[SLUG] Best of breed LDAP/directory servers in 2008?

2008-11-19 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Hello,

Does anyone have any recent experience with LDAP deployments across
reasonably large environments (we have 1000+ hosts)?We use LDAP for
traditional Unix host authentication/authorization, as well as various
other web apps.  We currently use Fedora Directory Server but are having
many problems with its multimaster replication, and have hit some walls
in troubleshooting it.  While I believe we probably can fix it,
management has asked for us to consider other directory server products
(including commercial ones), if they would offer better features and
long-term support.  I'm wondering if anyone can offer their recent LDAP
deployment experiences?

Our requirements:
	* Multimaster replication (or similar) for cluster deployment across 
diverse geographical sites

* Scalability to 1000's of hosts
* Some sort of GUI administration (I guess web-based would be
preferred; Fedora DS's Java-based admin tool is acceptable but painful
to set up, and very slow over LANs)
* Runs on RHEL, preferably playing nice with other apps on the same 
host(s)
* Sane backup, disaster recovery, and upgrade procedures

Commercial support availability is not a specific requirement, but is
something we'd consider if it has good cost/benefit so I'd be interested
in any thoughts on that also.  (Note:  head office is in the US, so 
AU-based support not really necessary)


Thanks,
--Jeremy
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Re: search engine for company network (OT)

2008-05-14 Thread Jeremy Portzer

rich wrote:

Hello all,
Richard here - been lurking for a while, first post.

Seb,
If you only have a few users to deal with then I concur with the Rev,
Google Desktop is a great solution; it's simple and it will meet your
users needs. There are alternatives, I actually use one called
Copernic Desktop myself (although mostly for mail) - it works for me.

If you are looking for something for more than a handful of users,
then I'd seriously consider spending $$ on a Google mini appliance.
They are about $6k for two years, which includes maintenance and
support (and you get to keep the box at the end).


We've used these search applicances at my company. The PTB liked them so
much that we bought one of the Enterprise versions. You're compeltely 
right about Google's algorithms being so far above anything else 
possible. They're not open source, but at least open-friendly.


--Jeremy

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] SIM cards as cheap data storage?

2008-04-15 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Peter Howard wrote:

On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 15:44 +1000, Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:

It looks to me that the Octopus card still requires a connection back
to a remote server somewhere to run the transaction. It's also geared
more as an ID device rather than a data storage medium.



Nope, it can be synchronised to the main servers later.  In the case of
bus travel the details from the box in the bus gets uploaded at the end
of the day.  T-card was working that way too.



But in the case of T-cards and buses in Sydney, there's a pretty high 
likelihood of the bus getting back to the depot and the data being 
uploaded safely (assuming the NSW government hasn't canceled the 
contract while the bus was out driving around!).  In the scenario 
discussed here it seems like the motorcycle rider disappear if he 
decided his motorcycle and handheld reader is worth more on the black 
market than his job.  Wouldn't the data be lost in your scenario, since 
the card is just an ID mechanism, without record of the actual 
transaction?   It seems that's part of the important requirement for 
read-write capability.


--Jeremy

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] SIM cards as cheap data storage?

2008-04-14 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Sridhar Dhanapalan wrote:

I am looking for a cheap data storage solution for many people. The
requirements are as follows:


How many is many?  That can really affects the cost issue quite a bit. 
Are we talking a hundred, a thousand, ten thousand, what?


--Jeremy


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Oracle 9i database and samba

2008-02-28 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Joel Heenan wrote:

Network
filesystems are not normally used for database files.



I work for an ASP that has all of its Oracle databases (hundreds of 
them) mounted via NFS.  It works just fine.  The database servers are 
running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 and 5, and the NFS mount points are 
NetApp filers.


Now, this is a bit tangential to the original question, which was about 
Windows and samba.  SMB/CIFS is not at all the same thing as NFS.  But 
it's worth pointing out that Oracle on network filesystems is perfectly 
doable - and NFS is fully supported by Oracle, given certain conditions. 
 An important way that we meet those conditions is that all NFS traffic 
for Oracle is in a physically separate network from all other traffic, 
and is managed very carefully to avoid congestion.


--Jeremy
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Mass converting Gigabites of wma to mp3

2008-01-21 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Sonia Hamilton wrote:

On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 01:52 +1100, Sam Gentle wrote:

Oh, and as always, man find will bring great enlightenment and
happiness.


Don't use 'man find' - 'info find' is better.


And if you don't like the emacs-y navigation/keybindings of info - 
checkout the pinfo client that accesses the same information, but with 
more standard PC keybindings - e.g. the pgup, pgdown, and arrow keys 
actually work as you might expect.


Sometimes pinfo isn't installed by default, but it's provided in most 
distributions.


--Jeremy
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Domain Name Servers

2007-12-03 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Rick Phillips wrote:

I have always thought that DNS servers for a domain may reside totally
outside the domain.  i.e. server.main.domain has no dns server running
but has DNS servers other.server.com and another.server.com act
authoritatively for server.main.domain.


That is correct.


We have a server with very sensitive information and the boss does not
want anything other than a web port open to the world.


Okay, that is fine and fits in with your previous statement.

 My experience

has always been that the server in question is at least the primary DNS.


This seems to contradict your previous statement.  If you don't wish 
this server in question with the sensitive information, to run DNS 
services, why not set up the configuration that you already established 
as probable, with the DNS hosted entirely by different servers?


I don't understand why the current configuration of some particular 
server should rule out the possibility of a different configuration 
being possible?


Perhaps I misunderstand.

Thanks,
Jeremy
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Quick and dirty mail/spam server

2007-11-25 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Jeff Waugh wrote:

quote who=James Gray


Here, here.


itym hear, hear... Or are you referring to the previous poster as a dog?
;-)



Heel, heel?  ;-)

--Jeremy
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Renting Dell servers for benchmarks?

2007-11-18 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Amos Shapira wrote:

Hello,

We'd like to try to assess our hardware requirements for a network
server and for this need access to a large-ish configuration (lots of
RAM, lots of disks, strong CPU's).

We are a small ISV and so I though that maybe Dell (with whom our
hosting provider in the US works) might provide such access as part of
a partners program but so far I failed to draw their attention (they
keep bouncing me back and forth among technical people with long
waiting times and difficult accent).

Does anyone know what are my options to access such hardware?

(The server will run CentOS 5, so that's the connection to Linux :).



Dell definitely does offer such services, we have used them extensively 
at my company (a US-based ISV).  Our requirements have been somewhat 
larger however (clusters of up to a dozen servers), so therefore more 
likely to attract their attention.   But I am not certain of the best 
method to get in touch with this department, however, as all my contact 
is second-hand through our performance testing director in the US.  But 
I would recommend working through the Dell sales organization (if you 
buy any significant amount of hardware, you should have a dedicated 
sales rep), or attempt to get a contact from your hosting provider.


We now have dedicated testing labs because we've found the need for 
performance testing was significant and Intel hardware is still 
relatively cheap.  Our software runs on Solaris also and for that we 
continue to use Sun testing labs, due to the extreme expense of 
high-performance Sun hardware.


--Jeremy
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] tip: how to renumbber screens in gnu screen

2007-11-14 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Simon Wong wrote:



The hardest thing about finding tip for screen is that typing screen
into Google is not exactly definitive!


I've found that using GNU screen in quotes is useful when Googling. 
This only finds hits where people have used that terminology, but Sonia 
did above, indicating it's reasonably common, and hopefully people will 
continue that convention.  :-)


--Jeremy
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] unwired and linux

2007-11-12 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Christopher Vance wrote:

On Nov 13, 2007 3:20 PM, Dean Hamstead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

How does unwired know who you are if it is using dhcp? do they
want your MAC address?


Unless things have changed since a friend got rid of his, the Unwired
modem is your dhcp server.



I've used unwired as recently as 2 months ago (with the Ethernet 
version), and it was a standard DHCP server.  It operates like a hotel 
wifi gateway  in that it redirects all web requests to an activation 
site.  Once you activate the modem, it just operates as a standard 
DHCP/NAT gateway.  There shouldn't be an issues with Linux.


Can't speak for the PC Card version.

I have the Ethernet modem still if you want to buy one cheap -it works 
fine.  I'm not sure if the same modem is used for prepaid (I had the 
month-to-month service), but I would expect it is.  (I switched to Optus 
DSL to get better latency and higher download limits.)


--Jeremy
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] restoring scren handling in terminal ?

2007-11-09 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Voytek Eymont wrote:

On Sat, November 10, 2007 11:14 am, Scott Ragen wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/11/2007 10:47:42 AM:



what's a way out of that ?

Typing 'reset' should correct this.



thanks, Scott, yes, fixed

when I 'man reset', some of the output, specifically quotes around some
words do not print correctly, does that mean I have some wrong terminal
specification somewhere...?



I think that means your terminal (or screen or something) doesn't 
support Unicode.  You can get around this by specifying the environment 
variable LANG to use an older format.  The following should work:

bash$ LANG=C man screen
or to set it for all future commands
bash$ export LANG=C
bash$ man screen

That tells it to use the default C locale which is really 
old-fashioned, but should be compatible with just about anything.  (C as 
in the programming language.)


Hope this helps,
Jeremy Portzer

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] installing 'file': edit Makefile.am or Makefile.in

2007-10-14 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Voytek Eymont wrote:

On Mon, October 15, 2007 11:37 am, jam wrote:


thanks, James

should I use '--exec-prefix' or '--prefix' ?

is it just like below:

./configure --prefix= usr/bin

--
Installation directories:
  --prefix=PREFIX install architecture-independent files in PREFIX
  [/usr/local]
  --exec-prefix=EPREFIX   install architecture-dependent files in EPREFIX
  [PREFIX]


As noted, --exec-prefix will default to the same thing as --prefix.  So 
you only need to use --prefix.  If you only set --exec-prefix, then 
--prefix will remain at the default (/usr/local) which in this case 
probably means the magic files will end up there.  That's a bit 
confusing.  I think --exec-prefix is designed for complex scenarios 
where you have multiple architectures supported in the same install 
tree, something that likely doesn't apply to you.


If it were up to me, I would use the default --prefix (/usr/local ) and 
install everything there.  This way, the files in /usr/bin will remain 
owned by the package management system, and be updated when a fix 
comes out for the security issue you are trying to patch.  Generally, 
/usr/local should be positioned before /usr/bin in your PATH (if not, 
you should fix this).


Hope this helps,
Jeremy Portzer
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] installing 'file': edit Makefile.am or Makefile.in ?

2007-10-14 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Voytek Eymont wrote:



thanks, Matthew

so where do I identify changelog /url for RH73 'file' ?



You mean Red Hat Linux (RHL) 7.3, right?  To get the changelog of the 
currently installed version, you can run rpm -q --changelog file this 
is the same as the previously-mentioned command, but getting its 
information from the local RPM database, instead of using the -p 
(package file) option.


But surely you must know that Red Hat Linux 7.3 received its last 
security updates many years ago - a quick Google search shows it was 31 
December 2003, almost four years go.


While I applaud your effort in keeping things up to date manually, many 
programs are much harder to build and configure than file - and many 
many security issues exist in software from 2003, especially in the 
kernel.  If you care anything about security, I think you would be 
better served by migrating away from RHL 7.3 to a much newer 
distribution that has current updates.


--Jeremy


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Aust Govt Netalert - Not for Linux

2007-10-12 Thread Jeremy Portzer

bill wrote:
Just received the Aust Govt booklet Netalert- protecting Australian 
Families OnLine.


Checked out their comparison table of internet filters. 
(http://www.netalert.gov.au/filters/Compare_internet_content_filters.html#Comparisontable) 



Gotta love how the Safe Eyes (Mac version) is ticked as certified for 
IE6 and IE7.  Huh?  The latest (and no longer supported) version of IE 
for Mac is 5.2.


Where The Australian Government has undertaken a detailed assessment 
process to provide Australian households with access to the best 
available filters through the /National Filter Scheme./


Seems like the Govt has missed the boat again Re Linux, or maybe Linux 
users are considered intelligent enough not to need Govt assistance?




What percentage of Australian home users are using Linux on the desktop? 
 Despite the advocacy of many here, I doubt the number is large enough 
to be worth spending money on.  This program is costly enough as it is.


--Jeremy



--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] X-client software.

2007-10-09 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Hasnain wrote:

Hi,


Is there anyone knows about any x-client software like humminbird exceed for
free to use x11 under ssh tunnelling. i used to use any gui to run on putty
setting the display into localhost and exceed used to pipe those displays
into local computers.



Hello,

I assume since you mention putty you're talking about running X 
applications displayed on MS-Windows?  Note that this type of software 
is technically called an X server - not client.  (The client is the 
program you're actually running on the remote system.)  The meanings of 
server and client are slightly backwards when it comes to the X Window 
system.


I typically used Cygwin and Cygwin/X .  It is free software and easy to 
install.  You can do exactly as you say and forward the displays using 
putty (or just use the cygwin ssh client which is easy to install once 
you have the cygwin environment configured).


--Jeremy
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Newlines - was Re: Comsec behaving badly

2007-10-08 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Jamie Wilkinson wrote:

 Jeremy Portzer wrote:


Common confusion/misconception is that \n refers to LF only.  This is not 
always the case-usually it refers to the portable newline that gets 
expanded to the proper characters depending on platform or context.


Over the wire, it is just newline, no carriage return.  


No, using your definition of newline = LF, this is incorrect. 
Standard TCP/IP protocols like SMTP and HTTP use CR+LF !



The \r component of
the CRLF bog is only a problem when you're doing file IO.  For a wire
protocol it's the \n that counts.


You are still confusing the issue by using the semi-portable notation of 
\n (newline) to refer interchangeably to the LF (linefeed) character, 
ASCII 10.  This is imprecise - but you're not the first to be tripped up 
by this.


As I stated, \n (or newline) and LF (ASCII 10) are NOT precisely the 
same thing.  They are equivalent when dealing with Unix files, yes - so 
many people with Unix/Linux background tend to think of them 
interchangeably, but this isn't the case on other platforms.  Yes, if 
you write a C or Perl program on Unix and want to make a DOS compatible 
file, you can use \r\n and it will work - because in Unix, \n becomes 
the ASCII 10, so the combined sequence is chr(13) then chr(10), or 
CR+LF.  But if you compile that same program on Windows you will end up 
with the sequence CR+CR+LF since \n on Windows means CR+LF.  This make 
sense?Again, \n is supposed to mean the newline character sequence 
on the relevant platform - and this ONLY equates to LF on some 
platforms, like Unix.


When dealing with TCP/IP protocols, the newline (\n) sequence is 
typically expanded to CRLF, just like Windows/DOS files.  I have not 
done C socket programming so I don't know whether \n automatically 
expands to CR+LF in standard socket libraries, or whether it is the 
responsibility of the programmer.  But certainly, user-land utilities 
like netcat or telnet take care of this translation for you, as do 
Perl, PHP, and similar scripting languages.


References:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newline talks about the general problem of 
the definition of newline


http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html - clearly defines the line 
separator as CRLF for Internet messages (email)


http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1945.html (HTTP 1.0) uses the same 
definition for protocol elements



Background for those who aren't familiar:  CR is carriage return - 
which on an old teletype/typewriter, means to move the carriage head 
back to the start.  LF, or line feed, advances the paper one line.  You 
need both of these to start a new line, so the DOS/Windows or TCP/IP 
interpretation is more technically correct for a teletype system.  I 
guess Unix tried to simplify things by only using LF, trying to get away 
from physical aspects of the device.  The wikipedia article has more on 
this esoterica.


Hope this helps,
Jeremy Portzer
newline pedant


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Comsec behaving badly, how to talk to a big business

2007-10-07 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Amos Shapira wrote:

On 07/10/2007, Alex Samad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:09:50AM +, Amos Shapira wrote:
DATA: malformed address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]\n may not follow
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: failing address in To: header is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It might be the @



Yes it might be, I now see that it isn't included in the definition of
atext (under 3.2.4 Atom in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#page-12).

Maybe they should put this text in a comment (()).

Also the \n looks a bit suspicious - maybe there is a missing \r there
somewhere?



\n just means newline - which can either be CRLF (usual format for 
Internet communications; Windows/DOS format) or LF-only (Unix text 
files), or even CR-only (old Macintosh).


Common confusion/misconception is that \n refers to LF only.  This is 
not always the case-usually it refers to the portable newline that 
gets expanded to the proper characters depending on platform or context.


--Jeremy


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] fun with sed

2007-09-26 Thread Jeremy Portzer

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Thursday 27 September 2007 10:00:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

man doesn't mention delimiter options, but info does.
looks like I need to get familiar with info

man is easy to use.
info is abominable.

In fact I have done 'info info' more times than 'info any_thing_else'.


Yet another case of 'look how clever I am' (not). One day I will take on 
making man pages out of info. Meanwhile quite a useable tool is info2html 
which presents the info stuff as a hyperlinked web page.


I second the recommendation for pinfo instead of info to read info 
pages.  It is straightforward to use and has an attractive ncurses 
interface.  Much less hassle than converting to HTML.


I have never used info again since someone told me about pinfo.

--Jeremy
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Re. Changes to cdrecord (etc.) ..

2007-09-23 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Adam Bogacki wrote:

Got it ! It's working.

Sometimes the act of writing down ( sending) the problems
gives me the answer.



Can you explain the fix please, for the benefit of the list membership 
and the archives?


Thanks,
JP
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Printer

2007-09-20 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Glen Turner wrote:


There are a lot of personal laser printers out there, the BW
models of those are cheap to run and cheap to buy.  You are
looking at about $100 to $200. Toner is about $90 -- I use
one a year in a household with three people printing uni and
school assignments. Beware that some printers come with a
half-full toner and no USB cable.


You know, in the days of parallel printers it always used to seem really 
silly to me that printers never came with interface cables, and they 
claimed it was because there were different types of parallel 
interfaces, even well after DB25 parallel connectors became fully 
standardized.  I can't believe they're still pulling this ruse when 
EVERY computer in the last 4-5 (6-8?) years has USB.


--Jeremy
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] undocumented null cipher for ssh?

2007-09-19 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Scott Ragen wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 20/09/2007 01:10:02 PM:

Someone mentioned on list a while ago about using an undocumented 

feature

of ssh that allows a null cipher (in order to speed up large file
transfers).

Does anyone remember the option?


The cipher name is none.

Regards,

Scott


Are you sure this is a standard option?  I've tried this in the past and 
never been able to make it work, and on my current system it just gives:


$ ssh -c none localhost
No valid ciphers for protocol version 2 given, using defaults.

$ ssh -V
OpenSSH_4.3p2 Debian-8ubuntu1, OpenSSL 0.9.8c 05 Sep 2006

Maybe the null cipher is available if you use SSH protocol version 1, 
but I don't have any servers that support ssh v1 anymore.


--Jeremy
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] ssh questions

2007-06-04 Thread Jeremy Portzer

Zhasper wrote:


Or, change your log level so they don't get logged. Or, have logrotate
gzip your archives (which it probably does anyway) so that logging
repeated patterns like that takes insignificant amounts of space.


Or use the logwatch utility to read your logs which can summarize 
these authentication attempts in a way that is reasonably easy to scroll 
through, while still pointing out any other oddities.


--Jeremy

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] recommendations for SATA RAID controllers?

2007-05-09 Thread Jeremy Portzer
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Howard Lowndes wrote:

 Amos Shapira wrote:

  I was thinking of using Linux software RAID (Debian Etch) but was very
  sternly warned not to do that on a production system.
 
 I don't know why not.  I have had far more problems with SATA, esp mobo 
 integrated, when running in RAID mode than when running in IDE mode and 
 using software RAID.
 

Software RAID 5 uses a lot of CPU cycles that are best left to a hardware
device.  But software RAID 1 or 1+0 on a modern Linux system of any type
should be fine in my opinion.  If you do go with HW RAID, keep in mind you
also want a card that interfaces well with Linux not just for the drive
contorller itself, but also the management interface for detecting failed
drives, rebuilding arrays, etc.  This is of course much easier with Linux
software raid.

--Jeremy

-- 
/-\
| Jeremy Portzer[EMAIL PROTECTED]  trilug.org/~jeremy |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\-/
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Oddball memory usage?

2007-02-21 Thread Jeremy Portzer
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Peter Hardy wrote:

 I'm a little puzzled by this:
 
   total   used   free sharedbuffers cached
 Mem:50050844816352 188732  0 1566443165540
 -/+ buffers/cache: 14941683510916
 Swap:   10526161052616  0
 
 Is this sort of usage normal? Filling a gigabyte of swap space while
 just under 1.5GB of memory is going towards buffers seems odd to me. And
 vmstat reports no usage of this swap space over a 15 minute period.
 
 What sort of utilities are around to analyse swap space? I'd like to get
 an idea of exactly what's using all of that memory.

If a background daemon loads a bunch of stuff into memory, but then never 
accesses those pages, it can get swapped out, in favor of buffering files 
that *are* being used.  This does improve overall performance and is 
normally useful, though counterintuitive at first.

--Jeremy

-- 
/-\
| Jeremy Portzer[EMAIL PROTECTED]  trilug.org/~jeremy |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\-/
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html