[request-sponsor] Can this be a fix for Bug-6490935?
Hi Carol,
Now , I have come to know that Ctrl-D doesnot generate a signal but signals EOF.
So , i made the following changes in the code again.
*
char *getresponse(char *oldval)
{
charresp[MAX_INPUT_LEN];
char*retval = NULL;
int resplen;
char c;
c=getchar();
if(c==EOF) {
retval=c;
fprintf(stderr,MSG_CTRL,c);
passwd_exit(CTRL);
}else {
(void) fgets(resp, sizeof (resp) - 1, stdin);
resplen = strlen(resp) - 1;
if (resp[resplen] == '\n')
resp[resplen] = '\0';
if (*resp != '\0' strcmp(resp, oldval) != 0)
retval = strdup(resp);
return (retval);
}
}
***
n the above MSG_CTRL is a macro defined under the messages column as
#define MSG_CTRL\nYou have typed %c (or Ctrl-D) which is
unacceptable\n
And CTRL is a macro defined under the exit values column as
#define CTRLD11 /*Exit value for typing Ctrl-D*/
Now we include this CTRLD macro under the switch-case block of
passwd-_exit() function
before the default block:
case CTRLD:
(void) fprintf(stderr, %s\n, gettext(MSG_SHELL_UNCHANGED));
break;
*
Now when we type 'passwd -e' in the shell and when prompted for a new
shell, we type
Ctrl-D, the output is
You have pressed #(or Ctrl-D) which is unacceptable.
Login shell unchanged.
***
Note: # in the above refers to a unwanted character
I hope that this is definitely better than the previous one.
Regards,
Samir Kumar Mishra
3rd year , Electronics and Telecommunication Engg.
UCE, Burla(India)
On 12/27/07, samir kumar mishra samirkumar.mishra at gmail.com wrote:
Hi Carol,
This is Samir Kumar Mishra from India.
I was just looking at this bug -6490935.(passwd does not handle
Control-D input correctly)
I think we can make the fix by doing the following changes in getresponse():
**
char *getresponse(char *oldval)
{
charresp[MAX_INPUT_LEN];
char*retval = NULL;
int resplen;
char c;
if(c==-2) {
retval=c;
fprintf(stderr,MSG_CTRL,c);
passwd_exit(CTRL);
}else {
(void) fgets(resp, sizeof (resp) - 1, stdin);
resplen = strlen(resp) - 1;
if (resp[resplen] == '\n')
resp[resplen] = '\0';
if (*resp != '\0' strcmp(resp, oldval) != 0)
retval = strdup(resp);
return (retval);
}
}
***
In the above MSG_CTRL is a macro defined under the messages column as
#define MSG_CTRLYou have typed %c (or Ctrl-D) which is
unacceptable\n
And CTRL is a macro defined under the exit values column as
#define CTRL11 /*Exit value for typing Ctrl-D*/
***
Now we include this CTRL macro under the switch-case block of
passwd-_exit() function
before the default block:
case CTRL:
(void) fprintf(stderr, %s\n,
gettext(MSG_SHELL_UNCHANGED));
break;
Now when we type 'passwd -e' in the shell and when prompted for a new
shell, we type
Ctrl-D, the output is
You have pressed #(or Ctrl-D) which is unacceptable.
Login shell unchanged.
***
Note: # in the above refers to a unwanted character
I have used c == -2 because when i wanted to test what number
corresponds to the character
generated by pressing Ctrl-D.
Here is another idea.If we could know what signal is generated when
Ctrl-D is pressed then we can do it more easily.
I hope this works out. I would be happier if i can work as your
team-member also.
Regards,
Samir Kumar Mishra
3rd year , Electronics and Telecommunication Engg.
UCE, Burla(India)
[request-sponsor] Can this be a fix for Bug-6490935?
Hi all, Unfortunately, I have worked on a bug that is already being sponsored and i think i have got the fix ready and submitted the same. BUG DETAILS: ** Synopsis:passwd does not handle Control-D input correctly Category:utility SubCategory:security ** Is it possible for me to team up with the Responsible Engineer? Regards, Samir Kumar Mishra
[request-sponsor] Can this be a fix for Bug-6490935?
Hi all,
Special thanks to Casper for his guidance.OK, then we just modify the
getresponse () function as below:
char *getresponse(char *oldval)
{
charresp[MAX_INPUT_LEN];
char*retval = NULL;
int resplen;
int c;
c=getchar();
if(c==EOF) {
fprintf(stderr,MSG_CTRL);
passwd_exit(CTRLD);
}else {
(void) fgets(resp, sizeof (resp) - 1, stdin);
resplen = strlen(resp) - 1;
if (resp[resplen] == '\n')
resp[resplen] = '\0';
if (*resp != '\0' strcmp(resp, oldval) != 0)
retval = strdup(resp);
return (retval);
}
}
And now, we just change the macro MSG_CTRL to
#define MSG_CTRL\nYou have typed Ctrl-D which is unacceptable\n
The other macro CTRLD remains the same.
#define CTRLD 11 /*Exit value for typing Ctrl-D*/
*
Now when we type 'passwd -e' in the shell and when prompted for a new
shell, we type Ctrl-D, the output is
You have pressed or Ctrl-D which is unacceptable.
Login shell unchanged.
*
Hope this solves the bug.
Regards,
Samir Kumar Mishra
3rd year , Electronics and Telecommunication Engg.
UCE, Burla(India)
On 12/28/07, Casper.Dik at sun.com Casper.Dik at sun.com wrote:
Hi Carol,
Now , I have come to know that Ctrl-D doesnot generate a signal but signals
EOF.
So , i made the following changes in the code again.
*
char *getresponse(char *oldval)
{
charresp[MAX_INPUT_LEN];
char*retval = NULL;
int resplen;
char c;
c=getchar();
getchar() returns an int and so c must be of type int.
Casper
[request-sponsor] Submission of fix for Bug-6573754
Hi all,
I think this can be the solution for the Bug--6573754
BUG Details
*
Synopsis timex error message when you forget a command is cryptic
State 1-Dispatched (Default State)
Category: utility
Subcategory accounting
Link:http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6573754
*
Solution needs the following changes in timex.c
Link---http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/cmd/sa/timex.c
Step-1: Delete line no 99
if (optind = argc) diag(Missing command);
Step-2 : Insert the followig lines after line number 80 starting at
line number 81
if(optind=argc) {
fprintf(stderr,\nMissing command\n);
diag(Usage: timex [-s][-o][-p[-fhkmrt]] cmd);
}
Now the output when we type 'timex' and forget to specify the program
is given below:
Missing command
Usage: timex [-s][-o][-p[-fhkmrt]] cmd
***
I would like to request a sponsor so that this fix can be evaluated
Regards,
Samir Kumar Mishra
3rd year , Electronics and Telecommunication Engg,
University College of Engineering, Burla(India)
[request-sponsor] AHCI driver patches for JMicron JMB363
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Boris Derzhavets wrote: AHCI driver in SNV59, SNV66,75a,76 did work with JMicron JMB363 and Intel ICH8R (set up in BIOS to AHCI mode) on ASUS P5B Deluxe. Just a bit slow, but no more complaints. That's interesting... perhaps the Asus BIOS configures the JMB363 differently. For the Intel ICH chips all the motherboard manufacturers seem to use the Intel AHCI BIOS, but I notice that Gigabyte has their own BIOS for the JMB363 controller... they even call it Gigabyte SATA with no reference to JMicron. Are you able to send me the prtconf -v output from the Asus board when the JMB363 is set to AHCI mode in BIOS? I'm particularly interested in seeing whether you have the AHCI and legacy IDE interfaces split into two separate PCI functions on the JMB363 device, and how long the regs property is for these functions. Thanks, Luke.
[request-sponsor] Bugs: 6615447,6248378 , 6445628, 6493125
Avinash, Other contributors have already shown interest to work on two of these bugs: 6248378 Archana/Veena/Sudersanan 6445628 Rishi Nair Regards, Kini On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:50 -, Avinash Joshi wrote: }Hi all. } }I am interested in working on bugs 6615447,6248378 , 6445628, 6493125. } }I will work on the bugs one by one. This is just to say the forum that i am interested in working on those bugs. } }Below are the synopsis and category/subcategory for each bug. } } }Bug ID :: 6615447 }Synopsis :: r.manifest can use $smf_alive without ever setting it }Category:Subcategory :: utility:smf } } } }Bug ID :: 6248378 }Synopsis :: general/enabled problems aren't handled completely }Category:Subcategory :: utility:smf } } } }Bug ID :: 6445628 }Synopsis :: Add a ::rootpage dcmd }Category:Subcategory :: utility:mdb } } } }Bug ID :: 6493125 }Synopsis :: df options needlessly differ between /usr/bin/ and /usr/xpg4/bin/ }Category:Subcategory :: utility:filesystem } } }My SCA number is OSO145. } }Thanks Regards, }Avinash Joshi } } }This message posted from opensolaris.org }___ }request-sponsor mailing list }request-sponsor at opensolaris.org } -- Sun Microsystems - India Engineering Centre http://blogs.sun.com/jkini
[request-sponsor] Can this be a fix for Bug-6490935?
Hi Samir, I guess its ok to team up as long as the other contributor agrees with it. I would say its not fair for the other contributor as you missed this bug in the request_sponsor page. I see that you have already picked up another bug. Two of your bugs were already being sponsored. I can see that your enthusiasm has not diminised because of this. Please be careful in picking up the bugs and continue to contribute. Regards, Kini On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:17 -, samir kumar mishra wrote: }Hi all, } }Unfortunately, I have worked on a bug that is already being sponsored }and i think i have got the fix ready and submitted the same. } }BUG DETAILS: }** }Synopsis:passwd does not handle Control-D input correctly }Category:utility }SubCategory:security }** } }Is it possible for me to team up with the Responsible Engineer? } } }Regards, }Samir Kumar Mishra }___ }request-sponsor mailing list }request-sponsor at opensolaris.org } -- Sun Microsystems - India Engineering Centre http://blogs.sun.com/jkini
[request-sponsor] Can this be a fix for Bug-6490935?
Jayakara: JK I guess its ok to team up as long as the other contributor agrees with it. i was planning to submit this along with the fix for 1214359 *passwd*:passwd does not allow -egh arguments for files repository however, that got stalled somewhere and so neither fix has been integrated. i've no problems if someone else wants to take it over. - river.
[request-sponsor] Can this be a fix for Bug-6490935?
Hi all, Thanks for your support , i would like learn more and more and contribute. Regards, Samir On 12/28/07, River Tarnell river at wikimedia.org wrote: Jayakara: JK I guess its ok to team up as long as the other contributor agrees with it. i was planning to submit this along with the fix for 1214359 *passwd*:passwd does not allow -egh arguments for files repository however, that got stalled somewhere and so neither fix has been integrated. i've no problems if someone else wants to take it over. - river.
[request-sponsor] Submission of fix for Bug-6573754
On 12/28/07, samir kumar mishra samirkumar.mishra at gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think this can be the solution for the Bug--6573754
BUG Details
*
Synopsis timex error message when you forget a command is cryptic
State 1-Dispatched (Default State)
Category: utility
Subcategory accounting
Link:http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6573754
*
Solution needs the following changes in timex.c
Link---http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/cmd/sa/timex.c
Step-1: Delete line no 99
if (optind = argc) diag(Missing command);
Step-2 : Insert the followig lines after line number 80 starting at
line number 81
if(optind=argc) {
fprintf(stderr,\nMissing command\n);
diag(Usage: timex [-s][-o][-p[-fhkmrt]] cmd);
}
Now the output when we type 'timex' and forget to specify the program
is given below:
Missing command
Usage: timex [-s][-o][-p[-fhkmrt]] cmd
***
I would like to request a sponsor so that this fix can be evaluated
This is to bring to your kind information that i have already
submitted my Sun Contriutor's agreement and waiting to get it.
Regards,
Samir Kumar Mishra
3rd year , Electronics and Telecommunication Engg,
University College of Engineering, Burla(India)
[request-sponsor] assignment request for Bug ID -6641990
Hi Narendra, Which email id have you used in your Sun Contributor Agreement? You should have used the same email id to send requests. I believe you are a Campus Ambassador which means you are designated as an intern at Sun. If you want to contribute as an intern, then you can do so without going through request-sponsor process. If you want to contribute as an individual, then please use a non-sun email id. If you are participating in the CFF contest, then please note that it is ending on Feb 14. Please make your contribution at the earliest. Regards, Kini On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:26 -, Narendra Pant wrote: } } }hi }i would like to work on this bug and want this assigned to me .it will }take me about one month to come back with a contribution. } } }Bug ID 6641990 }Synopsis *svcs* should not show instances which don't have a 'general' }property group } } }Regrds } -- Sun Microsystems - India Engineering Centre http://blogs.sun.com/jkini
[request-sponsor] Submission of fix for Bug-6573754
Samir
Avinash Joshi (OS0145) worked in this bug before but now he have withdrawn.
Eric.Saxe at Sun.COM was sponsoring him before his withdrawal. So check with
Eric whether he is still sponsoring, otherwise I will sponsor you.
Regards
Viswa
samir kumar mishra wrote:
On 12/28/07, samir kumar mishra samirkumar.mishra at gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think this can be the solution for the Bug--6573754
BUG Details
*
Synopsis timex error message when you forget a command is cryptic
State1-Dispatched (Default State)
Category: utility
Subcategory accounting
Link:http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6573754
*
Solution needs the following changes in timex.c
Link---http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/cmd/sa/timex.c
Step-1: Delete line no 99
if (optind = argc) diag(Missing command);
Step-2 : Insert the followig lines after line number 80 starting at
line number 81
if(optind=argc) {
fprintf(stderr,\nMissing command\n);
diag(Usage: timex [-s][-o][-p[-fhkmrt]] cmd);
}
Now the output when we type 'timex' and forget to specify the program
is given below:
Missing command
Usage: timex [-s][-o][-p[-fhkmrt]] cmd
***
I would like to request a sponsor so that this fix can be evaluated
This is to bring to your kind information that i have already
submitted my Sun Contriutor's agreement and waiting to get it.
Regards,
Samir Kumar Mishra
3rd year , Electronics and Telecommunication Engg,
University College of Engineering, Burla(India)
___
request-sponsor mailing list
request-sponsor at opensolaris.org
[request-sponsor] Submission of fix for Bug -6626020
Samir Looks like Chad have already sent a request for sponsor before you for this bug fix. So I will be sponsoring Chad. Sorry for the confusion. Chad please communicate with me directly to proceed from here. Regards Viswa Chad Mynhier wrote: On Dec 27, 2007 6:10 AM, Viswanathan Kannappan Viswanathan.Kannappan at sun.com wrote: Samir I will sponsor you for this bug. Please contact me directly from now regarding this. Regards Viswa You might want to note that there's already a sponsor request for this bug. Chad
[request-sponsor] Bug : 6621767
Hi , I would like to work on the bug : 6621767 and will finish working on it within a week. (I dont have a fix ready yet) *Bug ID *: 6621767 *Synopsis* : Need better error message when trying to delete non-existent discovery address. *Category:Subcategory* : storage_target:iscsi *My SCA number is* : OS0186 *My opensolaris id* : rej Thanks Regards, Rejeesh Nath -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/attachments/20071228/1f01a491/attachment.html
[request-sponsor] Can this be a fix for Bug-6490935?
That was very nice of you River. Samir, this bug was being sponsored for River by Darren Moffat. I don't think he'll mind sponsoring it for you ;) Regards, Kini On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:32 -, samir kumar mishra wrote: }Hi all, } }Thanks for your support , i would like learn more and more and contribute. } }Regards, }Samir } }On 12/28/07, River Tarnell river at wikimedia.org wrote: } Jayakara: } } JK I guess its ok to team up as long as the other contributor agrees with } it. } } i was planning to submit this along with the fix for } } 1214359 *passwd*:passwd does not allow -egh arguments for files } repository } } however, that got stalled somewhere and so neither fix has been } integrated. i've no problems if someone else wants to take it over. } } - river. } } } -- Sun Microsystems - India Engineering Centre http://blogs.sun.com/jkini
[request-sponsor] Submission of fix for Bug-6573754
Hi Eric,
I think I have worked out the fix for the bug-6573754 whose details
have been mentioned below. I wanted to know if you are still
sponsoring the Bug, so my fix has been ready, and I woder if we can
work together.
On 12/28/07, Viswanathan Kannappan Viswanathan.Kannappan at sun.com wrote:
Samir
Avinash Joshi (OS0145) worked in this bug before but now he have withdrawn.
Eric.Saxe at Sun.COM was sponsoring him before his withdrawal. So check with
Eric whether he is still sponsoring, otherwise I will sponsor you.
Regards
Viswa
samir kumar mishra wrote:
On 12/28/07, samir kumar mishra samirkumar.mishra at gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I think this can be the solution for the Bug--6573754
BUG Details
*
Synopsistimex error message when you forget a command is cryptic
State 1-Dispatched (Default State)
Category: utility
Subcategoryaccounting
Link:http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6573754
*
Solution needs the following changes in timex.c
Link---http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/cmd/sa/timex.c
Step-1: Delete line no 99
if (optind = argc)diag(Missing command);
Step-2 : Insert the followig lines after line number 80 starting at
line number 81
if(optind=argc) {
fprintf(stderr,\nMissing command\n);
diag(Usage: timex [-s][-o][-p[-fhkmrt]] cmd);
}
Now the output when we type 'timex' and forget to specify the program
is given below:
Missing command
Usage: timex [-s][-o][-p[-fhkmrt]] cmd
***
I would like to request a sponsor so that this fix can be evaluated
This is to bring to your kind information that i have already
submitted my Sun Contriutor's agreement and waiting to get it.
Regards,
Samir Kumar Mishra
3rd year , Electronics and Telecommunication Engg,
University College of Engineering, Burla(India)
___
request-sponsor mailing list
request-sponsor at opensolaris.org
[request-sponsor] Bug:6608290
Hi Rejeesh, This bug has already been fixed in build 76. ~Kini On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:30 -, Rejeesh Nath wrote: }Hi , } }I would like to work on the bug : 6608290 and will finish working on it }within a week. (I dont have a fix ready yet) } }Bug ID 6608290 }Synopsis : Missing word in description of -e option in logadm(1M) }Category:Subcategory manpage:section1m } }My SCA number is : OS0186 }My opensolaris id : rej } }Thanks Regards, }Rejeesh Nath } -- Sun Microsystems - India Engineering Centre http://blogs.sun.com/jkini
[request-sponsor] Bug : 6608290
Hi, i am sorry for the bug request. -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/attachments/20071228/0ab6fca6/attachment.html
[request-sponsor] Submission of fix for Bug -6626020
Dear Chad, I have no words to thank you.But I wonder if we both could work together. Regards, Chad On 12/28/07, Chad Mynhier cmynhier at gmail.com wrote: On Dec 28, 2007 5:34 AM, Viswanathan Kannappan Viswanathan.Kannappan at sun.com wrote: Samir Looks like Chad have already sent a request for sponsor before you for this bug fix. So I will be sponsoring Chad. Sorry for the confusion. Chad please communicate with me directly to proceed from here. Regards Viswa Actually, I'd be happy to withdraw my request and let Samir take this bug. But note that unlink(tnam); needs to happen before exit(1); so that we clean up after ourselves. Chad
[request-sponsor] Bugid: 6344436
I am Visakh M.R from Amrita School of Engineering. I am interested in working on bugid 6344436. I'll be submitting a fix tentatively by 10th Jan 2008. 6344436 : *mv* gives cryptic error when applied to unix domain sockets Category/Subcategory: utility:file I have initiated the process to get a SCA number. This message posted from opensolaris.org
[request-sponsor] assignment request for Bug ID -6641990]
hi i would like to work on this bug and want this assigned to me .it will take me about one month to come back with a contribution. Bug ID 6641990 Synopsis *svcs* should not show instances which don't have a 'general' property group Regards -- Narendra Pant Campus Ambassador Sun Microsystems College Of Technology,Pantnagar +91-9411707204 -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/attachments/20071228/8cb8000f/attachment.html
[request-sponsor] Request for sponsor for bug
I will sponsor this. I will contact you offline after I come back from winter break. Steve This message posted from opensolaris.org
