details Serial IP 212.72.11.202 Mask 255.255.255.252 Network 212.72.11.88 Mask 255.255.255.248 Gatway 212.72.11.201 Host Ips 212.72.11.89 212.72.11.90 212.72.11.91 212.72.11.92 212.72.11.93 212.72.11.94 212.72.11.95 I have abt 6 dedicated host Ips is there a better way I can utilise this,Pls suggest, I dont want to have a dedicated FTP or webserver. Thanks and regards Harish
Re: Network intallation bootdisk
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:50:22 -0700 (PDT) truc nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now I want to create a network installation bootdisk to boot from the old computer and get boot.img from other computers through LAN. How do I create the network installation floppy ? Hi Truc, Check out the installation guide for Redhat 8 on their site, it has a section for making network boot disks: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-8.0-Manual/install-guide/s1-steps-install-cdrom.html#S2-STEPS-MAKE-DISKS Essentially what you'll need to do is make a floppy disk using bootnet.img. Cheers, Sean -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: network printer setup
* Marc Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-09-01 17:11]: I've setup a LAN with one computer set up as a file server using NFS and it works fine. An Epson printer is connected to that host computer, and I tried to set it up as a remote printer on another computer. However, on the Queue type tab in printconf-gui the Path: line reads /printers/queue1, which doesn't exist on the host computer. Where can I find out what the path should be set to? Also, what are the actual configuration files involved in this, so I don't have to use the gui? Well, I got no replies so I went ahead and tried it as is and now I can't access my printer at all. all lp-commands give me unable to contact server! Any advice? -- Marc Adler -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: network printer setup
At 11:01 9/4/2003 -1000, you wrote: An Epson printer is connected to that host computer, How? Parallel or USB? Configured how? LPD or CUPS? Give details. I tried to set it up as a remote printer on another computer. How? Details! Also, what are the actual configuration files involved in this, so I don't have to use the gui? Which GUI? Configuration files for which print daemon? DETAILS!!! Marc, I don't know much about printing, but I can DEFINITELY tell you that your question does not present any useful information at all, and nobody has yet perfected telepathy. You are going to have to provide a lot more detail so people can try to help you. Also, get a better subject line! 'Epson printer on CUPS: unable to contact server' is much more descriptive, don't you think? Well, I got no replies In light of my above comments, it's not surprising. Any advice? See above. grin -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Printer set up under RH8
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:11:02PM +0200, Sasa Stupar wrote: Hi! I have setup a server (RH8) with Samba for printer share. With windows machines I can access printer and print without any problem. But from the linux clients (all are RH8) I can't print nothing. I have set up a printer thru gnome and choose UNIX printer (not local). Did I make some configuration mistake or what? I don't have RH8 so can't give you a precise answer, but you want to configure a Networked Windows (SMB) printer, not a UNIX printer. -- Robert C. Paulsen, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Printer set up under RH8
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 09:29:35AM -0500, Robert C. Paulsen Jr. wrote: On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:11:02PM +0200, Sasa Stupar wrote: Hi! I have setup a server (RH8) with Samba for printer share. With windows machines I can access printer and print without any problem. But from the linux clients (all are RH8) I can't print nothing. I have set up a printer thru gnome and choose UNIX printer (not local). Did I make some configuration mistake or what? I don't have RH8 so can't give you a precise answer, but you want to configure a Networked Windows (SMB) printer, not a UNIX printer. Not if you're printing FROM Unix/linux TO unix/linux. You want a Unix/lpd printer. Perhaps you need to check the file /etc/lpd.perms, which controls which lpd services are available and to whom. near the bottom (at least of mine, on RH7.2, using lprng--your mileage WILL vary if you're using CUPS) is this: # allow local job submissions only #REJECT SERVICE=X NOT SERVER The default setting is to have the second of those two lines NOT commented, which prevents remote lpd systems from accessing your lpd subsystem. The change shown here will let ANY remote lpd client talk to your lpd server, which may or may not be what you want. I suggest you read the (voluminous) commentary in /etc/lpd.perms to see how to restrict it to only the subset of clients to which you wish to actually serve printing. Fred -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen. - Jude 1:24,25 (niv) - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Network Printer set up under RH8
fred smith pravi: On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 09:29:35AM -0500, Robert C. Paulsen Jr. wrote: On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:11:02PM +0200, Sasa Stupar wrote: Hi! I have setup a server (RH8) with Samba for printer share. With windows machines I can access printer and print without any problem. But from the linux clients (all are RH8) I can't print nothing. I have set up a printer thru gnome and choose UNIX printer (not local). Did I make some configuration mistake or what? I don't have RH8 so can't give you a precise answer, but you want to configure a Networked Windows (SMB) printer, not a UNIX printer. Not if you're printing FROM Unix/linux TO unix/linux. You want a Unix/lpd printer. Perhaps you need to check the file /etc/lpd.perms, which controls which lpd services are available and to whom. near the bottom (at least of mine, on RH7.2, using lprng--your mileage WILL vary if you're using CUPS) is this: # allow local job submissions only #REJECT SERVICE=X NOT SERVER The default setting is to have the second of those two lines NOT commented, which prevents remote lpd systems from accessing your lpd subsystem. The change shown here will let ANY remote lpd client talk to your lpd server, which may or may not be what you want. I suggest you read the (voluminous) commentary in /etc/lpd.perms to see how to restrict it to only the subset of clients to which you wish to actually serve printing. Fred Yes, I want to print from Linux to Linux. I'll try your suggestion. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network config question
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 17:45, Jay Mallar wrote: I have a networking issue I need some help with. I use 192.168.0.10 to connect via VPN to my office. When I do so, the VPN software automatically excludes my local intranet traffic, so 192.168.0.10 can no longer see my internal network. The rest of my local net is unaffected but can no longer see 192.168.0.10 - and this is my main issue - because 192.168.0.10 is disconnected from the local intranet, the other machines can no longer access my printer. After connectiong to the VPN: # route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 * 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo default namehidden0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 eth0 Therein lies the problem. You've setup your routing so that when the VPN connection is active, all traffic is routed through the VPN, even your local LAN traffic. This is something I routinely run into while setting up IPsec for wireless Windows systems. In my circumstance, I have to do what I refer to as reflection, where I bounce all traffic off the VPN gateway, back into the LAN. All LAN hosts also have a static route pointing LAN traffic through the gateway, rather than delivering on the local segment. Yours should be easier to fix. If possible, change your VPN routing so that only traffic on the far end of the VPN tunnel is routed through your VPN connection. If, for example, the remote network is 10.0.0.0/24, you'll want a static route for that block to head out the VPN gateway. If that doesn't work, you should be able to override your LAN route with a simple static route on this host back to itself. Something like this should work: route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.0.10 If it doesn't work, the reflection trick is still possible, but seems a bit complex for your situation. Please let me know how this works for you. -- Jason Dixon, RHCE DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network config question
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:45:25 -0500 Jay Mallar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jay, I use 192.168.0.10 to connect via VPN to my office. When I do so, the VPN software automatically excludes my local intranet traffic, so 192.168.0.10 can no longer see my internal network. The rest of my local net is unaffected but can no longer see 192.168.0.10 - and this is my main issue - because 192.168.0.10 is disconnected from the local intranet, the other machines can no longer access my printer. Essentially what you are asking, is how to defeat one of the security measures provided by your VPN software. In your particular situation it may not be a very important measure anyway. How you go about doing it will depend on what VPN software you are using, but most (all?) have a way to turn this feature off (unless it is required by policy). Note that I've removed the DNS entry in the default route for security reasons, but it's now pointing to my VPN, not 192.168.0.1. The default route should have no influence on lan access only on your connection to the internet. The restriction is not being enforced by your routing table. Perhaps iptables is being employed, not sure. One interesting thing is that there doesn't appear to be any interface created for the VPN which seems a bit odd. What VPN software are you using? Cheers, Sean -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network config question
On 24 Aug 2003 18:06:43 -0400 Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: default namehidden0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 eth0 Therein lies the problem. You've setup your routing so that when the VPN connection is active, all traffic is routed through the VPN, even Jason, How does the default route affect all traffic? It will only be used when a destination IP does not match the subnet of a local interface. You don't even need a default route for lan access. Cheers, Sean -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network config question
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 18:23, Sean Estabrooks wrote: On 24 Aug 2003 18:06:43 -0400 Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: default namehidden0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 eth0 Therein lies the problem. You've setup your routing so that when the VPN connection is active, all traffic is routed through the VPN, even How does the default route affect all traffic? It will only be used when a destination IP does not match the subnet of a local interface. You don't even need a default route for lan access. Normally it doesn't, Sean. But I bet if he did a capture at the gateway, you'd see it. Without seeing *real* traffic patterns, we're simply guessing. Granted, this is on a Linux system, but I also have my doubts about the data (obfuscation?) that Jay has presented. I wouldn't propose such a thing if I hadn't dealt with it myself on numerous occassions. -- Jason Dixon, RHCE DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network config question
On 24 Aug 2003 18:26:32 -0400 Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi again Jason, On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 18:23, Sean Estabrooks wrote: On 24 Aug 2003 18:06:43 -0400 Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: default namehidden0.0.0.0 UG0 0 0 eth0 Therein lies the problem. You've setup your routing so that when the VPN connection is active, all traffic is routed through the VPN, even How does the default route affect all traffic? It will only be used when a destination IP does not match the subnet of a local interface. You don't even need a default route for lan access. Normally it doesn't, Sean. But I bet if he did a capture at the gateway, you'd see it. Without seeing *real* traffic patterns, we're simply guessing. Granted, this is on a Linux system, but I also have my doubts about the data (obfuscation?) that Jay has presented. Yes, i think it's up to Jay now to add some more information to his description. I wouldn't propose such a thing if I hadn't dealt with it myself on numerous occassions. I'm sure you wouldn't, guess it's just that it is outside of my experience. I'm always happy to learn new things that's why i asked. Will be interesting to see how this problem is resolved. Cheers, Sean -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: network configuration
Try telnet site.name 80 and see if it connects. If not, and you can ping it, it sounds like a firewall blocking port 80 somewhere between you and the site. regards, Willem On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Andre Kirchner wrote: Hi, I have the DNS servers IP correctly configured, and so I can discover the IP address of a site such as www.yahoo.com using nslookup, and can ping it. but somehow I can't open that sire with a browser. Does anyone have any idea about what could be wrong? Thanks a lot, Andre - Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network issues ...
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 16:48, Hugh Taylor wrote: I have two questions 1) I can't seem to get my wireless card working. It's recognized by the system and I can setup the wireless settings, but it won't connect. Any ideas? You really haven't given us enough info to go on. What are your network settings? Infrastructure or adhoc? Is your SSID configured properly? A lof of this depends on which card your working, since the linux-wlan project (for example) has a different setup than some of the others. 2) I'm looking for an easy way to switch network settings, between home hardwired, home wireless, work, etc. I used to use Netenv and wrote some shell scripts that restarted the network, can I do the same with the network switcher app? I'm about to RTFM, but thought I'd ask here anyway. If both networks use DHCP, you shouldn't have to configure anything. For example, my office sends a DHCPOFFER of a 10.109.10.x/24 address with a 10.109.10.1 default gateway. I never have the wireless pcmcia, so it's not an issue there. At home, eth0 isn't plugged in, so I only receive a DHCPOFFER of 192.168.0.0/24 with a 192.168.0.1 default gateway on wlan0. At either time, there's only one interface with carrier signal, so I only accept one network assignment. If you're static on one or the other, it's going to be sticky. You can write a script, but it's going to be a one-off for your particular situation. If you need assistance, you'll need to provide more info. -- Jason Dixon, RHCE DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: network configuration
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 14:08, Andre Kirchner wrote: Hi, I have the DNS servers IP correctly configured, and so I can discover the IP address of a site such as www.yahoo.com using nslookup, and can ping it. but somehow I can't open that sire with a browser. Does anyone have any idea about what could be wrong? Thanks a lot, Andre Have you double-checked your /etc/resolv.conf and your /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0? (That is, if you're accessing the network/internet via your ethernet card...) -- Fri Aug 8 16:55:00 EST 2003 16:55:00 up 4 days, 20:43, 1 user, load average: 1.45, 0.98, 0.76 - |____ |kuhn media australia| | /-oo /| |'-. |http://kma.0catch.com | | .\__/ || | | || | _ / `._ \|_|_.-' |stephen kuhn| | | / \__.`=._) (_ | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - linux user #:267497 linux machine #:194239 * MDK 9.1+ RH 9 Mandrake Linux Kernel 2.4.21-11mdk Cooker for i586 - * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer * Confidence is the feeling you have before you understand the situation. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: network connecting through 56K via linux
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 15:49, Kirby Clements wrote: This is an issue of connections in general, being that I don't even have the firewall turned on yet. The new standalone firewall box I have built is now connecting via PPP with wvdial, a great little tool. The firewall, be it shorewall or if I just decide to use ipchains with lokkit, is off. There will be approximately 25 Windows NT machines behind this linux box, all of them feeding off the PPP connect over a 56K modem. Only one of those NT machines has a static IP address - the rest are all being assigned (by Exchange I guess) 192.168 addresseses. That same NT server machine with a static IP is the mail server, and serves IIS and Exchange, offering UDP connects and so forth internally, while letting the entire network get/send mail. I have assigned the linux firewall a 192.168.0.0 address, being that I don't see that address taken on the network. My issue is that even with the firewall off, I can't get a connection with the other machines. Granted this is a scenario b/c I have been trialing this on my own network first, so I don't take down the actual NT network. I am using the internet services DNS servers, and have assigned a machine of mine a 192.168.0.1 address. The ethernet on the firewall is configured with no gateway since I have read PPP does not need one ( I tried it the other way but still no luck ) and like I stated, the linux box is connecting fine. I just cannot seem to get any of my other machines with 192.168 addresses to connect via their ethernet to the linux box's ethernet, via a dumb hub. I now know I need to masquerade the packets on the network, since they are 192.168 addresses. I have set that up in /etc/sysctl.conf. When I try to connect from a macintosh or windows box, using the linux PPP 56K connect, and using the internet services DNS info, I get nothing. A dig either gives me operation timed out or host is down. So, after 10 gruelling hours last night, I am trying to figure out what to do. I have also gone to the point to put client machines 192.168 addresses and names in the /etc/hosts file of the linux box, thinking that might be the trick. What else I have noticed is that in the linux logs, the dialup company used by the internet service (outsourced dialup service) is assigning random DNS server IP's to the linux box. Is this the issue? I will stop here b/c obviously this is enough info on this issue at the moment. Would purchasing a static IP for the linux box help? What am I not doing? I have now got 24 hours to find out :) Kirby 192.168.0.0 is the network number and cannot be used as an address. you need to use 192.168.0.1 or above. Dan -- Daniel Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: network logon?
It doesn't quite work like that, that I've used. You can mount Windows shares like so: smbmount -rw username=cwiegand,password=whatever //ntserver/share /networkshares/share On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 15:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I recently set up a test box on my network with an NT4 PDC. How do I get RH9 to log into/authenticate with the PDC? -- Chip Wiegand Computer Services Simrad, Inc www.simradusa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. --Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977 (Then why do I have 8? Somebody help me!) -- Michael Gargiullo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Warp Drive Networks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: network logon?
Title: RE: network logon? If what you are trying to do is to use your Windows logon as your logon for your linux computer, go to system settings-Authentication on the RedHat menu. Choose the Authentication tab, Check Enable SMB support. Then press the Configure SMB button and enter the workgroup name and the name of the domain controller. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:23 PM To: Red Hat List Subject: network logon? I recently set up a test box on my network with an NT4 PDC. How do I get RH9 to log into/authenticate with the PDC? -- Chip Wiegand Computer Services Simrad, Inc www.simradusa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. --Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977 (Then why do I have 8? Somebody help me!) -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: network logon?
It should be like this smbmount //192.168.0.X/test /data/dir -o rw,username=tridge,password=foobar Of course the directory /data/dir, or simular mount point, should be created first Test the NT server with smbclient -L NTserver -U validuser You could also edit your /etc/fstab file to make it automagicly mount on boot //192.168.0.X/test /data/dir smbfs rw,username=tridge,password=foobar 0 0 Alternately automagic mount on boot could be obtained by placing the command (smbmount //192.168.0.X/test /data/dir -o rw,username=tridge,password=foobar) directly into /etc/rc.local Regards Stuart Clark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Gargiullo Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2003 5:57 AM To: redhat mailing list Subject: Re: network logon? It doesn't quite work like that, that I've used. You can mount Windows shares like so: smbmount -rw username=cwiegand,password=whatever //ntserver/share /networkshares/share On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 15:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I recently set up a test box on my network with an NT4 PDC. How do I get RH9 to log into/authenticate with the PDC? -- Chip Wiegand Computer Services Simrad, Inc www.simradusa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. --Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977 (Then why do I have 8? Somebody help me!) -- Michael Gargiullo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Warp Drive Networks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: network logon?
Ah good catch. On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 16:32, Stuart Clark wrote: It should be like this smbmount //192.168.0.X/test /data/dir -o rw,username=tridge,password=foobar Of course the directory /data/dir, or simular mount point, should be created first Test the NT server with smbclient -L NTserver -U validuser You could also edit your /etc/fstab file to make it automagicly mount on boot //192.168.0.X/test /data/dir smbfs rw,username=tridge,password=foobar 0 0 Alternately automagic mount on boot could be obtained by placing the command (smbmount //192.168.0.X/test /data/dir -o rw,username=tridge,password=foobar) directly into /etc/rc.local Regards Stuart Clark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Gargiullo Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2003 5:57 AM To: redhat mailing list Subject: Re: network logon? It doesn't quite work like that, that I've used. You can mount Windows shares like so: smbmount -rw username=cwiegand,password=whatever //ntserver/share /networkshares/share On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 15:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I recently set up a test box on my network with an NT4 PDC. How do I get RH9 to log into/authenticate with the PDC? -- Chip Wiegand Computer Services Simrad, Inc www.simradusa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. --Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977 (Then why do I have 8? Somebody help me!) -- Michael Gargiullo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Warp Drive Networks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Michael Gargiullo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Warp Drive Networks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: network logon?
I've done that, but that doesn't provide a 'network login' in the way other windoze machines login. When I try to access a shared directory on a W2K box it asks for name and password and then says I don't have permission, but I do, full control, I'm one of the network admins. There must be a way to make Linux a member of the domain just a any windoze box is a member of the domain. That's the only way this company would even consider switching some workstations from windoze to linux. I'll have to look back at my old FreeBSD notes at home, I had made a FreeBSD box a domain member a few years ago, but don't recall off-hand right now. -- Chip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/22/2003 01:04:19 PM: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If what you are trying to do is to use your Windows = logon as your logon for your linux computer, go to system = settings-Authentication on the RedHat menu. Choose the = Authentication tab, Check Enable SMB support. Then press the Configure = SMB button and enter the workgroup name and the name of the domain = controller. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:23 PM To: Red Hat List Subject: network logon? I recently set up a test box on my network with an = NT4 PDC. How do I get RH9 to log into/authenticate with the PDC? -- Chip Wiegand Computer Services Simrad, Inc www.simradusa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no reason anyone would want a computer = in their home. --Ken Olson, president, = chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977 (Then why do I have 8? Somebody help = me!) -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mai= lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: network logon?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:45 PM said: I've done that, but that doesn't provide a 'network login' in the way other windoze machines login. When I try to access a shared directory on a W2K box it asks for name and password and then says I don't have permission, but I do, full control, I'm one of the network admins. (Maybe you already know this but...) When a computer is outside the domain you have to send the domain information along with the username and password. Best way to do that is like this: domain\username password See if that helps. Chris. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network printer setup with CUPS
Thanks for all the help guys, I found out where the problem was - the Netport Express itself. It has issues. Even though it allows printing from the entire MS Windoze network, it still has problems. The button on the side to print a test page results in no test page, the web interface button to print a test page results in no test page, and making any changes at all in the config from the web interface just locks it up. Even my spare, old Netport Express has the same issues. I replaced it with a spare Lexmark MarkNet box and everything is fine now. -- Chip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/16/2003 07:47:56 PM: On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 17:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the help so far. I have verified that the settings do appear to correct, it just always times out when attempting to print. I have used the web interface to set up the printer, still no good. Copied below is a section of the error_log, with debug turned on. -- Chip = D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob(2, 0x80b6598) D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob() id = 2, file = 0/1 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: Sending job to queue tagged as raw... D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] job-sheets=none,none D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] banner_page = 0 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: argv = Copyroom,2,root,testprint.ps,1,job-sheets=none,none page-bottom=36 cpi=12 lpi=7 scaling=100 page-right=36 page-left=36 wrap page-top=36 job-priority=50 job-hold-until=no-hold,/var/spool/cups/d2-001 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: envp = PATH=/usr/lib/cups/filter:/bin:/usr/bin,SOFTWARE=CUPS/1. 1,USER=root,CHARSET=iso-8859-1,LANG=en_US,,PPD=/etc/cups/ppd/Copyroom. ppd,CUPS_SERVERROOT=/etc/cups,RIP_MAX_CACHE=8m,TMPDIR=/var/spool/cups/tmp,CONTENT_TYPE=application/postscript,DEVICE_URI=,PRINTER=Copyroom,CUPS_DATADIR=/usr/share/cups,CUPS_FONTPATH=/usr/share/cups/fonts,,, D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: statusfds = 5, 6 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: filterfds[1] = 7, -1 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: backend = /usr/lib/cups/backend/ D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: filterfds[0] = -1, 8 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] start_process(/usr/lib/cups/backend/, 0xbfff9cc0, 0xbfff9170, 7, 8, 6) E [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] PID 14128 stopped with status 22! I [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] Started backend /usr/lib/cups/backend/ (PID -14128) for job 2. D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] [Job 2] /usr/lib/cups/backend/: No such file or directory D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] UpdateJob: job 2, file 0 is complete. D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StopJob: id = 2, force = 0 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StopJob: printer state is 5 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] AcceptClient() 5 from localhost:631. D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] ReadClient() 5 POST / HTTP/1.1 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] ProcessIPPRequest: 5 status_code=1 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] CloseClient() 5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/16/2003 12:12:44 PM: Yeah look in the /etc/cups/printers.conf DeviceURI socket://192.168.1.226:9100/ That's the URI for jetdirect card you should see something like that. Or try http://127.0.0.1:631 from your web browser should bring up the web interface for CUPS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network printer setup with CUPS I don't know what you mean by the right backend or the web front end to CUPS. I am using the RedHat printer configuration gui from the GNOME menu. Apparently there is more than this gui available. I do have it set up with the ip address and port 9100 though. -- Chip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/16/2003 08:31:14 AM: Did you try xx.xx.xx.xx:9100 That would be the jetdirect port. Then you need to let CUPS know the right backend to use. If you use the web front end to CUPS it's real easy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network printer setup with CUPS I have set up several printers for a RH9 box, all network printers (shared Windoze printers), but am having trouble printing to a HP Lazerjet 5Si on an Intel NetportExpress Pro. I point to the ip address of the box, but the print queue just shows unable to print, will retry in 15 seconds, and it never prints. Is it even possible to get RH9 to print to this quite old Intel print server box? -- Chip Wiegand Computer Services Simrad, Inc www.simradusa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chip, I use an Intel NetportExpress 10/100
RE: Network printer setup with CUPS
I recently set up a RedHat 9 box to test on our network and yesterday resolved a printing issue. Now today I am trying to install the rdesktop software but running up against a wall. First, the machine was set up using the default option for Personal Desktop. Okay, here's what I'm doing - Open Package Management gui from the menu. Select Development Tools and find GCC is selected by default, press the Update button Packages Not Found - krb5-libs and openssl Search around and find krb5-server in the Network servers tab (cannot find krb5-libs anywhere). Select krb5-server and select update Packages Not Found - krb5-libs, make, openssl, gettext, binutils Quit What's up with that? I thought Package Management meant it would find the dependencies and install them as needed, but apparently it doesn't. And where are the dependencies? Why can't can't it handle this by itself? (I'm new to linux, but have been using FreeBSD for about 4 years now, the FreeBSD ports system installs all dependencies on its own as needed) Mostly - What do I do now? Thanks, -- Chip Wiegand Computer Services Simrad, Inc www.simradusa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. --Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977 (Then why do I have 8? Somebody help me!) -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network printer setup with CUPS
Did you try xx.xx.xx.xx:9100 That would be the jetdirect port. Then you need to let CUPS know the right backend to use. If you use the web front end to CUPS it's real easy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network printer setup with CUPS I have set up several printers for a RH9 box, all network printers (shared Windoze printers), but am having trouble printing to a HP Lazerjet 5Si on an Intel NetportExpress Pro. I point to the ip address of the box, but the print queue just shows unable to print, will retry in 15 seconds, and it never prints. Is it even possible to get RH9 to print to this quite old Intel print server box? -- Chip Wiegand Computer Services Simrad, Inc www.simradusa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. --Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977 (Then why do I have 8? Somebody help me!) -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network printer setup with CUPS
I don't know what you mean by the right backend or the web front end to CUPS. I am using the RedHat printer configuration gui from the GNOME menu. Apparently there is more than this gui available. I do have it set up with the ip address and port 9100 though. -- Chip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/16/2003 08:31:14 AM: Did you try xx.xx.xx.xx:9100 That would be the jetdirect port. Then you need to let CUPS know the right backend to use. If you use the web front end to CUPS it's real easy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network printer setup with CUPS I have set up several printers for a RH9 box, all network printers (shared Windoze printers), but am having trouble printing to a HP Lazerjet 5Si on an Intel NetportExpress Pro. I point to the ip address of the box, but the print queue just shows unable to print, will retry in 15 seconds, and it never prints. Is it even possible to get RH9 to print to this quite old Intel print server box? -- Chip Wiegand Computer Services Simrad, Inc www.simradusa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. --Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977 (Then why do I have 8? Somebody help me!) -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network printer setup with CUPS
Yeah look in the /etc/cups/printers.conf DeviceURI socket://192.168.1.226:9100/ That's the URI for jetdirect card you should see something like that. Or try http://127.0.0.1:631 from your web browser should bring up the web interface for CUPS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network printer setup with CUPS I don't know what you mean by the right backend or the web front end to CUPS. I am using the RedHat printer configuration gui from the GNOME menu. Apparently there is more than this gui available. I do have it set up with the ip address and port 9100 though. -- Chip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/16/2003 08:31:14 AM: Did you try xx.xx.xx.xx:9100 That would be the jetdirect port. Then you need to let CUPS know the right backend to use. If you use the web front end to CUPS it's real easy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network printer setup with CUPS I have set up several printers for a RH9 box, all network printers (shared Windoze printers), but am having trouble printing to a HP Lazerjet 5Si on an Intel NetportExpress Pro. I point to the ip address of the box, but the print queue just shows unable to print, will retry in 15 seconds, and it never prints. Is it even possible to get RH9 to print to this quite old Intel print server box? -- Chip Wiegand Computer Services Simrad, Inc www.simradusa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. --Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977 (Then why do I have 8? Somebody help me!) -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network printer setup with CUPS
Thanks for the help so far. I have verified that the settings do appear to correct, it just always times out when attempting to print. I have used the web interface to set up the printer, still no good. Copied below is a section of the error_log, with debug turned on. -- Chip = D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob(2, 0x80b6598) D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob() id = 2, file = 0/1 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: Sending job to queue tagged as raw... D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] job-sheets=none,none D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] banner_page = 0 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: argv = Copyroom,2,root,testprint.ps,1,job-sheets=none,none page-bottom=36 cpi=12 lpi=7 scaling=100 page-right=36 page-left=36 wrap page-top=36 job-priority=50 job-hold-until=no-hold,/var/spool/cups/d2-001 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: envp = PATH=/usr/lib/cups/filter:/bin:/usr/bin,SOFTWARE=CUPS/1.1,USER=root,CHARSET=iso-8859-1,LANG=en_US,,PPD=/etc/cups/ppd/Copyroom.ppd,CUPS_SERVERROOT=/etc/cups,RIP_MAX_CACHE=8m,TMPDIR=/var/spool/cups/tmp,CONTENT_TYPE=application/postscript,DEVICE_URI=,PRINTER=Copyroom,CUPS_DATADIR=/usr/share/cups,CUPS_FONTPATH=/usr/share/cups/fonts,,, D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: statusfds = 5, 6 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: filterfds[1] = 7, -1 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: backend = /usr/lib/cups/backend/ D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: filterfds[0] = -1, 8 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] start_process(/usr/lib/cups/backend/, 0xbfff9cc0, 0xbfff9170, 7, 8, 6) E [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] PID 14128 stopped with status 22! I [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] Started backend /usr/lib/cups/backend/ (PID -14128) for job 2. D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] [Job 2] /usr/lib/cups/backend/: No such file or directory D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] UpdateJob: job 2, file 0 is complete. D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StopJob: id = 2, force = 0 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StopJob: printer state is 5 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] AcceptClient() 5 from localhost:631. D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] ReadClient() 5 POST / HTTP/1.1 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] ProcessIPPRequest: 5 status_code=1 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] CloseClient() 5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/16/2003 12:12:44 PM: Yeah look in the /etc/cups/printers.conf DeviceURI socket://192.168.1.226:9100/ That's the URI for jetdirect card you should see something like that. Or try http://127.0.0.1:631 from your web browser should bring up the web interface for CUPS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network printer setup with CUPS I don't know what you mean by the right backend or the web front end to CUPS. I am using the RedHat printer configuration gui from the GNOME menu. Apparently there is more than this gui available. I do have it set up with the ip address and port 9100 though. -- Chip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/16/2003 08:31:14 AM: Did you try xx.xx.xx.xx:9100 That would be the jetdirect port. Then you need to let CUPS know the right backend to use. If you use the web front end to CUPS it's real easy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network printer setup with CUPS I have set up several printers for a RH9 box, all network printers (shared Windoze printers), but am having trouble printing to a HP Lazerjet 5Si on an Intel NetportExpress Pro. I point to the ip address of the box, but the print queue just shows unable to print, will retry in 15 seconds, and it never prints. Is it even possible to get RH9 to print to this quite old Intel print server box? -- Chip Wiegand Computer Services Simrad, Inc www.simradusa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. --Ken Olson, president, chairman and founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, 1977 (Then why do I have 8? Somebody help me!) -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network printer setup with CUPS
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have set up several printers for a RH9 box, all network printers (shared Windoze printers), but am having trouble printing to a HP Lazerjet 5Si on an Intel NetportExpress Pro. I point to the ip address of the box, but the print queue just shows unable to print, will retry in 15 seconds, and it never prints. Is it even possible to get RH9 to print to this quite old Intel print server box? Yeah it's possible. First make sure you have the correct drivers on your Linux box. My feeling is that you're having some problems with your Samba configuration if it tells you retry in 15 seconds over a network. Check your /etc/samba/smb.conf and make sure it's correct. Issue the command testparm and see if you have no errors! If you can't solve your problem, post your problem on www.cups.org general newsgroups. Here is not the right place for CUPS prolems. :-) You'll get an answer much faster if you post on the CUPS newsgroup. -- Didier PhD student Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS) 5 Research Link, Singapore 117603 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://ssls.nus.edu.sg -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network printer setup with CUPS
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 17:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the help so far. I have verified that the settings do appear to correct, it just always times out when attempting to print. I have used the web interface to set up the printer, still no good. Copied below is a section of the error_log, with debug turned on. -- Chip = D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob(2, 0x80b6598) D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob() id = 2, file = 0/1 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: Sending job to queue tagged as raw... D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] job-sheets=none,none D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] banner_page = 0 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: argv = Copyroom,2,root,testprint.ps,1,job-sheets=none,none page-bottom=36 cpi=12 lpi=7 scaling=100 page-right=36 page-left=36 wrap page-top=36 job-priority=50 job-hold-until=no-hold,/var/spool/cups/d2-001 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: envp = PATH=/usr/lib/cups/filter:/bin:/usr/bin,SOFTWARE=CUPS/1.1,USER=root,CHARSET=iso-8859-1,LANG=en_US,,PPD=/etc/cups/ppd/Copyroom.ppd,CUPS_SERVERROOT=/etc/cups,RIP_MAX_CACHE=8m,TMPDIR=/var/spool/cups/tmp,CONTENT_TYPE=application/postscript,DEVICE_URI=,PRINTER=Copyroom,CUPS_DATADIR=/usr/share/cups,CUPS_FONTPATH=/usr/share/cups/fonts,,, D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: statusfds = 5, 6 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: filterfds[1] = 7, -1 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: backend = /usr/lib/cups/backend/ D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StartJob: filterfds[0] = -1, 8 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] start_process(/usr/lib/cups/backend/, 0xbfff9cc0, 0xbfff9170, 7, 8, 6) E [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] PID 14128 stopped with status 22! I [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] Started backend /usr/lib/cups/backend/ (PID -14128) for job 2. D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] [Job 2] /usr/lib/cups/backend/: No such file or directory D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] UpdateJob: job 2, file 0 is complete. D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StopJob: id = 2, force = 0 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] StopJob: printer state is 5 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] AcceptClient() 5 from localhost:631. D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] ReadClient() 5 POST / HTTP/1.1 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] ProcessIPPRequest: 5 status_code=1 D [16/Jul/2003:13:42:34 -0700] CloseClient() 5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/16/2003 12:12:44 PM: Yeah look in the /etc/cups/printers.conf DeviceURI socket://192.168.1.226:9100/ That's the URI for jetdirect card you should see something like that. Or try http://127.0.0.1:631 from your web browser should bring up the web interface for CUPS -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network printer setup with CUPS I don't know what you mean by the right backend or the web front end to CUPS. I am using the RedHat printer configuration gui from the GNOME menu. Apparently there is more than this gui available. I do have it set up with the ip address and port 9100 though. -- Chip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/16/2003 08:31:14 AM: Did you try xx.xx.xx.xx:9100 That would be the jetdirect port. Then you need to let CUPS know the right backend to use. If you use the web front end to CUPS it's real easy. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network printer setup with CUPS I have set up several printers for a RH9 box, all network printers (shared Windoze printers), but am having trouble printing to a HP Lazerjet 5Si on an Intel NetportExpress Pro. I point to the ip address of the box, but the print queue just shows unable to print, will retry in 15 seconds, and it never prints. Is it even possible to get RH9 to print to this quite old Intel print server box? -- Chip Wiegand Computer Services Simrad, Inc www.simradusa.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chip, I use an Intel NetportExpress 10/100 Print Server, probably an older/lower model than yours. It was very easy to set up in Linux once I got the hang of it. I will give you my set-up and maybe it will give you some insight on what you would need to do for yours My particular model has two parallel ports and one serial port (which I haven't had an occasion to use as yet.) The printer server was given the name print by the previous owner, so I left it that way. The name is not necessary, as you could use the IP address given to the device through static or DHCP. I prefer to have this addressed statically so as not to have to concern myself with IP conflicts, and using the name has always given me the choice of changing the server's IP address without having to alter all my hosts
RE: Network speed
Bret Hughes mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 11:08, Chris W. Parker wrote: jeff allen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can bring the man pages up on traceroute but it comes up with the error command not found. That's because the path that leads to traceroute is not a part of a regular user's environment. You have to specifically call it. Use 'locate traceroute' to find out where it is. As well I can ping web pages like google but I can't do it to our intranet. This web page is inside of our network. This is what I am typing: ping http://monolith/front_page/MFW_index/htm Am I missing something here? Yes you are. You (not you specifically, but people in general) don't ping webpages, you ping DNS records. Well, not exactly ping is a program that sends an ICMP message (echo request) to a machine. as with most (all?) tcp/ip networking programs if the host given as an argument is not recognized as an ip address, a call to a name resolution routines like gethostbyname() is made to map a host name to an ip address. This is where DNS comes in. a typical linux host configuration will look in the file /etc/hosts an if not found will ask the dns server defined in /etc/resolv.conf for the ipaddress of the hostname. It can take a while for the name resolution to time out. Try 'ping monolith' or 'ping http://monolith' and see what you get. I've never seen an http address without a top level domain (i.e. .com, .net, .org, etc.) so I'd be surprised if either of those worked. I agree, that pinging monolith will let you know if the name resolution is working. I would compare the /etc/hosts and /etc/resolv.conf files between the working and not working machines. Bret -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network speed
Bret Hughes mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes you are. You (not you specifically, but people in general) don't ping webpages, you ping DNS records. Well, not exactly ping is a program that sends an ICMP message (echo request) to a machine. as with most (all?) tcp/ip networking programs if the host given as an argument is not recognized as an ip address, a call to a name resolution routines like gethostbyname() is made to map a host name to an ip address. Don't confuse the guy. If he doesn't know how to use ping correctly I don't think he's going to understand what you just said. The bottom line is that you can't/don't ping URLs, you ping host records/DNS entries, and IP addresses. Is this incorrect? chris. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network speed
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 11:08, Chris W. Parker wrote: jeff allen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can bring the man pages up on traceroute but it comes up with the error command not found. That's because the path that leads to traceroute is not a part of a regular user's environment. You have to specifically call it. Use 'locate traceroute' to find out where it is. As well I can ping web pages like google but I can't do it to our intranet. This web page is inside of our network. This is what I am typing: ping http://monolith/front_page/MFW_index/htm Am I missing something here? Yes you are. You (not you specifically, but people in general) don't ping webpages, you ping DNS records. Well, not exactly ping is a program that sends an ICMP message (echo request) to a machine. as with most (all?) tcp/ip networking programs if the host given as an argument is not recognized as an ip address, a call to a name resolution routines like gethostbyname() is made to map a host name to an ip address. This is where DNS comes in. a typical linux host configuration will look in the file /etc/hosts an if not found will ask the dns server defined in /etc/resolv.conf for the ipaddress of the hostname. It can take a while for the name resolution to time out. Try 'ping monolith' or 'ping http://monolith' and see what you get. I've never seen an http address without a top level domain (i.e. .com, .net, .org, etc.) so I'd be surprised if either of those worked. I agree, that pinging monolith will let you know if the name resolution is working. I would compare the /etc/hosts and /etc/resolv.conf files between the working and not working machines. Bret -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network bandwitdth
On Tue Jun 10 2003 at 08:17, Steve Dixon wrote: I have a quick question that I havent been able to figure out. We are on a fiber connection to the internet which gives us about 3Mbps. We have a windows 2000 server that has been used as a gateway and is able to take full use of the bandwidth. When I try to use a redhat 9 box with masquerading my bandwidth maxes out at about 1.5. Is there a limitation or something that im seeing or some setting that can be changed? I'm not aware of specifically what drivers you are using for your fiber interface, but to help indentify what they could be, lsmod will give you a list of the loaded driver modules. Using modinfo module_name will give you the parameters (if any) that can be given to the module with modprobe at load time to fine-tune its behaviour (eg, with an options line in /etc/modules.conf). However I often find that I need to go to the kernel's docs and/or a module's source code to discover exactly what some of these options actually do, and often you'll find more pointers there to other useful docs. To test any options added to modules.conf, simply bring down your interface, make sure that the relevant driver modules are unloaded, then bring the interface back up again (with the drivers reloaded using the new options). No need to reboot (but doing that is often a good acid test for configuration stability through reboots). Bandwidth usage itself can be highly tuned in the kernel with the /sbin/tc (traffic control) command (which comes with /sbin/ip), but one would normally expect that by default there would be full usage of all available bandwidth on any particular interface (on a fifo basis). If you are interested in this sort of thing, see: Linux Advanced Routing Traffic Control HOWTO http://lartc.org/howto/ Bandwidth Limiting HOWTO http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Bandwidth-Limiting-HOWTO/index.html CBQ-based Traffic Control GUI http://users.skynet.be/am032016/ iproute2+tc notes http://snafu.freedom.org/linux2.2/iproute-notes.html The Linux traffic shaper (modinfo shaper) http://lwn.net/1998/1119/shaper.html Hope this helps to point you in the right direction. Steve Dixon BTW, I wonder how long it will be before many of us have fiber into our houses... :) Cheers Tony ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
RE: Network bandwitdth
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Steve Dixon wrote: at the reference guide there aren't any parameters that I can pass the card with /etc/modules.conf. Can someone from redhat confirm this? Please use mii-tool to see if the lan card negociaded properly the speed and duplex with the other equipment. Also try to ping your default gateway to be sure that there are no packet loss between you and your internet service provider. -- Tarhon-Onu Victor Area Technical Coordinator RDS Iasi - Network Operations Center http://www.rdsnet.ro, http://www.rdstel.ro Phone: +40-232-218385; Fax: +40-232-260099 .. Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such a case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
RE: Network speed
jeff allen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can bring the man pages up on traceroute but it comes up with the error command not found. That's because the path that leads to traceroute is not a part of a regular user's environment. You have to specifically call it. Use 'locate traceroute' to find out where it is. As well I can ping web pages like google but I can't do it to our intranet. This web page is inside of our network. This is what I am typing: ping http://monolith/front_page/MFW_index/htm Am I missing something here? Yes you are. You (not you specifically, but people in general) don't ping webpages, you ping DNS records. Try 'ping monolith' or 'ping http://monolith' and see what you get. I've never seen an http address without a top level domain (i.e. .com, .net, .org, etc.) so I'd be surprised if either of those worked. Chris. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network speed
jeff allen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have 22 workstations that have all the same hardware and software. Some machines are running great. They are pulling our intranet up quickly and then I have other machines that are taking forever to pull the page up. The page isn't flash based at all so I am thinking this is more of a networking issue. The NIC's ar running 100 full duplex. Can someone point me in the right direction to see why these machines are having issues. Try 'traceroute address' and see if some of the computers are having a hard time resolving the ip address. Sounds like a DNS issue. Also, did you try using other browsers for the off chance it's something related to the browser? Chris. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network speed
I can bring the man pages up on traceroute but it comes up with the error command not found. As well I can ping web pages like google but I can't do it to our intranet. This web page is inside of our network. This is what I am typing: ping http://monolith/front_page/MFW_index/htm Am I missing something here? From: Chris W. Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network speed Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:43:30 -0700 jeff allen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have 22 workstations that have all the same hardware and software. Some machines are running great. They are pulling our intranet up quickly and then I have other machines that are taking forever to pull the page up. The page isn't flash based at all so I am thinking this is more of a networking issue. The NIC's ar running 100 full duplex. Can someone point me in the right direction to see why these machines are having issues. Try 'traceroute address' and see if some of the computers are having a hard time resolving the ip address. Sounds like a DNS issue. Also, did you try using other browsers for the off chance it's something related to the browser? Chris. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list _ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Programming on RH8
Chen Shi-Ping wrote: I did download the source code from his (new) site, and that is what I have compiling error. I can't find anything about updated versions of the code (or for Linux). Please post the compiler output here and we can take a look. Bart -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Programming on RH8
Hi Fred,
Thanks for your information. First of all, I will read the APUE book.
If I can not figure out the problem. I will post another simple program.
Shi-Ping
On Fri, 30 May 2003, fred smith wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 09:19:56AM -0400, Chen Shi-Ping wrote:
Hi Fred,
Thanks for your email.
:^)
See below
On Fri, 30 May 2003, fred smith wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:10:56PM -0400, Chen Shi-Ping wrote:
Hi,
I am running RH8. Recently, I downloaded the source code of examples from
the book (UNIX Network Programming, Volume 2, Second Edition, Interprocess
Communications) by W. Richard Stevens. I followed README's procedures to
Mr. stevens is now, sad to say, deceased. However, his web site still
runs (last I noticed) so you may be able to find Linux-compatible
versions of his programs on that site (I haven't looked there for stuff
from the book you have, but I know for his APUE there are updated versions
of the code.).
I did download the source code from his (new) site, and
that is what I have compiling error. I can't find anything
about updated versions of the code (or for Linux).
Do you know exactly where I can locate it?
no, sorry, I don't. I was merely referring you to the web site on the
assumption that there may be linux-ized code there. The APU code has
been linuxized and that code is to be found there.
I've not tried that code, and I'm still on RH72, so I probably can't
give details. However, if you post (to, e.g., RH mailing list) some
terse examples (5-10 lines) of code that gives errors, perhaps someone
can offer some useful advice.
Also, what do you mean by 'his APUE'?
APUE is his book Advanced Programming in the Unix Environment, an
EXCELLENT book, though now getting kinda out of date. Nevertheless, it
gives excellent discussions of many/all aspects of Unix programming, so
that even if some of the programming examples are growing out of date
as Unix changes, it is still a great book.
Thanks!
Shi-Ping
configure and build the basic library as follows:
$./configure
$cd lib
$make
There seems no problem when I invoked ./configure and make commands.
However, I got syntax error when I tried the following:
$cd ../pipe
$make pipeconf
Some function calls have failed. If you know how to get these examples
working (under RH8), please let me know. Thank you very much.
Shi-Ping
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
--
Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father,
Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government there will be no end. He
will reign on David's throne and over his kingdom, establishing and upholding
it with justice and righteousness from that time on and forever.
--- Isaiah 9:7 (niv) --
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
--
Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
But God demonstrates his own love for us in this:
While we were still sinners,
Christ died for us.
--- Romans 5:8 (niv) --
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Programming on RH8
Hi Fred, Thanks for your email. On Fri, 30 May 2003, fred smith wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:10:56PM -0400, Chen Shi-Ping wrote: Hi, I am running RH8. Recently, I downloaded the source code of examples from the book (UNIX Network Programming, Volume 2, Second Edition, Interprocess Communications) by W. Richard Stevens. I followed README's procedures to Mr. stevens is now, sad to say, deceased. However, his web site still runs (last I noticed) so you may be able to find Linux-compatible versions of his programs on that site (I haven't looked there for stuff from the book you have, but I know for his APUE there are updated versions of the code.). I did download the source code from his (new) site, and that is what I have compiling error. I can't find anything about updated versions of the code (or for Linux). Do you know exactly where I can locate it? Also, what do you mean by 'his APUE'? Thanks! Shi-Ping configure and build the basic library as follows: $./configure $cd lib $make There seems no problem when I invoked ./configure and make commands. However, I got syntax error when I tried the following: $cd ../pipe $make pipeconf Some function calls have failed. If you know how to get these examples working (under RH8), please let me know. Thank you very much. Shi-Ping -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government there will be no end. He will reign on David's throne and over his kingdom, establishing and upholding it with justice and righteousness from that time on and forever. --- Isaiah 9:7 (niv) -- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Programming on RH8
On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 09:19:56AM -0400, Chen Shi-Ping wrote: Hi Fred, Thanks for your email. :^) See below On Fri, 30 May 2003, fred smith wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:10:56PM -0400, Chen Shi-Ping wrote: Hi, I am running RH8. Recently, I downloaded the source code of examples from the book (UNIX Network Programming, Volume 2, Second Edition, Interprocess Communications) by W. Richard Stevens. I followed README's procedures to Mr. stevens is now, sad to say, deceased. However, his web site still runs (last I noticed) so you may be able to find Linux-compatible versions of his programs on that site (I haven't looked there for stuff from the book you have, but I know for his APUE there are updated versions of the code.). I did download the source code from his (new) site, and that is what I have compiling error. I can't find anything about updated versions of the code (or for Linux). Do you know exactly where I can locate it? no, sorry, I don't. I was merely referring you to the web site on the assumption that there may be linux-ized code there. The APU code has been linuxized and that code is to be found there. I've not tried that code, and I'm still on RH72, so I probably can't give details. However, if you post (to, e.g., RH mailing list) some terse examples (5-10 lines) of code that gives errors, perhaps someone can offer some useful advice. Also, what do you mean by 'his APUE'? APUE is his book Advanced Programming in the Unix Environment, an EXCELLENT book, though now getting kinda out of date. Nevertheless, it gives excellent discussions of many/all aspects of Unix programming, so that even if some of the programming examples are growing out of date as Unix changes, it is still a great book. Thanks! Shi-Ping configure and build the basic library as follows: $./configure $cd lib $make There seems no problem when I invoked ./configure and make commands. However, I got syntax error when I tried the following: $cd ../pipe $make pipeconf Some function calls have failed. If you know how to get these examples working (under RH8), please let me know. Thank you very much. Shi-Ping -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government there will be no end. He will reign on David's throne and over his kingdom, establishing and upholding it with justice and righteousness from that time on and forever. --- Isaiah 9:7 (niv) -- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. --- Romans 5:8 (niv) -- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Programming on RH8
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:10:56PM -0400, Chen Shi-Ping wrote: Hi, I am running RH8. Recently, I downloaded the source code of examples from the book (UNIX Network Programming, Volume 2, Second Edition, Interprocess Communications) by W. Richard Stevens. I followed README's procedures to Mr. stevens is now, sad to say, deceased. However, his web site still runs (last I noticed) so you may be able to find Linux-compatible versions of his programs on that site (I haven't looked there for stuff from the book you have, but I know for his APUE there are updated versions of the code.). configure and build the basic library as follows: $./configure $cd lib $make There seems no problem when I invoked ./configure and make commands. However, I got syntax error when I tried the following: $cd ../pipe $make pipeconf Some function calls have failed. If you know how to get these examples working (under RH8), please let me know. Thank you very much. Shi-Ping -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- Fred Smith -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government there will be no end. He will reign on David's throne and over his kingdom, establishing and upholding it with justice and righteousness from that time on and forever. --- Isaiah 9:7 (niv) -- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network equipment monitoring tool
Sudhakar list wrote: Hi, I'd appreciate if anyone on the list can help me with information of a Linux tool for monitoring( CPU , Throughput, Memory) network equiment like Cisco routers and switches. Thanks, Sudhakar check out ntop or nagios - www.ntop.org www.nagios.org (FKA: netsaint) -- gyoo [at] attbi [dot] com -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iQCUAwUBPhxERRxoVYCzmrKXAQJK5gP3Y7CTsFyKpEz2p5W4GWI9+qSm+kWfdJ0R xNlma0Ma9rAL/OBJcZMo5IXyXas+3Edogbv4Al6dIf8lot1WS0Iaxxl/cg2f7gf+ otf7LfNpZDE/6OzR7A1qN6baPMLSjGzywwQWMfSVuWWb6kGQxMsA13Kn68G7Ozxs 5CODZqUPyg== =AolA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network equipment monitoring tool
MRTG? - Original Message - From: Gene Yoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 08:47 Subject: Re: Network equipment monitoring tool Sudhakar list wrote: Hi, I'd appreciate if anyone on the list can help me with information of a Linux tool for monitoring( CPU , Throughput, Memory) network equiment like Cisco routers and switches. Thanks, Sudhakar check out ntop or nagios - www.ntop.org www.nagios.org (FKA: netsaint) -- gyoo [at] attbi [dot] com -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iQCUAwUBPhxERRxoVYCzmrKXAQJK5gP3Y7CTsFyKpEz2p5W4GWI9+qSm+kWfdJ0R xNlma0Ma9rAL/OBJcZMo5IXyXas+3Edogbv4Al6dIf8lot1WS0Iaxxl/cg2f7gf+ otf7LfNpZDE/6OzR7A1qN6baPMLSjGzywwQWMfSVuWWb6kGQxMsA13Kn68G7Ozxs 5CODZqUPyg== =AolA -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network equipment monitoring tool
http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/ mrtg If you like snmp MRTG and RRDTool kick ass. I am monitoring everything here with mrtg. we have written a bunch of custom SNMP stuff to monitor specific time trendy data as well. If you are freindly with perl them mrtg is hyper extendable. Back when I started here, they had 50+ servers and a pile of cisco gear and no way of knowing what the hell is going on. Now if we want to know how busy the fans are on a box we go look at its graphs. David Busby wrote: MRTG? -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
re: Network Confituration text tools
I'm looking for a program which permit to configure the network using a terminal (not GUI). I tried linuxconf, but when I want to configure many aliases I have an error when I want to activate them. Here are my config files: [triton]:/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts# cat ifcfg-eth0:1 IPADDR=232.121.222.203-235 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 redhat 8 requires a line DEVICE=... to configure IP aliases. This was added in newer linuxconf. Upgrade linuxconf from www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/download.hc. - Jacques Gelinas [EMAIL PROTECTED] vserver: run general purpose virtual servers on one box, full speed! http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network Confituration text tools
netconfig will do eth0 by default netconfig --device=eth1 will do eth1 and so on On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 10:04, Yanick Quirion wrote: Hi all, I'm looking for a program which permit to configure the network using a terminal (not GUI). I tried linuxconf, but when I want to configure many aliases I have an error when I want to activate them. Here are my config files: [triton]:/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts# cat ifcfg-eth0:1 IPADDR=232.121.222.203-235 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 [triton]:/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts# cat ifcfg-eth0:0 IPADDR=232.121.222.200-201 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 This configuration works fine in RH 7.1 but in 8.0 it's not working. What is the best way to create a lot of aliases like I want to do (from 203 to 235). Thanks for your help Regards, -Yanick _ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 -- Richie Crews Unix Administrator / Internet Integrator RedHat Certified Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: (706) 773 - 3436 Desk: (706) 634 - 3681 Fax: (706) 634 - 3831 Providing security for your email needs Stop Spam, Support RBL http://www.mail-abuse.org -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network browsing eh . !!
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I am running a network of linux and windows boxes. In winoze the network neighbourhood is good enough to browse and copy or transfer files between pc s. In linux is LISA the option .. ? is there any other way in which I can access all the other other systems. LinNeighborhood download from: http://java.thn.htu.se/~toor/ Click on the LinNeigborhood-0.6.5-1.xxx.rpm links as they apply to your needs. Note that ...i386.rpm is fine for everything up to i586 class CPUs. The RPM link for Red Hat 8.0 link at the bottom of the page is compiled for i686 CPUs ONLY. When you get the app installed, read through the documentation very carefully. It isn't lengthy, easy to read and very explicit as to what you need to do. Also note that in Red Hat 8.0, you may need to change the permissions on 'usr/bin/smbmnt' to allow user execution so that user can mount Samba shares each time you access LinNeighborhood from user logged-in GUI: chmod 04711 /usr/bin/smbmnt See FAQ more at: http://www.bnro.de/~schmidjo/ I love the program! Makes connecting to shares on Linux boxes s easy. :-) T -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network activity monitoring
* Joe Polk Get iptraf. You can pull it down with up2date. Ah, thanks. It's already here. -- Jon Haugsand, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.norges-bank.no -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network activity monitoring
Get iptraf. You can pull it down with up2date. JAV On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 09:31, Jon Haugsand wrote: Working over a slow ISDN line, I sometimes experience the line is even slower, so there has to take place some activity I fair is of suspicious character. However, it can also be that I have a browser somewhere that does a periodic refresh, or that my son is sitting on another computer working. Anyway, I want to rule out the bad guys, so therefor I want to look at the network traffic. What is the best tool I can use? I do use iptables, but is a log entry on all incoming traffic a good one? -- Jon Haugsand, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.norges-bank.no -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network printer . . . sort of
ld . . . you lost me. What's ld? I have the libc5.so stuff. Google rocks! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Patrick May Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 1:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network printer . . . sort of For WordPerfect 8 to run, go and grab the libc5-compat RPM from RedHat 6.2 and install it. You will also need to do something ld to get the library recognised. Google around and see if you can find it. I have a doc, but not on this computer. Patrick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Phelps Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network printer . . . sort of You're probably right. I got an rpm of WP8 from a site (only one I could find) and got it to the point where RH calls it a Known App.: recognizes it on GNOME's Run box. I just can't launch it. Not that I need it. OpenOffice is pretty cool. I'll be wringing that out for a while. - Original Message - From: Anthony E. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:47 PM Subject: Re: Network printer . . . sort of On 06-Mar-2003/21:29 -0500, Mark Phelps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now if I can just get WordPerfect to install. I keep getting told that I need other stuff. Arrgghh. I don't know that there's a version of WP that will run on a current Linux distro. Tony -- Anthony E. Greene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/ Linux. The choice of a GNU generation http://www.linux.org/ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network printer setup..
Have you put the line ServerName ip.address-of-server in the /etc/cups/client.conf I had one computer with no printers attached that just refused to print I fussed with it for days and that fixed it in a minute. Linda On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, CHUNRIMA CHUNRIMA wrote: Yes, I did. but, the problem is that I can't printer anything from client. Could you let me know the specific setting for both server and client, when you use CUPs. Thanks. From: Manoj [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network printer setup.. Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:57:43 +0530 try CUPS Manoj -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of CHUNRIMA CHUNRIMA Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network printer setup.. Hi..all: Anyone knows about how to set up network printer? I have two linux boxes, both are running with RH8.0. HP lajer jet printer is connected to jack (name of server) throught parallel port. What I want to do is to print out from ryu (name of client) over network. Printer works fine when I work anything in server side, but it doesn't work at all when I try to connect to printer from client. anybody has experienced like this? pls, help me out. Thanks Jae _ Áõ±Ç Á¤º¸ °¡Àå ºü¸£°í ÆíÇÏ°Ô º¸½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. MSN Áõ±Ç/ÅõÀÚ http://www.msn.co.kr/stock/ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list _ Àü¼¼°èÀÎÀÌ ÇÔ²²ÇÏ´Â À¥ ¸ÞÀÏ ¼ºñ½ºÀÎ MSN HotmailÀ» ¸¸³ª º¸¼¼¿ä. http://loginnet.passport.com/login.srf?id=2svc=mailcbid=24325msppjph=1lc=1042 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network printer . . . sort of
What protocol does the printer use to send it data? If MSW clients are using the URL? (What is it look like by the way?) If your URL looks like \\Printer\something then you have a MSWindows non-URL URL look-a-like. This would mean your printer is using SMB to communicate. You'll need Samba (samba.org) to get your RH box to communicate via SMB. RH also provides Samba RPMs to install, use those while your new...compiling and the other fun stuff from source can come later. If the printer is using some other mechanism (read the printer docs) or supports HPJetDirect then you'll have no problem finding the package. /B - Original Message - From: Mark Phelps [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 15:50 Subject: Network printer . . . sort of Hi, I'm the rankest of newbies, so bear with me please. I'm trying to get this Linux RH box to print to a network printer. I have no idea what this configuration will suggest to anyone, but if you can make sense of it, and help me print from here . . . then you're the man ... or . . . woman. Yeah. Here's the deal: Cable modem - Linksys router - 4 workstations + Lexmark Optra printer. No. Neither print nor file sharing are enabled anywhere. All the msw boxes just print to the printer's url. This is the only Linux box in the place: just experimenting with the OS for fun. I can ping the printer, but I have no clue how to actually print to it from here. Any suggestions? Mark -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network printer . . . sort of
Need to run to a meeting, but will reply promptly afterward. Thanks, Mark On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 19:04, David Busby wrote: What protocol does the printer use to send it data? If MSW clients are using the URL? (What is it look like by the way?) If your URL looks like \\Printer\something then you have a MSWindows non-URL URL look-a-like. This would mean your printer is using SMB to communicate. You'll need Samba (samba.org) to get your RH box to communicate via SMB. RH also provides Samba RPMs to install, use those while your new...compiling and the other fun stuff from source can come later. If the printer is using some other mechanism (read the printer docs) or supports HPJetDirect then you'll have no problem finding the package. /B - Original Message - From: Mark Phelps [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 15:50 Subject: Network printer . . . sort of Hi, I'm the rankest of newbies, so bear with me please. I'm trying to get this Linux RH box to print to a network printer. I have no idea what this configuration will suggest to anyone, but if you can make sense of it, and help me print from here . . . then you're the man ... or . . . woman. Yeah. Here's the deal: Cable modem - Linksys router - 4 workstations + Lexmark Optra printer. No. Neither print nor file sharing are enabled anywhere. All the msw boxes just print to the printer's url. This is the only Linux box in the place: just experimenting with the OS for fun. I can ping the printer, but I have no clue how to actually print to it from here. Any suggestions? Mark -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network printer . . . sort of
Okay, Thanks for your patience (if you're still there). Protocol . . .I'm not sure what that means. (Told you I'm a rank newbie). It goes through the nic into the cable into the router into the printer. Is that TCP/IP? I have no clue. The url looks like http://192.168.1.10 Does any of this help? Mark On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 19:04, David Busby wrote: What protocol does the printer use to send it data? If MSW clients are using the URL? (What is it look like by the way?) If your URL looks like \\Printer\something then you have a MSWindows non-URL URL look-a-like. This would mean your printer is using SMB to communicate. You'll need Samba (samba.org) to get your RH box to communicate via SMB. RH also provides Samba RPMs to install, use those while your new...compiling and the other fun stuff from source can come later. If the printer is using some other mechanism (read the printer docs) or supports HPJetDirect then you'll have no problem finding the package. /B - Original Message - From: Mark Phelps [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 15:50 Subject: Network printer . . . sort of Hi, I'm the rankest of newbies, so bear with me please. I'm trying to get this Linux RH box to print to a network printer. I have no idea what this configuration will suggest to anyone, but if you can make sense of it, and help me print from here . . . then you're the man ... or . . . woman. Yeah. Here's the deal: Cable modem - Linksys router - 4 workstations + Lexmark Optra printer. No. Neither print nor file sharing are enabled anywhere. All the msw boxes just print to the printer's url. This is the only Linux box in the place: just experimenting with the OS for fun. I can ping the printer, but I have no clue how to actually print to it from here. Any suggestions? Mark -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network printer . . . sort of
GOT IT!!! WOO HOO!! I'm gonna get this Linux thing . . .or it's gonna get me! Told the printer config that it was an lpd queue (I still don't know what that means, but I'll learn), and then took the http://; out of the printer's url -- and voila!! Sheesh. I actually got one thing to work. But it's encouraging. Now if I can just get WordPerfect to install. I keep getting told that I need other stuff. Arrgghh. But I've got a printer now! Mark On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 21:10, Mark Phelps wrote: Okay, Thanks for your patience (if you're still there). Protocol . . .I'm not sure what that means. (Told you I'm a rank newbie). It goes through the nic into the cable into the router into the printer. Is that TCP/IP? I have no clue. The url looks like http://192.168.1.10 Does any of this help? Mark On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 19:04, David Busby wrote: What protocol does the printer use to send it data? If MSW clients are using the URL? (What is it look like by the way?) If your URL looks like \\Printer\something then you have a MSWindows non-URL URL look-a-like. This would mean your printer is using SMB to communicate. You'll need Samba (samba.org) to get your RH box to communicate via SMB. RH also provides Samba RPMs to install, use those while your new...compiling and the other fun stuff from source can come later. If the printer is using some other mechanism (read the printer docs) or supports HPJetDirect then you'll have no problem finding the package. /B - Original Message - From: Mark Phelps [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 15:50 Subject: Network printer . . . sort of Hi, I'm the rankest of newbies, so bear with me please. I'm trying to get this Linux RH box to print to a network printer. I have no idea what this configuration will suggest to anyone, but if you can make sense of it, and help me print from here . . . then you're the man ... or . . . woman. Yeah. Here's the deal: Cable modem - Linksys router - 4 workstations + Lexmark Optra printer. No. Neither print nor file sharing are enabled anywhere. All the msw boxes just print to the printer's url. This is the only Linux box in the place: just experimenting with the OS for fun. I can ping the printer, but I have no clue how to actually print to it from here. Any suggestions? Mark -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network printer . . . sort of
On 06-Mar-2003/21:29 -0500, Mark Phelps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now if I can just get WordPerfect to install. I keep getting told that I need other stuff. Arrgghh. I don't know that there's a version of WP that will run on a current Linux distro. Tony -- Anthony E. Greene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/ Linux. The choice of a GNU generation http://www.linux.org/ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network printer . . . sort of
You're probably right. I got an rpm of WP8 from a site (only one I could find) and got it to the point where RH calls it a Known App.: recognizes it on GNOME's Run box. I just can't launch it. Not that I need it. OpenOffice is pretty cool. I'll be wringing that out for a while. - Original Message - From: Anthony E. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:47 PM Subject: Re: Network printer . . . sort of On 06-Mar-2003/21:29 -0500, Mark Phelps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now if I can just get WordPerfect to install. I keep getting told that I need other stuff. Arrgghh. I don't know that there's a version of WP that will run on a current Linux distro. Tony -- Anthony E. Greene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/ Linux. The choice of a GNU generation http://www.linux.org/ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network printer . . . sort of
For WordPerfect 8 to run, go and grab the libc5-compat RPM from RedHat 6.2 and install it. You will also need to do something ld to get the library recognised. Google around and see if you can find it. I have a doc, but not on this computer. Patrick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Phelps Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network printer . . . sort of You're probably right. I got an rpm of WP8 from a site (only one I could find) and got it to the point where RH calls it a Known App.: recognizes it on GNOME's Run box. I just can't launch it. Not that I need it. OpenOffice is pretty cool. I'll be wringing that out for a while. - Original Message - From: Anthony E. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:47 PM Subject: Re: Network printer . . . sort of On 06-Mar-2003/21:29 -0500, Mark Phelps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now if I can just get WordPerfect to install. I keep getting told that I need other stuff. Arrgghh. I don't know that there's a version of WP that will run on a current Linux distro. Tony -- Anthony E. Greene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D AOL/Yahoo Messenger: TonyG05HomePage: http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/ Linux. The choice of a GNU generation http://www.linux.org/ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network printer setup..
Did you set up the printer as network printer?You have to edit cupsd.conf also. Read cups configuration file sam.html on cups site for conf details. Manoj -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of CHUNRIMA CHUNRIMA Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 12:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network printer setup.. Yes, I did. but, the problem is that I can't printer anything from client. Could you let me know the specific setting for both server and client, when you use CUPs. Thanks. From: Manoj [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network printer setup.. Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:57:43 +0530 try CUPS Manoj -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of CHUNRIMA CHUNRIMA Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network printer setup.. Hi..all: Anyone knows about how to set up network printer? I have two linux boxes, both are running with RH8.0. HP lajer jet printer is connected to jack (name of server) throught parallel port. What I want to do is to print out from ryu (name of client) over network. Printer works fine when I work anything in server side, but it doesn't work at all when I try to connect to printer from client. anybody has experienced like this? pls, help me out. Thanks Jae _ . MSN / http://www.msn.co.kr/stock/ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list _ MSN Hotmail . http://loginnet.passport.com/login.srf?id=2svc=mailcbid=2432 5msppjph=1lc=1042 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network printer setup..
try CUPS Manoj -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of CHUNRIMA CHUNRIMA Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network printer setup.. Hi..all: Anyone knows about how to set up network printer? I have two linux boxes, both are running with RH8.0. HP lajer jet printer is connected to jack (name of server) throught parallel port. What I want to do is to print out from ryu (name of client) over network. Printer works fine when I work anything in server side, but it doesn't work at all when I try to connect to printer from client. anybody has experienced like this? pls, help me out. Thanks Jae _ . MSN / http://www.msn.co.kr/stock/ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network printer setup..
Yes, I did. but, the problem is that I can't printer anything from client. Could you let me know the specific setting for both server and client, when you use CUPs. Thanks. From: Manoj [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network printer setup.. Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:57:43 +0530 try CUPS Manoj -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of CHUNRIMA CHUNRIMA Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network printer setup.. Hi..all: Anyone knows about how to set up network printer? I have two linux boxes, both are running with RH8.0. HP lajer jet printer is connected to jack (name of server) throught parallel port. What I want to do is to print out from ryu (name of client) over network. Printer works fine when I work anything in server side, but it doesn't work at all when I try to connect to printer from client. anybody has experienced like this? pls, help me out. Thanks Jae _ . MSN / http://www.msn.co.kr/stock/ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list _ MSN Hotmail . http://loginnet.passport.com/login.srf?id=2svc=mailcbid=24325msppjph=1lc=1042 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network profiles
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 02:04, Rus Foster wrote: Is there any tool under redhat that will let me switch network profiles between home/office. Ideally it would be able to update things like proxy settings on galeon/gaim and other such cool things redhat-config-network (Main Menu -- System Settings -- Network) will let you do this as far as your network adapters go; it will not update your galeon or gaim settings. Still, a useful tool. Do read the instructions if you have any trouble since its functionality was not intuitive for me at the beginning. -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network profiles
I missed the beginning of this thread, but is there a parameter you can pass using grub or lilo to select the profile? On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 02:04, Rus Foster wrote: Is there any tool under redhat that will let me switch network profiles between home/office. Ideally it would be able to update things like proxy settings on galeon/gaim and other such cool things redhat-config-network (Main Menu -- System Settings -- Network) will let you do this as far as your network adapters go; it will not update your galeon or gaim settings. Still, a useful tool. Do read the instructions if you have any trouble since its functionality was not intuitive for me at the beginning. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network
Depending on whether or not your firewall is using iptables or ipchains there are commands you can use while the firewall is running to modify the rules. This would also depend on what you are trying to accomplish. Example (using iptables): If I wanted to allow a certain IP address to access port 22 (ssh) on my firewall box I would do: iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT Forwarding rules would be a little bit more elaborate, but once you have them set and they work, do iptables-save to save your rules. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to punch a hole in the Linux firewall to allow certain IP addresses through it without stopping it or changing it so all IP addresses are allowed through it. My network is set up as so: dsl connected to my router / firewall connected to a win98 machine and a Linux / win2000 server dual boot machine? Thanks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network
Steve, iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT without saving it should I be able to see my Linux box in network neighborhood on my win98 machine? If so, I can't. Do I need to reboot either of my machines to establish the connection? - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:59 AM Subject: RE: Network Depending on whether or not your firewall is using iptables or ipchains there are commands you can use while the firewall is running to modify the rules. This would also depend on what you are trying to accomplish. Example (using iptables): If I wanted to allow a certain IP address to access port 22 (ssh) on my firewall box I would do: iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT Forwarding rules would be a little bit more elaborate, but once you have them set and they work, do iptables-save to save your rules. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to punch a hole in the Linux firewall to allow certain IP addresses through it without stopping it or changing it so all IP addresses are allowed through it. My network is set up as so: dsl connected to my router / firewall connected to a win98 machine and a Linux / win2000 server dual boot machine? Thanks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network
That was just an example. Substituting xx.xx.xx.xx with the IP address of the machine to which you wish to grant access would allow it to connect to port 22 on your firewall box. No reboots should be necessary on any machines to accomplish this. If you just need to grant general access to your win98 machine try this: iptables -I INPUT --src win98 ip/32 -j ACCEPT Seeing your Linux box in Network Neighborhood will require some additional configuration in Samba. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Steve, iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT without saving it should I be able to see my Linux box in network neighborhood on my win98 machine? If so, I can't. Do I need to reboot either of my machines to establish the connection? - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:59 AM Subject: RE: Network Depending on whether or not your firewall is using iptables or ipchains there are commands you can use while the firewall is running to modify the rules. This would also depend on what you are trying to accomplish. Example (using iptables): If I wanted to allow a certain IP address to access port 22 (ssh) on my firewall box I would do: iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT Forwarding rules would be a little bit more elaborate, but once you have them set and they work, do iptables-save to save your rules. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to punch a hole in the Linux firewall to allow certain IP addresses through it without stopping it or changing it so all IP addresses are allowed through it. My network is set up as so: dsl connected to my router / firewall connected to a win98 machine and a Linux / win2000 server dual boot machine? Thanks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network
Thanks Steve, Worked like a charm!! - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:25 AM Subject: RE: Network That was just an example. Substituting xx.xx.xx.xx with the IP address of the machine to which you wish to grant access would allow it to connect to port 22 on your firewall box. No reboots should be necessary on any machines to accomplish this. If you just need to grant general access to your win98 machine try this: iptables -I INPUT --src win98 ip/32 -j ACCEPT Seeing your Linux box in Network Neighborhood will require some additional configuration in Samba. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Steve, iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT without saving it should I be able to see my Linux box in network neighborhood on my win98 machine? If so, I can't. Do I need to reboot either of my machines to establish the connection? - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:59 AM Subject: RE: Network Depending on whether or not your firewall is using iptables or ipchains there are commands you can use while the firewall is running to modify the rules. This would also depend on what you are trying to accomplish. Example (using iptables): If I wanted to allow a certain IP address to access port 22 (ssh) on my firewall box I would do: iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT Forwarding rules would be a little bit more elaborate, but once you have them set and they work, do iptables-save to save your rules. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to punch a hole in the Linux firewall to allow certain IP addresses through it without stopping it or changing it so all IP addresses are allowed through it. My network is set up as so: dsl connected to my router / firewall connected to a win98 machine and a Linux / win2000 server dual boot machine? Thanks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network
Steve, When I used the ipchains-save command, it didn't save it permanently. How do I do that? I tried stoppin / starting ipchains but it didn't do the trick. Any ideas? - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:25 AM Subject: RE: Network That was just an example. Substituting xx.xx.xx.xx with the IP address of the machine to which you wish to grant access would allow it to connect to port 22 on your firewall box. No reboots should be necessary on any machines to accomplish this. If you just need to grant general access to your win98 machine try this: iptables -I INPUT --src win98 ip/32 -j ACCEPT Seeing your Linux box in Network Neighborhood will require some additional configuration in Samba. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Steve, iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT without saving it should I be able to see my Linux box in network neighborhood on my win98 machine? If so, I can't. Do I need to reboot either of my machines to establish the connection? - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:59 AM Subject: RE: Network Depending on whether or not your firewall is using iptables or ipchains there are commands you can use while the firewall is running to modify the rules. This would also depend on what you are trying to accomplish. Example (using iptables): If I wanted to allow a certain IP address to access port 22 (ssh) on my firewall box I would do: iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT Forwarding rules would be a little bit more elaborate, but once you have them set and they work, do iptables-save to save your rules. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to punch a hole in the Linux firewall to allow certain IP addresses through it without stopping it or changing it so all IP addresses are allowed through it. My network is set up as so: dsl connected to my router / firewall connected to a win98 machine and a Linux / win2000 server dual boot machine? Thanks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network
If the commands I gave you below worked then your system should be using iptables and not ipchains. Make sure ipchains is disabled (chkconfig ipchains off). Look at your iptables rules to make sure that iptables is running iptables -nL Use iptables-save to save your rules. They will be saved to: /etc/sysconfig/iptables. Each time /etc/init.d/iptables is run (at boot) it will see those rules and load them. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Steve, When I used the ipchains-save command, it didn't save it permanently. How do I do that? I tried stoppin / starting ipchains but it didn't do the trick. Any ideas? - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:25 AM Subject: RE: Network That was just an example. Substituting xx.xx.xx.xx with the IP address of the machine to which you wish to grant access would allow it to connect to port 22 on your firewall box. No reboots should be necessary on any machines to accomplish this. If you just need to grant general access to your win98 machine try this: iptables -I INPUT --src win98 ip/32 -j ACCEPT Seeing your Linux box in Network Neighborhood will require some additional configuration in Samba. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Steve, iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT without saving it should I be able to see my Linux box in network neighborhood on my win98 machine? If so, I can't. Do I need to reboot either of my machines to establish the connection? - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:59 AM Subject: RE: Network Depending on whether or not your firewall is using iptables or ipchains there are commands you can use while the firewall is running to modify the rules. This would also depend on what you are trying to accomplish. Example (using iptables): If I wanted to allow a certain IP address to access port 22 (ssh) on my firewall box I would do: iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT Forwarding rules would be a little bit more elaborate, but once you have them set and they work, do iptables-save to save your rules. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to punch a hole in the Linux firewall to allow certain IP addresses through it without stopping it or changing it so all IP addresses are allowed through it. My network is set up as so: dsl connected to my router / firewall connected to a win98 machine and a Linux / win2000 server dual boot machine? Thanks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network
That worked. Thanks!! - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:56 AM Subject: RE: Network If the commands I gave you below worked then your system should be using iptables and not ipchains. Make sure ipchains is disabled (chkconfig ipchains off). Look at your iptables rules to make sure that iptables is running iptables -nL Use iptables-save to save your rules. They will be saved to: /etc/sysconfig/iptables. Each time /etc/init.d/iptables is run (at boot) it will see those rules and load them. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Steve, When I used the ipchains-save command, it didn't save it permanently. How do I do that? I tried stoppin / starting ipchains but it didn't do the trick. Any ideas? - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:25 AM Subject: RE: Network That was just an example. Substituting xx.xx.xx.xx with the IP address of the machine to which you wish to grant access would allow it to connect to port 22 on your firewall box. No reboots should be necessary on any machines to accomplish this. If you just need to grant general access to your win98 machine try this: iptables -I INPUT --src win98 ip/32 -j ACCEPT Seeing your Linux box in Network Neighborhood will require some additional configuration in Samba. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Steve, iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT without saving it should I be able to see my Linux box in network neighborhood on my win98 machine? If so, I can't. Do I need to reboot either of my machines to establish the connection? - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:59 AM Subject: RE: Network Depending on whether or not your firewall is using iptables or ipchains there are commands you can use while the firewall is running to modify the rules. This would also depend on what you are trying to accomplish. Example (using iptables): If I wanted to allow a certain IP address to access port 22 (ssh) on my firewall box I would do: iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT Forwarding rules would be a little bit more elaborate, but once you have them set and they work, do iptables-save to save your rules. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to punch a hole in the Linux firewall to allow certain IP addresses through it without stopping it or changing it so all IP addresses are allowed through it. My network is set up as so: dsl connected to my router / firewall connected to a win98 machine and a Linux / win2000 server dual boot machine? Thanks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:56:17 -0600, Rigler, S C (Steve) wrote: Look at your iptables rules to make sure that iptables is running iptables -nL Use iptables-save to save your rules. They will be saved to: /etc/sysconfig/iptables. iptables-save will just print the rules and you would need to redirect them into a file. service iptables save would save them directory into /etc/sysconfig/iptables. - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+Pqag0iMVcrivHFQRArEhAJ45v8xfeczsXBC+/syu+Fgd3OQRLgCfW9w1 kuUEySGoJl3Nnj1e72acxhk= =NdTo -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network
Good point...I forgot about that. -Steve -Original Message- From: Michael Schwendt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:28 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:56:17 -0600, Rigler, S C (Steve) wrote: Look at your iptables rules to make sure that iptables is running iptables -nL Use iptables-save to save your rules. They will be saved to: /etc/sysconfig/iptables. iptables-save will just print the rules and you would need to redirect them into a file. service iptables save would save them directory into /etc/sysconfig/iptables. - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+Pqag0iMVcrivHFQRArEhAJ45v8xfeczsXBC+/syu+Fgd3OQRLgCfW9w1 kuUEySGoJl3Nnj1e72acxhk= =NdTo -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network
Thanks for the info. I see the output stating saving current rules to that directory. - Original Message - From: Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 12:28 PM Subject: Re: Network -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:56:17 -0600, Rigler, S C (Steve) wrote: Look at your iptables rules to make sure that iptables is running iptables -nL Use iptables-save to save your rules. They will be saved to: /etc/sysconfig/iptables. iptables-save will just print the rules and you would need to redirect them into a file. service iptables save would save them directory into /etc/sysconfig/iptables. - -- -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+Pqag0iMVcrivHFQRArEhAJ45v8xfeczsXBC+/syu+Fgd3OQRLgCfW9w1 kuUEySGoJl3Nnj1e72acxhk= =NdTo -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Network
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 11:07, John Salamone wrote: That worked. Thanks!! If you're using iptables, I cannot recommend Shorewall highly enough. Having taken the time to learn ipchains thoroughly and hand-craft my firewall settings, having Shorewall give me equal or better functionality with a 10-minute learning curve was a godsend. Check out http://www.shorewall.net for more details; I've been using it for months on several machines and have nothing but praise for it. -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network
You will need to find out where the scripts are that get loaded when the machine boots or use the configuration utility in the GUI to have this rule persistent. Otherwise after the first reboot you will have to run the command again. Larry S. Brown Dimension Networks, Inc. (727) 723-8388 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Salamone Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Thanks Steve, Worked like a charm!! - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:25 AM Subject: RE: Network That was just an example. Substituting xx.xx.xx.xx with the IP address of the machine to which you wish to grant access would allow it to connect to port 22 on your firewall box. No reboots should be necessary on any machines to accomplish this. If you just need to grant general access to your win98 machine try this: iptables -I INPUT --src win98 ip/32 -j ACCEPT Seeing your Linux box in Network Neighborhood will require some additional configuration in Samba. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Steve, iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT without saving it should I be able to see my Linux box in network neighborhood on my win98 machine? If so, I can't. Do I need to reboot either of my machines to establish the connection? - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:59 AM Subject: RE: Network Depending on whether or not your firewall is using iptables or ipchains there are commands you can use while the firewall is running to modify the rules. This would also depend on what you are trying to accomplish. Example (using iptables): If I wanted to allow a certain IP address to access port 22 (ssh) on my firewall box I would do: iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT Forwarding rules would be a little bit more elaborate, but once you have them set and they work, do iptables-save to save your rules. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to punch a hole in the Linux firewall to allow certain IP addresses through it without stopping it or changing it so all IP addresses are allowed through it. My network is set up as so: dsl connected to my router / firewall connected to a win98 machine and a Linux / win2000 server dual boot machine? Thanks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
RE: Network
Sorry didn't see the follow-up. I see you addressed that. Larry S. Brown Dimension Networks, Inc. (727) 723-8388 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rigler, S C (Steve) Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network If the commands I gave you below worked then your system should be using iptables and not ipchains. Make sure ipchains is disabled (chkconfig ipchains off). Look at your iptables rules to make sure that iptables is running iptables -nL Use iptables-save to save your rules. They will be saved to: /etc/sysconfig/iptables. Each time /etc/init.d/iptables is run (at boot) it will see those rules and load them. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Steve, When I used the ipchains-save command, it didn't save it permanently. How do I do that? I tried stoppin / starting ipchains but it didn't do the trick. Any ideas? - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 11:25 AM Subject: RE: Network That was just an example. Substituting xx.xx.xx.xx with the IP address of the machine to which you wish to grant access would allow it to connect to port 22 on your firewall box. No reboots should be necessary on any machines to accomplish this. If you just need to grant general access to your win98 machine try this: iptables -I INPUT --src win98 ip/32 -j ACCEPT Seeing your Linux box in Network Neighborhood will require some additional configuration in Samba. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network Steve, iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT without saving it should I be able to see my Linux box in network neighborhood on my win98 machine? If so, I can't. Do I need to reboot either of my machines to establish the connection? - Original Message - From: Rigler, S C (Steve) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 10:59 AM Subject: RE: Network Depending on whether or not your firewall is using iptables or ipchains there are commands you can use while the firewall is running to modify the rules. This would also depend on what you are trying to accomplish. Example (using iptables): If I wanted to allow a certain IP address to access port 22 (ssh) on my firewall box I would do: iptables -I INPUT --src xx.xx.xx.xx/32 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT Forwarding rules would be a little bit more elaborate, but once you have them set and they work, do iptables-save to save your rules. -Steve -Original Message- From: John Salamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Network Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to punch a hole in the Linux firewall to allow certain IP addresses through it without stopping it or changing it so all IP addresses are allowed through it. My network is set up as so: dsl connected to my router / firewall connected to a win98 machine and a Linux / win2000 server dual boot machine? Thanks -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
