Re: ComplexPhraseQueryParser and wildcards
iorixxx wrote: Hi Jean, Since you use WDF, your best bet can be to modify your query : cross link* compiler~50 crosslink* compiler~50 Thanks but crosslink* compiler~50 returns nothing (seems correct to me however) cross link* compiler~50 does not return exactly what I want e.g it returns: A cross and a linker and a compiler I want the exact expression cross link* e.g cross linkage, cross linking, cross linked ... Jean-Michel -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ComplexPhraseQueryParser-and-wildcards-tp2742244p2757396.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: solr upgrade question
Didn't get any responses. But I tried luke 1.0.1 and it did the magic. I run optimization and after that solr got up. Best Regards Alexander Aristov On 30 March 2011 15:47, Alexander Aristov alexander.aris...@gmail.comwrote: People Is were way to upgrade existsing index from solr 1.4 to solr 4(trunk). When I configured solr 4 and launched it complained about incorrect lucence file version (3 instead of old 2) Are there any procedures to convert index? Best Regards Alexander Aristov
TermsComponent and Morelikethis
Hi! plz tell me how can we filter the termcomponent handler result on the basis of user query .Also explain me how interesting terms are shown in morelikethis for ml on the basis of user query. Thanks! Isha
Re: How to use SolrSimilarity with Luke?
str name=http://localhost:8080/nutch/scoringtest1.html; 2.188457 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(content:artifici in 58), product of: 1.4142135 = tf(termFreq(content:artifici)=2) 3.0949457 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=65) 0.5 = *fieldNorm*(field=content, doc=58) /str So Solr interface provides with all I want. Luke is still prettier. On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Gabriele Kahlout gabri...@mysimpatico.com wrote: Hello, I'm not sure what's the Default Similarity Luke uses but I doubt it's SolrSimilarity (which I modified). I see the field to change the similarity used but typing org.apache.solr.search.SolrSimilarity doesn't work (Default similarity remains selected). Adding debugQuery=true to the query on Solr Web Interface gives most of what I want, except for the FieldNorm I see in Luke[1] . How can I see that with Solr too? $ cd $SOLR_HOME $ ant luke [1] http://screencast.com/t/I1YqGFZ2n -- Regards, K. Gabriele --- unchanged since 20/9/10 --- P.S. If the subject contains [LON] or the addressee acknowledges the receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email. subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧ time(x) Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this). If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the email does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid code starts with a hyphen and ends with X. ∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈ L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)). -- Regards, K. Gabriele --- unchanged since 20/9/10 --- P.S. If the subject contains [LON] or the addressee acknowledges the receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email. subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧ time(x) Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this). If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the email does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid code starts with a hyphen and ends with X. ∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈ L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).
How could I set multi-value for a field in DataImporter
Since the interface of DataImporter return a Map, I can't put multi value
for a same field, right?
Example:
I write a class extending DataImporter, and want to index {value1,
value2} for field name.
How should I do?
Many thanks.
Kun
Re: Unexpected character '0' (code 48) in prolog;
There is a spurious 0 at [1,1]. Check the XML you're posting.
On Thursday 31 March 2011 03:23:40 Charles Wardell wrote:
Can someone translate this error for me. My data looks pretty clean, so I
am not sure what is going on here.
Mar 30, 2011 5:21:52 AM org.apache.solr.common.SolrException log
SEVERE: Error processing legacy update
command:com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxUnexpectedCharException: Unexpected character
'0' (code 48) in prolog; expected '' at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [1,1]
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536620 / 06-50258350
Re: How could I set multi-value for a field in DataImporter
Kun,
it should be enough to use the same field second time, like this:
field name=foovalue1/field
field name=foovalue2/field
Regards
Stefan
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:39 AM, kun xiong xiongku...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the interface of DataImporter return a Map, I can't put multi value
for a same field, right?
Example:
I write a class extending DataImporter, and want to index {value1,
value2} for field name.
How should I do?
Many thanks.
Kun
Re: 2 index within the same Solr server ?
I want 2 index in same solr server.
How to create 2 index and its schema for two different search result
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Amel Fraisse amel.frai...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello every body,
referring to the link : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin.
I've created a solr.xml file as follows:
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
property name=snapshooter value=/home/solr-user/solr/
bin/snapshooter.sh /
cores adminPath=/admin/cores shareSchema=false
adminHandler=fr.splayce.solr.handler.MyAdminHandler
core name=core1 instanceDir=core0
property name=dataDir value=/core0/data /
/core
core name=core2 instanceDir=core1/
property name=dataDir value=/core1/data /
/cores
/solr
So before using SolrCore I instanciated a SolrServer to index and search
documents as follows:
System.setProperty(solr.solr.home, solr);
CoreContainer.Initializer initializer = new
CoreContainer.Initializer();
CoreContainer coreContainer = initializer.initialize();
server = new EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, );
And then to index a document : server.add(doc) and to search :
server.query(...).
So with SolrCore I've create MyAdminHandler by overrinding
handleCistomAction method like this (as mentionned in the link):
protected boolean handleCustomAction(SolrQueryRequest req,
SolrQueryResponse
rsp) {
CoreContainer container = super.getCoreContainer();
SolrCore mycore1 = container.getCore(core1);
SolrCore mycore2 = container.getCore(core2);
So how I could index and search document within the 2 indexes?
Thank you for your help.
2011/3/29 Rahul Warawdekar rahul.warawde...@gmail.com
Please refer
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
On 3/29/11, Amel Fraisse amel.frai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello every body,
Is it possible to create 2 index within the same Solr server ?
Thank you.
Amel.
--
Thanks and Regards
Rahul A. Warawdekar
Re: 2 index within the same Solr server ?
Hi,
You have to use SolrCore to create a solr.xml file in wich you specify 2
cores ( refer to the link : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin )
But for indexing and searching I've the same question: I don't know how I
could specify that document would be indexed a twice (in the first index and
in the second index).
Amel.
2011/3/31 Deepak Singh deep...@praumtech.com
I want 2 index in same solr server.
How to create 2 index and its schema for two different search result
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Amel Fraisse amel.frai...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello every body,
referring to the link : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin.
I've created a solr.xml file as follows:
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
property name=snapshooter value=/home/solr-user/solr/
bin/snapshooter.sh /
cores adminPath=/admin/cores shareSchema=false
adminHandler=fr.splayce.solr.handler.MyAdminHandler
core name=core1 instanceDir=core0
property name=dataDir value=/core0/data /
/core
core name=core2 instanceDir=core1/
property name=dataDir value=/core1/data /
/cores
/solr
So before using SolrCore I instanciated a SolrServer to index and search
documents as follows:
System.setProperty(solr.solr.home, solr);
CoreContainer.Initializer initializer = new
CoreContainer.Initializer();
CoreContainer coreContainer = initializer.initialize();
server = new EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, );
And then to index a document : server.add(doc) and to search :
server.query(...).
So with SolrCore I've create MyAdminHandler by overrinding
handleCistomAction method like this (as mentionned in the link):
protected boolean handleCustomAction(SolrQueryRequest req,
SolrQueryResponse
rsp) {
CoreContainer container = super.getCoreContainer();
SolrCore mycore1 = container.getCore(core1);
SolrCore mycore2 = container.getCore(core2);
So how I could index and search document within the 2 indexes?
Thank you for your help.
2011/3/29 Rahul Warawdekar rahul.warawde...@gmail.com
Please refer
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
On 3/29/11, Amel Fraisse amel.frai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello every body,
Is it possible to create 2 index within the same Solr server ?
Thank you.
Amel.
--
Thanks and Regards
Rahul A. Warawdekar
Re: 2 index within the same Solr server ?
On Thursday 31 March 2011 12:58:54 Amel Fraisse wrote:
But for indexing and searching I've the same question: I don't know how I
could specify that document would be indexed a twice (in the first index
and in the second index).
Amel, if you use multi core and wish to have a document indexed in both cores
then you must post the document to both cores.
Amel.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Amel Fraisse
amel.frai...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello every body,
referring to the link : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin.
I've created a solr.xml file as follows:
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
property name=snapshooter value=/home/solr-user/solr/
bin/snapshooter.sh /
cores adminPath=/admin/cores shareSchema=false
adminHandler=fr.splayce.solr.handler.MyAdminHandler
core name=core1 instanceDir=core0
property name=dataDir value=/core0/data /
/core
core name=core2 instanceDir=core1/
property name=dataDir value=/core1/data /
/cores
/solr
So before using SolrCore I instanciated a SolrServer to index and search
documents as follows:
System.setProperty(solr.solr.home, solr);
CoreContainer.Initializer initializer = new
CoreContainer.Initializer();
CoreContainer coreContainer = initializer.initialize();
server = new EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, );
And then to index a document : server.add(doc) and to search :
server.query(...).
So with SolrCore I've create MyAdminHandler by overrinding
handleCistomAction method like this (as mentionned in the link):
protected boolean handleCustomAction(SolrQueryRequest req,
SolrQueryResponse
rsp) {
CoreContainer container = super.getCoreContainer();
SolrCore mycore1 = container.getCore(core1);
SolrCore mycore2 = container.getCore(core2);
So how I could index and search document within the 2 indexes?
Thank you for your help.
2011/3/29 Rahul Warawdekar rahul.warawde...@gmail.com
Please refer
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
On 3/29/11, Amel Fraisse amel.frai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello every body,
Is it possible to create 2 index within the same Solr server ?
Thank you.
Amel.
--
Thanks and Regards
Rahul A. Warawdekar
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536620 / 06-50258350
Re: 2 index within the same Solr server ?
Hi Markus,
Thank you for your response.
In fact, I never used SolrCore before that.
So could you give me an example to ilustrate how I could send a document to
be indexed by both cores?
Thank you.
Amel.
2011/3/31 Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
On Thursday 31 March 2011 12:58:54 Amel Fraisse wrote:
But for indexing and searching I've the same question: I don't know how I
could specify that document would be indexed a twice (in the first index
and in the second index).
Amel, if you use multi core and wish to have a document indexed in both
cores
then you must post the document to both cores.
Amel.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Amel Fraisse
amel.frai...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello every body,
referring to the link : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin.
I've created a solr.xml file as follows:
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
property name=snapshooter value=/home/solr-user/solr/
bin/snapshooter.sh /
cores adminPath=/admin/cores shareSchema=false
adminHandler=fr.splayce.solr.handler.MyAdminHandler
core name=core1 instanceDir=core0
property name=dataDir value=/core0/data /
/core
core name=core2 instanceDir=core1/
property name=dataDir value=/core1/data /
/cores
/solr
So before using SolrCore I instanciated a SolrServer to index and
search
documents as follows:
System.setProperty(solr.solr.home, solr);
CoreContainer.Initializer initializer = new
CoreContainer.Initializer();
CoreContainer coreContainer = initializer.initialize();
server = new EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, );
And then to index a document : server.add(doc) and to search :
server.query(...).
So with SolrCore I've create MyAdminHandler by overrinding
handleCistomAction method like this (as mentionned in the link):
protected boolean handleCustomAction(SolrQueryRequest req,
SolrQueryResponse
rsp) {
CoreContainer container = super.getCoreContainer();
SolrCore mycore1 = container.getCore(core1);
SolrCore mycore2 = container.getCore(core2);
So how I could index and search document within the 2 indexes?
Thank you for your help.
2011/3/29 Rahul Warawdekar rahul.warawde...@gmail.com
Please refer
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
On 3/29/11, Amel Fraisse amel.frai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello every body,
Is it possible to create 2 index within the same Solr server ?
Thank you.
Amel.
--
Thanks and Regards
Rahul A. Warawdekar
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536620 / 06-50258350
Re: 2 index within the same Solr server ?
I don't use SolrJ. Try to find the documentation for that.
On Thursday 31 March 2011 13:09:49 Amel Fraisse wrote:
Hi Markus,
Thank you for your response.
In fact, I never used SolrCore before that.
So could you give me an example to ilustrate how I could send a document to
be indexed by both cores?
Thank you.
Amel.
2011/3/31 Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
On Thursday 31 March 2011 12:58:54 Amel Fraisse wrote:
But for indexing and searching I've the same question: I don't know how
I could specify that document would be indexed a twice (in the first
index and in the second index).
Amel, if you use multi core and wish to have a document indexed in both
cores
then you must post the document to both cores.
Amel.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Amel Fraisse
amel.frai...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello every body,
referring to the link : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin.
I've created a solr.xml file as follows:
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
property name=snapshooter value=/home/solr-user/solr/
bin/snapshooter.sh /
cores adminPath=/admin/cores shareSchema=false
adminHandler=fr.splayce.solr.handler.MyAdminHandler
core name=core1 instanceDir=core0
property name=dataDir value=/core0/data /
/core
core name=core2 instanceDir=core1/
property name=dataDir value=/core1/data /
/cores
/solr
So before using SolrCore I instanciated a SolrServer to index and
search
documents as follows:
System.setProperty(solr.solr.home, solr);
CoreContainer.Initializer initializer = new
CoreContainer.Initializer();
CoreContainer coreContainer = initializer.initialize();
server = new EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, );
And then to index a document : server.add(doc) and to search :
server.query(...).
So with SolrCore I've create MyAdminHandler by overrinding
handleCistomAction method like this (as mentionned in the link):
protected boolean handleCustomAction(SolrQueryRequest req,
SolrQueryResponse
rsp) {
CoreContainer container = super.getCoreContainer();
SolrCore mycore1 = container.getCore(core1);
SolrCore mycore2 = container.getCore(core2);
So how I could index and search document within the 2 indexes?
Thank you for your help.
2011/3/29 Rahul Warawdekar rahul.warawde...@gmail.com
Please refer
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
On 3/29/11, Amel Fraisse amel.frai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello every body,
Is it possible to create 2 index within the same Solr server ?
Thank you.
Amel.
--
Thanks and Regards
Rahul A. Warawdekar
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536620 / 06-50258350
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536620 / 06-50258350
MorelikeThis search Component
Hello! Can Morelikethis works for string type of field. like if I have field name person of string type and i use mlt.fl=person . Does it shows any result or not? Thanks! Isha
Re: ComplexPhraseQueryParser and wildcards
If you change your WordDelimiterFilterFactory (WDF) setting in the query section of your field definition and set catenatewords=1, do you get the specific behavior you're asking for when you search for crosslin* compiler~50? And is this acceptable? However, WDF settings take some time to really understand. I strongly recommend you spend some time on the admin/analysis page to get your mind around all the ramifications, or you'll be surprised G Also, the surround or span queries in lucene might give you another avenue, but you'd have to do some custom work to use them. Best Erick On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:51 AM, jmr jmpala...@free.fr wrote: iorixxx wrote: Hi Jean, Since you use WDF, your best bet can be to modify your query : cross link* compiler~50 crosslink* compiler~50 Thanks but crosslink* compiler~50 returns nothing (seems correct to me however) cross link* compiler~50 does not return exactly what I want e.g it returns: A cross and a linker and a compiler I want the exact expression cross link* e.g cross linkage, cross linking, cross linked ... Jean-Michel -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ComplexPhraseQueryParser-and-wildcards-tp2742244p2757396.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: 2 index within the same Solr server ?
I would guess just the way you always use cores. You'd open
your connection in SolrJ with the core name tacked on, something
like:
CommonsHttpSolrServer server1 = new
CommonsHttpSolrServer(http://localhost:8983/solr/core1);
CommonsHttpSolrServer server2 = new
CommonsHttpSolrServer(http://localhost:8983/solr/core2);
then add the document to both servers.
But I confess I haven't tried it from SolrJ so it's a guess. There may be
more efficient ways to do this.
But I have to ask what the purpose of putting the *same* document in two cores
is. Seems like a waste. That said, I don't know your problem space.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Amel Fraisse amel.frai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Markus,
Thank you for your response.
In fact, I never used SolrCore before that.
So could you give me an example to ilustrate how I could send a document to
be indexed by both cores?
Thank you.
Amel.
2011/3/31 Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.io
On Thursday 31 March 2011 12:58:54 Amel Fraisse wrote:
But for indexing and searching I've the same question: I don't know how I
could specify that document would be indexed a twice (in the first index
and in the second index).
Amel, if you use multi core and wish to have a document indexed in both
cores
then you must post the document to both cores.
Amel.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Amel Fraisse
amel.frai...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello every body,
referring to the link : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin.
I've created a solr.xml file as follows:
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
property name=snapshooter value=/home/solr-user/solr/
bin/snapshooter.sh /
cores adminPath=/admin/cores shareSchema=false
adminHandler=fr.splayce.solr.handler.MyAdminHandler
core name=core1 instanceDir=core0
property name=dataDir value=/core0/data /
/core
core name=core2 instanceDir=core1/
property name=dataDir value=/core1/data /
/cores
/solr
So before using SolrCore I instanciated a SolrServer to index and
search
documents as follows:
System.setProperty(solr.solr.home, solr);
CoreContainer.Initializer initializer = new
CoreContainer.Initializer();
CoreContainer coreContainer = initializer.initialize();
server = new EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, );
And then to index a document : server.add(doc) and to search :
server.query(...).
So with SolrCore I've create MyAdminHandler by overrinding
handleCistomAction method like this (as mentionned in the link):
protected boolean handleCustomAction(SolrQueryRequest req,
SolrQueryResponse
rsp) {
CoreContainer container = super.getCoreContainer();
SolrCore mycore1 = container.getCore(core1);
SolrCore mycore2 = container.getCore(core2);
So how I could index and search document within the 2 indexes?
Thank you for your help.
2011/3/29 Rahul Warawdekar rahul.warawde...@gmail.com
Please refer
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
On 3/29/11, Amel Fraisse amel.frai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello every body,
Is it possible to create 2 index within the same Solr server ?
Thank you.
Amel.
--
Thanks and Regards
Rahul A. Warawdekar
--
Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17
050-8536620 / 06-50258350
how to set cookie for url requesting in stream_url
Hi All, for indexing the documents in the other server i need to include a cookie value in the url requesting through the stream_url. can anybody tell me how to include the cookie in the url??? have anybody done this type??? or if there are any suggestions please tell me??? ex: http://localhost:8456/solr/update/extract?stream_url=remote_server_urlliteral.id=13748 ; here i need to include a cookie value while requesting for the remote_server_url. Regards, satya
Re: how to set cookie for url requesting in stream_url
That depends on what you're using. So, what are you using? On Thursday 31 March 2011 14:29:36 satya swaroop wrote: Hi All, for indexing the documents in the other server i need to include a cookie value in the url requesting through the stream_url. can anybody tell me how to include the cookie in the url??? have anybody done this type??? or if there are any suggestions please tell me??? ex: http://localhost:8456/solr/update/extract?stream_url=remote_server_urllite ral.id=13748 ; here i need to include a cookie value while requesting for the remote_server_url. Regards, satya -- Markus Jelsma - CTO - Openindex http://www.linkedin.com/in/markus17 050-8536620 / 06-50258350
Re: ComplexPhraseQueryParser and wildcards
Erick Erickson wrote: If you change your WordDelimiterFilterFactory (WDF) setting in the section of your field definition and set catenatewords=1, do you get the specific behavior you're asking for when you search for crosslin* compiler~50? And is this acceptable? I'm afraid this could have some side effects. I suppose that thematic* would then return: thematically but also the matico So, you confirm that there is nothing right now to do such kind of search in solr ? Regards, Jean-Michel -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ComplexPhraseQueryParser-and-wildcards-tp2742244p2758422.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Concatenate multivalued DIH fields
I would appreciate any help on this issue, I am unable to proceed without getting this solved. Thanks, Neha - Thanks, Neha -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Concatenate-multivalued-DIH-fields-tp2749988p2758485.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: DIH Issue(newbie to solr)
Hello Gora, I have a new Issue: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Concatenate-multivalued-DIH-fields-td2749988.html I haven't got enough help on this issue, Please could you advice me on solving this. Thanks, Neha - Thanks, Neha -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DIH-Issue-newbie-to-solr-tp2695407p2758500.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: 2 index within the same Solr server ?
On 3/31/2011 5:09 AM, Amel Fraisse wrote: Hi Markus, Thank you for your response. In fact, I never used SolrCore before that. So could you give me an example to ilustrate how I could send a document to be indexed by both cores? There is no magic within Solr that would let you issue a single command and import/post documents to more than one core. The cores are not linked in any way, even if you have them share config files. You could have one core replicate to the other, but I don't see much point to doing that, unless you're testing what will eventually become a multi-server setup. Logically speaking, cores are as separate as running Solr on two different machines, they just happen to live in the same servlet container on one machine. You must already have some kind of infrastructure in place to do your indexing, you have to either adjust that process to do the indexing twice or run two copies of it. Without cores, the base URL is http://HOST:PORT/solr/ ... with cores, it becomes http://HOST:PORT/solr/corename/ with corename being the variable part. Shawn
Re: ComplexPhraseQueryParser and wildcards
I'm afraid this could have some side effects. I suppose that thematic* would then return: thematically but also the matico No, WDF only works on tokens from the tokenizer. It would not concatenate two separate tokens together, just tokens generated because of, say, case changes, punctuation, etc in the single token that made it through, say, WhitespaceTokenizerFactory. The analysis page should make that clear, have you looked at it? But if WDF doesn't do what you want then I don't know what in Solr will do it OOTB. Best Erick On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:45 AM, jmr jmpala...@free.fr wrote: Erick Erickson wrote: If you change your WordDelimiterFilterFactory (WDF) setting in the section of your field definition and set catenatewords=1, do you get the specific behavior you're asking for when you search for crosslin* compiler~50? And is this acceptable? I'm afraid this could have some side effects. I suppose that thematic* would then return: thematically but also the matico So, you confirm that there is nothing right now to do such kind of search in solr ? Regards, Jean-Michel -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ComplexPhraseQueryParser-and-wildcards-tp2742244p2758422.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Matching the beginning of a word within a term
No, I don't really want to break down the words into subwords. In the
example I provided, I would not want kind to match either record because
it is not at the beginning of the word even though kind appears in both
records as part of a word.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:42 PM, lboutros boutr...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you want to tokenize subwords based on dictionaries ? A bit like
disagglutination of german words ?
If so, something like this could help : DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/CDRG_ch05_5.8.8
Ludovic
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org/apache/lucene/analysis/compound/DictionaryCompoundWordTokenFilter.html
2011/3/30 Brian Lamb [via Lucene]
ml-node+2754668-300063934-383...@n3.nabble.com
Hi all,
I have a field set up like this:
field name=common_names multiValued=true type=text indexed=true
stored=true required=false /
And I have some records:
RECORD1
arr name=common_names
strcompanion to mankind/str
strpooch/str
/arr
RECORD2
arr name=common_names
strcompanion to womankind/str
strman's worst enemy/str
/arr
I would like to write a query that will match the beginning of a word
within
the term. Here is the query I would use as it exists now:
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=*:*fq={!q.op=AND%20df=common_names}
companion
man~10
In the above example. I would want to return only RECORD1.
The query as it exists right now is designed to only match records where
both words are present in the same term. So if I changed man to mankind
in
the query, RECORD1 will be returned.
Even though the phrases companion and man exist in the same term in
RECORD2,
I do not want RECORD2 to be returned because 'man' is not at the
beginning
of the word.
How can I achieve this?
Thanks,
Brian Lamb
--
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
below:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Matching-the-beginning-of-a-word-within-a-term-tp2754668p2754668.html
To start a new topic under Solr - User, email
ml-node+472068-1765922688-383...@n3.nabble.com
To unsubscribe from Solr - User, click here
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=472068code=Ym91dHJvc2xAZ21haWwuY29tfDQ3MjA2OHw0Mzk2MDUxNjE=
.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Matching-the-beginning-of-a-word-within-a-term-tp2754668p2755561.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: 2 index within the same Solr server ?
i have implemented this works
indexing document at first index (core0)
http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/update/extract/?stream.file=path_of_filenamecommit=truehttp://localhost:8983/solr/core1/admin/
indexing document at first index (core)
http://localhost:8983/solr/core1/update/extract/?stream.file=path_of_filenamecommit=truehttp://localhost:8983/solr/core1/admin/
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Amel Fraisse a...@imaginatio.fr wrote:
2011/3/31 Deepak Singh deep...@praumtech.com
I want 2 index in same solr server.
How to create 2 index and its schema for two different search result
Hi,
You have to use SolrCore to create a solr.xml file in wich you specify 2
cores ( refer to the link : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin )
But for indexing and searching I've the same question: I don't know how I
could specify that document would be indexed a twice (in the first index and
in the second index).
Amel.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Amel Fraisse amel.frai...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello every body,
referring to the link : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin.
I've created a solr.xml file as follows:
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
property name=snapshooter value=/home/solr-user/solr/
bin/snapshooter.sh /
cores adminPath=/admin/cores shareSchema=false
adminHandler=fr.splayce.solr.handler.MyAdminHandler
core name=core1 instanceDir=core0
property name=dataDir value=/core0/data /
/core
core name=core2 instanceDir=core1/
property name=dataDir value=/core1/data /
/cores
/solr
So before using SolrCore I instanciated a SolrServer to index and search
documents as follows:
System.setProperty(solr.solr.home, solr);
CoreContainer.Initializer initializer = new
CoreContainer.Initializer();
CoreContainer coreContainer = initializer.initialize();
server = new EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, );
And then to index a document : server.add(doc) and to search :
server.query(...).
So with SolrCore I've create MyAdminHandler by overrinding
handleCistomAction method like this (as mentionned in the link):
protected boolean handleCustomAction(SolrQueryRequest req,
SolrQueryResponse
rsp) {
CoreContainer container = super.getCoreContainer();
SolrCore mycore1 = container.getCore(core1);
SolrCore mycore2 = container.getCore(core2);
So how I could index and search document within the 2 indexes?
Thank you for your help.
2011/3/29 Rahul Warawdekar rahul.warawde...@gmail.com
Please refer
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
On 3/29/11, Amel Fraisse amel.frai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello every body,
Is it possible to create 2 index within the same Solr server ?
Thank you.
Amel.
--
Thanks and Regards
Rahul A. Warawdekar
--
*Amel Fraisse*
*Imaginatio SAS*
*128 rue la Boétie
75008 PARIS
Bureaux : 12 rue Martel - 75010 PARIS*
http://compta.splayce.com
Re: assit with the Clustering component in Solr/Lucene
Hi Staszek:
I added the parameter as you suggested.
(LingoClusteringAlgorithm.clusterMergingThreshold) into the searchComponent
section that describes the Clustering module
Changing the value of the parameter did not have any effect on my search
results.
However, when I used the Carrot2 workbench, I could see the effect of changing
the value. (from 6 clusters it went down to 2 clusters)
here is the XML snippet for the searchComponent:
searchComponent
name=clusteringComponent
enable=${solr.clustering.enabled:false}
class=org.apache.solr.handler.clustering.ClusteringComponent
!-- Declare an engine --
lst name=engine
!-- The name, only one can be named default --
str name=namedefault/str
!--
Class name of Carrot2 clustering algorithm. Currently available
algorithms are:
* org.carrot2.clustering.lingo.LingoClusteringAlgorithm
* org.carrot2.clustering.stc.STCClusteringAlgorithm
See http://project.carrot2..org/algorithms.html
http://project.carrot2.org/algorithms.html for the algorithm's
characteristics.
--
str
name=carrot.algorithmorg.carrot2.clustering.lingo.LingoClusteringAlgorithm/str
!--
Overriding values for Carrot2 default algorithm attributes. For a
description
of all available attributes, see:
http://download.carrot2.org/stable/manual/#chapter.components.
Use attribute key as name attribute of str elements below. These can
be further
overridden for individual requests by specifying attribute key as
request
parameter name and attribute value as parameter value.
--
str name=LingoClusteringAlgorithm.desiredClusterCountBase20/str
str name=LingoClusteringAlgorithm.clusterMergingThreshold0.0/str
/lst
/searchComponent
I would appreciate any insights into this behavior.
Thanks
Ramdev
On Mar 30, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Stanislaw Osinski wrote:
Hi Ramdev,
Both of the clustering algorithms that ship with Solr (Lingo and STC)
are designed to allow one document to appear in more than one cluster, which
actually does make sense in many scenarios. There's no easy way to force them
to produce hard clusterings because this would require a complete change in the
way the algorithms work. If you need each document to belong to exactly one
cluster, you'd have to post-process the clusters to remove the redundant
document assignments. Alternatively, in case of the Lingo algorithm, you can
try lowering the LingoClusteringAlgorithm.clusterMergingThreshold to some
value in the range of 0.2--0.5. If you do that, clusters containing overlapping
documents will get merged. For more information about this attribute, see here:
http://download.carrot2.org/stable/manual/#section.attribute.LingoClusteringAlgorithm.clusterMergingThreshold.
Cheers,
Staszek
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 18:21, Markus Jelsma
markus.jel...@openindex.io wrote:
Yes, you can set engine specific parameters. Check the comments
in your
snippety.
Hi:
I recently included the CLustering component into Solr and
updated the
requestHandler accordingly (in solrconfig.xml). Snippet of
the Config for
the CLuserting:
searchComponent
name=clusteringComponent
enable=${solr.clustering.enabled:false}
class=org.apache.solr.handler.clustering.ClusteringComponent
!-- Declare an engine --
lst name=engine
!-- The name, only one can be named default --
str name=namedefault/str
!--
Class name of Carrot2 clustering algorithm.
Currently available
algorithms are:
*
org.carrot2.clustering.lingo.LingoClusteringAlgorithm
* org.carrot2.clustering.stc.STCClusteringAlgorithm
See http://project.carrot2.org/algorithms.html for
the
algorithm's characteristics. --
str
name=carrot.algorithmorg.carrot2.clustering.lingo.LingoClusteringAlgori
thm/str !--
Overriding values for Carrot2 default algorithm
attributes. For
a description of all available attributes, see:
http://download.carrot2.org/stable/manual/#chapter.components. Use
attribute key as name attribute of str elements below. These
can be
further overridden for individual requests by specifying
attribute key as
request parameter
DIH OutOfMemoryError?
Hi, I'm trying to index a big XML file (800Mo) using DIH, but i'm getting an OutOfMemoryError! I've got 2048mo of RAM on this server, obviously it's not enough... How much RAM is recomended for indexing big files? Thanks for your help Here is the error from DIH mode verbose: str name=EXCEPTIONjava.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError cannot be cast to java.lang.Exception at org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DebugLogger.log(DebugLogger.java:139) at org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.SolrWriter.log(SolrWriter.java:237) at org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.buildDocument(DocBuilder.java:422) at org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.buildDocument(DocBuilder.java:383) at org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.doFullDump(DocBuilder.java:242) at org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DocBuilder.execute(DocBuilder.java:180) at org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter.doFullImport(DataImporter.java:331) at org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImporter.runCmd(DataImporter.java:389) at org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandler.handleRequestBody(DataImportHandler.java:203) at org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:131) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1316) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.java:338) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:241) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:298) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:857) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:588) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:489) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) /str
Re: assit with the Clustering component in Solr/Lucene
I added the parameter as you suggested. (LingoClusteringAlgorithm.clusterMergingThreshold) into the searchComponent section that describes the Clustering module Changing the value of the parameter did not have any effect on my search results. However, when I used the Carrot2 workbench, I could see the effect of changing the value. (from 6 clusters it went down to 2 clusters) Interesting... Can you, for the sake of debugging, append LingoClusteringAlgorithm.clusterMergingThreshold=0.0 to your request URL? S.
Re: assit with the Clustering component in Solr/Lucene
That did make a difference, I now see the exact number of cluster i see from the workbench. I am of course interested in why the config changes did not have much effect. However, I am happy that by adding the threshold to my request URL produces the desired results let me know if I can do any more tests and I will do so. Thanks much Ramdev On Mar 31, 2011, at 10:18 AM, Stanislaw Osinski wrote: I added the parameter as you suggested. (LingoClusteringAlgorithm.clusterMergingThreshold) into the searchComponent section that describes the Clustering module Changing the value of the parameter did not have any effect on my search results. However, when I used the Carrot2 workbench, I could see the effect of changing the value. (from 6 clusters it went down to 2 clusters) Interesting... Can you, for the sake of debugging, append LingoClusteringAlgorithm.clusterMergingThreshold=0.0 to your request URL? S.
Re: 2 index within the same Solr server ?
Hi every body,
This is my implementation SolrJ to instanciate 2 SolrCore.
File f = new File (./solr/solr.xml);
System.setProperty(solr.solr.home, solr);
CoreContainer.Initializer initializer = new
CoreContainer.Initializer();
CoreContainer coreContainer = initializer.initialize();
coreContainer.load(f.getParent(), f);
SolrCore mycore0 = coreContainer.getCore(core0);
SolrCore mycore1 = coreContainer.getCore(core1);
servercore0 = new EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, core0);
servercore1 = new EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, core1);
But I have the follow bug: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: No such
core: core1
at
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.EmbeddedSolrServer.request(EmbeddedSolrServer.java:104)
The solr.xml file :
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
property name=snapshooter
value=/home/solr-user/solr/bin/snapshooter.sh /
cores adminPath=/admin/cores shareSchema=false
core name=core0 instanceDir=core0
property name=dataDir value=core0/data /
/core
core name=core1 instanceDir=core1/
property name=dataDir value=core1/data /
/cores
/solr
Amel.
2011/3/31 Amel Fraisse amel.frai...@gmail.com
Hello Deepack,
Thank you for your response.
Yes I would doing the same thing with SolrJ.
Amel.
2011/3/31 Deepak Singh deep...@praumtech.com
i have implemented this works
indexing document at first index (core0)
http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/update/extract/?stream.file=path_of_filenamecommit=truehttp://localhost:8983/solr/core1/admin/
indexing document at first index (core)
http://localhost:8983/solr/core1/update/extract/?stream.file=path_of_filenamecommit=truehttp://localhost:8983/solr/core1/admin/
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Amel Fraisse a...@imaginatio.fr wrote:
2011/3/31 Deepak Singh deep...@praumtech.com
I want 2 index in same solr server.
How to create 2 index and its schema for two different search result
Hi,
You have to use SolrCore to create a solr.xml file in wich you specify 2
cores ( refer to the link : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin )
But for indexing and searching I've the same question: I don't know how I
could specify that document would be indexed a twice (in the first index and
in the second index).
Amel.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Amel Fraisse
amel.frai...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello every body,
referring to the link : http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin.
I've created a solr.xml file as follows:
solr persistent=true sharedLib=lib
property name=snapshooter value=/home/solr-user/solr/
bin/snapshooter.sh /
cores adminPath=/admin/cores shareSchema=false
adminHandler=fr.splayce.solr.handler.MyAdminHandler
core name=core1 instanceDir=core0
property name=dataDir value=/core0/data /
/core
core name=core2 instanceDir=core1/
property name=dataDir value=/core1/data /
/cores
/solr
So before using SolrCore I instanciated a SolrServer to index and
search
documents as follows:
System.setProperty(solr.solr.home, solr);
CoreContainer.Initializer initializer = new
CoreContainer.Initializer();
CoreContainer coreContainer = initializer.initialize();
server = new EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, );
And then to index a document : server.add(doc) and to search :
server.query(...).
So with SolrCore I've create MyAdminHandler by overrinding
handleCistomAction method like this (as mentionned in the link):
protected boolean handleCustomAction(SolrQueryRequest req,
SolrQueryResponse
rsp) {
CoreContainer container = super.getCoreContainer();
SolrCore mycore1 = container.getCore(core1);
SolrCore mycore2 = container.getCore(core2);
So how I could index and search document within the 2 indexes?
Thank you for your help.
2011/3/29 Rahul Warawdekar rahul.warawde...@gmail.com
Please refer
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultipleIndexes
On 3/29/11, Amel Fraisse amel.frai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello every body,
Is it possible to create 2 index within the same Solr server ?
Thank you.
Amel.
--
Thanks and Regards
Rahul A. Warawdekar
Exact keyword search and redirect term
Hi All, I have many documents indexed based on a field having value “anniversary”. Also there is a redirect term which is having “anniversary” inside this. E.g. below: -- field name=docType_meta_stermRedirect/field field name=redirectUri_meta_s/product/silver+25th+anniversary.do/field field name=redirectTerms_en_us_meta_mv_t25th anniversary/field -- Now for any search based on “anniversary”, I am getting the redirection to above uri. I am expecting the redirection only for exact term “25th anniversary”. Is there any configuration to make sure that redirection should work on exact match? Thank You!
HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration change: abortOnConfigurationErrorfalse/abortOnConfigurationError in null ------------------------------------------------------------- org.xml
hi all, I used ubuntu 10.10 ,I'm trying to get solr 1.4up andrunning,with no success. i have fllowed this http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1532230 to run my solr, but there has error as: HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration. Check your log files for more detailed information on what may be wrong. If you want solr to continue after configuration errors, change: false in null - org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; lineNumber: 1036; columnNumber: 2; The markup in the document following the root element must be well-formed. at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.DOMParser.parse(DOMParser.java:253) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(DocumentBuilderImpl.java:288) at javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder.parse(DocumentBuilder.java:121) at org.apache.solr.core.Config.(Config.java:110) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig.(SolrConfig.java:130) at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$Initializer.initialize(CoreContainer.java:134) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.init(SolrDispatchFilter.java:83) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.getFilter(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:295) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.setFilterDef(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:422) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:115) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.filterStart(StandardContext.java:4001) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4651) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:791) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:771) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:546) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor(HostConfig.java:637) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptors(HostConfig.java:563) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployApps(HostConfig.java:498) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.start(HostConfig.java:1277) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.lifecycleEvent(HostConfig.java:321) at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport.fireLifecycleEvent(LifecycleSupport.java:119) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1053) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java:785) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1045) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:445) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start(StandardService.java:519) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(StandardServer.java:710) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:581) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(Bootstrap.java:289) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:414) any body know how to do?thanks -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/HTTP-Status-500-Severe-errors-in-solr-configuration-change-abortOnConfigurationError-false-abortOnCo6-tp2757493p2757493.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration change: abortOnConfigurationErrorfalse/abortOnConfigurationError in null ------------------------------------------------------------- org.xml
hi all, I used ubuntu 10.10 ,I'm trying to get solr 1.4up andrunning,with no success. i have fllowed this http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1532230 to run my solr, but there has error as: HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration. Check your log files for more detailed information on what may be wrong. If you want solr to continue after configuration errors, change: false in null - org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; lineNumber: 1036; columnNumber: 2; The markup in the document following the root element must be well-formed. at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.DOMParser.parse(DOMParser.java:253) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(DocumentBuilderImpl.java:288) at javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder.parse(DocumentBuilder.java:121) at org.apache.solr.core.Config.(Config.java:110) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig.(SolrConfig.java:130) at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$Initializer.initialize(CoreContainer.java:134) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.init(SolrDispatchFilter.java:83) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.getFilter(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:295) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.setFilterDef(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:422) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:115) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.filterStart(StandardContext.java:4001) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4651) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:791) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:771) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:546) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor(HostConfig.java:637) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptors(HostConfig.java:563) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployApps(HostConfig.java:498) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.start(HostConfig.java:1277) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.lifecycleEvent(HostConfig.java:321) at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport.fireLifecycleEvent(LifecycleSupport.java:119) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1053) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java:785) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1045) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:445) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start(StandardService.java:519) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(StandardServer.java:710) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:581) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(Bootstrap.java:289) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:414) any body know how to do?thanks -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/HTTP-Status-500-Severe-errors-in-solr-configuration-change-abortOnConfigurationError-false-abortOnCo6-tp2757494p2757494.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Apache Solr 3.1.0 available
March 2011, Apache Solr 3.1 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 3.1. This release contains numerous bug fixes, optimizations, and improvements, some of which are highlighted below. The release is available for immediate download at http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/solr (see note below). See the CHANGES.txt file included with the release for a full list of details as well as instructions on upgrading. What's in a Version? The version number for Solr 3.1 was chosen to reflect the merge of development with Lucene, which is currently also on 3.1. Going forward, we expect the Solr version to be the same as the Lucene version. Solr 3.1 contains Lucene 3.1 and is the release after Solr 1.4.1. Solr 3.1 Release Highlights * Numeric range facets (similar to date faceting). * New spatial search, including spatial filtering, boosting and sorting capabilities. * Example Velocity driven search UI at http://localhost:8983/solr/browse * A new termvector-based highlighter * Extend dismax (edismax) query parser which addresses some missing features in the dismax query parser along with some extensions. * Several more components now support distributed mode: TermsComponent, SpellCheckComponent. * A new Auto Suggest component. * Ability to sort by functions. * JSON document indexing * CSV response format * Apache UIMA integration for metadata extraction * Leverages Lucene 3.1 and it's inherent optimizations and bug fixes as well as new analysis capabilities. * Numerous improvements, bug fixes, and optimizations. Note: The Apache Software Foundation uses an extensive mirroring network for distributing releases. It is possible that the mirror you are using may not have replicated the release yet. If that is the case, please try another mirror. This also goes for Maven access.
Re: Exact keyword search and redirect term
There is no configuration. If: 1) you index your records as type String, with no analysis 2) You always do phrase searches in your query, surround it with double quotes. (Neccesary because otherwise queries with spaces in them won't be passed intact to the field for matching). (Alternately use the 'field' or 'raw' query parsers, or that other new one that will be in solr 3.1 that i forget the name of). Then I believe it will work how you say you want, only matching on _exact_ matches. I think, try it out. But beware that 'exact' here will REALLY mean 'exact' -- same case, exact same punctuation and spacing, exact same bytes. (Same serialization for unicode that can be serialized to several different valid byte representations in UTF8, etc) On 3/31/2011 2:17 PM, Tejinder Rawat wrote: Hi All, I have many documents indexed based on a field having value “anniversary”. Also there is a redirect term which is having “anniversary” inside this. E.g. below: -- field name=docType_meta_stermRedirect/field field name=redirectUri_meta_s/product/silver+25th+anniversary.do/field field name=redirectTerms_en_us_meta_mv_t25th anniversary/field -- Now for any search based on “anniversary”, I am getting the redirection to above uri. I am expecting the redirection only for exact term “25th anniversary”. Is there any configuration to make sure that redirection should work on exact match? Thank You!
Apache Solr 3.1.0
March 2011, Apache Solr 3.1 available The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 3.1. This release contains numerous bug fixes, optimizations, and improvements, some of which are highlighted below. The release is available for immediate download at http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/solr (see note below). See the CHANGES.txt file included with the release for a full list of details as well as instructions on upgrading. What's in a Version? The version number for Solr 3.1 was chosen to reflect the merge of development with Lucene, which is currently also on 3.1. Going forward, we expect the Solr version to be the same as the Lucene version. Solr 3.1 contains Lucene 3.1 and is the release after Solr 1.4.1. Solr 3.1 Release Highlights * Numeric range facets (similar to date faceting). * New spatial search, including spatial filtering, boosting and sorting capabilities. * Example Velocity driven search UI at http://localhost:8983/solr/browse * A new termvector-based highlighter * Extend dismax (edismax) query parser which addresses some missing features in the dismax query parser along with some extensions. * Several more components now support distributed mode: TermsComponent, SpellCheckComponent. * A new Auto Suggest component. * Ability to sort by functions. * JSON document indexing * CSV response format * Apache UIMA integration for metadata extraction * Leverages Lucene 3.1 and it's inherent optimizations and bug fixes as well as new analysis capabilities. * Numerous improvements, bug fixes, and optimizations. Note: The Apache Software Foundation uses an extensive mirroring network for distributing releases. It is possible that the mirror you are using may not have replicated the release yet. If that is the case, please try another mirror. This also goes for Maven access.
Re: ComplexPhraseQueryParser and wildcards
Ohhh, my. Well, in that case I'm afraid I'm out of ideas. Can you raise a JIRA on the crash? Please include the field definition and an example of the query you're sending. This should be fixed... Best Erick On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:28 AM, jmr jmpala...@free.fr wrote: Erick Erickson wrote: No, WDF only works on tokens from the tokenizer. It would not concatenate two separate tokens together, just tokens generated because of, say, case changes, punctuation, etc in the single token that made it through, say, WhitespaceTokenizerFactory. The analysis page should make that clear, have you looked at it? Thanks Erik, So, I've changed the query analyser and set catenateWords to 1. Unfortunately, the query crosslin* compiler~50 returns nothing. I have looked at the Analysis page and it does not show something different excepting than catenateWords is 1. Furthermore, the query (cross-linker compiler~50) is now crashing ComplexPhraseQueryParser. If there is nothing out of the box, maybe we'll need to modify the ComplexPhraseQuery Parser. I think that it should accept phrases as token for the proximity search. we could enter escaped quotes to specify phrases like: (\cross link*\) (\compiler\)~10 I just wanted to be sure I did not miss something obvious before investing time in developing/changing solr parser. Regards, Jean-Michel -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ComplexPhraseQueryParser-and-wildcards-tp2742244p2759078.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Problems with DIH and missing fields.
Hello, I have an XML which contains personal contacts. Not all contacts have the same fields (email, phone, postal). The problem is that when certain fields are NOT present, SOLR is injecting the previous contacts data. For example, assume the following from the XML feed: entry title type='text'Jane Doe/title gd:email rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#work' address=' jane@gmail.com' primary='true'/ gd:postalAddress rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#home 'Santiago Region Metropolitana Chile/gd:postalAddress /entry entry title type='text'Jeff Smith/title gd:email rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#work' address=' jeff.sm...@gmail.com' primary='true'/ /entry entry title type='text'Ana Mercurio/title gd:phoneNumber rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#mobile' primary='true'+56912345678/gd:phoneNumber /entry The second contact, will have the first contacts postal address. The third contact, will have Janes Postal Address and Jeffs email address: lst arr name=title strAna Mercurio/str /arr arr name=phoneNumber str+5612345678/str /arr arr name=email strjeff.sm...@gmail.com/str /arr arr name=postalAddress strSantiago Region Metropolitana Chile/str /arr /lst This is how I have the fields specified in the schema.xml file: field name=email type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true default= / field name=phoneNumber type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true default= / field name=postalAddress type=string indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true default= / What did I miss? Thanks for your help.
Re: HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration change: abortOnConfigurationErrorfalse/abortOnConfigurationError in null ------------------------------------------------------------- org
At a guess, you've somehow changed one of the configuration files and made it into invalid XML. Try opening the configuration XMLs in an application that checks for well-formedness and/or look at the line in the XML file indicated and see if there's anything that jumps out at you... Or just replace the whole directory if you haven't made any changes to it. It's always possible this is a random error. Best Erick On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:51 AM, jim guoru...@sohu.com wrote: hi all, I used ubuntu 10.10 ,I'm trying to get solr 1.4up andrunning,with no success. i have fllowed this http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1532230 to run my solr, but there has error as: HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration. Check your log files for more detailed information on what may be wrong. If you want solr to continue after configuration errors, change: false in null - org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; lineNumber: 1036; columnNumber: 2; The markup in the document following the root element must be well-formed. at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers.DOMParser.parse(DOMParser.java:253) at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse(DocumentBuilderImpl.java:288) at javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder.parse(DocumentBuilder.java:121) at org.apache.solr.core.Config.(Config.java:110) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig.(SolrConfig.java:130) at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$Initializer.initialize(CoreContainer.java:134) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.init(SolrDispatchFilter.java:83) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.getFilter(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:295) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.setFilterDef(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:422) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:115) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.filterStart(StandardContext.java:4001) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4651) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:791) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:771) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:546) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor(HostConfig.java:637) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptors(HostConfig.java:563) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployApps(HostConfig.java:498) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.start(HostConfig.java:1277) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.lifecycleEvent(HostConfig.java:321) at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport.fireLifecycleEvent(LifecycleSupport.java:119) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1053) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java:785) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1045) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:445) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start(StandardService.java:519) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(StandardServer.java:710) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:581) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(Bootstrap.java:289) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:414) any body know how to do?thanks -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/HTTP-Status-500-Severe-errors-in-solr-configuration-change-abortOnConfigurationError-false-abortOnCo6-tp2757493p2757493.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Exact keyword search and redirect term
In addition to Jo On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote: There is no configuration. If: 1) you index your records as type String, with no analysis 2) You always do phrase searches in your query, surround it with double quotes. (Neccesary because otherwise queries with spaces in them won't be passed intact to the field for matching). (Alternately use the 'field' or 'raw' query parsers, or that other new one that will be in solr 3.1 that i forget the name of). Then I believe it will work how you say you want, only matching on _exact_ matches. I think, try it out. But beware that 'exact' here will REALLY mean 'exact' -- same case, exact same punctuation and spacing, exact same bytes. (Same serialization for unicode that can be serialized to several different valid byte representations in UTF8, etc) On 3/31/2011 2:17 PM, Tejinder Rawat wrote: Hi All, I have many documents indexed based on a field having value “anniversary”. Also there is a redirect term which is having “anniversary” inside this. E.g. below: -- field name=docType_meta_stermRedirect/field field name=redirectUri_meta_s/product/silver+25th+anniversary.do/field field name=redirectTerms_en_us_meta_mv_t25th anniversary/field -- Now for any search based on “anniversary”, I am getting the redirection to above uri. I am expecting the redirection only for exact term “25th anniversary”. Is there any configuration to make sure that redirection should work on exact match? Thank You!
Re: Exact keyword search and redirect term
Oops, fat fingers. In addition to Jonathan's comment, you can construct your own field type from, say, keywordanalyzer and lowercasefilter to do some normalization, and/or patternreplacefilterfactory if you want to do even more normalization. Best Erick On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: In addition to Jo On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Jonathan Rochkind rochk...@jhu.edu wrote: There is no configuration. If: 1) you index your records as type String, with no analysis 2) You always do phrase searches in your query, surround it with double quotes. (Neccesary because otherwise queries with spaces in them won't be passed intact to the field for matching). (Alternately use the 'field' or 'raw' query parsers, or that other new one that will be in solr 3.1 that i forget the name of). Then I believe it will work how you say you want, only matching on _exact_ matches. I think, try it out. But beware that 'exact' here will REALLY mean 'exact' -- same case, exact same punctuation and spacing, exact same bytes. (Same serialization for unicode that can be serialized to several different valid byte representations in UTF8, etc) On 3/31/2011 2:17 PM, Tejinder Rawat wrote: Hi All, I have many documents indexed based on a field having value “anniversary”. Also there is a redirect term which is having “anniversary” inside this. E.g. below: -- field name=docType_meta_stermRedirect/field field name=redirectUri_meta_s/product/silver+25th+anniversary.do/field field name=redirectTerms_en_us_meta_mv_t25th anniversary/field -- Now for any search based on “anniversary”, I am getting the redirection to above uri. I am expecting the redirection only for exact term “25th anniversary”. Is there any configuration to make sure that redirection should work on exact match? Thank You!
Re: Concatenate multivalued DIH fields
Hello, In the schema.xml file you can contenate much easier. field name=name type=text indexed=true stored=true multiValued=true / copyField source=fname dest=name / copyField source=lname dest=name / /fields Hope this helps On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:01 PM, neha pneha...@yahoo.com wrote: I have two multivalued DIH fields fname and lname. I want to concatenate each of the fname and lname pairs to get a third multivalued DIH field name. I tried this : But the result is : [Lars L., Helle K., Thomas A., Jes] [Thomsen, Iversen, Brinck, Olesen], instead of Lars L. Thomsen, Helle K. Iverson, Thomas A Brinck, Jes Oleson. Is there a way to iterate through the multivalued fields or is there something more simple to do this. Thanks, Neha -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Concatenate-multivalued-DIH-fields-tp2749988p2749988.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Matching the beginning of a word within a term
So if i understand well, in these exemples :
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=*:*fq={!q.op=AND%20df=common_names}companion
mank~10
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=*:*fq={!q.op=AND%20df=common_names}companion
manki~10
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=*:*fq={!q.op=AND%20df=common_names}companion
mankin~10
You want to retrieve the same record (1) ? So you would like something like
:
http://localhost:8983/solr/search/?q=*:*fq={!q.op=AND%20df=common_names}companion
man*~10
Did you took a look to the ComplexPhraseQueryParser ?
http://lucene.apache.org/java/3_1_0/api/all/org/apache/lucene/queryParser/complexPhrase/ComplexPhraseQueryParser.html
Ludovic
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Matching-the-beginning-of-a-word-within-a-term-tp2754668p2760486.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Concatenate multivalued DIH fields
Hi, When there are multiple authors instead of concatenating, it append list of last names after the first names. Vincent White Bakken Sjaastad Maurice B. Linda R. Inger Johanne Ottar Thanks, Neha - Thanks, Neha -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Concatenate-multivalued-DIH-fields-tp2749988p2760520.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: solr upgrade question
Hi Alexander, I have posted same question a few month ago. The only solution that came up was to regenerate the index files using the new version. How did you do this exactly with luke 1.0.1 ? Would you mind sharing some of that magic ? Best, Johannes 2011/3/31 Alexander Aristov alexander.aris...@gmail.com Didn't get any responses. But I tried luke 1.0.1 and it did the magic. I run optimization and after that solr got up. Best Regards Alexander Aristov On 30 March 2011 15:47, Alexander Aristov alexander.aris...@gmail.com wrote: People Is were way to upgrade existsing index from solr 1.4 to solr 4(trunk). When I configured solr 4 and launched it complained about incorrect lucence file version (3 instead of old 2) Are there any procedures to convert index? Best Regards Alexander Aristov
Re: How could I set multi-value for a field in DataImporter
Stefan,
Thanks very much for your quick reply.
Actually I have to write a CustomDataImporter class to full-import data and
index them all.
So it should be done in java code and schema.xml.
When I write a CustomDataImporter, I have to implement a nextRow() method,
which return a mapString,Object. And also schema,xml have a multiValued
label for each field.
I am wondering how could I utilize it.
I believe there must be several ways to make it multi-valued, using analyzer
or copyField. I am finding a efficient and easiest way that I don't have to
change data format.
Kun
2011/3/31 Stefan Matheis matheis.ste...@googlemail.com
Kun,
it should be enough to use the same field second time, like this:
field name=foovalue1/field
field name=foovalue2/field
Regards
Stefan
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:39 AM, kun xiong xiongku...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the interface of DataImporter return a Map, I can't put multi value
for a same field, right?
Example:
I write a class extending DataImporter, and want to index {value1,
value2} for field name.
How should I do?
Many thanks.
Kun
Re: How could I set multi-value for a field in DataImporter
I found the answer from source code.
Using a Collection as value.
Thanks any way
2011/4/1 kun xiong xiongku...@gmail.com
Stefan,
Thanks very much for your quick reply.
Actually I have to write a CustomDataImporter class to full-import data and
index them all.
So it should be done in java code and schema.xml.
When I write a CustomDataImporter, I have to implement a nextRow() method,
which return a mapString,Object. And also schema,xml have a multiValued
label for each field.
I am wondering how could I utilize it.
I believe there must be several ways to make it multi-valued, using
analyzer or copyField. I am finding a efficient and easiest way that I don't
have to change data format.
Kun
2011/3/31 Stefan Matheis matheis.ste...@googlemail.com
Kun,
it should be enough to use the same field second time, like this:
field name=foovalue1/field
field name=foovalue2/field
Regards
Stefan
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:39 AM, kun xiong xiongku...@gmail.com wrote:
Since the interface of DataImporter return a Map, I can't put multi
value
for a same field, right?
Example:
I write a class extending DataImporter, and want to index {value1,
value2} for field name.
How should I do?
Many thanks.
Kun
Re: Solr 1.4.1 and Tika 0.9 - some tests not passing
: I'm still interested on what steps I could take to get to the bottom of the : failing tests. Is there additional information that I should provide? i'm not really up to speed on what might have changed in Tika 0.9 to cause this, but the best thing to do would probably be to look at what *does* work compared to what doesn't work. if *none* of hte asserts for dealing with an html doc work, that suggests that fundementally something is just completley broken about the html parsing. Consider this first assertion failure... : assertQ(req(title:Welcome), //*[@numFound='1']); ...in the context of what you said tika 0.9 gives you for that doc on the command line... : $ java -jar tika-app-0.9.jar : ../../../apache-solr-1.4.1-with-tika-0.9/contrib/extraction/src/test/resources/simple.html ... : titleWelcome to Solr/title ...if that basic little bit of info can't be extracted, then i'm guessing nothing is being extracted. I would suggest you run the example (with the 0.9 tika jars) and manually attempt to index one document, and then use the schema browser to see exactly what gets indexed. you may need to experiment with tweaking the config options for the extraction handler. -Hoss
Re: HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration change: abortOnConfigurationErrorfalse/abortOnConfigurationError in null ------------------------------------------------------------- org
i need help -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/HTTP-Status-500-Severe-errors-in-solr-configuration-change-abortOnConfigurationError-false-abortOnCo6-tp2757494p2761679.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: query expansion à la dismax
: So I wrote my own code that filters the top level queries and expands : them, using a similar instruction as dismax within a particular query : component. : : Question 1: doesn't such a code already exist? : (I haven't found it) the DisjunctionMaxQueryParser class has support for configuring field aliase -- in the DisMaxQParser it only uses it with setting up aliaes for a (fake) default field, but if you use it directly in code you can set up specific aliases for specific field names (there's plans to do this for the edismax handler but some other weird behavior bugs are holding it up) : Question 2: should I rather make a QParserPlugin? : (the javadoc is not very helpful) implementing QParserPlugin is how you register a plugin that solr knows to use to parse query strings when the user asks for a parser by name (either using the defType param, or with the local param syntax). within your QParserPlugin you can implement the actaul parsing anyway you like. The LuceneQParserPlugin serves as a really simple example of how to implement a QParserPlugin if you've already got a QueryParser subclass that you want to use -- it's really just about managing the request parameters. -Hoss
Re: Solrj Performance check.
: For eg, if I post a search url in browser, it shows the QTime in : milliseconds only. : : http://serverName/solr/mydata/select?q=computingqt=myhandlerfq=category:1 : : But, if I query the same using Solrj from my project like below, it takes : long time(8 - 12 sec) to produce the same results. Hence, I suspect whether : Solrj takes such long time to produce results. a) QTime is only the time spent processing the request, it doens't include the time spent writing the results back to hte client (which may be high if there are a lot of documents in the response, or very large documents i nthe response, or lots of network overhead, etc...) b) how are you timing your SolrJ code? the snippet you presented doesn't give us any indication of what you are using to determine the 8-12 second timing number, so we have no way of knowing what exactly might be contributing to the total time. : SolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(url); : SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery(computing); : query.setParam(qt, myhandler); : query.setFilterQueries(category:1); : query.setHighlight(false); : QueryResponse rsp = server.query( query ); (for instance: if you put those lines in a small java program and time the entire program, that's going ot be a bad way to represent the timing, as it will also factor in all the time spent initializing hte JVM, loading classes etc...) -Hoss
Re: HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration change: abortOnConfigurationErrorfalse/abortOnConfigurationError in null ------------------------------------------------------------- org
Thanks . I'll check it. but i don't know how to get the right solr configuration -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/HTTP-Status-500-Severe-errors-in-solr-configuration-change-abortOnConfigurationError-false-abortOnCo6-tp2757493p2761753.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration change: abortOnConfigurationErrorfalse/abortOnConfigurationError in null ------------------------------------------------------------- org
Hello, The error message states: The markup in the document following the root element must be well-formed Which means that one of your XML files is broken (invalid). It might be the solrconfig.xml file. Check the structure of these files, open them in a browser which checks for XML structure (such as Firefox or IE I think) and go from there. Hope this helps On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:33 PM, jim guoru...@sohu.com wrote: i need help -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/HTTP-Status-500-Severe-errors-in-solr-configuration-change-abortOnConfigurationError-false-abortOnCo6-tp2757494p2761679.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration change: abortOnConfigurationErrorfalse/abortOnConfigurationError in null ------------------------------------------------------------- org
I open it buy Firefox,and find the mistake. when correct the mistake. There still has the error as: HTTP Status 500 - Severe errors in solr configuration. Check your log files for more detailed information on what may be wrong. If you want solr to continue after configuration errors, change: false in null - org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: invalid boolean value: at org.apache.solr.common.util.StrUtils.parseBool(StrUtils.java:237) at org.apache.solr.common.util.DOMUtil.addToNamedList(DOMUtil.java:140) at org.apache.solr.common.util.DOMUtil.nodesToNamedList(DOMUtil.java:98) at org.apache.solr.common.util.DOMUtil.childNodesToNamedList(DOMUtil.java:88) at org.apache.solr.common.util.DOMUtil.addToNamedList(DOMUtil.java:142) at org.apache.solr.common.util.DOMUtil.nodesToNamedList(DOMUtil.java:98) at org.apache.solr.common.util.DOMUtil.childNodesToNamedList(DOMUtil.java:88) at org.apache.solr.core.PluginInfo.(PluginInfo.java:54) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig.readPluginInfos(SolrConfig.java:220) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig.loadPluginInfo(SolrConfig.java:212) at org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig.(SolrConfig.java:184) at org.apache.solr.core.CoreContainer$Initializer.initialize(CoreContainer.java:134) at org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.init(SolrDispatchFilter.java:83) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.getFilter(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:295) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.setFilterDef(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:422) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:115) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.filterStart(StandardContext.java:4001) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.start(StandardContext.java:4651) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:791) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:771) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:546) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptor(HostConfig.java:637) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployDescriptors(HostConfig.java:563) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployApps(HostConfig.java:498) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.start(HostConfig.java:1277) at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.lifecycleEvent(HostConfig.java:321) at org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport.fireLifecycleEvent(LifecycleSupport.java:119) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1053) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.start(StandardHost.java:785) at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.start(ContainerBase.java:1045) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngine.start(StandardEngine.java:445) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardService.start(StandardService.java:519) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardServer.start(StandardServer.java:710) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina.start(Catalina.java:581) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:616) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.start(Bootstrap.java:289) at org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:414) i need help -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/HTTP-Status-500-Severe-errors-in-solr-configuration-change-abortOnConfigurationError-false-abortOnCo6-tp2757494p2762082.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
