[Repeater-Builder] Re: Strange Signal on 158.275(ish)

2010-05-01 Thread kd8biw


Thanks for the help on this so far all!  OK, I get email digests (a lump of 
messages in 1 email) instead of individual emails for each message.  My email 
client is Hotmail, which I can and do sometimes use Outlook Express.

In the emails, there are no attachements to click on to open.  When I click on 
the title of the message, it takes me directly to that message on the Yahoo 
group.  On the group there is a box that says there is an attachment, but 
nothing is actually attached.  It even says the name of the particular file, 
just no attachment!  I'm stumped...  Maybe I can try looking at them through 
Outlook and see if that makes a difference.  I even made sure Hotmail was not 
blocking any inbound attachments, and I can not see any type of filter that 
would prevent it.  Thanks again all for your help!!

Steve KD8BIW

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Mike Besemer \(WM4B\) 
mwbese...@... wrote:

 That's it.  
 
  
 
 Funny you can't include in emails and the site.
 
  
 
 73,
 
  
 
 Mike
 
 WM4B
 
  
 
   _  
 
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Chuck Kelsey
 Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:37 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Strange Signal on 158.275(ish)
 
  
 
   
 
 Attachments on Yahoo Groups have these options for the list owner:
 
 Attachments
 a.. Store on site (exclude from emails)
 b.. Include in emails (exclude from site)
 c.. Exclude from site and emails
 Chuck
 WB2EDV
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Besemer (WM4B) mwbese...@cox. mailto:mwbesemer%40cox.net
 net
 To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:31 PM
 Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Strange Signal on 158.275(ish)
 
 If I recall correctly from the Yahoo Group I moderate, there is a way to set
 up the group so that it does or does not allow attachments to show from the
 web. I can't remember what it was called, but I remember that it was rather
 obscure.
 
 73,
 
 Mike
 WM4B
 
 From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of La Rue Communications
 Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 7:53 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Strange Signal on 158.275(ish)
 
 Chuck is on the ball more than I am..Yes, if you are not using your
 email client to view these messages, its very likely the attachments do not
 show up properly on the web page. I need to check the web page out and
 verify for myself. In the meantime, you can tell us how you are vieweing
 these messages.
 
 John Hymes
 La Rue Communications
 10 S. Aurora Street
 Stockton, CA 95202
 http://tinyurl. http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn com/2dtngmn
 - Original Message - 
 From: Chuck Kelsey
 To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 4:45 PM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Strange Signal on 158.275(ish)
 
 You say IE8, so I'm assuming you are viewing the messages on the web rather
 than individual emails. If so, I suspect that's the problem. I don't know
 what happens to attachments when you are using the web page to read stuff.
 
 Chuck
 WB2EDV
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: kd8biw kd8...@hotmail. mailto:kd8biw%40hotmail.com com
 To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 7:26 PM
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Strange Signal on 158.275(ish)
 
  IBM with Windows XP and IE8. Any help is appreciated!
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 --
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2846 - Release Date: 04/30/10 
 14:27:00





[Repeater-Builder] Re: license-free radios 1272619009.275.56317...@yahoogroups.com

2010-05-01 Thread Geert Jan de Groot
 While this one is not a huge problem, it happens too. Visitors come to Las
 Vegas from a lot of foreign countries. People in the UK have whats called
 PMR radios. It's their FRS service. The radios are all simplex, 8 channels
 on 6.25Khz splinter channels starting at 446.000  Yep! if you scan those
 channels here you DO hear activity on them!

For the record, most countries in EU have license-free radios in
3 frequency ranges:
- LPD (Low Power Device), 10mW, 433.075 - 434.775, 
  68 channels in 25 kHz raster.
  Not so polular beacuse 10mW doesn't get far in cities
- PMR (Public Mobile Radio), 500 mW, 446.000-446.100,
  8 channels in 12.5 kHz raster:
1   446.00625
2   446.01875
3   446.03125
4   446.04375
5   446.05625
6   446.06875
7   446.08125
8   446.09375
  These radios generally have PL support.
  Note that in EU, the 70cm band is 430.440 MHz so it is out of
  our bands here.
  These things are VERY popular - recently bought 2 radios for
  $35 together with charger and NiMh cells!
- Digital PMR, 500 mW, 446.100-446.200,
  This is like the analog PMR but uses digital voice (this is what
  ICOM developed D-STAR for)

Note that the American FRS/GMRS radios are simply illegal here, as
these frequencies were used by law enforcement till recently
(so not a good choice even to chance it).

You indeed might want to take this into account when setting up
repeater frequencies.

Hope this helps,

Geert Jan PE1HZG



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: license-free radios 1272619009.275.56317...@yahoogroups.com

2010-05-01 Thread Richard Fletcher
Hi Geret,
 I have some friends in Sweden that use something like this, no one seemed to 
know what freq they were on. When a few of them came here to the US we were 
talking about this and I showed them my Motorola GM 68, ICOM U16 and GE MPI II 
and GE PCS radios I have on GMRS. They loved the range of these and wondered if 
they could use something like this back in Sweden. I looked all over the 
Internet for information about this and could not find a thing. But now you 
mention PMR, I am going to focus my research there. 

Where in the UE are you by the way?
 Many thanks for all  that good info!

 Richard 

 




From: Geert Jan de Groot pe1...@xs4all.nl
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, May 1, 2010 7:34:56 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: license-free radios 
1272619009.275.56317...@yahoogroups.com

  
 While this one is not a huge problem, it happens too. Visitors come to Las
 Vegas from a lot of foreign countries. People in the UK have whats called
 PMR radios. It's their FRS service. The radios are all simplex, 8 channels
 on 6.25Khz splinter channels starting at 446.000  Yep! if you scan those
 channels here you DO hear activity on them!

For the record, most countries in EU have license-free radios in
3 frequency ranges:
- LPD (Low Power Device), 10mW, 433.075 - 434.775, 
68 channels in 25 kHz raster.
Not so polular beacuse 10mW doesn't get far in cities
- PMR (Public Mobile Radio), 500 mW, 446.000-446. 100,
8 channels in 12.5 kHz raster:
1 446.00625
2 446.01875
3 446.03125
4 446.04375
5 446.05625
6 446.06875
7 446.08125
8 446.09375
These radios generally have PL support.
Note that in EU, the 70cm band is 430.440 MHz so it is out of
our bands here.
These things are VERY popular - recently bought 2 radios for
$35 together with charger and NiMh cells!
- Digital PMR, 500 mW, 446.100-446. 200,
This is like the analog PMR but uses digital voice (this is what
ICOM developed D-STAR for)

Note that the American FRS/GMRS radios are simply illegal here, as
these frequencies were used by law enforcement till recently
(so not a good choice even to chance it).

You indeed might want to take this into account when setting up
repeater frequencies.

Hope this helps,

Geert Jan PE1HZG





  

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread Richard Fletcher
 J. C. and the rest.

 Yes I am going to say this because it seems to have been missed. When John 
asked is there a frequency monitored by law enforcement And to JC who said he 
going to use any frequency that I have to get help (Not to bright of a 
statement there JC, from where do you get this grand sense of entitlement 
anyway?) You guys do know that in the US there is still available CB Radio 
Right? Chanel 9 used to be monitored prior to Cellular and  there on the 40 CB 
channels  you can Legally communicate to your hearts content. As well as on 
the FRS devices. And with the flood of cell phones out there now, the CB Band 
is very clear. Now I do have radio equipment capable of almost any freq out 
there, but since I am not licensed on it I would not even concede transmitting 
on it. Only exception where I did was when I was at a GE Radio shop from 1980 
to 1995 where I would call in to the PD and Fire Dispatcher (And government 
bands) to confirm transmission. and
 all was done professionally while in maintaining of that agency's radio 
equipment. 
 I find it quite strange that any Ham (if you actually are one) would think 
that just because you have a radio capable of transmitting anywhere would think 
that he was entitled to do so. And no I am not a Ham, but I do listen! I am 
license on GMRS, and most folks there are in some cases more professional than 
that of some of the childish HAM conversations I have heard (usually on simplex 
freqs)

 Now I bet this will get things stirred up now won't they?

Richard 

 




From: J C jcar...@k9nzf.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, May 1, 2010 12:30:08 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

  
If my life is in danger, I am going to use any frequency that I have to get 
help. I don't care if it is a remote broadcast link frequency for a radio 
station! But that's me.

--- In Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com, La Rue Communications laruec...@. 
.. wrote:

 I forgot to add something, kind of crucial to my point at the end back 
 there. if my life was in jeopardy then. Is there a frequency that Law 
 Enforcement monitors for non emergency situations? For the public sector? Or 
 would it be any officer who knows how to build their own scanners? Let me 
 reclarify - if I was in an accident, and my radio was in reach over my cell 
 (i.e. my cell was in my pocket, or got knocked under the seat), and I had a 
 life threatening injury, what kind of response would that evoke?
 
 John Hymes
 La Rue Communications
 10 S. Aurora Street
 Stockton, CA 95202
 http://tinyurl. com/2dtngmn
 - Original Message - 
 From: Maire-Radios 
 To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com 
 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:30 AM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers
 
 
 
 
 you should not even think of doing that.
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: La Rue Communications 
 To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com 
 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:10 PM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers
 
 
 
 
 So if I had a UHF Saber, and programmed it to a Police frequency for the 
 purposes of TX EMERGENCY info only like 911, then its required to have 
 authorization? What if I was involved in a wreck and my radio was the only 
 thing in reach over my cell?
 
 John Hymes
 La Rue Communications
 10 S. Aurora Street
 Stockton, CA 95202
 http://tinyurl. com/2dtngmn
 - Original Message - 
 From: kd6aaj 
 To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com 
 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:58 AM
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers
 
 
 
 
 
 Strange, considering the GMRS can come with radios you buy, before you even 
 have the license. I guess you have to be one of the BIG boys to sell radios 
 preprogrammed with those freqs.
 
 and there is an EXCEPTION:
 
 Title 47: Telecommunication
 PART 90-PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICES
 Subpart N-Operating Requirements
 
 § 90.427 Precautions against unauthorized operation.
 (a) Each transmitter shall be so installed and protected that it is not 
 accessible to or capable of operation by persons other than those duly 
 authorized by and under the control of the licensee. Provisions of this part 
 authorizing certain unlicensed persons to operate stations, or authorizing 
 unattended operation of stations in certain circumstances, shall not be 
 construed to change or diminish in any respect the responsibility of station 
 licensees to maintain control over the stations licensed to them (including 
 all transmitter units thereof), or for the proper functioning and operation 
 of those stations and transmitter units in accordance with the terms of the 
 licenses of those stations.
 
 (b) Except for frequencies used in accordance with §90.417, no person shall 
 program into a transmitter frequencies for which the licensee using the 
 transmitter is not 

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread AARON LEWIS DINKIN
I thought the FCC rules say during an emergency with immediate threat to
life and property you may use any means at your disposal considering good
operating practices and as long as there are no FCC imposed communication
 restrictions you may use any frequency that you would be most likely to
elicit help.

Paraphrased of course!

On May 1, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Richard Fletcher rickfle...@yahoo.com wrote:



 J. C. and the rest.

 Yes I am going to say this because it seems to have been missed. When John
asked is there a frequency monitored by law enforcement And to JC who said
he going to use any frequency that I have to get help (Not to bright of a
statement there JC, from where do you get this grand sense of entitlement
anyway?) You guys do know that in the US there is still available CB Radio
Right? Chanel 9 used to be monitored prior to Cellular and  there on the 40
CB channels  you can Legally communicate to your hearts content. As well
as on the FRS devices. And with the flood of cell phones out there now, the
CB Band is very clear. Now I do have radio equipment capable of almost any
freq out there, but since I am not licensed on it I would not even concede
transmitting on it. Only exception where I did was when I was at a GE Radio
shop from 1980 to 1995 where I would call in to the PD and Fire Dispatcher
(And government bands) to confirm transmission. and all was done
professionally while in maintaining of that agency's radio equipment.
 I find it quite strange that any Ham (if you actually are one) would think
that just because you have a radio capable of transmitting anywhere would
think that he was entitled to do so. And no I am not a Ham, but I do listen!
I am license on GMRS, and most folks there are in some cases more
professional than that of some of the childish HAM conversations I have
heard (usually on simplex freqs)

 Now I bet this will get things stirred up now won't they?

Richard



 --
*From:* J C jcar...@k9nzf.com
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Sat, May 1, 2010 12:30:08 AM
*Subject:* [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers



If my life is in danger, I am going to use any frequency that I have to get
help. I don't care if it is a remote broadcast link frequency for a radio
station! But that's me.

--- In Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com,
La Rue Communications laruec...@. .. wrote:

 I forgot to add something, kind of crucial to my point at the end back
there. if my life was in jeopardy then. Is there a frequency that Law
Enforcement monitors for non emergency situations? For the public sector? Or
would it be any officer who knows how to build their own scanners? Let me
reclarify - if I was in an accident, and my radio was in reach over my cell
(i.e. my cell was in my pocket, or got knocked under the seat), and I had a
life threatening injury, what kind of response would that evoke?

 John Hymes
 La Rue Communications
 10 S. Aurora Street
 Stockton, CA 95202
 http://tinyurl. com/2dtngmn http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn
 - Original Message -
 From: Maire-Radios
 To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:30 AM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers




 you should not even think of doing that.


 - Original Message -
 From: La Rue Communications
 To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:10 PM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers




 So if I had a UHF Saber, and programmed it to a Police frequency for the
purposes of TX EMERGENCY info only like 911, then its required to have
authorization? What if I was involved in a wreck and my radio was the only
thing in reach over my cell?

 John Hymes
 La Rue Communications
 10 S. Aurora Street
 Stockton, CA 95202
 http://tinyurl. com/2dtngmn http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn
 - Original Message -
 From: kd6aaj
 To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:58 AM
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers





 Strange, considering the GMRS can come with radios you buy, before you
even have the license. I guess you have to be one of the BIG boys to sell
radios preprogrammed with those freqs.

 and there is an EXCEPTION:

 Title 47: Telecommunication
 PART 90-PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICES
 Subpart N-Operating Requirements

 § 90.427 Precautions against unauthorized operation.
 (a) Each transmitter shall be so installed and protected that it is not
accessible to or capable of operation by persons other than those duly
authorized by and under the control of the licensee. Provisions of this part
authorizing certain unlicensed persons to operate stations, or authorizing
unattended operation of stations in certain circumstances, shall not be

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: license-free radios

2010-05-01 Thread Mike Morris WA6ILQ
At 04:34 AM 05/01/10, you wrote:
  While this one is not a huge problem, it happens too. Visitors come to Las
  Vegas from a lot of foreign countries. People in the UK have whats called
  PMR radios. It's their FRS service. The radios are all simplex, 
 8 channels
  on 6.25Khz splinter channels starting at 446.000  Yep! if you 
 scan those
  channels here you DO hear activity on them!

For the record, most countries in EU have license-free radios in
3 frequency ranges:
- LPD (Low Power Device), 10mW, 433.075 - 434.775,
   68 channels in 25 kHz raster.
   Not so polular beacuse 10mW doesn't get far in cities
- PMR (Public Mobile Radio), 500 mW, 446.000-446.100,
   8 channels in 12.5 kHz raster:
 1   446.00625
 2   446.01875
 3   446.03125
 4   446.04375
 5   446.05625
 6   446.06875
 7   446.08125
 8   446.09375
   These radios generally have PL support.
   Note that in EU, the 70cm band is 430.440 MHz so it is out of
   our bands here.
   These things are VERY popular - recently bought 2 radios for
   $35 together with charger and NiMh cells!
- Digital PMR, 500 mW, 446.100-446.200,
   This is like the analog PMR but uses digital voice (this is what
   ICOM developed D-STAR for)

Note that the American FRS/GMRS radios are simply illegal here, as
these frequencies were used by law enforcement till recently
(so not a good choice even to chance it).

You indeed might want to take this into account when setting up
repeater frequencies.

Hope this helps,

Geert Jan PE1HZG

Sounds like 446.01-446.200 is a good place to put Dstar or
P25 repeater outputs, or point-to-point 9600 baud packet links...

Just out of curiosity what are the USA FRS and GMRS
frequencies used for now?  (you said until recently...)


Mike WA6ILQ







Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: license-free radios

2010-05-01 Thread va2ir
We get the canadian grand prix auto race here in june. A british media crew 
brings their own handies, whiuch happen to be on simplex 444.975 which is the 
input to montreal repeater VE2RJS. They have no idea they are coming over the 
ham band, its only for a week and its fun to listen to. Indusrtry canada 
doesn't really bother with ham problems much anymore. So when the race is over 
and they pack up, the interference goes with them. 

Ian
VA2IR
Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Mike Morris WA6ILQ wa6...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 06:00:06 
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: license-free radios

At 04:34 AM 05/01/10, you wrote:
  While this one is not a huge problem, it happens too. Visitors come to Las
  Vegas from a lot of foreign countries. People in the UK have whats called
  PMR radios. It's their FRS service. The radios are all simplex, 
 8 channels
  on 6.25Khz splinter channels starting at 446.000  Yep! if you 
 scan those
  channels here you DO hear activity on them!

For the record, most countries in EU have license-free radios in
3 frequency ranges:
- LPD (Low Power Device), 10mW, 433.075 - 434.775,
   68 channels in 25 kHz raster.
   Not so polular beacuse 10mW doesn't get far in cities
- PMR (Public Mobile Radio), 500 mW, 446.000-446.100,
   8 channels in 12.5 kHz raster:
 1   446.00625
 2   446.01875
 3   446.03125
 4   446.04375
 5   446.05625
 6   446.06875
 7   446.08125
 8   446.09375
   These radios generally have PL support.
   Note that in EU, the 70cm band is 430.440 MHz so it is out of
   our bands here.
   These things are VERY popular - recently bought 2 radios for
   $35 together with charger and NiMh cells!
- Digital PMR, 500 mW, 446.100-446.200,
   This is like the analog PMR but uses digital voice (this is what
   ICOM developed D-STAR for)

Note that the American FRS/GMRS radios are simply illegal here, as
these frequencies were used by law enforcement till recently
(so not a good choice even to chance it).

You indeed might want to take this into account when setting up
repeater frequencies.

Hope this helps,

Geert Jan PE1HZG

Sounds like 446.01-446.200 is a good place to put Dstar or
P25 repeater outputs, or point-to-point 9600 baud packet links...

Just out of curiosity what are the USA FRS and GMRS
frequencies used for now?  (you said until recently...)


Mike WA6ILQ








Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread AA8K73 GMail

Some try to develop scenarios that justify enabling transmit 
capability for Public Safety frequencies.

An intruder on law enforcement frequencies may be ignored as a 
false distress call as they begin intruder procedures.

As noted before, law enforcement is quite territorial about 
their communications channel.  In Michigan you will not be 
treated well if your vehicle can transmit on their channel.  I 
witnessed one ham who was pulled over when he was transmitting 
on amateur radio and the nearby patrol car's scanner had 
front-end overload.  Fortunately, he was able to avoid citations 
and impound, but was delayed substantially.

What will you say when an law enforcement person looks in your 
vehicle and says, What's that radio?  Does it receive or 
transmit on police frequencies?


Mike - AA8K


Richard Fletcher wrote:
  
 
  J. C. and the rest.
  
  Yes I am going to say this because it seems to have been missed. When 
 John asked is there a frequency monitored by law enforcement And to JC 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread Paul Holm
You mean during a traffic stop? or incidental chit-chat?  I'm assuming you 
mean during a stop.

Here in Minnesota I would politely hand him the copies of our state's 
'scanner law' that exempts Hams and of my FCC license that I keep in my 
glovebox.  And then be ready to wish him a good day when he realizes he has 
absolutely nothing to say under the law about any of the type accepted, 
unmodified radio equipment I have in my vehicle.


Paul - KC0HST



- Original Message - 
From: AA8K73 GMail
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers




 What will you say when an law enforcement person looks in your
 vehicle and says, What's that radio?  Does it receive or
 transmit on police frequencies?


 Mike - AA8K



[Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

2010-05-01 Thread na4it
I have started using this little kit 
(http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm) for fan control on 
repeaters. I can also be used as a PTT and Time Out circuit, along with a lot 
of other uses.

Download the pdf on that site and check it out.

Scott NA4IT



[Repeater-Builder] yaesu FTL-7011 Off Topic

2010-05-01 Thread John J. Riddell
I recently received a Yaesu FTL-7011 F radio. It's brand new in the box.
It has 24 channels and operates form 485-512 Mhz.

Can anyone think of a use for this thing ?

John   VE3AMZ

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread Matthew Kaufman
AARON LEWIS DINKIN wrote:


 I thought the FCC rules say during an emergency with immediate threat 
 to life and property you may use any means at your disposal 
 considering good operating practices and as long as there are no FCC 
 imposed communication  restrictions you may use any frequency that you 
 would be most likely to elicit help.  
Exactly. And while fire department channels, particularly fire 
department mutual aid channels, are likely places to find help... as is 
marine channel 16 if you're in a place where that is monitored,... 
police channels most definitely are not.

Not because you won't be heard, but because you'll either be carefully 
ignored or heard, but arrested, no matter what federal law says.

Matthew Kaufman


Re: [Repeater-Builder] yaesu FTL-7011 Off Topic

2010-05-01 Thread Com/Rad Inc
John

I found eBay is a good shopping ground for Vertex product.  Comparred to other 
makes of radio such as Midland and Icom etc we get more play on Vertex.
The frequency range isused comercially in certain areas of the US where the UHF 
TV spectrum allowed eralier part 90.114 allocation to land mobile service.
If you like we can post this in our ebay store if you would like to entertain a 
deal

73
Ed K9QPJ - http://www.com-rad.com
800 298 2850


  - Original Message - 
  From: John J. Riddell 
  To: Repeater-Builder 
  Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 12:17 PM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] yaesu FTL-7011 Off Topic




  I recently received a Yaesu FTL-7011 F radio. It's brand new in the box.
  It has 24 channels and operates form 485-512 Mhz.

  Can anyone think of a use for this thing ?

  John   VE3AMZ

  

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread Brian Raker
§97.111 Authorized transmissions.
(a) An amateur station may transmit the following types of two-way
communications:
...
  (3) Transmissions necessary to exchange messages with a station in another
FCC-regulated service while providing emergency communications;

Yes, we are allowed to do so only while providing emergency communications.
It's up to us to determine (hopefully with a good helping of common sense)
what is an emergency.

-Brian

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Richard Fletcher rickfle...@yahoo.comwrote:



  J. C. and the rest.

  Yes I am going to say this because it seems to have been missed. When John
 asked is there a frequency monitored by law enforcement And to JC who said
 he going to use any frequency that I have to get help (Not to bright of a
 statement there JC, from where do you get this grand sense of entitlement
 anyway?) You guys do know that in the US there is still available CB Radio
 Right? Chanel 9 used to be monitored prior to Cellular and  there on the 40
 CB channels  you can Legally communicate to your hearts content. As well
 as on the FRS devices. And with the flood of cell phones out there now, the
 CB Band is very clear. Now I do have radio equipment capable of almost any
 freq out there, but since I am not licensed on it I would not even concede
 transmitting on it. Only exception where I did was when I was at a GE Radio
 shop from 1980 to 1995 where I would call in to the PD and Fire Dispatcher
 (And government bands) to confirm transmission. and all was done
 professionally while in maintaining of that agency's radio equipment.
  I find it quite strange that any Ham (if you actually are one) would think
 that just because you have a radio capable of transmitting anywhere would
 think that he was entitled to do so. And no I am not a Ham, but I do listen!
 I am license on GMRS, and most folks there are in some cases more
 professional than that of some of the childish HAM conversations I have
 heard (usually on simplex freqs)

  Now I bet this will get things stirred up now won't they?

 Richard



  --
 *From:* J C jcar...@k9nzf.com

 *To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 *Sent:* Sat, May 1, 2010 12:30:08 AM

 *Subject:* [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers



 If my life is in danger, I am going to use any frequency that I have to get
 help. I don't care if it is a remote broadcast link frequency for a radio
 station! But that's me.

 --- In Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com,
 La Rue Communications laruec...@. .. wrote:
 
  I forgot to add something, kind of crucial to my point at the end back
 there. if my life was in jeopardy then. Is there a frequency that Law
 Enforcement monitors for non emergency situations? For the public sector? Or
 would it be any officer who knows how to build their own scanners? Let me
 reclarify - if I was in an accident, and my radio was in reach over my cell
 (i.e. my cell was in my pocket, or got knocked under the seat), and I had a
 life threatening injury, what kind of response would that evoke?
 
  John Hymes
  La Rue Communications
  10 S. Aurora Street
  Stockton, CA 95202
  http://tinyurl. com/2dtngmn http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn
  - Original Message -
  From: Maire-Radios
  To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:30 AM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio
 Dealers
 
 
 
 
  you should not even think of doing that.
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: La Rue Communications
  To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:10 PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio
 Dealers
 
 
 
 
  So if I had a UHF Saber, and programmed it to a Police frequency for the
 purposes of TX EMERGENCY info only like 911, then its required to have
 authorization? What if I was involved in a wreck and my radio was the only
 thing in reach over my cell?
 
  John Hymes
  La Rue Communications
  10 S. Aurora Street
  Stockton, CA 95202
  http://tinyurl. com/2dtngmn http://tinyurl.com/2dtngmn
  - Original Message -
  From: kd6aaj
  To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:58 AM
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers
 
 
 
 
 
  Strange, considering the GMRS can come with radios you buy, before you
 even have the license. I guess you have to be one of the BIG boys to sell
 radios preprogrammed with those freqs.
 
  and there is an EXCEPTION:
 
  Title 47: Telecommunication
  PART 90-PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICES
  Subpart N-Operating Requirements
 
  § 90.427 Precautions against unauthorized operation.
  (a) Each transmitter shall be so installed and protected that it is not
 accessible to or capable of operation by persons other than those duly
 

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

2010-05-01 Thread Eric Lemmon
Scott,

I must agree that the CK1614 is an extremely versatile timer, with many
potential uses.  However, using it for fan control is not only expensive,
but unnecessary.

A fan blowing on a transmitter heat sink does absolutely nothing immediately
after the transmitter is keyed, since the heat sink is likely at ambient
temperature.  It takes a period of time for the heat sink to warm up, so
operating the fan prematurely is a waste of energy- which may be an issue
for a solar-powered repeater.

IMHO, the most efficient means of fan control is also the cheapest:  A
thermal switch.  My first choice is a Cantherm #R2005015 normally-open
thermostat that closes at 50 degrees Celsius, about 122 degrees Fahrenheit.
When attached to a heat-sink fin, it turns the fan on when necessary, and
keeps it on until the heat sink cools below about 100 degrees F- around body
temperature.  This particular switch is available from Digi-Key for about
$9, as Catalog Number 317-1094-ND.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of na4it
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:38 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

  

I have started using this little kit
(http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm ) for fan
control on repeaters. I can also be used as a PTT and Time Out circuit,
along with a lot of other uses.

Download the pdf on that site and check it out.

Scott NA4IT







Re: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

2010-05-01 Thread Chuck Kelsey
I agree that timers for fans are a waste of time, effort and money.

If you can stand a little waste of power, I like to simply key the fan with 
a relay driven by PTT. Sure, it starts the fan before it's needed, but to me 
it's no big deal. Once the repeater stops transmitting, so does the source 
of heat - it won't get hotter, but will cool down slowly on it's own (just 
like turning the burner of your stove off - the pan starts to cool right 
away).

Chuck
WB2EDV



- Original Message - 
From: Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 2:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices


 Scott,

 I must agree that the CK1614 is an extremely versatile timer, with many
 potential uses.  However, using it for fan control is not only expensive,
 but unnecessary.

 A fan blowing on a transmitter heat sink does absolutely nothing 
 immediately
 after the transmitter is keyed, since the heat sink is likely at ambient
 temperature.  It takes a period of time for the heat sink to warm up, so
 operating the fan prematurely is a waste of energy- which may be an issue
 for a solar-powered repeater.

 IMHO, the most efficient means of fan control is also the cheapest:  A
 thermal switch.  My first choice is a Cantherm #R2005015 normally-open
 thermostat that closes at 50 degrees Celsius, about 122 degrees 
 Fahrenheit.
 When attached to a heat-sink fin, it turns the fan on when necessary, and
 keeps it on until the heat sink cools below about 100 degrees F- around 
 body
 temperature.  This particular switch is available from Digi-Key for about
 $9, as Catalog Number 317-1094-ND.

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of na4it
 Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:38 AM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices



 I have started using this little kit
 (http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
 http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm ) for fan
 control on repeaters. I can also be used as a PTT and Time Out circuit,
 along with a lot of other uses.

 Download the pdf on that site and check it out.

 Scott NA4IT







 



 Yahoo! Groups Links









No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2847 - Release Date: 05/01/10 
02:27:00



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

2010-05-01 Thread Larry Horlick
Eric,

This is good info. I have an immediate use for this. How have you actually
attached this 'stat to the fin?

Larry


On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net wrote:



 Scott,

 I must agree that the CK1614 is an extremely versatile timer, with many
 potential uses. However, using it for fan control is not only expensive,
 but unnecessary.

 A fan blowing on a transmitter heat sink does absolutely nothing
 immediately
 after the transmitter is keyed, since the heat sink is likely at ambient
 temperature. It takes a period of time for the heat sink to warm up, so
 operating the fan prematurely is a waste of energy- which may be an issue
 for a solar-powered repeater.

 IMHO, the most efficient means of fan control is also the cheapest: A
 thermal switch. My first choice is a Cantherm #R2005015 normally-open
 thermostat that closes at 50 degrees Celsius, about 122 degrees Fahrenheit.
 When attached to a heat-sink fin, it turns the fan on when necessary, and
 keeps it on until the heat sink cools below about 100 degrees F- around
 body
 temperature. This particular switch is available from Digi-Key for about
 $9, as Catalog Number 317-1094-ND.

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of na4it
 Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:38 AM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

 I have started using this little kit
 (http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
 http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm ) for fan
 control on repeaters. I can also be used as a PTT and Time Out circuit,
 along with a lot of other uses.

 Download the pdf on that site and check it out.

 Scott NA4IT

  



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread Matthew Kaufman
Brian Raker wrote:


 §97.111 Authorized transmissions.
 (a) An amateur station may transmit the following types of two-way 
 communications:
 ...
   (3) Transmissions necessary to exchange messages with a station in 
 another
 FCC-regulated service while providing emergency communications;

 Yes, we are allowed to do so only while providing emergency 
 communications.  It's up to us to determine (hopefully with a good 
 helping of common sense) what is an emergency.
Actually that's pretty easy. See 97.403 and 97.405.

Matthew Kaufman


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Kinda wandering off repeaters here, aren’t we?

 

Mike

WM4B

 

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Kaufman
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 3:06 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

 

  

Brian Raker wrote:


 §97.111 Authorized transmissions.
 (a) An amateur station may transmit the following types of two-way 
 communications:
 ...
 (3) Transmissions necessary to exchange messages with a station in 
 another
 FCC-regulated service while providing emergency communications;

 Yes, we are allowed to do so only while providing emergency 
 communications. It's up to us to determine (hopefully with a good 
 helping of common sense) what is an emergency.
Actually that's pretty easy. See 97.403 and 97.405.

Matthew Kaufman





[Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread J C
In reality what are the chances of needing to use any frequency that you're 
unauthorized to use in an emergency? And I am talking like like or death in a 
car sinking in the river emergency- not you have a flat tire and are stuck in a 
snow drift emergency. Most of the time one can use a cellphone of some other 
means rather than using a frequency that they are not licensed for. I bet you 
if I came up on a police car that had been in an accident and the officer was 
unconscious, I wouldn't get into a bit of trouble for picking up his radio and 
calling for help. It isn't any different if someone were to do it for 
themselves if need be. I'm sure they would investigate it, but I don't see how 
there would be anything to charge someone with if it is a true emergency. My 
sense of entitlement comes from that fact that I would use any resources that I 
have at my disposal to save someones life, and worry about the consequences 
later. Are you going to follow the speed limit if you are trying to get your 
loved one to a hospital because she is in labor, or worse yet sick or hurt? NO! 
We're talking about following rules here and there are always exceptions to the 
rule. I hope that I don't ever get put into a situation where I have to make 
those decisions, but I know what I would do. And if you would rather die or let 
someone die than to use a frequency that you unauthorized to use, good for you!

-Jordan 
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Richard Fletcher rickfle...@... 
wrote:

  J. C. and the rest.
 
  Yes I am going to say this because it seems to have been missed. When John 
 asked is there a frequency monitored by law enforcement And to JC who said 
 he going to use any frequency that I have to get help (Not to bright of a 
 statement there JC, from where do you get this grand sense of entitlement 
 anyway?) You guys do know that in the US there is still available CB Radio 
 Right? Chanel 9 used to be monitored prior to Cellular and  there on the 
 40 CB channels  you can Legally communicate to your hearts content. As 
 well as on the FRS devices. And with the flood of cell phones out there 
 now, the CB Band is very clear. Now I do have radio equipment capable of 
 almost any freq out there, but since I am not licensed on it I would not even 
 concede transmitting on it. Only exception where I did was when I was at a GE 
 Radio shop from 1980 to 1995 where I would call in to the PD and Fire 
 Dispatcher (And government bands) to confirm transmission. and
  all was done professionally while in maintaining of that agency's radio 
 equipment. 
  I find it quite strange that any Ham (if you actually are one) would think 
 that just because you have a radio capable of transmitting anywhere would 
 think that he was entitled to do so. And no I am not a Ham, but I do listen! 
 I am license on GMRS, and most folks there are in some cases more 
 professional than that of some of the childish HAM conversations I have 
 heard (usually on simplex freqs)
 
  Now I bet this will get things stirred up now won't they?
 
 Richard 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 From: J C jcar...@...
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Sat, May 1, 2010 12:30:08 AM
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers
 
   
 If my life is in danger, I am going to use any frequency that I have to get 
 help. I don't care if it is a remote broadcast link frequency for a radio 
 station! But that's me.
 
 --- In Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com, La Rue Communications 
 LaRueComm@ .. wrote:
 
  I forgot to add something, kind of crucial to my point at the end back 
  there. if my life was in jeopardy then. Is there a frequency that Law 
  Enforcement monitors for non emergency situations? For the public sector? 
  Or would it be any officer who knows how to build their own scanners? Let 
  me reclarify - if I was in an accident, and my radio was in reach over my 
  cell (i.e. my cell was in my pocket, or got knocked under the seat), and I 
  had a life threatening injury, what kind of response would that evoke?
  
  John Hymes
  La Rue Communications
  10 S. Aurora Street
  Stockton, CA 95202
  http://tinyurl. com/2dtngmn
  - Original Message - 
  From: Maire-Radios 
  To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com 
  Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 10:30 AM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers
  
  
  
  
  you should not even think of doing that.
  
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: La Rue Communications 
  To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com 
  Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:10 PM
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers
  
  
  
  
  So if I had a UHF Saber, and programmed it to a Police frequency for the 
  purposes of TX EMERGENCY info only like 911, then its required to have 
  authorization? What if I was involved in a wreck and my radio was the only 
  thing in reach over 

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

2010-05-01 Thread Kirk Just Kirk
I agree with Eric's assessment of the NOT running fans when not needed.
I do the same thing, slightly differant. I had some left over solid state
Waterbed thermostats. i wired them to switch around 109 degrees (they topped
out there).I wired them backwards to when the temp got to 109 they switched
on a SSR. fans would only start when needed. Saves the life of the
fans,filters and cuts down on the dirt inside the cabinet.
I am in the process of setting up a few PURC-5000/MSF5000 on 900Mhz and
440Mhz and they all will have this type of fan controller.The PURC has a set
of three fans in a rack mount.The heatsinks are MASSIVE in this beast, takes
a while for it to get warm.In Normal operation the fans will hardly run,
especially if they are in a cold mountaintop site

Kirk

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net wrote:



 Scott,

 I must agree that the CK1614 is an extremely versatile timer, with many
 potential uses. However, using it for fan control is not only expensive,
 but unnecessary.

 A fan blowing on a transmitter heat sink does absolutely nothing
 immediately
 after the transmitter is keyed, since the heat sink is likely at ambient
 temperature. It takes a period of time for the heat sink to warm up, so
 operating the fan prematurely is a waste of energy- which may be an issue
 for a solar-powered repeater.

 IMHO, the most efficient means of fan control is also the cheapest: A
 thermal switch. My first choice is a Cantherm #R2005015 normally-open
 thermostat that closes at 50 degrees Celsius, about 122 degrees Fahrenheit.
 When attached to a heat-sink fin, it turns the fan on when necessary, and
 keeps it on until the heat sink cools below about 100 degrees F- around
 body
 temperature. This particular switch is available from Digi-Key for about
 $9, as Catalog Number 317-1094-ND.

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY



 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of na4it
 Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:38 AM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

 I have started using this little kit
 (http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
 http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm ) for fan
 control on repeaters. I can also be used as a PTT and Time Out circuit,
 along with a lot of other uses.

 Download the pdf on that site and check it out.

 Scott NA4IT

  



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread Kris Kirby
On Sat, 1 May 2010, Mike Besemer (WM4B) wrote:
 Kinda wandering off repeaters here, aren?t we?
 
 Brian Raker wrote:
 
 
  ?97.111 Authorized transmissions.
  (a) An amateur station may transmit the following types of two-way
  communications:
  ...
  (3) Transmissions necessary to exchange messages with a station in
  another
  FCC-regulated service while providing emergency communications;
 
  Yes, we are allowed to do so only while providing emergency
  communications. It's up to us to determine (hopefully with a good
  helping of common sense) what is an emergency.
 Actually that's pretty easy. See 97.403 and 97.405.

We're way, wy off-topic.

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR
Disinformation Analyst


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread Eric Lowell
Seems like that happened a while ago. 
 Eric Lowell
Eastern Maine Electronics Inc.
48 Loon Road
Wesley ME 04686
eme@starband.net
www.satnetmaine.com
207-210-7469 





From: Mike Besemer (WM4B) mwbese...@cox.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, May 1, 2010 3:17:16 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

  
Kinda wandering off repeaters here, aren’t we?
 
Mike
WM4B
 
From:Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:Repeater- buil...@yahoogro 
ups.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Kaufman
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 3:06 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers
 
  
Brian Raker wrote:


 §97.111 Authorized transmissions.
 (a) An amateur station may transmit the following types of two-way 
 communications:
 ...
 (3) Transmissions necessary to exchange messages with a station in 
 another
 FCC-regulated service while providing emergency communications;

 Yes, we are allowed to do so only while providing emergency 
 communications. It's up to us to determine (hopefully with a good 
 helping of common sense) what is an emergency.
Actually that's pretty easy. See 97.403 and 97.405.

Matthew Kaufman



  

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

2010-05-01 Thread Kris Kirby
On Sat, 1 May 2010, Eric Lemmon wrote:
 A fan blowing on a transmitter heat sink does absolutely nothing 
 immediately after the transmitter is keyed, since the heat sink is 
 likely at ambient temperature.  It takes a period of time for the heat 
 sink to warm up, so operating the fan prematurely is a waste of 
 energy- which may be an issue for a solar-powered repeater.
 
 IMHO, the most efficient means of fan control is also the cheapest:  
 A thermal switch.  My first choice is a Cantherm #R2005015 
 normally-open thermostat that closes at 50 degrees Celsius, about 122 
 degrees Fahrenheit. When attached to a heat-sink fin, it turns the fan 
 on when necessary, and keeps it on until the heat sink cools below 
 about 100 degrees F- around body temperature.  This particular switch 
 is available from Digi-Key for about $9, as Catalog Number 
 317-1094-ND.

If you're going to be using solar power for the repeater, it might be 
just as wise to invest in metal -- more heatsink area and better 
heatsinking. Like, for instance, the head off of an old 
air-cooled Volkswagen. If you don't need a fan, and the temperature rise 
is acceptable

--
Kris Kirby, KE4AHR
Disinformation Analyst


RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread Butch Kanvick

I would think that law enforcement would need to have a search warrant to check 
the radio to see if it transmits on the law enforcement frequencies. I would 
also say they are over stepping the legal boundaries if they asked if the radio 
could transmit on law enforcement frequencies. Which frequencies would they be 
talking about, low band,vhf, uhf and 800 meg?

As a volunteer fire fighter I have several law enforcement channels included in 
the radios as back ups for emergency operations if the fire repeaters do not 
work. As we need to have constant communications with the dispatch center. We 
have used them before when we were out of range of the fire repeaters. A few 
people have used them for primary communications when they could not reach 911 
in an emergency, so we were covered and dispatch was happy to receive timely 
updates as the situation changed before law enforcement arrived.

Have a wonderful day, Butch, KE7FEL/r



 


To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
From: p...@chargertech.com
Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 10:07:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

  



You mean during a traffic stop? or incidental chit-chat? I'm assuming you 
mean during a stop.

Here in Minnesota I would politely hand him the copies of our state's 
'scanner law' that exempts Hams and of my FCC license that I keep in my 
glovebox. And then be ready to wish him a good day when he realizes he has 
absolutely nothing to say under the law about any of the type accepted, 
unmodified radio equipment I have in my vehicle.

Paul - KC0HST

- Original Message - 
From: AA8K73 GMail
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers



 What will you say when an law enforcement person looks in your
 vehicle and says, What's that radio? Does it receive or
 transmit on police frequencies?


 Mike - AA8K




  
_
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread MCH
I would submit that the FCC has claimed enforcement over radio 
transmissions in the USA, and that's in the radio is not relevant since 
it's out of his jurisdiction unless he wants to represent himself as a 
federal officer. Of course, this is not the proper attitude to present, 
but it is factually accurate.

BTW, since the 80s, the FCC's enforcement has maintained that it's the 
*end user's* responsibility to ensure licensing, not the programmer's. 
It's sad to see this interpretation reversing itself, as many times, and 
as I bet is the case here, the radios were programmed for an entity that 
has multiple licenses on the frequency in question, and it should not be 
the programmer's job to interrogate as to *where* the radios will be 
used. I bet they simply programmed them for Wal*Mart, a licensee, not 
for that specific store. It should be strictly Wal*Mart's responsibility 
to ensure that location is licensed properly. (and why would they not 
have a nationwide license in the first place?)

Back to repeaters anytime soon?

Joe M.

Butch Kanvick wrote:
 
 
 I would think that law enforcement would need to have a search warrant 
 to check the radio to see if it transmits on the law enforcement 
 frequencies. I would also say they are over stepping the legal 
 boundaries if they asked if the radio could transmit on law enforcement 
 frequencies. Which frequencies would they be talking about, low 
 band,vhf, uhf and 800 meg?
 As a volunteer fire fighter I have several law enforcement channels 
 included in the radios as back ups for emergency operations if the fire 
 repeaters do not work. As we need to have constant communications with 
 the dispatch center. We have used them before when we were out of range 
 of the fire repeaters. A few people have used them for primary 
 communications when they could not reach 911 in an emergency, so we were 
 covered and dispatch was happy to receive timely updates as the 
 situation changed before law enforcement arrived.
 
 Have a wonderful day, Butch, KE7FEL/r
 
 
 
  
 
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 From: p...@chargertech.com
 Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 10:07:06 -0500
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers
 
  
 You mean during a traffic stop? or incidental chit-chat? I'm assuming you
 mean during a stop.
 
 Here in Minnesota I would politely hand him the copies of our state's
 'scanner law' that exempts Hams and of my FCC license that I keep in my
 glovebox. And then be ready to wish him a good day when he realizes he has
 absolutely nothing to say under the law about any of the type accepted,
 unmodified radio equipment I have in my vehicle.
 
 Paul - KC0HST
 
 - Original Message -
 From: AA8K73 GMail
 Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 8:44 AM
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers
 
  
  
   What will you say when an law enforcement person looks in your
   vehicle and says, What's that radio? Does it receive or
   transmit on police frequencies?
  
  
   Mike - AA8K
 
 
 
 
 Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from 
 your inbox. See how. 
 http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
  
 
 
 






Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
repeater-builder-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
repeater-builder-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
repeater-builder-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

2010-05-01 Thread Mike Dietrich
Hey Eric,
The circuit board to the right in your picture;
Is that the controller and if so, what brand and model ?

Tnx,
Mike   KB5FLX


  - Original Message - 
  From: Eric Lemmon 
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 7:28 PM
  Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices



  Larry,

  My first use of this thermal switch was on a solar-powered Motorola R1225
  UHF repeater at a commercial site. I simply drilled and tapped two 4-40
  holes on a flat portion of the outside fin, and mounted the thermal switch
  after applying some heat-conductive paste. I used a three-inch low-EMI
  Panasonic fan blowing right on the fins. This is a 45-watt repeater set for
  about 30 watts output. It went into service early in 2003, and has been
  trouble-free ever since. I have attached a picture of what it looks like.

  73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Larry Horlick
  Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 11:56 AM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

  Eric,

  This is good info. I have an immediate use for this. How have you actually
  attached this 'stat to the fin?

  Larry

  On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net
  mailto:wb6...@verizon.net  wrote:



  Scott,

  I must agree that the CK1614 is an extremely versatile timer, with
  many
  potential uses. However, using it for fan control is not only
  expensive,
  but unnecessary.

  A fan blowing on a transmitter heat sink does absolutely nothing
  immediately
  after the transmitter is keyed, since the heat sink is likely at
  ambient
  temperature. It takes a period of time for the heat sink to warm up,
  so
  operating the fan prematurely is a waste of energy- which may be an
  issue
  for a solar-powered repeater.

  IMHO, the most efficient means of fan control is also the cheapest:
  A
  thermal switch. My first choice is a Cantherm #R2005015
  normally-open
  thermostat that closes at 50 degrees Celsius, about 122 degrees
  Fahrenheit.
  When attached to a heat-sink fin, it turns the fan on when
  necessary, and
  keeps it on until the heat sink cools below about 100 degrees F-
  around body
  temperature. This particular switch is available from Digi-Key for
  about
  $9, as Catalog Number 317-1094-ND.

  73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


  -Original Message-
  From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
  [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of na4it
  Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:38 AM
  To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
  mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
  Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

  I have started using this little kit
  (http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
  http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm 
  http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
  http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm  ) for fan
  control on repeaters. I can also be used as a PTT and Time Out
  circuit,
  along with a lot of other uses.

  Download the pdf on that site and check it out.

  Scott NA4IT





  

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

2010-05-01 Thread Richard
This has come up before, and I've also seen it come up in other groups. The
anything goes in an emergency crowd cannot be convinced that there are
virtually always consequences for their proposed actions, no matter what the
FCC says.
 
Hopefully the thread will die out soon; in the meantime some of the opinions
expressed are pretty funny.

Richard
www.n7tgb.net
The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's
money
--Margaret Thatcher


 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 12:17 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers


  


Kinda wandering off repeaters here, aren’t we?

Mike

WM4B

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Kaufman
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 3:06 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: A warning to Land Mobile Radio Dealers

  

Brian Raker wrote:


 §97.111 Authorized transmissions.
 (a) An amateur station may transmit the following types of two-way 
 communications:
 ...
 (3) Transmissions necessary to exchange messages with a station in 
 another
 FCC-regulated service while providing emergency communications;

 Yes, we are allowed to do so only while providing emergency 
 communications. It's up to us to determine (hopefully with a good 
 helping of common sense) what is an emergency.
Actually that's pretty easy. See 97.403 and 97.405.

Matthew Kaufman




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

2010-05-01 Thread Larry Horlick
This is excellent Eric. I have an R1225 repeater in a GR500 case. There is a
fan but it runs continuously. The duty cycle is low but because of the
nature of
the service there are times when it may be very high for extended periods of
time.
So most of the time the fan is not needed, but I want it there for those
rare occasions.
I don't recognize the part no. on the fan it looks remarkably similar to the
one stock in
GR500. This will work very well for me. Thanks.

lh

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net wrote:



 Larry,

 My first use of this thermal switch was on a solar-powered Motorola R1225
 UHF repeater at a commercial site. I simply drilled and tapped two 4-40
 holes on a flat portion of the outside fin, and mounted the thermal switch
 after applying some heat-conductive paste. I used a three-inch low-EMI
 Panasonic fan blowing right on the fins. This is a 45-watt repeater set for
 about 30 watts output. It went into service early in 2003, and has been
 trouble-free ever since. I have attached a picture of what it looks like.

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of Larry Horlick
 Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 11:56 AM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

 Eric,

 This is good info. I have an immediate use for this. How have you actually
 attached this 'stat to the fin?

 Larry

 On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Eric Lemmon 
 wb6...@verizon.netwb6fly%40verizon.net
 mailto:wb6...@verizon.net wb6fly%40verizon.net  wrote:



 Scott,

 I must agree that the CK1614 is an extremely versatile timer, with
 many
 potential uses. However, using it for fan control is not only
 expensive,
 but unnecessary.

 A fan blowing on a transmitter heat sink does absolutely nothing
 immediately
 after the transmitter is keyed, since the heat sink is likely at
 ambient
 temperature. It takes a period of time for the heat sink to warm up,
 so
 operating the fan prematurely is a waste of energy- which may be an
 issue
 for a solar-powered repeater.

 IMHO, the most efficient means of fan control is also the cheapest:
 A
 thermal switch. My first choice is a Cantherm #R2005015
 normally-open
 thermostat that closes at 50 degrees Celsius, about 122 degrees
 Fahrenheit.
 When attached to a heat-sink fin, it turns the fan on when
 necessary, and
 keeps it on until the heat sink cools below about 100 degrees F-
 around body
 temperature. This particular switch is available from Digi-Key for
 about
 $9, as Catalog Number 317-1094-ND.

 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


 -Original Message-
 From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%2540yahoogroups.com

 [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%2540yahoogroups.com
 ] On Behalf Of na4it
 Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:38 AM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
 mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%2540yahoogroups.com

 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

 I have started using this little kit
 (http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
 http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
 http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
 http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm  ) for fan
 control on repeaters. I can also be used as a PTT and Time Out
 circuit,
 along with a lot of other uses.

 Download the pdf on that site and check it out.

 Scott NA4IT



  



RE: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

2010-05-01 Thread Richard
It looks very professionally done. I use something similar, except that it
is glued to a heat sink fin.
 

Richard
www.n7tgb.net
The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's
money
--Margaret Thatcher


 

  _  

From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Eric Lemmon
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 5:29 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices


  

Larry,

My first use of this thermal switch was on a solar-powered Motorola R1225
UHF repeater at a commercial site. I simply drilled and tapped two 4-40
holes on a flat portion of the outside fin, and mounted the thermal switch
after applying some heat-conductive paste. I used a three-inch low-EMI
Panasonic fan blowing right on the fins. This is a 45-watt repeater set for
about 30 watts output. It went into service early in 2003, and has been
trouble-free ever since. I have attached a picture of what it looks like.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Larry Horlick
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 11:56 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

Eric,

This is good info. I have an immediate use for this. How have you actually
attached this 'stat to the fin?

Larry

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.
mailto:wb6fly%40verizon.net net
mailto:wb6...@verizon. mailto:wb6fly%40verizon.net net  wrote:



Scott,

I must agree that the CK1614 is an extremely versatile timer, with
many
potential uses. However, using it for fan control is not only
expensive,
but unnecessary.

A fan blowing on a transmitter heat sink does absolutely nothing
immediately
after the transmitter is keyed, since the heat sink is likely at
ambient
temperature. It takes a period of time for the heat sink to warm up,
so
operating the fan prematurely is a waste of energy- which may be an
issue
for a solar-powered repeater.

IMHO, the most efficient means of fan control is also the cheapest:
A
thermal switch. My first choice is a Cantherm #R2005015
normally-open
thermostat that closes at 50 degrees Celsius, about 122 degrees
Fahrenheit.
When attached to a heat-sink fin, it turns the fan on when
necessary, and
keeps it on until the heat sink cools below about 100 degrees F-
around body
temperature. This particular switch is available from Digi-Key for
about
$9, as Catalog Number 317-1094-ND.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of na4it
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:38 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

I have started using this little kit
(http://www.electron
http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
ickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
http://www.electron
http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
ickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm 
http://www.electron
http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
ickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
http://www.electron
http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
ickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm  ) for fan
control on repeaters. I can also be used as a PTT and Time Out
circuit,
along with a lot of other uses.

Download the pdf on that site and check it out.

Scott NA4IT








RE: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

2010-05-01 Thread Eric Lemmon
Larry,

That's odd; both the GR1225 and RKR1225 repeaters I am familiar with, which
use the R1225 transceiver, have a small thermal switch that is wedged
between two of the heat-sink fins.  In both repeaters, the fan runs only
when the radio gets hot.  I am surprised that you have a repeater using the
R1225 in which the fan runs continuously.  Perhaps this installation is a
prime candidate for a thermal switch!

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
 

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Larry Horlick
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 7:13 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

  

This is excellent Eric. I have an R1225 repeater in a GR500 case. There is a
fan but it runs continuously. The duty cycle is low but because of the
nature of
the service there are times when it may be very high for extended periods of
time.
So most of the time the fan is not needed, but I want it there for those
rare occasions.
I don't recognize the part no. on the fan it looks remarkably similar to the
one stock in
GR500. This will work very well for me. Thanks.

lh

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net
mailto:wb6...@verizon.net  wrote:


  

Larry,

My first use of this thermal switch was on a solar-powered Motorola
R1225
UHF repeater at a commercial site. I simply drilled and tapped two
4-40
holes on a flat portion of the outside fin, and mounted the thermal
switch
after applying some heat-conductive paste. I used a three-inch
low-EMI
Panasonic fan blowing right on the fins. This is a 45-watt repeater
set for
about 30 watts output. It went into service early in 2003, and has
been
trouble-free ever since. I have attached a picture of what it looks
like.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY

-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of Larry Horlick
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 11:56 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater
devices

Eric,

This is good info. I have an immediate use for this. How have you
actually
attached this 'stat to the fin?

Larry

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net
mailto:wb6fly%40verizon.net 
mailto:wb6...@verizon.net mailto:wb6fly%40verizon.net   wrote:



Scott,

I must agree that the CK1614 is an extremely versatile timer, with
many
potential uses. However, using it for fan control is not only
expensive,
but unnecessary.

A fan blowing on a transmitter heat sink does absolutely nothing
immediately
after the transmitter is keyed, since the heat sink is likely at
ambient
temperature. It takes a period of time for the heat sink to warm up,
so
operating the fan prematurely is a waste of energy- which may be an
issue
for a solar-powered repeater.

IMHO, the most efficient means of fan control is also the cheapest:
A
thermal switch. My first choice is a Cantherm #R2005015
normally-open
thermostat that closes at 50 degrees Celsius, about 122 degrees
Fahrenheit.
When attached to a heat-sink fin, it turns the fan on when
necessary, and
keeps it on until the heat sink cools below about 100 degrees F-
around body
temperature. This particular switch is available from Digi-Key for
about
$9, as Catalog Number 317-1094-ND.

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%2540yahoogroups.com  
[mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%2540yahoogroups.com  ] On Behalf Of na4it
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:38 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com 
mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
mailto:Repeater-Builder%2540yahoogroups.com  
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Neat kit for switching repeater devices

I have started using this little kit
(http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm
http://www.electronickits.com/kit/complete/elec/ck1614.htm 
 

[Repeater-Builder] Re: update on the repeater without duplexer isolation help

2010-05-01 Thread barancher
i realize this is posted months after you original post
did you go with the duplexer or stay with separate rx and tx antennas

without the duplexer you have much less loss

another question
have you considered placing your receive antenna at the top of your tower and 
side-mounting your transmit antenna 2 or 3 wave lengths below the rx antenna
i have found that this provides us with much better rx into the repeater from 
portables

just curious with your contact name are you in agriculture
we have a small cattle operation in OK
barancher

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, agrimm0034 agrimm0...@... wrote:

 My friend has a spare 6 cavity duplexer made by celwave. He tuned it into my 
 frequency on a service monitor and was able to get around 90db of isolation. 
 Is this a better improvement on my repeater or should I make a purchase off 
 him?





[Repeater-Builder] Looking For MSR2000 UHF RX and TX Boards

2010-05-01 Thread Eric Grabowski
Looking for a receiver board and a transmitter board from a Motorola MSR2000 
station. The boards must tune in the 440 to 450 MHz frequency range. Duplex TX 
board preferred but a simplex TX board would be okay. This is for a Ham Radio 
project. If you have one or both of these boards lying around gathering dust, 
please email me directly. Thanks for the bandwidth.

73 and aloha, Eric KH6CQ
kh...@arrl.net