Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-07 Thread Stephen Herr
The question Spacewalk is asking / answering when it shows you updates 
available to your system is Are there any newer versions of packages 
installed on this system in channels this system is subscribed to.


In your case, if the 6.5 client is subscribed to a 6.5 channel that only 
has packages up through 6.5 in it, then everything will be up to date. 
The fact that 6.6 has been released somewhere else is not relevant, what 
matters is what's in the channel and what's on the system.


-Stepehn

On 11/06/2014 10:59 AM, Daryl Rose wrote:

Michael,

I'm not sure that I understand your response.  The client is CentOS 6.5,
not 6.6. Yes, the Spacewalk server is 6.6, but the client is 6.5.  I
purposefully chose 6.5 because its an older release and I know there are
a number of packages that would be out of date.

Thank you

Daryl


On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Michael Mraka michael.mr...@redhat.com
mailto:michael.mr...@redhat.com wrote:

Daryl Rose wrote:
% I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server.   I
created a
% 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client
server
% and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
%
% When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many
how many
% updated packages it needed by doing a yum update.  It needed 264
% packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update.  Just looking.  I
then
% registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to
see if
% it was up to date or not.  Spacewalk is telling me that the client is
% up-to-date.  This is not accurate, why?

So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in
Spacewalk.
And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't
accurate?

If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know
about updates.

% Thanks.
%
% Daryl

Regards,

--
Michael Mráka
Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com mailto:Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list




___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list



___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list


Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-07 Thread Daryl Rose
How can I unregistered this server and clean up all references to the SW
server?   I removed the server from SW itself, but if I do a yum repolist I
get errors about an invalid registration.  I want to start over with a
clean system.

Thanks

Daryl


On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Stephen Herr sh...@redhat.com wrote:

 The question Spacewalk is asking / answering when it shows you updates
 available to your system is Are there any newer versions of packages
 installed on this system in channels this system is subscribed to.

 In your case, if the 6.5 client is subscribed to a 6.5 channel that only
 has packages up through 6.5 in it, then everything will be up to date. The
 fact that 6.6 has been released somewhere else is not relevant, what
 matters is what's in the channel and what's on the system.

 -Stepehn

 On 11/06/2014 10:59 AM, Daryl Rose wrote:

 Michael,

 I'm not sure that I understand your response.  The client is CentOS 6.5,
 not 6.6. Yes, the Spacewalk server is 6.6, but the client is 6.5.  I
 purposefully chose 6.5 because its an older release and I know there are
 a number of packages that would be out of date.

 Thank you

 Daryl


 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Michael Mraka michael.mr...@redhat.com
 mailto:michael.mr...@redhat.com wrote:

 Daryl Rose wrote:
 % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server.   I
 created a
 % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client
 server
 % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
 %
 % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many
 how many
 % updated packages it needed by doing a yum update.  It needed 264
 % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update.  Just looking.  I
 then
 % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to
 see if
 % it was up to date or not.  Spacewalk is telling me that the client
 is
 % up-to-date.  This is not accurate, why?

 So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in
 Spacewalk.
 And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't
 accurate?

 If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know
 about updates.

 % Thanks.
 %
 % Daryl

 Regards,

 --
 Michael Mráka
 Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com mailto:Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list




 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list


 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-07 Thread Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro
Daryl

Remove /etc/sysconfig/rhn/systemid file and try again.

B'Regards

__
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: waldi...@gmail.com
Skype: waldirio
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 How can I unregistered this server and clean up all references to the SW
 server?   I removed the server from SW itself, but if I do a yum repolist I
 get errors about an invalid registration.  I want to start over with a
 clean system.

 Thanks

 Daryl


 On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Stephen Herr sh...@redhat.com wrote:

 The question Spacewalk is asking / answering when it shows you updates
 available to your system is Are there any newer versions of packages
 installed on this system in channels this system is subscribed to.

 In your case, if the 6.5 client is subscribed to a 6.5 channel that only
 has packages up through 6.5 in it, then everything will be up to date. The
 fact that 6.6 has been released somewhere else is not relevant, what
 matters is what's in the channel and what's on the system.

 -Stepehn

 On 11/06/2014 10:59 AM, Daryl Rose wrote:

 Michael,

 I'm not sure that I understand your response.  The client is CentOS 6.5,
 not 6.6. Yes, the Spacewalk server is 6.6, but the client is 6.5.  I
 purposefully chose 6.5 because its an older release and I know there are
 a number of packages that would be out of date.

 Thank you

 Daryl


 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Michael Mraka michael.mr...@redhat.com
 mailto:michael.mr...@redhat.com wrote:

 Daryl Rose wrote:
 % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server.   I
 created a
 % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client
 server
 % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
 %
 % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many
 how many
 % updated packages it needed by doing a yum update.  It needed 264
 % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update.  Just looking.  I
 then
 % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to
 see if
 % it was up to date or not.  Spacewalk is telling me that the client
 is
 % up-to-date.  This is not accurate, why?

 So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in
 Spacewalk.
 And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't
 accurate?

 If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know
 about updates.

 % Thanks.
 %
 % Daryl

 Regards,

 --
 Michael Mráka
 Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com mailto:Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list




 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list


 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list



 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Kevin Sandy
Did you setup a 6.5 updates channel and repo, or just the base?  When showing 
updates, Spacewalk is showing you what packages updates it has available for 
the client, which won’t be the same as a ‘yum list updates’ if you have 
external repos defined directly on the client.


-- kevin



On Nov 6, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server.   I created a 6.5 
 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client server and 
 registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
 
 When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many how many 
 updated packages it needed by doing a yum update.  It needed 264 packages, 
 however, I DID NOT perform the update.  Just looking.  I then registered the 
 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to see if it was up to date 
 or not.  Spacewalk is telling me that the client is up-to-date.  This is not 
 accurate, why?
 
 Thanks.
 
 Daryl
 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Michael Mraka
Daryl Rose wrote:
% I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server.   I created a
% 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client server
% and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
% 
% When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many how many
% updated packages it needed by doing a yum update.  It needed 264
% packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update.  Just looking.  I then
% registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to see if
% it was up to date or not.  Spacewalk is telling me that the client is
% up-to-date.  This is not accurate, why?

So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in Spacewalk.
And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't accurate?
 
If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know about 
updates.

% Thanks.
% 
% Daryl

Regards,

--
Michael Mráka
Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro
Daryl, good afternoon

Have you checked your log files looking for some error ?! When you create
your environment, you create a repo, after a base channel, after ?!

Have you registered the servers directly to your base channel or before did
a cloned channel and them register the server to the clonned new channel ?!

Case you did the cloned (and I really recommend), you can check your logs,
imagine, during the cloning process, one error happened, the metadata or
files in fact can be corrupted, showing a wrong information or strange
things happening, like showing to be necessary update, although you don't
have packages to update.

Let me know if was clear.


__
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: waldi...@gmail.com
Skype: waldirio
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server.   I created a
 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client server
 and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.

 When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many how
 many updated packages it needed by doing a yum update.  It needed 264
 packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update.  Just looking.  I then
 registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to see if
 it was up to date or not.  Spacewalk is telling me that the client is
 up-to-date.  This is not accurate, why?

 Thanks.

 Daryl

 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Daryl Rose
Kevin,

Oh, so I have to add an update channel as well.  Okay.  This is my first
look at Spacewalk and just added the one channel.

I'll add in an update channel and see how that works.

Thank you for the feedback Kevin

Daryl

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Kevin Sandy ke...@digitallotus.com wrote:

 Did you setup a 6.5 updates channel and repo, or just the base?  When
 showing updates, Spacewalk is showing you what packages updates it has
 available for the client, which won’t be the same as a ‘yum list updates’
 if you have external repos defined directly on the client.


 -- kevin



 On Nov 6, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server.   I created a
 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client server
 and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.

 When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many how
 many updated packages it needed by doing a yum update.  It needed 264
 packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update.  Just looking.  I then
 registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to see if
 it was up to date or not.  Spacewalk is telling me that the client is
 up-to-date.  This is not accurate, why?

 Thanks.

 Daryl
 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list



 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Amedeo Salvati

   @daryl
   did you use relative path for specifically centos 6.5 like:
   /mirrors/CentOS/6.5
   or you use generic 6 version? like:
   /mirrors/CentOS/6
   both for base and updates, because centos repos when release new minor 
release will empty updates directory on the last one
   best regards
   a

   Da: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com

   A: spacewalk-list@redhat.com

   Cc:

   Data: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:44:25 +0100

   Oggetto: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

Daryl Rose wrote:

% I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I created a

% 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client server

% and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.

%

% When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many how 
many

% updated packages it needed by doing a yum update. It needed 264

% packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update. Just looking. I then

% registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to see if

% it was up to date or not. Spacewalk is telling me that the client is

% up-to-date. This is not accurate, why?

   

So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in 
Spacewalk.

And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't accurate?

   

If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know about 
updates.

   

% Thanks.

%

% Daryl

   

Regards,

   

--

Michael Mráka

Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

   

___

Spacewalk-list mailing list

Spacewalk-list@redhat.com

https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Daryl Rose
Michael,

I'm not sure that I understand your response.  The client is CentOS 6.5,
not 6.6. Yes, the Spacewalk server is 6.6, but the client is 6.5.  I
purposefully chose 6.5 because its an older release and I know there are a
number of packages that would be out of date.

Thank you

Daryl


On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Michael Mraka michael.mr...@redhat.com
wrote:

 Daryl Rose wrote:
 % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server.   I created a
 % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client server
 % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
 %
 % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many how
 many
 % updated packages it needed by doing a yum update.  It needed 264
 % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update.  Just looking.  I then
 % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to see if
 % it was up to date or not.  Spacewalk is telling me that the client is
 % up-to-date.  This is not accurate, why?

 So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in
 Spacewalk.
 And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't accurate?

 If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know about
 updates.

 % Thanks.
 %
 % Daryl

 Regards,

 --
 Michael Mráka
 Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Daryl Rose
Amedeo,

For the 6.5 base I used the URL path:

http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/os/x86_64/

I am in the process of adding an update channel, and I am using URL:

http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/updates/x86_64/

Are these not correct?  Should I use only http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6?

The documentation leaves a lot to be desired and doesn't provide an example
of setting up the repository channel.  I found a YouTube video of a guy
setting up a Spacewalk channel and repository.  He used the first URL that
I posted.  Is using http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6  a better method?

Any and all suggestions made are greatly appreciated.

Thank you.

Daryl



On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Amedeo Salvati ame...@oscert.net wrote:


 @daryl
 did you use relative path for specifically centos 6.5 like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6.5

 or you use generic 6 version? like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6

 both for base and updates, because centos repos when release new minor
 release will empty updates directory on the last one

 best regards
 a

 Da: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com
 A: spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 Cc:
 Data: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:44:25 +0100
 Oggetto: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

  Daryl Rose wrote:
  % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I created a
  % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client
 server
  % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
  %
  % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many how
 many
  % updated packages it needed by doing a yum update. It needed 264
  % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update. Just looking. I then
  % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to see
 if
  % it was up to date or not. Spacewalk is telling me that the client is
  % up-to-date. This is not accurate, why?
 
  So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in
 Spacewalk.
  And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't
 accurate?
 
  If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know
 about updates.
 
  % Thanks.
  %
  % Daryl
 
  Regards,
 
  --
  Michael Mráka
  Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
 
  ___
  Spacewalk-list mailing list
  Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro
Daryl

I sent a email to list last month about it (
https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2014-October/msg00222.html),
take a look, the idea is the same.

Tell me if is ok to you, about understanding, case not, I can create a post
about it in my blog.

B'Regards

__
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: waldi...@gmail.com
Skype: waldirio
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 Amedeo,

 For the 6.5 base I used the URL path:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/os/x86_64/

 I am in the process of adding an update channel, and I am using URL:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/updates/x86_64/

 Are these not correct?  Should I use only
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6?

 The documentation leaves a lot to be desired and doesn't provide an
 example of setting up the repository channel.  I found a YouTube video of a
 guy setting up a Spacewalk channel and repository.  He used the first URL
 that I posted.  Is using http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6  a better
 method?

 Any and all suggestions made are greatly appreciated.

 Thank you.

 Daryl



 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Amedeo Salvati ame...@oscert.net wrote:


 @daryl
 did you use relative path for specifically centos 6.5 like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6.5

 or you use generic 6 version? like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6

 both for base and updates, because centos repos when release new minor
 release will empty updates directory on the last one

 best regards
 a

 Da: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com
 A: spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 Cc:
 Data: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:44:25 +0100
 Oggetto: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

  Daryl Rose wrote:
  % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I created
 a
  % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client
 server
  % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
  %
  % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many
 how many
  % updated packages it needed by doing a yum update. It needed 264
  % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update. Just looking. I then
  % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to
 see if
  % it was up to date or not. Spacewalk is telling me that the client is
  % up-to-date. This is not accurate, why?
 
  So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in
 Spacewalk.
  And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't
 accurate?
 
  If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know
 about updates.
 
  % Thanks.
  %
  % Daryl
 
  Regards,
 
  --
  Michael Mráka
  Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
 
  ___
  Spacewalk-list mailing list
  Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list



 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Alexander Innes
if you use the frozen 6.5 you wont get any more updates, unless you
reay need to pointing to the symlink ones better. Also rather than
using the web interface in future you can use

/usr/bin/spacewalk-common-channels -v -u admin -p pass -a x86_64 -k
unlimited 'centos7*' 'spacewalk-client*'

Which deals with adding channels and repos like magic :)

On 6 November 2014 16:16, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 Amedeo,

 For the 6.5 base I used the URL path:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/os/x86_64/

 I am in the process of adding an update channel, and I am using URL:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/updates/x86_64/

 Are these not correct?  Should I use only
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6?

 The documentation leaves a lot to be desired and doesn't provide an
 example of setting up the repository channel.  I found a YouTube video of a
 guy setting up a Spacewalk channel and repository.  He used the first URL
 that I posted.  Is using http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6  a better
 method?

 Any and all suggestions made are greatly appreciated.

 Thank you.

 Daryl



 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Amedeo Salvati ame...@oscert.net wrote:


 @daryl
 did you use relative path for specifically centos 6.5 like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6.5

 or you use generic 6 version? like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6

 both for base and updates, because centos repos when release new minor
 release will empty updates directory on the last one

 best regards
 a

 Da: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com
 A: spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 Cc:
 Data: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:44:25 +0100
 Oggetto: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

  Daryl Rose wrote:
  % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I created
 a
  % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client
 server
  % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
  %
  % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many
 how many
  % updated packages it needed by doing a yum update. It needed 264
  % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update. Just looking. I then
  % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to
 see if
  % it was up to date or not. Spacewalk is telling me that the client is
  % up-to-date. This is not accurate, why?
 
  So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in
 Spacewalk.
  And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't
 accurate?
 
  If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know
 about updates.
 
  % Thanks.
  %
  % Daryl
 
  Regards,
 
  --
  Michael Mráka
  Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
 
  ___
  Spacewalk-list mailing list
  Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list



 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Daryl Rose
Waldirio,

Thank you for the information, but I'm still a bit confused on how to
configure the channel and repositories.

If I read your post correctly, I should create a CentOS 6.5 channel with a
CentOS 6.5
Base repository with a 6.5 update child repository?  Is that correct?

Thank you.

Daryl


On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro 
waldi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Daryl

 I sent a email to list last month about it (
 https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2014-October/msg00222.html),
 take a look, the idea is the same.

 Tell me if is ok to you, about understanding, case not, I can create a
 post about it in my blog.

 B'Regards

 __
 Atenciosamente
 Waldirio
 msn: waldi...@gmail.com
 Skype: waldirio
 Site: www.waldirio.com.br
 Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
 LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
 PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 Amedeo,

 For the 6.5 base I used the URL path:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/os/x86_64/

 I am in the process of adding an update channel, and I am using URL:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/updates/x86_64/

 Are these not correct?  Should I use only
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6?

 The documentation leaves a lot to be desired and doesn't provide an
 example of setting up the repository channel.  I found a YouTube video of a
 guy setting up a Spacewalk channel and repository.  He used the first URL
 that I posted.  Is using http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6  a better
 method?

 Any and all suggestions made are greatly appreciated.

 Thank you.

 Daryl



 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Amedeo Salvati ame...@oscert.net wrote:


 @daryl
 did you use relative path for specifically centos 6.5 like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6.5

 or you use generic 6 version? like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6

 both for base and updates, because centos repos when release new minor
 release will empty updates directory on the last one

 best regards
 a

 Da: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com
 A: spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 Cc:
 Data: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:44:25 +0100
 Oggetto: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

  Daryl Rose wrote:
  % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I
 created a
  % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client
 server
  % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
  %
  % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many
 how many
  % updated packages it needed by doing a yum update. It needed 264
  % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update. Just looking. I then
  % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to
 see if
  % it was up to date or not. Spacewalk is telling me that the client is
  % up-to-date. This is not accurate, why?
 
  So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in
 Spacewalk.
  And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't
 accurate?
 
  If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know
 about updates.
 
  % Thanks.
  %
  % Daryl
 
  Regards,
 
  --
  Michael Mráka
  Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
 
  ___
  Spacewalk-list mailing list
  Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list



 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list



 ___
 Spacewalk-list mailing list
 Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

___
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro
Daryl

You can do like this


Repo
repo: repo_centos6.5
url: http://mirror.globo.com/centos/6.5/os/x86_64/

Channel
base channel: centos6.5_x86-64_base


After this you will create a child channel


Repo
repo: repo_centos6.5_update
url: http://mirror.globo.com/centos/6.5/updates/x86_64/

Channel
base channel: centos6.5_x86-64_base
child channel label: centos6.5_x86-64_update


So you will create your environment like example above to all channels you
want in your server, but the best practice is, to your clients, you need a
controlled environment, so you will clone your base channels to freezed
channels, for example, to your development channels, you can create like
bellow

dev_centos6.5_x86-64
  |-- dev_centos6.5_x86-64_update
  | 
  | -- dev_epel_6_x86-64
  | -- dev_vmware_6_x86-64

remember, base channel will receive update all days (if you define this
update frequency, in your freezed channel, you will define when will be
updated, sure after some tests like, your application will run normally
after update gcc or kernel, anyway, you have to test before apply in your
production environment.

More 0,50 cents, you may create base channels like:

prod_base channel name # Production environment
homolog_base channel name   # Homolog environment
dev_base channel name  # Development environment

Let me know if was clear the explanation.

Take Care


__
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: waldi...@gmail.com
Skype: waldirio
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 Waldirio,

 Thank you for the information, but I'm still a bit confused on how to
 configure the channel and repositories.

 If I read your post correctly, I should create a CentOS 6.5 channel with a
 CentOS 6.5
 Base repository with a 6.5 update child repository?  Is that correct?

 Thank you.

 Daryl


 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro 
 waldi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Daryl

 I sent a email to list last month about it (
 https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2014-October/msg00222.html),
 take a look, the idea is the same.

 Tell me if is ok to you, about understanding, case not, I can create a
 post about it in my blog.

 B'Regards

 __
 Atenciosamente
 Waldirio
 msn: waldi...@gmail.com
 Skype: waldirio
 Site: www.waldirio.com.br
 Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
 LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
 PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 Amedeo,

 For the 6.5 base I used the URL path:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/os/x86_64/

 I am in the process of adding an update channel, and I am using URL:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/updates/x86_64/

 Are these not correct?  Should I use only
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6?

 The documentation leaves a lot to be desired and doesn't provide an
 example of setting up the repository channel.  I found a YouTube video of a
 guy setting up a Spacewalk channel and repository.  He used the first URL
 that I posted.  Is using http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6  a better
 method?

 Any and all suggestions made are greatly appreciated.

 Thank you.

 Daryl



 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Amedeo Salvati ame...@oscert.net
 wrote:


 @daryl
 did you use relative path for specifically centos 6.5 like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6.5

 or you use generic 6 version? like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6

 both for base and updates, because centos repos when release new minor
 release will empty updates directory on the last one

 best regards
 a

 Da: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com
 A: spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 Cc:
 Data: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:44:25 +0100
 Oggetto: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

  Daryl Rose wrote:
  % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I
 created a
  % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client
 server
  % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
  %
  % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many
 how many
  % updated packages it needed by doing a yum update. It needed 264
  % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update. Just looking. I
 then
  % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to
 see if
  % it was up to date or not. Spacewalk is telling me that the client is
  % up-to-date. This is not accurate, why?
 
  So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in
 Spacewalk.
  And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't
 accurate?
 
  If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know
 about updates.
 
  % Thanks.
  %
  % Daryl
 
  Regards,
 
  --
  Michael Mráka
  Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Daryl Rose
Waldirio,

I believe that is how I now have this setup.

I have a CentOS 6.5 Channel setup and under it, I have two repositories
setup, 6.5 Base and 6.5 update.

Now that I have the update repository setup, the client that I'm setting up
now show's that there are 128 packages that need to be updated.

Thank you Waldirio and everyone else who responded for helping me get this
setup correctly.

Daryl



On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro 
waldi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Daryl

 You can do like this

 
 Repo
 repo: repo_centos6.5
 url: http://mirror.globo.com/centos/6.5/os/x86_64/

 Channel
 base channel: centos6.5_x86-64_base
 

 After this you will create a child channel

 
 Repo
 repo: repo_centos6.5_update
 url: http://mirror.globo.com/centos/6.5/updates/x86_64/

 Channel
 base channel: centos6.5_x86-64_base
 child channel label: centos6.5_x86-64_update
 

 So you will create your environment like example above to all channels you
 want in your server, but the best practice is, to your clients, you need a
 controlled environment, so you will clone your base channels to freezed
 channels, for example, to your development channels, you can create like
 bellow

 dev_centos6.5_x86-64
   |-- dev_centos6.5_x86-64_update
   | 
   | -- dev_epel_6_x86-64
   | -- dev_vmware_6_x86-64

 remember, base channel will receive update all days (if you define this
 update frequency, in your freezed channel, you will define when will be
 updated, sure after some tests like, your application will run normally
 after update gcc or kernel, anyway, you have to test before apply in your
 production environment.

 More 0,50 cents, you may create base channels like:

 prod_base channel name # Production environment
 homolog_base channel name   # Homolog environment
 dev_base channel name  # Development environment

 Let me know if was clear the explanation.

 Take Care


 __
 Atenciosamente
 Waldirio
 msn: waldi...@gmail.com
 Skype: waldirio
 Site: www.waldirio.com.br
 Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
 LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
 PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 Waldirio,

 Thank you for the information, but I'm still a bit confused on how to
 configure the channel and repositories.

 If I read your post correctly, I should create a CentOS 6.5 channel with
 a CentOS 6.5
 Base repository with a 6.5 update child repository?  Is that correct?

 Thank you.

 Daryl


 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro 
 waldi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Daryl

 I sent a email to list last month about it (
 https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2014-October/msg00222.html),
 take a look, the idea is the same.

 Tell me if is ok to you, about understanding, case not, I can create a
 post about it in my blog.

 B'Regards

 __
 Atenciosamente
 Waldirio
 msn: waldi...@gmail.com
 Skype: waldirio
 Site: www.waldirio.com.br
 Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
 LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
 PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 Amedeo,

 For the 6.5 base I used the URL path:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/os/x86_64/

 I am in the process of adding an update channel, and I am using URL:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/updates/x86_64/

 Are these not correct?  Should I use only
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6?

 The documentation leaves a lot to be desired and doesn't provide an
 example of setting up the repository channel.  I found a YouTube video of a
 guy setting up a Spacewalk channel and repository.  He used the first URL
 that I posted.  Is using http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6  a better
 method?

 Any and all suggestions made are greatly appreciated.

 Thank you.

 Daryl



 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Amedeo Salvati ame...@oscert.net
 wrote:


 @daryl
 did you use relative path for specifically centos 6.5 like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6.5

 or you use generic 6 version? like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6

 both for base and updates, because centos repos when release new minor
 release will empty updates directory on the last one

 best regards
 a

 Da: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com
 A: spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 Cc:
 Data: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:44:25 +0100
 Oggetto: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

  Daryl Rose wrote:
  % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I
 created a
  % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client
 server
  % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.
  %
  % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many
 how many
  % updated packages it needed by doing a yum update. It needed 264
  % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update. Just looking. I
 then
  % registered the 6.5 client

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro
Enjoy!

;-)

__
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: waldi...@gmail.com
Skype: waldirio
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 Waldirio,

 I believe that is how I now have this setup.

 I have a CentOS 6.5 Channel setup and under it, I have two repositories
 setup, 6.5 Base and 6.5 update.

 Now that I have the update repository setup, the client that I'm setting
 up now show's that there are 128 packages that need to be updated.

 Thank you Waldirio and everyone else who responded for helping me get this
 setup correctly.

 Daryl



 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro 
 waldi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Daryl

 You can do like this

 
 Repo
 repo: repo_centos6.5
 url: http://mirror.globo.com/centos/6.5/os/x86_64/

 Channel
 base channel: centos6.5_x86-64_base
 

 After this you will create a child channel

 
 Repo
 repo: repo_centos6.5_update
 url: http://mirror.globo.com/centos/6.5/updates/x86_64/

 Channel
 base channel: centos6.5_x86-64_base
 child channel label: centos6.5_x86-64_update
 

 So you will create your environment like example above to all channels
 you want in your server, but the best practice is, to your clients, you
 need a controlled environment, so you will clone your base channels to
 freezed channels, for example, to your development channels, you can create
 like bellow

 dev_centos6.5_x86-64
   |-- dev_centos6.5_x86-64_update
   | 
   | -- dev_epel_6_x86-64
   | -- dev_vmware_6_x86-64

 remember, base channel will receive update all days (if you define this
 update frequency, in your freezed channel, you will define when will be
 updated, sure after some tests like, your application will run normally
 after update gcc or kernel, anyway, you have to test before apply in your
 production environment.

 More 0,50 cents, you may create base channels like:

 prod_base channel name # Production environment
 homolog_base channel name   # Homolog environment
 dev_base channel name  # Development environment

 Let me know if was clear the explanation.

 Take Care


 __
 Atenciosamente
 Waldirio
 msn: waldi...@gmail.com
 Skype: waldirio
 Site: www.waldirio.com.br
 Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
 LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
 PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 Waldirio,

 Thank you for the information, but I'm still a bit confused on how to
 configure the channel and repositories.

 If I read your post correctly, I should create a CentOS 6.5 channel with
 a CentOS 6.5
 Base repository with a 6.5 update child repository?  Is that correct?

 Thank you.

 Daryl


 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro 
 waldi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Daryl

 I sent a email to list last month about it (
 https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2014-October/msg00222.html),
 take a look, the idea is the same.

 Tell me if is ok to you, about understanding, case not, I can create a
 post about it in my blog.

 B'Regards

 __
 Atenciosamente
 Waldirio
 msn: waldi...@gmail.com
 Skype: waldirio
 Site: www.waldirio.com.br
 Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
 LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
 PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 Amedeo,

 For the 6.5 base I used the URL path:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/os/x86_64/

 I am in the process of adding an update channel, and I am using URL:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/updates/x86_64/

 Are these not correct?  Should I use only
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6?

 The documentation leaves a lot to be desired and doesn't provide an
 example of setting up the repository channel.  I found a YouTube video of 
 a
 guy setting up a Spacewalk channel and repository.  He used the first URL
 that I posted.  Is using http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6  a better
 method?

 Any and all suggestions made are greatly appreciated.

 Thank you.

 Daryl



 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Amedeo Salvati ame...@oscert.net
 wrote:


 @daryl
 did you use relative path for specifically centos 6.5 like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6.5

 or you use generic 6 version? like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6

 both for base and updates, because centos repos when release new
 minor release will empty updates directory on the last one

 best regards
 a

 Da: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com
 A: spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 Cc:
 Data: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:44:25 +0100
 Oggetto: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

  Daryl Rose wrote:
  % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I
 created a
  % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5

Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

2014-11-06 Thread Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro
Hello

Sure, you can do that using spacewalk-clone-by-date, although if you know
this command, probably you use RHN Satellite and there is like this (all
minor releases in just one base channel), and the clone-by-date is to do
what you have (different's minor releases), so you can do by different ways
to reach the paradise! ;-)

Talking about best practice, another good point is still your clients in
the last minor version. ;-), think about.

Take Care!

__
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: waldi...@gmail.com
Skype: waldirio
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Amedeo Salvati ame...@oscert.net wrote:

 your mileage may vary... i prefer to use constant path centos/6/ and then
 use a clone-by-date command to bring clients under particular version

 Best regards




 Inviato da Tablet Samsung



  Messaggio originale 
 Da: Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro waldi...@gmail.com
 Data: 06/11/2014 19:29 (GMT+01:00)
 A: spacewalk-list@redhat.com
 Oggetto: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?


 Daryl

 You can do like this

 
 Repo
 repo: repo_centos6.5
 url: http://mirror.globo.com/centos/6.5/os/x86_64/

 Channel
 base channel: centos6.5_x86-64_base
 

 After this you will create a child channel

 
 Repo
 repo: repo_centos6.5_update
 url: http://mirror.globo.com/centos/6.5/updates/x86_64/

 Channel
 base channel: centos6.5_x86-64_base
 child channel label: centos6.5_x86-64_update
 

 So you will create your environment like example above to all channels you
 want in your server, but the best practice is, to your clients, you need a
 controlled environment, so you will clone your base channels to freezed
 channels, for example, to your development channels, you can create like
 bellow

 dev_centos6.5_x86-64
   |-- dev_centos6.5_x86-64_update
   | 
   | -- dev_epel_6_x86-64
   | -- dev_vmware_6_x86-64

 remember, base channel will receive update all days (if you define this
 update frequency, in your freezed channel, you will define when will be
 updated, sure after some tests like, your application will run normally
 after update gcc or kernel, anyway, you have to test before apply in your
 production environment.

 More 0,50 cents, you may create base channels like:

 prod_base channel name # Production environment
 homolog_base channel name   # Homolog environment
 dev_base channel name  # Development environment

 Let me know if was clear the explanation.

 Take Care


 __
 Atenciosamente
 Waldirio
 msn: waldi...@gmail.com
 Skype: waldirio
 Site: www.waldirio.com.br
 Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
 LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
 PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 Waldirio,

 Thank you for the information, but I'm still a bit confused on how to
 configure the channel and repositories.

 If I read your post correctly, I should create a CentOS 6.5 channel with
 a CentOS 6.5
 Base repository with a 6.5 update child repository?  Is that correct?

 Thank you.

 Daryl


 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro 
 waldi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Daryl

 I sent a email to list last month about it (
 https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2014-October/msg00222.html),
 take a look, the idea is the same.

 Tell me if is ok to you, about understanding, case not, I can create a
 post about it in my blog.

 B'Regards

 __
 Atenciosamente
 Waldirio
 msn: waldi...@gmail.com
 Skype: waldirio
 Site: www.waldirio.com.br
 Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
 LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
 PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Daryl Rose rosed...@gmail.com wrote:

 Amedeo,

 For the 6.5 base I used the URL path:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/os/x86_64/

 I am in the process of adding an update channel, and I am using URL:

 http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/updates/x86_64/

 Are these not correct?  Should I use only
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6?

 The documentation leaves a lot to be desired and doesn't provide an
 example of setting up the repository channel.  I found a YouTube video of a
 guy setting up a Spacewalk channel and repository.  He used the first URL
 that I posted.  Is using http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6  a better
 method?

 Any and all suggestions made are greatly appreciated.

 Thank you.

 Daryl



 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Amedeo Salvati ame...@oscert.net
 wrote:


 @daryl
 did you use relative path for specifically centos 6.5 like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6.5

 or you use generic 6 version? like:

 /mirrors/CentOS/6

 both for base and updates, because centos repos when release new minor
 release will empty updates directory on the last