Re: Question about AD integration and users/groups
Glad e-mail is working! Is it literally /logs? Whatever directory you specify must exist and be writable by the web server. It will also likely take a server restart for logging to kick in. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.review-board.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.comwrote: On Oct 14, 2009, at 18:49, Christian Hammond wrote: We use Django's e-mail functionality which unfortunately doesn't give us any sort of debugging information. What mail server are you using? And is it on the same host? Do you have anything like DKIM turned on? Sorry for not replying sooner but it was a busy day. The email notifications just started working today so I am all set for now. I would still like to know how to enable logging to debug any problems in the future, but despite checking the option, I have nothing in the /logs directory. But at least I have everything working now and we can start deploying RB to the group soon. Thanks, Alfred To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Testers wanted for new SSH/HTTPS repository support
Hi Christian, thanks for the feedback! I guess, RB 1.1a identifying itself as Review Board 1.0.3 is a clear indication that the combined setup doesn't work, correct? You may be able to tell Apache which version to use by prepending the path to the particular Review Board .egg directory to the PythonPath, but you'll have to manually change this for every upgrade. And it may not work fully, due to pkg_resources lookups and dependencies. I'm confident that in a future version, it will absolutely not work correctly at all. Certainly, you don't want to use the same database on both versions, as the schema is incompatible. We took care of both, so it looks like running two versions concurrently isn't a good idea even now. Another question: how do I tell RB in the repository configuration dialog that I want to set up access via ssh? Cheers, Clemens -- Dr. Clemens Ballarin -- Senior Software Engineer aicas Allerton Interworks Computer Automated Systems GmbH Haid-und-Neu-Straße 18 * D-76131 Karlsruhe * Germany http://www.aicas.com * phone +49 721 663 968-35 * fax -99 USt-Id: DE216375633, Handelsregister HRB 109481, AG Mannheim Geschäftsführer: Dr. James J. Hunt --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Comment type/severity
Hi All, I would like to urge you to view this enhancement suggestion and participate in the discussion. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1277 I feel having a comment type/severity would greatly enhance the usability of RB at mature software development copmanies while it wouldn't hamper the usability in process-free environments (if that feature is turned off). H.M. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Question about AD integration and users/groups
On Oct 16, 2009, at 3:55, Christian Hammond wrote: Is it literally /logs? Whatever directory you specify must exist and be writable by the web server. It will also likely take a server restart for logging to kick in. Well, the rb-site script created a logs directory at the same level as conf, htdocs, and tmp. In the Admin interface, under Settings/ Logging, I have checked the Enable logging checkbox and restarted the server. I left the Log directory text box blank assuming it would pick the default logs directory, but maybe that is not the case. The directory is definitely writable by the apache user, but I am unsure what I need to put in the text box to make this work. Is the path relative to the RB site or the apache DocumentRoot or something else? Alfred --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
rb is super slow after upgrade to 1.0.4
Hey guys, The short story is that we're experiencing a huge increase in load on apache after we upgraded from 1.0.3 to 1.0.4. The long story is this: We had rb 1.0.3 on a dual core xeon 2.8ghz with 1GB of ram running linux 64-bit. The software setup is like this: apache-2.2.11, memcached-1.3.3, mysql-5.0.70, mod_python-3.3.1, python-memcached-1.44, libmemcache-1.2.4, mysql-python-1.2.2 all running on the local machine. It ran quite fast and everybody was happy. 5 days ago we upgraded to 1.0.4 and it the server started running super slow. I'm getting load averages of 6-7 on it now with a constant cpu load of 99% on both cores. The apache access_log accumulated 800mb of data in the first 2 days alone. It used to be less than a megabyte a day before. I added another 1.5 gb or ram to the machine (for a total of 2.5 gb now) and increased memcached's buffer size form the default 64mb to 1gb. However that did not seem to help at all, memcached is not using more than 125mb even after a few days of running. We have about 30 ppl using it at the same time and i see lines like these continuously showing up in the logs: GET /api/json/reviewrequests/367/last-update/?dummy= HTTP/1.1 What i make of all this is that now the client's browsers are constantly polling the server for updates and is what actually slows everything down. Any advice on what's going on? Thank you. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: rb is super slow after upgrade to 1.0.4
Hi, This absolutely shouldn't happen. The last-update code is only on our master branch for 1.1 alpha. I just checked the code and last-update doesn't occur in there at all. Was there ever an install of any part of 1.1 on that system? Anything from the master branch in git? I haven't heard this from anyone else yet, so it sounds local to that server, but we should find out for sure. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:06 AM, k1b dbund...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys, The short story is that we're experiencing a huge increase in load on apache after we upgraded from 1.0.3 to 1.0.4. The long story is this: We had rb 1.0.3 on a dual core xeon 2.8ghz with 1GB of ram running linux 64-bit. The software setup is like this: apache-2.2.11, memcached-1.3.3, mysql-5.0.70, mod_python-3.3.1, python-memcached-1.44, libmemcache-1.2.4, mysql-python-1.2.2 all running on the local machine. It ran quite fast and everybody was happy. 5 days ago we upgraded to 1.0.4 and it the server started running super slow. I'm getting load averages of 6-7 on it now with a constant cpu load of 99% on both cores. The apache access_log accumulated 800mb of data in the first 2 days alone. It used to be less than a megabyte a day before. I added another 1.5 gb or ram to the machine (for a total of 2.5 gb now) and increased memcached's buffer size form the default 64mb to 1gb. However that did not seem to help at all, memcached is not using more than 125mb even after a few days of running. We have about 30 ppl using it at the same time and i see lines like these continuously showing up in the logs: GET /api/json/reviewrequests/367/last-update/?dummy= HTTP/1.1 What i make of all this is that now the client's browsers are constantly polling the server for updates and is what actually slows everything down. Any advice on what's going on? Thank you. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Question about AD integration and users/groups
It's an absolute path, and needs to be specified. The 1.1 release will actually check that you've specified a valid, writable path. The 1.0.x releases just don't do the validation. I'm also planning to set it to the right log directory by default, and probably turn on logging by default. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.comwrote: On Oct 16, 2009, at 3:55, Christian Hammond wrote: Is it literally /logs? Whatever directory you specify must exist and be writable by the web server. It will also likely take a server restart for logging to kick in. Well, the rb-site script created a logs directory at the same level as conf, htdocs, and tmp. In the Admin interface, under Settings/Logging, I have checked the Enable logging checkbox and restarted the server. I left the Log directory text box blank assuming it would pick the default logs directory, but maybe that is not the case. The directory is definitely writable by the apache user, but I am unsure what I need to put in the text box to make this work. Is the path relative to the RB site or the apache DocumentRoot or something else? Alfred To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 1277 in reviewboard: Comment Types
Comment #4 on issue 1277 by vi...@djgraphite.com: Comment Types http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1277 I think that while this is a good idea in spirit, I'm not sure it would work in practice. I don't think severity is useful in the case of code reviews in the same way that severity isn't all that useful in the case of bugs (wait for the explanation). In the case of bugs, in most cases, there are a few people who have a the big picture of the product and set the relative severity of the bugs. In this case however, it sounds like the commenter would set the priority. That's probably not a good way to go. I do like the idea of having comment types - a defect checkbox, or a checkbox that additionally says that security might be a concern. This classifies them without priority. I think it's up to the developer to read _all_ of the comments and then prioritize and address them. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 1357 in reviewboard: XMPP chat notification of request changes
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium New issue 1357 by gic...@gmail.com: XMPP chat notification of request changes http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1357 Is there a general notification API one can implement to observe changes in review requests? It would be cool if an RB bot could be created to hang out on an XMPP chat and provide updates as relevant review requests change, spit out information on reviews when they are mentioned or when asked, etc. Idea could also be extended to IRC or to simple unicast notifications for any IM network. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 1357 in reviewboard: XMPP chat notification of request changes
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 488 Comment #1 on issue 1357 by trowbrds: XMPP chat notification of request changes http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1357 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Issue 488 in reviewboard: Instant messaging integration
Comment #4 on issue 488 by trowbrds: Instant messaging integration http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=488 Issue 1357 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups reviewboard-issues group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
