Re: Thoroughly Confused via Installation
Hmm, the default lighttpd config file generated by `rb-site install` should trigger fastcgi starting on demand. Even if you have to run it yourself, you should be using the binary file in the site dir's conf/ directory, which sets the parameters we need. Are you using our generated config, or writing your own? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Danny zematyn...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm - I'm not using apache, I'm using lighttpd. There is no 000- default. There is a default document root however. But lighttpd has to have one in order to start. lighttpd starts fine and is listening at the right place but isn't connecting to the reviewboard django site. I finally found that there is a command manage for rb-site and that I can start the site via: rb-site manage /home/azillia/webapps/reviewboard/ runfcgi method=threaded daemonize=false host=127.0.0.1 port=13000. So now the site comes up but there's an issue with the css and images not being found. Looks like I need to change the media_url or something like that. Cool. Almost there. Danny On Mar 16, 12:12 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: The guts of the application are in the Python site-packages directory. Unlike .php files, we don't need to install files inside the htdocs directory. As long as you have your new server config set up properly (which may require disabling the 000-default file if you have one, which sets /var/www as the htdocs for every subdomain), you're ready to go. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Danny zematyn...@gmail.com wrote: I must be missing something simple (I hope). Here are the steps I am taking to install latest 1.0alpha5 on Ubuntu 8.04 with lighttpd: installed all dependencies sudo easy_install ReviewBoard rb-site install --copy-media /home/user/webapps/reviewboard - specify domain, lighttpd, sqlite, and all others as defaults this creates a site with the following files and dirs in /home/user/ webapps/reviewboard : -conf/ db/ htdocs/ logs/ tmp/ This is where I am missing something. Am I supposed to install this into an existing django app? Or did something go wrong? Or did I miss a step? Where are the guts of the application? If it's in the docs I must be blind as I've looked over them many times. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Danny --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Problem with Subsequent Diffs
This is fixed in the nightlies. There's still an issue with interdiffs, but they work, it just sometimes shows errors for the files not in the diff. You should be able to upgrade to the nightly without problems. I'm look to push out beta 1 soon, but I have house guests this week and won't be getting to it until next week at the earliest. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Gavin M. Roy g...@myyearbook.com wrote: Yes, sorry, this more accurately describes the problem. If the exception wasn't clear it's 1.0a4. On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:26 PM, housemaister housemais...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I get the same error when trying to view the Changes between two uploaded revisions; however viewing the diff of single revision against the repository works fine. But I'm also clueless why this happens. BTW, repository is subversion. Thanks, Stefan. On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Gavin M. Roy g...@myyearbook.com wrote: We're running into issues in the case of a review where once the first diff is done, the developer is attaching the revised diff for review, but we're getting the following error: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 145, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True)[0] IndexError: list index out of range Any suggestions on tracking this down? Thanks, Gavin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Problem with Subsequent Diffs
Thanks, another issue being reported is: The issue Wyatt and I were just looking at appears to be when you have a new file, diff'ed after an svn add, then make changes and update a new diff with the full add (including your changes) again. What we're seeing is that instead of looking for the differences between diff-r1 and diff-r2, it combines the two, so you have the full contents of diff-r1, followed by the full contents of diff-r2 (looks like you have the entire file duplicated in one file). Not sure that's an accurate description of what's going on, but that's what it looks like. On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: This is fixed in the nightlies. There's still an issue with interdiffs, but they work, it just sometimes shows errors for the files not in the diff. You should be able to upgrade to the nightly without problems. I'm look to push out beta 1 soon, but I have house guests this week and won't be getting to it until next week at the earliest. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Gavin M. Roy g...@myyearbook.com wrote: Yes, sorry, this more accurately describes the problem. If the exception wasn't clear it's 1.0a4. On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:26 PM, housemaister housemais...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I get the same error when trying to view the Changes between two uploaded revisions; however viewing the diff of single revision against the repository works fine. But I'm also clueless why this happens. BTW, repository is subversion. Thanks, Stefan. On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Gavin M. Roy g...@myyearbook.com wrote: We're running into issues in the case of a review where once the first diff is done, the developer is attaching the revised diff for review, but we're getting the following error: Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 145, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True)[0] IndexError: list index out of range Any suggestions on tracking this down? Thanks, Gavin --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
post-review potentially confused about different repository addresses?
Hey, I've been trying to evaluate Review Board for my team's work on the Mono Accessibility project. I've got it all set up, and it seems to be purring well, however post-review bails out with: [mono] ~/build/uia2atk @ post-review Error creating review request: The repository path specified is not in the list of known repositories (code 206) I suspect this is because the RB server is pointed at the anonymous SVN URL -- http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/source -- while developers, such as I, have a checkout using the SVN+SSH-based URL, http://mono-cvs.ximian.com/source. The Mono project hosts these on two entirely seperate servers. I see that post-review has a --repository-url parameter where I could potentially pass the anonymous URL, but this requires --revision- range, so it doesn't quite seem like an appropriate fit. Has anyone else hit this case? Is there a simple solution that I'm missing? Thanks in advance, -Brad --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: post-review potentially confused about different repository addresses?
Hi Brad, What you can do in this case is to set your main repository URL to be your anonymous path (which Review Board will use for checkouts), and then set Mirror Path to be your developer SVN URL. When looking up a URL, it will check against both of those URLs, and should find the developer one. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Brad Taylor brad.tay...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, I've been trying to evaluate Review Board for my team's work on the Mono Accessibility project. I've got it all set up, and it seems to be purring well, however post-review bails out with: [mono] ~/build/uia2atk @ post-review Error creating review request: The repository path specified is not in the list of known repositories (code 206) I suspect this is because the RB server is pointed at the anonymous SVN URL -- http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/source -- while developers, such as I, have a checkout using the SVN+SSH-based URL, http://mono-cvs.ximian.com/source. The Mono project hosts these on two entirely seperate servers. I see that post-review has a --repository-url parameter where I could potentially pass the anonymous URL, but this requires --revision- range, so it doesn't quite seem like an appropriate fit. Has anyone else hit this case? Is there a simple solution that I'm missing? Thanks in advance, -Brad --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
exception after publishing review
I've created a number of reviews with post-review and svn. This
seemed to work fine. Then I added a review group and and additional
reviewer and tried to post the review. In at least one instance, it
said it failed to post the review (no sure it happened both times).
Anyway, now when I try to look at either review I get the following
exception:
Environment:
Request Method: GET
Request URL: http://hostname:8080/r/10/
Django Version: 1.0.2 final
Python Version: 2.6.0
Installed Applications:
['django.contrib.admin',
'django.contrib.auth',
'django.contrib.contenttypes',
'django.contrib.markup',
'django.contrib.sites',
'django.contrib.sessions',
'djblets.datagrid',
'djblets.feedview',
'djblets.siteconfig',
'djblets.util',
'djblets.webapi',
'reviewboard.accounts',
'reviewboard.admin',
'reviewboard.changedescs',
'reviewboard.diffviewer',
'reviewboard.iphone',
'reviewboard.reports',
'reviewboard.reviews',
'reviewboard.scmtools',
'reviewboard.webapi',
'django_evolution']
Installed Middleware:
('django.middleware.gzip.GZipMiddleware',
'django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware',
'django.middleware.doc.XViewMiddleware',
'django.middleware.http.ConditionalGetMiddleware',
'django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware',
'django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware',
'django.contrib.auth.middleware.AuthenticationMiddleware',
'djblets.siteconfig.middleware.SettingsMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.LoadSettingsMiddleware',
'djblets.log.middleware.LoggingMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.CheckUpdatesRequiredMiddleware')
Template error:
In template /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/templates/reviews/
review_request_box.html, error at line 47
Caught an exception while rendering: Reverse for 'reviewboard.user'
with arguments '(User: kimonp,)' and keyword arguments '{}' not
found.
37 : /tr
38 : tr
39 :td class=labellabel for=bugs_closed{% trans Bugs
%}:/label/td
40 :td class=valuespan id=bugs_closed class=editable
comma-editable{% spaceless %}
41 : {% for bug in review_request_details.get_bug_list %}
42 : {% if review_request.repository.bug_tracker %}a href={{bug|
bug_url:review_request}}{{bug}}/a{% else %}{{bug}}{% endif %}{% if
not forloop.last %}, {% endif %}
43 : {% endfor %}
44 : {% endspaceless %}/span/td
45 :td class=indented labellabel for=target_people{%
trans People %}:/label/td
46 :td class=valuespan id=target_people class=editable
comma-editable{% spaceless %}
47 : {% for person in review_request_details.target_people.all
%}
48 : a href={% url user person %}{% if not person.is_active %}
class=inactive{% endif %}{{person}}/a{% if not forloop.last %},
{% endif %}
49 : {% endfor %}
50 : {% endspaceless %}/span/td
51 : /tr
52 : tr
53 :td class=labellabel for=changenum{% trans Change
Number %}:/label/td
54 :td class=valuespan id=changenum
{{review_request.changenum}}/span/td
55 :td class=labellabel for=repository{% trans
Repository %}:/label/td
56 :td class=valuespan id=repository
{{review_request.repository}}/span/td
57 : /tr
Traceback:
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/handlers/
base.py in get_response
86. response = callback(request, *callback_args,
**callback_kwargs)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-
py2.6.egg/reviewboard/accounts/decorators.py in _check
27. return view_func(*args, **kwargs)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-
py2.6.egg/reviewboard/reviews/views.py in review_detail
200. 'PRE_CREATION': PRE_CREATION,
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/shortcuts/
__init__.py in render_to_response
18. return HttpResponse(loader.render_to_string(*args,
**kwargs), **httpresponse_kwargs)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
loader.py in render_to_string
107. return t.render(context_instance)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
__init__.py in render
176. return self.nodelist.render(context)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
__init__.py in render
768. bits.append(self.render_node(node, context))
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
debug.py in render_node
71. result = node.render(context)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
loader_tags.py in render
97. return compiled_parent.render(context)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
__init__.py in render
176. return self.nodelist.render(context)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
__init__.py in render
768. bits.append(self.render_node(node, context))
File
exception after publishing review
(strange...did not seem to post the first time so I'm trying to post
again)
I've created a number of reviews with post-review and svn. This
seemed to work fine. Then I added a review group and and additional
reviewer and tried to post the review. In at least one instance, it
said it failed to post the review (no sure it happened both times).
Anyway, now when I try to look at either review I get the following
exception:
Environment:
Request Method: GET
Request URL: http://hostname:8080/r/10/
Django Version: 1.0.2 final
Python Version: 2.6.0
Installed Applications:
['django.contrib.admin',
'django.contrib.auth',
'django.contrib.contenttypes',
'django.contrib.markup',
'django.contrib.sites',
'django.contrib.sessions',
'djblets.datagrid',
'djblets.feedview',
'djblets.siteconfig',
'djblets.util',
'djblets.webapi',
'reviewboard.accounts',
'reviewboard.admin',
'reviewboard.changedescs',
'reviewboard.diffviewer',
'reviewboard.iphone',
'reviewboard.reports',
'reviewboard.reviews',
'reviewboard.scmtools',
'reviewboard.webapi',
'django_evolution']
Installed Middleware:
('django.middleware.gzip.GZipMiddleware',
'django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware',
'django.middleware.doc.XViewMiddleware',
'django.middleware.http.ConditionalGetMiddleware',
'django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware',
'django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware',
'django.contrib.auth.middleware.AuthenticationMiddleware',
'djblets.siteconfig.middleware.SettingsMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.LoadSettingsMiddleware',
'djblets.log.middleware.LoggingMiddleware',
'reviewboard.admin.middleware.CheckUpdatesRequiredMiddleware')
Template error:
In template /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/
ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/templates/reviews/
review_request_box.html, error at line 47
Caught an exception while rendering: Reverse for 'reviewboard.user'
with arguments '(User: kimonp,)' and keyword arguments '{}' not
found.
37 : /tr
38 : tr
39 :td class=labellabel for=bugs_closed{% trans Bugs
%}:/label/td
40 :td class=valuespan id=bugs_closed class=editable
comma-editable{% spaceless %}
41 : {% for bug in review_request_details.get_bug_list %}
42 : {% if review_request.repository.bug_tracker %}a href={{bug|
bug_url:review_request}}{{bug}}/a{% else %}{{bug}}{% endif %}{% if
not forloop.last %}, {% endif %}
43 : {% endfor %}
44 : {% endspaceless %}/span/td
45 :td class=indented labellabel for=target_people{%
trans People %}:/label/td
46 :td class=valuespan id=target_people class=editable
comma-editable{% spaceless %}
47 : {% for person in review_request_details.target_people.all
%}
48 : a href={% url user person %}{% if not person.is_active %}
class=inactive{% endif %}{{person}}/a{% if not forloop.last %},
{% endif %}
49 : {% endfor %}
50 : {% endspaceless %}/span/td
51 : /tr
52 : tr
53 :td class=labellabel for=changenum{% trans Change
Number %}:/label/td
54 :td class=valuespan id=changenum
{{review_request.changenum}}/span/td
55 :td class=labellabel for=repository{% trans
Repository %}:/label/td
56 :td class=valuespan id=repository
{{review_request.repository}}/span/td
57 : /tr
Traceback:
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/handlers/
base.py in get_response
86. response = callback(request, *callback_args,
**callback_kwargs)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-
py2.6.egg/reviewboard/accounts/decorators.py in _check
27. return view_func(*args, **kwargs)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-
py2.6.egg/reviewboard/reviews/views.py in review_detail
200. 'PRE_CREATION': PRE_CREATION,
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/shortcuts/
__init__.py in render_to_response
18. return HttpResponse(loader.render_to_string(*args,
**kwargs), **httpresponse_kwargs)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
loader.py in render_to_string
107. return t.render(context_instance)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
__init__.py in render
176. return self.nodelist.render(context)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
__init__.py in render
768. bits.append(self.render_node(node, context))
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
debug.py in render_node
71. result = node.render(context)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
loader_tags.py in render
97. return compiled_parent.render(context)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
__init__.py in render
176. return self.nodelist.render(context)
File /usr/local/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/django/template/
__init__.py in render
768.
Re: Reviewboard CMSynergy
We're happy to include support for any SCMs out there, but it's not realistic for us to implement support for cmsynergy or other SCMs that we don't have access to. If you or someone else were to submit a patch for a cmsynergy SCMTool, we'd be happy to include it. -David On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, aditya vikram avik...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, I read a couple of posts about mapping cmsynergy to reviewboard concepts. Are you planning to have cmsynergy supported in Reviewboard? I'll be really looking forward as it as we use it as one of the few SCM tools (other being svn cvs) Thanks, Aditya --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issues in configuring the smtp server to send emails..
Hi guys,
I have en issue in configuring the smtp server.
basically we got a smtp server which can be access on the server which
runs review board..But we tried configuring with lot of times but we
failed all the time. This is very critical for me Can anyone please
help with some good documentation please.
here is the dump of the 500 on the board
gaierror at /reviewboard/api/json/reviewrequests/28/reviews/draft/
publish/
(11001, 'getaddrinfo failed')
Request Method: POST
Request URL:
http://light/reviewboard/api/json/reviewrequests/28/reviews/draft/publish/
Exception Type: gaierror
Exception Value:
(11001, 'getaddrinfo failed')
Exception Location: c:\Python25\lib\smtplib.py in connect, line 296
Python Executable: C:\Program Files\Apache Software Foundation
\Apache2.2\bin\httpd.exe
Python Version: 2.5.4
Python Path:['c:/www/reviewboard/conf', 'C:\\Python25\\lib\\site-
packages\\reviewboard-1.0alpha4-py2.5.egg', 'C:\\Python25\\lib\\site-
packages\\flup-1.0.1-py2.5.egg', 'C:\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\
\djblets-0.5alpha3-py2.5.egg', 'C:\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\
\django_evolution-0.0.0-py2.5.egg', 'C:\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\
\django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg', 'C:\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\
\simplejson-2.0.9-py2.5.egg', 'C:\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\
\pygments-1.0-py2.5.egg', 'C:\\WINDOWS\\system32\\python25.zip', 'C:\
\Python25\\Lib', 'C:\\Python25\\DLLs', 'C:\\Python25\\Lib\\lib-tk', 'C:
\\Program Files\\Apache Software Foundation\\Apache2.2', 'C:\\Program
Files\\Apache Software Foundation\\Apache2.2\\bin', 'C:\\Python25', 'C:
\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages', 'C:\\Python25\\lib\\site-packages\
\PIL']
Server time:Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:06:40 +1100
Traceback Switch to copy-and-paste view
* c:\python25\lib\site-packages\django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg\django
\core\handlers\base.py in get_response
79. # Apply view middleware
80. for middleware_method in self._view_middleware:
81. response = middleware_method(request, callback,
callback_args, callback_kwargs)
82. if response:
83. return response
84.
85. try:
86. response = callback(request, *callback_args,
**callback_kwargs) ...
87. except Exception, e:
88. # If the view raised an exception, run it through
exception
89. # middleware, and if the exception middleware returns a
90. # response, use that. Otherwise, reraise the exception.
91. for middleware_method in self._exception_middleware:
92. response = middleware_method(request, e)
▶ Local vars
Variable Value
callback
function review_draft_save at 0x02489730
callback_args
()
callback_kwargs
{'api_format': u'json', 'publish': True, 'review_request_id':
u'28'}
e
gaierror(11001, 'getaddrinfo failed')
exc_info
(class 'socket.gaierror', gaierror(11001, 'getaddrinfo
failed'), traceback object at 0x0285C800)
exceptions
module 'django.core.exceptions' from 'C:\Python25\lib\site-
packages\django-1.0.2_final-py2.5.egg\django\core\exceptions.pyc'
middleware_method
bound method LoggingMiddleware.process_view of
djblets.log.middleware.LoggingMiddleware object at 0x03387A50
receivers
[(function _rollback_on_exception at 0x01E046F0, None)]
request
ModPythonRequest path:/reviewboard/api/json/reviewrequests/28/
reviews/draft/publish/, GET:QueryDict: {}, POST:QueryDict:
{u'dummy': [u'']}, COOKIES:{'collapsediffs': 'True', 'rbsessionid':
'9299810472fd790cf909191c1e83e7d2'}, META:{'AUTH_TYPE': None,
'CONTENT_LENGTH': 0L, 'CONTENT_TYPE': None, 'GATEWAY_INTERFACE': 'CGI/
1.1', 'HTTP_ACCEPT': 'application/json, text/javascript, */*',
'HTTP_ACCEPT_CHARSET': 'ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7',
'HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING': 'gzip,deflate', 'HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE': 'en-
us,en;q=0.5', 'HTTP_CACHE_CONTROL': 'no-cache', 'HTTP_CONNECTION':
'keep-alive', 'HTTP_CONTENT_LENGTH': '6', 'HTTP_CONTENT_TYPE':
'application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=UTF-8', 'HTTP_COOKIE':
'rbsessionid=9299810472fd790cf909191c1e83e7d2; collapsediffs=True',
'HTTP_HOST': 'light', 'HTTP_KEEP_ALIVE': '300', 'HTTP_PRAGMA': 'no-
cache', 'HTTP_REFERER': 'http://light/reviewboard/r/28/diff/',
'HTTP_USER_AGENT': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-
US; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021906 Firefox/3.0.7',
'HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH': 'XMLHttpRequest', 'PATH_INFO': u'/reviewboard/
api/json/reviewrequests/28/reviews/draft/publish/', 'PATH_TRANSLATED':
None, 'QUERY_STRING': None, 'REMOTE_ADDR': '192.168.23.121',
'REMOTE_HOST': None, 'REMOTE_IDENT': None, 'REMOTE_USER': None,
'REQUEST_METHOD': 'POST', 'SCRIPT_NAME': '', 'SERVER_NAME': 'light',
'SERVER_PORT': 0, 'SERVER_PROTOCOL': 'HTTP/1.1', 'SERVER_SOFTWARE':
'mod_python'}
resolver
RegexURLResolver djblets.util.rooturl ^/
response
None
self
django.core.handlers.modpython.ModPythonHandler object at
Issue 957 in reviewboard: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 3: ordinal not in range(128)
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 957 by i...@avalanchestudios.se: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 3: ordinal not in range(128) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=957 Hi, We're using alpha4 with perforce, and posting diffs with post-review.py, hitting this error: URL: http://reviewboard/r/296/diff/ Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 145, in view_diff interdiffset, highlighting, True)[0] File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 619, in get_diff_files large_data=True) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/Djblets-0.5alpha3-py2.4.egg/djblets/util/misc.py, line 143, in cache_memoize data = lookup_callable() File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 618, in lambda enable_syntax_highlighting), File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 431, in get_chunks a[i1:i2], b[j1:j2], oldlines, newlines) File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py, line 265, in diff_line if oldline and newline and oldline != newline: UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 3: ordinal not in range(128) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 953 in reviewboard: Diff viewer does not work on Mercurial ssh repositories
Comment #1 on issue 953 by sandeep.iitkgp: Diff viewer does not work on Mercurial ssh repositories http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=953 I had the same problem even though I was not using SSH. The problem seems to be that reviewboard's support for mercurial seems to be based on a newer version of the 'hg python API'. Hence the 'sshrepository' object has no attribute 'changectx'. Upgrading to mercurial 1.1.2 solved the problem for me. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 954 in reviewboard: Download Diff should allow selection of line endings
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 954 by grossag: Download Diff should allow selection of line endings http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=954 *NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to http://reviews.review- board.org/ Describe the enhancement and the motivation for it. On my Windows machine, if I try to download the diff from review board and feed it directly in patch, patch fails because it can't handle the Unix line endings. I then have to find a unix2dos utility to convert it to dos line endings. It would be nice if the Download Diff button could have a dropdown menu like Close, in this case letting you select Windows or Linux compatibility. What operating system are you using? What browser? Firefox 3 on Windows XP Pro SP3 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 928 in reviewboard: post-review in subdirectories of a git (svn) work tree would result in broken diffs.
Comment #1 on issue 928 by vicaya: post-review in subdirectories of a git (svn) work tree would result in broken diffs. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=928 http://reviews.review-board.org/r/756/ -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 927 in reviewboard: Add guess-summary and guess-description options for those who use a dvcs like git
Comment #2 on issue 927 by vicaya: Add guess-summary and guess-description options for those who use a dvcs like git http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=927 http://reviews.review-board.org/r/755 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 936 in reviewboard: Add a way for a reviewer to only see the new version of the code (e.g. collapse/remove the diff)
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 936 by keithhoffman22: Add a way for a reviewer to only see the new version of the code (e.g. collapse/remove the diff) http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=936 *NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to http://reviews.review- board.org/ What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to, if any? Reviews Describe the enhancement and the motivation for it. Currently, you can only view the code under review as diff. There are two problems with this: 1. Some users prefer only to examine the code as it will be post-review. They aren't interested in the diff. 2. Sometimes the code is line-wrapped so much it becomes harder to look at. It would be nice to be able to remove the diff (alternatively, motivation #2 could be satisfied by collapsing the old portion of the diff). What operating system are you using? What browser? Irrelevant. Windows Vista, Firefox. Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 935 in reviewboard: Add notification of a draft unpublished review to the top of the review page as well as in-line with the reviews
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 935 by keithhoffman22: Add notification of a draft unpublished review to the top of the review page as well as in-line with the reviews http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=935 *NOTE: If you have a patch, please submit it to http://reviews.review- board.org/ What's the URL of the page this enhancement relates to, if any? Describe the enhancement and the motivation for it. Currently, if you are responding to a review and slide up to examine say the review description etc, you may miss the Draft Review. Click to Publish notification. Add this notification to the top of the review as well or make it slide with the window. What operating system are you using? What browser? Windows Vista, Firefox 3.0.6 Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 959 in reviewboard: LDAP authentication scope
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 959 by kimonp: LDAP authentication scope http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=959 The LDAP server at my (very large) company would not authenticate with reviewboard using LDAP. The problem was the SCOPE settings used in ldapo.search_s() in accounts/backends.py It was set to: SCOPE_ONELEVEL I changed it to: SCOPE_SUBTREE This was in 2 places in backends.py (which is all of the instances of SCOPE_ONELEVEL). This was the setting used in our company's example script which is why I tried it. When I changed both instances is accounts/backends.py it was able to authenticate properly against our LDSP. Based on the following, I think this is a better value for this script and likely to work with more varied LDAP schemes: http://www.idevelopment.info/data/LDAP/LDAP_Resources/SEARCH_Setting_the_SCOPE_Parameter.shtml -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 873 in reviewboard: page not found at /review/r/rid/diff/X-X/raw
Comment #2 on issue 873 by ciaomary: page not found at /review/r/rid/diff/X-X/raw http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=873 We're also having this issue. Even with the 3/13/09 nightly. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 807 in reviewboard: Links from reviews do not link to the corresponding line in the diff properly.
Comment #11 on issue 807 by ciaomary: Links from reviews do not link to the corresponding line in the diff properly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=807 I can also confirm this is fixed with 3/13/09 nightly. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 961 in reviewboard: A comment box pops up if you click 'expand' in diff viewer on RB 3/13 nightly
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 961 by ciaomary: A comment box pops up if you click 'expand' in diff viewer on RB 3/13 nightly http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=961 What's the URL of the page containing the problem? https://reviewboard/r/2276/diff/#index_header What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Open up the diff. 2. Click to 'expand' code 3. An annoying comment box pops up that you must cancel. This is on the nightly 3/13/09 nightly RB install What is the expected output? What do you see instead? Very annoying and strange behavior. What operating system are you using? What browser? RB server=CentOS 5. Browser=Firefox 3.0.7 Please provide any additional information below. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
