[Repeater-Builder] GE Power Supply 19A149978BP1

2010-06-23 Thread Chuck Kimball
Anyone familiar with this beast?
It was installed with a MastrII station, but it's putting out 16VDC.
It's a newer supply 3RU/Black Front.   Looking inside I'm not seeing 
many options for getting the voltage down.
Repeater-Builder.com has a couple of references to the Power Supply in 
other manuals (EDACS Orion), so I'm guessing this was  a replacement 
that someone stuck in at some point.

Anyone who has dealt with one of these, or has a manual?

Thanks
Chuck  n0nhj
Glenwood Springs, CO


[Repeater-Builder] Monitoring Positive Ground 48 to negative Ground 0-5

2010-01-30 Thread Chuck Kimball
Speaking of monitoring

Anyone have an easy way of converting a Positive Ground 48 to 72 volt 
system to a Negative Ground 0-5V for monitoring?

Thanks
Chuck  n0nhj



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Monitoring Positive Ground 48 to negative Ground 0-5

2010-01-30 Thread Chuck Kimball
Yes, trying to monitor the local -48 Power system, and solar charging 
system with my APRS digi +12VDC that accepts 0-5VDC input.


Chuck

skipp025 wrote:

Chuck Kimball n0...@... wrote:
Speaking of monitoring
Anyone have an easy way of converting a Positive 
Ground 48 to 72 volt system to a Negative Ground 
0-5V for monitoring?



Do you want the voltage to vary with change in the 48 to 
72 volt dc supply? 

s. 








Yahoo! Groups Links




  


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Low Voltage Disconnect and Very Remote Site Operation

2010-01-25 Thread Chuck Kimball

Hi Mike:

I think the other Chuck try to usurp my answer.

I put together a web page of the most recent solar powered digi I built.
http://aprs.n0nhj.net/bb/index.html

This site is using a synthesized radio since I need multiple 
frequencies.   The best I've done is with an old MT500 that only has 
about a 12ma standby current draw.


The batteries at the smaller sites are all 24 to 28 Amp Hour Gel Cells. 


73's
Chuck  n0nhj



kc8fwd wrote:

Chuck,
I want to solar power a Digi and was curious what all you use and what type of 
batteries.Thanks Mike KC8FWD

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Kimball n0...@... wrote:
  
The 100 to 200ma to hold the coil in on some of the older LVDs can be 
more than the entire load at some sites. 
I run several solar powered digipeater sites where the standby current 
is 50ma.


Last summer I ran across the Samlex LVD's that are all solid state, and 
the load is only 4ma. 
http://www.samlex.com/pdf/products/batteryguard_en.pdf


Tessco carries the 40A version for about $65 (Gold Price)  (Non 
stock/special order).


I have had good luck with them so far. 

Chuck  
n0nhj












Yahoo! Groups Links




  


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Low Voltage Disconnect and Very Remote Site Operation

2010-01-24 Thread Chuck Kimball
The 100 to 200ma to hold the coil in on some of the older LVDs can be 
more than the entire load at some sites. 
I run several solar powered digipeater sites where the standby current 
is 50ma.

Last summer I ran across the Samlex LVD's that are all solid state, and 
the load is only 4ma. 
http://www.samlex.com/pdf/products/batteryguard_en.pdf

Tessco carries the 40A version for about $65 (Gold Price)  (Non 
stock/special order).

I have had good luck with them so far. 

Chuck  
n0nhj



Re: [Repeater-Builder] Split site link via IP

2009-03-10 Thread Chuck Kimball
In addition to what's already been mentioned, a pure linking box (no 
ID's etc.) on the commerical side is the JPS NXU2
http://www.jps.com/page/view/89about $750 for each end last time I 
priced them. 

Chuck  n0nhj



Ethercrash wrote:
 My repeater group is considering building split-site 6m machine.  As an 
 inter-site link, I was thinking of using some sort of VOIP arrangement via 
 the internet.  I'm curious if anyone has tried something like this:

 My idea is to use a point-to-point, private link (i.e. not IRLP or Echo) to 
 pump audio and maybe even some signaling between sites.  The receive site 
 would consist of the receive radio, controller (most likely an Arcom), and a 
 PC to do the encoding/streaming.  The transmit site would consist of a PC to 
 decode the audio stream, a PL decoder for TX logic, and the TX radio.  The 
 basic premise would be to take audio from the RX (PL filtered), fed thru the 
 controller, mixed with link PL, and fed to the PC's audio input.  The PC then 
 streams the audio over the internet to the RX site PC, where it is decoded 
 and fed to the TX radio, which will be keyed by a PL decoder (provided the IP 
 encode/decode process hasn't mangled the PL).

 Whew... Now, question is: will it work?  Or more properly, has anyone made 
 this work?  I'm going to try it on a small scale just to prove concept, but 
 I'm curious if anyone has tried this already.  My intention is to use 
 something along the lines of Winamp with Shoutcast or Windows Media Encoder 
 to stream the audio.  I'd rather find a Linux-based CLI encoder if such an 
 animal exists.  I had thought about using IRLP nodes as endpoints, but IRLP 
 policy would preclude that.

 Thoughts? Encouragement? FTW is he THINKING?!?! ;)  I'd be interested in the 
 group's thoughts, and I'll report the results of my experiments.

 Thanks  73,
 Brian, N4BWP



 



 Yahoo! Groups Links




   


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: MTR2000 Backplane Fuse

2008-12-29 Thread Chuck Kimball
Thanks everyone, that was the info I needed.   I had looked through the 
book several times, but
didn't expect to find a section on fuse replacement in with 'modules'. 

Mouser has them in stock for $0.67 each  Littlelfuse part number is 
0453005.MR


Thanks again
Chuck



wb6fly wrote:
I took a close look at a spare Motorola MTR2000 fuse, part number 
6583049X16, and can provide some additional data:  The fuse is 
rectangular, with a square cross-section, and measures about 6.0mm by 
2.6mm.  It has a ceramic body, with silver-plated end caps.  The 
legend IE5A is printed on one face.


This fuse seems to be identical to Littelfuse (note the spelling) 
Series 453 Nano fuses.  The data sheet is here:

www.littelfuse.com/data/en/Data_Sheets/Littelfuse_Fuse_451_453.pdf

73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY


--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ray Brown kb0...@... 
wrote:
  
- Original Message - 
From: Chuck Kimball n0...@...

To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 5:45 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] MTR2000 Backplane Fuse




Good Day Everyone:

I'm looking for some info on the small fuses on the backplane of 
  

the
  

MTR2000 repeaters.  I've got a Instruction/Field Service Manual
68P81096E30-C, and can't find anything in there on the part 
  

number for
  

the fuse.   Apparently Motorola doesn't think those are field
replaceable. ;)

They are a 5A very small 1/8x1/8x1/4* fuse not much larger than 
  

a
  
surface mount resistor - looks to be ceramic with metal ends.   
  

I've
  
seen these once before, but don't know the name of that style to 
  

do
  

any sort of a search on it.
  
  LittleFuse. I forget their exact part designation but several 


models of
  
hospital beds uses them. I had never seen them before and 


unfortunately
  
got them from the mfgr. of the beds because I needed some overnight 


and
  
didn't have time to search.  I got about 10 of each (they range 


from 0.5 to
  

7 amps @ 32 VDC) plus fuse holders for each one for $200. (sigh)

  I can't give any of the fuses away, but if anyone wants any 


surface-
  

mounts for these fuses, I think I have about 30 of them that I could
give away. :-)

  Anyway, Newark stocks them, too. :-)


Ray, KBØSTN










Yahoo! Groups Links




  


[Repeater-Builder] MTR2000 Backplane Fuse

2008-12-28 Thread Chuck Kimball
Good Day Everyone:

I'm looking for some info on the small fuses on the backplane of the
MTR2000 repeaters.  I've got a Instruction/Field Service Manual
68P81096E30-C, and can't find anything in there on the part number for
the fuse.   Apparently Motorola doesn't think those are field
replaceable. ;)  

They are a 5A very small 1/8x1/8x1/4* fuse not much larger than a
surface mount resistor - looks to be ceramic with metal ends.   I've
seen these once before, but don't know the name of that style to do
any sort of a search on it.  

The generic name or source for them would probably be quicker than
ordering through Motorola.

Thanks for the help

Chuck  n0nhj




[Repeater-Builder] Height Gain figure

2008-08-09 Thread Chuck Kimball
At one point I had read a number for figuring out the gain you get by 
increasing the height.  Of course at the moment I'm unable to locate that. 

ie: If I move the same antenna (VHF 2m) up a hill and gain 100' of 
elevation, but it costs me the line loss (300'), did I really gain 
anything. 
I'll figure in the line loss, and adjust the hardline to minimize the 
loss, but I'm looking for the number to compare how much gain (in db) 
did I get with the increased height.

So...  Anyone know what number is for gain as a function of height?  or 
know a reference I can look up.

Thanks
Chuck
n0nhj


[Repeater-Builder] Anderson Power Pole / MTR2000 Repeater

2008-08-02 Thread Chuck Kimball
Anyone know off hand which size of the Anderson Power Pole connectors is 
used on the MTR2000 repeaters?
I'm guessing the 75 AMP, but want to confirm that before I put in an 
order.  (It will be Tuesday before I'm back in a position to measure one).

Thanks
Chuck   n0nhj
Glenwood Springs, CO


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Switching a Repeater Betwen AC Sources

2008-08-02 Thread Chuck Kimball
Laryn:

Take a look at:  http://www.apc.com/products/family/index.cfm?id=14

This would do exactly what you want.  Don't bother with the new 
(Especially at $400), I have an older version picked up off of Ebay here 
at the house and it runs great.
Protects against the UPS failing, and since it's got a network 
connection I can log into it remotely and actually see the log of when 
power dropped out on either side.

Chuck  n0nhj


Laryn Lohman wrote:
 Thanks for the great posts so far.

 Perhaps I didn't make it clear in my original post--our equipment is
 and always has been plugged into the red receptacle.  It was installed
 by hospital electricians a number of years ago for us, and we are the
 sole load on the circuit.  It was the recent storm, and presumed
 lightning strike, that tripped the AC breaker in the emergency breaker
 panel in the penthouse where our stuff is.

 The point of all this is that the breaker tripped, leaving our
 equipment with no power duh hehehe.  So I was proposing a method of
 implementing a backup breaker in case one breaker trips.  My
 proposal is that our normal, daily supply would be the white
 receptacle.  If it goes dead, whether from utility failure or breaker
 trip, we have the red receptacle, which will then be ready to feed our
 stuff.

 The reason we would not want to be on the red receptacle normally is
 that in case of a lightning strike we are potentially left with a dead
 red from the strike, and dead white if the utility is down. 
 Obviously, another strike, after we've switched to the red, kills AC
 totally to our stuff.  The presumption is that a breaker probably
 won't trip, even after a strike, if there's not a load of some sort on
 it to complete a path for the tripping current.  Make sense?

 Eric, I think you're on my line of thinking.  Good point on keeping
 the greens isolated.

 Laryn K8TVZ




 



 Yahoo! Groups Links




   


Re: [Repeater-Builder] slightly OT: securing feedline to the side of a tower

2007-06-03 Thread Chuck Kimball
Have you even looked it up?   I didn't keep the original message, so 
I've lost what you really needed (Was the unistrut already in place?

Install I did last summer I spent:

10 pack of Hangers for 1/2 Hardline  16.00
10 Pack of Angle adapters 24.78

That gives you 40' of tower support for less than $50.  If you've got 
round members, you can grab the Stainless Steel hose clamps locally and 
don't even have the cost of the angle adapters.

Given todays price of Gas, It doesn't take but a couple of trips to a 
site to make up for the 'savings' of doing it cheaper.

YMMV

Chuck

Jay Urish wrote:
 Great advice! I know how much the andrew hardware costs... That would 
 bankrupt this project.
 
 I ended up going the all home depot route with galv unistrut and strut 
 clamps, minis  and my spacing is 8'. I will evaluate the load on the 
 feedline, and add additional supports in problem areas..
 
 
 Jeff DePolo wrote:

   Nope, because like you said, they would draw the feedline into the
   strut, smashing it all up...

 I regularly use cushioned clamps for attaching rigid feedline to unistrut.
 I usually buy them from McMaster-Carr, but I'm sure they're available
 elsewhere. McMaster-Carr has them available in tubing sizes in additional
 to normal trade sizes- 1 5/8 or 3 1/8 rigid line is really 1 5/8 or 3
 1/8 OD. The soft plastic insert prevents the clamps from damaging the
 line. Here's what they look like:

 www.mcmastercarr.com - search for 32625T62

 However, I wouldn't use them nor mini's (Minearallac-type EMT clamps) on a
 tower, nor would I use any kind of off-the-shelf galvanized, anodized, any
 kind of plated unistrut on a tower. The galv on regular electrical-grade
 hardware doesn't hold up as long as most other tower-grade galvanized
 structural steel. Valmont makes good hot-dipped galv strut if you wanted to
 go that route. And as always, use only high-grade galv or stainless bolts,
 nuts, and other hardware to attach to the tower. Never ever use any kind of
 plated steel components on a tower. They will quickly rust and become
 semiconductors, and you will almost as quickly be banished from the site
 (assuming managed by diligent/competent people).

 Personally, I'd stick with the real stuff - stainless round member adapters
 (hose clamps) or stainless angle member adapters (beam clamps), and
 stainless butterflies or snap-ins. Do it once, do it right. If you make a
 few calls to local tower companies, I'd bet you'll find someone that either
 has a surplus that they'll see you at a fraction of the new cost, or maybe
 even a few 5-gallon buckets of hardware taken down that might still be in
 good condition and can be reused.

 As far as spacing between brackets/hangers, it varies with wind speed, icing
 conditions, and line size. Here's Andrew's chart, based on EIA-222:

 http://www.andrew.com/search/BN_96221.aspx 
 http://www.andrew.com/search/BN_96221.aspx

 Most towers around here come from the factory with brackets spaced at 4'.

 And remember, coax hangers really aren't hangers. They aren't meant to
 hold the vertical weight of the line - that's what hoisting grips (aka
 Kellems grips) are for. The job of the hangers is to keep the line from
 flopping around horizontally in the wind, not to hold the weight up. A
 properly-installed butterfly is only tight enough to keep the line from
 moving, not hold the weight.

 As an alternative to butterflies or snap-ins, on big towers where feedline
 bundling is a necessity due to congestion and to reduce the windload, the
 traditional techinque is to install runs of rigid conduit the entire length
 of the tower (inside preferably), and then using tie wires (12AWG THHN
 solid) or band it stainless straps to aggregate the lines together around
 the conduit, again at regular (4' nominally) intervals. Hoisting grips are
 still used every 200' to hold the weight of each cable individually.

 Tie-wiring a cable directly to a leg is generally considered bad practice
 for a number of reasons. First, what do you do when you come to a leg
 flange? If you hug the cable tight against the flange, the sharp edges of
 the flange creates a spot for it to wear through. If you form the cable
 loosly around the flange, it leaves it open for room to move and create new
 problems that way. Also, by being mounted to the leg, it becomes an
 obstacle when someone else comes along and wants to attach an antenna mount
 to the leg. It's also more likely to get damaged by climbers and rigging
 lines. The list goes on and on...

 Hope this helps.

 --- Jeff


 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Antennas that work both in commercial and amateur

2007-02-15 Thread Chuck Kimball
I've had issues with the customer service folks at Sinclair also.  Will 
avoid them in the future when I can.   Had a circulator that showed up 
and can't be tuned with the normal adjustments to get it back on track. 
  After several excuses of needing a tax number and then some other 
documentation, they just stopped answering my emails asking for an RMA. 
  Two years later, I've given up.

YMMV
Chuck  n0nhj


skipp025 wrote:
 Yep... 
 
 About $10K to $15K worth of crap VHF Antennas bad... Doesn't keep 
 me from buying more... just not the model/type we bought with the 
 problems that have yet to be resolved.  I only get a chance to 
 grind on them about it at IWCE each year... every year. 
 
 Overall Sinclair makes and made great stuff. But I have a large 
 collection of VHF Aluminum Sinclair Edsels in my collection. 
 
 cheers,
 skipp 
 
 Jed Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 wow, really, that bad?

   _  

 From: skipp025 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 3:36 PM
 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Antennas that work both in
 commercial and
 amateur



 Sinclair makes what you're looking for... but you won't like the 
 price... and if their customer service is still as bad as my last 
 experience you won't enjoy trying to resolve any problems that 
 might pop up. 

 cheers,
 skipp 

 Jed Barton jed@ wrote:

 Hey guys,
 I need some suggestions. I need a vhf and a uhf antena.
 Here's the requirement. I'm planning to operate both amateur and
 commercial
 stuff from the house.
 I'd rather not use a ham antenna in the commercial bands.
 Are there some that'll do the 136 to 174 split, and some UHF that'll
 do like
 439 to 490?
 Any ideas?

 Thanks,
 Jed

 
 
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 


Re: [Repeater-Builder] Mystery Signal

2006-12-14 Thread Chuck Kimball
The other way you could help rule out anything on that tower would be to 
get a list of the transmitters there and listen to their frequency and 
compare when you're hearing the interference.  Make take a day or two to 
get through them all, but that should help.

i.e.  Scanner or extra receiver tuned to example 151.085 at the :53 
transmission, nothing heard and no key up during that time, move on to 
the next frequency and listen at the :23 transmission, etc.  If the 
tower owner knows they are running a data specific type system that 
would be the one to start with.  If you don't want to bug him again, 
start with a search of the FCC database for those coordinates.
http://www.fcc.gov   click on search, etc.  You can enter the lat/lon 
and a radius around and list out the transmitters.

Chuck
n0nhj

Scott Overstreet wrote:
 Hello All
  
 Many thanks to all of you who have responded to my call for help in 
 identifing our Mystery Signal--all of your comments and especially 
 the signal analysis work done by Rodger, Nate, Joe and others are 
 helping with our task. Please keep up the effort as we have not found 
 our signal yet.
  
 Preliminary Doppler DF work has us surounding a large scale municiple 
 tower with what we have labled our area of uncertainitya half mile 
 diameter circle or so. Distant vectors from clear areas converge there 
 but close in vectors disperce in almost all directions apparently due to 
 reflections from tall buildings, cars, metel doors, roofs etc.. We are 
 now rounding up a team of experienced DF'ers with other techniques. I 
 have succeded in making contact with the guy that is responsible for the 
 Motorola gear on the towerhe says that our signal isn't comming from 
 any of his stuff but that there is other gear in the radio room and that 
 he will look it over while monitoring by service monitor---a start there.
  
  From your responses so far, it sounds like we may well be looking for a 
 piece of ham gear that is mistakenly on our repeater inputwith this 
 we will get back into the neighborhoods around the tower for a new look 
 and spread the word through the packet guys.
  
 Again, many thanks to all of you-I'll keep you informed.
  
 Scott
 
 
 
 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG Free Edition.
 Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.18/585 - Release Date: 12/13/2006
 


[Repeater-Builder] Re: [Repeaters] In-Band linking question

2006-11-03 Thread Chuck Kimball
Very Generally...

Comm Shop tells me that you need 50.2 db of isolation between the antennas for 
10 watts and .25 rx sens. 
10 feet of vertical separation, or 81 feet of horizontal.   

If you've got less than that, you could add a pass cavity to the transmitter 
and probably make up the amount needed. 

Chuck  n0nhj


- Original Message 
From: Vincent Caruso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 3, 2006 12:49:30 PM
Subject: [Repeaters] In-Band linking question

I have a question regarding linking receivers to a main site via RF, the 
situation is as follows:
Receiver 462.XXX Link Frequencies available are in the 451. range 
the average separation is about 10.5 MHz
The receivers will be mostly located on building tops so there are no 
towers in the equation and vertical separation will not be easy (give or 
take 6' to 10').

I wanted to use two separate antennas an omni antenna for the 462.XXX 
frequency and a yagi for the link transmitter (LOS should not be an 
issue).  Output power on the link transmitter will most likely be no 
more than 10 Watts.

Now for the questions.

Will I be able to get away with this scenario or do I need to combine 
antennas and install a duplexer at the sites?

If I don't use a duplexer how much separation would I need between the 
Yagi and the Omni?

Has anyone else on this list done this before and how did it work out?

Thanks to all in advance

Vince




The popular, friendly and calm repeater mailing list.  If you have questions or 
comments about this mailing list, please contact Ray Vaughan, KD4BBM, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]   Please pass the word about this list to every repeater owner or 
operator you know.We learn from each other, so the more, the better.   
Yahoo! Groups Links











 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



[Repeater-Builder] Yoke - for mounting duplexer cavities

2006-03-24 Thread Chuck Kimball
Good Day All:

I'm looking for a source for the plastic part that Sinclair uses in 
their duplexers for holding the cans to the cross rails.  I found 
out they call it a 'yoke', but so far have been unsuccessful in 
getting a part number or price out of them to order some.  (Or an 
RMA for a Circulator, but that's another story). 

Due to a building that is really tight on space, I've stripped the 
duplexer out of the cabinet and mounted the cans to the ceiling.  
Now I've got a couple of more cavities to mount, and am out of 
the 'yokes' from the duplexer.  

Any suggestions or locations to find those sorts of mounting 
brackets.  I'm familiar with how TX/RX does just the L bracket for 
the hose clamp, but prefer the spacing the plastic piece from 
Sinclair 
provides.  

Thanks
Chuck








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[Repeater-Builder] Motorola Repeater DC Power Plugs

2005-11-10 Thread Chuck Kimball
Good Day:

Anyone know off the top of their head which of the Anderson Power plugs 
motorola uses on the stations (MTR2000, etc.)?

Looking at the web site, I'm guessing the 75 Amp, but want to verify 
with someone who might have actually researched this.
It's going to take a couple of months to get these delivered, and I 
don't want to get it wrong.

Thanks
Chuck Kimball
n0nhj






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] DeskTrac power supply question

2005-08-02 Thread Chuck Kimball






Earlier this week I battery backed up a desktrac here at the house for
my aprs Igate. Since I already had a power supply and battery setup,
I just left the desktrac power supply unplugged, and lifted the spade
terminals and wired them to my fuse block on the way to the battery.
Used two sets of wire - 1 for the PA power on the back of the radio,
and the 2nd for the smaller wire to the control board under the rf. If
I ever want to restore it, I just need to put the spades back on the
power supply. The manual I have has very little info on the battery
revert option, other than it will only provide 100 ma for charging. I
decided the independent system would work better fore me.

Chuck
n0nhj





Thomas Oliver wrote:

  
  
  
  
  I would like to know if the internal power supply will allow me
to conect a battery for battery backup. There seems to be some .25 male
spade terminals near the output rail. I do not have a manual so I don't
want to ruin anything.
  
  tom n8ies
  
  
  "BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU!"
  This message brought to you by the US Department of Homeland
Security
  
















  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  










[Repeater-Builder] Slightly OT - Looking for programming info on RNET450S radios

2005-07-15 Thread Chuck Kimball
I picked up some RNET 450S radios at the Williams Hamfest last weekend, 
and am looking for the programming information on them. 
(I've got the Cable  the Rib).

Intend to use a pair of them for a portable repeater.

Thanks.
Chuck n0nhj
Glenwood Springs, CO






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] highest repeater?

2004-10-01 Thread Chuck Kimball






I believe the highest in Colorado (off the top of my head) would be the
Pikes Peak machines.
146.970, and 448.450 at 14,109 feet above mean sea level.

Chuck n0nhj

mch wrote:

  The HIGHEST repeater I can think of would be in Colorado, or the Rocky
Mountain chain somewhere. I'm sorry this doesn't answer your question,
but I bet it helps others understand what the question is. :-)

Of course, an OSCAR unit would be the highest repeater, but that's not
just limited to the USA.

Joe M.

Doug Strobel-KB3HAM wrote:
  
  
Hello all me and a buddy wer talking and sounthing came up. Does anyone by
any chance no what the hiest elavation repeater is or was in the us?.  2m ,
70cm  what ever thanks alot for the help in answering my strange  question
73
Doug Strobel kb3ham

  
  




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


  















Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.











Re: [Repeater-Builder] Topographical website?

2004-02-08 Thread Chuck Kimball
http://www.topozone.com

Chuck  n0nhj

Tim Shephard wrote:

Is there a website where you can punch in the lat/long and get the altitude?

-Tim
www.telecom-pros.com/tim/tim  
eFax (508)590-0320





 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 

  






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] newbie here needs help - PAC RT

2003-12-17 Thread Chuck Kimball
Jay:
There are lots of special versions out there, but the standard PAC RT 
was used with a mobile
radio to create an in car cross band repeaters.  Depending on the 
version, and the mobile it was
interfaced with, it typically hooked to a Micor or Syntor (or lots of 
others) mobile radio on
Low Band, then the officer would carry a high band radio.  When he/she 
got out of the car
they would turn on the repeater which would allow them to talk on 
154.695 with a PL tone,
and it would key the car radio.  Anything received on the car radio 
would be broadcast back
out on 154.695 carrier squelch, but the PAC RT would drop ever couple of 
seconds for a
few milliseconds to listen for a response from the officer.  The RT 
versions also had special
signaling between the units so if more than one was at a scene only one 
would be active. 

Not really very useful in the standard configuration, the RF was based 
on a portable radio,
and only ran 2 watts or less for most units.You might be able to use 
the RF if you were
building something for low power, but if you're planning a 100 watt, I'm 
guessing you've got
AC power, and the PAC RT RF probably wouldn't be the best option. 


Hope this helps.

Chuckn0nhj
Grand Junction, CO


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello everyone,
I am a newbie here, I admit it, I know knowthing! So please dont 
make fun of me. I have been a No-Code Tech for almost 12 years, but 
never really learned much. Now here is where I need help, I want to 
setup a 100 watt repeater near my camp . I have a Motorola Fm Mobile 
Repeater Radio PAC-RT and the key that opens the case. I have no 
wires or instructions. On one side it says it is on a frquency of 
154.695, I know this is a State Police frequency in most states so I 
cant use it as is. Inside it has a label with Recvr1 42.74. Could 
you please tell me what I have and is it possible to reprogram this 
to a different frequency in the 154.*** band Transmit and Receive. Or 
do I have junk and forget about it. Thank you in advance.

Dad1Boy1Girl
Jay
n2orw
 





 

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 



  





 

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




[Repeater-Builder] COR on HT600 for solar repeater

2003-12-14 Thread Chuck Kimball
I've collected a couple of HT600's I'm planning on trying to use as a
low power repeater, but don't have the manual
yet.

Anyone done anything similar, and are familiar with where to pickup the
COR  PL decode point?

Also anyone done anything similar with a 220 radio (I'll need one for
the link to the rest of the system),
any preferences?A 3AT will not work, I need to be doing the reverse
split, which it won't handle.

Thanks
Chuck   n0nhj





 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/