Seamonkey adding br tags on download?
Seamonkey 1.1.18 (and earlier) progressively mess up a web page I am trying to let a nontechnical user edit, as each time they use Seamonkey to edit the page more br tags get inserted. The page has a CSS based popup menu, with source that looks like this when I 'view source' in a browser other than Seamonkey: ul class=nav li class=menunosuba href=/index.htmlHome/a/li li class=menua href=#About Us/a ul class=menu lia href=/PhotosVideos.htmlPhotos and Videos/a/li lia href=/history.htmlHistory/a/li lia href=/News.htmlNews/a/li lia href=/BOD/ALL.htmlBoard and Staff/a/li The same page loaded into Seamonkey (via Open Web Location in a Composer window) and viewed looks like: ul class=nav li class=menunosuba href=/index.htmlHome/a/li li class=menua href=#About Us/a ul class=menu lia href=/PhotosVideos.htmlPhotos and Videos/abr /li lia href=/history.htmlHistory/abr /li lia href=/News.htmlNews/abr /li lia href=/BOD/ALL.htmlBoard and Staff/abr /li Note the introduction of gratuitous br tags in each *nested* li element (but not in the outer lis). After editing, these br tags are saved back to the web page, and on the next edit, yet another set of br tags is introduced. The empty space in the pulldown menus grows with every edit. If the source is simply viewed in the Seamonkey browser, it's just like all the other browsers (no extra br tags), but the Composer reliably introduces them. I Googled, then searched the archives to this list after joining, but no luck. So maybe nobody knows a workaround? The page I reference can be viewed at http://www.dunngardens.org/. -- Mike Casteel Seattle, WA ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
what is places.sqlite.corrupt?
Hi, I have 9475 files like places.sqlite-*.corrupt in my profile, they are a little old, the last file is on the 10 June 2009. Can I suppress them, are they useful for bugzilla? -- Stéphane http://pasdenom.info/fortune ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey adding br tags on download?
Michael Casteel schrieb: Seamonkey 1.1.18 (and earlier) progressively mess up a web page I am trying to let a nontechnical user edit, as each time they use Seamonkey to edit the page more br tags get inserted. The page has a CSS based popup menu, with source that looks like this when I 'view source' in a browser other than Seamonkey: ul class=nav li class=menunosuba href=/index.htmlHome/a/li li class=menua href=#About Us/a ul class=menu lia href=/PhotosVideos.htmlPhotos and Videos/a/li lia href=/history.htmlHistory/a/li lia href=/News.htmlNews/a/li lia href=/BOD/ALL.htmlBoard and Staff/a/li The same page loaded into Seamonkey (via Open Web Location in a Composer window) and viewed looks like: ul class=nav li class=menunosuba href=/index.htmlHome/a/li li class=menua href=#About Us/a ul class=menu lia href=/PhotosVideos.htmlPhotos and Videos/abr /li lia href=/history.htmlHistory/abr /li lia href=/News.htmlNews/abr /li lia href=/BOD/ALL.htmlBoard and Staff/abr /li Note the introduction of gratuitous br tags in each *nested* li element (but not in the outer lis). After editing, these br tags are saved back to the web page, and on the next edit, yet another set of br tags is introduced. The empty space in the pulldown menus grows with every edit. If the source is simply viewed in the Seamonkey browser, it's just like all the other browsers (no extra br tags), but the Composer reliably introduces them. I Googled, then searched the archives to this list after joining, but no luck. So maybe nobody knows a workaround? The page I reference can be viewed at http://www.dunngardens.org/. I can't reproduce this behaviour of automatically inserting br tags in SM2.0beta2, maybe you want to try that one out? regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.gerstbach.at/2004/ascii ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM Address autocomplete remembers deleted addresses?
Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Every once in a while, one of my emails is returned and I have to delete the bad address. I'm careful to take it out of all my address books, including the Collected Addresses AB. Somehow SeaMonkey remembers it anyway, and if I'm not extra careful when entering this person's name next time, I can still inadvertently send to an address that doesn't exist in ANY of my address books. What gives? These zombie addresses just won't die, and it's getting really annoying. How do I tell the program I really mean it, this address is bad, forGET it forEVVVer!! Have you tried Searching for the name or address afterwards in the adressbook-search? What happens if you export the adressbook and search through that file? What if exporting and deleting all addresses in the addressbook afterwards, does it still show up? (you can import your backup after that again) regards Martin -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - http://www.gerstbach.at/2004/ascii ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: migrate from tbird3b2+lighting to SM2b2+lightning?
Craig wrote: Can someone outline how whether this is doable? It is doable for sure, the profile data should be compatible, and IIRC, most of the data should probably be able to be imported with SeaMonkey's migration feature. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: what is places.sqlite.corrupt?
Stéphane Grégoire wrote: Hi, I have 9475 files like places.sqlite-*.corrupt in my profile, they are a little old, the last file is on the 10 June 2009. Can I suppress them, are they useful for bugzilla? Delete them, this was probably a problem with some development version of the history storage (places). Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lightning in SM2
Alan Cummings wrote: Alan Cummings wrote: Just a quick question on whether or not Lightning will install in SM 2.0 b2? To answer my own question.. no it doesn't work. :( Oh, but it does - if you're using a recent nightly version of Lightning. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Windows 'snap-to' problem - repeat posting
I originally sent this post on 9/6/09, at 8:22 AM, and as far as I know, it has never shown up on this support list, so I'm sending it again. Apologies if I'm the only one that didn't get a copy, and you've all seen it. I'll risk that this one time... Thanks, keith whaley original message** A while back, I started a small discussion here about an oddity I was experiencing with my Finder's desktop. To begin with, I use the Snow Leopard OS, v. 10.6.1. My mail/news client is Mozilla SeaMonkey 1.1.18. My problem is, _sometimes_ when I have some window on top, mostly filling the screen, and I try to move it aside a little, by click-and-drag on the window's uppermost bar, to see what's underneath, and release the mouse cursor after moving the top window aside, that window snaps back to where it was originally. In other words, I cannot move the window and expect it to STAY where I put it! Yes, I know I can press my mouse's scroll ball, to reveal what windows I have open, but in this instance, I wanted to view the window full size. Pressing the mouse button reduces the size of all windows, to be able to display all of them. I didn't want that. To briefly recap, the last time this happened someone on this list suggested I go to the SM menu bar item Window/Zoom. That does indeed jostle the top window, and when I first tried that technique, it freed the window's rubbery attachment to the screen, and I thought I had that problem solved for all time. Nope. That just happened again, so I tried Zoom. It jostled the window, but the 'rubber band' effect keeps pulling that window to it's original position on the screen. So, that's not a solution to the problem... I can't tell you WHAT window I had up, nor what led up to my wanting to take a look at the other windows, but I sure would like to know what's going on! BTW, I was in the mail/newsgroups side of SeaMonkey when this happened, not in Navigator. This snapping back to a previous position is a big annoyance to me, and I'd like to know how to get out of it when it happens. Thanks, keith whaley ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Windows 'snap-to' problem - repeat posting
Keith Whaley wrote: I originally sent this post on 9/6/09, at 8:22 AM... That is an error. The date was 0/26/09, NOT 9/6. Thanks, keith ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Problem sending emails
Hi! I'm helping a friend of mine. Until now he was using the old mozilla suite... (argh!). I just installed Seamonkey 1.1.18 and have some little problems when I'm sending mails with attachements. Also installed on this computer is the latest GData Antivirus software which scans outgoing mails. So now when I send a mail with a large attachement, seamonkey takes some time sending the mail. But in the end the mail is not sent and I get an error message (smtp server error). When I turn off the email check in GData Antivirus everything works just fine. My friend is a little bit paranoid about computer viruses and wants to ckeck outgoing mails. So what can be done to solve this problem? Is it a known problem? As I said before, he was using the old mozilla which did not have this problem at all. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem sending emails
jnmayer wrote: So now when I send a mail with a large attachement, seamonkey takes some time sending the mail. But in the end the mail is not sent and I get an error message (smtp server error). When I turn off the email check in GData Antivirus everything works just fine. My friend is a little bit paranoid about computer viruses and wants to ckeck outgoing mails. So what can be done to solve this problem? Is it a known problem? As I said before, he was using the old mozilla which did not have this problem at all. I've never placed that much importance on scanning outgoing mail. If outgoing mail has a virus you have bigger problems. How did it get there in the first place and why didn't the anti-virus program detect it when it arrived? -- Jordon ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Lightning in SM2
NoOp wrote: On 09/26/2009 10:15 AM, Alan Cummings wrote: Just a quick question on whether or not Lightning will install in SM 2.0 b2? thanks Yes. You'll need to get the latest lightning version from the nightlies repository: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/ http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-1.9.1/linux-xpi/ There is an add-on to get the latest nightly updates: http://ilpolipo.free.fr/addons/?sn=lnu https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/4623 This seems to work with SM 2.0b2 - (does not work with 2.0pre). Excellent, thanks alot. -- Alan. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem sending emails
On 29 Sep., 18:32, Jordon jor...@removethissamiamnot.com wrote: jnmayer wrote: So now when I send a mail with a large attachement, seamonkey takes some time sending the mail. But in the end the mail is not sent and I get an error message (smtp server error). When I turn off the email check in GData Antivirus everything works just fine. My friend is a little bit paranoid about computer viruses and wants to ckeck outgoing mails. So what can be done to solve this problem? Is it a known problem? As I said before, he was using the old mozilla which did not have this problem at all. I've never placed that much importance on scanning outgoing mail. If outgoing mail has a virus you have bigger problems. How did it get there in the first place and why didn't the anti-virus program detect it when it arrived? You have mistaken me. There is no virus in the attachement! But when GData tries to scan for infections, Seamonkey doesn't send the mail. Jürgen ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM Address autocomplete remembers deleted addresses?
Martin Freitag wrote: Paul B. Gallagher schrieb: Every once in a while, one of my emails is returned and I have to delete the bad address. I'm careful to take it out of all my address books, including the Collected Addresses AB. Somehow SeaMonkey remembers it anyway, and if I'm not extra careful when entering this person's name next time, I can still inadvertently send to an address that doesn't exist in ANY of my address books. What gives? These zombie addresses just won't die, and it's getting really annoying. How do I tell the program I really mean it, this address is bad, forGET it forEVVVer!! Have you tried Searching for the name or address afterwards in the adressbook-search? Always. I search for both to be sure. What happens if you export the adressbook and search through that file? What if exporting and deleting all addresses in the addressbook afterwards, does it still show up? (you can import your backup after that again) Haven't yet tried that, busy day, will try to get to it tonight or tomorrow. FWIW, things seem to be better today now that I've shut down and restarted the program -- perhaps it doesn't really delete until then, just pretends? -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Windows 'snap-to' problem - repeat posting
Keith Whaley wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: I originally sent this post on 9/6/09, at 8:22 AM... That is an error. The date was 0/26/09, NOT 9/6. Thanks, keith As a linguist I'm always on the lookout for new vocabulary. Would you be so kind as to explain which month is zero? -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: migrate from tbird3b2+lighting to SM2b2+lightning?
On 09/29/2009 04:48 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: Craig wrote: Can someone outline how whether this is doable? It is doable for sure, the profile data should be compatible, and IIRC, most of the data should probably be able to be imported with SeaMonkey's migration feature. Robert Kaiser Thanks Robert Philip. I expect to do this on at least one box in the next week or two. When I do, I'll post back. best, -Craig ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Windows 'snap-to' problem - repeat posting
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: Keith Whaley wrote: I originally sent this post on 9/6/09, at 8:22 AM... That is an error. The date was 0/26/09, NOT 9/6/09. Thanks, keith As a linguist I'm always on the lookout for new vocabulary. Would you be so kind as to explain which month is zero? Uhhh, one of the binary months? Hah! It took a linguist to point out that when I'm mostly asleep, my fingers don't fit in place on the keyboard exactly as they should! 9/26/09 is correct, I just neglected to proof my own typing. Sighhh. I was tempted to say, Just wanted to see if anyone really reads these messages. But I thought it better to just admit a failure to function efficiently in the wee hours. Thanks! keith ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Problem sending emails
jnmayer wrote: Jordon wrote: jnmayer wrote: So now when I send a mail with a large attachement, seamonkey takes some time sending the mail. But in the end the mail is not sent and I get an error message (smtp server error). When I turn off the email check in GData Antivirus everything works just fine. My friend is a little bit paranoid about computer viruses and wants to ckeck outgoing mails. So what can be done to solve this problem? Is it a known problem? As I said before, he was using the old mozilla which did not have this problem at all. I've never placed that much importance on scanning outgoing mail. If outgoing mail has a virus you have bigger problems. How did it get there in the first place and why didn't the anti-virus program detect it when it arrived? You have mistaken me. There is no virus in the attachement! But when GData tries to scan for infections, Seamonkey doesn't send the mail. I have not mistaken you. You have said that there is no problem when scanning of outbound mail is turned off. I said that I don't see the importance of scanning outbound mail. The way I look at it, the solution is simple. Turn off the scanning of outbound mail. The attachments got on the computer somehow. Why should they be scanned twice? I said If your outbound email has a virus you have bigger problems. If that were the case it would lead me to believe that the anti-virus program didn't do its job when the virus got into the computer. Why would you trust it to catch something on the way out that it didn't catch on the way in? -- Jordon ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: what is places.sqlite.corrupt?
Hi, Robert Kaiser a tapoté, le 29/09/2009 13:49: Delete them, this was probably a problem with some development version of the history storage (places). Thanks! -- Stéphane http://pasdenom.info/fortune ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Tiff files opening in SM 2.0b2
Hello all, I have SM 2.0b2 and cannot remember where the settings are to open Tiff files in the browser or to set it as the place where I want these files opened. Currently quick time is trying, and is unsuccessful might I add, in opening these files. I will go back and try to re-install quick time too. Thank you for your assistance. SamuelS ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Tiff files opening in SM 2.0b2
On 09/29/2009 02:15 PM, Samuel S wrote: Hello all, I have SM 2.0b2 and cannot remember where the settings are to open Tiff files in the browser or to set it as the place where I want these files opened. Currently quick time is trying, and is unsuccessful might I add, in opening these files. I will go back and try to re-install quick time too. Thank you for your assistance. SamuelS I do not know the settings for Windows (you can check Edit|Preferences|Browser|Helper Applications), but for linux I use MozPlugger tiff files render without issue. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: AW: Open Composer
Alfred Frank wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: support-seamonkey-bounces+office=frankedv...@lists.mozilla.org [mailto:support-seamonkey-bounces+office=frankedv...@lists.mozilla.org] Im Auftrag von intrudere Gesendet: Samstag, 26. September 2009 00:31 An: support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org Betreff: Re: Open Composer On 23 sep, 21:00, mozziscant.reg...@rocketmail.com wrote: Great application, Seamonkey but I was wondering, when I go to edit a HTML file, it opens the browser which is NOT what I want at all. I hope something can be done to address the problem. Thanks At first I open a page with the SM browser, and than I start the composer using [Ctrl]+[E] to edit this page. hth Alfred. It's all workarounds for SM I'm afraid. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Seamonkey adding br tags on download?
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Martin Freitag prof_nosp...@quantentunnel.de wrote: Michael Casteel schrieb: Seamonkey 1.1.18 (and earlier) progressively mess up a web page I am trying to let a nontechnical user edit, as each time they use Seamonkey to edit the page more br tags get inserted. I can't reproduce this behaviour of automatically inserting br tags in SM2.0beta2, maybe you want to try that one out? Thanks. Looks good. -- Mike Casteel Seattle, WA ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
