Re: using large hard disk as backup desitination

1999-12-20 Thread Luke Jaeger

If you back up to a "Macintosh Disk" rather than a "Macintosh File",
does the 2 GB limit still apply? (This prevents you using the drive for
anything else however)

If not, you could partition your big HD down into 2 GB chunks. Then
Retrospect should parcel the "Retrospect Data" file among them as
needed, right?
-- 


top of the world,

Luke Jaeger, Technology Coordinator
Disney Magazine Publishing
Northampton, Massachusetts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Any opinions expressed in this message are my own and may not represent
the opinions of Disney Publishing, etc etc etc.

*


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: using large hard disk as backup desitination

1999-12-20 Thread Luke Jaeger

no no, this could work. If you could get Retro to treat a bunch of disk
images as if they were 2G removables, it would stripe the backup data
across as many of them as it needed. The backup would not be limited to
2G. The disk images would be like multiple tapes (zips, cdr's, etc) in a
storage set. Backup set. Whatever it's called now.

This is probably easier than my original idea of separate 2G partitions.

Wade Masshardt wrote:
 
 RE: You can use resedit to make retrospect recognize other media. I
 back up to disk images all the time.  Ask tech support for the fix
 or if you can't get it I have it archived away somewhere.
 
 Tom
 
 In this case it doesn't gain me anything, really, since the disk
 images have the same 2GB size limitation.  If DiskCopy is able to
 create larger images in the future, I'll hunt up the fix, so thanks
 for the info.
 
 --
 +--+--+
 |Wade Masshardt| The Wisconsin Alumni Association |
 |   Tech Support Coordinator   | 1-888-WIS-ALUM  (1-888-947-2586) |
 | 608-265-8766 |http://www.uwalumni.com/|
 +--+--+
 |  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
 +-+
 
 --
 --
 To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
 Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 


top of the world,

Luke Jaeger, Technology Coordinator
Disney Magazine Publishing
Northampton, Massachusetts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Any opinions expressed in this message are my own and may not represent
the opinions of Disney Publishing, etc etc etc.

*


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: using large hard disk as backup desitination

1999-12-20 Thread Matthew Tevenan

 Reply to:   RE: using large hard disk as backup desitination
Michael,

I'm really not sure why this was done. I'm assuming it was decided to wait until Apple 
lifted the 2GB limit before working around it in the software. Now that Apple has 
lifted the limit, that's our cue to change Retrospect's capabilities...

I'll be sure to flag this suggestion, though.

Regards,

Matthew Tevenan
Technical Support Specialist
Dantz Development Corporation
925.253.3050 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Michael Gaines wrote:
At 8:34 AM -0800 12/17/1999, Matthew Tevenan wrote:
Reply to: RE: using large hard disk as backup desitination Wade,

Up until Mac OS 9, the maximum file size was 2 GB. Now that Apple has lifted that 
limit, we need to change Retrospect to reflect that new capability. We'll probably 
be doing this in our next release.


I understand that the physical file can't exceed 2GB (at least prior to OS9), but I 
don't understand why this is a barrier to doing a file backup set that exceeds 2GB 
in total. Other programs are able create segmented files when they reach a given 
size. If I'm reading the message that Eric posted to the list a few months back (see 
below) correctly, even your own program understands how to do segmentation when 
dealing with removable media. So my question is, why can't it do segmentation (via 
containers or whatever) when dealing with a file backup set on a fixed drive that 
exceeds the 2GB mark?

Barring some technical reason, maybe that option can be added to the next update 
(ideally where the user can set the segmentation size)? This has benefit of working 
even for those of us that choose not to upgrade to OS9. It also provides a mechanism 
for dealing with the issue when we start to reach OS9's file size limits. Although 
at 2TB hopefully we wont reach that point for a year or two. :)

Thanks


At 3:15 PM -0700 8/19/1999, Eric Ullman wrote:

With Retrospect 4.1, we included support for filling removable cartridges that 
hold more than 2GB, by writing multiple containers as required, up to the media's 
max storage capacity. However, we can't do this with file StorageSets (on a second 
hard drive, for example); one must use a duplicate (OS format, no compression) 
operation to fill a 9GB hard disk.

Best regards,

Eric


Michael Gaines snail mail: Learning Technology 
Center
Computer Systems Administrator Box 45, GPC
   
Nashville, TN 37203
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   (615) 322-8070




--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



using large hard disk as backup desitination

1999-12-17 Thread Wade Masshardt

In order to speed up the backup during the week (it is taking 12-14 
hours to back our site up to our Travan 5 drive), I hit upon the idea 
of buying a Promax Ultra ATA DMA/33 PCI card and a 25 gig IBM 
deskstar drive (total cost about $475 including delivery) and using 
that as the backup destination during the week.  After I get this all 
set up, I find out that Retrospect's file backup set has a limit of 2 
GB, which seems a little restrictive to me.  I need about 14-20 gigs 
worth, so is there any way, other than making a bunch of 2 GB file 
backup sets and adding them all as destinations, to use the whole 
disk as a backup destination?

If anyone from Retrospect is reading this, is it possible to up the 
file backup set limit to, e.g., 2 TB, now that the Mac filesystem 
supports files that large?
-- 

--
+--+--+
|Wade Masshardt| The Wisconsin Alumni Association |
|   Tech Support Coordinator   | 1-888-WIS-ALUM  (1-888-947-2586) |
| 608-265-8766 |http://www.uwalumni.com/|
+--+--+
|  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
+-+


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: using large hard disk as backup desitination

1999-12-17 Thread Wade Masshardt

  Reply to:   RE: using large hard disk as backup desitination
Wade,

Up until Mac OS 9, the maximum file size was 2 GB. Now that Apple has
lifted that limit, we need to change Retrospect to reflect that new
capability. We'll probably be doing this in our next release.

That will be great.  Any idea when this release might be forthcoming?

In the meantime, the method described, namely using a bunch of file 
backup sets (11 in my case) as the destination for a backup should 
work, right?  My main concern (I haven't actually tried it yet, 
tonight is the first night) is that Retrospect will automatically 
move on to the next file backup set when the first one is full and so 
one (I have about 14 gigs worth of data that gets backed up when I do 
a recycle backup.)  If this is what happens, then everything should 
be peachy.  If not, I'll have to find an alternative, like making 11 
2GB Diskcopy images and using those as the target.

Regards,

Matthew Tevenan
Technical Support Specialist
Dantz Development Corporation
925.253.3050
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Wade Masshardt wrote:
In order to speed up the backup during the week (it is taking 12-14
hours to back our site up to our Travan 5 drive), I hit upon the idea
of buying a Promax Ultra ATA DMA/33 PCI card and a 25 gig IBM
deskstar drive (total cost about $475 including delivery) and using
that as the backup destination during the week.  After I get this all
set up, I find out that Retrospect's file backup set has a limit of 2
GB, which seems a little restrictive to me.  I need about 14-20 gigs
worth, so is there any way, other than making a bunch of 2 GB file
backup sets and adding them all as destinations, to use the whole
disk as a backup destination?

If anyone from Retrospect is reading this, is it possible to up the
file backup set limit to, e.g., 2 TB, now that the Mac filesystem
  supports files that large?
-- 

--
+--+--+
|Wade Masshardt| The Wisconsin Alumni Association |
|   Tech Support Coordinator   | 1-888-WIS-ALUM  (1-888-947-2586) |
| 608-265-8766 |http://www.uwalumni.com/|
+--+--+
|  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
+-+


--
--
To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/
Problems?:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]