[scifinoir2] Top 10 Evil Human Experiments

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
http://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/Top 10 Evil
Human Experiments

Share This javascript:void(0)- Published March 14, 2008 - 343
Commentshttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#idc-container

*[WARNING] This list contains descriptions and images of human
experimentation which may cause offense to some readers.]* Human
experimentation and research ethics evolved over time. On occasion, the
subjects of human experimentation have been prisoners, slaves, or even
family http://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#members.
In some notable cases, doctors have performed experiments on
themselves when they have been unwilling to risk the lives of others. This
is known as self-experimentation. This is a list of the 10 most evil and
unethical experiments carried out on humans.
10
Stanford Prison Experiment

[image: Stanford Prison]

The Stanford prison experiment was a
psychologicalhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#study
of human responses to captivity and its behavioral effects on both
authorities and inmates in prison. The experiment was conducted in 1971 by a
team of researchers led by psychologist Philip Zimbardo at Stanford
University. Undergraduate volunteers played the roles of both guards and
prisoners living in a mock prison in the basement of the Stanford psychology
building.

Prisoners and guards rapidly adapted to their roles, stepping beyond the
boundaries of what had been predicted and leading to dangerous and
psychologically damaging situations. One-third of the guards were judged to
have exhibited “genuine” sadistic tendencies, while many prisoners were
emotionally traumatized and two had to be removed from the experiment early.
Finally, Zimbardo, alarmed at the increasingly abusive anti-social behavior
from his subjects, terminated the entire experiment early.
9
The Monster Study

[image: Stuttering]

The Monster Study was a stuttering experiment on 22 orphan
childrenhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#in
Davenport, Iowa, in 1939 conducted by Wendell Johnson at the
University
of Iowa. Johnson chose one of his graduate students, Mary Tudor, to conduct
the experiment and he supervised her research. After placing the children in
control and experimental groups, Tudor gave positive speech therapy to half
of the children, praising the fluency of their speech, and negative speech
therapy to the other half, belittling the children for every speech
imperfection and telling them they were stutterers. Many of the normal
speaking orphan children who received negative therapy in the experiment
suffered negative psychological effects and some retained speech problems
during the course of their life. Dubbed “The Monster Study” by some of
Johnson’s peers who were horrified that he would experiment on orphan
children to prove a theory, the experiment was kept hidden for fear
Johnson’s reputation would be tarnished in the wake of human experiments
conducted by the Nazis during World War II. The University of Iowa publicly
apologized for the Monster Study in 2001.
8
Project 4.1

[image: 300Px-Project 4.1 Figures]

Project 4.1 was the designation for a medical study conducted by the United
States of those residents of the Marshall Islands exposed to radioactive
fallout from the March 1, 1954 Castle Bravo nuclear test at Bikini Atoll,
which had an unexpectedly large yield. For the first decade after the test,
the effects were ambiguous and statistically difficult to correlate to
radiation exposure: miscarriages and stillbirths among exposed Rongelap
women doubled in the first five years after the accident, but then returned
to normal; some developmental difficulties and impaired growth appeared in
children, but in no clear-cut pattern. In the decades that followed, though,
the effects were undeniable. Children began to suffer disproportionately
from thyroid 
cancerhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#(due
to exposure to radioiodines), and almost a third of those exposed
developed neoplasms by 1974.

As a Department of
Energyhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#Committee
writing on the human radiation experiments wrote, “It appears to
have been almost immediately apparent to the AEC and the Joint Task Force
running the Castle series that research on radiation effects could be done
in conjunction with the medical treatment of the exposed populations.” The
DOE report also concluded that “The dual purpose of what is now a DOE
medical program has led to a view by the Marshallese that they were being
used as ‘guinea pigs’ in a ‘radiation experiment.’”
7
Project MKULTRA

[image: Cia Lsd]

Project MKULTRA, or MK-ULTRA, was the code name for a CIA mind-control
research program, run by the Office of Scientific Intelligence, that began
in the early 1950s and continued at least through the late 1960s. There is
much published evidence that the project 

[scifinoir2] 10 Extremely Weird Religions

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
 http://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/Originally, I
wasn't going to post this, but I noticed that 2 of the groups were African
American.

10 Extremely Weird Religions

Share This javascript:void(0)- Published September 10, 2009 by *JFrater* -
318 
Commentshttp://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/#idc-container

We have previously published a variety of lists on strange religious
practices http://listverse.com/2007/08/13/10-weird-religious-practices/,
religions
you never knew 
existedhttp://listverse.com/2008/07/08/top-10-religions-you-never-knew-existed/,
and weird cults http://listverse.com/2007/09/15/top-10-cults/, but not a
list of bizarre religions. This list is designed to fill the gap by
discussing ten religions that most of us have not heard of (for good reason
as you will see). Be sure to use the comments to tell us about any other
bizarre religions and, especially, your own experiences of them.

10
Scientology

[image: 
Scientology1-2]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/scientology1-2.jpg

Scientology has featured on a previous list, but if I didn’t include it here
the comments would be inundated with “where’s scientology?” questions. The
Church of Scientology is a cult created by L Ron Hubbard (Elron) in 1952 as
an outgrowth of his earlier self-help system called Dianetics. The Church of
Scientology holds that at the higher levels of initiation (OT levels)
mystical teachings are imparted that may be harmful to unprepared readers.
These teachings are kept secret from members who have not reached these
levels. In the OT levels, Hubbard explains how to reverse the effects of
past-life trauma patterns that supposedly extend millions of years into the
past. Among these advanced teachings is the story of Xenu (sometimes Xemu),
introduced as an alien ruler of the “Galactic Confederacy.” According to
this story, 75 million years ago Xenu brought billions of people to Earth in
spacecraft resembling Douglas DC-8 airliners, stacked them around volcanoes
and detonated hydrogen bombs in the volcanoes. The thetans then clustered
together, stuck to the bodies of the living, and continue to do this today.
Scientologists at advanced levels place considerable emphasis on isolating
body thetans and neutralizing their ill effects.

9
Creativity Movement

[image: Splc Hale
350X4501]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/splc_hale_350x4501.jpg

The Creativity Movement (formerly known as World Church Of The Creator), is
a white separatist organization that advocates the whites-only religion,
Creativity. It was also a descriptive phrase used by Ben Klassen, that
included all adherents of the religion. The use of the term creator does not
refer to a deity, but rather to themselves (white people). Despite the
former use of the word Church in its name, the movement is atheistic.
Creativity is a White Separatist religion that was founded by Ben Klassen in
early 1973 under the name Church of the Creator. After Klassen’s death in
1993, Creativity almost died out as a religion until the New Church of the
Creator was established three years later by Matthew F. Hale as its Pontifex
Maximus (high priest), until his incarceration in January 2003 for plotting
with the movement’s head of security, Anthony Evola (an FBI informant), to
murder a federal judge.

8
Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth

[image: Picture
2-81]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/picture-2-81.png

Obviously spelling is not a fundamental part of this religion! Thee Temple
ov Psychick Youth (TOPY) was founded in 1981 by members of Psychic
TVhttp://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/#,
Coil, Current 93, and a number of other individuals. The ever-evolving
network is a loosely federated group of people operating as a unique blend
of artistic collective, and practitioners of magic. TOPY is dedicated to the
manifestation of magical concepts lacking mysticism or the worship of gods.
The group focuses on the psychic and magical aspects of the human brain
linked with “guiltless sexuality”. Throughout its existence, TOPY has been
an influential group in the underground Chaos magic scene and in the wider
western occult tradition. TOPY’s research has covered both Left-hand path
and Right-hand path magick, various elements of psychology, art, music, and
a variety of other media. Some of the influences on the network have
been Aleister
Crowley http://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/#,
Austin Osman Spare, and Brion Gysin.

7
Nation of Yahweh

[image: 
1Heavensfamilyufosmall]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/1heavensfamilyufosmall.jpg

The Nation of Yahweh is a predominantly African-American religious group
that is the most controversial offshoot of the Black Hebrew Israelites line
of thought. They were founded in 1979 in Miami by Hulon Mitchell, Jr., who
went by the name Yahweh ben Yahweh. Their goal is to return African
Americans, whom they see as the original 

[scifinoir2] 50 Spectacular Conceptual Artworks by Tariq Raheem

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
50 Spectacular Conceptual Artworks by Tariq
Raheemhttp://www.presidiacreative.com/50-spectacular-conceptual-artworks-by-tariq-raheem/

May 18, 2010 Featured http://www.presidiacreative.com/category/featured/,
Inspiration http://www.presidiacreative.com/category/inspiration/

Tariq Raheem is a digital painter, illustrator and conceptual artist from
Australia.  His work combines a futuristic hybrid of humanity and machines,
echoing themes from science fiction classics such as the Matrix, Blade
Runner, Mass Effect and others, and a fantasy world of sorceresses, queens
and Spartan warriors.

In this post, we’ve featured 50 spectacular artworks from Tariq, selected
from his gallery on deviantART: http://tariq12.deviantart.com/ His artwork
is truly spectacular, so if the digital version isn’t enough for you, Tariq
has recently artbook titled Chaotic Evolution.  More information is
available on his personal website: http://www.tariqart.net/

Hope you like the artworks!

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Sparky_001_CLOSE_UP.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Battle_Angel_by_tariq12.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/spidey_.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Spartan_Queen_close_up.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Queen.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Tia_ja.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/TheReaper_cvr_1_.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/The_Jester_480_.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/The_Guard_.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/The_Drifter_movie_poster_1.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/The_Devil__s_grave.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/The_Assassins_Lookout_MK_201.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/That-Which-Bites_cover.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Steve_Rogers__AKA__.jpg


http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Spartan_Queen.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Silent_Alley.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Redhorn_poster.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Red-Sonja.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Recon.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/reactor-.jpg


http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/plasmatron_fin__.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Our_Girl_1.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Maiden-of-War-1.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Mad_Darryl.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Lethal_Instinct_6_cover.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Lethal_Instinct_3.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Leech2B_.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/JP_and_Monica__.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/JFH_issue_3.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Hulk_vs_Wolvie.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Gypsy_poster.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Grokk_.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Drifter-poster-1_-clean-plate.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Dredd.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Conan_carnage_colour.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Canyon_.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Bunker__001.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/AIE_Poster_.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Aeshuam_WIP_colour.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Temple.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Scarrens__i_love_these_mofos.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Raven_.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Majesty_.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Dawn_Warrior__WIP.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Darrian_lynx.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Cry_Wolf_.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/creatures_408.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Shaka_Zulu_.jpg

http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Queen_Fran__WIP.jpg
*If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS
feedhttp://www.presidiacreative.com/feed/
!*

-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity 

Re: [scifinoir2] 50 Spectacular Conceptual Artworks by Tariq Raheem

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
No complaints here, Mr Worf. Thanks!

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:08 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 50 Spectacular Conceptual Artworks by Tariq 
 Raheemhttp://www.presidiacreative.com/50-spectacular-conceptual-artworks-by-tariq-raheem/

 May 18, 2010 Featured http://www.presidiacreative.com/category/featured/,
 Inspiration http://www.presidiacreative.com/category/inspiration/

 Tariq Raheem is a digital painter, illustrator and conceptual artist from
 Australia.  His work combines a futuristic hybrid of humanity and machines,
 echoing themes from science fiction classics such as the Matrix, Blade
 Runner, Mass Effect and others, and a fantasy world of sorceresses, queens
 and Spartan warriors.

 In this post, we’ve featured 50 spectacular artworks from Tariq, selected
 from his gallery on deviantART: http://tariq12.deviantart.com/ His artwork
 is truly spectacular, so if the digital version isn’t enough for you, Tariq
 has recently artbook titled Chaotic Evolution.  More information is
 available on his personal website: http://www.tariqart.net/

 Hope you like the artworks!

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Sparky_001_CLOSE_UP.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Battle_Angel_by_tariq12.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/spidey_.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Spartan_Queen_close_up.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Queen.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Tia_ja.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/TheReaper_cvr_1_.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/The_Jester_480_.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/The_Guard_.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/The_Drifter_movie_poster_1.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/The_Devil__s_grave.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/The_Assassins_Lookout_MK_201.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/That-Which-Bites_cover.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Steve_Rogers__AKA__.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Spartan_Queen.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Silent_Alley.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Redhorn_poster.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Red-Sonja.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Recon.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/reactor-.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/plasmatron_fin__.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Our_Girl_1.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Maiden-of-War-1.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Mad_Darryl.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Lethal_Instinct_6_cover.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Lethal_Instinct_3.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Leech2B_.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/JP_and_Monica__.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/JFH_issue_3.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Hulk_vs_Wolvie.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Gypsy_poster.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Grokk_.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Drifter-poster-1_-clean-plate.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Dredd.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Conan_carnage_colour.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Canyon_.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Bunker__001.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/AIE_Poster_.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Aeshuam_WIP_colour.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Temple.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Scarrens__i_love_these_mofos.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Raven_.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Majesty_.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Dawn_Warrior__WIP.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Darrian_lynx.jpg

 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Cry_Wolf_.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/creatures_408.jpg


 http://www.presidiacreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Shaka_Zulu_.jpg


 

Re: [scifinoir2] 10 Extremely Weird Religions

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
I laugh my narrow a$$ off at this, especially the Prince Philip Movement.
Wonder if those brothers know that their deity is a racist bastich...

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 http://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/ Originally,
 I wasn't going to post this, but I noticed that 2 of the groups were African
 American.

 10 Extremely Weird Religions

 Share This- Published September 10, 2009 by *JFrater* - 318 
 Commentshttp://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/#idc-container

 We have previously published a variety of lists on strange religious
 practices http://listverse.com/2007/08/13/10-weird-religious-practices/,
 religions you never knew 
 existedhttp://listverse.com/2008/07/08/top-10-religions-you-never-knew-existed/,
 and weird cults http://listverse.com/2007/09/15/top-10-cults/, but not a
 list of bizarre religions. This list is designed to fill the gap by
 discussing ten religions that most of us have not heard of (for good reason
 as you will see). Be sure to use the comments to tell us about any other
 bizarre religions and, especially, your own experiences of them.

 10
 Scientology

 [image: 
 Scientology1-2]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/scientology1-2.jpg

 Scientology has featured on a previous list, but if I didn’t include it
 here the comments would be inundated with “where’s scientology?” questions.
 The Church of Scientology is a cult created by L Ron Hubbard (Elron) in 1952
 as an outgrowth of his earlier self-help system called Dianetics. The Church
 of Scientology holds that at the higher levels of initiation (OT levels)
 mystical teachings are imparted that may be harmful to unprepared readers.
 These teachings are kept secret from members who have not reached these
 levels. In the OT levels, Hubbard explains how to reverse the effects of
 past-life trauma patterns that supposedly extend millions of years into the
 past. Among these advanced teachings is the story of Xenu (sometimes Xemu),
 introduced as an alien ruler of the “Galactic Confederacy.” According to
 this story, 75 million years ago Xenu brought billions of people to Earth in
 spacecraft resembling Douglas DC-8 airliners, stacked them around volcanoes
 and detonated hydrogen bombs in the volcanoes. The thetans then clustered
 together, stuck to the bodies of the living, and continue to do this today.
 Scientologists at advanced levels place considerable emphasis on isolating
 body thetans and neutralizing their ill effects.

 9
 Creativity Movement

 [image: Splc Hale 
 350X4501]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/splc_hale_350x4501.jpg

 The Creativity Movement (formerly known as World Church Of The Creator), is
 a white separatist organization that advocates the whites-only religion,
 Creativity. It was also a descriptive phrase used by Ben Klassen, that
 included all adherents of the religion. The use of the term creator does not
 refer to a deity, but rather to themselves (white people). Despite the
 former use of the word Church in its name, the movement is atheistic.
 Creativity is a White Separatist religion that was founded by Ben Klassen in
 early 1973 under the name Church of the Creator. After Klassen’s death in
 1993, Creativity almost died out as a religion until the New Church of the
 Creator was established three years later by Matthew F. Hale as its Pontifex
 Maximus (high priest), until his incarceration in January 2003 for plotting
 with the movement’s head of security, Anthony Evola (an FBI informant), to
 murder a federal judge.

 8
 Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth

 [image: Picture 
 2-81]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/picture-2-81.png

 Obviously spelling is not a fundamental part of this religion! Thee Temple
 ov Psychick Youth (TOPY) was founded in 1981 by members of Psychic 
 TVhttp://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/#,
 Coil, Current 93, and a number of other individuals. The ever-evolving
 network is a loosely federated group of people operating as a unique blend
 of artistic collective, and practitioners of magic. TOPY is dedicated to the
 manifestation of magical concepts lacking mysticism or the worship of gods.
 The group focuses on the psychic and magical aspects of the human brain
 linked with “guiltless sexuality”. Throughout its existence, TOPY has been
 an influential group in the underground Chaos magic scene and in the wider
 western occult tradition. TOPY’s research has covered both Left-hand path
 and Right-hand path magick, various elements of psychology, art, music, and
 a variety of other media. Some of the influences on the network have been 
 Aleister
 Crowley http://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/#,
 Austin Osman Spare, and Brion Gysin.

 7
 Nation of Yahweh

 [image: 
 1Heavensfamilyufosmall]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/1heavensfamilyufosmall.jpg

 The Nation of Yahweh is a predominantly 

Re: [scifinoir2] Top 10 Evil Human Experiments

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
Ain't humanity WONDERFUL?

Martin (needs t get around to hacking the DoD to launch everything and end
this vale of tears)

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 http://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/
 Top 10 Evil Human Experiments

 Share This- Published March 14, 2008 - 343 
 Commentshttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#idc-container

 *[WARNING] This list contains descriptions and images of human
 experimentation which may cause offense to some readers.]* Human
 experimentation and research ethics evolved over time. On occasion, the
 subjects of human experimentation have been prisoners, slaves, or even
 family 
 http://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#members. In 
 some notable cases, doctors have performed experiments on
 themselves when they have been unwilling to risk the lives of others. This
 is known as self-experimentation. This is a list of the 10 most evil and
 unethical experiments carried out on humans.
 10
 Stanford Prison Experiment

 [image: Stanford Prison]

 The Stanford prison experiment was a 
 psychologicalhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#study
  of human responses to captivity and its behavioral effects on both
 authorities and inmates in prison. The experiment was conducted in 1971 by a
 team of researchers led by psychologist Philip Zimbardo at Stanford
 University. Undergraduate volunteers played the roles of both guards and
 prisoners living in a mock prison in the basement of the Stanford psychology
 building.

 Prisoners and guards rapidly adapted to their roles, stepping beyond the
 boundaries of what had been predicted and leading to dangerous and
 psychologically damaging situations. One-third of the guards were judged to
 have exhibited “genuine” sadistic tendencies, while many prisoners were
 emotionally traumatized and two had to be removed from the experiment early.
 Finally, Zimbardo, alarmed at the increasingly abusive anti-social behavior
 from his subjects, terminated the entire experiment early.
 9
 The Monster Study

 [image: Stuttering]

 The Monster Study was a stuttering experiment on 22 orphan 
 childrenhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#in 
 Davenport, Iowa, in 1939 conducted by Wendell Johnson at the University
 of Iowa. Johnson chose one of his graduate students, Mary Tudor, to conduct
 the experiment and he supervised her research. After placing the children in
 control and experimental groups, Tudor gave positive speech therapy to half
 of the children, praising the fluency of their speech, and negative speech
 therapy to the other half, belittling the children for every speech
 imperfection and telling them they were stutterers. Many of the normal
 speaking orphan children who received negative therapy in the experiment
 suffered negative psychological effects and some retained speech problems
 during the course of their life. Dubbed “The Monster Study” by some of
 Johnson’s peers who were horrified that he would experiment on orphan
 children to prove a theory, the experiment was kept hidden for fear
 Johnson’s reputation would be tarnished in the wake of human experiments
 conducted by the Nazis during World War II. The University of Iowa publicly
 apologized for the Monster Study in 2001.
 8
 Project 4.1

 [image: 300Px-Project 4.1 Figures]

 Project 4.1 was the designation for a medical study conducted by the United
 States of those residents of the Marshall Islands exposed to radioactive
 fallout from the March 1, 1954 Castle Bravo nuclear test at Bikini Atoll,
 which had an unexpectedly large yield. For the first decade after the test,
 the effects were ambiguous and statistically difficult to correlate to
 radiation exposure: miscarriages and stillbirths among exposed Rongelap
 women doubled in the first five years after the accident, but then returned
 to normal; some developmental difficulties and impaired growth appeared in
 children, but in no clear-cut pattern. In the decades that followed, though,
 the effects were undeniable. Children began to suffer disproportionately
 from thyroid 
 cancerhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#(due 
 to exposure to radioiodines), and almost a third of those exposed
 developed neoplasms by 1974.

 As a Department of 
 Energyhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#Committee
  writing on the human radiation experiments wrote, “It appears to
 have been almost immediately apparent to the AEC and the Joint Task Force
 running the Castle series that research on radiation effects could be done
 in conjunction with the medical treatment of the exposed populations.” The
 DOE report also concluded that “The dual purpose of what is now a DOE
 medical program has led to a view by the Marshallese that they were being
 used as ‘guinea pigs’ in a ‘radiation experiment.’”
 7
 Project MKULTRA

 [image: Cia 

Re: [scifinoir2] [Far, Far Away Off Topic] Is 2010 New York City, America's Summer of Ass?

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
Brent, as a Leg Man for Life, I am bereft.

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:29 PM, brent wodehouse 
brent_wodeho...@thefence.us wrote:



 :-)
 

 http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/07/is_2010_new_yor.php

 Badonkadonk

 Is 2010 New York City, America's Summer of Ass?

 By Foster Kamer

 Mon., Jul. 12 2010

 The times, they change. The ebb and flow of the universe is simply
 something to be gerneally understood as such, and nothing more. For every
 action, there's an equal reaction. And for every physics law, there's a
 metaphysical plane to apply it to that generally shows its face when you
 look at it from the right direction at a certain point. Like this one.
 From behind. In other words:

 In 2009, New York City, and the rest of America had the Summer of Death.

 In 2010, New York City, and the rest of America has the Summer of Ass.

 Because 2009 was the Summer, when, like, every celebrity died! And that's
 sad. So America must be rewarded with something. The revitalized
 popularity emerging for big derrieres -- an easily-achievable physical
 feat, one may argue -- is, of course, society's natural karmic award for
 bearing the pain of all those dead celebrities last year.

 The New York Daily News didn't note this in their piece of the Summer of
 Ass -- which, by the way, Runnin' Scared Dot Com would like to officially
 get behind (heh) in a big way (heh, that's another big ass joke, right
 there) -- but after much looking, and looking, and looking, and talking to
 impressively-assed celebrities like Kim Kardashian, they think they've
 unlocked the secret of the reemergence of the ample back-asset
 [
 http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/fashion/2010/07/12/2010-07-12_rearing_to_go_big_butts_are_summer_2010s_hottest_trend.html?page=1#ixzz0tTz6zgoG
 ]:

 'Gone are the days of being ashamed of a wider bottom, with America
 becoming more diverse amid shifting standards, according to Stylesight
 trend analyst Sharon Graubard. I think it's about the diversity of our
 population and more accepted beauty, and a wider range of accepted
 beauty, Graubard explains.'

 Realize what a win-win situation this is for everyone:

 * The Big-Bottomed: Pleased.
 * The Ass Men: Pleased.
 * The Workout Industry: Pleased.
 * The Food Industry: Pleased.
 * The Ass-Accentuating Denim Industry: Pleased.
 * Pat Kiernan: Pleased
 [http://www.patspapers.com/story_stack/item/everybody_likes_big_butts/].

 Of all of society's ills, will the large-ass trend work to heal any of
 them? Only time will tell. In the mean time, there's certainly one
 marginalized group that may -- nay, must -- see something good yielded by
 all of this:

 * The Booty Jam Nostalgists.
 Lest you not understand what a Booty Jam is, all you need to know is: It
 is a song created for hyper-utilization by those with, um, big asses. And
 hopefully, these songs will come back, because they are amazing.
 Certainly, you can have your Sir Mix-A-Lot, you may have your Apple
 Bottom Jeans and your Nelly, but ah, you don't know anything about Luke,
 69 Boyz, and 2 Live Crew's heyday, until you experience it. Like this.

  




-- 
If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik


Re: [scifinoir2] ATT may also lose AMC

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
Mr Worf, in all honesty, I wouldn't count AMC as a loss. I haven't put my TV
there in three years.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 I just caught a commercial on AMC stating that ATT may lose AMC as well.
 Looks like they are trying to pull all of the good channels from ATT.
  




-- 
If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik


Re: [scifinoir2] Upgraded to 21st Century TV and Now Wonder

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
No, Bosco, you aren't missing anything. IMO, this is just the SF doesn't
really matter to us syndrome at work. For those of you who doubt me, try
this experiment.

If there's a B Dalton's in your area, go to it. Walk in the door, go as
straight as you can to the rear of the store, and hang  aright.

You'll be in the SF/Fantasy section. Where no one has to see it unless they
*want* to see it. (I've tested this theory in six states, from California to
Virginia, and found only two exceptions.)

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Bosco Bosco ironpi...@yahoo.com wrote:



 So last week after noticing I hadn't actually used my home phone in more
 than 7 months, I decided to ditch it. I upgraded my ATT Uverse package and
 now have actual pay programing which is costing me less than the previous
 package.

 I was unfamiliar with the encore and starz end of the cable spectrum as I
 have never had premium channels before. They have western, action, mystery
 and other genre channels that are none to shabby. I have to wonder why they
 don't have a sci-fi or speculative fiction channel. It seems a natural.
 Surely there is bandwidth and programming available? Or am I missing
 something?

 Bosco

  




-- 
If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik


Re: [scifinoir2] Wide-eyed Beauty Seyfried to star in 'I'm.mortal'

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
This moves me.

To stay away from it, that is.

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:40 PM, brent wodehouse 
brent_wodeho...@thefence.us wrote:



 http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118021636.html?categoryid=13cs=1

 Posted: Mon., Jul. 12, 2010

 Seyfried to star in 'I'm.mortal'

 New Regency sci-fi pic to be distributed by Fox

 By PAMELA MCCLINTOCK

 Amanda Seyfried is seeking immortality, starring in New Regency's sci-fi
 action thriller, I'm.mortal, from writer-director Andrew Niccol.
 Twentieth Century Fox will distribute the film, which also has romance
 elements.

 I'm.mortal centers on a society in which aging stops at 25 -- meaning
 that every role will be played by actors in their mid-20s.

 New Regency picked up the high-priority project this spring. Niccol is
 expected to begin lensing this year.

 Eric Newman and Marc Abraham are producing via their Strike Entertainment.
 Strike's Kristel Laiblin is exec producing.

 Time is the currency in the world of I'm.mortal, where citizens must buy
 and bank time when their aging gene turns off at age 25. The rich can live
 forever, but those who run out of time are engineered to die automatically.

 When a rebel from the ghetto is falsely accused of murdering a wealthy man
 for his time, he is forced to go on the run with a beautiful, rich hostage
 (Seyfried).

 Seyfried stars in Warner Bros.' upcoming Red Riding Hood, from director
 Catherine Hardwicke. She was last in theaters with Letters to Juliet,
 Dear John and Mamma Mia!The male lead hasn't yet been cast.

 It's a strange casting process. Even for a small role like a priest or a
 pawnbroker, where you would normally cast a 75-year-old character actor, I
 have to find a 75-year-old character actor in a 25-year old body, Niccol
 told Daily Variety.

 Niccol's previous directing/writing credits include Gattaca and Lord of
 War. He also wrote The Truman Show.

 I'm.mortal isn't the only sci-fi film project broaching the subject of a
 future where people don't age.

 A remake of Logan's Run has been in the works for more than a decade at
 Warner Bros., with Joel Silver and Akiva Goldsman producing. That film
 focuses on a man trying to escape a mandatory death sentence on his 30th
 birthday.

 Seyfried is repped by Innovative Artists.

 Contact Pamela McClintock at 
 pamela.mcclint...@variety.compamela.mcclintock%40variety.com
 .

  




-- 
If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik


Re: [scifinoir2] Feature Version of Robert Heinlein's Have Space Suit, Will Travel

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
Please get it right... [?][?][?][?]

Thanks for the post, Brent! [?]

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:06 PM, brent wodehouse 
brent_wodeho...@thefence.us wrote:



 http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118021311.html?categoryid=13cs=1

 Jupiter 9 'Travels' to sci fi

 Indie to develop tome with Gotham Group

 By DAVE MCNARY

 Harry Kloor's Jupiter 9 Prods. is developing a feature version of Robert
 Heinlein's Have Space Suit, Will Travel with Gotham Group's Ellen
 Goldsmith-Vein and Peter McHugh attached as producers.

 Kloor, who founded Jupiter 9 to promote science literacy, obtained film
 rights after presenting a finished script to the Heinlein estate.

 I was inspired to become a scientist and science fiction writer in part
 by reading the works of grand master Robert Heinlein, Kloor said.

 Have Space Suit, Will Travel was originally serialized in 1958 in
 Magazine of Fantasy  Science Fiction and published later that year in
 hardcover by Scribner's. Set in 2040, Space Suit tells the story of a
 teenager who loses a contest for a free trip to the Moon, but wins a
 broken-down space suit -- which contains properties that lead to
 humanity's first contact with aliens.

 Kloor's credits include writing for such TV series as Star Trek:
 Voyager, the animated series Godzilla and the syndie drama Earth:
 Final Conflict, and the upcoming animated feature Quantum Quest: A
 Cassini Space Odyssey, which will be released in large-format theaters in
 the fall. Quantum Quest interweaves animated sequences rendered by
 Digimax with space imagery captured from seven ongoing space missions.

 Gotham Group was a producer on The Spiderwick Chronicles and is in
 preproduction on Abduction, starring Taylor Lautner and directed by John
 Singleton.

 Contact Dave McNary at dave.mcn...@variety.com dave.mcnary%40variety.com

  




-- 
If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
330.gif360.gif

Re: [scifinoir2] Kevin Bacon Vs The X-Men?

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
I could see him playing Henry Gyrich.

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:53 PM, brent wodehouse 
brent_wodeho...@thefence.us wrote:



 http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=28329

 12 July 2010

 Kevin Bacon Vs The X-Men?

 In talks for the First Class villain

 Source: Deadline

 The cast of Matthew Vaughn’s X-Men: First Class could all see their number
 in the Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon game go down by a few digits - the actor
 has been offered the role of the main villain in the movie.

 While the exact details of the bad guy is unknown, Deadline reports that
 Bacon is in talks to snatch the role, which would see him facing off
 against James McAvoy’s Professor Charles Xavier, Michael Fassbender’s Erik
 Lensherr and the young mutants they’re training to help the world.

 There has been a flurry of casting on the film in recent weeks, with the
 likes of Nicholas Hoult (Beast), Caleb Landry Jones (Banshee), Alice Eve
 (Emma Frost) and Lucas Till (Havoc) all signing on, with the likelihood of
 a few more to come.

 With a script re-written by Vaughn and regular collaborator Jane Goldman,
 X-Men: First Class will start shooting next month.

 James White

  




-- 
If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik


[scifinoir2] Top 10 Errors in Science Fiction Movies

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
Top 10 Errors in Science Fiction Movies

Share This javascript:void(0)- Published November 23, 2007 - 5500249
Comments
http://listverse.com/2007/11/23/top-10-errors-in-science-fiction-movies/
Top+10+Errors+in+Science+Fiction+Movies2007-11-23+11%3A22%3A44jfraterhttp://listverse.com/2007/11/23/top-10-errors-in-science-fiction-movies/#comments

Science Fiction movies are great for expanding the mind and showing us
things we may never get to see in real life. Unfortunately though, they all
seem to make the same fundamental errors regarding true science. This is a
list of the top 10 errors in Science Fiction movies.

10. Simplicity

[image: 574Px-M87
Jet]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/574px-m87-jet.jpg

This is less a crime of commission than one of omission. Space is full of
wonders we cannot even begin to understand, yet most science fiction films
are based in a very simplistic environment and do not even begin to
investigate the wonderful possibilities that science fiction offers us. We
don’t see interplanetary tunnels, aliens on planets around pulsars,
creatures living on dead suns, alien life forms that inhabit the edges of
supermassive black holes, or so many of the other thought provoking
scenarios. Let’s spice up our science fiction movies!

9. Simplistic Planets

[image: 133946 Tatooine
L]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/133946-tatooine-l.jpg

This is particularly evident in the Star Wars movies. Whenever a planet is
introduced in a science fiction film, it has one equal ecological system
across the entire planet – for example, it might be entirely covered in snow
– or entirely covered in sand. If people are living on these planets, they
must be providing water and other important things needed for survival.
This, in turn, would suggest that the planet ought to have a well developed
complex ecosystem which varies from region to region – for example ice at
the poles and arid land at the center (this is just an example of course).

8. Alien / Human Breeding

[image: Spock-1] http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/spock-1.jpg

This is often seen in Star Trek – for example Spock – he was half human and
half Vulcan. It is not even possible for human/ape crossbreeds to occur due
to genetic differences, it is inconceivable that a human and an alien might
be able to crossbreed. There are, of course, additional problems: how do you
perform the cross breeding if the alien does not have sexual organs or the
means to extract the necessary seeds of life?

7. Alien / Human communication

[image: Dish] http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/dish.jpg

If aliens did exist, it would be extremely unlikely that we could
communicate with them in a very short amount of time. In addition to the
regular problems in translating an entirely unknown language, we would also
have to consider a society that probably involves concepts we do not
understand at all. Imagine an alien race trying to understand God if they
have never had a notion of religion in their society. Of course, none of
this matters if the aliens communicate with their minds or non-audible means
– it would be impossible for us to communicate at all with a race that has
no concept of sight and sound.

6. Instant Communications

[image: Contact Large
15]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/contact-large-15.jpg

Even if we did use light particles/waves to transmit radio data, the vast
distances in space would make instant radio communication impossible. A rare
exception to this flaw is in the movie Contact; as the camera draws away
from the earth we hear the radio emanations getting progressively older
until you finally reach silence. This trick is very effectively used to show
just how massive space is.



5. Humanoid Aliens

[image: 
Aliennewstag7]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/aliennewstag7.jpg

This is endemic on the various Star Trek series, where creatures from
entirely different sectors of the Universe look just like Humans except for
the occasional bulging ridge on their foreheads, etc. Humans evolved on
earth in order to meet a very specific criteria for survival – the
presumption that this is true of all other planets is ridiculous.

4. Explosions in Space

[image: 
Explosion2004]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/explosion2004.jpg

Unfortunately virtually every science fiction movie makes this error – in
fact, in the vacuum of outer space, there can be no flames (as flames need
oxygen) and, of course, no boom. An exception to this is the film 2001, in
which Bowman re-enters the Discovery by blowing out an airlock.

3. Superluminal Travel

[image: 1062881070-Warp
Speed]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/1062881070-warp-speed.jpg

According to Einstein’s special theory of relativity, as an object
approaches the speed of light, the energy required to propel it is immense –
by the time you reach the speed of light, infinite energy is needed – this
renders faster-than-light travel 

Re: [scifinoir2] Nolan won't replace Ledger as Joker in 'Batman 3'

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
That's upright of him. But I still won't be surprised if Ledger's replaced
somewhere down the road.

After all, this IS H'Wood we speak of...

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:47 PM, brent wodehouse 
brent_wodeho...@thefence.us wrote:




 http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/entertainment/2012336593_apusfilmbatmansequel.html?prmid=head_main

 Nolan won't replace Ledger as Joker in 'Batman 3'

 Batman is returning, but he won't have the Joker to contend with next time.

 The Associated Press

 LOS ANGELES - Batman is returning, but he won't have the Joker to contend
 with next time.

 Director Christopher Nolan says he will not bring back the Joker, the
 villain played so maniacally in The Dark Knight by the late Heath Ledger
 that the role earned him an Academy Award a year after his death.

 Nolan would not disclose what villain or villains might take on Batman in
 the next film, due out July 20, 2012, the same weekend that brought the
 record-breaking $158.4 million debut of The Dark Knight in 2008.

 For me, Heath was the definitive Joker, Nolan said in an interview to
 promote Inception, his sci-fi thriller opening Friday. It wouldn't feel
 appropriate to readdress that character.

 Ledger died of an accidental prescription drug overdose in January 2008.
 His death stoked fan interest in The Dark Knight, which topped $1
 billion at the box office worldwide.

 With his supporting-actor win, Ledger became only the second performer
 ever to earn an Oscar posthumously.

 The next Batman film will be the third in the current Warner Bros.
 incarnation of the franchise, which stars Christian Bale as the vigilante
 superhero.

  




-- 
If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik


Re: [scifinoir2] Top 10 Errors in Science Fiction Movies

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
Mr Worf, this goes back to the lack of science advisers in SF movies. Again,
blame H'Wood. I do.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 Top 10 Errors in Science Fiction Movies

 Share This- Published November 23, 2007 - 5500249 Comments
 http://listverse.com/2007/11/23/top-10-errors-in-science-fiction-movies/
 Top+10+Errors+in+Science+Fiction+Movies2007-11-23+11%3A22%3A44jfraterhttp://listverse.com/2007/11/23/top-10-errors-in-science-fiction-movies/#comments

 Science Fiction movies are great for expanding the mind and showing us
 things we may never get to see in real life. Unfortunately though, they all
 seem to make the same fundamental errors regarding true science. This is a
 list of the top 10 errors in Science Fiction movies.

 10. Simplicity

 [image: 574Px-M87 
 Jet]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/574px-m87-jet.jpg

 This is less a crime of commission than one of omission. Space is full of
 wonders we cannot even begin to understand, yet most science fiction films
 are based in a very simplistic environment and do not even begin to
 investigate the wonderful possibilities that science fiction offers us. We
 don’t see interplanetary tunnels, aliens on planets around pulsars,
 creatures living on dead suns, alien life forms that inhabit the edges of
 supermassive black holes, or so many of the other thought provoking
 scenarios. Let’s spice up our science fiction movies!

 9. Simplistic Planets

 [image: 133946 Tatooine 
 L]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/133946-tatooine-l.jpg

 This is particularly evident in the Star Wars movies. Whenever a planet is
 introduced in a science fiction film, it has one equal ecological system
 across the entire planet – for example, it might be entirely covered in snow
 – or entirely covered in sand. If people are living on these planets, they
 must be providing water and other important things needed for survival.
 This, in turn, would suggest that the planet ought to have a well developed
 complex ecosystem which varies from region to region – for example ice at
 the poles and arid land at the center (this is just an example of course).

 8. Alien / Human Breeding

 [image: Spock-1]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/spock-1.jpg

 This is often seen in Star Trek – for example Spock – he was half human and
 half Vulcan. It is not even possible for human/ape crossbreeds to occur due
 to genetic differences, it is inconceivable that a human and an alien might
 be able to crossbreed. There are, of course, additional problems: how do you
 perform the cross breeding if the alien does not have sexual organs or the
 means to extract the necessary seeds of life?

 7. Alien / Human communication

 [image: Dish] http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/dish.jpg

 If aliens did exist, it would be extremely unlikely that we could
 communicate with them in a very short amount of time. In addition to the
 regular problems in translating an entirely unknown language, we would also
 have to consider a society that probably involves concepts we do not
 understand at all. Imagine an alien race trying to understand God if they
 have never had a notion of religion in their society. Of course, none of
 this matters if the aliens communicate with their minds or non-audible means
 – it would be impossible for us to communicate at all with a race that has
 no concept of sight and sound.

 6. Instant Communications

 [image: Contact Large 
 15]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/contact-large-15.jpg

 Even if we did use light particles/waves to transmit radio data, the vast
 distances in space would make instant radio communication impossible. A rare
 exception to this flaw is in the movie Contact; as the camera draws away
 from the earth we hear the radio emanations getting progressively older
 until you finally reach silence. This trick is very effectively used to show
 just how massive space is.



 5. Humanoid Aliens

 [image: 
 Aliennewstag7]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/aliennewstag7.jpg

 This is endemic on the various Star Trek series, where creatures from
 entirely different sectors of the Universe look just like Humans except for
 the occasional bulging ridge on their foreheads, etc. Humans evolved on
 earth in order to meet a very specific criteria for survival – the
 presumption that this is true of all other planets is ridiculous.

 4. Explosions in Space

 [image: 
 Explosion2004]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/explosion2004.jpg

 Unfortunately virtually every science fiction movie makes this error – in
 fact, in the vacuum of outer space, there can be no flames (as flames need
 oxygen) and, of course, no boom. An exception to this is the film 2001, in
 which Bowman re-enters the Discovery by blowing out an airlock.

 3. Superluminal Travel

 [image: 1062881070-Warp 
 Speed]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/1062881070-warp-speed.jpg

 According to 

Re: [scifinoir2] Tesla May Get Some Company: The Supercar Goes Electric

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
They've got it on the boards right now, I hear.

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 Porchea and Ferrari are both working on one as well. Although I think
 Ferrari will probably do a hybrid first.

 On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:



 I'm impressed.

 But the Veyron still owns the better part of me.


 On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.comwrote:



 Tesla May Get Some Company: The Supercar Goes Electric

 *CHARGE!* SLS AMG E-Cell has an electric motor powering each of the
 wheels. More Photos 
 »http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/07/11/automobiles/autoreviews/20100711-mercedes.html
  By LAWRENCE ULRICH Published: July 8, 2010

- 
 Facebookhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
-  Twitter
- Recommend
- Sign In to 
 E-Mailhttp://www.nytimes.com/auth/login?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html
- 
 Printhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1pagewanted=print
-  
 Reprintshttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
- 
 Sharehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#

 Closehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   - 
 Linkedinhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   - 
 Digghttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   - 
 Mixxhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   - 
 MySpacehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   - Yahoo! 
 Buzzhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   - 
 Permalinkhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   -


 http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=gotoopznpage=www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/automobilespos=Frame4Asn2=7da8705c/b3e9b981sn1=d03db86c/2f814a4ecamp=foxsearch2010_emailtools_1225558c_nyt5ad=Cyrus_120x60_NowPlaying_06.18goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Fcyrus

 INTRODUCED in New York in 1954, the Mercedes-Benz 300SL was a stunningly
 advanced machine, the first production car to trade a carburetor for fuel
 injection.
   Multimedia
   Slide Show
 http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/07/11/automobiles/autoreviews/20100711-mercedes.html?ref=automobiles
  2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS 
 AMGhttp://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/07/11/automobiles/autoreviews/20100711-mercedes.html?ref=automobiles
   Related

-  Behind the Wheel | 2011 Mercedes-Benz Sls Amg: Winging It One More

 Timehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/autoreviews/11WHEEL.html?ref=automobiles(July
  11, 2010)

   Now, with the SLS AMG echoing the style of that original gullwing
 sports car, Mercedes may produce an electric version that could give the
 company environmental bragging rights. Mercedes is testing the prototype SLS
 AMG E-Cell, in which the standard model’s 563-horsepower gasoline V-8 has
 been replaced with four electric motors, one powering each wheel, that spool
 up 535 horsepower and 649 pound-feet of peak torque.

 Mercedes estimates a 0-to-60 time of four seconds flat for the electric
 SLS, just a few tenths slower than the gasoline version. Power is stored in
 a liquid-cooled 
 lithiumhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/l/lithium_metal/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier-ion
 battery; brakes capture energy and return it to the battery.

 Ola Kallenius, chairman of Mercedes’s AMG high-performance division, said
 the company was considering a small production run for the SLS E-Cell.

 At a recent presentation for the car in Norway, a retired Formula 
 Onehttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/f/formula_one/index.html?inline=nyt-orgracer,
  David Coulthard, tested the E-Cell on an airstrip and public roads.
 His drive and commentary were documented on Web video. “My first experience
 of an electric 
 carhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/e/electric_vehicles/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier,”
 Mr. Coulthard said, emerging from the E-Cell with a grin. “You will not
 believe the performance.”

 The E-Cell, along with cars like the new S400 hybrid sedan, shows
 Mercedes shifting more of its renowned technical resources toward increasing
 fuel economy and developing alternative propulsion systems. Mercedes, which
 has paid more than $300 million in federal fines since 1983 for falling
 short of fuel-economy standards — thanks largely to its fuel-sucking AMG
 models — has vowed to improve mileage and avoid the fines.

 Mercedes has not disclosed a potential price, driving range or top speed
 for the E-Cell, though the basics are easily surmised: it is likely to cost
 more than the gas model, with much less range and a lower top speed —
 perhaps 120 miles per hour instead of 197.

 Audi may beat 

[scifinoir2] Top 10 Filmable Batman Villains

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
Top 10 Filmable Batman Villains

Share This javascript:void(0)- Published January 2, 2010 by *
valentinedragon* - 143
Commentshttp://listverse.com/2010/01/02/top-10-filmable-batman-villains/#idc-container

It can’t be denied that Christopher
Nolanhttp://listverse.com/2010/01/02/top-10-filmable-batman-villains/#has
reinvented the way we look at comic book movies today. This was
accomplished once he realized that he can take away the “Pow!” “Boom!” and
“Kablamo!” attached to the Batman legacy where he then found material for
some deeply moving, thrilling, and innovative stories. As shown in Batman
Begins and The Dark Knight, Nolan created a believable universe in which
Batman and his band of not-so-merry men could truly exist where they were
once thought too cartoon-ish or unrealistic for serious cinema. He
successfully brought the Scarecrow, Ra’s al Ghul, Two-Face and the Joker to
life but what lies ahead for the third (and future) installment in this new
Batman franchise? Which characters have the greatest potential to make the
cut in the Nolanverse?

10
Clayface

[image: Zclayface]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/zclayface.jpg

*Name/Alias:* Several – Clayface

*Story:* Clayface is the only person on this list with superpowers which is
an attribute we have yet to see in any Nolanverse villain but don’t cast him
aside just yet. Not only can he make weapons like saws,
hammershttp://listverse.com/2010/01/02/top-10-filmable-batman-villains/#,
and blades with his own body, he can shapeshift into anyone. Think of him as
the clay baby of T-1000 from Terminator 2 and Mystique from X-Men. The
actions Clayface is capable of are endless. Does he want to infiltrate Wayne
Enterprises? Pose as Lucius Fox. Does he want to break someone out of
Arkham? Pose as a security guard. Or better yet: Does he want to ruin
Batman’s reputation? Pose as the Bat himself.

Clayface could very easily become a bad decision in the Nolanverse should
the production team make him into a Sandman-esque character from Spider-Man
3. I say that just because a villain has powers doesn’t mean he needs to go
overboard with said powers. Allow Clayface to absorb a batarang or fall off
a skyscraper without a scratch. He doesn’t need to turn into the Blob and
mud up the city for him to be impressive and/or worthwhile.

*Overall Challenge:* High. A character made of clay who can be anyone at any
time and who can get out of almost any situation? Yeah. I hope it rains a
lot in Gotham.

9
Talia al Ghul

[image: Ztalia] http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/ztalia.jpg

*Name/Alias:* Talia al Ghul

*Story:* Move aside Rachel What’s-Your-Name! You’re yesterday’s news. Enter
Talia al Ghul, the daughter of the League of Shadows leader Ra’s al Ghul.
Although, you don’t want to label her as some damsel in distress. Not only
can Talia’s exotic beauty stun a man, she can work a number of weapons
expertly and her handle of the sword is not easily matched (pun slightly
intended). In the comics, she (like her father) knows that Bruce Wayne is
Batman and she is convinced that he is the most suitable man to bear a child
with. The two share an on-again off-again relationship, making Talia not a
strict Batman villain, but rather an anti-hero who errs on the side of good
from time to time.

As we saw in Batman
Beginshttp://listverse.com/2010/01/02/top-10-filmable-batman-villains/#,
Ra’s al Ghul blended into the Nolanverse perfectly so the chances that his
daughter can do the same are equally good. Plus, we don’t hear anything from
Ra’s during the second film, so what better way to reintroduce him in the
third film then by sending his daughter to seduce Bruce back into his favor?
Ra’s gets a “son,” Talia gets her man, and Bats gets some booty. Everybody
wins!

*Overall Challenge:* Medium. What stops Talia from being a true villain is
her love and respect for Batman so if he’s smart, he’ll use that infamous
playboy charm of his when he needs it most, say, right before she beheads
him to please her father.

8
Calculator

[image: 
Zcalculator]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/zcalculator.jpg

*Name/Alias:* Noah Kuttler – Calculator

*Story:* As a relatively unknown rogue, Calculator first began as a
third-rate criminal. It wasn’t until recent that he discovered how to
reinvent himself for the modern war between heroes and villains: start a
business! Serving as the “evil” counterpart to Oracle (Barbara Gordon, a.k.a
the former Batgirl), Calculator began a business where he serves as the
villain community’s information broker. In need of henchmen? Weapons?
Jobshttp://listverse.com/2010/01/02/top-10-filmable-batman-villains/#?
Maps? Connections? The Calculator is the man to hook you up with your
criminal needs… for a price.

One of the good things about Noah is that doesn’t run around at night in a
costume. The threat he poses is a technological one. We’re beginning to see
more of Batman’s detective work (primarily in The Dark Knight) and a perfect

Re: [scifinoir2] Flying Car approved by FAA

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
I've heard about it. Someone in Clayton County (where Hartsfield-Jackson is)
is protesting the installation of the tower it'll take, because of property
issues.

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 That's very true. I live near the flight path and if you combine all of
 that plus careless drivers and we will have issues. I'm just hoping that
 they use the new satellite based system to help out with takeoffs and
 landings. (have you heard about that yet? They just installed it here.)

 On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:



 DEFINITELY not an urban setting. At any given moment, 50,000 people tying
 to take to the skies=at least 100 crashes.

 On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.comwrote:



 There is that little town in Florida that is small plane friendly. I
 think John Travolta owns a house there. Taking off from the street wouldn't
 be illegal there. I could see that working in some areas or more rural areas
 but not in a urban setting.


 On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Kelwyn ravena...@yahoo.com wrote:



 http://www.boingboing.net/2010/07/09/ridiculous-looking-f.html

 Next year, those of you with a sport pilot license and $194,000 to burn
 will be able to buy an honest-to-Doc-Brown flying car. Take-off requires a
 mere 1/3 of a mile runway, which Popular Science says means you could use
 your street as an airstrip—but I suspect that may be illegal.




 --
 If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody
 hell wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik





 --
 Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
 Mahogany at:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/




 --
 If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
 wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik





 --
 Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
 Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/

  




-- 
If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik


Re: [scifinoir2] Top 10 Filmable Batman Villains

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
Right off the bat, whoever wrote this is lagging behind, else he/she would
already know that Batman and Talia have a son, Damian, and that he's Robin.

I've been waiting for Zasaz, Hush and Black mask to be called up to the big
screen. Catwoman and Riddler, IMO, they can keep. Deadshot would be extra
fun because, in continuity, he trained Batman (Bruce Wayne) in sniping.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 Top 10 Filmable Batman Villains

 Share This- Published January 2, 2010 by *valentinedragon* - 143 
 Commentshttp://listverse.com/2010/01/02/top-10-filmable-batman-villains/#idc-container

 It can’t be denied that Christopher 
 Nolanhttp://listverse.com/2010/01/02/top-10-filmable-batman-villains/#has 
 reinvented the way we look at comic book movies today. This was
 accomplished once he realized that he can take away the “Pow!” “Boom!” and
 “Kablamo!” attached to the Batman legacy where he then found material for
 some deeply moving, thrilling, and innovative stories. As shown in Batman
 Begins and The Dark Knight, Nolan created a believable universe in which
 Batman and his band of not-so-merry men could truly exist where they were
 once thought too cartoon-ish or unrealistic for serious cinema. He
 successfully brought the Scarecrow, Ra’s al Ghul, Two-Face and the Joker to
 life but what lies ahead for the third (and future) installment in this new
 Batman franchise? Which characters have the greatest potential to make the
 cut in the Nolanverse?

 10
 Clayface

 [image: Zclayface]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/zclayface.jpg

 *Name/Alias:* Several – Clayface

 *Story:* Clayface is the only person on this list with superpowers which
 is an attribute we have yet to see in any Nolanverse villain but don’t cast
 him aside just yet. Not only can he make weapons like saws, 
 hammershttp://listverse.com/2010/01/02/top-10-filmable-batman-villains/#,
 and blades with his own body, he can shapeshift into anyone. Think of him as
 the clay baby of T-1000 from Terminator 2 and Mystique from X-Men. The
 actions Clayface is capable of are endless. Does he want to infiltrate Wayne
 Enterprises? Pose as Lucius Fox. Does he want to break someone out of
 Arkham? Pose as a security guard. Or better yet: Does he want to ruin
 Batman’s reputation? Pose as the Bat himself.

 Clayface could very easily become a bad decision in the Nolanverse should
 the production team make him into a Sandman-esque character from Spider-Man
 3. I say that just because a villain has powers doesn’t mean he needs to go
 overboard with said powers. Allow Clayface to absorb a batarang or fall off
 a skyscraper without a scratch. He doesn’t need to turn into the Blob and
 mud up the city for him to be impressive and/or worthwhile.

 *Overall Challenge:* High. A character made of clay who can be anyone at
 any time and who can get out of almost any situation? Yeah. I hope it rains
 a lot in Gotham.

 9
 Talia al Ghul

 [image: Ztalia] http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/ztalia.jpg

 *Name/Alias:* Talia al Ghul

 *Story:* Move aside Rachel What’s-Your-Name! You’re yesterday’s news.
 Enter Talia al Ghul, the daughter of the League of Shadows leader Ra’s al
 Ghul. Although, you don’t want to label her as some damsel in distress. Not
 only can Talia’s exotic beauty stun a man, she can work a number of weapons
 expertly and her handle of the sword is not easily matched (pun slightly
 intended). In the comics, she (like her father) knows that Bruce Wayne is
 Batman and she is convinced that he is the most suitable man to bear a child
 with. The two share an on-again off-again relationship, making Talia not a
 strict Batman villain, but rather an anti-hero who errs on the side of good
 from time to time.

 As we saw in Batman 
 Beginshttp://listverse.com/2010/01/02/top-10-filmable-batman-villains/#,
 Ra’s al Ghul blended into the Nolanverse perfectly so the chances that his
 daughter can do the same are equally good. Plus, we don’t hear anything from
 Ra’s during the second film, so what better way to reintroduce him in the
 third film then by sending his daughter to seduce Bruce back into his favor?
 Ra’s gets a “son,” Talia gets her man, and Bats gets some booty. Everybody
 wins!

 *Overall Challenge:* Medium. What stops Talia from being a true villain is
 her love and respect for Batman so if he’s smart, he’ll use that infamous
 playboy charm of his when he needs it most, say, right before she beheads
 him to please her father.

 8
 Calculator

 [image: 
 Zcalculator]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/zcalculator.jpg

 *Name/Alias:* Noah Kuttler – Calculator

 *Story:* As a relatively unknown rogue, Calculator first began as a
 third-rate criminal. It wasn’t until recent that he discovered how to
 reinvent himself for the modern war between heroes and villains: start a
 business! Serving as the “evil” counterpart to Oracle (Barbara Gordon, a.k.a
 the former Batgirl), Calculator 

Re: [scifinoir2] Fwd: Consumer Group Sniffs Congresswoman's Open Wi-Fi

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
True, Mr Worf, on both counts. I'm thinking that Google's intent in this was
two-fold, to deflect attention from their own hacking and actual altruism,
wanting to solve the problem before it leaps out of hand.

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 Some of these politicians are just stupid, but she probably didn't have
 anything to do with setting up the network.

 On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:





 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Martin Baxter martin.baxter@gmail.com
 Date: Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:52 PM
 Subject: Consumer Group Sniffs Congresswoman's Open Wi-Fi
 To: martinbaxt...@gmail.com


 Holy hacking, Batman!

 ===

 Consumer Group Sniffs Congresswoman’s Open Wi-Fi

- By David Kravetshttp://www.wired.com/threatlevel/author/davidkravets/ 
 [image:
Email Author] david_krav...@wired.com
- July 9, 2010  |
- 1:37 pm  |
- Categories: 
 Surveillancehttp://www.wired.com/threatlevel/category/surveillance/,
privacy http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/category/privacy/
-

  http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2010/07/Picture-28.pngWe’re
 not sure what’s more humorous: That California Rep. Jane Harman, the ranking
 member of the House Intelligence Committee, maintains two unencrypted Wi-Fi
 networks at her residence, or that a consumer group sniffed her unsecured
 traffic in a bid to convince lawmakers to hold hearings about Google.

 A representative for Consumer 
 Watchdoghttp://www.consumerwatchdog.org/corporateering/articles/?storyId=35100—
  a group largely funded by legal fees, the Rose Foundation, Streisand
 Foundation, Tides Foundation and others — parked outside Harman’s and other
 lawmakers’ Washington-area residences to determine whether they had
 unsecured Wi-Fi networks that might have been sniffed by Google as part of
 the internet giant’s Street View and Google Maps program.

 The group wants the House Energy and Commerce Committee, of which Harman
 is also a member, to haul Google executives before it, so they can publicly
 explain why, for three years, Google was downloading data packets from
 unencrypted Wi-Fi networks in neighborhoods in dozens of countries. Google
 has repeatedly said it didn’t realize it was storing snippets of payload
 data on unsecured Wi-Fi networks, until German privacy authorities began
 questioning what data Google was collecting.


 More at:
 http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/07/congresswoman-wifi-sniffed/


 --
 Between getsumei no michi and the Zero...no better place to live.

 (About little moments of happiness) If this isn't nice, I don't know what
 is. -- Kurt Vonnegut, A Man Without A Country



 --
 If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
 wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik





 --
 Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
 Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/

  




-- 
If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik


Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
Keith, if they want flavor-of-the-week, Michael Cera would be a great fit
for Banner as well. And the character would have to be written, IMO, the way
he's been done post-World War Hulk, after Banner and the Hulk were
separated, and Banner became a truly scary bastich who played mind games
with everyone around him.

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 They need to quit worrying about name actors and just get an actor who
 looks and can play the part. Eric Bana was way too buff and handsome for
 Banner. Norton was probably closer, but his almost Shakespearean intensity
 was a bit too much for the skinny, unsure, milksop that is Bruce Banner. I
 think Phoenix would come off too much like a crazed mad scientist than the
 puny Banner we need.  Cast the net far and wide to find the right man, and
 notoriety be hanged! That's the damn problem with H'Wood all the time.

 Someone who looks the part, for example, would be Jon Cryer, the whiny
 brother on Two and A Half Men. Not saying he *should* do it, but that's
 the *look* you need for Banner-someone who looks soft and weak, as if he's
 never seen the sun or the inside of a gym.

 
 - Original Message -
 From: Daryle Lockhart dar...@darylelockhart.com

 So  now I'm hearing they're talking  seriously  to  Joaquin Phoenix. Which
  is both  awesome and frightening at the same time to me.

 *

 On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Cinque B wrote:

 Marvel: Norton Won't Return As Hulk For 'Avengers'; Norton's Rep Responds
  Source: Access 
 Hollywoodhttp://movies.yahoo.com/news/usmovies.accesshollywood.com/ Sun
 Jul 11, 2010, 8:15 pm EDT


 Edward Norton http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/contributor/1800018634 won't
 be reprising his role as the Incredible 
 Hulkhttp://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1807592188/info/in 2012's The Avengers, 
 a Marvel rep confirmed to
 * Access Hollywood * on Sunday.

 Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige explained the decision
 in a statement to 
 *HitFix*http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/2008-12-6-motion-captured/posts/exclusive-marvel-confirms-they-will-hire-new-hulk-for-avengers
 .

 VIEW THE PHOTOS: Edward 
 Nortonhttp://www.accesshollywood.com/edward-norton_gallery_1430

 We have made the decision to not bring Ed 
 Nortonhttp://movies.yahoo.com/movie/contributor/1800018634back to portray 
 the title role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers,' Feige
 told the site. Our decision is definitely not one based on monetary
 factors, but instead rooted in the need for an actor who embodies the
 creativity and collaborative spirit of our other talented cast members. 'The
 Avengers' demands players who thrive working as part of an ensemble, as
 evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, Sam, Scarlett, and all of our
 talented casts. We are looking to announce a name actor who fulfills these
 requirements, and is passionate about the iconic role in the coming weeks.

 The actors referred to in the statement include current Marvel stars Robert
 Downey Jr. http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/contributor/1800010914 ( Iron
 Man http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1808411893/info/ ), Chris Hemsworth
 (Thor), Chris 
 Evanshttp://movies.yahoo.com/movie/contributor/1803006988(Captain America: 
 The First Avenger), Samuel
 L. Jackson http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/contributor/1800018848 (Nick
 Fury), Scarlett 
 Johanssonhttp://movies.yahoo.com/movie/contributor/1800022348( Iron
 Man http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1808411893/info/ 2's Black Widow),
 who are expected to reprise their superhero roles in team-up film The
 Avengers.

 VIEW THE PHOTOS: Scenes From ‘
 http://www.accesshollywood.com/check-out-these-scenes-from-the-incredible-hulk_gallery_1370The
 Incredible Hulk http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1807592188/info/ ’

 A rep for Norton responded to the statement to Hitfix on Sunday, calling it
 purposefully misleading and claiming that his client had been in
 discussions to return to the role.

 This offensive statement from Kevin Feige at Marvel is a purposefully
 misleading, inappropriate attempt to paint our client in a negative light,
 the rep told the site. Here are the facts: two months ago, Kevin called me
 and said he wanted Edward to reprise the role of Bruce Banner in 'The
 Avengers.' He told me it would be his fantasy to bring Edward on stage with
 the rest of the cast at [Comic-Con] and make it the event of the convention.
 When I said that Edward was definitely open to this idea, Kevin was very
 excited and we agreed that Edward should meet with [director] Joss Whedon to
 discuss the project. Edward and Joss had a very good meeting (confirmed by
 Feige to me) at which Edward said he was enthusiastic at the prospect of
 being a part of the ensemble cast.

 However, the rep further claimed, the talks fell apart last week.

 VIEW THE PHOTOS: Fan Candy : Superheroes, Sci-Fi  Beyond 
 

Re: [scifinoir2] Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 Photos)

2010-07-13 Thread Martin Baxter
Guy deserves that brewski at the end. He done good...

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/

 Author: John http://thechive.com/author/jresig/

- links http://thechive.com/category/links

  [image: iron man new Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit

 Edit: Apparently that’s War Machine, not Iron Man, however I’m not changing
 the title ’cause I’m drinking Jack Daniels at the moment. Continue with your
 nerdgasms…
  [image: iron man pics 41 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-4-2/
 [image: iron man pics 01 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-0-2/
 [image: iron man pics 11 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-1-2/
 [image: iron man pics 21 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-2-2/
 [image: iron man suit1 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-suit-2/
 [image: iron man pics 51 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-5-2/



 --
 Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
 Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/

  




-- 
If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik


[scifinoir2] Re: Where Are They Now - Project Greenlight Winners

2010-07-13 Thread Kelwyn
I was fascinated by Project Greenlight and watched Season Two religiously.  It 
was both cringe-inducing and hilarious to watch the attached at the hip twin 
directors fumble over each shot - at one point the two of them were directing 
Shia LaBeouf from both the driver and passenger side windows of a prop car at 
the same time.  

I was also fascinated that the producers of the show chose The Battle of 
Shaker Heights, which plays like an earnest after school special, as a feature 
film project. Failure was eminent and predicable.  

I learned two things from Project Greenlight: nobody knows anything and the 
best way to make it in Hollywood is to  know or be related to somebody - their 
most successful film came from John Gulager who is the son of character actor 
Clu Gulager.

Oh, yeah, I learned one more thing: when all else fails, make some schlock.

~rave!

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@... wrote:

  Where Are They Now - Project Greenlight
 Winnershttp://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/archives/2009/05/where_are_they_41.html
 Posted by Jellio http://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/archives/authors/jellio
  2 
 Commentshttp://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/archives/2009/05/where_are_they_41.html#comments
 
 [image: PGFinal.jpg]
 
 I'm not sure what made me think of Project
 Greenlighthttp://www.hbo.com/greenlight/,
 recently. Was it last week's opening of the Tribeca Film
 Festivalhttp://www.tribecafilm.com/festival/that made me think of
 the HBO competition from a few years back? Or maybe it
 was the sudden reemergence of Ben Affleck, in films like State of Play, and
 Extract http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzJI08YUNik (which looks pretty
 funny). Or maybe it was the Matt Damon
 cameohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZMX1vfrlYwduring Finding
 Forrester (he does alot of those).
 
 Oh well, whatever it was, now that I've got it in my head, I'll have to look
 all over the Internet, or at least
 Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Greenlight,
 to find out if the winners ever went on to bigger and better things.
 
 *Season One - Stolen Summer*
 [image: StolenSummerFinal.jpg]
 *Description:* In its premiere season, Project Greenlight producers received
 7,000 screenplays, with the top prize going to filmmaker *Pete Jones
 *for Stolen
 Summer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2VhIp2q5tY, the story of a Catholic
 boy who tries to convert his terminally ill Jewish friend (Wow...can you
 believe it only made $134,000) The HBO behind-the-scenes series focused on
 the day-to-day struggles of a director who was clearly over his head, and
 the hilarious confrontations that followed.
 *Cast:* Aidan Quinn, Bonnie Hunt, Kevin Pollak, Brian Dennehy
 *Where Is He Now?* After Stolen Summer, Jones wrote, directed and starred in
 Outing Riley http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTZwGePZRe8, the story of a
 regular Joe who comes out to his drinking buddies. The film was praised by
 the Gay and Lesbian Alliance, but didn't get much traction beyond that. But
 in 2005, Jones wrote Hall Pass http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0480687/, the
 story of man whose wife gives him permission to sleep around (sounds
 believable), and it was actually
 purchasedhttp://movies.about.com/od/moviesinproduction/a/hallpass091905.htmby
 the Farrelly Brothers. He also had a role in My
 Big Fat Independent Movie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvipnU9IjzM, but
 I'm sure he wants to forget that. He's probably hoping the Farrellys finally
 decide to make Hall Pass their next Something About Mary.
 
 
 *Season Two - The Battle of Shaker Heights*
 [image: ShakerHeightsFinal.jpg]
 *Description:* In season two, the competition was split into writing and
 directing categories, presumably to foster some good fight scenes between
 the directors, and writer whose work they were butchering. *Erica Beeney *won
 the writing competition with The Battle of Shaker
 Heightshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl-GC7JiVZM,
 and *Kyle Rankin *and *Efram Potelle *were chosen to direct. As I think
 back, the one thing I remember most about this season was continually
 asking, Shia who? I don't say that anymore.
 *Cast:* Shia LaBeouf, Amy Smart, Kathleen Quinlan, William Sadler
 *Where Are They Now?* Kyle Rankin and Efram Potelle's production
 company, Newborn
 Pictures http://www.newbornpix.com/ went on to produce classics like InSex
 and a web series called 
 HellHoleshttp://www.atom.com/funny_videos/hellholes/,
 the story of a hapless drifter who buys a new home for a dollar, only to
 discover he's purchased a portal to Hell (I don't know about you, but I
 think I have to see this flick). And the only thing I can find on writer Erica
 Beeneyhttp://www.allbusiness.com/services/amusement-recreation-services/4383737-1.htmlis
 that she worked on some television pilots, including Ice Road
 Truckers.
 (Please insert long cold rode to stardom joke here)
 
 
 *Season Three - Feast*
 [image: FeastFinal.jpg]
 *Description:* HBO gives up on its baby, and Bravo picks up the third and
 

[scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

2010-07-13 Thread Kelwyn
Going with a comic actor is not a bad idea.  Bixby was known primarily as a 
comic actor when he became David Bruce Banner.  Ditto for Michael Keaton when 
he became the Batman.  When you mentioned Jon Cryer my brain went even further 
out on a limb and thought David Spade.

(So sue me).

~rave!

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:

 I've never seen Cryer do drama, just offered up his physical characteristics. 
 Then again, Bill Bixby was a handsome man who wasn't physically frail, but he 
 was an effective David Banner because of his acting ability. He wasn't the 
 weakling of Banner in the comics, but he was a very soft-spoken, gentle soul 
 who worked very well as Banner in the series. 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 6:15:17 PM 
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I agree, They need an Ed Begley Jr. type actor. Basically someone that does 
 not have that strong physical look and more like a doctor. I don't think John 
 Cryer would be able to pull off the transformation scenes. 
 
 
 On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@...  wrote: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 They need to quit worrying about name actors and just get an actor who 
 looks and can play the part. Eric Bana was way too buff and handsome for 
 Banner. Norton was probably closer, but his almost Shakespearean intensity 
 was a bit too much for the skinny, unsure, milksop that is Bruce Banner. I 
 think Phoenix would come off too much like a crazed mad scientist than the 
 puny Banner we need. Cast the net far and wide to find the right man, and 
 notoriety be hanged! That's the damn problem with H'Wood all the time. 
 
 Someone who looks the part, for example, would be Jon Cryer, the whiny 
 brother on Two and A Half Men. Not saying he *should* do it, but that's the 
 *look* you need for Banner-someone who looks soft and weak, as if he's never 
 seen the sun or the inside of a gym. 
 
  
 - Original Message - 
 From: Daryle Lockhart  dar...@...  
 
 So now I'm hearing they're talking seriously to Joaquin Phoenix. Which is 
 both awesome and frightening at the same time to me. 
 
 * 
 
 
 
 
 On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Cinque B wrote: 
 
 
 
 Marvel: Norton Won't Return As Hulk For 'Avengers'; Norton's Rep Responds 
 
 
 Source: Access Hollywood Sun Jul 11, 2010, 8:15 pm EDT 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Edward Norton won't be reprising his role as the Incredible Hulk in 2012's 
 The Avengers, a Marvel rep confirmed to Access Hollywood on Sunday. 
 
 Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige explained the decision in 
 a statement to HitFix . 
 
 VIEW THE PHOTOS: Edward Norton 
 
 We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title 
 role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers,' Feige told the site. Our decision 
 is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the 
 need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our 
 other talented cast members. 'The Avengers' demands players who thrive 
 working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, 
 Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a 
 name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the 
 iconic role in the coming weeks. 
 
 The actors referred to in the statement include current Marvel stars Robert 
 Downey Jr. ( Iron Man ), Chris Hemsworth (Thor), Chris Evans (Captain 
 America: The First Avenger), Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury), Scarlett 
 Johansson ( Iron Man 2's Black Widow), who are expected to reprise their 
 superhero roles in team-up film The Avengers. 
 
 VIEW THE PHOTOS: Scenes From ‘ The Incredible Hulk ’ 
 
 A rep for Norton responded to the statement to Hitfix on Sunday, calling it 
 purposefully misleading and claiming that his client had been in 
 discussions to return to the role. 
 
 This offensive statement from Kevin Feige at Marvel is a purposefully 
 misleading, inappropriate attempt to paint our client in a negative light, 
 the rep told the site. Here are the facts: two months ago, Kevin called me 
 and said he wanted Edward to reprise the role of Bruce Banner in 'The 
 Avengers.' He told me it would be his fantasy to bring Edward on stage with 
 the rest of the cast at [Comic-Con] and make it the event of the convention. 
 When I said that Edward was definitely open to this idea, Kevin was very 
 excited and we agreed that Edward should meet with [director] Joss Whedon to 
 discuss the project. Edward and Joss had a very good meeting (confirmed by 
 Feige to me) at which Edward said he was enthusiastic at the prospect of 
 being a part of the ensemble cast. 
 
 However, the rep further claimed, the talks fell apart last week. 
 
 

[scifinoir2] Man builds War Machine suit

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
Mr.Worf wants to share this great news called Iron Man War Machine in Real
Lifehttp://designerscouch.org/show_news/1113/iron-man-war-machine-in-real-life.htmlon
DesignersCouch. Please check it here:

http://designerscouch.org/show_news/1113/iron-man-war-machine-in-real-life.html


Best Regards,
DesignersCouch.
www.designerscouch.org



-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


[scifinoir2] Re: ATT may also lose AMC

2010-07-13 Thread Kelwyn
As I stated earlier, this may come to past as there will be nowhere near the 
clamor there was when the House of the Mouse threatened to pull, at different 
junctures, ESPN and the Disney Channels.

~(no)rave!

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@... wrote:

 I just caught a commercial on AMC stating that ATT may lose AMC as well.
 Looks like they are trying to pull all of the good channels from ATT.





[scifinoir2] Re: Upgraded to 21st Century TV and Now Wonder

2010-07-13 Thread Kelwyn
I am holding on to my land line simply because I had a handset on every level 
of my house and I never have to look for a phone.  

Regarding a sci-fi channel, there is nowhere near enough programing, at least 
not on the level of the treasure trove of western programing Encore's Western 
Channel has at its disposal.  

~rave!

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Bosco Bosco ironpi...@... wrote:

 So last week after noticing I hadn't actually used my home phone in more than 
 7 months, I decided to ditch it. I upgraded my ATT Uverse package and now 
 have actual pay programing which is costing me less than the previous package.
 
 I was unfamiliar with the encore and starz end of the cable spectrum as I 
 have never had premium channels before. They have western, action, mystery 
 and other genre channels that are none to shabby. I have to wonder why they 
 don't have a sci-fi or speculative fiction channel. It seems a natural. 
 Surely there is bandwidth and programming available? Or am I missing 
 something?
 
 Bosco





[scifinoir2] Re: Top 10 Evil Human Experiments

2010-07-13 Thread Kelwyn
Wow.  I opened this up thinking it was Top 10 FICTIONAL Evil Human Experiments. 
 Ain't no party like a REAL Top 10 Fictional Evil Human Experiment list.

~rave?

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@... wrote:

 http://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/Top 10 Evil
 Human Experiments
 
 Share This javascript:void(0)- Published March 14, 2008 - 343
 Commentshttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#idc-container
 
 *[WARNING] This list contains descriptions and images of human
 experimentation which may cause offense to some readers.]* Human
 experimentation and research ethics evolved over time. On occasion, the
 subjects of human experimentation have been prisoners, slaves, or even
 family 
 http://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#members.
 In some notable cases, doctors have performed experiments on
 themselves when they have been unwilling to risk the lives of others. This
 is known as self-experimentation. This is a list of the 10 most evil and
 unethical experiments carried out on humans.
 10
 Stanford Prison Experiment
 
 [image: Stanford Prison]
 
 The Stanford prison experiment was a
 psychologicalhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#study
 of human responses to captivity and its behavioral effects on both
 authorities and inmates in prison. The experiment was conducted in 1971 by a
 team of researchers led by psychologist Philip Zimbardo at Stanford
 University. Undergraduate volunteers played the roles of both guards and
 prisoners living in a mock prison in the basement of the Stanford psychology
 building.
 
 Prisoners and guards rapidly adapted to their roles, stepping beyond the
 boundaries of what had been predicted and leading to dangerous and
 psychologically damaging situations. One-third of the guards were judged to
 have exhibited “genuine” sadistic tendencies, while many prisoners were
 emotionally traumatized and two had to be removed from the experiment early.
 Finally, Zimbardo, alarmed at the increasingly abusive anti-social behavior
 from his subjects, terminated the entire experiment early.
 9
 The Monster Study
 
 [image: Stuttering]
 
 The Monster Study was a stuttering experiment on 22 orphan
 childrenhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#in
 Davenport, Iowa, in 1939 conducted by Wendell Johnson at the
 University
 of Iowa. Johnson chose one of his graduate students, Mary Tudor, to conduct
 the experiment and he supervised her research. After placing the children in
 control and experimental groups, Tudor gave positive speech therapy to half
 of the children, praising the fluency of their speech, and negative speech
 therapy to the other half, belittling the children for every speech
 imperfection and telling them they were stutterers. Many of the normal
 speaking orphan children who received negative therapy in the experiment
 suffered negative psychological effects and some retained speech problems
 during the course of their life. Dubbed “The Monster Study” by some of
 Johnson’s peers who were horrified that he would experiment on orphan
 children to prove a theory, the experiment was kept hidden for fear
 Johnson’s reputation would be tarnished in the wake of human experiments
 conducted by the Nazis during World War II. The University of Iowa publicly
 apologized for the Monster Study in 2001.
 8
 Project 4.1
 
 [image: 300Px-Project 4.1 Figures]
 
 Project 4.1 was the designation for a medical study conducted by the United
 States of those residents of the Marshall Islands exposed to radioactive
 fallout from the March 1, 1954 Castle Bravo nuclear test at Bikini Atoll,
 which had an unexpectedly large yield. For the first decade after the test,
 the effects were ambiguous and statistically difficult to correlate to
 radiation exposure: miscarriages and stillbirths among exposed Rongelap
 women doubled in the first five years after the accident, but then returned
 to normal; some developmental difficulties and impaired growth appeared in
 children, but in no clear-cut pattern. In the decades that followed, though,
 the effects were undeniable. Children began to suffer disproportionately
 from thyroid 
 cancerhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#(due
 to exposure to radioiodines), and almost a third of those exposed
 developed neoplasms by 1974.
 
 As a Department of
 Energyhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#Committee
 writing on the human radiation experiments wrote, “It appears to
 have been almost immediately apparent to the AEC and the Joint Task Force
 running the Castle series that research on radiation effects could be done
 in conjunction with the medical treatment of the exposed populations.” The
 DOE report also concluded that “The dual purpose of what is now a DOE
 medical program has led to a view by the Marshallese that they were being
 used as ‘guinea 

Re: [scifinoir2] Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 Photos)

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
I hope that he doesn't get drunk and gets into a bar fight. Someone could
hurt their hand. ;)

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:



 Guy deserves that brewski at the end. He done good...


 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/

 Author: John http://thechive.com/author/jresig/

- links http://thechive.com/category/links

  [image: iron man new Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit

 Edit: Apparently that’s War Machine, not Iron Man, however I’m not
 changing the title ’cause I’m drinking Jack Daniels at the moment. Continue
 with your nerdgasms…
  [image: iron man pics 41 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-4-2/
 [image: iron man pics 01 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-0-2/
 [image: iron man pics 11 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-1-2/
 [image: iron man pics 21 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-2-2/
 [image: iron man suit1 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-suit-2/
 [image: iron man pics 51 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-5-2/



 --
 Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
 Mahogany at:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/




 --
 If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
 wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik


 




-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


Re: [scifinoir2] Top 10 Evil Human Experiments

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
I strongly believe that this is a prolonged stage of human development. We
will eventually evolve out of this stage into a more enlightened one. (I
hope.)

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:



 Ain't humanity WONDERFUL?

 Martin (needs t get around to hacking the DoD to launch everything and end
 this vale of tears)


 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 http://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/
 Top 10 Evil Human Experiments

 Share This- Published March 14, 2008 - 343 
 Commentshttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#idc-container

 *[WARNING] This list contains descriptions and images of human
 experimentation which may cause offense to some readers.]* Human
 experimentation and research ethics evolved over time. On occasion, the
 subjects of human experimentation have been prisoners, slaves, or even
 family 
 http://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#members. In 
 some notable cases, doctors have performed experiments on
 themselves when they have been unwilling to risk the lives of others. This
 is known as self-experimentation. This is a list of the 10 most evil and
 unethical experiments carried out on humans.
 10
 Stanford Prison Experiment

 [image: Stanford Prison]

 The Stanford prison experiment was a 
 psychologicalhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#study
  of human responses to captivity and its behavioral effects on both
 authorities and inmates in prison. The experiment was conducted in 1971 by a
 team of researchers led by psychologist Philip Zimbardo at Stanford
 University. Undergraduate volunteers played the roles of both guards and
 prisoners living in a mock prison in the basement of the Stanford psychology
 building.

 Prisoners and guards rapidly adapted to their roles, stepping beyond the
 boundaries of what had been predicted and leading to dangerous and
 psychologically damaging situations. One-third of the guards were judged to
 have exhibited “genuine” sadistic tendencies, while many prisoners were
 emotionally traumatized and two had to be removed from the experiment early.
 Finally, Zimbardo, alarmed at the increasingly abusive anti-social behavior
 from his subjects, terminated the entire experiment early.
 9
 The Monster Study

 [image: Stuttering]

 The Monster Study was a stuttering experiment on 22 orphan 
 childrenhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#in 
 Davenport, Iowa, in 1939 conducted by Wendell Johnson at the University
 of Iowa. Johnson chose one of his graduate students, Mary Tudor, to conduct
 the experiment and he supervised her research. After placing the children in
 control and experimental groups, Tudor gave positive speech therapy to half
 of the children, praising the fluency of their speech, and negative speech
 therapy to the other half, belittling the children for every speech
 imperfection and telling them they were stutterers. Many of the normal
 speaking orphan children who received negative therapy in the experiment
 suffered negative psychological effects and some retained speech problems
 during the course of their life. Dubbed “The Monster Study” by some of
 Johnson’s peers who were horrified that he would experiment on orphan
 children to prove a theory, the experiment was kept hidden for fear
 Johnson’s reputation would be tarnished in the wake of human experiments
 conducted by the Nazis during World War II. The University of Iowa publicly
 apologized for the Monster Study in 2001.
 8
 Project 4.1

 [image: 300Px-Project 4.1 Figures]

 Project 4.1 was the designation for a medical study conducted by the
 United States of those residents of the Marshall Islands exposed to
 radioactive fallout from the March 1, 1954 Castle Bravo nuclear test at
 Bikini Atoll, which had an unexpectedly large yield. For the first decade
 after the test, the effects were ambiguous and statistically difficult to
 correlate to radiation exposure: miscarriages and stillbirths among exposed
 Rongelap women doubled in the first five years after the accident, but then
 returned to normal; some developmental difficulties and impaired growth
 appeared in children, but in no clear-cut pattern. In the decades that
 followed, though, the effects were undeniable. Children began to suffer
 disproportionately from thyroid 
 cancerhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#(due 
 to exposure to radioiodines), and almost a third of those exposed
 developed neoplasms by 1974.

 As a Department of 
 Energyhttp://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/#Committee
  writing on the human radiation experiments wrote, “It appears to
 have been almost immediately apparent to the AEC and the Joint Task Force
 running the Castle series that research on radiation effects could be done
 in conjunction with the medical treatment of the exposed populations.” 

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Upgraded to 21st Century TV and Now Wonder

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
Folks should remember that in case of an emergency the land phone lines will
probably be up faster than anything else.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:16 AM, Kelwyn ravena...@yahoo.com wrote:

 I am holding on to my land line simply because I had a handset on every
 level of my house and I never have to look for a phone.

 Regarding a sci-fi channel, there is nowhere near enough programing, at
 least not on the level of the treasure trove of western programing Encore's
 Western Channel has at its disposal.

 ~rave!

 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Bosco Bosco ironpi...@... wrote:
 
  So last week after noticing I hadn't actually used my home phone in more
 than 7 months, I decided to ditch it. I upgraded my ATT Uverse package and
 now have actual pay programing which is costing me less than the previous
 package.
 
  I was unfamiliar with the encore and starz end of the cable spectrum as I
 have never had premium channels before. They have western, action, mystery
 and other genre channels that are none to shabby. I have to wonder why they
 don't have a sci-fi or speculative fiction channel. It seems a natural.
 Surely there is bandwidth and programming available? Or am I missing
 something?
 
  Bosco
 




 

 Post your SciFiNoir Profile at

 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scifinoir2/app/peoplemap2/entry/add?fmvn=mapYahoo!
 Groups Links






-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


Re: [scifinoir2] ATT may also lose AMC

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
That's too bad. You missed out on a couple of good shows such as Mad Men.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:



 Mr Worf, in all honesty, I wouldn't count AMC as a loss. I haven't put my
 TV there in three years.


 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.comwrote:



 I just caught a commercial on AMC stating that ATT may lose AMC as well.
 Looks like they are trying to pull all of the good channels from ATT.




 --
 If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
 wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik


 




-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


[scifinoir2] Re: 10 Extremely Weird Religions

2010-07-13 Thread Kelwyn
The 70's were a very fertile decade for crack-pot religions - as were the end 
of the first millennium and the middle-ages.

~rave!

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@... wrote:

  http://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/Originally, I
 wasn't going to post this, but I noticed that 2 of the groups were African
 American.
 
 10 Extremely Weird Religions
 
 Share This javascript:void(0)- Published September 10, 2009 by *JFrater* -
 318 
 Commentshttp://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/#idc-container
 
 We have previously published a variety of lists on strange religious
 practices http://listverse.com/2007/08/13/10-weird-religious-practices/,
 religions
 you never knew 
 existedhttp://listverse.com/2008/07/08/top-10-religions-you-never-knew-existed/,
 and weird cults http://listverse.com/2007/09/15/top-10-cults/, but not a
 list of bizarre religions. This list is designed to fill the gap by
 discussing ten religions that most of us have not heard of (for good reason
 as you will see). Be sure to use the comments to tell us about any other
 bizarre religions and, especially, your own experiences of them.
 
 10
 Scientology
 
 [image: 
 Scientology1-2]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/scientology1-2.jpg
 
 Scientology has featured on a previous list, but if I didn’t include it here
 the comments would be inundated with “where’s scientology?” questions. 
 The
 Church of Scientology is a cult created by L Ron Hubbard (Elron) in 1952 as
 an outgrowth of his earlier self-help system called Dianetics. The Church of
 Scientology holds that at the higher levels of initiation (OT levels)
 mystical teachings are imparted that may be harmful to unprepared readers.
 These teachings are kept secret from members who have not reached these
 levels. In the OT levels, Hubbard explains how to reverse the effects of
 past-life trauma patterns that supposedly extend millions of years into the
 past. Among these advanced teachings is the story of Xenu (sometimes Xemu),
 introduced as an alien ruler of the “Galactic Confederacy.” According to
 this story, 75 million years ago Xenu brought billions of people to Earth in
 spacecraft resembling Douglas DC-8 airliners, stacked them around volcanoes
 and detonated hydrogen bombs in the volcanoes. The thetans then clustered
 together, stuck to the bodies of the living, and continue to do this today.
 Scientologists at advanced levels place considerable emphasis on isolating
 body thetans and neutralizing their ill effects.
 
 9
 Creativity Movement
 
 [image: Splc Hale
 350X4501]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/splc_hale_350x4501.jpg
 
 The Creativity Movement (formerly known as World Church Of The Creator), is
 a white separatist organization that advocates the whites-only religion,
 Creativity. It was also a descriptive phrase used by Ben Klassen, that
 included all adherents of the religion. The use of the term creator does not
 refer to a deity, but rather to themselves (white people). Despite the
 former use of the word Church in its name, the movement is atheistic.
 Creativity is a White Separatist religion that was founded by Ben Klassen in
 early 1973 under the name Church of the Creator. After Klassen’s death in
 1993, Creativity almost died out as a religion until the New Church of the
 Creator was established three years later by Matthew F. Hale as its Pontifex
 Maximus (high priest), until his incarceration in January 2003 for plotting
 with the movement’s head of security, Anthony Evola (an FBI informant), to
 murder a federal judge.
 
 8
 Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth
 
 [image: Picture
 2-81]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/picture-2-81.png
 
 Obviously spelling is not a fundamental part of this religion! Thee Temple
 ov Psychick Youth (TOPY) was founded in 1981 by members of Psychic
 TVhttp://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/#,
 Coil, Current 93, and a number of other individuals. The ever-evolving
 network is a loosely federated group of people operating as a unique blend
 of artistic collective, and practitioners of magic. TOPY is dedicated to the
 manifestation of magical concepts lacking mysticism or the worship of gods.
 The group focuses on the psychic and magical aspects of the human brain
 linked with “guiltless sexuality”. Throughout its existence, TOPY has been
 an influential group in the underground Chaos magic scene and in the wider
 western occult tradition. TOPY’s research has covered both Left-hand path
 and Right-hand path magick, various elements of psychology, art, music, and
 a variety of other media. Some of the influences on the network have
 been Aleister
 Crowley http://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/#,
 Austin Osman Spare, and Brion Gysin.
 
 7
 Nation of Yahweh
 
 [image: 
 1Heavensfamilyufosmall]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/1heavensfamilyufosmall.jpg
 
 The Nation 

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Where Are They Now - Project Greenlight Winners

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
I got the same impression that you did rave. It all kind of comes down to
meeting the right person at the right time and throwing your pitch or
meeting someone who connects you with someone that is looking to do a
project.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Kelwyn ravena...@yahoo.com wrote:

 I was fascinated by Project Greenlight and watched Season Two religiously.
  It was both cringe-inducing and hilarious to watch the attached at the hip
 twin directors fumble over each shot - at one point the two of them were
 directing Shia LaBeouf from both the driver and passenger side windows of a
 prop car at the same time.

 I was also fascinated that the producers of the show chose The Battle of
 Shaker Heights, which plays like an earnest after school special, as a
 feature film project. Failure was eminent and predicable.

 I learned two things from Project Greenlight: nobody knows anything and
 the best way to make it in Hollywood is to  know or be related to somebody -
 their most successful film came from John Gulager who is the son of
 character actor Clu Gulager.

 Oh, yeah, I learned one more thing: when all else fails, make some schlock.

 ~rave!

 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@... wrote:
 
   Where Are They Now - Project Greenlight
  Winners
 http://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/archives/2009/05/where_are_they_41.html
  Posted by Jellio http://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/archives/authors/jellio
   2 Comments
 http://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/archives/2009/05/where_are_they_41.html#comments
 
 
  [image: PGFinal.jpg]
 
  I'm not sure what made me think of Project
  Greenlighthttp://www.hbo.com/greenlight/,
  recently. Was it last week's opening of the Tribeca Film
  Festivalhttp://www.tribecafilm.com/festival/that made me think of
  the HBO competition from a few years back? Or maybe it
  was the sudden reemergence of Ben Affleck, in films like State of Play,
 and
  Extract http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzJI08YUNik (which looks pretty
  funny). Or maybe it was the Matt Damon
  cameohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZMX1vfrlYwduring Finding
  Forrester (he does alot of those).
 
  Oh well, whatever it was, now that I've got it in my head, I'll have to
 look
  all over the Internet, or at least
  Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Greenlight,
  to find out if the winners ever went on to bigger and better things.
 
  *Season One - Stolen Summer*
  [image: StolenSummerFinal.jpg]
  *Description:* In its premiere season, Project Greenlight producers
 received
  7,000 screenplays, with the top prize going to filmmaker *Pete Jones
  *for Stolen
  Summer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2VhIp2q5tY, the story of a
 Catholic
  boy who tries to convert his terminally ill Jewish friend (Wow...can you
  believe it only made $134,000) The HBO behind-the-scenes series focused
 on
  the day-to-day struggles of a director who was clearly over his head, and
  the hilarious confrontations that followed.
  *Cast:* Aidan Quinn, Bonnie Hunt, Kevin Pollak, Brian Dennehy
  *Where Is He Now?* After Stolen Summer, Jones wrote, directed and starred
 in
  Outing Riley http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTZwGePZRe8, the story of
 a
  regular Joe who comes out to his drinking buddies. The film was praised
 by
  the Gay and Lesbian Alliance, but didn't get much traction beyond that.
 But
  in 2005, Jones wrote Hall Pass http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0480687/,
 the
  story of man whose wife gives him permission to sleep around (sounds
  believable), and it was actually
  purchased
 http://movies.about.com/od/moviesinproduction/a/hallpass091905.htmby
  the Farrelly Brothers. He also had a role in My
  Big Fat Independent Movie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvipnU9IjzM,
 but
  I'm sure he wants to forget that. He's probably hoping the Farrellys
 finally
  decide to make Hall Pass their next Something About Mary.
 
 
  *Season Two - The Battle of Shaker Heights*
  [image: ShakerHeightsFinal.jpg]
  *Description:* In season two, the competition was split into writing and
  directing categories, presumably to foster some good fight scenes between
  the directors, and writer whose work they were butchering. *Erica Beeney
 *won
  the writing competition with The Battle of Shaker
  Heightshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl-GC7JiVZM,
  and *Kyle Rankin *and *Efram Potelle *were chosen to direct. As I think
  back, the one thing I remember most about this season was continually
  asking, Shia who? I don't say that anymore.
  *Cast:* Shia LaBeouf, Amy Smart, Kathleen Quinlan, William Sadler
  *Where Are They Now?* Kyle Rankin and Efram Potelle's production
  company, Newborn
  Pictures http://www.newbornpix.com/ went on to produce classics like
 InSex
  and a web series called HellHoles
 http://www.atom.com/funny_videos/hellholes/,
  the story of a hapless drifter who buys a new home for a dollar, only to
  discover he's purchased a portal to Hell (I don't know about you, but I
  think I have to see this flick). And the only thing 

Re: [scifinoir2] Tesla May Get Some Company: The Supercar Goes Electric

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
BMW is also working on a super hybrid as well. They were all pretty much won
over a couple of years ago when an electric was entered into one of the road
races in Europe. It did extremely well but wasn't allowed to finish.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:



 They've got it on the boards right now, I hear.


 On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 Porchea and Ferrari are both working on one as well. Although I think
 Ferrari will probably do a hybrid first.

 On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Martin Baxter 
 martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:



 I'm impressed.

 But the Veyron still owns the better part of me.


 On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.comwrote:



 Tesla May Get Some Company: The Supercar Goes Electric

 *CHARGE!* SLS AMG E-Cell has an electric motor powering each of the
 wheels. More Photos 
 »http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/07/11/automobiles/autoreviews/20100711-mercedes.html
  By LAWRENCE ULRICH Published: July 8, 2010

- 
 Facebookhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
-  Twitter
- Recommend
- Sign In to 
 E-Mailhttp://www.nytimes.com/auth/login?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html
- 
 Printhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1pagewanted=print
-  
 Reprintshttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
- 
 Sharehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#

 Closehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   - 
 Linkedinhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   - 
 Digghttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   - 
 Mixxhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   - 
 MySpacehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   - Yahoo! 
 Buzzhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   - 
 Permalinkhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/11ELECTRIC.html?_r=1#
   -


 http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=gotoopznpage=www.nytimes.com/yr/mo/day/automobilespos=Frame4Asn2=7da8705c/b3e9b981sn1=d03db86c/2f814a4ecamp=foxsearch2010_emailtools_1225558c_nyt5ad=Cyrus_120x60_NowPlaying_06.18goto=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Fcyrus

 INTRODUCED in New York in 1954, the Mercedes-Benz 300SL was a stunningly
 advanced machine, the first production car to trade a carburetor for fuel
 injection.
   Multimedia
   Slide Show
 http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/07/11/automobiles/autoreviews/20100711-mercedes.html?ref=automobiles
  2011 Mercedes-Benz SLS 
 AMGhttp://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2010/07/11/automobiles/autoreviews/20100711-mercedes.html?ref=automobiles
   Related

-  Behind the Wheel | 2011 Mercedes-Benz Sls Amg: Winging It One
More 
 Timehttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/11/automobiles/autoreviews/11WHEEL.html?ref=automobiles(July
  11, 2010)

   Now, with the SLS AMG echoing the style of that original gullwing
 sports car, Mercedes may produce an electric version that could give the
 company environmental bragging rights. Mercedes is testing the prototype 
 SLS
 AMG E-Cell, in which the standard model’s 563-horsepower gasoline V-8 has
 been replaced with four electric motors, one powering each wheel, that 
 spool
 up 535 horsepower and 649 pound-feet of peak torque.

 Mercedes estimates a 0-to-60 time of four seconds flat for the electric
 SLS, just a few tenths slower than the gasoline version. Power is stored in
 a liquid-cooled 
 lithiumhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/l/lithium_metal/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier-ion
 battery; brakes capture energy and return it to the battery.

 Ola Kallenius, chairman of Mercedes’s AMG high-performance division,
 said the company was considering a small production run for the SLS E-Cell.

 At a recent presentation for the car in Norway, a retired Formula 
 Onehttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/f/formula_one/index.html?inline=nyt-orgracer,
  David Coulthard, tested the E-Cell on an airstrip and public roads.
 His drive and commentary were documented on Web video. “My first experience
 of an electric 
 carhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/e/electric_vehicles/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier,”
 Mr. Coulthard said, emerging from the E-Cell with a grin. “You will not
 believe the performance.”

 The E-Cell, along with cars like the new S400 hybrid sedan, shows
 Mercedes shifting more of its renowned technical resources toward 
 increasing
 fuel economy and developing alternative propulsion systems. Mercedes, which
 has paid more than $300 million in federal fines since 1983 for falling
 short of fuel-economy standards — thanks largely to its fuel-sucking AMG
 models — has vowed to improve 

Re: [scifinoir2] Top 10 Errors in Science Fiction Movies

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
They kind of left out the incredible problems with diseases that could be
transmitted by human / alien contact. Just breathing on an alien (or a human
with no immune system) is a death sentence.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:



 Mr Worf, this goes back to the lack of science advisers in SF movies.
 Again, blame H'Wood. I do.


 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 Top 10 Errors in Science Fiction Movies

 Share This- Published November 23, 2007 - 5500249 Comments
 http://listverse.com/2007/11/23/top-10-errors-in-science-fiction-movies/
 Top+10+Errors+in+Science+Fiction+Movies2007-11-23+11%3A22%3A44jfraterhttp://listverse.com/2007/11/23/top-10-errors-in-science-fiction-movies/#comments

 Science Fiction movies are great for expanding the mind and showing us
 things we may never get to see in real life. Unfortunately though, they all
 seem to make the same fundamental errors regarding true science. This is a
 list of the top 10 errors in Science Fiction movies.

 10. Simplicity

 [image: 574Px-M87 
 Jet]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/574px-m87-jet.jpg

 This is less a crime of commission than one of omission. Space is full of
 wonders we cannot even begin to understand, yet most science fiction films
 are based in a very simplistic environment and do not even begin to
 investigate the wonderful possibilities that science fiction offers us. We
 don’t see interplanetary tunnels, aliens on planets around pulsars,
 creatures living on dead suns, alien life forms that inhabit the edges of
 supermassive black holes, or so many of the other thought provoking
 scenarios. Let’s spice up our science fiction movies!

 9. Simplistic Planets

 [image: 133946 Tatooine 
 L]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/133946-tatooine-l.jpg

 This is particularly evident in the Star Wars movies. Whenever a planet is
 introduced in a science fiction film, it has one equal ecological system
 across the entire planet – for example, it might be entirely covered in snow
 – or entirely covered in sand. If people are living on these planets, they
 must be providing water and other important things needed for survival.
 This, in turn, would suggest that the planet ought to have a well developed
 complex ecosystem which varies from region to region – for example ice at
 the poles and arid land at the center (this is just an example of course).

 8. Alien / Human Breeding

 [image: Spock-1]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/spock-1.jpg

 This is often seen in Star Trek – for example Spock – he was half human
 and half Vulcan. It is not even possible for human/ape crossbreeds to occur
 due to genetic differences, it is inconceivable that a human and an alien
 might be able to crossbreed. There are, of course, additional problems: how
 do you perform the cross breeding if the alien does not have sexual organs
 or the means to extract the necessary seeds of life?

 7. Alien / Human communication

 [image: Dish] http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/dish.jpg

 If aliens did exist, it would be extremely unlikely that we could
 communicate with them in a very short amount of time. In addition to the
 regular problems in translating an entirely unknown language, we would also
 have to consider a society that probably involves concepts we do not
 understand at all. Imagine an alien race trying to understand God if they
 have never had a notion of religion in their society. Of course, none of
 this matters if the aliens communicate with their minds or non-audible means
 – it would be impossible for us to communicate at all with a race that has
 no concept of sight and sound.

 6. Instant Communications

 [image: Contact Large 
 15]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/contact-large-15.jpg

 Even if we did use light particles/waves to transmit radio data, the vast
 distances in space would make instant radio communication impossible. A rare
 exception to this flaw is in the movie Contact; as the camera draws away
 from the earth we hear the radio emanations getting progressively older
 until you finally reach silence. This trick is very effectively used to show
 just how massive space is.



 5. Humanoid Aliens

 [image: 
 Aliennewstag7]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/aliennewstag7.jpg

 This is endemic on the various Star Trek series, where creatures from
 entirely different sectors of the Universe look just like Humans except for
 the occasional bulging ridge on their foreheads, etc. Humans evolved on
 earth in order to meet a very specific criteria for survival – the
 presumption that this is true of all other planets is ridiculous.

 4. Explosions in Space

 [image: 
 Explosion2004]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/explosion2004.jpg

 Unfortunately virtually every science fiction movie makes this error – in
 fact, in the vacuum of outer space, there can be no flames (as flames need
 oxygen) 

[scifinoir2] Re: Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7 Photos)

2010-07-13 Thread Kelwyn
Looks like the kinda dude you can sit down and have a beer with.

~rave!

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@... wrote:

 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7
 Photos)http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/
 
 Author: John http://thechive.com/author/jresig/
 
- links http://thechive.com/category/links
 
  [image: iron man new Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit
 
 Edit: Apparently that’s War Machine, not Iron Man, however I’m not 
 changing
 the title ’cause I’m drinking Jack Daniels at the moment. Continue with 
 your
 nerdgasms…
  [image: iron man pics 41 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-4-2/
 [image: iron man pics 01 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-0-2/
 [image: iron man pics 11 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-1-2/
 [image: iron man pics 21 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-2-2/
 [image: iron man suit1 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-suit-2/
 [image: iron man pics 51 Dude builds entire Iron Man suit (7
 Photos)]http://thechive.com/2010/01/06/dude-constructs-entire-iron-man-suit/iron-man-pics-5-2/
 
 
 
 -- 
 Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
 Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/





[scifinoir2] Re: Where Are They Now - Project Greenlight Winners

2010-07-13 Thread B Smith
Feast was one of the most fun, low budget horror movies I've seen in a long 
time. I had a Halloween double feature of Feast and Slither the year they came 
out and we had a ball. The sequels are in my Netflix queue.

I liked the show quite a bit and I'm glad the third season winner was something 
beyond the typical indie fare.

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@... wrote:

 I got the same impression that you did rave. It all kind of comes down to
 meeting the right person at the right time and throwing your pitch or
 meeting someone who connects you with someone that is looking to do a
 project.
 
 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Kelwyn ravena...@... wrote:
 
  I was fascinated by Project Greenlight and watched Season Two religiously.
   It was both cringe-inducing and hilarious to watch the attached at the hip
  twin directors fumble over each shot - at one point the two of them were
  directing Shia LaBeouf from both the driver and passenger side windows of a
  prop car at the same time.
 
  I was also fascinated that the producers of the show chose The Battle of
  Shaker Heights, which plays like an earnest after school special, as a
  feature film project. Failure was eminent and predicable.
 
  I learned two things from Project Greenlight: nobody knows anything and
  the best way to make it in Hollywood is to  know or be related to somebody -
  their most successful film came from John Gulager who is the son of
  character actor Clu Gulager.
 
  Oh, yeah, I learned one more thing: when all else fails, make some schlock.
 
  ~rave!
 
  --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Mr. Worf HelloMahogany@ wrote:
  
Where Are They Now - Project Greenlight
   Winners
  http://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/archives/2009/05/where_are_they_41.html
   Posted by Jellio http://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/archives/authors/jellio
2 Comments
  http://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/archives/2009/05/where_are_they_41.html#comments
  
  
   [image: PGFinal.jpg]
  
   I'm not sure what made me think of Project
   Greenlighthttp://www.hbo.com/greenlight/,
   recently. Was it last week's opening of the Tribeca Film
   Festivalhttp://www.tribecafilm.com/festival/that made me think of
   the HBO competition from a few years back? Or maybe it
   was the sudden reemergence of Ben Affleck, in films like State of Play,
  and
   Extract http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzJI08YUNik (which looks pretty
   funny). Or maybe it was the Matt Damon
   cameohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZMX1vfrlYwduring Finding
   Forrester (he does alot of those).
  
   Oh well, whatever it was, now that I've got it in my head, I'll have to
  look
   all over the Internet, or at least
   Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Greenlight,
   to find out if the winners ever went on to bigger and better things.
  
   *Season One - Stolen Summer*
   [image: StolenSummerFinal.jpg]
   *Description:* In its premiere season, Project Greenlight producers
  received
   7,000 screenplays, with the top prize going to filmmaker *Pete Jones
   *for Stolen
   Summer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2VhIp2q5tY, the story of a
  Catholic
   boy who tries to convert his terminally ill Jewish friend (Wow...can you
   believe it only made $134,000) The HBO behind-the-scenes series focused
  on
   the day-to-day struggles of a director who was clearly over his head, and
   the hilarious confrontations that followed.
   *Cast:* Aidan Quinn, Bonnie Hunt, Kevin Pollak, Brian Dennehy
   *Where Is He Now?* After Stolen Summer, Jones wrote, directed and starred
  in
   Outing Riley http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTZwGePZRe8, the story of
  a
   regular Joe who comes out to his drinking buddies. The film was praised
  by
   the Gay and Lesbian Alliance, but didn't get much traction beyond that.
  But
   in 2005, Jones wrote Hall Pass http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0480687/,
  the
   story of man whose wife gives him permission to sleep around (sounds
   believable), and it was actually
   purchased
  http://movies.about.com/od/moviesinproduction/a/hallpass091905.htmby
   the Farrelly Brothers. He also had a role in My
   Big Fat Independent Movie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvipnU9IjzM,
  but
   I'm sure he wants to forget that. He's probably hoping the Farrellys
  finally
   decide to make Hall Pass their next Something About Mary.
  
  
   *Season Two - The Battle of Shaker Heights*
   [image: ShakerHeightsFinal.jpg]
   *Description:* In season two, the competition was split into writing and
   directing categories, presumably to foster some good fight scenes between
   the directors, and writer whose work they were butchering. *Erica Beeney
  *won
   the writing competition with The Battle of Shaker
   Heightshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dl-GC7JiVZM,
   and *Kyle Rankin *and *Efram Potelle *were chosen to direct. As I think
   back, the one thing I remember most about this season was continually
   asking, Shia who? I don't say that anymore.
   *Cast:* Shia 

Re: [scifinoir2] Man builds War Machine suit

2010-07-13 Thread Amy Harlib

ahar...@earthlink.net
WOW!   'Nuff said!
Amy


From: Mr. Worf 
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:16 AM
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Man builds War Machine suit






Mr.Worf wants to share this great news called Iron Man War Machine in Real Life 
on DesignersCouch. Please check it here: 

http://designerscouch.org/show_news/1113/iron-man-war-machine-in-real-life.html


Best Regards,
DesignersCouch.
www.designerscouch.org 



-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity! 
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/





Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

2010-07-13 Thread George Arterberry
The cash is going toward effects. I'm sure Robert Downey Jr. will take % points 
instead of a salary if his agent had half a brain.

I doubt Banner would get much face-time in the Avengers movie anyway. More 
like Hulk come down this semi so we can attack Galactus.





From: Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 13, 2010 2:18:00 PM
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

  
Keith, if they want flavor-of-the- week, Michael Cera would be a great fit 
for 
Banner as well. And the character would have to be written, IMO, the way he's 
been done post-World War Hulk, after Banner and the Hulk were separated, and 
Banner became a truly scary bastich who played mind games with everyone around 
him.


On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ comcast.net 
wrote:

  
They need to quit worrying about name actors and just get an actor who looks 
and can play the part. Eric Bana was way too buff and handsome for Banner. 
Norton was probably closer, but his almost Shakespearean intensity was a bit 
too 
much for the skinny, unsure, milksop that is Bruce Banner. I think Phoenix 
would 
come off too much like a crazed mad scientist than the puny Banner we need.  
Cast the net far and wide to find the right man, and notoriety be hanged! 
That's 
the damn problem with H'Wood all the time.

Someone who looks the part, for example, would be Jon Cryer, the whiny brother 
on Two and A Half Men. Not saying he *should* do it, but that's the *look* 
you 
need for Banner-someone who looks soft and weak, as if he's never seen the sun 
or the inside of a gym.

 * * * *
- Original Message -
From: Daryle Lockhart dar...@darylelockha rt.com

So  now I'm hearing they're talking  seriously  to  Joaquin Phoenix. Which  is 
both  awesome and frightening at the same time to me. 


 * * * * *



On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Cinque B wrote:

Marvel: Norton Won't Return As Hulk For 'Avengers'; Norton's Rep Responds
Source: Access Hollywood Sun Jul 11, 2010, 8:15 pm EDT 


 


Edward Norton won't be reprising his role as the Incredible Hulk in 2012's 
The 
Avengers, a Marvel rep confirmed to Access Hollywood on Sunday.
Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige explained the decision in 
a 
statement to HitFix.
VIEW THE PHOTOS: Edward Norton 
We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title 
role 
of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers,' Feige told the site. Our decision is 
definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the need 
for 
an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our other 
talented cast members. 'The Avengers' demands players who thrive working as 
part 
of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, Sam, Scarlett, and 
all 
of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a name actor who fulfills 
these requirements, and is passionate about the iconic role in the coming 
weeks.
The actors referred to in the statement include current Marvel stars Robert 
Downey Jr. ( Iron Man ), Chris Hemsworth (Thor), Chris Evans (Captain 
America: The First Avenger), Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury), Scarlett 
Johansson 
( Iron Man 2's Black Widow), who are expected to reprise their superhero 
roles 
in team-up film The Avengers.
VIEW THE PHOTOS: Scenes From ‘ The Incredible Hulk ’ 
A rep for Norton responded to the statement to Hitfix on Sunday, calling it 
purposefully misleading and claiming that his client had been in 
discussions 
to return to the role.
This offensive statement from Kevin Feige at Marvel is a purposefully 
misleading, inappropriate attempt to paint our client in a negative light, 
the 
rep told the site. Here are the facts: two months ago, Kevin called me and 
said 
he wanted Edward to reprise the role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers.' He 
told 
me it would be his fantasy to bring Edward on stage with the rest of the cast 
at 
[Comic-Con] and make it the event of the convention. When I said that Edward 
was 
definitely open to this idea, Kevin was very excited and we agreed that 
Edward 
should meet with [director] Joss Whedon to discuss the project. Edward and 
Joss 
had a very good meeting (confirmed by Feige to me) at which Edward said he 
was 
enthusiastic at the prospect of being a part of the ensemble cast.
However, the rep further claimed, the talks fell apart last week.
VIEW THE PHOTOS: Fan Candy : Superheroes, Sci-Fi  Beyond ! 
Marvel subsequently made him a financial offer to be in the film and both 
sides 
started negotiating in good faith, he told Hitfix. This past Wednesday, 
after 
several weeks of civil, uncontentious discussions, but before we had come to 
terms on a deal, a representative from Marvel called to say they had decided 
to 
go in another direction with the part. This seemed to us to be 

Re: [scifinoir2] Kevin Bacon Vs The X-Men?

2010-07-13 Thread George Arterberry
This has camp ala Punisher-War-Zone' written all over it.



 




From: Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.com
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 13, 2010 1:50:40 PM
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Kevin Bacon Vs The X-Men?

  
I could see him playing Henry Gyrich.


On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:53 PM, brent wodehouse brent_wodehouse@ thefence. 
us wrote:

  
http://www.empireon line.com/ news/story. asp?NID=28329

12 July 2010

Kevin Bacon Vs The X-Men?

In talks for the First Class villain

Source: Deadline

The cast of Matthew Vaughn’s X-Men: First Class could all see their number
in the Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon game go down by a few digits - the actor
has been offered the role of the main villain in the movie.

While the exact details of the bad guy is unknown, Deadline reports that
Bacon is in talks to snatch the role, which would see him facing off
against James McAvoy’s Professor Charles Xavier, Michael Fassbender’s Erik
Lensherr and the young mutants they’re training to help the world.

There has been a flurry of casting on the film in recent weeks, with the
likes of Nicholas Hoult (Beast), Caleb Landry Jones (Banshee), Alice Eve
(Emma Frost) and Lucas Till (Havoc) all signing on, with the likelihood of
a few more to come.

With a script re-written by Vaughn and regular collaborator Jane Goldman,
X-Men: First Class will start shooting next month.

James White




-- 
If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell 
wrote 
the script? -- Charles E Grant

http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik




  

Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

2010-07-13 Thread Keith Johnson
I wonder if Cera might not be a bit too young? I don't follow Hulk. What's up 
with Banner's behaviour? 

- Original Message - 
From: Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:18:00 AM 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick 






Keith, if they want flavor-of-the-week, Michael Cera would be a great fit for 
Banner as well. And the character would have to be written, IMO, the way he's 
been done post-World War Hulk, after Banner and the Hulk were separated, and 
Banner became a truly scary bastich who played mind games with everyone around 
him. 


On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@comcast.net  
wrote: 









They need to quit worrying about name actors and just get an actor who looks 
and can play the part. Eric Bana was way too buff and handsome for Banner. 
Norton was probably closer, but his almost Shakespearean intensity was a bit 
too much for the skinny, unsure, milksop that is Bruce Banner. I think Phoenix 
would come off too much like a crazed mad scientist than the puny Banner we 
need. Cast the net far and wide to find the right man, and notoriety be hanged! 
That's the damn problem with H'Wood all the time. 

Someone who looks the part, for example, would be Jon Cryer, the whiny brother 
on Two and A Half Men. Not saying he *should* do it, but that's the *look* 
you need for Banner-someone who looks soft and weak, as if he's never seen the 
sun or the inside of a gym. 

 
- Original Message - 
From: Daryle Lockhart  dar...@darylelockhart.com  

So now I'm hearing they're talking seriously to Joaquin Phoenix. Which is both 
awesome and frightening at the same time to me. 

* 




On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Cinque B wrote: 



Marvel: Norton Won't Return As Hulk For 'Avengers'; Norton's Rep Responds 


Source: Access Hollywood Sun Jul 11, 2010, 8:15 pm EDT 







Edward Norton won't be reprising his role as the Incredible Hulk in 2012's The 
Avengers, a Marvel rep confirmed to Access Hollywood on Sunday. 

Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige explained the decision in a 
statement to HitFix . 

VIEW THE PHOTOS: Edward Norton 

We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title 
role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers,' Feige told the site. Our decision is 
definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the need 
for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our other 
talented cast members. 'The Avengers' demands players who thrive working as 
part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, Sam, Scarlett, 
and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a name actor who 
fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the iconic role in the 
coming weeks. 

The actors referred to in the statement include current Marvel stars Robert 
Downey Jr. ( Iron Man ), Chris Hemsworth (Thor), Chris Evans (Captain 
America: The First Avenger), Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury), Scarlett Johansson 
( Iron Man 2's Black Widow), who are expected to reprise their superhero 
roles in team-up film The Avengers. 

VIEW THE PHOTOS: Scenes From ‘ The Incredible Hulk ’ 

A rep for Norton responded to the statement to Hitfix on Sunday, calling it 
purposefully misleading and claiming that his client had been in discussions 
to return to the role. 

This offensive statement from Kevin Feige at Marvel is a purposefully 
misleading, inappropriate attempt to paint our client in a negative light, the 
rep told the site. Here are the facts: two months ago, Kevin called me and 
said he wanted Edward to reprise the role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers.' He 
told me it would be his fantasy to bring Edward on stage with the rest of the 
cast at [Comic-Con] and make it the event of the convention. When I said that 
Edward was definitely open to this idea, Kevin was very excited and we agreed 
that Edward should meet with [director] Joss Whedon to discuss the project. 
Edward and Joss had a very good meeting (confirmed by Feige to me) at which 
Edward said he was enthusiastic at the prospect of being a part of the ensemble 
cast. 

However, the rep further claimed, the talks fell apart last week. 

VIEW THE PHOTOS: Fan Candy : Superheroes, Sci-Fi  Beyond ! 

Marvel subsequently made him a financial offer to be in the film and both 
sides started negotiating in good faith, he told Hitfix. This past Wednesday, 
after several weeks of civil, uncontentious discussions, but before we had come 
to terms on a deal, a representative from Marvel called to say they had decided 
to go in another direction with the part. This seemed to us to be a financial 
decision but, whatever the case, it is completely their prerogative, and we 
accepted their decision with no hard feelings... We know a lot of 

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

2010-07-13 Thread Keith Johnson
I *really* don't see Spade! Next you'll be recommending Rob Schneider or 
(shudder!) Paulie Shore! :( 

- Original Message - 
From: Kelwyn ravena...@yahoo.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:10:58 AM 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick 






Going with a comic actor is not a bad idea. Bixby was known primarily as a 
comic actor when he became David Bruce Banner. Ditto for Michael Keaton when he 
became the Batman. When you mentioned Jon Cryer my brain went even further out 
on a limb and thought David Spade. 

(So sue me). 

~rave! 

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote: 
 
 I've never seen Cryer do drama, just offered up his physical characteristics. 
 Then again, Bill Bixby was a handsome man who wasn't physically frail, but he 
 was an effective David Banner because of his acting ability. He wasn't the 
 weakling of Banner in the comics, but he was a very soft-spoken, gentle soul 
 who worked very well as Banner in the series. 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 6:15:17 PM 
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I agree, They need an Ed Begley Jr. type actor. Basically someone that does 
 not have that strong physical look and more like a doctor. I don't think John 
 Cryer would be able to pull off the transformation scenes. 
 
 
 On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@...  wrote: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 They need to quit worrying about name actors and just get an actor who 
 looks and can play the part. Eric Bana was way too buff and handsome for 
 Banner. Norton was probably closer, but his almost Shakespearean intensity 
 was a bit too much for the skinny, unsure, milksop that is Bruce Banner. I 
 think Phoenix would come off too much like a crazed mad scientist than the 
 puny Banner we need. Cast the net far and wide to find the right man, and 
 notoriety be hanged! That's the damn problem with H'Wood all the time. 
 
 Someone who looks the part, for example, would be Jon Cryer, the whiny 
 brother on Two and A Half Men. Not saying he *should* do it, but that's the 
 *look* you need for Banner-someone who looks soft and weak, as if he's never 
 seen the sun or the inside of a gym. 
 
  
 - Original Message - 
 From: Daryle Lockhart  dar...@...  
 
 So now I'm hearing they're talking seriously to Joaquin Phoenix. Which is 
 both awesome and frightening at the same time to me. 
 
 * 
 
 
 
 
 On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Cinque B wrote: 
 
 
 
 Marvel: Norton Won't Return As Hulk For 'Avengers'; Norton's Rep Responds 
 
 
 Source: Access Hollywood Sun Jul 11, 2010, 8:15 pm EDT 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Edward Norton won't be reprising his role as the Incredible Hulk in 2012's 
 The Avengers, a Marvel rep confirmed to Access Hollywood on Sunday. 
 
 Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige explained the decision in 
 a statement to HitFix . 
 
 VIEW THE PHOTOS: Edward Norton 
 
 We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title 
 role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers,' Feige told the site. Our decision 
 is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the 
 need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our 
 other talented cast members. 'The Avengers' demands players who thrive 
 working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, 
 Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a 
 name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the 
 iconic role in the coming weeks. 
 
 The actors referred to in the statement include current Marvel stars Robert 
 Downey Jr. ( Iron Man ), Chris Hemsworth (Thor), Chris Evans (Captain 
 America: The First Avenger), Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury), Scarlett 
 Johansson ( Iron Man 2's Black Widow), who are expected to reprise their 
 superhero roles in team-up film The Avengers. 
 
 VIEW THE PHOTOS: Scenes From ‘ The Incredible Hulk ’ 
 
 A rep for Norton responded to the statement to Hitfix on Sunday, calling it 
 purposefully misleading and claiming that his client had been in 
 discussions to return to the role. 
 
 This offensive statement from Kevin Feige at Marvel is a purposefully 
 misleading, inappropriate attempt to paint our client in a negative light, 
 the rep told the site. Here are the facts: two months ago, Kevin called me 
 and said he wanted Edward to reprise the role of Bruce Banner in 'The 
 Avengers.' He told me it would be his fantasy to bring Edward on stage with 
 the rest of the cast at [Comic-Con] and make it the event of the convention. 
 When I said that Edward was definitely open to this idea, Kevin was very 
 excited and we 

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

2010-07-13 Thread Keith Johnson
I have no issue with comedic actors though, since H'Wood is replete with 
comedians who turned out to be amazing dramatic actors: Whoopi Goldberg, Robin 
Williams, Richard Pryor (who never got a vehicle to showcase how could he could 
have been dramatically), etc. 
Many people probably don't know that Eric Bana is really an accomplished 
comedian with a background that's more reminiscent of old vaudeville than what 
we see in America nowadays. Movies like the first Hulk, Syrianna, Troy, etc., 
coupled with his physique and looks, have him labeled as a serious/romantic 
actor, but comedy is his first gig. Hugh Jackman is the same way. A tall, buff, 
handsome guy who quickly gets considered for action/dramatic/romantic roles, 
he's an accomplished song-and-dance man like those of old. 

I guess I can see why so many Aussie and Brit actors get work in America: it 
seems more of them still come from the old school systems where they're 
expected to do plays and learn a bunch of skills for stage as well as just 
screen. It's why the likes of Patrick Stewart or others can fluidly move from 
drama to comedy, futuristic scifi to period pieces, TV to movies to one man 
shows on stage. In America, so many of the up-and-comers want to be famous 
instantly, they try to jump immediately to movies. 

- Original Message - 
From: Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:24:28 PM 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers 
Flick 







I *really* don't see Spade! Next you'll be recommending Rob Schneider or 
(shudder!) Paulie Shore! :( 

- Original Message - 
From: Kelwyn ravena...@yahoo.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:10:58 AM 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick 






Going with a comic actor is not a bad idea. Bixby was known primarily as a 
comic actor when he became David Bruce Banner. Ditto for Michael Keaton when he 
became the Batman. When you mentioned Jon Cryer my brain went even further out 
on a limb and thought David Spade. 

(So sue me). 

~rave! 

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote: 
 
 I've never seen Cryer do drama, just offered up his physical characteristics. 
 Then again, Bill Bixby was a handsome man who wasn't physically frail, but he 
 was an effective David Banner because of his acting ability. He wasn't the 
 weakling of Banner in the comics, but he was a very soft-spoken, gentle soul 
 who worked very well as Banner in the series. 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 6:15:17 PM 
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 I agree, They need an Ed Begley Jr. type actor. Basically someone that does 
 not have that strong physical look and more like a doctor. I don't think John 
 Cryer would be able to pull off the transformation scenes. 
 
 
 On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@...  wrote: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 They need to quit worrying about name actors and just get an actor who 
 looks and can play the part. Eric Bana was way too buff and handsome for 
 Banner. Norton was probably closer, but his almost Shakespearean intensity 
 was a bit too much for the skinny, unsure, milksop that is Bruce Banner. I 
 think Phoenix would come off too much like a crazed mad scientist than the 
 puny Banner we need. Cast the net far and wide to find the right man, and 
 notoriety be hanged! That's the damn problem with H'Wood all the time. 
 
 Someone who looks the part, for example, would be Jon Cryer, the whiny 
 brother on Two and A Half Men. Not saying he *should* do it, but that's the 
 *look* you need for Banner-someone who looks soft and weak, as if he's never 
 seen the sun or the inside of a gym. 
 
  
 - Original Message - 
 From: Daryle Lockhart  dar...@...  
 
 So now I'm hearing they're talking seriously to Joaquin Phoenix. Which is 
 both awesome and frightening at the same time to me. 
 
 * 
 
 
 
 
 On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Cinque B wrote: 
 
 
 
 Marvel: Norton Won't Return As Hulk For 'Avengers'; Norton's Rep Responds 
 
 
 Source: Access Hollywood Sun Jul 11, 2010, 8:15 pm EDT 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Edward Norton won't be reprising his role as the Incredible Hulk in 2012's 
 The Avengers, a Marvel rep confirmed to Access Hollywood on Sunday. 
 
 Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige explained the decision in 
 a statement to HitFix . 
 
 VIEW THE PHOTOS: Edward Norton 
 
 We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title 
 role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers,' Feige told the site. Our decision 
 is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the 
 need 

[scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

2010-07-13 Thread B Smith
Bruce Banner hasn't been the puny Banner stereotype for a long time. Banner is 
a bit of a snarky so and so and that could lead to some nice exchanges with 
Downey and Jackson. Norton played him just right but unfortunately he was such 
a pain to work with he was dropped.

Michael Cera is way too young. Jason Bateman on the other hand could be awesome.

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:

 I wonder if Cera might not be a bit too young? I don't follow Hulk. What's up 
 with Banner's behaviour? 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:18:00 AM 
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Keith, if they want flavor-of-the-week, Michael Cera would be a great fit 
 for Banner as well. And the character would have to be written, IMO, the way 
 he's been done post-World War Hulk, after Banner and the Hulk were separated, 
 and Banner became a truly scary bastich who played mind games with everyone 
 around him. 
 
 
 On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@...  wrote: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 They need to quit worrying about name actors and just get an actor who 
 looks and can play the part. Eric Bana was way too buff and handsome for 
 Banner. Norton was probably closer, but his almost Shakespearean intensity 
 was a bit too much for the skinny, unsure, milksop that is Bruce Banner. I 
 think Phoenix would come off too much like a crazed mad scientist than the 
 puny Banner we need. Cast the net far and wide to find the right man, and 
 notoriety be hanged! That's the damn problem with H'Wood all the time. 
 
 Someone who looks the part, for example, would be Jon Cryer, the whiny 
 brother on Two and A Half Men. Not saying he *should* do it, but that's the 
 *look* you need for Banner-someone who looks soft and weak, as if he's never 
 seen the sun or the inside of a gym. 
 
  
 - Original Message - 
 From: Daryle Lockhart  dar...@...  
 
 So now I'm hearing they're talking seriously to Joaquin Phoenix. Which is 
 both awesome and frightening at the same time to me. 
 
 * 
 
 
 
 
 On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Cinque B wrote: 
 
 
 
 Marvel: Norton Won't Return As Hulk For 'Avengers'; Norton's Rep Responds 
 
 
 Source: Access Hollywood Sun Jul 11, 2010, 8:15 pm EDT 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Edward Norton won't be reprising his role as the Incredible Hulk in 2012's 
 The Avengers, a Marvel rep confirmed to Access Hollywood on Sunday. 
 
 Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige explained the decision in 
 a statement to HitFix . 
 
 VIEW THE PHOTOS: Edward Norton 
 
 We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title 
 role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers,' Feige told the site. Our decision 
 is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the 
 need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our 
 other talented cast members. 'The Avengers' demands players who thrive 
 working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, 
 Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a 
 name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the 
 iconic role in the coming weeks. 
 
 The actors referred to in the statement include current Marvel stars Robert 
 Downey Jr. ( Iron Man ), Chris Hemsworth (Thor), Chris Evans (Captain 
 America: The First Avenger), Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury), Scarlett 
 Johansson ( Iron Man 2's Black Widow), who are expected to reprise their 
 superhero roles in team-up film The Avengers. 
 
 VIEW THE PHOTOS: Scenes From ‘ The Incredible Hulk ’ 
 
 A rep for Norton responded to the statement to Hitfix on Sunday, calling it 
 purposefully misleading and claiming that his client had been in 
 discussions to return to the role. 
 
 This offensive statement from Kevin Feige at Marvel is a purposefully 
 misleading, inappropriate attempt to paint our client in a negative light, 
 the rep told the site. Here are the facts: two months ago, Kevin called me 
 and said he wanted Edward to reprise the role of Bruce Banner in 'The 
 Avengers.' He told me it would be his fantasy to bring Edward on stage with 
 the rest of the cast at [Comic-Con] and make it the event of the convention. 
 When I said that Edward was definitely open to this idea, Kevin was very 
 excited and we agreed that Edward should meet with [director] Joss Whedon to 
 discuss the project. Edward and Joss had a very good meeting (confirmed by 
 Feige to me) at which Edward said he was enthusiastic at the prospect of 
 being a part of the ensemble cast. 
 
 However, the rep further claimed, the talks fell apart last week. 
 
 VIEW THE PHOTOS: Fan Candy : Superheroes, Sci-Fi  Beyond ! 
 
 Marvel 

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

2010-07-13 Thread Keith Johnson
Thanks for the update. Though snarky, isn't Banner still frail and weak 
looking? 

- Original Message - 
From: B Smith daikaij...@yahoo.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:41:55 PM 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick 






Bruce Banner hasn't been the puny Banner stereotype for a long time. Banner is 
a bit of a snarky so and so and that could lead to some nice exchanges with 
Downey and Jackson. Norton played him just right but unfortunately he was such 
a pain to work with he was dropped. 

Michael Cera is way too young. Jason Bateman on the other hand could be 
awesome. 

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote: 
 
 I wonder if Cera might not be a bit too young? I don't follow Hulk. What's up 
 with Banner's behaviour? 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:18:00 AM 
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Keith, if they want flavor-of-the-week, Michael Cera would be a great fit 
 for Banner as well. And the character would have to be written, IMO, the way 
 he's been done post-World War Hulk, after Banner and the Hulk were separated, 
 and Banner became a truly scary bastich who played mind games with everyone 
 around him. 
 
 
 On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@...  wrote: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 They need to quit worrying about name actors and just get an actor who 
 looks and can play the part. Eric Bana was way too buff and handsome for 
 Banner. Norton was probably closer, but his almost Shakespearean intensity 
 was a bit too much for the skinny, unsure, milksop that is Bruce Banner. I 
 think Phoenix would come off too much like a crazed mad scientist than the 
 puny Banner we need. Cast the net far and wide to find the right man, and 
 notoriety be hanged! That's the damn problem with H'Wood all the time. 
 
 Someone who looks the part, for example, would be Jon Cryer, the whiny 
 brother on Two and A Half Men. Not saying he *should* do it, but that's the 
 *look* you need for Banner-someone who looks soft and weak, as if he's never 
 seen the sun or the inside of a gym. 
 
  
 - Original Message - 
 From: Daryle Lockhart  dar...@...  
 
 So now I'm hearing they're talking seriously to Joaquin Phoenix. Which is 
 both awesome and frightening at the same time to me. 
 
 * 
 
 
 
 
 On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Cinque B wrote: 
 
 
 
 Marvel: Norton Won't Return As Hulk For 'Avengers'; Norton's Rep Responds 
 
 
 Source: Access Hollywood Sun Jul 11, 2010, 8:15 pm EDT 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Edward Norton won't be reprising his role as the Incredible Hulk in 2012's 
 The Avengers, a Marvel rep confirmed to Access Hollywood on Sunday. 
 
 Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige explained the decision in 
 a statement to HitFix . 
 
 VIEW THE PHOTOS: Edward Norton 
 
 We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title 
 role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers,' Feige told the site. Our decision 
 is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the 
 need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our 
 other talented cast members. 'The Avengers' demands players who thrive 
 working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, 
 Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a 
 name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the 
 iconic role in the coming weeks. 
 
 The actors referred to in the statement include current Marvel stars Robert 
 Downey Jr. ( Iron Man ), Chris Hemsworth (Thor), Chris Evans (Captain 
 America: The First Avenger), Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury), Scarlett 
 Johansson ( Iron Man 2's Black Widow), who are expected to reprise their 
 superhero roles in team-up film The Avengers. 
 
 VIEW THE PHOTOS: Scenes From ‘ The Incredible Hulk ’ 
 
 A rep for Norton responded to the statement to Hitfix on Sunday, calling it 
 purposefully misleading and claiming that his client had been in 
 discussions to return to the role. 
 
 This offensive statement from Kevin Feige at Marvel is a purposefully 
 misleading, inappropriate attempt to paint our client in a negative light, 
 the rep told the site. Here are the facts: two months ago, Kevin called me 
 and said he wanted Edward to reprise the role of Bruce Banner in 'The 
 Avengers.' He told me it would be his fantasy to bring Edward on stage with 
 the rest of the cast at [Comic-Con] and make it the event of the convention. 
 When I said that Edward was definitely open to this idea, Kevin was very 
 excited and we agreed that Edward should meet with [director] Joss Whedon to 
 discuss the project. Edward 

Re: [scifinoir2] Top 10 Evil Human Experiments

2010-07-13 Thread brent wodehouse
Gruesome. :-\


Brent
  

Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:

http://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/

Top 10 Evil Human Experiments

Share This- Published March 14, 2008 - 343 Comments

[WARNING] This list contains descriptions and images of human
experimentation which may cause offense to some readers.] Human
experimentation and research ethics evolved over time. On occasion, the
subjects of human experimentation have been prisoners, slaves, or even
family members. In some notable cases, doctors have performed experiments
on themselves when they have been unwilling to risk the lives of others.
This is known as self-experimentation. This is a list of the 10 most evil
and unethical experiments carried out on humans.





[scifinoir2] OT: Goldberg: Mel Gibson is Not a Racist

2010-07-13 Thread Keith Johnson
Brent, 

I owe you an apology for high-mindedly saying I don't like being privy to 
people's private thoughts and utterances, odious though they may be. I still 
feel that way. I hate knowing that Gibson is such a racist on this level. I 
don't get why his girlfriend chose to release this crap to Radar Online instead 
of just the cops. I think, like the other topics we've discussed recently of 
media coverage, we are becoming way too much of a nation where everyone wants 
to get their stuff out in the media for a variety of reasons. But, for all that 
I wish and think this stuff should never have been released this way, I must 
admit I've listened to it, and it sickens me. The only question I have is, why 
is *anyone* still surprised at Gibson's racism? The drunken rants when he was 
arrested were enough evidence, the disturbing anti-Semitic tones of The 
Passion of the Christ were troublesome as well. 

As for Whoopi Goldberg saying he's not a racist, I have no idea what the hell 
her definition is, but I'm not surprised. She's dealt with self-hatred and 
hatred of black people for a long time. I've noticed over the years how she 
attacks people who use the term African-American, saying she's just an 
American, as if the term were insulting. I note how refused to wear a ribbon 
against racism for the Oscars one year, and even did a riff on it, but 
curiously, she wore things supporting everything from gay rights to women's 
rights. And I note that, the same lady who gives people like Gibson a pass is 
very quick to attack other blacks. years ago she was given an Essence award I 
believe. (Might have been NAACP...) When she got the award, Goldberg proceeded 
to thank the audience, then tell them Y'all have made it hard on me--very 
hard. She berated the audience for all the years that blacks had laughed at 
her looks, not supported her, and made her feel ugly. Odd that she was so quick 
to attack blacks publicly, takes offense at black labels, yet can be so 
forgiving and understanding of racism like this. 

Oh yeah: I bet Danny Glover is saying, What the fu**, Mel?! 

 
http://www.examiner.com/x-15166-Comedy-Examiner~y2010m7d13-Whoopi-Goldberg-defends-Mel-Gibson-Mel-Gibson-is-not-a-racist
 



We've been following the goings-on over at the Mel Gibson Meltdownapalooza 
for the past few weeks. By now, you've probably heard one or more of the audio 
tapes that Gibson's ex has leaked to the press, so we don't need to reiterate 
the blatant hate-speech, misogyny, and-- let's face it-- flat-out threats that 
Gibson spits out during these tapes. This is the sorta situation that any 
reasonable, intelligent, rational thinking-person could look at and say, You 
know, I think that Mel Gibson's a bit of a racist, and probably a few other 
things. With that said, Whoopi Goldberg has sprung into action to defend Mel 
Gibson as decidedly un-racist. Read all about it below, my gentle Examiner 
readers... 

This Mel Gibson thing's really getting out of hand. The current news on the 
situation is that authorities are now looking into the Gibson/Oksana (that'd be 
his ex-wife) debacle for a multitude of reasons. On one side of the fence, 
you've got Gibson's camp accusing Oksana of trying to extor Gibson by releasing 
the tapes to the media. This side claims that Gibson was set-up and provoked 
into making the several audio tapes that have now leaked to the press. On the 
other side of the debate, you've got Gibson's ex's people, who claim that 
Gibson beat her up, threatened to plant her in (his) rose garden, and that 
Gibson's a flaming racist. Now, just because there aren't enough cooks in this 
particular kitchen, Whoopi Goldberg's got a few things to say: 



I have had a long friendship with Mel. You can say he's being a bonehead, but I 
can't sit and say that he's a racist having spent time with him in my house 
with my kids, added Goldberg, 54.I don't like what he's done, make no 
mistake, she went on. I'm not defending Mel. I'm simply saying I don't see 
him as [a racist] because that's not been my experience with him. 

That's Whoopi Goldberg speaking to MSN.com. She's apparently taken the stance 
that, while Gibson's behavior is certainly boneheaded, it's not necessarily 
racist. Goldberg's careful to add that she doesn't support Gibson's behavior or 
the things that he's said that might be construed as threatening to Gibson's ex 
or children, but that whole pack of n---gers thing definitely wasn't racist. 
With that in mind, let's take a trip down memory lane for the other non-racist 
and tolerant things that Gibson's been caught saying on camera, on tape, or by 
police officers with glorious breasts: 



You look like a f-cking pig in heat, and if you get raped by a pack of n---ers, 
it will be your fault. 



F-cking Jews... The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world… Are you 
a Jew? 



With this look, who's going to think I'm gay? I don't lend 

Re: [scifinoir2] Top 10 Evil Human Experiments

2010-07-13 Thread Keith Johnson
I saw the play Miss Evers' Boys here in Atlanta years ago, dealing with 
Tuskegee. It was mind-boggling that black people could have been involved in 
such a thing, but they were told that it was a way to show that we were human 
too, just like whites. The old  show them you're as good as them by showing 
you can die like them thing that's been used for everything from hazardous 
jobs to being cannon fodder in war. By the end of the play, when one guy dies 
onstage from his untreated syphillis, there wasn't a dry eye in the house, 
white or black, man or woman. 


- Original Message - 
From: brent wodehouse brent_wodeho...@thefence.us 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:07:09 PM 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Top 10 Evil Human Experiments 






Gruesome. :-\ 

Brent 


Mr. Worf  hellomahog...@gmail.com  wrote: 

 http://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/ 
 
Top 10 Evil Human Experiments 
 
Share This- Published March 14, 2008 - 343 Comments 
 
[WARNING] This list contains descriptions and images of human 
experimentation which may cause offense to some readers.] Human 
experimentation and research ethics evolved over time. On occasion, the 
subjects of human experimentation have been prisoners, slaves, or even 
family members. In some notable cases, doctors have performed experiments 
on themselves when they have been unwilling to risk the lives of others. 
This is known as self-experimentation. This is a list of the 10 most evil 
and unethical experiments carried out on humans. 

 




[scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

2010-07-13 Thread B Smith
Still thin but not frail. He's learned a few tricks and picked up some fighting 
skills. 

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote:

 Thanks for the update. Though snarky, isn't Banner still frail and weak 
 looking? 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: B Smith daikaij...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:41:55 PM 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Bruce Banner hasn't been the puny Banner stereotype for a long time. Banner 
 is a bit of a snarky so and so and that could lead to some nice exchanges 
 with Downey and Jackson. Norton played him just right but unfortunately he 
 was such a pain to work with he was dropped. 
 
 Michael Cera is way too young. Jason Bateman on the other hand could be 
 awesome. 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
  
  I wonder if Cera might not be a bit too young? I don't follow Hulk. What's 
  up with Banner's behaviour? 
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Martin Baxter martinbaxter7@ 
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:18:00 AM 
  Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers 
  Flick 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Keith, if they want flavor-of-the-week, Michael Cera would be a great fit 
  for Banner as well. And the character would have to be written, IMO, the 
  way he's been done post-World War Hulk, after Banner and the Hulk were 
  separated, and Banner became a truly scary bastich who played mind games 
  with everyone around him. 
  
  
  On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Keith Johnson  KeithBJohnson@  wrote: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  They need to quit worrying about name actors and just get an actor who 
  looks and can play the part. Eric Bana was way too buff and handsome for 
  Banner. Norton was probably closer, but his almost Shakespearean intensity 
  was a bit too much for the skinny, unsure, milksop that is Bruce Banner. I 
  think Phoenix would come off too much like a crazed mad scientist than the 
  puny Banner we need. Cast the net far and wide to find the right man, and 
  notoriety be hanged! That's the damn problem with H'Wood all the time. 
  
  Someone who looks the part, for example, would be Jon Cryer, the whiny 
  brother on Two and A Half Men. Not saying he *should* do it, but that's 
  the *look* you need for Banner-someone who looks soft and weak, as if he's 
  never seen the sun or the inside of a gym. 
  
   
  - Original Message - 
  From: Daryle Lockhart  daryle@  
  
  So now I'm hearing they're talking seriously to Joaquin Phoenix. Which is 
  both awesome and frightening at the same time to me. 
  
  * 
  
  
  
  
  On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Cinque B wrote: 
  
  
  
  Marvel: Norton Won't Return As Hulk For 'Avengers'; Norton's Rep Responds 
  
  
  Source: Access Hollywood Sun Jul 11, 2010, 8:15 pm EDT 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Edward Norton won't be reprising his role as the Incredible Hulk in 2012's 
  The Avengers, a Marvel rep confirmed to Access Hollywood on Sunday. 
  
  Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige explained the decision 
  in a statement to HitFix . 
  
  VIEW THE PHOTOS: Edward Norton 
  
  We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title 
  role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers,' Feige told the site. Our decision 
  is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the 
  need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of 
  our other talented cast members. 'The Avengers' demands players who thrive 
  working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, 
  Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a 
  name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the 
  iconic role in the coming weeks. 
  
  The actors referred to in the statement include current Marvel stars Robert 
  Downey Jr. ( Iron Man ), Chris Hemsworth (Thor), Chris Evans (Captain 
  America: The First Avenger), Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury), Scarlett 
  Johansson ( Iron Man 2's Black Widow), who are expected to reprise their 
  superhero roles in team-up film The Avengers. 
  
  VIEW THE PHOTOS: Scenes From ‘ The Incredible Hulk ’ 
  
  A rep for Norton responded to the statement to Hitfix on Sunday, calling it 
  purposefully misleading and claiming that his client had been in 
  discussions to return to the role. 
  
  This offensive statement from Kevin Feige at Marvel is a purposefully 
  misleading, inappropriate attempt to paint our client in a negative light, 
  the rep told the site. Here are the facts: two months ago, Kevin called me 
  and said he wanted Edward to reprise the role of Bruce Banner in 'The 
  Avengers.' He told me it would be his fantasy to 

[scifinoir2] 6 Coolest Inventions you Probably Didn’t Know Exis t

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
6 Coolest Inventions you Probably Didn’t Know Exist December 2, 2009 by
uphaa.blog http://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/author/admin/
 Progress Bar on a Traffic Light


A 
designhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#award
has been given for a concept that would allow existing traffic lights
to be retrofitted with progress bars that offer a visual representation of
when the light will change.
Damjan Stanković -the designer- promotes this stoplight as an eco solution
in the following ways: If you’ve got the amount of time you’ve got to stop
in front of you, you can shut your engine off, wait, be calm, and turn it
back on again when the time is almost up. This not only lessens the amount
of 
gashttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#you
use sitting still, but it lessens the amount of crazy madness you have
wondering if the stoplight is stuck, or just really, really long.Source
http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/11/30/a-better-understanding-of-stoplights/

  Waterproof Gadget Coating


Golden Shellback Coating is here and it is specifically created to protect
gizmoshttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#against
damage and loss of function due to harsh weather conditions and
moisture. This protective shield produces a vacuum-deposited film that is
non-flammable and insoluble in solvents. It is an ideal protection for
plastic, copper, aluminum, metal, ceramic, steel, tin, or glass.
The price of this excellent anti-corrosion coating depends on the equipment
you want to use it for. For the BlackBerry
Pearlhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#,
$120; the iPod Shuffle, $60; the iPod
Touchhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#$120.Source.
http://www.golden-shellback.com/
Airport Sleep Pods



Have you ever slept at the airport? For those of us who want the convenience
of 
sleepinghttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#at
the airport, without so much of the crazy, there’s these amazing
things
right here! 
“Sleephttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#Box”
they go by the name of, designed by Arch Group for those who need
private time in strange, unfriendly places!
There’s a thousand instances where the ideal personal cubical could come in
handy. Here’s one of them: the airport. In between flights, what do you do?
Sit in some marginally comfortable seats. Lots of time in between flights,
what do you do? Sleep box.
The box itself is 2mx1.4mx2.3m. The main bed is 2×0.6m, equipped with an
automatic system which changes the
linenshttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#(think
Fifth Element.) The bed is a soft, flexible strip of polymer and pulp
tissue.
Ventilation system, sound alerts, built-in LCD television, wireless internet
accesshttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#,
power sockets, extra luggage space under lounges. Payment is made in time,
anywhere from 15 minutes to several
hours.Sourcehttp://www.yankodesign.com/2009/11/12/airport-sleep-pods/

  Live Checking Card



Do you know who the Green Monster is? It’s that skunk-of-a-bill that you get
at the end of the month; it devours all your Dollars because you overspent!
Only if you could use something like the Live Checking Card! A Credit Card
won’t let you go beyond your limits. It’s a digital thang with an E-ink
display that allows you to check your payment history on it. It even
tracks your
bankhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#account’s
transaction through
RFIDhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#.
A cumulative amount shows up on the screen every time you swipe the card;
giving you your account balance on your finger tips.
Designers: Jin-young Yoon, Wook-sun Oh, Young-ho Lee  Jun-kyo Lee.
Sourcehttp://www.yankodesign.com/2009/11/26/kick-the-green-monster/
Hydropak – World’s First Portable Fuel Cell


The HydroPak is the world’s first commercially available fuel
cellhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#.
The system consists of a fuel cell and water-activated
power-cartridgehttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#.
Insert a hydrogen cartridge and add water, and the fuel cell would be
sufficient to recharge your laptop
computerhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#between
8 and 10 times. In addition, the HydroPak is designed with a common
AC outlet as well as x2 USB connectors, allowing you to connect/charge a
variety of appliances such as lights, television

[scifinoir2] 10 Bizarre Theories And The Facts Surrounding Them

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
10 Bizarre Theories And The Facts Surrounding Them

Share This javascript:void(0)- Published July 24, 2008 - 550
Commentshttp://listverse.com/2008/07/24/10-bizarre-theories-and-the-facts-surrounding-them/#idc-container

Previously we posted a list on conspiracy
theorieshttp://listverse.com/miscellaneous/another-10-conspiracy-theories/,
but the items on this list are not really suited to that genre. This is a
list of bizarre theories or beliefs that many people subscribe to – with a
list of the facts as far as modern science is concerned. This is not meant
as a criticism of believers, but as a discussion of the theories and facts.
10
Magic

[image: Picture
1-36]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/picture-1-36.png

The Theory: The theory is by using certain objects such as a
candlehttp://listverse.com/2008/07/24/10-bizarre-theories-and-the-facts-surrounding-them/#,
a dagger and a wide variety of things you can bend the universe to your will
completely ignoring the laws of physics and the practical laws of the
universe.

The facts: Many people claim that they can use such powers as summoning
demons, angels or other things and the OOBE or out of body experience under
laboratory conditions but no one has been able to prove it so far. There are
incidents that do defy logical explanations, such as some people’s claims of
using the Ouija board, though since none of these events can be proven it is
very weak evidence.

9
Reptoids

[image: Picture
2-17]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/picture-2-17.png

The Theory: This has to be one of the most outlandish theories ever brought
forth, it is claimed most famously by David Icke but as well by several
others. It states that the royal
familyhttp://listverse.com/2008/07/24/10-bizarre-theories-and-the-facts-surrounding-them/#of
Britain, President Bush’s family as well as many other higher ups are
actually aliens that are here to secretly take over earth, feeding off of
humans to maintain their “human form”.

The facts: Most of the theorists proof consists of enhanced photos of people
such as Mr. Bush with reptile looking eyes, though they have come forth with
many other forms of proof such as videos and other reptile aspects of the
reptoids here on earth. The videos all brought forth have been proven fake
or are so obviously fake no one has wasted time and resources to look into
it.
8
2008 is actually 1711

[image: Herman] http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/herman.jpg

The Theory: The theory here is that the early Middle Ages never existed and
we have been counting the earth almost 200 years older than it actually is.

The facts: Well, there is no solid way to prove or disprove it, since the
very theory says the carbon dating of this age is flawed. They also claim
the written test from that era is a forgery from people of that era. Though
they have not put forth a reason why and there is no solid evidence from
them to prove this theory since the basis of their theory stops us from
being able to scientifically prove they are wrong. It is a matter of who
believes what, though the evidence does seem to be stronger for the side
against the Middle Ages not existing. Since all this theory says is that the
carbon dating is incorrect and the writings are forgeries though we have an
almost perfect time line with the carbon dating we use, we can almost cast
this one aside without proof.
7
Nazi Advances

[image: Warbonds
Poster]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/warbonds-poster.jpg

The Theory: The theory is the Nazis were much farther ahead than technology
http://listverse.com/2008/07/24/10-bizarre-theories-and-the-facts-surrounding-them/#would
allow them to be at the time. It ranges wildly but one of the most
popular versions is that the Nazis landed on the moon as early as 1942 and
established a moon base on the dark side of the moon. They also had
establishments with at least half a dozen alien civilizations, and that the
remaining Nazis remain on the moon to this day.

The facts: There are so many holes in this Theory, for example most skeptics
believe that we haven’t had any contact at all with aliens as of yet, as
well the dark side of the moon is freezing, they would need amazing
machineryhttp://listverse.com/2008/07/24/10-bizarre-theories-and-the-facts-surrounding-them/#to
accomplish living there. They would need a way to renew all their
resources; this could be explained by growing plants for food and air. But
they would also need an energy source of some kind, which there would have
to be one not yet discovered by us back here on earth.
6
Hollow Earth

[image: Hollow Earth Complete Shell
Model]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/hollow-earth-complete-shell-model.gif

The Theory: The theory is the earth is actually hollow and is not filled
with magma. It ranges from there being several layered
shellshttp://listverse.com/2008/07/24/10-bizarre-theories-and-the-facts-surrounding-them/#on
the inside (usually four) to the inside 

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
How about Jackie Earle Haley?

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:17 PM, B Smith daikaij...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Still thin but not frail. He's learned a few tricks and picked up some
 fighting skills.

 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@...
 wrote:
 
  Thanks for the update. Though snarky, isn't Banner still frail and weak
 looking?
 
  - Original Message -
  From: B Smith daikaij...@...
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:41:55 PM
  Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers
 Flick
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Bruce Banner hasn't been the puny Banner stereotype for a long time.
 Banner is a bit of a snarky so and so and that could lead to some nice
 exchanges with Downey and Jackson. Norton played him just right but
 unfortunately he was such a pain to work with he was dropped.
 
  Michael Cera is way too young. Jason Bateman on the other hand could be
 awesome.
 
  --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@
 wrote:
  
   I wonder if Cera might not be a bit too young? I don't follow Hulk.
 What's up with Banner's behaviour?
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Martin Baxter martinbaxter7@
   To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:18:00 AM
   Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers
 Flick
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Keith, if they want flavor-of-the-week, Michael Cera would be a great
 fit for Banner as well. And the character would have to be written, IMO, the
 way he's been done post-World War Hulk, after Banner and the Hulk were
 separated, and Banner became a truly scary bastich who played mind games
 with everyone around him.
  
  
   On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Keith Johnson  KeithBJohnson@ 
 wrote:
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   They need to quit worrying about name actors and just get an actor
 who looks and can play the part. Eric Bana was way too buff and handsome for
 Banner. Norton was probably closer, but his almost Shakespearean intensity
 was a bit too much for the skinny, unsure, milksop that is Bruce Banner. I
 think Phoenix would come off too much like a crazed mad scientist than the
 puny Banner we need. Cast the net far and wide to find the right man, and
 notoriety be hanged! That's the damn problem with H'Wood all the time.
  
   Someone who looks the part, for example, would be Jon Cryer, the whiny
 brother on Two and A Half Men. Not saying he *should* do it, but that's
 the *look* you need for Banner-someone who looks soft and weak, as if he's
 never seen the sun or the inside of a gym.
  
   
   - Original Message -
   From: Daryle Lockhart  daryle@ 
  
   So now I'm hearing they're talking seriously to Joaquin Phoenix. Which
 is both awesome and frightening at the same time to me.
  
   *
  
  
  
  
   On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Cinque B wrote:
  
  
  
   Marvel: Norton Won't Return As Hulk For 'Avengers'; Norton's Rep
 Responds
  
  
   Source: Access Hollywood Sun Jul 11, 2010, 8:15 pm EDT
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Edward Norton won't be reprising his role as the Incredible Hulk in
 2012's The Avengers, a Marvel rep confirmed to Access Hollywood on Sunday.
  
   Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige explained the
 decision in a statement to HitFix .
  
   VIEW THE PHOTOS: Edward Norton
  
   We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the
 title role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers,' Feige told the site. Our
 decision is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted
 in the need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative
 spirit of our other talented cast members. 'The Avengers' demands players
 who thrive working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H,
 Chris E, Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to
 announce a name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate
 about the iconic role in the coming weeks.
  
   The actors referred to in the statement include current Marvel stars
 Robert Downey Jr. ( Iron Man ), Chris Hemsworth (Thor), Chris Evans
 (Captain America: The First Avenger), Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury),
 Scarlett Johansson ( Iron Man 2's Black Widow), who are expected to
 reprise their superhero roles in team-up film The Avengers.
  
   VIEW THE PHOTOS: Scenes From ‘ The Incredible Hulk ’
  
   A rep for Norton responded to the statement to Hitfix on Sunday,
 calling it purposefully misleading and claiming that his client had been
 in discussions to return to the role.
  
   This offensive statement from Kevin Feige at Marvel is a purposefully
 misleading, inappropriate attempt to paint our client in a negative light,
 the rep told the site. Here are the facts: two months ago, Kevin called me
 and said he wanted Edward to reprise the role of Bruce Banner in 'The
 Avengers.' He 

Re: [scifinoir2] Top 10 Evil Human Experiments

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
The Tuskegee experiment, as well as the things that were done in the
eugenics program (and other programs) is America's dark secret.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 I saw the play Miss Evers' Boys here in Atlanta years ago, dealing with
 Tuskegee. It was mind-boggling that black people could have been involved in
 such a thing, but they were told that it was a way to show that we were
 human too, just like whites. The old  show them you're as good as them by
 showing you can die like them thing that's been used for everything from
 hazardous jobs to being cannon fodder in war.  By the end of the play, when
 one guy dies onstage from his untreated syphillis, there wasn't a dry eye in
 the house, white or black, man or woman.



 - Original Message -
 From: brent wodehouse brent_wodeho...@thefence.us
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:07:09 PM
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Top 10 Evil Human Experiments



 Gruesome. :-\

 Brent


 Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com HelloMahogany%40gmail.com wrote:

 http://listverse.com/2008/03/14/top-10-evil-human-experiments/
 
 Top 10 Evil Human Experiments
 
 Share This- Published March 14, 2008 - 343 Comments
 
 [WARNING] This list contains descriptions and images of human
 experimentation which may cause offense to some readers.] Human
 experimentation and research ethics evolved over time. On occasion, the
 subjects of human experimentation have been prisoners, slaves, or even
 family members. In some notable cases, doctors have performed experiments
 on themselves when they have been unwilling to risk the lives of others.
 This is known as self-experimentation. This is a list of the 10 most evil
 and unethical experiments carried out on humans.

 



 




-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


Re: [scifinoir2] [Far, Far Away Off Topic] Is 2010 New York City, America's Summ

2010-07-13 Thread brent wodehouse
Ah, sadly, we are somewhat at odds then, Martin. You see, it's fiendishly
difficult to describe, but... Words fail me. The sight when one
encounters... when the vision of... ineffable. I guess the feeling...
beyond the ken of mere mortals (certainly this mortal :-). It pushes one
out of acceptable comportment into a sort of glassy-eyed delirium. You
see, there; it makes one confused and exhilarated at the same time.

Bother. 

I've ceased making sense. All I can be certain of is that the effect is
total. :-)


Brent


Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.com wrote:

Brent, as a Leg Man for Life, I am bereft.


On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 11:29 PM, brent wodehouse
brent_wodeho...@thefence.us wrote:

 

:-)

   
http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/07/is_2010_new_yor.php

Badonkadonk

Is 2010 New York City, America's Summer of Ass?

By Foster Kamer

Mon., Jul. 12 2010

The times, they change. The ebb and flow of the universe is simply
something to be gerneally understood as such, and nothing more. For
every
action, there's an equal reaction. And for every physics law, there's a
metaphysical plane to apply it to that generally shows its face when
you
look at it from the right direction at a certain point. Like this one.
From behind. In other words:

In 2009, New York City, and the rest of America had the Summer of
Death.

In 2010, New York City, and the rest of America has the Summer of Ass.

Because 2009 was the Summer, when, like, every celebrity died! And
that's
sad. So America must be rewarded with something. The revitalized
popularity emerging for big derrieres -- an easily-achievable physical
feat, one may argue -- is, of course, society's natural karmic award
for
bearing the pain of all those dead celebrities last year.

The New York Daily News didn't note this in their piece of the Summer
of
Ass -- which, by the way, Runnin' Scared Dot Com would like to
officially
get behind (heh) in a big way (heh, that's another big ass joke, right
there) -- but after much looking, and looking, and looking, and
talking to
impressively-assed celebrities like Kim Kardashian, they think they've
unlocked the secret of the reemergence of the ample back-asset
   
[http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/fashion/2010/07/12/2010-07-12_rearing_to_go_big_butts_are_summer_2010s_hottest_trend.html?page=1#ixzz0tTz6zgoG]:

'Gone are the days of being ashamed of a wider bottom, with America
becoming more diverse amid shifting standards, according to Stylesight
trend analyst Sharon Graubard. I think it's about the diversity of our
population and more accepted beauty, and a wider range of accepted
beauty, Graubard explains.'

Realize what a win-win situation this is for everyone:

* The Big-Bottomed: Pleased.
* The Ass Men: Pleased.
* The Workout Industry: Pleased.
* The Food Industry: Pleased.
* The Ass-Accentuating Denim Industry: Pleased.
* Pat Kiernan: Pleased
   
[http://www.patspapers.com/story_stack/item/everybody_likes_big_butts/].

Of all of society's ills, will the large-ass trend work to heal any of
them? Only time will tell. In the mean time, there's certainly one
marginalized group that may -- nay, must -- see something good yielded
by
all of this:

* The Booty Jam Nostalgists.
Lest you not understand what a Booty Jam is, all you need to know
is: It
is a song created for hyper-utilization by those with, um, big asses.
And
hopefully, these songs will come back, because they are amazing.
Certainly, you can have your Sir Mix-A-Lot, you may have your Apple
Bottom Jeans and your Nelly, but ah, you don't know anything about
Luke,
69 Boyz, and 2 Live Crew's heyday, until you experience it. Like this.



Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Goldberg: Mel Gibson is Not a Racist

2010-07-13 Thread brent wodehouse
No harm, no foul. I post, you comment. Fair play. :-)


Brent


Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net writes:


Brent,

I owe you an apology for high-mindedly saying I don't like being privy to
people's private thoughts and utterances, odious though they may be. I
still feel that way. I hate knowing that Gibson is such a racist on this
level. I don't get why his girlfriend chose to release this crap to Radar
Online instead of just the cops. I think, like the other topics we've
discussed recently of media coverage, we are becoming way too much of a
nation where everyone wants to get their stuff out in the media for a
variety of reasons.Ê But, for all that I wish and think this stuff should
never have been released this way, I must admit I've listened to it, and
it sickens me.Ê The only question I have is, why is *anyone* still
surprised at Gibson's racism? The drunken rants when he was arrested were
enough evidence, the disturbing anti-Semitic tones of The Passion of the
Christ were troublesome as well. 

As for Whoopi Goldberg saying he's not a racist, I have no idea what the
hell her definition is, but I'm not surprised. She's dealt with
self-hatred and hatred of black people for a long time. I've noticed over
the years how she attacks people who use the term African-American,
saying she's just an American, as if the term were insulting. I note
how refused to wear a ribbon against racism for the Oscars one year, and
even did a riff on it, but curiously, she wore things supporting
everything from gay rights to women's rights. And I note that, the same
lady who gives people like Gibson a pass is very quick to attack other
blacks. years ago she was given an Essence award I believe. (Might have
been NAACP...) When she got the award, Goldberg proceeded to thank the
audience, then tell them Y'all have made it hard on me--very hard. She
berated the audience for all the years that blacks had laughed at her
looks, not supported her, and made her feel ugly. Odd that she was so
quick to attack blacks publicly, takes offense at black labels,Ê yet
can be so forgiving and understanding of racism like this. 

Oh yeah: I bet Danny Glover is saying, What the fu**, Mel?!


http://www.examiner.com/x-15166-Comedy-Examiner~y2010m7d13-Whoopi-Goldberg-defends-Mel-Gibson-Mel-Gibson-is-not-a-racist



We've been following the goings-on over at the Mel Gibson
Meltdownapalooza for the past few weeks.Ê By now, you've probably heard
one or more of the audio tapes that Gibson's ex has leaked to the press,
so we don't need to reiterate the blatant hate-speech, misogyny, and--
let's face it-- flat-out threats that Gibson spits out during these
tapes.Ê This is the sorta situation that any reasonable, intelligent,
rational thinking-person could look at and say, You know, I think that
Mel Gibson's a bit of a racist, and probably a few other things.Ê With
that said, Whoopi Goldberg has sprung into action to defend Mel Gibson as
decidedly un-racist.Ê Read all about it below, my gentle Examiner
readers...

This Mel Gibson thing's really getting out of hand.Ê The current news on
the situation is that authorities are now looking into the Gibson/Oksana
(that'd be his ex-wife) debacle for a multitude of reasons.Ê On one side
of the fence, you've got Gibson's camp accusing Oksana of trying to extor
Gibson by releasing the tapes to the media.Ê This side claims that Gibson
was set-up and provoked into making the several audio tapes that have now
leaked to the press.Ê On the other side of the debate, you've got
Gibson's ex's people, who claim that Gibson beat her up, threatened to
plant her in (his) rose garden, and that Gibson's a flaming racist.Ê
Now, just because there aren't enough cooks in this particular kitchen,
Whoopi [
http://wonderwall.msn.com/tv/whoopi-goldberg-mel-gibson-is-not-a-racist-1560886.story?GT1=28135
]Goldberg's got a few things to say:



I have had a long friendship with Mel. You can say he's being a bonehead,
but I can't sit and say that he's a racist having spent time with him in
my house with my kids, added Goldberg, 54.I don't like what he's done,
make no mistake, she went on. I'm not defending Mel. I'm simply saying
I don't see him as [a racist] because that's not been my experience with
him.




That's Whoopi Goldberg speaking to MSN.com.Ê She's apparently taken the
stance that, while Gibson's behavior is certainly boneheaded, it's not
necessarily racist.Ê Goldberg's careful to add that she doesn't support
Gibson's behavior or the things that he's said that might be construed as
threatening to Gibson's ex or children, but that whole pack of n---gers
thing definitely wasn't racist.Ê With that in mind, let's take a trip
down memory lane for the other non-racist and tolerant things that
Gibson's been caught saying on camera, on tape, or by police officers
with glorious breasts:



You look like a f-cking pig in heat, and if you get raped by a pack of
n---ers, it will be 

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Goldberg: Mel Gibson is Not a Racist

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
I think Mel gets his racism from his father who is a well documented
anti-semite and conspiracy theorist.

I think Whoopi has bought into the Hollywood hype. She has been in the
Hollywood system so long that she has lost her bearings on reality. This
happens to a lot of people of color that gain acceptance through tokenism
and may have genuine white friends, but that does not mean that all is right
with the world.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 Brent,

 I owe you an apology for high-mindedly saying I don't like being privy to
 people's private thoughts and utterances, odious though they may be. I still
 feel that way. I hate knowing that Gibson is such a racist on this level. I
 don't get why his girlfriend chose to release this crap to Radar Online
 instead of just the cops. I think, like the other topics we've discussed
 recently of media coverage, we are becoming way too much of a nation where
 everyone wants to get their stuff out in the media for a variety of
 reasons.  But, for all that I wish and think this stuff should never have
 been released this way, I must admit I've listened to it, and it sickens
 me.  The only question I have is, why is *anyone* still surprised at
 Gibson's racism? The drunken rants when he was arrested were enough
 evidence, the disturbing anti-Semitic tones of The Passion of the Christ
 were troublesome as well.

 As for Whoopi Goldberg saying he's not a racist, I have no idea what the
 hell her definition is, but I'm not surprised. She's dealt with self-hatred
 and hatred of black people for a long time. I've noticed over the years how
 she attacks people who use the term African-American, saying she's just
 an American, as if the term were insulting. I note how refused to wear a
 ribbon against racism for the Oscars one year, and even did a riff on it,
 but curiously, she wore things supporting everything from gay rights to
 women's rights. And I note that, the same lady who gives people like Gibson
 a pass is very quick to attack other blacks. years ago she was given an
 Essence award I believe. (Might have been NAACP...) When she got the award,
 Goldberg proceeded to thank the audience, then tell them Y'all have made it
 hard on me--very hard. She berated the audience for all the years that
 blacks had laughed at her looks, not supported her, and made her feel ugly.
 Odd that she was so quick to attack blacks publicly, takes offense at
 black labels,  yet can be so forgiving and understanding of racism like
 this.

 Oh yeah: I bet Danny Glover is saying, What the fu**, Mel?!

 

 http://www.examiner.com/x-15166-Comedy-Examiner~y2010m7d13-Whoopi-Goldberg-defends-Mel-Gibson-Mel-Gibson-is-not-a-racisthttp://www.examiner.com/x-15166-Comedy-Examiner%7Ey2010m7d13-Whoopi-Goldberg-defends-Mel-Gibson-Mel-Gibson-is-not-a-racist

 *We've been following the goings-on over at the Mel Gibson
 Meltdownapalooza for the past few weeks.  By now, you've probably heard one
 or more of the audio tapes that Gibson's ex has leaked to the press, so we
 don't need to reiterate the blatant hate-speech, misogyny, and-- let's face
 it-- flat-out threats that Gibson spits out during these tapes.  This is the
 sorta situation that any reasonable, intelligent, rational thinking-person
 could look at and say, You know, I think that Mel Gibson's a bit of a
 racist, and probably a few other things.  With that said, Whoopi Goldberg
 has sprung into action to defend Mel Gibson as decidedly un-racist.  Read
 all about it below, my gentle Examiner readers...*

 This Mel Gibson thing's really getting out of hand.  The current news on
 the situation is that authorities are now looking into the Gibson/Oksana
 (that'd be his ex-wife) debacle for a multitude of reasons.  On one side of
 the fence, you've got Gibson's camp accusing Oksana of trying to extor
 Gibson by releasing the tapes to the media.  This side claims that Gibson
 was set-up and provoked into making the several audio tapes that have now
 leaked to the press.  On the other side of the debate, you've got Gibson's
 ex's people, who claim that Gibson beat her up, threatened to plant her in
 (his) rose garden, and that Gibson's a flaming racist.  Now, just because
 there aren't enough cooks in this particular kitchen, Whoopi Goldberg's
 got a few things to 
 say:http://wonderwall.msn.com/tv/whoopi-goldberg-mel-gibson-is-not-a-racist-1560886.story?GT1=28135

 *I have had a long friendship with Mel. You can say he's being a bonehead,
 but I can't sit and say that he's a racist having spent time with him in my
 house with my kids, added Goldberg, 54.I don't like what he's done, make
 no mistake, she went on. I'm not defending Mel. I'm simply saying I don't
 see him as [a racist] because that's not been my experience with him.*

 That's Whoopi Goldberg speaking to MSN.com.  She's apparently taken the
 stance that, while Gibson's behavior is certainly 

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Goldberg: Mel Gibson is Not a Racist

2010-07-13 Thread Tracy Curtis
The whole Whoppi Goldberg thing is bizarre.  I can't imagine hearing these
words from anyone I know and then trying to defend that person.

Does anyone else feel as though this recording is getting so much play just
because news outlets want to play slurs, even when they're bleeped?

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 I think Mel gets his racism from his father who is a well documented
 anti-semite and conspiracy theorist.

 I think Whoopi has bought into the Hollywood hype. She has been in the
 Hollywood system so long that she has lost her bearings on reality. This
 happens to a lot of people of color that gain acceptance through tokenism
 and may have genuine white friends, but that does not mean that all is right
 with the world.

 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Keith Johnson 
 keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 Brent,

 I owe you an apology for high-mindedly saying I don't like being privy to
 people's private thoughts and utterances, odious though they may be. I still
 feel that way. I hate knowing that Gibson is such a racist on this level. I
 don't get why his girlfriend chose to release this crap to Radar Online
 instead of just the cops. I think, like the other topics we've discussed
 recently of media coverage, we are becoming way too much of a nation where
 everyone wants to get their stuff out in the media for a variety of
 reasons.  But, for all that I wish and think this stuff should never have
 been released this way, I must admit I've listened to it, and it sickens
 me.  The only question I have is, why is *anyone* still surprised at
 Gibson's racism? The drunken rants when he was arrested were enough
 evidence, the disturbing anti-Semitic tones of The Passion of the Christ
 were troublesome as well.

 As for Whoopi Goldberg saying he's not a racist, I have no idea what the
 hell her definition is, but I'm not surprised. She's dealt with self-hatred
 and hatred of black people for a long time. I've noticed over the years how
 she attacks people who use the term African-American, saying she's just
 an American, as if the term were insulting. I note how refused to wear a
 ribbon against racism for the Oscars one year, and even did a riff on it,
 but curiously, she wore things supporting everything from gay rights to
 women's rights. And I note that, the same lady who gives people like Gibson
 a pass is very quick to attack other blacks. years ago she was given an
 Essence award I believe. (Might have been NAACP...) When she got the award,
 Goldberg proceeded to thank the audience, then tell them Y'all have made it
 hard on me--very hard. She berated the audience for all the years that
 blacks had laughed at her looks, not supported her, and made her feel ugly.
 Odd that she was so quick to attack blacks publicly, takes offense at
 black labels,  yet can be so forgiving and understanding of racism like
 this.

 Oh yeah: I bet Danny Glover is saying, What the fu**, Mel?!

 

 http://www.examiner.com/x-15166-Comedy-Examiner~y2010m7d13-Whoopi-Goldberg-defends-Mel-Gibson-Mel-Gibson-is-not-a-racisthttp://www.examiner.com/x-15166-Comedy-Examiner%7Ey2010m7d13-Whoopi-Goldberg-defends-Mel-Gibson-Mel-Gibson-is-not-a-racist

 *We've been following the goings-on over at the Mel Gibson
 Meltdownapalooza for the past few weeks.  By now, you've probably heard one
 or more of the audio tapes that Gibson's ex has leaked to the press, so we
 don't need to reiterate the blatant hate-speech, misogyny, and-- let's face
 it-- flat-out threats that Gibson spits out during these tapes.  This is the
 sorta situation that any reasonable, intelligent, rational thinking-person
 could look at and say, You know, I think that Mel Gibson's a bit of a
 racist, and probably a few other things.  With that said, Whoopi Goldberg
 has sprung into action to defend Mel Gibson as decidedly un-racist.  Read
 all about it below, my gentle Examiner readers...*

 This Mel Gibson thing's really getting out of hand.  The current news on
 the situation is that authorities are now looking into the Gibson/Oksana
 (that'd be his ex-wife) debacle for a multitude of reasons.  On one side of
 the fence, you've got Gibson's camp accusing Oksana of trying to extor
 Gibson by releasing the tapes to the media.  This side claims that Gibson
 was set-up and provoked into making the several audio tapes that have now
 leaked to the press.  On the other side of the debate, you've got Gibson's
 ex's people, who claim that Gibson beat her up, threatened to plant her in
 (his) rose garden, and that Gibson's a flaming racist.  Now, just because
 there aren't enough cooks in this particular kitchen, Whoopi Goldberg's
 got a few things to 
 say:http://wonderwall.msn.com/tv/whoopi-goldberg-mel-gibson-is-not-a-racist-1560886.story?GT1=28135

 *I have had a long friendship with Mel. You can say he's being a
 bonehead, but I can't sit and say that he's a racist having 

Re: [scifinoir2] 6 Coolest Inventions you Probably D idn’t Know Exist

2010-07-13 Thread Tracy Curtis
These are great.  Although I once saw a traffic light that did some kind of
crazy blinking when the caution light came on.  It was late.  It seemed
brighter than normal.  For a second, I thought it might mean something other
than what normal traffic lights mean.  I think I'm getting to the point
where I need some warning when the everyday changes.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 6 Coolest Inventions you Probably Didn’t Know Exist December 2, 2009 by
 uphaa.blog http://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/author/admin/
 Progress Bar on a Traffic Light


 A 
 designhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#award
  has been given for a concept that would allow existing traffic lights
 to be retrofitted with progress bars that offer a visual representation of
 when the light will change.
 Damjan Stanković -the designer- promotes this stoplight as an eco solution
 in the following ways: If you’ve got the amount of time you’ve got to stop
 in front of you, you can shut your engine off, wait, be calm, and turn it
 back on again when the time is almost up. This not only lessens the amount
 of 
 gashttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#you
  use sitting still, but it lessens the amount of crazy madness you have
 wondering if the stoplight is stuck, or just really, really long.Source
 http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/11/30/a-better-understanding-of-stoplights/

  Waterproof Gadget Coating


 Golden Shellback Coating is here and it is specifically created to protect
 gizmoshttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#against
  damage and loss of function due to harsh weather conditions and
 moisture. This protective shield produces a vacuum-deposited film that is
 non-flammable and insoluble in solvents. It is an ideal protection for
 plastic, copper, aluminum, metal, ceramic, steel, tin, or glass.
 The price of this excellent anti-corrosion coating depends on the equipment
 you want to use it for. For the BlackBerry 
 Pearlhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#,
 $120; the iPod Shuffle, $60; the iPod 
 Touchhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#$120.Source.
 http://www.golden-shellback.com/
 Airport Sleep Pods



 Have you ever slept at the airport? For those of us who want the
 convenience of 
 sleepinghttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#at
  the airport, without so much of the crazy, there’s these amazing things
 right here! 
 “Sleephttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#Box”
  they go by the name of, designed by Arch Group for those who need
 private time in strange, unfriendly places!
 There’s a thousand instances where the ideal personal cubical could come in
 handy. Here’s one of them: the airport. In between flights, what do you do?
 Sit in some marginally comfortable seats. Lots of time in between flights,
 what do you do? Sleep box.
 The box itself is 2mx1.4mx2.3m. The main bed is 2×0.6m, equipped with an
 automatic system which changes the 
 linenshttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#(think
  Fifth Element.) The bed is a soft, flexible strip of polymer and pulp
 tissue.
 Ventilation system, sound alerts, built-in LCD television, wireless internet
 accesshttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#,
 power sockets, extra luggage space under lounges. Payment is made in time,
 anywhere from 15 minutes to several 
 hours.Sourcehttp://www.yankodesign.com/2009/11/12/airport-sleep-pods/

  Live Checking Card



 Do you know who the Green Monster is? It’s that skunk-of-a-bill that you
 get at the end of the month; it devours all your Dollars because you
 overspent! Only if you could use something like the Live Checking Card! A
 Credit Card won’t let you go beyond your limits. It’s a digital thang with
 an E-ink display that allows you to check your payment history on it. It
 even tracks your 
 bankhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#account’s
  transaction through
 RFIDhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#.
 A cumulative amount shows up on the screen every time you swipe the card;
 giving you your account balance on your finger tips.
 Designers: Jin-young Yoon, Wook-sun Oh, Young-ho Lee  Jun-kyo Lee. 
 Sourcehttp://www.yankodesign.com/2009/11/26/kick-the-green-monster/
 Hydropak – World’s First Portable Fuel Cell


 The HydroPak is the world’s first commercially available fuel 
 cellhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#.
 The system consists of a fuel cell and water-activated 
 

Re: [scifinoir2] 6 Coolest Inventions you Probably D idn’t Know Exist

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
There really hasn't been any changes to the current redlight system for a
great while. Some areas have the smart intersection systems that will
sense a car. If there isn't a car in traveling across the intersection, the
system will speed up the light. It also allows emergency vehicles to control
the lights into their favor. (also the redlight cams which turned into an
expensive joke here. After several years and cities all over the state
installing them, they are starting to take them down because they don't
always work properly by capturing people making a right turn etc.)

I enjoy looking at new inventions that will change our lives a bit. For a
long time things felt stagnant.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Tracy Curtis tlcurti...@gmail.com wrote:



 These are great.  Although I once saw a traffic light that did some kind of
 crazy blinking when the caution light came on.  It was late.  It seemed
 brighter than normal.  For a second, I thought it might mean something other
 than what normal traffic lights mean.  I think I'm getting to the point
 where I need some warning when the everyday changes.


 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 6 Coolest Inventions you Probably Didn’t Know Exist December 2, 2009 by
 uphaa.blog http://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/author/admin/
 Progress Bar on a Traffic Light


 A 
 designhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#award
  has been given for a concept that would allow existing traffic lights
 to be retrofitted with progress bars that offer a visual representation of
 when the light will change.
 Damjan Stanković -the designer- promotes this stoplight as an eco solution
 in the following ways: If you’ve got the amount of time you’ve got to stop
 in front of you, you can shut your engine off, wait, be calm, and turn it
 back on again when the time is almost up. This not only lessens the amount
 of 
 gashttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#you
  use sitting still, but it lessens the amount of crazy madness you have
 wondering if the stoplight is stuck, or just really, really long.Source
 http://www.yankodesign.com/2009/11/30/a-better-understanding-of-stoplights/

  Waterproof Gadget Coating


 Golden Shellback Coating is here and it is specifically created to protect
 gizmoshttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#against
  damage and loss of function due to harsh weather conditions and
 moisture. This protective shield produces a vacuum-deposited film that is
 non-flammable and insoluble in solvents. It is an ideal protection for
 plastic, copper, aluminum, metal, ceramic, steel, tin, or glass.
 The price of this excellent anti-corrosion coating depends on the
 equipment you want to use it for. For the BlackBerry 
 Pearlhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#,
 $120; the iPod Shuffle, $60; the iPod 
 Touchhttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#$120.Source.
 http://www.golden-shellback.com/
 Airport Sleep Pods



 Have you ever slept at the airport? For those of us who want the
 convenience of 
 sleepinghttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#at
  the airport, without so much of the crazy, there’s these amazing things
 right here! 
 “Sleephttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#Box”
  they go by the name of, designed by Arch Group for those who need
 private time in strange, unfriendly places!
 There’s a thousand instances where the ideal personal cubical could come
 in handy. Here’s one of them: the airport. In between flights, what do you
 do? Sit in some marginally comfortable seats. Lots of time in between
 flights, what do you do? Sleep box.
 The box itself is 2mx1.4mx2.3m. The main bed is 2×0.6m, equipped with an
 automatic system which changes the 
 linenshttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#(think
  Fifth Element.) The bed is a soft, flexible strip of polymer and pulp
 tissue.
 Ventilation system, sound alerts, built-in LCD television, wireless internet
 accesshttp://www.uphaa.com/blog/index.php/6-coolest-inventions-you-probably-didnt-know-exist/#,
 power sockets, extra luggage space under lounges. Payment is made in time,
 anywhere from 15 minutes to several 
 hours.Sourcehttp://www.yankodesign.com/2009/11/12/airport-sleep-pods/

  Live Checking Card



 Do you know who the Green Monster is? It’s that skunk-of-a-bill that you
 get at the end of the month; it devours all your Dollars because you
 overspent! Only if you could use something like the Live Checking Card! A
 Credit Card won’t let you go beyond your limits. It’s a digital thang with
 an E-ink display that allows you to check your payment history on it. It
 even tracks your 

[scifinoir2] [] they still hating on Lebron

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
[image: http://cache0.bigcartel.com/product_images/25546133/HEadSouth.jpg]


http://kissmyassleb ron.bigcartel. com/product/ you-can-head- south-but-
your-mom- 
rides-westhttp://kissmyasslebron.bigcartel.com/product/you-can-head-south-but-your-mom-rides-west

Designated Hitter








-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Goldberg: Mel Gibson is Not a Racist

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
There could be a couple of things going on here. One could be that there are
some producers milking it for what its worth. (that's always a certainty)
The other is that someone is getting pleasure out of it because it is so
un-PC which is a conservative hot button. It fits right in with the
teabagger crap.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Tracy Curtis tlcurti...@gmail.com wrote:



 The whole Whoppi Goldberg thing is bizarre.  I can't imagine hearing these
 words from anyone I know and then trying to defend that person.

 Does anyone else feel as though this recording is getting so much play just
 because news outlets want to play slurs, even when they're bleeped?

 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 I think Mel gets his racism from his father who is a well documented
 anti-semite and conspiracy theorist.

 I think Whoopi has bought into the Hollywood hype. She has been in the
 Hollywood system so long that she has lost her bearings on reality. This
 happens to a lot of people of color that gain acceptance through tokenism
 and may have genuine white friends, but that does not mean that all is right
 with the world.

 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.net
  wrote:



 Brent,

 I owe you an apology for high-mindedly saying I don't like being privy to
 people's private thoughts and utterances, odious though they may be. I still
 feel that way. I hate knowing that Gibson is such a racist on this level. I
 don't get why his girlfriend chose to release this crap to Radar Online
 instead of just the cops. I think, like the other topics we've discussed
 recently of media coverage, we are becoming way too much of a nation where
 everyone wants to get their stuff out in the media for a variety of
 reasons.  But, for all that I wish and think this stuff should never have
 been released this way, I must admit I've listened to it, and it sickens
 me.  The only question I have is, why is *anyone* still surprised at
 Gibson's racism? The drunken rants when he was arrested were enough
 evidence, the disturbing anti-Semitic tones of The Passion of the Christ
 were troublesome as well.

 As for Whoopi Goldberg saying he's not a racist, I have no idea what the
 hell her definition is, but I'm not surprised. She's dealt with self-hatred
 and hatred of black people for a long time. I've noticed over the years how
 she attacks people who use the term African-American, saying she's just
 an American, as if the term were insulting. I note how refused to wear a
 ribbon against racism for the Oscars one year, and even did a riff on it,
 but curiously, she wore things supporting everything from gay rights to
 women's rights. And I note that, the same lady who gives people like Gibson
 a pass is very quick to attack other blacks. years ago she was given an
 Essence award I believe. (Might have been NAACP...) When she got the award,
 Goldberg proceeded to thank the audience, then tell them Y'all have made it
 hard on me--very hard. She berated the audience for all the years that
 blacks had laughed at her looks, not supported her, and made her feel ugly.
 Odd that she was so quick to attack blacks publicly, takes offense at
 black labels,  yet can be so forgiving and understanding of racism like
 this.

 Oh yeah: I bet Danny Glover is saying, What the fu**, Mel?!

 

 http://www.examiner.com/x-15166-Comedy-Examiner~y2010m7d13-Whoopi-Goldberg-defends-Mel-Gibson-Mel-Gibson-is-not-a-racisthttp://www.examiner.com/x-15166-Comedy-Examiner%7Ey2010m7d13-Whoopi-Goldberg-defends-Mel-Gibson-Mel-Gibson-is-not-a-racist

 *We've been following the goings-on over at the Mel Gibson
 Meltdownapalooza for the past few weeks.  By now, you've probably heard one
 or more of the audio tapes that Gibson's ex has leaked to the press, so we
 don't need to reiterate the blatant hate-speech, misogyny, and-- let's face
 it-- flat-out threats that Gibson spits out during these tapes.  This is the
 sorta situation that any reasonable, intelligent, rational thinking-person
 could look at and say, You know, I think that Mel Gibson's a bit of a
 racist, and probably a few other things.  With that said, Whoopi Goldberg
 has sprung into action to defend Mel Gibson as decidedly un-racist.  Read
 all about it below, my gentle Examiner readers...*

 This Mel Gibson thing's really getting out of hand.  The current news on
 the situation is that authorities are now looking into the Gibson/Oksana
 (that'd be his ex-wife) debacle for a multitude of reasons.  On one side of
 the fence, you've got Gibson's camp accusing Oksana of trying to extor
 Gibson by releasing the tapes to the media.  This side claims that Gibson
 was set-up and provoked into making the several audio tapes that have now
 leaked to the press.  On the other side of the debate, you've got Gibson's
 ex's people, who claim that Gibson beat her up, threatened to plant her in
 (his) 

Re: [scifinoir2] 10 Extremely Weird Religions

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
They hold on to stuff for a long time. Have you seen that Travel Channel
show about the tribe from New Guinea that comes to America? The chief's
father met a couple of white guys during WW2 and sent a group to the US to
find him.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:



 I laugh my narrow a$$ off at this, especially the Prince Philip Movement.
 Wonder if those brothers know that their deity is a racist bastich...


 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:



 http://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/ Originally,
 I wasn't going to post this, but I noticed that 2 of the groups were African
 American.

 10 Extremely Weird Religions

 Share This- Published September 10, 2009 by *JFrater* - 318 
 Commentshttp://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/#idc-container

 We have previously published a variety of lists on strange religious
 practices http://listverse.com/2007/08/13/10-weird-religious-practices/,
 religions you never knew 
 existedhttp://listverse.com/2008/07/08/top-10-religions-you-never-knew-existed/,
 and weird cults http://listverse.com/2007/09/15/top-10-cults/, but not
 a list of bizarre religions. This list is designed to fill the gap by
 discussing ten religions that most of us have not heard of (for good reason
 as you will see). Be sure to use the comments to tell us about any other
 bizarre religions and, especially, your own experiences of them.

 10
 Scientology

 [image: 
 Scientology1-2]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/scientology1-2.jpg

 Scientology has featured on a previous list, but if I didn’t include it
 here the comments would be inundated with “where’s scientology?” questions.
 The Church of Scientology is a cult created by L Ron Hubbard (Elron) in 1952
 as an outgrowth of his earlier self-help system called Dianetics. The Church
 of Scientology holds that at the higher levels of initiation (OT levels)
 mystical teachings are imparted that may be harmful to unprepared readers.
 These teachings are kept secret from members who have not reached these
 levels. In the OT levels, Hubbard explains how to reverse the effects of
 past-life trauma patterns that supposedly extend millions of years into the
 past. Among these advanced teachings is the story of Xenu (sometimes Xemu),
 introduced as an alien ruler of the “Galactic Confederacy.” According to
 this story, 75 million years ago Xenu brought billions of people to Earth in
 spacecraft resembling Douglas DC-8 airliners, stacked them around volcanoes
 and detonated hydrogen bombs in the volcanoes. The thetans then clustered
 together, stuck to the bodies of the living, and continue to do this today.
 Scientologists at advanced levels place considerable emphasis on isolating
 body thetans and neutralizing their ill effects.

 9
 Creativity Movement

 [image: Splc Hale 
 350X4501]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/splc_hale_350x4501.jpg

 The Creativity Movement (formerly known as World Church Of The Creator),
 is a white separatist organization that advocates the whites-only religion,
 Creativity. It was also a descriptive phrase used by Ben Klassen, that
 included all adherents of the religion. The use of the term creator does not
 refer to a deity, but rather to themselves (white people). Despite the
 former use of the word Church in its name, the movement is atheistic.
 Creativity is a White Separatist religion that was founded by Ben Klassen in
 early 1973 under the name Church of the Creator. After Klassen’s death in
 1993, Creativity almost died out as a religion until the New Church of the
 Creator was established three years later by Matthew F. Hale as its Pontifex
 Maximus (high priest), until his incarceration in January 2003 for plotting
 with the movement’s head of security, Anthony Evola (an FBI informant), to
 murder a federal judge.

 8
 Thee Temple ov Psychick Youth

 [image: Picture 
 2-81]http://listverse.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/picture-2-81.png

 Obviously spelling is not a fundamental part of this religion! Thee Temple
 ov Psychick Youth (TOPY) was founded in 1981 by members of Psychic 
 TVhttp://listverse.com/2009/09/10/10-extremely-weird-religions/#,
 Coil, Current 93, and a number of other individuals. The ever-evolving
 network is a loosely federated group of people operating as a unique blend
 of artistic collective, and practitioners of magic. TOPY is dedicated to the
 manifestation of magical concepts lacking mysticism or the worship of gods.
 The group focuses on the psychic and magical aspects of the human brain
 linked with “guiltless sexuality”. Throughout its existence, TOPY has been
 an influential group in the underground Chaos magic scene and in the wider
 western occult tradition. TOPY’s research has covered both Left-hand path
 and Right-hand path magick, various elements of psychology, art, music, and
 a variety of other media. Some of the influences on the 

[scifinoir2] Pawn Stars

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
This week's episode of Pawn Stars features a brotha in Vegas selling his
Transformers collection of over 1000 pieces! He has one of the largest
collections outside of Hasbro ever seen.




-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


[scifinoir2] No mobile phone coverage? No worries, researchers put a tower in a phone

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
No mobile phone coverage? No worries, researchers put a tower in a phone

By Darren Quick http://www.gizmag.com/author/darren-quick/

*23:49 July 12, 2010*

4 
Commentshttp://www.gizmag.com/serval-mobile-phone-network/15696/?utm_source=Gizmag+Subscribersutm_campaign=7ac4b1b9b5-UA-2235360-4utm_medium=email#comments
  [image: Australian researchers have developed software that creates a mesh
network using Wi-Fi
ena...]http://www.gizmag.com/serval-mobile-phone-network/15696/picture/117609/

Australian researchers have developed software that creates a mesh network
using Wi-Fi enabled mobile phones (Image:
dbrulzhttp://www.flickr.com/photos/dbrulz/via Flickr)
  Flexible Cell Phone
Planhttp://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=lai=BZ3nHJuE8TIn6LY38qAOmjsnKCsax222uxt3EFMCNtwGAxWYQARgBILPc-gEoBDgAUOS8zqQFYMmO8IbIo6AZoAGuwqP6A7IBDnd3dy5naXptYWcuY29tugEKMzAweDI1MF9qc8gBAdoBjAFodHRwOi8vd3d3Lmdpem1hZy5jb20vc2VydmFsLW1vYmlsZS1waG9uZS1uZXR3b3JrLzE1Njk2Lz91dG1fc291cmNlPUdpem1hZytTdWJzY3JpYmVycyZ1dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249N2FjNGIxYjliNS1VQS0yMjM1MzYwLTQmdXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbIACAagDAegD_gLoA_8C6AOGA-gDaPUDRAnum=1sig=AGiWqtxUwW3CfnwIHIKTMGVKQn-9a4wF4Aclient=ca-pub-1607124478120364adurl=http://consumercellular.imswebmktg.com/consumercellular/unique/113273.php%3F%26cm_mmc%3DGoogle-_-SEM-_-Content-_-Compet_Serv%26KEYWORD%3Djitterbug%2520cell%2520phone%2520plans-
www.ConsumerCellular.comhttp://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=lai=BZ3nHJuE8TIn6LY38qAOmjsnKCsax222uxt3EFMCNtwGAxWYQARgBILPc-gEoBDgAUOS8zqQFYMmO8IbIo6AZoAGuwqP6A7IBDnd3dy5naXptYWcuY29tugEKMzAweDI1MF9qc8gBAdoBjAFodHRwOi8vd3d3Lmdpem1hZy5jb20vc2VydmFsLW1vYmlsZS1waG9uZS1uZXR3b3JrLzE1Njk2Lz91dG1fc291cmNlPUdpem1hZytTdWJzY3JpYmVycyZ1dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249N2FjNGIxYjliNS1VQS0yMjM1MzYwLTQmdXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbIACAagDAegD_gLoA_8C6AOGA-gDaPUDRAnum=1sig=AGiWqtxUwW3CfnwIHIKTMGVKQn-9a4wF4Aclient=ca-pub-1607124478120364adurl=http://consumercellular.imswebmktg.com/consumercellular/unique/113273.php%3F%26cm_mmc%3DGoogle-_-SEM-_-Content-_-Compet_Serv%26KEYWORD%3Djitterbug%2520cell%2520phone%2520plans
Same nationwide coverage-low rates. Plans start at $10/mo. Enroll Now!
Google Mobile 
Advertisinghttp://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=lai=BvNQbJuE8TIn6LY38qAOmjsnKCsXt2bMB1fC1qxDAjbcBwNPwAhACGAIgs9z6ASgEOABQv57h2Pj_AWDJjvCGyKOgGaAB-6yE-wOyAQ53d3cuZ2l6bWFnLmNvbboBCjMwMHgyNTBfanPIAQHaAYwBaHR0cDovL3d3dy5naXptYWcuY29tL3NlcnZhbC1tb2JpbGUtcGhvbmUtbmV0d29yay8xNTY5Ni8_dXRtX3NvdXJjZT1HaXptYWcrU3Vic2NyaWJlcnMmdXRtX2NhbXBhaWduPTdhYzRiMWI5YjUtVUEtMjIzNTM2MC00JnV0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWyoAwHoA_4C6AP_AugDhgPoA2j1AwAAAEQnum=2sig=AGiWqtxac9rsc5Hkd5tqYtRFehzagtFLeQclient=ca-pub-1607124478120364adurl=http://www.google.com/mobileads/advertiser_home.html-
adwords.google.comhttp://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=lai=BvNQbJuE8TIn6LY38qAOmjsnKCsXt2bMB1fC1qxDAjbcBwNPwAhACGAIgs9z6ASgEOABQv57h2Pj_AWDJjvCGyKOgGaAB-6yE-wOyAQ53d3cuZ2l6bWFnLmNvbboBCjMwMHgyNTBfanPIAQHaAYwBaHR0cDovL3d3dy5naXptYWcuY29tL3NlcnZhbC1tb2JpbGUtcGhvbmUtbmV0d29yay8xNTY5Ni8_dXRtX3NvdXJjZT1HaXptYWcrU3Vic2NyaWJlcnMmdXRtX2NhbXBhaWduPTdhYzRiMWI5YjUtVUEtMjIzNTM2MC00JnV0bV9tZWRpdW09ZW1haWyoAwHoA_4C6AP_AugDhgPoA2j1AwAAAEQnum=2sig=AGiWqtxac9rsc5Hkd5tqYtRFehzagtFLeQclient=ca-pub-1607124478120364adurl=http://www.google.com/mobileads/advertiser_home.html
Reach Your Customers On-The-Go! Start With Google Mobile Ads Today.
Listen-In on Phone
Callshttp://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=lai=BGK7DJuE8TIn6LY38qAOmjsnKCo-HrdYB5-uXpSLAjbcB8OYXEAMYAyCz3PoBKAQ4AFCzhKjz-f8BYMmO8IbIo6AZoAGh_IzuA7IBDnd3dy5naXptYWcuY29tugEKMzAweDI1MF9qc8gBAdoBjAFodHRwOi8vd3d3Lmdpem1hZy5jb20vc2VydmFsLW1vYmlsZS1waG9uZS1uZXR3b3JrLzE1Njk2Lz91dG1fc291cmNlPUdpem1hZytTdWJzY3JpYmVycyZ1dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249N2FjNGIxYjliNS1VQS0yMjM1MzYwLTQmdXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbIACAagDAegD_gLoA_8C6AOGA-gDaPUDRAnum=3sig=AGiWqtxDdoSipqyopLapnU2ea-71qLenuQclient=ca-pub-1607124478120364adurl=http://www.TheCellSnoop.com-
www.TheCellSnoop.comhttp://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/aclk?sa=lai=BGK7DJuE8TIn6LY38qAOmjsnKCo-HrdYB5-uXpSLAjbcB8OYXEAMYAyCz3PoBKAQ4AFCzhKjz-f8BYMmO8IbIo6AZoAGh_IzuA7IBDnd3dy5naXptYWcuY29tugEKMzAweDI1MF9qc8gBAdoBjAFodHRwOi8vd3d3Lmdpem1hZy5jb20vc2VydmFsLW1vYmlsZS1waG9uZS1uZXR3b3JrLzE1Njk2Lz91dG1fc291cmNlPUdpem1hZytTdWJzY3JpYmVycyZ1dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249N2FjNGIxYjliNS1VQS0yMjM1MzYwLTQmdXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbIACAagDAegD_gLoA_8C6AOGA-gDaPUDRAnum=3sig=AGiWqtxDdoSipqyopLapnU2ea-71qLenuQclient=ca-pub-1607124478120364adurl=http://www.TheCellSnoop.com
Read Text Messages - Cell Phone Spy Undetectable! Works with All Phones
Call any Country from

[scifinoir2] Re: Consumer Reports will not recommend Apple iPhone 4

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
G4 reported today that Apple has been deleting posts on the Consumer Reports
article from their group websites. Hmmm that was a m$ move there.

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com wrote:

 Consumer Reports will not recommend Apple iPhone 4

-
- [image: Digg] Digg This
- [image: Twitter] Tweet This
- [image: LinkedIn]Share on LinkedIn
- [image: Facebook] Share on Facebook

Related News

- Analysis: ATT shares look cheap compared with 
 Verizon'shttp://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6684XP20100709
Fri, Jul 9 2010
- ATT, Alcatel Lucent find glitch affecting iPhone 
 4http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6664BO20100707
Wed, Jul 7 2010
- UPDATE 3-Apple says iPhones overstate signal 
 strengthhttp://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN0220253620100702
Fri, Jul 2 2010
- Consumers sue Apple over iPhone antenna 
 problemshttp://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6603R620100701
Thu, Jul 1 2010
- Passengers sue to block UAL/Continental 
 mergerhttp://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2915358320100629
Tue, Jun 29 2010

   Related Topics

- Technology » http://www.reuters.com/news/technology
- ipad » http://www.reuters.com/subjects/ipad
- Hot Stocks » http://www.reuters.com/finance/markets/hotStocks
- Asian Markets » http://www.reuters.com/finance/markets/asia
- Media » http://www.reuters.com/news/media
- Regulatory News » http://www.reuters.com/finance/deals/regulatory

  [image: A customer looks at an iPhone 4 at the Apple Store 5th Avenue
 in New York, in this June 24, 2010 file photo. REUTERS/Eric Thayer/Files]

 A customer looks at an iPhone 4 at the Apple Store 5th Avenue in New York,
 in this June 24, 2010 file photo.

 Credit: Reuters/Eric Thayer/Files

 SAN FRANCISCO | Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:01pm EDT

 SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Consumer Reports said it cannot recommend
 Apple's iPhone 4 to buyers after tests confirmed the device's
 well-publicized reception glitches.

 It added that that ATT Inc, the exclusive mobile phone carrier for the
 iPhone 4, was not necessarily the main culprit.

 The influential nonprofit organization, which publishes guides on
 everything from cars to TVs, said in a report released on Monday that it
 also tested other phones -- including the iPhone 3GS and Palm Pre -- and
 found none had the signal-loss problems of Apple's latest iPhone.

 The report was the latest blow to the iPhone 4, which sold 1.7 million
 units in its first three days on the market but has been plagued by
 complaints of poor reception. Many of the complaints involve a wraparound
 antenna whose signal strength is said to be affected if touched in a certain
 way.

 Kaufman Bros analyst Shaw Wu said he was surprised by the stance that
 Consumer Reports took on the new iPhone. Wu noted that the group's
 recommendations are used as a guide by many consumers.

 Consumer reports is a respected publication. This could have an impact on
 iPhone sales, Wu said.

 Apple shares were down 1 percent at $257.06 on Monday afternoon on the
 Nasdaq.

 The company has been sued by iPhone customers in at least three complaints
 related to antenna problems.

 When your finger or hand touches a spot on the phone's lower left side --
 an easy thing, especially for lefties -- the signal can significantly
 degrade enough to cause you to lose your connection altogether if you're in
 an area with a weak signal, contributor Mike Gikas said in a report on the
 Consumer Reports website.

 Our findings call into question the recent claim by Apple that the iPhone
 4's signal-strength issues were largely an optical illusion caused by faulty
 software that 'mistakenly displays 2 more bars than it should for a given
 signal strength,' Gikas said.

 Apple did not respond to a request for comment.

 Gikas recommended covering the gap in the wraparound antenna with duct tape
 or some other non-conductive material.

 Apple has said almost any cellphone will suffer a loss of signal if held in
 certain ways. It said later it had discovered a software glitch that
 overstates signal strength, though it did not directly address concerns
 about the antenna with that admission.

 On the flip side, Consumer Reports said the iPhone scored high on other
 testing grounds such as battery life, sharp display and high-quality video
 camera.

 However, Gikas said the signal problem was the reason the iPhone 4 would
 not be classified as a recommended device in its smartphone ratings.

 Apple needs to come out with a permanent -- and free -- fix to the antenna
 problem before we can recommend the iPhone4, said Gikas in his blog post on
 ConsumerReports.org.

 (Reporting by Carolina Madrid and Gabriel 
 Madwayhttp://blogs.reuters.com/search/journalist.php?edition=usn=gabriel.madway;;
 Editing by Edwin Chan, Matthew 
 Lewishttp://blogs.reuters.com/search/journalist.php?edition=usn=matthew.lewis;and
  Steve Orlofsky)


 --
 Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity 

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

2010-07-13 Thread Keith Johnson
Wow, thanks for the correction! Is the book any better? Like I said, I've never 
been a fan, and the whole Red Hulk and Son of Hulk storylines haven't drawn me 
in at all. 

- Original Message - 
From: B Smith daikaij...@yahoo.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:17:25 PM 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick 






Still thin but not frail. He's learned a few tricks and picked up some fighting 
skills. 

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote: 
 
 Thanks for the update. Though snarky, isn't Banner still frail and weak 
 looking? 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: B Smith daikaij...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:41:55 PM 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Bruce Banner hasn't been the puny Banner stereotype for a long time. Banner 
 is a bit of a snarky so and so and that could lead to some nice exchanges 
 with Downey and Jackson. Norton played him just right but unfortunately he 
 was such a pain to work with he was dropped. 
 
 Michael Cera is way too young. Jason Bateman on the other hand could be 
 awesome. 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
  
  I wonder if Cera might not be a bit too young? I don't follow Hulk. What's 
  up with Banner's behaviour? 
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Martin Baxter martinbaxter7@ 
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:18:00 AM 
  Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers 
  Flick 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Keith, if they want flavor-of-the-week, Michael Cera would be a great fit 
  for Banner as well. And the character would have to be written, IMO, the 
  way he's been done post-World War Hulk, after Banner and the Hulk were 
  separated, and Banner became a truly scary bastich who played mind games 
  with everyone around him. 
  
  
  On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Keith Johnson  KeithBJohnson@  wrote: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  They need to quit worrying about name actors and just get an actor who 
  looks and can play the part. Eric Bana was way too buff and handsome for 
  Banner. Norton was probably closer, but his almost Shakespearean intensity 
  was a bit too much for the skinny, unsure, milksop that is Bruce Banner. I 
  think Phoenix would come off too much like a crazed mad scientist than the 
  puny Banner we need. Cast the net far and wide to find the right man, and 
  notoriety be hanged! That's the damn problem with H'Wood all the time. 
  
  Someone who looks the part, for example, would be Jon Cryer, the whiny 
  brother on Two and A Half Men. Not saying he *should* do it, but that's 
  the *look* you need for Banner-someone who looks soft and weak, as if he's 
  never seen the sun or the inside of a gym. 
  
   
  - Original Message - 
  From: Daryle Lockhart  daryle@  
  
  So now I'm hearing they're talking seriously to Joaquin Phoenix. Which is 
  both awesome and frightening at the same time to me. 
  
  * 
  
  
  
  
  On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Cinque B wrote: 
  
  
  
  Marvel: Norton Won't Return As Hulk For 'Avengers'; Norton's Rep Responds 
  
  
  Source: Access Hollywood Sun Jul 11, 2010, 8:15 pm EDT 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Edward Norton won't be reprising his role as the Incredible Hulk in 2012's 
  The Avengers, a Marvel rep confirmed to Access Hollywood on Sunday. 
  
  Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige explained the decision 
  in a statement to HitFix . 
  
  VIEW THE PHOTOS: Edward Norton 
  
  We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title 
  role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers,' Feige told the site. Our decision 
  is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the 
  need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of 
  our other talented cast members. 'The Avengers' demands players who thrive 
  working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, 
  Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a 
  name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the 
  iconic role in the coming weeks. 
  
  The actors referred to in the statement include current Marvel stars Robert 
  Downey Jr. ( Iron Man ), Chris Hemsworth (Thor), Chris Evans (Captain 
  America: The First Avenger), Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury), Scarlett 
  Johansson ( Iron Man 2's Black Widow), who are expected to reprise their 
  superhero roles in team-up film The Avengers. 
  
  VIEW THE PHOTOS: Scenes From ‘ The Incredible Hulk ’ 
  
  A rep for Norton responded to the statement to Hitfix on Sunday, calling it 
  purposefully misleading and claiming that his client had been 

Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

2010-07-13 Thread Keith Johnson
Dude, he would be freaking awesome as Banner! I wonder if the suits would think 
he looks too creepy, like Phoenix? He'd meet the criteria for this new edgy 
Banner Brent mentioned. 

- Original Message - 
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:41:43 PM 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers 
Flick 






How about Jackie Earle Haley? 


On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:17 PM, B Smith  daikaij...@yahoo.com  wrote: 


Still thin but not frail. He's learned a few tricks and picked up some fighting 
skills. 


--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@... wrote: 
 

 Thanks for the update. Though snarky, isn't Banner still frail and weak 
 looking? 
 
 - Original Message - 



 From: B Smith daikaij...@... 
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:41:55 PM 
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Bruce Banner hasn't been the puny Banner stereotype for a long time. Banner 
 is a bit of a snarky so and so and that could lead to some nice exchanges 
 with Downey and Jackson. Norton played him just right but unfortunately he 
 was such a pain to work with he was dropped. 
 
 Michael Cera is way too young. Jason Bateman on the other hand could be 
 awesome. 
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@ wrote: 
  
  I wonder if Cera might not be a bit too young? I don't follow Hulk. What's 
  up with Banner's behaviour? 
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Martin Baxter martinbaxter7@ 
  To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:18:00 AM 
  Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers 
  Flick 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Keith, if they want flavor-of-the-week, Michael Cera would be a great fit 
  for Banner as well. And the character would have to be written, IMO, the 
  way he's been done post-World War Hulk, after Banner and the Hulk were 
  separated, and Banner became a truly scary bastich who played mind games 
  with everyone around him. 
  
  
  On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Keith Johnson  KeithBJohnson@  wrote: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  They need to quit worrying about name actors and just get an actor who 
  looks and can play the part. Eric Bana was way too buff and handsome for 
  Banner. Norton was probably closer, but his almost Shakespearean intensity 
  was a bit too much for the skinny, unsure, milksop that is Bruce Banner. I 
  think Phoenix would come off too much like a crazed mad scientist than the 
  puny Banner we need. Cast the net far and wide to find the right man, and 
  notoriety be hanged! That's the damn problem with H'Wood all the time. 
  
  Someone who looks the part, for example, would be Jon Cryer, the whiny 
  brother on Two and A Half Men. Not saying he *should* do it, but that's 
  the *look* you need for Banner-someone who looks soft and weak, as if he's 
  never seen the sun or the inside of a gym. 
  
   
  - Original Message - 
  From: Daryle Lockhart  daryle@  
  
  So now I'm hearing they're talking seriously to Joaquin Phoenix. Which is 
  both awesome and frightening at the same time to me. 
  
  * 
  
  
  
  
  On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Cinque B wrote: 
  
  
  
  Marvel: Norton Won't Return As Hulk For 'Avengers'; Norton's Rep Responds 
  
  
  Source: Access Hollywood Sun Jul 11, 2010, 8:15 pm EDT 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Edward Norton won't be reprising his role as the Incredible Hulk in 2012's 
  The Avengers, a Marvel rep confirmed to Access Hollywood on Sunday. 
  
  Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige explained the decision 
  in a statement to HitFix . 
  
  VIEW THE PHOTOS: Edward Norton 
  
  We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title 
  role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers,' Feige told the site. Our decision 
  is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the 
  need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of 
  our other talented cast members. 'The Avengers' demands players who thrive 
  working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, 
  Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a 
  name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the 
  iconic role in the coming weeks. 
  
  The actors referred to in the statement include current Marvel stars Robert 
  Downey Jr. ( Iron Man ), Chris Hemsworth (Thor), Chris Evans (Captain 
  America: The First Avenger), Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury), Scarlett 
  Johansson ( Iron Man 2's Black Widow), who are expected to reprise their 
  superhero roles in team-up film The Avengers. 
  
  VIEW THE PHOTOS: Scenes From ‘ The Incredible Hulk ’ 

  
  A rep for 

Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Goldberg: Mel Gibson is Not a Racist

2010-07-13 Thread Keith Johnson
You're right on both counts. Gibson's dad spends his time as a traveling 
Holocaust denier. Gibson subscribes to some older tenets of the Catholic 
Church--officially abandoned by the church a few decades back--that lean more 
toward things such as condemning the Jews for the Crucifixtion. I have 
certainly known closet bigots on this level in my life, but it's been a 
while... 
As for Goldberg, unfortunately I have friends and relatives just like that. 
They condemn blacks for all the wrongs they suffered at their hands, but don't 
hold the same grudges against whites. I have black friends who are really quick 
to call blacks ghetto, or label all black women golddiggers or whatever, but 
who never speak in general terms about the bad characteristics of other ethnic 
groups. Dennis Rodman is an example. He loves to say he dates white women 
because black women were so cruel to him before he gained fame and money. 
somehow he's never forgiven those knucklehead sisters who were shallow in his 
youth, but doesn't seem to realize few white women would be dating him if he 
weren't rich? Don't get it. A big concern of mine recently has been the 
explosion in black men who are quick to call Sisters gold diggers, but don't 
seem to label other races--often more deserving--as quickly with that title. 

I get that it hurts more coming from your own, but shouldn't forgiveness start 
there too? 

- Original Message - 
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 5:17:36 PM 
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Goldberg: Mel Gibson is Not a Racist 






I think Mel gets his racism from his father who is a well documented 
anti-semite and conspiracy theorist. 

I think Whoopi has bought into the Hollywood hype. She has been in the 
Hollywood system so long that she has lost her bearings on reality. This 
happens to a lot of people of color that gain acceptance through tokenism and 
may have genuine white friends, but that does not mean that all is right with 
the world. 


On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Keith Johnson  keithbjohn...@comcast.net  
wrote: 






Brent, 

I owe you an apology for high-mindedly saying I don't like being privy to 
people's private thoughts and utterances, odious though they may be. I still 
feel that way. I hate knowing that Gibson is such a racist on this level. I 
don't get why his girlfriend chose to release this crap to Radar Online instead 
of just the cops. I think, like the other topics we've discussed recently of 
media coverage, we are becoming way too much of a nation where everyone wants 
to get their stuff out in the media for a variety of reasons. But, for all that 
I wish and think this stuff should never have been released this way, I must 
admit I've listened to it, and it sickens me. The only question I have is, why 
is *anyone* still surprised at Gibson's racism? The drunken rants when he was 
arrested were enough evidence, the disturbing anti-Semitic tones of The 
Passion of the Christ were troublesome as well. 

As for Whoopi Goldberg saying he's not a racist, I have no idea what the hell 
her definition is, but I'm not surprised. She's dealt with self-hatred and 
hatred of black people for a long time. I've noticed over the years how she 
attacks people who use the term African-American, saying she's just an 
American, as if the term were insulting. I note how refused to wear a ribbon 
against racism for the Oscars one year, and even did a riff on it, but 
curiously, she wore things supporting everything from gay rights to women's 
rights. And I note that, the same lady who gives people like Gibson a pass is 
very quick to attack other blacks. years ago she was given an Essence award I 
believe. (Might have been NAACP...) When she got the award, Goldberg proceeded 
to thank the audience, then tell them Y'all have made it hard on me--very 
hard. She berated the audience for all the years that blacks had laughed at 
her looks, not supported her, and made her feel ugly. Odd that she was so quick 
to attack blacks publicly, takes offense at black labels, yet can be so 
forgiving and understanding of racism like this. 

Oh yeah: I bet Danny Glover is saying, What the fu**, Mel?! 

 
http://www.examiner.com/x-15166-Comedy-Examiner~y2010m7d13-Whoopi-Goldberg-defends-Mel-Gibson-Mel-Gibson-is-not-a-racist
 



We've been following the goings-on over at the Mel Gibson Meltdownapalooza 
for the past few weeks. By now, you've probably heard one or more of the audio 
tapes that Gibson's ex has leaked to the press, so we don't need to reiterate 
the blatant hate-speech, misogyny, and-- let's face it-- flat-out threats that 
Gibson spits out during these tapes. This is the sorta situation that any 
reasonable, intelligent, rational thinking-person could look at and say, You 
know, I think that Mel Gibson's a bit of a racist, and probably a few other 
things. With that said, 

Re: [scifinoir2] Pawn Stars

2010-07-13 Thread Keith Johnson
I'm always singing that show's praises. I watch it religiously. I also like 
American Pickers. 

- Original Message - 
From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com 
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:19:14 PM 
Subject: [scifinoir2] Pawn Stars 






This week's episode of Pawn Stars features a brotha in Vegas selling his 
Transformers collection of over 1000 pieces! He has one of the largest 
collections outside of Hasbro ever seen. 




-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity! 
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/ 



[scifinoir2] Washington Post Reviews Rizzoli and Isles, Covert Affairs.

2010-07-13 Thread Keith Johnson
I watched Rizzoli and Isles last night. Knowing nothing about the source 
material, and given what I saw on the trailers, I didn't expect it to be quite 
as grim as it was. Not bad, just grim. I'm also having to get used to Sasha 
Gray playing gentler and more cerebral here than she did as the tough agent in 
NCIS. That, and the change from the raven locks on NCIS to the blonde look. 
I'm not a supper fan of Angie Harmon. Her fairly hard and unforgiving character 
on Law and Order never appealed to me, and I have to be honest that her 
conservative politics biased me a bit too. But overall the show has potential, 
so I'll give it a chance. 
I also watched the new show The Glades. It was okay too. Didn't draw me in 
quite as much as the premieres of Justified, Memphis Beat, or The Good 
Guys, but hey--worth a look. I'm just amazed at all the new fare we're getting 
on cable channels. With Closer, Burn Notice, Rescue Me, White Collar, In Plain 
Sight, Mad Men, Leverage, Royal Pains, Army Wives and others, there's a whole 
hell of a lot of good, original programming to be had. I can't remember the 
last time I've seen this many original series on TV covering the gamut of 
genres, and *lasting*! 

Looking forward to Covert Affairs tonight. Hope it's a fun action series. I 
see the actor who played Jake 2.0 is back in the espionage biz in this 
series, although here he's not a field agent, but a blind guy who I guess is 
support. 

* 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/11/AR2010071103084.html
 


By Hank Stuever Washington Post Staff Writer 
Monday, July 12, 2010 



While Boston homicide detective Jane Rizzoli (Angie Harmon) and medical 
examiner Maura Isles (Sasha Alexander) check over a naked woman's corpse in the 
woods to make sure she's been murdered to the exact, telltale preferences of a 
notorious serial killer, let us occupy ourselves by making a list of all the 
stylized cop procedurals we've been subjected to lately. 


It's like browsing that shelf of faded paperbacks that collect on the living 
room shelves of a beach rental. One of these new shows (new never seems like 
the right word) was about a smart-talkin' Chicago detective in Florida, called 
The Glades. (Is it about air freshener? No, air deadener.) Jason Lee's doing 
another one -- Memphis-something-or-other; Blue? Heat? Whichever, Lee's 
character sings in blues clubs after he solves the crime. And there was one 
about a lady FBI agent sent to a small town (the titular Haven) to 
investigate a murder and realizes the town is not what it seems. You don't say. 

Rizzoli  Isles, premiering Monday night on TNT, is just the thing for you 
silent lambs: easy-on-the-brain depictions of rape and murder, solved in one 
hour through the power of roguish cop sass and the discovery of semen spots on 
the ottoman. If you like to come home from work, wait for the microwave to 
beep, and together with your Brownie Husband watch splatter-patterned murder 
stories solved by women (and men) with impeccable hair and tiny waists -- well, 
this is the summer for you. Let the mutual rigor mortis work its magic, as 
Rizzoli, insulted by a colleague, retorts with lines you've heard a thousand 
times before, such as: How is it that you're still single? 

How is it that actual FBI statistics show a drop in violent crime for years 
now, and yet the TV crime wave continues? Perhaps watching these shows is what 
keeps real serial killers occupied and vicariously sated? 

Thus ends my genre griping. As for Rizzoli  Isles, it isn't brilliant 
television, but everyone in it seems to be giving it their all -- even the 
corpses. It's drawn from a series of crime novels by Tess Gerritsen, where the 
hard-crusted, soft-centered Rizzoli (that sounds like a dessert!) forms a 
symbiotic friendship with the calm, encyclopedia-brained Isles. While Rizzoli 
fumes and fumbles out in the field, Isles meticulously Quincies back at the 
morgue. While Rizzoli wears hoodies and a ponytail, Isles is always decked out 
in stilettos. As Rizzoli, Harmon, a long-ago  Law and Order  player, attacks 
her part with intense crabbiness, which all but obliterates any acting that 
Alexander, who was on  NCIS , might have had in mind. 

After a wealthy couple is murdered, Rizzoli's off to the state pen to play 
Hannibal-and-Clarice interrogatory games with a serial killer, on the hunch 
that he's trained an apprentice. There's a hunky FBI agent who shows up to 
investigate the case, and he distracts Rizzoli and Isles not only from their 
jobs but from the faintly lesbian undertones that the show keeps trying to 
establish. Will it be Rizzoli or Isles who captures Agent Hunky's attention? 
Somebody should, don't you think? Rizzoli asks. 




Should we draw straws? Isles counters. 

Can't we just show him our [breasts] and let him decide? Rizzoli says. 

Can't someone put a sheet over me? asks the corpse. I shouldn't have to 

Re: [scifinoir2] Apple's Clean Hands May Have Dirtied iPhone 4 Signal

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
I think that it is just a design flaw. If you touch the corner of the phone
it is probably making you ground.  Consumer Reports said that the signal
drops about -20db! Which can take about 1/2 of a signal.

On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Martin Baxter martinbaxt...@gmail.comwrote:



 Still not quite buying this...


 http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/07/apples-clean-hands-may-have-dirtied-iphone-4-signal/

 --
 If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
 wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik


 




-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Goldberg: Mel Gibson is Not a Racist

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
I believe that there needs to be more of a dialog on this but until someone
in the media takes on the topic it will not exist.

I guess Whoopi and others are the equivalent of self hating black ala Uncle
Ruckus. Or denial on overdrive.



On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 You're right on both counts. Gibson's dad spends his time as a traveling
 Holocaust denier. Gibson subscribes to some older tenets of the Catholic
 Church--officially abandoned by the church a few decades back--that lean
 more toward things such as condemning the Jews for the Crucifixtion.  I have
 certainly known closet bigots on this level in my life, but it's been a
 while...
 As for Goldberg, unfortunately I have friends and relatives just like that.
 They condemn blacks for all the wrongs they suffered at their hands, but
 don't hold the same grudges against whites.  I have black friends who are
 really quick to call blacks ghetto, or label all black women golddiggers
 or whatever, but who never speak in general terms about the bad
 characteristics of other ethnic groups. Dennis Rodman is an example. He
 loves to say he dates white women because black women were so cruel to him
 before he gained fame and money. somehow he's never forgiven those
 knucklehead sisters who were shallow in his youth, but doesn't seem to
 realize few white women would be dating him if he weren't rich? Don't get
 it. A big concern of mine recently has been the explosion in black men who
 are quick to call Sisters gold diggers, but don't seem to label other
 races--often more deserving--as quickly with that title.

  I get that it hurts more coming from your own, but shouldn't forgiveness
 start there too?


 - Original Message -
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 5:17:36 PM
 Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] OT: Goldberg: Mel Gibson is Not a Racist



 I think Mel gets his racism from his father who is a well documented
 anti-semite and conspiracy theorist.

 I think Whoopi has bought into the Hollywood hype. She has been in the
 Hollywood system so long that she has lost her bearings on reality. This
 happens to a lot of people of color that gain acceptance through tokenism
 and may have genuine white friends, but that does not mean that all is right
 with the world.

 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Keith Johnson 
 keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 Brent,

 I owe you an apology for high-mindedly saying I don't like being privy to
 people's private thoughts and utterances, odious though they may be. I still
 feel that way. I hate knowing that Gibson is such a racist on this level. I
 don't get why his girlfriend chose to release this crap to Radar Online
 instead of just the cops. I think, like the other topics we've discussed
 recently of media coverage, we are becoming way too much of a nation where
 everyone wants to get their stuff out in the media for a variety of
 reasons.  But, for all that I wish and think this stuff should never have
 been released this way, I must admit I've listened to it, and it sickens
 me.  The only question I have is, why is *anyone* still surprised at
 Gibson's racism? The drunken rants when he was arrested were enough
 evidence, the disturbing anti-Semitic tones of The Passion of the Christ
 were troublesome as well.

 As for Whoopi Goldberg saying he's not a racist, I have no idea what the
 hell her definition is, but I'm not surprised. She's dealt with self-hatred
 and hatred of black people for a long time. I've noticed over the years how
 she attacks people who use the term African-American, saying she's just
 an American, as if the term were insulting. I note how refused to wear a
 ribbon against racism for the Oscars one year, and even did a riff on it,
 but curiously, she wore things supporting everything from gay rights to
 women's rights. And I note that, the same lady who gives people like Gibson
 a pass is very quick to attack other blacks. years ago she was given an
 Essence award I believe. (Might have been NAACP...) When she got the award,
 Goldberg proceeded to thank the audience, then tell them Y'all have made it
 hard on me--very hard. She berated the audience for all the years that
 blacks had laughed at her looks, not supported her, and made her feel ugly.
 Odd that she was so quick to attack blacks publicly, takes offense at
 black labels,  yet can be so forgiving and understanding of racism like
 this.

 Oh yeah: I bet Danny Glover is saying, What the fu**, Mel?!

 

 http://www.examiner.com/x-15166-Comedy-Examiner~y2010m7d13-Whoopi-Goldberg-defends-Mel-Gibson-Mel-Gibson-is-not-a-racisthttp://www.examiner.com/x-15166-Comedy-Examiner%7Ey2010m7d13-Whoopi-Goldberg-defends-Mel-Gibson-Mel-Gibson-is-not-a-racist

 *We've been following the goings-on over at the Mel Gibson
 Meltdownapalooza for the past few weeks.  By now, you've probably heard 

Re: [scifinoir2] Pawn Stars

2010-07-13 Thread Mr. Worf
Me too! Love American Pickers. Its one of the few shows that I can discuss
with my mom. We watch it together for some bonding time.

On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Keith Johnson keithbjohn...@comcast.netwrote:



 I'm always singing that show's praises. I watch it religiously. I also like
 American Pickers.


 - Original Message -
 From: Mr. Worf hellomahog...@gmail.com
 To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:19:14 PM
 Subject: [scifinoir2] Pawn Stars



 This week's episode of Pawn Stars features a brotha in Vegas selling his
 Transformers collection of over 1000 pieces! He has one of the largest
 collections outside of Hasbro ever seen.




 --
 Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
 Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


 




-- 
Celebrating 10 years of bringing diversity to perversity!
Mahogany at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mahogany_pleasures_of_darkness/


[scifinoir2] Re: Spoiler--Anyone notice the inaccuracy in the Predators trailer?

2010-07-13 Thread angelababycat
That was a cool scene in P2, and it's what I thought about when I saw the 
trailer.   Which, again, is why I felt cheated when it didn't turn out that 
way.  Oh well, that was last week.  Now I'm trying to figure out how to see 
Inception this Friday afternoon...I really need to find a baby sitter one of 
these days.

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, B Smith daikaij...@... wrote:

 I wonder if that scene in the trailer was a call back to Predator 2? After 
 Danny Glover manages to beat his Predator something similar happened to him.
 
 --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Martin Baxter martinbaxter7@ wrote:
 
  Reboot, Angela. All of the previous rules are probably out the window.
  
  On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:07 PM, angelababycat asrobinson@wrote:
  
  
  
   Per usual, I saw Predators early Friday afternoon (in a theater with 100
   guys and maybe 6 other chics--I should have dressed nicer, LOL!).
  
   Anyway,there's really not much to discuss about this installment--if 
   you're
   a Predators follower, you'll just go see it and then move on with your 
   life.
   But one thing that really, really irritated me: the movie trailer 
   includes a
   clip in which the Brody character has the 3-red-dot lights from a dozen
   Predator gus on him, suggesting that at some point he and the crew will be
   up against 12+ Predators at once. But in the actual movie, that same sence
   shows only ONE such site light on the center of his chest. And accordingly
   the ensuing fight is with one Predator. Plus, it's revealed earlier in the
   movie that Predators only hunt in groups of 3 anyway. So I feel mislead
   about the scale of the confrontation we were going to see in the movie.
   Maybe that's one reason the 2nd half of the movie was so flat. We were all
   led to expect a huge battle--even if we don't remember exactly why--that
   never happens.
  
   Never underestimate people with photographic memories.
  
   Angela
  

  
  
  
  
  -- 
  If all the world's a stage and we are merely players, who the bloody hell
  wrote the script? -- Charles E Grant
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQUxw9aUVik
 





[scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers Flick

2010-07-13 Thread Kelwyn
This is inspired casting.  Jackie Earle Haley can be self-effacing and even 
sweet-natured and you can believe this monster resides within him.  Haley looks 
like a Herb Trimpe character.

~rave!

--- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Mr. Worf hellomahog...@... wrote:

 How about Jackie Earle Haley?
 
 On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 1:17 PM, B Smith daikaij...@... wrote:
 
  Still thin but not frail. He's learned a few tricks and picked up some
  fighting skills.
 
  --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com, Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@
  wrote:
  
   Thanks for the update. Though snarky, isn't Banner still frail and weak
  looking?
  
   - Original Message -
   From: B Smith daikaiju66@
   To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
   Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 12:41:55 PM
   Subject: [scifinoir2] Re: Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers
  Flick
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Bruce Banner hasn't been the puny Banner stereotype for a long time.
  Banner is a bit of a snarky so and so and that could lead to some nice
  exchanges with Downey and Jackson. Norton played him just right but
  unfortunately he was such a pain to work with he was dropped.
  
   Michael Cera is way too young. Jason Bateman on the other hand could be
  awesome.
  
   --- In scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com , Keith Johnson KeithBJohnson@
  wrote:
   
I wonder if Cera might not be a bit too young? I don't follow Hulk.
  What's up with Banner's behaviour?
   
- Original Message -
From: Martin Baxter martinbaxter7@
To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:18:00 AM
Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Marvel Dumps Norton as Banner for Avengers
  Flick
   
   
   
   
   
   
Keith, if they want flavor-of-the-week, Michael Cera would be a great
  fit for Banner as well. And the character would have to be written, IMO, the
  way he's been done post-World War Hulk, after Banner and the Hulk were
  separated, and Banner became a truly scary bastich who played mind games
  with everyone around him.
   
   
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Keith Johnson  KeithBJohnson@ 
  wrote:
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
They need to quit worrying about name actors and just get an actor
  who looks and can play the part. Eric Bana was way too buff and handsome for
  Banner. Norton was probably closer, but his almost Shakespearean intensity
  was a bit too much for the skinny, unsure, milksop that is Bruce Banner. I
  think Phoenix would come off too much like a crazed mad scientist than the
  puny Banner we need. Cast the net far and wide to find the right man, and
  notoriety be hanged! That's the damn problem with H'Wood all the time.
   
Someone who looks the part, for example, would be Jon Cryer, the whiny
  brother on Two and A Half Men. Not saying he *should* do it, but that's
  the *look* you need for Banner-someone who looks soft and weak, as if he's
  never seen the sun or the inside of a gym.
   

- Original Message -
From: Daryle Lockhart  daryle@ 
   
So now I'm hearing they're talking seriously to Joaquin Phoenix. Which
  is both awesome and frightening at the same time to me.
   
*
   
   
   
   
On Jul 12, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Cinque B wrote:
   
   
   
Marvel: Norton Won't Return As Hulk For 'Avengers'; Norton's Rep
  Responds
   
   
Source: Access Hollywood Sun Jul 11, 2010, 8:15 pm EDT
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Edward Norton won't be reprising his role as the Incredible Hulk in
  2012's The Avengers, a Marvel rep confirmed to Access Hollywood on Sunday.
   
Marvel Studios president of production Kevin Feige explained the
  decision in a statement to HitFix .
   
VIEW THE PHOTOS: Edward Norton
   
We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the
  title role of Bruce Banner in 'The Avengers,' Feige told the site. Our
  decision is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted
  in the need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative
  spirit of our other talented cast members. 'The Avengers' demands players
  who thrive working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H,
  Chris E, Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to
  announce a name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate
  about the iconic role in the coming weeks.
   
The actors referred to in the statement include current Marvel stars
  Robert Downey Jr. ( Iron Man ), Chris Hemsworth (Thor), Chris Evans
  (Captain America: The First Avenger), Samuel L. Jackson (Nick Fury),
  Scarlett Johansson ( Iron Man 2's Black Widow), who are expected to
  reprise their superhero roles in team-up film The Avengers.
   
VIEW THE PHOTOS: Scenes From â€ˊThe Incredible Hulk 
’
   
A rep for Norton responded to the statement to Hitfix on Sunday,
  calling it