Re: Restore the old Form Manager!
On 11/18/09 10:50 am, Philip Chee wrote: I think an interim workaround is to port the Firefox Form Autofill extension which (I think) uses it's own storage format and allows autofilling whole forms as well as it's own editor to access stored forms data. Just had a look to this extension. Seems really interesting, and elaborate. Yet capture of a complete form to be used with a single URL sounds simple: (http://autofillforms.mozdev.org/drupal/content/how-add-complete-form-profile) --- Autofill Forms makes it easy to add a complete form as profile: * Visit the website containing the form, e.g. http://autofillforms.mozdev.org/test.html * Fill out the form with the desired values. * Invoke the context menu of one of the form fields (e.g. by clicking with the right mouse button on the form field). * Select the menu item Add complete form as profile... from the context menu. Autofill Forms Advanced Editor will be opened, displaying the newly created profile with a rule for each form field. Note that the profile Site Rule is automatically set to match only the website containing the form. --- (profiles here do not refer to usual user profiles) Maybe Bill Davidsen, who uses intensively SM1 fill in form capability, could consider trying this extension within FF and giving us feedback? Le 18 novembre 2009, Steve Wendt a écrit : Auto-fill of whole forms sounds interesting, but that's not the most common case - *for you* -- LL ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
RE: Suggested look at as SM Macro Recorder / Player
RE:Suggested to look at as a SM Macro Recorder / Player vTask Web: www.vtaskstudio.com Contact: sa...@vtaskstudio.com Obviously can be applied to far more than SeaMonkey 2, but has so far been effective and intuitive to use with SM2. Currently being tested and used here as Windows-only in vTask version 7.63. There's some word that cross-platform being considered at some stage. A very capable tool for macro-izing and speeding up simple-to-complex SM tasks. Am testing in the various SM modules, appears to work and communicate with all. Would not yet call this a wholesale endorsement, but it's making friends here:) Joe ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...
Benoit Renard wrote: NoOp wrote: My apologies; I've also been informed by jens that the bug is related to where the file has been downloaded *locally*. Sorry, never paid much attention to that feature as I set downloads to go to only one folder can find the file by a search if I'm not paying attention and it goes astray. Is this feature really such a deal breaker for you for moving on to 2.0? I mean, it seems pretty simple/logical to create a 'download' folder and then set Edit|Preferences|Browser|Downloads|When saving a file: Save files to... or keep the 'Always ask me where to save files' default. I'd have to vote for 'WONTFIX' as it seems to me that the feature just adds unecessary bloat (clutter?) to the interface. Please don't adopt the Firefox mentality. If such an option is considered bloat, a lot of options in SeaMonkey can be considered bloat. Talk about Bloat!! In SM 1.x you could just install the SM browser if that was all you wanted...Now some bright spark has decided that you MUST install every bit of SM (browser, mail/news, composer, chatzilla, etc.) or no bits at all. Now that is bloat!!! (Mind you, I don't understand why someone might want to just install the browser only!but what would I know!!) Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Suddenly asked to hand dial.
Richard Lane wrote: Suddenly I am now being asked to hand dial my isp, why? Browser Seamonkey 1.1.9, WP SP2. Dick I'm guessing that you didn't change anything, did you?? On the other hand I have to manually dial in to my ISP to get a connection! Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Help on a true profile migration problem from SM1.1.18 to SM2
Tom wrote: Alex Beauroy schrieb: Hi, I have installed several time SM2 but never got the Migration Wizard. I would like to use one of the 2 profiles I had with SM1.1.18 but don't know how does the Migration Wizard works... So went back to SM1.1.18 How pitiful Can I get a little solution for that??? Best Regards @lex Use a other directory for the installation, an fix the file profiles.ini to your old profil directory Thanks a lot for the tip!!! But what do you mean by an fix the file profiles.ini to your old profil directory and how do I do that? Thanks in advance, Best Regards @lex ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 -- truncated Inbox problem on getting pop3 mail
Bob Fleischer wrote: Several times with SM 2.0 I have received the message Alert: There was an error truncating the Inbox after filtering a message to the folder 'k4p'. You may need to shutdown SeaMonkey and delete INBOX.msf. Aside from the fact that it should no longer be necessary to shutdown SeaMonkey and delete INBOX.msf (since one can rebuild the index from within SeaMonkey), why does this happen? I have a high volume of email and a lot of filter rules (about 20) with mail being sorted to a lot of folders. I used to get this message only on my laptop when fetching mail over dialup (with SM 1.1.18). Now I can get it (occasionally -- about once a day) on my desktop on cable internet. Bob Bob, the inbox.msf file is the index file for your inbox, deleting it should not cause any great problems, just the next time you select your inbox (without the suffix), a new inbox.msf is created. Two provisos:- 1. before you delete your inbox.msf, in SeaMonkey empty your Trash folder, then select File|Compact files. This will reduce the size of your inbox by permanently removing deleted emails. 2. If you have sub folders of your inbox, may cause you to delete the mail that you have in these sub-folders. HTH Daniel ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Restore the old Form Manager!
me2 wrote: ..new. .Form Manager seem to be hard for people to grasp.. No! its just it is not as usable as the previous, most of us have seen it in firefox. Many of us used SM 1.x because of the presence of form manger. The new one doesn't handle whole forms, requires an extension to get minimum usability, and represents a break from a working often used existing part of SM. sigh.. bring back form manger. On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:44:26 -0500, Bill Spikowski b...@spikowski.com wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote: Restore the old Form Manager! ...please... We discussed this in the SeaMonkey Status Meeting yesterday. https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2009-11-17#SeaMonkey_2.0_Final Look under the feedback section. That's great news -- I'll bet there's an awful lot of who haven't switched to 2.0 simply because of the loss of the truly excellent form manager in the 1.n series. When colleagues ask me why I rely on software as little known as Seamonkey, I give several compelling reasons -- the form manager has always been #1 (and the support from this newsgroup is #2 -- thanks to you all!). I agree - we NEED the old Form Manager back. I won't switch to 2.0 without it. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Restore the old Form Manager!
Tom Pamin wrote: me2 wrote: ..new. .Form Manager seem to be hard for people to grasp.. No! its just it is not as usable as the previous, most of us have seen it in firefox. Many of us used SM 1.x because of the presence of form manger. The new one doesn't handle whole forms, requires an extension to get minimum usability, and represents a break from a working often used existing part of SM. sigh.. bring back form manger. On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:44:26 -0500, Bill Spikowski b...@spikowski.com wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:56:15 -0600, me2 wrote: Restore the old Form Manager! ...please... We discussed this in the SeaMonkey Status Meeting yesterday. https://wiki.mozilla.org/index.php?title=SeaMonkey:StatusMeetings:2009-11-17#SeaMonkey_2.0_Final Look under the feedback section. That's great news -- I'll bet there's an awful lot of who haven't switched to 2.0 simply because of the loss of the truly excellent form manager in the 1.n series. When colleagues ask me why I rely on software as little known as Seamonkey, I give several compelling reasons -- the form manager has always been #1 (and the support from this newsgroup is #2 -- thanks to you all!). I agree - we NEED the old Form Manager back. I won't switch to 2.0 without it. I'd like to see the SM 1.x.x Form Manager in Firefox,too! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Eliminating long To: lists when printing
Mr. Cheese wrote: I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists. Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is longer than the email content... what a waste You can choose to forward in-line that way you can snip everything but the message. Normally a Forward is set up as an attachment. That way it just forwards the message in its entirety, and tacks on your header Info. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...
Daniel wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: NoOp wrote: My apologies; I've also been informed by jens that the bug is related to where the file has been downloaded *locally*. Sorry, never paid much attention to that feature as I set downloads to go to only one folder can find the file by a search if I'm not paying attention and it goes astray. Is this feature really such a deal breaker for you for moving on to 2.0? I mean, it seems pretty simple/logical to create a 'download' folder and then set Edit|Preferences|Browser|Downloads|When saving a file: Save files to... or keep the 'Always ask me where to save files' default. I'd have to vote for 'WONTFIX' as it seems to me that the feature just adds unecessary bloat (clutter?) to the interface. Please don't adopt the Firefox mentality. If such an option is considered bloat, a lot of options in SeaMonkey can be considered bloat. Talk about Bloat!! In SM 1.x you could just install the SM browser if that was all you wanted...Now some bright spark has decided that you MUST install every bit of SM (browser, mail/news, composer, chatzilla, etc.) or no bits at all. Now that is bloat!!! (Mind you, I don't understand why someone might want to just install the browser only!but what would I know!!) Daniel I could do without the Chatzilla. I believe its a extension. I'm thinking about removing it. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
OK, I NEED HELP
I am using Seamonkey 2.0 Previously I wrote that I could not find any deleted files in my Trash or Junk folders. This morning I found that I could not get my emails. Called and they (ISP) were of no help. After a lot of checking I could find nothing wrong. It (email) just will not connect to get mail and will say PW or user ID is wrong. Checked all of it OK. Then thank goodness I had not deleted 1.1.17 and it worked perfectly got my mail and all. Found most of my mail in the SPAM FOLDER of the browser. My SM 2.0 Browser works perfectly and I got my news groups also with email settings and finally got my email via the browser. -- Lee (in Florida)US Army Retired Georgie Boy Cruise Master Logitech Vid Skype lee.g.bray ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: OK, I NEED HELP
Lee wrote: I am using Seamonkey 2.0 Previously I wrote that I could not find any deleted files in my Trash or Junk folders. This morning I found that I could not get my emails. Called and they (ISP) were of no help. After a lot of checking I could find nothing wrong. It (email) just will not connect to get mail and will say PW or user ID is wrong. Checked all of it OK. Then thank goodness I had not deleted 1.1.17 and it worked perfectly got my mail and all. Found most of my mail in the SPAM FOLDER of the browser. My SM 2.0 Browser works perfectly and I got my news groups also with email settings and finally got my email via the browser. Disregard the above, got the problem solved and it was a glitch I checked in server setting and saw the Connection setting: and it showed SSL/TL and I know I did not change it. All I did was change it to NONE and the program as far as getting mail now works again. Sorry about the long post above. -- Lee (in Florida)US Army Retired Georgie Boy Cruise Master Logitech Vid Skype lee.g.bray ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0: No Home Button on Personal Toolbar
On Nov 17, 5:21 am, Philip Chee philip.c...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:27:14 -0600, Sqwertz wrote: The proposed solution to this seems to be that you're supposed to customize the tool bar, using thebuttonfrom your personal toolbar. Well, I don't have ahomebuttonon my personal toolbar. Probably because I turned it off when I installedHomeButtonon SM 1.1.x. And when I imported my settings from 1.1 the absence of thehomebuttonwent with it. I don't know why the concept of having a prominently displayedHomebutton is a foreign concept to the Mozilla folks. It kind reminds me having to re-map the [backspace] key work every time you installed Emacs: Something irritating you have to do immediately after every install and before you can do anything else. Do people really not use aHomebutton? I'm pretty sure that if you put it right up there on the navigation toolbar by default, only an insignificant number of users would complain about not being able to disable it (the same number of people who would like to disable the Back button). If you had hidden thehomebuttonin 1.1 we seem to have accidentally copied that preference over to 2.0 when we shouldn't (and other buttons). Go to about:config Filter for: browser.toolbars.showbutton.home Or even better: browser.toolbars.showbutton Right click on each and select Reset Or Toggle-True if currently false. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.comhttp://flashblock.mozdev.org/http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. THANK YOU!!! I finally have my home button back (now that the home button extension would not work with SM 2.0). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Restore the old Form Manager!
Lucas Levrel wrote: On 11/18/09 10:50 am, Philip Chee wrote: I think an interim workaround is to port the Firefox Form Autofill extension which (I think) uses it's own storage format and allows autofilling whole forms as well as it's own editor to access stored forms data. Just had a look to this extension. Seems really interesting, and elaborate. (...) Maybe Bill Davidsen, who uses intensively SM1 fill in form capability, could consider trying this extension within FF and giving us feedback? For the brave: The extension mostly works in SM2 as well if you follow these steps: 1. set extensions.checkCompatibility to false (create new boolean pref in about:config) 2. install the extension 3. add the following line to the chrome.manifest file in the extensions/autofillfo...@blueimp.net folder: overlay chrome://navigator/content/navigator.xul chrome://autofillforms/content/autofillFormsOverlay.xul From a brief look only some icons in the preferences dialog are missing. Even the customizable toolbar button is available. Shouldn't be too hard for Philip to hack. ;-) HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/ SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Eliminating long To: lists when printing
Mr. Cheese wrote: I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists. Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is longer than the email content... what a waste Tell them you are concerned about your privacy and ask them to make the list a BCC list (Blind Carbon Copy). That way there will be No Long List. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
ID Passwords
For my various browser accounts (bank, etc), SM 2 requires that I first manually enter my ID for that account before it pastes in the password. SM 1.x did all of that automatically - both ID and password got pasted in when arriving at a controlled site. Is that an SM 2 failing or is there some option setting I'm missing? -- JohnW-Mpls ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: OK, I NEED HELP
Lee wrote: Lee wrote: I am using Seamonkey 2.0 Previously I wrote that I could not find any deleted files in my Trash or Junk folders. This morning I found that I could not get my emails. Called and they (ISP) were of no help. After a lot of checking I could find nothing wrong. It (email) just will not connect to get mail and will say PW or user ID is wrong. Checked all of it OK. Then thank goodness I had not deleted 1.1.17 and it worked perfectly got my mail and all. Found most of my mail in the SPAM FOLDER of the browser. My SM 2.0 Browser works perfectly and I got my news groups also with email settings and finally got my email via the browser. Disregard the above, got the problem solved and it was a glitch I checked in server setting and saw the Connection setting: and it showed SSL/TL and I know I did not change it. All I did was change it to NONE and the program as far as getting mail now works again. Sorry about the long post above. I had the same thing happen this morning with ATT. This afternoon it works fine with SSL/TLS. Apparently ATT was having a problem. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: mental block with basic CDATA section?
[1:05 pm re-post of a 12:25 pm post] Barclay, Daniel wrote: [Excuse this if it's a duplicate. Local evidence suggests that the first attempt to sending this didn't make it to the list.] Bookmark this page. http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.seamonkey Google Groups archives everything and has very low latency --certainly less than 40 minutes. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Eliminating long To: lists when printing
Rick Merrill wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists. Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is longer than the email content... what a waste Tell them you are concerned about your privacy and ask them to make the list a BCC list (Blind Carbon Copy). That way there will be No Long List. I know about bcc: that's the method I use. I don't mind seeing the long address lists cause I sometimes add an entry to my address book), I just don't want to print them. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Eliminating long To: lists when printing
Phillip Jones wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists. Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is longer than the email content... what a waste You can choose to forward in-line that way you can snip everything but the message. Normally a Forward is set up as an attachment. That way it just forwards the message in its entirety, and tacks on your header Info. Forward inline still adds the email as an attachment??? Does this have something to do with the way that the email was sent to me? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...
NoOp wrote: On 11/18/2009 09:03 AM, Benoit Renard wrote: NoOp wrote: My apologies; I've also been informed by jens that the bug is related to where the file has been downloaded *locally*. Sorry, never paid much attention to that feature as I set downloads to go to only one folder can find the file by a search if I'm not paying attention and it goes astray. Is this feature really such a deal breaker for you for moving on to 2.0? I mean, it seems pretty simple/logical to create a 'download' folder and then set Edit|Preferences|Browser|Downloads|When saving a file: Save files to... or keep the 'Always ask me where to save files' default. I'd have to vote for 'WONTFIX' as it seems to me that the feature just adds unecessary bloat (clutter?) to the interface. Please don't adopt the Firefox mentality. If such an option is considered bloat, a lot of options in SeaMonkey can be considered bloat. I don't consider ones inability to keep track of where a file is downloaded 'Firefox mentality'; quite the opposite IMO. The Firefox mentality I was referring to is quickly going oh this is bloat in response to the proposal of an option, and suggesting to WONTFIX it. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.0 Download Progress Dialog...
Daniel wrote: Talk about Bloat!! In SM 1.x you could just install the SM browser if that was all you wanted...Now some bright spark has decided that you MUST install every bit of SM (browser, mail/news, composer, chatzilla, etc.) or no bits at all. The browser and composer always had to be installed. mailnews is no longer an option due to technical limitations. Everything else you can still opt to not install. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ID Passwords
On 11/19/2009 11:24 AM, JohnW-Mpls wrote: For my various browser accounts (bank, etc), SM 2 requires that I first manually enter my ID for that account before it pastes in the password. SM 1.x did all of that automatically - both ID and password got pasted in when arriving at a controlled site. Is that an SM 2 failing or is there some option setting I'm missing? Assuming your user IDs and passwords in the Password Manager were successfully migrated from SM 1.x to SM 2.0, there is a change in the user interface. You must left-click once or twice in the user ID field on the logon page after the page completes loading. You will then get a pull-down selection list of user IDs. In some cases, the user ID and password fill-in immediately. In some cases, it takes a click. In other cases, it takes two clicks. No one has been able to explain this variation. Also, today I had to reload a page for even two clicks to work. One final word: If you have the Activate Autocomplete 1.0.1 extension installed, it can interfere with logging-on to some sites. This affected two of the four financial institution sites where I frequently logon. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ID Passwords
JohnW-Mpls wrote: For my various browser accounts (bank, etc), SM 2 requires that I first manually enter my ID for that account before it pastes in the password. SM 1.x did all of that automatically - both ID and password got pasted in when arriving at a controlled site. Is that an SM 2 failing or is there some option setting I'm missing? I found that sites where I have two user names (mine and my wife's) I had to type the first letter then the name would appear. After I deleted the user name and password for my wife (she does hers on another computer) mine will fill in automatically along with the password. You might check to see if more than one exists in your password list. However, I eventually reverted back to v.1.1.18 due to several small problems. Maybe I'll try 2.1 when it comes out. -- Gerald Ross Cochran, GA Me? A skeptic? I trust that you have proof?! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ID Passwords
On or about 11/19/2009 5:33 PM, David E. Ross typed the following: On 11/19/2009 11:24 AM, JohnW-Mpls wrote: For my various browser accounts (bank, etc), SM 2 requires that I first manually enter my ID for that account before it pastes in the password. SM 1.x did all of that automatically - both ID and password got pasted in when arriving at a controlled site. Is that an SM 2 failing or is there some option setting I'm missing? Assuming your user IDs and passwords in the Password Manager were successfully migrated from SM 1.x to SM 2.0, there is a change in the user interface. You must left-click once or twice in the user ID field on the logon page after the page completes loading. You will then get a pull-down selection list of user IDs. In some cases, the user ID and password fill-in immediately. In some cases, it takes a click. In other cases, it takes two clicks. No one has been able to explain this variation. Also, today I had to reload a page for even two clicks to work. One final word: If you have the Activate Autocomplete 1.0.1 extension installed, it can interfere with logging-on to some sites. This affected two of the four financial institution sites where I frequently logon. Double clicking does not work for me. Multiple identities only show up after entering a character(assuming more than one identity starts with that character). See the thread I started ln this newsgroup with a subj of: Multiple user/passwords -- Ed ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Eliminating long To: lists when printing
Mr. Cheese wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Mr. Cheese wrote: I receive emails from organizations that use long distribution lists. Is there a way to print these emails without showing the list of ID's other than cutting and pasting into a text file. Often the ID list is longer than the email content... what a waste You can choose to forward in-line that way you can snip everything but the message. Normally a Forward is set up as an attachment. That way it just forwards the message in its entirety, and tacks on your header Info. Forward inline still adds the email as an attachment??? Does this have something to do with the way that the email was sent to me? No. Clicking forward inline insert everything from the mail you want to Forward in a new post. This includes the header info. If you click Forward as attachment a new window opens and if you have three Pane mode set you see an attachment in the Attachments Window. In Inline all you need to do is highlight all the header stuff and hit delete. You can send it as if its your own. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ID Passwords
JohnW-Mpls wrote: For my various browser accounts (bank, etc), SM 2 requires that I first manually enter my ID for that account before it pastes in the password. SM 1.x did all of that automatically - both ID and password got pasted in when arriving at a controlled site. Is that an SM 2 failing or is there some option setting I'm missing? Do what's in this URL and it will return the SM1.1.8 style. http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-remember-passwords/ -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.If it's Fixed, Don't Break it http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
OldCroc wrote: The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't want to lose! It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line only. The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line, then state your question in full in the body of the message. Just install it. SM 2.0 installs to a different location then SM 1.1.18. Installing SM2 does not overwrite SM 1.1.18. The profile migration wizard does not remove your 1.1.18 profile. It copies the data to a different location. Form that point you have two different profiles, one for 2.0 and one for 1.1.18. If you prefer not to have the wizard migrate your data, simply shoose to import nothing. A new blank profile will be created for 2.0. Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: ID Passwords
On or about 11/19/2009 8:23 PM, Phillip Jones typed the following: JohnW-Mpls wrote: For my various browser accounts (bank, etc), SM 2 requires that I first manually enter my ID for that account before it pastes in the password. SM 1.x did all of that automatically - both ID and password got pasted in when arriving at a controlled site. Is that an SM 2 failing or is there some option setting I'm missing? Do what's in this URL and it will return the SM1.1.8 style. http://cybernetnews.com/firefox-remember-passwords/ Tried that (see my thread in this news group: Multiple user/passwords). Didn't work. -- Ed Convention is the ruler of all. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?
Subject: says it all. :) I did read here that SM 2.0 will supposedly work on Win 7 as a 32bit application. But I am asking specifically, about any version built for 64 bits on a cpu like the Intel core i7 920. Because that's what I'm hoping to upgrade to. As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux distributions? -- Rostyk ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Is there a 64 bit version of SeaMonkey 2.0 available for MS Windows 7 ?
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: Subject: says it all. :) I did read here that SM 2.0 will supposedly work on Win 7 as a 32bit application. But I am asking specifically, about any version built for 64 bits on a cpu like the Intel core i7 920. Because that's what I'm hoping to upgrade to. As a secondary question, How about any 64 bit Linux distributions? I'm running the regular 32 bit version on Snow leopard and Vista 64, working fine on both. You can try here, though I have not tried it: http://wiki.mozilla-x86-64.com/SeaMonkey:Download Lee ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
OldCroc wrote: The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't want to lose! One thing I will recommend is this: before installing 2.0, rename the desktop icon to Seamonkey 1.1.18. If you do this, then you will be able to launch 1.1.18 from your desktop. Otherwise, 2.0 will cause the desktop icon to point to its location and not the older version. And as Mr Jones suggests, say NO to the import wizard and then manually import those items you want in 2.0. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
On 11/19/2009 5:21 PM, OldCroc wrote: The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't want to lose! Others have answered in this thread. One warning: You cannot have both SM 1.1.18 and SM 2.0 running at the same time. Once one of them is running, attempting to launch the other will merely launch a new window of the one that is already running. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ Go to Mozdev at http://www.mozdev.org/ for quick access to extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other Mozilla-related applications. You can access Mozdev much more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
David E. Ross: One warning: You cannot have both SM 1.1.18 and SM 2.0 running at the same time. Once one of them is running, attempting to launch the other will merely launch a new window of the one that is already running. While running SM2 i sometimes launch SM1 with the parameter -no-remote. Or i start SM2 a second time in another profile, also whith -no-remote, when i want to check something. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
On 11/19/2009 8:25 PM PT, David E. Ross typed: One warning: You cannot have both SM 1.1.18 and SM 2.0 running at the same time. Once one of them is running, attempting to launch the other will merely launch a new window of the one that is already running. Wow. Isn't that a bug? I sometimes do run two different things even if they are related. I hope to finally install v2 during the long Thanksgiving weekend. :) -- Not to engage in the pursuit of ideas is to live like ants instead of men. --Mortimer J. Adler /\___/\ / /\ /\ \ Phil/Ant @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site) | |o o| |Ant's Quality Foraged Links (AQFL): http://aqfl.net \ _ / Nuke ANT from e-mail address: phi...@earthlink.netant ( ) or ant...@zimage.com Ant is currently not listening to any songs on his home computer. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: How to install version 2.0 so that it does NOT interfere with Version 1.1.18
Leonidas Jones wrote: OldCroc wrote: The Subject line says it all, except I would like to add that this is important to me, as I do not want what is on my Version either Destroyed or imported into Version 2.0, except by manually being done by me. There are some errors in formatting in certain folders that I do not want carried over, plus I have too many things I just don't want to lose! It is never a good idea to state your question in the subject line only. The better procedure is to write a descriptive subject line, then state your question in full in the body of the message. Just install it. SM 2.0 installs to a different location then SM 1.1.18. Installing SM2 does not overwrite SM 1.1.18. The profile migration wizard does not remove your 1.1.18 profile. It copies the data to a different location. Form that point you have two different profiles, one for 2.0 and one for 1.1.18. If you prefer not to have the wizard migrate your data, simply shoose to import nothing. A new blank profile will be created for 2.0. Lee I would take a much more prudent approach, since it is a fact that the migration wizard does not always start and give you a choice: Personnally, I have never seen it appear upon SM2 install. And even if it does, the possibility of interference with your SM1 cannot ruled out. Better be safe than sorry. As I have stated in a different thread, it is wize to make a back up of both SM 1 profile *and* installation folder, the latter because it may contain add-ons which by design or customization did not install in the profile folder. Just zip those folders, making sure the path is saved along with the file (check the option in your zip program). Then, and only then, go ahead, you are safe in case actually SM 2 messes up your SM 1 installation, as it did for me (admittedly, my installation is heavily customized, so this was something I expected). -- John Doue ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
