Re: Upgrade from 3.0.20 to 4.0.7

[Martin Marusinec]

I switched the python symbolic link to python3, and found the logs in 
/var/log/httpd, and it seems it tries to use python2.7:
[Mon Jun 27 16:57:10.508059 2022] [:error] [pid 1856] [client 
10.103.108.170:60804] mod_wsgi (pid=1856): Target WSGI script 
'/var/www/XX/htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi' cannot be loaded as Python 
module., referer: https://10.103.100.250/
[Mon Jun 27 16:57:10.508117 2022] [:error] [pid 1856] [client 
10.103.108.170:60804] mod_wsgi (pid=1856): Exception occurred processing 
WSGI script '/var/www/ XX/htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi'., referer: 
https://10.103.100.250/
[Mon Jun 27 16:57:10.508188 2022] [:error] [pid 1856] [client 
10.103.108.170:60804] Traceback (most recent call last):, referer: 
https://10.103.100.250/
[Mon Jun 27 16:57:10.508224 2022] [:error] [pid 1856] [client 
10.103.108.170:60804]   File "/var/www/ XX/htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi", 
line 3, in , referer: https://10.103.100.250/
[Mon Jun 27 16:57:10.508304 2022] [:error] [pid 1856] [client 
10.103.108.170:60804] import pkg_resources, referer: 
https://10.103.100.250/
[Mon Jun 27 16:57:10.508318 2022] [:error] [pid 1856] [client 
10.103.108.170:60804]   File 
"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 72, in 
, referer: https://10.103.100.250/
[Mon Jun 27 16:57:10.508351 2022] [:error] [pid 1856] [client 
10.103.108.170:60804] from . import py31compat, referer: 
https://10.103.100.250/
[Mon Jun 27 16:57:10.508382 2022] [:error] [pid 1856] [client 
10.103.108.170:60804] ImportError: cannot import name py31compat, referer: 
https://10.103.100.250/


Dátum: pondelok 27. júna 2022, čas: 15:38:50 UTC+2, odosielateľ: Martin 
Marusinec

> Hello,
>
> what is the correct method to upgrade from 3.0.20 to 4.0.7 ? I inherited 
> the server and was asked to upgrade, however the method described in the 
> documentation (pip upgrade ...) does not work, it fails with python errors. 
> I understood the 3.x runs with python 2.7 and 4.x runs with python 3, but 
> here my python experience ends. 
>
> I managed to run "python3 -m pip install --upgrade pip" without erros, and 
> "pip3 install ReviewBoard" afterwards. It complained I ran it as root. 
> Running "rb-site upgrade /var/www/rbsite" wrote ModuleNotFoundError: No 
> module named 'psycopg2' and some other errors. Running "pip3 install 
> psycopg2" wrote:
> Building wheels for collected packages: psycopg2
> Building wheel for psycopg2 (setup.py) ... error
> ERROR: Command errored out with exit status 1:
> ...
> ./psycopg/psycopg.h:35:20: fatal error: Python.h: No such file or directory
>
> So I run "pip install psycopg2-binary==2.8.6" (I cound not compile it and 
> newer version had issue with timezone). 
>
> "rb-site upgrade /var/www/rbsite" was *successfull *this time, I 
> restarted httpd and memcached, however I get HTTP500 error now.  I see no 
> log files generated.
>
> Running the file manually writes this:
> [root@localhost htdocs]# python3 reviewboard.wsgi
> /usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/paramiko/transport.py:33: 
> CryptographyDeprecationWarning: Python 3.6 is no longer supported by the 
> Python core team. Therefore, support for it is deprecated in cryptography 
> and will be removed in a future release.
>   from cryptography.hazmat.backends import default_backend
> [root@localhost htdocs]#
>
> Could you please give try to navigate me, what to fix ?
>
> Thansk,
>
> BR
>
> MM
>

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/26eec0e5-f5c0-4a9a-b71d-ae68771170f0n%40googlegroups.com.

Upgrade from 3.0.20 to 4.0.7

[Martin Marusinec]

Hello,

what is the correct method to upgrade from 3.0.20 to 4.0.7 ? I inherited 
the server and was asked to upgrade, however the method described in the 
documentation (pip upgrade ...) does not work, it fails with python errors. 
I understood the 3.x runs with python 2.7 and 4.x runs with python 3, but 
here my python experience ends. 

I managed to run "python3 -m pip install --upgrade pip" without erros, and 
"pip3 install ReviewBoard" afterwards. It complained I ran it as root. 
Running "rb-site upgrade /var/www/rbsite" wrote ModuleNotFoundError: No 
module named 'psycopg2' and some other errors. Running "pip3 install 
psycopg2" wrote:
Building wheels for collected packages: psycopg2
Building wheel for psycopg2 (setup.py) ... error
ERROR: Command errored out with exit status 1:
...
./psycopg/psycopg.h:35:20: fatal error: Python.h: No such file or directory

So I run "pip install psycopg2-binary==2.8.6" (I cound not compile it and 
newer version had issue with timezone). 

"rb-site upgrade /var/www/rbsite" was *successfull *this time, I restarted 
httpd and memcached, however I get HTTP500 error now.  I see no log files 
generated.

Running the file manually writes this:
[root@localhost htdocs]# python3 reviewboard.wsgi
/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/paramiko/transport.py:33: 
CryptographyDeprecationWarning: Python 3.6 is no longer supported by the 
Python core team. Therefore, support for it is deprecated in cryptography 
and will be removed in a future release.
  from cryptography.hazmat.backends import default_backend
[root@localhost htdocs]#

Could you please give try to navigate me, what to fix ?

Thansk,

BR

MM

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/6476153f-3695-41aa-a1a8-88a0e0edea60n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: Reviewboard showing only 20 branches of gitlab repository

[Martin Růžek]

egg\rbtools\commands\__init__.py",
 
line 754, in initialize_scm_tool*
*client_name=client_name)*
*  File "C:\Program Files 
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-1.0.3-py2.7.egg\rbtools\clients\__init__.py",
 
line 803, in scan_usable_client*
*repository_info = tool.get_repository_info()*
*  File "C:\Program Files 
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-1.0.3-py2.7.egg\rbtools\clients\git.py",
 
line 284, in get_repository_info*
*ignore_errors=True).strip()*
*  File "C:\Program Files 
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-1.0.3-py2.7.egg\rbtools\clients\git.py",
 
line 1261, in _execute*
*return execute(cmdline, cwd=self._git_toplevel, *args, **kwargs)*
*  File "C:\Program Files 
(x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\site-packages\rbtools-1.0.3-py2.7.egg\rbtools\utils\process.py",
 
line 155, in execute*
***popen_encoding_args)*
*  File "C:\Program Files (x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\subprocess.py", line 
394, in __init__*
*errread, errwrite)*
*  File "C:\Program Files (x86)\RBTools\Python27\lib\subprocess.py", line 
644, in _execute_child*
*startupinfo)*
*WindowsError: [Error 267] The directory name is invalid*

Martin

Dne pátek 22. května 2020 11:58:58 UTC+2 Christian Hammond napsal(a):
>
> That error doesn’t make much sense to me. It sounds like it’s being run 
> from a directory that was then deleted, or there’s some special characters 
> or something that something is having trouble with. 
>
> I’d like to see more about how you’re using RBTools. Can you go into 
> detail on your setup, how you’re invoking it?
>
> I’d also like to see the debug output from the invocation that leads to 
> that error. You can pass --debug as the first parameter to `rbt post`.
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 05:46 kort...@email.cz  <
> kort...@email.cz > wrote:
>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Thanks, I have contacted our GitLab support and hopefully it will have a 
>> good ending.
>>
>> The colleague testing the RBTools was using this guide 
>> https://www.reviewboard.org/docs/rbtools/1.0/workflows/git/#rbtools-workflow-git
>> But ended with 
>> CRITICAL: [Error 267] The directory name is invalid
>> when tried using rbt post
>>
>> I tried to google around for it, but got nothing usefull...
>>
>>
>> Dne úterý 19. května 2020 2:21:05 UTC+2 Christian Hammond napsal(a):
>>>
>>> It doesn't ring any bells. It does sound like a credential/repository 
>>> access issue, though. I suspect *something* is preventing that user 
>>> from accessing changes on that repository in GitLab's settings. I know 
>>> other companies are using private repositories on GitLab with Review Board 
>>> without issue.
>>>
>>> What's the problem you're hitting with RBTools?
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 9:04 AM kort...@email.cz  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>> Update:
>>>>
>>>> When we tested it with a "public" repository on our gitlab server, it 
>>>> works. But our repositories needs to be private.
>>>>
>>>> So it seems the problem is somewhere in the recognition of the 
>>>> reviewboard as a valid user, even though I filled in all the tokens and 
>>>> keys and user credentials...
>>>>
>>>> Rings any bells?
>>>>
>>>> Dne pondělí 18. května 2020 16:47:21 UTC+2 kort...@email.cz napsal(a):
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Christian,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the ideas, my admin managed to update reviewboard to 
>>>>> 3.0.17, but no luck.
>>>>> I found out I am missing the SSH settings, so I created a new one and 
>>>>> added the public part to our gitlab repository, but that was not it 
>>>>> either...
>>>>>
>>>>> I am running out of ideas... is there some information I can give you 
>>>>> so you can help me? 
>>>>>
>>>>> For some reason we were not able to make the RBTools run either.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would hate to have to look for another tool:(
>>>>>
>>>>> Dne pondělí 18. května 2020 5:19:48 UTC+2 Christian Hammond napsal(a):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jirka,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We've fixed the pagination issue and will have the fix in 3.0.18.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know what's going on in that backtrace, but 3.0.12 is pretty 
>>>>>> old now, so it may have been a bug in an older rel

Re: site-upgrade from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20 fails

[Martin Großhauser]

Hi Eric,

thanks for your reply. As it was not top priority to migrate all the old 
data to the new version I installed a fresh, empty 3.0 instance and 
restored the old 1.7 instance to an at least working state for archive 
purposes.

Kind regards,
Martin

Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2019 19:43:12 UTC+2 schrieb Eric Johnson:
>
>
> On Monday, June 3, 2019 at 7:58:29 AM UTC-7, Martin Großhauser wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> Indeed, there was version 1.7.27 from EPEL installed. But the version 
>> running according to the web interface was 1.7.14. Also in the SQL-table 
>> siteconfig_siteconfiguration I see a string '1.7.14', which looks to me 
>> like the version. Uninstalling the RPM version and reinstalling 2.0.20 via 
>> easy_install with an rb-site upgrade afterwards did not resolve my issue.
>>
>> Maybe there is a version conflict in the current setup?
>>
>> I did not maintain this setup in the past, so I do not know much about 
>> what happened before. Internal documentation shows there was at least an 
>> unfinished upgrade to 1.7.27 with an inconsistent state in between. Version 
>> was rolled back to 1.7.14 then, but maybe some artifacts remained, which 
>> are causing the current trouble.
>>
>
> Oh, this is a critical detail. There are two paths that I can think of 
> here.
>
> Path 1) Install a fresh copy of your current installed version (1.7.14) 
> into a fresh database, and compare that database schema to the one for your 
> production install. If they differ, repeat the exercise with 1.7.27, and 
> see how that differs. It may be that you've got most of the changes for 
> 1.7.27, but for a few, and might be able to apply those.
>
> At one point in the distant past of our ReviewBoard use (1.X), I did run 
> into problems with a mismatch between the database layout and the version 
> of ReviewBoard. It had to do with a similar situation - an aborted upgrade. 
> I thought I had rolled back. In the end, I had to manually bring the 
> database forward to the expected version. Once I did that, I haven't had 
> problems since. However, I've been a die-hard developer for a long time, 
> this path might not be for you. Digging into SQL, and pouring over the 
> Python code of RB didn't deter me (it is pretty good code, as open source 
> goes. It is almost like each commit gets reviewed ;-) ).
>
> Path 2) ReviewBoard is a great tool, and BeanBag deserves $$ for the work 
> they do making it. Perhaps pay for support from the company help untangle 
> the issue you've got? It may save you a lot of time, and be worth every 
> dollar spent.
>
> Eric.
>
>  
>
>>
>> Am Montag, 3. Juni 2019 15:28:47 UTC+2 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:25 AM Martin Großhauser 
>>>  wrote: 
>>> > 
>>> > I'm trying to upgrade ReviewBoard to 2.0.20, but site-upgrade fails 
>>> with output: 
>>> > 
>>> > # rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard 
>>> > Rebuilding directory structure 
>>> > Updating database. This may take a while. 
>>> > 
>>> > The log output below, including warnings and errors, 
>>> > can be ignored unless upgrade fails. 
>>> > 
>>> > --  -- 
>>> > Creating tables ... 
>>> > Upgrading Review Board from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20 
>>> > There are unapplied evolutions for auth. 
>>> > There are unapplied evolutions for contenttypes. 
>>> > There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. 
>>> > There are unapplied evolutions for attachments. 
>>> > There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs. 
>>> > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. 
>>> > There are unapplied evolutions for hostingsvcs. 
>>> > There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. 
>>> > There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. 
>>> > There are unapplied evolutions for site. 
>>> > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required 
>>> > Installing custom SQL ... 
>>> > Installing indexes ... 
>>> > Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) 
>>> > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. 
>>> > 
>>> > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes 
>>> required. 
>>> > 
>>> > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: 
>>> > The application markup has been deleted 
>>> > In model attachments.FileAttachment: 
>>> > In field 'file': 
>>> >

Re: site-upgrade from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20 fails

[Martin Großhauser]

Thanks for your reply.

Indeed, there was version 1.7.27 from EPEL installed. But the version 
running according to the web interface was 1.7.14. Also in the SQL-table 
siteconfig_siteconfiguration I see a string '1.7.14', which looks to me 
like the version. Uninstalling the RPM version and reinstalling 2.0.20 via 
easy_install with an rb-site upgrade afterwards did not resolve my issue.

Maybe there is a version conflict in the current setup?

I did not maintain this setup in the past, so I do not know much about what 
happened before. Internal documentation shows there was at least an 
unfinished upgrade to 1.7.27 with an inconsistent state in between. Version 
was rolled back to 1.7.14 then, but maybe some artifacts remained, which 
are causing the current trouble.

Am Montag, 3. Juni 2019 15:28:47 UTC+2 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:25 AM Martin Großhauser 
> > wrote: 
> > 
> > I'm trying to upgrade ReviewBoard to 2.0.20, but site-upgrade fails with 
> output: 
> > 
> > # rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard 
> > Rebuilding directory structure 
> > Updating database. This may take a while. 
> > 
> > The log output below, including warnings and errors, 
> > can be ignored unless upgrade fails. 
> > 
> > --  -- 
> > Creating tables ... 
> > Upgrading Review Board from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20 
> > There are unapplied evolutions for auth. 
> > There are unapplied evolutions for contenttypes. 
> > There are unapplied evolutions for accounts. 
> > There are unapplied evolutions for attachments. 
> > There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs. 
> > There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer. 
> > There are unapplied evolutions for hostingsvcs. 
> > There are unapplied evolutions for reviews. 
> > There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools. 
> > There are unapplied evolutions for site. 
> > Project signature has changed - an evolution is required 
> > Installing custom SQL ... 
> > Installing indexes ... 
> > Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s) 
> > The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes. 
> > 
> > Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes 
> required. 
> > 
> > The following are the changes that could not be resolved: 
> > The application markup has been deleted 
> > In model attachments.FileAttachment: 
> > In field 'file': 
> > Property 'max_length' has changed 
> > In model hostingsvcs.HostingServiceAccount: 
> > Field 'hosting_url' has been added 
> > The model auth.Message has been deleted 
> > In model reviews.FileAttachmentComment: 
> > Field 'extra_data' has been added 
> > In model reviews.ReviewRequest: 
> > Field 'depends_on' has been added 
> > In model reviews.ReviewRequestDraft: 
> > Field 'depends_on' has been added 
> > In model accounts.Profile: 
> > Field 'timezone' has been added 
> > Field 'open_an_issue' has been added 
> > Field 'extra_data' has been added 
> > In model diffviewer.DiffSet: 
> > Field 'base_commit_id' has been added 
> > In model diffviewer.DiffSetHistory: 
> > Field 'last_diff_updated' has been added 
> > In model diffviewer.FileDiff: 
> > Field 'diff_hash' has been added 
> > Field 'parent_diff_hash' has been added 
> > Field 'diff64' has been added 
> > Field 'parent_diff64' has been added 
> > Field 'parent_diff' has been deleted 
> > Field 'diff' has been deleted 
> > CommandError: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot 
> resolve automatically. 
> > 
> > OS-Version is: 
> > CentOS release 6.7 (Final) 
> > 
> > Django packages are: 
> > # yum list installed |grep -i django 
> > Django14.noarch 1.4.21-1.el6       
> @epel 
> > python-django-evolution.noarch  1:0.6.9-4.el6 
>  @epel 
> > python-django-pipeline.noarch   1.2.24-2.el6   
> @epel 
> > 
> > Do you have any idea what's going wrong here? I'm grateful for any ideas 
> how to solve this problem. 
> > 
> > Extra question: I expected an upgrade to version 3. Instead I got 
> 2.0.20. Why is that? 
> > 
> > Kind regards, 
> > Martin 
> > 
>
> I maintain the packages for EPEL. ReviewBoard is abandoned on EPEL 6 
> because versions newer than 2.0 are incompatible with the set of 
> packages available in RHEL 6. If you want to go to 3.x and use the RPM 
> packages, you need to be on RHEL 7. 
>
> Otherwise, you

site-upgrade from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20 fails

[Martin Großhauser]

I'm trying to upgrade ReviewBoard to 2.0.20, but site-upgrade fails with 
output:

# rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard
Rebuilding directory structure
Updating database. This may take a while.

The log output below, including warnings and errors,
can be ignored unless upgrade fails.

--  --
Creating tables ...
Upgrading Review Board from 1.7.14 to 2.0.20
There are unapplied evolutions for auth.
There are unapplied evolutions for contenttypes.
There are unapplied evolutions for accounts.
There are unapplied evolutions for attachments.
There are unapplied evolutions for changedescs.
There are unapplied evolutions for diffviewer.
There are unapplied evolutions for hostingsvcs.
There are unapplied evolutions for reviews.
There are unapplied evolutions for scmtools.
There are unapplied evolutions for site.
Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
Installing custom SQL ...
Installing indexes ...
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes.

Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes 
required.

The following are the changes that could not be resolved:
The application markup has been deleted
In model attachments.FileAttachment:
In field 'file':
Property 'max_length' has changed
In model hostingsvcs.HostingServiceAccount:
Field 'hosting_url' has been added
The model auth.Message has been deleted
In model reviews.FileAttachmentComment:
Field 'extra_data' has been added
In model reviews.ReviewRequest:
Field 'depends_on' has been added
In model reviews.ReviewRequestDraft:
Field 'depends_on' has been added
In model accounts.Profile:
Field 'timezone' has been added
Field 'open_an_issue' has been added
Field 'extra_data' has been added
In model diffviewer.DiffSet:
Field 'base_commit_id' has been added
In model diffviewer.DiffSetHistory:
Field 'last_diff_updated' has been added
In model diffviewer.FileDiff:
Field 'diff_hash' has been added
Field 'parent_diff_hash' has been added
Field 'diff64' has been added
Field 'parent_diff64' has been added
Field 'parent_diff' has been deleted
Field 'diff' has been deleted
CommandError: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot 
resolve automatically.

OS-Version is:
CentOS release 6.7 (Final)

Django packages are:
# yum list installed |grep -i django
Django14.noarch 1.4.21-1.el6   @epel
python-django-evolution.noarch  1:0.6.9-4.el6  @epel
python-django-pipeline.noarch   1.2.24-2.el6   @epel

Do you have any idea what's going wrong here? I'm grateful for any ideas 
how to solve this problem.

Extra question: I expected an upgrade to version 3. Instead I got 2.0.20. 
Why is that?

Kind regards,
Martin

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/99b9ec65-7dde-46e0-812b-5b60a6e5cfd4%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Review Board Ticket #4720: Avatar, file upload not working

[Martin Wallin]

--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4720/
--

New ticket #4720 by guzzard
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board

Status: New
Tags: Priority:Medium, Type:Defect

File attachments:

 * avatar_bug.png
   



--
Avatar, file upload not working
==

# What version are you running?
3.0.8

# What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
All


# What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Choose file upload in user settings
2. Upload an image
3. View any page


# What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Expect to see the uploaded avatar, but instead shows username in text (alt. 
text?)


# What operating system are you using? What browser?
Ubuntu, Linux 4.14


# Please provide any additional information below.
Have confirmed that files are uploaded into media-folder.
No errors shown in either apache or RB logs.
Gravatar service works as expected.


--

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Review Board Ticket #4719: Timezone incorrect regardless of settings

[Martin Wallin]

--
To reply, visit https://hellosplat.com/s/beanbag/tickets/4719/
--

New ticket #4719 by guzzard
For Beanbag, Inc. > Review Board

Status: New
Tags: Priority:Medium, Type:Defect


--
Timezone incorrect regardless of settings
==

# What version are you running?
3.0.8


# What's the URL of the page containing the problem?
https://webserver/reviewboard/r/new/


# What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Commit something in SVN
2. Look at "New Review Request" in Review Board


# What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Commit time should show approx current time (eg. 1 min ago). Instead commit 
time is shown as 2 hours ago. I'm unable to get the correct commit time to show 
regardless of settings.

# What operating system are you using? What browser?
Ubuntu, kernel 4.14
Chromium


# Please provide any additional information below.
OS timezone is Europe/Stockholm, RB general settings timezone is 
Europe/Stockholm, and user setting is also Europe/Stockholm.

Tested with local svn repo on same server as RB install. Commit time is still 
shown as 2 hours ago (UTC).

--

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Does ReviewBoard properly support Perforce like it does Hg

[Martin Mactaggart]

I get the impression ReviewBoard's support for P4 is extrememly limited.

Is there any way to get a list of changes in the RB menu such that users 
can simply choose one without resorting to command line tools and being 
forced to post review requests manually?

Also, no matter what I do with RBTools it always tells me that "P4PASSWD" 
is unset, and yet I can do a p4 update without issue... So the issue is not 
with P4.

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

LDAP Configuration

[Martin Dew-Hattens]

New to Review Board and trying to get LDAP config to work. 

in log file getting

2017-03-31 10:14:41,923 - WARNING -  - LDAP error: {'desc': "Can't contact LDAP 
server"}




I know the parameters I use are correct since they are used elsewhere 

ldap://host:389
Bindaccount  accountusedbefore
passwrd  passusedbefore
LDAP base  dc=company:dc=dtt, dc=ad

So how does one debug this ?

nmap tells me that port 389 is open 

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Restore data into other server - errors displaying many diffs ('ascii' codec can't decode byte xxx in position yy: ordinal not in range(128))

[Fernando Martin]

After changing the Bitbucket account of the repositories to a new one, 
everything works fine. After importing my database the current bitbucket 
account stopped working.

How can I delete some of the bitbucket accounts? It's easy to add new ones, 
but no to modify/delete.

Thanks!

El jueves, 30 de abril de 2015, 9:05:32 (UTC+2), Fernando Martin escribió:

 It looks like a problem with the repositories config. I'm using Bitbucket, 
 when I try to modify something in the repository configurations I'm getting 
 same error:

 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0x94 in position 0: ordinal not in 
 range(128)

 After importing my files + database in other server it seems there are 
 problems with thebitbucket repositories. I cannot mofify them and most of 
 the reviews show also this same error.

 Any advice would be much appreciated.


 El miércoles, 29 de abril de 2015, 20:38:54 (UTC+2), Fernando Martin 
 escribió:

 Hi all,

 I've created a backup of my Review Board files and the database, then 
 I've installed same Review board version (2.0.8) into other server and 
 restored these files there. 

 Everything works okay excepting that I'm getting lots of errors like this 
 one when showing the diffs of my previous reviews:

 There was an error displaying this diff. 

 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0x94 in position 0: ordinal not in 
 range(128)

 This may be a bug in the software, a temporary outage, or an issue with 
 the format of your diff. 

 Why this can be happening?

 Thanks!



-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Restore data into other server - errors displaying many diffs ('ascii' codec can't decode byte xxx in position yy: ordinal not in range(128))

[Fernando Martin]

It looks like a problem with the repositories config. I'm using Bitbucket, 
when I try to modify something in the repository configurations I'm getting 
same error:

'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0x94 in position 0: ordinal not in 
range(128)

After importing my files + database in other server it seems there are 
problems with thebitbucket repositories. I cannot mofify them and most of 
the reviews show also this same error.

Any advice would be much appreciated.


El miércoles, 29 de abril de 2015, 20:38:54 (UTC+2), Fernando Martin 
escribió:

 Hi all,

 I've created a backup of my Review Board files and the database, then I've 
 installed same Review board version (2.0.8) into other server and restored 
 these files there. 

 Everything works okay excepting that I'm getting lots of errors like this 
 one when showing the diffs of my previous reviews:

 There was an error displaying this diff. 

 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0x94 in position 0: ordinal not in 
 range(128)

 This may be a bug in the software, a temporary outage, or an issue with 
 the format of your diff. 

 Why this can be happening?

 Thanks!


-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Bazaar review request - revision does not exists

[Martin Lachance]

Looks like it's not even a matter of hours, but minutes (around 20-30). I'm 
starting to think the timezone is not the problem. Is there a minimum 
version of Bazaar required or recommended?

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Bazaar review request - revision does not exists

[Martin Lachance]

When trying to create a new review request on recently updated files on my 
bazaar repository, I get the error: Requested revision: 'date:2013-07-04 
19:23:10' does not exist in branch: whatever

It seems to be a problem related to timezone. My bazaar repository is in 
UTC (I don't want to change it since people in UK might also be using it). 
I'm in EST (Canada), so the problem seemed to be that the latest revision 
is in the future. And indeed, if I wait a couple a hours, then it works. 
So I tried changing the system time of the Ubuntu VM which hosts the 
ReviewBoard site to UTC and the problem still persists. I also changed the 
timezone in the ReviewBoard admin  system settings to UTC, and the user 
timezone to UTC in My Account.

Does anyone have a clue of how to solve this problem?

Thanks, any help appreciated :)

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Re: Rational Synergy and ReviewBoard?

[Ryan Martin]

Keith, did you contribute these scripts back to the project? They sound 
quite useful for anyone trying to link Rational tools to reviewboard.

Best regards,
Ryan Martin

On Friday, April 12, 2013 12:14:41 PM UTC-4, Keith Moyer wrote:


 On Monday, April 2, 2012 9:12:02 AM UTC-6, ed wrote:

 Hello, 

 I am trying to use reviewboard with Rational Synergy (moving away from 
 synergy to something else is not an option).

 I searched the group for information on whether or not that is possible, 
 but I could only find a couple of posts from 4 years ago which indicate I 
 may be able to do what I want.


 Ed,

 I have gotten Rational Synergy to work with reviewboard for my company.  
 The approach I took was

 1. Set up a git repository in reviewboard
 2. Wrote a script that formats a Synergy task in git diff format (with 
 %name:%type:%subsystem as the filename and the CVID padded out to 40 
 characters as the version hash), creates a review request (using the 
 Synergy task attributes), and uploads the diff
 3. Created a tiny web application that just outputs the contents of files 
 (or directory listing if a directory object is given) via Synergy when 
 given their CVID
 4. Changed the reviewboard repository to point to the web application in 
 the Raw file URL mask: field
 5. I then took the actual git repository offline, as ReviewBoard now never 
 needs to contact it.  Instead, it thinks it's talking to a git repository 
 when it's talking to my web application.

 I know this is an old thread, but I hope this helps!


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Using X.509 Public Key for Authentication

[Martin Möller]

Hi guys,

Does anyone have deeper experiences using X.509 certificates for 
authentication?

   - I switched on the setting in the admin page (incl. automatically 
   create new accounts)
   - Apache(2) is also configured to run with SSL enabled
   - When opening the reviewboard instance with any browser I am asked for 
   a certificate to identify myself

However this does not automatically create an account for me and forward me 
to the correct location, but only shows the standard login page with the 
information (no need to register, simply use your standard 
username/password).

I also enabled logging with severity DEBUG, but the log file of the 
reviewboard remains empty.

Any ideas? 

Thanks,
Martin

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Table 'rb17.extensions_registeredextension' doesn't exist

[martin]

I'm getting this error on a fresh install of 1.7.6. rb-site install didn't 
report any problems (though I didn't see it creating this table).

Versions:

Python 2.6.6, Django 1.4.5, Djblets 0.7.11


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Check structure of summary

[Martin]

Hi group, I want to check if summary of each new review request is 
compliant with a defined structure.
It could be performed using regular expressions, for instance.

Does someone know if there is this feature or if there is a workaround to 
do this?

Thanks in advance.

Regards.

MArtin.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

I want to see the first name or last name in list of reviews

[Martin]

Hi, I have installed the RB 1.6.1.
I'm using LDAP autentication.
When I go to All reviews request, in the people column, I see the 
userId, but I want to see the first Name or LAst Name.
Does anybody knows how I can do this?

Thanks in advance.

Martin.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Change email of users

[Martin]

Hi, I'm using RB 1.6.1 with LDAP authentication.
I want to each user can modifiy his email address.
I tried add the users a group with auth|user|Can change user, but it still 
not working...

Does somebody can help me?

Thanks in advance.

Martin.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Change email of users

[Martin]

Thanks a lot Chris.
I am managing my own instance of ReviewBoard, but, the LDAP is under the 
client control.
So, the only chance to change the email is from the admin account.

I will tell you if  I can figure out an alternative way.

Thanks you very much.

Regards.

MArtin.




-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Problem upgrading from 1.6beta1 to 1.6rc1

[martin]

beta1 upgrade was done through easy_install also.

1.5 and beta1 were using evolution 0.6.2, the rc1 install upgraded to
evolution 0.6.2.


On Jun 29, 5:27 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Was the upgrade to beta 1 also through easy_install?

 Can you check which version of django_evolution you have installed?

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com







 On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:00 PM, martin martin.don...@gmail.com wrote:
  I updated from 1.5.4 to 1.6beta1 to 1.6rc1. The upgrade from 1.5.4 to
  beta1 was a few months ago and I was new to both reviewboard and
  django. Maybe I didn't run the rb-site upgrade step after that
  upgrade? I can't be sure either way now. Upgrading to rc1 was done
  with easy_install and then running rb-site upgrade.

  Schema dump:

  
  -- MySQL dump 10.13  Distrib 5.1.49, for debian-linux-gnu (x86_64)
  --
  -- Host: localhost    Database: reviewboard
  -- --
  -- Server version       5.1.49-3

  /*!40101 SET @OLD_CHARACTER_SET_CLIENT=@@CHARACTER_SET_CLIENT */;
  /*!40101 SET @OLD_CHARACTER_SET_RESULTS=@@CHARACTER_SET_RESULTS */;
  /*!40101 SET @OLD_COLLATION_CONNECTION=@@COLLATION_CONNECTION */;
  /*!40101 SET NAMES utf8 */;
  /*!40103 SET @OLD_TIME_ZONE=@@TIME_ZONE */;
  /*!40103 SET TIME_ZONE='+00:00' */;
  /*!40014 SET @OLD_UNIQUE_CHECKS=@@UNIQUE_CHECKS, UNIQUE_CHECKS=0 */;
  /*!40014 SET @OLD_FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=@@FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS,
  FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=0 */;
  /*!40101 SET @OLD_SQL_MODE=@@SQL_MODE,
  SQL_MODE='NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO' */;
  /*!40111 SET @OLD_SQL_NOTES=@@SQL_NOTES, SQL_NOTES=0 */;

  --
  -- Table structure for table `accounts_localsiteprofile`
  --

  DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `accounts_localsiteprofile`;
  /*!40101 SET @saved_cs_client     = @@character_set_client */;
  /*!40101 SET character_set_client = utf8 */;
  CREATE TABLE `accounts_localsiteprofile` (
   `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
   `user_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
   `profile_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
   `local_site_id` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
   `direct_incoming_request_count` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
   `total_incoming_request_count` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
   `pending_outgoing_request_count` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
   `total_outgoing_request_count` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
   `starred_public_request_count` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
   PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
   UNIQUE KEY `user_id` (`user_id`,`local_site_id`),
   UNIQUE KEY `profile_id` (`profile_id`,`local_site_id`),
   KEY `accounts_localsiteprofile_fbfc09f1` (`user_id`),
   KEY `accounts_localsiteprofile_141c6eec` (`profile_id`),
   KEY `accounts_localsiteprofile_45ded6af` (`local_site_id`)
  ) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=27 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
  /*!40101 SET character_set_client = @saved_cs_client */;

  --
  -- Table structure for table `accounts_profile`
  --

  DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `accounts_profile`;
  /*!40101 SET @saved_cs_client     = @@character_set_client */;
  /*!40101 SET character_set_client = utf8 */;
  CREATE TABLE `accounts_profile` (
   `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
   `user_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
   `first_time_setup_done` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
   `collapsed_diffs` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
   `wordwrapped_diffs` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
   `syntax_highlighting` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
   `show_submitted` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
   `sort_review_request_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
   `sort_dashboard_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
   `sort_submitter_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
   `sort_group_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
   `review_request_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
   `dashboard_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
   `submitter_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
   `group_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
   `is_private` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
   PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
   UNIQUE KEY `user_id` (`user_id`)
  ) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=31 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
  /*!40101 SET character_set_client = @saved_cs_client */;

  --
  -- Table structure for table `accounts_profile_starred_groups`
  --

  DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `accounts_profile_starred_groups`;
  /*!40101 SET @saved_cs_client     = @@character_set_client */;
  /*!40101 SET character_set_client = utf8 */;
  CREATE TABLE `accounts_profile_starred_groups` (
   `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
   `profile_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
   `group_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
   PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
   UNIQUE KEY `profile_id` (`profile_id`,`group_id`),
   KEY `accounts_profile_starred_groups_141c6eec` (`profile_id`),
   KEY `accounts_profile_starred_groups_bda51c3c` (`group_id`)
  ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
  /*!40101 SET character_set_client = @saved_cs_client */;

  --
  -- Table structure for table
  `accounts_profile_starred_review_requests`
  --

  DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `accounts_profile_starred_review_requests`;
  /*!40101 SET @saved_cs_client     = @@character_set_client */;
  /*!40101 SET character_set_client

Re: Problem upgrading from 1.6beta1 to 1.6rc1

[martin]

Upgraded to django_evolution 0.6.4, I mean. sorry.


On Jun 30, 11:14 am, martin martin.don...@gmail.com wrote:
 beta1 upgrade was done through easy_install also.

 1.5 and beta1 were using evolution 0.6.2, the rc1 install upgraded to
 evolution 0.6.2.

 On Jun 29, 5:27 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:







  Was the upgrade to beta 1 also through easy_install?

  Can you check which version of django_evolution you have installed?

  Christian

  --
  Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
  Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
  VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

  On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:00 PM, martin martin.don...@gmail.com wrote:
   I updated from 1.5.4 to 1.6beta1 to 1.6rc1. The upgrade from 1.5.4 to
   beta1 was a few months ago and I was new to both reviewboard and
   django. Maybe I didn't run the rb-site upgrade step after that
   upgrade? I can't be sure either way now. Upgrading to rc1 was done
   with easy_install and then running rb-site upgrade.

   Schema dump:

   
   -- MySQL dump 10.13  Distrib 5.1.49, for debian-linux-gnu (x86_64)
   --
   -- Host: localhost    Database: reviewboard
   -- --
   -- Server version       5.1.49-3

   /*!40101 SET @OLD_CHARACTER_SET_CLIENT=@@CHARACTER_SET_CLIENT */;
   /*!40101 SET @OLD_CHARACTER_SET_RESULTS=@@CHARACTER_SET_RESULTS */;
   /*!40101 SET @OLD_COLLATION_CONNECTION=@@COLLATION_CONNECTION */;
   /*!40101 SET NAMES utf8 */;
   /*!40103 SET @OLD_TIME_ZONE=@@TIME_ZONE */;
   /*!40103 SET TIME_ZONE='+00:00' */;
   /*!40014 SET @OLD_UNIQUE_CHECKS=@@UNIQUE_CHECKS, UNIQUE_CHECKS=0 */;
   /*!40014 SET @OLD_FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=@@FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS,
   FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=0 */;
   /*!40101 SET @OLD_SQL_MODE=@@SQL_MODE,
   SQL_MODE='NO_AUTO_VALUE_ON_ZERO' */;
   /*!40111 SET @OLD_SQL_NOTES=@@SQL_NOTES, SQL_NOTES=0 */;

   --
   -- Table structure for table `accounts_localsiteprofile`
   --

   DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `accounts_localsiteprofile`;
   /*!40101 SET @saved_cs_client     = @@character_set_client */;
   /*!40101 SET character_set_client = utf8 */;
   CREATE TABLE `accounts_localsiteprofile` (
    `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
    `user_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
    `profile_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
    `local_site_id` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
    `direct_incoming_request_count` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
    `total_incoming_request_count` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
    `pending_outgoing_request_count` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
    `total_outgoing_request_count` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
    `starred_public_request_count` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
    PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
    UNIQUE KEY `user_id` (`user_id`,`local_site_id`),
    UNIQUE KEY `profile_id` (`profile_id`,`local_site_id`),
    KEY `accounts_localsiteprofile_fbfc09f1` (`user_id`),
    KEY `accounts_localsiteprofile_141c6eec` (`profile_id`),
    KEY `accounts_localsiteprofile_45ded6af` (`local_site_id`)
   ) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=27 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
   /*!40101 SET character_set_client = @saved_cs_client */;

   --
   -- Table structure for table `accounts_profile`
   --

   DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `accounts_profile`;
   /*!40101 SET @saved_cs_client     = @@character_set_client */;
   /*!40101 SET character_set_client = utf8 */;
   CREATE TABLE `accounts_profile` (
    `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
    `user_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
    `first_time_setup_done` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
    `collapsed_diffs` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
    `wordwrapped_diffs` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
    `syntax_highlighting` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
    `show_submitted` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
    `sort_review_request_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
    `sort_dashboard_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
    `sort_submitter_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
    `sort_group_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
    `review_request_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
    `dashboard_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
    `submitter_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
    `group_columns` varchar(256) NOT NULL,
    `is_private` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
    PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
    UNIQUE KEY `user_id` (`user_id`)
   ) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=31 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
   /*!40101 SET character_set_client = @saved_cs_client */;

   --
   -- Table structure for table `accounts_profile_starred_groups`
   --

   DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `accounts_profile_starred_groups`;
   /*!40101 SET @saved_cs_client     = @@character_set_client */;
   /*!40101 SET character_set_client = utf8 */;
   CREATE TABLE `accounts_profile_starred_groups` (
    `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
    `profile_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
    `group_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
    PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
    UNIQUE KEY `profile_id` (`profile_id`,`group_id`),
    KEY `accounts_profile_starred_groups_141c6eec` (`profile_id`),
    KEY `accounts_profile_starred_groups_bda51c3c` (`group_id`)
   ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
   /*!40101 SET character_set_client = @saved_cs_client */;

   --
   -- Table structure for table

Re: Problem upgrading from 1.6beta1 to 1.6rc1

[martin]

` (`localsite_id`),
  KEY `site_localsite_admins_fbfc09f1` (`user_id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
/*!40101 SET character_set_client = @saved_cs_client */;

--
-- Table structure for table `site_localsite_users`
--

DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `site_localsite_users`;
/*!40101 SET @saved_cs_client = @@character_set_client */;
/*!40101 SET character_set_client = utf8 */;
CREATE TABLE `site_localsite_users` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `localsite_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `user_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  UNIQUE KEY `localsite_id` (`localsite_id`,`user_id`),
  KEY `site_localsite_users_5eaeed01` (`localsite_id`),
  KEY `site_localsite_users_fbfc09f1` (`user_id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
/*!40101 SET character_set_client = @saved_cs_client */;

--
-- Table structure for table `siteconfig_siteconfiguration`
--

DROP TABLE IF EXISTS `siteconfig_siteconfiguration`;
/*!40101 SET @saved_cs_client = @@character_set_client */;
/*!40101 SET character_set_client = utf8 */;
CREATE TABLE `siteconfig_siteconfiguration` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `site_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `version` varchar(20) NOT NULL,
  `settings` text NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  KEY `siteconfig_siteconfiguration_6223029` (`site_id`)
) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=2 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
/*!40101 SET character_set_client = @saved_cs_client */;
/*!40103 SET TIME_ZONE=@OLD_TIME_ZONE */;

/*!40101 SET SQL_MODE=@OLD_SQL_MODE */;
/*!40014 SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=@OLD_FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS */;
/*!40014 SET UNIQUE_CHECKS=@OLD_UNIQUE_CHECKS */;
/*!40101 SET CHARACTER_SET_CLIENT=@OLD_CHARACTER_SET_CLIENT */;
/*!40101 SET CHARACTER_SET_RESULTS=@OLD_CHARACTER_SET_RESULTS */;
/*!40101 SET COLLATION_CONNECTION=@OLD_COLLATION_CONNECTION */;
/*!40111 SET SQL_NOTES=@OLD_SQL_NOTES */;

-- Dump completed on 2011-06-29 13:50:31

On Jun 29, 1:47 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Scratch the scratch that. The problem I hit was separate and local to my
 setup (didn't fully switch branches in a clean way). So, I can't actually
 reproduce this, and I started off with Django 1.2.5 and RB 1.6 beta1 and
 went to Django 1.3 and RB RC1, and it worked fine. So we need to figure out
 how your database is in an inconsistent state.

 Just to verify, how do you do the upgrade to RC1?

 Can you dump the database schema and send it to me? (No content, just the
 schema.)

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

 On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.comwrote:







  Sorry, scratch that. I'm able to reproduce this when going from beta 1 to
  RC1 as well. It has to do with the is_profile. Looking into it. It *does*
  have an evolution file, but it appears that it's not being taken into
  account.

  Christian

  --
  Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
  Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
  VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

  On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Christian Hammond 
  chip...@chipx86.comwrote:

  So what I'm seeing is that some of these evolutions that have been applied
  are recorded as having already been applied. That most often happens when
  you've done an upgrade, then tried reverting the schema for some reason
  (perhaps to downgrade) but never erased the evolution history. You say the
  database wasn't modified, but did anything ever happen beyond just 
  upgrading
  from one release to another?

  What database are you using?

  What version of Review Board did you have installed prior to 1.6 beta 1?

  Christian

  --
  Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com

  Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
  VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

  On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 1:02 PM, martin martin.don...@gmail.com wrote:

  Thanks Christian.

  Screenshot:http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9410307/evolutions.PNG

  #- Evolution for sessions
  from django_evolution.mutations import *
  from django.db import models

  MUTATIONS = [
     ChangeField('Session', 'expire_date', initial=None, db_index=True)
  ]
  #--
  #- Evolution for accounts
  from django_evolution.mutations import *
  from django.db import models

  MUTATIONS = [
     AddField('Profile', 'is_private', models.BooleanField,
  initial=False)
  ]
  #--
  #- Evolution for reviews
  from django_evolution.mutations import *
  from django.db import models

  MUTATIONS = [
     AddField('Comment', 'issue_opened', models.BooleanField,
  initial=False),
     AddField('Comment', 'issue_status', models.CharField,
  max_length=1, null=True, db_index=True),
     AddField('Group', 'local_site', models.ForeignKey, null=True,
  related_model='site.LocalSite'),
     AddField('Group', 'incoming_request_count', models.CounterField,
  null=True),
     AddField('Group', 'visible', models.BooleanField, initial=True),
     AddField('Group', 'invite_only', models.BooleanField

New error with post-review

[Martin]

Hi all.
I fixed the las error re- installing  RBTools.
Now, when I try to execute post-review -o, I get

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/post-review, line 8, in module
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.3.2', 'console_scripts', 'post-review')()
  File 
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.6.egg/rbtools/postreview.py,
 
line 3769, in main
TypeError: object of type 'NoneType' has no len()

Does somebody can help me?

Thanks in advance.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Realized web-based post-commit reviews

[Martin]

Congratulations, I saw you customization and is great.
Do you know if there is something like that for git?

Thanks in advance.

Martin.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

I can't use the post-review. I get Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']

[Martin]

Hi, everyone.
I had installed ReviewBoard and I created a review uploading the diff patch 
from the web UI. This task worked perfectly, but when I want use post-review 
for the same , I get the following error:

Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']

I have configured mi git repo in ReviewBoard as a non-bare repository, in 
fact, is a git svn clone of a central SVN.

Does anybody can help me, please?

Thanks in advance.

Martin.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Error with post-review. I get Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']

[Martin]

Hi, everyone.
I had installed ReviewBoard and I created a review uploading the diff
patch from the web UI. This task worked perfectly, but when I want use
post-review for the same , I get the following error:

Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']

I have configured mi git repo in ReviewBoard as a non-bare repository,
in fact, is a git svn clone of a central SVN.

Does anybody can help me, please?

Thanks in advance.

Martin.


-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Error with post-review. I get Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']

[Martin]

Nothing happens.
The command is executed but I don't get anything by the standar output.
Any else tip will be useful.

Thanks a lot.

MArtin.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Error with post-review. I get Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']

[Martin]

Before anything...
I configured my non-bare git repository in ReviewBoard. This repository is a 
git svn clone of a central SVN repository.
I'm trying to execute a pre commit review, using the post-review commit with 
the following syntax:

cat file.diff |post-review -d --diff-filename=-
Is this correct?

Thanks.

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Re: Error with post-review. I get Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']

[Martin]

The full debug log below

-bash-4.0$ cat AirStories.diff |post-review --debug --diff-filename=-
 RBTools 0.3.2
 Home = /home/hudsonhome
 svn info
 git rev-parse --git-dir
 git symbolic-ref -q HEAD
Failed to execute command: ['git', 'symbolic-ref', '-q', 'HEAD']

-bash-4.0$ echo $?
1
-bash-4.0$ 

I feel this is not a good news, don't  you?



-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

post-review with git-svn parent throwing error

[Martin]

Hi everyone,

I'm working with git-svn and the post-review command is failing when
working on branches. I'm using the --parent and there are differences
between the branches and the master.

My repo is like this:

* master - The one that fetches from svn trunk
  mockito_refactor - Branched from master
  mockito_refactor_models - Branched from mockito-refactor

I did a review between mockito-refactor and master as usual, but
between mockito-refactor-models and mockito-refactor fails.

This is what I'm running
laptop15:~/dev/models/quijote.git:mockito_refactor_models$ post-review
--parent=mockito_refactor --guess_summary --guess-description

And this is the error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/local/bin/post-review, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('RBTools==0.2', 'console_scripts', 'post-review')
()
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/RBTools-0.2-py2.6.egg/
rbtools/postreview.py, line 2861, in main
submit_as=options.submit_as)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/RBTools-0.2-py2.6.egg/
rbtools/postreview.py, line 2554, in tempt_fate
parent_diff_content)
  File /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/RBTools-0.2-py2.6.egg/
rbtools/postreview.py, line 503, in upload_diff
debug(Uploading diff, size: %d % len(diff_content))
TypeError: object of type 'NoneType' has no len()

If I run git diff between the branches I see all the differences.

Does anyone knows why this is failing?

The server runs 1.5.1 version.

Thanks,
Martin

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Store large data in memcached

[Martin]

Hi,

is there a way to store larger data in memcached?
As posted in the performance related thread, a file containing of 24k
lines is not stored in the cache.
The log says:

WARNING - Failed to fetch large data from cache for key
codereview:diff-sidebyside-31114: .

Is there a way to configure the software to store larger data?

Thanks,
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Store large data in memcached

[Martin]

I am running beta2.

I just saw, taht memcached -m num is in MB. I tried 2GB but the 24k
file was still not cached.
Maybe there is a different setting how large each item can be.
The option -m num configures how large the entire storage can be.

On Apr 2, 1:44 pm, David Trowbridge trowb...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hum. I thought we had worked around all of our cache size problems by
 splitting stuff up under multiple keys. What version are you running?

 -David

 On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

  Thank you, I will try the memcache parameters.

  Swapping is not an issue for us. Used Swap is at 0KB. We have 4GB
  memory in that server.

  Thanks,
  Martin

  On Apr 2, 1:31 pm, ciaomary ciaom...@gmail.com wrote:
   Provided your machine can handle it, i believe you can do this when
   starting memcache by setting the max memory to use for items higher. I
   do this as so:

    /usr/local/bin/memcached -d -m 2048 -l 127.0.0.1 -u memcache

   By the way, if you are using RB with really large diffs (I believe you
   said this in another post) I would keep an eye on the servers Virtual
   Memory. Our experience was that with only 2-4G of VM we started
   thrashing in swap neverland after a while and had to add more memory
   (8G is working well.) We have some really really big diffs though
   which may not be the typical use case. But if you do it may be
   something to watch for.

   On Apr 2, 8:42 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi,

is there a way to store larger data in memcached?
As posted in the performance related thread, a file containing of 24k
lines is not stored in the cache.
The log says:

WARNING - Failed to fetch large data from cache for key
codereview:diff-sidebyside-31114: .

Is there a way to configure the software to store larger data?

Thanks,
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: can't create comments, javascript error?

[Martin]

same with IE7

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: can't create comments, javascript error?

[Martin]

phew, good. thank you!
I appreciate your efforts!


On Mar 30, 12:13 am, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Huh, I'm actually seeing this too on one of my installs. I'm looking into it
 and will get back to you.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
 VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

 On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

  the error points into the js code:
  I added [line 361:]  which firefox tells me where the error occurs.

   /*
      * Shows the comment dialog.
      */
     showCommentDlg: function() {
         var self = this;

         if (gCommentDlg == null) {
             gCommentDlg = $(#comment-detail)
                 .commentDlg()
                 .css(z-index, 999)
                 .appendTo(body);
         }

         gCommentDlg
  [line 361:]            .one(close, function() {
                  gCommentDlg
                     .setCommentBlock(self)
                     .css({
                         left: $(document).scrollLeft() +
                               ($(window).width() - gCommentDlg.width
  ()) / 2,
                         top:  self.endRow.offset().top +
                               self.endRow.height()
                     })
                     .open(self.el);
             })
              .close();
     },

  On Mar 30, 12:08 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:
   I also restarted memcached.

   On Mar 30, 12:06 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

I use django 1.0.2 final if that matters.

On Mar 30, 12:05 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

 after the easy_install I did

 [r...@vmcodereview ~]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard
 Rebuilding directory structure
 Updating database
 Upgrading Review Board from 1.0alpha4 to 1.0beta1
 Installing json fixture 'initial_data' from '/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
 packages/ReviewBoard-1.0beta1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/
 fixtures'.
 Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
 No evolution required.

 On Mar 30, 12:04 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

  yes, I did.

  On Mar 29, 11:59 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com
  wrote:

   Did you run `rb-site upgrade` on the new site and restart the
  Apache server?

   Christian

   --
   Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
   Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
   VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

   On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com
  wrote:

Hi,

when I click on a line of code in the diff viewer, I get this
  error
message in firefox 3 after upgrading to the first beta release:

Error: gCommentDlg.one(close, function ()
{gCommentDlg.setCommentBlock(self).css({left:
  $(document).scrollLeft()
+ ($(window).width() - gCommentDlg.width()) / 2, top:
self.endRow.offset().top + self.endRow.height()}).open
(self.el);}).close is not a function
Source File:

 http://codereview/reviewboard/media/rb/js/diffviewer.js?1238384481
Line: 361

I did clear the browser cache.

Please help.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: can't create comments, javascript error?

[Martin]

I also restarted memcached.

On Mar 30, 12:06 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:
 I use django 1.0.2 final if that matters.

 On Mar 30, 12:05 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

  after the easy_install I did

  [r...@vmcodereview ~]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard
  Rebuilding directory structure
  Updating database
  Upgrading Review Board from 1.0alpha4 to 1.0beta1
  Installing json fixture 'initial_data' from '/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
  packages/ReviewBoard-1.0beta1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/
  fixtures'.
  Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
  No evolution required.

  On Mar 30, 12:04 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

   yes, I did.

   On Mar 29, 11:59 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:

Did you run `rb-site upgrade` on the new site and restart the Apache 
server?

Christian

--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,

 when I click on a line of code in the diff viewer, I get this error
 message in firefox 3 after upgrading to the first beta release:

 Error: gCommentDlg.one(close, function ()
 {gCommentDlg.setCommentBlock(self).css({left: $(document).scrollLeft()
 + ($(window).width() - gCommentDlg.width()) / 2, top:
 self.endRow.offset().top + self.endRow.height()}).open
 (self.el);}).close is not a function
 Source File:
http://codereview/reviewboard/media/rb/js/diffviewer.js?1238384481
 Line: 361

 I did clear the browser cache.

 Please help.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: can't create comments, javascript error?

[Martin]

I use django 1.0.2 final if that matters.

On Mar 30, 12:05 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:
 after the easy_install I did

 [r...@vmcodereview ~]# rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard
 Rebuilding directory structure
 Updating database
 Upgrading Review Board from 1.0alpha4 to 1.0beta1
 Installing json fixture 'initial_data' from '/usr/lib/python2.4/site-
 packages/ReviewBoard-1.0beta1-py2.4.egg/reviewboard/scmtools/
 fixtures'.
 Installed 6 object(s) from 1 fixture(s)
 No evolution required.

 On Mar 30, 12:04 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

  yes, I did.

  On Mar 29, 11:59 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:

   Did you run `rb-site upgrade` on the new site and restart the Apache 
   server?

   Christian

   --
   Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
   Review Board -http://www.review-board.org
   VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com

   On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi,

when I click on a line of code in the diff viewer, I get this error
message in firefox 3 after upgrading to the first beta release:

Error: gCommentDlg.one(close, function ()
{gCommentDlg.setCommentBlock(self).css({left: $(document).scrollLeft()
+ ($(window).width() - gCommentDlg.width()) / 2, top:
self.endRow.offset().top + self.endRow.height()}).open
(self.el);}).close is not a function
Source File:
   http://codereview/reviewboard/media/rb/js/diffviewer.js?1238384481
Line: 361

I did clear the browser cache.

Please help.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Diff between revisions is broken in alpha4

[Martin]

Hi,

when I view the diff between revisions I get either one of the
following two issues:


1) A page containing the error message :

 list index out of range

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha4-
py2.4.egg/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py, line 145, in view_diff
interdiffset, highlighting, True)[0]
IndexError: list index out of range



2) The page showing the code review header but the panel which is
supposed to show the diff
now shows a paginator for 2 pages but both pages are empty.

Logging is enabled but no errors in httpd's error log.

Am I the only one experiencing that?

Thanks,
Martin


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Diff between revisions is broken in alpha4

[Martin]

ah, somebody already opened a bug for this:

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=892

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: settings_local.py ?

[Martin Ankerl]

Thanks a lot! This seems to work now.

Martin

On Feb 11, 11:26 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Okay, looks like the reviewboard.fcgi file isn't being generated correctly.
 Can you two edit that file and append /conf/ to the path being inserted?
 For example:

     sys.path.insert(0, /var/www/reviews2/conf/)

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 VMware, Inc.

 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Martin Ankerl 
 martin.ank...@gmail.comwrote:



  Hi, I have got the same problem using lighthttpd and sqlite. I have
  just followed the standard installation instructions.

  Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: settings_local.py ?

[Martin Ankerl]

Hi, I have got the same problem using lighthttpd and sqlite. I have
just followed the standard installation instructions.

Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Sometimes I get Diff currently unavailable

[Martin]

awesome!!

now, I am really looking forward to alpha3 :)


On Feb 6, 5:34 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Also fixed in last night's nightly.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 VMware, Inc.

 On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi,

  when viewing revision changes (rev 1-2), then I sometimes get:

  
  Diff currently unavailable.

  Error: Internal error. Unable to locate file record for filediff 26908
  

  However, sometimes I actually get to see the diff. I could not find
  anything helpful in regards to that in the reviewboard log file.
  Anything else I can tell you

  I have alpha2 installed from the release date.

  Thanks,
  Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Sometimes I get Diff currently unavailable

[Martin]

Hi,

when viewing revision changes (rev 1-2), then I sometimes get:


Diff currently unavailable.

Error: Internal error. Unable to locate file record for filediff 26908


However, sometimes I actually get to see the diff. I could not find
anything helpful in regards to that in the reviewboard log file.
Anything else I can tell you

I have alpha2 installed from the release date.

Thanks,
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: using django.po for custom strings

[Martin]

I did run

django-admin.py compilemessages
being in /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.0alpha2-
py2.4.egg/reviewboard

restarted httpd, but no luck :(

On Feb 6, 9:52 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I would like to replace some strings with my own strings (i.e. replace
 Bugs with MKS).
 One way would be to modify the html source or editing

 locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/django.po

 I found the MsgId for Bugs and set the Msgstr to 'MKS'.
 Do I need to do anything special other than maybe restart httpd to
 apply the changes in the po file?

 Thanks,
 Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

using django.po for custom strings

[Martin]

Hi,

I would like to replace some strings with my own strings (i.e. replace
Bugs with MKS).
One way would be to modify the html source or editing

locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/django.po

I found the MsgId for Bugs and set the Msgstr to 'MKS'.
Do I need to do anything special other than maybe restart httpd to
apply the changes in the po file?

Thanks,
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Review Board 1.0 alpha 2 released

[Martin]

thank you!! looks lovely!

migrating from a svn based install to rb-site/easy_install was a
breeze!

found and reported one bug (848) regarding not being able to delete
images from a review.

On Feb 3, 10:11 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Hey everyone,

 We've just put out the 1.0 alpha 2 release of Review Board. Those of you who
 have been using the nightlies know what to expect in this release, but for
 everyone else, you can read about it at:

 http://review-board.org/news/2009/02/03/review-board-10-alpha-2-relea...

 Unlike with the alpha 1 release, upgrades from now really shouldn't
 auto-grab nightlies. We tracked down the reason that nightlies were still
 being used for alpha 1 installs and have fixed it. If you still would like
 to use nightlies (which would certainly help us with debugging), you can
 read the Getting Started guide 
 (http://www.review-board.org/docs/GettingStarted) to find out how to switch.

 If there are any problems with the upgrade, do let us know!

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 VMware, Inc.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: can't search because python doesn't find libjava.so

[Martin]

meh, I think you can ignore this. I believe this is an issue while
compiling pylucene...
turns out I had some wrong paths while building jcc
sorry for the noise

On Jan 30, 10:41 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I set up pylucene
 I added the path to libjava.so to /etc/ld.so.conf and loaded it using
 ldconfig.

 # ldconfig -p | grep libjava.so
         libjava.so (libc6, hwcap: 0x0001) = /usr/lib/jvm/
 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so

 if you now do
 # python import lucene

 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File stdin, line 1, in ?
   File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/lucene-2.4.0-py2.4-linux-
 i686.egg/lucene/__init__.py, line 2, in ?
     import os, _lucene
 ImportError: libjava.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file
 or directory

 if you set LD_LIBRARY_PATH before you run python, the import will
 work.

 My reviewboard uses mod_python and I am not sure how to solve this
 issue since mod_python seems to ignore my ldconfig as well.

 I did manage to build the full index on the command line after setting
 LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but I can't search, because mod_python ignores the
 shared libs in ldconfig :(

 Any help or pointers are appreciated.

 Thanks,
 Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: anonymous users shouldn't be able to leave comments

[Martin]

issue is already closed!

Thanks for the quick fix, Christian!

On Jan 22, 8:38 am, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:
 here it is

 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=827

 thanks.

 On Jan 21, 4:54 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:

  I'm surprised I missed that during testing. Would you mind filing a bug on
  this? We'll be sure to fix it soon.

  Christian

  --
  Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
  VMware, Inc.

  On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

   Hi,

   A colleague of mine just ran into that:
   I had anonymous viewing of reviews and diffs enabled.
   If you now view a diff as anonymous, you can leave comments.
   Attempts to publish or edit the review will fail, because it asks you
   to login and will not remember your changes (obviously, since they are
   not in the database).

   Wouldn't it be better to turn off the ability to create comments when
   you are not logged in?
   My colleague spent half an hour creating comments, which he lost
   because he didn't realize he was not logged in.

   Thanks,
   Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: anonymous users shouldn't be able to leave comments

[Martin]

here it is

http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=827

thanks.

On Jan 21, 4:54 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 I'm surprised I missed that during testing. Would you mind filing a bug on
 this? We'll be sure to fix it soon.

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 VMware, Inc.

 On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi,

  A colleague of mine just ran into that:
  I had anonymous viewing of reviews and diffs enabled.
  If you now view a diff as anonymous, you can leave comments.
  Attempts to publish or edit the review will fail, because it asks you
  to login and will not remember your changes (obviously, since they are
  not in the database).

  Wouldn't it be better to turn off the ability to create comments when
  you are not logged in?
  My colleague spent half an hour creating comments, which he lost
  because he didn't realize he was not logged in.

  Thanks,
  Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

anonymous users shouldn't be able to leave comments

[Martin]

Hi,

A colleague of mine just ran into that:
I had anonymous viewing of reviews and diffs enabled.
If you now view a diff as anonymous, you can leave comments.
Attempts to publish or edit the review will fail, because it asks you
to login and will not remember your changes (obviously, since they are
not in the database).

Wouldn't it be better to turn off the ability to create comments when
you are not logged in?
My colleague spent half an hour creating comments, which he lost
because he didn't realize he was not logged in.

Thanks,
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

Re: Trophy causing problems

[Martin]

Hi Christian,

thanks so much!
I'll update our server first thing in the morning.

How else do you get a trophy?
That was so neat to see that the st ID got a trophy :)

Thanks,
Martin

On Jan 16, 5:43 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
 Hi Martin.

 There's a patch up to fix this, which I'm going to commit today. If someone
 can upgrade the server today or tomorrow, once it goes in, then this problem
 will be taken care of. Sorry about the inconvenience :(

 Christian

 --
 Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
 VMware, Inc.

 On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Martin mkoeb...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi,
  a colleague of mine recently created the st code review request
  which gave him a nice looking trophy! Really neat easter egg. I just
  updated my reviewboard to svn trunk and that trophy seems to cause
  some trouble now. We no longer can view that reviewrequest.

  Please help :)

  Environment:

  Request Method: GET
  Request URL:http://codereview.ykf.navtech.corp/reviewboard/r//
  Django Version: 1.0.2 final
  Python Version: 2.4.3
  Installed Applications:
  ['django.contrib.admin',
   'django.contrib.auth',
   'django.contrib.contenttypes',
   'django.contrib.markup',
   'django.contrib.sites',
   'django.contrib.sessions',
   'djblets.datagrid',
   'djblets.feedview',
   'djblets.siteconfig',
   'djblets.util',
   'djblets.webapi',
   'reviewboard.accounts',
   'reviewboard.admin',
   'reviewboard.changedescs',
   'reviewboard.diffviewer',
   'reviewboard.iphone',
   'reviewboard.reports',
   'reviewboard.reviews',
   'reviewboard.scmtools',
   'reviewboard.webapi',
   'django_evolution']
  Installed Middleware:
  ('django.middleware.common.CommonMiddleware',
   'django.middleware.doc.XViewMiddleware',
   'django.middleware.locale.LocaleMiddleware',
   'django.contrib.sessions.middleware.SessionMiddleware',
   'django.contrib.auth.middleware.AuthenticationMiddleware',
   'djblets.siteconfig.middleware.SettingsMiddleware',
   'reviewboard.admin.middleware.LoadSettingsMiddleware',
   'djblets.log.middleware.LoggingMiddleware',
   'reviewboard.admin.middleware.CheckUpdatesRequiredMiddleware')

  Template error:
  In template /var/www/reviewboard/templates/reviews/trophy_box.html,
  error at line 9
    Caught an exception while rendering: u'review_request.id'
    1 : {% load djblets_deco %}

    2 : {% load djblets_utils %}

    3 : {% load i18n %}

    4 : {% load reviewtags %}

    5 :

    6 : {% ifneatnumber review_request.id %}

    7 : {%  box yay %}

    8 :  img src={{MEDIA_URL}}rb/images/{% if milestone %}trophy{%
  else %}fish-trophy{% endif %}.png width=32 height=48 border=0
  alt= /

    9 :  h1 {% blocktrans with review_request.submitter|
  user_displayname as submitter %} {{submitter}} got review request #
  {{review_request.id}}!{% endblocktrans %}/h1

    10 : {%  endbox %}

    11 : {% endifneatnumber %}

    12 :

    13 :

  Traceback:
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/core/handlers/base.py
  in get_response
   86.                 response = callback(request, *callback_args,
  **callback_kwargs)
  File /var/www/reviewboard/accounts/decorators.py in _check
   27.             return view_func(*args, **kwargs)
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/views/decorators/
  cache.py in _cache_controlled
   30.             response = viewfunc(request, *args, **kw)
  File /var/www/reviewboard/reviews/views.py in review_detail
   175.     return render_to_response(template_name, RequestContext
  (request, {
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/shortcuts/__init__.py
  in render_to_response
   18.     return HttpResponse(loader.render_to_string(*args,
  **kwargs), **httpresponse_kwargs)
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/loader.py in
  render_to_string
   107.     return t.render(context_instance)
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/__init__.py in
  render
   176.         return self.nodelist.render(context)
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/__init__.py in
  render
   768.                 bits.append(self.render_node(node, context))
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/debug.py in
  render_node
   71.             result = node.render(context)
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/loader_tags.py
  in render
   97.         return compiled_parent.render(context)
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/__init__.py in
  render
   176.         return self.nodelist.render(context)
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/__init__.py in
  render
   768.                 bits.append(self.render_node(node, context))
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/debug.py in
  render_node
   71.             result = node.render(context)
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/loader_tags.py
  in render
   24.         result = self.nodelist.render(context)
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages

Trophy causing problems

[Martin]

/util/decorators.py in render
  150. return self.tag_func(context, self.nodelist, *args)
File /var/www/reviewboard/reviews/templatetags/reviewtags.py in
ifneatnumber
  84. s = nodelist.render(context)
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/__init__.py in
render
  768. bits.append(self.render_node(node, context))
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/debug.py in
render_node
  71. result = node.render(context)
File /var/www/reviewboard/djblets/util/decorators.py in render
  150. return self.tag_func(context, self.nodelist, *args)
File /var/www/reviewboard/djblets/util/templatetags/djblets_deco.py
in box
  42. return render_to_string('deco/box.html', {
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/__init__.py in
render
  768. bits.append(self.render_node(node, context))
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/debug.py in
render_node
  81. raise wrapped

Exception Type: TemplateSyntaxError at /reviewboard/r//
Exception Value: Caught an exception while rendering:
u'review_request.id'

Original Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/debug.py,
line 71, in render_node
result = node.render(context)
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/templatetags/i18n.py,
line 85, in render
data = dict([(v, force_unicode(context[v])) for v in vars])
  File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/template/context.py,
line 43, in __getitem__
raise KeyError(key)
KeyError: u'review_request.id'



Thanks!

Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
reviewboard group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---