[freenet-support] Internal error with KeyUtils

2010-07-02 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Internal error: please report

java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
freenet.client.async.SplitFileFetcher.(Lfreenet/client/Metadata;Lfreenet/client/async/GetCompletionCallback;Lfreenet/client/async/ClientRequester;Lfreenet/client/FetchContext;ZLjava/util/List;Lfreenet/client/ClientMetadata;Lfreenet/client/ArchiveContext;ILfreenet/support/api/Bucket;JLcom/db4o/ObjectContainer;Lfreenet/client/async/ClientContext;)V
at plugins.KeyUtils.KeyExplorerUtils.splitGet(KeyExplorerUtils.java:157)
at
plugins.KeyUtils.KeyExplorerUtils.splitManifestGet(KeyExplorerUtils.java:170)
at
plugins.KeyUtils.toadlets.SiteExplorerToadlet.parseMetadataItem(SiteExplorerToadlet.java:360)
at
plugins.KeyUtils.toadlets.SiteExplorerToadlet.parseMetadataItem(SiteExplorerToadlet.java:319)
at
plugins.KeyUtils.toadlets.SiteExplorerToadlet.makeManifestPage(SiteExplorerToadlet.java:286)
at
plugins.KeyUtils.toadlets.SiteExplorerToadlet.handleMethodPOST(SiteExplorerToadlet.java:152)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at
freenet.clients.http.ToadletContextImpl.handle(ToadletContextImpl.java:534)
at
freenet.clients.http.SimpleToadletServer$SocketHandler.run(SimpleToadletServer.java:794)
at
freenet.support.PooledExecutor$MyThread.realRun(PooledExecutor.java:228)
at freenet.support.io.NativeThread.run(NativeThread.java:101)

* Freenet 0.7.5 Build #1257 build01257
* Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] PB freenet

2009-10-25 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Quand tu installes Freenet, et que tu lances un navigateur sur
l'adresse 127.0.0.1: tu n'arrives pas sur le noeud ? Et si tu
installes avec le fichier JAR au lieu de l'installateur Windows ?


--
Freenet - totale liberté d'expression : anonymat, résistance à la
censure, résistance aux attaques.

Documentation  téléchargement :
http://doc-fr.freenetproject.org/Description_generale


2009/10/14 Pascal pascal.guille...@free.fr

 bonjour,

 voila ce qui m' amène, freenet a été installé correctement sur une machine 
 mais il y a eu un pb sur le profil du compte ( profil errant) lors d'un 
 rapatriement.

 Depuis le service freenet ne monte plus en auto après redémarrage de la 
 machine.
 Impossible de désinstaller freenet sans avoir le service monté.
 Suppression de freenet manuellement et nettoyage de la base de registre.
 Impossible de réinstaller freenet, la creation de compte freenet sur firefox 
 pour configurer le noeud ne se fait pas puis une erreur apparait 1067 le 
 service ne monte pas.
 Impossible de lancer le service manuellement en administrateur local et de 
 domaine.

 je vous remercie d'avance de votre aide

 bonne soirée
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Administrator of french wiki needed

2009-09-01 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Hi,

CP web links (probably) are posted on the french wiki. Someone can delete
these links:

http://doc-fr.freenetproject.org/index.php?title=Description_techniqueoldid=3849#Fonctionnement_du_r.C3.A9seau
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Administrator of french wiki needed

2009-09-01 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
The French wiki allowed to make known freenet to french users. I would like
to reopen the French wiki, but we must designate a french administrator to
resolve these problems. (If possible, someone who can speak English better
than me to discuss with the official developers.)


On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
 wrote:

 On Tuesday 01 September 2009 10:57:42 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
  Hi,
 
  CP web links (probably) are posted on the french wiki. Someone can delete
  these links:
 
 
 http://doc-fr.freenetproject.org/index.php?title=Description_techniqueoldid=3849#Fonctionnement_du_r.C3.A9seau
 
 I have shut down the French wiki. If somebody wants to maintain it I will
 start it back up.

 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Urgent Freenet security announcement: upgrade your Java now!

2009-08-09 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
I use Ubuntu 8.10

Remove java

Download java 6 update 15:
32 bits: http://javadl.sun.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=33223
64 bits: http://javadl.sun.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=33227

And follow these steps:

sudo mv /.../jre-6u15-linux-x64.bin /opt/
cd /opt/
chmod +x jre-6u15-linux-x64.bin
sudo ./jre-6u15-linux-x64.bin
YES
sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/bin/java java
/opt/jre1.6.0_15/bin/java 1
sudo update-alternatives --config java
sudo rm /usr/bin/java
sudo ln -fs /opt/jre1.6.0_15/bin/java /usr/bin/java

Launch Freenet



On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:49 AM, user1 bq...@telia.com wrote:

 On Sunday 09 August 2009 01:22:28 am Matthew Toseland wrote:
  Anyone running Freenet must upgrade to at least Sun Java 6 Update 15 or
 Sun
  Java 5 Update 20.
 
  Until you are able to do this, please shut down anything that parses XML,
  specifically: - Do not use the search function (XMLLibrarian).
  - Unload the WoT and Freetalk plugins if you are using them. Likewise
 with
  Library etc. - Do not use Thaw. Shut it down if it is running.
 
  Other applications may also be vulnerable via the Python libexpat and
  Apache Xerces libraries, so you should update your distribution ASAP.
  However, not all applications that process XML are vulnerable as there
 are
  a number of XML parsers.
 
  This concerns both denial of service and remote code execution and thus
 is
  a *SEVERE* vulnerability.
 
  I will be putting out a new build ASAP, which will tell any users who
  haven't upgraded to upgrade and will disable XMLLibrarian until they do
 so.
 
  http://www.cert.fi/en/reports/2009/vulnerability2009085.html

 I am using ubuntu 8.04

 There is an easy way in ubuntu to upgrade packages.

 Open a terminal and run

 updage-manager

 Then click Install Updates

 I just did that, but I only get sun-java6 update 14 (6-14-0ubuntu)

 I also checked if Freenet 1228 had been automatic updated, but it had not,
 so
 I ran:

 cd Freenet

 ./update.sh

 and now 1228 is running (instead of 1223)

 But my Freenet still complains about updating sun-java

 I can inform, that I also did an upgrade on another machine running ubuntu
 9.04, and this also is running sun-java6 update 14 (6-14-0ubuntu)
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Darknet port

2009-06-10 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Thanks!

I searched for explanations to backup my freemail identity, but I haven't
found. How do I backup my freemail identity? Can we have this feature on the
freemail plugin page?


On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
 wrote:

 On Tuesday 09 June 2009 19:42:30 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
  If I reinstall freenet, should I swap my new darknet port (randomly
 given)
  to previous port? (If I am Darknet only.)
 
 You will need to keep a bunch of files including your freenet.ini, node-*
 and peers-*. There is a wiki page about this:
 http://wiki.freenetproject.org/BackingUpFreenet

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Darknet port

2009-06-09 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
If I reinstall freenet, should I swap my new darknet port (randomly given)
to previous port? (If I am Darknet only.)
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Auto-updating system COMPROMIZED! on 2009-06-07 17:30:22

2009-06-07 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
From FMS:

fala...@ixvqeqm0lyydtmyaf5z49sjzuxr7ntqkoqvyg0hvitw wrote :
 I tried to update to #1215 and now I find this message, and I am still on
 #1214:

 Your node has found the auto-updater's revocation key on the network. It
 means that our auto-updating system is likely to have been COMPROMIZED!
 Consequently, it has been disabled on your node to prevent bad things to

 be installed. We strongly advise you to check the project's website for
 updates. Please take care of verifying that the website hasn't been
 spoofed either. The revocation message is the following : Could not read
 revocation cert from temp file ...freenet/node/persistent-temp-12345/
 revocation-12341234123412341234.fblob.tmp from node a.b.c.d:e !.

 Could this be some kind of targeted attack to try to identify FMS
 identities behind a given IP address? So they send this message to my IP
 address only, and then when I report it on FMS, they know falafel's IP
 address?

 The IP address has no reverse lookup hostname but the IP address block
 seems to be in Costa Rica, which seems a little suspicious if you are of
 the tinfoil hat persuasion.
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Freenet HTML page loads only partially

2009-06-07 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
 I have no problem to access to your freesites.


On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Prawda2 prawda2.i...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Juiceman juicema...@gmail.com wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1



 On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Prawda2 wrote:
  Hello,
 
  Too see how (and if) freenet really works I created my first test-page.
 
  The key is:
  u...@f-wpzfvcasstm-i6hifzfvrevyhsoame3qz03djjewy
 ,vBdtIQ6JYGV-wVMVWqTKwOSlq00J4UmhbUUFFSBDHQQ,AQACAAE/prawda2/1/index2.html
 
  It went well, but I have 2 problems with it now.
 
  1) When I enter the key manually the page loads, but before it happens I
 get
  a warning:
  Unknown and potentially dangerous content type:
 
  Size: 15.9 KiB
  MIME type:
 
  It happens even though I set a proper MIME type before publishing the
 files.
 
 
  2) When I launch this key from a bookmark it does not warn, but then
 only
  part of the page loads. :( The HTML file is just cut.
 
  The same happens when I use internel key-link from a sub-page, not a
  bookmark:
  u...@f-wpzfvcasstm-i6hifzfvrevyhsoame3qz03djjewy
 ,vBdtIQ6JYGV-wVMVWqTKwOSlq00J4UmhbUUFFSBDHQQ,AQACAAE/prawda2/1/index.html
 
 
  Can anyone please help, or at least explain what is happening here?
  Is there anything I could do to fix this?
 
  Cheers,
  Piotr

 It seems to be a bug in the Freenet home page.  Inputing any Freenet
 URI results in ?type= being appended after the URI, thus causing the
 node to warn.


 I am not sure if I understand.
 Are you saying that both the problems I have are the symptoms of one bug?
 Can I do something to make it fixed? :)
 Cheers


 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Auto-update key blown according to 1 peer(s)!

2009-05-24 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
I also have the same message with another IP.


On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:26 AM, SmallSister development 
smallsis...@xs4all.nl wrote:

 theymos wrote:
  I just got this message. What do I do?
 
  Auto-update key blown according to 1 peer(s)!
 
  One or more of your peers says that the auto-update key is blown!
  This means that an attacker may know the private key for the
  auto-update system and can therefore cause your node to run code of
  his choice (if you update)! The auto-update system has been disabled.
  It is also possible that your peers are deliberately lying about it.
 
  Your node has been unable to download the revocation certificate.
  Possible causes include an attack on your node to try to get you to
  update despite the key being blown, or your nodes lying about the key
  being blown. Please contact the developers or other Freenet users to
  sort out this mess.

 I got the message too (from another IP) and they told me that it wasn't
 serious...

 Peter.
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] Darknet

2009-05-23 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Thanks Luke! Also, I think I have to modify the darknet port in freenet.ini.


On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Luke771 luke771.li...@gmail.com wrote:

 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
  Can I use an old reference Darknet (file node-port) when I reinstall
  the node to avoid losing the connection with my friends?
 

 yes but you also need the file peers-port
 IIUC node-port is your node and peers-port  is your darnet peers' info.
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] 1210 performance

2009-05-23 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
I install these plugins only:

JSTUN
XMLLibrarian
KeyExplorer


On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Juiceman juicema...@gmail.com wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1



 On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:01 PM, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i  wrote:
  I had no problem with version 1209. The machine has 2GB of RAM, it
 doesn't
  use the swap, and the node wasn't rebuilding or resizing. I tried
  reinstalling the node several times, I have the same problem after a few
  hours. When I restart the node, it is immediately slow. Finally, I tried
  BDB, and the problems have disappeared.

 Could you check your plugins and make sure you are not running the
 XML_spider?  I had horrible performance on my node until I realized
 the spider was writing to a 1+ GB file on the disk the node was
 running on.

 - --
 I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the
 death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
 Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve
 neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
 Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.5)

 iEYEARECAAYFAkoXL/wACgkQ4esu1mlKOs8aHQCgiwJKBY7GkCbSFDjq/uoRh3tt
 z8IAnA907pQqkVhRaYEjkJW091Y740Ak
 =kO5W
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] [freenet-dev] New java-based installers

2009-05-23 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
It's OK on Linux, but the installer and the first time wizard don't ask if
I want auto-start (and I don't want auto-start).


On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
 wrote:

 The java-based installer has been updated. Windows users already see the
 windows installer, this is for mac and linux users. The installer no longer
 asks about auto-start, plugins or auto-update (all but auto-start are asked
 in the first-time wizard), start on reboot support on OS/X should be fixed
 thanks to mrsteveman, and we are shipping the offline installer, with all
 the
 dependancies included, except for in the jnlp version used for mac's (this
 should probably be fixed soon). Both the wininstaller and the java
 installer
 are now being distributed via CoralCache, which can achieve good download
 speeds, but a file cannot be updated easily once it has been published.
 Because we are bundling all the dependancies in both the windows installer
 and the java installer, it will need to be rebuilt for every new stable
 build.

 If you have a mac, please test the installer. In particular, does Freenet
 successfully restart after a reboot (it should start up during login).

 If you don't have a mac, testing would still be helpful.

 ___
 Devl mailing list
 d...@freenetproject.org
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] 1210 performance

2009-05-22 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
*With Salt-Hash :*

My freenet partition and the pages 127.0.0.1:/... take tens of seconds
or several minutes to display (files, directory, freesites, config,
statistics...). In addition, my stats:

CHK Request RTT=1m7s
SSK Request RTT=12,711s
CHK Insert RTT=1m39s
SSK Insert RTT=22,441s

Successful 35,454s
Unsuccessful 14,235s
Average 23,404s

*With BDB :*

No problem. My stats :

CHK Request RTT=9,132s
SSK Request RTT=11,833s
CHK Insert RTT=41,958s
SSK Insert RTT=24,022s

Successful 11,734s
Unsuccessful 15,130s
Average 13,338s

* Freenet 0.7 Build #1210 build01210
* Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771
* Used Java memory: 117 MiB
* Allocated Java memory: 246 MiB
* Maximum Java memory: 246 MiB
* Running threads: 172/500
* Available CPUs: 2
* Java Version: 1.6.0_10
* JVM Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
* JVM Version: 11.0-b15
* OS Name: Linux
* OS Version: 2.6.27-14-generic
* OS Architecture: amd64
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

Re: [freenet-support] 1210 performance

2009-05-22 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
I had no problem with version 1209. The machine has 2GB of RAM, it doesn't
use the swap, and the node wasn't rebuilding or resizing. I tried
reinstalling the node several times, I have the same problem after a few
hours. When I restart the node, it is immediately slow. Finally, I tried
BDB, and the problems have disappeared.


On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org
 wrote:

 On Friday 22 May 2009 11:38:10 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
  *With Salt-Hash :*
 
  My freenet partition and the pages 127.0.0.1:/... take tens of
 seconds
  or several minutes to display (files, directory, freesites, config,
  statistics...). In addition, my stats:
 
  CHK Request RTT=1m7s
  SSK Request RTT=12,711s
  CHK Insert RTT=1m39s
  SSK Insert RTT=22,441s
 
  Successful 35,454s
  Unsuccessful 14,235s
  Average 23,404s
 
  *With BDB :*
 
  No problem. My stats :
 
  CHK Request RTT=9,132s
  SSK Request RTT=11,833s
  CHK Insert RTT=41,958s
  SSK Insert RTT=24,022s
 
  Successful 11,734s
  Unsuccessful 15,130s
  Average 13,338s
 
  * Freenet 0.7 Build #1210 build01210
  * Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771
  * Used Java memory: 117 MiB
  * Allocated Java memory: 246 MiB
  * Maximum Java memory: 246 MiB
  * Running threads: 172/500
  * Available CPUs: 2
  * Java Version: 1.6.0_10
  * JVM Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
  * JVM Version: 11.0-b15
  * OS Name: Linux
  * OS Version: 2.6.27-14-generic
  * OS Architecture: amd64
 
 Is this a swapping problem? How much actual RAM does the machine have? The
 Bloom filter memory requirements on salted-hash may be pushing Freenet into
 swap, that's one plausible explanation.

 Also, is this specifically a 1210 problem? How did it behave with 1209?

 Also, was it rebuilding the bloom filters or resizing the store at the
 time?

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Darknet

2009-05-22 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Can I use an old reference Darknet (file node-port) when I reinstall the
node to avoid losing the connection with my friends?
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] db4o, database corrupted

2009-05-16 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Before, "Preallocate space for datastore" was false. Now, this option is
true by default. It's the reason of my "problem".


On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Matthew Toseland  wrote:

> On Thursday 23 April 2009 07:55:17 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> > Since db4o, the freenet directory exceeds the maximum size of the
> datastore.
> > This is an important issue, because my freenet directory is located on a
> > partition equal to the size of the datastore (it remains less than 1 GB
> of
> > free space). The database is corrupted when the size of the directory
> > reaches the partition size. How much space required by the freenet
> directory
> > since db4o?
>
> It depends on how much stuff you queue. Just as it always has.
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20090516/8280c4e5/attachment.html>


[freenet-support] Please answer a quick survey on Freenet

2009-05-06 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
What OS do you use for Freenet?
Ubuntu GNU Linux 9.04 AMD64


What is your current datastore size set to?
16 GB

What is your output bandwidth limit set to?
900 KB/s


What actual bandwidth usage do you typically get?
65KB/s when no QOS, and between 0 and 25 KB/s when use the port 53 (when my
ISP blocks other UDP ports).


This will help us to make decisions about new performance features ...



On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Dennis Nezic wrote:

> On Wed, 6 May 2009 13:54:16 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
>
> > What OS do you use for Freenet?
> Gentoo Linux, amd64
>
> > What is your current datastore size set to?
> 8GiB
>
> > What is your output bandwidth limit set to?
> 9KB/s
>
> > What actual bandwidth usage do you typically get?
> 7KB/s (average, my ISP throttles)
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 



Re: [freenet-support] Please answer a quick survey on Freenet

2009-05-06 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
What OS do you use for Freenet?
Ubuntu GNU Linux 9.04 AMD64


What is your current datastore size set to?
16 GB

What is your output bandwidth limit set to?
900 KB/s


What actual bandwidth usage do you typically get?
65KB/s when no QOS, and between 0 and 25 KB/s when use the port 53 (when my
ISP blocks other UDP ports).


This will help us to make decisions about new performance features ...



On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Dennis Nezic denn...@dennisn.dyndns.orgwrote:

 On Wed, 6 May 2009 13:54:16 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:

  What OS do you use for Freenet?
 Gentoo Linux, amd64

  What is your current datastore size set to?
 8GiB

  What is your output bandwidth limit set to?
 9KB/s

  What actual bandwidth usage do you typically get?
 7KB/s (average, my ISP throttles)
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] db4o, database corrupted

2009-04-23 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Since db4o, the freenet directory exceeds the maximum size of the datastore.
This is an important issue, because my freenet directory is located on a
partition equal to the size of the datastore (it remains less than 1 GB of
free space). The database is corrupted when the size of the directory
reaches the partition size. How much space required by the freenet directory
since db4o?


--
Freenet - totale libert? d'expression : anonymat, r?sistance ? la censure,
r?sistance aux attaques.

Documentation & t?l?chargement :
http://doc-fr.freenetproject.org/Description_generale
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 



[freenet-support] db4o, database corrupted

2009-04-23 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Since db4o, the freenet directory exceeds the maximum size of the datastore.
This is an important issue, because my freenet directory is located on a
partition equal to the size of the datastore (it remains less than 1 GB of
free space). The database is corrupted when the size of the directory
reaches the partition size. How much space required by the freenet directory
since db4o?


--
Freenet - totale liberté d'expression : anonymat, résistance à la censure,
résistance aux attaques.

Documentation  téléchargement :
http://doc-fr.freenetproject.org/Description_generale
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-02 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Forwarded to FMS, Freenet board.


On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Luke771  wrote:

> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:21:01 -0500
> Ian Clarke  wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > As you can see looking at the website, the project can afford to pay for
> > Matthew for only another 25 days.
>
> 
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ian.
> >
>
> 
>
> Forwarded to Frost, Freenet board.
> NOT forwarded to FMS
>
> --
>
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 



Re: [freenet-support] Freenet funding status

2009-04-02 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Forwarded to FMS, Freenet board.


On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Luke771 luke...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:21:01 -0500
 Ian Clarke ian.cla...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hey all,
 
  As you can see looking at the website, the project can afford to pay for
  Matthew for only another 25 days.

 snip

 
  Thanks,
 
  Ian.
 

 sig snip

 Forwarded to Frost, Freenet board.
 NOT forwarded to FMS

 --

 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Getting Going

2009-03-09 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Hi,

Try this:


Go here: http://127.0.0.1:/config/?mode=3

And choose: *NORMAL*: I live in a relatively free country, but I would like
to make it more difficult for others to monitor my communications.


--
Freenet - totale libert? d'expression : anonymat, r?sistance ? la censure,
r?sistance aux attaques.

Documentation & t?l?chargement :
http://doc-fr.freenetproject.org/Description_generale


On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:20 PM, rlabarge  wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>
>
> I appear to have downloaded Freenet correctly, but can?t get it going.
> Every search I try, even those suggested on the browsing page return the
> following message:
>
>
>
> ?Freenet was unable to retrieve this file.
>
>
>
> Route not found - could not find enough nodes to be sure the data doesn't
> exist?
>
>
>
> I know no one else who is using it.  I?ve left it running for several days
> now.  Is it hopeless?
>
>
>
> Rich LaBarge
>
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 



Re: [freenet-support] Getting Going

2009-03-09 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Hi,

Try this:


Go here: http://127.0.0.1:/config/?mode=3

And choose: *NORMAL*: I live in a relatively free country, but I would like
to make it more difficult for others to monitor my communications.


--
Freenet - totale liberté d'expression : anonymat, résistance à la censure,
résistance aux attaques.

Documentation  téléchargement :
http://doc-fr.freenetproject.org/Description_generale


On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:20 PM, rlabarge labar...@san.rr.com wrote:

  Hi,



 I appear to have downloaded Freenet correctly, but can’t get it going.
 Every search I try, even those suggested on the browsing page return the
 following message:



 “Freenet was unable to retrieve this file.



 Route not found - could not find enough nodes to be sure the data doesn't
 exist”



 I know no one else who is using it.  I’ve left it running for several days
 now.  Is it hopeless?



 Rich LaBarge

 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Two bugs reported on FMS

2009-01-28 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Don Sato at tGZmfuEbnEqArnhpyqj4of3-s21B0uTliyfALlQ0bw8 wrote:
> One of the recent Freenet builds caused my Freenet node end up with
> almost constant 100% CPU usage. This trouble began somewhere inbetween
> 1199-1203 releases. My node used to work very nicely before that. Is
> anyone else experiencing this problem?
>
> I can post info Stats page and Freenet logs to help in diagnosing the
> problem if needed. Just let me know which parts in particular you're
> interested in. Regarding wrapper.log, I found nothing of use in there,
> just the node (re)start/stop related activity.
>
> I even tried complete reinstall of the node with new datastore, but to no
> avail. Datastore type is salt-hash.
>
> My specs:
> JVM Info
>
> * Used Java memory: 159 MiB
> * Allocated Java memory: 244 MiB
> * Maximum Java memory: 508 MiB
> * Running threads: 280/500
> * Available CPUs: 1
> * Java Version: 1.6.0_10
> * JVM Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
> * JVM Version: 11.0-b15
> * OS Name: Linux
> * OS Version: 2.6.27-9-generic
> * OS Architecture: i386

bubba at Uv~laZHgpQPILgjUTc2bD~mMDm5r1PJKYsS3kZNUixM wrote:
> Tommy[D]@EefdujDZxdWxl0qusX0cJofGmJBvd3dF4Ty61PZy8Y8 wrote:
>
>> myidentity at 1QowK8lzyEYNUsI0yGamWcd6ox80XQkKr8kCS6PmJ5Q schrieb:
>>> Has happened a couple times in the last couple days.  All through put simply
>>> stops with my node.  Once I simply waited a long time and it started to work
>>> again but the speed was very, very slow so I restarted the node.
>>>
>>> One time confirmed for sure it died for 6 hours till I got back to my 
>>> computer
>>> and restarted the node.
>>>
>>> After restarting the node it seems to work fine again till it dies.  This 
>>> is not
>>> common maybe it has happened 3-4 times since the last update.
>>>
>>> I run a fast computer with lots of memory.  1 gig given to freenet.
>>>
>>> I will continue to monitor this and report back if it continues.
>>
>> Would be nice to have some data out of wrapper.log or logs/*, else it is 
>> hard to find the problem
>> and fix it. Also other things like node stats can be interesting.
>
> same here, i think it's a memory leak


-- 
3buib3s50i at gmail.com | dimonqmfcb at gmx.com



[freenet-support] Two bugs reported on FMS

2009-01-27 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Don s...@tgzmfuebneqarnhpyqj4of3-s21b0utliyfallq0bw8 wrote:
 One of the recent Freenet builds caused my Freenet node end up with
 almost constant 100% CPU usage. This trouble began somewhere inbetween
 1199-1203 releases. My node used to work very nicely before that. Is
 anyone else experiencing this problem?

 I can post info Stats page and Freenet logs to help in diagnosing the
 problem if needed. Just let me know which parts in particular you're
 interested in. Regarding wrapper.log, I found nothing of use in there,
 just the node (re)start/stop related activity.

 I even tried complete reinstall of the node with new datastore, but to no
 avail. Datastore type is salt-hash.

 My specs:
 JVM Info

 * Used Java memory: 159 MiB
 * Allocated Java memory: 244 MiB
 * Maximum Java memory: 508 MiB
 * Running threads: 280/500
 * Available CPUs: 1
 * Java Version: 1.6.0_10
 * JVM Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
 * JVM Version: 11.0-b15
 * OS Name: Linux
 * OS Version: 2.6.27-9-generic
 * OS Architecture: i386

bu...@uv~lazhgpqpilgjutc2bd~mmdm5r1pjkyss3kznuixm wrote:
 tommy...@eefdujdzxdwxl0qusx0cjofgmjbvd3df4ty61pzy8y8 wrote:

 myident...@1qowk8lzyeynusi0ygamwcd6ox80xqkkr8kcs6pmj5q schrieb:
 Has happened a couple times in the last couple days.  All through put simply
 stops with my node.  Once I simply waited a long time and it started to work
 again but the speed was very, very slow so I restarted the node.

 One time confirmed for sure it died for 6 hours till I got back to my 
 computer
 and restarted the node.

 After restarting the node it seems to work fine again till it dies.  This 
 is not
 common maybe it has happened 3-4 times since the last update.

 I run a fast computer with lots of memory.  1 gig given to freenet.

 I will continue to monitor this and report back if it continues.

 Would be nice to have some data out of wrapper.log or logs/*, else it is 
 hard to find the problem
 and fix it. Also other things like node stats can be interesting.

 same here, i think it's a memory leak


-- 
3buib3s...@gmail.com | dimonqm...@gmx.com
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


[freenet-support] How open two Firefox profiles at the same time?

2009-01-25 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Thank you very much, Edward.

On 1/25/09, Edward Langenback  wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> How do open two different firefox profiles at the same time? When I
>> open firefox, it always uses the same profile, I cannot open two
>> different. Before, freenet automatically opened in a new one, now he
>> doesn't, and I cannot do it manually.
>>
>
> I found a few pages that might help...
>
> http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/internet/firefox/use-multiple-firefox-profiles-at-the-same-time/
>
> http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=38=209184=0=0=t=a
>
> http://www.searchenginejournal.com/firefox-for-seos-working-with-several-firefox-profiles/7319/
>
> http://lifehacker.com/software/firefox/geek-to-live--manage-multiple-firefox-profiles-231646.php
>
> - --
> The best way to get past my spam filter is to sign or encrypt
> your email to me.
> My PGP KeyId: 0x84D46604
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iQEVAwUBSXxzYnV+YnyE1GYEAQhzAwgArpoh7Jqva5ZeC9d7ni2dOx6HIRL8roXL
> /kjIwJWJlrQLcGDlA8VlVFQNN7aMRDjpFiNJpk9eawhfHoT5fBBhd1BN9pm5zb8W
> gTYsI5VZAh5xNn6kUw75w2UiVKQ0z+0CtsHEde9WrefUNzjCt7JlMuaHbIHbJH8X
> x4NSRJcaYDYIUVsTUezsOKKHqFy+XjvH5W5EI+/8RfOTNuDFDbCpp1YHLgLg8r+F
> CjiRZh/lrtQ/2rcn6e05KCXj0wlCGtwjKhOePE03Gh9LcfA4QcprAYYE5mwpecXd
> NSRbSPi3IKgEzsMK1gu9vxeU3nqw+JuP8lKoeR0Ea2F/TtA+gSBjrA==
> =CBEc
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>


-- 
3buib3s50i at gmail.com | dimonqmfcb at gmx.com



[freenet-support] How open two Firefox profiles at the same time?

2009-01-25 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Hi,

How do open two different firefox profiles at the same time? When I
open firefox, it always uses the same profile, I cannot open two
different. Before, freenet automatically opened in a new one, now he
doesn't, and I cannot do it manually.

-- 
3buib3s50i at gmail.com | dimonqmfcb at gmx.com



[freenet-support] From FMS: insertion error

2009-01-25 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
herb at 5FeJUDg2ZdEqo-u4yoYWc1zF4tgPwOWlqcAJVGCoRv8 wrote:

I have a big problem with recent releases (after 1194).
Uploads crash. See this screenshot:
CHK at 
C8~jdMdN0Iz7TbKjmVmAmcuqIMFzkgQQjgpioFsaBnY,9GXBGEXt5v3UzVMEufgQTvvYtUBPwWWh
Vr5tOjYG9V8,AAIC--8/.jpg


Uploads stop before 100% and the files aren't uploaded correctly (O KB if I try
download them).

Please forward to developpers.

I will try to reinstall freenet...

-- 
3buib3s50i at gmail.com | dimonqmfcb at gmx.com



[freenet-support] How open two Firefox profiles at the same time?

2009-01-25 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Hi,

How do open two different firefox profiles at the same time? When I
open firefox, it always uses the same profile, I cannot open two
different. Before, freenet automatically opened in a new one, now he
doesn't, and I cannot do it manually.

-- 
3buib3s...@gmail.com | dimonqm...@gmx.com
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] How open two Firefox profiles at the same time?

2009-01-25 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Thank you very much, Edward.

On 1/25/09, Edward Langenback apos...@peculiarplace.com wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA256

 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
 Hi,

 How do open two different firefox profiles at the same time? When I
 open firefox, it always uses the same profile, I cannot open two
 different. Before, freenet automatically opened in a new one, now he
 doesn't, and I cannot do it manually.


 I found a few pages that might help...

 http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/internet/firefox/use-multiple-firefox-profiles-at-the-same-time/

 http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=38t=209184start=0st=0sk=tsd=a

 http://www.searchenginejournal.com/firefox-for-seos-working-with-several-firefox-profiles/7319/

 http://lifehacker.com/software/firefox/geek-to-live--manage-multiple-firefox-profiles-231646.php

 - --
 The best way to get past my spam filter is to sign or encrypt
 your email to me.
 My PGP KeyId: 0x84D46604
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iQEVAwUBSXxzYnV+YnyE1GYEAQhzAwgArpoh7Jqva5ZeC9d7ni2dOx6HIRL8roXL
 /kjIwJWJlrQLcGDlA8VlVFQNN7aMRDjpFiNJpk9eawhfHoT5fBBhd1BN9pm5zb8W
 gTYsI5VZAh5xNn6kUw75w2UiVKQ0z+0CtsHEde9WrefUNzjCt7JlMuaHbIHbJH8X
 x4NSRJcaYDYIUVsTUezsOKKHqFy+XjvH5W5EI+/8RfOTNuDFDbCpp1YHLgLg8r+F
 CjiRZh/lrtQ/2rcn6e05KCXj0wlCGtwjKhOePE03Gh9LcfA4QcprAYYE5mwpecXd
 NSRbSPi3IKgEzsMK1gu9vxeU3nqw+JuP8lKoeR0Ea2F/TtA+gSBjrA==
 =CBEc
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe



-- 
3buib3s...@gmail.com | dimonqm...@gmx.com
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


[freenet-support] From FMS: insertion error

2009-01-24 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
h...@5fejudg2zdeqo-u4yoywc1zf4tgpwowlqcajvgcorv8 wrote:

I have a big problem with recent releases (after 1194).
Uploads crash. See this screenshot:
c...@c8~jdmdn0iz7tbkjmvmamcuqimfzkgqqjgpiofsabny,9GXBGEXt5v3UzVMEufgQTvvYtUBPwWWh
Vr5tOjYG9V8,AAIC--8/.jpg


Uploads stop before 100% and the files aren't uploaded correctly (O KB if I try
download them).

Please forward to developpers.

I will try to reinstall freenet...

-- 
3buib3s...@gmail.com | dimonqm...@gmx.com
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


Re: [freenet-support] mDNS protocol and freenet security

2009-01-14 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Thank you for your explanation. I didn't pay attention to the class
(224.0.0.x: class D).

On 1/14/09, Ilya Margolin i...@ulani.de wrote:
 2009/1/13 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i 3buib3s...@gmail.com:
 Ok, so this packet isn't forward to WAN by the router?
 Target: MY COMPUTER NAME
 your computer is the target, so it seems not to do anything else but
 stay home. Your IP got translated to your computer name by your
 sniffer and is most certainly not in the packet itself.

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


[freenet-support] mDNS protocol and freenet security

2009-01-13 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Ok, so this packet isn't forward to WAN by the router?

On 1/13/09, Matthew Toseland  wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 January 2009 18:12, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
>> I have captured this packet (see quote below). I have found my darknet
>> port and the name of my computer. I don't know the recipient and I
>> have no friends (for darknet). Why this packet has been send from my
>> computer (in opennet only)?
>
> It is sent to your LAN to make it easier to use FCP clients on computers
> other
> than the one you installed Freenet onto.
>>
>> (mDNS protocol)
>>
>> Name: Freenet 0,7 Node server -=Node id=-._freenet._udp.local
>> Type: SRV (Service location)
>> .000   0001 = Class: IN (0x0001)
>> 0...    = Cache flush: False
>> Time to live: X hour
>> Data length: X
>> Priority: X
>> Weight: X
>> Port: MY DARKNET PORT
>> Target: MY COMPUTER NAME
>



[freenet-support] mDNS protocol and freenet security

2009-01-13 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
I have captured this packet (see quote below). I have found my darknet
port and the name of my computer. I don't know the recipient and I
have no friends (for darknet). Why this packet has been send from my
computer (in opennet only)?

(mDNS protocol)

Name: Freenet 0,7 Node server -=Node id=-._freenet._udp.local
Type: SRV (Service location)
.000   0001 = Class: IN (0x0001)
0...    = Cache flush: False
Time to live: X hour
Data length: X
Priority: X
Weight: X
Port: MY DARKNET PORT
Target: MY COMPUTER NAME



[freenet-support] Behavior with 1195/1196

2009-01-13 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is
increased by 20 percent.

With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced
by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the others are
backed off), often all nodes are backed off!

Peer backoff reasons

* FatalTimeout 1
* ForwardRejectedOverload 10
* InsertTimeoutNoFinalAck 1
* Took too long (still running) 7
* TransferFailedInsert 1

A moment later :

Peer backoff reasons

* FatalTimeout 1
* ForwardRejectedOverload 9
* InsertTimeoutNoFinalAck 2
* Took too long (still running) 5
* TransferFailedInsert 1
* TransferFailedRequest5 1



[freenet-support] Behavior with 1195/1196

2009-01-13 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
With 1195, CHK time is between 5 and 12 seconds. My bandwidth is
increased by 20 percent.

With 1196, CHK time is between 4 and 7 seconds. My bandwith is reduced
by 85 percent! And I have only 1 or 2 nodes connected (the others are
backed off), often all nodes are backed off!

Peer backoff reasons

* FatalTimeout 1
* ForwardRejectedOverload 10
* InsertTimeoutNoFinalAck 1
* Took too long (still running) 7
* TransferFailedInsert 1

A moment later :

Peer backoff reasons

* FatalTimeout 1
* ForwardRejectedOverload 9
* InsertTimeoutNoFinalAck 2
* Took too long (still running) 5
* TransferFailedInsert 1
* TransferFailedRequest5 1
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


[freenet-support] mDNS protocol and freenet security

2009-01-13 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
I have captured this packet (see quote below). I have found my darknet
port and the name of my computer. I don't know the recipient and I
have no friends (for darknet). Why this packet has been send from my
computer (in opennet only)?

(mDNS protocol)

Name: Freenet 0,7 Node server -=Node id=-._freenet._udp.local
Type: SRV (Service location)
.000   0001 = Class: IN (0x0001)
0...    = Cache flush: False
Time to live: X hour
Data length: X
Priority: X
Weight: X
Port: MY DARKNET PORT
Target: MY COMPUTER NAME
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe


[freenet-support] Concerned about privacy

2009-01-06 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
So, Freemulet or Frost "automatic insertion" are dangerous? We know the key
before the upload of the file.


On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:

> On Tuesday 23 December 2008 18:14, Shironeko wrote:
> > Dear Freenet Support Team,
> >
> > I send you this message because I've stumbled upon a "curiosity"  which
> I'd
> > like to get explained since I'm not able to find any other documentation
> > regarding this issue.
> >
> > I was browsing through my hard drive's Freenet Directory, looking at the
> > latest logs when I suddenly realized that there were IP adresses written
> in.
> >
> > This is an example:
> >
> > dic 23, 2008 17:06:14:078 (freenet.node.NodeDispatcher, UdpSocketHandler
> for
> > port 266XX(2), NORMAL): Rejecting CHK request from 213.238.213.XX:387XX
> > preemptively because Insufficient output bandwidth
> >
> > I may not fully understand the protocol Freenet uses for data
> transmission
> > but these IP's are uplookable and can represent a problem for anyone who
> > connects from a country like China.
>
> I don't see why. For it to be a problem the bad guys would have to already
> have seized (or electronically compromised) your node, in which case they
> probably have your browser history, your datastore, your Friends list ...
> >
> > Also, I wonder if it would be possible to collect valuable information by
> > gathering the LOGs of many different nodes and following a specific IP's
> > requests.
>
> Yes, but you'd need to compromise all the nodes on the path of that
> request.
> >
> > Finally I'd like to ask you about this message I found in the logs too:
> >
> > "Note that this version of Freenet is still a very early alpha, and may
> well
> > have numerous bugs and design flaws.
> > In particular: YOU ARE WIDE OPEN TO YOUR IMMEDIATE PEERS! They can
> eavesdrop
> > on your requests with relatively little difficulty at present
> (correlation
> > attacks etc)."
> >
> > I suppose that this must be an old message since the Freenet project is
> not
> > in a very early alpha version anymore and I'm using 0.7, the latest.
>
> This is partly true. There are a number of known attacks on Freenet, which
> cannot be completely eliminated short of new features which we have not yet
> implemented. On the other hand, for some situations, Freenet may be the
> best
> currently available. For example, Freenet's scalable darknet functionality
> is
> fairly unusual, allowing you to only connect to people you trust, and also
> it
> is easier to safely publish a website on Freenet than on a Tor hidden
> service
> afaik (due to e.g. issues with configuring apache to not give away
> incriminating details, and much harder intersection attacks). The bottom
> line
> is if you are going to stake your freedom and/or life on the security of an
> anonymous network, you need to seriously consider the pro's and con's of
> each
> possible option, including doing nothing; Freenet has had severe bugs in
> the
> past, and is pre-1.0, but apart from that, we have fairly serious known
> attacks...
>
> There are 4 basic powerful attacks on Freenet that we are concerned about:
> 1. Harvesting. Finding lots of Freenet nodes quickly, in order to e.g.
> block
> them on a national firewall. Most anonymous networks do not address this
> problem at all. On opennet, harvesting is relatively easy (slightly harder
> than on Tor or I2P); on darknet, harvesting should be fairly hard.
> 2. Datastore seizure. What happens when/if the bad guys either
> electronically
> compromise or physically seize your computer? At the moment everything you
> download through Freenet is cached in your datastore. Temporary files are
> encrypted with ephemeral keys, but for long-term downloads we have to store
> the keys to disk.
> 3. Snooping on your peers. It is probably possible, under some assumptions
> (e.g. being able to identify the content, it being sufficiently large), to
> do
> statistical attacks to figure out what those nodes you are connected to are
> downloading/uploading. This is yet another reason to use darknet.
> 4. Mobile attacker tracing the source of a stream of content. If an
> anonymous
> identity publishes data that can be identified (e.g. reinserting known
> content, posting to FMS boards, posting to a known freesite), it may be
> possible to gradually approach his location. Reinsertion of known content
> makes this much easier, because of CHKs; because we always insert the top
> block (the freesite USK e.g.) last, if the content isn't guessable in
> advance
> it is very difficult to pull this off against large inserts, because the
> attacker can only identify the stream after the top block (or the FMS post
> referring to the new file) was inserted; if the content *is* guessable, the
> attacker can move towards the target continually over the course of the
> insert.
>
> All of these attacks we have some mitigation against, but all of them are
> feasible to some extent under some mostly-reasonable assumptions. 

Re: [freenet-support] Concerned about privacy

2009-01-06 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
So, Freemulet or Frost automatic insertion are dangerous? We know the key
before the upload of the file.


On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Matthew Toseland
t...@amphibian.dyndns.orgwrote:

 On Tuesday 23 December 2008 18:14, Shironeko wrote:
  Dear Freenet Support Team,
 
  I send you this message because I've stumbled upon a curiosity  which
 I'd
  like to get explained since I'm not able to find any other documentation
  regarding this issue.
 
  I was browsing through my hard drive's Freenet Directory, looking at the
  latest logs when I suddenly realized that there were IP adresses written
 in.
 
  This is an example:
 
  dic 23, 2008 17:06:14:078 (freenet.node.NodeDispatcher, UdpSocketHandler
 for
  port 266XX(2), NORMAL): Rejecting CHK request from 213.238.213.XX:387XX
  preemptively because Insufficient output bandwidth
 
  I may not fully understand the protocol Freenet uses for data
 transmission
  but these IP's are uplookable and can represent a problem for anyone who
  connects from a country like China.

 I don't see why. For it to be a problem the bad guys would have to already
 have seized (or electronically compromised) your node, in which case they
 probably have your browser history, your datastore, your Friends list ...
 
  Also, I wonder if it would be possible to collect valuable information by
  gathering the LOGs of many different nodes and following a specific IP's
  requests.

 Yes, but you'd need to compromise all the nodes on the path of that
 request.
 
  Finally I'd like to ask you about this message I found in the logs too:
 
  Note that this version of Freenet is still a very early alpha, and may
 well
  have numerous bugs and design flaws.
  In particular: YOU ARE WIDE OPEN TO YOUR IMMEDIATE PEERS! They can
 eavesdrop
  on your requests with relatively little difficulty at present
 (correlation
  attacks etc).
 
  I suppose that this must be an old message since the Freenet project is
 not
  in a very early alpha version anymore and I'm using 0.7, the latest.

 This is partly true. There are a number of known attacks on Freenet, which
 cannot be completely eliminated short of new features which we have not yet
 implemented. On the other hand, for some situations, Freenet may be the
 best
 currently available. For example, Freenet's scalable darknet functionality
 is
 fairly unusual, allowing you to only connect to people you trust, and also
 it
 is easier to safely publish a website on Freenet than on a Tor hidden
 service
 afaik (due to e.g. issues with configuring apache to not give away
 incriminating details, and much harder intersection attacks). The bottom
 line
 is if you are going to stake your freedom and/or life on the security of an
 anonymous network, you need to seriously consider the pro's and con's of
 each
 possible option, including doing nothing; Freenet has had severe bugs in
 the
 past, and is pre-1.0, but apart from that, we have fairly serious known
 attacks...

 There are 4 basic powerful attacks on Freenet that we are concerned about:
 1. Harvesting. Finding lots of Freenet nodes quickly, in order to e.g.
 block
 them on a national firewall. Most anonymous networks do not address this
 problem at all. On opennet, harvesting is relatively easy (slightly harder
 than on Tor or I2P); on darknet, harvesting should be fairly hard.
 2. Datastore seizure. What happens when/if the bad guys either
 electronically
 compromise or physically seize your computer? At the moment everything you
 download through Freenet is cached in your datastore. Temporary files are
 encrypted with ephemeral keys, but for long-term downloads we have to store
 the keys to disk.
 3. Snooping on your peers. It is probably possible, under some assumptions
 (e.g. being able to identify the content, it being sufficiently large), to
 do
 statistical attacks to figure out what those nodes you are connected to are
 downloading/uploading. This is yet another reason to use darknet.
 4. Mobile attacker tracing the source of a stream of content. If an
 anonymous
 identity publishes data that can be identified (e.g. reinserting known
 content, posting to FMS boards, posting to a known freesite), it may be
 possible to gradually approach his location. Reinsertion of known content
 makes this much easier, because of CHKs; because we always insert the top
 block (the freesite USK e.g.) last, if the content isn't guessable in
 advance
 it is very difficult to pull this off against large inserts, because the
 attacker can only identify the stream after the top block (or the FMS post
 referring to the new file) was inserted; if the content *is* guessable, the
 attacker can move towards the target continually over the course of the
 insert.

 All of these attacks we have some mitigation against, but all of them are
 feasible to some extent under some mostly-reasonable assumptions. Later
 versions of Freenet will make them much harder with new features e.g.
 rendezvous tunnels.
 
  Thank you very much.

[freenet-support] Forwarded from FMS

2009-01-04 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
salamander at KKgo71wBFZiGGE-V...

The IRC logs on emu.freenetproject.org aren't working for 2009. Is someone
going to fix this?
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 



[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1194

2008-12-26 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
This problem is resolved for me. Thanks!


On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 7:34 PM,  wrote:

> I still get this:
>
>* Probably a bug: please report: 2 peers forcibly disconnected due
> to not acknowledging packets.
>* Probably a bug: please report: 1 peers forcibly disconnected due
> to not acknowledging packets.
>
> with
>
>* Freenet 0.7 Build #1194 r24387
>* Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771
>
> after this
>
>   nodeUptime: 1d21h
>
>
> Merry Christmas
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 17:13, SmallSister development
>  wrote:
> > Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >> Freenet 0.7 build 1194 is now available. Please upgrade, this will be
> >> mandatory on Friday. Some fairly substantial changes:
> >
> > It looks like the infamous "# peers forcibly disconnected" bug is gone
> > in this release, thanks and congratulations! (I see far less package
> > handling related messages in the logfiles.)
> >
> > While I'm at it: Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
> >
> > Peter.
> > ___
> > Support mailing list
> > Support at freenetproject.org
> > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> > Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
> >
>
>
>
> --
> __
> GnuPG key:   (0x48DBFA8A)
> Keyserver:   pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de
> Fingerprint:
> 477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A
> __
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 



[freenet-support] Freenet and firewall

2008-12-26 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Thanks for your response.

I like the principle "always jump a nation boundary on each hop" :)


On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Matthew Toseland  wrote:

> On Thursday 18 December 2008 22:03, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> > My idea:
> > Interpose at least one "foreign IP address" between sender and recipient
> of
> > a same country.
> > The goal: isolate the sender and recipient.
> > The "foreign IP address" is a "country" that cooperates little, or
> doesn't
> > cooperate.
> > For example:
> > USA --> Venezuela --> USA
> > USA --> Russia --> Venezuela --> USA
> > China --> USA --> China
> > Etc.
> > Friends are unnecessary. The authorities and lobbies artists are more
> > difficult to trap users.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> This has been proposed before. I believe there is a VPN-based network on
> such
> principles (always jump a nation boundary on each hop). I would point out
> that the set of such antipathic relationships is quite small. On Freenet,
> it
> wouldn't help much IMHO (on opennet i.e. Strangers, it is possible to
> attack
> the network without compromising nodes) and would have a considerable
> performance cost. There was a design decision taken that if you have
> security
> level NORMAL and therefore use opennet you want adequate (if not stellar)
> performance; high security and opennet do not go together on Freenet's
> architecture, so options that cost a lot of performance are disabled by
> default on NORMAL; HIGH turns off opennet. However if somebody sends a
> patch
> and some mechanism to update the IP mappings, we would consider having it
> as
> an option.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Luke771  wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:31:46 +0100
> > > "3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i" <3buib3s50i at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thank you for your reply.
> > > >
> > > >  I tried to block all traffic. Everything is blocked, except Freenet
> and
> > > > TOR.
> > > >
> > > > I wanted to allow only the IP ranges of some countries. And allow
> > > connection
> > > > to seednodes. This is an intermediate solution between darknet and
> > > opennet.
> > >
> > > No, this is nonsense.
> > > You can run darknet, opennet, or even both side by side, but there's no
> > > such thing as an 'intermediate solution' The idea of blocking whole
> > > countries (based on -what? biased information from the propaganda
> machine?)
> > > makes no sense at all. Please reconsider your position.
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081226/f3917cab/attachment.html>


[freenet-support] Freenet and firewall

2008-12-18 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
My idea:
Interpose at least one "foreign IP address" between sender and recipient of
a same country.
The goal: isolate the sender and recipient.
The "foreign IP address" is a "country" that cooperates little, or doesn't
cooperate.
For example:
USA --> Venezuela --> USA
USA --> Russia --> Venezuela --> USA
China --> USA --> China
Etc.
Friends are unnecessary. The authorities and lobbies artists are more
difficult to trap users.

What do you think?


On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Luke771  wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:31:46 +0100
> "3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i" <3buib3s50i at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your reply.
> >
> >  I tried to block all traffic. Everything is blocked, except Freenet and
> > TOR.
> >
> > I wanted to allow only the IP ranges of some countries. And allow
> connection
> > to seednodes. This is an intermediate solution between darknet and
> opennet.
>
> No, this is nonsense.
> You can run darknet, opennet, or even both side by side, but there's no
> such thing as an 'intermediate solution' The idea of blocking whole
> countries (based on -what? biased information from the propaganda machine?)
> makes no sense at all. Please reconsider your position.
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081218/32bdcad9/attachment.html>


Re: [freenet-support] Freenet and firewall

2008-12-18 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
My idea:
Interpose at least one foreign IP address between sender and recipient of
a same country.
The goal: isolate the sender and recipient.
The foreign IP address is a country that cooperates little, or doesn't
cooperate.
For example:
USA -- Venezuela -- USA
USA -- Russia -- Venezuela -- USA
China -- USA -- China
Etc.
Friends are unnecessary. The authorities and lobbies artists are more
difficult to trap users.

What do you think?


On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Luke771 luke...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:31:46 +0100
 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i 3buib3s...@gmail.com wrote:

  Thank you for your reply.
 
   I tried to block all traffic. Everything is blocked, except Freenet and
  TOR.
 
  I wanted to allow only the IP ranges of some countries. And allow
 connection
  to seednodes. This is an intermediate solution between darknet and
 opennet.

 No, this is nonsense.
 You can run darknet, opennet, or even both side by side, but there's no
 such thing as an 'intermediate solution' The idea of blocking whole
 countries (based on -what? biased information from the propaganda machine?)
 makes no sense at all. Please reconsider your position.
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Freenet and firewall

2008-12-16 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Thank you for your reply.

 I tried to block all traffic. Everything is blocked, except Freenet and
TOR.

I wanted to allow only the IP ranges of some countries. And allow connection
to seednodes. This is an intermediate solution between darknet and opennet.

This is not a mistake of rules, but I will continue to search, and test
different firewalls.



On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Luke771  wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:45:49 +0100
> "3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i" <3buib3s50i at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I use the OpenNet mode and I want to use a firewall to block certain IP
> > addresses. All traffic is blocked, except for TOR and Freenet which
> aren't
> > blocked by the firewall. Even with a "deny all"! Why? You have an idea?
> >
>
> Because you allowed Freenet and Tor to accept conections from the internet?
>
>
> If you ran darknet, you could make a firewall rule and allow connections
> only to your manually added Darknet peers ('Friends'), but as long as you
> run Opennet, your node need to be able to communicate to any IP.
>
> You could either use a 'negative' firewall rule like "allow connections on
> port  to everyone  excpet ", or software like
> PeerGuardian that blocks a list of "bad" IP's: you could use that software
> and replace their "bad IP's" list with your own list of IP's you need to
> block.
>
> Note that the PeerGuardian approach of blocking IP's based on who owns them
> (NSA, etc) is essentially pointless because if the 'bad guys' are going to
> spy on you, they won't do that from secretservices.gov ; they would use
> apartments and connections on private citizens' names.
>
> Anyways, yours is basically a firewall question. Check out your firewall's
> manual, read some forums, use Google, etc., and learn how to make a firewall
> rule to deny access to specific IP's/ranges
> ___
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081216/7162a6cd/attachment.html>


Re: [freenet-support] Freenet and firewall

2008-12-16 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Thank you for your reply.

 I tried to block all traffic. Everything is blocked, except Freenet and
TOR.

I wanted to allow only the IP ranges of some countries. And allow connection
to seednodes. This is an intermediate solution between darknet and opennet.

This is not a mistake of rules, but I will continue to search, and test
different firewalls.



On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:29 AM, Luke771 luke...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:45:49 +0100
 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i 3buib3s...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi,
 
  I use the OpenNet mode and I want to use a firewall to block certain IP
  addresses. All traffic is blocked, except for TOR and Freenet which
 aren't
  blocked by the firewall. Even with a deny all! Why? You have an idea?
 

 Because you allowed Freenet and Tor to accept conections from the internet?


 If you ran darknet, you could make a firewall rule and allow connections
 only to your manually added Darknet peers ('Friends'), but as long as you
 run Opennet, your node need to be able to communicate to any IP.

 You could either use a 'negative' firewall rule like allow connections on
 port opennet port to everyone  excpet list, or software like
 PeerGuardian that blocks a list of bad IP's: you could use that software
 and replace their bad IP's list with your own list of IP's you need to
 block.

 Note that the PeerGuardian approach of blocking IP's based on who owns them
 (NSA, etc) is essentially pointless because if the 'bad guys' are going to
 spy on you, they won't do that from secretservices.gov ; they would use
 apartments and connections on private citizens' names.

 Anyways, yours is basically a firewall question. Check out your firewall's
 manual, read some forums, use Google, etc., and learn how to make a firewall
 rule to deny access to specific IP's/ranges
 ___
 Support mailing list
 Support@freenetproject.org
 http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
 Unsubscribe at
 http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
 Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe

[freenet-support] Freenet and firewall

2008-12-15 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Hi,

I use the OpenNet mode and I want to use a firewall to block certain IP
addresses. All traffic is blocked, except for TOR and Freenet which aren't
blocked by the firewall. Even with a "deny all"! Why? You have an idea?
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 



[freenet-support] Freenet and firewall

2008-12-14 Thread 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i
Hi,

I use the OpenNet mode and I want to use a firewall to block certain IP
addresses. All traffic is blocked, except for TOR and Freenet which aren't
blocked by the firewall. Even with a deny all! Why? You have an idea?
___
Support mailing list
Support@freenetproject.org
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe