[RCSE] ESL/BRASS first contest of season

2002-01-10 Thread Tom Broeski


We now have 21 people signed up for the BRASS/ESL
contest April 20  21
So, if you were waiting to see if we would hit quota before registering,
we have hit it already.
Best get your hotel reservations in early. We will be allowing
camping again this year. There are sinks and bathrooms and picnic
shelters and grills. I need to know min of 3 weeks in advance if
there will be any campers.
There are 10 signed up for slope on Friday the 19th at Monticello (Brown's
Mountain) there are still 10 slots open.
--
BRASS
32 Mount View Dr.
Afton, VA 22920
540 943-3356 Fax 540 943-4178



Re: [RCSE] Contests; why?

2002-01-10 Thread Anker Berg-Sonne

I fly gliders because they are challenging, and I fly in contests because
that's the only way I can measure my own performance.

I see the following reasons:

A) If you regularly go on the contest circuit you make a number of friends
that you normally only see at contests.

B) Some people go to contests to win. The trouble is that if that's your
motivation you get awfully frustrated if you don't win. I'm not good enough
(yet) to win ESL contests in Expert class, and I'd have given up long ago if
this were my motivation.

C) Measuring your own performance. As the scorekeeper for the ESL I
introduced an inprovement measure that is calculated each year. I do this
for two reasons: One, it makes it possible to reward pilots for improving
their performance. Two, it is a measure of individual performance. The neat
thing is that the top fliers are the benchmark that individual
performance/improvement is measured against, so they have tiny fluctuations.
The major drawback is that it really highlights the effects of aging on the
older pilots.

Bottom line: There are better motivations for going to contests than
winning.

Anker
- Original Message -
From: Bill Swingle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RCSE Soaring (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: [RCSE] Contests; why?



 Could someone please explain something?

 Why do so many pilots need contests to fly? The are volumes of posts
arguing
 about rules and formats. Then after an event guys argue about results and
 rules. Seems silly to me.

 Bill Swingle
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Janesville, CA


 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Which GPS?

2002-01-10 Thread Bill Conkling

Thanks, I have en e-trex and the altitude reslolution sucks using the
satellites alone. A barometric alstitude would be nice.

Thanks for clarifying this.

.bc([EMAIL PROTECTED]

   http://www.widomaker.com/~conk
Williamsburg, VA 23185


On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, John Roe wrote:


 I've had several requests for the size/shape/model of GPS unit that might be 
suitable for sending up in a model to record data.  Probably the best one readily 
available for this, and one that is very popular with the full-scale crowd is the 
Garmin E-trex.  There are a couple of versions, you want the one that has barometric 
as well as GPS altitude capture, I believe it's the Vista.  The unit is about the 
size and shape of an 1800 series Nokia cell phone.  Very useful in the car as well, 
or for boating, hiking or whatever...

 JR.



 John Roe
 Laguna Hills, Ca

 www.MartialArtsAcademy.org







 -
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail.

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [RCSE] Production Runs

2002-01-10 Thread John Derstine

The Genesis full sale Flying wing was originally designed without a
horozontal stabilizer and flew fine. In order to go into production it was
neccessary to add a small stab, don't know if it was FAA or public
perception, or both that caused the change.
John Derstine

Endless Mountain Models
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.scalesoaring.net/EMM/rand.htm

-Original Message-
From: tony estep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [RCSE] Production Runs




B^2 would love to see a full-size tailless sailplane, as would many
others, but anybody who manufactured one would be setting him(her)self
up for a lifetime of lawsuits and no upside...



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Seeking old RCSD articles

2002-01-10 Thread Joedy Drulia

 
I am currently looking for copies of past articles that appeared in the 
RCSoaring Digest. The copies that I have access to only go back to around 
1996. 
 
I am seeking copies of the following articles: 
 
December 90, "Magic design shwon in 3 views and discussed..." 
 
November 91, "Weston Magic disvussed by a happy customer..." 
 
November 94, "V tail mounting problems for the Maigc..." 
 
I am willing to reimburse shipping charges and photocopy charges. 
 
 
Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com.
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [RCSE] Contests; why?

2002-01-10 Thread Rick Eckel

I've wondered the same thing many times.  And I've heard and used all of 
the familiar explanations (with which I agree).  But I think that the real 
bottom line is that people contest because interesting things happen in 
contests.  Its the same reason people watch sporting events and to some 
extent even sitcoms (ugh).

At a contest interesting things happen within a formal context that makes 
them very memorable.  Just sport flying interesting things happen but they 
often aren't in a context that makes them particularly memorable.  They 
just happen but have no meaning in any larger context.  If someone has a 
great flight while sport flying it doesn't have any other impact than it 
was just a great flight.  It didn't enhance his standing in a points 
total.  It didn't cause someone else to have to try harder.  It didn't 
catapult the pilot into a position of higher peer recognition-ie he wins or 
places in a contest.  It just kind of happened.

Contests, no matter where you place, provide a context for fun and 
interesting things to happen.  Maybe you like to rib your best friend about 
how you beat him in the contest.  Or perhaps you like to track your 
progress as your ability to score a high percentage of the winners 
score.  Or perhaps you want to score more landing points than even the 
winning pilot.  Its all interesting stuff.

I'm always pleased to congratulate a sport flyer when he is excited about a 
20 minute flight.  I won't harsh his mellow and it is a significant 
feat.  But its also mostly about the conditions.  Sometimes 20 minute 
flights are much easier than other times.  A contest levels the conditions 
because, to a large extent, everyone is flying in the same conditions.  Its 
much more interesting that way.

Some guys focus on the winning aspect of contesting and fail to recognize 
that its the interesting things that happen in the contest that is the real 
fun.  Of course winning really snaps a lot of interesting things into 
focus! and makes savoring the memories much more enjoyable.

Rick
Orlando


At 07:03 PM 1/9/02 -0700, Tom Hoopes wrote:
At 10:19 AM 1/9/02 -0800, Bill Swingle wrote:
 
 Could someone please explain something?
 
 Why do so many pilots need contests to fly? The are volumes of posts arguing
 about rules and formats. Then after an event guys argue about results and
 rules. Seems silly to me.
 
 Bill Swingle
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Janesville, CA

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Contests; why?

2002-01-10 Thread Monkey King

On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Ron Scharck wrote:

 Great article, Tom. The fact of the matter is that whenever that plane
 leaves our hands, regardless of method, it is always a contest...if nothing
 else, between the pilot and Mother Nature.

It's not a contest between the pilot and mother nature any more than a
surfer or a sailor is in contest with mother nature.  For me, it's a
matter of finding a dialogue, finding a way of working with nature.

In my opinion, Nature is the kind of opponent you don't want to tangle
with.

I think it comes down to the nature of the individual: some people are
inspired toward greatness by competition with others and some are inspired
by competition with themselves.

It's inspiring for me to watch videos of other peoples' competitions and
see how great they fly.  But, even if I had a shot at placing in a
contest, I really don't think I'd compete.

I was thinking about this yesterday and I realized that I'd be excited if
someone was competing with one of my planes, though.

-J

 
 Ron Scharck
 San Diego, CA
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Tom Hoopes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; RCSE Soaring (E-mail)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:03 PM
 Subject: Re: [RCSE] Contests; why?
 
 
  At 10:19 AM 1/9/02 -0800, Bill Swingle wrote:
  
  Could someone please explain something?
  
  Why do so many pilots need contests to fly? The are volumes of posts
 arguing
  about rules and formats. Then after an event guys argue about results and
  rules. Seems silly to me.
  
  Bill Swingle
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Janesville, CA
 
 
  Hi Bill,
 
  I don't know about others' motivation but I can explain why I like
 contesting.
  I was present when our local club was formed back in 1979. I loved to fly,
 but
  had no interest in contests.
 
  School, family, and business took all of my time for the next ten years
 and
  flying fell by the wayside. In '89 my wife told me that I was becoming a
  workaholic and needed a hobby. I pulled out my trusty Oly II that had been
 in
  its box for almost ten years.
 
  I showed up at the slope, tossed the Oly out and everything came back to
 me in
  a quick rush, just like riding a bike. After an hour of smiles, I was
  surprised
  to have several pilots come over and introduce themselves. They saw a
  potential
  new club member and most likely another contestant, so they started the
  squeeze to get me out to an upcoming contest. I told them that I didn't
 like
  contests and was kind of a lone wolf or some load of crap to get them to
  leave me alone.
 
  In the next couple of weeks I began receiving phone calls and further
  invitations to participate in another thermal contest. I could see that
 lone
  wolf thing wasn't working, nor was anything else to get them to leave me
  alone, so I came to the contest.
 
  The contest was a simple four round precision duration thermal format, yet
 I
  was incredibly nervous and before long, I was sweating like a rat under
 hot
  lights. I was sure that I had made a huge mistake. I got through the first
  round without crashing, hitting someone or something, and not looking like
 an
  idiot. By the end of the contest, I was actually having a ton of fun and
 began
  to realize that the only person that considered me to be an idiot was
 myself.
 
  I drove home with a smile and replayed in my mind a low level save and
 decent
  landing that I made during the contest. In a fun fly environment, I would
 not
  have attempted the low level save and the landing would have been a run
 of
  the
  mill slide somewhere away from the point the I had originally intended.
 
  The contest environment helped me to improve my flying skills dramatically
 and
  I was no longer a nervous wreak. The first time that I attended a really
 large
  contest (Visalia) in  1991, I was truely inspired by some of the superb
 flying
  that I witnessed and could appreciate.
 
  I've learned alot of skills, techniques, styles through contesting and
 have
  had
  alot of fun doing so. Of course the social aspect of the contest can be as
  much
  fun as the contest itsself.  Where else have you seen a fun-o-meter in
  action
  or a vasectomy in a raffle, h?
 
  Along the path, I've flown a plane 3,000' above me while sitting in a
 truck
  bed
  doing 90 mph, marvelled that a composite toy remains in one piece while
 two
  linemen type brutes try to pull it apart on some fishing line, or watching
 a 7
  ounce plane slowly circle in lift so light that only mother nature and I
 are
  aware of it. Fun with a purpose.
 
  I know why I love contest, just because
 
 
  Tom Hoopes - ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
 
 --   Hoopes Designs   -
  Taking the hassle out of wiring harnesses
 
  RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
 and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL 

Re: [RCSE] Kevlar cutting

2002-01-10 Thread Bob Johnson


 This is speculation, cause I've never tried it, but perhaps a rotary
cutter would work,
 especially with the masking tape that has already been suggested.  What is
a rotary
 cutter?  It looks like a high-tech pizza cutting wheel and you use it
pretty much the same
 way.  The usual application is cutting fabric for clothes, quilts and
such.  Mostly they
 seem to be useful for straight cuts and moderate curves.  Might be
difficult for tighter
 curves or inside corners.  A rotary cutter is always used on a cutting mat
which is a
 plastic sheet with a moderately hard surface.  The cutter wheel cuts
through the fabric,
 and slightly into the pad.  Cutting slightly into the pad insures that the
fabric fibers
 are cut through, but the pad protects your table top and provides a
consistant surface for
 the rotary cutter that does not damage the cutting wheel.  You can buy the
rotary cutter,
 replacement blades and cutting pad at a fabric store.  Ask when they will
be on sale,
 cause the list prices seem a bit high to me.

Mark,
In order to be successful in cutting kevlar with a rotary cutter, the
'moderately hard cutting surface' must be extremely hard. Using a moderately
hard surface such as a 'self-healing' matt to cut kevlar only results in the
kevlar fibers being forced into the cutting matt and not being cut. By the
time you have a hard enough surface, the rotary cutter would rapidly be
destroyed and it is highly unlikely that the kevlar would be cut.

The best way to cut kevlar is with a shears that has a serated edge.
Anything else will yield a less than satisfactory result. I believe that
both Aerospace Composites and Composite Structures sells them.

Regards,
Bob Johnson
Fond du Lac, WI


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [RCSE] Contests; why?

2002-01-10 Thread Douglas, Brent

I was nervous to fly in my first contest, was just to the point where
landing didn't necessarily involve repairing - one of the fliers helping me
(thanks, Dave!) told me that they were just an excuse to fly...

I still think that holds true, for me at least.  Even the more 'serious'
fliers seem to be there for the fun - the only intense times I witness are
people staring down the tape on landing

I hope that doesn't mean I'm missing something  ; )

brent
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Re : Kerf Foam Question

2002-01-10 Thread Bonfiglio Tullio

Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 23:04:33 -0800

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 

Question, Assuming a basic melt speed, what kind of kerf do people use to

cut the templates to provide an accurate core, assuming the thickness of the

eventual FG covering will be very small, like for a HLG. For those using

programs, how do the programs treat the expected kerf?

 

Hi, Chris.

Assuming you have the stomach to carry on the reading of my bad digestion
thoughts about the kerf, have a look at my site (
http://space.tin.it/sport/ocapofer http://space.tin.it/sport/ocapofer ) in
the Article section.

Ciao from Italy (and good digestion ! 8-

Tullio


begin 600 winmail.dat
M)\^(A\/`0:0``$```!``$``00!@`(Y`0```#H``$(@``
M$E032Y-:6-R;W-O9G0@36%I;Y.;W1E`#$(`06``P`.T@!``H`
M$``4`!X`!``J`0$@@`,`#@```-('`0`*`!``%0`*@$!8`!`$W
M,3@P,C8V1#4T,#!$-C$Q.#$R-C`P-C`P.#=#-$$U-@P!@$$@`$`%)E
M(#H@2V5R9B!;V%M(%%U97-T:6]N`-0'`0V`!```@```$#D`8`3`L`
M`#`+``(``0(!,0`!W%!#1$9%0C`Y``$``@!'
M`#BANQ`%Y1`:H;L(`LJ5L(``US'-T+F1L;```3DE40?F_N`$`J@`W
MV6X```!#.EQ03U-405Q;VYF+G!S=``8`+3+YRO2AT0F'3B(6%$
M:(^B@TRWNKTH=$)ATXB%A1B/Y$9-`!@`M,M[
MG*]*'18=.(A841HC\*08`F;50`UA!)@!@'Q*5A@```!292`Z
M($MEF8@1F]A;2!1=65S=EO;@!``#D`8/7\5NJ9P0$`'```0```!@```!2
M92`Z($MEF8@1F]A;2!1=65S=EO;@``7$``0```!8!P9GL#)1M)H!]
M`%01UH$F``(?$I6#%``0H```!3TY24=,24\#`!I`
M`!X`,$`!@```$)/3D9)1TQ)3P,`4```@$)$`$```8!0``
ME`4``)40``!,6D9UK`LB0,`@!R8W!G,3(U@C(#0VAT;6PQ`S`_`0,!]PJ`
M`J0#XP(`8VC!L!S970P(`3`H#_$`,`4`16%4'LA'5#E$#`=T0US(``;#
M$=4S!$80V6\2ZQ'C.\)]SL8SPXP-3L1T@Q@8P!0PD!9#,VDQ%@Z4T(!`
M*EP.L@4!D=#,@/%$`$]#5%E012!(`%1-3!054),`$E#((M+R]71#-#
M(#!$5$0?1#22+A%@5'(`G1I`B##!T`@,$5.(CX1XQWGYQZ0J,BG#$Y'J`?
M4B*.XQV`)/!%040BC0[Q(Z\+)Y\D=#8.\#Q-15002`%H`(P?!T/2(+!`?
M4S4A0#`N,C.*,2$P,2P`,(@(@`)!X`]1R)015)!5-1/4B*--IA+R9_'E$+
M*0\03418#Q3T2.62*-'/$P;VY-AZ@N$1)5B*`'?,`(2```*\TY1%@,B\S
M/S8F05`TOXDUPT1A*Q`Z(%)@+0L(302@.1`=`P%/!!+#`Z,#0Z,QZ0+?PP
M.P`.*8*HCB7G(XMO\*HCV(-?T!P[1.'$V'SOS@_/IA`V$Z()#:)D%
M$'-`!/$\QS`'U!($N!:!M+,`=JS@=@XF'C`@$,7/#Z?1K\?RK`J-$
MT`$0*U``P`,0=/QO.A#P1.]%\D+Z`S$(D#1L9!W9DV@X!S=)1[2!\14A_0
M3DL@`/]*OT5K%^`!\4V@$2`,!@P_0!!=0,A2$=/KT730Q\Z]2-U3*,WQ`
M$D$BC429_U':CY4[SR?/:]63S_/0-\/0]_UUO1P-N8G-P\4=Y7=A/!=:
MCUN?7*_?7;]SU_?8.]A_%$*4$Y02R'A.G!U;0N`9Z`@82!B80W1(``
MW1XP(0``Z871``5`HFL+@0@;V(`:P2046(`9\@;_!OU!E]!U$3`@
M3W!EOV;/9]^?:.]I_VL/;!]BF-U!4#D=AR,65MU$K$`0@YT]P9`#8'9I
M`0!O``.@_P#0J`A@L0*M$8T#IP;T#+;J5ZXV@-XMN!Y`$(/]P\2WL=[5Z
MX7)_X]TGW6O3W:_=\]XWV(:978K(77[!T!$0$JT8CP!1!NX0/P[T5@;R!Q
M\(G!6_0`,!%8.DZQI2`@`A`%P\0$A,1RY$0`6QN!O_W(AA!NT8_
M@^WX/OA/^_A@^''V(:_$)PSPSIP_XS`!^!Q7KBE99R0!C0''IN)E
M_P8RL0-!Q(OX_C6^.?X^/D)^1KY*_D\_#8A])*E-004XJT`M@4000/3DT
M.Q`VHQ`Q_#4M+($.(#L!G\^@WU$_Z(RI`E6'V,_9$]E7YFOFK__I^^WYWO
MGO^D3Z@?HB^C/]NR'Q]`:3IP1,,NI6^F?_^J;ZM_K(^ROZZOK[^PS[8?O[V?
ML_^U#\OPK-NAWD(8/U*0(\'K33E`#1#P[+^8PK`BM$('K3?S_`0I!
MUTXA;O!P\6V*X)O,'#0G4X@9VX$+,,L75G#K#_!`!H`A@L1Q(I81R)O
M$/D88]K;P`%0,PA(;'*#QW`)C##TGK#K!T#HG(#I4`#092XATXN9R'`
MT_$82]OR5#4X;_!)!,CTV?3J?3G]2O40]2[_8;]E_N9]57\*O5W@IT$__
MP#,+@'K3!Q`AT,1@R(80?\AX;@/N1_?'[L_O$_@?[YO_[]_P(_!G^JOP[_$
MS\7?[\1.0PP8`#4B!)`9!L98K@*$61(?/8,R)(,8AXF_M4S@M*?@QY3__
MYD_G7^AOZ7_OK^N?[*_MO[_S#_W_\._Q_P(/`Q-44A#]BW!O^'_YC_J?^Z_\
MOP+O?_[?)$[[1-(S@7S$6.'NT3'/'E$W+M(E'R-G?0$60`,`WC^O;P``
M`P`4``#``)9`@,`5DP^@`@@!@``P$8`
M`X4#`,#`1@`0A0,`
MPX`((`8``,!`%*%``.:@$`'@#B@`@@!@``P```
M`$8`5(4```$$.2XP``,`XX`((`8``,!
M``%P#L@`@@!@``P$8`#H4#
M`.V#`1@`1A0,`[X`((`8``,``
M``!`!B%'@#^@`@@!@``P$8`-H4`
M``$!`!X`_X`((`8``,!`#%```!
M`0```!```#`1@`XA0```0$`
MPT!@``P$8`!H4`(R`
M``#`1@#A0```0```!,Y-#`R-C(V,34M,3`P,3(P,#(`
M``,`\3\0!P`F```#`#8```,`_3_D!P`$/\`4`
M`0```#D```!C/4E4.V$](#MP/4%.4T%,1$\@16YEF=I83ML/4=!4$]35$$M
M,#(P,3$P,34R,#,P6BTX,34T-0``#A``0H```!3TY24=,24\`
M#E``0H```!3TY24=,24\```!```PR@W]5NJ9P0%```@P]((2
M5^J9P0$`#T``0$`'@`=#@$84F4@.B!+97)F($9O
M86T@475EW1I;VX`'@`U$`$_/#$V13`V0SS-#,R,T0U,3%-D$Y
M,#!,$0P,C)#,C(S,#%13DY.#E`;6%I;YA96XN86YS86QD;RYI=#X```L`
M*0`!P`C```#``80[Y-(V0,`!Q`]`@```P`0$``#`!$0
M`!X`!`!90```$1!5$4Z5T5$+#E*04XR,#`R,C,Z,#0Z,S,M,#@P,$92
M3TTZ(D-(4DE30%-#4D],3%-!3D1%4D-/32(\0TA225-`4T-23TQ,4T%.1$52
M0T]-/$U!24Q43SI#2%))4T!30U)/3$P``@%_``$_/#$V13`V
M0SS-#,R,T0U,3%-D$Y,#!,$0P,C)#,C(S,#%13DY.#E`;6%I;YA96XN
/86YS86QD;RYI=#X``TZ
`
end
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] zagi upgrade.

2002-01-10 Thread Douglas, Brent

hey all,

I've been seeing better SP400 pusher prop setups lately, any ideas where to
get?

The one I liked best had a regular looking zagi prop reamed out, held in
place with a nut.

Anyone, class?

Brent
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [RCSE] Kevlar cutting

2002-01-10 Thread Jeff Winder
Title: RE: [RCSE] Kevlar cutting





I originally tried cutting Kevlar with the masking tape trick, but found that removing the masking tape from the cut piece would fray the edges producing a 'not clean' finished piece. 

A much better way to cut Kevlar is to take an old pair of scissors and file a pretty flat angle into them. 


Normally, scissors have a rather steep angle on each blade. This is great for cutting most materials, but really causes a problem when cutting Kevlar. The thing to do is to file each blade of the scissors almost flat. Don't worry about getting them smooth, as a rougher surface seems to help. 

The flatter angle of the scissors will now 'grip' and hold the Kevlar while it is being cut.


Can't take credit for this one, got the idea from Denny Maize at PoleCat Aero Plane Works. 


Jeff Winder
Cincinnati, OH 



-Original Message-
From: Bob Johnson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:41 AM
To: Mark D. Holm; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RCSE] Kevlar cutting



 This is speculation, cause I've never tried it, but perhaps a rotary
cutter would work,
 especially with the masking tape that has already been suggested. What is
a rotary
 cutter? It looks like a high-tech pizza cutting wheel and you use it
pretty much the same
 way. The usual application is cutting fabric for clothes, quilts and
such. Mostly they
 seem to be useful for straight cuts and moderate curves. Might be
difficult for tighter
 curves or inside corners. A rotary cutter is always used on a cutting mat
which is a
 plastic sheet with a moderately hard surface. The cutter wheel cuts
through the fabric,
 and slightly into the pad. Cutting slightly into the pad insures that the
fabric fibers
 are cut through, but the pad protects your table top and provides a
consistant surface for
 the rotary cutter that does not damage the cutting wheel. You can buy the
rotary cutter,
 replacement blades and cutting pad at a fabric store. Ask when they will
be on sale,
 cause the list prices seem a bit high to me.


Mark,
In order to be successful in cutting kevlar with a rotary cutter, the
'moderately hard cutting surface' must be extremely hard. Using a moderately
hard surface such as a 'self-healing' matt to cut kevlar only results in the
kevlar fibers being forced into the cutting matt and not being cut. By the
time you have a hard enough surface, the rotary cutter would rapidly be
destroyed and it is highly unlikely that the kevlar would be cut.


The best way to cut kevlar is with a shears that has a serated edge.
Anything else will yield a less than satisfactory result. I believe that
both Aerospace Composites and Composite Structures sells them.


Regards,
Bob Johnson
Fond du Lac, WI



RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [RCSE] Hard data on L/D values for models

2002-01-10 Thread tony estep


--- Anker Berg-Sonne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Flying at max L/D is great when looking for thermals in relatively
still air.
 However, where flying at best L/D is really, really important is when
you 
 are trying to return to the field from downwind in a stiff breeze, or
a
 howling hurricane.
 The problem is that flying at max L/D isn't optimal. Some higher
 speed is.

Right. For the math of this, see 
http://www.mvsaclub.com/articles/penetrate.htm
As you feed in downtrim, airspeed, ground speed, and sinking speed all
increase. The sinking speed is airspeed / (L/D), and the ground speed
is airspeed - wind velocity.

An easy way to figure out how far upwind you can fly from a given
altitude at a given speed is to calculate the associated sinking speed,
then figure out how long the plane can stay in the air; once you know
that, you can get how far the plane can fly over the ground by
multiplying time in the air * ground speed. To do this, you need the
plane's polar.

As Anker points out, best penetration typically occurs at a lower CL
(i.e. at a faster speed) than does max L/D. For my simulated 3M plane
loaded to 13 oz., best penetration comes at a CL of 0.5 if the wind is
10 mph, 0.4 if it's 15 mph, and 0.3 if it's 20 mph.


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Hard data on L/D values for models

2002-01-10 Thread Dick Williamson

Whenever a discussion of optimum flight strategy in head winds and 
sink comes up, I go back to an excellent web site that graphically 
ties all of this to drag polars:

http://home.att.net/~jdburch/polar.htm

In a head wind, you do not want to fly at the max L/D, as illustrated 
nicely on this web site.

Dick



I can add some credibility to these numbers.

Flying at max L/D is great when looking for thermals in relatively still
air.

However, where flying at best L/D is really, really important is when you
are trying to return to the field from downwind in a stiff breeze, or a
howling hurricane.

The problem is that flying at max L/D isn't optimal. Some higher speed is.
To comprehend this, it is useful to imagine trying to get back in a breeze
which is exactly your best L/D speed, It isn't difficult to understand that
you will have zero ground speed and never get home. So best L/D is some
unknown speed that is higher than max L/D. What that speed is, is totally
dependent on the specific wind speed, and is one of the most difficult
things to learn. At the F3J selection trials a couple of years ago I was
most impressed by the ability of the top pilots ability to come back home
from way, way downwind in a wind that was really pushing them back. If I had
a really good feeling for that I would be able to stay in lift much longer
than I currently dare.

Anker
-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Richard C. WilliamsonPhone:  781-981-7857
Room C-317   FAX:781-981-0122
Lincoln Laboratory   Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
244 Wood Street
Lexington, MA 02420-9108
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Hard data on L/D values for models

2002-01-10 Thread tony estep


--- Paul Breed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Cool data,
   what does your simulation predict for minimum sink for these
 aircraft?

For my hypothetical 3M plane, minimum sink at 10 oz./sq ft is 1.2
ft/sec. That's at an airspeed of about 17 - 18 mph. 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Contests - why?

2002-01-10 Thread tony estep

It's no different from 25 cent skins when you're playing golf with your
buddies. It adds purpose to your flying - as much or as little as you
want to make it. It can't hurt to try to do your best in anything. 

Contests make you pay more attention to detail in trimming your plane
and make you work on flying skills, neither of which is a bad thing.
And you get some memorable moments, for better or worse. I've got some
wood and a Nats trophy from days when things went right, and some
rueful stories to tell from the (many more) days when they didn't.

I always urge our new club members to come out and try contest flying.
Some do, a larger number don't. But for those who do, I think it adds
another dimension to a hobby that offers so much richness of experience.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] RE: Donation to US F3J Team

2002-01-10 Thread mark browning

Hell IT was The fastest and ugliest flight I have ever seen from my ASS
YES I was Pulling
Mark B


From: James V. Bacus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RCSE] RE: Donation to US F3J Team
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 23:22:53 -0600

At 11:03 PM 1/9/2002, Chris  Laura wrote:
Hey Mark,
 For those of us that weren't at the team selections and didn't get 
much
info about how they went, fill us in about your record!

 Mark Taylor
(record holder- 2.7 second F3J flight with 55 landing points.)

  8-)) big seg

Imagine a two man tow fully tensioned and then an instant pop off that went
right over his head and landed behind the pilots right on his tape.  One
big swooping fast plant.

Very fast in the heat of F3J, wild...  I witnessed it from a few lanes
over, kinda cool  heh heh heh


Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club,  AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level III
ICQ 6997780R/C Soaring Page at www.jimbacus.net

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Hard data on L/D values for models

2002-01-10 Thread John Roe
 Some good posts on this thread.
 As pointed out by Anker, flying at the air speed that produces the best L/D for a stationary airmass will by definition cover the most ground (horizontal movement) for the altitude lost (vertical movement). We as pilots are often interested in being able to travel as far as possible over the ground when the airmass IS moving, either horizontally (wind) or vertically (sink). Usually if the airmass is rising (lift) we are content to stay in that area of the airmass, and will even circle ;-)
 The rule of thumb is to "speed up" in sink, or into the wind, and slow down in lift. But how much? And which airfoil/planform/airframe configurations can still maintain a high L/D a a wider range of(higher and lower) airspeeds? This information would be wonderful to have. If drawn out graphically as a polar it would show for each aircraft design what to expect in the way the plane could be flown.It would alsoshow to all on paperwhy some airfoils are notorious for being "fussy" about the speed they are flown at (sharply peaked polar) or not fussy (flat polar). If plotted with minimin sink speed and stall speed, and maybe even stall speed in landing configuration we could suddenly be able to know much about a design just by reading the (accurate ;-) performance data. Except for launch...hmmm
 The basic desire would be a plane that could achieve it's best L/D even at very high (air)speed, allowing it to effortlessly penetrate even very high winds, at low wing-loadings. This low wing-loading plane with high speed L/D cruise then would still have a low sinkrate at low speed, allowing tight thermal turns in weak lift while still climbing and be able to slow way down to land.
 This is pretty much exactly what most designs have been striving for, with compromises being made to optimize for regional or personal preferences. In the USA we have the popular "west coast" planes, i.e. the Addiction, which gives up range in wind for better climb and especially slower landing speeds, as in California we "always make our times anyway" and many contests are decided...literally...by a few inches difference in landing scores over a whole contest.
 In Europe they have wind, lots of it, and low clouds and often poor lift. They prefer planes that perhaps don't land as accurately (they measure by the meter not the inch anyway) but can hang in the wind, then get back to the field after taking the one thermal way downwind to make the typically 10 minutes or longer European thermal task time. We fly (relatively) much shorter tasks with much higher precision landings, in different weather conditions.
 Understanding and quantifying theseperformance and stylistic differences would seem to me to make a lot of sellers and purchasers of cool toys happier. There would be less of the suprise and dissapointment that I hear about when a model that is supposed to be "the best" doesn't do what the owner wants it to. Usuallythrough no fault of it's own. This info would also make ballasting less of a "black art," atleast some of the time anyways, and allow people to buy a range of planes to suit the conditions they expect to fly in. Plus lots more to debate on RCSE.
 I think the technology is just about here now...
JR
John RoeLaguna Hills, Ca
www.MartialArtsAcademy.org

Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail.

[RCSE] Re: Contests; why?

2002-01-10 Thread John Roe
Contests are the engines that drive the development of the planes we all enjoy for each our own reasons. Contest pilots push out the envelope of performance. Contest pilots want answers to questions that most pilots would never ask, but all builders and pilots get to benefit and extend their enjoyment of the hobby because of these answers. Mostly pilots fly contests because of the wealth and adoration of ourwives and women everywhere who find us irresistable in our shorts and floppy hats with astopwatch around our neck.
JR
PS. the REAL secret is the bare feet...John RoeLaguna Hills, Ca
www.MartialArtsAcademy.org

Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail.

RE: [RCSE] tip stall tape

2002-01-10 Thread Bill Swingle

The tape should go on the top.

The tape is intended to turbulate the air flow's boundary layer. It is
intended to delay stall because the turbulated flow tends to remain better
attached to upper surface.

In addition to a saw tooth shape, a simple linear arrangement is also used.
The linear style is called a trip strip. The saw tooth is called a vortex
generator. It's my understanding that both are similar in what they are
intended to do. But, one may be more effective than the other.

It's my opinion that the tapes are a band-aide measure. They can be helpful
but often there is a better way. Plus, using them incurs a drag penalty.

I'm sorry but I'm not familiar with what you're called a Gurney flap.

Bill Swingle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Janesville, CA


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Re: Contests; why?

2002-01-10 Thread Anker Berg-Sonne



Bummer,

If that's the secret I'll never make it! I hate 
being tickled under my feet. :-(

But thanks for letting us know!

Anker

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  John 
  Roe 
  To: Rick Eckel ; Tom Hoopes ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  ; RCSE Soaring 
  (E-mail) 
  Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:03 
  PM
  Subject: [RCSE] Re: Contests; why?
  
  Contests are the engines that drive the development of the planes we all 
  enjoy for each our own reasons. Contest pilots push out the 
  envelope of performance. Contest pilots want answers to questions that 
  most pilots would never ask, but all builders and pilots get to benefit and 
  extend their enjoyment of the hobby because of these answers. Mostly 
  pilots fly contests because of the wealth and adoration of ourwives and 
  women everywhere who find us irresistable in our shorts and floppy hats with 
  astopwatch around our neck. 
  JR 
  PS. the REAL secret is the bare feet...
  John RoeLaguna Hills, Ca
  www.MartialArtsAcademy.org
  
  
  
  
  Do You Yahoo!?Send FREE video 
  emails in Yahoo! 
Mail.


Re: [RCSE] Re: Contests; why?

2002-01-10 Thread RCsoarnut

Dudes

  Attending contests has simply become a matter of economics for me.  Here in 
the ESL  we don't get the 200 person contests like they do on the west coast 
so guys like Anker and Tom and Phil have taken to giving me Show money just 
to add to the list of people who's ass they have kicked on a given day:-)  
Hell, on a good weekend I can cover travel expenses and make enough besides 
to go out Saturday night with one of those adoring Glider Groupies that are 
so predominant in our sport.
  Reminds me, Guys, it's time to negotiate the 2002 contract:-)

Denny Maize
Polecat Aeroworks
(717) 789-0146
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A HREF=http://www.polecataero.com;http://www.polecataero.com/A
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Contests; why?

2002-01-10 Thread Fred Guilfoyle


 At a contest interesting things happen within a
 formal context that makes 
 them very memorable.  Just sport flying interesting
 things happen but they 
 often aren't in a context that makes them
 particularly memorable

Rick has a good point.  My first contest, first
flight, I nailed the landing, absolutely perfect. 
Second flight, an almost perfect landing.  I was
totally jazzed!!  Third flight a mid-air, totalled the
airplane, I was bummed out!  But I sure as hell
remembered those three flights.

Fred Guilfoyle
My stuff: http://www.evergo.net/~guil/buildflyindex.htm

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Re: Contests; why?

2002-01-10 Thread Jack Iafret



Hey barefoot, come and use that technique in our 
32nd annual Snow-Fly on 16FE02 here in Michigan. :).


Jack Iafret"Keeper of the Nostalgia Rules"

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  John 
  Roe 
  To: Rick Eckel ; Tom Hoopes ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  ; RCSE Soaring 
  (E-mail) 
  Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:03 
  PM
  Subject: [RCSE] Re: Contests; why?
  
  Contests are the engines that drive the development of the planes we all 
  enjoy for each our own reasons. Contest pilots push out the 
  envelope of performance. Contest pilots want answers to questions that 
  most pilots would never ask, but all builders and pilots get to benefit and 
  extend their enjoyment of the hobby because of these answers. Mostly 
  pilots fly contests because of the wealth and adoration of ourwives and 
  women everywhere who find us irresistable in our shorts and floppy hats with 
  astopwatch around our neck. 
  JR 
  PS. the REAL secret is the bare feet...
  John RoeLaguna Hills, Ca
  www.MartialArtsAcademy.org
  
  
  
  
  Do You Yahoo!?Send FREE video 
  emails in Yahoo! 
Mail.


Re: [RCSE] Hard data on L/D values for models

2002-01-10 Thread John O'Sullivan



Dick Williamson wrote:

 Whenever a discussion of optimum flight strategy in head winds and
 sink comes up, I go back to an excellent web site that graphically
 ties all of this to drag polars:

 http://home.att.net/~jdburch/polar.htm

 In a head wind, you do not want to fly at the max L/D, as illustrated
 nicely on this web site.

 Dick

 

Thanks Dick:
 An excellent practical example for those of us who fly by intuition.
Now if there was something similar to explain the so called downwind turn!

--
John O'Sullivan
Nova Scotia

Wind and Wave Models
http://www.windandwavemodels.com/index.html


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Hard data on L/D values for models

2002-01-10 Thread John O'Sullivan



[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In a message dated 1/10/2002 2:46:41 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Now if there was something similar to explain the so called downwind
 turn! 
 Hey John

   I did a lot of research on that with my canard skeeter F3J plane.  Has
 something to do with which way the water rotates in your toilet:-)

 Denny Maize

Tried the same thing with my Whipper Whiz but had trouble deciding whether
to whip or whiz!
Tried DS on the lee side of the waves in the toilet but it a was foiled by
coriolis rotation.
Could not use it for F3J as it came without CG or tow hook instructions.

Don't forget to file your Whipper Whiz contest results with me. Contest ends
15 January. Total of three best flights in a single day count. If you want
plans of stretched Discus launched version email me and I'll send on a pdf
plan.
Details at http://www.windandwavemodels.com/WhipperWhiz.html
Kevin Moseley of England is current leader.


--
John O'Sullivan
Nova Scotia

Wind and Wave Models
http://www.windandwavemodels.com/index.html


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[RCSE] Re:2D CAD Programs for Macintosh

2002-01-10 Thread WDimick


In a message dated 1/8/02 5:14:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Any 2D CAD shareware programs for the Mac?
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I got TurboCAD for my PC, but wonder if there is something similar for the
Apple line of computers. 

TIA for any help, Keith

Keith,
I use DenebaCad for the mac from Deneba software (find them on the web) Great 
program, but it is definately not shareware . I did use a program called 
Cadintosh for a while that was share or freeware (works, but limited tools). 
I found it through an interesting web site named Cadtopia.com they are worth 
checking out anyway. DenebaCad is definately the best I have found for the 
Mac. I exchange files with friends that use Master Cam/Autocad for machine 
control all the time and have zero problems. Good luck on your search.
Walt Dimick
I.R.F. Machine Works, Inc.

*
Have you checked out I.R.F. Machine Works' precision and heavy duty accessorie
s for rotary flap and aileron drivers? The components for this totally clean 
and hidden system for moving control surfaces are now available 
premanufactured.
Get the scoop for your next building project at our RDS web site:
http://www.irfmachineworks.com/rds 
**I.R.F. also builds the Little Big Winch, a complete, personal launching 
system for RC sailplanes up to 3.5 meters. 
http://www.irfmachineworks.com/lbwinch
*


RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Cobra V2

2002-01-10 Thread James V. Bacus

At 03:20 PM 1/10/2002, Jack Strother wrote:
Just thought you might like to know.

Capn', I know the Cobra kits have been fairly complete in the past, does 
the new V2 come complete with a wool sock?  8-)


Jim
Downers Grove, IL
Member of the Chicago SOAR club,  AMA 592537LSF 7560 Level III
ICQ 6997780R/C Soaring Page at www.jimbacus.net

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] Any wind anywhere

2002-01-10 Thread Simon Van Leeuwen

Come join us...we have lots...

Dieter @ ShredAir wrote:
 
 Watching the news, the wind appears to be in Afganistan, but the LZs suck...
 
 Dieter
 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
   Simon Van Leeuwen, Calgary, Alberta
 RADIUS SYSTEMS
Cogito-Ergo-Zoom
  IAC25233*MAAC12835*IMAC1756*LSF5953*IMAA20209
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [RCSE] What I found out about tooling costs.

2002-01-10 Thread Mike Bailey

With some work you could probably make a wing plug and then lay up an
acceptable set of wing molds. The costs would only be comparatively low with
more labor on your part. You can also do a good job with bagged wings.
Mike

- Original Message -
From: bcourtice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 9:52 PM
Subject: [RCSE] What I found out about tooling costs.


 Several people replied to my inquiry off-line, and several others have
also
 asked me what I may have found out.

 The reason I asked the question to start with  is that I like to design
and
 fly PSS warbirds, and I have often thought it would be very cool if there
 were some high quality all composite kits available. I imagine the market
is
 probably not that large. It may even be doubtful that a quality product
 could be realized with any reasonable hope of making a couple of bucks or
at
 least breaking even on the investment. Still, it sure would be nice to be
 able to buy a slope warbird with the same level of quality and
 prefabrication that we are now finding in the conventional moldie
market.

 What I found out is that CNC molds are VERY expensive! One gentleman is
 working on tooling a design and was quoted $4,000 per wing. Tome Copp of
 f3x.com said he could probably get the job done for about $5,000. Several
 others estimated prices in the $20,000 plus range!!

 Anyway, at this point I am not feeling very inclined to jump right in! I
am
 actually pretty amazed that we have as many molded airplanes to choose
from
 as we do, considering how expensive it is for manufacturers to market a
 product of this type.
 ---
 Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
 Version: 6.0.313 / Virus Database: 174 - Release Date: 1/2/2002

 RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe
and unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News.  Send subscribe and 
unsubscribe requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]